Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Lab 11A CUE
You have the wrong license file. The Proctor Guide will walk you through where to get the file from. You need to load the CUCME file versus the CM file which is currently on the module. It will be something like software install clean URL FTP://10.10.210.5 etc Sent from my iPhone On Nov 4, 2012, at 11:28 PM, Brandon brana...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm at the point of factory reseting the CUE module and using the CUE wizard to import users from CUCME. The screenshot from the details solution guide on page 567 doesn't look like what I'm seeing. Under Run Initialization Wizard, the screenshot from the book reads CallManger Express Login, whereas the actual page I am getting reads CallManger Login. The book reads as the following for the fields to populate: Hostname Web User Name Web Password XML User Name XML Password The actual page I get in my browser to 10.10.202.2 Primary CallManager *: Secondary CallManager: Tertiary CallManager: Web User Name: Web Password: JTAPI User Name: JTAPI Password: I am not able to get past this point. Any ideas? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Desktop Administrator
If you look in the solutions guide tho is a custom field you create and reference in your script. You can call it anything you want, but you have to create it. [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861 [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.commailto:rrcr...@yahoo.com Reply-To: Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.commailto:rrcr...@yahoo.com Date: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:21 PM To: Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Desktop Administrator Hello, I was working the new 5 labs lab 1. It asks to modify the screen for an UCCX agent to see the number of calls in queue. The custom field that needs to be created, per the DSG, is callinq I looked in the admin guide and could not find this only the others listed already. Does anyone know where I can reference the available fields? Have a great day! Thanks, Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] . Passed!!!!
Congrats Steve Sarrick Cisco Systems SE - PA Select 412-480-3861 On Sep 21, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Justin McIntyre justin.mcint...@blackbox.com wrote: I just wanted to say thanks to everyone that helped me throughout this journey. It has been a very humbling and all inspiring experience to say the least. I received my results during breakfast and have been on cloud 9 ever since Thanks, Justin McIntyre This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VoiceView/Service URL
Yes, I have these [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861 [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Gurpreet Singh Kukreja tycoononway1...@gmail.commailto:tycoononway1...@gmail.com Date: Friday, September 7, 2012 1:56 AM To: Steven Sarrick ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Cc: Online Study (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com) ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VoiceView/Service URL Hi Steven, - Under Telephony service, i would put the following commands: config# telephony-service url services http://IP OF CUE/voiceview/common/login.do url authentication http://IP OF CUE/voiceview/authentication/authenticate.do The reason for the authentication command above is explained in the document below: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/rel2_3/cliadmin/ch_vview.html#wp1070594 Configuring Cisco Unified CallManager Express for VoiceView Express: The Authentication Manager is a network server that handles authentication requests for IP phone tasks. The IP phone learns the authentication server URL during the phone's registration process. Cisco Unified CallManager Express (Cisco Unified CME) does not have an authentication server. Cisco Unity Express starts an authentication server that acts as the primary authentication server for VoiceView Express. The Cisco Unified CME administrator must ensure that Cisco Unified CME authentication server URL points to Cisco Unity Express authentication server. The URL format is http://Cisco-Unity-Express-hostname/voiceview/authentication/authenticate.do + - On Cue, i would make sure of this: service voiceview enable session idletimeout 10 end voiceview - Make sure to do this under Telephony Service: telephony-service no create cnf-files create cnf files Then, reset the phones. Please share your config and we can see what's going on. Regards Gurpreet On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Steven Sarrick (ssarrick) ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com wrote: Practicing VoiceView. Url's are in Telephony Service however the URL's are not being pushed to my phones (go into settings and services/auth url not on phone). When I press services button I get No services configured. End of my lab time so not able to fool with it long. I did reboot, reset phones, basics. Anyone run into this and what is the workaround? Per the DSG for this lab, I did everything as expected. [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338tel:%2B1%20412%20237%206338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861tel:%2B1%20412%20480%203861 [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VoiceView/Service URL
I'm pretty sure I had all of this minus the authentication local command – would this cause the services not to propagate to the phone though? When I go to the device settings, http, the URL's aren't there. [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861 [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Kevin Spicer ke...@kevinspicer.co.ukmailto:ke...@kevinspicer.co.uk Date: Friday, September 7, 2012 2:01 AM To: Steven Sarrick ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Cc: Online Study (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com) ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VoiceView/Service URL Hi Steven, Did you configure the web server / CME web interface in the router? ip http server ip http authentication local ip http path flash:GUI telephony-service dn-webedit time-webedit web admin system user admin pass cisco I think only the first 1-3 commands are likely to be necessary to get it to work but I've never tested for that. On 7 Sep 2012 05:07, Steven Sarrick (ssarrick) ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com wrote: Practicing VoiceView. Url's are in Telephony Service however the URL's are not being pushed to my phones (go into settings and services/auth url not on phone). When I press services button I get No services configured. End of my lab time so not able to fool with it long. I did reboot, reset phones, basics. Anyone run into this and what is the workaround? Per the DSG for this lab, I did everything as expected. [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338tel:%2B1%20412%20237%206338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861tel:%2B1%20412%20480%203861 [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VoiceView/Service URL
Yes, did this. Plus reboot. [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861 [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Dimuthu dim...@yahoo.commailto:dim...@yahoo.com Reply-To: Dimuthu dim...@yahoo.commailto:dim...@yahoo.com Date: Friday, September 7, 2012 2:10 AM To: Steven Sarrick ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com, Online Study (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com) ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VoiceView/Service URL Check if ip http server is enabled on CME Router I guess you already did no create cnf-files / create cnf-files From: Steven Sarrick (ssarrick) ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com To: Online Study (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com) ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Friday, September 7, 2012 9:33 AM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VoiceView/Service URL Practicing VoiceView. Url's are in Telephony Service however the URL's are not being pushed to my phones (go into settings and services/auth url not on phone). When I press services button I get No services configured. End of my lab time so not able to fool with it long. I did reboot, reset phones, basics. Anyone run into this and what is the workaround? Per the DSG for this lab, I did everything as expected. [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861 [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html ___For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comAre you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] forward digits versus no digit strip
Just making sure I don't run into any issues/caveats. I know there is more than one way to skin a cat. That being said. If I have a dial-peer where I want to include the dialed digits plus prefix additional am I hurting myself or walking into a later problem if I use forward digits all along with the prefix instead of no digit strip plus the prefix. In the solution guide it uses no digit strip but I am in the habit of forward digits all – I have not seen any issues but just looking for potential scenarios. Example dial-peer voice 2002 pots translation-profile outgoing 4to164 destination-pattern 3... port 0/0/0:15 forward-digits all prefix 001408387 Versus dial-peer voice 2002 pots translation-profile outgoing 4to164 destination-pattern 3... port 0/0/0:15 No digit-strip prefix 001408387 [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861 [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VoiceView/Service URL
Practicing VoiceView. Url's are in Telephony Service however the URL's are not being pushed to my phones (go into settings and services/auth url not on phone). When I press services button I get No services configured. End of my lab time so not able to fool with it long. I did reboot, reset phones, basics. Anyone run into this and what is the workaround? Per the DSG for this lab, I did everything as expected. [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861 [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail SRST
Quick scenario where I find mentions on this list but no firm answer – probably in an archive as I know its out there. Can you point me to a solution or maybe an example in the IPExpert Workbooks of the solution for hitting a voicemail box on UC while in SRST without alternate extension. I'm pretty sure Vik goes over it, but have not seen it in my searches. [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861 [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New Lab 1 CCX no value for calls in queue
I had this happen before. For me it was refreshing my script. Go to the GUI for script management and upload the saved script again. Your changes are not getting refreshed. [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861 Cisco.comhttp://www.cisco.com [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Steffen Bruening stbruen...@gmail.commailto:stbruen...@gmail.com Date: Saturday, August 25, 2012 2:27 PM To: Edgar Feliz ejzi...@gmail.commailto:ejzi...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New Lab 1 CCX no value for calls in queue Hi Edgar, I know which sites are showing the solution and I have done it that way. I can see the word callinq in my Cdata screen, but there is no colon and no number (0 or 1). 2012/8/25 Edgar Feliz ejzi...@gmail.commailto:ejzi...@gmail.com I think you have to add that look at pages 176-178 on the guide book for lab 1. Edgar On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Steffen Bruening stbruen...@gmail.commailto:stbruen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, my ccx scripting skills are only on a basic level. When I configure the script and the layout I never seen a value behind the callinq variable in cdata during an incoming or active call. I test with my own script also the with the script from the solution guide, in both case the behaviour is equal. What I miss or where is the failure in the solution guide? Regards Steffen ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice 5 Lab Handbook
I believe it to be well worth it. I think its on sale right now too, or at least it was. I know people who have used them personally and passed so that should give you a good indication. In the same breath, I don't think they are a replacement for the other items you mentioned. For example, I think the vol2 labs get more practice with Globalized calling more than the 5 lab workbook does. Also QOS seem to hit harder in Vol 2. The 5 lab book hits on more troubleshooting like you may see in the lab as well. Each has its pros – no cons that I can think of! [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.commailto:ssarr...@cisco.com Phone: +1 412 237 6338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861 Cisco.comhttp://www.cisco.com [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.commailto:b...@ucguerrilla.com Date: Friday, August 17, 2012 3:30 PM To: Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice 5 Lab Handbook Earlier this year I purchased the blended learning solution from ipExpert. This includes some bootcamps, workbook 1 and workbook2 (along with some other items). Right around the same time ipExpert released CCIE Voice 5 Lab Handbook. I was wondering if that handbook is worth the price of entry and what benefits it is actually provided above/beyond Workbook 2? I am looking for consumer feedback. Thanks, Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [MARKETING] CUE voiceview authentication headache :)
voice view uses Pub Authentication URL inside enterprise parameters. make sure that is set to IP and not host name Steve Sarrick Cisco Systems SE - PA Select 412-480-3861 On Aug 11, 2012, at 10:31 PM, ccielabrat ccielab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi group, I have my CUE configured with CUCM. I can call into CUE voicemail and check messages, so I know my PIN is good. I've subscribed my phone to the voiceview service and can get the authentication url to show on the phone. I login in with username scphX (thats the username) and the pin, but I get login failed everytime. Can anyone help me understand where the voiceview app is referencing for authentication? Does it change if the CUE module it integrated to CME or CUCM ? Thanks Lab Rat ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NEW LAB in Voice
Hi, This is not a spam or anything neither we are cheating anyone! This is what i think and as per me it is right. When we go to school they teach subjects we note it in our book. While exam comes we read that but still once we complete that we ran here and there collecting more info e.g self study or question set or see last 3 years question set what other people got it till now we do those also! It's a human nature that everyone want to pass in 1st attempt so that do not mean it is a cheating, Either it is you or anyone else. Now we know the subject here and we are making our final touch to get other close workbooks so that we can clear it easily , It do not mean that we do not know the technology or skipping the tech definitely everyone needed last touch workbooks which help him to pass the test you can consider it last 3 years question set or whatever... Now i have a questions to you When in school we came out after test everyone says and ask discuss about how you did what was the answer you put is it anything difference Same in every every every institute when you enroll you first make friends then discuss learn with him go for attempt he comes out then he update to others and that is how it works so is that mean these are cheating if it is then we should close all the training institutes. Writing my above email do not mean or hurt anyone echo its just a truth what i am trying to say. Now even in school we have some different cases !!! ha ha like they will refer the workbooks but say i do not , some will say coming in front yes i did and passed bec of this , some will take write all the questions/solutions in their own format and then say they have made it by their own to proof them they are more good then others Some will do hard work take and search and verify what other did is it right or not from those workbooks again this is natural I don't want to make this email big so that people will not even study and through in dusbi.. I wish everyone good luck and success in life I have purchase the same bec i do not have 3 attempts for free where i go in lab and look at the questions come out make it and then again and then again and 4th or 5th attempt i will go and pass :) Josh friend (Please please please use this forum for help and building up other students studying for the exam like me in an ethical manner.) Do you mean to say attempt the exam without books very strange everyone has ethical manner its just want and how you take it, It's depend on you. Please don't reply now on this because it wont change my mind :) bye tc Regards On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Joshua Reola josh.re...@gmail.com wrote: Dennis. STOP IT! I don't know if you are a spammer or a collection of some group of other people scamming and spamming this thread to cheat. I've been noticing all this lab 7 and all this other bullish*t stuff flying around. Passing on the first attempt. Excuse after excuse after excuse of why cheating is needed. I'm getting married. I have no patience. Whatever the case may be. It doesn't warrant cheating. DON'T CHEAT and STOP POSTING. Learn your material. Be a master of your craft which is the CCIE. I'm going to throw this in this into another perspective. If you ever go do a doctor to get help because you or your family member is sick, do you want to visit a doctor that cheated his way through medical school?l F-NO! NO! I want a doctor that worked hard, is ethical and is passionate in his field. You don't realize that you are working on a PBX. A voice system that is extremely important. I used to work for Nortel and I now work at Cisco. Every vendor stresses the importance of the PBX and 5, 9's availability. That also includes making sure you configure and setup your PBX right for 911 emergencies and best practices. Ever think about that lives can be at stake? I'm taking it to the extreme, but at the end of the day, your work and what is installed is important to people on a daily basis. Please please please use this forum for help and building up other students studying for the exam like me in an ethical manner. Josh Reola www.joshreola.com On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Dennis Agosti dennisago...@gmail.com wrote: Heellooo Friends, I have a attempt on 13th Aug in Aus right now i can see something new update coming on their google talk status message of voice lab I need it man otherwise i wont pass the test if anyone is ready for group purchase please email me so that we can work together as i am going to purchase as i need to crack the lab in my first attempt now no more patience's left. It was better my friends did last year from their workbook in first attempt dunno why i missed that so big chance Just want to check did anyone purchased from below link or another option purchasing directly from voice lab is bit expensive. http://www. c e r tknow l e d g
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NEW LAB in Voice
Nicolas, I got it you are in a category which uses but still still no no i am nt I myself leaving this no need to ban Whoever is interested can email me so that we can work together. On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Nicolas MICHEL mcl.nico...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Guys. Can someone ban this guy please ? Read enough BS for this year .. Thanks Nic On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:41 AM, steven smith smith.steven1...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, This is not a spam or anything neither we are cheating anyone! This is what i think and as per me it is right. When we go to school they teach subjects we note it in our book. While exam comes we read that but still once we complete that we ran here and there collecting more info e.g self study or question set or see last 3 years question set what other people got it till now we do those also! It's a human nature that everyone want to pass in 1st attempt so that do not mean it is a cheating, Either it is you or anyone else. Now we know the subject here and we are making our final touch to get other close workbooks so that we can clear it easily , It do not mean that we do not know the technology or skipping the tech definitely everyone needed last touch workbooks which help him to pass the test you can consider it last 3 years question set or whatever... Now i have a questions to you When in school we came out after test everyone says and ask discuss about how you did what was the answer you put is it anything difference Same in every every every institute when you enroll you first make friends then discuss learn with him go for attempt he comes out then he update to others and that is how it works so is that mean these are cheating if it is then we should close all the training institutes. Writing my above email do not mean or hurt anyone echo its just a truth what i am trying to say. Now even in school we have some different cases !!! ha ha like they will refer the workbooks but say i do not , some will say coming in front yes i did and passed bec of this , some will take write all the questions/solutions in their own format and then say they have made it by their own to proof them they are more good then others Some will do hard work take and search and verify what other did is it right or not from those workbooks again this is natural I don't want to make this email big so that people will not even study and through in dusbi.. I wish everyone good luck and success in life I have purchase the same bec i do not have 3 attempts for free where i go in lab and look at the questions come out make it and then again and then again and 4th or 5th attempt i will go and pass :) Josh friend (Please please please use this forum for help and building up other students studying for the exam like me in an ethical manner.) Do you mean to say attempt the exam without books very strange everyone has ethical manner its just want and how you take it, It's depend on you. Please don't reply now on this because it wont change my mind :) bye tc Regards On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Joshua Reola josh.re...@gmail.comwrote: Dennis. STOP IT! I don't know if you are a spammer or a collection of some group of other people scamming and spamming this thread to cheat. I've been noticing all this lab 7 and all this other bullish*t stuff flying around. Passing on the first attempt. Excuse after excuse after excuse of why cheating is needed. I'm getting married. I have no patience. Whatever the case may be. It doesn't warrant cheating. DON'T CHEAT and STOP POSTING. Learn your material. Be a master of your craft which is the CCIE. I'm going to throw this in this into another perspective. If you ever go do a doctor to get help because you or your family member is sick, do you want to visit a doctor that cheated his way through medical school?l F-NO! NO! I want a doctor that worked hard, is ethical and is passionate in his field. You don't realize that you are working on a PBX. A voice system that is extremely important. I used to work for Nortel and I now work at Cisco. Every vendor stresses the importance of the PBX and 5, 9's availability. That also includes making sure you configure and setup your PBX right for 911 emergencies and best practices. Ever think about that lives can be at stake? I'm taking it to the extreme, but at the end of the day, your work and what is installed is important to people on a daily basis. Please please please use this forum for help and building up other students studying for the exam like me in an ethical manner. Josh Reola www.joshreola.com On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Dennis Agosti dennisago...@gmail.com wrote: Heellooo Friends, I have a attempt on 13th Aug in Aus right now i can see something new update coming on their google talk status message of voice lab I need it man otherwise i wont pass
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NEW LAB in Voice
Hi, Its a pain to attempt attempt attempt better pass in first yes , certknow ledge has active lic i purchased it last week its really good going for next ping me on my email so that we can work together where in Aus I also purchased from cert know ledge last week it is very good Waiting for new updates lets see what is again new in lab hope it should not be major * http://wwwTC* On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Dennis Agosti dennisago...@gmail.comwrote: Heellooo Friends, I have a attempt on 13th Aug in Aus right now i can see something new update coming on their google talk status message of voice lab I need it man otherwise i wont pass the test if anyone is ready for group purchase please email me so that we can work together as i am going to purchase as i need to crack the lab in my first attempt now no more patience's left. It was better my friends did last year from their workbook in first attempt dunno why i missed that so big chance Just want to check did anyone purchased from below link or another option purchasing directly from voice lab is bit expensive. *http://www. c e r tknow l e d g e.com/forum/index.php?/topic/24-gb-ccievoicelabscom-real-labs/ * Cheers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FileOpen for iPad
I am using it as well. It was not working over the weekend but an email with support was answered early Monday and a change to the server fixed it. Used it last night to read through some labs while watching playoff hockey! Steve Sarrick SE - PA Select 412-480-3861 [cid:2A5235AB-632E-475A-8ABF-6FDABA5C1356] Join our LinkedIN Group for PA Select opportunities at: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=gid=4133756 From: Bill whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.com Date: Monday, June 11, 2012 11:40 PM To: Rafael Chavantes raf...@chavantes.commailto:raf...@chavantes.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FileOpen for iPad Hello I have downloaded fileopen on iPad, then put my files on dropbox, then opened file in dropbox, once opened, I hit the open with, scrolled down to fileopen and was able to open the file on the iPad. Bill On Jun 11, 2012, at 7:41 PM, Rafael Chavantes raf...@chavantes.commailto:raf...@chavantes.com wrote: Hey Dan, Have you tested? I tested Fileopen few weeks ago, but i couldn't open the IPE files. On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Dan Quinlan (daquinla) daqui...@cisco.commailto:daqui...@cisco.com wrote: FYI - FileOpen is now available for iPad. It works great for your IPExpert files. DQ d...@cisco.commailto:d...@cisco.com Sent from my iPhone ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Rafael Chavantes ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com inline: image[22].png___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA
is the call name missing in the rining or answered state? answer the call on thePSTN side and see if the name is there, if not make sure you have gone to the primary extension number and propagated the call line values to the RDP extension, the user is assocaited with both lines and that the owner ID for the primary phones is the user. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] [Vol2 Lab3] Call Routing doubt
Use a translation pattern to convert the 9.whatever to full e164 + that way you get by with single RP with multiple translation pattern. A good tip is to get into the habit of doing this. Translation pattern to cobert 9 dialing to + route patterns to route + and do ANI manipulation called party transformation to do DNIS manipulation (apply the DNIS css to the gateways) In this way there are manipulations done in the route lists and the benefis are 1. easy to trouble shoot if there is an error (DNIS is called party, ANI is route pattern, no route = TP 2. once you've set up a couple of the called party transformations for standard and the TEHO and route redundancy - it tends to simply even complex route patterns ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Lan QOS
Ken, appreciate the wanring - but not sure what this has to do with Cisco NDA, we were discussing the Lab7 ccievoicelabs question as was evident in both the question title and my comments about it being a poorly worded question. Are you saying that this is similar to an actual exam question? Best regards, Steve On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Didn't you forget cisco NDA discuss exam questions like this? (Cisco seems given a never-ending exercise to NDA violators) You can't conclude answers this way don't hope to pass first attempt or if cisco gives such questions. Just try again youll pass next time or a in a subsequent attempt if you prepared very well using IPExpert material. Thats only I can say. Thanks On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Kevin Spicer ke...@kevinspicer.co.ukwrote: But cucm and cup both run on the same VMWare server so will use the internal vswitch to communicate only traffic to the clients will traverse the switch port. On 15 May 2012 03:41, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: Whilst in some aspects you are right in that the CUPS server is really only involved in signalling - the question requires a guarantee of 32k for signal traffic between CUPC and CUPS (that's how I read it) as we are only instructed to put a policy of the CUPS server port, then we have to be careful not to put traffic between the CUPS and CUCM into the same policy as above as this would impact of the bandwidth allocated. At the end of the day it is a badly worded question. Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Lan QOS
Whilst in some aspects you are right in that the CUPS server is really only involved in signalling - the question requires a guarantee of 32k for signal traffic between CUPC and CUPS (that's how I read it) as we are only instructed to put a policy of the CUPS server port, then we have to be careful not to put traffic between the CUPS and CUCM into the same policy as above as this would impact of the bandwidth allocated. At the end of the day it is a badly worded question. Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Lan QOS
I've been doing some work on this topic and have moved away from my original thoughts which were along the same lines as originally posted by Nazeer and a few others . Here are some recent thoughts on the subject the question is not particularly well worded, we can't really influence the traffic from the CUPC client to the server by applying policy on the server port. What we can do is control what the switch port does with packets from the CUPS server to the clients by classifying and applying an input ploicy on the server port. I went back to the presence section in the CUCM srnd - the only traffic between CUPC and CUPS seems be 5060 for sip/simple and 443 for SOAP, this was sort of backed up by the information in the CUPC 7.1 release. The release notes also mention that ports 16384-16424 are used for TFTP - but this would not be classed as signalling. Since there are other servers on the port any access list would need to specifiy the server IP address. If you wanted to make it really specific you could also specify the destination address of the CUPC clients as well. Finally by putting bidirectional access lists (any any eq and any eq any) you may loose the points as it might appear you are hedging your bets and do not know how directional QoS works. Also we are asked to guarantee 32k for signalling traffic if we put non signalling traffic into this policy we are not achieving the requirements. These statements are not facts, just my current opinion based on the last bits of documentation read and I am happy to discuss. Best regards. Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] H225 or ICT Trunk conundrum
The question - set up a POC H.323 trunk to your service provider ip address x.x.x.x and route international calls, these calls should have audio issues, It is not clear whether to set up a H.225 gatekeeerp controlled or a non gatekeeer controlled ICT. I would take it that since it does not mention that the service provider is using CUCM that you cannot use an ICT (GK or non GK controlled) -although in practice this works just fine to the PSTN-WAN router and without audio issues. So I take it then the correct way is to set up a gatekeeper and a gatekeeper controlled H225 trunk. But I still do not have any audio connection issues, it would seem the only way to ensure these is to set up CUBE which breaks the H.245 negotiation, unless of course the far end PSTN-WAN has CUBE installed, which of course would result in the same H245 issues. Has anyone had audio connection issues on a correctly set up GK controlled H.225 trunk without CUBE? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA Hangs Up
There are quite a few issues with getting MVA to work correctly and with the rest of your config. if you post your config it will help also what you are entering as the RD and whether you globalise the numbers in the incoming gateway Here's some pointers the number that arrives at the gateway is usually a 7 figure subscriber number e.g. 525 if this number is entered as the remote destination number, all will work as long as whatever you decide to be used in the service parameter to provide the CSS (gateway or RDP) has the correct access partition with the local endpoints or to a route pattern for external. The issues start to arise when you configure the gateway to globalise the numbers. So the number arrives as 525222 but is passed to call manager from the GW as +1972525, this will cause the MVA 2 stage dial out to fail. after some playing around here's what I cam up with as a solution if you need to globalise the numbers. apply a voice translation profile to the voice-port as generic or specific as you like to get rule 1 /^525222/ /+1972/ type any international (international as the gateway will strip the + on the way through and the global prefix of + will add it back on - leaving it as subscriber ends up with a +14081408525) use the Full number +1408525 as the RD Set the Service parameter to use the RDP for CSS and set the CSS on the RDP to whatever you want remember of course to set the phone owner to the user with mobile access and that's it ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone View
I played around with phoneview a while ago and found that the refresh rate needs to be set depending on what phone type you are using, for newer phones they recommend much longer refresh times 5 or 10 seconds, as short times aren't long enough to refresh through the program and can cause issues such as this. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS QoS
if a question was to ask to apply QoS for the port connected to the CUPS would you trust DSCP or COS on the port? Taking into account that the default for CUPS proxy is cs3 and assuming you've applied a policy that contains an access list to cover all the port used by CUPS. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA access with gateway globalised numbers
can someone please either expalin or send me a working configuration for a basic h323 gateway MVA to allow 2 stage dialling. Here is the scenario PSTN number 525 dials MVA 3033300 recieves enter your PIn, select 1 and then can dial out as part of another question the h323 gw is globalising the incoming 525 number to +1972525 what needs to be set as the remote destination number? (PIN must be the 1st prompt not the enter your remote destination) what needs to be set in the service parameters I my lab if I set the RD to 525222 and leave the globalisation on - the call can not be routed, as soon as I remove globalisation from the gateway, the call can be routed to whereever I want depending on the CSS applied. If I set the RD to +1972525222 then I get the prompt to enter the RD (the call still routes if I enter and follow the prompts) Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ordering directory services menu - solution
there's been much information on this including needless deleting and recreating of services - here is a good method that I found works 100% and doesn't need a time wasting dip into the release notes. so SSH into the pub run sql select * from telecasterservice this returns something similar to = == == === == === == a0eed443-c705-4232-86d4-957295dd339c Placed Calls Application:Cisco/PlacedCallsPlaced CallsPlaced Calls1 t t 20 0061bdd2-26c0-46a4-98a3-48a6878edf53 Received Calls Application:Cisco/ReceivedCalls Received Calls Received Calls 1 t t 30 27f92f3c-11ed-45f3-8400-fe06431c0bfc Intercom Calls Application:Cisco/IntercomCalls Intercom Calls Intercom Calls 1 f t 40 7eca2cf1-0c8d-4df4-a807-124b18fe89a4 Corporate Directory Application:Cisco/CorporateDirectory Corporate Directory Corporate Directory 1 t t 10 ca69f2e4-d088-47f8-acb2-ceea6722272e Voicemail Application:Cisco/Voicemail Voicemail Voicemail = == == === == === == a bit confusing without the table headers but the only bit I'm interested in is the pkid I then: run the following command to change the corporate directory priority from 1 to 4; run sql update telecasterservice set Priority=4 where pkid=7eca2cf1-0c8d-4df4-a807-124b18fe89a4 restart the phone this will set the priority of the service and change the order on the menu. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ordering directory services menu - solution
it works in my lab - I haven't tried it in the exam but it would really
suck if they did this, then you are stuck with creating the entire insert
either from the release notes or from the run sql select command edit the
returned string taking out the extra vendor and version headers like this.
It only takes a less than a minute.
*Original*
pkid name
urltemplate description
nameascii tkphoneservice vendor version enterprisesubscription
enabled priority tkphoneservicecategory
===
===
=== == == === ==
=== ==
d0059763-cdcc-4be7-a2a8-bbd4aac73f63 Missed Calls
Application:Cisco/MissedCallsMissed CallsMissed
Calls1 t t
10
*Modified*
run sql insert into telecasterservice (pkid, name, urltemplate,
description, nameascii, tkphoneservice, enterprisesubscription, enabled,
priority, tkphoneservicecategory) values
('d0059763-cdcc-4be7-a2a8-bbd4aac73f63','Missed
Calls','Application:Cisco/MissedCalls','Missed Calls','Missed
Calls','1','t','t','1','0')
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, gabriel gabriel.zicare...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Steve,
Does it work?
I remember trying to update this same stuff last year and apparently
the admin user had privileges for 'deletes' and 'inserts' but not for
'updates.
Great to see this!
Cheers,
Gabriel
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:25 AM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote:
there's been much information on this including needless deleting and
recreating of services - here is a good method that I found works 100%
and
doesn't need a time wasting dip into the release notes.
so
SSH into the pub
run sql select * from telecasterservice
this returns something similar to
= == == === == ===
==
a0eed443-c705-4232-86d4-957295dd339c Placed Calls
Application:Cisco/PlacedCallsPlaced CallsPlaced Calls
1 t t 2
0
0061bdd2-26c0-46a4-98a3-48a6878edf53 Received Calls
Application:Cisco/ReceivedCalls Received Calls Received Calls
1 t t 3
0
27f92f3c-11ed-45f3-8400-fe06431c0bfc Intercom Calls
Application:Cisco/IntercomCalls Intercom Calls Intercom Calls
1 f t 4
0
7eca2cf1-0c8d-4df4-a807-124b18fe89a4 Corporate Directory
Application:Cisco/CorporateDirectory Corporate Directory Corporate
Directory
1 t t 1
0
ca69f2e4-d088-47f8-acb2-ceea6722272e Voicemail
Application:Cisco/Voicemail Voicemail Voicemail
= == == === == ===
==
a bit confusing without the table headers but the only bit I'm
interested in
is the pkid
I then: run the following command to change the corporate directory
priority
from 1 to 4;
run sql update telecasterservice set Priority=4 where
pkid=7eca2cf1-0c8d-4df4-a807-124b18fe89a4
restart the phone
this will set the priority of the service and change the order on the
menu.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP phones continuously toggling between
I have seen a lot of these issues and others for both sccp and sip phones when there are dbreplication issues (including during the exam) go to RTMT and look at the DBreplication if it is not 2 2 4 (pub, sub, cluster) then do the following on the sub utils dbreplication stop on the pub utils dbreplication stop utils dbreplication cluserreset utils dbreplication reset all depending upon the size of the databse and the server this can be done in 10 minutes or an hour. I needed to do this in my last exam. Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] directory services
So here's what I know and don't know to remove the directory services from a single phone - 1. point the phone to use external url for services provisioning 2. enterprise parameters delete URL Directories 3. add URL messages http://Pub:8080/ccmcip/getmessagesmenu.jsphttp://pub:8080/ccmcip/getmessagesmenu.jsp 4. Reset phone selecting the phone directory button returns no services configured to restict specific directory services to a subset of phones 1. delete existing directory services 2. recreate required services without enterprise subscription 3. using BAT create phone template and subscribe to the required services 4. Using BAT apply the template to the phones The only issue I have is the order in which the services are applied is now alphabetical - I can put a number in front of each but this looks silly - what is the best way to order the services - preferbly without scripting and writing an external .jsp file to provide it. Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 Message Button for VM
Thanks for the reference configuration. But i don't see any difference, besides that you also configured Visual Voicemail. I was thinking about, maybe my phone isn't set up right. Type is correctly set and i use digit authentication. How did you set up your phone? Any authentication process? Regards Steven Am 05.04.2012 23:09, schrieb chase mergenthal: This is what I have: phoneService type=2 category=0 nameVoicemail/name urlApplication:Cisco/Voicemail/url vendor/vendor version/version /phoneService phoneService type=2 category=1 displayNameVisualVoicemail/displayName nameVisualVoicemail/name urlhttp://deleted.com/midlets/VisualVoicemail/VisualVoicemail.jad?call_connect_delay=1000amp;log_level=infoamp;use_secure_https_connection=noamp;voicemail_server=deleted.com/url vendorCisco/vendor version/version /phoneService -Chase -- If winners never quit and quitters never win, then who coined the phrase, Quit while you’re still ahead.? Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 21:56:48 +0200 From: forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 Message Button for VM Hi Chase, since i'm using the standard one it is subscribed by default (Enterprise Service). You can also verify it in my Config snipped near the bottom: phoneService type=2 category=0 nameVoicemail/name urlApplication:Cisco/Voicemail/url vendor/vendor version/version /phoneService So subscription seems ok. I also don't know if all SIP-only phones encounter something similar. Maybe someone has an 99xx available to check? Regards, Steven Am 05.04.2012 17:21, schrieb chase mergenthal: Can you subscribe the Voicemail service to your 9971's? -Chase -- If winners never quit and quitters never win, then who coined the phrase, Quit while you’re still ahead.? Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:09:25 +0200 From: forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net mailto:forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 Message Button for VM Thanks for your fast reply: I'm running on 7.1.5.3-1 Regards. Am 05.04.2012 16:02, schrieb chase mergenthal: What version of CM are you running? -Chase -- If winners never quit and quitters never win, then who coined the phrase, Quit while you’re still ahead.? Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:41:12 +0200 From: forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net mailto:forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 Message Button for VM Hello Group, i'm playing arounf with CUE and SIP phones. I tried to get the messages-button working for an 9971. Already tried to set Service Provision to extermal and set it to the same URL sccp phones use. Strange thing is all my sccp phones working fine and i can also manually dial my CTI RP to get to the VM. However like i said before, the message button doesn't do anything. Any hints appreciated. Thanks in advance. PS: Snipped Config: ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 Message Button for VM
Hello Group,
i'm playing arounf with CUE and SIP phones.
I tried to get the messages-button working for an 9971.
Already tried to set Service Provision to extermal and set it to the
same URL sccp phones use.
Strange thing is all my sccp phones working fine and i can also manually
dial my CTI RP to get to the VM.
However like i said before, the message button doesn't do anything.
Any hints appreciated. Thanks in advance.
PS: Snipped Config:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
device xsi:type=axl:XIPPhone ctiid=205
uuid={8c91449e-ae42-c1db-f1e3-ae7c373569a5}
fullConfigtrue/fullConfig
deviceProtocolSIP/deviceProtocol
[...]
callManagerGroup
nameDefault/name
tftpDefaulttrue/tftpDefault
members
member priority=0
callManager
namePub/name
descriptionPub/description
processNodeNamePub/processNodeName
/callManager
/member
/members
/callManagerGroup
[...]
sipProfile
sipProxies
backupProxyUSECALLMANAGER/backupProxy
backupProxyPort5060/backupProxyPort
emergencyProxyUSECALLMANAGER/emergencyProxy
emergencyProxyPort5060/emergencyProxyPort
outboundProxyUSECALLMANAGER/outboundProxy
outboundProxyPort5060/outboundProxyPort
registerWithProxytrue/registerWithProxy
/sipProxies
sipCallFeatures
cnfJoinEnabledtrue/cnfJoinEnabled
callForwardURIx-cisco-serviceuri-cfwdall/callForwardURI
callPickupURIx-cisco-serviceuri-pickup/callPickupURI
callPickupListURIx-cisco-serviceuri-opickup/callPickupListURI
callPickupGroupURIx-cisco-serviceuri-gpickup/callPickupGroupURI
meetMeServiceURIx-cisco-serviceuri-meetme/meetMeServiceURI
abbreviatedDialURIx-cisco-serviceuri-abbrdial/abbreviatedDialURI
rfc2543Holdfalse/rfc2543Hold
callHoldRingback2/callHoldRingback
localCfwdEnabletrue/localCfwdEnable
semiAttendedTransfertrue/semiAttendedTransfer
anonymousCallBlock2/anonymousCallBlock
callerIdBlocking2/callerIdBlocking
dndControl0/dndControl
remoteCcEnabletrue/remoteCcEnable
retainForwardInformationtrue/retainForwardInformation
/sipCallFeatures
[...]
sipLines
line button=1 lineIndex=1
featureID9/featureID
featureLabelLine 1/featureLabel
proxyUSECALLMANAGER/proxy
port5060/port
name202/name
displayNameLine 1/displayName
autoAnswer
autoAnswerEnabled2/autoAnswerEnabled
/autoAnswer
callWaiting3/callWaiting
authNameci...@cisco.com/authName
authPassword1737/authPassword
sharedLinetrue/sharedLine
messageWaitingLampPolicy1/messageWaitingLampPolicy
messageWaitingAMWI0/messageWaitingAMWI
messagesNumber300/messagesNumber
ringSettingIdle4/ringSettingIdle
ringSettingActive5/ringSettingActive
contact6d65c733-1f49-cce7-5fd8-12151feb7cb1/contact
forwardCallInfoDisplay
callerNametrue/callerName
callerNumberfalse/callerNumber
redirectedNumberfalse/redirectedNumber
dialedNumbertrue/dialedNumber
/forwardCallInfoDisplay
maxNumCalls4/maxNumCalls
busyTrigger2/busyTrigger
/line
[...]
/sipLines
externalNumberMask/externalNumberMask
voipControlPort5060/voipControlPort
[...]
alwaysUsePrimeLinefalse/alwaysUsePrimeLine
alwaysUsePrimeLineVoiceMailtrue/alwaysUsePrimeLineVoiceMail
/sipProfile
[...]
loadInformationsip9971.9-2-2/loadInformation
inactiveLoadInformationsip9971.9-1-2/inactiveLoadInformation
vendorConfig
disableSpeakerfalse/disableSpeakerdisableSpeakerAndHeadsetfalse/disableSpeakerAndHeadsetpcPort0/pcPortsdio1/sdiowifi0/wifigarp1/garpvoiceVlanAccess0/voiceVlanAccesswebAccess0/webAccessallCallsOnPrimary0/allCallsOnPrimarydaysDisplayNotActive7/daysDisplayNotActivedisplayOnTime09:00/displayOnTimedisplayOnDuration20:00/displayOnDurationdisplayIdleTimeout00:30/displayIdleTimeoutwebProtocol0/webProtocolspanToPCPort1/spanToPCPortloggingDisplay0/loggingDisplayrecordingTone0/recordingTonerecordingToneLocalVolume100/recordingToneLocalVolumerecordingToneRemoteVolume50/recordingToneRemoteVolumerecordingToneDuration/recordingToneDurationdisplayOnWhenIncomingCall1/displayOnWhenIncomingCalllogServer/logServerg722CodecSupport2/g722CodecSupportheadsetWidebandUIControl0/headsetWidebandUIControlheadsetWidebandEnable0/headsetWidebandEnablelldpAssetId/lldpAssetIdpowerPriority0/powerPriority
detectCMConnectionFailure0/detectCMConnectionFailurepowerNegotiation1/powerNegotiationrestrictDataRates0/restrictDataRates
/vendorConfig
commonConfig
/commonConfig
enterpriseConfig
/enterpriseConfig
versionStamp1333630640-ad62be06-be31-4b72-99c7-677d862cb1e4/versionStamp
[...]
authenticationURLhttp://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmcip/authenticate.jsp/authenticationURL
directoryURLhttp://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmcip/xmldirectory.jsp/directoryURL
idleURL/idleURL
informationURLhttp://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmcip/GetTelecasterHelpText.jsp/informationURL
messagesURL/messagesURL
proxyServerURL/proxyServerURL
servicesURLhttp://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmcip/getservicesmenu.jsp/servicesURL
[...]
phoneServices
provisioning0/provisioning
phoneService type=1 category=0
nameMissed Calls/name
urlApplication:Cisco/MissedCalls/url
vendor/vendor
version/version
/phoneService
phoneService type=2 category=0
nameVoicemail/name
urlApplication:Cisco/Voicemail/url
vendor/vendor
version/version
/phoneService
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 Message Button for VM
Thanks for your fast reply: I'm running on 7.1.5.3-1 Regards. Am 05.04.2012 16:02, schrieb chase mergenthal: What version of CM are you running? -Chase -- If winners never quit and quitters never win, then who coined the phrase, Quit while you’re still ahead.? Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:41:12 +0200 From: forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 Message Button for VM Hello Group, i'm playing arounf with CUE and SIP phones. I tried to get the messages-button working for an 9971. Already tried to set Service Provision to extermal and set it to the same URL sccp phones use. Strange thing is all my sccp phones working fine and i can also manually dial my CTI RP to get to the VM. However like i said before, the message button doesn't do anything. Any hints appreciated. Thanks in advance. PS: Snipped Config: ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 Message Button for VM
Hi Chase, since i'm using the standard one it is subscribed by default (Enterprise Service). You can also verify it in my Config snipped near the bottom: phoneService type=2 category=0 nameVoicemail/name urlApplication:Cisco/Voicemail/url vendor/vendor version/version /phoneService So subscription seems ok. I also don't know if all SIP-only phones encounter something similar. Maybe someone has an 99xx available to check? Regards, Steven Am 05.04.2012 17:21, schrieb chase mergenthal: Can you subscribe the Voicemail service to your 9971's? -Chase -- If winners never quit and quitters never win, then who coined the phrase, Quit while you’re still ahead.? Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:09:25 +0200 From: forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 Message Button for VM Thanks for your fast reply: I'm running on 7.1.5.3-1 Regards. Am 05.04.2012 16:02, schrieb chase mergenthal: What version of CM are you running? -Chase -- If winners never quit and quitters never win, then who coined the phrase, Quit while you’re still ahead.? Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:41:12 +0200 From: forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net mailto:forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 Message Button for VM Hello Group, i'm playing arounf with CUE and SIP phones. I tried to get the messages-button working for an 9971. Already tried to set Service Provision to extermal and set it to the same URL sccp phones use. Strange thing is all my sccp phones working fine and i can also manually dial my CTI RP to get to the VM. However like i said before, the message button doesn't do anything. Any hints appreciated. Thanks in advance. PS: Snipped Config: ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP failover events
Dear all, I just want to amke sure I have this question nailed. Can someone comment on revised annotation of the MGCP Packet debug below. Original question prove when the subscriber fails, the publisher will work. While the call is active shut down the CUCM - Subscriber services. Debug the MGCP message, steps should show: 1. Backup call agent send the message to the gateway to check the status of the Endpoint 2. Gateway sends the status of the call to the call agent about the status of the call. 3. Back up the message send from the call agent to the gateway. Put all the steps as event 1, event 2, and event 3 in the text file Apr 4 21:50:19.967: MGCP Packet received from 142.100.64.12:2427--- 200 858012 --- HQ-RTR# Apr 4 21:50:32.011: MGCP Packet received from 142.100.64.12:2427--- CRCX 73 S0/DS1-1/6@HQ-RTR MGCP 0.1 C: D2e5498b00F50003 X: 6 L: p:20, a:PCMU, s:off, t:b8, fxr/fx:t38 M: recvonly R: D/[0-9ABCD*#] Q: process,loop --- Apr 4 21:50:32.059: MGCP Packet sent to 142.100.64.12:2427--- 200 73 OK I: 5 v=0 o=- 5 0 IN IP4 142.102.64.254 s=Cisco SDP 0 c=IN IP4 142.102.64.254 t=0 0 m=audio 16414 RTP/AVP 0 100 a=rtpmap:100 X-NSE/8000 a=fmtp:100 200-202 a=X-sqn:0 a=X-cap: 1 audio RTP/AVP 100 a=X-cpar: a=rtpmap:100 X-NSE/8000 a=X-cpar: a=fmtp:100 200-202 a=X-cap: 2 image udptl t38 --- HQ-RTR# Apr 4 21:50:32.191: MGCP Packet received from 142.100.64.12:2427--- MDCX 74 S0/DS1-1/6@HQ-RTR MGCP 0.1 C: D2e5498b00F50003 I: 5 X: 6 L: p:20, a:PCMU, s:off, t:b8, fxr/fx:t38 M: sendrecv R: D/[0-9ABCD*#], FXR/t38 S: Q: process,loop v=0 o=- 5 0 IN EPN S0/DS1-1/6@HQ-RTR s=Cisco SDP 0 t=0 0 m=audio 21070 RTP/AVP 0 c=IN IP4 142.102.64.29 a=X-sqn:0 a=X-cap:1 image udptl t38 --- Apr 4 21:50:32.211: MGCP Packet sent to 142.100.64.12:2427--- 200 74 OK --- HQ-RTR# Apr 4 21:50:44.751: MGCP Packet sent to 142.100.64.12:2427--- RSIP 858013 *@HQ-RTR MGCP 0.1 RM: graceful --- Apr 4 21:50:44.755: MGCP Packet sent to 142.100.64.11:2427--- RSIP 858015 *@HQ-RTR MGCP 0.1 RM: restart --- Apr 4 21:50:45.259: MGCP Packet sent to 142.100.64.12:2427--- RSIP 858013 *@HQ-RTR MGCP 0.1 RM: graceful --- Apr 4 21:50:45.259: MGCP Packet sent to 142.100.64.11:2427--- RSIP 858015 *@HQ-RTR MGCP 0.1 RM: restart --- Apr 4 21:50:45.447: MGCP Packet received from 142.100.64.11:2427--- 200 858015 --- Apr 4 21:50:45.447: MGCP Packet received from 142.100.64.11:2427--- 200 858015 --- Apr 4 21:50:45.451: MGCP Packet sent to 142.100.64.11:2427--- NTFY 858017 *@HQ-RTR MGCP 0.1 X: 0 O: --- * Event1: Backup call agent sending AUEP to gateway, to inquire about an endpoint * Apr 4 21:50:45.507: MGCP Packet received from 142.100.64.11:2427--- AUEP 1 S0/DS1-1/1@HQ-RTR MGCP 0.1 F: X, A, I --- Event2: Gateway returning (200 OK) with valid I: value (connection identifier) Apr 4 21:50:45.515: MGCP Packet sent to 142.100.64.11:2427--- 200 1 I: X: 1 L: p:10-20, a:PCMU;PCMA;G.nX64, b:64, e:on, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:L;G;D;T;H;ATM;FXR L: p:10-220, a:G.729;G.729a;G.729b, b:8, e:on, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:L;G;D;T;H;ATM;FXR L: p:10-110, a:G.726-16, b:16, e:on, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:L;G;D;T;H;ATM;FXR L: p:10-70, a:G.726-24, b:24, e:on, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:L;G;D;T;H;ATM;FXR L: p:10-50, a:G.726-32, b:32, e:on, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:L;G;D;T;H;ATM;FXR M: sendonly, recvonly, sendrecv, inactive, loopback, conttest, data, netwloop, netwtest --- Apr 4 21:50:45.515: MGCP Packet received from 142.100.64.11:2427--- AUEP 2 S0/DS1-1/2@HQ-RTR MGCP 0.1 F: X, A, I --- Apr 4 21:50:45.523: MGCP Packet sent to 142.100.64.11:2427--- 200 2 I: X: 0 L: p:10-20, a:PCMU;PCMA;G.nX64, b:64, e:on, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:L;G;D;T;H;ATM;FXR L: p:10-220, a:G.729;G.729a;G.729b, b:8, e:on, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:L;G;D;T;H;ATM;FXR L: p:10-110, a:G.726-16, b:16, e:on, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:L;G;D;T;H;ATM;FXR L: p:10-70, a:G.726-24, b:24, e:on, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:L;G;D;T;H;ATM;FXR L: p:10-50, a:G.726-32, b:32, e:on, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:L;G;D;T;H;ATM;FXR M: sendonly, recvonly, sendrecv, inactive, loopback, conttest, data, netwloop, netwtest --- Apr 4 21:50:45.527: MGCP Packet received from 142.100.64.11:2427--- AUEP 3 S0/DS1-1/3@HQ-RTR MGCP 0.1 F: X, A, I --- Apr 4 21:50:45.531: MGCP Packet sent to 142.100.64.11:2427--- 200 3 I: X: 0 L: p:10-20, a:PCMU;PCMA;G.nX64, b:64, e:on, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:L;G;D;T;H;ATM;FXR L: p:10-220, a:G.729;G.729a;G.729b,
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] switch-QoS-Quick Question
thanks for the reponse - this is more or less where I started with my config however there were some concerns over the term guarantee - so it was thought best to put the cos 3/dscp 24 into the priority queue by itself. In the interests of speed I left the auto qos stuff in as it did not seem to be doing any harm Best regards, Steve On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jurassic Labs jurassicl...@gmail.comwrote: Yes - I think that looks good. I agree with the access-list 100 statements. One thing I am doing is saving the switch config BEFORE running the auto-qos macro; copying out the mls qos statements and class-maps / policy-maps, then modifying in notepad. I'll then reboot the switch and paste back in what I need. This effectively resets the switch to no Auto-QoS...and so my config would look something more like: ! mls-qos mls qos dscp-cos map 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56 mls qos map policed-dscp 24 to 8 ! access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq 2427 access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq 2428 ! class-map match-all SCCP match access-group 100 ! policy-map POLICED class SCCP set dscp cs3 police 16000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit ! int g1/0/1 mls qos trust dscp service-policy input POLICED ! I'm seeing several other take this approach, but not 100% if that's a good way or not. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] switch-QoS-Quick Question
Dear all, many thanks for all the replies - I got a little lost in all the discussion around trust boundaries. Here is the final config - which I am hoping meets all of the questions requirements. Ports 4 and 5 are Cisco phones and 6 is my vmware server. Port 1 is the router uplink port. Please lte me know if this is OK. original question On port fa0/1 which is connected to HQ router, guarantee 16k for MGCP signaling traffic. Excess traffic should be marked to DSCP 8 and then transmitted. ! mls qos map policed-dscp 26 46 to 0 mls qos map policed-dscp 24 to 8 mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56 mls qos srr-queue input bandwidth 90 10 mls qos srr-queue input threshold 1 8 16 mls qos srr-queue input threshold 2 34 66 mls qos srr-queue input buffers 67 33 mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 1 threshold 2 1 mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 0 mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 2 threshold 1 2 mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 2 threshold 2 4 5 6 7 mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 2 threshold 3 3 mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 1 threshold 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 1 threshold 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 1 threshold 3 32 mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 2 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 48 mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 2 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 2 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 5 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3 3 6 7 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 3 2 4 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 2 1 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 3 0 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 1 threshold 3 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 3 threshold 3 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 3 threshold 3 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 1 8 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 1 138 138 92 138 mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 2 138 138 92 400 mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 3 36 77 100 318 mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 4 20 50 67 400 mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 1 149 149 100 149 mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 2 118 118 100 235 mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 3 41 68 100 272 mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 4 42 72 100 242 mls qos queue-set output 1 buffers 10 10 26 54 mls qos queue-set output 2 buffers 16 6 17 61 mls qos ! ! ! class-map match-all AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust match ip dscp ef class-map match-all class-mgcp match access-group 100 class-map match-all AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust match ip dscp cs3 af31 ! ! policy-map policy-mgcp class class-mgcp police 16000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit policy-map AutoQoS-Police-CiscoPhone class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust set dscp ef police 32 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust set dscp cs3 police 32000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit ! ! interface FastEthernet0/1 description HQ-RTR Interface FastEthernet 0/0 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 202 switchport trunk allowed vlan 100-102,202,210 switchport mode trunk srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 priority-queue out mls qos trust cos auto qos voip trust service-policy input policy-mgcp ! ! interface FastEthernet0/4 description Cisco-Phone switchport access vlan 202 switchport mode access switchport voice vlan 102 srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 priority-queue out mls qos trust device cisco-phone mls qos trust cos auto qos voip cisco-phone spanning-tree portfast service-policy input AutoQoS-Police-CiscoPhone ! interface FastEthernet0/5 description Cisco-Phone switchport access vlan 202 switchport mode access switchport voice vlan 102 srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 priority-queue out mls qos trust device cisco-phone mls qos trust cos auto qos voip cisco-phone spanning-tree portfast service-policy input AutoQoS-Police-CiscoPhone ! ! interface FastEthernet0/6 description VMware-Server-CUCM-Unity switchport access vlan 100 switchport mode access srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 priority-queue out mls qos trust cos
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] switch-QoS-Quick Question
I’m preparing for the exam and as you are all aware question interpretation is really important. Below is a practice question plus my config on how to approach it. I would appreciate it if anyone could comment on my approach to the question and see if the answer meets the brief. I considered running auto qos on the phone and server ports to mark the traffic at source but this seems excessive for the question. Question On port fa0/1 which is connected to HQ router, guarantee 16k for MGCP signaling traffic. Excess traffic should be marked to DSCP 8 and then transmitted. mls qos ! mls qos map cos 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56 ! mls qos map policed-dscp 24 to 8 ! ip access-list extended 100 permit tcp any any eq 2428 permit udp any any eq 2427 ! class-map class-mgcp match access-group 100 ! policy-map policy-mgcp class class-mgcp set dscp cs3 police 16000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit ! interface fa0/1 service input policy-mgcp ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called-# representation on Calling-phone
Hi List, i was wondering if we need to manipulate the Called # on the phne display in the way a user doesn't notice anything. For example: I have RP 9.1XXX with a RL assigned that includes only the SLRG. PreDot is applied to this RP. When a user dials 91000 the Pattern matches and the user-display changes to 1000 Is this the correct way or should it display 91000 instead of 1000 If the 9 is needed to be displayed i would make my SLRG with PreDot by default. I'm struggling with this because i think i would waste a lot of the benefits a SLRG brings. Thanks and Regards, Steven ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs
I did noticed the same, and today at nearly the same time the same issue again. Contacting support isn't possible right now because the complete proctorlabs.com is not reachable. So you're not alone. -Steven Am 08.03.2012 07:41, schrieb Ken Wyan: Yesterday Proctorlabs was down for more than 1 Hour. Earlier they issued vouchers for such session interruptions. This time I didn't receive a voucher. Anybody faced same issue? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ Phones - DHCP Problem
Hi Ramy, cdp is only needed for the VLAN information. If your phone doesn't get an ip address you have a different problem. Enable service dhcp on HQ-RTR and check with debug ip udp if port 68 and 69 are getting unicast-ed to the CUCM. Regards, Steven Am 28.02.2012 21:00, schrieb Ramy Abdelrahim: Actually, I changed the question and I was trying to receive DHCP for HQ/BR1 from CUCM PUB and BR2 from BR2-RTR. I'll try the cdp advertise and update you all. Thanks Ramy CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com From: whl...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ Phones - DHCP Problem Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:52:59 -0600 To: ramyoth...@hotmail.com On switch you have no cdp adv, this command prevents the phones from getting vlan set No dhcp pool on router so your br1 is most likely using cached addressing Bill On Feb 26, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Ramy Abdelrahim ramyoth...@hotmail.com mailto:ramyoth...@hotmail.com wrote: Kindly find attached the full config of HQ-3750 and HQ-RTR for your reference. Thanks Ramy From: ramyoth...@hotmail.com mailto:ramyoth...@hotmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: HQ Phones - DHCP Problem Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:53:34 + Hi All, In the five-lab ebook, lab 2, there's a requirement that HQ/BR1 phones must receive an IP address from the DHCP server configured on HQ-RTR. BR1 phones didreceive IP address successfully but HQ did not. Can anyone help on this? Thanks in advance. Ramy HQ-3750.txt HQ-RTR.txt ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FXS incoming flapping
Guys you're correct. I totaly displaced that i need an FXO to connect to an FXS. Heading out to buy one right now. Thank you all. -Steven Am 26.02.2012 17:03, schrieb Mohd Baqari: Hi Steve, What Kevin mentioned is correct. Since its working with your analog phone, then your provider port is FXS. They need to change to FXO to provide you with DID service. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Feb 26, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Kevin Spicer ke...@kevinspicer.co.uk mailto:ke...@kevinspicer.co.uk wrote: As an ordinary analogue phone works in the PSTN socket then it is FXS on the telco side, so you need FXO on your router. FXS DID would require the telco to have implemented as FXO their side, and would only provide incoming service to you, not outgoing. On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Steven forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net mailto:forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net wrote: Can you please explain in more details the problem Of course, help is much appreciated. To the PSTN i got 2 FXS ports from my provider and i want to route them through my cme to distribute calls over voip. A normal phone works just fine on the provided FXS ports, so i took these cabling as reference (Pin 2 + 3). When i conenct my analog phone directly to an FXS port everything works fine. Eg. i can call from/to analog phone to/from voip without problems. From this point i modified the setup and connected the provided FXS port with my Cisco-FXS port. At this point a test call incoming from the PSTN (PSTN - FXS - Cisco-FXS) makes it to the CME and an ip phone starts to ring. But the ip phone only rings in that moment when the caller hears the ringing tone. I created a short video clip ( ~8MB ) to clarify the issue. Please bear with me. http://www.mediafire.com/?u696rm912rtyl4o Regards, Steven Am 26.02.2012 07 tel:26.02.2012%2007:29, schrieb Mohd Baqari: So your module support DID. Can you please explain in more details the problem Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Feb 26, 2012, at 4:38 AM, Steven forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net mailto:forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net wrote: Thanks for your response. #sh inv -snip- NAME: 3rd generation four port FXS DID voice interface daughtercard on Slot 0 SubSlot 1, DESCR: 3rd generation four port FXS DID voice interface daughtercard PID: VIC3-4FXS/DID , VID: V03 , SN: FOC151X -snip- ... Please elaborate more My english isn't perfect so i'm not sure if i understand this one right. You want me to outline the scenario in more detail? Additionaly, when i pick up the phone in the right moment a connection is made. But the audio sounds a bit like statics. Thanks and regards, Steven Am 25.02.2012 22 tel:25.02.2012%2022:08, schrieb Mohd Baqari: Regarding the connection part of your scenario, you can use FXS ports for PSTN connection in case they support DID. Post show inventory output to check whether it supports DID or not. But still I can get the exact problem. Please elaborate more Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Feb 25, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Steven forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net mailto:forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net wrote: Thanks for your responses. You're right, i was a bit unclear at this point. I got 2 FXS conenctions from my provider and extend them to my router. So FXS should be the right interface. Because the provider box expects an connected analog phone. Regards, Steven Am 25.02.2012 16 tel:25.02.2012%2016:17, schrieb Bill Lake: Easy way to remember FXS is Station as in phone endpoint FXO as is CO as in Central Office or PSTN On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:12 AM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com mailto:datucha...@gmail.com wrote: FXS is used to connect Analog Phones, not the PSTN. For PSTN connectivity you need FXO Card. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Steven forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net mailto:forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net wrote: Hi group, i'm playing with FXS ports right now and encountered a strange behaviour. First the call-flow to get the picture: PSTN --- FXS --- CME The callED phone is ringing, but it only rings when the callING phone hears a tone. When the tone stops, the callED phone stops riniging. And the process starts over. For the callING phone the ringing tone is just fine. My guess is i have done something wrong with FXS signaling and/or cabling. I hope somebody already encountered something similar. PSTN network is Germany. Some
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FXS incoming flapping
Can you please explain in more details the problem Of course, help is much appreciated. To the PSTN i got 2 FXS ports from my provider and i want to route them through my cme to distribute calls over voip. A normal phone works just fine on the provided FXS ports, so i took these cabling as reference (Pin 2 + 3). When i conenct my analog phone directly to an FXS port everything works fine. Eg. i can call from/to analog phone to/from voip without problems. From this point i modified the setup and connected the provided FXS port with my Cisco-FXS port. At this point a test call incoming from the PSTN (PSTN - FXS - Cisco-FXS) makes it to the CME and an ip phone starts to ring. But the ip phone only rings in that moment when the caller hears the ringing tone. I created a short video clip ( ~8MB ) to clarify the issue. Please bear with me. http://www.mediafire.com/?u696rm912rtyl4o Regards, Steven Am 26.02.2012 07:29, schrieb Mohd Baqari: So your module support DID. Can you please explain in more details the problem Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Feb 26, 2012, at 4:38 AM, Steven forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net mailto:forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net wrote: Thanks for your response. #sh inv -snip- NAME: 3rd generation four port FXS DID voice interface daughtercard on Slot 0 SubSlot 1, DESCR: 3rd generation four port FXS DID voice interface daughtercard PID: VIC3-4FXS/DID , VID: V03 , SN: FOC151X -snip- ... Please elaborate more My english isn't perfect so i'm not sure if i understand this one right. You want me to outline the scenario in more detail? Additionaly, when i pick up the phone in the right moment a connection is made. But the audio sounds a bit like statics. Thanks and regards, Steven Am 25.02.2012 22:08, schrieb Mohd Baqari: Regarding the connection part of your scenario, you can use FXS ports for PSTN connection in case they support DID. Post show inventory output to check whether it supports DID or not. But still I can get the exact problem. Please elaborate more Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Feb 25, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Steven forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net mailto:forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net wrote: Thanks for your responses. You're right, i was a bit unclear at this point. I got 2 FXS conenctions from my provider and extend them to my router. So FXS should be the right interface. Because the provider box expects an connected analog phone. Regards, Steven Am 25.02.2012 16:17, schrieb Bill Lake: Easy way to remember FXS is Station as in phone endpoint FXO as is CO as in Central Office or PSTN On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:12 AM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com mailto:datucha...@gmail.com wrote: FXS is used to connect Analog Phones, not the PSTN. For PSTN connectivity you need FXO Card. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Steven forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net mailto:forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net wrote: Hi group, i'm playing with FXS ports right now and encountered a strange behaviour. First the call-flow to get the picture: PSTN --- FXS --- CME The callED phone is ringing, but it only rings when the callING phone hears a tone. When the tone stops, the callED phone stops riniging. And the process starts over. For the callING phone the ringing tone is just fine. My guess is i have done something wrong with FXS signaling and/or cabling. I hope somebody already encountered something similar. PSTN network is Germany. Some config: ! voice-port 0/1/0 cptone DE ! dial-peer voice 50 pots translation-profile incoming 54856975 incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial port 0/1/0 ! voice translation-profile 1000 translate called 50 ! voice translation-rule 50 rule 1 // /1000/ ! voice register pool 1 id mac E840.. type 9971 number 1 dn 1 ! voice register dn 1 number 1000 name Steven Thanks in advance, Steven ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 150 ms latency
As defined in the International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) G.114 specifications, the recommended one-way overall delay for voice is 150 ms. For a private network, 200 ms is a reasonable goal, and 250 ms must be the maximum. Source: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk698/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094ae2.shtml Regards, Steven Am 27.02.2012 00:06, schrieb donny f: hi all, are the 150 ms latency and 64 kpbs for one way or 2 way ? tks d ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper VIAZONE - Could not find an IPIPGW
@Boris @Leslie @Amit I got some other issues too. I skipped to check the GK-only functionality (BIG mistake). After i fixed the normal (without outvia) GK functions i revisited the CUBE issue. It turns out i accidently put the allow-connections on the Br2 instead of the HQ. Thanks for your time and help! :D Regards Steven ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper VIAZONE - Could not find an IPIPGW
Hi there, i got some problems with my viazone (CUBE) at HQ-RTR. I already checked the Tech prefix match and it seems to succeed. But i'm clueless how to debug/resolve the Could not find an IPIPGW-problem. I also checked the dial-peers on HQ-RTR. Any help appreciated. Regards, Steven ! *** Begin tech details: HQ-RTR#debug gatekeeper main 10! tried to call from HQ (5002) to BR2 (3006) Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x48F0C08C,crv=0x7, answerCall=0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/gk_dns_query: No Name servers Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (3006) Tech-prefix match failed. Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (3006) Matched zone prefix 3 and remainder 006 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning default ingress network = 1 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the source side, src_zonep=0x4793079C Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is UCM, and z_invianamelen=0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the destination side, dst_zonep=0x47930A08 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is UCME, and z_outvianamelen=4 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone and z_outvianamep=CUBE Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: Received ARQ for a zone (UCME) that has an outviazone (CUBE) specified. Pick an IP-IP gateway in that viazone. Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: zonep: 0x47930C74, tpp: 0x0, current_endpt: 0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: Selecting any IPIPGW. qelemp.head=0x46F0FE88, use_count=1, current_endpt=0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: qelemp=0x46F0FE88, loop_count=0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: Examining tgwp 0x46F253E0, g_supp_prots: 0x50 qelemp: 0x46F0FE88, loop_count: 1 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: Searched through the entire gateway list. loop_count=0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: Could not find an IPIPGW. Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo(3006): Viazone gateway selection failed for zone CUBE Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq: rassrv_get_addrinfo() failed (return code = 0x805) HQ-RTR#show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 1#*(Default gateway-technology) Zone CUBE master gateway list: 10.10.110.1:1720 HQ-RTR Zone UCM master gateway list: 10.10.210.10:44248 gk-trunk_1 10.10.210.11:36641 gk-trunk_2 Prefix: 3#* Zone UCME master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1720 BR2-RTR HQ-RTR#show gatekeeper zone prefix ZONE PREFIX TABLE = GK-NAME E164-PREFIX --- --- UCME 3... UCM 5... HQ-RTR#show running-config interface loopback 0 interface Loopback0 ip address 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id CUBE ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id HQ-RTR h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1# HQ-RTR#show running-config | section gatekeeper gatekeeper zone local UCM ipexpert.com zone local UCME ipexpert.com outvia CUBE zone local CUBE ipexpert.com zone prefix UCME 3... zone prefix UCM 5... gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology no shutdown ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] pstn-wan not passing RDNIS
Dear all, I am trying to get the mailbox on br1phn2 to redirect across the PSTN when there is AAR invoked. This works but I get the generic message. On the PSTN WAN router ISDN Q931 debug (below) I can see the 3 legs of the call, first the call to 8631002, 2nd is the incoming from BR1 MGCP gateway with the redirect number present (1002) and 3rd the call out to HQ missing the redirect number. Both the HQ and BR1 Gateways are MGCP, BR1 has the redirecting number outbound selected and HQ has the redirecting number inbound selected. Both Gateways have been reset, routers reloaded and even CUCM restarted. PSTN WAN PRI interfaces as below. interface Serial0/0:15 description ** E1 PRI D-CHANNEL TO HQ-RTR ** no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice isdn outgoing display-ie no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/1:15 description ** E1 PRI D-CHANNEL TO BR1-RTR ** no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice no cdp enable PSTN WAN ISDN Q931 capture * 1st leg* Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Progress Ind i = 0x8183 - Origination address is non-ISDN PSTN-WAN# Display i = 'Emergency Services' Calling Party Number i = 0x0080, '911' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0x81, '6178631002' Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown Oct 26 20:07:56.881: ISDN Se0/1:15 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x81C9 Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Oct 26 20:07:56.957: ISDN Se0/1:15 Q931: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x81C9 Progress Ind i = 0x8088 - In-band info or appropriate now available PSTN-WAN# *2nd Leg *Oct 26 20:07:59.913: ISDN Se0/1:15 Q931: RX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0004 Sending Complete Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98382 Exclusive, Channel 2 Display i = 'Emergency Services' Calling Party Number i = 0x0083, '911' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0x80, '12123945600' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Redirecting Number i = 0x82, '1002' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Oct 26 20:07:59.913: ISDN Se0/1:15 Q931: extract_redirect_orig_called_ie: IE type redirecting num 1002 reason 2 cnt -1 plan 0 type 0 pres 0 Oct 26 20:07:59.921: ISDN Se0/0:15 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0x12 is 0x0 0x0, Calling num 911 Oct 26 20:07:59.921: ISDN Se0/0:15 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0x12 is 0x0 0x0, Called num 2123945600 Oct 26 20:07:59.921: ISDN Se0/1:15 Q931: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x8004 Channel ID i = 0xA98382 Exclusive, Channel 2 *3rd Leg* Oct 26 20:07:59.921: ISDN Se0/0:15 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x01CA Sending Complete Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Display i = 'Emergency Services' Calling Party Number i = 0x0083, '911' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0x80, '2123945600' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Oct 26 20:08:00.001: ISDN Se0/0:15 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x81CA Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] pstn-wan not passing RDNIS - solved
Dear all, The issue was quite simple in the end – the PSTN int ser 0/0:15 needed to have the cmd isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number I am not sure why this is not in the initial IPExperts config for lab for the PSTN WAN router. Ah well – all’s well……. Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-HDV and RSVP
I have a Cisco 2651 router (BR1) with an nm-hdv and 2 pvdm12 installed. I've used it for CFB and MTP for transcoding, however the CLI config is different than my other 2651 router(HQ) which has a NM-HD-2VE. Is there a way to configure an RSVP MTP using the NM-HDV or does this require an enhanced HDV as the call amanger 7 interface only offer the possibility of enhanced IOS MTP. If this is the case then I guess I need to buy a module that supports enhanced IOS features - what are the differences in anutshell between a nm hd-2ve and an nm-hdv2 best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] b-acd on CME
Problem solved, for those that had looked at the issue or may face a similar one in the future: the b-cad application was installed and working fine as shown by creating a pots dial-peer and poiting directly at the application. The problem was when I used the loopback interface either from external or internal. I finally traced the issue to a bit of config left over from a previous exercise - the ras port for registration to the HQ GK was set at 1820, this prevents the loopback from working. Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] b-acd on CME
Any hints on how to get this working. I have it all installed and working from PSTN (not the method in the lab book). Basically because it wouldn’t work I created a pots dial peer for the incoming ivr number (3500) and pointed it to the service aa – all works as expected for both aa and aa-drop. However the internal phones don’t seem to be able to access the aa. I believe this is down to the fact that the dialpeer loopback through the loopback interface does not seem to be working, in the debug I can see that it matches the outgoing dial peer correctly but it never seems to loop back in and match the incoming dialpeer and send it to the application. I separated the outgoing and incoming dial peer functions to separate dial peers to prove this. I’ve reloaded the router and ensured that h323 to h323 is enabled What am I missing Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] b-acd on CME
Here is the config and the results of various sh commands HERE IS THE SHOW CALL APPLICATION SESSION Session ID 6 App: queue Type: Service Url: flash:cme-b-acd-2.1.2.3/app-b-acd-2.1.2.3.tcl here is stopping the session and loading BR2-RTR(config-dial-peer)#do call application session stop id 6 Stopping session BR2-RTR(config-dial-peer)# BR2-RTR(config-dial-peer)# Aug 12 01:16:50.550: %IVR-6-APP_INFO: TCL B-ACD: B-ACD Service Terminated BR2-RTR(config-dial-peer)# BR2-RTR(config-dial-peer)#do call appli voice load aa BR2-RTR(config-dial-peer)# Aug 12 01:17:09.946: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_ifs_cb: hifs ifs file read succeeded. size=37673, url=flash:cme-b-acd-2.1.2.3/app-b-acd-aa-2.1.2.3.tcl Aug 12 01:17:09.946: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x491843D0 Aug 12 01:17:09.946: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x491843D0 BR2-RTR(config-dial-peer)#do call appli voice load aa-drop BR2-RTR(config-dial-peer)# Aug 12 01:17:18.474: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_ifs_cb: hifs ifs file read succeeded. size=37673, url=flash:cme-b-acd-2.1.2.3/app-b-acd-aa-2.1.2.3.tcl Aug 12 01:17:18.474: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x49183D74 Aug 12 01:17:18.474: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x49183D74 BR2-RTR(config-dial-peer)# here is the sh vers Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVENTERPRISEK9_IVS-M), Version 12.4(24)T3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 23-Mar-10 06:43 by prod_rel_team ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(13r)T11, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) BR2-RTR uptime is 16 hours, 18 minutes System returned to ROM by reload at 10:58:29 CET Thu Aug 11 2011 System restarted at 11:00:10 CET Thu Aug 11 2011 System image file is flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-24.T3.bin Cisco 2811 (revision 53.50) with 419840K/104448K bytes of memory. Processor board ID FCZ140972K1 6 FastEthernet interfaces 7 Serial interfaces 1 Serial(sync/async) interface 1 terminal line 1 Channelized/Clear E1/PRI port 1 Virtual Private Network (VPN) Module 1 cisco service engine(s) DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity enabled. 239K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 126000K bytes of ATA CompactFlash (Read/Write) Configuration register is 0x2102 Here is the sh ip int br BR2-RTR(config-dial-peer)#do sh ip int br Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol FastEthernet0/0unassigned YES NVRAM up up FastEthernet0/0.20010.10.102.1 YES NVRAM up up FastEthernet0/0.40010.10.202.1 YES NVRAM up up FastEthernet0/1unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down FastEthernet0/2/0 unassigned YES unset up down FastEthernet0/2/1 unassigned YES unset up down FastEthernet0/2/2 unassigned YES unset up down FastEthernet0/2/3 unassigned YES unset up down Serial0/0/0unassigned YES NVRAM up up Serial0/0/0.1 10.10.112.2 YES NVRAM up up Serial0/1/0:0 unassigned YES unset down down Serial0/1/0:1 unassigned YES unset down down Serial0/1/0:2 unassigned YES unset down down Serial0/1/0:3 unassigned YES unset down down Serial0/1/0:4 unassigned YES unset down down Serial0/1/0:5 unassigned YES unset down down Serial0/1/0:15 unassigned YES NVRAM up up Service-Engine1/0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down Vlan1 unassigned YES NVRAM up down Loopback0 10.10.110.3 YES NVRAM up up Here is the sh dial-peer voice summary BR2-RTR#sh dial-p voice sum dial-peer hunt 0 ADPRE PASS OUT TAGTYPE MIN OPER PREFIXDEST-PATTERN FER THRU SESS-TARGET STAT PORT 3210 voip up up 3210 0 syst loopback:rtp 999pots up up 9990 up 0/1/0:15 100pots up up0 down 15 voip up up [15]...$ 0 syst ipv4:10.10.210.13 900pots up up 00900T 0 up 0/1/0:15 3000 voip up up0 syst 16 voip up up [15]...$ 1 syst ipv4:10.10.210.12 8 pots up up 9[2-9]... 0 up 0/1/0:15 20001 pots up up 3001$ 0 50/0/1 20002 pots up up 3002$ 0 50/0/2 20003 pots up up 53... 0 50/0/5 40001 voip up up 3005 0 syst ipv4: 10.10.202.51:50 220pots up up0 down 219pots up up0 down 223voip up up
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - Problem solved,
Larry, my error was really basic - although I have been in the video space for many years - this is my first foray into the world of voice and Cisco. Basically when configuring the mgcp gateway in cucm web page I added the 2651xm router as 26XX, I then added the AIM voice 30 (2 subunits) to slot 0 and added my vwic 2mft e1 card to subunit 1 (subunit 0 is occupied by my serial port). Upon saving, this presents you with 2 ports to configure 0/0 and 0/1 - this is where my ignorance led me astray - I assumed that these ports represented the 2 ports of my E1 card, as I had only the first port connected I configured this for use by my gateway - which of course failed. George very quickly pointed out that these ports do not refer to ports 1 and 2 of my vwic card but to the serial port (0/0) and the E1 port (0/1). Once this was done it all worked as expected (I had the rest of the config correct). I hope my stupidity can help someone else, however it was not all wasted as I learnt a hell of lot about collecting and analysing debugs and traces. Steve On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Larry Powers larry.s.pow...@gmail.comwrote: I have been trying to follow the many posts regarding this issue. I look forward to Steven sharing what resolved the issue because I have some of the same inventory in my lab and don't want to repeat the problem. I've been troubleshooting for a long time and have had many occasions where all it took to resolve an issue was a fresh set of eyes! I have been on both sides of that exchange many times. Good luck with the lab and your studies. Larry On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: can you share the configuration error? On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:59 AM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.comwrote: Dear all just to let you know that I was helped by George in webex session and he found a configuration error in the my CUCM and solved the issue. Many thanks to all who offered advice. Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required
Dear all, I posted this a couple of days ago and have tried all of the suggestions and many more from trawling the websites and still I cannot pinpoint the issue. In brief, this is part of the IPExpets vol1 ex 4 I have a vwic-2mft-e1 in my 2651 running (C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9_IVS-M), Version 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) sh ccm shows that the MGCP gateway is registered, however it does not show as registered in the CUCM 7.02 interface sh isdn stat - shows no problem sh controller E1 shows no recent issues for line code, path code or slips sh network-clocks shows the E1 0/1 as priority 1 the E1 clock source is set to line (with the PSTN-WAN switch set to internal) Does anyone know how to configure a 2651xm for MGCP using E1 card The ccie voice that sold me the equipment assured me all would work - (Unfortunately for me he is now travelling in remote parts and uncontactable). I have his config and mine is the same, however I do not have the CUCM 7 that he used - are there any advanced parameters in CUCM 7 needed to make this work? Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required
Thanks petter for the suugestions, I had tried them before to no avail but tried again anyway. The 2651xm still shows as unregistered in the CUCM interface - by the way I also have a 2811 and that shows as resisterd and verified working as expected. Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required
Hi, thanks for the suggestions - I have done all of these to no avail. There is no firewall or ACL between the router and the CUCM - this is a lab network. I have a 2811 that is correctly registered and working. The 2651 is on the latest IOS available, the MGCP is the only protocol running on the gateway. Best regards, Steve On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mxwrote: Hello You can try reload a CCM?do you have any firewalls?or ACL?do you try the upgraded IOS Gateways?exist domain in Gateway or correctly hostname?do you try no mgcp ;mgcp?do you try mgcp bind to correct address?do you have only protocols mgcp in gateway or have sip,h323 in same time? De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] En nombre de steven moran [ smoran...@gmail.com] Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de julio de 2011 12:52 a.m. Para: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Asunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required Dear all, I posted this a couple of days ago and have tried all of the suggestions and many more from trawling the websites and still I cannot pinpoint the issue. In brief, this is part of the IPExpets vol1 ex 4 I have a vwic-2mft-e1 in my 2651 running (C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9_IVS-M), Version 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) sh ccm shows that the MGCP gateway is registered, however it does not show as registered in the CUCM 7.02 interface sh isdn stat - shows no problem sh controller E1 shows no recent issues for line code, path code or slips sh network-clocks shows the E1 0/1 as priority 1 the E1 clock source is set to line (with the PSTN-WAN switch set to internal) Does anyone know how to configure a 2651xm for MGCP using E1 card The ccie voice that sold me the equipment assured me all would work - (Unfortunately for me he is now travelling in remote parts and uncontactable). I have his config and mine is the same, however I do not have the CUCM 7 that he used - are there any advanced parameters in CUCM 7 needed to make this work? Best regards, Steve La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required
Yes I am, however if is remove the mgcp bind control/media source interface Loopabck 0 command and restrat mgcp - I see that ip address in the CUCM interface changes as expected to the nearest interface - serial int 10.10.111.2 but the device still shows as unregistered whereas the sh ccm shows it as registered. -this status persistes even if I restart the ris data collextor and CM service Best regards, Steve On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:09 PM, amit batra batraji...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Steven are you using loopback as source of MGCP packets ?? -- *From:* steven moran smoran...@gmail.com *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:52 PM *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required Dear all, I posted this a couple of days ago and have tried all of the suggestions and many more from trawling the websites and still I cannot pinpoint the issue. In brief, this is part of the IPExpets vol1 ex 4 I have a vwic-2mft-e1 in my 2651 running (C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9_IVS-M), Version 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) sh ccm shows that the MGCP gateway is registered, however it does not show as registered in the CUCM 7.02 interface sh isdn stat - shows no problem sh controller E1 shows no recent issues for line code, path code or slips sh network-clocks shows the E1 0/1 as priority 1 the E1 clock source is set to line (with the PSTN-WAN switch set to internal) Does anyone know how to configure a 2651xm for MGCP using E1 card The ccie voice that sold me the equipment assured me all would work - (Unfortunately for me he is now travelling in remote parts and uncontactable). I have his config and mine is the same, however I do not have the CUCM 7 that he used - are there any advanced parameters in CUCM 7 needed to make this work? Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required
BR1-RTR(config)# *Jul 19 10:03:38.550: MGCP Packet sent to 10.10.210.12:2427--- NTFY 162794359 *@BR1-RTR.lab.com MGCP 0.1 X: 0 O: --- *Jul 19 10:03:38.554: MGCP Packet received from 10.10.210.12:2427--- 200 162794359 --- On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mxwrote: You can try a debug mgcp packect o anything? De: steven moran [smoran...@gmail.com] Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de julio de 2011 02:58 a.m. Para: Santiago Figueroa; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Asunto: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required Hi, thanks for the suggestions - I have done all of these to no avail. There is no firewall or ACL between the router and the CUCM - this is a lab network. I have a 2811 that is correctly registered and working. The 2651 is on the latest IOS available, the MGCP is the only protocol running on the gateway. Best regards, Steve On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx mailto:sfigue...@mnet.com.mx wrote: Hello You can try reload a CCM?do you have any firewalls?or ACL?do you try the upgraded IOS Gateways?exist domain in Gateway or correctly hostname?do you try no mgcp ;mgcp?do you try mgcp bind to correct address?do you have only protocols mgcp in gateway or have sip,h323 in same time? De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] En nombre de steven moran [ smoran...@gmail.commailto:smoran...@gmail.com] Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de julio de 2011 12:52 a.m. Para: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Asunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required Dear all, I posted this a couple of days ago and have tried all of the suggestions and many more from trawling the websites and still I cannot pinpoint the issue. In brief, this is part of the IPExpets vol1 ex 4 I have a vwic-2mft-e1 in my 2651 running (C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9_IVS-M), Version 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) sh ccm shows that the MGCP gateway is registered, however it does not show as registered in the CUCM 7.02 interface sh isdn stat - shows no problem sh controller E1 shows no recent issues for line code, path code or slips sh network-clocks shows the E1 0/1 as priority 1 the E1 clock source is set to line (with the PSTN-WAN switch set to internal) Does anyone know how to configure a 2651xm for MGCP using E1 card The ccie voice that sold me the equipment assured me all would work - (Unfortunately for me he is now travelling in remote parts and uncontactable). I have his config and mine is the same, however I do not have the CUCM 7 that he used - are there any advanced parameters in CUCM 7 needed to make this work? Best regards, Steve La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required
Also please note that in the sh ccm at the end it does not show any packets recieved, where as the 2811 does. I shut down the sub on 10.10.210.13 to simply things Steve BR1-RTR(config)#do sh ccm MGCP Domain Name: BR1-RTR.lab.com PriorityStatus Host Primary Down 10.10.210.13 First BackupRegistered 10.10.210.12 Second Backup None Current active Call Manager:10.10.210.12 Backhaul/Redundant link port: 2428 Failover Interval: 30 seconds Keepalive Interval: 15 seconds Last keepalive sent:20:04:53 AEST Jul 19 2011 (elapsed time: 00:00:05) Last MGCP traffic time: 20:04:53 AEST Jul 19 2011 (elapsed time: 00:00:05) Last failover time: 20:02:38 AEST Jul 19 2011 from (10.10.210.13) Last switchback time: 19:49:17 AEST Jul 19 2011 from (10.10.210.12) Switchback mode:Immediate MGCP Fallback mode: Not Selected Last MGCP Fallback start time: None Last MGCP Fallback end time:None MGCP Download Tones:Disabled TFTP retry count to shut Ports: 2 Backhaul Link info: Link Protocol: TCP Remote Port Number: 2428 Remote IP Address: 10.10.210.12 Current Link State: OPEN Statistics: Packets recvd: 0 Recv failures: 0 Packets xmitted: 0 Xmit failures: 0 PRI Ports being backhauled: Slot 0, port 1 FAX mode: cisco Configuration Error History: On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:21 PM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: BR1-RTR(config)# *Jul 19 10:03:38.550: MGCP Packet sent to 10.10.210.12:2427--- NTFY 162794359 *@BR1-RTR.lab.com MGCP 0.1 X: 0 O: --- *Jul 19 10:03:38.554: MGCP Packet received from 10.10.210.12:2427--- 200 162794359 --- On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx wrote: You can try a debug mgcp packect o anything? De: steven moran [smoran...@gmail.com] Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de julio de 2011 02:58 a.m. Para: Santiago Figueroa; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Asunto: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required Hi, thanks for the suggestions - I have done all of these to no avail. There is no firewall or ACL between the router and the CUCM - this is a lab network. I have a 2811 that is correctly registered and working. The 2651 is on the latest IOS available, the MGCP is the only protocol running on the gateway. Best regards, Steve On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx mailto:sfigue...@mnet.com.mx wrote: Hello You can try reload a CCM?do you have any firewalls?or ACL?do you try the upgraded IOS Gateways?exist domain in Gateway or correctly hostname?do you try no mgcp ;mgcp?do you try mgcp bind to correct address?do you have only protocols mgcp in gateway or have sip,h323 in same time? De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] En nombre de steven moran [ smoran...@gmail.commailto:smoran...@gmail.com] Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de julio de 2011 12:52 a.m. Para: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Asunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required Dear all, I posted this a couple of days ago and have tried all of the suggestions and many more from trawling the websites and still I cannot pinpoint the issue. In brief, this is part of the IPExpets vol1 ex 4 I have a vwic-2mft-e1 in my 2651 running (C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9_IVS-M), Version 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) sh ccm shows that the MGCP gateway is registered, however it does not show as registered in the CUCM 7.02 interface sh isdn stat - shows no problem sh controller E1 shows no recent issues for line code, path code or slips sh network-clocks shows the E1 0/1 as priority 1 the E1 clock source is set to line (with the PSTN-WAN switch set to internal) Does anyone know how to configure a 2651xm for MGCP using E1 card The ccie voice that sold me the equipment assured me all would work - (Unfortunately for me he is now travelling in remote parts and uncontactable). I have his config and mine is the same, however I do not have the CUCM 7 that he used - are there any advanced parameters in CUCM 7 needed to make this work? Best regards, Steve La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required
Would you know why the MGCP Packet debug shows the commuication going to port 2427 whereas the sh ccm specifies it to use port 2428 Steve On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:21 PM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: BR1-RTR(config)# *Jul 19 10:03:38.550: MGCP Packet sent to 10.10.210.12:2427--- NTFY 162794359 *@BR1-RTR.lab.com MGCP 0.1 X: 0 O: --- *Jul 19 10:03:38.554: MGCP Packet received from 10.10.210.12:2427--- 200 162794359 --- On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx wrote: You can try a debug mgcp packect o anything? De: steven moran [smoran...@gmail.com] Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de julio de 2011 02:58 a.m. Para: Santiago Figueroa; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Asunto: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required Hi, thanks for the suggestions - I have done all of these to no avail. There is no firewall or ACL between the router and the CUCM - this is a lab network. I have a 2811 that is correctly registered and working. The 2651 is on the latest IOS available, the MGCP is the only protocol running on the gateway. Best regards, Steve On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx mailto:sfigue...@mnet.com.mx wrote: Hello You can try reload a CCM?do you have any firewalls?or ACL?do you try the upgraded IOS Gateways?exist domain in Gateway or correctly hostname?do you try no mgcp ;mgcp?do you try mgcp bind to correct address?do you have only protocols mgcp in gateway or have sip,h323 in same time? De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] En nombre de steven moran [ smoran...@gmail.commailto:smoran...@gmail.com] Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de julio de 2011 12:52 a.m. Para: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Asunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - help required Dear all, I posted this a couple of days ago and have tried all of the suggestions and many more from trawling the websites and still I cannot pinpoint the issue. In brief, this is part of the IPExpets vol1 ex 4 I have a vwic-2mft-e1 in my 2651 running (C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9_IVS-M), Version 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) sh ccm shows that the MGCP gateway is registered, however it does not show as registered in the CUCM 7.02 interface sh isdn stat - shows no problem sh controller E1 shows no recent issues for line code, path code or slips sh network-clocks shows the E1 0/1 as priority 1 the E1 clock source is set to line (with the PSTN-WAN switch set to internal) Does anyone know how to configure a 2651xm for MGCP using E1 card The ccie voice that sold me the equipment assured me all would work - (Unfortunately for me he is now travelling in remote parts and uncontactable). I have his config and mine is the same, however I do not have the CUCM 7 that he used - are there any advanced parameters in CUCM 7 needed to make this work? Best regards, Steve La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2651xm and MGCP gateway - Problem solved,
Dear all just to let you know that I was helped by George in webex session and he found a configuration error in the my CUCM and solved the issue. Many thanks to all who offered advice. Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind)
Dear all, I am not sure what is going on here, I welcome all suggestions I have rebuilt a new Pub and Sub environment (10.10.210.12 and 13) I have reloaded the router without the controller config and triple checked the config and built all of the ISDN connectivity again. Here is what is happening pri-group timeslots 1-6,16 isdn stat shows the L2 TEI as MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED when I add the service mgcp to the isdn timeslots 1-6,16 the TEI losses L2 and status becomes TEI_ASSIGNED I add the isdn bind-l3 ccm command to int ser 0/1:15 and shut no shut the int. L2 status is still TEI_ASSIGNED I do a no isdn bind-l3 ccm The L2 status becomes MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED I can then issue the isdn bind-l3 ccm command and the status stays MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED as long as I do not reload the router or restart the ser 0/1:15 interface - if I do it becomes TEI_ASSIGNED. With regards to the registtration on the Call Manager i I remove the mgcp bind control/media source interface loopback 0 the gateway registers to the call manager using the BR1 serial interface - 10.10.11.2 When I put the commands back and restart MGCP - the gateway shows as unregistered and uses the 10.10.110.2 address. I have also followed Ashraf suggestion and in the mgcp clusterwide service parameters issued the command S0/ds...@br1-rtr.lab.com= 0011 to diasble the unused B1 channels At the end of the day when I make a call from HQ to 916178632683 nothing shows up on the isdn q931 debug - I feel that this is maybe due to the isdn bind-l3 ccm not being implemented correctly. The DNA shows that number is being correctly routed to the gateway. By the way I put in a voice dial peer from BR2 for this number and it does ring on the phone - so my PSTN WAN router and phone seem to be all OK. Once again here is my most recent config and sh status MGCP Domain Name: BR1-RTR.lab.com PriorityStatus Host Primary Registered 10.10.210.13 First BackupBackup Ready 10.10.210.12 Second Backup None Current active Call Manager:10.10.210.13 Backhaul/Redundant link port: 2428 Failover Interval: 30 seconds Keepalive Interval: 15 seconds Last keepalive sent:09:59:46 AEST Jul 19 2011 (elapsed time: 00:00:08) Last MGCP traffic time: 09:59:46 AEST Jul 19 2011 (elapsed time: 00:00:08) Last failover time: None Last switchback time: None Switchback mode:Immediate MGCP Fallback mode: Not Selected Last MGCP Fallback start time: None Last MGCP Fallback end time:None MGCP Download Tones:Disabled TFTP retry count to shut Ports: 2 Backhaul Link info: Link Protocol: TCP Remote Port Number: 2428 Remote IP Address: 10.10.210.13 Current Link State: OPEN Statistics: Packets recvd: 0 Recv failures: 0 Packets xmitted: 0 Xmit failures: 0 PRI Ports being backhauled: Slot 0, port 1 FAX mode: cisco Configuration Error History: BR1-RTR(config)#do sh isdn stat Global ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5 %Q.931 is backhauled to CCM MANAGER 0x0003 on DSL 0. Layer 3 output may not apply ISDN Serial0/1:15 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5 L2 Protocol = Q.921 0x L3 Protocol(s) = CCM MANAGER 0x0003 Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 0, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0 The Free Channel Mask: 0x803F Number of L2 Discards = 0, L2 Session ID = 3 Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0 Config Current configuration : 2725 bytes ! ! No configuration change since last restart ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname BR1-RTR ! boot-start-marker boot system flash:c2600-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-15.T14.bin boot-end-marker ! enable secret 5 $1$LaQO$FR59LroSkjvjxYkzDsZ1N/ ! no aaa new-model clock timezone AEST 9 clock summer-time AEST recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00 network-clock-participate wic 1 network-clock-select 1 E1 0/1 voice-card 0 dspfarm no local-bypass ! ip cef ! ! ! ! ip domain name lab.com ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! isdn switch-type primary-net5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! ! ! controller E1 0/1 pri-group timeslots 1-6,16 service mgcp ! controller E1 0/2 shutdown ! ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 description management ip address ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/0.130 description data vlan to switch encapsulation dot1Q 130 native ip address 10.10.101.1
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP and H323 Gateway issue/riddle
Dear all, over the last few days I've done everything I can think of to get the MGCP gateway working on BR1 - cisco 2651xm router with no luck whatsoever. Coincidentally I had a similar issue with getting the H.323 gateway workimg on the BR2 router - Cisco 2811. I reloaded both routers, re-imaged them and checked the config a hundred times and implemented all the advice I got - all to no avail. This morning I configured the MGCP gateway on BR2 - 2811 and the H.323 on the BR1 2651 and it all worked first time (this took me less than 15 minutes to config). I am not happy that it does not seem to work the other way around and would like to have got to the bottom of the issue, so if anyone has any suggestions please let me know. At least I know that all of my config was ok and I learnt a lot about MGCP and H.323 gateways in the process. Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind)
Bill, thanks for the response, the idea from the IPExperts is to use the ccm-manager mgcp command and specify a fractional E1 - all of the commands for the gateway are done on the router (control/media bind commands) and the define call-agent etc. I too have no issues using the 2811 router - all of my issues are when using the 2651xm with c2600-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-15.T14.bin. I applied the advanced command on advice to busy out the bchannels not being alocated. Best regards, Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: CUCM7 and VMWare esxi 4.1 packet loss
I am running the cucm 7.02 pub and sub on vmware esxi 4.1 host (dual quad core, 16 gb ram) and if I ping the server from the router (1000 pings at 1000 bytes) I loose 1 in every six packets repeatedly - ie 5 success, 1 loss in a pattern. All the posts I can find about this are on the CDP duplex mismatch error, which of course I get but ignore and switch off with no cdp when it bothers me. However there is nothing on data loss. if I ping the esxi vswitch management interface I get no loss at all, so it seems it is the CUCM servers that are the issue. They are reporting that they are set to 100 Full and do not allow me to set network nic eth0 auto en I have tried setting all the path (server, vswitch and 3550 to 100 Full) with no improvement. Finally I tried moving the servers to a seperate vswitch (away from the management interface) that is connected to the cisco 3550 L3 switch using 2 ports set up as etherchannel. the esxi is set up to load balance based in ip hash. Still no improvement with 1 in 6 pings lost. interface Port-channel1 switchport access vlan 30 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 30 switchport mode trunk switchport nonegotiate spanning-tree portfast trunk interface FastEthernet0/11 description SERVER LAN switchport access vlan 30 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 30 switchport mode trunk switchport nonegotiate channel-group 1 mode on spanning-tree portfast trunk ! interface FastEthernet0/12 description SERVER LAN switchport access vlan 30 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 30 switchport mode trunk switchport nonegotiate channel-group 1 mode on spanning-tree portfast trunk Best regards. Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind)
No matter what I do I cannot get the MGCP gateway to show as registered in CUCM 7.02. I think I have configured up the gateway in CUCM correctly. I cut and paste the router name from the sh ccm-m and the card is configured in slot 0 (aim-voice-30 (2 subunits) subunit 1 vwic-2mft-E1 0/0. After all the config is done I apply the no mgcp/mgcp command. I can see from the DNA that the dialled number is correctly routed to the MGCP gateway but a sh isdn q931 shows no output - ie the call never gets there. I aslo tried restarting the ris data collector and CM service on both pub and Sub to see if this was just mis represented in the GUI. When I reload the router the L2 isdn status goes back to TEI assigned until I remove the isdn bind-l3 from the loopback restart mgcp and then add it back in again. Here is the sh run Current configuration : 2717 bytes ! ! No configuration change since last restart ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname BR1-RTR ! boot-start-marker boot system flash:c2600-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-15.T14.bin boot-end-marker ! enable secret 5 $1$LaQO$FR59LroSkjvjxYkzDsZ1N/ ! no aaa new-model clock timezone AEST 9 clock summer-time AEST recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00 network-clock-participate wic 1 network-clock-select 1 E1 0/1 voice-card 0 dspfarm no local-bypass ! ip cef ! ! ! ! ip domain name smlab.com ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! isdn switch-type primary-net5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! ! ! controller E1 0/1 pri-group timeslots 1-6,16 service mgcp ! controller E1 0/2 ! ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 description management ip address ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/0.130 description data vlan to switch encapsulation dot1Q 130 native ip address 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 description br1 voice vlan encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.111.2 255.255.255.0 snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/1:15 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! router eigrp 1 network 10.0.0.0 no auto-summary ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ! no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! voice-port 0/1:15 ! ccm-manager switchback immediate ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10 ccm-manager mgcp ! mgcp mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 service-type mgcp version 0.1 mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band mgcp bind control source-interface Loopback0 mgcp bind media source-interface Loopback0 ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet line vty 5 15 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet ! ntp clock-period 17207966 ntp server 10.10.100.2 ! end Here is the Sh inv NAME: 2651XM chassis, DESCR: 2651XM chassis , V, SN: FTX1012A2UU NAME: WAN Interface Card - Serial (1T) on Slot 0 Subslot 0, DESCR: WAN Interface Card - Serial (1T) PID: WIC-1T= , VID: 1.0, SN: 30895396 NAME: Two port E1 voice interface daughtercard on Slot 0 Subslot 1, DESCR: Two port E1 voice interface daughtercard PID: VWIC-2MFT-E1= , VID: 1.0, SN: 33273411 NAME: Voice AIM with 4 DSPs 0, DESCR: Voice AIM with 4 DSPs PID: 59-03 , VID: 1.0, SN: JAE084503SR Here is the sh isdn stat BR1-RTR(config)#do sh isdn stat Global ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5 %Q.931 is backhauled to CCM MANAGER 0x0003 on DSL 0. Layer 3 output may not apply ISDN Serial0/1:15 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5 L2 Protocol = Q.921 0x L3 Protocol(s) = CCM MANAGER 0x0003 Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 0, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0 The Free Channel Mask: 0x803F Number of L2 Discards = 0, L2 Session ID = 4 and sh ccm-manager BR1-RTR(config)#do sh ccm-m MGCP Domain Name: BR1-RTR.smlab.com http://br1-rtr.smlab.com/ PriorityStatus Host Primary Registered 10.10.210.11 First Backup
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: CUCM7 and VMWare esxi 4.1 packet loss
Ki, thanks for the explantion as you can see from my other post regarding MGCP gateway - I was wondering whether my registration problem was a connectivity issue. I am following up on the suggestions on the mgcp post and will update soon. Best regards, Steve On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Steven, This is a normal behavior. It is cause by some sort of DOS protection in place. If you ping from windows, you won't see this symptom. Basically from Linux or iOS, they fire ping much more rapidly than windows. It happens on physical server as well. Sent from my iPhone Pls pardon my fat fingers. On Jul 17, 2011, at 3:44 PM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: I am running the cucm 7.02 pub and sub on vmware esxi 4.1 host (dual quad core, 16 gb ram) and if I ping the server from the router (1000 pings at 1000 bytes) I loose 1 in every six packets repeatedly - ie 5 success, 1 loss in a pattern. All the posts I can find about this are on the CDP duplex mismatch error, which of course I get but ignore and switch off with no cdp when it bothers me. However there is nothing on data loss. if I ping the esxi vswitch management interface I get no loss at all, so it seems it is the CUCM servers that are the issue. They are reporting that they are set to 100 Full and do not allow me to set network nic eth0 auto en I have tried setting all the path (server, vswitch and 3550 to 100 Full) with no improvement. Finally I tried moving the servers to a seperate vswitch (away from the management interface) that is connected to the cisco 3550 L3 switch using 2 ports set up as etherchannel. the esxi is set up to load balance based in ip hash. Still no improvement with 1 in 6 pings lost. interface Port-channel1 switchport access vlan 30 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 30 switchport mode trunk switchport nonegotiate spanning-tree portfast trunk interface FastEthernet0/11 description SERVER LAN switchport access vlan 30 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 30 switchport mode trunk switchport nonegotiate channel-group 1 mode on spanning-tree portfast trunk ! interface FastEthernet0/12 description SERVER LAN switchport access vlan 30 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 30 switchport mode trunk switchport nonegotiate channel-group 1 mode on spanning-tree portfast trunk Best regards. Steve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] GREETINGS...
Hello all - I've been following the Voice-OSL now for many months as I've been passively studying for the Voice Lab since successfully passing my written-exam back in March 2010. I've been sort of sitting on the sidelines up till now as I'm now officially hitting the road with focused studies! I've slated my lab sitting for May 10th at RTP and so I'm excited to be coming on the field so to speak. I've started a blog at www.jurassiclabs.net and I invite you to take a look over the next several weeks as I will try to make relevant posts about my studies / progress. I've learned a lot of pointers from some of you (Matthew Berry) and appreciate your posts as both motivation and guidance! Thanks to you guys! You can also follow me on Twitter at @stevenjuras . I'm not a big social media nut so you won't see me post time wasting info about what I ordered for lunch. It's my desire and goal to put these new tools to professional use and join the community. Steven Juras - CCNP, CCDP, CCVP www.jurassiclabs.net @stevenjuras Thomasville, Georgia ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE HARDWARE
Thanks for the update Erik. I have discovered another solution which might work. It seems their is a hacked platform disk out their on the Internet. I was able to install on VMWare Microsoft 2003 Server but have not tried the installation of UCCX7. Will update when I try. I'm not really sure if it is appropriate for me to post the link. So I'm just going to give you key words to search for in google. Search for Operating_System_Software_that_Enables_and_Powers_Cisco_Unified_ and you should be able to find it. Thanks, Steven On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Erik Goppel egop...@gmail.com wrote: Steven, There is a very easy way to make the 2k3 os work in vmware. You have to install the os on a real MCS-server first, this is important. As soon as you have done that, you can use vmware converter (it is free) to make it virtual. As soon as you have virtualized the server, and you start it up in vmware, it will give you a message that you need to activate the OS license. This because the hardware has been changed to much, activate the server with the key provided on the OS disk you received. Reboot the server, and you are all fine. i have done this about 20+ times, and no problems whatsoever. Even if you have an AMD proc for your VMware machine, this will give you no problems for UCCX7 , for UCM ofcourse it will. Good luck, Erik On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote: It's true. UCM7 will not install on AMD machines running VMWare. Someone I spoke with at Cisco said it was not intentional to prevent installing UCM7 on AMD when running VMWare. Perhaps the 7.01 ES release on CCO fixes this? If not, I'm sure a new version is coming. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Chris Kagadis (kagadis.com) Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 6:20 PM To: Erik Goppel Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Sunny Sharma Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE HARDWARE Quick question; Are your servers on Vmware with Intel or AMD? I tried installing this weekend on AMD and had problems. I read a post that said that CUCM (at least) can not currently be installed on WMware/AMD. On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Erik Goppel egop...@gmail.com wrote: Sunny, Besides the HW (which is quite clear), look at building a good VMware machine, and order the UC 7.0 NFR Kit, this includes all the 7.0 material for the v3 blueprint. Currently i have the entire 7.0 launch running in vmware without any problems, so you should be ok there. looking at the licenses provided with the NFR (or in VM moded), for CUCM you will have 3 node licenses and 150 dlu`s, for presence you can run 2 nodes. UCCX 7.0 comes with a staggering 150 premium agent license, outbound and basic email is included in premium. unity connection i am not sure, need to check that. grtz, Erik On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Sunny Sharma su...@sunnysharma.net wrote: hi experts planning to build a ccie voice rack. need help in hardware setup as per new V3 blueprint thanks in advance SS -- Chris Kagadis
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE HARDWARE
I guess I didn't word it correctly, how did you get UCCX working in VMWare is my question? I have the NFR I work for partner. I tried it over the weekend and you can't use the OS provided since it tries to match the hardware configuration. Thanks, Steven Sarte On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Erik Goppel egop...@gmail.com wrote: Steven, I received them by ordering the NFR kit, i am able to do this, because i work for a partner. If you do not work for a partner, you should contact cisco marketplace or your Cisco SE/AM, and ask what other options you have in obtaining this software for study purposes. good luck, Erik On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Steven Sarte steven.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Erick, Can you please provide some input on how you got the UCCX 7.0 and Presence? Thanks, Steven Sarte On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Erik Goppel egop...@gmail.com wrote: Sunny, Besides the HW (which is quite clear), look at building a good VMware machine, and order the UC 7.0 NFR Kit, this includes all the 7.0 material for the v3 blueprint. Currently i have the entire 7.0 launch running in vmware without any problems, so you should be ok there. looking at the licenses provided with the NFR (or in VM moded), for CUCM you will have 3 node licenses and 150 dlu`s, for presence you can run 2 nodes. UCCX 7.0 comes with a staggering 150 premium agent license, outbound and basic email is included in premium. unity connection i am not sure, need to check that. grtz, Erik On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Sunny Sharma su...@sunnysharma.net wrote: hi experts planning to build a ccie voice rack. need help in hardware setup as per new V3 blueprint thanks in advance SS
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE HARDWARE
Erick, Can you please provide some input on how you got the UCCX 7.0 and Presence? Thanks, Steven Sarte On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Erik Goppel egop...@gmail.com wrote: Sunny, Besides the HW (which is quite clear), look at building a good VMware machine, and order the UC 7.0 NFR Kit, this includes all the 7.0 material for the v3 blueprint. Currently i have the entire 7.0 launch running in vmware without any problems, so you should be ok there. looking at the licenses provided with the NFR (or in VM moded), for CUCM you will have 3 node licenses and 150 dlu`s, for presence you can run 2 nodes. UCCX 7.0 comes with a staggering 150 premium agent license, outbound and basic email is included in premium. unity connection i am not sure, need to check that. grtz, Erik On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Sunny Sharma su...@sunnysharma.net wrote: hi experts planning to build a ccie voice rack. need help in hardware setup as per new V3 blueprint thanks in advance SS
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctor Labs CCIE Voice EzVPN
I will be attempting my first try next Saturday using the EzVPN connection. Will Internet access be available? Thanks, Steven
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 0 Conf max sessions
Hi, May I know for the CCIE Voice Lab which SRND version is used? Cheers From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:20:11 -0400CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 0 Conf max sessionsThank you Mike. On Jul 9, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Mike Stevenson wrote: As was mentioned.. a PVDM2-16 contains 1 DSP, when a DSP is configured as a Conference Bridge, the rtr loads the required firmware into the DSP. A DSP that has been configured as a Conference Bridge, cannot also be used as a transcoder or terminate PSTN calls. from the config profile 1 is conf-b, profile 2 is xcoder. both cannot run on the same DSP, for this config to work you would either require a PVDM2-32 (this contains 2 DSPs) or greater, or or the existing PVDM2-16, and another PVDM2-(8 or 16 or more) PVDM2-8 = .5 DSP PVDM2-16 = 1 DSP PVDM2-32 = 2 DSP etc.. This is all covered in the CCM SRND. Cheers On 10/07/2008, at 12:56 PM, Michael Thompson wrote: Onur, just curious where this ended up. On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Jonathan Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Post a show diag, I think your DSPs may be hosed... prob badfirmware but this is a WAGJonathan On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Onur Tufekci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And this is if I do it other way around: router2(config-dspfarm-profile)#dspfarm profile 2 router2(config-dspfarm-profile)#shut Disabling profile will disconnect active TRANSCODING calls, do you want to continue ? [yes/no]y router2(config-dspfarm-profile)# router2(config-dspfarm-profile)# router2(config-dspfarm-profile)#dspfarm profile 1 router2(config-dspfarm-profile)#no shut router2(config-dspfarm-profile)#dspfarm profile 2 router2(config-dspfarm-profile)#no shut Enabling profile failed due to insufficient TRANSCODING resources, resources available to support 0 sessions; please modify the configuration and retry router2(config-dspfarm-profile)# On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Onur Tufekci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the configuration and results: router2(config)#do show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 2938 bytes ! ! Last conf iguration change at 15:11:09 UTC Mon Jul 7 2008 ! NVRAM config last updated at 14:49:04 UTC Mon Jul 7 2008 ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec service password-encryption ! hostname router2 ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! card type t1 0 0 no logging console enable secret 5 $1$7cJ4$U9gWuPCv.H1DPdXYIyWJD0 ! no aaa new-model ! resource policy ! network-clock-participate wic 0 ! ! ip cef ! ! no ip domain lookup ! isdn switch-type primary-ni ! voice-card 0 dspfarm dsp services dspfarm ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! controller T1 0/0/0 framing esf linecode b8zs ! controller T1 0/0/1 framing esf linecode b8zs ! ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 duplex full speed 100 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 192.168.2.1 ! interface FastEthernet0 /1 description Management_IP ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0 duplex full speed 100 ! interface Service-Engine1/0 no ip address shutdown ! ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.1 ip route 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.3 ! ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! ! ! sccp local FastEthernet0/0 sccp ccm 192.168.2.1 identifier 1 sccp ! sccp ccm group 1 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate profile 2 register xcoder associate profile 1 register conference ! dspfarm profile 2 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g729r8 maximum sessions 4 associate application SCCP shutdown ! dspfarm profile 1 conference codec g711ulaw codec g729r8 maximum sessions 1 associate application SCCP shutdown ! ! dial-peer voice 1000 voip answer-address 1... destination-pattern 1... session target ipv4:192.168.1.1 codec g711ulaw ! dia l-peer voice 9 pots destination-pattern 9T incoming called-number 14345552... direct-inward-dial ! ! ! telephony-service max-ephones 2 max-dn 2 ip source-address 192.168.2.1 port 2000 auto assign 1 to 2 system message Your current options sdspfarm units 5 sdspfarm tag 1 xcoder sdspfarm tag 2 conference dialplan-pattern 1 14345552... extension-length 4 max-conferences 8 gain -6 call-forward pattern .T web admin system name cisco password cisco dn-webedit time-webedit transfer-system full-consult transfer-pattern .T secondary-dialtone 9 ! ! ephone-dn 1 dual-line number 2001 description 14345552001 name Gil Grissom ! ! router2(config)#dspfarm router2(config)# router2(config)# router2(config)# router2(config)#dspfarm pro 2 router2(config-dspfarm-profile)#no shut router2(config-dspfarm-profile)#dspfarm pro 1 router2(config-dspfarm-profile)#no shut Enabling profile failed due to insufficient CONFERENCING resources, resources available to support 0 sessions; please modify the configuration and retry router2(config-dspfarm-profile)#do
