[ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] crystallization of complex and ...

2011-09-16 Thread alexander . pautsch
Dear Min,

regarding #1 some things come to my mind:

- What is the Kd that you got from the Biacore? And did you make sure that
the sample is concentrated enough (both on gel filtration and in
crystallization) to have a sufficient  amount  in the complex.

- did you use the same buffer systems? Your Kd might be different in
different buffers.

Best

Alex

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Alexander Pautsch 
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH  Co. KG
Dept. Lead Identific. and Optim. Sup. Ge
Tel.: +49 (7351) 54-4683
Fax: +49 (7351) 54-97924 
mailto:alexander.paut...@boehringer-ingelheim.com
mailto:alexander.paut...@boehringer-ingelheim.com 

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH  Co. KG, Sitz: Ingelheim am Rhein;
Registergericht Mainz: HR A 22206; Komplementär Boehringer Ingelheim
Deutschland GmbH; Geschäftsführung: Dr. Engelbert Günster (Vorsitzender),
Ralf Gorniak, Mark Hagmann, Michael Klein, Dr. Martin Wanning; Vorsitzender
des Aufsichtsrates: Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Barner; Sitz: Ingelheim am Rhein;
Registergericht Mainz: HR B 23260

Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich zu behandeln. Sie kann besonderem rechtlichen
Schutz unterliegen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind, senden Sie
bitte diese E-Mail an den Absender zurück, löschen die eingegangene E-Mail
und geben den Inhalt der E-Mail nicht weiter. Jegliche unbefugte Bearbeitung,
Nutzung, Vervielfältigung oder Verbreitung ist verboten. / This e-mail is
confidential and may also be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please reply to sender, delete the e-mail and do not disclose its
contents to any person. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying or
distribution is strictly prohibited.

Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von m
zhang
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2011 04:20
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [ccp4bb] crystallization of complex and ...

 

Dear all,

 

I have two questions:

 

First, I was trying to crystallize a complex of two proteins. Both proteins
has been crystallized before. The two proteins bind to each other based on
Biacore study, but they didn't form a single peak on gel filtration. When I
mixed them at 1:1 ratio, the crystals I got contain only one of the two
proteins. I was suggested to increase the ratio, for example 1.5:1, to
increase the probability of co-crystallization which I will try. But I do
want to hear if there are other possible ways to try. What would you try if
you were in my situation? 

 

Second is about reusing of Ni-NTA resin. According to Qiagen's instruction,
after using fresh Ni-NTA resin, one only needs to wash the used Ni resin
first with 0.5M NaOH, then with your own buffer. After that the resin is
ready to be reused until it needs being recharged. But my question is: Once
immidazole competes with His-tagged protein and binds to Ni-resin, how can
immidazole be rinsed off with the same buffer(usually pH is above 7) one uses
to purify the protein?

 

Thank you for any suggestion or comment.

 

Min



[ccp4bb] Silver staining Coomassie stained gels

2011-09-16 Thread K Singh
Dear All,
Can anyone suggest me a protocol for silver-staining the PAGE that is
already stained with Coomassie.
Kris


Re: [ccp4bb] crystallization of complex and ...

2011-09-16 Thread Enrico Stura

Dear Min,

Regarding the stoichiometry that you should use in crystallizing two  
proteins

that form a complex. I have looked at this question before. See:
Stura, E.A., Graille, M., Taussig, M.J., Sutton, B.J. Gore, M.G.,  
Silverman, G.J., Charbonnier, J.-B. (2001)
Crystallization of macromolecular complexes: Stoichiometric variation  
screening. J. Cryst. Growth 232:580-590.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022024801011721

Briefly: The stoichiometry can, and should, be varied in your screening.

The relative protein solubility of the two individual proteins and the  
solubility of the complex should be
analysed under various potential crystallization conditions. Conditions  
where the complex is less soluble
than the individual ptoteins should be chosen if the complex has a  
tendency to dissociate.


Since both  proteins have been crystallized before you may also use
crystals of both the free forms of the two proteins to stimulate  
nucleation of the complex

The final  composition of the asymmetric unit may include free poteins as
well as the complex.

The paper will give you a lot more methodology to use to obtain crystals  
of the complex, if

such complex really exists, is homegeneous and relatively stable.

Enrico.


On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 04:20:26 +0200, m zhang mzhang...@hotmail.com wrote:



Dear all,
I have two questions:
First, I was trying to crystallize a complex of two proteins. Both  
proteins has been crystallized before. The two proteins bind to each  
other based on Biacore study, but they didn't form a single peak on gel  
filtration. When I mixed them at 1:1 ratio, the crystals I got contain  
only one of the two proteins. I was suggested to increase the ratio, for  
example 1.5:1, to increase the probability of co-crystallization which I  
will try. But I do want to hear if there are other possible ways to try.  
What would you try if you were in my situation?
Second is about reusing of Ni-NTA resin. According to Qiagen's  
instruction, after using fresh Ni-NTA resin, one only needs to wash the  
used Ni resin first with 0.5M NaOH, then with your own buffer. After  
that the resin is ready to be reused until it needs being recharged. But  
my question is: Once immidazole competes with His-tagged protein and  
binds to Ni-resin, how can immidazole be rinsed off with the same  
buffer(usually pH is above 7) one uses to purify the protein?

Thank you for any suggestion or comment.
Min




--
Enrico A. Stura D.Phil. (Oxon) ,Tel: 33 (0)1 69 08 4302 Office
Room 19, Bat.152,   Tel: 33 (0)1 69 08 9449Lab
LTMB, SIMOPRO, IBiTec-S, CE Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette,   FRANCE
http://www-dsv.cea.fr/en/institutes/institute-of-biology-and-technology-saclay-ibitec-s/unites-de-recherche/department-of-molecular-engineering-of-proteins-simopro/molecular-toxinology-and-biotechnology-laboratory-ltmb/crystallogenesis-e.-stura
http://www.chem.gla.ac.uk/protein/mirror/stura/index2.html
e-mail: est...@cea.fr Fax: 33 (0)1 69 08 90 71


Re: [ccp4bb] Why Does Cross-linking Mean Anything?

2011-09-16 Thread R. M. Garavito

Jacob,

One of the problems with glutaraldehyde is the its chemistry is so  
bizarre.  It actually forms quite long transient polymers in  
solution.  You also have to ask yourself why formaldehyde also fixes  
tissues.  This is why glutaraldehyde works so well for tissue fixation  
for EM as opposed to our usual bivalent crosslinkers we use in  
biochemistry experiments.  Check out the old EM literature about  
discussions of glutaraldehyde chemistry.


Moreover, the Schiff's base linkage glutaraldehyde is slowly  
reversible.  You need to reduce it to make it permanent.  I think that  
glutaraldehyde is a very poor choice for a precise bivalent  
crosslinker, but as a broad spectrum crosslinker (hitting lysines and  
a free amino terminii that are different distances apart),  
glutaraldehyde is great.  As it is highly volatile (its unique smell  
tells you you've had the bottle open too long), you can crosslink  
crystals by vapor diffusion in an hour.


So I would be cautious about interpreting any crosslinking results  
using glutaraldehyde, except the obvious (i.e., oligomers may indicate  
the native tertiary state of a protein or complex).


Cheers,

Michael


R. Michael Garavito, Ph.D.
Professor of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
513 Biochemistry Bldg.
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI 48824-1319
Office:  (517) 355-9724 Lab:  (517) 353-9125
FAX:  (517) 353-9334Email:  rmgarav...@gmail.com




On Sep 15, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:


Dear Crystallographers and Biochemists,

cross-linking, say with gluteraldehyde, is an oft-used method of
demonstrating a protein's oligomeric state in solution. I have a
difficulty with this, however: theoretically (and in practice!), one
can tune the amount of cross-linker to get what ever result is
desired, such that any protein with some exposed lysines can be
cross-linked in any oligomeric state. How, then, does one evaluate the
power of this evidence? Maybe one should do a gradient of
gluteraldehyde concentrations, then plot the deviation of the observed
cross-linked oligomerization from a theoretical null hypothesis? Seems
like this could be done, but I have never seen this in the
literature...

Best,

Jacob Keller

--
***
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
cel: 773.608.9185
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
***




Re: [ccp4bb] Mac OSX 10.7 Lion

2011-09-16 Thread Phil Evans
I use my MBP with external screen, keyboard  mouse all the time. The new ones 
are fast,  mine should easily cope with Lion

My question about Lion was because

1. on the one hand as far as I can see Bill Scott only builds latest 
stand-alone Coots (0.7...) for Lion, and these don't work on 10.6 (is this true 
Bill?)

2. on the other hand, I had a report that ccp4mg doesn't work on Lion (is that 
true Stuart?)

and I need both of these (and don't fancy building either myself)

Phil (still on 10.6)


On 11 Sep 2011, at 17:55, Sean Seaver wrote:

 Dear Herbert,
 
 I've come across quite a few people that are using mac books as their main 
 development computer.  This site ( http://usesthis.com/ ) can be an good way 
 to learn about various setups.  A popular trend seems to be using a mac book 
 along with the apple thunderbolt display for more screen real estate.
 
 Take Care,
 
 Sean Seaver
 
 P212121
 http://store.p212121.com/


Re: [ccp4bb] Mac OSX 10.7 Lion

2011-09-16 Thread William G. Scott
Dear Phil (and everyone):

1.  I've now got automated build systems for coot for 10.7.1 and 10.6.8.  I 
just haven't had a chance to get the 10.6.8 one on line.  I'll try to do this 
today.  (Also, the last few haven't build due to a change in the code with 
which the compiler can't cope, but hopefully that will be a thing of the past 
soon.)

2.  Most things build on 10.6.X will run on 10.7.X.  I haven't opened ccp4mg, 
but will give it a try after I wake up.


3.  I've had trouble with stereo on coot with 10.7.1, but, oddly, the problem 
goes away if I have a second monitor.

If you update to 10.7, keep a clone of 10.6 just in case it drives you nuts.  
There are all sorts of perverse changes, and (unlike the reversal in scrolling 
direction) not a lot of over-ride options.

I guess this is a glimpse of the post-Jobs era, albeit one provided from an 
inconvenient vista.

Peace and joy,

Bill


On Sep 16, 2011, at 6:33 AM, William G. Scott wrote:

 Dear Phil (and everyone):
 
 1.  I've now got automated build systems for coot for 10.7.1 and 10.6.8.  I 
 just haven't had a chance to get the 10.6.8 one on line.  I'll try to do this 
 today.  (Also, the last few haven't build due to a change in the code with 
 which the compiler can't cope, but hopefully that will be a thing of the past 
 soon.)
 
 2.  Most things build on 10.6.X will run on 10.7.X.  I haven't opened ccp4mg, 
 but will give it a try after I wake up.
 
 
 3.  I've had trouble with stereo on coot with 10.7.1, but, oddly, the problem 
 goes away if I have a second monitor.
 
 If you update to 10.7, keep a clone of 10.6 just in case it drives you nuts.  
 There are all sorts of perverse changes, and (unlike the reversal in 
 scrolling direction) not a lot of over-ride options.
 
 I guess this is a glimpse of the post-Jobs era, albeit one provided from an 
 inconvenient vista.
 
 Peace and joy,
 
 Bill
 
 
 
 On Sep 16, 2011, at 5:48 AM, Phil Evans wrote:
 
 I use my MBP with external screen, keyboard  mouse all the time. The new 
 ones are fast,  mine should easily cope with Lion
 
 My question about Lion was because
 
 1. on the one hand as far as I can see Bill Scott only builds latest 
 stand-alone Coots (0.7...) for Lion, and these don't work on 10.6 (is this 
 true Bill?)
 
 2. on the other hand, I had a report that ccp4mg doesn't work on Lion (is 
 that true Stuart?)
 
 and I need both of these (and don't fancy building either myself)
 
 Phil (still on 10.6)
 
 
 On 11 Sep 2011, at 17:55, Sean Seaver wrote:
 
 Dear Herbert,
 
 I've come across quite a few people that are using mac books as their main 
 development computer.  This site ( http://usesthis.com/ ) can be an good 
 way to learn about various setups.  A popular trend seems to be using a mac 
 book along with the apple thunderbolt display for more screen real estate.
 
 Take Care,
 
 Sean Seaver
 
 P212121
 http://store.p212121.com/
 


Re: [ccp4bb] crystallization of complex and ...

2011-09-16 Thread Ed Pozharski
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 22:20 -0400, m zhang wrote:
 Second is about reusing of Ni-NTA resin. According to Qiagen's
 instruction, after using fresh Ni-NTA resin, one only needs to wash
 the used Ni resin first with 0.5M NaOH, then with your own buffer.
 After that the resin is ready to be reused until it needs being
 recharged. But my question is: Once immidazole competes with
 His-tagged protein and binds to Ni-resin, how can immidazole be rinsed
 off with the same buffer(usually pH is above 7) one uses to purify the
 protein? 

Imidazole binds much weaker than a his-tag, and thus more of it goes
into the buffer when you wash the column.  In theory, if you wash a
column with protein bound long enough, it will all slowly come off.

-- 
Hurry up before we all come back to our senses!
   Julian, King of Lemurs


Re: [ccp4bb] Silver staining Coomassie stained gels

2011-09-16 Thread Ed Pozharski
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 15:28 +0530, K Singh wrote:
 Dear All,
 Can anyone suggest me a protocol for silver-staining the PAGE that is
 already stained with Coomassie.
 Kris

Just destain it and then use the standard silver-staining protocol.  If
for some reason you want to have both stainings superimposed, take two
pictures and then combine them - it should be easy to do by
superimposing the ladders, just make sure that pictures are of the same
size (maybe tricky if you don't have an imager, but nothing GIMP
couldn't overcome).

-- 
Hurry up before we all come back to our senses!
   Julian, King of Lemurs


[ccp4bb] about alternate conformations

2011-09-16 Thread Ming
Hi,

I was using Refmac from CCP4 to refine a protein's crystal structure. The
methionine has half selenium and half sulfur. I was trying to make alternate
conformations and let refmac do the refinement. But it keeps giving me error
message as follows:


There is an error in the input coordinate file
At least one the chains has 2 residues with the same number
Check above to see error
=== Error: Problem with coordinate file
BFONT COLOR=#FF!--SUMMARY_BEGIN--
 Refmac_5.5.0109:  Problem with coordinate file

And here is my modified pdb file.

HETATM  403  N  AMSE A 129  ***   N
HETATM  404  CA AMSE A 129  ***   C
HETATM  405  CB AMSE A 129  ***   C
HETATM  406  CG AMSE A 129  ***   C
HETATM  407 SE  AMSE A 129  ***  SE
HETATM  408  CE AMSE A 129  ***   C
HETATM  409  C  AMSE A 129  ***   C
HETATM  410  O  AMSE A 129  ***   O
ATOM411  N  BMET A 129  ***   N
ATOM412  CA BMET A 129  ***   C
ATOM413  CB BMET A 129  ***   C
ATOM414  CG BMET A 129  ***   C
ATOM415  SD BMET A 129  ***   S
ATOM416  CE BMET A 129  ***   C
ATOM417  C  BMET A 129  ***   C
ATOM418  O  BMET A 129  ***   O

I already confirmed with pdb that this is the right format for this case.
But refmac doesn't work with it. I wonder if there is any other changes I
should make for refmac?

Thank you,


Ming


[ccp4bb] about alternate conformations

2011-09-16 Thread Ming
Hi all,

I was using Refmac from CCP4 to refine a protein's crystal structure. The
methionine has half selenium and half sulfur. I was trying to make alternate
conformations and let refmac do the refinement. But it keeps giving me error
message as follows:


There is an error in the input coordinate file
At least one the chains has 2 residues with the same number
Check above to see error
=== Error: Problem with coordinate file
BFONT COLOR=#FF!--SUMMARY_BEGIN--
 Refmac_5.5.0109:  Problem with coordinate file

And here is my modified pdb file.

HETATM  403  N  AMSE A 129  ***   N
HETATM  404  CA AMSE A 129  ***   C
HETATM  405  CB AMSE A 129  ***   C
HETATM  406  CG AMSE A 129  ***   C
HETATM  407 SE  AMSE A 129  ***  SE
HETATM  408  CE AMSE A 129  ***   C
HETATM  409  C  AMSE A 129  ***   C
HETATM  410  O  AMSE A 129  ***   O
ATOM411  N  BMET A 129  ***   N
ATOM412  CA BMET A 129  ***   C
ATOM413  CB BMET A 129  ***   C
ATOM414  CG BMET A 129  ***   C
ATOM415  SD BMET A 129  ***   S
ATOM416  CE BMET A 129  ***   C
ATOM417  C  BMET A 129  ***   C
ATOM418  O  BMET A 129  ***   O

I already confirmed with pdb that this is the right format for this case.
But refmac doesn't work with it. I wonder if there is any other changes I
should make for refmac?

Thank you,

Ming


Re: [ccp4bb] Silver staining Coomassie stained gels

2011-09-16 Thread Artem Evdokimov
Destain it really well. One easy peasy option is to put the gel in water and
add 1 or 2 ml of cheap Q sepharose to it then boil. Gel will destain in 2-3
minutes of boiling.
On Sep 16, 2011 5:10 AM, K Singh ksc...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear All,
 Can anyone suggest me a protocol for silver-staining the PAGE that is
 already stained with Coomassie.
 Kris


Re: [ccp4bb] crystallization of complex and ...

2011-09-16 Thread Artem Evdokimov
1 imidazole affinity is not high which is why you use 200 mM or more to
elute. So it comes off by itself.
2 you can wash with low ph and then recharge this is somewhat easier on the
resin
On Sep 15, 2011 9:25 PM, m zhang mzhang...@hotmail.com wrote:





 Dear all,
 I have two questions:
 First, I was trying to crystallize a complex of two proteins. Both
proteins has been crystallized before. The two proteins bind to each other
based on Biacore study, but they didn't form a single peak on gel
filtration. When I mixed them at 1:1 ratio, the crystals I got contain only
one of the two proteins. I was suggested to increase the ratio, for example
1.5:1, to increase the probability of co-crystallization which I will try.
But I do want to hear if there are other possible ways to try. What would
you try if you were in my situation?
 Second is about reusing of Ni-NTA resin. According to Qiagen's
instruction, after using fresh Ni-NTA resin, one only needs to wash the used
Ni resin first with 0.5M NaOH, then with your own buffer. After that the
resin is ready to be reused until it needs being recharged. But my question
is: Once immidazole competes with His-tagged protein and binds to Ni-resin,
how can immidazole be rinsed off with the same buffer(usually pH is above 7)
one uses to purify the protein?
 Thank you for any suggestion or comment.
 Min



Re: [ccp4bb] Silver staining Coomassie stained gels

2011-09-16 Thread Soisson, Stephen M
Now that's a nifty trick I hadn't heard of before!



From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Artem Evdokimov
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:27 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Silver staining Coomassie stained gels



Destain it really well. One easy peasy option is to put the gel in water
and add 1 or 2 ml of cheap Q sepharose to it then boil. Gel will destain
in 2-3 minutes of boiling.

On Sep 16, 2011 5:10 AM, K Singh ksc...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear All,
 Can anyone suggest me a protocol for silver-staining the PAGE that is
 already stained with Coomassie.
 Kris

Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
information of Merck  Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates Direct contact information
for affiliates is available at 
http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential,
proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are
not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from 
your system.


Re: [ccp4bb] Silver staining Coomassie stained gels

2011-09-16 Thread Artem Evdokimov
It is nice indeed, that's how we stainand destain our gels in less than 8
minutes :-) there was at one time a proprietary product like tis called
magic beads or somesuch. But regular resin works ;-)
On Sep 16, 2011 9:31 AM, Soisson, Stephen M stephen_sois...@merck.com
wrote:
 Now that's a nifty trick I hadn't heard of before!

 

 From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
 Artem Evdokimov
 Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:27 AM
 To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
 Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Silver staining Coomassie stained gels



 Destain it really well. One easy peasy option is to put the gel in water
 and add 1 or 2 ml of cheap Q sepharose to it then boil. Gel will destain
 in 2-3 minutes of boiling.

 On Sep 16, 2011 5:10 AM, K Singh ksc...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear All,
 Can anyone suggest me a protocol for silver-staining the PAGE that is
 already stained with Coomassie.
 Kris

 Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
 information of Merck  Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
 New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates Direct contact information
 for affiliates is available at
 http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential,
 proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely
 for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are
 not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error,
 please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from
 your system.


Re: [ccp4bb] about alternate conformations

2011-09-16 Thread Ed Pozharski
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 10:08 -0400, Ming wrote:
 The methionine has half selenium and half sulfur.

Do you have the evidence that your incorporation ration was 50%?

On a practical side, try giving the SeMET a different chain ID.  You can
change it back manually after refinement.  Assuming that the side chain
conformation is the same, you can probably just have the selenium atom
added and hope that due to partial occupancy refmac will not apply any
vdw terms.

-- 
Hurry up before we all come back to our senses!
   Julian, King of Lemurs


Re: [ccp4bb] about alternate conformations

2011-09-16 Thread Kevin Jin
I did not make it clear. The protocol we used for protein expression always
limit the occ of MSE as 0.75. You may estimate your occ of MSE by ED. You
can check PDB for JCSG structures.

Cheers,

Kevin

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Ming dongm...@udel.edu wrote:

 Hi all,


 I was using Refmac from CCP4 to refine a protein's crystal structure. The
 methionine has half selenium and half sulfur. I was trying to make alternate
 conformations and let refmac do the refinement. But it keeps giving me error
 message as follows:


 There is an error in the input coordinate file
 At least one the chains has 2 residues with the same number
 Check above to see error
 === Error: Problem with coordinate file
 BFONT COLOR=#FF!--SUMMARY_BEGIN--
  Refmac_5.5.0109:  Problem with coordinate file

 And here is my modified pdb file.

 HETATM  403  N  AMSE A 129  ***   N
 HETATM  404  CA AMSE A 129  ***   C
 HETATM  405  CB AMSE A 129  ***   C
 HETATM  406  CG AMSE A 129  ***   C
 HETATM  407 SE  AMSE A 129  ***  SE
 HETATM  408  CE AMSE A 129  ***   C
 HETATM  409  C  AMSE A 129  ***   C
 HETATM  410  O  AMSE A 129  ***   O
 ATOM411  N  BMET A 129  ***   N
 ATOM412  CA BMET A 129  ***   C
 ATOM413  CB BMET A 129  ***   C
 ATOM414  CG BMET A 129  ***   C
 ATOM415  SD BMET A 129  ***   S
 ATOM416  CE BMET A 129  ***   C
 ATOM417  C  BMET A 129  ***   C
 ATOM418  O  BMET A 129  ***   O

 I already confirmed with pdb that this is the right format for this case.
 But refmac doesn't work with it. I wonder if there is any other changes I
 should make for refmac?

 Thank you,

 Ming



[ccp4bb] DNA cif files

2011-09-16 Thread Gregory Bowman
I have a question about the bond angle restraints in the DNA cif files. I 
recently submitted a protein-DNA complex to the PDB, and found out that many of 
the glycosidic bond angles (atoms O4'-C1'-N9/N1) were outside the accepted 
range. I switched from CCP4 6.1.13 to 6.2.0 (installed/updated with fink on Mac 
OSX 10.6.8), and this fixed the problem in that now there is a narrower 
distribution of bond angles, but the target/ideal values are different in these 
two CCP4 monomer libraries (108.4 versus 107.8):

=
/sw64/lib/ccp4-6.1.13/data/monomers

file=a/AD.cif
Ad   A   'Adenosine   ' DNA32  21 .
Ad   N9 C1*O4* 108.4003.000

file=c/CD.cif
Cd   C   'Cytidine' DNA30  19 .
Cd   N1 C1*O4* 108.4003.000

file=g/GD.cif
Gd   G   'Guanosine   ' DNA33  22 .
Gd   N9 C1*O4* 108.4003.000

file=t/TD.cif
Td   T   'Thymidine   ' DNA32  20 .
Td   N1 C1*O4* 108.4003.000

=
/sw64/lib/ccp4-6.2.0/data/monomers

file=d/DA.cif
DA   DA  '2'-DEOXYADENOSINE-5'-MONOPHOSPHATE  ' DNA34  22 .
DA   O4'  C1'  N9  107.8000.800

file=d/DC.cif
DC   DC  '2'-DEOXYCYTIDINE-5'-MONOPHOSPHATE   ' DNA32  20 .
DC   O4'  C1'  N1  107.8000.800

file=d/DG.cif
DG   DG  '2'-DEOXYGUANOSINE-5'-MONOPHOSPHATE  ' DNA35  23 .
DG   O4'  C1'  N9  107.8000.800

file=d/DT.cif
DT   DT  'THYMIDINE-5'-MONOPHOSPHATE  ' DNA34  21 .
DT   O4'  C1'  N1  107.8000.800


Why are these values different in the two libraries? Am I looking at the wrong 
files or the wrong bonds?

Thanks!
Greg





Re: [ccp4bb] Silver staining Coomassie stained gels

2011-09-16 Thread Dima Klenchin

Can anyone suggest me a protocol for silver-staining the PAGE that is
already stained with Coomassie.


There is absolutely nothing wrong with silver staining of a 
Coomassie-stained gel without destaining. It only prevents blowout of 
most intense bands already well-visible with Coomassie. The only thing to 
do is to equlibrate the gel in water before going with silver. At least 
that's my experinece with the silver staining protocol that is based on 
tungstosilicic acid (aka Bio-Rad Silver Stain Plus described here for DNA 
in agarose but works equally well for proteins in PAAG: 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2446526 ).


- Dima


Re: [ccp4bb] DNA cif files

2011-09-16 Thread Ian Tickle
Hi, it depends what you mean by 'different'.  The SUs of the new set are
much lower than the old values (0.8 deg vs. 3.0) so one would assume that
these are improved estimates based on new data.  The difference between the
old and the new is (108.4 - 107.8) = 0.6 deg with a SU of the difference of
sqrt(3^2 + 0.8^2) = 3.1 deg, so difference/SU = 0.6/3.1 = 0.2 sigma - hardly
what one could call 'significantly different'.

Cheers

-- Ian

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Gregory Bowman gdbow...@jhu.edu wrote:

 I have a question about the bond angle restraints in the DNA cif files. I
 recently submitted a protein-DNA complex to the PDB, and found out that many
 of the glycosidic bond angles (atoms O4'-C1'-N9/N1) were outside the
 accepted range. I switched from CCP4 6.1.13 to 6.2.0 (installed/updated with
 fink on Mac OSX 10.6.8), and this fixed the problem in that now there is a
 narrower distribution of bond angles, but the target/ideal values are
 different in these two CCP4 monomer libraries (108.4 versus 107.8):

 =
 /sw64/lib/*ccp4-6.1.13*/data/monomers

 file=a/AD.cif
 Ad   A   'Adenosine   ' DNA32
  21 .
 Ad   N9 C1*O4* 108.4003.000

 file=c/CD.cif
 Cd   C   'Cytidine' DNA30
  19 .
 Cd   N1 C1*O4* 108.4003.000

 file=g/GD.cif
 Gd   G   'Guanosine   ' DNA33
  22 .
 Gd   N9 C1*O4* 108.4003.000

 file=t/TD.cif
 Td   T   'Thymidine   ' DNA32
  20 .
 Td   N1 C1*O4* 108.4003.000

 =
 /sw64/lib/*ccp4-6.2.0*/data/monomers

 file=d/DA.cif
 DA   DA  '2'-DEOXYADENOSINE-5'-MONOPHOSPHATE  ' DNA34
  22 .
 DA   O4'  C1'  N9  107.8000.800

 file=d/DC.cif
 DC   DC  '2'-DEOXYCYTIDINE-5'-MONOPHOSPHATE   ' DNA32
  20 .
 DC   O4'  C1'  N1  107.8000.800

 file=d/DG.cif
 DG   DG  '2'-DEOXYGUANOSINE-5'-MONOPHOSPHATE  ' DNA35
  23 .
 DG   O4'  C1'  N9  107.8000.800

 file=d/DT.cif
 DT   DT  'THYMIDINE-5'-MONOPHOSPHATE  ' DNA34
  21 .
 DT   O4'  C1'  N1  107.8000.800


 Why are these values different in the two libraries? Am I looking at the
 wrong files or the wrong bonds?

 Thanks!
 Greg






[ccp4bb] Insoluble ligand?

2011-09-16 Thread Chaudhary, Ritcha
Hi All

I have a ligand that is dissolved in 100% DMSO. The ligand crashes out even 
when diluted to 20% final DMSO concentration in the protein buffer. I have 
heard of people using detergents such as n octyl Beta D glucoside to keep the 
ligand solubilized at lower DMSO concentrations. Can someone give me pointers 
in this direction? Any suggestions, references etc.

Thanks much
Ritcha 

Re: [ccp4bb] Insoluble ligand?

2011-09-16 Thread Smita Mohanty
Hi Ritcha,

Did you try Methanol or Ethanol to see if your ligand dissolve in these
solvents? You should try these solvents first before adding any
detergents.  

Good luck.

Smita Mohanty

 Chaudhary, Ritcha chaudha...@missouri.edu 9/16/2011 11:04 AM

Hi All

I have a ligand that is dissolved in 100% DMSO. The ligand crashes out
even when diluted to 20% final DMSO concentration in the protein buffer.
I have heard of people using detergents such as n octyl Beta D glucoside
to keep the ligand solubilized at lower DMSO concentrations. Can someone
give me pointers in this direction? Any suggestions, references
etc.

Thanks much
Ritcha 


Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] crystallization of complex and ...

2011-09-16 Thread m zhang

To all and Alex,

-The Kd is around 500nM from Biacore. 
-One of my protein tends to precipitate and is only stable below 3mg/m. If I 
concentrated it to higher concentration, it will precipitate a lot after 1hr. 
And it was previously crystallized at low concentration. But when I inject on 
gel filtration, I do try to load large amount both proteins. Then this leads to 
another question: How high should the concentration of complex be in 
co-crystallization or gel filtration? I set mine at 6mg/ml for the complex and 
I get some precipitate. What concentration of complex would people start with 
to co-crystallize?
-Yes, I use the same buffer system for both proteins and complex.

Thank you all for your suggestions.

Min

Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:13:46 +0200
From: alexander.paut...@boehringer-ingelheim.com
Subject: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] crystallization of complex and ...
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK



Dear Min,regarding #1 some things come to my mind:- What is the Kd that you got 
from the Biacore? And did you make sure that the sample is concentrated enough 
(both on gel filtration and in crystallization) to have a “sufficient”  amount  
in the complex.- did you use the same buffer systems? Your Kd might be 
different in different buffers.BestAlex Dr. Alexander Pautsch 
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH  Co. KG
Dept. Lead Identific. and Optim. Sup. Ge
Tel.: +49 (7351) 54-4683
Fax: +49 (7351) 54-97924 
mailto:alexander.paut...@boehringer-ingelheim.com

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH  Co. KG, Sitz: Ingelheim am Rhein; 
Registergericht Mainz: HR A 22206; Komplementär Boehringer Ingelheim 
Deutschland GmbH; Geschäftsführung: Dr. Engelbert Günster (Vorsitzender),  Ralf 
Gorniak, Mark Hagmann, Michael Klein, Dr. Martin Wanning; Vorsitzender des 
Aufsichtsrates: Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Barner; Sitz: Ingelheim am Rhein; 
Registergericht Mainz: HR B 23260

Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich zu behandeln. Sie kann besonderem rechtlichen 
Schutz unterliegen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind, senden Sie bitte 
diese E-Mail an den Absender zurück, löschen die eingegangene E-Mail und geben 
den Inhalt der E-Mail nicht weiter. Jegliche unbefugte Bearbeitung, Nutzung, 
Vervielfältigung oder Verbreitung ist verboten. / This e-mail is confidential 
and may also be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient 
please reply to sender, delete the e-mail and do not disclose its contents to 
any person. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying or distribution 
is strictly prohibited.Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] 
Im Auftrag von m zhang
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2011 04:20
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [ccp4bb] crystallization of complex and ... Dear all, I have two 
questions: First, I was trying to crystallize a complex of two proteins. Both 
proteins has been crystallized before. The two proteins bind to each other 
based on Biacore study, but they didn't form a single peak on gel filtration. 
When I mixed them at 1:1 ratio, the crystals I got contain only one of the two 
proteins. I was suggested to increase the ratio, for example 1.5:1, to increase 
the probability of co-crystallization which I will try. But I do want to hear 
if there are other possible ways to try. What would you try if you were in my 
situation?  Second is about reusing of Ni-NTA resin. According to Qiagen's 
instruction, after using fresh Ni-NTA resin, one only needs to wash the used Ni 
resin first with 0.5M NaOH, then with your own buffer. After that the resin is 
ready to be reused until it needs being recharged. But my question is: Once 
immidazole competes with His-tagged protein and binds to Ni-resin, how can 
immidazole be rinsed off with the same buffer(usually pH is above 7) one uses 
to purify the protein? Thank you for any suggestion or comment. Min 
   

Re: [ccp4bb] Insoluble ligand?

2011-09-16 Thread Roger Rowlett

  
  
Keep in mind it may also be possible to soak in
  ligand from the solid if the binding constant is tight enough. Le
  Chatelier's principle will drag it from the undissolved solid into
  the complex. This process will be improved if you can increase
  solubility in solution, e.g. by incuding 20% DMSO or some other
  cosolvent in your drop. If you crystals will tolerate some
  cosolvent without cracking or dissolving, the equilibrium
  concentration of ligand in solution may still be high enough to
  populate your protein. This won't work for a loose-binding ligand.

Cheers,
___
Roger S. Rowlett
Gordon  Dorothy Kline Professor
Department of Chemistry
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346

tel: (315)-228-7245
ofc: (315)-228-7395
fax: (315)-228-7935
email: rrowl...@colgate.edu


On 9/16/2011 12:04 PM, Chaudhary, Ritcha wrote:

  Hi All

I have a ligand that is dissolved in 100% DMSO. The ligand crashes out even when diluted to 20% final DMSO concentration in the protein buffer. I have heard of people using detergents such as n octyl Beta D glucoside to keep the ligand solubilized at lower DMSO concentrations. Can someone give me pointers in this direction? Any suggestions, references etc.

Thanks much
Ritcha 

  



Re: [ccp4bb] UV imaging of crystals

2011-09-16 Thread Shiva Bhowmik
Would be curious to know the current limitations on UV microscopy employed
for screening protein crystals - such as content of aromatic amino acids,
protein size etc.

Cheers,

Shiva

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Klaus Fütterer k.futte...@bham.ac.ukwrote:

 From the experience when our (commercial) UV imaging system was set up, I
 can confirm that signal-to-noise is a non-trivial parameter for imaging in
 the UV range.

 I find the additional info gained from the UV capability very useful, not
 just to distinguish salt from protein crystals, but also to tell protein
 from buffer precipitate, buffer phase separation from protein phase
 separation, etc.

 Klaus


 ===

Klaus Fütterer, Ph.D.
Reader in Structural Biology
  Undergraduate Admissions

 School of Biosciences P: +44-(0)-121-414 5895
 University of Birmingham  F: +44-(0)-121-414 5925
 Edgbaston E: k.futte...@bham.ac.uk
 Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK   W: http://tinyurl.com/futterer-lab
 ===





 On 16 Sep 2011, at 04:57, Nagarajan V wrote:

  Typically, what you image is Trp fluorescence by exciting at around 280
 nm and observing at around 350 nm. Standard silicon based detectors do fine
 at the detection wavelength, although, as you can imagine, increased
 sensitivity in the UV means increase in the price of the detector. If your
 excitation and emission light paths do not overlap, you also can get by with
 standard glass (crown, flint, etc.) optics since they do allow some of the
 350-nm light to get through. Therefore, yes, it is possible to build an
 inexpensive UV imager based on inexpensive excitation light source (Douglas
 Instruments offers a pen light), and standard lab microscope. Of course, for
 increased sensitivity and contrast you need a very good light source, optics
 made of quartz and calcium fluoride that let almost all the UV light
 through, highly discriminating filters and a sensitive detector.
 
  V. Nagarajan
  JANSi
  http://janscientific.com
 
  On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Edward A. Berry ber...@upstate.edu
 wrote:
  A real UV microscope requires quartz optics, right?
  Probably conventional microscopes use glass.
  And you can't see 280 nm (and its not good for your eyes)
  so you need some kind of phosphor screen to view the image?
 
 
  Bosch, Juergen wrote:
  I'm replying here to myself :-)
 
  So in an off-board discussion it turns out that the microscope in
 question was a special
  emitted light and not a UV microscope. So real UV microscopes might be
 better for the
  purpose of detecting real crystals.
 
  Sorry for the confusion - had too much sun today :-)
 
  Jürgen
 
  On Sep 15, 2011, at 4:19 PM, Jürgen Bosch wrote:
 
  I once tested such a commercial system in Seattle about 4 years ago. It
 did not impress
  me. In particular the discrimination between salt and protein did not
 work for about 10
  different proteins from which we already had collected data. sure those
 were small
  between 10 and 100 micrometer. Excuse was to few tryptophans
  So in theory it is nice but a cheaper variant might be to add Gfp to your
 protein and
  screen for something green.
  Jürgen
 
  ..
  Jürgen Bosch
  Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
  Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
  615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
  Baltimore, MD 21205
  Phone: +1-410-614-4742
  Lab: +1-410-614-4894
  Fax: +1-410-955-3655
  http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/
 
  On Sep 15, 2011, at 16:03, Frank von Delft frank.vonde...@sgc.ox.ac.uk
 wrote:
 
  A while ago I was trying to be cheap, so we played around with it quite
  a bit in the lab. After rediscovering some of the basics of
  signal-to-noise and microscope transmission efficiency and that sort of
  rot, I realised that the commercial systems may not be all that
  ridiculously overpriced after all. Not if one wants to be able to say
  something useful about really really small crystals -- the only ones
  that really matter in the grand scheme of things (big ones are quick to
  test; little ones must first be optimized = money+time).
 
  But maybe I was just being incompetent. Happens.
  phx.
 
 
 
 
  On 15/09/2011 20:50, Andrew Purkiss-Trew wrote:
  Quoting Harman, Christinechristine.har...@fda.hhs.gov:
 
  Hi All,
  I was curious if any of you have tried or even know if it is
  possible to adapt a stereoscope (in my case an Olympus SZX10 model)
  so as to view protein crystals with UV illumination. Basically, I
  want a cheap manual version of what a Rock UV Imager does. I know
  this is probably a crazy dream. However, I would greatly appreciate
  any comments, advice or experience any of you may have.
 
  Molecular Dimension do such an adaptor which fits to existing
 

[ccp4bb] density modification help

2011-09-16 Thread James Garnett
Dear BB,

I hope you can help. I have been trying to density modify my potential SAD 
solutions but I think it would help if I could conceptualize the arrangement of 
molecules in my crystals and it is making my head hurt.

I have 2 crystal forms. I  only obtained a single crystal for the first form 
which I have never been able to reproduce. It processes well to ~3A in 
P6122/P6522 (a=52.3, b=52.3, c=216.9; 1 mol/AU) and C2221 (a=52.3, b=90.5, 
c=216.9; 3 mol/AU), systematic absences are convincing and there does not look 
like any twinning issues. MR has not worked but the closest model has less than 
20% similarity. A self rotation function shows strong peaks along x, y and z 
(k=180) and weaker ones along z (k=60 and 120).

In a slightly altered condition I can obtain reproducible crystals although the 
space group has now changed. I have collected native and iodide-SAD data to 
~3.2A on these crystals which now index in P222. Systematic absences suggest 
they are P212121 (a=52.61, b=88.261, c=212.072 in the SAD data), however, they 
contain pseudotranslational NCS (0.5,0.5,0.03) which is ~40% of the origin, so 
it may be another choice of P222. The self rotation function is similar to the 
previous data. As these cell dimensions and that of the C2221 data are almost 
identical it looks like there has been a slight shift in the lattice 
arrangement causing the pseudotranslational symmetry (therefore 6 mols/AU). The 
native and SAD data are isomorphous within 1% but I get much better statistics 
from phasing with SAD alone. The anomalous signal is reasonable to 4.5-5A but I 
do get some potential solutions using PHENIX (FOMs ~0.5, BAYES-CC ~40, scew 
10-20). Whilst I can see solvent/protein boundaries, at this resolution it is 
hard to tell what is going on and I am finding it hard to trace any sheets (it 
is an Ig-like fold) and I think some NCS averaging may do a world of good.

The problem is how do I apply this with  improper NCS - i.e. how is the 6-fold 
NCS from the self rotation related to the translational NCS. Also am I missing 
something which is blatantly obvious which can help me improve these maps and 
hopefully push the resolution out to its full potential. I might be asking for 
a lot with this data but if you can help it would be much appreciated - and if 
I have left out any details please ask away.

Many thanks

James

Dr James Garnett
Division of Molecular Biosciences,
Imperial College London
Level 5, Biochemistry Building,
South Kensington,
LONDON,
SW7 2AZ,
UK.

 


[ccp4bb] Paper describing the structure of LFA-1

2011-09-16 Thread Narayanan Ramasubbu

Dear All:
I would like to know the literature on the crystal structure of 
Leukocyte Function-Associated Antigen One (LFA-1, CD11a/CD18).
I have the structure of I domain but not for the entire molecule. I 
would greatly appreciate if people can point me to the right 
article/reference.


Thanks
Subbu


Re: [ccp4bb] stereo

2011-09-16 Thread Sabuj Pattanayek
Hi,

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Hena Dutta hdutt...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Sabuj,

 Thanks for all your answers. I finally came to this plan. Please tell me if
 I am doing anything wrong.

 Option 1.

 HP Workstation Z400 FL998U8#ABA Desktop PC - Intel Xeon W3550 3.06GHz, 8GB
 DDR3, 160GB 10k RPM HDD, DVDRW, NVIDIA Quadro FX3800, Windows 7 Professional
 32-bit $1000

 Acer HN274H bmiiid 27 Class Widescreen 3D LED HD Monitor - 1920 x 1080,
 16:9, 1:1 Dynamic, 1000:1 Native, 120Hz, 2ms, HDMI, DVI-D, VGA,
 NVIDIA 3D Glasses, Energy Star $670

I highly doubt this monitor will work in Linux unless you buy the 3d
vision kit which comes with the emitter that you can hook into the 3
pin mini din port of your quadro (btw your quadro 3800 requires an
extra 3 pin mini din bracket, more on that below).

This monitor has a built in emitter that works with the pair of nvidia
(these are not generic active shutter goggles) 3d vision goggles it
comes bundled with :

http://3dvision-blog.com/review-of-the-27-acer-hn274h-3d-vision-ready-lcd-monitor/

...but does not have an input for the 3 pin mini din coming off a
proper quadro. The latest nvidia driver for linux still mentions that
you need the 3 pin mini din for nvidia 3d vision stereo in linux:

http://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/280.13/README/xconfigoptions.html


Option Stereo integer

10  NVIDIA 3D Vision mode for use with NVIDIA 3D Vision glasses.
The NVIDIA 3D Vision infrared emitter must be connected to a USB port
of your computer, and to the 3-pin DIN connector of a Quadro graphics
board (based on G8xGL or higher GPU) before starting the X server.
Hot-plugging the USB infrared stereo emitter is not yet supported.
Also, 3D Vision Stereo Linux support requires a Linux kernel built
with USB device filesystem (usbfs) and USB 2.0 support. Not presently
supported on FreeBSD or Solaris.


Having just the USB connected to the emitter still only works in
windows with the standard emitter. I also know that the windows nvidia
driver explicitly checks to see what sort of monitor you have before
enabling 3d vision (see the nvidia 3d vision wizard in the nvidia
control panel), i.e. that's probably why you don't need a USB cable
connected from your computer to this particular monitor where the
emitter is housed in the bezel.

So, basically if you decide to go with this monitor you'll still
probably need to get the 3D vision kit with the proper emitter and
you'll also need to get the 3 pin mini din bracket for your Quadro
3800 since it doesn't have the 3 pin mini din output:

There's a forum about it here :

http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=96163

which leads to this PNY part # 900-50762--000 :

http://www.google.com/products/catalog?q=900-50762--000cid=17694678402912029306ei=OoVzTvKqH6mExgXwi5HRAQved=0CAkQgggwAA#scoring=tp

 Ofcourse I have to install linux. Do I need to buy anything else(say emiter
 or connector) for 3D stereo set up in linux distribution. What linux you
 like to suggest? I am familiar with open suse or ubuntu.

Either would be fine.

 Lenovo IdeaCentre K330B 7747-1GU Desktop PC - Intel Core i7-2600 3.40GHz,
 8GB DDR3, 1.5TB HDD, DVDRW, ATI Radeon HD 6450, Windows 7 Home Premium
 64-bit $750

 But, then I have to buy the right graphics card.

Yes.

 I think buying the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 graphics card will be much costly
 than to increase the hard drive.

 Which one is better processor?

 Intel Xeon W3550 3.06GHz or  Intel Core i7-2600 3.40GHz

i'd say the i7 2600 @ 3.4GHz, uses less power too.

 If they are not big difference, I will go with the first one and increase
 the hard drive. What do you think?

Buy the 2nd one, get a quadro 3700, get the 3d vision kit, and if you
want a 120Hz 27 LED monitor, here's one :

http://www.buy.com/prod/samsung-syncmaster-s27a750d-27-3d-led-lcd-monitor-16-9-2-ms-adjustable/223430191.html

that doesn't have a built in emitter which as mentioned above probably
isn't going to work in linux.

HTH,
Sabuj



 Many thanks for your time.

 Hena


 On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Sabuj Pattanayek sab...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Hena Dutta hdutt...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Isn't that an LCD monitor (Acer HS244HQ)?

 It's edge LED backlit. I don't know if there are any direct LED
 backlit 120Hz monitors. Couldn't find much information on those types.




Re: [ccp4bb] Paper describing the structure of LFA-1

2011-09-16 Thread Ed Pozharski
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 14:10 -0400, Narayanan Ramasubbu wrote:
 Dear All:
 I would like to know the literature on the crystal structure of 
 Leukocyte Function-Associated Antigen One (LFA-1, CD11a/CD18).
 I have the structure of I domain but not for the entire molecule. I 
 would greatly appreciate if people can point me to the right 
 article/reference.
 
 Thanks
 Subbu

One way to get that kind of information is to run your sequence against
pdb using NCBI BLAST, and then follow up the papers associated with the
PDB entries that come up.

PubMed search is also not a bad starting point.  If all else fails,
there is always google.  I am sure that with right keywords (e.g.
structure of Leukocyte Function-Associated Antigen One) a review
article will pop up (if it exists) among the first five or so hits.

-- 
Oh, suddenly throwing a giraffe into a volcano to make water is crazy?
Julian, King of Lemurs


Re: [ccp4bb] Protein preps become a jelly

2011-09-16 Thread Phoebe Rice
Gamma delta resolvase catalytic domain stock solutions used to make a nice 
clear jelly at 4 degrees, but it was perfectly reversible by warming the sample 
to room T.  In fact, one mutant crystallized in the stock tube after a few 
trips in and out of the fridge.  The crystals didn't diffract very well (so we 
never published that), but it was a fun way to grow them.
  Phoebe

=
Phoebe A. Rice
Dept. of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
The University of Chicago
phone 773 834 1723
http://bmb.bsd.uchicago.edu/Faculty_and_Research/01_Faculty/01_Faculty_Alphabetically.php?faculty_id=123
http://www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp


 Original message 
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:31:20 +0800
From: CCP4 bulletin board CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK (on behalf of aidong 
a...@xmu.edu.cn)
Subject: [ccp4bb] Protein preps become a jelly  
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Dear Buddies,

Sorry for bothering you with an off-ccp4 question.  We recently are  
experiencing a very strange phenomena.  A couple of protein preps with  
reasonably high concentration (10-20mg/ml) become a jelly after  
storages for overnight or a couple of days at 4C.  All of them have  
been purified by gel filtration.  Some of these proteins behave like  
this from very first preps but some of them had been very kind to us  
previously.  We have googled extensively in CCP4BB and www but it  
appears this only happens to us.  It would be highly appreciated that  
you could exchange their experiences or provide your suggestions.

Aidong Han, Ph.D

Department of Biomedical Sciences
School of Life Sciences
Xiamen University
Xiamen, Fujian 361005
China
Phone: 0592-218-8172 (O)
   0592-218-8173 (L)
Web: http://life.xmu.edu.cn/adhanlab/


Re: [ccp4bb] Protein preps become a jelly

2011-09-16 Thread Jacob Keller
I think I know another protein that does this: gelatin! (Well, not the
crystallization part...)

Jacob

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Phoebe Rice pr...@uchicago.edu wrote:
 Gamma delta resolvase catalytic domain stock solutions used to make a nice 
 clear jelly at 4 degrees, but it was perfectly reversible by warming the 
 sample to room T.  In fact, one mutant crystallized in the stock tube after a 
 few trips in and out of the fridge.  The crystals didn't diffract very well 
 (so we never published that), but it was a fun way to grow them.
  Phoebe

 =
 Phoebe A. Rice
 Dept. of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
 The University of Chicago
 phone 773 834 1723
 http://bmb.bsd.uchicago.edu/Faculty_and_Research/01_Faculty/01_Faculty_Alphabetically.php?faculty_id=123
 http://www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp


  Original message 
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:31:20 +0800
From: CCP4 bulletin board CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK (on behalf of aidong 
a...@xmu.edu.cn)
Subject: [ccp4bb] Protein preps become a jelly
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Dear Buddies,

Sorry for bothering you with an off-ccp4 question.  We recently are
experiencing a very strange phenomena.  A couple of protein preps with
reasonably high concentration (10-20mg/ml) become a jelly after
storages for overnight or a couple of days at 4C.  All of them have
been purified by gel filtration.  Some of these proteins behave like
this from very first preps but some of them had been very kind to us
previously.  We have googled extensively in CCP4BB and www but it
appears this only happens to us.  It would be highly appreciated that
you could exchange their experiences or provide your suggestions.

Aidong Han, Ph.D

Department of Biomedical Sciences
School of Life Sciences
Xiamen University
Xiamen, Fujian 361005
China
Phone: 0592-218-8172 (O)
               0592-218-8173 (L)
Web: http://life.xmu.edu.cn/adhanlab/




-- 
***
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
cel: 773.608.9185
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
***