Re: [ccp4bb] Heavy atom sites

2013-12-16 Thread Tim Gruene
Hello David,

I would use the SAD target function of refmac5 for the anomalous
occupancy. As of isomorphous occupancy and phasing power, I don't know.

Best,
Tim

On 12/15/2013 10:29 PM, David Schuller wrote:
 I have some SIRAS data of a known structure. I want to get the
 isomorphous and anomalous occupancy and phasing power from my data.
 What's the best software to do this?
 

-- 
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] Wrong Space Group?

2013-12-16 Thread Herman . Schreuder
Dear Bonsor,

I fully second James suggestions but have a few additional comments:
If you get a solution in P6522 with one molecule, you should get the same 
solution in P65 with 2 molecules. One of the crystallographic symmetry 
operators would then be non-crystallographic.
The current version of Refmac will test all possible twinning operations, so 
there is no need to do it yourself (provided of course that you get a molecular 
replacement solution). 
I would also try your rebuilt model with extended helix as a model for MR. 
I suspect that the dimer which has formed is asymmetric and that it may be 
randomly packed in your crystal. If the helix is a small compared to the 
complete protein, it may not show up in twinning tests.

Good luck!
Herman 



-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von James 
Holton
Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2013 23:29
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] Wrong Space Group?

Its possible you are in a lower space group, perhaps with some twinning, but 
your search model is different enough to only find a solution when things are 
over-merged.

Try refining your P6522 model against data merged in P65. If the other copy 
(symmetry mate in P6522) does not show up, you may be in trouble (wrong MR 
solution). I'd also try refinement/building in the other triogonal/hexagonal 
space groups, but again, start with the PDB file that you got for P6522.  Just 
change the space group in the header, and switch out the MTZ file. You will 
need to merge your data in each space group and also check the a-b flip 
re-indexing for most of them. Have a look at the CCP4 reindexing list for the 
h,k,l operators to try:
http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/html/reindexing.html
note how similar they are to the twinning operators:
http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/html/twinning.html
If I have counted right, that means you have 36 jobs to run.
  
  I'd also recommend turning the TWIN option in refmac off and on for each of 
these cases. This will always give you a lower R factor, because of the dynamic 
range compression you get with twinning, but if one particular combination of 
twinning with a particular space group and axis reindexing is markedly better 
than all the others, then you have just found your right space group.  So, now 
we are up to 72 jobs, but hardly a lot of work compared to growing the crystals 
in the first place.

You might also want to try being clever and generating the symmetry mates of 
your P6522 model and refine these partners as separate molecules as you reduce 
the symmetry of the data.  It's tricky, but think of it as an exercise.  Which 
real-space operator becomes what reciprocal-space operator?  You can check your 
answer by loading it up in coot and seeing if symmetry mates clash with the 
input coordinates.

Yes, its a lot of work to try all these combinations, but that's the annoying 
thing about twinning, it opens up a lot of ambiguities.

Good luck!

-James Holton
MAD Scientist

On 12/14/2013 6:44 AM, D Bonsor wrote:
 Dear all,

 I have collected ~160 degrees of data on a new crystal form of a protein 
 which has already been solved. Data was processed with XDS and reindex, 
 scaled and truncated with Aimless. Both XDS and Pointless suggested a Laue 
 group of  P6/mmm with a possible space group of P6122 or P6522. Stats showed 
 an overall Rmerge of 0.131 but an Rpim of 0.041 (multiplicity/redundancy of 
 19.1), a completeness of 99.1% and resolution of 2.8Ang.

 With cell dimensions of 63.1 63.1 243, only one protein chain can be found in 
 the asymmetric unit (two copies would leave a solvent content of 8%). I ran 
 phaser with all alternative space groups and a single solution in P6522 with 
 a TFZ of 10.0.

 I then performed 20 Refmac cycles ending up with an R/Rfree of 35.5/45.5. I 
 open the structure and map in Coot and could see that there was a large 
 conformational change of helix-turn-helix actually becoming just a long helix 
 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/4s6g8apatsi5xcg/Before_Building.png) and then 
 dimerizing through the long helix with one of the symmetry mates.

 This section was rebuilt 
 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/5j7tv0i5yq3mxxx/After_Building.png) and ran 
 through Refmac again resulting in an R/Rfree of 35.5/44.3. Looking through 
 the rest of the structure I see nothing else really to be modeled. Nothing 
 that could bring the Rfactors down to a reasonable range.

 I have therefore tried several things. I ran the structure through Zanuda 
 server to look at other space group possibilities. The server suggested I was 
 in the correct space group. However I did reprocess the data to P6, P3, P312, 
 P321, C2221, P2 and C2, and reran phaser in search all alternative space 
 groups using the original search model but found no solutions. I did 
 reprocess the data in P1, though I did not collect enough data.

 Twinning tests show no twinning. Although that does not mean there is no 
 twinning, I can 

[ccp4bb] Postdoctoral positions in structural biology/ cryo-EM at OIST

2013-12-16 Thread Matthias Wolf
Dear structural biologists,

there are two positions for postdoctoral researchers available with an emphasis 
on high-resolution cryo-EM at OIST (Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology 
Graduate University, Japan).

We are a highly motivated young international team and benefit from an 
excellent infrastructure which is hard to match elsewhere.

* Postdoctoral position for an expert in cryo-EM

* Postdoctoral position in Structural Biology

http://www.oist.jp/careers

The fully funded positions are available immediately and will be open until 
suitable candidates are identified.

Best regards,

   Matthias

___

Matthias Wolf, PhD MPharm - Assistant Professor
Molecular Cryo-Electron Microscopy Unit 
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University 
1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Kunigami-gun Okinawa 904-0412, Japan


[ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] Phaser output problem

2013-12-16 Thread Herman . Schreuder
Looks like you need to search for more molecules.
Best,
Herman

Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Amanda 
Blythe
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 11:46
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [ccp4bb] Phaser output problem

I am trying to solve a structure by molecular replacement using Phaser.  The 
pdb fits the density really well but the output shows strange crystal packing. 
I've attached an image, does anyone know what is causing this?

[cid:image001.jpg@01CEFA56.DCDA5270]

Amanda
PhD student

Laboratory 4.26, Bayliss Building

School of Chemistry and Biochemistry
M313
The University of Western Australia
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley WA 6009
Australia

T (+61 8) 6488 3163
E lewis...@student.uwa.edu.aumailto:lewis...@student.uwa.edu.au

inline: image001.jpg

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] Phaser output problem

2013-12-16 Thread Eleanor Dodson
Things to check - number of molecules to search for.
You can use Matthewscoeff to get a suggestion - MOLREP does it
autromatically .

Space group - has Phaser chosen as best SG an alternative to that in your
header?

Eleanor


On 16 December 2013 11:03, herman.schreu...@sanofi.com wrote:

  Looks like you need to search for more molecules.

 Best,

 Herman



 *Von:* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] *Im Auftrag von
 *Amanda Blythe
 *Gesendet:* Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 11:46
 *An:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
 *Betreff:* [ccp4bb] Phaser output problem



 I am trying to solve a structure by molecular replacement using Phaser.
  The pdb fits the density really well but the output shows strange crystal
 packing. I've attached an image, does anyone know what is causing this?





 Amanda

 PhD student

 Laboratory 4.26, Bayliss Building

 School of Chemistry and Biochemistry
 M313
 The University of Western Australia
 35 Stirling Highway
 Crawley WA 6009
 Australia

 *T* (+61 8) 6488 3163

 *E* lewis...@student.uwa.edu.au



image001.jpg

Re: [ccp4bb] Heavy atom sites

2013-12-16 Thread Eleanor Dodson
I would find the sites from the PHIC - you need to use CAD to add
Fcalc PHIC and FOM to the original data with Fnative Fderiv DANOderiv
etc
I usually then use SCALEIT to scale native and derivative to Fcalc -
then you know you are roughly on an absolute scale


Then feed those sites into Phaser_EP and it will refine occupancy etc
and give you phasing power
Eleanor

On 16 December 2013 09:21, Tim Gruene t...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de wrote:
 Hello David,

 I would use the SAD target function of refmac5 for the anomalous
 occupancy. As of isomorphous occupancy and phasing power, I don't know.

 Best,
 Tim

 On 12/15/2013 10:29 PM, David Schuller wrote:
 I have some SIRAS data of a known structure. I want to get the
 isomorphous and anomalous occupancy and phasing power from my data.
 What's the best software to do this?


 --
 Dr Tim Gruene
 Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
 Tammannstr. 4
 D-37077 Goettingen

 GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A



[ccp4bb] ACA 2014, Industrial Research from Young Scientists

2013-12-16 Thread George Lountos
The Industrial Special Interest Group and Young Scientists Special Interest 
Group of the American Crystallographic Association will be hosting a scientific 
session on Sunday, May 25, 2014 during the ACA Meeting in Albuquerque, New 
Mexico which will highlight research by young scientists (undergraduate, 
graduate, post-doc) that is done in industry or in collaboration with industry. 
We encourage young scientists in this area to submit an abstract for 
consideration for a talk during this session. A brief description of the 
session is highlighted below,1.2.1  Industrial Research from Young 
ScientistsOrganizers:  George Lountos, Pete Wood An industrial environment can 
provide invaluable research and career experience for students and other young 
scientists. At the same time a short or long term research placement can 
provide an industrial partner with the opportunity to have very focussed 
research carried out in an otherwise time-stretched setting. This session will 
showcase research being performed by young scientists at any level 
(undergraduate, post-graduate or early post-doctoral) either within industry or 
funded by industry. The deadline for abstract submission is January 31, 2014. 
Abstracts may be submitted online at 
http://www.amercrystalassn.org/2014-abstractsYoung scientists wishing to 
present at the meeting are also encouraged to apply for a Travel Grant. 
http://www.amercrystalassn.org/2014-young-scientistsIf you have any questions, 
feel free to contact the session organizers, Pete Wood (w...@ccdc.cam.ac.uk) or 
George Lountos (lount...@mail.nih.gov)Thanks,George
  

[ccp4bb] CAD

2013-12-16 Thread Ashu Kumar
Dear all,

I am trying to use CAD to apply b-factor sharpening to my 3.7 A data.
Following is the script which I am running.


cad hklin1 test.mtz hklout test_out.mtz END-cad
RESOLUTION OVERALL 40 3.7
scale file_number 1 1 -50
END
END-cad

test.mtz is the refmac output.

The output fails to open in Coot. Could any please correct the script?

Thanks,

Ashu


Re: [ccp4bb] CAD

2013-12-16 Thread Pete Meyer

Hi,

It looks like you're missing your LABIN line.

Pete

Ashu Kumar wrote:

Dear all,

I am trying to use CAD to apply b-factor sharpening to my 3.7 A data.
Following is the script which I am running.


cad hklin1 test.mtz hklout test_out.mtz END-cad
RESOLUTION OVERALL 40 3.7
scale file_number 1 1 -50
END
END-cad

test.mtz is the refmac output.

The output fails to open in Coot. Could any please correct the script?

Thanks,

Ashu



Re: [ccp4bb] ccp4 v6.4.0 cannot extract mtz

2013-12-16 Thread Peter Keller
Dear Uli,

On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 15:52 +, ulrich.goh...@mdc-berlin.de wrote:
 Dear colleagues,
 
 Trying to run the latest version of ccp4 (6.4.0), say Refmac, I get
 the following error when I fill in the file box for the data file:
 
 CCP4i encountered an error when trying to extract the data from
 data.mtz. You can view the output from the mtzdump program etc. +
 crash of the GUI.
 
 Now, running mtzdump gives me this:
 
 ./mtzdump: /usr/lib64/libgfortran.so.3: version `GFORTRAN_1.1' not
 found (required
 by /xprogs/CCP4/CCP4-6.4.0/destination/ccp4-6.4.0/bin/../lib/libccp4f.so.0)
 
 In /usr/lib64 I have softlinked libgfortran.so.3 -
 libgfortran.so.3.0.0 (did so in 2011).
 
 I am not sure what I need to update here and how. I am running
 Novell's SLES 11 on a 64 bit system with the libgfortran43 runtime
 library installed. I have also checked file permissions (incl. tmp
 directories), and I cannot find anything obvious. I cannot remember
 having had similar problems with v6.3.0 in the beginning.

This may be a problem with the version information in the gfortran
library supplied by SUSE not containing anything matching the version
used by CCP4 on the system that they use for building their binaries.

For more information, you could try the commands:

  ldd -v /path/to/mtzdump

which will list explicitly the version information of the required
shared libraries, and:

  readelf -V /usr/lib64/libgfortran.so.3

and looking for the section starting Version definition section: it
should look something like this:

 Version definition section '.gnu.version_d' contains 9 entries:
   Addr: 0x00015da0  Offset: 0x015da0  Link: 5 (.dynstr)
   00: Rev: 1  Flags: BASE   Index: 1  Cnt: 1  Name: libgfortran.so.3
   0x001c: Rev: 1  Flags: none  Index: 2  Cnt: 1  Name: GFORTRAN_1.0
   0x0038: Rev: 1  Flags: none  Index: 3  Cnt: 2  Name: GFORTRAN_1.1
   0x0054: Parent 1: GFORTRAN_1.0
   0x005c: Rev: 1  Flags: none  Index: 4  Cnt: 2  Name: GFORTRAN_1.2
   0x0078: Parent 1: GFORTRAN_1.1
   0x0080: Rev: 1  Flags: none  Index: 5  Cnt: 2  Name: GFORTRAN_1.3
   0x009c: Parent 1: GFORTRAN_1.2
   0x00a4: Rev: 1  Flags: none  Index: 6  Cnt: 2  Name: GFORTRAN_1.4
   0x00c0: Parent 1: GFORTRAN_1.3
   0x00c8: Rev: 1  Flags: none  Index: 7  Cnt: 1  Name: F2C_1.0
   0x00e4: Rev: 1  Flags: none  Index: 8  Cnt: 1  Name: GFORTRAN_C99_1.0
   0x0100: Rev: 1  Flags: none  Index: 9  Cnt: 2  Name: GFORTRAN_C99_1.1
   0x011c: Parent 1: GFORTRAN_C99_1.0


I suspect that your version may be missing the GFORTRAN_1.1 entry (the
above listing is from openSUSE 12.3, which does have the correct
version). If so, maybe this is something that CCP4 need to deal with in
their build of the official binaries. Alternatively, if you build CCP4
from source on your system, it should work.

 Has anyone encountered the same problem and solved it yet?

We have a SLES licence at Global Phasing, although we haven't run CCP4
on a SLES system for a long time now. Your experience suggests that we
should give it a try again: we had been assuming that if it works with
openSUSE then SLES/SLED should also be OK but now it seems not :-) I'm
afraid that I am unlikely to have time to do this before January though,
so it won't help you if you are in a hurry.

Unless someone else who is running CCP4 under SLES has a quick fix, I
think that building CCP4 from source may be your quickest solution.

Regards,
Peter.


-- 
Peter Keller Tel.: +44 (0)1223 353033
Global Phasing Ltd., Fax.: +44 (0)1223 366889
Sheraton House,
Castle Park,
Cambridge CB3 0AX
United Kingdom


Re: [ccp4bb] MrBUMP not running after update

2013-12-16 Thread Ronan Keegan

Dear Jie,

Thanks for spotting this problem. I've made a fix for MrBUMP that should 
address the problem. It will be included in the next CCP4 update which 
will go out tomorrow (Tuesday 17th of December) all being well.


Best wishes,

Ronan


On 10/12/13 01:34, jie liu wrote:

Dear All

I just installed CCP4-6.4 and all the subsequent updates. Now MrBump 
failed

with the following error message:

The program run with command: /usr/local/ccp4-6.4.0/bin/ccp4-python -u
/usr/local/ccp4-6.4.0/bin/mrbump HKLIN
/home/jie/Structures/local/se-p26c8newn6/ccp4_6.3/high_x4c.mtz SEQIN
/home/jie/Structures/local/se-p26c8newn6/ccp4_6.3/seq.seq HKLOUT
/home/jie/Structures/local/se-p26c8newn6/ccp4_6.3/high_x4c_mrbump_soln1.mtz 


XYZOUT
/home/jie/Structures/local/se-p26c8newn6/ccp4_6.3/high_x4c_mrbump_soln1.pdb 


has failed with error message
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File /usr/local/ccp4-6.4.0/bin/mrbump, line 107, in module
   queue = master.fast_search_MR(init, target_info, mstat)
 File
/usr/local/ccp4-6.4.0/share/mrbump/include/initialisation/MRBUMP_master.py, 


line 482, in fast_search_MR
   ps.get_top_hit(mstat.sorted_MR_list, init, mstat)
 File /usr/local/ccp4-6.4.0/share/mrbump/include/structures/Matches.py,
line 1431, in get_top_hit
   CHAIN=mstat.chain_list[chain]
KeyError: '1e6j_p2'

It was running fine with CCP4-6.3. Could someone help please?

Thanks!

Jie




--
Scanned by iCritical.


Re: [ccp4bb] ccp4 v6.4.0 cannot extract mtz

2013-12-16 Thread Parthasarathy Sampathkumar
Yes Uli. I have the same issue, but not solve it yet :-(

Partha


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:52 AM, ulrich.goh...@mdc-berlin.de 
ulrich.goh...@mdc-berlin.de wrote:

  Dear colleagues,

 Trying to run the latest version of ccp4 (6.4.0), say Refmac, I get the
 following error when I fill in the file box for the data file:

 CCP4i encountered an error when trying to extract the data from data.mtz.
 You can view the output from the mtzdump program etc. + crash of the GUI.

 Now, running mtzdump gives me this:

  http://www.hkl-xray.com/data-upload-form-and-bug-report./mtzdump:
 /usr/lib64/libgfortran.so.3: version `GFORTRAN_1.1' not found (required by
 /xprogs/CCP4/CCP4-6.4.0/destination/ccp4-6.4.0/bin/../lib/libccp4f.so.0)

 In /usr/lib64 I have softlinked libgfortran.so.3 - libgfortran.so.3.0.0
 (did so in 2011).

 I am not sure what I need to update here and how. I am running Novell's
 SLES 11 on a 64 bit system with the libgfortran43 runtime library
 installed. I have also checked file permissions (incl. tmp directories),
 and I cannot find anything obvious. I cannot remember having had similar
 problems with v6.3.0 in the beginning.

 Has anyone encountered the same problem and solved it yet?

 My apologies if this has been discussed already; I searched the archive
 and I couldn't find a similar thread.

 Cheers,

  Uli


 ---

 dr ulrich gohlke

 *staff scientist - m**acromolecular structure and interaction*

 max-delbrück-center for molecular medicine (mdc)


 +49 30 9406 - 2725 (w)

 +49 30 9406 - 2548 (fax)

 ulrich.goh...@mdc-berlin.de




 http://www.mdc-berlin.de/en/research/research_teams/macromolecular_structure_and_interaction/



Re: [ccp4bb] Heavy atom sites

2013-12-16 Thread Bosch, Juergen
Didn't mlphare use to print those values in the log file ?
Jürgen

On Dec 15, 2013, at 4:29 PM, David Schuller 
dj...@cornell.edumailto:dj...@cornell.edu wrote:

I have some SIRAS data of a known structure. I want to get the
isomorphous and anomalous occupancy and phasing power from my data.
What's the best software to do this?

--
===
All Things Serve the Beam
===
   David J. Schuller
   modern man in a post-modern world
   MacCHESS, Cornell University
   schul...@cornell.edumailto:schul...@cornell.edu

..
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins University
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Office: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
Fax:  +1-410-955-2926
http://lupo.jhsph.edu






[ccp4bb] Cryo solution for crystals grown in magnesium formate

2013-12-16 Thread Xiao, Junyu
Dear all, sorry if this topic does not interest you. I wonder whether anyone 
has experience with freezing crystals grown in ~0.2 M Magnesium Formate. Garman 
and Mitchell suggested that A major anomaly is solution 44, 0.2 M magnesium 
formate, which requires 50% glycerol for cryoprotection in their 1996 paper (J 
Appl. Cryst.  29, 584-587).  Since 50% glycerol is kind of harsh, I wonder 
whether anyone has tried alternative cryo protectant. Your kind help will be 
highly appreciated.

Best regards,
Junyu

---
Junyu Xiao, Ph.D.
University of California, San Diego
Leichtag Room 283
9500 Gilman Drive, 0721
La Jolla, CA 92093-0721
Lab phone: 858-822-0684




Re: [ccp4bb] Cryo solution for crystals grown in magnesium formate

2013-12-16 Thread Roger Rowlett

Junyu,

I haven't tried it personally with this particular solution, but I have 
found that 30% glucose can pretty much cryoprotect any condition I have 
tried it with. If necessary, add cryoprotectant solution (mother liquor 
+ 30% glucose) gradually to minimize osmotic shock and potential 
cracking of crystals.


You can try this without crystals to see if the solution vitrifies as a 
clear solid in liquid nitrogen. If it freezes clear, it is very likely 
to work fine with your crystals.


Cheers,

___
Roger S. Rowlett
Gordon  Dorothy Kline Professor
Department of Chemistry
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346

tel: (315)-228-7245
ofc: (315)-228-7395
fax: (315)-228-7935
email: rrowl...@colgate.edu

On 12/16/2013 4:36 PM, Xiao, Junyu wrote:
Dear all, sorry if this topic does not interest you. I wonder whether 
anyone has experience with freezing crystals grown in ~0.2 M Magnesium 
Formate. Garman and Mitchell suggested that A major anomaly is 
solution 44, 0.2 M magnesium formate, which requires 50% glycerol for 
cryoprotection in their 1996 paper (J Appl. Cryst.  29, 584-587). 
 Since 50% glycerol is kind of harsh, I wonder whether anyone has 
tried alternative cryo protectant. Your kind help will be highly 
appreciated.


Best regards,
Junyu

---
Junyu Xiao, Ph.D.
University of California, San Diego
Leichtag Room 283
9500 Gilman Drive, 0721
La Jolla, CA 92093-0721
Lab phone: 858-822-0684






Re: [ccp4bb] Cryo solution for crystals grown in magnesium formate

2013-12-16 Thread Nat Echols
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Xiao, Junyu jx...@mail.ucsd.edu wrote:

  Dear all, sorry if this topic does not interest you. I wonder whether
 anyone has experience with freezing crystals grown in ~0.2 M Magnesium
 Formate. Garman and Mitchell suggested that A major anomaly is solution
 44, 0.2 M magnesium formate, which requires 50% glycerol for
 cryoprotection in their 1996 paper (J Appl. Cryst.  29, 584-587).  Since
 50% glycerol is kind of harsh, I wonder whether anyone has tried
 alternative cryo protectant. Your kind help will be highly appreciated.


Another good reference:

http://journals.iucr.org/j/issues/2002/05/00/do0015/index.html

It suggests 35% PEG 400, 30% ethylene glycol, or 30% of whatever PG means
(based on the rest of the paper I suspect propanediol, but the abbreviation
doesn't really make sense - perhaps Eddie Snell can clarify).  There are of
course many other good cryoprotectants beyond those evaluated in the paper;
personally, I'm a big fan of xylitol (which I believe will work in lower
concentrations - at least with some conditions), but what really matters is
what the crystals can tolerate.

Note that these estimates are using very strict criteria - you can often
get away with less cryoprotection if you are very good at freezing crystals
and/or willing to tolerate some increased background.  But I wouldn't try
this until you've determined that your crystals can't handle the
recommended amounts.

-Nat


[ccp4bb] in vitro Tyr phosphorylation

2013-12-16 Thread Gloria Borgstahl
Does anyone know of a good way to phosphorylate the Tyr on a protein for
structural studies?  Is there a generic kinase that can be coexpressed or
purified for phosphorylation?

The pCMF Amber codon system is very expensive
and Glu really doesn't mimic pTyr all that well.

Any ideas/help would be appreciated, G


[ccp4bb] How to config CPU to run ccp4 with multi-processor

2013-12-16 Thread Chang Qing
Dear all

I just installed CCP4 6.4 on Ubuntu 12.1. The program can work. I found it
just used 1 processor instead of 4( Intel i5) for data solving. Does anyone
know how to config CPU so that all processors can be used.

Thanks

Chang


[ccp4bb] How to config CPU to run ccp4 with multi-processor

2013-12-16 Thread Chang Qing
Dear all

I just installed CCP4 6.4 on Ubuntu 12.1. The program can work. I found it
just used 1 processor instead of 4( Intel i5) for data solving. Does anyone
know how to config CPU so that all processors can be used.

Thanks
Chang