Re: [ccp4bb] DM NCS averaging question
Well - if the CCs are 0 then no averaging can take place. You know you can let DM make the mask itself - are you using the GUI? It shows you what to set.. Eleanr zhan...@umbc.edu wrote: Hi, Thanks for reminding me checking the mask. I think their might be something wrong with the mask, since when DM read in the mask, it says: Number of columns, rows, sections ... 84 74 69 Map mode 0 Start and stop points on columns, rows, sections -53 30 80 153 -4 64 Grid sampling on x, y, z 136 260 150 Cell dimensions . 135.57100 260.11200 150.2 90.0 101.14000 90.0 Fast, medium, slow axes .ZXY Minimum density . 0.0 Maximum density . 0.0 Mean density 0.0 Rms deviation from mean density . 0.0 Space-group .4 Number of titles 1 It seems the mask is just null. However, I converted it to a map file, and coot clearly showed the mask, so I am not sure why the null mask was found by DM. Moreover, the NCS CCs are just 0s for the mask. Anyway, following is my NCSMASK script I used to generate the above mask, where XYZIN is the reorganized pdb containing only a single fixed NCS unit (chain A). and all the operations were generated by LSQKAB with Chain A mapped to other chains. Not sure whether there is something wrong here or not... ncsmask xyzin ${PDB}_A.pdb mskout ${PDB}.msk eof SYMM P1211 EXPAND 1.0 OVERLAP 3 AVERAGE 12 #Identical ROTA MATRIX 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TRAN 0.0 0.0 0.0 #AC ROTA MATRIX -0.22748 0.97259 0.04813 -0.97372 -0.22662 -0.02273 -0.01120 -0.05203 0.99858 TRAN 101.4683781.74413 2.89341 #AD ROTA MATRIX -0.90337 0.42792 0.02831 -0.42883 -0.90066 -0.07011 -0.00451 -0.07547 0.99714 TRAN 158.0331736.91842 3.25853 #AF ROTA MATRIX -0.21272 -0.97702 0.01352 0.97675 -0.21300 -0.02424 0.02657 0.00805 0.99961 TRAN 100.69797 -81.01860-1.71365 #AG ROTA MATRIX 0.61704 -0.78687 -0.01005 0.78590 0.61553 0.05899 -0.04023 -0.04429 0.99821 TRAN 32.50667 -65.76570 7.05504 #AH ROTA MATRIX -0.85814 -0.51116 -0.04813 -0.51290 0.85771 0.03558 0.02310 0.05522 -0.99821 TRAN 156.1498142.2387348.93406 #AI ROTA MATRIX -0.13703 -0.98975 -0.04032 -0.99048 0.13635 0.01902 -0.01332 0.04254 -0.99901 TRAN 95.9763082.3094852.82510 #AJ ROTA MATRIX 0.69662 -0.71695 -0.02645 -0.71716 -0.69691 0.00230 -0.02008 0.01737 -0.99965 TRAN 25.8458859.7628653.68224 #AK ROTA MATRIX 0.99467 0.10258 -0.01072 0.10259 -0.99472 0.00088 -0.01057 -0.00197 -0.4 TRAN0.47215-8.8608252.78315 #AL ROTA MATRIX 0.55782 0.82946 0.02875 0.82987 -0.55793 -0.00466 0.01218 0.02646 -0.99958 TRAN 36.68436 -68.6383349.21587 #AM ROTA MATRIX -0.30892 0.95102 -0.01113 0.95109 0.30890 -0.00370 -0.8 -0.01173 -0.3 TRAN 109.48987 -79.0555052.39334 #AN ROTA MATRIX -0.93676 0.34855 -0.03147 0.34600 0.93589 0.06627 0.05255 0.05119 -0.99731 TRAN 162.32979 -29.2680045.41564 eof The commonest error with averaging is getting the mask wrong. Check that the CCs after application of the averaging start at a reasonable value - 0.3 at least and increase with each cycle ( by the way why do ncycle 1?) But in the end the density will not be identical, the Fobs are not perfectly symmetric so there will be differences. The best idea is to average (with correct matrices - I always find that takes several pases before I get them all right - then build molecule A and refit it over the others before starting refinement. EleanorHailiang Zhang wrote: Hi, I am using the following DM script to perform a NCS averaging. I have a fundemental question: after NCS averaging, are the density distrubitions of different NCS unit being averaged supposed to be the same? I found they are different by checking FCDM/PHICDM, and maybe I am wrong somewhere... dm NCSIN ${PDB}.msk HKLIN ${PDBALL}.mtz HKLOUT ${PDBALL}-dm.mtz \ dmtest mode AVER ncycle 1 combine PERT scheme ALL solc 0.6213 #Identical AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TRAN 0.0 0.0 0.0 #AC AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.22748 0.97259 0.04813 -0.97372 -0.22662 -0.02273 -0.01120 -0.05203 0.99858 TRAN 101.4683781.74413 2.89341 #AD AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.90337 0.42792 0.02831 -0.42883 -0.90066 -0.07011 -0.00451 -0.07547 0.99714 TRAN 158.0331736.91842 3.25853 #AF AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1
Re: [ccp4bb] DM NCS averaging question
The commonest error with averaging is getting the mask wrong. Check that the CCs after application of the averaging start at a reasonable value - 0.3 at least and increase with each cycle ( by the way why do ncycle 1?) But in the end the density will not be identical, the Fobs are not perfectly symmetric so there will be differences. The best idea is to average (with correct matrices - I always find that takes several pases before I get them all right - then build molecule A and refit it over the others before starting refinement. EleanorHailiang Zhang wrote: Hi, I am using the following DM script to perform a NCS averaging. I have a fundemental question: after NCS averaging, are the density distrubitions of different NCS unit being averaged supposed to be the same? I found they are different by checking FCDM/PHICDM, and maybe I am wrong somewhere... dm NCSIN ${PDB}.msk HKLIN ${PDBALL}.mtz HKLOUT ${PDBALL}-dm.mtz \ dmtest mode AVER ncycle 1 combine PERT scheme ALL solc 0.6213 #Identical AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TRAN 0.0 0.0 0.0 #AC AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.22748 0.97259 0.04813 -0.97372 -0.22662 -0.02273 -0.01120 -0.05203 0.99858 TRAN 101.4683781.74413 2.89341 #AD AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.90337 0.42792 0.02831 -0.42883 -0.90066 -0.07011 -0.00451 -0.07547 0.99714 TRAN 158.0331736.91842 3.25853 #AF AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.21272 -0.97702 0.01352 0.97675 -0.21300 -0.02424 0.02657 0.00805 0.99961 TRAN 100.69797 -81.01860-1.71365 #AG AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.61704 -0.78687 -0.01005 0.78590 0.61553 0.05899 -0.04023 -0.04429 0.99821 TRAN 32.50667 -65.76570 7.05504 #AH AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.85814 -0.51116 -0.04813 -0.51290 0.85771 0.03558 0.02310 0.05522 -0.99821 TRAN 156.1498142.2387348.93406 #AI AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.13703 -0.98975 -0.04032 -0.99048 0.13635 0.01902 -0.01332 0.04254 -0.99901 TRAN 95.9763082.3094852.82510 #AJ AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.69662 -0.71695 -0.02645 -0.71716 -0.69691 0.00230 -0.02008 0.01737 -0.99965 TRAN 25.8458859.7628653.68224 #AK AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.99467 0.10258 -0.01072 0.10259 -0.99472 0.00088 -0.01057 -0.00197 -0.4 TRAN0.47215-8.8608252.78315 #AL AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.55782 0.82946 0.02875 0.82987 -0.55793 -0.00466 0.01218 0.02646 -0.99958 TRAN 36.68436 -68.6383349.21587 #AM AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.30892 0.95102 -0.01113 0.95109 0.30890 -0.00370 -0.8 -0.01173 -0.3 TRAN 109.48987 -79.0555052.39334 #AN AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.93676 0.34855 -0.03147 0.34600 0.93589 0.06627 0.05255 0.05119 -0.99731 TRAN 162.32979 -29.2680045.41564 LABIN FP = FWT PHIO = PHIC FOMO = WCMB LABOUT FDM=FDM PHIDM=PHIDM FOMDM=FOMDM FCDM=FCDM PHICDM=PHICDM END dmtest
Re: [ccp4bb] DM NCS averaging question
Hi, Thanks for reminding me checking the mask. I think their might be something wrong with the mask, since when DM read in the mask, it says: Number of columns, rows, sections ... 84 74 69 Map mode 0 Start and stop points on columns, rows, sections -53 30 80 153 -4 64 Grid sampling on x, y, z 136 260 150 Cell dimensions . 135.57100 260.11200 150.2 90.0 101.14000 90.0 Fast, medium, slow axes .ZXY Minimum density . 0.0 Maximum density . 0.0 Mean density 0.0 Rms deviation from mean density . 0.0 Space-group .4 Number of titles 1 It seems the mask is just null. However, I converted it to a map file, and coot clearly showed the mask, so I am not sure why the null mask was found by DM. Moreover, the NCS CCs are just 0s for the mask. Anyway, following is my NCSMASK script I used to generate the above mask, where XYZIN is the reorganized pdb containing only a single fixed NCS unit (chain A). and all the operations were generated by LSQKAB with Chain A mapped to other chains. Not sure whether there is something wrong here or not... ncsmask xyzin ${PDB}_A.pdb mskout ${PDB}.msk eof SYMM P1211 EXPAND 1.0 OVERLAP 3 AVERAGE 12 #Identical ROTA MATRIX 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TRAN 0.0 0.0 0.0 #AC ROTA MATRIX -0.22748 0.97259 0.04813 -0.97372 -0.22662 -0.02273 -0.01120 -0.05203 0.99858 TRAN 101.4683781.74413 2.89341 #AD ROTA MATRIX -0.90337 0.42792 0.02831 -0.42883 -0.90066 -0.07011 -0.00451 -0.07547 0.99714 TRAN 158.0331736.91842 3.25853 #AF ROTA MATRIX -0.21272 -0.97702 0.01352 0.97675 -0.21300 -0.02424 0.02657 0.00805 0.99961 TRAN 100.69797 -81.01860-1.71365 #AG ROTA MATRIX 0.61704 -0.78687 -0.01005 0.78590 0.61553 0.05899 -0.04023 -0.04429 0.99821 TRAN 32.50667 -65.76570 7.05504 #AH ROTA MATRIX -0.85814 -0.51116 -0.04813 -0.51290 0.85771 0.03558 0.02310 0.05522 -0.99821 TRAN 156.1498142.2387348.93406 #AI ROTA MATRIX -0.13703 -0.98975 -0.04032 -0.99048 0.13635 0.01902 -0.01332 0.04254 -0.99901 TRAN 95.9763082.3094852.82510 #AJ ROTA MATRIX 0.69662 -0.71695 -0.02645 -0.71716 -0.69691 0.00230 -0.02008 0.01737 -0.99965 TRAN 25.8458859.7628653.68224 #AK ROTA MATRIX 0.99467 0.10258 -0.01072 0.10259 -0.99472 0.00088 -0.01057 -0.00197 -0.4 TRAN0.47215-8.8608252.78315 #AL ROTA MATRIX 0.55782 0.82946 0.02875 0.82987 -0.55793 -0.00466 0.01218 0.02646 -0.99958 TRAN 36.68436 -68.6383349.21587 #AM ROTA MATRIX -0.30892 0.95102 -0.01113 0.95109 0.30890 -0.00370 -0.8 -0.01173 -0.3 TRAN 109.48987 -79.0555052.39334 #AN ROTA MATRIX -0.93676 0.34855 -0.03147 0.34600 0.93589 0.06627 0.05255 0.05119 -0.99731 TRAN 162.32979 -29.2680045.41564 eof The commonest error with averaging is getting the mask wrong. Check that the CCs after application of the averaging start at a reasonable value - 0.3 at least and increase with each cycle ( by the way why do ncycle 1?) But in the end the density will not be identical, the Fobs are not perfectly symmetric so there will be differences. The best idea is to average (with correct matrices - I always find that takes several pases before I get them all right - then build molecule A and refit it over the others before starting refinement. EleanorHailiang Zhang wrote: Hi, I am using the following DM script to perform a NCS averaging. I have a fundemental question: after NCS averaging, are the density distrubitions of different NCS unit being averaged supposed to be the same? I found they are different by checking FCDM/PHICDM, and maybe I am wrong somewhere... dm NCSIN ${PDB}.msk HKLIN ${PDBALL}.mtz HKLOUT ${PDBALL}-dm.mtz \ dmtest mode AVER ncycle 1 combine PERT scheme ALL solc 0.6213 #Identical AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TRAN 0.0 0.0 0.0 #AC AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.22748 0.97259 0.04813 -0.97372 -0.22662 -0.02273 -0.01120 -0.05203 0.99858 TRAN 101.4683781.74413 2.89341 #AD AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.90337 0.42792 0.02831 -0.42883 -0.90066 -0.07011 -0.00451 -0.07547 0.99714 TRAN 158.0331736.91842 3.25853 #AF AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.21272 -0.97702 0.01352 0.97675 -0.21300 -0.02424 0.02657 0.00805 0.99961 TRAN 100.69797 -81.01860-1.71365 #AG AVER
[ccp4bb] DM NCS averaging question
Hi, I am using the following DM script to perform a NCS averaging. I have a fundemental question: after NCS averaging, are the density distrubitions of different NCS unit being averaged supposed to be the same? I found they are different by checking FCDM/PHICDM, and maybe I am wrong somewhere... dm NCSIN ${PDB}.msk HKLIN ${PDBALL}.mtz HKLOUT ${PDBALL}-dm.mtz \ dmtest mode AVER ncycle 1 combine PERT scheme ALL solc 0.6213 #Identical AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TRAN 0.0 0.0 0.0 #AC AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.22748 0.97259 0.04813 -0.97372 -0.22662 -0.02273 -0.01120 -0.05203 0.99858 TRAN 101.4683781.74413 2.89341 #AD AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.90337 0.42792 0.02831 -0.42883 -0.90066 -0.07011 -0.00451 -0.07547 0.99714 TRAN 158.0331736.91842 3.25853 #AF AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.21272 -0.97702 0.01352 0.97675 -0.21300 -0.02424 0.02657 0.00805 0.99961 TRAN 100.69797 -81.01860-1.71365 #AG AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.61704 -0.78687 -0.01005 0.78590 0.61553 0.05899 -0.04023 -0.04429 0.99821 TRAN 32.50667 -65.76570 7.05504 #AH AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.85814 -0.51116 -0.04813 -0.51290 0.85771 0.03558 0.02310 0.05522 -0.99821 TRAN 156.1498142.2387348.93406 #AI AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.13703 -0.98975 -0.04032 -0.99048 0.13635 0.01902 -0.01332 0.04254 -0.99901 TRAN 95.9763082.3094852.82510 #AJ AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.69662 -0.71695 -0.02645 -0.71716 -0.69691 0.00230 -0.02008 0.01737 -0.99965 TRAN 25.8458859.7628653.68224 #AK AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.99467 0.10258 -0.01072 0.10259 -0.99472 0.00088 -0.01057 -0.00197 -0.4 TRAN0.47215-8.8608252.78315 #AL AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.55782 0.82946 0.02875 0.82987 -0.55793 -0.00466 0.01218 0.02646 -0.99958 TRAN 36.68436 -68.6383349.21587 #AM AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.30892 0.95102 -0.01113 0.95109 0.30890 -0.00370 -0.8 -0.01173 -0.3 TRAN 109.48987 -79.0555052.39334 #AN AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.93676 0.34855 -0.03147 0.34600 0.93589 0.06627 0.05255 0.05119 -0.99731 TRAN 162.32979 -29.2680045.41564 LABIN FP = FWT PHIO = PHIC FOMO = WCMB LABOUT FDM=FDM PHIDM=PHIDM FOMDM=FOMDM FCDM=FCDM PHICDM=PHICDM END dmtest
Re: [ccp4bb] DM NCS averaging question
Regarding your script: change a couple of things: MODE HIST SOLV MULT AVER COMBINE PERT SCHEME RES FROM 3.0 (or from where you have FOM 70%, as your low res phases will be more reliable) NCYCLE 50 (since you have 12 molecules you should get a significant benefit from averaging. Then the first Aver card does not require the REFI card as it should not be refined. For all the others I would change them to AVER REFI EVERY 3 to update the matrices while performing the averaging. You could also update the solvent mask with the command SOLMASK UPDATE 20 if you want. Good luck, Jürgen - Jürgen Bosch Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Department of Biochemistry Molecular Biology Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute 615 North Wolfe Street, W8708 Baltimore, MD 21205 Phone: +1-410-614-4742 Lab: +1-410-614-4894 Fax: +1-410-955-3655 http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/ On Aug 28, 2010, at 10:05 PM, Hailiang Zhang wrote: Hi, I am using the following DM script to perform a NCS averaging. I have a fundemental question: after NCS averaging, are the density distrubitions of different NCS unit being averaged supposed to be the same? I found they are different by checking FCDM/PHICDM, and maybe I am wrong somewhere... dm NCSIN ${PDB}.msk HKLIN ${PDBALL}.mtz HKLOUT ${PDBALL}-dm.mtz \ dmtest mode AVER ncycle 1 combine PERT scheme ALL solc 0.6213 #Identical AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TRAN 0.0 0.0 0.0 #AC AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.22748 0.97259 0.04813 -0.97372 -0.22662 -0.02273 -0.01120 -0.05203 0.99858 TRAN 101.4683781.74413 2.89341 #AD AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.90337 0.42792 0.02831 -0.42883 -0.90066 -0.07011 -0.00451 -0.07547 0.99714 TRAN 158.0331736.91842 3.25853 #AF AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.21272 -0.97702 0.01352 0.97675 -0.21300 -0.02424 0.02657 0.00805 0.99961 TRAN 100.69797 -81.01860-1.71365 #AG AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.61704 -0.78687 -0.01005 0.78590 0.61553 0.05899 -0.04023 -0.04429 0.99821 TRAN 32.50667 -65.76570 7.05504 #AH AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.85814 -0.51116 -0.04813 -0.51290 0.85771 0.03558 0.02310 0.05522 -0.99821 TRAN 156.1498142.2387348.93406 #AI AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.13703 -0.98975 -0.04032 -0.99048 0.13635 0.01902 -0.01332 0.04254 -0.99901 TRAN 95.9763082.3094852.82510 #AJ AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.69662 -0.71695 -0.02645 -0.71716 -0.69691 0.00230 -0.02008 0.01737 -0.99965 TRAN 25.8458859.7628653.68224 #AK AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.99467 0.10258 -0.01072 0.10259 -0.99472 0.00088 -0.01057 -0.00197 -0.4 TRAN0.47215-8.8608252.78315 #AL AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.55782 0.82946 0.02875 0.82987 -0.55793 -0.00466 0.01218 0.02646 -0.99958 TRAN 36.68436 -68.6383349.21587 #AM AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.30892 0.95102 -0.01113 0.95109 0.30890 -0.00370 -0.8 -0.01173 -0.3 TRAN 109.48987 -79.0555052.39334 #AN AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.93676 0.34855 -0.03147 0.34600 0.93589 0.06627 0.05255 0.05119 -0.99731 TRAN 162.32979 -29.2680045.41564 LABIN FP = FWT PHIO = PHIC FOMO = WCMB LABOUT FDM=FDM PHIDM=PHIDM FOMDM=FOMDM FCDM=FCDM PHICDM=PHICDM END dmtest
Re: [ccp4bb] DM NCS averaging question
Thanks. I will try the comprehensive script. Originally I just wanted to see what happens if I do NCS averaging only without solvent flattening or histogram match, to see whether all NCS units are the same. Anyway, it is always better to use more of them. Also thanks for pointing out that the REFI is not necessary for the identity op. Best Regards, Hailiang Regarding your script: change a couple of things: MODE HIST SOLV MULT AVER COMBINE PERT SCHEME RES FROM 3.0 (or from where you have FOM 70%, as your low res phases will be more reliable) NCYCLE 50 (since you have 12 molecules you should get a significant benefit from averaging. Then the first Aver card does not require the REFI card as it should not be refined. For all the others I would change them to AVER REFI EVERY 3 to update the matrices while performing the averaging. You could also update the solvent mask with the command SOLMASK UPDATE 20 if you want. Good luck, Jürgen - Jürgen Bosch Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Department of Biochemistry Molecular Biology Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute 615 North Wolfe Street, W8708 Baltimore, MD 21205 Phone: +1-410-614-4742 Lab: +1-410-614-4894 Fax: +1-410-955-3655 http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/ On Aug 28, 2010, at 10:05 PM, Hailiang Zhang wrote: Hi, I am using the following DM script to perform a NCS averaging. I have a fundemental question: after NCS averaging, are the density distrubitions of different NCS unit being averaged supposed to be the same? I found they are different by checking FCDM/PHICDM, and maybe I am wrong somewhere... dm NCSIN ${PDB}.msk HKLIN ${PDBALL}.mtz HKLOUT ${PDBALL}-dm.mtz \ dmtest mode AVER ncycle 1 combine PERT scheme ALL solc 0.6213 #Identical AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TRAN 0.0 0.0 0.0 #AC AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.22748 0.97259 0.04813 -0.97372 -0.22662 -0.02273 -0.01120 -0.05203 0.99858 TRAN 101.4683781.74413 2.89341 #AD AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.90337 0.42792 0.02831 -0.42883 -0.90066 -0.07011 -0.00451 -0.07547 0.99714 TRAN 158.0331736.91842 3.25853 #AF AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.21272 -0.97702 0.01352 0.97675 -0.21300 -0.02424 0.02657 0.00805 0.99961 TRAN 100.69797 -81.01860-1.71365 #AG AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.61704 -0.78687 -0.01005 0.78590 0.61553 0.05899 -0.04023 -0.04429 0.99821 TRAN 32.50667 -65.76570 7.05504 #AH AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.85814 -0.51116 -0.04813 -0.51290 0.85771 0.03558 0.02310 0.05522 -0.99821 TRAN 156.1498142.2387348.93406 #AI AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.13703 -0.98975 -0.04032 -0.99048 0.13635 0.01902 -0.01332 0.04254 -0.99901 TRAN 95.9763082.3094852.82510 #AJ AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.69662 -0.71695 -0.02645 -0.71716 -0.69691 0.00230 -0.02008 0.01737 -0.99965 TRAN 25.8458859.7628653.68224 #AK AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.99467 0.10258 -0.01072 0.10259 -0.99472 0.00088 -0.01057 -0.00197 -0.4 TRAN0.47215-8.8608252.78315 #AL AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX 0.55782 0.82946 0.02875 0.82987 -0.55793 -0.00466 0.01218 0.02646 -0.99958 TRAN 36.68436 -68.6383349.21587 #AM AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.30892 0.95102 -0.01113 0.95109 0.30890 -0.00370 -0.8 -0.01173 -0.3 TRAN 109.48987 -79.0555052.39334 #AN AVER REFI NCSMASK NMER 1 ROTA MATRIX -0.93676 0.34855 -0.03147 0.34600 0.93589 0.06627 0.05255 0.05119 -0.99731 TRAN 162.32979 -29.2680045.41564 LABIN FP = FWT PHIO = PHIC FOMO = WCMB LABOUT FDM=FDM PHIDM=PHIDM FOMDM=FOMDM FCDM=FCDM PHICDM=PHICDM END dmtest