Re: [ccp4bb] Protein melting temperatures

2011-09-28 Thread Patrick Shaw Stewart
I actually think you *can *make comparisons between different proteins.  We
heard a very nice talk by Jose Marquez about exactly this at the RAMC
meeting recently.

Basically, 45C seemed to be the dividing line.  If your protein melts below
this it's a bad sign for crystallization and may point to setting up your
crystallization experiments at lower temperatures.

Patrick



On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Anastassis Perrakis a.perra...@nki.nlwrote:

 **

 Hello -

 The excellent paper of McCrary, uses differential scanning
 calorimetry, which will give an absolute measure of thermostability.

 Using Thermofluor I would be afraid you can only assess the relative
 thermostability of one protein in different conditions.
 As your fluorescence reporter would interact differently with exposed
 hydro[hobic patches in different proteins, I would be a bit more careful
 in comparing the Thermofluor results between different proteins ... I
 am not aware of anyone correlating differential scanning calorimetrywith
 Thermofluor data, but I must admit I have not looked up that
 literature recently.

 A.


 On 23 Sep 2010, at 18:40, Philippe DUMAS wrote:

  Le 23/09/2010 17:28, Raji Edayathumangalam a écrit :
 
  Raji
  I suggest having a look to this paper:
  McCrary et al. J. Mol. Biol. 264(1996) 784
  where you will find an interesting study on protein stability and an
  interesting comparison with other proteins.
  Philippe Dumas
 
  Hi Folks,
 
  Sorry for the pre-xtallo question; pre-xtallo right now, but hoping
  to
  take my protein the xtallo way one of these days!
 
  I am currently performing Thermofluor assays with my protein and the
  results show that the Tm is ~45C.  I am looking for some examples of
  proteins and their melting temperatures so that I can gauge where my
  protein falls in the spectrum of unstable-to-stably folded. For
  example, the melting temperature of some forms of lysozyme is 73.8C
  (very stable, I suppose).
 
  Just need a sense for whether my protein is considered unstable or
  somewhat stable. Please could you share some examples.
 
  Many thanks.
  Raji
 
  ---
  Raji Edayathumangalam
  Joint Research Fellow
  Harvard Medical School/
  Brigham and Women's Hospital
  Brandeis University
 
 
  McCrary-JMB264(1996)784.pdfp_dumas.vcf




-- 
 patr...@douglas.co.ukDouglas Instruments Ltd.
 Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
 Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart

 http://www.douglas.co.uk
 Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
 Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36


Re: [ccp4bb] Protein melting temperatures

2011-09-28 Thread Artem Evdokimov
For what it's worth, we've been using thermofluor to compare the 'apparent'
melting points of enzymes with their thermal stability measured as
inhibition of their respective reactions by elevated temperature. The data
so far make sense - the differences in apparent enzyme Tm (using the same
conditions as the reaction mix!) match the differences in the
half-inhibition T. Not the absolute number,though (which is not unexpected
givn the different kinds of measurements involved).

So I'd say thermofluor is reasonably good at comparing different proteins.
Qualitatively at least.

Artem

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Patrick Shaw Stewart patr...@douglas.co.uk
 wrote:


 I actually think you *can *make comparisons between different proteins.
  We heard a very nice talk by Jose Marquez about exactly this at the RAMC
 meeting recently.

 Basically, 45C seemed to be the dividing line.  If your protein melts below
 this it's a bad sign for crystallization and may point to setting up your
 crystallization experiments at lower temperatures.

 Patrick



 On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Anastassis Perrakis a.perra...@nki.nlwrote:

 **

 Hello -

 The excellent paper of McCrary, uses differential scanning
 calorimetry, which will give an absolute measure of thermostability.

 Using Thermofluor I would be afraid you can only assess the relative
 thermostability of one protein in different conditions.
 As your fluorescence reporter would interact differently with exposed
 hydro[hobic patches in different proteins, I would be a bit more careful
 in comparing the Thermofluor results between different proteins ... I
 am not aware of anyone correlating differential scanning calorimetrywith
 Thermofluor data, but I must admit I have not looked up that
 literature recently.

 A.


 On 23 Sep 2010, at 18:40, Philippe DUMAS wrote:

  Le 23/09/2010 17:28, Raji Edayathumangalam a écrit :
 
  Raji
  I suggest having a look to this paper:
  McCrary et al. J. Mol. Biol. 264(1996) 784
  where you will find an interesting study on protein stability and an
  interesting comparison with other proteins.
  Philippe Dumas
 
  Hi Folks,
 
  Sorry for the pre-xtallo question; pre-xtallo right now, but hoping
  to
  take my protein the xtallo way one of these days!
 
  I am currently performing Thermofluor assays with my protein and the
  results show that the Tm is ~45C.  I am looking for some examples of
  proteins and their melting temperatures so that I can gauge where my
  protein falls in the spectrum of unstable-to-stably folded. For
  example, the melting temperature of some forms of lysozyme is 73.8C
  (very stable, I suppose).
 
  Just need a sense for whether my protein is considered unstable or
  somewhat stable. Please could you share some examples.
 
  Many thanks.
  Raji
 
  ---
  Raji Edayathumangalam
  Joint Research Fellow
  Harvard Medical School/
  Brigham and Women's Hospital
  Brandeis University
 
 
  McCrary-JMB264(1996)784.pdfp_dumas.vcf




 --
  patr...@douglas.co.ukDouglas Instruments Ltd.
  Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
  Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart

  http://www.douglas.co.uk
  Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
  Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36




Re: [ccp4bb] Protein melting temperatures

2011-09-28 Thread Bosch, Juergen
We have proteins that melt at 60˚C but they don't crystallize. According to 
your 45 degree rule we should have crystals, what are we doing wrong ?

Jürgen

On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Artem Evdokimov wrote:

For what it's worth, we've been using thermofluor to compare the 'apparent' 
melting points of enzymes with their thermal stability measured as inhibition 
of their respective reactions by elevated temperature. The data so far make 
sense - the differences in apparent enzyme Tm (using the same conditions as the 
reaction mix!) match the differences in the half-inhibition T. Not the absolute 
number,though (which is not unexpected givn the different kinds of measurements 
involved).

So I'd say thermofluor is reasonably good at comparing different proteins. 
Qualitatively at least.

Artem

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Patrick Shaw Stewart 
patr...@douglas.co.ukmailto:patr...@douglas.co.uk wrote:

I actually think you can make comparisons between different proteins.  We heard 
a very nice talk by Jose Marquez about exactly this at the RAMC meeting 
recently.

Basically, 45C seemed to be the dividing line.  If your protein melts below 
this it's a bad sign for crystallization and may point to setting up your 
crystallization experiments at lower temperatures.

Patrick



On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Anastassis Perrakis 
a.perra...@nki.nlmailto:a.perra...@nki.nl wrote:

Hello -

The excellent paper of McCrary, uses differential scanning
calorimetry, which will give an absolute measure of thermostability.

Using Thermofluor I would be afraid you can only assess the relative
thermostability of one protein in different conditions.
As your fluorescence reporter would interact differently with exposed
hydro[hobic patches in different proteins, I would be a bit more careful
in comparing the Thermofluor results between different proteins ... I
am not aware of anyone correlating differential scanning calorimetrywith
Thermofluor data, but I must admit I have not looked up that
literature recently.

A.


On 23 Sep 2010, at 18:40, Philippe DUMAS wrote:

 Le 23/09/2010 17:28, Raji Edayathumangalam a écrit :

 Raji
 I suggest having a look to this paper:
 McCrary et al. J. Mol. Biol. 264(1996) 784
 where you will find an interesting study on protein stability and an
 interesting comparison with other proteins.
 Philippe Dumas

 Hi Folks,

 Sorry for the pre-xtallo question; pre-xtallo right now, but hoping
 to
 take my protein the xtallo way one of these days!

 I am currently performing Thermofluor assays with my protein and the
 results show that the Tm is ~45C.  I am looking for some examples of
 proteins and their melting temperatures so that I can gauge where my
 protein falls in the spectrum of unstable-to-stably folded. For
 example, the melting temperature of some forms of lysozyme is 73.8C
 (very stable, I suppose).

 Just need a sense for whether my protein is considered unstable or
 somewhat stable. Please could you share some examples.

 Many thanks.
 Raji

 ---
 Raji Edayathumangalam
 Joint Research Fellow
 Harvard Medical School/
 Brigham and Women's Hospital
 Brandeis University


 McCrary-JMB264(1996)784.pdfp_dumas.vcf



--
 patr...@douglas.co.ukmailto:patr...@douglas.co.ukDouglas Instruments Ltd.
 Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
 Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart

 http://www.douglas.co.ukhttp://www.douglas.co.uk/
 Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090US toll-free 1-877-225-2034tel:1-877-225-2034
 Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36



..
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins University
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Office: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
Fax:  +1-410-955-2926
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/







Re: [ccp4bb] Protein melting temperatures

2011-09-28 Thread Linda Schuldt
Dear Raji,

what exactly do you mean when you say the melting temperature is 45deg.
Did you only test one buffer, or did you test many buffers and 45deg is
the most stable one? If you have only tested one buffer you should run a
screen testing different buffer systems (pH) and e.g. NaCl concentration
and glycerol concentrations (or ligands, if your proteins binds any). Then
you identify the buffer which is stabilizing your protein the most. I have
seen big impacts on protein stability and crystallization when optimizing
my buffers like this.

I think you should not only consider the melting temperature alone, but
also how the curve looks like. Do you get a high initial flourescence
(which often indicates partially unfolded protein or hydrophobic patches)
or do you have very low initial flourescence (which is a good sign for
compact protein). Another thing to look at is if your transition is sharp
(the steeper the better). Taking all this together you can judge if your
protein is happy or not.

Hope this helps you!

Linda

Patrick Shaw Stewart wrote:
 I actually think you *can *make comparisons between different proteins.
 We
 heard a very nice talk by Jose Marquez about exactly this at the RAMC
 meeting recently.

 Basically, 45C seemed to be the dividing line.  If your protein melts
 below
 this it's a bad sign for crystallization and may point to setting up your
 crystallization experiments at lower temperatures.

 Patrick



 On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Anastassis Perrakis
 a.perra...@nki.nlwrote:

 **

 Hello -

 The excellent paper of McCrary, uses differential scanning
 calorimetry, which will give an absolute measure of thermostability.

 Using Thermofluor I would be afraid you can only assess the relative
 thermostability of one protein in different conditions.
 As your fluorescence reporter would interact differently with exposed
 hydro[hobic patches in different proteins, I would be a bit more careful
 in comparing the Thermofluor results between different proteins ... I
 am not aware of anyone correlating differential scanning calorimetrywith
 Thermofluor data, but I must admit I have not looked up that
 literature recently.

 A.


 On 23 Sep 2010, at 18:40, Philippe DUMAS wrote:

  Le 23/09/2010 17:28, Raji Edayathumangalam a écrit :
 
  Raji
  I suggest having a look to this paper:
  McCrary et al. J. Mol. Biol. 264(1996) 784
  where you will find an interesting study on protein stability and an
  interesting comparison with other proteins.
  Philippe Dumas
 
  Hi Folks,
 
  Sorry for the pre-xtallo question; pre-xtallo right now, but hoping
  to
  take my protein the xtallo way one of these days!
 
  I am currently performing Thermofluor assays with my protein and the
  results show that the Tm is ~45C.  I am looking for some examples of
  proteins and their melting temperatures so that I can gauge where my
  protein falls in the spectrum of unstable-to-stably folded. For
  example, the melting temperature of some forms of lysozyme is 73.8C
  (very stable, I suppose).
 
  Just need a sense for whether my protein is considered unstable or
  somewhat stable. Please could you share some examples.
 
  Many thanks.
  Raji
 
  ---
  Raji Edayathumangalam
  Joint Research Fellow
  Harvard Medical School/
  Brigham and Women's Hospital
  Brandeis University
 
 
  McCrary-JMB264(1996)784.pdfp_dumas.vcf




 --
  patr...@douglas.co.ukDouglas Instruments Ltd.
  Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
  Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart

  http://www.douglas.co.uk
  Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
  Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36







***
Dr. Linda Schuldt
Department of Molecular Biology
University of Aarhus
Science Park
Gustav Wieds Vej 10c
DK-8000 Århus C
Denmark


Re: [ccp4bb] Protein melting temperatures

2011-09-28 Thread sankaranarayanan srinivasan
This paper on thermofluor is a good reference and if you have access to a
real time PCR machine, different buffer systems, like the PACT screen can be
evaluated within an hour to find out the buffer in which your protein is
most stable.
It gives the Tm of your protein and if you have a high fluorescence to start
with, it means your protein is unfolded to start with.

Curr Protoc Mol Biol. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21472694# 2011
Apr;Chapter 10:Unit10.28.
The combined use of the Thermofluor assay and ThermoQ analytical software
for the determination of protein stability and buffer optimization as an aid
in protein crystallization.
Phillips 
Khttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Phillips%20K%22%5BAuthor%5D
, de la Peña 
AHhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22de%20la%20Pe%C3%B1a%20AH%22%5BAuthor%5D
.

Best regards

Shankar

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Linda Schuldt lschu...@mb.au.dk wrote:

 Dear Raji,

 what exactly do you mean when you say the melting temperature is 45deg.
 Did you only test one buffer, or did you test many buffers and 45deg is
 the most stable one? If you have only tested one buffer you should run a
 screen testing different buffer systems (pH) and e.g. NaCl concentration
 and glycerol concentrations (or ligands, if your proteins binds any). Then
 you identify the buffer which is stabilizing your protein the most. I have
 seen big impacts on protein stability and crystallization when optimizing
 my buffers like this.

 I think you should not only consider the melting temperature alone, but
 also how the curve looks like. Do you get a high initial flourescence
 (which often indicates partially unfolded protein or hydrophobic patches)
 or do you have very low initial flourescence (which is a good sign for
 compact protein). Another thing to look at is if your transition is sharp
 (the steeper the better). Taking all this together you can judge if your
 protein is happy or not.

 Hope this helps you!

 Linda

 Patrick Shaw Stewart wrote:
  I actually think you *can *make comparisons between different proteins.
  We
  heard a very nice talk by Jose Marquez about exactly this at the RAMC
  meeting recently.
 
  Basically, 45C seemed to be the dividing line.  If your protein melts
  below
  this it's a bad sign for crystallization and may point to setting up your
  crystallization experiments at lower temperatures.
 
  Patrick
 
 
 
  On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Anastassis Perrakis
  a.perra...@nki.nlwrote:
 
  **
 
  Hello -
 
  The excellent paper of McCrary, uses differential scanning
  calorimetry, which will give an absolute measure of thermostability.
 
  Using Thermofluor I would be afraid you can only assess the relative
  thermostability of one protein in different conditions.
  As your fluorescence reporter would interact differently with exposed
  hydro[hobic patches in different proteins, I would be a bit more careful
  in comparing the Thermofluor results between different proteins ... I
  am not aware of anyone correlating differential scanning calorimetrywith
  Thermofluor data, but I must admit I have not looked up that
  literature recently.
 
  A.
 
 
  On 23 Sep 2010, at 18:40, Philippe DUMAS wrote:
 
   Le 23/09/2010 17:28, Raji Edayathumangalam a écrit :
  
   Raji
   I suggest having a look to this paper:
   McCrary et al. J. Mol. Biol. 264(1996) 784
   where you will find an interesting study on protein stability and an
   interesting comparison with other proteins.
   Philippe Dumas
  
   Hi Folks,
  
   Sorry for the pre-xtallo question; pre-xtallo right now, but hoping
   to
   take my protein the xtallo way one of these days!
  
   I am currently performing Thermofluor assays with my protein and the
   results show that the Tm is ~45C.  I am looking for some examples of
   proteins and their melting temperatures so that I can gauge where my
   protein falls in the spectrum of unstable-to-stably folded. For
   example, the melting temperature of some forms of lysozyme is 73.8C
   (very stable, I suppose).
  
   Just need a sense for whether my protein is considered unstable or
   somewhat stable. Please could you share some examples.
  
   Many thanks.
   Raji
  
   ---
   Raji Edayathumangalam
   Joint Research Fellow
   Harvard Medical School/
   Brigham and Women's Hospital
   Brandeis University
  
  
   McCrary-JMB264(1996)784.pdfp_dumas.vcf
 
 
 
 
  --
   patr...@douglas.co.ukDouglas Instruments Ltd.
   Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
   Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart
 
   http://www.douglas.co.uk
   Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
   Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36
 






 ***
 Dr. Linda Schuldt
 Department of Molecular Biology
 University of Aarhus
 Science Park
 Gustav Wieds Vej 10c
 DK-8000 Århus C
 Denmark



Re: [ccp4bb] Protein melting temperatures

2011-09-28 Thread Patrick Shaw Stewart
Susan and everyone,

I should apologise for any confusion that I may have caused.

Rajiv actually asked his question a year ago, and I accidentally replied to
it a year too late!

It's an interesting question though

Patrick

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Linda Schuldt lschu...@mb.au.dk wrote:

 **

 Dear Raji,

 what exactly do you mean when you say the melting temperature is 45deg.
 Did you only test one buffer, or did you test many buffers and 45deg is
 the most stable one? If you have only tested one buffer you should run a
 screen testing different buffer systems (pH) and e.g. NaCl concentration
 and glycerol concentrations (or ligands, if your proteins binds any). Then
 you identify the buffer which is stabilizing your protein the most. I have
 seen big impacts on protein stability and crystallization when optimizing
 my buffers like this.

 I think you should not only consider the melting temperature alone, but
 also how the curve looks like. Do you get a high initial flourescence
 (which often indicates partially unfolded protein or hydrophobic patches)
 or do you have very low initial flourescence (which is a good sign for
 compact protein). Another thing to look at is if your transition is sharp
 (the steeper the better). Taking all this together you can judge if your
 protein is happy or not.

 Hope this helps you!

 Linda

 Patrick Shaw Stewart wrote:
  I actually think you *can *make comparisons between different proteins.
  We
  heard a very nice talk by Jose Marquez about exactly this at the RAMC
  meeting recently.
 
  Basically, 45C seemed to be the dividing line.  If your protein melts
  below
  this it's a bad sign for crystallization and may point to setting up your
  crystallization experiments at lower temperatures.
 
  Patrick
 
 
 
  On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Anastassis Perrakis
  a.perra...@nki.nlwrote:
 
  **
 
  Hello -
 
  The excellent paper of McCrary, uses differential scanning
  calorimetry, which will give an absolute measure of thermostability.
 
  Using Thermofluor I would be afraid you can only assess the relative
  thermostability of one protein in different conditions.
  As your fluorescence reporter would interact differently with exposed
  hydro[hobic patches in different proteins, I would be a bit more careful
  in comparing the Thermofluor results between different proteins ... I
  am not aware of anyone correlating differential scanning calorimetrywith
  Thermofluor data, but I must admit I have not looked up that
  literature recently.
 
  A.
 
 
  On 23 Sep 2010, at 18:40, Philippe DUMAS wrote:
 
   Le 23/09/2010 17:28, Raji Edayathumangalam a écrit :
  
   Raji
   I suggest having a look to this paper:
   McCrary et al. J. Mol. Biol. 264(1996) 784
   where you will find an interesting study on protein stability and an
   interesting comparison with other proteins.
   Philippe Dumas
  
   Hi Folks,
  
   Sorry for the pre-xtallo question; pre-xtallo right now, but hoping
   to
   take my protein the xtallo way one of these days!
  
   I am currently performing Thermofluor assays with my protein and the
   results show that the Tm is ~45C.  I am looking for some examples of
   proteins and their melting temperatures so that I can gauge where my
   protein falls in the spectrum of unstable-to-stably folded. For
   example, the melting temperature of some forms of lysozyme is 73.8C
   (very stable, I suppose).
  
   Just need a sense for whether my protein is considered unstable or
   somewhat stable. Please could you share some examples.
  
   Many thanks.
   Raji
  
   ---
   Raji Edayathumangalam
   Joint Research Fellow
   Harvard Medical School/
   Brigham and Women's Hospital
   Brandeis University
  
  
   McCrary-JMB264(1996)784.pdfp_dumas.vcf
 
 
 
 
  --
   patr...@douglas.co.ukDouglas Instruments Ltd.
   Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
   Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart
 
   http://www.douglas.co.uk
   Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
   Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36
 






 ***
 Dr. Linda Schuldt
 Department of Molecular Biology
 University of Aarhus
 Science Park
 Gustav Wieds Vej 10c
 DK-8000 Århus C
 Denmark




-- 
 patr...@douglas.co.ukDouglas Instruments Ltd.
 Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
 Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart

 http://www.douglas.co.uk
 Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
 Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36


[ccp4bb] Protein melting temperatures

2010-09-23 Thread Raji Edayathumangalam

Hi Folks,

Sorry for the pre-xtallo question; pre-xtallo right now, but hoping to  
take my protein the xtallo way one of these days!


I am currently performing Thermofluor assays with my protein and the  
results show that the Tm is ~45C.  I am looking for some examples of  
proteins and their melting temperatures so that I can gauge where my  
protein falls in the spectrum of unstable-to-stably folded. For  
example, the melting temperature of some forms of lysozyme is 73.8C  
(very stable, I suppose).


Just need a sense for whether my protein is considered unstable or  
somewhat stable. Please could you share some examples.


Many thanks.
Raji

---
Raji Edayathumangalam
Joint Research Fellow
Harvard Medical School/
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Brandeis University


Re: [ccp4bb] Protein melting temperatures

2010-09-23 Thread Daniel Bonsor
There is a nice paper

Comput Biol Chem. 2009 Dec;33(6):445-50. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
Predicting melting temperature directly from protein sequences.

Ku T, Lu P, Chan C, Wang T, Lai S, Lyu P, Hsiao N.

They have a list of 35 different proteins with their Tms with the references 
from where they obtained their data.

Hope this aids in your work.


Dan


Re: [ccp4bb] Protein melting temperatures

2010-09-23 Thread Tim Gruene
Not sure whether this is the kind of information you are looking for: 
The protein with PDB-ID 1ofc had a melting temperature of 37deg (from CD), which
was supported by the fact that it did not express in E.coli at that temperature.

At 20deg it expressed to about 60mg / (liter LB), could be concentrated to more
than 100mg/ml, crystallised at room temperature and diffracted to 1.9A.

The initial purification steps were done at 4deg, but I guess that's generally
good advice anyhow.

So maybe you don't need to worry too much, because stability is probably not the
same as thermal stability.

Cheers, Tim


On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:28:20AM -0400, Raji Edayathumangalam wrote:
 Hi Folks,

 Sorry for the pre-xtallo question; pre-xtallo right now, but hoping to  
 take my protein the xtallo way one of these days!

 I am currently performing Thermofluor assays with my protein and the  
 results show that the Tm is ~45C.  I am looking for some examples of  
 proteins and their melting temperatures so that I can gauge where my  
 protein falls in the spectrum of unstable-to-stably folded. For example, 
 the melting temperature of some forms of lysozyme is 73.8C (very stable, 
 I suppose).

 Just need a sense for whether my protein is considered unstable or  
 somewhat stable. Please could you share some examples.

 Many thanks.
 Raji

 ---
 Raji Edayathumangalam
 Joint Research Fellow
 Harvard Medical School/
 Brigham and Women's Hospital
 Brandeis University

-- 
--
Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [ccp4bb] Protein melting temperatures

2010-09-23 Thread Anastassis Perrakis

Hello -

The excellent paper of McCrary, uses differential scanning  
calorimetry, which will give an absolute measure of thermostability.


Using Thermofluor I would be afraid you can only assess the relative  
thermostability of one protein in different conditions.
As your fluorescence reporter would interact differently with exposed  
hydro[hobic patches in different proteins, I would be a bit more careful
in comparing the Thermofluor results between different proteins ... I  
am not aware of anyone correlating differential scanning calorimetrywith
Thermofluor data, but I must admit I have not looked up that  
literature recently.


A.


On 23 Sep 2010, at 18:40, Philippe DUMAS wrote:


Le 23/09/2010 17:28, Raji Edayathumangalam a écrit :

Raji
I suggest having a look to this paper:
McCrary et al. J. Mol. Biol. 264(1996) 784
where you will find an interesting study on protein stability and an
interesting comparison with other proteins.
Philippe Dumas


Hi Folks,

Sorry for the pre-xtallo question; pre-xtallo right now, but hoping  
to

take my protein the xtallo way one of these days!

I am currently performing Thermofluor assays with my protein and the
results show that the Tm is ~45C.  I am looking for some examples of
proteins and their melting temperatures so that I can gauge where my
protein falls in the spectrum of unstable-to-stably folded. For
example, the melting temperature of some forms of lysozyme is 73.8C
(very stable, I suppose).

Just need a sense for whether my protein is considered unstable or
somewhat stable. Please could you share some examples.

Many thanks.
Raji

---
Raji Edayathumangalam
Joint Research Fellow
Harvard Medical School/
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Brandeis University



McCrary-JMB264(1996)784.pdfp_dumas.vcf


Re: [ccp4bb] Protein melting temperatures

2010-09-23 Thread Thomas J Magliery PhD
 I agree that you can't take two unrelated proteins and expect their 
Thermofluor Tms will be correlated with CD/DSC values.  We've done quite 
a bit with point mutants, and it works well for that (see an example in 
our paper below).  Also note that the dye is a perturbant the reduces 
the apparent Tm at higher concentrations, and of course that the whole 
point of using Thermofluor to help find Xtal conditions is that the 
apparent Tm is sensitive to buffer, ligands, etc.


Tom

http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/~magliery/pdfs/LavinderMagliery2009JACS.pdf


On 9/23/2010 1:03 PM, Anastassis Perrakis wrote:

Hello -

The excellent paper of McCrary, uses differential scanning 
calorimetry, which will give an absolute measure of thermostability.


Using Thermofluor I would be afraid you can only assess the relative 
thermostability of one protein in different conditions.
As your fluorescence reporter would interact differently with exposed 
hydro[hobic patches in different proteins, I would be a bit more careful
in comparing the Thermofluor results between different proteins ... I 
am not aware of anyone correlating differential scanning calorimetrywith
Thermofluor data, but I must admit I have not looked up that 
literature recently.


A.


On 23 Sep 2010, at 18:40, Philippe DUMAS wrote:


Le 23/09/2010 17:28, Raji Edayathumangalam a écrit :

Raji
I suggest having a look to this paper:
McCrary et al. J. Mol. Biol. 264(1996) 784
where you will find an interesting study on protein stability and an
interesting comparison with other proteins.
Philippe Dumas


Hi Folks,

Sorry for the pre-xtallo question; pre-xtallo right now, but hoping to
take my protein the xtallo way one of these days!

I am currently performing Thermofluor assays with my protein and the
results show that the Tm is ~45C.  I am looking for some examples of
proteins and their melting temperatures so that I can gauge where my
protein falls in the spectrum of unstable-to-stably folded. For
example, the melting temperature of some forms of lysozyme is 73.8C
(very stable, I suppose).

Just need a sense for whether my protein is considered unstable or
somewhat stable. Please could you share some examples.

Many thanks.
Raji

---
Raji Edayathumangalam
Joint Research Fellow
Harvard Medical School/
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Brandeis University



McCrary-JMB264(1996)784.pdfp_dumas.vcf


--
Thomas J. Magliery, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Chemistry
  Department of Biochemistry
The Ohio State University
1043 Evans Laboratory
100 West 18th Ave.
Columbus, OH 43210-1185

(614) 859-5743 phone (Google Voice)
(614) 292-1685 fax
magli...@chemistry.ohio-state.edu
http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/~magliery