Re: [ccp4bb] Used AREIMOL to judge the steric clashes

2011-04-11 Thread Edward A. Berry

Hailiang Zhang wrote:

Thanks Edward! Actually Areaimol works well for my problem.

But now I have a new issue looking for some advice. I want to randomly
generate some points in the unit cell and make a quick judgment whether it
is outside of the solvent mask or not. It seems that Areaimol doesn't help
at this point, and wonder whether some others tools in CCP4 can help to
make it.


Convert solvent mask to a map, exress the random points as dummy atoms in a
pdb file, and see reent thread on program to calculate electron density at 
x,y,z
for methods to print out density at arbitrary points in a map.



Thanks again for your help!

Best Regards, Hailiang

Areaimol is good for determining the contact area from the difference you
mentioned. If you want to distinguish real clashes from comfortable
van-der-Waals
contacts, you can use pdbdist3:

http://sb20.lbl.gov/berry/for/pdbdist3.for

The two molecules have to be in separate pdb files. You give a
threshold distance. For every atom in the first structure, every
atom in the second structure that is closer than the threshold distance
results in printing out the pair of atoms and the distance separating
them.
this gives a list of all contacts within the threshold distance.

For v-d-w contacts are around 3.4 A, H-bonds 2.7, and anything
closer than 2.0 could be considered a serious clash.

Hailiang Zhang wrote:

Hi,

I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins and want to quickly judge whether
there
are some steric clashes. One quick way I am thinking is using CCP4
AREAIMOL to calculate the surfaces of each individual protein as well as
the heterodimer, and check whether the sum of the two individual
surfaces
is larger then the dimer. I am wondering whether I can get some advices
about this method.

I also know there must be some other tools to quickly do it since this
is
kinda a simple docking problem, and I appreciate if suggested some more
direct methods.

Finally, I am also wondering whether AREAIMOL considers the assymetric
unit during calculation.

Thanks!

Hailiang









Re: [ccp4bb] Used AREIMOL to judge the steric clashes

2011-04-11 Thread Hailiang Zhang
Hi Edward:

Yes, this is really a good way to do it. Now I am trying to generate a
solvent map using CCP4 sfall (MODE ATMMAP). The thing is I want to specify
a large probe radius (~20A), but it seems that sfall can't change the
probe radius at all. Do you know any other tools to do that?

Thanks again for your time!

Best Regards, Hailiang

 Hailiang Zhang wrote:
 Thanks Edward! Actually Areaimol works well for my problem.

 But now I have a new issue looking for some advice. I want to randomly
 generate some points in the unit cell and make a quick judgment whether
 it
 is outside of the solvent mask or not. It seems that Areaimol doesn't
 help
 at this point, and wonder whether some others tools in CCP4 can help to
 make it.

 Convert solvent mask to a map, exress the random points as dummy atoms in
 a
 pdb file, and see reent thread on program to calculate electron density
 at x,y,z
 for methods to print out density at arbitrary points in a map.


 Thanks again for your help!

 Best Regards, Hailiang
 Areaimol is good for determining the contact area from the difference
 you
 mentioned. If you want to distinguish real clashes from comfortable
 van-der-Waals
 contacts, you can use pdbdist3:

 http://sb20.lbl.gov/berry/for/pdbdist3.for

 The two molecules have to be in separate pdb files. You give a
 threshold distance. For every atom in the first structure, every
 atom in the second structure that is closer than the threshold distance
 results in printing out the pair of atoms and the distance separating
 them.
 this gives a list of all contacts within the threshold distance.

 For v-d-w contacts are around 3.4 A, H-bonds 2.7, and anything
 closer than 2.0 could be considered a serious clash.

 Hailiang Zhang wrote:
 Hi,

 I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins and want to quickly judge whether
 there
 are some steric clashes. One quick way I am thinking is using CCP4
 AREAIMOL to calculate the surfaces of each individual protein as well
 as
 the heterodimer, and check whether the sum of the two individual
 surfaces
 is larger then the dimer. I am wondering whether I can get some
 advices
 about this method.

 I also know there must be some other tools to quickly do it since this
 is
 kinda a simple docking problem, and I appreciate if suggested some
 more
 direct methods.

 Finally, I am also wondering whether AREAIMOL considers the assymetric
 unit during calculation.

 Thanks!

 Hailiang










Re: [ccp4bb] Used AREIMOL to judge the steric clashes

2011-04-11 Thread Edward A. Berry

Do you really want atomradius 20A?
Molecules separated by 40 A atomcenter to atomcenter will
be in contact, exclude solvent? Maybe you should tell us what you
are trying to do?

Using fft mode atommap to make a protein mask you could use a
low threshold when converting map to mask, which would expand the
atoms somewhat, but not to 20A.

The uppsala program mama lets you make a protein mask with
setting the atom radius. It has all kind of other neat tools
which may be useful for whatever you are trying to do.

 http://xray.bmc.uu.se/usf/mama_man.html


#Make a mask in ref cell, grid, etc:
setenv MASKSIZE  4573536
setenv MApSIZE  4573536
mama -b eof
new Cell 170.900   181.400   240.20090.00090.00090.000
new Grid 168   168   240
new radius 2.0
new pdb m1 ref.pdb
smooth m1 10
smooth m1 10
smooth m1 10
island m1
fill m1
write m1 ref.msk
eof

I think the Uppsala mask format is different from the ccp4 one, but that it is 
easy
to convert.
Hailiang Zhang wrote:

Hi Edward:

Yes, this is really a good way to do it. Now I am trying to generate a
solvent map using CCP4 sfall (MODE ATMMAP). The thing is I want to specify
a large probe radius (~20A), but it seems that sfall can't change the
probe radius at all. Do you know any other tools to do that?

Thanks again for your time!

Best Regards, Hailiang


Hailiang Zhang wrote:

Thanks Edward! Actually Areaimol works well for my problem.

But now I have a new issue looking for some advice. I want to randomly
generate some points in the unit cell and make a quick judgment whether
it
is outside of the solvent mask or not. It seems that Areaimol doesn't
help
at this point, and wonder whether some others tools in CCP4 can help to
make it.


Convert solvent mask to a map, exress the random points as dummy atoms in
a
pdb file, and see reent thread on program to calculate electron density
at x,y,z
for methods to print out density at arbitrary points in a map.



Thanks again for your help!

Best Regards, Hailiang

Areaimol is good for determining the contact area from the difference
you
mentioned. If you want to distinguish real clashes from comfortable
van-der-Waals
contacts, you can use pdbdist3:

http://sb20.lbl.gov/berry/for/pdbdist3.for

The two molecules have to be in separate pdb files. You give a
threshold distance. For every atom in the first structure, every
atom in the second structure that is closer than the threshold distance
results in printing out the pair of atoms and the distance separating
them.
this gives a list of all contacts within the threshold distance.

For v-d-w contacts are around 3.4 A, H-bonds 2.7, and anything
closer than 2.0 could be considered a serious clash.

Hailiang Zhang wrote:

Hi,

I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins and want to quickly judge whether
there
are some steric clashes. One quick way I am thinking is using CCP4
AREAIMOL to calculate the surfaces of each individual protein as well
as
the heterodimer, and check whether the sum of the two individual
surfaces
is larger then the dimer. I am wondering whether I can get some
advices
about this method.

I also know there must be some other tools to quickly do it since this
is
kinda a simple docking problem, and I appreciate if suggested some
more
direct methods.

Finally, I am also wondering whether AREAIMOL considers the assymetric
unit during calculation.

Thanks!

Hailiang















Re: [ccp4bb] Used AREIMOL to judge the steric clashes

2011-04-11 Thread Hailiang Zhang
Hi Edward:

Actually as I mentioned in the original thread, I have 2 proteins, and
wanted to randomly put the smaller one around the larger one, and quickly
tell whether there is some steric clashes. The smaller protein has a
radius about 20A, and therefore I plan to generate a mask around the
larger protein with a probe radius of 20A, and if I random select a point
falling inside this mask, I won't even give it a try for the smaller
protein. (I need to generate huge amount of conformations and trying to
save time for steric clash judgment).

Anyway, I will try MAMA as you suggested, and see how it work.

Thanks again for your effort!

Best Regards, Hailiang

 Do you really want atomradius 20A?
 Molecules separated by 40 A atomcenter to atomcenter will
 be in contact, exclude solvent? Maybe you should tell us what you
 are trying to do?

 Using fft mode atommap to make a protein mask you could use a
 low threshold when converting map to mask, which would expand the
 atoms somewhat, but not to 20A.

 The uppsala program mama lets you make a protein mask with
 setting the atom radius. It has all kind of other neat tools
 which may be useful for whatever you are trying to do.

   http://xray.bmc.uu.se/usf/mama_man.html

 
 #Make a mask in ref cell, grid, etc:
 setenv MASKSIZE  4573536
 setenv MApSIZE  4573536
 mama -b eof
 new Cell 170.900   181.400   240.20090.00090.00090.000
 new Grid 168   168   240
 new radius 2.0
 new pdb m1 ref.pdb
 smooth m1 10
 smooth m1 10
 smooth m1 10
 island m1
 fill m1
 write m1 ref.msk
 eof

 I think the Uppsala mask format is different from the ccp4 one, but that
 it is easy
 to convert.
 Hailiang Zhang wrote:
 Hi Edward:

 Yes, this is really a good way to do it. Now I am trying to generate a
 solvent map using CCP4 sfall (MODE ATMMAP). The thing is I want to
 specify
 a large probe radius (~20A), but it seems that sfall can't change the
 probe radius at all. Do you know any other tools to do that?

 Thanks again for your time!

 Best Regards, Hailiang

 Hailiang Zhang wrote:
 Thanks Edward! Actually Areaimol works well for my problem.

 But now I have a new issue looking for some advice. I want to randomly
 generate some points in the unit cell and make a quick judgment
 whether
 it
 is outside of the solvent mask or not. It seems that Areaimol doesn't
 help
 at this point, and wonder whether some others tools in CCP4 can help
 to
 make it.

 Convert solvent mask to a map, exress the random points as dummy atoms
 in
 a
 pdb file, and see reent thread on program to calculate electron
 density
 at x,y,z
 for methods to print out density at arbitrary points in a map.


 Thanks again for your help!

 Best Regards, Hailiang
 Areaimol is good for determining the contact area from the difference
 you
 mentioned. If you want to distinguish real clashes from comfortable
 van-der-Waals
 contacts, you can use pdbdist3:

   http://sb20.lbl.gov/berry/for/pdbdist3.for

 The two molecules have to be in separate pdb files. You give a
 threshold distance. For every atom in the first structure, every
 atom in the second structure that is closer than the threshold
 distance
 results in printing out the pair of atoms and the distance separating
 them.
 this gives a list of all contacts within the threshold distance.

 For v-d-w contacts are around 3.4 A, H-bonds 2.7, and anything
 closer than 2.0 could be considered a serious clash.

 Hailiang Zhang wrote:
 Hi,

 I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins and want to quickly judge whether
 there
 are some steric clashes. One quick way I am thinking is using CCP4
 AREAIMOL to calculate the surfaces of each individual protein as
 well
 as
 the heterodimer, and check whether the sum of the two individual
 surfaces
 is larger then the dimer. I am wondering whether I can get some
 advices
 about this method.

 I also know there must be some other tools to quickly do it since
 this
 is
 kinda a simple docking problem, and I appreciate if suggested some
 more
 direct methods.

 Finally, I am also wondering whether AREAIMOL considers the
 assymetric
 unit during calculation.

 Thanks!

 Hailiang














[ccp4bb] Used AREIMOL to judge the steric clashes

2011-04-10 Thread Hailiang Zhang
Hi,

I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins and want to quickly judge whether there
are some steric clashes. One quick way I am thinking is using CCP4
AREAIMOL to calculate the surfaces of each individual protein as well as
the heterodimer, and check whether the sum of the two individual surfaces
is larger then the dimer. I am wondering whether I can get some advices
about this method.

I also know there must be some other tools to quickly do it since this is
kinda a simple docking problem, and I appreciate if suggested some more
direct methods.

Finally, I am also wondering whether AREAIMOL considers the assymetric
unit during calculation.

Thanks!

Hailiang


Re: [ccp4bb] Used AREIMOL to judge the steric clashes

2011-04-10 Thread Edward A. Berry

Areaimol is good for determining the contact area from the difference you
mentioned. If you want to distinguish real clashes from comfortable 
van-der-Waals
contacts, you can use pdbdist3:

http://sb20.lbl.gov/berry/for/pdbdist3.for

The two molecules have to be in separate pdb files. You give a
threshold distance. For every atom in the first structure, every
atom in the second structure that is closer than the threshold distance
results in printing out the pair of atoms and the distance separating them.
this gives a list of all contacts within the threshold distance.

For v-d-w contacts are around 3.4 A, H-bonds 2.7, and anything
closer than 2.0 could be considered a serious clash.

Hailiang Zhang wrote:

Hi,

I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins and want to quickly judge whether there
are some steric clashes. One quick way I am thinking is using CCP4
AREAIMOL to calculate the surfaces of each individual protein as well as
the heterodimer, and check whether the sum of the two individual surfaces
is larger then the dimer. I am wondering whether I can get some advices
about this method.

I also know there must be some other tools to quickly do it since this is
kinda a simple docking problem, and I appreciate if suggested some more
direct methods.

Finally, I am also wondering whether AREAIMOL considers the assymetric
unit during calculation.

Thanks!

Hailiang



Re: [ccp4bb] Used AREIMOL to judge the steric clashes

2011-04-10 Thread Hailiang Zhang
Thanks Edward! Actually Areaimol works well for my problem.

But now I have a new issue looking for some advice. I want to randomly
generate some points in the unit cell and make a quick judgment whether it
is outside of the solvent mask or not. It seems that Areaimol doesn't help
at this point, and wonder whether some others tools in CCP4 can help to
make it.

Thanks again for your help!

Best Regards, Hailiang
 Areaimol is good for determining the contact area from the difference you
 mentioned. If you want to distinguish real clashes from comfortable
 van-der-Waals
 contacts, you can use pdbdist3:

   http://sb20.lbl.gov/berry/for/pdbdist3.for

 The two molecules have to be in separate pdb files. You give a
 threshold distance. For every atom in the first structure, every
 atom in the second structure that is closer than the threshold distance
 results in printing out the pair of atoms and the distance separating
 them.
 this gives a list of all contacts within the threshold distance.

 For v-d-w contacts are around 3.4 A, H-bonds 2.7, and anything
 closer than 2.0 could be considered a serious clash.

 Hailiang Zhang wrote:
 Hi,

 I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins and want to quickly judge whether
 there
 are some steric clashes. One quick way I am thinking is using CCP4
 AREAIMOL to calculate the surfaces of each individual protein as well as
 the heterodimer, and check whether the sum of the two individual
 surfaces
 is larger then the dimer. I am wondering whether I can get some advices
 about this method.

 I also know there must be some other tools to quickly do it since this
 is
 kinda a simple docking problem, and I appreciate if suggested some more
 direct methods.

 Finally, I am also wondering whether AREAIMOL considers the assymetric
 unit during calculation.

 Thanks!

 Hailiang