Re: [ccp4bb] off topic: problematic protein

2011-04-21 Thread Savvas Savvides
I would like to thank all of you  who promptly replied to my posting with so 
many ideas and suggestions (18 answers so far). I will post a summary soon.

best wishes to all
Savvas


 
 
 On Apr 19, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Savvas Savvides wrote:
 
 Dear colleagues
 
 We are working on a large bacterial protein (featuring a large number of 
 repeats) that appears to copurify with a lot of other proteins after 
 Ni-affinity chromatography and gel-filtration. We have tried adjusting the 
 ionic strength of these runs and have gone to as high as 5M NaCl but only 
 saw marginal improvements.  It appears that the protein likes to stick to a 
 lot of stuff, and in fact the number of repeats in a given construct 
 appears to correlate with the extent of contaminants in our purification 
 steps. We have admittedly never seen anything like this among the so many 
 different, and often challenging, proteins, we have worked on in our group 
 over the last few years.
 
 We are now thinking of trying detergents in the buffers (at non-micellar 
 concentrations), in conjunction with playing a bit with the pH to see if 
 such an approach provides a 'stripping' effect. Interestingly, the protein 
 has a calculated pI of 3.5 !
 
 As the options for handling this protein are indeed quite numerous, we 
 would be grateful for any additional input and possible tips/tricks.
 
 I will prompty post a summary of the thread.
 
 Best regards
 Savvas et al.
 
 
 
 Savvas Savvides
 Unit for Structural Biology @ L-ProBE
 Ghent University
 K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
 Tel/SMS/texting +32  (0)472 928 519
 Skype: savvas.savvides_skype
 http://www.LProBE.ugent.be/xray.html
 



Re: [ccp4bb] off topic: problematic protein

2011-04-20 Thread Tommi Kajander
I would think thing here is that this protein actually associates to  
those lipid nanodiscs...(around the disc) and Na cholate CMC is   
around 10 mM.
so, yes you can solubilise proteins that bind lipids, the question is  
does this protein bind lipids or not? or is it just scrambled or  
whatever, doesnt like to be overexpressed etc??? or sticky because it  
is part of a larger complex naturally and not stable alone, for  
instance. which i wouldn't know of course.


regards,
Tommi

On Apr 20, 2011, at 1:08 AM, Arthur Glasfeld wrote:

I recently followed a protocol from Stephen Sligar's lab for the  
purification of his nanodisc protein, which has strong hydrophobic  
character as it associates with phospholipids.  His protocol  
includes washes with 1% Triton X-100 and then with 50 mM cholate  
(both at pH 8 in the presence of 300 mM NaCl).  Worked great, and I  
saw stuff coming off the column in both washes.  The reference is:


Bayburt et al. (2002) Nano Letters, vol. 2, pp 853-856.
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl025623k

Good luck,
Arthur

Arthur Glasfeld
Department of Chemistry
Reed College
3203 SE Woodstock Blvd.
Portland, OR 97202
USA





On Apr 19, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Savvas Savvides wrote:


Dear colleagues

We are working on a large bacterial protein (featuring a large  
number of repeats) that appears to copurify with a lot of other  
proteins after Ni-affinity chromatography and gel-filtration. We  
have tried adjusting the ionic strength of these runs and have gone  
to as high as 5M NaCl but only saw marginal improvements.  It  
appears that the protein likes to stick to a lot of stuff, and in  
fact the number of repeats in a given construct appears to  
correlate with the extent of contaminants in our purification  
steps. We have admittedly never seen anything like this among the  
so many different, and often challenging, proteins, we have worked  
on in our group over the last few years.


We are now thinking of trying detergents in the buffers (at non- 
micellar concentrations), in conjunction with playing a bit with  
the pH to see if such an approach provides a 'stripping' effect.  
Interestingly, the protein has a calculated pI of 3.5 !


As the options for handling this protein are indeed quite numerous,  
we would be grateful for any additional input and possible tips/ 
tricks.


I will prompty post a summary of the thread.

Best regards
Savvas et al.



Savvas Savvides
Unit for Structural Biology @ L-ProBE
Ghent University
K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Tel/SMS/texting +32  (0)472 928 519
Skype: savvas.savvides_skype
http://www.LProBE.ugent.be/xray.html











Tommi Kajander, Ph.D.
Structural Biology and Biophysics
Institute of Biotechnology
University of Helsinki
Viikinkaari 1
(P.O. Box 65)
00014 Helsinki
Finland
p. +358-9-19158903
tommi.kajan...@helsinki.fi


[ccp4bb] off topic: problematic protein

2011-04-19 Thread Savvas Savvides
Dear colleagues

We are working on a large bacterial protein (featuring a large number of 
repeats) that appears to copurify with a lot of other proteins after 
Ni-affinity chromatography and gel-filtration. We have tried adjusting the 
ionic strength of these runs and have gone to as high as 5M NaCl but only saw 
marginal improvements.  It appears that the protein likes to stick to a lot of 
stuff, and in fact the number of repeats in a given construct appears to 
correlate with the extent of contaminants in our purification steps. We have 
admittedly never seen anything like this among the so many different, and often 
challenging, proteins, we have worked on in our group over the last few years.

We are now thinking of trying detergents in the buffers (at non-micellar 
concentrations), in conjunction with playing a bit with the pH to see if such 
an approach provides a 'stripping' effect. Interestingly, the protein has a 
calculated pI of 3.5 !

As the options for handling this protein are indeed quite numerous, we would be 
grateful for any additional input and possible tips/tricks.

I will prompty post a summary of the thread.

Best regards
Savvas et al.



Savvas Savvides
Unit for Structural Biology @ L-ProBE
Ghent University
K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Tel/SMS/texting +32  (0)472 928 519
Skype: savvas.savvides_skype
http://www.LProBE.ugent.be/xray.html









Re: [ccp4bb] off topic: problematic protein

2011-04-19 Thread Arthur Glasfeld
I recently followed a protocol from Stephen Sligar's lab for the purification 
of his nanodisc protein, which has strong hydrophobic character as it 
associates with phospholipids.  His protocol includes washes with 1% Triton 
X-100 and then with 50 mM cholate (both at pH 8 in the presence of 300 mM 
NaCl).  Worked great, and I saw stuff coming off the column in both washes.  
The reference is:

Bayburt et al. (2002) Nano Letters, vol. 2, pp 853-856.
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl025623k

Good luck,
Arthur

Arthur Glasfeld
Department of Chemistry
Reed College
3203 SE Woodstock Blvd.
Portland, OR 97202
USA





On Apr 19, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Savvas Savvides wrote:

 Dear colleagues
 
 We are working on a large bacterial protein (featuring a large number of 
 repeats) that appears to copurify with a lot of other proteins after 
 Ni-affinity chromatography and gel-filtration. We have tried adjusting the 
 ionic strength of these runs and have gone to as high as 5M NaCl but only saw 
 marginal improvements.  It appears that the protein likes to stick to a lot 
 of stuff, and in fact the number of repeats in a given construct appears to 
 correlate with the extent of contaminants in our purification steps. We have 
 admittedly never seen anything like this among the so many different, and 
 often challenging, proteins, we have worked on in our group over the last few 
 years.
 
 We are now thinking of trying detergents in the buffers (at non-micellar 
 concentrations), in conjunction with playing a bit with the pH to see if such 
 an approach provides a 'stripping' effect. Interestingly, the protein has a 
 calculated pI of 3.5 !
 
 As the options for handling this protein are indeed quite numerous, we would 
 be grateful for any additional input and possible tips/tricks.
 
 I will prompty post a summary of the thread.
 
 Best regards
 Savvas et al.
 
 
 
 Savvas Savvides
 Unit for Structural Biology @ L-ProBE
 Ghent University
 K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
 Tel/SMS/texting +32  (0)472 928 519
 Skype: savvas.savvides_skype
 http://www.LProBE.ugent.be/xray.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Re: [ccp4bb] off topic: problematic protein

2011-04-19 Thread Kendall Nettles
HI Savvas,
We recently had a protein that showed two overlapping peaks on the disposable 
fast flow Q columns, so we decided to see if we could resolve them with a 
higher resolution Q media. It ended up having 7 distinct peaks, only one of 
which was free of contaminants. We have also noticed that the presence of heat 
shock protein bound to our favorite protein is highly dependent on the 
induction time/temp, and also varies between bacterial strains. It is also 
effected by the media. Yo might try osmotic shock or other additives in the 
media.

We have also had luck by adding 1-3 molar urea in the lysis buffer. We get lots 
more protein out, with better purity, but some of it crashes, which I think is 
purifying out the misfolded protein.

Lastly, you might try a fusion protein to something that has chaperone 
activity, like MBP, which may mask the binding epitopes for the other proteins.
Best regards,
Kendall Nettles


On Apr 19, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Savvas Savvides wrote:

Dear colleagues

We are working on a large bacterial protein (featuring a large number of 
repeats) that appears to copurify with a lot of other proteins after 
Ni-affinity chromatography and gel-filtration. We have tried adjusting the 
ionic strength of these runs and have gone to as high as 5M NaCl but only saw 
marginal improvements.  It appears that the protein likes to stick to a lot of 
stuff, and in fact the number of repeats in a given construct appears to 
correlate with the extent of contaminants in our purification steps. We have 
admittedly never seen anything like this among the so many different, and often 
challenging, proteins, we have worked on in our group over the last few years.

We are now thinking of trying detergents in the buffers (at non-micellar 
concentrations), in conjunction with playing a bit with the pH to see if such 
an approach provides a 'stripping' effect. Interestingly, the protein has a 
calculated pI of 3.5 !

As the options for handling this protein are indeed quite numerous, we would be 
grateful for any additional input and possible tips/tricks.

I will prompty post a summary of the thread.

Best regards
Savvas et al.



Savvas Savvides
Unit for Structural Biology @ L-ProBE
Ghent University
K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Tel/SMS/texting +32  (0)472 928 519
Skype: savvas.savvides_skype
http://www.LProBE.ugent.be/xray.html