[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-03-04 Thread Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via cctalk
Chris Zach via cctalk  writes:

> It is quite possible to put a touch of watch oil on the shaft of an
> older drive (without opening it) to quiet the bearings and
> re-libricate the grease. I'm still running RD54's and RD53's without
> much of an issue, firing them up every few months seems to keep them
> happy.

All the RD53s that I've owned have died, but every RD54 is still
working.  One of them has developed a bearing whine that occurs for a
few seconds once every couple of hours, though, and I'd like to try
oiling the lower bearing.  However, the circuit board is in the way.
Do you have experience with taking that off to get at the end of the
shaft?  Are there gotchas under there, like flimsy connectors that will
break when you try to lift the board?

-tih
-- 
Most people who graduate with CS degrees don't understand the significance
of Lisp.  Lisp is the most important idea in computer science.  --Alan Kay


[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-27 Thread Rod Smallwood via cctalk

Get a sheet of glass.

In a not too dusty area (hint A/C has filers usually)

gloves on

Top off glass on - all will be revealed.

Rod - Digital Equipment Corporation  1975 - 1985



On 27/02/2024 03:50, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote:

Oh wait, that sound? Over and over?

I had a RD54 type drive that I hit with a magnet by mistake and took 
out the servo platter. Got that sound, over and over because the drive 
used servo loop positioning and couldn't find the servo track.


Since you probably didn't do this, check to see if you get a signal 
off the servo head, and the preamps there. That might actually be it.


C


On 2/26/2024 5:28 PM, Jacob Ritorto via cctalk wrote:

Thanks for the good ideas and convo everyone.

Now please do note that I can definitely hear motor/platter spinup
happening so it's definitely not "heads stuck to platter" stiction.

I hear the lock unlatch and I *think* I even hear the heads load and fly
(comparing what I hear on this drive to other drives I've actually 
seen the
guts of in flying action) so I substantially doubt it's "arm stuck to 
lock

pad goo" stiction.

So we've made it through a lot of the powerup sequence and the 
problem is
at the final part - the track scan up and back down the surface - the 
phase

when the signature "...blearrt-meelrp..." happens :)

And yes I believe from memory that XT-2190 is supposed to make the same
track scan noise as the XT-1140 (I have an XT-1140 running perfectly 
as a

fake RD54 in another pdp here).

So could my behaviour of being hung at the final phase - the track scan
noise - be the result of a lost servo track?  Thinking about that, 
didn't

someone on this list kill an XT-2190 recently by taking an outrageous
magnet to it?  Did you get the same track scan failure as I'm getting?

Confused electronics on the PCB?

Something else?

Where would one begin diagnosing this particular problem?

I did try the wrist twist torquing thing.

And lightly whacking side of housing with palm of hand during track scan
noise.  Declining to do that hard, tho.

Powered off and back on (to retry) probably near a hundred times now.

Heated it gently in front of our forced-air furnace duct until 
comfortably

warm to touch - probably near 105 F.

All these produced absolutely zero behaviour change.

thx
jake


[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-26 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk

Oh wait, that sound? Over and over?

I had a RD54 type drive that I hit with a magnet by mistake and took out 
the servo platter. Got that sound, over and over because the drive used 
servo loop positioning and couldn't find the servo track.


Since you probably didn't do this, check to see if you get a signal off 
the servo head, and the preamps there. That might actually be it.


C


On 2/26/2024 5:28 PM, Jacob Ritorto via cctalk wrote:

Thanks for the good ideas and convo everyone.

Now please do note that I can definitely hear motor/platter spinup
happening so it's definitely not "heads stuck to platter" stiction.

I hear the lock unlatch and I *think* I even hear the heads load and fly
(comparing what I hear on this drive to other drives I've actually seen the
guts of in flying action) so I substantially doubt it's "arm stuck to lock
pad goo" stiction.

So we've made it through a lot of the powerup sequence and the problem is
at the final part - the track scan up and back down the surface - the phase
when the signature "...blearrt-meelrp..." happens :)

And yes I believe from memory that XT-2190 is supposed to make the same
track scan noise as the XT-1140 (I have an XT-1140 running perfectly as a
fake RD54 in another pdp here).

So could my behaviour of being hung at the final phase - the track scan
noise - be the result of a lost servo track?  Thinking about that, didn't
someone on this list kill an XT-2190 recently by taking an outrageous
magnet to it?  Did you get the same track scan failure as I'm getting?

Confused electronics on the PCB?

Something else?

Where would one begin diagnosing this particular problem?

I did try the wrist twist torquing thing.

And lightly whacking side of housing with palm of hand during track scan
noise.  Declining to do that hard, tho.

Powered off and back on (to retry) probably near a hundred times now.

Heated it gently in front of our forced-air furnace duct until comfortably
warm to touch - probably near 105 F.

All these produced absolutely zero behaviour change.

thx
jake


[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-26 Thread Wayne S via cctalk
Here’s some info.

https://www.stason.org/TULARC/pc/hard-drives-hdd/maxtor/XT-2190-155MB-5-25-FH-MFM-ST506.html

It does sound like it can’t seek.
Maybe a jumper incorrect?

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 26, 2024, at 14:29, Jacob Ritorto via cctalk  
wrote:

Thanks for the good ideas and convo everyone.

Now please do note that I can definitely hear motor/platter spinup
happening so it's definitely not "heads stuck to platter" stiction.

I hear the lock unlatch and I *think* I even hear the heads load and fly
(comparing what I hear on this drive to other drives I've actually seen the
guts of in flying action) so I substantially doubt it's "arm stuck to lock
pad goo" stiction.

So we've made it through a lot of the powerup sequence and the problem is
at the final part - the track scan up and back down the surface - the phase
when the signature "...blearrt-meelrp..." happens :)

And yes I believe from memory that XT-2190 is supposed to make the same
track scan noise as the XT-1140 (I have an XT-1140 running perfectly as a
fake RD54 in another pdp here).

So could my behaviour of being hung at the final phase - the track scan
noise - be the result of a lost servo track?  Thinking about that, didn't
someone on this list kill an XT-2190 recently by taking an outrageous
magnet to it?  Did you get the same track scan failure as I'm getting?

Confused electronics on the PCB?

Something else?

Where would one begin diagnosing this particular problem?

I did try the wrist twist torquing thing.

And lightly whacking side of housing with palm of hand during track scan
noise.  Declining to do that hard, tho.

Powered off and back on (to retry) probably near a hundred times now.

Heated it gently in front of our forced-air furnace duct until comfortably
warm to touch - probably near 105 F.

All these produced absolutely zero behaviour change.

thx
jake


[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-26 Thread Jacob Ritorto via cctalk
Thanks for the good ideas and convo everyone.

Now please do note that I can definitely hear motor/platter spinup
happening so it's definitely not "heads stuck to platter" stiction.

I hear the lock unlatch and I *think* I even hear the heads load and fly
(comparing what I hear on this drive to other drives I've actually seen the
guts of in flying action) so I substantially doubt it's "arm stuck to lock
pad goo" stiction.

So we've made it through a lot of the powerup sequence and the problem is
at the final part - the track scan up and back down the surface - the phase
when the signature "...blearrt-meelrp..." happens :)

And yes I believe from memory that XT-2190 is supposed to make the same
track scan noise as the XT-1140 (I have an XT-1140 running perfectly as a
fake RD54 in another pdp here).

So could my behaviour of being hung at the final phase - the track scan
noise - be the result of a lost servo track?  Thinking about that, didn't
someone on this list kill an XT-2190 recently by taking an outrageous
magnet to it?  Did you get the same track scan failure as I'm getting?

Confused electronics on the PCB?

Something else?

Where would one begin diagnosing this particular problem?

I did try the wrist twist torquing thing.

And lightly whacking side of housing with palm of hand during track scan
noise.  Declining to do that hard, tho.

Powered off and back on (to retry) probably near a hundred times now.

Heated it gently in front of our forced-air furnace duct until comfortably
warm to touch - probably near 105 F.

All these produced absolutely zero behaviour change.

thx
jake


[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-25 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk
It is quite possible to put a touch of watch oil on the shaft of an 
older drive (without opening it) to quiet the bearings and re-libricate 
the grease. I'm still running RD54's and RD53's without much of an 
issue, firing them up every few months seems to keep them happy.


Same for RD51's and RD50's. By the time you get to the full height 
Hitachi ESDI and CDC half height ESDI drives they just seem to work 
without complaining. No issues there.


C

(I love RD53's: They were the biggest disk you could run in a 
Pro/350-380 and I have opened them to free stuck heads. They have an 
absolute air filter in there which filters the air as it is sucked into 
the spindle to be blown out over the heads, so to be honest I think you 
can open and close them without the world coming to an end.


Just don't sprinkle salt from a shaker into the drive to see if the 
heads will FINALLY crash (yes, eventually that will do it).


On 2/25/2024 10:09 AM, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:

On Sat, Feb 24, 2024, 9:41 AM Rick Bensene via cctalk 
wrote:



Another trick was for drives whose read/write amplifiers (which were
typically situated within the sealed chamber, thus not replaceable except
in a clean-room facility) had become flakey, and the drive would start
getting lots of I/O errors.

I would take the drive and put it inside a large ziplock bag, along with a
bag of desiccant(this part is really important to suck up moisture in the
air in the bag), and a small battery-powered digital thermometer.  I'd put
it in the freezer until the drive had reached roughly 42F, and then take it
out, and immediately hook it up to an archival system and power it up while
it was still cold.

This would allow me to get the data off without I/O errors as long as I
could get what I needed before the drive warmed up enough that the weakness
in the amplifiers again became a problem.   I found out about this trick
somewhere on USENET many moons ago.   It worked for me a number of times.



This jogged some brain cells. I vaguely recall placing a container full of
ice on top of a drive to keep it cool enough during operation for its
bearings to not start screaming before I was able to copy all the data of
of it.

Sellam





[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-25 Thread Sellam Abraham via cctalk
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024, 9:41 AM Rick Bensene via cctalk 
wrote:

>
> Another trick was for drives whose read/write amplifiers (which were
> typically situated within the sealed chamber, thus not replaceable except
> in a clean-room facility) had become flakey, and the drive would start
> getting lots of I/O errors.
>
> I would take the drive and put it inside a large ziplock bag, along with a
> bag of desiccant(this part is really important to suck up moisture in the
> air in the bag), and a small battery-powered digital thermometer.  I'd put
> it in the freezer until the drive had reached roughly 42F, and then take it
> out, and immediately hook it up to an archival system and power it up while
> it was still cold.
>
> This would allow me to get the data off without I/O errors as long as I
> could get what I needed before the drive warmed up enough that the weakness
> in the amplifiers again became a problem.   I found out about this trick
> somewhere on USENET many moons ago.   It worked for me a number of times.
>

This jogged some brain cells. I vaguely recall placing a container full of
ice on top of a drive to keep it cool enough during operation for its
bearings to not start screaming before I was able to copy all the data of
of it.

Sellam

>


[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-24 Thread Rick Bensene via cctalk
Unsticking stiction is different than dislodging a stuck actuator.  

Stiction is where the heads resting on the disk surface resist the torque of 
the spindle drive, causing the drive not to spin up.  Generally it is caused by 
weak driver transistors in the spindle drive such that the spindle motor does 
not generate sufficient torque to overcome the static tension on the disk 
caused by the numerous heads sitting on it.   

This didn't happen on drives that retracted the heads either completely off of 
the disk surface, or had a ramp mechanism that raised the heads off the surface 
when the heads were retracted.   The retraction would occur at power off when a 
large capacitor was discharged across the voicecoil with enough energy to pull 
the heads to the parking position.  

However, some drives actually had a dedicated landing zone on the disk surfaces 
where the heads could gently settle down (land) onto the disk surface as the 
platters spun down.  It was this type of drive that tended to have issues with 
stiction. 

Other cases where stiction could become a problem is in situations where the 
power-off retract didn't work properly, leaving the heads in contact with the 
disk surface when they weren't supposed to be.In these situations, if the 
stiction was cleared by rapping the drive the right way, data damage could 
occur.  

In the case of stiction where there is a landing zone, since there's no 
data/servo information in the landing zone area, causing an abrupt acceleration 
in the correct axis could dislodge the heads, allowing the drive to spin up 
properly.  So, rapping them with a hammer was a solution for these cases, 
though I typically used a small-sized dead-blow rubber mallet rather than a 
hammer, as it wouldn't induce as much resonance as rapping the HDA case with a 
metal-headed hammer. 

Also, I managed to use a variant of the "twist" method to clear stiction.  I 
would hook a power connector to the drive, with a switch that switched the +12 
and +5 power.  I would hold the drive in one hand, and the switch in the other. 
 I'd throw the switch to the ON position, and at the same time, give the drive 
a quick twist.  The twist would accelerate the platters just enough to overcome 
the stiction such that the spindle drive could start up properly.   I'd let it 
run long enough to warm up, then shut it off, and quickly hook it up to the 
archival system, and it'd properly spin up and I could get the data off.

I also used the hammer method to release stiction.  

Another trick was for drives whose read/write amplifiers (which were typically 
situated within the sealed chamber, thus not replaceable except in a clean-room 
facility) had become flakey, and the drive would start getting lots of I/O 
errors.

I would take the drive and put it inside a large ziplock bag, along with a bag 
of desiccant(this part is really important to suck up moisture in the air in 
the bag), and a small battery-powered digital thermometer.  I'd put it in the 
freezer until the drive had reached roughly 42F, and then take it out, and 
immediately hook it up to an archival system and power it up while it was still 
cold.   

This would allow me to get the data off without I/O errors as long as I could 
get what I needed before the drive warmed up enough that the weakness in the 
amplifiers again became a problem.   I found out about this trick somewhere on 
USENET many moons ago.   It worked for me a number of times.   

I can't say that it'd work on anything more recent than /early/ 3.5" hard disk 
drives, though. Newer technology drives have such tight tolerances that the 
cooling might cause shrinkage that could cause head crashes, so take heed.  

-Original Message-
From: Bill Gunshannon via cctalk [mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org] 
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 6:10 AM
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
Cc: Bill Gunshannon 
Subject: [cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep




Back in the day when these disks were common I used to elicit a good laugh from 
my boss when I got out my little mallet and smacked the side of the drive. 
Stiction was the problem but a good hammer fixes anything.  And, no, I never 
had it damage a disk.  I guess it was all in the technique.  :-)

bill



[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-24 Thread Sellam Abraham via cctalk
"...blearrt-meelrp..."

Best audio-to-text descriptive ever.

Sellam

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:47 PM Jacob Ritorto via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> Hi!  Remember the blearrt-meelrp sounding seek oscillation noise
> that the RD54 makes when you turn it on -- after it spins up, unlatches and
> loads the heads?
>
> Well, I took a chance on an el-(c)heapo ePay special RD54 that does all
> these things perfectly up until the seek oscillation thing and then only
> makes one steady m- sound that seems to last indefinitely (or at least
> until I get tired of listening to it after a few minutes).
>
> Would anyone here know enough about these disks to venture a guess at where
> to begin troubleshooting this?
>
>
> thx
> jake
>
> P.S.  If I'm being too vague, let me restate: I can hear it spin up,
> bearings sound normal, hear it unlock its head lock latch, then a perfectly
> *slight* noise of head actuation and the normal accompanying barely audible
> riding-on-air head noise.  Then I expect to hear the two seek tones, but
> only get one steady seek tone that lasts (I assume) forever.
>


[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-24 Thread Bill Gunshannon via cctalk





Back in the day when these disks were common I used to elicit
a good laugh from my boss when I got out my little mallet and
smacked the side of the drive. Stiction was the problem but a
good hammer fixes anything.  And, no, I never had it damage a
disk.  I guess it was all in the technique.  :-)

bill



[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-24 Thread Tom Hunter via cctalk
Thanks Rick for clarifying my somewhat ambiguous description of how to
dislodge a stuck voice coil mechanism.

On Sat, 24 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm Rick Bensene via cctalk, <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> Just make sure when you torque the drive as mentioned that you rotate it
> in as close to the same axis of rotation as the platter(s) spin as
> possible, as any other direction of torque could cause the head(s) to
> impact the platter(s) with more energy than desirable, especially if the
> head(s) are positioned over data areas.
>
> Sometimes the actuator will not fully park when the drive is last powered
> off, especially if things are already gummy.  That can leave the heads over
> area of the disk where data or servo information is recorded, potentially
> causing damage that may not be repairable (without opening the sealed
> area), and likely ruining part or all of the data on the drive (if you care
> about what's on it) even if the positioner is "unstuck" by the torque.
>
> I have successfully (at least temporarily) resurrected some old Maxtor
> XT-1140 (ST-506) drives using this "twist" technique.   My experience shows
> that the technique only works a few times and then it quits working.  Thus,
> if you do get the drive running and care about the data that is on it,
> before powering it up, get it connected up to a system that you can use to
> reliably archive the content, because once you power it back down, it may
> get stuck worse than it was before.
>
> I have not tried "cooking" the drive as also mentioned.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Hunter via cctalk [mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 6:25 PM
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> Cc: Tom Hunter 
> Subject: [cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep
>
> It may be that the voice coil positioner is stuck due to some hardened
> grease.
> If that is the case, you could try holding the drive in your hand and
> flick your wrist hard several times to try to dislodge a possibly stuck
> voice coil.
> Alternatively you could flick the drive against something soft like your
> thigh or a rubber mat.
> Finally you could try to gently heat the drive to about 60 degrees C and
> then immediately before cooling connect it up to exercise the now hopefully
> loosened voice coil mechanism.
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 8:15 AM Jacob Ritorto via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 19:01, r.stricklin via cctalk <
> > cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > voice coil positioner.
> >
> >
> > Yikes, so that's an "open the lid" situation, bear?  Any "how to"
> > advise / docs / anecdotes out there as I begin searching?
> >
>


[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-23 Thread Rick Bensene via cctalk
Just make sure when you torque the drive as mentioned that you rotate it in as 
close to the same axis of rotation as the platter(s) spin as possible, as any 
other direction of torque could cause the head(s) to impact the platter(s) with 
more energy than desirable, especially if the head(s) are positioned over data 
areas.   

Sometimes the actuator will not fully park when the drive is last powered off, 
especially if things are already gummy.  That can leave the heads over area of 
the disk where data or servo information is recorded, potentially causing 
damage that may not be repairable (without opening the sealed area), and likely 
ruining part or all of the data on the drive (if you care about what's on it) 
even if the positioner is "unstuck" by the torque.

I have successfully (at least temporarily) resurrected some old Maxtor XT-1140 
(ST-506) drives using this "twist" technique.   My experience shows that the 
technique only works a few times and then it quits working.  Thus, if you do 
get the drive running and care about the data that is on it, before powering it 
up, get it connected up to a system that you can use to reliably archive the 
content, because once you power it back down, it may get stuck worse than it 
was before.

I have not tried "cooking" the drive as also mentioned.  




-Original Message-
From: Tom Hunter via cctalk [mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 6:25 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts 
Cc: Tom Hunter 
Subject: [cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

It may be that the voice coil positioner is stuck due to some hardened grease.
If that is the case, you could try holding the drive in your hand and flick 
your wrist hard several times to try to dislodge a possibly stuck voice coil.
Alternatively you could flick the drive against something soft like your thigh 
or a rubber mat.
Finally you could try to gently heat the drive to about 60 degrees C and then 
immediately before cooling connect it up to exercise the now hopefully loosened 
voice coil mechanism.

On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 8:15 AM Jacob Ritorto via cctalk < 
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 19:01, r.stricklin via cctalk < 
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> wrote:
>
> > voice coil positioner.
>
>
> Yikes, so that's an "open the lid" situation, bear?  Any "how to" 
> advise / docs / anecdotes out there as I begin searching?
>


[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-23 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
I wonder if the XT2180 uses the same mech as the XT1140.  That thing's
initial seek would wake the dead..

--Chuck



[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-23 Thread Tom Hunter via cctalk
It may be that the voice coil positioner is stuck due to some hardened
grease.
If that is the case, you could try holding the drive in your hand and flick
your wrist hard several times to try to dislodge a possibly stuck voice
coil.
Alternatively you could flick the drive against something soft like your
thigh or a rubber mat.
Finally you could try to gently heat the drive to about 60 degrees C and
then immediately before cooling connect it up to exercise the now hopefully
loosened voice coil mechanism.

On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 8:15 AM Jacob Ritorto via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 19:01, r.stricklin via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> wrote:
>
> > voice coil positioner.
>
>
> Yikes, so that's an "open the lid" situation, bear?  Any "how to" advise /
> docs / anecdotes out there as I begin searching?
>


[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-23 Thread Jacob Ritorto via cctalk
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 19:01, r.stricklin via cctalk 
wrote:

> voice coil positioner.


Yikes, so that's an "open the lid" situation, bear?  Any "how to" advise /
docs / anecdotes out there as I begin searching?


[cctalk] Re: RD54 Maxtor XT-2190 w/one long meep

2024-02-23 Thread r.stricklin via cctalk


> On Feb 23, 2024, at 3:46 PM, Jacob Ritorto via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
> Would anyone here know enough about these disks to venture a guess at where
> to begin troubleshooting this?


voice coil positioner.


ok
bear.