Re: This actually works!

2012-01-20 Thread Raymond Camden

I don't think that is accurate. Yes you can use array/struct functions
on them, but they are not array/structs. Consider this example:

cfxml variable=test
obs
users
name type=rootRay/name
nameFoo/name
/users
/obs
/cfxml

cfdump var=#test#
cfset node = test.obs.users.name[2]
cfoutput#xmlGetNodeType(node)#/cfoutput
p
cfoutput#node.getClass()#/cfoutput

The first output clearly shows much more then a structure and much
more than what you see above - ie it recognizes that 'type' is an
xmlAttribute.

The second example shows that the class behind the variable is
org.apache.xerces.dom.DeferredElementNSImpl.

Maybe I'm being picky. ;)


On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Justin Scott leviat...@darktech.org wrote:

 Yeah, thanks Rick, good tip. You'll find that working with CF XML
 nodes is a lot like working with structs and arrays, so most of
 those array*() and struct*() built-in functions will work with your XML.

 When you use XMLParse(), the resulting variable is a set of arrays and
 structures, so it's not just a lot like working with them, you
 actually are, so all of the relevant functions are applicable.
 Whenever I'm working with parsing XML I tend to make judicious use of
 CFDUMP which will show the entire set of ColdFusion data structures
 and makes navigating them a lot easier.  Glad this got brought up as
 I've run into a lot of people that didn't realize this was the case.


 -Justin

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349560
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: This actually works!

2012-01-20 Thread Andrew Scott

Raymond,

From what I have experienced what is returned from XMLParse is indeed an
associate array, an array of structs, and your example doesn't use XMLParse.

So Justin is actually correct.

-- 
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
Google+: http://plus.google.com/108193156965451149543




On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Raymond Camden raymondcam...@gmail.comwrote:


 I don't think that is accurate. Yes you can use array/struct functions
 on them, but they are not array/structs. Consider this example:

 cfxml variable=test
 obs
 users
name type=rootRay/name
nameFoo/name
 /users
 /obs
 /cfxml

 cfdump var=#test#
 cfset node = test.obs.users.name[2]
 cfoutput#xmlGetNodeType(node)#/cfoutput
 p
 cfoutput#node.getClass()#/cfoutput

 The first output clearly shows much more then a structure and much
 more than what you see above - ie it recognizes that 'type' is an
 xmlAttribute.

 The second example shows that the class behind the variable is
 org.apache.xerces.dom.DeferredElementNSImpl.

 Maybe I'm being picky. ;)





~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349561
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: This actually works!

2012-01-20 Thread Raymond Camden

I repeated my test using xmlParse and got the same results.

cfsavecontent variable=test
obs
users
name type=rootRay/name
nameFoo/name
/users
/obs
/cfsavecontent
cfset test2 = xmlParse(test)
cfdump var=#test2#
cfset node = test2.obs.users.name[2]
cfoutput#xmlGetNodeType(node)#/cfoutput
p
cfoutput#node.getClass()#/cfoutput

Again, I don't think it's critical, but I really think I'm right here.
These _aren't_ exactly array/structs.

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Andrew Scott andr...@andyscott.id.au wrote:

 Raymond,

 From what I have experienced what is returned from XMLParse is indeed an
 associate array, an array of structs, and your example doesn't use XMLParse.

 So Justin is actually correct.

 --
 Regards,
 Andrew Scott
 WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
 Google+: http://plus.google.com/108193156965451149543




 On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Raymond Camden 
 raymondcam...@gmail.comwrote:


 I don't think that is accurate. Yes you can use array/struct functions
 on them, but they are not array/structs. Consider this example:

 cfxml variable=test
 obs
 users
        name type=rootRay/name
        nameFoo/name
 /users
 /obs
 /cfxml

 cfdump var=#test#
 cfset node = test.obs.users.name[2]
 cfoutput#xmlGetNodeType(node)#/cfoutput
 p
 cfoutput#node.getClass()#/cfoutput

 The first output clearly shows much more then a structure and much
 more than what you see above - ie it recognizes that 'type' is an
 xmlAttribute.

 The second example shows that the class behind the variable is
 org.apache.xerces.dom.DeferredElementNSImpl.

 Maybe I'm being picky. ;)





 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349562
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: This actually works!

2012-01-20 Thread Andrew Scott

Cool, well you maybe right.

-- 
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
Google+: http://plus.google.com/108193156965451149543


On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Raymond Camden raymondcam...@gmail.comwrote:


 I repeated my test using xmlParse and got the same results.

 cfsavecontent variable=test
 obs
 users
name type=rootRay/name
nameFoo/name
 /users
 /obs
 /cfsavecontent
 cfset test2 = xmlParse(test)
 cfdump var=#test2#
 cfset node = test2.obs.users.name[2]
 cfoutput#xmlGetNodeType(node)#/cfoutput
 p
 cfoutput#node.getClass()#/cfoutput

 Again, I don't think it's critical, but I really think I'm right here.
 These _aren't_ exactly array/structs.




~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349563
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: ridiculously cheap CFML conference next month

2012-01-20 Thread Roger Austin

 andy matthews li...@commadelimited.com wrote: 
 
 But will NCDevCon be taking place this year? I've heard different stories.

I'm not the official spokesperson, but I doubt any decision has been made one 
way or another. We are not that organized. (Don't tell Dan or Jim I said that.)

A big factor is when our wonderful host, North Carolina State University 
College 
of Textiles, can schedule the facility for our use. Another big factor is 
whether 
Adobe will continue to support ColdFusion. (Note the very effective use of a 
highly volatile diversionary tactic there. ;)

Thanks from all of us in TACFUG for the show of support.
--
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/roger-austin/8/a4/60
Twitter:  http://twitter.com/RogerTheGeek
Google+:  https://plus.google.com/117357905892731200369


~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349564
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: ridiculously cheap CFML conference next month

2012-01-20 Thread Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Jason Blum jason.b...@gmail.com wrote:

 I know http://OpenCFSummit.org has been mentioned a few times on this
 list.  I just wanted to share that the schedule is up and registrations are
 pouring in: http://opencfsummit.org/index.cfm/schedule/

 Also wanted to clarify that the reason this conference is so cheap is
 obviously because of our amazing sponsors - but the idea behind it is to
 grow our community by trying to attract programmers from other technologies.



Too bad the round trip flight from Albany, NY is about $600...


~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349565
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: ridiculously cheap CFML conference next month

2012-01-20 Thread andy matthews

Yeah, I went the first year when it was CFinNC and it was fantastic.



andy 

-Original Message-
From: Justin Scott [mailto:leviat...@darktech.org] 
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:37 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: ridiculously cheap CFML conference next month


 But will NCDevCon be taking place this year? I've heard different stories.

I am not involved in the conference aside from attending, so I do not know
what their plans are for 2012.  As an attendee I certainly hope they choose
to continue with NCDevCon if it's feasible to do so.  The College of
Textiles was am amazing host location and everyone involved with the
conference did a wonderful job.  If they do run it again in
2012 I will definitely be making the trip.


-Justin Scott



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349566
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: This actually works!

2012-01-20 Thread Jochem van Dieten

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Justin Scott wrote:
 When you use XMLParse(), the resulting variable is a set of arrays and
 structures, so it's not just a lot like working with them, you
 actually are,

What does that even mean in a typeless language?


The way I always explain it when doing CF training is that in a
strongly typed language variable datatypes take precedence over
function/operator datatypes while in CFML funtion and operator types
take precedence over variable datatypes.
So in a strongly typed language the statement x = y + z is executed
by looking at the datatypes of y and z, and then searching for an
operator with symbol + and a left and right parameter with the right
datatypes. In CFML on the other hand the statement x = y + z is
executed by searching for the operator +, finding out what types its
left and right parameter are and then casting y and z to the
required type.

So no, the resulting variable from XMLParse() is not a set of arrays
and structures, it is a variable that is cast-compatible with array
and structure functions.

Jochem


-- 
Jochem van Dieten
http://jochem.vandieten.net/

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349567
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


(ot) SEO

2012-01-20 Thread Dave Hatz

Sorry about the OT here, but I know there are some really good SEO people that 
are on this list.

I have a CFM page that processes some information, then redirects to another 
CFM page.  I have a client that is telling me that my redirect inside my cfm 
page is not going to work for SEO.

I have index.cfm, it parses the URL for some data, updates the DB, then I use 
CFLOCATION to send the page to another CFM page.  Client says this will not 
work for his SEO stuff.  

As you can tell, I am not well versed in SEO.  Can I get some verification from 
others on this list that are well versed on SEO topics and let me know if my 
client is right or wrong? 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349568
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


CF9 .NET Integration

2012-01-20 Thread Rob Parkhill

Good Morning,

I'm having an issue getting the .NET integration working with CF 9.01.  I've 
downloaded and replaced the .NET integration stuff, to make sure that that is 
all good, but now it won't reference any class inside the assembly.  NOTE:  
This is my first time with .NET integration...

I have help docs for a .NET SDK that is part of a program we use at work.  
Seems that it can access the assembly fine, but not see any of the functions 
inside of it.  From the help docs for the SDK, it seems that the classes are 
all in various name spaces.  Should I reference the namespace when indicating 
the class name?  Do I use dot notation or replace the dots with underscores?

Right now I have the following:

cfobject type=.NET name=labber assembl=path.to.dll class=COM_Batch/

then I get an error COM_Batch not found in specified assembly and regardless 
of how I reference the class 'COM_Batch' the error doesn't change.

Are there any suggestions for what I might be missing here?

Cheers,

Rob 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349569
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: (ot) SEO

2012-01-20 Thread Jacob

You may want to look into this.

cfheader statuscode=301 statustext=Moved permanently
cfheader name=Location value=http://www.domain.com/page.cfm;

If you are doing redirects, you want to use 301 to be search engine
friendly.

-Original Message-
From: Dave Hatz [mailto:daveh...@hatzventures.org] 
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 7:15 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: (ot) SEO


Sorry about the OT here, but I know there are some really good SEO people
that are on this list.

I have a CFM page that processes some information, then redirects to another
CFM page.  I have a client that is telling me that my redirect inside my cfm
page is not going to work for SEO.

I have index.cfm, it parses the URL for some data, updates the DB, then I
use CFLOCATION to send the page to another CFM page.  Client says this will
not work for his SEO stuff.  

As you can tell, I am not well versed in SEO.  Can I get some verification
from others on this list that are well versed on SEO topics and let me know
if my client is right or wrong? 



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349570
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: CF9 .NET Integration

2012-01-20 Thread Scott Stewart

It sounds like you've run into an issue that I ran into when I upgraded to
9.0.1

See if this blog entry helps:
http://www.sstwebworks.com/index.cfm?mode=archivemonth=7year=2011

Hope this helps



On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Rob Parkhill robert.parkh...@gmail.comwrote:


 Good Morning,

 I'm having an issue getting the .NET integration working with CF 9.01.
  I've downloaded and replaced the .NET integration stuff, to make sure that
 that is all good, but now it won't reference any class inside the assembly.
  NOTE:  This is my first time with .NET integration...

 I have help docs for a .NET SDK that is part of a program we use at work.
  Seems that it can access the assembly fine, but not see any of the
 functions inside of it.  From the help docs for the SDK, it seems that the
 classes are all in various name spaces.  Should I reference the namespace
 when indicating the class name?  Do I use dot notation or replace the dots
 with underscores?

 Right now I have the following:

 cfobject type=.NET name=labber assembl=path.to.dll
 class=COM_Batch/

 then I get an error COM_Batch not found in specified assembly and
 regardless of how I reference the class 'COM_Batch' the error doesn't
 change.

 Are there any suggestions for what I might be missing here?

 Cheers,

 Rob

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349571
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: (ot) SEO

2012-01-20 Thread Steve 'Cutter' Blades

The bigger question is, what is it you are doing in the interim process, 
and is a redirect truly necessary? If this is a logging process, why 
aren't you just logging in your onRequestEnd? By doing the 301, the 
Search Engines are going to index and catalog the page being directed 
to. This means that users coming from the search engine would get links 
directly to the redirected page, skipping the interim process currently 
in place.

Sounds like you need to build a better mousetrap.

Steve 'Cutter' Blades
Adobe Community Professional
Adobe Certified Expert
Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer

http://cutterscrossing.com


Co-Author Learning Ext JS 3.2 Packt Publishing 2010
https://www.packtpub.com/learning-ext-js-3-2-for-building-dynamic-desktop-style-user-interfaces/book

The best way to predict the future is to help create it


On 1/20/2012 10:29 AM, Jacob wrote:
 You may want to look into this.

 cfheader statuscode=301 statustext=Moved permanently
 cfheader name=Location value=http://www.domain.com/page.cfm;

 If you are doing redirects, you want to use 301 to be search engine
 friendly.

 -Original Message-
 From: Dave Hatz [mailto:daveh...@hatzventures.org]
 Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 7:15 AM
 To: cf-talk
 Subject: (ot) SEO


 Sorry about the OT here, but I know there are some really good SEO people
 that are on this list.

 I have a CFM page that processes some information, then redirects to another
 CFM page.  I have a client that is telling me that my redirect inside my cfm
 page is not going to work for SEO.

 I have index.cfm, it parses the URL for some data, updates the DB, then I
 useCFLOCATION to send the page to another CFM page.  Client says this will
 not work for his SEO stuff.

 As you can tell, I am not well versed in SEO.  Can I get some verification
 from others on this list that are well versed on SEO topics and let me know
 if my client is right or wrong?



 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349572
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: CF9 .NET Integration

2012-01-20 Thread Rob Parkhill

Scott,

Thanks, but I had that issue and fixed it.  It can open the assembly, but
it never finds the class inside of it.  I'm not sure if it is a problem
with the source dll, or if it has to do with name spaces.

Cheers,

Rob
On Jan 20, 2012 10:40 AM, Scott Stewart webmas...@sstwebworks.com wrote:


 It sounds like you've run into an issue that I ran into when I upgraded to
 9.0.1

 See if this blog entry helps:
 http://www.sstwebworks.com/index.cfm?mode=archivemonth=7year=2011

 Hope this helps



 On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Rob Parkhill robert.parkh...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
  Good Morning,
 
  I'm having an issue getting the .NET integration working with CF 9.01.
   I've downloaded and replaced the .NET integration stuff, to make sure
 that
  that is all good, but now it won't reference any class inside the
 assembly.
   NOTE:  This is my first time with .NET integration...
 
  I have help docs for a .NET SDK that is part of a program we use at work.
   Seems that it can access the assembly fine, but not see any of the
  functions inside of it.  From the help docs for the SDK, it seems that
 the
  classes are all in various name spaces.  Should I reference the namespace
  when indicating the class name?  Do I use dot notation or replace the
 dots
  with underscores?
 
  Right now I have the following:
 
  cfobject type=.NET name=labber assembl=path.to.dll
  class=COM_Batch/
 
  then I get an error COM_Batch not found in specified assembly and
  regardless of how I reference the class 'COM_Batch' the error doesn't
  change.
 
  Are there any suggestions for what I might be missing here?
 
  Cheers,
 
  Rob
 
 

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349573
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: CF9 .NET Integration

2012-01-20 Thread Scott Stewart

After you instantiate the assembly, dump it. This will show you what CF
sees.. it ain't always what you think it should be.

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Rob Parkhill robert.parkh...@gmail.comwrote:


 Scott,

 Thanks, but I had that issue and fixed it.  It can open the assembly, but
 it never finds the class inside of it.  I'm not sure if it is a problem
 with the source dll, or if it has to do with name spaces.

 Cheers,

 Rob
 On Jan 20, 2012 10:40 AM, Scott Stewart webmas...@sstwebworks.com
 wrote:

 
  It sounds like you've run into an issue that I ran into when I upgraded
 to
  9.0.1
 
  See if this blog entry helps:
  http://www.sstwebworks.com/index.cfm?mode=archivemonth=7year=2011
 
  Hope this helps
 
 
 
  On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Rob Parkhill 
 robert.parkh...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  
   Good Morning,
  
   I'm having an issue getting the .NET integration working with CF 9.01.
I've downloaded and replaced the .NET integration stuff, to make sure
  that
   that is all good, but now it won't reference any class inside the
  assembly.
NOTE:  This is my first time with .NET integration...
  
   I have help docs for a .NET SDK that is part of a program we use at
 work.
Seems that it can access the assembly fine, but not see any of the
   functions inside of it.  From the help docs for the SDK, it seems that
  the
   classes are all in various name spaces.  Should I reference the
 namespace
   when indicating the class name?  Do I use dot notation or replace the
  dots
   with underscores?
  
   Right now I have the following:
  
   cfobject type=.NET name=labber assembl=path.to.dll
   class=COM_Batch/
  
   then I get an error COM_Batch not found in specified assembly and
   regardless of how I reference the class 'COM_Batch' the error doesn't
   change.
  
   Are there any suggestions for what I might be missing here?
  
   Cheers,
  
   Rob
  
  
 
 

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349574
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: CF9 .NET Integration

2012-01-20 Thread Rob Parkhill

But it won't instantiate unless I indicate the correct class... Hence my
current problem... :-)
On Jan 20, 2012 11:16 AM, Scott Stewart webmas...@sstwebworks.com wrote:


 After you instantiate the assembly, dump it. This will show you what CF
 sees.. it ain't always what you think it should be.

 On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Rob Parkhill robert.parkh...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 
  Scott,
 
  Thanks, but I had that issue and fixed it.  It can open the assembly, but
  it never finds the class inside of it.  I'm not sure if it is a problem
  with the source dll, or if it has to do with name spaces.
 
  Cheers,
 
  Rob
  On Jan 20, 2012 10:40 AM, Scott Stewart webmas...@sstwebworks.com
  wrote:
 
  
   It sounds like you've run into an issue that I ran into when I upgraded
  to
   9.0.1
  
   See if this blog entry helps:
   http://www.sstwebworks.com/index.cfm?mode=archivemonth=7year=2011
  
   Hope this helps
  
  
  
   On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Rob Parkhill 
  robert.parkh...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
   
Good Morning,
   
I'm having an issue getting the .NET integration working with CF
 9.01.
 I've downloaded and replaced the .NET integration stuff, to make
 sure
   that
that is all good, but now it won't reference any class inside the
   assembly.
 NOTE:  This is my first time with .NET integration...
   
I have help docs for a .NET SDK that is part of a program we use at
  work.
 Seems that it can access the assembly fine, but not see any of the
functions inside of it.  From the help docs for the SDK, it seems
 that
   the
classes are all in various name spaces.  Should I reference the
  namespace
when indicating the class name?  Do I use dot notation or replace the
   dots
with underscores?
   
Right now I have the following:
   
cfobject type=.NET name=labber assembl=path.to.dll
class=COM_Batch/
   
then I get an error COM_Batch not found in specified assembly and
regardless of how I reference the class 'COM_Batch' the error doesn't
change.
   
Are there any suggestions for what I might be missing here?
   
Cheers,
   
Rob
   
   
  
  
 
 

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349575
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: This actually works!

2012-01-20 Thread Justin Scott

 I don't think that is accurate. Yes you can use array/struct functions
 on them, but they are not array/structs. Consider this example:

I saw your post and ran the code, and you are correct, CF is
representing them as an xml document rather than arrays and structs.
 It's been a while since I have done a lot of XML parsing and
remembered this detail incorrectly.  That's what I get for posting
late at night after driving for six hours. :)


-Justin

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349576
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: CF9 .NET Integration

2012-01-20 Thread Leigh

Is your class publically accessible? Are you using the full namespace with dot 
notation ie If the namspace is COM and class name is Batch use 
COM.Batch?  Might also check the {cf_root}\jnbridge error logs. Depending on 
the real error, it sometimes has more detailed error information

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349577
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: (ot) SEO

2012-01-20 Thread Donne Bachan

Redirects are never good for SEO. 301s are your best bet but if you are doing 
it on every page then I would look at another solution for your interim page. 
Possibly use your onRequest method in application.cfc?

Sent from my iPhone

On 20 Jan 2012, at 15:15, Dave  Hatz daveh...@hatzventures.org wrote:

 
 Sorry about the OT here, but I know there are some really good SEO people 
 that are on this list.
 
 I have a CFM page that processes some information, then redirects to another 
 CFM page.  I have a client that is telling me that my redirect inside my cfm 
 page is not going to work for SEO.
 
 I have index.cfm, it parses the URL for some data, updates the DB, then I use 
 CFLOCATION to send the page to another CFM page.  Client says this will not 
 work for his SEO stuff.  
 
 As you can tell, I am not well versed in SEO.  Can I get some verification 
 from others on this list that are well versed on SEO topics and let me know 
 if my client is right or wrong? 
 
 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349578
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: ridiculously cheap CFML conference next month

2012-01-20 Thread Jordan Michaels

I was able to attend OFCS last year and it was great. I *really* appreciated 
the single track approach. It was nice to be able to see all the available 
content. Even the content I thought I would only be mildly interested in ended 
up being fascinating. I learned a lot and I'm sure those who attend will also. 
Well worth the cost if you can make it.

-Jordan

- Original Message -
From: Jason Blum jason.b...@gmail.com
To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 7:51:23 AM
Subject: ridiculously cheap CFML conference next month


Hi folks,

I know http://OpenCFSummit.org has been mentioned a few times on this list.  I 
just wanted to share that the schedule is up and registrations are pouring in: 
http://opencfsummit.org/index.cfm/schedule/

Also wanted to clarify that the reason this conference is so cheap is obviously 
because of our amazing sponsors - but the idea behind it is to grow our 
community by trying to attract programmers from other technologies.

This year's conference has a strong emphasis on options for super affordable 
Cloud Computing hosting options and getting ColdFusion programmers more 
involved in Civic Hacktivism and the whole Gov 2.0 movement.

For $72 you know this isn't one of those cruise ship conferences, where you 
can wander around lost for days.  http://OpenCFSummit.org is all about keeping 
things intimiate and attendee-centric, with only one track of sessions, tons of 
free training, a great hackfest, lightening talks, unconference space and more.

Forgive the sales pitch - but since CFUnited shut down, our community just has 
so few opportunities to get together and grow.  Sure there's the amazing 
http://cfobjective.com/

I just wanted to make sure folks hadn't missed this one...

Thanks!

-Jason Blum
@phenotypical 



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349579
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: (ot) SEO

2012-01-20 Thread Al Musella, DPM

Maybe there is a much easier way...
Instead of redirecting, just do a cfinclude of that next page to 
place it inside the first page... this way the correct page gets indexed.


~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349580
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: (ot) SEO

2012-01-20 Thread William Seiter

Hey Dave,
The description of what you are trying to accomplish is  very vague. If you 
just wanted clarification on redirects vs SEO, they are not good practice and 
will probably mess everything up.  If you want advice on how to handle what you 
need to accomplish on an SEO friendly way, please post what it is that your 
index page is doing, being as specific as possible. Or hit me up off list

--
William Seiter 

On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Dave  Hatz daveh...@hatzventures.org wrote:

 
 Sorry about the OT here, but I know there are some really good SEO people 
 that are on this list.
 
 I have a CFM page that processes some information, then redirects to another 
 CFM page.  I have a client that is telling me that my redirect inside my cfm 
 page is not going to work for SEO.
 
 I have index.cfm, it parses the URL for some data, updates the DB, then I use 
 CFLOCATION to send the page to another CFM page.  Client says this will not 
 work for his SEO stuff.  
 
 As you can tell, I am not well versed in SEO.  Can I get some verification 
 from others on this list that are well versed on SEO topics and let me know 
 if my client is right or wrong? 
 
 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349581
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: (ot) SEO

2012-01-20 Thread Dave Watts

 You may want to look into this.

 cfheader statuscode=301 statustext=Moved permanently
 cfheader name=Location value=http://www.domain.com/page.cfm;

 If you are doing redirects, you want to use 301 to be search engine
 friendly.

You can use CFLOCATION for permanent redirects (or any other
300-series response):

cflocation statuscode=301 ...

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/

Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on
GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite.

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349582
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: (ot) SEO

2012-01-20 Thread Dave Watts

 I have index.cfm, it parses the URL for some data, updates the DB, then I use 
 CFLOCATION to send the page to another CFM page.  Client
 says this will not work for his SEO stuff.

Why do you go to index.cfm in the first place, though? You could
easily handle this in the page you ultimately want to go to (or the
Application file used by that page) in a variety of ways.

Redirection for its own sake is unnecessary and generally a bad approach.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/

Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on
GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349583
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm