Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
GG/Phyllis, Thank you so much! Il 13/10/2019 2.40, Phyllis Smith ha scritto: For consistency, the Wipe and Direction of the ShapeWipe window start at the same location as Preset Shapes in the Mask window does now with the latest GIT checkin. (...)This mod is in the latest test build available for Ubuntu16 also. gg/Phyllis -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
IgorB: > The title bar's lenght of "Wipe" and "Direction" are differents from > Mask tool. My fault. > Could you make them like Mask tool, for consistency, please? > For consistency, the Wipe and Direction of the ShapeWipe window start at the same location as Preset Shapes in the Mask window does now with the latest GIT checkin. The ShapeWipe window is not as big in either direction as the Mask window, so the total length of the line will be different but now for consistency, they start the wording at the same location. This mod is in the latest test build available for Ubuntu16 also. gg/Phyllis -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
Thanks WP! IgorBeg Il 10/10/2019 12.08, W P ha scritto: I am in lurking-mode since a while but I always follow the ml and the project, I just wanted to say great job for the beautiful transitions! CinGG really needed them! -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
I am in lurking-mode since a while but I always follow the ml and the project, I just wanted to say great job for the beautiful transitions! CinGG really needed them! -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
GG/Phyllis, sorry, maybe I have wrong to draw the photomontage. The title bar's lenght of "Wipe" and "Direction" are differents from Mask tool. My fault. Could you make them like Mask tool, for consistency, please? I added a picure to show the difference. Thanks. IgorBeg Il 08/10/2019 19.31, Phyllis Smith ha scritto: IgorB: If You agree with me, is it possible to do a little refinement about alignment? No problem. It looks better now. There is a Ubuntu16 build if you have any spare time to check it out at: https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/download/testing/cinelerra-5.1-ub16-x86_64-static.txz The Git checkin and this build include the addition "back by popular demand" of the load mode icons for the Insertion Strategy in the Load Files, Render, Menu Effects, and Record gui-s. gg/Phyllis -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
IgorB: If You agree with me, is it possible to do a little refinement about > alignment? > No problem. It looks better now. There is a Ubuntu16 build if you have any spare time to check it out at: https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/download/testing/cinelerra-5.1-ub16-x86_64-static.txz The Git checkin and this build include the addition "back by popular demand" of the load mode icons for the Insertion Strategy in the Load Files, Render, Menu Effects, and Record gui-s. gg/Phyllis -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
I was very busy fixing bugs caused by all the new updates. It's really annoying when you do the updates for security reasons and then suddenly important parts of the website don't work. I agree with Igor that the alignment of the controls in the example of Igor is good and I would appreciate it if it would be adopted in this way. At this point I would like to thank you for all the new improvements. Sam On 07.10.19 13:18, Igor BEGHETTO wrote: GG/Phyllis, You are too fast for me. =) I thought that someone (Sam, Andrea, Olaf, Andrey, and others) replied with an refinement at my photomontage. Thanks for the new layout. If You agree with me, is it possible to do a little refinement about alignment? I added a GIF animated for the lines. It seems better of the prevoius version. I am sorry for that, but sometime further changes are needed. Thank you so much (and for the build)! IgorBeg Il 07/10/2019 1.59, Phyllis Smith ha scritto: Thanks for the photomontage. That makes it real easy for GG to implement. He added the textbox and clear button and used your suggested "mask-like" layout. When there is a slider, I think would be fine to have a textbox and its Clear button to clear the slider. So I have done two quickly photomontage, a simply and another inhereited by Mask tool. A Ubuntu16 build is at: https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/download/testing/cinelerra-5.1-ub16-x86_64-static.txz -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
GG/Phyllis, You are too fast for me. =) I thought that someone (Sam, Andrea, Olaf, Andrey, and others) replied with an refinement at my photomontage. Thanks for the new layout. If You agree with me, is it possible to do a little refinement about alignment? I added a GIF animated for the lines. It seems better of the prevoius version. I am sorry for that, but sometime further changes are needed. Thank you so much (and for the build)! IgorBeg Il 07/10/2019 1.59, Phyllis Smith ha scritto: Thanks for the photomontage. That makes it real easy for GG to implement. He added the textbox and clear button and used your suggested "mask-like" layout. When there is a slider, I think would be fine to have a textbox and its Clear button to clear the slider. So I have done two quickly photomontage, a simply and another inhereited by Mask tool. A Ubuntu16 build is at: https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/download/testing/cinelerra-5.1-ub16-x86_64-static.txz -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
IgorB: Thanks for the photomontage. That makes it real easy for GG to implement. He added the textbox and clear button and used your suggested "mask-like" layout. > When there is a slider, I think would be fine to have a textbox and its > Clear button to clear the slider. So I have done two quickly > photomontage, a simply and another inhereited by Mask tool. > A Ubuntu16 build is at: https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/download/testing/cinelerra-5.1-ub16-x86_64-static.txz Off topic. Andrea's suggestion for changing the Projector and Camera menus to be mask-like also is a good idea. I am not sure if there are BT issues related to Projector/Camera but it would probably be best to do that at the same time as other work on these 2 as that is easier for GG in case the layout has any new features. Again, at that time if someone provides a layout, then GG will implement it as he does not like to design it himself. gg/Phyllis -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
Andrea:
Thanks for the followup email. GG had looked at the dump and log and then
fired up an Arch with Nvidia to find a problem, but of course, it worked.
That is OK though as it reaffirmed correctness for us and he is thinking
about creating an environment variable to print out the ffmpeg filters. At
some point in time, this may be handy for you to know. In the routine,
pluginfclient.C, there is a print line that is commented out with the 2
slashes - "//printf("%s\n",filter->name);". If you remove the //, and do a
build then each of the ffmpeg filters will print out in the terminal window.
IgorB:
> Question: is Feather like Anti-aliasing when the position's slider is to
> the left edge? It seems a bit different.
>
It is a bit different. Anti-aliasing was originally a classical 3 pixel
blend on each side of the center line. Now the feathering involves all
pixels over the feather range.
> So I have done two quickly photomontage,
GG will look at these and I will see whether he will do the Mask like one.
I think that that is a good format as menus are redone.
--
Cin mailing list
Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
Sorry. Bad compile is my fault. It's ok now. -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Re: [Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
Il 06/10/2019 3.12, Phyllis Smith ha scritto: GG did a lot of rework on the Shape Wipe Transitions code. He added the 25 1080 versions; fixed a couple of bugs; added a Feather slider (based on exponential values); and built in parallel processing instead of single threading. Really thanks! I agree with you, Phyllis; now, 1080 works like 0540 and it is very fast! Thanks GG! Question: is Feather like Anti-aliasing when the position's slider is to the left edge? It seems a bit different. If I can add one thing. When there is a slider, I think would be fine to have a textbox and its Clear button to clear the slider. So I have done two quickly photomontage, a simply and another inheredited by Mask tool. If You and other Users agree with me it could be a possible, little, improvement for the GUI, I think. It is only an idea, of course. Thanks! (And, thanks Andrea) IgorBeg -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
[Cin] Shape Wipe Transitions and GIT checkin
(Started new email so title is more relevant). Included in today's GIT checkin is the following. IgorB supplied another 25 Shape Wipe Transitions -- actually 50 with a 1080 and a 540 version. For further information refer to earlier email at: https://www.mail-archive.com/cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org/msg00619.html GG did a lot of rework on the Shape Wipe Transitions code. He added the 25 1080 versions; fixed a couple of bugs; added a Feather slider (based on exponential values); and built in parallel processing instead of single threading. So in response to: > Yes it is resampled, but by my tests on my poor PC, 540 works faster than > 1080 for a 29.97 fps project, the MIN fps achieved with "Tr-1080_Butterfly" > is 22fps, while with "Tr-540_Butterfly" is 28fps. So, in some projects I > can use the 540 instead of 1080 to save cpu. > the fps with the 1080 should now be almost the same as the 540 now with the rework that gg did. I tested it and it seemed to use the same amount of cpu at 1080 as at 540 (monitor with the "top" command and checked Preferences frames per second). He says that once past the initial check at the very beginning, it should run at the same speed.. A static tar build is at the following in case anyone wants to test for Ubuntu16: https:// cinelerra-gg.org/download/testing/cinelerra-5.1-ub16-x86_64-static.txz Thanks IgorB! gg/Phyllis -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
