[c-nsp] Cisco IOS to IOS XR Conversion
Dear All, Is there is any tool to convert Cisco IOS to Cisco XR IOS ? if there is one , i think it could benefit me alot ? Thanks Regards Jason ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] QoS with Traffic shaping on ATM OC3 on 7206
Aha, Tim. After upgrading IOS here was an error in the log that did not show up when entering commands. Here it is: *Oct 22 12:18:52: GTS : Not supported over ATM VCs I cannot apply this policy to either the ATM subinterface, or major ATM interface, as it won't accept the command and tells me that CBWFQ is not supported. Did you try applying just the inside policy with class definitions, rather than the parent shaper, to the VC? Regards, Tim. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] RPF-vector and Interdomain multicast
Dear All, Does anybody deploy RPF-vector feature with interdomain multicast solution ? We need to distribute multicast source routes with BGP ipv4 multicast AF. However, we wants to save completely BGP-free core (P-routers and some other). RPF Vector looks like very suitable feature in this situation, but unfortunately, we cannot use it, because of our multicast solution is interdomain(we are using PIM SSM) and routers in our AS are RPF-vector-enabled, however routers in upstream's AS are non-RPFvector-enabled. So, we need to enable rpf vector feature on our ASBRs, but upstream's ASBRs doesn't support this TLV. My questions are: 1. Is it true, that RPF vector feature must be enabled in all routers in a multicast tree even if tree is interdomain ? 2. If no, how this TLV should be processed by non-rpf-vector-aware routers? 3. How do you think, would it be logical to enable this feature on a per-interface(and even per-interface per direction) basis ? -- Best regards, Egor Zimin ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS to IOS XR Conversion
On Friday 23 October 2009 03:48:17 pm Jason Alex wrote: Dear All, Is there is any tool to convert Cisco IOS to Cisco XR IOS ? if there is one , i think it could benefit me alot ? Start here: http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/iosxr_r3.5/xr12000_conversion/reference/guide/cn35main.html http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/mcl/380_cr_mcl/380_book.html Cheers, Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Problem after upgrading ios on the 6509-E
A lot of my WS-X6148A-GE-45AF showing up with minor error after i upgrade the IOS on my switch, does any body here have any idea why and how to fix it? I've tried the following but still showing up with errors 1) i reset the module 2) i reseat the module ( take it out and put it back in) Take a look at the sho mod #sho mod Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. --- - -- -- --- 1 48 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule WS-X6148A-GE-45AF SAD093908LP 2 48 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule WS-X6148A-GE-45AF SAD093909ST 3 48 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule WS-X6148A-GE-45AF SAD0938074N 4 48 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule WS-X6148A-GE-45AF SAL1007DK13 59 Supervisor Engine 32 8GE (Active) WS-SUP32-GE-3B SAD0939053K 6 48 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule WS-X6148A-GE-45AF SAD093807LW Mod MAC addresses HwFw Sw Status --- -- -- --- 1 0015.c649.d1e0 to 0015.c649.d20f 1.3 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok 2 0015.c699.0790 to 0015.c699.07bf 1.3 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok 3 0015.63db.d030 to 0015.63db.d05f 1.2 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok 4 0016.c8ca.c350 to 0016.c8ca.c37f 2.0 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok 5 0013.809d.e5ce to 0013.809d.e5d9 4.2 12.2(18r)SX2 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok 6 0015.63db.a090 to 0015.63db.a0bf 1.2 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status --- -- --- --- --- 1 IEEE Voice Daughter CardWS-F6K-GE48-AF SAD093908VM 1.2Ok 2 IEEE Voice Daughter CardWS-F6K-GE48-AF SAD093908WP 1.2Ok 3 IEEE Voice Daughter CardWS-F6K-GE48-AF SAD093806F7 1.2Ok 4 IEEE Voice Daughter CardWS-F6K-48-AF SAL1007DAQZ 2.0Ok 5 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAD093906E5 2.1Ok 5 Cat6k MSFC 2A daughterboard WS-F6K-MSFC2A SAD09390847 3.0Ok 6 IEEE Voice Daughter CardWS-F6K-GE48-AF SAD093806HK 1.2Ok Mod Online Diag Status --- 1 Pass 2 Pass 3 Pass 4 Pass 5 Minor Error 6 Pass VACO_24_5C# On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Peter Kranz pkr...@unwiredltd.com wrote: Hi Renelson, Without telling us the errors, not sure how we can diagnose your issue. Peter Kranz Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd www.UnwiredLtd.com http://www.unwiredltd.com/ Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207- pkr...@unwiredltd.com -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Renelson Panosky Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 8:07 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Problem after upgrading ios on the 6509-E A lot of my WS-X6148A-GE-45AF showing up with minor error after i upgrade the IOS on my switch, does any body here have any idea why and how to fix it? I've tried the following but still showing up with errors 1) i reset the module 2) i reseat the module ( take it out and put it back in) Renelson ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] juniper trinity
Hi, does anyone know what is this all about: http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/21/cisco-hardware-software-technology-cio-network-juniper.html They say ...will reveal a new chipset it says is capable of twice the data-pushing capacity of the current industry record Juniper already has a 100G (half duplex) chip set on T1600 (ASIC) , and so does Alcatel-Lucent on 7750/7450 platforms (true network processor) . Does this announcement means that this new chip set will be a 200G (half duplex) chip set or is it all a marketing hype? Will it be an ASIC or a true NP? And why would they change their logo? Marlon ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Problem after upgrading ios on the 6509-E
If you haven't mixed the output from 2 platforms then it's your supervisor, not linecards, has failed some minor test. show diagnostic result module 5 may provide you with some ideas where to look next. On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Renelson Panosky panocisc...@gmail.comwrote: A lot of my WS-X6148A-GE-45AF showing up with minor error after i upgrade the IOS on my switch, does any body here have any idea why and how to fix it? I've tried the following but still showing up with errors 1) i reset the module 2) i reseat the module ( take it out and put it back in) Take a look at the sho mod #sho mod Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. --- - -- -- --- 1 48 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule WS-X6148A-GE-45AF SAD093908LP 2 48 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule WS-X6148A-GE-45AF SAD093909ST 3 48 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule WS-X6148A-GE-45AF SAD0938074N 4 48 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule WS-X6148A-GE-45AF SAL1007DK13 59 Supervisor Engine 32 8GE (Active) WS-SUP32-GE-3B SAD0939053K 6 48 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule WS-X6148A-GE-45AF SAD093807LW Mod MAC addresses HwFw Sw Status --- -- -- --- 1 0015.c649.d1e0 to 0015.c649.d20f 1.3 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok 2 0015.c699.0790 to 0015.c699.07bf 1.3 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok 3 0015.63db.d030 to 0015.63db.d05f 1.2 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok 4 0016.c8ca.c350 to 0016.c8ca.c37f 2.0 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok 5 0013.809d.e5ce to 0013.809d.e5d9 4.2 12.2(18r)SX2 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok 6 0015.63db.a090 to 0015.63db.a0bf 1.2 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status --- -- --- --- --- 1 IEEE Voice Daughter CardWS-F6K-GE48-AF SAD093908VM 1.2Ok 2 IEEE Voice Daughter CardWS-F6K-GE48-AF SAD093908WP 1.2Ok 3 IEEE Voice Daughter CardWS-F6K-GE48-AF SAD093806F7 1.2Ok 4 IEEE Voice Daughter CardWS-F6K-48-AF SAL1007DAQZ 2.0Ok 5 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAD093906E5 2.1Ok 5 Cat6k MSFC 2A daughterboard WS-F6K-MSFC2A SAD09390847 3.0Ok 6 IEEE Voice Daughter CardWS-F6K-GE48-AF SAD093806HK 1.2Ok Mod Online Diag Status --- 1 Pass 2 Pass 3 Pass 4 Pass 5 Minor Error 6 Pass VACO_24_5C# On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Peter Kranz pkr...@unwiredltd.com wrote: Hi Renelson, Without telling us the errors, not sure how we can diagnose your issue. Peter Kranz Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd www.UnwiredLtd.com http://www.unwiredltd.com/ Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207- pkr...@unwiredltd.com -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Renelson Panosky Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 8:07 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Problem after upgrading ios on the 6509-E A lot of my WS-X6148A-GE-45AF showing up with minor error after i upgrade the IOS on my switch, does any body here have any idea why and how to fix it? I've tried the following but still showing up with errors 1) i reset the module 2) i reseat the module ( take it out and put it back in) Renelson ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] 12.4(24)T2 has been released
Just a reminder to all those who were waiting on the release of 12.4(24)T2 that addressed most of the bugs reported by PSIRT on 9/23, 24T2 was posted this morning. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4t/release/notes/124TCAVS.html It's supposed to also address the bug that prevents NTP access-groups from working properly. Justin ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] WAAS NM-WAE License?
Thanks Dale, I will try that. Have a nice weekend. David David Alejandro Lima Mencias Soporte Internetworking Alpha Systems S.R.L. Tel: 591-2-2354141 ext. 256 Cel: 591-72568138 La Paz - Bolivia david.l...@alphasys.com.bo -Mensaje original- De: dale.s...@gmail.com [mailto:dale.s...@gmail.com] En nombre de Dale Shaw Enviado el: Jueves, 22 de Octubre de 2009 05:44 p.m. Para: David Lima CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Asunto: Re: [c-nsp] WAAS NM-WAE License? Hi David, On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:12 AM, David Lima david.l...@alphasys.com.bo wrote: Hi, I have a C2811 with a NM-WAE-502. 1. How can I check is the license is an Enterprise or transport? I haven't used a WAAS NM before, but I understand you access it either directly (CLI or web GUI; https://ip.addr:8443) or via a service-module .. command. Anyway, if you can get a command line up, show license will tell you what license type is used. 2. If I have a transport license, How can I upgrade to Enterprise License? license add Enterprise will do it. It's an honour system. You can also enable it using the web GUI and again it's just a tick box. cheers, Dale ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] juniper trinity
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 07:21:33AM -0700, Marlon Duksa wrote: Hi, does anyone know what is this all about: http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/21/cisco-hardware-software-technology-cio-network-juniper.html They say ...will reveal a new chipset it says is capable of twice the data-pushing capacity of the current industry record Juniper already has a 100G (half duplex) chip set on T1600 (ASIC) , and so does Alcatel-Lucent on 7750/7450 platforms (true network processor) . Does this announcement means that this new chip set will be a 200G (half duplex) chip set or is it all a marketing hype? Will it be an ASIC or a true NP? And why would they change their logo? This article is total bunk, factually incorrect in every possible way. Take this paragraph for example: Juniper's new processors, what it will call the Trio family, will be built into line cards--networking components that can be stacked in a router to add capacity--that offer 16 10-gigabyte Ethernet ports. That's twice as much bandwidth as Cisco ( CSCO - news - people ) currently offers, though Cisco plans to launch its own 16-port devices in 2010. If this doesn't send you screaming, nothing will. Whoever leaks this info to these folks should do a better job of it at least. Also that new logo is uglier than sin. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] new logos
On Oct 23, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: If this doesn't send you screaming, nothing will. Whoever leaks this info to these folks should do a better job of it at least. Also that new logo is uglier than sin. :) Depends, do you enjoy the new Cisco crayon logo? :) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] juniper trinity
Keep in mind that this is from the Forbes magazine - these guys have no clue what a router is. But the point is that something is coming out next week, and it gives me kind of clue what... I gather they will have 40G (full duplex chipset), have three of them on a line card which will give them 120G of throughput??? Of course this will go on MX...With no fabric redundancy. Only 10GE ports, no 100GE?? Will find out soon... Marlon On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.netwrote: On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 07:21:33AM -0700, Marlon Duksa wrote: Hi, does anyone know what is this all about: http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/21/cisco-hardware-software-technology-cio-network-juniper.html They say ...will reveal a new chipset it says is capable of twice the data-pushing capacity of the current industry record Juniper already has a 100G (half duplex) chip set on T1600 (ASIC) , and so does Alcatel-Lucent on 7750/7450 platforms (true network processor) . Does this announcement means that this new chip set will be a 200G (half duplex) chip set or is it all a marketing hype? Will it be an ASIC or a true NP? And why would they change their logo? This article is total bunk, factually incorrect in every possible way. Take this paragraph for example: Juniper's new processors, what it will call the Trio family, will be built into line cards--networking components that can be stacked in a router to add capacity--that offer 16 10-gigabyte Ethernet ports. That's twice as much bandwidth as Cisco ( CSCO - news - people ) currently offers, though Cisco plans to launch its own 16-port devices in 2010. If this doesn't send you screaming, nothing will. Whoever leaks this info to these folks should do a better job of it at least. Also that new logo is uglier than sin. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] juniper trinity
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:53:17AM -0700, Marlon Duksa wrote: Keep in mind that this is from the Forbes magazine - these guys have no clue what a router is. But the point is that something is coming out next week, and it gives me kind of clue what... I gather they will have 40G (full duplex chipset), have three of them on a line card which will give them 120G of throughput??? Of course this will go on MX...With no fabric redundancy. Only 10GE ports, no 100GE?? Will find out soon... Remember the articles that came out before the MX's release, about how Juniper had outsourced the entire thing and it was an EZChip based platform? Makes you wonder exactly how full of shit they are on every other article that isn't about something you actually know well, doesn't it? :) -- Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue
Hello all, I have an issue where random users will apparently lose their pppoe connection on their end for some reason, and reconnect again. The reconnect goes well, but the user cannot browse. Doing a show user | inc username will list 2 pppoe sessions for the user. Obviously one of these is the lost session. We have a keepalive set, so after the keepalive time passes, the old session of course disappears. The problem is, until that happens or we remove the old session, the user cannot browse at all. Any ideas on causes of this would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- D.J. O'Berry Network Design Engineer ZCorum 866-467-9791 ext 7041 dobe...@zcorum.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] juniper trinity
Richard A Steenbergen wrote: If this doesn't send you screaming, nothing will. Whoever leaks this info to these folks should do a better job of it at least. Also that new logo is uglier than sin. :) Well, yeah. Like Cisco, they went from a respectable logo to something that looks like a 4-year old did it. Jeff ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue
Did this start out of the blue or is this a new installation? We had something like this occurring for a while but only on our own DSLAM's. It ended up being a timing issue from the DSLAM manufacturer which I confirmed from others using the same gear (Occam). To work around this issue, we adjusted our keepalives in the virtual-template: interface Virtual-Template1 keepalive 30 10 This worked for us .. Occam I'm told is unable to reproduce this issue in their labs but since this resolved it for us we never pushed the matter... Cheers, Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of D.J. O'Berry Sent: October 23, 2009 12:28 PM To: 'Cisco-nsp' Subject: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue Hello all, I have an issue where random users will apparently lose their pppoe connection on their end for some reason, and reconnect again. The reconnect goes well, but the user cannot browse. Doing a show user | inc username will list 2 pppoe sessions for the user. Obviously one of these is the lost session. We have a keepalive set, so after the keepalive time passes, the old session of course disappears. The problem is, until that happens or we remove the old session, the user cannot browse at all. Any ideas on causes of this would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- D.J. O'Berry Network Design Engineer ZCorum 866-467-9791 ext 7041 dobe...@zcorum.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] CRS-1 etherchannel
Hello! Could anybody answer me, is the etherchannel feature supported on CRS-1 with 4-10GE modules (either, ports on single card or cross-cards aggregation)? I plan to use 4 10G ports as layer2 trunk and subinterfaces on it. Is it possible on CRS-1? P.S. Any fresh plans of FCS date for 100G cards? Thanks! -- Dmitry Kiselev ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] juniper trinity
There is no logo change. Could not find info anywhere on the juniper site and it was not even shown here http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/press-center/images/image-library/logos/ I found an article claiming the that logo change was not true. Finding that article is an exercise left to the reader. -- -- Brian Raaen Network Engineer bra...@zcorum.com On Friday 23 October 2009, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 07:21:33AM -0700, Marlon Duksa wrote: Hi, does anyone know what is this all about: http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/21/cisco-hardware-software-technology-cio- network-juniper.html They say ...will reveal a new chipset it says is capable of twice the data-pushing capacity of the current industry record Juniper already has a 100G (half duplex) chip set on T1600 (ASIC) , and so does Alcatel-Lucent on 7750/7450 platforms (true network processor) . Does this announcement means that this new chip set will be a 200G (half duplex) chip set or is it all a marketing hype? Will it be an ASIC or a true NP? And why would they change their logo? This article is total bunk, factually incorrect in every possible way. Take this paragraph for example: Juniper's new processors, what it will call the Trio family, will be built into line cards--networking components that can be stacked in a router to add capacity--that offer 16 10-gigabyte Ethernet ports. That's twice as much bandwidth as Cisco ( CSCO - news - people ) currently offers, though Cisco plans to launch its own 16-port devices in 2010. If this doesn't send you screaming, nothing will. Whoever leaks this info to these folks should do a better job of it at least. Also that new logo is uglier than sin. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue
We noticed it after a new site had grown some in size if I recall .. hope that helps.. Paul -Original Message- From: D.J. O'Berry [mailto:dobe...@zcorum.com] Sent: October 23, 2009 1:47 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: 'Cisco-nsp' Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue The issue started up out of the blue. This network has run fine for several months with no issues. Its only in the last few months that the issue started occuring. We dont use Occam dslams but I'll keep that in mind. We were using default keepalive settings of 300 seconds but have shortened that to 180 for testing. We'd like to stay away from 30 second keepalives if possible, but if we can't get the 180 to work we may try that. Thanks for the suggestion. Paul Stewart wrote: Did this start out of the blue or is this a new installation? We had something like this occurring for a while but only on our own DSLAM's. It ended up being a timing issue from the DSLAM manufacturer which I confirmed from others using the same gear (Occam). To work around this issue, we adjusted our keepalives in the virtual-template: interface Virtual-Template1 keepalive 30 10 This worked for us .. Occam I'm told is unable to reproduce this issue in their labs but since this resolved it for us we never pushed the matter... Cheers, Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of D.J. O'Berry Sent: October 23, 2009 12:28 PM To: 'Cisco-nsp' Subject: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue Hello all, I have an issue where random users will apparently lose their pppoe connection on their end for some reason, and reconnect again. The reconnect goes well, but the user cannot browse. Doing a show user | inc username will list 2 pppoe sessions for the user. Obviously one of these is the lost session. We have a keepalive set, so after the keepalive time passes, the old session of course disappears. The problem is, until that happens or we remove the old session, the user cannot browse at all. Any ideas on causes of this would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- D.J. O'Berry Network Design Engineer ZCorum 866-467-9791 ext 7041 dobe...@zcorum.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue
The issue started up out of the blue. This network has run fine for several months with no issues. Its only in the last few months that the issue started occuring. We dont use Occam dslams but I'll keep that in mind. We were using default keepalive settings of 300 seconds but have shortened that to 180 for testing. We'd like to stay away from 30 second keepalives if possible, but if we can't get the 180 to work we may try that. Thanks for the suggestion. Paul Stewart wrote: Did this start out of the blue or is this a new installation? We had something like this occurring for a while but only on our own DSLAM's. It ended up being a timing issue from the DSLAM manufacturer which I confirmed from others using the same gear (Occam). To work around this issue, we adjusted our keepalives in the virtual-template: interface Virtual-Template1 keepalive 30 10 This worked for us .. Occam I'm told is unable to reproduce this issue in their labs but since this resolved it for us we never pushed the matter... Cheers, Paul -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of D.J. O'Berry Sent: October 23, 2009 12:28 PM To: 'Cisco-nsp' Subject: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue Hello all, I have an issue where random users will apparently lose their pppoe connection on their end for some reason, and reconnect again. The reconnect goes well, but the user cannot browse. Doing a show user | inc username will list 2 pppoe sessions for the user. Obviously one of these is the lost session. We have a keepalive set, so after the keepalive time passes, the old session of course disappears. The problem is, until that happens or we remove the old session, the user cannot browse at all. Any ideas on causes of this would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- D.J. O'Berry Network Design Engineer ZCorum 866-467-9791 ext 7041 dobe...@zcorum.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] CRS-1 etherchannel
Dmitry Kiselev wrote: Could anybody answer me, is the etherchannel feature supported on CRS-1 with 4-10GE modules (either, ports on single card or cross-cards aggregation)? I plan to use 4 10G ports as layer2 trunk and subinterfaces on it. Is it possible on CRS-1? On CRS-1 it is called bundle-ethernet. You can do it on set of ports within all the linecards you have. -- Grzegorz Janoszka ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] juniper trinity
Not an EZChip. NP4 is scheduled for sampling in Dec of this year. It will not be in production for another year... This Trio or Trinity, whatever they call it is internally grown technology...a combination if EZChip + I-chip functionality. Plus I don't think it is a good strategy for Juniper to use third party vendors as this will not give them differentiation... Marlon On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Roger Gabarit roger.gaba...@gmail.comwrote: This is probably related to the EZChip again though. 100G EZChip NP4 (used for queueing and filtering) will be produced in 2010, and given that it will be used both in Cisco ASR 9k and Juniper MX on their 100G line cards, it will be tough for any of the 2 vendors to make any difference on the packet forwarding/queing/filtering. 2009/10/23 Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:53:17AM -0700, Marlon Duksa wrote: Keep in mind that this is from the Forbes magazine - these guys have no clue what a router is. But the point is that something is coming out next week, and it gives me kind of clue what... I gather they will have 40G (full duplex chipset), have three of them on a line card which will give them 120G of throughput??? Of course this will go on MX...With no fabric redundancy. Only 10GE ports, no 100GE?? Will find out soon... Remember the articles that came out before the MX's release, about how Juniper had outsourced the entire thing and it was an EZChip based platform? Makes you wonder exactly how full of shit they are on every other article that isn't about something you actually know well, doesn't it? :) -- Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-...@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-...@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] IP Route Cache - Unable to Route
An interesting problem came up that I thought I'd share and see if anyone has some thoughts. A user on one of our private networks was able to route fine to anything on his subnet but as soon as he attempted any routing to another subnet, the connection slowed to a crawl. We found that moving him from his IP (172.30.50.131) to another IP worked so upon further investigation I ran the following command and received this output: #show ip cache IP routing cache 2 entries, 420 bytes 3996 adds, 3994 invalidates, 0 refcounts Minimum invalidation interval 2 seconds, maximum interval 5 seconds, quiet interval 3 seconds, threshold 0 requests Invalidation rate 0 in last second, 0 in last 3 seconds Last full cache invalidation occurred 00:03:09 ago Prefix/Length Age Interface Next Hop 172.30.50.131/3200:02:54 Fa2/1.1 172.30.50.131 172.30.50.155/3200:01:01 Fa2/1.1 172.30.50.155 Out of curiosity I changed the IP on a computer in the subnet to 172.30.50.155 and it had problems routing. I changed it to 172.30.50.131 and received the same routing problem. The problem cleared when I disabled route-caching on the FA2/1.1 interface servicing the 172.30.50.x subnet. The strange thing is there are a bunch of other very active IPs on this subnet and none of them show up in this list, only these two IPs. Route-caching is also enabled for other interfaces on this router but there are no entries for IPs behind those interfaces. I tried clearing the cache but it did not have an effect. Before: interface FastEthernet2/1 description [Office LAN] Connected to 3COM-3 Port 13 no ip address ip flow ingress ip route-cache policy ip route-cache flow no ip mroute-cache duplex full ipv6 enable ipv6 nd ra-interval 30 ipv6 nd prefix default 172800 172800 hold-queue 1500 in interface FastEthernet2/1.1 encapsulation dot1Q 1 native ip address 172.30.50.1 255.255.255.0 ip flow ingress no ip mroute-cache no snmp trap link-status ipv6 enable ipv6 nd ra-interval 30 ipv6 nd prefix default 172800 172800 After: interface FastEthernet2/1 description [Office LAN] Connected to 3COM-3 Port 13 no ip address ip flow ingress no ip route-cache cef no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache duplex full ipv6 enable ipv6 nd ra-interval 30 ipv6 nd prefix default 172800 172800 hold-queue 1500 in interface FastEthernet2/1.1 encapsulation dot1Q 1 native ip address 172.30.50.1 255.255.255.0 ip flow ingress no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache no snmp trap link-status ipv6 enable ipv6 nd ra-interval 30 ipv6 nd prefix default 172800 172800 This network has been up for years with this configuration and I've never seen this before. Another strange thing...since I changed the configuration, the output of show ip cache has expanded. Before, there were only the two 172.30.50.x entries. Now it looks like this: #show ip cache IP routing cache 137 entries, 25160 bytes 4212 adds, 4075 invalidates, 0 refcounts Minimum invalidation interval 2 seconds, maximum interval 5 seconds, quiet interval 3 seconds, threshold 0 requests Invalidation rate 0 in last second, 0 in last 3 seconds Last full cache invalidation occurred 00:20:27 ago Prefix/Length Age Interface Next Hop 8.0.0.0/8 00:05:21 FastEthernet1/0 10.1.1.1 12.0.0.0/8 00:13:28 FastEthernet1/0 10.1.1.1 17.0.0.0/8 00:09:01 FastEthernet1/0 10.1.1.1 24.0.0.0/8 00:13:22 FastEthernet1/0 10.1.1.1 32.0.0.0/8 00:05:49 FastEthernet1/0 10.1.1.1 38.0.0.0/8 00:13:16 FastEthernet1/0 10.1.1.1 63.0.0.0/8 00:13:01 FastEthernet1/0 10.1.1.1 64.0.0.0/8 00:13:31 FastEthernet1/0 10.1.1.1 65.0.0.0/8 00:13:31 FastEthernet1/0 10.1.1.1 66.0.0.0/8 00:12:24 FastEthernet1/0 10.1.1.1 xxx.xxx.xxx.131/32 00:07:43 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.131 xxx.xxx.xxx.132/32 00:09:11 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.132 xxx.xxx.xxx.141/32 00:13:31 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.141 xxx.xxx.xxx.143/32 00:07:20 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.143 xxx.xxx.xxx.148/32 00:04:23 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.148 xxx.xxx.xxx.161/32 00:00:48 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.161 xxx.xxx.xxx.162/32 00:13:05 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.162 xxx.xxx.xxx.169/32 00:01:55 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.169 xxx.xxx.xxx.170/32 00:00:11 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.170 xxx.xxx.xxx.175/32 00:13:27 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.175 xxx.xxx.xxx.178/32 00:13:17 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.178 xxx.xxx.xxx.179/32 00:05:38 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.179 xxx.xxx.xxx.181/32 00:13:31 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.181 xxx.xxx.xxx.186/32 00:13:31 FastEthernet2/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.186 xxx.xxx.xxx.188/32 00:13:19 FastEthernet2/0
[c-nsp] telnet session hangs on 6503-E
Hi Im having a weird problem with telnet to a C6503-E. When telneting from the the router connected to its WAN, There is no problem at all. However, when Im telneting from my jumphost telnet session hangs after 30seconds if im lucky. Usually it hangs before I get to enter the password When debugging tcp, I get this error when the session hangs: Oct 23 23:25:31: TCP2: bad seg from 192.168.105.117 -- outside window: port 23 seq 2084376338 ack 2015498788 rcvnxt 2084376350 rcvwnd 4092 len 12 I have tried service nagel, service tcp-keepalive-in/out, disabled tacacs, tried to telnet to differnt IPs/VRFs on the switch, but still the exact same thing. I use this jumphouse for this customer, and they have a bunch of 2800 and 3800 that works perfect. But the three 6500s they have all behave like this. Any tips? Thanks Roger ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] telnet session hangs on 6503-E
Yes, run SSH! Telnet is extremely bad form.;) - Original Message - From: Roger Wiklund co...@xy.org To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 4:35 PM Subject: [c-nsp] telnet session hangs on 6503-E Hi Im having a weird problem with telnet to a C6503-E. When telneting from the the router connected to its WAN, There is no problem at all. However, when Im telneting from my jumphost telnet session hangs after 30seconds if im lucky. Usually it hangs before I get to enter the password When debugging tcp, I get this error when the session hangs: Oct 23 23:25:31: TCP2: bad seg from 192.168.105.117 -- outside window: port 23 seq 2084376338 ack 2015498788 rcvnxt 2084376350 rcvwnd 4092 len 12 I have tried service nagel, service tcp-keepalive-in/out, disabled tacacs, tried to telnet to differnt IPs/VRFs on the switch, but still the exact same thing. I use this jumphouse for this customer, and they have a bunch of 2800 and 3800 that works perfect. But the three 6500s they have all behave like this. Any tips? Thanks Roger ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] juniper trinity
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:54:40PM -0700, Marlon Duksa wrote: This Trio or Trinity, whatever they call it is internally grown technology...a combination if EZChip + I-chip functionality. Plus I don't think it is a good strategy for Juniper to use third party vendors as this will not give them differentiation... I've heard people make this argument, but it is absurd. The only thing EZChip is used for on the MX is basic Ethernet framing and MAC lookup. No doubt it was much cheaper and easier for Juniper to use an off the shelf chip for this than to spin their own just to do this. To go from there to claiming that the rest of the forwarding/queuing/etc will be the same as a Cisco platform is absolutely insane, the only thing they have in common is the Ethernet frame. It would be really sad if Juniper (or anyone else) could be pressured into not using the best/cheapest component for the job because the FUD department can somehow convince people that there is no differentiation. Of course, the next time Juniper designed a new ASIC it would probably make sense for them to add that functionality into the new chip to reduce costs and simplify the architecture. -- Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue
Do both PPPoE sessions have an IP address associated with them? If you look at the route table, both from an IP and a Virtual-Access perspective, are there duplicate or missing entries from any perspective? We ended up opening a TAC case for a somewhat similar issue centered around the use of an external DHCP server and faulty day zero PPP state situation. The bug was resolved in 12.2(33)SB16. Frank -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of D.J. O'Berry Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:28 AM To: 'Cisco-nsp' Subject: [c-nsp] PPPoE multiple sessions issue Hello all, I have an issue where random users will apparently lose their pppoe connection on their end for some reason, and reconnect again. The reconnect goes well, but the user cannot browse. Doing a show user | inc username will list 2 pppoe sessions for the user. Obviously one of these is the lost session. We have a keepalive set, so after the keepalive time passes, the old session of course disappears. The problem is, until that happens or we remove the old session, the user cannot browse at all. Any ideas on causes of this would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- D.J. O'Berry Network Design Engineer ZCorum 866-467-9791 ext 7041 dobe...@zcorum.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
