Re: [c-nsp] About Cisco ASR 1006 Router performance
Stable product. Not sure about full internet feed but I am using 7609 for the same purpose it is perfectly running. ASR is the high end series should work. -FJ On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Md. Jahangir Hossain jrjahan...@yahoo.comwrote: Dear honorable member: Wishes all are fine. i need suggestion from you about CISCO ASR 1006 router performance. i want to buy this router for IP Transit provider where i received all global routes . it would be nice please put your valued suggestion about this issue. thanks jahangir ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Using PTP (Precision Time Protocol) in MPLS
Hi, Do anyone ever configure Cisco routers / switches in MPLS network for PTP traffic? -FJ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Routers and switches backup tools..
Rancid. Regards, Farhan Jaffer On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Ambedkar p.ambed...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there any free Backup tools are available which will regular backup's of cisco devices say weekly once for scheduled day and time. Thanks in advance. Bye. Ambedkar ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Round trip time internet providers
Hi, We used to use SmokePing to learn the RTT from different providers then accordingly make decision. You may use any other tool to study the important routes before going to implement the changes. Regards, Farhan Jaffer On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Alexandre Durand alexandre.dur...@tasfrance.com wrote: Hi, We manage multi-home transit providers around our network and they don t provide us RTT graphs about RTT depending on geographical locations. Is there a way to know and get such information ? Let s say for example, we want to compare UK routes originated from 2 providers interoute and opentransit ,so we can make preferences over communities and so on ... depending on best RTT results. Regards alexandre durand __**_ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsphttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR
Hi Osama, If you know JUNOS IOS, IOS-XR is not a new for you. Learn some basic tips starts working, it's very easy. Migration from IOS to IOS-XR depends on the configuration you have on your GSR. Because once you up-graded GSR, you have to re-configure it with IOS-XR syntax (a bit change). Please also note that the enough RAM available with GSR for IOS-XR. Regards, Farhan Jaffer On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:18 PM, mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree mohamed.abos...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I need some help with this,Let's assume that i'm new to IOS-XR,dealing with GSR and CRS. I need to know the best source or the best technquie to understand,learn IOS-XR and be professional in dealing with like normal IOS :) Also i would appreciate if some one can send me the steps to how to upgrade from normal IOS to IOS-XR on GSR. Thanks, Osama ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] CRS1 downgrade from 4.0.1 to 3.6.2
Hi Vikas, Have the CRS is running on 4.0.1? I mean that the all steps required to complete the installation have completed? Or you are stuck during installation... For downgrade the same procedures are required. However your flash file system is required to up-grade from FAT 16 to FAT 32 in 4.0.1, have you did this? -FJ On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Vikas Sharma vikasshar...@gmail.comwrote: Also I can see this log which clearly says no upgrade package is available but then why it asks to uninstall the upgrade package.. Fri Feb 25 02:26:03.572 UTC Install operation 396 '(admin) install remove disk1:hfr-upgrade-p.pie-4.0.1 synchronous' started by user 'colt123' via CLI at 02:26:04 UTC Fri Feb 25 2011. P/0/RP0/CPU0:Feb 25 02:26:04.876 : instdir[216]: %INSTALL-INSTMGR-3-INSTALL_OPERATION_USER_ERROR : User error occurred during install operation 396. See 'show install log 396 detail' for more inKformation. Warning: The following specified package does not use the boot device, and so Warning: will not be removed: Warning: disk1:hfr-upgrade-p.pie-4.0.1 Error:There are no valid packages on the boot device to be removed. Regards, VIkas On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Vikas Sharma vikasshar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have upgraded CRS1 to 4.0.1 from 3.6.2. Upgrade worked fine and it is running 4.0.1. But the issue is I am not able to downgrade it back to 3.6.2 If I am trying to run any install command I see similar output - RP/0/RP0/CPU0:crs1.BLB(admin)#install commit Fri Feb 25 03:45:10.181 UTC Install operation 402 '(admin) install commit' started by user 'colt123' via CLI at 03:45:10 UTC Fri Feb 25 2011. Error:Cannot proceed with the operation because the upgrade package is Error:active. Error: Error:The package should only be used when upgrading from software RP/0/RP0/CPU0:Feb 25 03:45:11.503 : instdir[216]: %INSTALL-INSTMGR-3-INSTALL_OPERATION_USER_ERROR : User error occurred during install operation 402. See 'show install log 402 detail' for more inError:versions prior to 4.0.0. Once the upgrade is complete, it should be formation. Error:immediately deactivated and removed. No further install operations Error:will be allowed until this is completed. Error: Error:Deactivate the package from the entire router by executing the Error:'install deactivate ' command in admin mode. Error:Remove the package from the entire router by executing the 'install Error:remove ' command in admin mode. Error:No further install operations will be allowed until this is Error:completed. Install operation 402 failed at 03:45:11 UTC Fri Feb 25 2011. I have also checked on the active and inactive files and could not locate upgrade package on active disk (boot disk). Does anyone has faced similar issue? Regards, Vikas ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] CRS-1 Policy change
Hi, I have tried the same configuration it is working... (config)#show Fri Feb 25 10:19:56.980 PST Building configuration... ! class-map match-any Premium-From-PE_CORE match dscp default cs1 end-class-map ! class-map match-any Business1-From-PE-CORE match dscp default cs1 end-class-map ! policy-map CR_QOS_FROM_PE-CORE class Premium-From-PE_CORE set qos-group 5 ! class Business1-From-PE-CORE set qos-group 3 ! class class-default ! end-policy-map ! end (config)#commit (config)# (config)# (config)# (config)# (config)#policy-map CR_QOS_FROM_PE-CORE (config-pmap)#class Premium-From-PE_CORE (config-pmap-c)#set qos-group 4 (config-pmap-c)#exit (config-pmap)#exit (config)#commit (config)# (config)# (config)# -FJ On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Vikas Sharma vikasshar...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Farhan, All other policies I am able to modify except this. Also this is the only policy with qos-group (for incoming packets) policy-map CR_QOS_FROM_PE-CORE class Premium-From-PE_CORE set qos-group 5 ! class Business1-From-PE-CORE set qos-group 3 ! class Business2-From-PE-CORE set qos-group 2 ! class Business3-From-PE-CORE set qos-group 1 ! class Routing-Management-From-PE-CORE set qos-group 6 ! class Default-From-PE-CORE set qos-group 0 ! class Multicast-From-PE-CORE set qos-group 4 ! class class-default ! end-policy-map Regards, Vikas On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Farhan Jaffer bandh...@gmail.comwrote: Can you please confirm the modified configuration / new class-map? We are running same version on CRS-1s with no. of policies modification on need basis. This should not be the case... -FJ On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Vikas Sharma vikasshar...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I have a policy which I can see currently not applied on any interface, I am trying to modify the policy (remove existing class-map and add new class-map), but when I commit I see following message !!% Policy manager does not support this feature: Platform does not support policy-map modification type qos I am sure this policy is not anywhere attached as otherwise I would see following error !!% Object is in use: Class-map Default-From-PE-CORE of type qos is used bypolicy-map(s). Delete failed This is on CRS1 XR rel 3.6.2 am I missing something? Regards, Vikas ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] CRS-1 Policy change
Can you please confirm the modified configuration / new class-map? We are running same version on CRS-1s with no. of policies modification on need basis. This should not be the case... -FJ On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Vikas Sharma vikasshar...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I have a policy which I can see currently not applied on any interface, I am trying to modify the policy (remove existing class-map and add new class-map), but when I commit I see following message !!% Policy manager does not support this feature: Platform does not support policy-map modification type qos I am sure this policy is not anywhere attached as otherwise I would see following error !!% Object is in use: Class-map Default-From-CR-SAR of type qos is used bypolicy-map(s). Delete failed This is on CRS1 XR rel 3.6.2 am I missing something? Regards, Vikas ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Experience on MPLS-TP (MPLS Transport profile)
Thanks Mark for the update. Let's see how next generation of Transport Networks look like! -FJ On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.netwrote: On Saturday 24 April 2010 06:58:26 pm Farhan Jaffer wrote: Any one who have an experience on network running MPLS-TP? I would like to know that how this technology is being adopt by service providers, especially those who are running IP/MPLS backbone in their networks. AFAIK, no real implementations exist in production. Much of the work is still within the standards bodies, and a number of working groups are working on various parts of the protocol. A general update from Luca Martini can be found here: http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/presentations/Tuesday/Martini_MPLS_N48.pdf It's going to be interesting to see how existing IP/MPLS backbones receive MPLS-TP, especially if they aren't incumbents. That said, I can see how legacy telco's would like the concepts it presents, even though they may have existing IP/MPLS backbones. Cheers, Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Experience on MPLS-TP (MPLS Transport profile)
Yes, few features taken out to simplify things, like PHP, etc, but it will work with IP/MPLS backbone. I am not sure how (and why) telco's ready to accept this new technology sooner or later. -FJ On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.netwrote: On Sunday 25 April 2010 07:04:45 pm Farhan Jaffer wrote: Thanks Mark for the update. Let's see how next generation of Transport Networks look like! It's very different from regular MPLS, with a number of features taken out to simplify things the way (I think) telco's would prefer them. Personally, I wouldn't run it, as it's probably easier to add OAM capabilities into existing MPLS (but that's likely because I'm already happy with IP/MPLS). However, it would very appealing to telco's who are hesitant to run packetized networks with the exception of Ethernet. Nonetheless, yes, I'd like to see what it looks like in the end (MPLS-TP). Cheers, Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Experience on MPLS-TP (MPLS Transport profile)
Hi, Any one who have an experience on network running MPLS-TP? I would like to know that how this technology is being adopt by service providers, especially those who are running IP/MPLS backbone in their networks. Thanks, -FJ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR version you use
3.6.2 (only on CRS) so far. We upgraded 3-4 months back on Cisco AS recommendation. No added features needed for 3.8. -FJ On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Per Carlson per...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I look for a good choice of XR to upgrade to from 3.5. In terms of features there are no mandatory ones that could drive us to do 3.8 instead of 3.6 Does anyone of you use 3.8 in a production environment? Please share any thoughts on this. We are using 3.5.4 (CRS and XR12k) and do plan a move to 3.6.3 on both platforms. XR 3.8 didn't give us any needed features either, and the lower exposure in the wild made the choice of 3.6 rather easy. -- Pelle ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Fwd: Internet Routing Table Size
You can register yourself for weekly routing table. -FJ -- Forwarded message -- From: Routing Analysis Role Account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:09 PM Subject: [SANOG] Weekly Routing Table Report To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 11 Oct, 2008 Report Website: http://thyme.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary BGP routing table entries examined: 270790 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 130670 Deaggregation factor: 2.07 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 131713 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 29477 Prefixes per ASN: 9.19 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 25621 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 12506 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:3856 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 82 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 3.6 Max AS path length visible: 18 Max AS path prepend of ASN ( 3816) 15 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 569 Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 208 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs: 61 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 10 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:755 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 1911844672 Equivalent to 113 /8s, 244 /16s and 111 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 51.6 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 62.6 Percentage of available address space allocated: 82.3 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 73.7 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 132945 APNIC Region Analysis Summary - Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:62393 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 23186 APNIC Deaggregation factor:2.69 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 59270 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:26697 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:3402 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 17.42 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:903 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:543 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:3.5 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 17 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 378110880 Equivalent to 22 /8s, 137 /16s and 131 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 80.5 APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079 APNIC Address Blocks58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:123078 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:64823 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 1.90 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks:92344 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 35062 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:12519 ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 7.38 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:4856 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:1197 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.3 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 16 Number of ARIN
[c-nsp] PtP link over FR
Hi, There is an interesting situation, let me discuss the scenario first, Cisco Router A (same n/w) Juniper Router -(FR point-to-point pvc) --- Cisco Router B. PVC is Active point to point connectivity is OK. But the ping response from cisco router A to B via FR is unreachable vice versa. however if i replace Juniper router with Cisco Router, it works fine. Is there any IP forwarding like thing? or any other problem. Thanks very much in advance. -FJ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] PtP link over FR
Thanks for all. It was one mistake from my side. I used management interface ip address for routes on Juniper :) It's working fine now. Thanks again. -FJ On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Farhan Jaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, There is an interesting situation, let me discuss the scenario first, Cisco Router A (same n/w) Juniper Router -(FR point-to-point pvc) --- Cisco Router B. PVC is Active point to point connectivity is OK. But the ping response from cisco router A to B via FR is unreachable vice versa. however if i replace Juniper router with Cisco Router, it works fine. Is there any IP forwarding like thing? or any other problem. Thanks very much in advance. -FJ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Total output drops - congestion ? - 7200-VXR
Have you tried 'hold-queue ...' command. This may resolves your problem.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Wilkinson, Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am having problems with a particular device going down every 3-4 days.
The switchport for which this device is connected to is telling me it is
having a lot of output drops e.g.
Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops:
13342805
I 'suspect' that these output drops could be the root cause of the device
attached to this port going down consistently.
Question: Since 'output drops' seems to relate to interface congestion can
anyone recommed a tool to 'blast' this particular interface in
order to test {in,out}queues and congestion ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence
Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES
ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Question about the CCNA and CCNP certification
very true. You can take CCNP exam (any paper) without CCNA, you will get individual results. But in order to get CCNP certification, you must have a valid (means before expire) CCNA certificate. Regards -FJ On 9/8/07, Fred Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jay, You are right. You don't need a CCNA in order to take the CCNP tests, but you will require one before you get your actual certification. Just like you are required to have a signed exam certification agreement on-file (usually a click-through one you do for every test). However, there is no prereq for a CCIE. If you're board with figuring out subnet masks and the basic stuff why don't you just get a CCIE? Fred Reimer, CISSP Senior Network Engineer Coleman Technologies, Inc. 954-298-1697 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Hennigan Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 5:35 PM To: Bernd Ueberbacher Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Question about the CCNA and CCNP certification Bernd Ueberbacher wrote: A guy I know from a different company also wants to become a CCNP, but today he told me, that he is heading directly towards the CCNP without passing the CCNA. I said that this is not possible, but he was completely sure about it and had an interesting explanation... He says that the CCNA is a requirement for the CCNP if you want to attend a CCNP class room course. This prevents that you have absolutely no clue about networking and slow down the whole group/class. If you don't attend the class, but do it by self studying and just take the exam with Pearson Vue etc, you don't need a valid CCNA certification. This is because it's your money/problem if you fail but you are not annoying anybody else with your incompetence and if you have no clue you just don't pass. He is wrong. CCNA is a prerequisite for CCNP regardless if you take classroom training or just schedule the exams at Pearson VUE. You will not receive a CCNP certificate without first having a valid CCNA. I suppose you could take them all at once if you want to do so. See http://www.cisco.com/go/ccnp See the line CCNP Prerequisites. -- -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
