Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-04-07 Thread Marian Ďurkovič
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:24:00 +0300, Saku Ytti wrote
  3. Topologies used
c) anritsu  --darkfibre--  ten7/1:7600:ten7/2  --darkfibre-- anritsu
 
  4. Pure IP performance
4.1 no features configured, plain IP routing
c) 64bytes does 87.5% of linerate, rate appraoches 100% as size grows,

This is expected result - it's the 26 Mpps limit in Janus ASIC.

   but is both bps and pps bound, so no configuration of packet size
   and interval got 100%.

That is strange. There is no bandwidth limitation between the ports and Janus,
so it looks like something was broken in older IOS versions.

   M.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-04-06 Thread Marian Ďurkovič
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 10:58:56PM -0400, Lee wrote:
 On 3/31/09, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net wrote:
  On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:01:24AM +0200, Gergely Antal wrote:
 
  I meant that you can not push 40G out of a 6704
  even with a dfc attached to it.But you can do it with a 6708
  with 1:1 subscription.
 
  Worse, some days you can't even get 7G in from a single port on a 6704
  with the other 3 ports unused. We routinely have problems with ingress
  interface overruns or egress interface output queue overflows on 6704
  in that traffic range, and DFC doesn't make any difference.
 
  It seems like it is head of line blocking, and TAC's only answer is
  those things have no buffers, buy a 6708.
 
 We had a TAC case for input queue drops on a 6704 port - they told us
 it's a hardware limitation.  When traffic is switched between two
 ports leading to the same asic you're limited to about 8Gb per port.

???
This is definitely possible with 6704 and SXI:

TenGigabitEthernet2/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
  Last clearing of show interface counters 00:04:57
  Input queue: 0/2000/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  30 second input rate 9900042000 bits/sec, 137227 packets/sec
  30 second output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec

TenGigabitEthernet2/2 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
  Last clearing of show interface counters 00:04:55
  Input queue: 0/2000/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  30 second input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  30 second output rate 9900041000 bits/sec, 137226 packets/sec

No single packet drop in 5 minutes, and the traffic is switched locally
in the ASIC -  not going out to fabric:

#show fabric utilization 
 slotchannel  speedIngress % Egress %
2  020G00
2  120G00

This is on WS-SUP720-3B system with WS-X6704-10GE + WS-F6700-CFC.


With kind regards,

   M.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-04-06 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2009-04-06 18:11 +0200), Marian Ďurkovič wrote:

  We had a TAC case for input queue drops on a 6704 port - they told us
  it's a hardware limitation.  When traffic is switched between two
  ports leading to the same asic you're limited to about 8Gb per port.
 
 This is definitely possible with 6704 and SXI:

 TenGigabitEthernet2/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
   30 second input rate 9900042000 bits/sec, 137227 packets/sec
 TenGigabitEthernet2/2 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
   30 second output rate 9900041000 bits/sec, 137226 packets/sec

When I tested it traffic inside single channel was worst 
alternative.

 3. Topologies used
   I used four different topologies:
   a) anritsu  --darkfibre--  ten7/1:7600:ten7/3  --darkfibre-- anritsu
   b) anritsu  --darkfibre--  ten7/1:7600:ten4/1  --darkfibre-- anritsu
   c) anritsu  --darkfibre--  ten7/1:7600:ten7/2  --darkfibre-- anritsu
   d) anr -dark- ten9/3:7600:ten9/2 -dwdm- ten4/1:7600:ten7/1 -dark- anr

 4. Pure IP performance
   4.1 no features configured, plain IP routing
   a) 67bytes and above is linerate in both directions
   b) 65bytes and above is linerate in both directions
   c) 64bytes does 87.5% of linerate, rate appraoches 100% as size grows,
  but is both bps and pps bound, so no configuration of packet size
  and interval got 100%.
   d) 67bytes and above is linerate in boh directions

This was in mid 2006 with 6704 and CFC running SRA. ACL's and Policers
didn't affect forwarding, uRPF did affect slightly.

-- 
  ++ytti
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-04-05 Thread Lee
On 3/31/09, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net wrote:
 On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:01:24AM +0200, Gergely Antal wrote:

 I meant that you can not push 40G out of a 6704
 even with a dfc attached to it.But you can do it with a 6708
 with 1:1 subscription.

 Worse, some days you can't even get 7G in from a single port on a 6704
 with the other 3 ports unused. We routinely have problems with ingress
 interface overruns or egress interface output queue overflows on 6704
 in that traffic range, and DFC doesn't make any difference.

 It seems like it is head of line blocking, and TAC's only answer is
 those things have no buffers, buy a 6708.

We had a TAC case for input queue drops on a 6704 port - they told us
it's a hardware limitation.  When traffic is switched between two
ports leading to the same asic you're limited to about 8Gb per port.

Regards,
Lee
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-04-01 Thread Jan Sandmaier

Geoffrey Pendery schrieb:

The stuff we've been reading (look at Supervisor Engines Supported
on the data sheets for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series 10 Gigabit Ethernet
Interface Modules, or browse the line cards for the 7600, or go into
Configurator tool) claims that the RSP 720 won't support the X6704 or
X6708 10 Gig LAN cards, only the SIP/SPA/ES WAN type cards.

I don't mean to kick off a big 6500 vs 7600 storm again, but does
anyone know if this is incorrect?
Can we buy a new 7609-S chassis, put a new RSP 720 in it, put 7600 IOS
on that Sup, then plug in a WS-X6708-10G-3C and have it work?
  


X6708-10G-3C works definitly. X6704 also. You have to check the release 
notes or software advisor for the suitable IOS.


Jan


-Geoff


On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com wrote:
  

Hi
I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP connections. I 
would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the 
moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable.

My technical requirements are:
10Gbps line rate
IPv4
Able to handle full Internet routing table
Potentially IPv6 and MPLS in the future

With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are available 
with it i.e.

Memory Option:
MEM-XCEF720-256M
Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A)
MEM-XCEF720-512M
Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A/DFC3B)
MEM-XCEF720-1GB
Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3BXL)


Distributed Forwarding Card Option

WS-F6700-CFC
Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
WS-F6700-DFC3B
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx
WS-F6700-DFC3A
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
WS-F6700-DFC3BXL
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx
WS-F6700-DFC3C
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
WS-F6700-DFC3CXL
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx

I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?

Regards

Mark




___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


  



--
Jan Sandmaier 
Network Engineer


1und1 Internet AG Mail: jan.sandma...@1und1.de
Brauerstrasse 48  Tel.: +49 721/91374-4213
D-76135 Karlsruhe Fax : +49 721/91374-212

http://www.1und1.de (AS8560)

Handelsregister Amtsgericht Montabaur, HRB 6484
USt-IdNr. DE811247114

Vorstand: Henning Ahlert, Ralph Dommermuth, Matthias Ehrlich, Thomas 
Gottschlich, Matthias Greve, Robert Hoffmann, Markus Huhn, Oliver Mauss, Achim 
Weiss
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Michael Scheeren

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-04-01 Thread Gabor Szabo (gabszabo)

RSP720 supervisor is supported from 12.2(33)SRB and supports X6704 from the 
beginning.
X6708 is supported from 12.2(33)SRC for both SUP720 and RSP720 in the SR train.

Regards,

Gabor


-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net 
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jan Sandmaier
Sent: 2009. április 1. 8:45
To: Geoffrey Pendery
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

Geoffrey Pendery schrieb:
 The stuff we've been reading (look at Supervisor Engines Supported
 on the data sheets for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series 10 Gigabit Ethernet
 Interface Modules, or browse the line cards for the 7600, or go into
 Configurator tool) claims that the RSP 720 won't support the X6704 or
 X6708 10 Gig LAN cards, only the SIP/SPA/ES WAN type cards.

 I don't mean to kick off a big 6500 vs 7600 storm again, but does
 anyone know if this is incorrect?
 Can we buy a new 7609-S chassis, put a new RSP 720 in it, put 7600 IOS
 on that Sup, then plug in a WS-X6708-10G-3C and have it work?
   

X6708-10G-3C works definitly. X6704 also. You have to check the release 
notes or software advisor for the suitable IOS.

Jan

 -Geoff


 On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com wrote:
   
 Hi
 I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP connections. 
 I would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the 
 moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable.

 My technical requirements are:
 10Gbps line rate
 IPv4
 Able to handle full Internet routing table
 Potentially IPv6 and MPLS in the future

 With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are available 
 with it i.e.

 Memory Option:
 MEM-XCEF720-256M
 Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A)
 MEM-XCEF720-512M
 Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A/DFC3B)
 MEM-XCEF720-1GB
 Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3BXL)

 
 Distributed Forwarding Card Option

 WS-F6700-CFC
 Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
 WS-F6700-DFC3B
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx
 WS-F6700-DFC3A
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
 WS-F6700-DFC3BXL
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx
 WS-F6700-DFC3C
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
 WS-F6700-DFC3CXL
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx

 I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?

 Regards

 Mark




 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


   


-- 
Jan Sandmaier 
Network Engineer

1und1 Internet AG Mail: jan.sandma...@1und1.de
Brauerstrasse 48  Tel.: +49 721/91374-4213
D-76135 Karlsruhe Fax : +49 721/91374-212

http://www.1und1.de (AS8560)

Handelsregister Amtsgericht Montabaur, HRB 6484
USt-IdNr. DE811247114

Vorstand: Henning Ahlert, Ralph Dommermuth, Matthias Ehrlich, Thomas 
Gottschlich, Matthias Greve, Robert Hoffmann, Markus Huhn, Oliver Mauss, Achim 
Weiss
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Michael Scheeren

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Gergely Antal
And also keep in mind that WS-X6708-10GE is a true line-rate card...

Eric Gauthier wrote:
 Mark,
 
 I'm not sure if you have other 10g links, but keep in mind that Cisco has 
 (at least) two 10g optics - Xenpak and X2 - that are not intercompatible.  
 I believe that the 6704-10ge uses Xenpak and the 6708-10gE, which is the
 same card but with 8 ports, uses X2.  If everything else you do is X2,
 it might make sense to jump up to the 8 port card to prevent yourself
 from having to buy/spare two types of optics.
 
 Eric :)
 
 
 On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:41:12AM -0700, Mark Tech wrote:
 Hi
 I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP connections. 
 I would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the 
 moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable.

 My technical requirements are:
 10Gbps line rate
 IPv4
 Able to handle full Internet routing table
 Potentially IPv6 and MPLS in the future

 With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are available 
 with it i.e.

 Memory Option: 
 MEM-XCEF720-256M 
 Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A) 
 MEM-XCEF720-512M 
 Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A/DFC3B)  
 MEM-XCEF720-1GB 
 Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3BXL) 

 
 Distributed Forwarding Card Option

 WS-F6700-CFC 
 Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
 WS-F6700-DFC3B 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx  
 WS-F6700-DFC3A 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
 WS-F6700-DFC3BXL 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx 
 WS-F6700-DFC3C 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
 WS-F6700-DFC3CXL 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx

 I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?

 Regards

 Mark


   

 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Paul Stewart
I don't have the spec sheets handy but I do believe though that the 6708 is
1:2 oversubscribed though correct?  The 6704 is 1:1 if that's important to
the application

Paul


-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gergely Antal
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 2:55 AM
To: Eric Gauthier
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

And also keep in mind that WS-X6708-10GE is a true line-rate card...

Eric Gauthier wrote:
 Mark,
 
 I'm not sure if you have other 10g links, but keep in mind that Cisco 
 has (at least) two 10g optics - Xenpak and X2 - that are not
intercompatible.
 I believe that the 6704-10ge uses Xenpak and the 6708-10gE, which is 
 the same card but with 8 ports, uses X2.  If everything else you do 
 is X2, it might make sense to jump up to the 8 port card to prevent 
 yourself from having to buy/spare two types of optics.
 
 Eric :)
 
 
 On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:41:12AM -0700, Mark Tech wrote:
 Hi
 I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP
connections. I would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP
720-3CXL's, at the moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be
suitable.

 My technical requirements are:
 10Gbps line rate
 IPv4
 Able to handle full Internet routing table Potentially IPv6 and MPLS 
 in the future

 With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are
available with it i.e.

 Memory Option: 
 MEM-XCEF720-256M
 Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A) 
 MEM-XCEF720-512M Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, 
 DFC3A/DFC3B) MEM-XCEF720-1GB Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx 
 interface, DFC3BXL)

 
 Distributed Forwarding Card Option

 WS-F6700-CFC
 Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules WS-F6700-DFC3B 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx WS-F6700-DFC3A 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules WS-F6700-DFC3BXL 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx WS-F6700-DFC3C 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules WS-F6700-DFC3CXL 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx

 I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?

 Regards

 Mark


   

 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Gergely Antal
I meant that you can not push 40G out of a 6704
even with a dfc attached to it.But you can do it with a 6708
with 1:1 subscription.

Gert Doering wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 08:54:47AM +0200, Gergely Antal wrote:
 And also keep in mind that WS-X6708-10GE is a true line-rate card...
 
 Hardly.
 
 gert



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou

Why is that? Small (16MB) buffers?
We are at about 32G without any problem until now.

--
Tassos

Gergely Antal wrote on 31/03/2009 11:01:

I meant that you can not push 40G out of a 6704
even with a dfc attached to it.But you can do it with a 6708
with 1:1 subscription.

Gert Doering wrote:

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 08:54:47AM +0200, Gergely Antal wrote:

And also keep in mind that WS-X6708-10GE is a true line-rate card...

Hardly.

gert





___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Tamas Sziraki
6704 is just said to be 1:1 with dfc. What we experienced, is that if  
you need the full 4G use the 6708, regardless if it's oversubscribed  
2:1.



Tamas

On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:

I don't have the spec sheets handy but I do believe though that the  
6708 is
1:2 oversubscribed though correct?  The 6704 is 1:1 if that's  
important to

the application

Paul


-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gergely Antal
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 2:55 AM
To: Eric Gauthier
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

And also keep in mind that WS-X6708-10GE is a true line-rate card...

Eric Gauthier wrote:

Mark,

I'm not sure if you have other 10g links, but keep in mind that Cisco
has (at least) two 10g optics - Xenpak and X2 - that are not

intercompatible.

I believe that the 6704-10ge uses Xenpak and the 6708-10gE, which is
the same card but with 8 ports, uses X2.  If everything else you do
is X2, it might make sense to jump up to the 8 port card to prevent
yourself from having to buy/spare two types of optics.

Eric :)


On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:41:12AM -0700, Mark Tech wrote:

Hi
I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP

connections. I would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP
720-3CXL's, at the moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card  
may be

suitable.


My technical requirements are:
10Gbps line rate
IPv4
Able to handle full Internet routing table Potentially IPv6 and MPLS
in the future

With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are

available with it i.e.


Memory Option:
MEM-XCEF720-256M
Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A)
MEM-XCEF720-512M Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface,
DFC3A/DFC3B) MEM-XCEF720-1GB Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx
interface, DFC3BXL)


Distributed Forwarding Card Option

WS-F6700-CFC
Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules WS-F6700-DFC3B
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx WS-F6700-DFC3A
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules WS-F6700-DFC3BXL
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx WS-F6700-DFC3C
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules WS-F6700-DFC3CXL
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx

I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?

Regards

Mark




___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/






___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Frederic LOUI


Hi Mark,
Mark Tech a écrit :

Hi
  

...

I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP connections. I 
would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the 
moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable.
  

We've re-used  WS-X6704-10GE (from our 6500 without DFC3CXL daughter card)

My technical requirements are:
10Gbps line rate
  

10G = yes

IPv4
Able to handle full Internet routing table
Potentially IPv6 and MPLS in the future
  
We're implementing all of these features without (as from now) any issue 
except VPLS which needs ES20/ES40 or ES(combo)
We're also using IPv4 (sparse mode with anycast RP ) /IPv6 multicast 
with embedded RP, pseudowire, L3VPN with MPLS.
As far as it goes 6VPE is also supported... (We also tested in lab, 
traffic-engineering with CRS1 in the tunnel path and it has worked at 
10Gb rate)
For whatever reason CISCO recommended a 4gb RAM RSP memory upgrade if 
the 7600 need but I'm not convinced about this recommendation.
(Note that if you need to upgrade you need to purchase 2x4Gb in case of 
redundant RSP)

With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are available 
with it i.e.

Memory Option: 
MEM-XCEF720-256M 
Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A) 
MEM-XCEF720-512M 
Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A/DFC3B)  
MEM-XCEF720-1GB 
Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3BXL) 



Distributed Forwarding Card Option

WS-F6700-CFC 
Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
WS-F6700-DFC3B 
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx  
WS-F6700-DFC3A 
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
WS-F6700-DFC3BXL 
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx 
WS-F6700-DFC3C 
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
WS-F6700-DFC3CXL 
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx


I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?

  
Yes. WS-F6700-DFC3CXL becomes handy if you're planning to use netflow as 
the NDE(we extensively use it at full flow)  is handle by the Forwarding 
card.
(So the RSP7203CXL won't handle NDE burden) Again, more RAM would help 
to have more room for NETFLOW cache. But maybe this RAM is useful for 
another feature that I'm not awre of.


Netflow is useful and the only way (we found) to monitor IPv6 traffic on 
this platform as IPv6 MIBs are not available on this architecture.

Regards

Mark

  

Cheers/Fred
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2009-03-31 03:02 -0400), Paul Stewart wrote:

 I don't have the spec sheets handy but I do believe though that the 6708 is
 1:2 oversubscribed though correct?  The 6704 is 1:1 if that's important to
 the application

6704 is not exactly 1:1, while 6708 is exactly 1:2. So if you stick
play-doh on 4 ports in 6708 you have wire-speed card (FSVO wire-speed,
I really hate the term though, I mean wire-speed surely has to mean
overspeed of maxports-1 * maxportspeed?)
Also as an interesting curiosity LAN cards prior to 6708 are slow
to detect linedown, so if you're venturing inside the subsecond
convergency world, it is relevant.

 Paul
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
 [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gergely Antal
 Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 2:55 AM
 To: Eric Gauthier
 Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609
 
 And also keep in mind that WS-X6708-10GE is a true line-rate card...
 
 Eric Gauthier wrote:
  Mark,
  
  I'm not sure if you have other 10g links, but keep in mind that Cisco 
  has (at least) two 10g optics - Xenpak and X2 - that are not
 intercompatible.
  I believe that the 6704-10ge uses Xenpak and the 6708-10gE, which is 
  the same card but with 8 ports, uses X2.  If everything else you do 
  is X2, it might make sense to jump up to the 8 port card to prevent 
  yourself from having to buy/spare two types of optics.
  
  Eric :)
  
  
  On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:41:12AM -0700, Mark Tech wrote:
  Hi
  I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP
 connections. I would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP
 720-3CXL's, at the moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be
 suitable.
 
  My technical requirements are:
  10Gbps line rate
  IPv4
  Able to handle full Internet routing table Potentially IPv6 and MPLS 
  in the future
 
  With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are
 available with it i.e.
 
  Memory Option: 
  MEM-XCEF720-256M
  Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A) 
  MEM-XCEF720-512M Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, 
  DFC3A/DFC3B) MEM-XCEF720-1GB Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx 
  interface, DFC3BXL)
 
  
  Distributed Forwarding Card Option
 
  WS-F6700-CFC
  Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules WS-F6700-DFC3B 
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx WS-F6700-DFC3A 
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules WS-F6700-DFC3BXL 
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx WS-F6700-DFC3C 
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules WS-F6700-DFC3CXL 
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx
 
  I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?
 
  Regards
 
  Mark
 
 

 
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-- 
  ++ytti
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Geoffrey Pendery
The stuff we've been reading (look at Supervisor Engines Supported
on the data sheets for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series 10 Gigabit Ethernet
Interface Modules, or browse the line cards for the 7600, or go into
Configurator tool) claims that the RSP 720 won't support the X6704 or
X6708 10 Gig LAN cards, only the SIP/SPA/ES WAN type cards.

I don't mean to kick off a big 6500 vs 7600 storm again, but does
anyone know if this is incorrect?
Can we buy a new 7609-S chassis, put a new RSP 720 in it, put 7600 IOS
on that Sup, then plug in a WS-X6708-10G-3C and have it work?


-Geoff


On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Hi
 I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP connections. I 
 would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the 
 moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable.

 My technical requirements are:
 10Gbps line rate
 IPv4
 Able to handle full Internet routing table
 Potentially IPv6 and MPLS in the future

 With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are available 
 with it i.e.

 Memory Option:
 MEM-XCEF720-256M
 Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A)
 MEM-XCEF720-512M
 Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A/DFC3B)
 MEM-XCEF720-1GB
 Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3BXL)

 
 Distributed Forwarding Card Option

 WS-F6700-CFC
 Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
 WS-F6700-DFC3B
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx
 WS-F6700-DFC3A
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
 WS-F6700-DFC3BXL
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx
 WS-F6700-DFC3C
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
 WS-F6700-DFC3CXL
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx

 I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?

 Regards

 Mark




 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-...@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:01:24AM +0200, Gergely Antal wrote:
 I meant that you can not push 40G out of a 6704
 even with a dfc attached to it.But you can do it with a 6708
 with 1:1 subscription.

Worse, some days you can't even get 7G in from a single port on a 6704
with the other 3 ports unused. We routinely have problems with ingress
interface overruns or egress interface output queue overflows on 6704 
in that traffic range, and DFC doesn't make any difference.

It seems like it is head of line blocking, and TAC's only answer is
those things have no buffers, buy a 6708. The problem can usually be
worked around by changing the way traffic is being mapped between the
ports. For example, the one that seems to be the absolute worst case is
in one port and out the other on the same fabric channel, i.e. in port
1 and out port 2 or the same thing on 3/4.

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net   http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Jason Lixfeld

Looks like the 6708 isn't as bad as we think.

On 2009-03-31, at 4:12 PM, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net  
wrote:



On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:01:24AM +0200, Gergely Antal wrote:

I meant that you can not push 40G out of a 6704
even with a dfc attached to it.But you can do it with a 6708
with 1:1 subscription.


Worse, some days you can't even get 7G in from a single port on a 6704
with the other 3 ports unused. We routinely have problems with ingress
interface overruns or egress interface output queue overflows on 6704
in that traffic range, and DFC doesn't make any difference.

It seems like it is head of line blocking, and TAC's only answer is
those things have no buffers, buy a 6708. The problem can usually be
worked around by changing the way traffic is being mapped between the
ports. For example, the one that seems to be the absolute worst case  
is
in one port and out the other on the same fabric channel, i.e. in  
port

1 and out port 2 or the same thing on 3/4.

--
Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net   http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1  
2CBC)

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Dodd, Steven
Keith Tokash has a pretty good writeup on the 6704 vs 6708 buffer issue:

http://www.cciecandidate.com/?p=505

-Steve

-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 1:38 PM
To: Richard A Steenbergen
Cc: Gert Doering; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

Looks like the 6708 isn't as bad as we think.

On 2009-03-31, at 4:12 PM, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net  
wrote:

 On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:01:24AM +0200, Gergely Antal wrote:
 I meant that you can not push 40G out of a 6704
 even with a dfc attached to it.But you can do it with a 6708
 with 1:1 subscription.

 Worse, some days you can't even get 7G in from a single port on a 6704
 with the other 3 ports unused. We routinely have problems with ingress
 interface overruns or egress interface output queue overflows on 6704
 in that traffic range, and DFC doesn't make any difference.

 It seems like it is head of line blocking, and TAC's only answer is
 those things have no buffers, buy a 6708. The problem can usually be
 worked around by changing the way traffic is being mapped between the
 ports. For example, the one that seems to be the absolute worst case  
 is
 in one port and out the other on the same fabric channel, i.e. in  
 port
 1 and out port 2 or the same thing on 3/4.

 -- 
 Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
 GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1  
 2CBC)
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Brian Mengel
This got me curious, so I did a bit of digging.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet09186a00801dce34.html

WS-X6704-10GE - 16MB port buffers
WS-X6708-10G-3CXL - 200 MB port buffers

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps368/data_sheet_c78-49152.html

7600-ES+4TG3CXL - 512MB port buffers



On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote:
 Looks like the 6708 isn't as bad as we think.

 On 2009-03-31, at 4:12 PM, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net wrote:

 On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:01:24AM +0200, Gergely Antal wrote:

 I meant that you can not push 40G out of a 6704
 even with a dfc attached to it.But you can do it with a 6708
 with 1:1 subscription.

 Worse, some days you can't even get 7G in from a single port on a 6704
 with the other 3 ports unused. We routinely have problems with ingress
 interface overruns or egress interface output queue overflows on 6704
 in that traffic range, and DFC doesn't make any difference.

 It seems like it is head of line blocking, and TAC's only answer is
 those things have no buffers, buy a 6708. The problem can usually be
 worked around by changing the way traffic is being mapped between the
 ports. For example, the one that seems to be the absolute worst case is
 in one port and out the other on the same fabric channel, i.e. in port
 1 and out port 2 or the same thing on 3/4.

 --
 Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
 GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-...@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-...@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Ben Steele
Yes you can use the WS-670x in the 7600 with an RSP, I have a couple of
chassis with this at the moment, given they are the 6704(one with DFC)
10GE's but I can't see a 6708 not working either...
7600#sh mod
Mod Ports Card Type  Model  Serial
No.
--- - -- --
---
  14  CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet  WS-X6704-10GE  SERIAL
  24  CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet  WS-X6704-10GE  SERIAL
  3   48  CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet  WS-X6748-GE-TX SERIAL
  52  Route Switch Processor 720 (Active)RSP720-3CXL-GE SERIAL

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Geoffrey Pendery ge...@pendery.net wrote:

 The stuff we've been reading (look at Supervisor Engines Supported
 on the data sheets for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series 10 Gigabit Ethernet
 Interface Modules, or browse the line cards for the 7600, or go into
 Configurator tool) claims that the RSP 720 won't support the X6704 or
 X6708 10 Gig LAN cards, only the SIP/SPA/ES WAN type cards.

 I don't mean to kick off a big 6500 vs 7600 storm again, but does
 anyone know if this is incorrect?
 Can we buy a new 7609-S chassis, put a new RSP 720 in it, put 7600 IOS
 on that Sup, then plug in a WS-X6708-10G-3C and have it work?


 -Geoff


 On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  Hi
  I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP
 connections. I would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP
 720-3CXL's, at the moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be
 suitable.
 
  My technical requirements are:
  10Gbps line rate
  IPv4
  Able to handle full Internet routing table
  Potentially IPv6 and MPLS in the future
 
  With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are
 available with it i.e.
 
  Memory Option:
  MEM-XCEF720-256M
  Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A)
  MEM-XCEF720-512M
  Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A/DFC3B)
  MEM-XCEF720-1GB
  Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3BXL)
 
  
  Distributed Forwarding Card Option
 
  WS-F6700-CFC
  Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
  WS-F6700-DFC3B
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx
  WS-F6700-DFC3A
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
  WS-F6700-DFC3BXL
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx
  WS-F6700-DFC3C
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
  WS-F6700-DFC3CXL
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx
 
  I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?
 
  Regards
 
  Mark
 
 
 
 
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Jon Wolberg
How much RAM do you have in your 6704?  I have some too running in a RSP 
without issues and just got a new one.  It refused to push the FIB to the DFC 
and blew up due to low memory.  Our vendor only put a 256MB stick of RAM in 
this card when they usually have 1GB.

Other than that, I haven't had any issues.


Jon Wolberg
Operations Manager
PowerVPS / Defender Hosting
Defender Technologies Group, LLC.


- Original Message -
From: Ben Steele illcrit...@gmail.com
To: Geoffrey Pendery ge...@pendery.net
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:53:14 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

Yes you can use the WS-670x in the 7600 with an RSP, I have a couple of
chassis with this at the moment, given they are the 6704(one with DFC)
10GE's but I can't see a 6708 not working either...
7600#sh mod
Mod Ports Card Type  Model  Serial
No.
--- - -- --
---
  14  CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet  WS-X6704-10GE  SERIAL
  24  CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet  WS-X6704-10GE  SERIAL
  3   48  CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet  WS-X6748-GE-TX SERIAL
  52  Route Switch Processor 720 (Active)RSP720-3CXL-GE SERIAL

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Geoffrey Pendery ge...@pendery.net wrote:

 The stuff we've been reading (look at Supervisor Engines Supported
 on the data sheets for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series 10 Gigabit Ethernet
 Interface Modules, or browse the line cards for the 7600, or go into
 Configurator tool) claims that the RSP 720 won't support the X6704 or
 X6708 10 Gig LAN cards, only the SIP/SPA/ES WAN type cards.

 I don't mean to kick off a big 6500 vs 7600 storm again, but does
 anyone know if this is incorrect?
 Can we buy a new 7609-S chassis, put a new RSP 720 in it, put 7600 IOS
 on that Sup, then plug in a WS-X6708-10G-3C and have it work?


 -Geoff


 On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  Hi
  I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP
 connections. I would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP
 720-3CXL's, at the moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be
 suitable.
 
  My technical requirements are:
  10Gbps line rate
  IPv4
  Able to handle full Internet routing table
  Potentially IPv6 and MPLS in the future
 
  With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are
 available with it i.e.
 
  Memory Option:
  MEM-XCEF720-256M
  Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A)
  MEM-XCEF720-512M
  Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A/DFC3B)
  MEM-XCEF720-1GB
  Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3BXL)
 
  
  Distributed Forwarding Card Option
 
  WS-F6700-CFC
  Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
  WS-F6700-DFC3B
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx
  WS-F6700-DFC3A
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
  WS-F6700-DFC3BXL
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx
  WS-F6700-DFC3C
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
  WS-F6700-DFC3CXL
  Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx
 
  I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?
 
  Regards
 
  Mark
 
 
 
 
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-31 Thread Ben Steele
1GB on the DFC, 256MB definitely wouldn't cut it for us.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Jon Wolberg j...@defenderhosting.comwrote:

 How much RAM do you have in your 6704?  I have some too running in a RSP
 without issues and just got a new one.  It refused to push the FIB to the
 DFC and blew up due to low memory.  Our vendor only put a 256MB stick of RAM
 in this card when they usually have 1GB.

 Other than that, I haven't had any issues.


 Jon Wolberg
 Operations Manager
 PowerVPS / Defender Hosting
 Defender Technologies Group, LLC.


 - Original Message -
 From: Ben Steele illcrit...@gmail.com
 To: Geoffrey Pendery ge...@pendery.net
 Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:53:14 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

 Yes you can use the WS-670x in the 7600 with an RSP, I have a couple of
 chassis with this at the moment, given they are the 6704(one with DFC)
 10GE's but I can't see a 6708 not working either...
 7600#sh mod
 Mod Ports Card Type  Model  Serial
 No.
 --- - -- --
 ---
  14  CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet  WS-X6704-10GE  SERIAL
  24  CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet  WS-X6704-10GE  SERIAL
  3   48  CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet  WS-X6748-GE-TX SERIAL
  52  Route Switch Processor 720 (Active)RSP720-3CXL-GE SERIAL

 On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Geoffrey Pendery ge...@pendery.net
 wrote:

  The stuff we've been reading (look at Supervisor Engines Supported
  on the data sheets for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series 10 Gigabit Ethernet
  Interface Modules, or browse the line cards for the 7600, or go into
  Configurator tool) claims that the RSP 720 won't support the X6704 or
  X6708 10 Gig LAN cards, only the SIP/SPA/ES WAN type cards.
 
  I don't mean to kick off a big 6500 vs 7600 storm again, but does
  anyone know if this is incorrect?
  Can we buy a new 7609-S chassis, put a new RSP 720 in it, put 7600 IOS
  on that Sup, then plug in a WS-X6708-10G-3C and have it work?
 
 
  -Geoff
 
 
  On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com wrote:
  
   Hi
   I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP
  connections. I would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP
  720-3CXL's, at the moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be
  suitable.
  
   My technical requirements are:
   10Gbps line rate
   IPv4
   Able to handle full Internet routing table
   Potentially IPv6 and MPLS in the future
  
   With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are
  available with it i.e.
  
   Memory Option:
   MEM-XCEF720-256M
   Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A)
   MEM-XCEF720-512M
   Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A/DFC3B)
   MEM-XCEF720-1GB
   Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3BXL)
  
   
   Distributed Forwarding Card Option
  
   WS-F6700-CFC
   Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
   WS-F6700-DFC3B
   Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx
   WS-F6700-DFC3A
   Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
   WS-F6700-DFC3BXL
   Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx
   WS-F6700-DFC3C
   Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules
   WS-F6700-DFC3CXL
   Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx
  
   I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?
  
   Regards
  
   Mark
  
  
  
  
   ___
   cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
   https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
   archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
  
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-30 Thread Mark Tech

Hi
I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP connections. I 
would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the 
moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable.

My technical requirements are:
10Gbps line rate
IPv4
Able to handle full Internet routing table
Potentially IPv6 and MPLS in the future

With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are available 
with it i.e.

Memory Option: 
MEM-XCEF720-256M 
Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A) 
MEM-XCEF720-512M 
Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A/DFC3B)  
MEM-XCEF720-1GB 
Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3BXL) 


Distributed Forwarding Card Option

WS-F6700-CFC 
Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
WS-F6700-DFC3B 
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx  
WS-F6700-DFC3A 
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
WS-F6700-DFC3BXL 
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx 
WS-F6700-DFC3C 
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
WS-F6700-DFC3CXL 
Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx

I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?

Regards

Mark


  

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-30 Thread Mark Tech

Hi thanks fot that. I was looking at the ES card until the licence pricing was 
introduced. Then it suddenly went away very quicky!!

Cheers

Mark



- Original Message 
From: Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:13:51 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

On Monday 30 March 2009 05:41:12 pm Mark Tech wrote:

 I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and
 Upstream ISP connections. I would need to connect these
 into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the moment I
 have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable.

We typically order our WS-X67xx-based 10Gbps line cards like 
so, for a complete set:

* WS-X6704-10GE
* WS-F6700-DFC3CXL
* XENPAK-10GB-SR (depends on your distance needs)
* MEM-XCEF720-1GB (part of this bundle)

Since you're running a 7600, you may also consider an ES+20 
or ES+40 line card, if the price is right, of course (watch 
out for that v6 license).

Cheers,

Mark.



  

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-30 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday 30 March 2009 05:41:12 pm Mark Tech wrote:

 I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and
 Upstream ISP connections. I would need to connect these
 into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the moment I
 have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable.

We typically order our WS-X67xx-based 10Gbps line cards like 
so, for a complete set:

* WS-X6704-10GE
* WS-F6700-DFC3CXL
* XENPAK-10GB-SR (depends on your distance needs)
* MEM-XCEF720-1GB (part of this bundle)

Since you're running a 7600, you may also consider an ES+20 
or ES+40 line card, if the price is right, of course (watch 
out for that v6 license).

Cheers,

Mark.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-30 Thread Eric Gauthier
Mark,

I'm not sure if you have other 10g links, but keep in mind that Cisco has 
(at least) two 10g optics - Xenpak and X2 - that are not intercompatible.  
I believe that the 6704-10ge uses Xenpak and the 6708-10gE, which is the
same card but with 8 ports, uses X2.  If everything else you do is X2,
it might make sense to jump up to the 8 port card to prevent yourself
from having to buy/spare two types of optics.

Eric :)


On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:41:12AM -0700, Mark Tech wrote:
 
 Hi
 I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP connections. I 
 would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the 
 moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable.
 
 My technical requirements are:
 10Gbps line rate
 IPv4
 Able to handle full Internet routing table
 Potentially IPv6 and MPLS in the future
 
 With the WS-X6704-10GE, there seems to be several options that are available 
 with it i.e.
 
 Memory Option: 
 MEM-XCEF720-256M 
 Catalyst 6500 256MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A) 
 MEM-XCEF720-512M 
 Cat 6500 512MB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3A/DFC3B)  
 MEM-XCEF720-1GB 
 Catalyst 6500 1GB DDR, xCEF720 (67xx interface, DFC3BXL) 
 
 
 Distributed Forwarding Card Option
 
 WS-F6700-CFC 
 Catalyst 6500 Central Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
 WS-F6700-DFC3B 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card, 256K Routes for WS-X67xx  
 WS-F6700-DFC3A 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
 WS-F6700-DFC3BXL 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3BXL, for WS-X67xx 
 WS-F6700-DFC3C 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card for WS-X67xx modules 
 WS-F6700-DFC3CXL 
 Catalyst 6500 Dist Fwd Card- 3CXL, for WS-X67xx
 
 I assume that I would need MEM-XCEF720-1GB and WS-F6700-DFC3CXL?
 
 Regards
 
 Mark
 
 
   
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/