Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-29 Thread Lars Rune Nøstdal
Looks interesting. It even has the issue tracker on github still enabled.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-29 Thread Sean Corfield
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Lars Rune Nøstdal
larsnost...@gmail.com wrote:
 Looks interesting. It even has the issue tracker on github still enabled.

The reason contrib libraries (and Clojure itself) have the issue
tracker disabled on Github is because they use JIRA for tracking
issues - and pull requests are not accepted for contrib libraries (or
Clojure itself), instead you need to submit a patch to a ticket in
JIRA (and you need a signed Contributor's Agreement on file). Please
don't revisit that discussion tho' - search the archives for several
of the (often heated) discussions about patches vs pull requests, and
just accept that's the way things are done for Clojure and its contrib
libraries...
-- 
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/

Perfection is the enemy of the good.
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-20 Thread Andy Fingerhut
Andrey:

I am no lawyer, but the following answer on this QA page about the Eclipse
Public License suggests that if you take code from an EPL-licensed project
(which java.jdbc is), then the project in which you include it must also be
licensed under the EPL (whch clj.jdbc is currently not, as far as I can
tell):

http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php#USEINANOTHER

Andy


On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Andrey Antukh andrei.anto...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi agai Soan.

 Repeating now: as I said previously, copyright notice of taken code should
 to be present. And is my mistake from the start not incluide it, I don't
 have any problem for it. Now I have added a copyright notice.

 Yo can explain me that is a current legal problem has my library. I would
 fix it.

 We are all human here, and we make mistakes. It would be better to help
 fix it instead attempts to discredit...

 Andrey.

 Sent from my Nexus 4
 On Nov 20, 2013 3:51 AM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Michael Klishin
 michael.s.klis...@gmail.com wrote:
  2013/11/20 Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be
  About license question: if these functions had not copied, but written
  from scratch, them would be the same functions with minimal
 differences or
  none...
  Sorry but that's a ridiculous argument. You must respect and obey by the
  license of the project you take code
  from.

 Thank you Michael.

 Any company that uses Andrey's library at this point is immediately in
 a difficult position from a legal standpoint...
 --
 Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
 An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
 World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/

 Perfection is the enemy of the good.
 -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

 --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

  --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-20 Thread Andrey Antukh
Hi Andy.

A lot of thanks for this information. I was also researching on this point.
Currently I have removed all taken code from the clojure.java.jdbc, license
problem should be solved.

Again, I in no way want to belittle the original work. It was big mistake
on my part not to mention from start of the project.

Andrey


2013/11/20 Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com

 Andrey:

 I am no lawyer, but the following answer on this QA page about the
 Eclipse Public License suggests that if you take code from an EPL-licensed
 project (which java.jdbc is), then the project in which you include it must
 also be licensed under the EPL (whch clj.jdbc is currently not, as far as I
 can tell):

 http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php#USEINANOTHER

 Andy


 On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Andrey Antukh 
 andrei.anto...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi agai Soan.

 Repeating now: as I said previously, copyright notice of taken code
 should to be present. And is my mistake from the start not incluide it, I
 don't have any problem for it. Now I have added a copyright notice.

 Yo can explain me that is a current legal problem has my library. I would
 fix it.

 We are all human here, and we make mistakes. It would be better to help
 fix it instead attempts to discredit...

 Andrey.

 Sent from my Nexus 4
 On Nov 20, 2013 3:51 AM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Michael Klishin
 michael.s.klis...@gmail.com wrote:
  2013/11/20 Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be
  About license question: if these functions had not copied, but written
  from scratch, them would be the same functions with minimal
 differences or
  none...
  Sorry but that's a ridiculous argument. You must respect and obey by
 the
  license of the project you take code
  from.

 Thank you Michael.

 Any company that uses Andrey's library at this point is immediately in
 a difficult position from a legal standpoint...
 --
 Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
 An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
 World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/

 Perfection is the enemy of the good.
 -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

 --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

  --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


  --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




-- 
Andrey Antukh - Андрей Антух - n...@niwi.be
http://www.niwi.be/about.html
http://www.kaleidos.net/A5694F/

Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD is for people who love UNIX
Social Engineer - Because there is no patch for human stupidity

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message 

Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Sean Corfield
To Michael: It is fairly up to date - there have only been a few small
changes to java.jdbc since the last updates to that part of
clojure-doc.org. Now that java.jdbc 0.3.0 has hit beta and has a
stable API for release, I feel more comfortable about updating the
clojure-doc.org pages to include the handful of changes that are
missing. It has been expanded quite a bit from the original version
that was part of the clojure.java.jdbc repo.

I'm a little disappointed that after moving it to clojure-doc.org
specifically to remove the CA barrier to entry, none of java.jdbc's
users have taken the time to provide updates to the documentation
site. The whole point of moving it to clojure-doc.org was to enable
community contribution.

To Andrey: I'm a bit disappointed you didn't offer to contribute to
java.jdbc's documentation since you found it lacking, and that you
didn't raise your concerns about either the documentation or the API
with me, rather than creating your own library based on the old API.
Open source projects improve through collaboration.

That said, there's always room for more libraries and alternative
approaches. I'll be a lot happier with java.jdbc when I'm able to
strip the old API out after it has been deprecated for a few releases
- and I'll point out that the API changes from 0.2.x to 0.3.0 are
primarily in response to feedback from Clojure/core. java.jdbc is in
fairly heavy production use these days so I'm having to be more
conservative about changing it than I would if it were just my
project and not a Clojure contrib library :)

Sean


On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Michael Klishin
michael.s.klis...@gmail.com wrote:

 2013/11/16 Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be


 - Lack of documentation.


 FTR, there is some documentation for java.jdbc, but it certainly
 isn't being actively worked on (despite not being covered by the CA) and may
 already be out of date.

 http://clojure-doc.org/articles/ecosystem/java_jdbc/home.html

 If you'd like to contribute:
 http://github.com/clojuredocs/guides
 --
 MK

 http://github.com/michaelklishin
 http://twitter.com/michaelklishin

 --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
 first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/

Perfection is the enemy of the good.
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Sean Corfield
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be wrote:
 Additionally I have
 copied some useful functions like parsing dbspec to URI or a map of
 protocol-cases
 and the rest are written from scratch.

Looking through the source code, there are quite a few functions
copied directly from parts of java.jdbc - even maintaining docstrings,
making it clear you copied and pasted them - but I notice that you
have not maintained the copyright or license from java.jdbc.

Would you like to explain why you have copied open source software
without respecting the license and contributors?
-- 
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/

Perfection is the enemy of the good.
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread gaz jones
Because there is no patch for human stupidity?


On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be wrote:
  Additionally I have
  copied some useful functions like parsing dbspec to URI or a map of
  protocol-cases
  and the rest are written from scratch.

 Looking through the source code, there are quite a few functions
 copied directly from parts of java.jdbc - even maintaining docstrings,
 making it clear you copied and pasted them - but I notice that you
 have not maintained the copyright or license from java.jdbc.

 Would you like to explain why you have copied open source software
 without respecting the license and contributors?
 --
 Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
 An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
 World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/

 Perfection is the enemy of the good.
 -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

 --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Softaddicts
You have the typical profile of people who do not understand open source.
To you, open source is the same thing has a side hobby, ...
with lack of commitment and seriousness.

How do you expect open source software quality to improve if each of us
starts to spin off our own flavor of the same lib ?
How is this a constructive cooperating effort ?
How can open source software be used in production in this context ?

Some people are using this stuff to build serious solutions to hard problems.

I will not even rant about copying without the copyright.

It's the overall lack of logic and self centric egoism that you exhibit that 
makes 
me rant.

You should apply the maxim you have thrown in this thread to yourself.
You are much more representative of it than anyone else I saw
on this mailing list in 5 years.

Punk.

Luc P.

 Because there is no patch for human stupidity?
 
 
 On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be wrote:
   Additionally I have
   copied some useful functions like parsing dbspec to URI or a map of
   protocol-cases
   and the rest are written from scratch.
 
  Looking through the source code, there are quite a few functions
  copied directly from parts of java.jdbc - even maintaining docstrings,
  making it clear you copied and pasted them - but I notice that you
  have not maintained the copyright or license from java.jdbc.
 
  Would you like to explain why you have copied open source software
  without respecting the license and contributors?
  --
  Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
  An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
  World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
 
  Perfection is the enemy of the good.
  -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)
 
  --
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups Clojure group.
  To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
  Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
  your first post.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
  ---
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Clojure group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
  email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 -- 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
 first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
--
Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail from my ipad!

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Andrey Antukh
Hi Sean.


2013/11/19 Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com

 To Michael: It is fairly up to date - there have only been a few small
 changes to java.jdbc since the last updates to that part of
 clojure-doc.org. Now that java.jdbc 0.3.0 has hit beta and has a
 stable API for release, I feel more comfortable about updating the
 clojure-doc.org pages to include the handful of changes that are
 missing. It has been expanded quite a bit from the original version
 that was part of the clojure.java.jdbc repo.

 I'm a little disappointed that after moving it to clojure-doc.org
 specifically to remove the CA barrier to entry, none of java.jdbc's
 users have taken the time to provide updates to the documentation
 site. The whole point of moving it to clojure-doc.org was to enable
 community contribution.

 To Andrey: I'm a bit disappointed you didn't offer to contribute to
 java.jdbc's documentation since you found it lacking, and that you
 didn't raise your concerns about either the documentation or the API
 with me, rather than creating your own library based on the old API.
 Open source projects improve through collaboration.

 That said, there's always room for more libraries and alternative
 approaches. I'll be a lot happier with java.jdbc when I'm able to
 strip the old API out after it has been deprecated for a few releases
 - and I'll point out that the API changes from 0.2.x to 0.3.0 are
 primarily in response to feedback from Clojure/core. java.jdbc is in
 fairly heavy production use these days so I'm having to be more
 conservative about changing it than I would if it were just my
 project and not a Clojure contrib library :)


I have not  proposed the api changes because java.jdbc 0.3 is ready to be
released and the probability of include a significant change in the near
future, it was very remote.
And I was pretty frustrated with the current implementation.

Also, I did not want start documenting a library that I do not like how it
behaves.

On the other hand, if the situation is different, I would love to
collaborate and join forces in a single library.

About license question: if these functions had not copied, but written from
scratch, them would be the same functions with minimal differences or
none...

You're totally right in that would be nice to put in the documentation that
is based in parts of clojure.java.jdbc and I will gladly put it.

;)
Andrey

-- 
Andrey Antukh - Андрей Антух - n...@niwi.be
http://www.niwi.be/about.html
http://www.kaleidos.net/A5694F/

Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD is for people who love UNIX
Social Engineer - Because there is no patch for human stupidity

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Softaddicts
Gaz, excuse me if I misunderstood you, I reread your reply and it was not clear
to me to whom you were referring in your comment.

I still stand by what I said toward the op. Saying that if rewritten the code
would be the same as the original is a lame excuse, it's the same as all that 
internet cheating thing in schools. Unexcusable.

Luc P.

 You have the typical profile of people who do not understand open source.
 To you, open source is the same thing has a side hobby, ...
 with lack of commitment and seriousness.
 
 How do you expect open source software quality to improve if each of us
 starts to spin off our own flavor of the same lib ?
 How is this a constructive cooperating effort ?
 How can open source software be used in production in this context ?
 
 Some people are using this stuff to build serious solutions to hard problems.
 
 I will not even rant about copying without the copyright.
 
 It's the overall lack of logic and self centric egoism that you exhibit that 
 makes 
 me rant.
 
 You should apply the maxim you have thrown in this thread to yourself.
 You are much more representative of it than anyone else I saw
 on this mailing list in 5 years.
 
 Punk.
 
 Luc P.
 
  Because there is no patch for human stupidity?
  
  
  On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Sean Corfield 
  seancorfi...@gmail.comwrote:
  
   On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be wrote:
Additionally I have
copied some useful functions like parsing dbspec to URI or a map of
protocol-cases
and the rest are written from scratch.
  
   Looking through the source code, there are quite a few functions
   copied directly from parts of java.jdbc - even maintaining docstrings,
   making it clear you copied and pasted them - but I notice that you
   have not maintained the copyright or license from java.jdbc.
  
   Would you like to explain why you have copied open source software
   without respecting the license and contributors?
   --
   Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
   An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
   World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
  
   Perfection is the enemy of the good.
   -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)
  
   --
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
   Groups Clojure group.
   To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
   Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
   your first post.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
   For more options, visit this group at
   http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
   ---
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
   Clojure group.
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
   email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
  -- 
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups Clojure group.
  To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
  Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
  your first post.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
  --- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  Clojure group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
  email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
 --
 Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail from my ipad!
 
 -- 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
 first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
--
Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail from my ipad!

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You 

Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Michael Klishin
2013/11/20 Softaddicts lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca

 How do you expect open source software quality to improve if each of us
 starts to spin off our own flavor of the same lib ?


Sometimes creating a new library is the right thing to do.

I'll give you one example.

When I started Langohr and Monger in 2011, there were WabbitMQ and
congomongo.
I could have contributed to both but what I wanted those clients to be was
quite far away from
their established public API's. In other words, I could improve them only
up to a point and
probably fail at that since I'm not great at convincing other people their
API's need to seriously
change. So I did my own thing, which does exactly what I wanted developed
and documented
up to my standards. Some developers apparently like them, too.

In clojure.java.jdbc's case, the development process is just too slow. If
you want to contribute
anything substantial or incompatible or simply opinionated, chances are,
you will have to waste
*many* months convincing people, running after people to screen your
patches, etc.

Or you can take another route: write code, document it, promote your
library, without waiting
for anybody. And get a great feedback loop for yourself and the rest of the
community.

Needless to say, if you reuse some code from the original project you
should respect the license
in give credit when its due. In Monger's case, we've borrowed one function
which was subsequently
slightly modified and we still have a mention for that [1].

1.
https://github.com/michaelklishin/monger/blob/master/src/clojure/monger/conversion.clj#L1-3
-- 
MK

http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Michael Klishin
2013/11/20 Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be


 About license question: if these functions had not copied, but written
 from scratch, them would be the same functions with minimal differences or
 none...


Sorry but that's a ridiculous argument. You must respect and obey by the
license of the project you take code
from.
-- 
MK

http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread gaz jones
Whoops, sorry looks like my intended light-hearted sarcasm based on one of
the email signatures in the thread got mis-interpreted. Hard to express in
an email, perhaps a cheeky :P after would have let you know I wasn't being
particularly serious!

No offense intended, or taken :)


On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Softaddicts lprefonta...@softaddicts.cawrote:

 Gaz, excuse me if I misunderstood you, I reread your reply and it was not
 clear
 to me to whom you were referring in your comment.

 I still stand by what I said toward the op. Saying that if rewritten the
 code
 would be the same as the original is a lame excuse, it's the same as all
 that
 internet cheating thing in schools. Unexcusable.

 Luc P.

  You have the typical profile of people who do not understand open source.
  To you, open source is the same thing has a side hobby, ...
  with lack of commitment and seriousness.
 
  How do you expect open source software quality to improve if each of us
  starts to spin off our own flavor of the same lib ?
  How is this a constructive cooperating effort ?
  How can open source software be used in production in this context ?
 
  Some people are using this stuff to build serious solutions to hard
 problems.
 
  I will not even rant about copying without the copyright.
 
  It's the overall lack of logic and self centric egoism that you exhibit
 that makes
  me rant.
 
  You should apply the maxim you have thrown in this thread to yourself.
  You are much more representative of it than anyone else I saw
  on this mailing list in 5 years.
 
  Punk.
 
  Luc P.
 
   Because there is no patch for human stupidity?
  
  
   On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be wrote:
 Additionally I have
 copied some useful functions like parsing dbspec to URI or a map of
 protocol-cases
 and the rest are written from scratch.
   
Looking through the source code, there are quite a few functions
copied directly from parts of java.jdbc - even maintaining
 docstrings,
making it clear you copied and pasted them - but I notice that you
have not maintained the copyright or license from java.jdbc.
   
Would you like to explain why you have copied open source software
without respecting the license and contributors?
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
   
Perfection is the enemy of the good.
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)
   
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
 with
your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
   
  
   --
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
   Groups Clojure group.
   To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
   Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
 with your first post.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
   For more options, visit this group at
   http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
   ---
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  --
  Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail from my ipad!
 
  --
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups Clojure group.
  To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
  Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
  ---
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by 

Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Andrey Antukh
Is not an excuse, is only a opinion, nothing more. This opinion can not
change that, mention the original author is right and I've done it. I have
no way intend to belittle anyone.

;)
Andrey




2013/11/19 Softaddicts lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca

 Gaz, excuse me if I misunderstood you, I reread your reply and it was not
 clear
 to me to whom you were referring in your comment.

 I still stand by what I said toward the op. Saying that if rewritten the
 code
 would be the same as the original is a lame excuse, it's the same as all
 that
 internet cheating thing in schools. Unexcusable.

 Luc P.

  You have the typical profile of people who do not understand open source.
  To you, open source is the same thing has a side hobby, ...
  with lack of commitment and seriousness.
 
  How do you expect open source software quality to improve if each of us
  starts to spin off our own flavor of the same lib ?
  How is this a constructive cooperating effort ?
  How can open source software be used in production in this context ?
 
  Some people are using this stuff to build serious solutions to hard
 problems.
 
  I will not even rant about copying without the copyright.
 
  It's the overall lack of logic and self centric egoism that you exhibit
 that makes
  me rant.
 
  You should apply the maxim you have thrown in this thread to yourself.
  You are much more representative of it than anyone else I saw
  on this mailing list in 5 years.
 
  Punk.
 
  Luc P.
 
   Because there is no patch for human stupidity?
  
  
   On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be wrote:
 Additionally I have
 copied some useful functions like parsing dbspec to URI or a map of
 protocol-cases
 and the rest are written from scratch.
   
Looking through the source code, there are quite a few functions
copied directly from parts of java.jdbc - even maintaining
 docstrings,
making it clear you copied and pasted them - but I notice that you
have not maintained the copyright or license from java.jdbc.
   
Would you like to explain why you have copied open source software
without respecting the license and contributors?
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
   
Perfection is the enemy of the good.
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)
   
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
 with
your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
 send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
   
  
   --
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
   Groups Clojure group.
   To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
   Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
 with your first post.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
   For more options, visit this group at
   http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
   ---
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  --
  Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail from my ipad!
 
  --
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups Clojure group.
  To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
  Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
  ---
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 --
 Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail from my ipad!

 --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure 

Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Alexander Hudek
Sean, for what it's worth many of us do appreciate the slow and careful 
development of java.jdbc. When it's used so widely in production code 
frequent breaking changes are very costly. The new 0.3.0 API is pretty 
nice, though I have found documentation for it somewhat lacking. That said, 
I haven't found time to contribute to it either.

Perhaps this thread isn't the right place, but I am curious about the 
rational and plans for the sql namespace. Is this going to be fleshed out 
to be more fully featured over time? Why choose to integrate it rather than 
have it as a separate add-on? 

Thanks for the work on jdbc. :-)

Alex


On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 2:28:16 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote:

 To Michael: It is fairly up to date - there have only been a few small 
 changes to java.jdbc since the last updates to that part of 
 clojure-doc.org. Now that java.jdbc 0.3.0 has hit beta and has a 
 stable API for release, I feel more comfortable about updating the 
 clojure-doc.org pages to include the handful of changes that are 
 missing. It has been expanded quite a bit from the original version 
 that was part of the clojure.java.jdbc repo. 

 I'm a little disappointed that after moving it to clojure-doc.org 
 specifically to remove the CA barrier to entry, none of java.jdbc's 
 users have taken the time to provide updates to the documentation 
 site. The whole point of moving it to clojure-doc.org was to enable 
 community contribution. 

 To Andrey: I'm a bit disappointed you didn't offer to contribute to 
 java.jdbc's documentation since you found it lacking, and that you 
 didn't raise your concerns about either the documentation or the API 
 with me, rather than creating your own library based on the old API. 
 Open source projects improve through collaboration. 

 That said, there's always room for more libraries and alternative 
 approaches. I'll be a lot happier with java.jdbc when I'm able to 
 strip the old API out after it has been deprecated for a few releases 
 - and I'll point out that the API changes from 0.2.x to 0.3.0 are 
 primarily in response to feedback from Clojure/core. java.jdbc is in 
 fairly heavy production use these days so I'm having to be more 
 conservative about changing it than I would if it were just my 
 project and not a Clojure contrib library :) 

 Sean 


 On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Michael Klishin 
 michael@gmail.com javascript: wrote: 
  
  2013/11/16 Andrey Antukh ni...@niwi.be javascript: 
  
  
  - Lack of documentation. 
  
  
  FTR, there is some documentation for java.jdbc, but it certainly 
  isn't being actively worked on (despite not being covered by the CA) and 
 may 
  already be out of date. 
  
  http://clojure-doc.org/articles/ecosystem/java_jdbc/home.html 
  
  If you'd like to contribute: 
  http://github.com/clojuredocs/guides 
  -- 
  MK 
  
  http://github.com/michaelklishin 
  http://twitter.com/michaelklishin 
  
  -- 
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
  Groups Clojure group. 
  To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.comjavascript: 
  Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
 your 
  first post. 
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript: 
  For more options, visit this group at 
  http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en 
  --- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups 
  Clojure group. 
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an 
  email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript:. 
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 



 -- 
 Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN 
 An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ 
 World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ 

 Perfection is the enemy of the good. 
 -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) 


-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Sean Corfield
I'll address the java.jdbc.sql question in a separate thread (I've
actually addressed it before so I'll search the archives and elaborate
on my previous responses). Give me an hour or so...

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Alexander Hudek
a...@diligenceengine.com wrote:
 Sean, for what it's worth many of us do appreciate the slow and careful
 development of java.jdbc. When it's used so widely in production code
 frequent breaking changes are very costly. The new 0.3.0 API is pretty nice,
 though I have found documentation for it somewhat lacking. That said, I
 haven't found time to contribute to it either.

 Perhaps this thread isn't the right place, but I am curious about the
 rational and plans for the sql namespace. Is this going to be fleshed out to
 be more fully featured over time? Why choose to integrate it rather than
 have it as a separate add-on?

 Thanks for the work on jdbc. :-)

 Alex


 On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 2:28:16 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote:

 To Michael: It is fairly up to date - there have only been a few small
 changes to java.jdbc since the last updates to that part of
 clojure-doc.org. Now that java.jdbc 0.3.0 has hit beta and has a
 stable API for release, I feel more comfortable about updating the
 clojure-doc.org pages to include the handful of changes that are
 missing. It has been expanded quite a bit from the original version
 that was part of the clojure.java.jdbc repo.

 I'm a little disappointed that after moving it to clojure-doc.org
 specifically to remove the CA barrier to entry, none of java.jdbc's
 users have taken the time to provide updates to the documentation
 site. The whole point of moving it to clojure-doc.org was to enable
 community contribution.

 To Andrey: I'm a bit disappointed you didn't offer to contribute to
 java.jdbc's documentation since you found it lacking, and that you
 didn't raise your concerns about either the documentation or the API
 with me, rather than creating your own library based on the old API.
 Open source projects improve through collaboration.

 That said, there's always room for more libraries and alternative
 approaches. I'll be a lot happier with java.jdbc when I'm able to
 strip the old API out after it has been deprecated for a few releases
 - and I'll point out that the API changes from 0.2.x to 0.3.0 are
 primarily in response to feedback from Clojure/core. java.jdbc is in
 fairly heavy production use these days so I'm having to be more
 conservative about changing it than I would if it were just my
 project and not a Clojure contrib library :)

 Sean


 On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Michael Klishin
 michael@gmail.com wrote:
 
  2013/11/16 Andrey Antukh ni...@niwi.be
 
 
  - Lack of documentation.
 
 
  FTR, there is some documentation for java.jdbc, but it certainly
  isn't being actively worked on (despite not being covered by the CA) and
  may
  already be out of date.
 
  http://clojure-doc.org/articles/ecosystem/java_jdbc/home.html
 
  If you'd like to contribute:
  http://github.com/clojuredocs/guides
  --
  MK
 
  http://github.com/michaelklishin
  http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
 
  --
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups Clojure group.
  To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
  Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
  your
  first post.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
  ---
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups
  Clojure group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
  an
  email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 --
 Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
 An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
 World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/

 Perfection is the enemy of the good.
 -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

 --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
 first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/

Perfection is the enemy of the good.
-- Gustave Flaubert, 

Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Sean Corfield
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Michael Klishin
michael.s.klis...@gmail.com wrote:
 2013/11/20 Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be
 About license question: if these functions had not copied, but written
 from scratch, them would be the same functions with minimal differences or
 none...
 Sorry but that's a ridiculous argument. You must respect and obey by the
 license of the project you take code
 from.

Thank you Michael.

Any company that uses Andrey's library at this point is immediately in
a difficult position from a legal standpoint...
-- 
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/

Perfection is the enemy of the good.
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-19 Thread Andrey Antukh
Hi agai Soan.

Repeating now: as I said previously, copyright notice of taken code should
to be present. And is my mistake from the start not incluide it, I don't
have any problem for it. Now I have added a copyright notice.

Yo can explain me that is a current legal problem has my library. I would
fix it.

We are all human here, and we make mistakes. It would be better to help fix
it instead attempts to discredit...

Andrey.

Sent from my Nexus 4
On Nov 20, 2013 3:51 AM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Michael Klishin
 michael.s.klis...@gmail.com wrote:
  2013/11/20 Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be
  About license question: if these functions had not copied, but written
  from scratch, them would be the same functions with minimal differences
 or
  none...
  Sorry but that's a ridiculous argument. You must respect and obey by the
  license of the project you take code
  from.

 Thank you Michael.

 Any company that uses Andrey's library at this point is immediately in
 a difficult position from a legal standpoint...
 --
 Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
 An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
 World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/

 Perfection is the enemy of the good.
 -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

 --
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-17 Thread Andrey Antukh
Hi Zach!

It is not based on any concrete version (is not a fork). Casually, it
has similarities with java.jdbc 0.2.x because uses same name for some
functions
(in my opinion 0.2 version has better api than 0.3). Additionally I have
copied some useful functions like parsing dbspec to URI or a map of
protocol-cases
and the rest are written from scratch.

Furthermore, a new version of java.jdbc (0.3.x), introduces a lot of
complexity to code in comparison to 0.2 and base it on the new version
would be a mistake.
In any case, as I said previously, clj.jdbc is not based in any concrete
version of java.jdbc.

You can read more about it on faq section of clj.jdbc
http://cljjdbc.readthedocs.org/en/latest/faq.html#why-one-other-jdbc-wrapper
that
explains a main differences
with a current version of java.jdbc (0.3)

In respect to jdk7, personally I don't know if clj.jdbc works with jdk6
because I only working with jdk7. But, any compatibility fixes for jdk6 are
welcome!



2013/11/17 Zach Oakes zsoa...@gmail.com

 Andrey, this looks interesting. It seems to be based on a really old
 version of clojure.java.jdbc, though. Is there a reason for this? Since it
 is a fork, it seems like it would be best to base it on a recent version,
 to aid those who may want to try switching to it. Also, does it require JDK
 7 to compile?


 On Saturday, November 16, 2013 6:48:03 AM UTC-5, Andrey Antukh wrote:

 Hi!

 I have some frustration with current official jdbc wrapper for clojure
 and I have worked in one alternative mainly because of:

 - Lack of documentation.
 - Philosophical differences of how things should be done.

 Documentation page: http://cljjdbc.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
 Github: https://github.com/niwibe/clj.jdbc

 Any feedback always welcome.

 Andrey

 --
 Andrey Antukh - Андрей Антух - ni...@niwi.be

 http://www.niwi.be/about.html
 http://www.kaleidos.net/A5694F/

 Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD is for people who love UNIX
 Social Engineer - Because there is no patch for human stupidity




-- 
Andrey Antukh - Андрей Антух - n...@niwi.be
http://www.niwi.be/about.html
http://www.kaleidos.net/A5694F/

Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD is for people who love UNIX
Social Engineer - Because there is no patch for human stupidity

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-16 Thread Andrey Antukh
Hi!

I have some frustration with current official jdbc wrapper for clojure and
I have worked in one alternative mainly because of:

- Lack of documentation.
- Philosophical differences of how things should be done.

Documentation page: http://cljjdbc.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
Github: https://github.com/niwibe/clj.jdbc

Any feedback always welcome.

Andrey

-- 
Andrey Antukh - Андрей Антух - n...@niwi.be
http://www.niwi.be/about.html
http://www.kaleidos.net/A5694F/

Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD is for people who love UNIX
Social Engineer - Because there is no patch for human stupidity

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-16 Thread Michael Klishin
2013/11/16 Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be

 - Lack of documentation.
 - Philosophical differences of how things should be done.

 Documentation page: http://cljjdbc.readthedocs.org/en/latest/


+ ridiculous Clojure CA that keeps non-North America/EU contributors away.

Good job, Andrey. It's important to have more than 1 option for every
problem
and clojure.java.jdbc could certainly use  some well documented,
contributor friendly competition.
-- 
MK

http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-16 Thread Brian Craft


On Saturday, November 16, 2013 5:11:05 AM UTC-8, Michael Klishin wrote:

 + ridiculous Clojure CA that keeps non-North America/EU contributors away.


What is this? A link will do, if this has been discussed previously. 

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-16 Thread Michael Klishin
2013/11/16 Brian Craft craft.br...@gmail.com

 What is this? A link will do, if this has been discussed previously.


https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/clojure/CA$20/clojure/FlwqULYM7n0/x1-ArtQe1isJ
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/0gwjKtatf-0/discussion

-- 
MK

http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-16 Thread Michael Klishin
2013/11/16 Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be


 - Lack of documentation.


FTR, there is some documentation for java.jdbc, but it certainly
isn't being actively worked on (despite not being covered by the CA) and may
already be out of date.

http://clojure-doc.org/articles/ecosystem/java_jdbc/home.html

If you'd like to contribute:
http://github.com/clojuredocs/guides
-- 
MK

http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-16 Thread Andrey Antukh
2013/11/16 Michael Klishin michael.s.klis...@gmail.com


 2013/11/16 Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be


 - Lack of documentation.


 FTR, there is some documentation for java.jdbc, but it certainly
 isn't being actively worked on (despite not being covered by the CA) and
 may
 already be out of date.

 http://clojure-doc.org/articles/ecosystem/java_jdbc/home.html


Thanks! I know about existence of it! Is totally outdated with current
version of java.jdbc and incomplete ;)

Andrey

-- 
Andrey Antukh - Андрей Антух - n...@niwi.be
http://www.niwi.be/about.html
http://www.kaleidos.net/A5694F/

Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD is for people who love UNIX
Social Engineer - Because there is no patch for human stupidity

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: [ANN]: clj.jdbc 0.1-beta1 - Alternative implementation of jdbc wrapper for clojure.

2013-11-16 Thread Zach Oakes
Andrey, this looks interesting. It seems to be based on a really old 
version of clojure.java.jdbc, though. Is there a reason for this? Since it 
is a fork, it seems like it would be best to base it on a recent version, 
to aid those who may want to try switching to it. Also, does it require JDK 
7 to compile?

On Saturday, November 16, 2013 6:48:03 AM UTC-5, Andrey Antukh wrote:

 Hi!

 I have some frustration with current official jdbc wrapper for clojure and 
 I have worked in one alternative mainly because of:

 - Lack of documentation.
 - Philosophical differences of how things should be done.

 Documentation page: http://cljjdbc.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
 Github: https://github.com/niwibe/clj.jdbc

 Any feedback always welcome.

 Andrey

 -- 
 Andrey Antukh - Андрей Антух - ni...@niwi.be javascript:
 http://www.niwi.be/about.html
 http://www.kaleidos.net/A5694F/

 Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD is for people who love UNIX
 Social Engineer - Because there is no patch for human stupidity 


-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.