[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8296) hadoop/yarn daemonlog usage wrong

2012-04-20 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13258061#comment-13258061
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8296:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523460/HADOOP-8296.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/872//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/872//console

This message is automatically generated.

 hadoop/yarn daemonlog usage wrong 
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8296
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8296
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.23.2, 2.0.0, 3.0.0
Reporter: Thomas Graves
Assignee: Devaraj K
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8296.patch


 $ yarn daemonlog
 USAGES:
 java org.apache.hadoop.log.LogLevel -getlevel host:port name
 java org.apache.hadoop.log.LogLevel -setlevel host:port name level
 The usage shouldn't print java org.apache.hadoop.log.LogLevel

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8297) Writable javadocs don't carry default constructor

2012-04-20 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13258147#comment-13258147
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8297:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523479/HADOOP-8297.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/873//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/873//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Writable javadocs don't carry default constructor
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8297
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8297
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: io
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Harsh J
Assignee: Harsh J
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: HADOOP-8297.patch


 The Writable API docs have a custom writable example but doesn't carry a 
 default constructor in it. Apparently a default constructor is required and 
 hence the example ought to carry it for benefit of the reader/paster.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8285) Use ProtoBuf for RpcPayLoadHeader

2012-04-20 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13258398#comment-13258398
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8285:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523523/hadoop-8285-3-common.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

-1 findbugs.  The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/874//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/874//artifact/trunk/hadoop-common-project/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshadoop-common.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/874//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Use ProtoBuf for RpcPayLoadHeader
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8285
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8285
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Sanjay Radia
Assignee: Sanjay Radia
 Attachments: hadoop-8285-1-common.patch, hadoop-8285-1.patch, 
 hadoop-8285-2-common.patch, hadoop-8285-2.patch, hadoop-8285-3-common.patch, 
 hadoop-8285-3.patch




--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7549) Use JDK ServiceLoader mechanism to find FileSystem implementations

2012-04-19 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257846#comment-13257846
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7549:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523408/HADOOP-7549v3.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/869//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Use JDK ServiceLoader mechanism to find FileSystem implementations
 --

 Key: HADOOP-7549
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7549
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 0.23.0
Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur
Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
 Fix For: 0.24.0

 Attachments: HADOOP-7549v1.patch, HADOOP-7549v2.patch, 
 HADOOP-7549v3.patch


 Currently configuring FileSystem implementations must be done by declaring 
 the FileSystem class in the Hadoop configuration files (core-default.xml, 
 ...).
 Using JDK ServiceLoader mechanism this configuration step can be avoided. 
 Adding the JAR file with the additional FileSystem implementation would 
 suffice. 
 This is similar to what is being proposed for compression codecs 
 (HADOOP-7350).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8294) IPC Connection becomes unusable even if server address was temporarilly unresolvable

2012-04-19 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257903#comment-13257903
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8294:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523425/hadoop-8294.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/870//console

This message is automatically generated.

 IPC Connection becomes unusable even if server address was temporarilly 
 unresolvable
 

 Key: HADOOP-8294
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8294
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ipc
Affects Versions: 1.0.2
Reporter: Kihwal Lee
Assignee: Kihwal Lee
Priority: Critical
 Fix For: 1.0.3, 1.1.0

 Attachments: hadoop-8294.patch


 This is same as HADOOP-7428, but was observed on 1.x data nodes. This can 
 happen more frequently after HADOOP-7472, which allows IPC Connection to 
 re-resolve the name. HADOOP-7428 needs to be back-ported.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8152) Expand public APIs for security library classes

2012-04-19 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257915#comment-13257915
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8152:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523428/HADOOP-8152.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/871//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/871//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Expand public APIs for security library classes
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8152
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8152
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: security
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
Assignee: Aaron T. Myers
 Attachments: HADOOP-8152.patch, HADOOP-8152.patch, HADOOP-8152.patch


 Currently projects like Hive and HBase use UserGroupInformation and 
 SecurityUtil methods. Both of these classes are marked 
 LimitedPrivate(HDFS,MR) but should probably be marked more generally public.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8289) Hadoop Common project build failure in cygwin

2012-04-18 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256256#comment-13256256
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8289:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523082/common.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/863//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Hadoop Common project build failure in cygwin 
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8289
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8289
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: build
Affects Versions: 0.23.1
 Environment: windows, cygwin 5.2
Reporter: Biao Chen
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: common.patch




--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8253) Improper log mesage when blockreport interval comapred with initial delay

2012-04-18 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256444#comment-13256444
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8253:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523174/Hadoop-8253.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/864//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Improper log mesage when blockreport interval comapred with initial delay
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8253
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8253
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Brahma Reddy Battula
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: Hadoop-8253.patch, Hadoop-8253.patch


 Log message is telling if initialDelay is more than blockReportInterval 
 setting to 0.
 But actuall check is greaterthan and equal..like following..It is misleading 
 initail I thought if it
 is equal then initailBr wn't set to zero.
 {code}
 if (initBRDelay = blockReportInterval) {
   initBRDelay = 0;
   DataNode.LOG.info(dfs.blockreport.initialDelay is greater than  +
   dfs.blockreport.intervalMsec. +  Setting initial delay to 0 
 msec:);
 }
 {code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8290) Remove two remaining references to hadoop.native.lib oldprop

2012-04-18 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256545#comment-13256545
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8290:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523187/HADOOP-8290.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/865//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/865//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Remove two remaining references to hadoop.native.lib oldprop
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8290
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8290
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: test
Affects Versions: 3.0.0
Reporter: Harsh J
Assignee: Harsh J
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: HADOOP-8290.patch, HADOOP-8290.patch


 The following two test files still carry the old prop name:
 {code}
 # modified:   
 hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/TestCodec.java
 # modified:   
 hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/file/tfile/TestTFileSeqFileComparison.java
 {code}
 This JIRA is to merely fix those up to use the new io.native.lib.enabled prop.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8288) Remove references of mapred.child.ulimit etc. since they are not being used any more

2012-04-18 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13256624#comment-13256624
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8288:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523203/HADOOP-8288.branch-0.23.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/866//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Remove references of mapred.child.ulimit etc. since they are not being used 
 any more
 

 Key: HADOOP-8288
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8288
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.23.2
Reporter: Ravi Prakash
Assignee: Ravi Prakash
 Attachments: HADOOP-8288.branch-0.23.patch, 
 HADOOP-8288.branch-0.23.patch


 Courtesy Philip Su, we found that (mapred.child.ulimit, mapreduce.map.ulimit, 
 mapreduce.reduce.ulimit) were not being used at all. The configuration exists 
 but is never used. Its also mentioned in mapred-default.xml and 
 templates/../mapred-site.xml . Also the method getUlimitMemoryCommand in 
 Shell.java is now useless and can be removed.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8284) clover integration broken, also mapreduce poms are pulling in clover as a dependency

2012-04-18 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257023#comment-13257023
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8284:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523266/HADOOP-8284.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/867//console

This message is automatically generated.

 clover integration broken, also mapreduce poms are pulling in clover as a 
 dependency
 

 Key: HADOOP-8284
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8284
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: build
Reporter: Patrick Hunt
Assignee: Patrick Hunt
 Attachments: HADOOP-8284.patch, HADOOP-8284.patch


 companion to MAPREDUCE-4141 - clover is broken on trunk.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8284) clover integration broken, also mapreduce poms are pulling in clover as a dependency

2012-04-18 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257054#comment-13257054
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8284:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523268/HADOOP-8284.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/868//console

This message is automatically generated.

 clover integration broken, also mapreduce poms are pulling in clover as a 
 dependency
 

 Key: HADOOP-8284
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8284
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: build
Reporter: Patrick Hunt
Assignee: Patrick Hunt
 Attachments: HADOOP-8284.patch, HADOOP-8284.patch, HADOOP-8284.patch


 companion to MAPREDUCE-4141 - clover is broken on trunk.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8285) Use ProtoBuf for RpcPayLoadHeader

2012-04-17 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255365#comment-13255365
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8285:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522916/hadoop-8285-2-common.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

-1 findbugs.  The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/861//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/861//artifact/trunk/hadoop-common-project/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshadoop-common.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/861//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Use ProtoBuf for RpcPayLoadHeader
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8285
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8285
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Sanjay Radia
Assignee: Sanjay Radia
 Attachments: hadoop-8285-1-common.patch, hadoop-8285-1.patch, 
 hadoop-8285-2-common.patch, hadoop-8285-2.patch




--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8288) Remove references of mapred.child.ulimit etc. since they are not being used any more

2012-04-17 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255761#comment-13255761
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8288:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522986/HADOOP-8288.branch-0.23.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/862//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Remove references of mapred.child.ulimit etc. since they are not being used 
 any more
 

 Key: HADOOP-8288
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8288
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.23.2
Reporter: Ravi Prakash
Assignee: Ravi Prakash
 Attachments: HADOOP-8288.branch-0.23.patch


 Courtesy Philip Su, we found that (mapred.child.ulimit, mapreduce.map.ulimit, 
 mapreduce.reduce.ulimit) were not being used at all. The configuration exists 
 but is never used. Its also mentioned in mapred-default.xml and 
 templates/../mapred-site.xml . Also the method getUlimitMemoryCommand in 
 Shell.java is now useless and can be removed.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8282) start-all.sh refers incorrectly start-dfs.sh existence for starting start-yarn.sh

2012-04-16 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254594#comment-13254594
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8282:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522753/HADOOP-8282.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/853//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/853//console

This message is automatically generated.

 start-all.sh refers incorrectly start-dfs.sh existence for starting 
 start-yarn.sh
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8282
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8282
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: scripts
Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 3.0.0
Reporter: Devaraj K
Assignee: Devaraj K
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8282.patch




--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8227) Allow RPC to limit ephemeral port range.

2012-04-16 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254764#comment-13254764
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8227:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522785/HADOOP-8227-trunk.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/854//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/854//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Allow RPC to limit ephemeral port range.
 

 Key: HADOOP-8227
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8227
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.23.2
Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
Priority: Blocker
 Attachments: HADOOP-8227-trunk.txt, HADOOP-8227-trunk.txt, 
 HADOOP-8227-trunk.txt


 This is a sub task of MAPREDUCE-4079.  For security reasons we would like to 
 limit the range of ports that are used when some RPC servers select a port.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8283) Allow tests to control token service value

2012-04-16 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254772#comment-13254772
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8283:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522789/HADOOP-8283.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/855//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/855//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Allow tests to control token service value
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8283
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8283
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Test
  Components: test
Affects Versions: 0.23.0
Reporter: Daryn Sharp
Assignee: Daryn Sharp
 Attachments: HADOOP-8283.patch


 Tests in projects other than common need to be able to change whether the 
 token service uses an ip or a host.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8284) clover integration broken, also mapreduce poms are pulling in clover as a dependency

2012-04-16 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254798#comment-13254798
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8284:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522799/HADOOP-8284.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/856//console

This message is automatically generated.

 clover integration broken, also mapreduce poms are pulling in clover as a 
 dependency
 

 Key: HADOOP-8284
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8284
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: build
Reporter: Patrick Hunt
Assignee: Patrick Hunt
 Attachments: HADOOP-8284.patch


 companion to MAPREDUCE-4141 - clover is broken on trunk.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8172) Configuration no longer sets all keys in a deprecated key list.

2012-04-16 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254863#comment-13254863
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8172:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522820/HADOOP-8172-branch-2.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

-1 javac.  The applied patch generated 1028 javac compiler warnings (more 
than the trunk's current 1014 warnings).

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.conf.TestConfigurationDeprecation

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/857//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/857//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Configuration no longer sets all keys in a deprecated key list.
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8172
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8172
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: conf
Affects Versions: 0.23.3, 0.24.0
Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
Assignee: Anupam Seth
Priority: Blocker
 Attachments: HADOOP-8172-branch-2.patch


 I did not look at the patch for HADOOP-8167 previously, but I did in response 
 to a recent test failure. The patch appears to have changed the following 
 code (I am just paraphrasing the code)
 {code}
 if(!deprecated(key)) {
   set(key, value);
 } else {
   for(String newKey: depricatedKeyMap.get(key)) {
 set(newKey, value);
   }
 }
 {code}
 to be 
 {code}
 set(key, value);
 if(depricatedKeyMap.contains(key)) {
set(deprecatedKeyMap.get(key)[0], value);
 } else if(reverseKeyMap.contains(key)) {
set(reverseKeyMap.get(key), value);
 }
 {code}
 If a key is deprecated and is mapped to more then one new key value only the 
 first one in the list will be set, where as previously all of them would be 
 set.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8172) Configuration no longer sets all keys in a deprecated key list.

2012-04-16 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13254923#comment-13254923
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8172:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522826/HADOOP-8172-branch-2.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

-1 javac.  The applied patch generated 1028 javac compiler warnings (more 
than the trunk's current 1014 warnings).

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/858//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/858//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Configuration no longer sets all keys in a deprecated key list.
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8172
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8172
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: conf
Affects Versions: 0.23.3, 0.24.0
Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
Assignee: Anupam Seth
Priority: Blocker
 Attachments: HADOOP-8172-branch-2.patch, HADOOP-8172-branch-2.patch


 I did not look at the patch for HADOOP-8167 previously, but I did in response 
 to a recent test failure. The patch appears to have changed the following 
 code (I am just paraphrasing the code)
 {code}
 if(!deprecated(key)) {
   set(key, value);
 } else {
   for(String newKey: depricatedKeyMap.get(key)) {
 set(newKey, value);
   }
 }
 {code}
 to be 
 {code}
 set(key, value);
 if(depricatedKeyMap.contains(key)) {
set(deprecatedKeyMap.get(key)[0], value);
 } else if(reverseKeyMap.contains(key)) {
set(reverseKeyMap.get(key), value);
 }
 {code}
 If a key is deprecated and is mapped to more then one new key value only the 
 first one in the list will be set, where as previously all of them would be 
 set.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8285) Use ProtoBuf for RpcPayLoadHeader

2012-04-16 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255046#comment-13255046
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8285:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522846/hadoop-8285-1-common.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

-1 javac.  The patch appears to cause tar ant target to fail.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

-1 findbugs.  The patch appears to cause Findbugs (version 1.3.9) to fail.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/859//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/859//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Use ProtoBuf for RpcPayLoadHeader
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8285
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8285
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Sanjay Radia
Assignee: Sanjay Radia
 Attachments: hadoop-8285-1-common.patch, hadoop-8285-1.patch




--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8286) Simplify getting a socket address from conf

2012-04-16 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13255113#comment-13255113
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8286:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522868/HADOOP-8286.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/860//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/860//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Simplify getting a socket address from conf
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8286
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8286
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: conf
Affects Versions: 0.23.0
Reporter: Daryn Sharp
Assignee: Daryn Sharp
 Attachments: HADOOP-8286.patch


 {{NetUtils.createSocketAddr(addr, port, confKey}} will throw an exception 
 with a descriptive message of a malformed conf value.  A corresponding 
 {{conf#getSocketAddr}} would make it easier to use, and ensure that 
 {{NetUtils}} is used to parse the address.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes

2012-04-13 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253653#comment-13253653
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7350:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522601/HADOOP-7350.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/850//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/850//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-7350
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: conf, io
Reporter: Tom White
Assignee: Tom White
 Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, 
 HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, 
 HADOOP-7350.patch


 By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to 
 io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), 
 since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8275) harden serialization logic against malformed or malicious input

2012-04-13 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253847#comment-13253847
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8275:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522627/HADOOP-8275.001.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/851//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/851//console

This message is automatically generated.

 harden serialization logic against malformed or malicious input
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8275
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8275
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Colin Patrick McCabe
Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8275.001.patch


 harden serialization logic against malformed or malicious input

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8275) harden serialization logic against malformed or malicious input

2012-04-13 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13253911#comment-13253911
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8275:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522643/HADOOP-8275.002.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/852//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/852//console

This message is automatically generated.

 harden serialization logic against malformed or malicious input
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8275
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8275
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.23.0
Reporter: Colin Patrick McCabe
Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 2.0.0

 Attachments: HADOOP-8275.001.patch, HADOOP-8275.002.patch


 harden serialization logic against malformed or malicious input

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8232) Provide a command line entry point to view/test topology options

2012-04-12 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13252638#comment-13252638
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8232:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522448/HADOOP-8232.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/849//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/849//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Provide a command line entry point to view/test topology options
 

 Key: HADOOP-8232
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8232
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Sub-task
  Components: util
Affects Versions: 0.23.1
Reporter: Steve Loughran
Assignee: Steve Loughran
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8232.patch, HADOOP-8232.patch


 Add a new command line entry point topo with commands for preflight 
 checking of a clusters topology setup. 
 The initial operations would be to list the implementation class of the 
 mapper, and attempt to load it, resolve a set of supplied hostnames, then 
 dump the topology map after the resolution process.
 Target audience: 
 # ops teams trying to get a new/changed script working before deploying it on 
 a cluster.
 # someone trying to write their first script.
 Resolve and list the rack mappings of the given host
 {code}
 hadoop topo test [host1] [host2] ... 
 {code}
 This would load the hostnames from a given file, resolve all of them and list 
 the results:
 {code}
 hadoop topo testfile filename
 {code}
  This version is intended for the ops team who have a list of hostnames, IP 
 addresses. 
 * Rather than just list them, the ops team may want to mandate that there 
 were no /default-rack mappings found, as that is invariably a sign that the 
 script isn't handling a hostname properly.
 * No attempt to be clever and do IP address resolution, FQDN to hostname 
 mapping, etc.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8268) hadoop-project-dist/pom.xml fails XML validation

2012-04-11 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13251477#comment-13251477
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8268:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/1253/hadoop-pom.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/844//console

This message is automatically generated.

 hadoop-project-dist/pom.xml fails XML validation
 

 Key: HADOOP-8268
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8268
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: build
Affects Versions: 0.23.0
 Environment: FreeBSD 8.2 / AMD64
Reporter: Radim Kolar
  Labels: maven, patch
 Attachments: hadoop-pom.txt


 In this pom file are embedded ant commands which contains '' - redirection. 
 This makes XML file invalid and this POM file can not be deployed into 
 validating Maven repository managers such as Artifactory.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7510) Tokens should use original hostname provided instead of ip

2012-04-11 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13251697#comment-13251697
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7510:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522265/HADOOP-7510.branch-0.23.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/845//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Tokens should use original hostname provided instead of ip
 --

 Key: HADOOP-7510
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7510
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: security
Reporter: Daryn Sharp
Assignee: Daryn Sharp
 Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.24.0

 Attachments: HADOOP-7510-10.patch, HADOOP-7510-11.patch, 
 HADOOP-7510-12.patch, HADOOP-7510-2.patch, HADOOP-7510-3.patch, 
 HADOOP-7510-4.patch, HADOOP-7510-5.patch, HADOOP-7510-6.patch, 
 HADOOP-7510-8.patch, HADOOP-7510-9.patch, HADOOP-7510.branch-0.23.patch, 
 HADOOP-7510.patch, HADOOP-7510.trunk.patch


 Tokens currently store the ip:port of the remote server.  This precludes 
 tokens from being used after a host's ip is changed.  Tokens should store the 
 hostname used to make the RPC connection.  This will enable new processes to 
 use their existing tokens.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8144) pseudoSortByDistance in NetworkTopology doesn't work properly if no local node and first node is local rack node

2012-04-11 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13252040#comment-13252040
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8144:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522341/hadoop-8144.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/846//console

This message is automatically generated.

 pseudoSortByDistance in NetworkTopology doesn't work properly if no local 
 node and first node is local rack node
 

 Key: HADOOP-8144
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8144
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: io
Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 0.23.0
Reporter: Junping Du
Assignee: Junping Du
Priority: Minor
  Labels: patch
 Attachments: HADOOP-8144-1.patch, HADOOP-8144-v2.patch, 
 hadoop-8144.txt


 pseudoSortByDistance in NetworkTopology.java should sort nodes according to 
 its distance with reader as local node, local rack node, ... 
 But if there is no local node with reader in nodes and the first node is 
 local rack node with reader, then it will put a random node at position 0.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8270) hadoop-daemon.sh stop action is not LSB compliant

2012-04-11 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13252051#comment-13252051
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8270:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522342/HADOOP-8270.patch.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/847//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/847//console

This message is automatically generated.

 hadoop-daemon.sh stop action is not LSB compliant
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8270
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8270
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: scripts
Affects Versions: 0.23.1
Reporter: Roman Shaposhnik
Assignee: Roman Shaposhnik
 Fix For: 2.0.0

 Attachments: HADOOP-8270.patch.txt


 The following bit of code from hadoop-daemon.sh is not LSB compliant, since
 according to 
 http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html
 a stop action on an already stopped service should return 0.
 {noformat}
  (stop)
 if [ -f $pid ]; then
   if kill -0 `cat $pid`  /dev/null 21; then
 echo stopping $command
 kill `cat $pid`
   else
 echo no $command to stop
 exit 1
   fi
 else
   echo no $command to stop
   exit 1
 fi
 ;;
 {noformat}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8144) pseudoSortByDistance in NetworkTopology doesn't work properly if no local node and first node is local rack node

2012-04-11 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13252074#comment-13252074
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8144:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522348/hadoop-8144.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/848//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/848//console

This message is automatically generated.

 pseudoSortByDistance in NetworkTopology doesn't work properly if no local 
 node and first node is local rack node
 

 Key: HADOOP-8144
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8144
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: io
Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 0.23.0
Reporter: Junping Du
Assignee: Junping Du
Priority: Minor
  Labels: patch
 Attachments: HADOOP-8144-1.patch, HADOOP-8144-v2.patch, 
 hadoop-8144.txt, hadoop-8144.txt


 pseudoSortByDistance in NetworkTopology.java should sort nodes according to 
 its distance with reader as local node, local rack node, ... 
 But if there is no local node with reader in nodes and the first node is 
 local rack node with reader, then it will put a random node at position 0.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8264) Remove irritating double double quotes in front of hostname

2012-04-10 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13250602#comment-13250602
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8264:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522091/hadoop-8264-quoting.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/843//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/843//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Remove irritating double double quotes in front of hostname 
 

 Key: HADOOP-8264
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8264
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.23.2
Reporter: Bernd Fondermann
Assignee: Bernd Fondermann
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: hadoop-8264-quoting.patch


 The attached patch fixes display of destination port from hostname to 
 hostname

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8261) Har file system doesn't deal with FS URIs with a host but no port

2012-04-09 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249692#comment-13249692
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8261:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521910/HADOOP-8261.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/839//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/839//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Har file system doesn't deal with FS URIs with a host but no port
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8261
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8261
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
Assignee: Aaron T. Myers
 Fix For: 2.0.0

 Attachments: HADOOP-8261-with-test-in-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-8261.patch, 
 HADOOP-8261.patch


 If you try to run an MR job with a Hadoop Archive as the input, but the URI 
 you give it has no port specified (e.g. hdfs://simon) the job will fail 
 with an error like the following:
 {noformat}
 java.io.IOException: Incomplete HDFS URI, no host: 
 hdfs://simon:-1/user/atm/input.har/input
 {noformat}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8152) Expand public APIs for security library classes

2012-04-09 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249720#comment-13249720
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8152:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521917/HADOOP-8152.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/840//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/840//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Expand public APIs for security library classes
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8152
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8152
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: security
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
Assignee: Aaron T. Myers
 Attachments: HADOOP-8152.patch, HADOOP-8152.patch


 Currently projects like Hive and HBase use UserGroupInformation and 
 SecurityUtil methods. Both of these classes are marked 
 LimitedPrivate(HDFS,MR) but should probably be marked more generally public.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8227) Allow RPC to limit ephemeral port range.

2012-04-09 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249878#comment-13249878
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8227:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521962/HADOOP-8227-trunk.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/841//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/841//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Allow RPC to limit ephemeral port range.
 

 Key: HADOOP-8227
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8227
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.23.2
Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
Priority: Blocker
 Attachments: HADOOP-8227-trunk.txt, HADOOP-8227-trunk.txt


 This is a sub task of MAPREDUCE-4079.  For security reasons we would like to 
 limit the range of ports that are used when some RPC servers select a port.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8263) Stringification of IPC calls not useful

2012-04-09 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13250339#comment-13250339
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8263:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522041/hadoop-8263.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/842//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/842//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Stringification of IPC calls not useful
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8263
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8263
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ipc
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: hadoop-8263.txt


 Since the Protobufification of Hadoop, the log messages on IPC exceptions on 
 the server side now read like:
 12/04/09 16:04:06 INFO ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 9 on 8021, call 
 org.apache.hadoop.ipc.ProtobufRpcEngine$RpcRequestWritable@7087e9bf from 
 127.0.0.1:47989: error: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.StandbyException: Operation 
 category READ is not supported in state standby
 The call should instead stringify the method name and the request protobuf 
 (perhaps abbreviated if it is longer than a few hundred chars)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8253) Improper log mesage when blockreport interval comapred with initial delay

2012-04-07 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249234#comment-13249234
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8253:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521816/Hadoop-8253.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/837//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Improper log mesage when blockreport interval comapred with initial delay
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8253
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8253
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Brahma Reddy Battula
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: Hadoop-8253.patch


 Log message is telling if initialDelay is more than blockReportInterval 
 setting to 0.
 But actuall check is greaterthan and equal..like following..It is misleading 
 initail I thought if it
 is equal then initailBr wn't set to zero.
 {code}
 if (initBRDelay = blockReportInterval) {
   initBRDelay = 0;
   DataNode.LOG.info(dfs.blockreport.initialDelay is greater than  +
   dfs.blockreport.intervalMsec. +  Setting initial delay to 0 
 msec:);
 }
 {code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8152) Expand public APIs for security library classes

2012-04-07 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249301#comment-13249301
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8152:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521709/HADOOP-8152.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/838//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/838//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Expand public APIs for security library classes
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8152
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8152
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: security
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
Assignee: Aaron T. Myers
 Attachments: HADOOP-8152.patch


 Currently projects like Hive and HBase use UserGroupInformation and 
 SecurityUtil methods. Both of these classes are marked 
 LimitedPrivate(HDFS,MR) but should probably be marked more generally public.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8075) Lower native-hadoop library log from info to debug

2012-04-06 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248336#comment-13248336
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8075:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520276/HDFS-8075.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/830//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/830//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Lower native-hadoop library log from info to debug 
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8075
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8075
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: native
Affects Versions: 0.23.0
Reporter: Eli Collins
  Labels: newbie
 Attachments: HDFS-8075.patch


 The following log shows up in all commands. It's useful to have it in the 
 server log, but let's figure out a way so that it isn't logged eg every time 
 you cat a file. 
 {noformat}
 [eli@centos6 ~]$ hadoop fs -cat /user/eli/foo
 12/02/12 20:10:20 INFO util.NativeCodeLoader: Loaded the native-hadoop library
 {noformat}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8014) ViewFileSystem does not correctly implement getDefaultBlockSize, getDefaultReplication, getContentSummary

2012-04-06 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248466#comment-13248466
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8014:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521558/HADOOP-8014.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/831//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/831//console

This message is automatically generated.

 ViewFileSystem does not correctly implement getDefaultBlockSize, 
 getDefaultReplication, getContentSummary
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8014
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8014
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 0.23.0, 0.23.2, 0.24.0
Reporter: Daryn Sharp
Assignee: John George
 Attachments: HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch, 
 HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch


 {{ViewFileSystem}} incorrectly returns the {{FileSystem}} default values for 
 {{getDefaultBlockSize()}} and {{getDefaultReplication()}}.  This causes files 
 to be created with incorrect values.  The problem is that the current apis 
 are insufficient for viewfs because the defaults depend on the underlying 
 mount point.  These methods need counterparts that accept a {{Path}} so 
 viewfs can resolve the mount point for a path.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8014) ViewFileSystem does not correctly implement getDefaultBlockSize, getDefaultReplication, getContentSummary

2012-04-06 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248497#comment-13248497
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8014:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521694/HADOOP-8014.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/832//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/832//console

This message is automatically generated.

 ViewFileSystem does not correctly implement getDefaultBlockSize, 
 getDefaultReplication, getContentSummary
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8014
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8014
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 0.23.0, 0.23.2, 0.24.0
Reporter: Daryn Sharp
Assignee: John George
 Attachments: HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch, 
 HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch


 {{ViewFileSystem}} incorrectly returns the {{FileSystem}} default values for 
 {{getDefaultBlockSize()}} and {{getDefaultReplication()}}.  This causes files 
 to be created with incorrect values.  The problem is that the current apis 
 are insufficient for viewfs because the defaults depend on the underlying 
 mount point.  These methods need counterparts that accept a {{Path}} so 
 viewfs can resolve the mount point for a path.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7510) Tokens should use original hostname provided instead of ip

2012-04-06 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248515#comment-13248515
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7510:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521695/HADOOP-7510.trunk.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/833//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/833//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Tokens should use original hostname provided instead of ip
 --

 Key: HADOOP-7510
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7510
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: security
Reporter: Daryn Sharp
Assignee: Daryn Sharp
 Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.24.0

 Attachments: HADOOP-7510-10.patch, HADOOP-7510-11.patch, 
 HADOOP-7510-12.patch, HADOOP-7510-2.patch, HADOOP-7510-3.patch, 
 HADOOP-7510-4.patch, HADOOP-7510-5.patch, HADOOP-7510-6.patch, 
 HADOOP-7510-8.patch, HADOOP-7510-9.patch, HADOOP-7510.patch, 
 HADOOP-7510.trunk.patch


 Tokens currently store the ip:port of the remote server.  This precludes 
 tokens from being used after a host's ip is changed.  Tokens should store the 
 hostname used to make the RPC connection.  This will enable new processes to 
 use their existing tokens.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8249) invalid hadoop-auth cookies should trigger authentication if info is avail before returning HTTP 401

2012-04-05 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13247117#comment-13247117
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8249:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521475/HADOOP-8249.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/822//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/822//console

This message is automatically generated.

 invalid hadoop-auth cookies should trigger authentication if info is avail 
 before returning HTTP 401
 

 Key: HADOOP-8249
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8249
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: security
Affects Versions: 0.23.1, 2.0.0
Reporter: bc Wong
Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
 Fix For: 2.0.0

 Attachments: HADOOP-8249.patch


 WebHdfs gives out cookies. But when the client passes them back, it'd 
 sometimes reject them and return a HTTP 401 instead. (Sometimes as in after 
 a restart.) The interesting thing is that if the client doesn't pass the 
 cookie back, WebHdfs will be totally happy.
 The correct behaviour should be to ignore the cookie if it looks invalid, and 
 attempt to proceed with the request handling.
 I haven't tried HttpFs to see whether it handles restart better.
 Reproducing it with curl:
 {noformat}
 
 ## Initial curl. Storing cookie to file.
 
 [root@vbox2 ~]# curl -c /tmp/webhdfs.cookie -i 
 'http://localhost:50070/webhdfs/v1/?op=LISTSTATUSuser.name=bcwalrus'
 HTTP/1.1 200 OK
 Content-Type: application/json
 Expires: Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:00 GMT
 Set-Cookie: 
 hadoop.auth=u=bcwalrusp=bcwalrust=simplee=1333614686366s=z2w5xpFlufnnEoOHxVRiXqxwtqM=;Path=/
 Content-Length: 597
 Server: Jetty(6.1.26)
 {FileStatuses:{FileStatus:[
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333577906198,owner:mapred,pathSuffix:tmp,permission:1777,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY},
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333577511848,owner:hdfs,pathSuffix:user,permission:1777,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY},
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333428745116,owner:mapred,pathSuffix:var,permission:755,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY}
 ]}}
 
 ## Another curl. Using the cookie jar.
 
 [root@vbox2 ~]# curl -b /tmp/webhdfs.cookie -i 
 'http://localhost:50070/webhdfs/v1/?op=LISTSTATUSuser.name=bcwalrus'
 HTTP/1.1 200 OK
 Content-Type: application/json
 Content-Length: 597
 Server: Jetty(6.1.26)
 {FileStatuses:{FileStatus:[
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333577906198,owner:mapred,pathSuffix:tmp,permission:1777,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY},
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333577511848,owner:hdfs,pathSuffix:user,permission:1777,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY},
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333428745116,owner:mapred,pathSuffix:var,permission:755,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY}
 ]}}
 
 ## Restart NN.
 
 [root@vbox2 ~]# /etc/init.d/hadoop-hdfs-namenode restartStopping Hadoop 
 namenode:  [  OK  ]
 stopping namenode
 Starting Hadoop namenode:  [  OK  ]
 starting namenode, logging to 
 /var/log/hadoop-hdfs/hadoop-hdfs-namenode-vbox2.out
 
 ## Curl using cookie jar gives error.
 
 [root@vbox2 ~]# curl -b /tmp/webhdfs.cookie -i 
 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8249) invalid hadoop-auth cookies should trigger authentication if info is avail before returning HTTP 401

2012-04-05 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13247217#comment-13247217
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8249:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521475/HADOOP-8249.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/824//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/824//console

This message is automatically generated.

 invalid hadoop-auth cookies should trigger authentication if info is avail 
 before returning HTTP 401
 

 Key: HADOOP-8249
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8249
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: security
Affects Versions: 0.23.1, 2.0.0
Reporter: bc Wong
Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
 Fix For: 2.0.0

 Attachments: HADOOP-8249.patch


 WebHdfs gives out cookies. But when the client passes them back, it'd 
 sometimes reject them and return a HTTP 401 instead. (Sometimes as in after 
 a restart.) The interesting thing is that if the client doesn't pass the 
 cookie back, WebHdfs will be totally happy.
 The correct behaviour should be to ignore the cookie if it looks invalid, and 
 attempt to proceed with the request handling.
 I haven't tried HttpFs to see whether it handles restart better.
 Reproducing it with curl:
 {noformat}
 
 ## Initial curl. Storing cookie to file.
 
 [root@vbox2 ~]# curl -c /tmp/webhdfs.cookie -i 
 'http://localhost:50070/webhdfs/v1/?op=LISTSTATUSuser.name=bcwalrus'
 HTTP/1.1 200 OK
 Content-Type: application/json
 Expires: Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:00 GMT
 Set-Cookie: 
 hadoop.auth=u=bcwalrusp=bcwalrust=simplee=1333614686366s=z2w5xpFlufnnEoOHxVRiXqxwtqM=;Path=/
 Content-Length: 597
 Server: Jetty(6.1.26)
 {FileStatuses:{FileStatus:[
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333577906198,owner:mapred,pathSuffix:tmp,permission:1777,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY},
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333577511848,owner:hdfs,pathSuffix:user,permission:1777,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY},
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333428745116,owner:mapred,pathSuffix:var,permission:755,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY}
 ]}}
 
 ## Another curl. Using the cookie jar.
 
 [root@vbox2 ~]# curl -b /tmp/webhdfs.cookie -i 
 'http://localhost:50070/webhdfs/v1/?op=LISTSTATUSuser.name=bcwalrus'
 HTTP/1.1 200 OK
 Content-Type: application/json
 Content-Length: 597
 Server: Jetty(6.1.26)
 {FileStatuses:{FileStatus:[
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333577906198,owner:mapred,pathSuffix:tmp,permission:1777,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY},
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333577511848,owner:hdfs,pathSuffix:user,permission:1777,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY},
 {accessTime:0,blockSize:0,group:supergroup,length:0,modificationTime:1333428745116,owner:mapred,pathSuffix:var,permission:755,replication:0,type:DIRECTORY}
 ]}}
 
 ## Restart NN.
 
 [root@vbox2 ~]# /etc/init.d/hadoop-hdfs-namenode restartStopping Hadoop 
 namenode:  [  OK  ]
 stopping namenode
 Starting Hadoop namenode:  [  OK  ]
 starting namenode, logging to 
 /var/log/hadoop-hdfs/hadoop-hdfs-namenode-vbox2.out
 
 ## Curl using cookie jar gives error.
 
 [root@vbox2 ~]# curl -b /tmp/webhdfs.cookie -i 
 

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8086) KerberosName silently sets defaultRealm to if the Kerberos config is not found, it should log a WARN

2012-04-05 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13247218#comment-13247218
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8086:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521479/HADOOP-8086.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/823//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/823//console

This message is automatically generated.

 KerberosName silently sets defaultRealm to  if the Kerberos config is not 
 found, it should log a WARN
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8086
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8086
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: security
Affects Versions: 0.23.2, 0.24.0
Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur
Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 0.23.2

 Attachments: HADOOP-8086.patch




--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6963) Fix FileUtil.getDU. It should not include the size of the directory or follow symbolic links

2012-04-05 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13247308#comment-13247308
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6963:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521513/HADOOP-6963.branch-23.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/826//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/826//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Fix FileUtil.getDU. It should not include the size of the directory or follow 
 symbolic links
 

 Key: HADOOP-6963
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6963
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.1
Reporter: Owen O'Malley
Assignee: Ravi Prakash
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: HADOOP-6963.branch-1.0.2.patch, 
 HADOOP-6963.branch-1.0.2.patch, HADOOP-6963.branch-23.patch, 
 HADOOP-6963.branch-23.patch, HADOOP-6963.branch-23.patch


 The getDU method should not include the size of the directory. The Java 
 interface says that the value is undefined and in Linux/Sun it gets the 4096 
 for the inode. Clearly this isn't useful.
 It also recursively calls itself. In case the directory has a symbolic link 
 forming a cycle, getDU keeps spinning in the cycle. In our case, we saw this 
 in the org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobLocalizer.downloadPrivateCacheObjects 
 call. This prevented other tasks on the same node from committing, causing 
 the TT to become effectively useless (because the JT thinks it already has 
 enough tasks running)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6963) Fix FileUtil.getDU. It should not include the size of the directory or follow symbolic links

2012-04-05 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13247314#comment-13247314
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6963:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521518/HADOOP-6963.branch-1.0.2.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/827//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Fix FileUtil.getDU. It should not include the size of the directory or follow 
 symbolic links
 

 Key: HADOOP-6963
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6963
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.1
Reporter: Owen O'Malley
Assignee: Ravi Prakash
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: HADOOP-6963.branch-1.0.2.patch, 
 HADOOP-6963.branch-1.0.2.patch, HADOOP-6963.branch-23.patch, 
 HADOOP-6963.branch-23.patch, HADOOP-6963.branch-23.patch


 The getDU method should not include the size of the directory. The Java 
 interface says that the value is undefined and in Linux/Sun it gets the 4096 
 for the inode. Clearly this isn't useful.
 It also recursively calls itself. In case the directory has a symbolic link 
 forming a cycle, getDU keeps spinning in the cycle. In our case, we saw this 
 in the org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobLocalizer.downloadPrivateCacheObjects 
 call. This prevented other tasks on the same node from committing, causing 
 the TT to become effectively useless (because the JT thinks it already has 
 enough tasks running)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8180) Remove hsqldb since its not needed from pom.xml

2012-04-05 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13247430#comment-13247430
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8180:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12518695/HADOOP-8180.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/828//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Remove hsqldb since its not needed from pom.xml
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8180
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8180
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.23.2
Reporter: Ravi Prakash
Assignee: Ravi Prakash
 Attachments: HADOOP-8180.patch


 Related to MAPREDUCE-3621

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8251) SecurityUtil.fetchServiceTicket broken after HADOOP-6941

2012-04-05 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248042#comment-13248042
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8251:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521640/hadoop-8251.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/829//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/829//console

This message is automatically generated.

 SecurityUtil.fetchServiceTicket broken after HADOOP-6941
 

 Key: HADOOP-8251
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8251
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: security
Affects Versions: 1.1.0, 2.0.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
Priority: Blocker
 Attachments: hadoop-8251.txt


 HADOOP-6941 replaced direct references to some classes with reflective access 
 so as to support other JDKs. Unfortunately there was a mistake in the name of 
 the Krb5Util class, which broke fetchServiceTicket. This manifests itself as 
 the inability to run checkpoints or other krb5-SSL HTTP-based transfers:
 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: sun.security.jgss.krb5

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8007) HA: use substitution token for fencing argument

2012-04-04 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13246098#comment-13246098
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8007:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521287/hadoop-8007.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash
  org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestZKFailoverController

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/818//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/818//console

This message is automatically generated.

 HA: use substitution token for fencing argument
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8007
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8007
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: ha
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
 Attachments: hadoop-8007.txt, hadoop-8007.txt


 Per HADOOP-7983 currently the fencer always passes the target host:port to 
 fence as the first argument to the fence script, it would be better to use a 
 substitution token. That is to say, the user would configure myfence.sh 
 $TARGETHOST foo bar and Hadoop would substitute the target. This would allow 
 use of pre-existing scripts that might have a different ordering of arguments 
 without a wrapper.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6963) Fix FileUtil.getDU. It should not include the size of the directory or follow symbolic links

2012-04-04 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13246652#comment-13246652
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6963:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521370/HADOOP-6963.branch-23.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

-1 findbugs.  The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/819//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/819//artifact/trunk/hadoop-common-project/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshadoop-common.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/819//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Fix FileUtil.getDU. It should not include the size of the directory or follow 
 symbolic links
 

 Key: HADOOP-6963
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6963
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.1
Reporter: Owen O'Malley
Assignee: Ravi Prakash
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: HADOOP-6963.branch-1.0.2.patch, 
 HADOOP-6963.branch-23.patch, HADOOP-6963.branch-23.patch


 The getDU method should not include the size of the directory. The Java 
 interface says that the value is undefined and in Linux/Sun it gets the 4096 
 for the inode. Clearly this isn't useful.
 It also recursively calls itself. In case the directory has a symbolic link 
 forming a cycle, getDU keeps spinning in the cycle. In our case, we saw this 
 in the org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobLocalizer.downloadPrivateCacheObjects 
 call. This prevented other tasks on the same node from committing, causing 
 the TT to become effectively useless (because the JT thinks it already has 
 enough tasks running)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8234) Enable user group mappings on Windows

2012-04-04 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13246838#comment-13246838
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8234:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521414/HADOOP-8234.branch-1-win.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/820//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Enable user group mappings on Windows
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8234
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8234
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Sub-task
  Components: native
Affects Versions: 1.0.0
Reporter: Bikas Saha
Assignee: Bikas Saha
 Attachments: HADOOP-8234.branch-1-win.patch


 The initial patch submitted is missing mapping of users to groups. A number 
 of test failures are related to this. The jira tracks adding this support.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8244) Improve comments on ByteBufferReadable.read

2012-04-04 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13246863#comment-13246863
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8244:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521416/HADOOP-8244.1.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/821//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/821//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Improve comments on ByteBufferReadable.read
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8244
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8244
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Henry Robinson
Assignee: Henry Robinson
 Fix For: 0.24.0

 Attachments: HADOOP-8244.0.patch, HADOOP-8244.1.patch


 There are a couple of ways in which the comment on ByteBufferReadable.read 
 can be improved. Since this is a public-facing API with potentially many 
 implementations, it's worth taking the time to get it right.
 * We should describe what can become of the byte buffer state in the case of 
 an exception (is the limit changed? where's the position?). For the 
 DFSInputStream implementation, position and limit are unchanged if there is 
 an error, but I don't think that's the right think to mandate for all 
 implementations. 
 * We should mention explicitly that 0-byte reads are legitimate - this is 
 particularly important in light of HDFS-3110 which detects support for direct 
 reads by issuing a 0-byte read from libhdfs. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8244) Improve comments on ByteBufferReadable.read

2012-04-03 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245744#comment-13245744
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8244:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521203/HADOOP-8244.0.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/816//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/816//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Improve comments on ByteBufferReadable.read
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8244
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8244
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Henry Robinson
Assignee: Henry Robinson
 Attachments: HADOOP-8244.0.patch


 There are a couple of ways in which the comment on ByteBufferReadable.read 
 can be improved. Since this is a public-facing API with potentially many 
 implementations, it's worth taking the time to get it right.
 * We should describe what can become of the byte buffer state in the case of 
 an exception (is the limit changed? where's the position?). For the 
 DFSInputStream implementation, position and limit are unchanged if there is 
 an error, but I don't think that's the right think to mandate for all 
 implementations. 
 * We should mention explicitly that 0-byte reads are legitimate - this is 
 particularly important in light of HDFS-3110 which detects support for direct 
 reads by issuing a 0-byte read from libhdfs. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8241) Building package fails under Windows

2012-04-02 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13244423#comment-13244423
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8241:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521000/FixPackageBuild.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/812//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Building package fails under Windows
 

 Key: HADOOP-8241
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8241
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: build
Affects Versions: 0.23.1
 Environment: Windows
Reporter: Mostafa Elhemali
 Fix For: 0.23.2

 Attachments: FixPackageBuild.patch


 After applying the patch in 
 [MAPREDUCE-3540|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-3540] the 
 build fails if you do mvn clean package under Windows, in 
 hadoop-hdfs-project and hadoop-dist.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8242) AbstractDelegationTokenIdentifier: add getter methods for owner and realuser

2012-04-02 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13244477#comment-13244477
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8242:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521007/HADOOP-8242.001.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/813//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/813//console

This message is automatically generated.

 AbstractDelegationTokenIdentifier: add getter methods for owner and realuser
 

 Key: HADOOP-8242
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8242
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Colin Patrick McCabe
Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8242.001.patch


 AbstractDelegationTokenIdentifier: add getter methods for owner and realuser. 
   This is needed for another change in HDFS.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8243) Security support broken in CLI (manual) failover controller

2012-04-02 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13244675#comment-13244675
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8243:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521040/hadoop-8243.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/814//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/814//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Security support broken in CLI (manual) failover controller
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8243
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8243
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ha, security
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: hadoop-8243.txt


 Some recent refactoring accidentally caused the proxies in some places to get 
 created with a default Configuration, instead of using the Configuration set 
 up by the DFSHAAdmin tool. This causes the HAServiceProtocol to be missing 
 the configuration which specifies the NN principle -- and thus breaks the CLI 
 HAAdmin tool in secure setups.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8241) Building package fails under Windows

2012-04-02 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13244865#comment-13244865
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8241:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12521081/FixPackageBuild-CommonPart.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/815//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Building package fails under Windows
 

 Key: HADOOP-8241
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8241
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: build
Affects Versions: 0.23.1
 Environment: Windows
Reporter: Mostafa Elhemali
 Fix For: 0.23.2

 Attachments: FixPackageBuild-CommonPart.patch, FixPackageBuild.patch


 After applying the patch in 
 [MAPREDUCE-3540|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-3540] the 
 build fails if you do mvn clean package under Windows, in 
 hadoop-hdfs-project and hadoop-dist.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8238) NetUtils#getHostNameOfIP blows up if given ip:port string w/o port

2012-04-01 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13243827#comment-13243827
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8238:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520843/hadoop-8238.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/808//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/808//console

This message is automatically generated.

 NetUtils#getHostNameOfIP blows up if given ip:port string w/o port
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8238
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8238
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Eli Collins
Assignee: Eli Collins
 Attachments: hadoop-8238.txt


 NetUtils#getHostNameOfIP blows up if not given a string of form ip:port, 
 because the regex matches the port optionally but the code requires a 
 semicolon. It also doesn't check the given string for null.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8210) Common side of HDFS-3148

2012-04-01 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13243888#comment-13243888
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8210:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520846/hadoop-8210.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/809//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/809//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Common side of HDFS-3148
 

 Key: HADOOP-8210
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8210
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Sub-task
  Components: io, performance
Reporter: Eli Collins
Assignee: Eli Collins
 Attachments: hadoop-8210.txt, hadoop-8210.txt


 Common side of HDFS-3148, add necessary DNS and NetUtils methods. Test 
 coverage is in the HDFS-3148 patch. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8236) haadmin should have configurable timeouts for failover commands

2012-04-01 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13243955#comment-13243955
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8236:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520865/hadoop-8236.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/810//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/810//console

This message is automatically generated.

 haadmin should have configurable timeouts for failover commands
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8236
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8236
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: ha
Affects Versions: 0.23.3
Reporter: Philip Zeyliger
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
 Attachments: hadoop-8236.txt, hadoop-8236.txt


 The HAAdmin failover could should time out reasonably aggressively and go 
 onto the fencing strategies if it's dealing with a mostly dead active 
 namenode.  Currently it uses what's probably the default, which is to say no 
 timeout whatsoever.
 {code}
   /**
* Return a proxy to the specified target service.
*/
   protected HAServiceProtocol getProtocol(String serviceId)
   throws IOException {
 String serviceAddr = getServiceAddr(serviceId);
 InetSocketAddress addr = NetUtils.createSocketAddr(serviceAddr);
 return (HAServiceProtocol)RPC.getProxy(
   HAServiceProtocol.class, HAServiceProtocol.versionID,
   addr, getConf());
   }
 {code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8227) Allow RPC to limit ephemeral port range.

2012-03-30 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13242433#comment-13242433
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8227:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520610/HADOOP-8227-trunk.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 5 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/802//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/802//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Allow RPC to limit ephemeral port range.
 

 Key: HADOOP-8227
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8227
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.23.2
Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
Priority: Blocker
 Attachments: HADOOP-8227-trunk.txt


 This is a sub task of MAPREDUCE-4079.  For security reasons we would like to 
 limit the range of ports that are used when some RPC servers select a port.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8232) Provide a command line entry point to view/test topology options

2012-03-30 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13242558#comment-13242558
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8232:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520625/HADOOP-8232.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/803//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/803//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Provide a command line entry point to view/test topology options
 

 Key: HADOOP-8232
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8232
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Sub-task
  Components: util
Affects Versions: 0.23.1
Reporter: Steve Loughran
Assignee: Steve Loughran
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8232.patch


 Add a new command line entry point topo with commands for preflight 
 checking of a clusters topology setup. 
 The initial operations would be to list the implementation class of the 
 mapper, and attempt to load it, resolve a set of supplied hostnames, then 
 dump the topology map after the resolution process.
 Target audience: 
 # ops teams trying to get a new/changed script working before deploying it on 
 a cluster.
 # someone trying to write their first script.
 Resolve and list the rack mappings of the given host
 {code}
 hadoop topo test [host1] [host2] ... 
 {code}
 This would load the hostnames from a given file, resolve all of them and list 
 the results:
 {code}
 hadoop topo testfile filename
 {code}
  This version is intended for the ops team who have a list of hostnames, IP 
 addresses. 
 * Rather than just list them, the ops team may want to mandate that there 
 were no /default-rack mappings found, as that is invariably a sign that the 
 script isn't handling a hostname properly.
 * No attempt to be clever and do IP address resolution, FQDN to hostname 
 mapping, etc.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8221) Hftp connections do not have a timeout

2012-03-30 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13242577#comment-13242577
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8221:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520632/HADOOP-8221.branch-1.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/804//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Hftp connections do not have a timeout
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8221
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8221
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 0.23.0, 0.24.0
Reporter: Daryn Sharp
Assignee: Daryn Sharp
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: HADOOP-8221.branch-1.patch, HADOOP-8221.patch


 Hftp connections do not have read timeouts.  This leads to indefinitely hung 
 sockets when there is a network outage during which time the remote host 
 closed the socket.
 This may also affect WebHdfs, etc.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8220) ZKFailoverController doesn't handle failure to become active correctly

2012-03-30 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13242673#comment-13242673
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8220:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520652/hadoop-8220.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/805//console

This message is automatically generated.

 ZKFailoverController doesn't handle failure to become active correctly
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8220
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8220
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: auto-failover, ha
Affects Versions: 0.23.3, 0.24.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: hadoop-8220.txt, hadoop-8220.txt, hadoop-8220.txt, 
 hadoop-8220.txt, hadoop-8220.txt


 The ZKFC doesn't properly handle the case where the monitored service fails 
 to become active. Currently, it catches the exception and logs a warning, but 
 then continues on, after calling quitElection(). This causes a NPE when it 
 later tries to use the same zkClient instance while handling that same 
 request. There is a test case, but the test case doesn't ensure that the node 
 that had the failure is later able to recover properly.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8014) ViewFileSystem does not correctly implement getDefaultBlockSize, getDefaultReplication, getContentSummary

2012-03-30 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13242730#comment-13242730
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8014:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520663/HADOOP-8014.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 7 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/806//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/806//console

This message is automatically generated.

 ViewFileSystem does not correctly implement getDefaultBlockSize, 
 getDefaultReplication, getContentSummary
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8014
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8014
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 0.23.0, 0.23.2, 0.24.0
Reporter: Daryn Sharp
Assignee: John George
 Attachments: HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch, 
 HADOOP-8014.patch


 {{ViewFileSystem}} incorrectly returns the {{FileSystem}} default values for 
 {{getDefaultBlockSize()}} and {{getDefaultReplication()}}.  This causes files 
 to be created with incorrect values.  The problem is that the current apis 
 are insufficient for viewfs because the defaults depend on the underlying 
 mount point.  These methods need counterparts that accept a {{Path}} so 
 viewfs can resolve the mount point for a path.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8236) haadmin should have configurable timeouts for failover commands

2012-03-30 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13242982#comment-13242982
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8236:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520711/hadoop-8236.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/807//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/807//console

This message is automatically generated.

 haadmin should have configurable timeouts for failover commands
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8236
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8236
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: ha
Affects Versions: 0.23.3
Reporter: Philip Zeyliger
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
 Attachments: hadoop-8236.txt


 The HAAdmin failover could should time out reasonably aggressively and go 
 onto the fencing strategies if it's dealing with a mostly dead active 
 namenode.  Currently it uses what's probably the default, which is to say no 
 timeout whatsoever.
 {code}
   /**
* Return a proxy to the specified target service.
*/
   protected HAServiceProtocol getProtocol(String serviceId)
   throws IOException {
 String serviceAddr = getServiceAddr(serviceId);
 InetSocketAddress addr = NetUtils.createSocketAddr(serviceAddr);
 return (HAServiceProtocol)RPC.getProxy(
   HAServiceProtocol.class, HAServiceProtocol.versionID,
   addr, getConf());
   }
 {code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8225) DistCp fails when invoked by Oozie

2012-03-29 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241467#comment-13241467
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8225:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520465/HADOOP-8225-branch-0.23.1.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/796//console

This message is automatically generated.

 DistCp fails when invoked by Oozie
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8225
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8225
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.23.1
Reporter: Mithun Radhakrishnan
 Attachments: HADOOP-8225-branch-0.23.1.patch, HADOOP-8225.patch


 When DistCp is invoked through a proxy-user (e.g. through Oozie), the 
 delegation-token-store isn't picked up by DistCp correctly. One sees failures 
 such as:
 ERROR [main] org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp: Couldn't complete DistCp
 operation: 
 java.lang.SecurityException: Intercepted System.exit(-999)
 at
 org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.LauncherSecurityManager.checkExit(LauncherMapper.java:651)
 at java.lang.Runtime.exit(Runtime.java:88)
 at java.lang.System.exit(System.java:904)
 at org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp.main(DistCp.java:357)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at
 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at
 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
 at
 org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.LauncherMapper.map(LauncherMapper.java:394)
 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:54)
 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runOldMapper(MapTask.java:399)
 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334)
 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.YarnChild$2.run(YarnChild.java:147)
 at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
 at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396)
 at
 org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1177)
 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.YarnChild.main(YarnChild.java:142)
 Looking over the DistCp code, one sees that HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION isn't 
 being copied to mapreduce.job.credentials.binary, in the job-conf. I'll post 
 a patch for this shortly.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8225) DistCp fails when invoked by Oozie

2012-03-29 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241508#comment-13241508
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8225:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520480/HADOOP-8225.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/797//console

This message is automatically generated.

 DistCp fails when invoked by Oozie
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8225
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8225
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.23.1
Reporter: Mithun Radhakrishnan
 Attachments: HADOOP-8225.patch


 When DistCp is invoked through a proxy-user (e.g. through Oozie), the 
 delegation-token-store isn't picked up by DistCp correctly. One sees failures 
 such as:
 ERROR [main] org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp: Couldn't complete DistCp
 operation: 
 java.lang.SecurityException: Intercepted System.exit(-999)
 at
 org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.LauncherSecurityManager.checkExit(LauncherMapper.java:651)
 at java.lang.Runtime.exit(Runtime.java:88)
 at java.lang.System.exit(System.java:904)
 at org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp.main(DistCp.java:357)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at
 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at
 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
 at
 org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.LauncherMapper.map(LauncherMapper.java:394)
 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:54)
 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runOldMapper(MapTask.java:399)
 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334)
 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.YarnChild$2.run(YarnChild.java:147)
 at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
 at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396)
 at
 org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1177)
 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.YarnChild.main(YarnChild.java:142)
 Looking over the DistCp code, one sees that HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION isn't 
 being copied to mapreduce.job.credentials.binary, in the job-conf. I'll post 
 a patch for this shortly.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8221) Hftp connections do not have a timeout

2012-03-29 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241920#comment-13241920
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8221:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520529/HADOOP-8221.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/799//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Hftp connections do not have a timeout
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8221
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8221
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 0.23.0, 0.24.0
Reporter: Daryn Sharp
Assignee: Daryn Sharp
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: HADOOP-8221.patch


 Hftp connections do not have read timeouts.  This leads to indefinitely hung 
 sockets when there is a network outage during which time the remote host 
 closed the socket.
 This may also affect WebHdfs, etc.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8226) a few native libraries are missing from a full build and binary tarball

2012-03-29 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13242018#comment-13242018
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8226:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520548/HADOOP-8226.patch.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/800//console

This message is automatically generated.

 a few native libraries are missing from a full build and binary tarball
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8226
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8226
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: build
Affects Versions: 0.23.1
Reporter: Roman Shaposhnik
Assignee: Roman Shaposhnik
 Attachments: HADOOP-8226.patch.txt


 Hadoop 1.0.X ships the following native libraries in its tarball:
 {noformat}
 hadoop-1.0.1/c++/Linux-amd64-64/lib/libhadooppipes.a
 hadoop-1.0.1/c++/Linux-amd64-64/lib/libhadooputils.a
 hadoop-1.0.1/c++/Linux-i386-32/lib/libhadooppipes.a
 hadoop-1.0.1/c++/Linux-i386-32/lib/libhadooputils.a
 hadoop-1.0.1/lib/native/Linux-amd64-64/libhadoop.a
 hadoop-1.0.1/lib/native/Linux-i386-32/libhadoop.a
 hadoop-1.0.1/c++/Linux-amd64-64/lib/libhdfs.so
 hadoop-1.0.1/c++/Linux-i386-32/lib/libhdfs.so
 hadoop-1.0.1/lib/native/Linux-amd64-64/libhadoop.so
 hadoop-1.0.1/lib/native/Linux-i386-32/libhadoop.so
 {noformat}
 While Hadoop 0.23.1 ships a subset:
 {noformat}
 ./lib/native/libhadoop.a
 ./lib/native/libhdfs.a
 ./lib/native/libhadoop.so
 ./lib/native/libhdfs.so
 {noformat}
 The question is: do we have any reason not to support/publish the following 
 libraries:
 libhadooppipes.a, libhadooputils.a ?
 And we also used to have librecordio that now seems to be missing from both.
 If this is not intentional I can provide a patch to re-enable these bits.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8220) ZKFailoverController doesn't handle failure to become active correctly

2012-03-29 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13242059#comment-13242059
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8220:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520563/hadoop-8220.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/801//console

This message is automatically generated.

 ZKFailoverController doesn't handle failure to become active correctly
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8220
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8220
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: auto-failover, ha
Affects Versions: 0.23.3, 0.24.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: hadoop-8220.txt, hadoop-8220.txt, hadoop-8220.txt, 
 hadoop-8220.txt


 The ZKFC doesn't properly handle the case where the monitored service fails 
 to become active. Currently, it catches the exception and logs a warning, but 
 then continues on, after calling quitElection(). This causes a NPE when it 
 later tries to use the same zkClient instance while handling that same 
 request. There is a test case, but the test case doesn't ensure that the node 
 that had the failure is later able to recover properly.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8220) ZKFailoverController doesn't handle failure to become active correctly

2012-03-28 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13240792#comment-13240792
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8220:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520334/hadoop-8220.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/793//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/793//console

This message is automatically generated.

 ZKFailoverController doesn't handle failure to become active correctly
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8220
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8220
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: auto-failover, ha
Affects Versions: 0.23.3, 0.24.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: hadoop-8220.txt, hadoop-8220.txt


 The ZKFC doesn't properly handle the case where the monitored service fails 
 to become active. Currently, it catches the exception and logs a warning, but 
 then continues on, after calling quitElection(). This causes a NPE when it 
 later tries to use the same zkClient instance while handling that same 
 request. There is a test case, but the test case doesn't ensure that the node 
 that had the failure is later able to recover properly.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8149) cap space usage of default log4j rolling policy

2012-03-28 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13240803#comment-13240803
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8149:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520335/HADOOP-8149.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/794//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/794//console

This message is automatically generated.

 cap space usage of default log4j rolling policy 
 

 Key: HADOOP-8149
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8149
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: conf
Reporter: Patrick Hunt
Assignee: Patrick Hunt
 Attachments: HADOOP-8149.patch, HADOOP-8149.patch, HADOOP-8149.patch, 
 HADOOP-8149.patch, HADOOP-8149.patch


 I've seen several critical production issues because logs are not 
 automatically removed after some time and accumulate. Changes to Hadoop's 
 default log4j file appender would help with this.
 I recommend we move to an appender which:
 1) caps the max file size (configurable)
 2) caps the max number of files to keep (configurable)
 3) uses rolling file appender rather than DRFA, see the warning here:
 http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/DailyRollingFileAppender.html
 Specifically: DailyRollingFileAppender has been observed to exhibit 
 synchronization issues and data loss.
 We'd lose (based on the default log4j configuration) the daily rolling 
 aspect, however increase reliability.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8014) ViewFileSystem does not correctly implement getDefaultBlockSize, getDefaultReplication, getContentSummary

2012-03-27 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239867#comment-13239867
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8014:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520179/HADOOP-8014.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestFilterFileSystem
  org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestZKFailoverController
  
org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemWithAuthorityLocalFileSystem
  
org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestFSMainOperationsLocalFileSystem
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemLocalFileSystem
  org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestFailoverController

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/791//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/791//console

This message is automatically generated.

 ViewFileSystem does not correctly implement getDefaultBlockSize, 
 getDefaultReplication, getContentSummary
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8014
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8014
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 0.23.0, 0.23.2, 0.24.0
Reporter: Daryn Sharp
Assignee: John George
 Attachments: HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch


 {{ViewFileSystem}} incorrectly returns the {{FileSystem}} default values for 
 {{getDefaultBlockSize()}} and {{getDefaultReplication()}}.  This causes files 
 to be created with incorrect values.  The problem is that the current apis 
 are insufficient for viewfs because the defaults depend on the underlying 
 mount point.  These methods need counterparts that accept a {{Path}} so 
 viewfs can resolve the mount point for a path.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8014) ViewFileSystem does not correctly implement getDefaultBlockSize, getDefaultReplication, getContentSummary

2012-03-27 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239890#comment-13239890
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8014:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520183/HADOOP-8014.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestFilterFileSystem
  org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestZKFailoverController
  
org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemWithAuthorityLocalFileSystem
  
org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestFSMainOperationsLocalFileSystem
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFileSystemLocalFileSystem
  org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestFailoverController

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/792//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/792//console

This message is automatically generated.

 ViewFileSystem does not correctly implement getDefaultBlockSize, 
 getDefaultReplication, getContentSummary
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8014
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8014
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: fs
Affects Versions: 0.23.0, 0.23.2, 0.24.0
Reporter: Daryn Sharp
Assignee: John George
 Attachments: HADOOP-8014.patch, HADOOP-8014.patch


 {{ViewFileSystem}} incorrectly returns the {{FileSystem}} default values for 
 {{getDefaultBlockSize()}} and {{getDefaultReplication()}}.  This causes files 
 to be created with incorrect values.  The problem is that the current apis 
 are insufficient for viewfs because the defaults depend on the underlying 
 mount point.  These methods need counterparts that accept a {{Path}} so 
 viewfs can resolve the mount point for a path.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8202) stopproxy() is not closing the proxies correctly

2012-03-26 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13238713#comment-13238713
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8202:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519992/HADOOP-8202-4.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/783//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/783//console

This message is automatically generated.

 stopproxy() is not closing the proxies correctly
 

 Key: HADOOP-8202
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8202
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ipc
Affects Versions: 0.24.0
Reporter: Hari Mankude
Assignee: Hari Mankude
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8202-1.patch, HADOOP-8202-2.patch, 
 HADOOP-8202-3.patch, HADOOP-8202-4.patch, HADOOP-8202.patch, HADOOP-8202.patch


 I was running testbackupnode and noticed that NNprotocol proxy was not being 
 closed. Talked with Suresh and he observed that most of the protocols do not 
 implement ProtocolTranslator and hence the logic in stopproxy() does not 
 work. Instead, since all of them are closeable, Suresh suggested that 
 closeable property should be used at close.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8206) Common portion of ZK-based failover controller

2012-03-26 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13238741#comment-13238741
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8206:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519905/hadoop-8206.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 8 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

-1 findbugs.  The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestZKFailoverController

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/784//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/784//artifact/trunk/hadoop-common-project/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshadoop-common.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/784//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Common portion of ZK-based failover controller
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8206
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8206
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: ha
Affects Versions: 0.24.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
 Attachments: hadoop-8206.txt


 This JIRA is for the Common (generic) portion of HDFS-2185. It can't run on 
 its own, but this JIRA will include unit tests using mock/dummy services.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8206) Common portion of ZK-based failover controller

2012-03-26 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13238812#comment-13238812
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8206:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520001/hadoop-8206.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 8 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/785//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/785//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Common portion of ZK-based failover controller
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8206
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8206
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: ha
Affects Versions: 0.24.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
 Attachments: hadoop-8206.txt, hadoop-8206.txt


 This JIRA is for the Common (generic) portion of HDFS-2185. It can't run on 
 its own, but this JIRA will include unit tests using mock/dummy services.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8206) Common portion of ZK-based failover controller

2012-03-26 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13238974#comment-13238974
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8206:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520023/hadoop-8206.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 11 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/786//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/786//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Common portion of ZK-based failover controller
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8206
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8206
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: ha
Affects Versions: 0.24.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
 Attachments: hadoop-8206.txt, hadoop-8206.txt, hadoop-8206.txt


 This JIRA is for the Common (generic) portion of HDFS-2185. It can't run on 
 its own, but this JIRA will include unit tests using mock/dummy services.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8216) address log4j.properties inconsistencies btw main and template dirs

2012-03-26 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239094#comment-13239094
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8216:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520037/HADOOP-8216.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/787//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/787//console

This message is automatically generated.

 address log4j.properties inconsistencies btw main and template dirs
 ---

 Key: HADOOP-8216
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8216
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: conf
Reporter: Patrick Hunt
Assignee: Patrick Hunt
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8216.patch


 DRFAAUDIT is in 
 ./hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/packages/templates/conf/log4j.properties
  but not in 
 ./hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/conf/log4j.properties 
 (although it's used in hadoop-env.sh)
 lesser issues but I noticed:
 I see MRAUDIT commented out of main, but it's uncommented in template. (the 
 conversion pattern also differs). 
 afaict the other appenders (JSA, MRAUDIT, TLA, etc...) are all still being 
 used and should not be removed.
 Should we be renaming some of these? JSA is being used by the history server 
 for example.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8218) RPC.closeProxy shouldn't throw error when closing a mock

2012-03-26 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239157#comment-13239157
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8218:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520051/hadoop-8218.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/788//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/788//console

This message is automatically generated.

 RPC.closeProxy shouldn't throw error when closing a mock
 

 Key: HADOOP-8218
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8218
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ipc, test
Affects Versions: 0.24.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: hadoop-8218.txt


 HADOOP-8202 changed the behavior of RPC.stopProxy() to throw an exception if 
 called on an object which doesn't implement Closeable. Unfortunately, we use 
 mock objects in many test cases, and those mocks don't implement Closeable. 
 This is causing TestZKFailoverController to fail in trunk, for example.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8220) ZKFailoverController doesn't handle failure to become active correctly

2012-03-26 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239178#comment-13239178
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8220:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520062/hadoop-8220.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestFailoverController
  org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestZKFailoverController

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/789//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/789//console

This message is automatically generated.

 ZKFailoverController doesn't handle failure to become active correctly
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8220
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8220
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ha
Affects Versions: 0.23.3, 0.24.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: hadoop-8220.txt


 The ZKFC doesn't properly handle the case where the monitored service fails 
 to become active. Currently, it catches the exception and logs a warning, but 
 then continues on, after calling quitElection(). This causes a NPE when it 
 later tries to use the same zkClient instance while handling that same 
 request. There is a test case, but the test case doesn't ensure that the node 
 that had the failure is later able to recover properly.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8218) RPC.closeProxy shouldn't throw error when closing a mock

2012-03-26 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13239191#comment-13239191
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8218:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12520063/hadoop-8218.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 11 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/790//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/790//console

This message is automatically generated.

 RPC.closeProxy shouldn't throw error when closing a mock
 

 Key: HADOOP-8218
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8218
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ipc, test
Affects Versions: 0.24.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
Priority: Critical
 Attachments: hadoop-8218.txt, hadoop-8218.txt


 HADOOP-8202 changed the behavior of RPC.stopProxy() to throw an exception if 
 called on an object which doesn't implement Closeable. Unfortunately, we use 
 mock objects in many test cases, and those mocks don't implement Closeable. 
 This is causing TestZKFailoverController to fail in trunk, for example.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8208) Disallow self failover

2012-03-25 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237945#comment-13237945
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8208:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519870/hdfs-3145.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/775//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Disallow self failover
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8208
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8208
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ha
Reporter: Eli Collins
Assignee: Eli Collins
 Attachments: hdfs-3145.txt


 It is currently possible for users to make a standby NameNode failover to 
 itself and become active. We shouldn't allow this to happen in case operators 
 mistype and miss the fact that there are now two active NNs.
 {noformat}
 bash-4.1$ hdfs haadmin -ns ha-nn-uri -failover nn2 nn2
 Failover from nn2 to nn2 successful
 {noformat}
 After the failover above, nn2 will be active.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8208) Disallow self failover

2012-03-25 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237953#comment-13237953
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8208:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519870/hdfs-3145.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/776//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Disallow self failover
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8208
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8208
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ha
Reporter: Eli Collins
Assignee: Eli Collins
 Attachments: hdfs-3145.txt


 It is currently possible for users to make a standby NameNode failover to 
 itself and become active. We shouldn't allow this to happen in case operators 
 mistype and miss the fact that there are now two active NNs.
 {noformat}
 bash-4.1$ hdfs haadmin -ns ha-nn-uri -failover nn2 nn2
 Failover from nn2 to nn2 successful
 {noformat}
 After the failover above, nn2 will be active.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8208) Disallow self failover

2012-03-25 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237960#comment-13237960
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8208:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519873/hadoop-8208.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/777//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/777//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Disallow self failover
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8208
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8208
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ha
Reporter: Eli Collins
Assignee: Eli Collins
 Attachments: hadoop-8208.txt, hdfs-3145.txt


 It is currently possible for users to make a standby NameNode failover to 
 itself and become active. We shouldn't allow this to happen in case operators 
 mistype and miss the fact that there are now two active NNs.
 {noformat}
 bash-4.1$ hdfs haadmin -ns ha-nn-uri -failover nn2 nn2
 Failover from nn2 to nn2 successful
 {noformat}
 After the failover above, nn2 will be active.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8208) Disallow self failover

2012-03-25 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237966#comment-13237966
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8208:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519873/hadoop-8208.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/778//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/778//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Disallow self failover
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8208
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8208
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ha
Reporter: Eli Collins
Assignee: Eli Collins
 Attachments: hadoop-8208.txt, hdfs-3145.txt


 It is currently possible for users to make a standby NameNode failover to 
 itself and become active. We shouldn't allow this to happen in case operators 
 mistype and miss the fact that there are now two active NNs.
 {noformat}
 bash-4.1$ hdfs haadmin -ns ha-nn-uri -failover nn2 nn2
 Failover from nn2 to nn2 successful
 {noformat}
 After the failover above, nn2 will be active.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8210) Common side of HDFS-3148

2012-03-25 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13238020#comment-13238020
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8210:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519884/hadoop-8210.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/779//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Common side of HDFS-3148
 

 Key: HADOOP-8210
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8210
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Sub-task
  Components: io, performance
Reporter: Eli Collins
Assignee: Eli Collins
 Attachments: hadoop-8210.txt


 Common side of HDFS-3148, add necessary DNS and NetUtils methods. Test 
 coverage is in the HDFS-3148 patch. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8211) Update commons-net version to 3.1

2012-03-25 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13238027#comment-13238027
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8211:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519886/hadoop-8211.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/780//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Update commons-net version to 3.1
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8211
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8211
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Sub-task
  Components: io, performance
Reporter: Eli Collins
Assignee: Eli Collins
 Attachments: hadoop-8211.txt


 HADOOP-8210 requires the commons-net version be upgraded. Let's bump it to 
 the latest stable version. The only other user is FtpFs.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8212) Improve ActiveStandbyElector's behavior when session expires

2012-03-25 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13238113#comment-13238113
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8212:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519904/hadoop-8212.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 11 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/781//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/781//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Improve ActiveStandbyElector's behavior when session expires
 

 Key: HADOOP-8212
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8212
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.23.3, 0.24.0
Reporter: Todd Lipcon
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
 Attachments: hadoop-8212.txt


 Currently when the ZK session expires, it results in a fatal error being sent 
 to the application callback. This is not the best behavior -- for example, in 
 the case of HA, if ZK goes down, we would like the current state to be 
 maintained, rather than causing either NN to abort. When the ZK clients are 
 able to reconnect, they should sort out the correct leader based on the 
 normal locking schemes.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8204) TestHealthMonitor fails occasionally

2012-03-24 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237753#comment-13237753
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8204:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519829/hadoop-8204.txt
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/773//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/773//console

This message is automatically generated.

 TestHealthMonitor fails occasionally 
 -

 Key: HADOOP-8204
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8204
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.23.3, 0.24.0
Reporter: Tom White
Assignee: Todd Lipcon
 Attachments: hadoop-8204.txt, hadoop-8204.txt


 See e.g. 
 https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/756//testReport/org.apache.hadoop.ha/TestHealthMonitor/testMonitor/

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8202) stopproxy() is not closing the proxies correctly

2012-03-24 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237785#comment-13237785
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8202:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519847/HADOOP-8202-3.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/774//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/774//console

This message is automatically generated.

 stopproxy() is not closing the proxies correctly
 

 Key: HADOOP-8202
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8202
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ipc
Affects Versions: 0.24.0
Reporter: Hari Mankude
Assignee: Hari Mankude
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8202-1.patch, HADOOP-8202-2.patch, 
 HADOOP-8202-3.patch, HADOOP-8202.patch, HADOOP-8202.patch


 I was running testbackupnode and noticed that NNprotocol proxy was not being 
 closed. Talked with Suresh and he observed that most of the protocols do not 
 implement ProtocolTranslator and hence the logic in stopproxy() does not 
 work. Instead, since all of them are closeable, Suresh suggested that 
 closeable property should be used at close.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8202) stopproxy() is not closing the proxies correctly

2012-03-23 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13236863#comment-13236863
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8202:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519670/HADOOP-8202.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

-1 findbugs.  The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/754//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/754//artifact/trunk/hadoop-common-project/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshadoop-common.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/754//console

This message is automatically generated.

 stopproxy() is not closing the proxies correctly
 

 Key: HADOOP-8202
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8202
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ipc
Affects Versions: 0.24.0
Reporter: Hari Mankude
Assignee: Hari Mankude
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8202.patch


 I was running testbackupnode and noticed that NNprotocol proxy was not being 
 closed. Talked with Suresh and he observed that most of the protocols do not 
 implement ProtocolTranslator and hence the logic in stopproxy() does not 
 work. Instead, since all of them are closeable, Suresh suggested that 
 closeable property should be used at close.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8202) stopproxy() is not closing the proxies correctly

2012-03-23 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13236949#comment-13236949
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8202:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519675/HADOOP-8202.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/755//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/755//console

This message is automatically generated.

 stopproxy() is not closing the proxies correctly
 

 Key: HADOOP-8202
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8202
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ipc
Affects Versions: 0.24.0
Reporter: Hari Mankude
Assignee: Hari Mankude
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8202.patch, HADOOP-8202.patch


 I was running testbackupnode and noticed that NNprotocol proxy was not being 
 closed. Talked with Suresh and he observed that most of the protocols do not 
 implement ProtocolTranslator and hence the logic in stopproxy() does not 
 work. Instead, since all of them are closeable, Suresh suggested that 
 closeable property should be used at close.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7030) new topology mapping implementations

2012-03-23 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13236960#comment-13236960
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7030:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519688/HADOOP-7030.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

-1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
  org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestHealthMonitor

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/756//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/756//console

This message is automatically generated.

 new topology mapping implementations
 

 Key: HADOOP-7030
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7030
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2, 0.21.0
Reporter: Patrick Angeles
Assignee: Tom White
 Attachments: HADOOP-7030-2.patch, HADOOP-7030.patch, 
 HADOOP-7030.patch, HADOOP-7030.patch, HADOOP-7030.patch, topology.patch


 The default ScriptBasedMapping implementation of DNSToSwitchMapping for 
 determining cluster topology has some drawbacks. Principally, it forks to an 
 OS-specific script.
 This issue proposes two new Java implementations of DNSToSwitchMapping. 
 TableMapping reads a two column text file that maps an IP or hostname to a 
 rack ID. Ip4RangeMapping reads a three column text file where each line 
 represents a start and end IP range plus a rack ID.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8194) viewfs: quota command does not report remaining quotas

2012-03-23 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13236977#comment-13236977
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8194:
---

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519695/HADOOP-8194.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/757//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/757//console

This message is automatically generated.

 viewfs: quota command does not report remaining quotas
 --

 Key: HADOOP-8194
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8194
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.23.2, 0.23.3, 0.24.0
Reporter: John George
Assignee: John George
 Attachments: HADOOP-8194.patch, HADOOP-8194.patch


 The space and namesapce quotas and remaining are not reported.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8202) stopproxy() is not closing the proxies correctly

2012-03-23 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237005#comment-13237005
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8202:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12519700/HADOOP-8202-1.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

+1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

+1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

+1 eclipse:eclipse.  The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.

+1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

+1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

+1 core tests.  The patch passed unit tests in .

+1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/758//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/758//console

This message is automatically generated.

 stopproxy() is not closing the proxies correctly
 

 Key: HADOOP-8202
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8202
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ipc
Affects Versions: 0.24.0
Reporter: Hari Mankude
Assignee: Hari Mankude
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: HADOOP-8202-1.patch, HADOOP-8202.patch, HADOOP-8202.patch


 I was running testbackupnode and noticed that NNprotocol proxy was not being 
 closed. Talked with Suresh and he observed that most of the protocols do not 
 implement ProtocolTranslator and hence the logic in stopproxy() does not 
 work. Instead, since all of them are closeable, Suresh suggested that 
 closeable property should be used at close.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-8088) User-group mapping cache incorrectly does negative caching on transient failures

2012-03-23 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237215#comment-13237215
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8088:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12518767/hadoop-8088-trunk.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

+1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/760//console

This message is automatically generated.

 User-group mapping cache incorrectly does negative caching on transient 
 failures
 

 Key: HADOOP-8088
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8088
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: security
Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0, 1.0.0, 1.1.0, 0.23.1, 0.24.0
Reporter: Kihwal Lee
 Fix For: 1.0.2, 0.23.2, 0.24.0

 Attachments: hadoop-8088-branch-1.patch, hadoop-8088-branch-1.patch, 
 hadoop-8088-trunk.patch, hadoop-8088-trunk.patch, hadoop-8088-trunk.patch


 We've seen a case where some getGroups() calls fail when the ldap server or 
 the network is having transient failures. Looking at the code, the 
 shell-based and the JNI-based implementations swallow exceptions and return 
 an empty or partial list. The caller, Groups#getGroups() adds this likely 
 empty list into the mapping cache for the user. This will function as 
 negative caching until the cache expires. I don't think we want negative 
 caching here, but even if we do, it should be intelligent enough to 
 distinguish transient failures from ENOENT. The log message in the jni-based 
 impl also needs an improvement. It should print what exception it encountered 
 instead of just saying one happened.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7689) Process cannot exit when there is many RPC readers more that actual client

2012-03-23 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13237219#comment-13237219
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7689:
---

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12517661/HADOOP-7689.patch
  against trunk revision .

+1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

-1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

-1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/761//console

This message is automatically generated.

 Process cannot exit when there is many RPC readers more that actual client
 --

 Key: HADOOP-7689
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7689
 Project: Hadoop Common
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ipc
Affects Versions: 0.21.0
 Environment: local
Reporter: Denny Ye
  Labels: rpc
 Attachments: HADOOP-7689.patch


 I met a strange issue that process cannot exit when I run RPC test cases in 
 my Eclipse.
 Conditions:
 1. Only one Server and one client(local)
 2. I have set many readers(conf.setInt(ipc.server.read.threadpool.size, 
 5)), it great than client number.
 After any test cases, the process cannot exit. I tested with several cases 
 and found the root cause.
 RPC serves socket with reader(transferring binary to Call), and even shutdown 
 the thread pool. But all the free readers are blocked at 
 readSelector.select() (they are useless by Listener)
 Those threads and process cannot exit always.
 It can be fixed by invoking corresponding selector for each reader.The same 
 thing was done at 0.20 version.   
  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




  1   2   3   4   5   6   >