Re: [CGUYS] Computer backup software

2008-12-11 Thread Judy Cosler

syncback

Richard P. wrote:

Any recommendations for scheduled data backup software for Windows XP?
Free would be good too.

Thanks in advance,

Richard P.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*

  



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Computer backup software

2008-12-11 Thread Tony B
Now that you've heard what everyone else does, if you actually want
any specific help you're going to have to tell us a lot more about
what it is you do, and what it is you want backed up.

e.g. I don't back up *anything* on the wife's laptop, but her emails
are all via Yahoo, so they're already backed up in the cloud. OTOH,
the office machine that runs Quickbooks and keeps two important
company databases is backed up daily to the cloud (specifically,
Amazon via Jungledisk). My own machine, used primarily for
development, images the C drive daily to a second drive.

All three methods have already been described, but which one is right
for you just depends on what the machine in question is doing. Note
that no backup method will ever prevent you from having to reinstall
your OS occasionally, so don't bother trying to reach for that lofty
goal.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] No ID? No Internet for You!

2008-12-11 Thread Tom Piwowar
A complacent attitude about the technology plans of the new 
administration opens to door for fear mongers to take over...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/09/technology/09security.html

Restricting Internet access is one of a series of recommendations that a 
group of more than 60 government and business computer security 
specialists will make in a public presentation, Securing Cyberspace in 
the 44th Presidency, on Monday. The report has been prepared during the 
last 18 months under the auspices of the Center for Strategic and 
International Studies, a Washington policy group, after a number of 
break-ins into government computer systems.

This will certainly make it easier for advertisers to track and measure 
consumer behavior. And easier to nail those bald guys who criminally 
claim otherwise.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] MS Share Drops 19% YOY

2008-12-11 Thread Tom Piwowar
Google up 8% YOY.

Despite MS's machinations to kill off Yahoo!, Yahoo! leads MS by 147%. 
That's why MS must redouble its efforts to herd the sheeple.

What's the problem with Dogpile? I guess no innovation and no ability to 
strong arm the sheeple, puts them at the bottom.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Nielsen-Online-Announces-October-US/s
tory.aspx?guid={D176757E-7A2C-4AA7-A9AF-00D3E42F31C4}

Provider  Searches (000)  YOY Change   Share of Searches
---   --  --   -
All Search 7,775,913   -2.0%  100.0%
Google Search  4,755,4938.1%   61.2%
Yahoo! Search  1,311,504  -12.0%   16.9%
MSN/Windows Live Search  885,567  -19.0%   11.4%
AOL Search   334,467   14.5%4.3%
Ask.com Search   177,131  -22.9%2.3%
My Web Search 60,336  -38.2%0.8%
Comcast Search40,246  -13.4%0.5%
ATT Worldnet Search  25,474   92.8%0.3%
NexTag Search 16,599  -12.9%0.2%
Dogpile.com Search14,485  -30.5%0.2%


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] MS Share Drops 19% YOY

2008-12-11 Thread mike
I realize you'll probably just start covering your ears and screaming WFB!
WFB!...but...how does a 5% lead make it 147%?

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Google up 8% YOY.

 Despite MS's machinations to kill off Yahoo!, Yahoo! leads MS by 147%.
 That's why MS must redouble its efforts to herd the sheeple.

 What's the problem with Dogpile? I guess no innovation and no ability to
 strong arm the sheeple, puts them at the bottom.

 http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Nielsen-Online-Announces-October-US/s
 tory.aspx?guid={D176757E-7A2C-4AA7-A9AF-00D3E42F31C4}http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Nielsen-Online-Announces-October-US/story.aspx?guid=%7BD176757E-7A2C-4AA7-A9AF-00D3E42F31C4%7D

 Provider  Searches (000)  YOY Change   Share of Searches
 ---   --  --   -
 All Search 7,775,913   -2.0%  100.0%
 Google Search  4,755,4938.1%   61.2%
 Yahoo! Search  1,311,504  -12.0%   16.9%
 MSN/Windows Live Search  885,567  -19.0%   11.4%
 AOL Search   334,467   14.5%4.3%
 Ask.com Search   177,131  -22.9%2.3%
 My Web Search 60,336  -38.2%0.8%
 Comcast Search40,246  -13.4%0.5%
 ATT Worldnet Search  25,474   92.8%0.3%
 NexTag Search 16,599  -12.9%0.2%
 Dogpile.com Search14,485  -30.5%0.2%


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *




-- 
Make sure you support your local CarbonONset programs!


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No ID? No Internet for You!

2008-12-11 Thread Ralph
I hate to say it but is this akin to licensing guy buyers (which I
favor, BTW)?  Legitimate buyers obey the law, but criminals don't?
Legitimate computer users will be licensed, and hackers will find ways
to circumvent the requirement?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No ID? No Internet for You!

2008-12-11 Thread Snyder, Mark (IT CIV)
The gist of the effort appears to be how employees gain access to the
network.  The group advocates dropping user-ID and password and
replacing with certificate-based login.  I think your comment is off the
mark.  This is about accessing their network as a regular user, not
accessing the internet.  They are trying to prevent hostile access to
their networks and user-ID / passwords are too easily cracked.  They
want to use their CAC cards (encrypted certificates) for network access.
This doesn't appear to include any change for joe/jane user accessing
the internet or seeing Gov. web sites (at least the external-facing
ones). 

Thank you,

Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
A complacent attitude about the technology plans of the new
administration opens to door for fear mongers to take over...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/09/technology/09security.html

Restricting Internet access is one of a series of recommendations that
a group of more than 60 government and business computer security
specialists will make in a public presentation, Securing Cyberspace in
the 44th Presidency, on Monday. The report has been prepared during the
last 18 months under the auspices of the Center for Strategic and
International Studies, a Washington policy group, after a number of
break-ins into government computer systems.

This will certainly make it easier for advertisers to track and measure
consumer behavior. And easier to nail those bald guys who criminally
claim otherwise.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Computer backup software

2008-12-11 Thread Richard P.
You raise good points. The backup would essentially be for only My
Documents although at some point I would like to start backing up the
image on a daily basis too. Never planned on trying to backup the
operating system. It's too much fun reinstalling it :)

Richard P.

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Tony B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Now that you've heard what everyone else does, if you actually want
 any specific help you're going to have to tell us a lot more about
 what it is you do, and what it is you want backed up.

 e.g. I don't back up *anything* on the wife's laptop, but her emails
 are all via Yahoo, so they're already backed up in the cloud. OTOH,
 the office machine that runs Quickbooks and keeps two important
 company databases is backed up daily to the cloud (specifically,
 Amazon via Jungledisk). My own machine, used primarily for
 development, images the C drive daily to a second drive.

 All three methods have already been described, but which one is right
 for you just depends on what the machine in question is doing. Note
 that no backup method will ever prevent you from having to reinstall
 your OS occasionally, so don't bother trying to reach for that lofty
 goal.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Computer backup software

2008-12-11 Thread mike
Acronis is an option for backing up everything including OS.  I have several
images at different stages made by acronis I keep on ext drives.  My system
is back up and running with all programs in about ten minutes.

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Tony B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 All three methods have already been described, but which one is right
 for you just depends on what the machine in question is doing. Note
 that no backup method will ever prevent you from having to reinstall
 your OS occasionally, so don't bother trying to reach for that lofty
 goal.




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] MS Share Drops 19% YOY

2008-12-11 Thread Chris Dunford
 I realize you'll probably just start covering your ears and screaming
 WFB! WFB!...but...how does a 5% lead make it 147%?

Yahoo / MS * 100 = 147%

That's a 47% lead, not 147%, but this one time I am willing to chalk it up
to an honest misstatement. Just this once, though.

Personally, I'm not sure why -anyone- uses MS search.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] speedtest

2008-12-11 Thread RLeeSimon
what can I conclude from these results for my comcast sold as 768up speed
basic internet via cable?
 
speedtest.net 1867u/145d NY.NY
speedtest.net 1195/116 Newark,DE (listed preferred)
frontier.net 1115/335
voip.com 1004/361
 
do these results have any meaning?  are they accurate?  are there better
places to check this?
 
there was a splitter installed by comcast to allow a tv about 10 feet
before my cable modem.  I took it out and put in a bullet rated for over
3g and the speed went up about 30-40%.  Was the splitter defective?  Is
there some sort of splitter I can get that will better distribute the signal
as I want to hook up a tv near the computer?  Can I hook the TV up somehow
behind my router instead of on the cable before it?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No ID? No Internet for You!

2008-12-11 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Already required for military users.

Stewart


At 09:53 AM 12/11/2008, you wrote:

The gist of the effort appears to be how employees gain access to the
network.  The group advocates dropping user-ID and password and
replacing with certificate-based login.  I think your comment is off the
mark.  This is about accessing their network as a regular user, not
accessing the internet.  They are trying to prevent hostile access to
their networks and user-ID / passwords are too easily cracked.  They
want to use their CAC cards (encrypted certificates) for network access.
This doesn't appear to include any change for joe/jane user accessing
the internet or seeing Gov. web sites (at least the external-facing
ones).

Thank you,

Mark Snyder


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Computer backup software

2008-12-11 Thread Tony B
Oh, I didn't mean to imply your C: image wouldn't include your OS. I
just didn't want you to think you would _never_ have to reinstall an
OS. The trick is partitioning your C drive small enough to hold
everything you need on a daily basis as well as all your documents.
Currently, I do around 50gb for C. My Games, Music, Videos, and Adobe
 Office suites go to a different partition.

Having evaluated both, I prefer Ghost over Acronis, as it's more
versatile. Worth the extra $20 or so.


On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Richard P. richs...@gmail.com wrote:
 You raise good points. The backup would essentially be for only My
 Documents although at some point I would like to start backing up the
 image on a daily basis too. Never planned on trying to backup the
 operating system. It's too much fun reinstalling it :)

 Richard P.

 On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
 Now that you've heard what everyone else does, if you actually want
 any specific help you're going to have to tell us a lot more about
 what it is you do, and what it is you want backed up.

 e.g. I don't back up *anything* on the wife's laptop, but her emails
 are all via Yahoo, so they're already backed up in the cloud. OTOH,
 the office machine that runs Quickbooks and keeps two important
 company databases is backed up daily to the cloud (specifically,
 Amazon via Jungledisk). My own machine, used primarily for
 development, images the C drive daily to a second drive.

 All three methods have already been described, but which one is right
 for you just depends on what the machine in question is doing. Note
 that no backup method will ever prevent you from having to reinstall
 your OS occasionally, so don't bother trying to reach for that lofty
 goal.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] speedtest

2008-12-11 Thread Tony B
Stop diddling with the wires. Unless there's something drastically
wrong with the signal, you're best off not screwing with them. They
aren't like analog signals of yore that could slow down a connection
if there was a bit of noise on the line. The increase you saw from the
splitter was probably just a transient internet thing.

There's definitely _something_ wrong with your results, if your
download speeds are such a small fraction of upload. I assume you
tried different servers? But it's not going to be a problem inside
your house, or anything you can do about it short of calling them. Try
lying if you have to just to get a tech out to see for themselves.

PS My Comcast is giving me 25000d/1400u to DC today.


On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:08 PM, RLeeSimon rleesi...@gmail.com wrote:
 what can I conclude from these results for my comcast sold as 768up speed
 basic internet via cable?

 speedtest.net 1867u/145d NY.NY
 speedtest.net 1195/116 Newark,DE (listed preferred)
 frontier.net 1115/335
 voip.com 1004/361

 do these results have any meaning?  are they accurate?  are there better
 places to check this?

 there was a splitter installed by comcast to allow a tv about 10 feet
 before my cable modem.  I took it out and put in a bullet rated for over
 3g and the speed went up about 30-40%.  Was the splitter defective?  Is
 there some sort of splitter I can get that will better distribute the signal
 as I want to hook up a tv near the computer?  Can I hook the TV up somehow
 behind my router instead of on the cable before it?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Computer backup software

2008-12-11 Thread gerald
a lot of people back up to a single external drive.  i think this not a good 
idea.  i have not had good luck with external drive reliability.  if possible, 
back up to cd's or dvd's and grandfather them.  for my company, we did a backup 
every day just before closing.  used append feature.  dated each cd or dvd.  
stacked them back on the spindle as they filled.  

last year the state of Texas sent me a love note for not paying sales tax(my 
company is in MD) for the past 7 or 8 years for $110,000 plus about another 
100k in penalties.  went back to 1999.  i then got a bill from texas for 
another 110k for not paying franchise fees.  oh, and 100k in penalties.   by 
the time it was all said and done, texas wanted half a mil from me.

i dug out the spindles, created year end data, customer lists, etc for 
1999-2007.  hired a couple texas lawyers, and went about defending self.  could 
not have done it without the backups.

could not do it if i backed up external.  data would be long gone.

backups were on win98, 2000 and xp.  all were recoverable with backup my pc 
to xp.  this is very difficult if you used MS win 98 and win 2000 backup.  i do 
not think they talk to win xp backup.



At 04:51 PM 12/10/2008, you wrote:
Any recommendations for scheduled data backup software for Windows XP?
Free would be good too.

Thanks in advance,

Richard P.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Computer backup software

2008-12-11 Thread b_s-wilk

You raise good points. The backup would essentially be for only My
Documents although at some point I would like to start backing up the
image on a daily basis too. Never planned on trying to backup the
operating system. It's too much fun reinstalling it :)


Aren't settings and preferences in the OS directory? How about serial # 
registrations for your software? It's a real pain to reinstall the OS 
AND all the programs AND finding the serial numbers to make them work.


Leaving any data, software, etc. in only one place, locally or remotely 
is a guarantee that one day, some or all of it will be lost. I like 
living dangerously, but losing essential data is crossing the line. I 
store critical info in several places in the cloud [where did that 
come from?] as well as locally. Everything else is like my travel 
philosophy: I carry one overnight bag. Anything I lose or don't have, I 
either don't need or can find as I go, but I do have 
lists/links/accounts that I can use, just in case.


Betty


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Computer backup software

2008-12-11 Thread Tony B
You are incorrect. In my own case, my tax records for years are kept
in My Documents, and are imaged along with my whole C partition. The
most paranoid only need two drives - swap them every month, and keep
one off the premises. These drives are cheap these days, so I agree
nobody should only have one backup drive.

Optical media is still good for archiving the big stuff, but until I
can fit my C drive on one disk again, hard drives are just lots
_easier_.


On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:33 PM, gerald ger...@slawecki.com wrote:
 a lot of people back up to a single external drive.  i think this not a good 
 idea.  i have not had good luck with external drive reliability.  if 
 possible, back up to cd's or dvd's and grandfather them.  for my company, we 
 did a backup every day just before closing.  used append feature.  dated each 
 cd or dvd.  stacked them back on the spindle as they filled.

 last year the state of Texas sent me a love note for not paying sales tax(my 
 company is in MD) for the past 7 or 8 years for $110,000 plus about another 
 100k in penalties.  went back to 1999.  i then got a bill from texas for 
 another 110k for not paying franchise fees.  oh, and 100k in penalties.   by 
 the time it was all said and done, texas wanted half a mil from me.

 i dug out the spindles, created year end data, customer lists, etc for 
 1999-2007.  hired a couple texas lawyers, and went about defending self.  
 could not have done it without the backups.

 could not do it if i backed up external.  data would be long gone.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] MS Share Drops 19% YOY

2008-12-11 Thread b_s-wilk

Yahoo / MS * 100 = 147%



No.

Yahoo / MS = 1,311,504 / 885,567 = 1.48097659 = 148%
148% * 100 = 14800% or 148. Yahoo's share isn't 148 times more than MS' 
share. It just seems that way.


Yahoo's share is 148% of MS share, or Yahoo's share is 48% more than MS 
share. MS still sucks.


Who are all the Yahoos who are still using MS for search? Are they the 
ones who eat pink donuts because someone put a plate in front of them, 
even though they prefer chocolate cream donuts or bagels or muffins on 
the next table, but didn't notice them or are too lazy to get up?



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] ghost and acronis

2008-12-11 Thread mike
It's been years since I used ghost, what features are most compelling to
you?  I'm more then willing to switch if there are better things going on.

Mike

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:

 Oh, I didn't mean to imply your C: image wouldn't include your OS. I
 just didn't want you to think you would _never_ have to reinstall an
 OS. The trick is partitioning your C drive small enough to hold
 everything you need on a daily basis as well as all your documents.
 Currently, I do around 50gb for C. My Games, Music, Videos, and Adobe
  Office suites go to a different partition.

 Having evaluated both, I prefer Ghost over Acronis, as it's more
 versatile. Worth the extra $20 or so.


 On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Richard P. richs...@gmail.com wrote:
  You raise good points. The backup would essentially be for only My
  Documents although at some point I would like to start backing up the
  image on a daily basis too. Never planned on trying to backup the
  operating system. It's too much fun reinstalling it :)
 
  Richard P.
 
  On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
  Now that you've heard what everyone else does, if you actually want
  any specific help you're going to have to tell us a lot more about
  what it is you do, and what it is you want backed up.
 
  e.g. I don't back up *anything* on the wife's laptop, but her emails
  are all via Yahoo, so they're already backed up in the cloud. OTOH,
  the office machine that runs Quickbooks and keeps two important
  company databases is backed up daily to the cloud (specifically,
  Amazon via Jungledisk). My own machine, used primarily for
  development, images the C drive daily to a second drive.
 
  All three methods have already been described, but which one is right
  for you just depends on what the machine in question is doing. Note
  that no backup method will ever prevent you from having to reinstall
  your OS occasionally, so don't bother trying to reach for that lofty
  goal.


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *




-- 
Make sure you support your local CarbonONset programs!


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] ghost and acronis

2008-12-11 Thread Tony B
Ghost is the current iteration of an old and revered program - Drive
Image from Powerquest. I've been a fan for ages, even long before
Symantec bought them and scrapped the old Ghost. The last time I set
up Acronis, I was unable to set the number of full backups it would
keep. Presumably once the backup drive was full, the user is supposed
to go in and clear space manually.?


On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:16 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
 It's been years since I used ghost, what features are most compelling to
 you?  I'm more then willing to switch if there are better things going on.

 Mike

 On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:

 Oh, I didn't mean to imply your C: image wouldn't include your OS. I
 just didn't want you to think you would _never_ have to reinstall an
 OS. The trick is partitioning your C drive small enough to hold
 everything you need on a daily basis as well as all your documents.
 Currently, I do around 50gb for C. My Games, Music, Videos, and Adobe
  Office suites go to a different partition.

 Having evaluated both, I prefer Ghost over Acronis, as it's more
 versatile. Worth the extra $20 or so.


 On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Richard P. richs...@gmail.com wrote:
  You raise good points. The backup would essentially be for only My
  Documents although at some point I would like to start backing up the
  image on a daily basis too. Never planned on trying to backup the
  operating system. It's too much fun reinstalling it :)
 
  Richard P.
 
  On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
  Now that you've heard what everyone else does, if you actually want
  any specific help you're going to have to tell us a lot more about
  what it is you do, and what it is you want backed up.
 
  e.g. I don't back up *anything* on the wife's laptop, but her emails
  are all via Yahoo, so they're already backed up in the cloud. OTOH,
  the office machine that runs Quickbooks and keeps two important
  company databases is backed up daily to the cloud (specifically,
  Amazon via Jungledisk). My own machine, used primarily for
  development, images the C drive daily to a second drive.
 
  All three methods have already been described, but which one is right
  for you just depends on what the machine in question is doing. Note
  that no backup method will ever prevent you from having to reinstall
  your OS occasionally, so don't bother trying to reach for that lofty
  goal.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No ID? No Internet for You!

2008-12-11 Thread MrMike6by9
Where I worked, before retirement, we were using a CAC to access our
workplace machines for over 6 years. A friend who works for a civilian
agency lives with a system that has each machine dedicated to a
specific user. If his machine goes down or he goes to another
office/location, he cannot log on to a computer. With the CAC, we were
theoretically able to log on to access any similarly protected,
networked computer. A new account automatically created for the new
user on that machine. This made the change-out of defective equipment
very easy which minimized downtime for the employee. Obviously, this
strategy works when all user data is available on networked shares or
in the cloud.

YMMV



  A complacent attitude about the technology plans of the new
  administration opens to door for fear mongers to take over...

  http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/09/technology/09security.html

  Restricting Internet access is one of a series of recommendations that a
  group of more than 60 government and business computer security
  specialists will make in a public presentation, Securing Cyberspace in
  the 44th Presidency, on Monday. The report has been prepared during the
  last 18 months under the auspices of the Center for Strategic and
  International Studies, a Washington policy group, after a number of
  break-ins into government computer systems.

  This will certainly make it easier for advertisers to track and measure
  consumer behavior. And easier to nail those bald guys who criminally
  claim otherwise.




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] MS Share Drops 19% YOY

2008-12-11 Thread Tom Piwowar
That's a 47% lead, not 147%, but this one time I am willing to chalk it up
to an honest misstatement. Just this once, though.

We had this same battle 10 years ago when I said on air that a certain 
PPC chip was 200% faster than a Pentium chip. I stick to my language. If 
I drink 100% of a bottle of beer I have consumed a full bottle. 200% 
means I drank 2 bottles. O% means I'm still sober.

WFBs want me to drink only 47% of the beer. Which makes my glass more 
than half empty. Just what I would expect from those party poopers.

Notice how they don't want to address the issue so distract us with math 
problems instead. Baa!


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] No ID? No Internet for You!

2008-12-11 Thread Tom Piwowar
I hate to say it but is this akin to licensing guy buyers (which I
favor, BTW)?  Legitimate buyers obey the law, but criminals don't?
Legitimate computer users will be licensed, and hackers will find ways
to circumvent the requirement?

But think of all the money to be made in selling credentials to the 
non-hackers. MS will be able to revive its plans of an Internet Passport 
system.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] ghost and acronis

2008-12-11 Thread mike
Ah, I use acronis in a more manual based timeshot fashion.  Every so often
when the urge strikes I take a snapshot and store it with the previous
two...If I have anything before those previous two when I make a new one, I
delete it.

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ghost is the current iteration of an old and revered program - Drive
 Image from Powerquest. I've been a fan for ages, even long before
 Symantec bought them and scrapped the old Ghost. The last time I set
 up Acronis, I was unable to set the number of full backups it would
 keep. Presumably once the backup drive was full, the user is supposed
 to go in and clear space manually.?


 On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:16 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
  It's been years since I used ghost, what features are most compelling to
  you?  I'm more then willing to switch if there are better things going
 on.
 
  Mike
 
  On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Oh, I didn't mean to imply your C: image wouldn't include your OS. I
  just didn't want you to think you would _never_ have to reinstall an
  OS. The trick is partitioning your C drive small enough to hold
  everything you need on a daily basis as well as all your documents.
  Currently, I do around 50gb for C. My Games, Music, Videos, and Adobe
   Office suites go to a different partition.
 
  Having evaluated both, I prefer Ghost over Acronis, as it's more
  versatile. Worth the extra $20 or so.
 
 
  On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Richard P. richs...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   You raise good points. The backup would essentially be for only My
   Documents although at some point I would like to start backing up the
   image on a daily basis too. Never planned on trying to backup the
   operating system. It's too much fun reinstalling it :)
  
   Richard P.
  
   On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
   Now that you've heard what everyone else does, if you actually want
   any specific help you're going to have to tell us a lot more about
   what it is you do, and what it is you want backed up.
  
   e.g. I don't back up *anything* on the wife's laptop, but her emails
   are all via Yahoo, so they're already backed up in the cloud. OTOH,
   the office machine that runs Quickbooks and keeps two important
   company databases is backed up daily to the cloud (specifically,
   Amazon via Jungledisk). My own machine, used primarily for
   development, images the C drive daily to a second drive.
  
   All three methods have already been described, but which one is right
   for you just depends on what the machine in question is doing. Note
   that no backup method will ever prevent you from having to reinstall
   your OS occasionally, so don't bother trying to reach for that lofty
   goal.


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *




-- 
Make sure you support your local CarbonONset programs!


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] MS Share Drops 19% YOY

2008-12-11 Thread mike
Now I know why it's so hard to figure out WTH you are on about...this whole
list is a drinking game to you.  Must be everytime you type WFB you get to
take a drink?

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 That's a 47% lead, not 147%, but this one time I am willing to chalk it up
 to an honest misstatement. Just this once, though.

 We had this same battle 10 years ago when I said on air that a certain
 PPC chip was 200% faster than a Pentium chip. I stick to my language. If
 I drink 100% of a bottle of beer I have consumed a full bottle. 200%
 means I drank 2 bottles. O% means I'm still sober.

 WFBs want me to drink only 47% of the beer. Which makes my glass more
 than half empty. Just what I would expect from those party poopers.

 Notice how they don't want to address the issue so distract us with math
 problems instead. Baa!


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *




-- 
Make sure you support your local CarbonONset programs!


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] speedtest

2008-12-11 Thread gerald
???

At 12:54 PM 12/11/2008, you wrote:
There's definitely _something_ wrong with your results, if your
download speeds are such a small fraction of upload. I assume you
tried different servers? But it's not going to be a problem inside
your house, or anything you can do about it short of calling them. Try
lying if you have to just to get a tech out to see for themselves.

PS My Comcast is giving me 25000d/1400u to DC today.

you got:

1400/25000=?

he got:
speedtest.net 1867u/145d NY.NY   145/1867=?
speedtest.net 1195/116 Newark,DE (listed preferred)  116/1195=?
frontier.net 1115/335 335/1115=?
voip.com 1004/361   361/1004=?

i think his ratios are better than yours.

___

i have2321/19705= about13% on frontier, wva
and  2133/14875 = about 15% on verizon in va.

when i went cross country to seattle,

2460/4313= lots of bottlenecks en route.




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] MS Share Drops 19% YOY

2008-12-11 Thread Chris Dunford
  Yahoo / MS * 100 = 147%
 
 No.
 
 Yahoo / MS = 1,311,504 / 885,567 = 1.48097659 = 148%
 148% * 100 = 14800% or 148. Yahoo's share isn't 148 times more than MS'
 share. It just seems that way.
 
 Yahoo's share is 148% of MS share, or Yahoo's share is 48% more than MS
 share. MS still sucks.

I'm confused why you say No, on account of that is exactly what I said: 
Yahoo's share is 148% of MS's.

(Well, not exactly; I took Tom's 147 number instead of getting out the 
calculator.)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] MS Share Drops 19% YOY

2008-12-11 Thread Chris Dunford
 Notice how they don't want to address the issue so distract us with
 math problems instead. Baa!

I guess you missed the part where I said that I don't understand why anyone
uses MS search?

In any event, the math/terminology for this is well established. Yahoo's
share is 148% of MS's. You can also say that Yahoo's share is 48% larger.
What you -can't- say is the Yahoo's share is 148% larger than MS's, because
it ain't.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] MS Share Drops 19% YOY

2008-12-11 Thread Jeff Wright
 We had this same battle 10 years ago when I said on air that a certain
 PPC chip was 200% faster than a Pentium chip. I stick to my language. If
 I drink 100% of a bottle of beer I have consumed a full bottle. 200%
 means I drank 2 bottles. O% means I'm still sober.

Which only means that you're 100% as weasely as you were 10 years ago.

 Despite MS's machinations to kill off Yahoo!, Yahoo! leads MS by 147%

Everyone else is correct:  Yahoo's share is 148% of MS, but they lead
by only 48%.  The *difference* between their respective shares is 48%
of Microsoft's.  If Yahoo led by 148%, then they would have a share of
28.3% of the total, not 16.9%.

But, no matter how you dice it, Google is rightly kicking both their
asses.  It's share is 216% of MS's and Yahoo's share *combined.*


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] speedtest

2008-12-11 Thread Richard P.
Yes, there are splitters with different impedance's. Cox has the cable
hitting the splitter and then the lowest impedance output (3.5db) of
the splitter along with the shortest run of cable going to the modem.
The higher impedance (7.0db) connections go to the TV sets. One time
after doing some maintenance the connections got mixed up and the Cox
help desk was able to see this through the modem signal strength
reading. I swapped the terminals back and the signal strength came
back up to normal. Here is an example of a similar splitter:

http://www.dslreports.com/faq/3399

Regardless, your numbers seem abnormally low for cable on a regular
basis. Adding 30 to 40% by bypassing the TV isn't a solution. Tony is
probably right in suggesting that the bigger problem is more likely
outside your house, rather than inside. I had a similar issue and the
technicians found a bad connection at the pole and a shorting out
cable, both problems outside. Get a technician out there.

Richard P.

 what can I conclude from these results for my comcast sold as 768up speed
 basic internet via cable?

 speedtest.net 1867u/145d NY.NY
 speedtest.net 1195/116 Newark,DE (listed preferred)
 frontier.net 1115/335
 voip.com 1004/361

 do these results have any meaning?  are they accurate?  are there better
 places to check this?

 there was a splitter installed by comcast to allow a tv about 10 feet
 before my cable modem.  I took it out and put in a bullet rated for over
 3g and the speed went up about 30-40%.  Was the splitter defective?  Is
 there some sort of splitter I can get that will better distribute the signal
 as I want to hook up a tv near the computer?  Can I hook the TV up somehow
 behind my router instead of on the cable before it?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*