Re: [CGUYS] links cut off

2009-06-21 Thread Chris Dunford
  On my screen the following goes all the way to the right side 
  without wrapping. What do others see?
 
  12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678
  9012
  34567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
  1234
  56789012345678
 
 I see lines wrapped at 72 chars.

This suddenly annoyed me after years of not being much bothered by it. In my 
case, at least, it turned out to be caused by an Outlook setting: the wrap 
setting in Tools.Options.Mail Format.Internet
Format.  Inexplicably, the dialog won't let you set a value  132, but it can 
be set in the registry instead, and any value works there.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] myEarthLink News Article - Reports: Apple CEO Steve Jobs had liver transplant

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar
Curiously this is a front page story even on European news sites.  
Much of the world pins its hopes for technological progress on this  
one man.


On Jun 20, 2009, at 11:09 PM, Rev. Stewart A. Marshall wrote:

Reports: Apple CEO Steve Jobs had liver transplant



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 20, 2009, at 10:46 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
But the FCC already has sold off the bandwidth.  I don't understand  
why they
don't lease this sort of thing rather than sell it off wholesale.   
It should

be continuing revenue not a one time thing.


Political ideology. Once you sell off a public asset it is hard to  
get it back. Recall that RR had a plan to sell off weather forecasting.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread Constance Warner
The debate may be over, but the consequences are not.  One  
consequence that's ongoing:  TV reception that's eccentric at best.   
So why not talk about it?  Among other things, useful information can  
be exchanged: e.g. which types and brands of antenna work best, where  
to get them, and other tips.  This is especially important for those  
of us who live in apartments and can't put a big antenna on the roof.


I'd love to have cable or satellite, but that's a Let them eat cake  
solution to the problem.  (Have you ever noticed how many ways there  
are to say, Let them eat cake?  While, in a strictly historical  
sense, Marie Antoinette may not have actually said it, other people  
have been saying it in one form or another ever since.)


--Constance Warner
On Jun 20, 2009, at 1:09 PM, t.piwowar wrote:


On Jun 20, 2009, at 11:49 AM, mike wrote:
This kind of thing is done with almost every topic, it's just not  
noticed
when it is already your view.  Can you say, 'The debate is  
over' ?  These
kinds of so called debates aren't good for anyone on any topic.   
How often
do we get real news on the RIAA?  Ever hear the letters EFF on  
network or

cable news when talking about copyright cases?


That's is a tough one. On one hand we have the Supreme Ayatollah  
who says The election is over. On the other hand you have those  
corrupt cons/neocons who will scream No until hell freezes over.  
There will always be dissenters who will not shut up. At some point  
a reasonable person has to say it is time to move on. With the RIAA  
a reasonable person might say it is time to go back and fix  
mistakes of the past. This may be a question that has no answer.



** 
***
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **
** 
***



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 20, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Jeff Miles wrote:
The quote about the neighbors said losing his life... not that he  
was killed. You imply by saying killed that he was murdered. From  
what I've read it seems he lost his life through complications  
brought on by a bit of stupid rage.


I did not expect this to be turned into a demonstration of senseless  
WFB rage. All the usual suspects responded and even tried to work M$  
into the story. Why? All I get from this is a list of people to pay  
no attention to. They don't respond to the message, but to some  
fantasied caricature of the messenger.


Killed is the most neutral term I can think of for moving from the  
state of being alive to the state of being dead through the action of  
some event. One can be killed by a fall or a heart attack or a  
lightning bolt or elevated blood pressure etc..


I do wonder what the tech could have possibly done to cause such rage.

I guess what caused me to post it here was our discussion of OTA DTV  
unhappiness. Even customers of the highly-regarded FIOS service can  
get plenty mad. Fortunately, none of us got that mad at DTV.


P.S. I am a happy Verizon customer.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Databases: Open Office Base?

2009-06-21 Thread db
File Metadata is a wonderful thing but it seems to me unless you are 
using it yourself for yourself, like professional photogs do, it opens 
opens up a whole indexing discipline can of worms. 

Wouldn't metadata indexing work spottily unless you have put a LOT of 
professional caliber design planning into it before you start and then 
execute it throughout the database's lifespan with consistency?


Classical filing by location, filename or date, automatically imposes a 
simple system and discipline to the project from the start.   It seems 
to me that people .. run of the mill employees, volunteers etc are more 
likely to understand and perform, file naming and folder distribution 
than they are to reliably and uniformly tag files.


One has to do that to accomplish anything but you can put one badly 
thought out tag on a file, call it done and it will be next to useless 
for retrieval purposes.


?

db

Tony B wrote:

Ya, but often the fields are different. i.e., You want to describe
that photo as Uncle George, Atlantic City, July 2008, Aunt
Mary, Casino, Beach, vacations. What field are you going to put
these in so that ALL your apps will read and can use the data? And how
many of your apps will pass that data to the right place if the file
is converted from a .jpg to a .png? Or .tif? Heck, many apps just
strip all the metadata during simple picture manipulations and don't
even tell you!

I know you hate it, I do too frankly, but if MS gets behind it then it
_will_ become some sort of standard. Until then, it's next to useless.


On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 2:45 PM, t.piwowart...@tjpa.com wrote:
  

On Jun 20, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Tony B wrote:


We've discussed this before on the list. The new WinFS file system was
supposed to be implemented with Vista and would have used metadata in
files to sort them.
  

Yes, M$ dropped the ball, but you don't need WinFS to do metadata. Metadata
is defined in the specs for JPEG and TIFF files and probably others too.

Seems to me that a photo management program would be able to manage scanned
docs just as well.




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*

  



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Recommendations for good iPod to Itunes (reverse) copy

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 21, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Steve at Verizon wrote:
Sounds pretty good. However, I just want to copy tracks manually,  
not sync. Does it handle that?


I use iPodDisk.app for that. Free. The iPod appears on the desktop as  
a disk image with folders as you would expect.


www.nabble.com


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] links cut off

2009-06-21 Thread db

I see lines wrapped at 72 characters.

Does the ___  trick mentioned earlier, always consistently trump 
this URL break problem if you use it?


db

Chris Dunford wrote:
On my screen the following goes all the way to the right side 
without wrapping. What do others see?


12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678
9012
34567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
1234
56789012345678
  

I see lines wrapped at 72 chars.



This suddenly annoyed me after years of not being much bothered by it. In my case, at 
least, it turned out to be caused by an Outlook setting: the wrap setting in 
Tools.Options.Mail Format.Internet
Format.  Inexplicably, the dialog won't let you set a value  132, but it can 
be set in the registry instead, and any value works there.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*

  



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 21, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Constance Warner wrote:
The debate may be over, but the consequences are not.  One  
consequence that's ongoing:  TV reception that's eccentric at  
best.  So why not talk about it?  Among other things, useful  
information can be exchanged: e.g. which types and brands of  
antenna work best, where to get them, and other tips.  This is  
especially important for those of us who live in apartments and  
can't put a big antenna on the roof.


I saw the transition as an opportunity to upgrade and had many of my  
questions answered beforehand on this list. Based on what I learned  
here I replaced my SD Replay with an HD Tivo. I also learned here  
that DTV transmitter power was set much lower than it was for SD. So  
I decided to get an outdoor antenna. Not being suicidal I hired  
Fairfax Antenna to do the job. As one would expect from a pro, they  
immediately told me that I still needed both VHF and UHF. They knew  
about 7 and 9. So I had an easy transition at home. The Tivo service  
even downloads new channel assignments so I have no need to rescan.  
My TV at the office was a do-it-yourself job and did not go as  
smoothly. However, I think the channel 9 problem was caused by the  
station because the problem went away without my doing anything.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Databases: Open Office Base?

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 21, 2009, at 12:52 PM, db wrote:
File Metadata is a wonderful thing but it seems to me unless you  
are using it yourself for yourself, like professional photogs do,  
it opens opens up a whole indexing discipline can of worms.
Classical filing by location, filename or date, automatically  
imposes a simple system and discipline to the project from the  
start.   It seems to me that people .. run of the mill employees,  
volunteers etc are more likely to understand and perform, file  
naming and folder distribution than they are to reliably and  
uniformly tag files.


Things things you list are tags. In some systems many of these can  
even be applied automatically.


Additional tags may or may not make a mess. Some people name their  
folders poorly and scatter them in various locations on their hard  
drive, server, cloud etc. I don't see how tags would be any worse.  
They could potentially be better because they would work even it  
situations where the folder organization was a mess.


The most important tags are often about the people in the photos. It  
is interesting that Apple added face recognition to iPhoto to do  
precisely that. For a version 1.0 product it ain't bad.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread db
Who knows what happened in this case but modern residential consumer 
cabling installations are frequently a dysfunctional boondoggle no 
matter where you are located in the US and what company you are dealing 
with. 

Often the installers are young relatively unskilled and underpaid 
pieceworkers using their own equipment.  The companies follow through 
and middle management systems are minimal for residential consumer 
installation or repair.


A difficult troubleshooting problem that might involve a systemic 
problem can take 5 troubleshooting visits (requiring being at home for a 
4 hour window each time) over the space of six weeks.  Sometimes no one 
even shows up ... simple installations can easily and frequently do take 
two visits because of incompetence or management oversight or 
miscommunication.


I have repeatedly seen homeowners who have been thru the mill before pay 
a professional 3rd party contractor to do the work, rather than schedule 
a free cable maintenance call and undergo another infuriating gut 
wrenching, waste of their time experience.


This customer's reaction of grabbing the steering wheel to try to get 
the guy to stay and do whatever it was the paying customer so obviously 
strongly felt should be done, does not surprise me in the least.


In 20 years of cable service, I have been there myself all too often.

This abuse of negligence occures because there it no consequences for 
the companies.  No consumer enforcement mechanism and no real 
competition / choices for us.


db


t.piwowar wrote:

On Jun 20, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Jeff Miles wrote:
The quote about the neighbors said losing his life... not that he 
was killed. You imply by saying killed that he was murdered. From 
what I've read it seems he lost his life through complications 
brought on by a bit of stupid rage.


I did not expect this to be turned into a demonstration of senseless 
WFB rage. All the usual suspects responded and even tried to work M$ 
into the story. Why? All I get from this is a list of people to pay no 
attention to. They don't respond to the message, but to some fantasied 
caricature of the messenger.


Killed is the most neutral term I can think of for moving from the 
state of being alive to the state of being dead through the action of 
some event. One can be killed by a fall or a heart attack or a 
lightning bolt or elevated blood pressure etc..


I do wonder what the tech could have possibly done to cause such rage.

I guess what caused me to post it here was our discussion of OTA DTV 
unhappiness. Even customers of the highly-regarded FIOS service can 
get plenty mad. Fortunately, none of us got that mad at DTV.


P.S. I am a happy Verizon customer.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Databases: Open Office Base?

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 20, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Tony B wrote:

I know you hate it, I do too frankly, but if MS gets behind it then it
_will_ become some sort of standard. Until then, it's next to useless.


Your faith in the Supreme Ayatollah is touching.

I have not seen any evidence that M$ has any particular expertise in  
this. Well defined tagging already exists and is commonly used. We  
really don't need a johnny-come-lately messing things up.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] colbert on natal

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 20, 2009, at 10:11 PM, mike wrote:
Steven Colbert unveiled a new MS product...the Ex-Box.  It comes  
with not
only no controller, but no games and no console...for only 500  
dollars!


He is being a bit more clever about it, but this is exactly what I  
was saying. He is right.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread Steve at Verizon
There's a lot of this going on these days, and not just at the Fed 
level. Many states are selling the rights to the future income from the 
tobacco settlement and from their toll road tolls.  And it's not 
ideology, just shortsighted desire by both parties for revenue to spend .


t.piwowar wrote:

On Jun 20, 2009, at 10:46 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
But the FCC already has sold off the bandwidth.  I don't understand 
why they
don't lease this sort of thing rather than sell it off wholesale.  It 
should

be continuing revenue not a one time thing.


Political ideology. Once you sell off a public asset it is hard to get 
it back. Recall that RR had a plan to sell off weather forecasting.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*





*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Embedding Metadata in PDF (Was: Databases: Open Office Base?)

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 20, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Alvin Auerbach wrote:
Problem: File size of original document: 2.2 MB. File size of  
modified document: 9.2 MB.

 Why the huge increase in file size?


Preview does not attempt to create optimized PDFs. It saves the file  
as quickly as possible. There is no option to perform extra  
processing to make it smaller. For that you need to pay for Acrobat.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread Tony B
We'll probably never know, so we can speculate all day. I tend to
imagine it was something the tech had absolutely no power over, like
he was having trouble with long distance which was from a different
company.


 I do wonder what the tech could have possibly done to cause such rage.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Semantics always play a roll in how a word is defined.

The man died due to injuries sustained during the confrontation 
between him and the cable install technician.


We know nothing other than this.

Newspapers have done their best to misuse the English language for a long time.

Kill is a verb along with die.  How ever one indicates action taken 
upon that person and the other indicates a passive type of action.


At this point we have no other information other than the man died 
due to injuries sustained when he grabbed hold of the wheel of the 
vehicle the technician was driving.


The English language is very bad for technical terms as the words 
tend to be defined alike.  Many foreign languages use specific words 
that have specific definitions.


Case in point.  May people recite the Ten commandments and say the 
5th (in my church, in others the 6th) commandment says that you shall 
not kill.  However a better rendering of that commandment is you 
shall not murder.  A very specific term that indicates the illegal 
taking of another person life.


One of my members is a former newspaper man who then went into 
professional journal management.  He comments all the time on how 
poorly the modern newspapers are doing their job in using the English 
language properly.


Stewart



At 01:41 PM 6/21/2009, you wrote:

We'll probably never know, so we can speculate all day. I tend to
imagine it was something the tech had absolutely no power over, like
he was having trouble with long distance which was from a different
company.


 I do wonder what the tech could have possibly done to cause such rage.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread Eric S. Sande

We'll probably never know, so we can speculate all day.


Verizon is cooperating with the police investigation.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] links cut off

2009-06-21 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:57 PM, db db...@att.net wrote:

 I see lines wrapped at 72 characters.

 Does the ___  trick mentioned earlier, always consistently trump this
 URL break problem if you use it?

 It does on usenet.

-- 
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread mike
A sad, sad statement on the perception of the telcos today that Eric felt he
even had to say this.  Course he doesn't work for qwest where the driver
would have backed over the customer to ensure he wouldn't have to return to
fix the problem he had just made worse.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Eric S. Sande esa...@erols.com wrote:

 We'll probably never know, so we can speculate all day.


 Verizon is cooperating with the police investigation.



 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Constance Warnercawar...@his.com wrote:

 The debate may be over, but the consequences are not.  One consequence
 that's ongoing:  TV reception that's eccentric at best.  So why not talk
 about it?  Among other things, useful information can be exchanged: e.g.
 which types and brands of antenna work best, where to get them, and other
 tips.

  Of course we will continue to discuss this just as we continue to
discuss other computer topics.  There a number of aspects concerning
this digital transition that are actually still being debated and will
continue to be for some time to come.

  A very important aspect is the digital television receiver.  The
receiver is critical to the signal chain and can have a great impact
on the ability of the viewer to be able to receive a broadcast.  The
receiver is as important to receiving a signal as is the antenna or
the transmitter and its power and location relative to the viewers
location.

  There are no standards mandated by the FCC for television receivers.
 Never have been.  Not even for the now pretty much deceased analog
system.  Receivers can be as good or as crappy as the manufacturer
wants them to be.  Recent calls for standardization have been beaten
back by industry, headed up by the lobbying of the Consumer
Electronics Association.

  The 8-VSB digital broadcast system was dictated by the FCC to be the
standard for broadcasts in the United States.  This system was chosen
over the system used by most of the other nations of the world, and is
used by only three countries, Canada, the United States and, if I am
not mistaken here, New Zealand.  Back in the early days of analog, the
United States decided to go with an inferior standard than was chosen
by most of the rest of the world. and we have probably done it again.
The 8-VSB system is generally regarded as the most troublesome in
terms of being able to obtain good reception under adverse conditions
as compared to the COFDM system used by most of the rest of the world.
 Our system is more prone to interference, and it is that interference
that is causing a lot of our current reception problems, especially in
urban areas.

  This is where some minimum receiver specification standards would be
of great help.  Receivers can be designed to include circuitry and
components that can help to minimize multipath interference that
causes loss of signal and pixellation problems.  Some receivers are a
lot more sensitive to low signal levels than are others, and can thus
capture a signal than could not otherwise be received.  Receiver
sensitivity and the ability to fend off interference problems is much
more important with our new digital TV than it was with the old analog
system, and is the reason why standards for receivers is now being
debated.

  The manufacturing industry has thus far been successful in
convincing the FCC that the marketplace should be the one and only
determining factor involved in sorting out this end of the problem,
while others maintain that some minimum standards would be of immense
help in offsetting receptions problems that were both anticipated as
well as being a reality.

  There is a royalty fee that is paid to Zenith Corp., the holder of
the 8-VSB patent, and this royalty fee ranges from $24 to about $41
per DTV television set that is sold.  The amount of the fee is
dependent upon the screen size of the TV set.  I do not know what the
fee is for each converter box, but there is one.  Those royalty fees
are quite steep, and add to the cost of digital TV sets.  Since the
fee is the same regardless of the quality of the signal processor,
wouldn't it be to the benefit of the consumer if the signal processor
met certain minimum standards in terms of capability?  Many think so,
but the industry disagrees.  In fact, it is very difficult for
consumers to obtain and be able to compare receiver specs other than
screen size and resolution.  If there were mandated standards, those
specs would most likely be widely available and could be of great
assistance to consumers when they are making purchasing decisions.

  Broadcasters like the 8-VSB system because it is cheaper to operate
than the COFDM system.  The 8-VSB system allows for less transmitter
power to get a usable signal to the receiver under ideal conditions,
but the trade-off is being more prone to multipath interference on the
receive end under typical conditions.  That being said, two networks,
CBS, and ABC if memory serves me well, initially objected to the 8-VSB
system being chosen over COFDM because of the known reception
problems, but the story has it that extreme lobbying by Zenith and an
amalgam of patent holders relative to the 8-VSB system held sway and
we have what we now have.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at 

Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 21, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Steve at Verizon wrote:
There's a lot of this going on these days, and not just at the Fed  
level. Many states are selling the rights to the future income from  
the tobacco settlement and from their toll road tolls.  And it's  
not ideology, just shortsighted desire by both parties for revenue  
to spend .


This is a consequence of the inability to raise sufficient current  
revenue through taxation. And that is a consequence of the squealing  
hogs who insist that mansions and private jets are a more worthy  
expenditure than taking care of children and the infirm: the Gold as  
God crowd.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread mike
Damn those who think of themselves and their family before the State..

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:39 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 On Jun 21, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Steve at Verizon wrote:

 There's a lot of this going on these days, and not just at the Fed level.
 Many states are selling the rights to the future income from the tobacco
 settlement and from their toll road tolls.  And it's not ideology, just
 shortsighted desire by both parties for revenue to spend .


 This is a consequence of the inability to raise sufficient current revenue
 through taxation. And that is a consequence of the squealing hogs who insist
 that mansions and private jets are a more worthy expenditure than taking
 care of children and the infirm: the Gold as God crowd.



 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 21, 2009, at 4:07 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:

In fact, it is very difficult for
consumers to obtain and be able to compare receiver specs other than
screen size and resolution.


That was my major gripe when shopping for a converter box. I'm sure  
that the Tivax box I have at the office is not as good as the RCA box  
I have at home, but the Tivax box got better reviews.


I wonder if the FCC could require some key specifications to be  
disclosed by vendors. After all the acclaimed free market can not  
function in the absence of information. Back when I used to be a high- 
fidelity fan I routinely compared specifications on various types of  
gear. So strange to have that information kept secret.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 21, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Kill is a verb along with die.  How ever one indicates action taken  
upon that person and the other indicates a passive type of action.


Would not die firmly put the responsibility for the act on the  
person doing the dying?


He was killed by lightning. vs. He died of natural causes.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 21, 2009, at 4:44 PM, mike wrote:

Damn those who think of themselves and their family before the State..


Using words to hide true meaning. What is the State. This is not  
North Korea or Iran. This is a democratic state. There is nothing  
wrong with people banding together to take care of common concerns  
like taking care of sick children or providing medical care for the  
infirm. I see nothing to commend a cruel dog-eat-dog regime.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread mike
Some states have good Samaritan laws on the books so standing by is a crime.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:57 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 On Jun 21, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:

 Case in point.  May people recite the Ten commandments and say the 5th (in
 my church, in others the 6th) commandment says that you shall not kill.
  However a better rendering of that commandment is you shall not murder.  A
 very specific term that indicates the illegal taking of another person life.


 Hence ignoring a dying man is deemed perfectly fine since the man is doing
 the dying and observation of the event is not connected with killing?

 I guess this terminology would thwart the anti-abortion folks too.

 Very interesting point of view.



 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Indecent Language

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar
WAMU just broadcast an apology for indecent language broadcast  
earlier today during technical difficulties. Did anyone hear what  
happened?



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread mike
Indeed, indeed...people..the community banding together...not the STATE
demanding it under penalty of imprisonment.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:10 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 On Jun 21, 2009, at 4:44 PM, mike wrote:

 Damn those who think of themselves and their family before the State..


 Using words to hide true meaning. What is the State. This is not North
 Korea or Iran. This is a democratic state. There is nothing wrong with
 people banding together to take care of common concerns like taking care of
 sick children or providing medical care for the infirm. I see nothing to
 commend a cruel dog-eat-dog regime.



 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread mike
http://www.houstonpress.com/2009-06-18/music/byte-this/

Interesting article about web sites cropping up selling 'used' mp3's you
maybe want to be rid of.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread Jeff Wright
This is a consequence of the inability of our elected officials to behave
like adults and not repeatedly overspend the current levels taxation. And
that is a consequence of the squealing hogs who insist that anything is a
worthy expenditure: the state as God crowd.

FTFY


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread Jeff Wright
 Using words to hide true meaning. What is the State. This is not
 North Korea or Iran. This is a democratic state. 

That only shows how little you know of our system.  It is a republic, not a
democracy.

If it were a democracy, the citizenry would be voting every single thing up
or down.

 There is nothing
 wrong with people banding together to take care of common concerns
 like taking care of sick children or providing medical care for the
 infirm. I see nothing to commend a cruel dog-eat-dog regime.

Sorry for you 49.9%, but we 50.1% have plans for you.  If you have any
objections, the complaint line forms out back.  Pick up a complimentary
blindfold and cigarette on the way out.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 21, 2009, at 5:20 PM, mike wrote:
Some states have good Samaritan laws on the books so standing by is  
a crime.


Without such laws the Good Samaritan would risk prosecution for less  
then perfect assistance. Having such a law shields the person who  
wants to do the right thing. Of course in your dog-eat-dog world that  
would not be seen as a good thing.


Maybe we would be better off if the state provided us with a Soylent  
Green style of exit. That would take care of the sick and the poor  
and provide more fuel for the hogs?



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 21, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Case in point.  May people recite the Ten commandments and say the  
5th (in my church, in others the 6th) commandment says that you  
shall not kill.  However a better rendering of that commandment is  
you shall not murder.  A very specific term that indicates the  
illegal taking of another person life.


Hence ignoring a dying man is deemed perfectly fine since the man is  
doing the dying and observation of the event is not connected with  
killing?


I guess this terminology would thwart the anti-abortion folks too.

Very interesting point of view.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Indecent Language

2009-06-21 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:16 PM, t.piwowart...@tjpa.com wrote:

 WAMU just broadcast an apology for indecent language broadcast earlier
 today during technical difficulties. Did anyone hear what happened?

  I did not hear it, but I would supposed that someone said something
that Gorge Carlin might appreciate when they thought their microphone
was turned off.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:49 PM, t.piwowart...@tjpa.com wrote:

 I wonder if the FCC could require some key specifications to be disclosed by
 vendors. After all the acclaimed free market can not function in the absence
 of information. Back when I used to be a high-fidelity fan I routinely
 compared specifications on various types of gear. So strange to have that
 information kept secret.

  The ready availability of important specs about televisions is
nothing at all like it is, and has been, in the the audio world.  It
is almost as if the makers are not anxious to reveal their specs to
the buying public.  To a degree, this is the fault of the consumers
themselves.  Neither the ordinary consumer or their governmental
representatives have pushed for this, and lest we forget, our
governmental representatives are consumers just like us.  Look how
hard it has been to get reasonably informative ingredient and
nutrition labeling on food products, and food is much more important
to our lives than any TV set...at least among folks that I hang out
with.  What are the chances for mandated TV spec availability?  Zilch.
 What are the chances for the voluntary availability of TV set
receiver specs?  Less zilch, but not promising at all.

  So here we now are.  The industry and the industry regulator, the
FCC, have handed the reception problems off to the typically
non-expert consumer to solve.   On top of that daunting chore, we
can't even get the necessary info about how well a given TV set's
receiver is expected to perform except through internet forums that
are, for the most part. opinions and anecdotal experiences.  While not
useless, such forums do not constitute actual laboratory measurements
of the performance of the TV receiver circuitry.  That is what we, the
unwashed public needs in order to do our work.  Do the right thing, TV
manufacturers.  Make those missing specs as readily available as you
do your screen size, resolution and contrast ratios.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:26 PM, mikexha...@gmail.com wrote:

 http://www.houstonpress.com/2009-06-18/music/byte-this/

 Interesting article about web sites cropping up selling 'used' mp3's you
 maybe want to be rid of.

  Wait until the RIAA gets wind of this!

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Recommendations for good iPod to Itunes (reverse) copy

2009-06-21 Thread Steve at Verizon
Thank you Tom. However, I committed the unpardonable sin of omitting my 
OS. Am looking for a Windows app.


t.piwowar wrote:

On Jun 21, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Steve at Verizon wrote:
Sounds pretty good. However, I just want to copy tracks manually, not 
sync. Does it handle that?


I use iPodDisk.app for that. Free. The iPod appears on the desktop as 
a disk image with folders as you would expect.


www.nabble.com


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*





*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread Jeff Wright
From what I understand of the Amazon TOS, this is kosher.

But, since the recording labels get screwed out their cut on the 2nd, 3rd
and 17th rounds, this is a bad thing.

 -Original Message-
://www.houstonpress.com/2009-06-18/music/byte-this/
 
 Interesting article about web sites cropping up selling 'used' mp3's
 you
 maybe want to be rid of.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread mike
I remember Garth Brooks? was trying to get royalties from used sales of his
albums.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Jeff Wright jswri...@gmail.com wrote:

 From what I understand of the Amazon TOS, this is kosher.

 But, since the recording labels get screwed out their cut on the 2nd, 3rd
 and 17th rounds, this is a bad thing.

  -Original Message-
 ://www.houstonpress.com/2009-06-18/music/byte-this/
 
  Interesting article about web sites cropping up selling 'used' mp3's
  you
  maybe want to be rid of.


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread Jeff Miles
	This is only a bad thing if you happen to own stock in or own one of  
these record labels. It's good for everybody else. Can you imagine  
owning a Ford car and when you sold it or traded it in having to send  
a portion of the sale or trade in value back to Ford? I understand how  
copying is illegal, but a physical product, once you've purchased it,  
is yours to do with as you please. At least as far as selling it goes.


Jeff M


On Jun 21, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:


From what I understand of the Amazon TOS, this is kosher.

But, since the recording labels get screwed out their cut on the  
2nd, 3rd

and 17th rounds, this is a bad thing.


-Original Message-

://www.houstonpress.com/2009-06-18/music/byte-this/


Interesting article about web sites cropping up selling 'used' mp3's
you
maybe want to be rid of.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **

*



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread mike
That's your man, Tom Daschle...


On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:57 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:


 Maybe we would be better off if the state provided us with a Soylent Green
 style of exit. That would take care of the sick and the poor and provide
 more fuel for the hogs?



 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread mike
True, but how often have people been ripping mp3's off their cds and then
selling them to used stores?



On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Jeff Miles jmile...@charter.net wrote:

This is only a bad thing if you happen to own stock in or own one of
 these record labels. It's good for everybody else. Can you imagine owning a
 Ford car and when you sold it or traded it in having to send a portion of
 the sale or trade in value back to Ford? I understand how copying is
 illegal, but a physical product, once you've purchased it, is yours to do
 with as you please. At least as far as selling it goes.

 Jeff M



 On Jun 21, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:

  From what I understand of the Amazon TOS, this is kosher.

 But, since the recording labels get screwed out their cut on the 2nd, 3rd
 and 17th rounds, this is a bad thing.

  -Original Message-

 ://www.houstonpress.com/2009-06-18/music/byte-this/


 Interesting article about web sites cropping up selling 'used' mp3's
 you
 maybe want to be rid of.



 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

According to some copyright people that is not the case.

You only buy the rights to listen to it, you do not buy the physical 
ownership of that piece of music.


Same goes with software.

Some artists are pushing to get paid for each time their music is 
played on the radio.


Stewart


At 06:59 PM 6/21/2009, you wrote:
This is only a bad thing if you happen to own stock in or 
own one of

these record labels. It's good for everybody else. Can you imagine
owning a Ford car and when you sold it or traded it in having to send
a portion of the sale or trade in value back to Ford? I understand how
copying is illegal, but a physical product, once you've purchased it,
is yours to do with as you please. At least as far as selling it goes.

Jeff M


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
No it tells of the state of the person not indicating any assumption 
on how he died.


The person is dead.  How did he die?

By the way Lightening does not kill you it disrupts the electrical 
function of your body and that kills you!  :-)  (From a medical perspective.)


Stewart


At 04:01 PM 6/21/2009, you wrote:
Would not die firmly put the responsibility for the act on the

person doing the dying?

He was killed by lightning. vs. He died of natural causes.


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Unlike you Tom I do not try and prejudge anyone for what happened.

All we know is what was reported.  cable guy showed up did work went 
to leave customer came out grabbed onto steering wheel of moving 
vehicle (I assume it was steering wheel).


Other than that we can make no assumptions or judgements.

The other part of the article does mention that the customer died of 
injuries sustained and does not state anymore.  (Did he get caught 
under a wheel?  did he get dragged?)


Newspapers and news media very often use their headlines to catch 
your attention to grab you not caring that they themselves have made 
a prejudgment of what happened.


I can detail a case of this, but it is long and I do not want to take 
up the lists time.


It is horrible no matter what.

Of course if it had been Charter, I could not see the guy getting 
injured by a tricycle.


Stewart


At 03:57 PM 6/21/2009, you wrote:


Hence ignoring a dying man is deemed perfectly fine since the man is
doing the dying and observation of the event is not connected with
killing?

I guess this terminology would thwart the anti-abortion folks too.

Very interesting point of view.


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread Jeff Miles
	I guess that would fall under illegal copying, but not quite sure.  
Aren't we allowed to make a copy for ourselves of something we own, as  
long as we don't sell that copy? But selling the original shouldn't be  
a problem.
	The thing I'm confused about is how is a person supposed to know if  
an MP3 is the original or a copy. Is there some kind of company  
digital signature one the file that doesn't get copied over if someone  
makes a bunch of illegal copies? I deal with so little music files  
that I'm really out of my depth on this subject.


Jeff M


On Jun 21, 2009, at 5:16 PM, mike wrote:

True, but how often have people been ripping mp3's off their cds and  
then

selling them to used stores?



On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Jeff Miles jmile...@charter.net  
wrote:


  This is only a bad thing if you happen to own stock in or own  
one of
these record labels. It's good for everybody else. Can you imagine  
owning a
Ford car and when you sold it or traded it in having to send a  
portion of

the sale or trade in value back to Ford? I understand how copying is
illegal, but a physical product, once you've purchased it, is yours  
to do

with as you please. At least as far as selling it goes.

Jeff M



On Jun 21, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:

From what I understand of the Amazon TOS, this is kosher.


But, since the recording labels get screwed out their cut on the  
2nd, 3rd

and 17th rounds, this is a bad thing.

-Original Message-



://www.houstonpress.com/2009-06-18/music/byte-this/



Interesting article about web sites cropping up selling 'used'  
mp3's

you
maybe want to be rid of.




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ 
  **

*




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **

*




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **

*



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread Jeff Miles
	According to some... But is it the law? Like I said, I can  
understand making numerous, or even one copy and selling that, while  
keeping the original for yourself. Making a copy and then selling the  
original is walking a very thin line. But just selling the original? I  
think that would be a tough sell in court on the part of the music or  
software companies. I'm sure some courts would side with the  
companies, but others, I'm also sure, would overturn them.
	As for the radio stations, I'm surprised they haven't been doing this  
all along. They've been doing this with old TV shows for years.


Jeff M


On Jun 21, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:


According to some copyright people that is not the case.

You only buy the rights to listen to it, you do not buy the physical  
ownership of that piece of music.


Same goes with software.

Some artists are pushing to get paid for each time their music is  
played on the radio.


Stewart


At 06:59 PM 6/21/2009, you wrote:
   This is only a bad thing if you happen to own stock in or  
own one of

these record labels. It's good for everybody else. Can you imagine
owning a Ford car and when you sold it or traded it in having to send
a portion of the sale or trade in value back to Ford? I understand  
how

copying is illegal, but a physical product, once you've purchased it,
is yours to do with as you please. At least as far as selling it  
goes.


Jeff M


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **

*



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread Bill Wajert

Ther Problem with Socialism (what the liberals want) is that You
Eventually Run Out Of Other Peoples Money

Illogical Tom wrote:


On Jun 21, 2009, at 4:44 PM, mike wrote:

Damn those who think of themselves and their family before the State..


Using words to hide true meaning. What is the State. This is not North 
Korea or Iran. This is a democratic state. There is nothing wrong with 
people banding together to take care of common concerns like taking care 
of sick children or providing medical care for the infirm. I see nothing 
to commend a cruel dog-eat-dog regime.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] I Got 9

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 21, 2009, at 6:47 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:

While not
useless, such forums do not constitute actual laboratory measurements
of the performance of the TV receiver circuitry.  That is what we, the
unwashed public needs in order to do our work.  Do the right thing, TV
manufacturers.  Make those missing specs as readily available as you
do your screen size, resolution and contrast ratios.


Consumer Reports perhaps? Their last review of set top boxes was not  
very thorough.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Recommendations for good iPod to Itunes (reverse) copy

2009-06-21 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 21, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Steve at Verizon wrote:
Thank you Tom. However, I committed the unpardonable sin of  
omitting my OS. Am looking for a Windows app.


Sorry, you are screwed -- hehe.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread Jeff Miles

Insert illegal after keeping the original for yourself, below.

Jeff M


On Jun 21, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Jeff Miles wrote:

	According to some... But is it the law? Like I said, I can  
understand making numerous, or even one copy and selling that, while  
keeping the original for yourself. Making a copy and then selling  
the original is walking a very thin line. But just selling the  
original? I think that would be a tough sell in court on the part of  
the music or software companies. I'm sure some courts would side  
with the companies, but others, I'm also sure, would overturn them.
	As for the radio stations, I'm surprised they haven't been doing  
this all along. They've been doing this with old TV shows for years.


Jeff M


On Jun 21, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:


According to some copyright people that is not the case.

You only buy the rights to listen to it, you do not buy the  
physical ownership of that piece of music.


Same goes with software.

Some artists are pushing to get paid for each time their music is  
played on the radio.


Stewart


At 06:59 PM 6/21/2009, you wrote:
  This is only a bad thing if you happen to own stock in or  
own one of

these record labels. It's good for everybody else. Can you imagine
owning a Ford car and when you sold it or traded it in having to  
send
a portion of the sale or trade in value back to Ford? I understand  
how
copying is illegal, but a physical product, once you've purchased  
it,
is yours to do with as you please. At least as far as selling it  
goes.


Jeff M


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **

*



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **

*



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread Jeff Wright
   This is only a bad thing if you happen to own stock in or own one
 of
 these record labels. It's good for everybody else. Can you imagine
 owning a Ford car and when you sold it or traded it in having to send
 a portion of the sale or trade in value back to Ford? I understand how
 copying is illegal, but a physical product, once you've purchased it,
 is yours to do with as you please. At least as far as selling it goes.

Yes, that was my point.

Can you imagine the families of Picasso or Monet demanding a cut from
Cristies every time one of their paintings is re-sold?

Copying music from a buddy, who purchased the music, for personal use
shouldn't be illegal.  Nor should making a copy of music or movies that you
legally own.  Only copying someone else's work and passing it off as your
own creation should be illegal.  

The recording labels and artists need to realize that they don't have a
right to an unlimited revenue stream.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
It does not matter what we want, but what has been passed into law 
and what the law is.


That is not the way they define it, and unless you want to appear 
before the court and pay judgments such as the recently rendered 
one.  I would not assume any of that.


Stewart


At 09:40 PM 6/21/2009, you wrote:

Yes, that was my point.

Can you imagine the families of Picasso or Monet demanding a cut from
Cristies every time one of their paintings is re-sold?

Copying music from a buddy, who purchased the music, for personal use
shouldn't be illegal.  Nor should making a copy of music or movies that you
legally own.  Only copying someone else's work and passing it off as your
own creation should be illegal.

The recording labels and artists need to realize that they don't have a
right to an unlimited revenue stream.


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread Jeff Wright
IP is out of control Rev.

It's time we take it back.

I never bought any crippled music during the 7-odd years the RIAA tried to
cram DRM down our throats.  Not so ironically, music piracy brought them to
their senses and they finally backed off of the DRM demand.  But, I did buy
used CDs and ripped them to MP3 for use on my MP3 players.  

The RIAA would like to see that outlawed as well.

http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/01/are-personal-copies-digital-music-files
-unauthorized-or-not

There was nothing to stop me from reselling that CD again.  How is that any
different than directly buying ripped MP3s from an individual?

 -Original Message-
 It does not matter what we want, but what has been passed into law
 and what the law is.
 
 That is not the way they define it, and unless you want to appear
 before the court and pay judgments such as the recently rendered
 one.  I would not assume any of that.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread Tony B
This story may actually offer a huge clue. Or not. But I can see
myself getting pretty darned angry if this happened to me.

and she replied if I wanted to be sure to have a working phone I should 
upgrade to FIOS.

http://consumerist.com/5298449/verizons-new-marketing-pitch-squirrels-eat-old-phone-lines-so-upgrade-to-fios-for-guaranteed-service


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Jeff Wrightjswri...@gmail.com wrote:

 Copying music from a buddy, who purchased the music, for personal use
 shouldn't be illegal.  Nor should making a copy of music or movies that you
 legally own.

  The Motion Picture Association of America says that you do not have
the right to make a copy of a movie that you have legally purchased.


 The recording labels and artists need to realize that they don't have a
 right to an unlimited revenue stream.

  Someone needs to inform the previously mentioned MPAA as well as the
RIAA of your feelings about this.  They do not share your beliefs.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

I am not advocating anything.

I run up against the same restrictions if not more.

If I publish my printed service I better have all the correct 
copyrights, even to the hymnal I got the service out of to put it up 
on the web.


That can be as many as 10 different copyright holders.  Therefore I 
do not publish my printed service.


By the way that includes a hymnal that the church bought and paid for 
(even to the development costs) yet we have to purchase copyright 
permission to print it!


Like I said I may not agree with it, but currently that is the law 
and that is what it says.


Stewart


At 10:08 PM 6/21/2009, you wrote:

IP is out of control Rev.

It's time we take it back.

I never bought any crippled music during the 7-odd years the RIAA tried to
cram DRM down our throats.  Not so ironically, music piracy brought them to
their senses and they finally backed off of the DRM demand.  But, I did buy
used CDs and ripped them to MP3 for use on my MP3 players.

The RIAA would like to see that outlawed as well.

http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/01/are-personal-copies-digital-music-files
-unauthorized-or-not

There was nothing to stop me from reselling that CD again.  How is that any
different than directly buying ripped MP3s from an individual?


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Killing flat rate?

2009-06-21 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/The-Metered-Billing-Fight-Is-About-To-Get-Ugly-103043

Interesting story on how the industry wants to kill flat rate billing 
for the Internet.


Stewart

Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] selling used mp3's

2009-06-21 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
The MPAA almost stopped the VHS machine from being able to record and 
it is also the one who tried to stop DVD recorders from being a reality.


Notice the warning on the beginning of a movie.  It is only for 
personal or home use.


I have to get a license to show a movie to a group at church!!!

The communication industry is a minefield of regulations and 
copyrights that has to be navigated very carefully.


Stewart


At 10:19 PM 6/21/2009, you wrote:

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Jeff Wrightjswri...@gmail.com wrote:

 Copying music from a buddy, who purchased the music, for personal use
 shouldn't be illegal.  Nor should making a copy of music or movies that you
 legally own.

  The Motion Picture Association of America says that you do not have
the right to make a copy of a movie that you have legally purchased.


 The recording labels and artists need to realize that they don't have a
 right to an unlimited revenue stream.

  Someone needs to inform the previously mentioned MPAA as well as the
RIAA of your feelings about this.  They do not share your beliefs.

  Steve


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Unhappy Verizon Customer Killed

2009-06-21 Thread db

Oh wicked!

db

mike wrote:

A sad, sad statement on the perception of the telcos today that Eric felt he
even had to say this.  Course he doesn't work for qwest where the driver
would have backed over the customer to ensure he wouldn't have to return to
fix the problem he had just made worse.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Eric S. Sande esa...@erols.com wrote:

  

We'll probably never know, so we can speculate all day.

Verizon is cooperating with the police investigation.




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*





*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*

  



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*