Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Ondrej Dockal]

Jonah, thanks for taking care of this. If we will revert it after RedDeer
is pushed, I think it is safe to give it a try. Also, If Jetty should be
built somewhere with a fix it might provide a space for updating all deps
in all project, though, in quite late time.

Thanks

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Jonah Graham  wrote:

> Hi Ondre/Nitin,
>
> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738
> decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think
> it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged.
>
> Thanks
> Jonah
>
>
>
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham  wrote:
>
>> Hi Ondrej,
>>
>> AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from
>> reddeer.
>>
>> 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4
>> (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j
>> [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found
>>
>> So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is unintentionally
>> breaking WTP.
>>
>> Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think there
>> is actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just need a
>> resolution of WTP first.
>>
>> I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jonah
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this
>>> time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can
>>> be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my
>>> side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle
>>> this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed.
>>>
>>> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in
>>> release, not sure if that can help.
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console
>>> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Ondrej,

 I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2
 site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from
 Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.

 Markus,

 Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you
 mean that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many
 projects, then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp,
 and reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06
 release entirely.

 Nitin,

 I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is
 still publishing slf4j 2.0.

 Jonah
 ~~~
 Jonah Graham
 Kichwa Coders
 www.kichwacoders.com


 On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?
>
> [1]:
> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer <
> mkna...@eclipsesource.com> wrote:
>
>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially
>> because the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2
>> repository for building. I will try that now.
>>
>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is
>> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible 
>> to
>> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Markus
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution*
>>> (Thanks Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done 
>>> that I
>>> don't know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means
>>> that Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>>>
>>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
>>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
>>> jetty 10 from other sources.
>>>
>>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
>>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
>>> please.
>>>
>>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
>>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
>>> 

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Jonah Graham]

Hi Ondre/Nitin,

https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738
decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think
it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged.

Thanks
Jonah




~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com


On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham  wrote:

> Hi Ondrej,
>
> AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from
> reddeer.
>
> 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4
> (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j
> [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found
>
> So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is unintentionally
> breaking WTP.
>
> Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think there is
> actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just need a
> resolution of WTP first.
>
> I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment.
>
> Thanks,
> Jonah
>
>
>
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this
>> time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can
>> be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my
>> side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle
>> this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed.
>>
>> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in release,
>> not sure if that can help.
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console
>> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ondrej,
>>>
>>> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2
>>> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from
>>> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.
>>>
>>> Markus,
>>>
>>> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean
>>> that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects,
>>> then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and
>>> reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release
>>> entirely.
>>>
>>> Nitin,
>>>
>>> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is
>>> still publishing slf4j 2.0.
>>>
>>> Jonah
>>> ~~~
>>> Jonah Graham
>>> Kichwa Coders
>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Folks,

 Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
 requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
 guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?

 [1]:
 https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/

 On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer 
 wrote:

> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially
> because the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2
> repository for building. I will try that now.
>
> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is
> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to
> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.
>
> Thanks
> Markus
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution*
>> (Thanks Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done 
>> that I
>> don't know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means
>> that Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>>
>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
>> jetty 10 from other sources.
>>
>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
>> please.
>>
>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
>> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel
>> output repo!
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Jonah
>>
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
>
>
> 

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Jonah Graham]

Hi Jesse,

Thanks for the update - that is great.

@all:

Not sure how we are going to handle a respin to pull in the new version
yet. AFAICT rap, reddeer(?), webtools and platform will all have to respin
again so that only jetty 10.0.5 is in the 2021-06 release.

Jonah


~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com




On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:27, Jesse McConnell 
wrote:

> I believe the issue with Jetty is resolved and we are looking to make
> another release for you folks shortly.
>
> --
> jesse mcconnell
> jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 3:15 PM Ondrej Dockal  wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this
>> time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can
>> be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my
>> side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle
>> this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed.
>>
>> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in release,
>> not sure if that can help.
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console
>> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ondrej,
>>>
>>> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2
>>> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from
>>> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.
>>>
>>> Markus,
>>>
>>> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean
>>> that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects,
>>> then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and
>>> reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release
>>> entirely.
>>>
>>> Nitin,
>>>
>>> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is
>>> still publishing slf4j 2.0.
>>>
>>> Jonah
>>> ~~~
>>> Jonah Graham
>>> Kichwa Coders
>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Folks,

 Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
 requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
 guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?

 [1]:
 https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/

 On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer 
 wrote:

> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially
> because the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2
> repository for building. I will try that now.
>
> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is
> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to
> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.
>
> Thanks
> Markus
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution*
>> (Thanks Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done 
>> that I
>> don't know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means
>> that Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>>
>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
>> jetty 10 from other sources.
>>
>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
>> please.
>>
>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
>> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel
>> output repo!
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Jonah
>>
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
>
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Jesse McConnell]

I believe the issue with Jetty is resolved and we are looking to make
another release for you folks shortly.

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com


On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 3:15 PM Ondrej Dockal  wrote:

> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this
> time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can
> be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my
> side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle
> this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed.
>
> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in release,
> not sure if that can help.
>
> [1]:
> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console
> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham 
> wrote:
>
>> Ondrej,
>>
>> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2
>> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from
>> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.
>>
>> Markus,
>>
>> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean
>> that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects,
>> then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and
>> reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release
>> entirely.
>>
>> Nitin,
>>
>> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is
>> still publishing slf4j 2.0.
>>
>> Jonah
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
>>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
>>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially
 because the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2
 repository for building. I will try that now.

 slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is
 now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to
 remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.

 Thanks
 Markus

 On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham 
 wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution*
> (Thanks Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that 
> I
> don't know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that
> Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>
> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
> jetty 10 from other sources.
>
> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
> please.
>
> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel
> output repo!
>
> Thank you,
> Jonah
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>


 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

>>> ___
>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Jonah Graham]

Hi Ondrej,

AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from
reddeer.

15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4
(org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j
[2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found

So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is unintentionally
breaking WTP.

Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think there is
actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just need a
resolution of WTP first.

I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment.

Thanks,
Jonah




~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com


On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:

> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this
> time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can
> be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my
> side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle
> this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed.
>
> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in release,
> not sure if that can help.
>
> [1]:
> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console
> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham 
> wrote:
>
>> Ondrej,
>>
>> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2
>> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from
>> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.
>>
>> Markus,
>>
>> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean
>> that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects,
>> then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and
>> reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release
>> entirely.
>>
>> Nitin,
>>
>> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is
>> still publishing slf4j 2.0.
>>
>> Jonah
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
>>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
>>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially
 because the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2
 repository for building. I will try that now.

 slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is
 now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to
 remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.

 Thanks
 Markus

 On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham 
 wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution*
> (Thanks Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that 
> I
> don't know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that
> Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>
> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
> jetty 10 from other sources.
>
> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
> please.
>
> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel
> output repo!
>
> Thank you,
> Jonah
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>


 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

>>> ___
>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>
>> 

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Ondrej Dockal]

Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this time
it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can be
seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my
side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle
this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed.

I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in release,
not sure if that can help.

[1]:
https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console
[2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham  wrote:

> Ondrej,
>
> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2
> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from
> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.
>
> Markus,
>
> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean
> that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects,
> then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and
> reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release
> entirely.
>
> Nitin,
>
> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is
> still publishing slf4j 2.0.
>
> Jonah
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially because
>>> the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 repository for
>>> building. I will try that now.
>>>
>>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is
>>> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to
>>> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Markus
>>>
>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi folks,

 Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks
 Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't
 know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that
 Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.

 However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
 because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
 jetty 10 from other sources.

 Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
 ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
 please.

 As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
 Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
 contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output
 repo!

 Thank you,
 Jonah

 ~~~
 Jonah Graham
 Kichwa Coders
 www.kichwacoders.com
 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Markus Knauer]

Jonah, your investigation and explanation sounds plausible, and matches
what I found out.

We've been working on an upgrade of both RAP Runtime and RAP Tools to Jetty
10.0.4 in the last hours. This hopefully matches what other projects are
going to contribute.
And in addition to that we've been reworking all (transitive) dependencies
to SLF4J, ensuring that we are delivering the 1.7 version from our p2
repositories.

All is committed and pushed to SimRel now.

Thanks
Markus

On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 18:47, Jonah Graham  wrote:

> Ondrej,
>
> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2
> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from
> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.
>
> Markus,
>
> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean
> that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects,
> then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and
> reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release
> entirely.
>
> Nitin,
>
> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is
> still publishing slf4j 2.0.
>
> Jonah
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially because
>>> the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 repository for
>>> building. I will try that now.
>>>
>>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is
>>> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to
>>> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Markus
>>>
>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi folks,

 Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks
 Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't
 know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that
 Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.

 However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
 because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
 jetty 10 from other sources.

 Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
 ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
 please.

 As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
 Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
 contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output
 repo!

 Thank you,
 Jonah

 ~~~
 Jonah Graham
 Kichwa Coders
 www.kichwacoders.com
 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Nitin Dahyabhai]

Thanks Jonah,

I'm adding the bundle using the Orbit name to the relevant Server Tools
feature now. I guess I have my own RC2a to create and submit.

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:47 PM Jonah Graham  wrote:

> Ondrej,
>
> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2
> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from
> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.
>
> Markus,
>
> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean
> that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects,
> then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and
> reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release
> entirely.
>
> Nitin,
>
> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is
> still publishing slf4j 2.0.
>
> Jonah
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially because
>>> the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 repository for
>>> building. I will try that now.
>>>
>>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is
>>> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to
>>> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Markus
>>>
>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi folks,

 Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks
 Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't
 know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that
 Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.

 However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
 because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
 jetty 10 from other sources.

 Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
 ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
 please.

 As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
 Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
 contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output
 repo!

 Thank you,
 Jonah

 ~~~
 Jonah Graham
 Kichwa Coders
 www.kichwacoders.com
 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>


-- 
Regards,
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP PMC
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

[Jonah Graham]

Hi Nitin,

Jetty have started rolling another update - see
https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/pull/6381 and
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454#c15

Jonah
~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com


On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 09:40, Nitin Dahyabhai  wrote:

> It looks like jetty-jndi and jetty-plus did not have their SLF4J ranges
> lowered under 2.0, so the Jetty sites from Platform and WTP both still
> contain slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:20 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30.
>> Please let me know if there are any problems.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Sravan
>>
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Nitin Dahyabhai
> Eclipse WTP PMC
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Jonah Graham]

Ondrej,

I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2 site,
but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from Platform
until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.

Markus,

Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean
that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects,
then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and
reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release
entirely.

Nitin,

I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is still
publishing slf4j 2.0.

Jonah
~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com


On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?
>
> [1]:
> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer 
> wrote:
>
>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially because
>> the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 repository for
>> building. I will try that now.
>>
>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is now
>> referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to
>> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Markus
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks
>>> Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't
>>> know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that Eclipse
>>> Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>>>
>>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
>>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
>>> jetty 10 from other sources.
>>>
>>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
>>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
>>> please.
>>>
>>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
>>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
>>> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output
>>> repo!
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Jonah
>>>
>>> ~~~
>>> Jonah Graham
>>> Kichwa Coders
>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>> ___
>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

[Sravan K Lakkimsetti]

Thanks Patrick for understanding I will fix it in 2021-09 M1.

 

Thanks

Sravan

 

From: Patrick Tasse  
Sent: 09 June 2021 21:49
To: Cross project issues 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform 
contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

 

Ok, yes we can put back the workaround that we added in M2.

 

If it's fixed in 2021-09 we'll remove it again like we did in M3 ;)

 

Thanks,

Patrick

 

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:11 PM Sravan K Lakkimsetti mailto:sravankum...@in.ibm.com> > wrote:

Hi,

 

Can org.slf4j.api be added to target platform in 
https://git.eclipse.org/c/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git/tree/releng/org.eclipse.tracecompass.target/tracecompass-e4.20.target
 (we get it from Orbit see 
https://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator.git/tree/eclipse.platform.releng.prereqs.sdk/eclipse-sdk-prereqs.target#n73)
  and/or can this be added to 
https://git.eclipse.org/c/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git/tree/rcp/org.eclipse.tracecompass.rcp.product/tracing.product
 in the plugins section.

 

We mirror org.slf4j.api from orbit. My preference here is to fetch from orbit.

 

I would prefer not rebuild platform again.

 

Thanks 

Sravan

 

From: Patrick Tasse mailto:patrick.ta...@gmail.com> > 
Sent: 09 June 2021 20:59
To: Cross project issues mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> >
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform 
contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

 

Hi,

 

We depend on platform which includes help feature.

The help feature used to depend on jetty.http 10.0.2 which depends on org.slf4j 
2.0, with Bundle-SymbolicName: slf4j.api

The help feature now depends on jetty.http 10.0.4 which depends on org.slf4j 
1.7, with Bundle-SymbolicName: org.slf4j.api

 

The help feature.xml used to include feature slf4j.api, this has just been 
removed.

 

So I believe the help feature.xml must now include feature org.slf4j.api 
instead?

 

Thanks,

Patrick

 

 

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:05 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti mailto:sravankum...@in.ibm.com> > wrote:

Based on https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg18389.html 
there are some places you will need slf4j version 2. In all other places we 
should be good with slf4j 1.7.30. 

 

Thanks

Sravan

 

From: Nitin Dahyabhai mailto:thatnit...@gmail.com> > 
Sent: 09 June 2021 19:36
To: Cross project issues mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> >
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform 
contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

 

WTP doesn't contribute it either, just the ones that were needed and not 
provided in the Platform build. What I find curious is that both 
https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/jetty/10.0.4/plugins/ and 
https://download.eclipse.org/webtools/jetty/10.0.4/repository/plugins/ ended up 
with the 2.0.0 jar in their output. What I find troubling is that we use 
jetty-plus to resolve some OSGI Require/Provide-Capability configuration once 
installed, so I expect our build will compile cleanly but the related 
functionality will fail to load properly. :(

 

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:45 AM Jonah Graham mailto:jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote:

:-( But the Platform contribution does not have slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1, is that 
because Platform doesn't use  jetty-jndi and jetty-plus but WTP does?

 

Thanks

Jonah




~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com  

 

 

On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 09:40, Nitin Dahyabhai mailto:thatnit...@gmail.com> > wrote:

It looks like jetty-jndi and jetty-plus did not have their SLF4J ranges lowered 
under 2.0, so the Jetty sites from Platform and WTP both still contain 
slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.

 

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:20 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti mailto:sravankum...@in.ibm.com> > wrote:

Hi,

 

I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30. Please 
let me know if there are any problems.

 

Thanks

Sravan

 

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
 
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




 

-- 

Regards,

Nitin Dahyabhai

Eclipse WTP PMC

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
 
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
 
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




 

-- 

Regards,

Nitin Dahyabhai

Eclipse WTP PMC

 

___

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

[Patrick Tasse]

Ok, yes we can put back the workaround that we added in M2.

If it's fixed in 2021-09 we'll remove it again like we did in M3 ;)

Thanks,
Patrick

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:11 PM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> Can org.slf4j.api be added to target platform in
> https://git.eclipse.org/c/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git/tree/releng/org.eclipse.tracecompass.target/tracecompass-e4.20.target
> (we get it from Orbit see
> https://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator.git/tree/eclipse.platform.releng.prereqs.sdk/eclipse-sdk-prereqs.target#n73)
>  and/or can this be added to
> https://git.eclipse.org/c/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git/tree/rcp/org.eclipse.tracecompass.rcp.product/tracing.product
> in the plugins section.
>
>
>
> We mirror org.slf4j.api from orbit. My preference here is to fetch from
> orbit.
>
>
>
> I would prefer not rebuild platform again.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Sravan
>
>
>
> *From:* Patrick Tasse 
> *Sent:* 09 June 2021 20:59
> *To:* Cross project issues 
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform
> contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We depend on platform which includes help feature.
>
> The help feature used to depend on jetty.http 10.0.2 which depends on
> org.slf4j 2.0, with Bundle-SymbolicName: slf4j.api
>
> The help feature now depends on jetty.http 10.0.4 which depends on
> org.slf4j 1.7, with Bundle-SymbolicName: org.slf4j.api
>
>
>
> The help feature.xml used to include feature slf4j.api, this has just been
> removed.
>
>
>
> So I believe the help feature.xml must now include feature org.slf4j.api
> instead?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:05 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Based on
> https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg18389.html
> there are some places you will need slf4j version 2. In all other places we
> should be good with slf4j 1.7.30.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Sravan
>
>
>
> *From:* Nitin Dahyabhai 
> *Sent:* 09 June 2021 19:36
> *To:* Cross project issues 
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform
> contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade
>
>
>
> WTP doesn't contribute it either, just the ones that were needed and not
> provided in the Platform build. What I find curious is that both
> https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/jetty/10.0.4/plugins/ and
> https://download.eclipse.org/webtools/jetty/10.0.4/repository/plugins/
> ended up with the 2.0.0 jar in their output. What I find troubling is that
> we use jetty-plus to resolve some OSGI Require/Provide-Capability
> configuration once installed, so I expect our build will compile cleanly
> but the related functionality will fail to load properly. :(
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:45 AM Jonah Graham 
> wrote:
>
> :-( But the Platform contribution does not have slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1, is
> that because Platform doesn't use  jetty-jndi and jetty-plus but WTP does?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Jonah
>
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 09:40, Nitin Dahyabhai  wrote:
>
> It looks like jetty-jndi and jetty-plus did not have their SLF4J ranges
> lowered under 2.0, so the Jetty sites from Platform and WTP both still
> contain slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:20 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30.
> Please let me know if there are any problems.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Sravan
>
>
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Nitin Dahyabhai
>
> Eclipse WTP PMC
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Nitin Dahyabhai
>
> Eclipse WTP PMC
>
>
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Bugzilla notifications flaky

[Ed Willink]

Hi

Issue retracted. Sorry for the noise. (Unless someone else has missing 
notifications too...)


    Regards

        Ed Willink


On 09/06/2021 15:23, Denis Roy wrote:


As mentioned in my response to your direct email to me, I've traced 
emails and they are received by your mail server. I've provided the 
tracking numbers for the Message IDs on your side (queued as number), 
but I've never heard back:


C32B420C8B55: to=, relay=mail.*.uk[78.*.3]:25, delay=5.7, 
delays=0.04/0/5.3/0.31, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued 
as 43029802C0)



I understand this is frustrating, but there's unfortunately nothing we 
can do, no matter which component of our infra you claim is flaky.



Denis



On 2021-06-09 10:16 a.m., Ed Willink wrote:

Hi

See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=574103

Bugzilla notifications seem to be down again, consequently many 
important Bug correspondences are getting lost just as RC2 comes to a 
difficult climax.


    Regards

        Ed Willink



___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

[Sravan K Lakkimsetti]

Hi,

 

Can org.slf4j.api be added to target platform in 
https://git.eclipse.org/c/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git/tree/releng/org.eclipse.tracecompass.target/tracecompass-e4.20.target
 (we get it from Orbit see 
https://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator.git/tree/eclipse.platform.releng.prereqs.sdk/eclipse-sdk-prereqs.target#n73)
  and/or can this be added to 
https://git.eclipse.org/c/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git/tree/rcp/org.eclipse.tracecompass.rcp.product/tracing.product
 in the plugins section.

 

We mirror org.slf4j.api from orbit. My preference here is to fetch from orbit.

 

I would prefer not rebuild platform again.

 

Thanks 

Sravan

 

From: Patrick Tasse  
Sent: 09 June 2021 20:59
To: Cross project issues 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform 
contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

 

Hi,

 

We depend on platform which includes help feature.

The help feature used to depend on jetty.http 10.0.2 which depends on org.slf4j 
2.0, with Bundle-SymbolicName: slf4j.api

The help feature now depends on jetty.http 10.0.4 which depends on org.slf4j 
1.7, with Bundle-SymbolicName: org.slf4j.api

 

The help feature.xml used to include feature slf4j.api, this has just been 
removed.

 

So I believe the help feature.xml must now include feature org.slf4j.api 
instead?

 

Thanks,

Patrick

 

 

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:05 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti mailto:sravankum...@in.ibm.com> > wrote:

Based on https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg18389.html 
there are some places you will need slf4j version 2. In all other places we 
should be good with slf4j 1.7.30. 

 

Thanks

Sravan

 

From: Nitin Dahyabhai mailto:thatnit...@gmail.com> > 
Sent: 09 June 2021 19:36
To: Cross project issues mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> >
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform 
contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

 

WTP doesn't contribute it either, just the ones that were needed and not 
provided in the Platform build. What I find curious is that both 
https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/jetty/10.0.4/plugins/ and 
https://download.eclipse.org/webtools/jetty/10.0.4/repository/plugins/ ended up 
with the 2.0.0 jar in their output. What I find troubling is that we use 
jetty-plus to resolve some OSGI Require/Provide-Capability configuration once 
installed, so I expect our build will compile cleanly but the related 
functionality will fail to load properly. :(

 

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:45 AM Jonah Graham mailto:jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote:

:-( But the Platform contribution does not have slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1, is that 
because Platform doesn't use  jetty-jndi and jetty-plus but WTP does?

 

Thanks

Jonah




~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com  

 

 

On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 09:40, Nitin Dahyabhai mailto:thatnit...@gmail.com> > wrote:

It looks like jetty-jndi and jetty-plus did not have their SLF4J ranges lowered 
under 2.0, so the Jetty sites from Platform and WTP both still contain 
slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.

 

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:20 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti mailto:sravankum...@in.ibm.com> > wrote:

Hi,

 

I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30. Please 
let me know if there are any problems.

 

Thanks

Sravan

 

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
 
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




 

-- 

Regards,

Nitin Dahyabhai

Eclipse WTP PMC

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
 
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
 
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




 

-- 

Regards,

Nitin Dahyabhai

Eclipse WTP PMC

 

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
 
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

[Patrick Tasse]

Hi,

We depend on platform which includes help feature.
The help feature used to depend on jetty.http 10.0.2 which depends on
org.slf4j 2.0, with Bundle-SymbolicName: slf4j.api
The help feature now depends on jetty.http 10.0.4 which depends on
org.slf4j 1.7, with Bundle-SymbolicName: org.slf4j.api

The help feature.xml used to include feature slf4j.api, this has just been
removed.

So I believe the help feature.xml must now include feature org.slf4j.api
instead?

Thanks,
Patrick


On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:05 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:

> Based on
> https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg18389.html
> there are some places you will need slf4j version 2. In all other places we
> should be good with slf4j 1.7.30.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Sravan
>
>
>
> *From:* Nitin Dahyabhai 
> *Sent:* 09 June 2021 19:36
> *To:* Cross project issues 
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform
> contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade
>
>
>
> WTP doesn't contribute it either, just the ones that were needed and not
> provided in the Platform build. What I find curious is that both
> https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/jetty/10.0.4/plugins/ and
> https://download.eclipse.org/webtools/jetty/10.0.4/repository/plugins/
> ended up with the 2.0.0 jar in their output. What I find troubling is that
> we use jetty-plus to resolve some OSGI Require/Provide-Capability
> configuration once installed, so I expect our build will compile cleanly
> but the related functionality will fail to load properly. :(
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:45 AM Jonah Graham 
> wrote:
>
> :-( But the Platform contribution does not have slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1, is
> that because Platform doesn't use  jetty-jndi and jetty-plus but WTP does?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Jonah
>
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 09:40, Nitin Dahyabhai  wrote:
>
> It looks like jetty-jndi and jetty-plus did not have their SLF4J ranges
> lowered under 2.0, so the Jetty sites from Platform and WTP both still
> contain slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:20 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30.
> Please let me know if there are any problems.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Sravan
>
>
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Nitin Dahyabhai
>
> Eclipse WTP PMC
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Nitin Dahyabhai
>
> Eclipse WTP PMC
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

[Sravan K Lakkimsetti]

Based on https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg18389.html 
there are some places you will need slf4j version 2. In all other places we 
should be good with slf4j 1.7.30. 

 

Thanks

Sravan

 

From: Nitin Dahyabhai  
Sent: 09 June 2021 19:36
To: Cross project issues 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform 
contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

 

WTP doesn't contribute it either, just the ones that were needed and not 
provided in the Platform build. What I find curious is that both 
https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/jetty/10.0.4/plugins/ and 
https://download.eclipse.org/webtools/jetty/10.0.4/repository/plugins/ ended up 
with the 2.0.0 jar in their output. What I find troubling is that we use 
jetty-plus to resolve some OSGI Require/Provide-Capability configuration once 
installed, so I expect our build will compile cleanly but the related 
functionality will fail to load properly. :(

 

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:45 AM Jonah Graham mailto:jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote:

:-( But the Platform contribution does not have slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1, is that 
because Platform doesn't use  jetty-jndi and jetty-plus but WTP does?

 

Thanks

Jonah




~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com  

 

 

On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 09:40, Nitin Dahyabhai mailto:thatnit...@gmail.com> > wrote:

It looks like jetty-jndi and jetty-plus did not have their SLF4J ranges lowered 
under 2.0, so the Jetty sites from Platform and WTP both still contain 
slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.

 

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:20 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti mailto:sravankum...@in.ibm.com> > wrote:

Hi,

 

I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30. Please 
let me know if there are any problems.

 

Thanks

Sravan

 

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
 
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




 

-- 

Regards,

Nitin Dahyabhai

Eclipse WTP PMC

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
 
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
 
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




 

-- 

Regards,

Nitin Dahyabhai

Eclipse WTP PMC


___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Ondrej Dockal]

Hi Folks,

Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP requiring
jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I guess I
have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?

[1]:
https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer 
wrote:

> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially because
> the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 repository for
> building. I will try that now.
>
> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is now
> referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to
> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.
>
> Thanks
> Markus
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham  wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks
>> Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't
>> know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that Eclipse
>> Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>>
>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
>> jetty 10 from other sources.
>>
>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
>> please.
>>
>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 contributed
>> to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output repo!
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Jonah
>>
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
>
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

[Patrick Tasse]

Please take note of https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454.

Our project's build is failing with the latest platform RC2 (rebuild).

Thanks,
Patrick

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:05 AM Nitin Dahyabhai 
wrote:

> WTP doesn't contribute it either, just the ones that were needed and not
> provided in the Platform build. What I find curious is that both
> https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/jetty/10.0.4/plugins/ and
> https://download.eclipse.org/webtools/jetty/10.0.4/repository/plugins/
> ended up with the 2.0.0 jar in their output. What I find troubling is that
> we use jetty-plus to resolve some OSGI Require/Provide-Capability
> configuration once installed, so I expect our build will compile cleanly
> but the related functionality will fail to load properly. :(
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:45 AM Jonah Graham 
> wrote:
>
>> :-( But the Platform contribution does not have slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1,
>> is that because Platform doesn't use  jetty-jndi and jetty-plus but WTP
>> does?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Jonah
>>
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 09:40, Nitin Dahyabhai 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like jetty-jndi and jetty-plus did not have their SLF4J ranges
>>> lowered under 2.0, so the Jetty sites from Platform and WTP both still
>>> contain slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:20 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
>>> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hi,



 I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30.
 Please let me know if there are any problems.



 Thanks

 Sravan

 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Nitin Dahyabhai
>>> Eclipse WTP PMC
>>> ___
>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Nitin Dahyabhai
> Eclipse WTP PMC
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Markus Knauer]

Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially because
the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 repository for
building. I will try that now.

slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is now
referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to
remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.

Thanks
Markus

On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham  wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks
> Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't
> know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that Eclipse
> Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>
> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel because
> they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or jetty 10
> from other sources.
>
> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
> please.
>
> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has Jetty
> 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 contributed to
> webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output repo!
>
> Thank you,
> Jonah
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problem with repo.eclipse.org and simrel gerrit verification

[Jeff Johnston]

I tried retriggering yesterday afternoon multiple times until about dinner
time.  It appears the problem was known so no issues.

-- Jeff J.

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 8:23 PM Jonah Graham  wrote:

> Is this a fresh error? Repo.eclipse was down most of the afternoon
> https://www.eclipsestatus.io/incidents/9zv3vwwhn0rg
>
> Jonah
>
> On Tue., Jun. 8, 2021, 20:09 Jeff Johnston,  wrote:
>
>> I am seeing the following error trying to to get gerrit to verify for the 
>> Linux Tools RC2 simrel
>>
>> contribution.  Can somebody take a look?  I have ignored the failure and 
>> updated our contribution regardless as local
>>
>> validation works fine.
>>
>>
>> [ERROR] Plugin org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-clean-plugin:2.5 or one of its 
>> dependencies could not be resolved: Failed to read artifact descriptor for 
>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-clean-plugin:jar:2.5: Could not transfer 
>> artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-clean-plugin:pom:2.5 from/to 
>> eclipse.maven.central.mirror 
>> (https://repo.eclipse.org/content/repositories/maven_central/): Transfer 
>> failed for 
>> https://repo.eclipse.org/content/repositories/maven_central/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-clean-plugin/2.5/maven-clean-plugin-2.5.pom
>>  503 Service Unavailable -> [Help 1]
>>
>> -- Jeff J.
>>
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Bugzilla notifications flaky

[Denis Roy]

As mentioned in my response to your direct email to me, I've traced
emails and they are received by your mail server. I've provided the
tracking numbers for the Message IDs on your side (queued as number),
but I've never heard back:

C32B420C8B55: to=, relay=mail.*.uk[78.*.3]:25, delay=5.7,
delays=0.04/0/5.3/0.31, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
43029802C0)


I understand this is frustrating, but there's unfortunately nothing we
can do, no matter which component of our infra you claim is flaky.


Denis



On 2021-06-09 10:16 a.m., Ed Willink wrote:
> Hi
>
> See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=574103
>
> Bugzilla notifications seem to be down again, consequently many
> important Bug correspondences are getting lost just as RC2 comes to a
> difficult climax.
>
>     Regards
>
>         Ed Willink

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

[cross-project-issues-dev] Bugzilla notifications flaky

[Ed Willink]

Hi

See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=574103

Bugzilla notifications seem to be down again, consequently many 
important Bug correspondences are getting lost just as RC2 comes to a 
difficult climax.


    Regards

        Ed Willink


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Jonah Graham]

Hi Ondrej,

Thank you very much for that and being on top of the respin from Platform!

Jonah

~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com


On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:05, Ondrej Dockal  wrote:

> Hi Jonah,
>
> I am pushing release bits into RC2 SimRel which should not contain
> alpha of slf4j [1].
>
> [1]: https://download.eclipse.org/reddeer/releases/3.4.0/plugins/
>
> Regards.
>
> Ondrej
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 3:32 PM Jonah Graham 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks
>> Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't
>> know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that Eclipse
>> Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>>
>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
>> jetty 10 from other sources.
>>
>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
>> please.
>>
>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 contributed
>> to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output repo!
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Jonah
>>
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

[Nitin Dahyabhai]

WTP doesn't contribute it either, just the ones that were needed and not
provided in the Platform build. What I find curious is that both
https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/jetty/10.0.4/plugins/ and
https://download.eclipse.org/webtools/jetty/10.0.4/repository/plugins/
ended up with the 2.0.0 jar in their output. What I find troubling is that
we use jetty-plus to resolve some OSGI Require/Provide-Capability
configuration once installed, so I expect our build will compile cleanly
but the related functionality will fail to load properly. :(

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:45 AM Jonah Graham  wrote:

> :-( But the Platform contribution does not have slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1, is
> that because Platform doesn't use  jetty-jndi and jetty-plus but WTP does?
>
> Thanks
> Jonah
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 09:40, Nitin Dahyabhai  wrote:
>
>> It looks like jetty-jndi and jetty-plus did not have their SLF4J ranges
>> lowered under 2.0, so the Jetty sites from Platform and WTP both still
>> contain slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:20 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
>> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30.
>>> Please let me know if there are any problems.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Sravan
>>>
>>> ___
>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Nitin Dahyabhai
>> Eclipse WTP PMC
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>


-- 
Regards,
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP PMC
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Ondrej Dockal]

Hi Jonah,

I am pushing release bits into RC2 SimRel which should not contain alpha of
slf4j [1].

[1]: https://download.eclipse.org/reddeer/releases/3.4.0/plugins/

Regards.

Ondrej

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 3:32 PM Jonah Graham  wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks
> Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't
> know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that Eclipse
> Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>
> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel because
> they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or jetty 10
> from other sources.
>
> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
> please.
>
> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has Jetty
> 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 contributed to
> webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output repo!
>
> Thank you,
> Jonah
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

[Jonah Graham]

:-( But the Platform contribution does not have slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1, is
that because Platform doesn't use  jetty-jndi and jetty-plus but WTP does?

Thanks
Jonah

~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com


On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 09:40, Nitin Dahyabhai  wrote:

> It looks like jetty-jndi and jetty-plus did not have their SLF4J ranges
> lowered under 2.0, so the Jetty sites from Platform and WTP both still
> contain slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:20 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30.
>> Please let me know if there are any problems.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Sravan
>>
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Nitin Dahyabhai
> Eclipse WTP PMC
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

[Nitin Dahyabhai]

It looks like jetty-jndi and jetty-plus did not have their SLF4J ranges
lowered under 2.0, so the Jetty sites from Platform and WTP both still
contain slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 9:20 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30.
> Please let me know if there are any problems.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Sravan
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>


-- 
Regards,
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP PMC
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

[cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha

[Jonah Graham]

Hi folks,

Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks
Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't
know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that Eclipse
Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.

However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel because
they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or jetty 10
from other sources.

Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to ensure
that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel please.

As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has Jetty
10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 contributed to
webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output repo!

Thank you,
Jonah

~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

[cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse platform contribution with Jetty 10.0.4 upgrade

[Sravan K Lakkimsetti]

Hi,

 

I contributed eclipse platform with Jetty 10.0.4 and with slf4j 1.7.30.
Please let me know if there are any problems.

 

Thanks

Sravan


___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev