[css-d] Test
Subscription issue. Sorry about the noise. -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Test
Just running a test as I am new to the list and did not see my earlier message come through. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on OS X 10.7 Lion please
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: url: http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/helveN-L.html Do the first two paragraphs display as serif fonts on Lion (OS X 10.7) with any Gecko/ Firefox browser? If yes, there is a bug in Gecko. (I assume default font preferences - 'western' should use 'serif' as a default). The test fails (displays a serif font) on my side; I already cleared all font-caches. Other browsers work correctly. Seamonkey 2.5 (/still/ no auto-update to 2.6.1; has this been completely forogtten ?), Win/XP : Serif, serif, serif, sans-serif, sans-serif. Philip Taylor __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on OS X 10.7 Lion please
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Philip TAYLOR wrote: Seamonkey 2.5 (/still/ no auto-update to 2.6.1; has this been completely forogtten ?), Win/XP : Serif, serif, serif, sans-serif, sans-serif. Possible depending on what you have installed; that is not what I asked though… The Q was specifically about OS X 10.7 Now I am intrigued : if (as per your original message), Do the first two paragraphs display as serif fonts on Lion (OS X 10.7) with any Gecko/ Firefox browser? If yes, there is a bug in Gecko. and the first two paragraphs (in fact, the first three) display as serif fonts in XP with a Gecko browser, why is this not also an indication of a bug in Gecko ? Why does it have to manifest itself only in OS X 10.7 in order to demonstrate the existence of a bug ? I thought that HTML CSS were platform-neutral, and therefore if one sees unexpected behaviour on /any/ platform using the same underlying rendering engine this could be indicative of a rendering engine bug. Philip Taylor __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on OS X 10.7 Lion please
On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Possible depending on what you have installed; that is not what I asked
though…
The Q was specifically about OS X 10.7
Now I am intrigued : if (as per your original message),
Do the first two paragraphs display as serif fonts on Lion (OS X 10.7) with
any Gecko/ Firefox browser? If yes, there is a bug in Gecko.
and the first two paragraphs (in fact, the first three)
display as serif fonts in XP with a Gecko browser, why
is this not also an indication of a bug in Gecko ? Why
does it have to manifest itself only in OS X 10.7 in order
to demonstrate the existence of a bug ? I thought that
HTML CSS were platform-neutral, and therefore if one
sees unexpected behaviour on /any/ platform using the same
underlying rendering engine this could be indicative of
a rendering engine bug.
Because the fonts used are specific to OS X (10.6+) and thus not installed on
Win XP ?
The question was – does this testcase work on OS X 10.7. The answer is
currently NO on any release version of Gecko based browser. That is an OS
specific bug - I wanted to make sure that what I saw on my machine(s) was not
due to some odd combination of settings on my side.
Safari 5.1 appears to have another bug specific to @font-face { src:()} with
the same font. I'm not clear yet where exactly the bug is (the bug is fixed in
nightly webkit builds).
Satisfied ?
I thought the subject line was clear enough about the scope of the question…
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Test on OS X 10.7 Lion please
url: http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/helveN-L.html Do the first two paragraphs display as serif fonts on Lion (OS X 10.7) with any Gecko/ Firefox browser? If yes, there is a bug in Gecko. (I assume default font preferences - 'western' should use 'serif' as a default). The test fails (displays a serif font) on my side; I already cleared all font-caches. Other browsers work correctly. Philippe -- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on OS X 10.7 Lion please
On Jan 3, 2012, at 8:02 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: url: http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/helveN-L.html Do the first two paragraphs display as serif fonts on Lion (OS X 10.7) with any Gecko/ Firefox browser? If yes, there is a bug in Gecko. (I assume default font preferences - 'western' should use 'serif' as a default). The test fails (displays a serif font) on my side; I already cleared all font-caches. Other browsers work correctly. Philippe in FF, the first two paragraphs are serif, the rest are serif. In Safari, the first is serif and the second is sans, as are all the rest. J __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on OS X 10.7 Lion please
On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:49 PM, John wrote: url: http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/helveN-L.html Do the first two paragraphs display as serif fonts on Lion (OS X 10.7) with any Gecko/ Firefox browser? If yes, there is a bug in Gecko. (I assume default font preferences - 'western' should use 'serif' as a default). The test fails (displays a serif font) on my side; I already cleared all font-caches. Other browsers work correctly. in FF, the first two paragraphs are serif, the rest are serif. (only the first two paragraphs are serif, for the rest you meant sans-serif I guess) It appears to be fixed in Nightly builds; should work fine with Firefox 11. In Safari, the first is serif and the second is sans, as are all the rest. really ? …… oh wait – let me test again. Indeed. WebKit nightly builds work fine, though, as do Chrome 16+. Thanks for testing John. Philippe -- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on OS X 10.7 Lion please
glad to help…and to be clear…it's 10.7.2, Safari 5.1.2, and initially, I tried in FF 5 (just did a re-install and wrongly assumed it was the latest) tried again in FF 9.0.1, and the first two paragraphs are serif; the following 3 are SANS serif…yes, sorry about my earlier typo. J __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] test I need help!
__ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] test I need help!
Your test has been received successfully. There's a man in Massachusetts standing ready to demystify any CSS issues you're flummoxed by. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Test on thead, tbody, tfoot and background images
Results are pretty frustrating: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/02/css-thead-tbody-tfoot-and-background.html have you ever tested something similar? find anything better? a better fix? let me know :-) HTH. http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] [test]: CSS and the HTML5 video element
Hi. It took a little bit to find a good converter from FLV to OGV, but finally I did it! The video is 27 mb in size, so you have to be a little bit patient :-) Results are encouraging, especially for future CSS3 enhancements: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/01/css-and-html5-video-element.html note: also floating works, just as for the object element. it seems that supporting browsers have cloned their default display role from object to video. cascade works correctly. borders, margin etc. too. dimensions either. Tested in Chrome(latest), Safari(latest), Firefox(latest, i.e. 4 beta latest), Opera(latest). Safari has some problems loading the video. I think it expects ogg instead of ogv or something :-) again, hope that helps HTH :-) Gabriele http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] [test]: CSS and the HTML5 video element
On Jan 15, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: It took a little bit to find a good converter from FLV to OGV, but finally I did it! The video is 27 mb in size, so you have to be a little bit patient :-) Results are encouraging, especially for future CSS3 enhancements: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/01/css-and-html5-video-element.html note: also floating works, just as for the object element. it seems that supporting browsers have cloned their default display role from object to video. cascade works correctly. borders, margin etc. too. dimensions either. Tested in Chrome(latest), Safari(latest), Firefox(latest, i.e. 4 beta latest), Opera(latest). Safari has some problems loading the video. I think it expects ogg instead of ogv or something :-) I've no idea on which OS you managed to have that video loading in all those browsers. On OS X 10.6, it partly (*) worked in Chrome 10 dev channel and nothing else (Safari 5 and webkit nightly, Gecko 1.9.2 and 2.0b- fx nightly) (*) very slow to load (slower than expected for the given file size), blocky display, stuttering. Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] [test]: CSS and the HTML5 video element
Gabriele Romanato wrote: It took a little bit to find a good converter from FLV to OGV, but finally I did it! The video is 27 mb in size, so you have to be a little bit patient :-) Results are encouraging, especially for future CSS3 enhancements: Seamonkey 2.0.11 under Win/XP PRO;SP3 Partially rotated rounded-cornered square containing the word Ogg and a | button that has no perceivable effect. As regards the possible delay while 27Mb delivers itself, would it not be possible to use a streaming protocol, as in (say) src=rtsp://example.org/streaming/video.ogv/ rather than src=video.ogv as written ? Philip Taylor __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] [test]: CSS and the HTML5 video element
On 1/15/11 5:13 AM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: It took a little bit to find a good converter from FLV to OGV, but finally I did it! http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/01/css-and-html5-video-element.html Gabriele Greetings from Oaxaca. Please see: 1.png 2.png 3.png 4.png http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/gr/ Best, Jeronimo Lopez Ramirez Mexico -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] [test]: CSS and the HTML5 video element [1]
On 1/15/11 9:19 AM, David Laakso wrote: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/gr/ Screenshots Mac OS X10.4.11 -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] [test]: CSS and HTML5 audio element
This completes the test series on HTML5 media elements: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/01/css-and-html5-audio-element.html HTH :-) http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] [test]: CSS and HTML5 audio element
On 1/15/11 1:37 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: This completes the test series on HTML5 media elements: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/01/css-and-html5-audio-element.html HTH :-) Mac OS X 10.4.11 Pass Opera/11.0 Pass Safari/4.1.3 Pass WebKit/4.1.3 (4533.19.4, r63031) Fail SeaMonkey/2.0.11 Fail Camino/ 2.0.6 ~juan -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] [test] CSS and iframes
There are many possible ways to apply this test in a real case- scenario like: 1. website previews 2. dynamic content 3. active content http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/01/css-and-iframes.html this test clearly demonstrates the benefits of fluid css layouts. HTH :-) http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] [Test]: Positioning an object element
Hi. A couple of days ago a user posted here a message about object and positioning. I've created a test page and a brief description that I think it may be helpful for future use cases: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/01/css-positioning-object-element.html hope this will help you to get an idea of how this works. bye :-) http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] [Test]: Positioning an object element
Gabriele Romanato wrote: Hi. A couple of days ago a user posted here a message about object and positioning. I've created a test page and a brief description that I think it may be helpful for future use cases: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/01/css-positioning-object-element.html As you can see here, everything works just fine. Well, not /absolutely/ fine. When the linked demonstration is first rendered in SeaMonkey 2.0.11, at about the position where the | button will appear, /something/ followed by the unit px appears briefly on-screen. Any idea why ? Philip Taylor __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] [Test]: Positioning an object element
Don't get me wrong but ... What is the percentage of use of Seamonkey? ;-) Philip, as a rule of thumb, you should always test in major league browsers, like IE, Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome. Minority browsers get you mad. I used to have up to 10 browsers on my computer, and once I got access to the access logs of the sites I was developing I got struck by the fact that almost all users (98%-99%) were using either IE flavors or Firefox. Don't worry: it's probably due to a parsing error of Seamonkey. :-) bye :-) http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] [Test]: Positioning an object element
Gabriele Romanato wrote: Don't get me wrong but ... What is the percentage of use of Seamonkey? ;-) Philip, as a rule of thumb, you should always test in major league browsers, like IE, Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome. Of course, it /could/ be something to with the following, and nothing to do with my choice of browser at all : Validation Output: 5 Errors 1. Error Line 44, Column 37: Element object is missing one or more of the following attributes: data, type. object width=480 height=385param name=movie value=http://www.yout… 2. Error Line 44, Column 128: Stray end tag param. …nFl0nlHaWa4?fs=1amp;hl=en_US/paramparam name=allowFullScreen value=tr… 3. Error Line 44, Column 179: Stray end tag param. …allowFullScreen value=true/paramparam name=allowscriptaccess value=… 4. Error Line 44, Column 234: Stray end tag param. …n value=true/paramparam name=allowscriptaccess value=always/param 5. Error Line 45, Column 192: Stray end tag embed. …wscriptaccess=always allowfullscreen=true width=480 height=385/embed ** Phil. -- Not sent from my i-Pad, i-Phone, Blackberry, Blueberry, or any such similar poseurs' toy, none of which would I be seen dead with even if they came free with every packet of cornflakes. __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] [Test]: Positioning an object element
Dang it, did it again - sent to individual and not the list. What's up with that?! Not sure if the W3 browser stats are accurate, but ignoring chrome (and or safari) seems to be ignoring a large % of potential users... 2010 Internet Explorerhttp://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_explorer.asp Firefox http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_firefox.asp Chromehttp://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_chrome.asp Safari http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_safari.asp Operahttp://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_opera.aspDecember27.5 %43.5%22.4%3.8%2.2% Kevin Sent from Gmail in google chrome ;) On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote: Gabriele Romanato wrote: Don't get me wrong but ... What is the percentage of use of Seamonkey? ;-) Philip, as a rule of thumb, you should always test in major league browsers, like IE, Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome. Of course, it /could/ be something to with the following, and nothing to do with my choice of browser at all : Validation Output: 5 Errors 1. Error Line 44, Column 37: Element object is missing one or more of the following attributes: data, type. object width=480 height=385param name=movie value= http://www.yout… 2. Error Line 44, Column 128: Stray end tag param. …nFl0nlHaWa4?fs=1amp;hl=en_US/paramparam name=allowFullScreen value=tr… 3. Error Line 44, Column 179: Stray end tag param. …allowFullScreen value=true/paramparam name=allowscriptaccess value=… 4. Error Line 44, Column 234: Stray end tag param. …n value=true/paramparam name=allowscriptaccess value=always/param 5. Error Line 45, Column 192: Stray end tag embed. …wscriptaccess=always allowfullscreen=true width=480 height=385/embed ** Phil. -- Not sent from my i-Pad, i-Phone, Blackberry, Blueberry, or any such similar poseurs' toy, none of which would I be seen dead with even if they came free with every packet of cornflakes. __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on box-shadow and border-radius
Post your notes on my blog! Really interesting! :-) http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Test on box-shadow and border-radius
Hi all! Just finished this: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/06/test-on-css3-box-shadow-and-border.html HTH. :-) Gabriele Romanato http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on box-shadow and border-radius
From: Gabriele Romanato gabriele.roman...@gmail.com Hi all! Just finished this: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/06/test-on-css3-box-shadow-and-border.html Very nice. You should take it further to show more looks, such as different treatments for different corners, shadow lengths, etc. Could be a real valuable tutorial. We like the idea of using CSS3 like that, so long as authors understand IE8 and under don't support it. So if curves and shadow are considered an enhancement, rather than a design mandate, it's cool. Here's something we've been working on lately, which might prove interesting as it illustrates outer/inner curves: http://www.projectseven.com/peeks/tooltips/example4.htm Good job! -- Al Sparber - PVII http://www.projectseven.com Dreamweaver Menus | Galleries | Widgets __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on box-shadow and border-radius
Cool tooltips indeed! Stunning demo. thanks for sharing! :-) http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on box-shadow and border-radius
Gabriele Romanato wrote: Hi all! Just finished this: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/06/test-on-css3-box-shadow-and-border.html HTH. :-) Gabriele Romanato Nice. Best, ~d PS When you don't know what else to say: nit-pick :-) . http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/gr.png -- desktop http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on box-shadow and border-radius
You always have a different view of technical things. I think that web development would be pretty boring without your insights :-) http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test on box-shadow and border-radius
On Jun 26, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/06/test-on-css3-box-shadow-and-border.html Raining on your parade: You really, I mean really, should change the order in which you list the properties, to take the cascade into account. You currently have: border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; You should turn that around, list the -vendor- properties first, and _then_ the css3 property / notation. That way, you're sure that a UA that currently uses a -vendor-prefixed notation, but in the near future upgrades to use the CSS3 notation will use the 'real' thing, rather than fall back on the -vendor prefixed one. The 'real thing' might be more powerful or more correct or more… etc. Here is a quick dirty example, to be viewed with WebKit (and View source): http://dev.l-c-n.com/CSS3_border-background/border-radius_vendor-cascade.html Safari 5 and recent Chrome builds support the CSS3 notation, but also support the -vendor-prefixed one. The 2 boxes have the same properties listed. In the second box, the '-webkit-' one wins because it comes last in the code. (the same will happen when Gecko supports the CSS3 notation in Firefox 4). Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Test on CSS complex floats
Hi all! Hope that's useful: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/06/test-on-css-complex-floats.html HTH :-) http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] test - please delete
sorry about this everybody. __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] test - if someone could respond if this gets through
just testing. All my emails stopped from the list 10 Jan so I'm assuming that's spam assassin being changed but I've reverted back and still nothing. Either I'm not receiving the emails, lost my subscription or something else. If anyone could just reply if this does come through that way I'll know if I'm not getting the list to my mailbox or not even getting to the list in the first place. Thanks Wesley Lamont __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] test - if someone could respond if this gets through
Thanks everyone. It does indeed seem my emails are getting through fine and responses to me are getting through as well. I'm still not getting the regular posts however which is very odd. Anything I post is not showing up either. Going to have to take a look into my spam settings I think. Thanks to all those replies. Wesley Lamont __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test with Selectors
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:44:39 -0700, Alan Gresley wrote: [...] The first test show my attempts with namespace. http://css-class.com/test/css/selectors/namespace1.htm http://css- class.com/test/css/selectors/namespace2.htm Each of these tests shows a lexical error with this |p.test3 when I try to validate the CSS. Why is this the only p.class showing the error? Well, the error message does say after | so it must be looking at the vertical bar as a separate (unrecognized?) entity. Sorry I don't have a Mac (you don't know how sorry ;). Have you seen MRI?[1] It may help with your endeavors. [1] http://westciv.com/mri/ Cordially, David -- __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Test with Selectors
Hi all
Giving myself a nice learning curve, I have developed some test with selectors.
Each test is still under review and slowly becoming more complex. I can see
some test pages splintering on to other test pages.
I am developing it in a way that it shows firstly if a browser doesn't supports
a selector and then if a browser does support a selector it will show either a
match or non match. Also the tests show if the CSS is filtering or targeting
any browser due to non support or buggy support of a selector. I was surprised
to find how many there were. I will also have to redo the test in html4.01
strict and xml.
I have tested on Windows XP in FF 2.0.0.8, Mozilla 1.7.13, Flock 1.0.1, Opera
9.10, Opera 9.24, Safari 3.0.4 (beta) and IE7.
I would like any feedback for any of the test with Mac browsers or some others
browsers that I haven't got. I would also welcome criticism or suggestions
about the techniques for showing non support and filtering or targeting of
browsers. This I still have a lot of work with.
The first test show my attempts with namespace.
http://css-class.com/test/css/selectors/namespace1.htm
http://css-class.com/test/css/selectors/namespace2.htm
Each of these tests shows a lexical error with this
|p.test3
when I try to validate the CSS. Why is this the only p.class showing the error?
I not even sure if there should be the word namespace in the url string in the
later test page as both test pages with or without the word namespace works. I
sure someone will clarify my errors.
The next test are with the Negation pseudo-class Selectors
http://css-class.com/test/css/selectors/negation.htm
The test on this page will needs to be done over several pages as I find that
the test show quite broken support across browser land. Firefox and older Gecko
is very broken and somewhat Safari but for different selectors.
The next test are with Attribute selectors.
http://css-class.com/test/css/selectors/attribute.htm
This the only test that IE7 get a look in and surprisingly it passes with
almost flying colours. It shows the way to target Safari at least on windows,
which I believed is the same for Mac with case insensitivity.
Some of the test seem to be repeated over and over but this is done to
demonstrates all possible way that class names can be used either in the string
in the html or CSS.
The next test are with Attribute selectors with the Negation pseudo-class.
http://css-class.com/test/css/selectors/not-attribute.htm
This is almost the total reverse of the last page (used the last page as a
base) and will have to be streamlined. This page fails at this time because IE7
seems to be picking up some of the colours which it should not since it does
not support the negation pseudo-class.
The browser support overall is in this order.
Safari (beta) {Webkit)
Firefox (newer Gecko)
Mozilla (old Gecko)
Opera
IE7
The tests are intended to be used to check browser support or buggy support for
various selector, not as a way to feed alternative styles to x browser. But
having said that, I have done some extra test showing the possibilities.
Kind regards, Alan
http://css-class.com/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test in IE 6 and IE 7 please
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:29:21 +0200, Georg Portenkirchner wrote: Thank you everybody who sent me screenshots. After some changes finally the site seems to work in Safari, Firefox and Opera on a Mac. But Internet Explorer (6 and 7) still gives me headaches. Maybe someone has a hint for me? Thank you! http://www.theaterjugendring.de/index.php http://www.theaterjugendring.de/wp-content/themes/tjr/style.css It looks like IE Win is not honoring the margin-top on #content. Try changing this to padding-top. (I have not tried this, so no guarantees.) Cordially, David -- __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test in IE 6 and IE 7 please
Am 18.10.2007 um 19:10 schrieb David Hucklesby:
It looks like IE Win is not honoring the margin-top on #content. Try
changing this to
padding-top. (I have not tried this, so no guarantees.)
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:20:47 +0200, Georg Portenkirchner wrote:
I also thought about it, but then would the grey content color move up to the
header.
Georg,
Re: http://www.theaterjugendring.de/index.php
I played a little with this. Adding an outer DIV and giving it a
padding-top of 1px seems to contain that margin-top in IE.
The fixed #sidebar seems to take space in IE5.5 and 6, forcing the
content well below it. This seems to work for those versions:
* html #sidebar {position: absolute;}
IE before version 7 does not understand fixed anyway, so that's
the best you can hope for. Similarly, no :hover effect on the DIVs.
Cordially,
David
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Test in IE 6 and IE 7 please
Hello all! As I have no PC by hand right now, it would be nice to get feedback what are the problems in IE for this site: http://www.theaterjugendring.de/index.php http://www.theaterjugendring.de/wp-content/themes/tjr/style.css Thanks in advance Georg http://portenkirchner.net/ iChat / AIM: portenkirchner http://www.xing.com/profile/Georg_Portenkirchner __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test in IE 6 and IE 7 please
Georg Portenkirchner wrote: Hello all! As I have no PC by hand right now, it would be nice to get feedback what are the problems in IE for this site: http://www.theaterjugendring.de/index.php http://www.theaterjugendring.de/wp-content/themes/tjr/style.css Georg, I've taken screenshots in WindowsVistaIE7 and XP/IE6/7 of your site. Browsercam should have them avail within 30 mins of this mail (or so). HTH, ~Ray http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=385146 -- Non scholae sed vitae discimus __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test in IE 6 and IE 7 please
Apologies to all for the multi-post. seems my mail server hiccuped at just the wrong moment -- Non scholae sed vitae discimus __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test in IE 6 and IE 7 please
Thank you everybody who sent me screenshots. After some changes finally the site seems to work in Safari, Firefox and Opera on a Mac. But Internet Explorer (6 and 7) still gives me headaches. Maybe someone has a hint for me? Thank you! http://www.theaterjugendring.de/index.php http://www.theaterjugendring.de/wp-content/themes/tjr/style.css Am 17.10.2007 um 15:53 schrieb Georg Portenkirchner: Hello all! As I have no PC by hand right now, it would be nice to get feedback what are the problems in IE for this site: http://www.theaterjugendring.de/index.php http://www.theaterjugendring.de/wp-content/themes/tjr/style.css Thanks in advance Georg http://portenkirchner.net/ iChat / AIM: portenkirchner http://www.xing.com/profile/Georg_Portenkirchner __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ http://portenkirchner.net/ iChat / AIM: portenkirchner http://www.xing.com/profile/Georg_Portenkirchner __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] test
Testing __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] test
Hi, This is just a test mail to see if i have set myself up on the list properly. The name is Andy by the way. Pleased to meet you all. Andy -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] test, please ignore
__ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test Navigation Incorporated into Site - Doesn't Work
Matthew Stoneback wrote: Jens - Thank you for the help. You were right; all I had to do was fix the comment syntax and the navigation bar returned to normal. I am starting to get the hang of CSS slowly but surely. Thanks! Matthew, The problem that Jens pointed out was one that validation would have caught for you. As you learn CSS, please remember to validate your work before turning elsewhere for help. As you have seen, validation will often expose the problem and help you fix it very quickly. CSS validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ (X)HTML validator: http://validator.w3.org/ Thanks, Zoe -- Zoe M. Gillenwater Design Services Manager UNC Highway Safety Research Center http://www.hsrc.unc.edu __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Test Navigation Incorporated into Site - Doesn't Work
Once again, hello to all. So I have been helped out twice today and once again I wanted to say thanks. My new problem is incorporating my test navigation into my site. Test Nav URL: http://www.eddysound.com/tams/test_pages/navtest.htm My index page with the about navigation added in: http://www.eddysound.com/tams/index.htm My CSS Document: http://www.eddysound.com/tams/style/help.css As you can see, when I place the navigation into my HTML document and add the CSS into my help.css file, something strange happens. On top of everything, the list style reappears in every browser but IE.. Weird! Any ideas on how to make this navigation function? I want the navigation to sit flush against the left side navigation and extend all the way across the light grey area. Thanks in advance, Matthew Stoneback (Mr. I am full of problems today.) __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test Navigation Incorporated into Site - Doesn't Work
Hi Matthew, My CSS Document: http://www.eddysound.com/tams/style/help.css As you can see, when I place the navigation into my HTML document and add the CSS into my help.css file, something strange happens. On top of everything, the list style reappears in every browser but IE.. Weird! Any ideas on how to make this navigation function? you make use of SGML comment syntax in your Style sheet instead of CSS comments, e.g. you use !--beginning of left navigation styles-- instead of /* beginning of left navigation styles */ Please change your erroneous syntax and see if the flawed rendering still remains. Cheers, jens -- Jens Brueckmann http://www.yalf.de __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Test Navigation Incorporated into Site - Doesn't Work
Jens - Thank you for the help. You were right; all I had to do was fix the comment syntax and the navigation bar returned to normal. I am starting to get the hang of CSS slowly but surely. Thanks! Matthew Stoneback __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] test html pages on an handheld or smartphone browser
Hi, one of the advantages of using CSS is creating a wide readable HTML content. I don't know about you, but I've alway accessed it via computer browsers :-) Now I would like to test my html with an handheld or smartphone browser, I don't actually have one of thoose devices so I was wondering about a software (probably Windows software) able to emulate them and to make me browse on a specific Web site. Anybody can help me? I've found an unreachable discussion called [WD]: PDA Emulator available? in http://webdesign-l.com/archive.html Thanks, Enrico -- The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing Edmund Burke __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] test html pages on an handheld or smartphone browser
Opera has an emulation mode for small screen devices, you press Shift-F11. IIts not perfect, but it gives you a pretty good idea. Sam On 27/04/06, cj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: msdn had a web series dealing with mobile devices a while ago, and their web casts are saved and available to replay online. i don't remember the links they had to various company's controls/applications that let you view your pages on their phones, but i'm sure if you watched the 'cast they'd give them again. the series was called Mobile Web Development with ASP.NET 2.0 and was done july-august of 2005. i know the web cast is about making pages with asp, but the presenter talked about several web phone things you can view pages with. hth, and i wish i remembered more! __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] test html pages on an handheld or smartphone browser
* Openwave Phone Simulator http://developer.openwave.com/dvl/ * Microsoft Mobile Explorer http://www.devhood.com/tools/tool_details.aspx?tool_id=52 (though the site seems to be down at present) * Nokia has an emulator but I've never gotten it to work. * Latest Opera browsers has emulators built-in. * Klondike WAP Browser http://wap.apachesoftware.com/klondike.wml HTH, TTFN, David Merchant -- Director of Integrated Technology CATALyST Louisiana Tech University catalyst.latech.edu __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] test html pages on an handheld or smartphone browser
My apologies, the link for Klondike WAP Browser should've been http://www.apachesoftware.com/download.html HTH, TTFN, David Merchant -- Director of Integrated Technology CATALyST Louisiana Tech University catalyst.latech.edu __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] test html pages on an handheld or smartphone browser
Opera Mini Browser emulator: http://www.opera.com/products/mobile/operamini/demo.dml HTH, TTFN, David Merchant -- Director of Integrated Technology CATALyST Louisiana Tech University catalyst.latech.edu __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] test
__ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] test page check - especially mac
http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/Azule/index_test.html
I'm still battling to figure out why the middle blue area (with Experts
in Project Finance text) is about 3px higher in Safari, Firefox (IE is
fine). I had to set that blue area as a negative (margin-top: -8px;) so
I'm definitely doing something wrong there. Can someone spot how I can
fix this?
Thanks very much to those of you who gave me feedback on the site,
especially those screen shots, DL. Very helpful - will work on contrast.
Thanks!
Lee
Lee, I get an insignificant 3px difference from the top of the azure
blue to bottom of the toolbar comparing IE/FF in Xp
Very nice, clean simple layout.
Bit difficult for me to read-- found this helped(plus bumping the p
contrast):
p, ul, ol, table {
/*font-size: .8em;*/
line-height: /*1.9em*/1.7;
}
The azure links and the word 'Welcome' are unreadable(contrast).
16 captures: safari/mac/ie5.2/win2000
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=205520
Best,
~dL
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/162 - Release Date: 05/11/2005
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] test page check - especially mac
Hi Just wondering if someone could do a site check for me? http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/Azule/index_test.html It's displaying fine in IE, but the middle blue area is slightly too high in Firefox. Can't seem to figure this out! Also, I don't have a mac so would someone with a mac let me know how good/bad :( it is...and what browser/version etc you have? (thanks for your suggestions for fixed/fluid layouts, Thierry and Gunlaug. The layout I was using started to work out thank goodness) Thanks Lee -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/162 - Release Date: 05/11/2005 __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] test page check - especially mac
Virtuallee wrote: Hi Just wondering if someone could do a site check for me? http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/Azule/index_test.html It's displaying fine in IE, but the middle blue area is slightly too high in Firefox. Can't seem to figure this out! Also, I don't have a mac so would someone with a mac let me know how good/bad :( it is...and what browser/version etc you have? (thanks for your suggestions for fixed/fluid layouts, Thierry and Gunlaug. The layout I was using started to work out thank goodness) Thanks Lee Hello, Just wanted to let you know that I think this looks great. I viewed it in Firefox 1.5 under Windows and Linux. I'm not sure on what you are talking about with the middle blue area: it looks fine to me. Nice job. - Ian Williamson http://dropic.org/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] test page check - especially mac
Virtuallee wrote:
Just wondering if someone could do a site check for me?
http://www.virtuallee.co.uk/Azule/index_test.html
Lee
Lee, I get an insignificant 3px difference from the top of the azure
blue to bottom of the toolbar comparing IE/FF in Xp
Very nice, clean simple layout.
Bit difficult for me to read-- found this helped(plus bumping the p
contrast):
p, ul, ol, table {
/*font-size: .8em;*/
line-height: /*1.9em*/1.7;
}
The azure links and the word 'Welcome' are unreadable(contrast).
16 captures: safari/mac/ie5.2/win2000
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=205520
Best,
~dL
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] test
test __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] test message please excuse disregard
not sure if my messages are reaching the list, hence this test message. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
