Re: [css-d] New to css [late response]

2010-05-11 Thread MB
Ed Seedhouse said:

Yes, it is wrong to use tables to create a layout, but not to use them
when appropriate is equally mistaken.

I would argue that a general wrong is a bit strong in this context.
The wrong approach to reach your objectives in many cases or a more
limited way of achieving web layouts in general.

what HTML should be all about is the semantics of the
content.  That is what it is designed for, and was right from the
start.  
This is both true and untrue. The semantic idea is in the heart I'd say,
but it's far from a fulfilled property of HTML markup. The important
part, perhaps, is that separating structure and contextual meaning
(HTML) from presentation (CSS and graphics) when done right, gives many
advantages. The disadvantage is that it takes another way of developing
and that there are many pitfalls to watch out for.


__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-30 Thread Ed Seedhouse
There is nothing evil about tables, which are a part of html and as
such serve the purpose of marking up tabular content.  If the content
is naturally tabular, then it is wrong to mark it up other than with a
table.

Yes, it is wrong to use tables to create a layout, but not to use them
when appropriate is equally mistaken.

As Bill said, what HTML should be all about is the semantics of the
content.  That is what it is designed for, and was right from the
start.  Use HTML to mark up the meaning of the content, and CSS to
modify it's presentation.

Abuse of DIVs simply for layout is just as wrong as abusing tables for
the same purpose.  If you think there is a debate about divs vs.
tables you just simply don't get it.

And I close with a recommendation to read the links provided by Bill.

-- 
Ed Seedhouse
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-30 Thread Bill Braun

MB wrote:
 Bill Braun said:
   
 Setting aside the moral implications, having made a transition from a 
 site built completely around tables to one based on div, the latter, 
 in my experience and opinion, takes much better advantage of CSS. I have 
 been able to do everything using div as I did using table, in a much 
 more flexible manner, and, again in my opinion, with a slight edge in 
 favor of design aesthetics.
 

 Based on divs? Hello? What about based on structural semantic markup
 and CSS-layout techniques?

 You guys - Bill, Claude - sound like you have contracted divitis* in
 your migration to CSS-layout techniques. Better find a cure.
   

Your interpretation is a bit on the literal side, but I am grateful for 
your kind words nevertheless.

Bill B

__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-30 Thread Bill Braun


Ed Seedhouse wrote:
 And I close with a recommendation to read the links provided by Bill.
   
Credit goes to MB for the links.

Bill B


__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-30 Thread MB
Bill Braun said:

Your interpretation is a bit on the literal side, but I am grateful for 
your kind words nevertheless.

My apologies. I forgot the smiley. Digital communication can be
difficult when writing on the run.


__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-30 Thread Bill Braun

MB wrote:
 Bill Braun said:
   
 Your interpretation is a bit on the literal side, but I am grateful for 
 your kind words nevertheless.
 

 My apologies. I forgot the smiley. Digital communication can be
 difficult when writing on the run.
   

I've impaled myself on that hook a time or two...

Bill B


__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] New to css

2010-03-29 Thread Lineberger, Scott
Hi,

Quite new to css coding, so these questions may seem rather basic.  If you 
click on the link below, you see the beginnings of a customer self-management 
page that I am developing.  I want to:

1)Experiment with left/center/right alignments of the legend headings and 
the buttons;

2)Add a background image to each form within the table.


Can it be done?

http://scripts.coastalind.com/testa.html

Thanks,
Scott Lineberger
IT Director
Coastal Industries, Inc
Jacksonville, FL
904.861.5434 (direct)
904.861.5456 (fax)

__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-29 Thread Climis, Tim
 Experiment with left/center/right alignments of the legend headings and the 
 buttons;
 Add a background image to each form within the table.

 Can it be done?

Yes.

I'm presuming that you want each form to be different, right?  So you need to 
give each one a way to select it. Either a class or an id.
Ex:
form id=track
...
/form

form id=account
...
/form

form id=order
...
/form

And then you can be more specific in your CSS.

#track { /* the element with id=track (in this case a form) */
  background-image: url('relative/path/to/image/file.jpg');
}

#track legend { /* the legend tag inside the form with id=track */
  text-align: left;
}

Voila!

If you use class names (form class=track) instead of id's then put in a dot 
(.) instead of a hash (#).

---Tim
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-29 Thread Claude Needham
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Climis, Tim tcli...@indiana.edu wrote:
 If you use class names (form class=track) instead of id's then put in a dot 
 (.) instead of a hash (#).
 ---Tim

If you are truly new to css, you might wonder when to use id and when
to use class.

id is for unique elements -- on a page by page basis. Thus any element
(such as a div) that is given an id should be unique.

div id=header
..
/div

Things like footer, menu, maincontent, masthead, or the form.

id is like your driver's license -- one to a customer.

For any elements that will be used more than once on a page you need
to use class.

class is like a room full of students. they may all be special in
their own way but they share common characteristics that can be
assigned together using the class name.

Just covering the bases in case you haven't stumbled across this
distinction yet.

Regards,
Claude
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-29 Thread Lineberger, Scott
Thanks, Tim, that did the trick and put me on the right track.  Now, if I could 
only decide is tables are really all that evil!

Thanks,
Scott


-Original Message-
From: Climis, Tim [mailto:tcli...@indiana.edu] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:29 PM
To: Lineberger, Scott
Cc: 'css-d@lists.css-discuss.org'
Subject: RE: New to css

 Experiment with left/center/right alignments of the legend headings and the 
 buttons;
 Add a background image to each form within the table.

 Can it be done?

Yes.

I'm presuming that you want each form to be different, right?  So you need to 
give each one a way to select it. Either a class or an id.
Ex:
form id=track
...
/form

form id=account
...
/form

form id=order
...
/form

And then you can be more specific in your CSS.

#track { /* the element with id=track (in this case a form) */
  background-image: url('relative/path/to/image/file.jpg');
}

#track legend { /* the legend tag inside the form with id=track */
  text-align: left;
}

Voila!

If you use class names (form class=track) instead of id's then put in a dot 
(.) instead of a hash (#).

---Tim
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-29 Thread Bill Braun


Lineberger, Scott wrote:
 Thanks, Tim, that did the trick and put me on the right track.  Now, if I 
 could only decide is tables are really all that evil!

 Thanks,
 Scott

   

Setting aside the moral implications, having made a transition from a 
site built completely around tables to one based on div, the latter, 
in my experience and opinion, takes much better advantage of CSS. I have 
been able to do everything using div as I did using table, in a much 
more flexible manner, and, again in my opinion, with a slight edge in 
favor of design aesthetics.

Bill B


__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-29 Thread Claude Needham
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Bill Braun bbr...@hlthsys.com wrote:
 Setting aside the moral implications, having made a transition from a
 site built completely around tables to one based on div, the latter,
 in my experience and opinion, takes much better advantage of CSS. I have
 been able to do everything using div as I did using table, in a much
 more flexible manner, and, again in my opinion, with a slight edge in
 favor of design aesthetics.
 Bill B

I have to agree with the go whole hog into css and leave the tables
behind approach. After a very rocky first week or two things are
working about much better. I am very happy with the subtle aesthetic
improvements that strict css affords.

During those first few weeks getting my divs to behave was like trying
to corral a herd of kittens. Things would pop up here and pop up
there. I still don't know what I was doing wrong. All of a sudden it
was coming out right. If I didn't know better I would say that they
updated Firefox. Because I could swear my code is the same. But it
wasn't. I had discovered the one or two tricks that let my divs behave
themselves.

So don't be surprised if you have a few days of what in the heck is
going on.  But, after that you will be happy you dropped the tables.

However I still expect to run into some problem that I might need
tables for. Just haven't yet. I don't have a philosophical objection
to tables. Just don't need them at the moment. Got tired of colspan
and rowspan I guess. :)

Regards,
Claude
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-29 Thread Tim Climis
On Monday, March 29, 2010 5:02:01 pm you wrote:
 Thanks, Tim, that did the trick and put me on the right track.  Now, if I
 could only decide is tables are really all that evil!
 

I don't know that they're all _that_ evil, but I don't like them much, for 
what it's worth.  On the other hand, without them, you have to get your hands 
really dirty really quickly.

It might be worth it to keep the tables, and just play with the basic-ish 
formatting stuff for now until you get the hang of selectors and specificity, 
and then aim for bigger and better (and exponentially more annoying) things 
like the box model, and floats, and positioning.

---Tim
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to css

2010-03-29 Thread MB
Bill Braun said:

Setting aside the moral implications, having made a transition from a 
site built completely around tables to one based on div, the latter, 
in my experience and opinion, takes much better advantage of CSS. I have 
been able to do everything using div as I did using table, in a much 
more flexible manner, and, again in my opinion, with a slight edge in 
favor of design aesthetics.

Based on divs? Hello? What about based on structural semantic markup
and CSS-layout techniques?

You guys - Bill, Claude - sound like you have contracted divitis* in
your migration to CSS-layout techniques. Better find a cure.

Wiktionary definition of divitis
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/divitis
Jeffery Zeldman quote on divitis with code example
http://adam.kahtava.com/journal/2009/07/15/cronic-divitis-and-classitis-
what-is-it/

The cure is IMHO semantic markup methods. Robert Nyman has a nice brief
introduction:
Explaining Semantic Mark-Up
http://robertnyman.com/2007/10/29/explaining-semantic-mark-up/

/MB





Content precedes design. Design in the absence of content is not
design, it's decoration.
-- Jeffrey Zeldman http://twitter.com/zeldman/statuses/804159148


__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] New to CSS, can't figure out why this won't work.

2006-12-06 Thread Michael Netherton
I'm an old school coder. I've been writing sites for more than ten years and
I'm trying to get my head around CSS. As an old dog and I'm trying to learn
some new tricks, but this is turning out to be incredibly frustrating. I'm
reading Dan's book, Bulletproof Web Design, and I'm trying to duplicate
these examples so I may learn the ropes. However, I'm not having a great
deal of success.

I just don't understand why this is not working. I would be incredibly
grateful if anyone were to take a look and explain what the heck I'm doing
wrong. My first attempt at css is found here: http://www.mocap (dot)
com/default2.asp  [sorry to post a url that has to be edited, but I don't
want the SE's to pick it up]

I could have our new site up and done by now in tables, but I don't want to
bloat the code when it should be able to be done with CSS.

Sincerely,

Michael Netherton
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to CSS, can't figure out why this won't work.

2006-12-06 Thread css-dan
It's all about the box model ...

I had the same issue ... I was so used to IE, and their way of thinking 
(i do like it better), but that is not what the spec says ...

You can read about it here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/box.html

In short ... your #nav is 55px too wide ... because you have a width of 
775px and then right+left padding that = 55px ...  I would love to tell 
you that it will be a smooth journey, but it wasn't ... but keep at it 
...

_db
http://nuff-respec.com





On Dec 6, 2006, at 4:40 PM, Michael Netherton wrote:

 I'm an old school coder. I've been writing sites for more than ten 
 years and
 I'm trying to get my head around CSS. As an old dog and I'm trying to 
 learn
 some new tricks, but this is turning out to be incredibly frustrating. 
 I'm
 reading Dan's book, Bulletproof Web Design, and I'm trying to duplicate
 these examples so I may learn the ropes. However, I'm not having a 
 great
 deal of success.

 I just don't understand why this is not working. I would be incredibly
 grateful if anyone were to take a look and explain what the heck I'm 
 doing
 wrong. My first attempt at css is found here: http://www.mocap (dot)
 com/default2.asp  [sorry to post a url that has to be edited, but I 
 don't
 want the SE's to pick it up]

 I could have our new site up and done by now in tables, but I don't 
 want to
 bloat the code when it should be able to be done with CSS.

 Sincerely,

 Michael Netherton
 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to CSS, can't figure out why this won't work.

2006-12-06 Thread david
Michael Netherton wrote:
 I'm an old school coder. I've been writing sites for more than ten years and
 I'm trying to get my head around CSS. As an old dog and I'm trying to learn
 some new tricks, but this is turning out to be incredibly frustrating. I'm
 reading Dan's book, Bulletproof Web Design, and I'm trying to duplicate
 these examples so I may learn the ropes. However, I'm not having a great
 deal of success.
 
 I just don't understand why this is not working. I would be incredibly
 grateful if anyone were to take a look and explain what the heck I'm doing
 wrong. My first attempt at css is found here: http://www.mocap (dot)
 com/default2.asp  [sorry to post a url that has to be edited, but I don't
 want the SE's to pick it up]
 
 I could have our new site up and done by now in tables, but I don't want to
 bloat the code when it should be able to be done with CSS.

15 validation errors in your XHTML:

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mocap.com%2Fdefault2.asp

 From what I saw in Firefox 1.5.0.8 on Linux, what you have so far looks 
fine!

-- 
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to CSS, can't figure out why this won't work.

2006-12-06 Thread Mark J. Reed
Why do you have the header image broken up into pieces?  That
shouldn't be necessary with a CSS page.

Visually, I see these problems - if you're trying to fix something I
didn't catch, let me know.

* In IE 6, the navbar is offset to the right of the header image.

* In Firefox 2, there's a gap vertically between the header image and
navbar, and the nav bar extends to the right past the header image.

I don't think float: left is what you want there - you're just trying
to stack two div's vertically, which is what they do naturally if you
don't float them.

The offset issues are because of the box model (which IE = 6 gets
wrong).  If you want a 775-pixel-wide div all the way across, you
don't set the width to  775, you set it to 775 minus the width of the
left border, left padding, right padding, and right border.

Your #nav has no border, a right padding of 0, and a left padding of
50px, so you want to set its width to 775 - 50 = 725.px.

Also, the text-align: center on the body is going to cause trouble,
because IE  7 applies it to block elements while other browsers
don't.  You're better off setting it more locally.



On 12/6/06, Michael Netherton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm an old school coder. I've been writing sites for more than ten years and
 I'm trying to get my head around CSS. As an old dog and I'm trying to learn
 some new tricks, but this is turning out to be incredibly frustrating. I'm
 reading Dan's book, Bulletproof Web Design, and I'm trying to duplicate
 these examples so I may learn the ropes. However, I'm not having a great
 deal of success.

 I just don't understand why this is not working. I would be incredibly
 grateful if anyone were to take a look and explain what the heck I'm doing
 wrong. My first attempt at css is found here: http://www.mocap (dot)
 com/default2.asp  [sorry to post a url that has to be edited, but I don't
 want the SE's to pick it up]

 I could have our new site up and done by now in tables, but I don't want to
 bloat the code when it should be able to be done with CSS.

 Sincerely,

 Michael Netherton
 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/



-- 
Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to CSS, can't figure out why this won't work.

2006-12-06 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Michael Netherton wrote:
 I'm an old school coder. I've been writing sites for more than ten 
 years and I'm trying to get my head around CSS. As an old dog and I'm
  trying to learn some new tricks, but this is turning out to be 
 incredibly frustrating.
...
 http://www.mocap (dot) com/default2.asp

You should go back to the basics first, and produce clean source-code.
These articles are a good starting-point...
http://www.sitepoint.com/article/html-37-steps-perfect-markup
http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=393445
...and even the following might be useful...
http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03.html

The rest shouldn't be all that problematic then, and may end up looking
something like this...
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/test_8660.html

A few issues - that I have corrected:
- the 'W3C box-model'[1] must be taken into account.
- 'collapsing margins'[2] play a role and must be controlled.
- XHTML is case-sensitive.
- XHTML *must* be well-formed.

Also: All browsers can override font-sizes defined in pixels, so your
navigation may break into more than one line. Get used to it.

Note: I used HTML Tidy to clean up your code...
http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_07.html
...so the whole operation only took .2 second.

regards
Georg

[1]http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#box-dimensions
[2]http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#collapsing-margins
-- 
http://www.gunlaug.no
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] New to CSS and need help positioning

2006-08-10 Thread Kathryn Olds
Hi,
I'm new to CSS - about 3 weeks into it. I've been working on this page
trying to get CDs to line up under each other and off to the right, the
corresponding MP3 list to listen, and chord charts next to that. Can anyone
look at this and see where I've gone wrong, please? Thanks in advance.

Link: www.blastoffmusic.org/downloads/downloads2.php

Kat

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to CSS and need help positioning

2006-08-10 Thread Kathryn Olds
Having started learning CSS only three weeks ago, my site does have some
tables. However, in my defense, I did create 2 table-less pages index and
gallery last week. So not all hope is lost! :-D

I did what you suggested Tyson and that helped a lot; however, my text still
runs together. I've uploaded it again. I even tried a margin-top to see if
it helped. Nope. Any ideas? Thanks again!

Kat

-Original Message-
From: Tyson Tate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 10:06 AM
To: Kathryn Olds
Subject: Re: [css-d] New to CSS and need help positioning


Eeek! Tables for layout! Evil!

Anyways, add clear: left to your CDContent class.

-Tyson

On 8/10/06, Kathryn Olds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 I'm new to CSS - about 3 weeks into it. I've been working on this page
 trying to get CDs to line up under each other and off to the right, the
 corresponding MP3 list to listen, and chord charts next to that. Can
anyone
 look at this and see where I've gone wrong, please? Thanks in advance.

 Link: www.blastoffmusic.org/downloads/downloads2.php

 Kat

 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] New to CSS: Text randomly doesn't appear in IE/Windows

2006-04-18 Thread Shelley Cook
I am both brand new to this list as well as to CSS.  My very first  
attempt to write a CSS based site has led me to the following  
problem.  First, the site link.

http://www.racsb.state.va.us/Mayfest/index.html

The CSS itself can be found at http://www.racsb.state.va.us/Mayfest/ 
mayfestsite.css

(affected pages all can be found through links on the main page nav div)

Everything works well in various browser views from my mac, but when  
the site is loaded it randomly doesn't show the text in the content  
div of certain pages.  however, if you view source in the browser,  
sometimes it will load and stay there, and other times it won't.  It  
will also show the text if you drag over it and highlight it, but not  
upon initial loading.

I find the weirdest part to all of this is that I created each page  
based on the index.html file, so the layout structures of each are  
identical and the only difference is that i only edited text content  
in the site and added two images.  It doesn't seem to be specific to  
the pages with images, either.  (that one page only partially loads  
its images is a separate issue and one I am not as concerned with at  
the moment).

I have limited resources to perform the test as well.  I am creating  
the site from a distance and have no access to the server directly.   
Any page updates or corrections need to be e-mailed in, and running  
tests will drive the person loading these pages for me bonkers!

any help would be appreciated.  I am writing the site as a freebie to  
a non-profit in the region and the even connected starts very soon.   
Thanks!

Shelley
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to CSS: Text randomly doesn't appear in IE/Windows

2006-04-18 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip]
Everything works well in various browser views from my mac, but when  
the site is loaded it randomly doesn't show the text in the content  
div of certain pages.  however, if you view source in the browser,  
sometimes it will load and stay there, and other times it won't.  It  
will also show the text if you drag over it and highlight it, but not  
upon initial loading.
[/snip]

Google for IE peek-a-boo bug and you'll get your answers. There is no
magic bullet fix.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] New to CSS...Why isn't this horizontal?

2005-09-12 Thread Rick Faircloth

Hi, all...

I'm new to trying to do things with CSS...considering
using CSS instead of tables and seeing what can be done.

I'm trying to line up two DIV boxes horizontally.  Instead,
they are still vertical...

What am I doing wrong?

UL Style=display: inline-block;
  list-style-type: none

 LIDIV Style=top: 25px;
   left: 25px;
   height: 25px;
   width: 25px;
   margin: 5px;
   border: 1px solid black;
/DIV/LI

 LIDIV Style=height: 25px;
   width: 25px;
   margin: 5px;
   border: 1px solid black;
/DIV/LI

/UL

Thanks,

Rick



__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to CSS...Why isn't this horizontal?

2005-09-12 Thread Eric Shepherd
You have nothing set on the li elements to tell them to stack
horizontally. You set display: inline-block on the ul, but the items
inside the ul will stack as normal, which is vertically.

Setting the display property on the ul will force it to sit
horizontally with other block-level elements which are SIBLINGS (e.g.
another ul after this one), but it won't cause the children (the
lis) to display horizontally.

Instead, take the display off of the ul and set it (or float:left)
on the li elements. Then they will line up horizontally.

On 9/12/05, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi, all...
 
 I'm new to trying to do things with CSS...considering
 using CSS instead of tables and seeing what can be done.
 
 I'm trying to line up two DIV boxes horizontally.  Instead,
 they are still vertical...
 
 What am I doing wrong?
 
 UL Style=display: inline-block;
   list-style-type: none
 
  LIDIV Style=top: 25px;
left: 25px;
height: 25px;
width: 25px;
margin: 5px;
border: 1px solid black;
 /DIV/LI
 
  LIDIV Style=height: 25px;
width: 25px;
margin: 5px;
border: 1px solid black;
 /DIV/LI
 
 /UL
 
 Thanks,
 
 Rick
 
 
 
 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New to CSS...Why isn't this horizontal?

2005-09-12 Thread Steve Clay
Monday, September 12, 2005, 12:58:29 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
 I'm trying to line up two DIV boxes horizontally.  Instead,

Sounds like you basically want a 2-column layout, minus the header/footer.
You don't say what content will go in these boxes, so I'm assuming they
should expand as necessary.  This means float-based will be the way to go.

You could take something like this and adapt it:
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/tutorial0816.htm
remove the #top and #footer divs...

Could you give us an example of what you'd like to see?

Steve
-- 
http://mrclay.org/ : http://frenchhorns.mrclay.org/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


RE: [css-d] New to CSS...Why isn't this horizontal?

2005-09-12 Thread Rick Faircloth

Hi, Eric...

That worked...I had to using float: left (IE 6)...display: inline-block
didn't work...guess that works for other browsers?

Thanks for the help!

Rick


-Original Message-
From: Eric Shepherd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: css-discuss
Subject: Re: [css-d] New to CSS...Why isn't this horizontal?


You have nothing set on the li elements to tell them to stack
horizontally. You set display: inline-block on the ul, but the items
inside the ul will stack as normal, which is vertically.

Setting the display property on the ul will force it to sit
horizontally with other block-level elements which are SIBLINGS (e.g.
another ul after this one), but it won't cause the children (the
lis) to display horizontally.

Instead, take the display off of the ul and set it (or float:left)
on the li elements. Then they will line up horizontally.

On 9/12/05, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi, all...
 
 I'm new to trying to do things with CSS...considering
 using CSS instead of tables and seeing what can be done.
 
 I'm trying to line up two DIV boxes horizontally.  Instead,
 they are still vertical...
 
 What am I doing wrong?
 
 UL Style=display: inline-block;
   list-style-type: none
 
  LIDIV Style=top: 25px;
left: 25px;
height: 25px;
width: 25px;
margin: 5px;
border: 1px solid black;
 /DIV/LI
 
  LIDIV Style=height: 25px;
width: 25px;
margin: 5px;
border: 1px solid black;
 /DIV/LI
 
 /UL
 
 Thanks,
 
 Rick
 
 
 
 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re[2]: [css-d] New to CSS...Why isn't this horizontal?

2005-09-12 Thread Steve Clay
Monday, September 12, 2005, 2:17:47 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
 I guess, by your comments, that DIV's need to have a float
 characteristic to be expandable according to content?

Float-based layouts are typically more flexible than absolute positioning
at least.  Floated elements remain in the normal flow so they can affect
and be affected by content around them (good for accessibility, a bit
harder to design for).

Steve
-- 
http://mrclay.org/ : http://frenchhorns.mrclay.org/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] new to css

2005-08-30 Thread Roger Roelofs

Patrick,

On Aug 29, 2005, at 9:38 PM, Patrick Roane wrote:


I've been working on a site that is supposed to
funtion as a pure liquid .css site:

www.lessstressdoctor.com/test/index.html

The problem I am having is with IE 5 and 5.2 for MAC.
For some reason the words 'services' 'bio' and
'testimonials' (each on their respective pages ...see
the nav bar) overlap the text. Only after I hit the
re-fresh button do they adjust.

Also, on the 'contact' page (again, a problem with the
above mentioned browser), every other field is out of
line with it's corrisponding label.

Does anyone have any suggestions on what I can do iron
out these problems?


Step 1 should be to remove the html and css errors.
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A// 
www.lessstressdoctor.com/test/bio.html
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? 
profile=css2warning=2uri=http%3A//www.lessstressdoctor.com/test/ 
bio.html


Step 2 should be to remove the css that is not actually used on the  
site.


When you strip it down to the essentials, the problems will be easier  
to find and fix.


hth
Roger,

Roger Roelofs
Remember, if you’re headed in the wrong direction,
God allows U-turns!
  ~Allison Gappa Bottke
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] new to css

2005-08-29 Thread Patrick Roane
Hey folks,

I've been working on a site that is supposed to
funtion as a pure liquid .css site: 

www.lessstressdoctor.com/test/index.html 

The problem I am having is with IE 5 and 5.2 for MAC.
For some reason the words 'services' 'bio' and
'testimonials' (each on their respective pages ...see
the nav bar) overlap the text. Only after I hit the
re-fresh button do they adjust.

Also, on the 'contact' page (again, a problem with the
above mentioned browser), every other field is out of
line with it's corrisponding label.

Does anyone have any suggestions on what I can do iron
out these problems?  

Patrick Roane
Web design and development
www.franklin-band.com
Fox River Grove, Il.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/