[CTRL] Kelly Murder Was 'Sloppy Work' - or Mind Controlled?

2003-09-08 Thread Lyn Milnes
-Caveat Lector-


-Caveat Lector-










Comment on Kelly death and story below.




 Surely Campbell was in
 these words (below) merely reminding Blair he had nothing to hide.
 Blair looks a bit stricken in
 press photographs. Personally, I suspect he is under pressures he has
 not divulged to anyone.
 I doubt that somebody else was needed
 to slit Kellys wrist. Given the mind control techniques being used in
 21st century warfare (see below), the easiest way to kill Kelly
 would be to hypnotise him and get him to do it himself in a trance state,
 foreseeing that people might happen by. In this scenario the local thugs
 would be present but staying at a distance, being too cowardly to approach
 the body to remove the heart monitor in case they were observed. 
 Such a method (as I have just
 suggested) would be characteristic not of British government but of vested
 interests by whom Kelly had earlier been used. These thugs are powerful
 but not yet powerful enough to call themselves government.
 It would accord with Kellys
 reported answer, months earlier, to a friend who asked What will happens
 if the USA invades Iraq, of I
 will probably be found dead in the woods (not exact words). This might
 have been said semi-dreamily, retrieving submerged information from his
 mind.
 IMO Kelly perhaps had an
 earlier role forced on him by the people who managed his death, perhaps to
 help make the WMD dossier as innocuous as possible, and this would clarify
 his reported remark to the friend.
 Some people are reproaching
 government for not protecting Kellys identity. But Kelly had by that
 time disobeyed rules and leaked confidential information. Why would
 government still be expected to protect him under these circumstances.
 IMO, again going by typical
 mind control military and political methods, Kelly, if being used to
 restrain comments in a dossier, would have been threatened with a woods
 death from the start  plus threatened with a lot of other things. These
 sorts of mind controllers use a battery of threats, half-hidden in the
 subconscious of the victim.
 I think the friend of Kelly needs
 questioning further about the context of the remark and hope the enquiry
 does this.




Notes:



Mind control research at a military level
has been going on for more than 50 years in USA, USSR and Europe. Private groups have
now got hold of it. If you would like to know more on mind control methods, try
www.datafilter.com/mc/

which is a responsibly-run site with
references to published information. 



And whenever you read of child abuse rings,
bear in mind that child abuse is linked to this same sort of political
blackmail leading to political power. This is the new military technology of
today. 



The new wars, in other words, are being
fought by helpless infants. Victimised children, who are selected (usually) from
attacked families or attacked populations at an early age, are traumatised in
ways which make them more easy to control later on. In other words, some
players in this Kelly drama might themselves have been child abuse victims,
cultivated and used throughout life under part-hypnosis and part-vicious
threats. Genetic lines which are found to be easy to control in this way are
cultivated, their families becoming attacked families.



--Lyn Milnes









On
Behalf Of William Shannon
Sent: 04
 September 2003 10:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CTRL] Former MI6 Agent:
Kelly Murder Was 'Sloppy Work'



http://www.propagandamatrix.com/010903kellymurder.html



Former MI6 Agent: Kelly Murder Was 'Sloppy Work' 

I received the following E mail from a Scottish journalist who works from a
mainstream paper. I know his identity but he asked it not to be revealed.
Suffice to say I have verified his name. It is up to the reader to discern
whether the following information is accurate but it fits in with related
information previously featured on this website. The E mail is edited for
clarity.

=

I'm a reader from Glasgow, Scotland in the United
  Kingdom. I'm a journalist and stand-up comedian and heard some bits
and pieces from a BBC reporter who was on Tony Blair's far-east tour plane
following Kelly's death.

A conversation was overheard by this BBC reporter between Tony Blair and his
press secretary Alistair Campbell. The conversation was heard folowing the
press conference when Blair was asked if he had Dr Kelly's blood on his hands
and Blair froze and didn't answer.

Campbell, a notorious ranter was heard to say: What the fuck was that,
you know the line on this, what were you doing, why didn't you answer.
Blair's response was inaudible and Campbell was then
heard to say: This is what you wanted, you asked for this so play the
game Tony. Since then Blair continually trotted out the line about
waiting for the Inquiry

Re: [CTRL] Iraqi doctors blame cancer rise on depleted uranium shells

2003-09-02 Thread Lyn Milnes
-Caveat Lector-












By-Products of Manufacturing  costly disposal or profitable sale?

(Well, that depends how stupid your government is.)



--

The best way to dispose of unwanted by-products, from a business bottom-line
point of view, is to get some idiot who doesnt realise you have a
disposal problem to pay good money for them. 



In bauxite-aluminium manufacturing, apparently the unwelcome by-product
fluoride no longer has to be dumped, as a nuisance and expense to the
manufacturer. 



It can now be sold to government for use as a dental caries
preventative, making added profits for the aluminium business. Though
useful only while childrens second teeth are growing, fluoride is often administered
to all age groups in drinking water. Some opponents say fluoride in
drinking water also has the tendency to make a population more docile, said to
have been discovered during Nazi WW2 research.



Similarly, in natural uranium refining, the metal remainder by-product depleted
uranium can be sold to government. 



As mentioned in the Japan Today story submitted (below) it is sold for
use in artillery shells and bombs designed to penetrate tanks and other armoured
vehicles. Some doctors blame increased birth defects and increased leukaemic
type cancers on the use of depleted uranium shells in Bosnia and Iraq.
In Iraq the increase in birth defects since 1988, before Gulf War One, has been
tenfold in some areas, and the rise in leukaemic cancers is equally
dramatic. 



It should be noted however that such medical conditions can result from
other factors which might similarly have been increased during war, such as non-ionising
radiation such as altered electro-magnetic fields, inhalation of other
chemicals, or ingestion of other chemicals. 



There is good recent British evidence for example (H Dolk et al) showing
that birth defects increase by about 33% within a 2-3 kilometre vicinity of typical
European landfills, though such landfills are not believed to contain items
emitting ionising radiation.



Leukaemic disorders have been found to occur in suspicious clusters
around certain types of electromagnetic fields, as shown in research in Sydney,
NSW, Australia, or downwind of some metal smelters such as in Port Kembla, NSW,
  Australia. How do we know these same sorts of effects were not
what caused the increased incidence after Gulf War One?



Business is good, especially small and medium-sized business.
Attention to profits is good. Recycling of wastes is
good. 



But all these things can be used to create bad ends as well, especially
when the scale is huge because government gets involved. 



We shouldnt let a small handful of idiot public servants have
the power to dose us all with something in our drinking water. Or,
for that matter, in our health systems, armies, welfare agencies or schools.




Governments do a rotten job in health, only a fair job in education
(with lots of hurts, failures and injuries to self-esteem), a just plain
anti-social job in welfare, and they always make a mess of things when they touch
business. They destroy small business, confuse medium business, and
are completely outwitted by big business. 



Governments should be starved of money and kept very small.




Perhaps they should be administering only Police, Justice and Foreign
Affairs; nothing else. Individuals, families and local communities
should be allowed to fill in the social, business, educative and health gaps in
the ways they find best for themselves. It would force them to get
together, discuss, and co-operate  and can that be a bad thing?

When it comes to disposing of unwelcome by-products, the best idiot of
all is usually Government. Government isnt really an idiot, of
course, but it only takes a few bribed or mind-controlled (e.g. hypnotised with
social and technical aids  see www.datafilter.com/mc/ ) or outside-loyalties
public servants to make it one. I think democracy is great 
or would be, if we had ever had it. We havent.
What we have had is vested interests exploiting government to suit themselves,
while putting up a camouflage of democracy. Maybe, if we are
careful about protecting the integrity of our greatest asset, the internet, we
will one day achieve it. Meanwhile, lets chop government off
at the knees by, say, abolishing income tax. 



But, a caution: lets not create a dangerous
vacuum. We dont want to get rid of one government only to
find a self-appointed surrogate government has come in and taken its
place. Lets not allow big media or big business or big
religion to make themselves into some new government. That would be
worse than what we have now.



Lyn Milnes

in New Zealand











On
Behalf Of Eric Hoffsten
Sent: 19
 August 2003 17:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CTRL] Iraqi doctors
blame cancer rise on depleted uranium shells



from
http://www.japantoday.com/e/?content=newscat=8id=269783

Re: [CTRL] Kelly: 'I'll probably be found dead in the woods'

2003-08-21 Thread Lyn Milnes
-Caveat Lector-


-Caveat Lector-










Good story, significant in my view, because there is
a pattern of people who have been threatened dropping hints to the odd person
while not being able to say so directly to the authorities. This
tells me a great deal. Thank you.

LM



===

William Shannon wrote:

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1023



Kelly: 'I'll probably be found dead in the
woods'
PA News Reporters -- The Independent 21 August 2003 

David Kelly, the government weapons expert, predicted that he would be
found dead in the woods if Iraq was invaded, months before his
apparent suicide, the Hutton Inquiry heard today. 

The weapons inspector slashed his wrist in Oxfordshire woodlands after being
revealed as the source for BBC claims that the Government's dossier on Iraq's weapons
of mass destruction had been sexed up in the run-up to war. 

Foreign Office official David Broucher said Dr Kelly had made what he thought
to be the throwaway remark in February, when they met in Geneva. 

Dr Kelly had expected to remain anonymous after meeting BBC journalist Andrew
Gilligan, the inquiry had heard earlier. 

He had publicly maintained that the Ministry of Defence had been quite
good when he revealed he had briefed Mr Gilligan. But privately the
weapons expert told a trusted contact: I have been through the wringer.
 (more) 






www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] Israeli Center Opened In Baghdad (How Nice)

2003-08-20 Thread Lyn Milnes
-Caveat Lector-


-Caveat Lector-








Some of this story is
nonsense.   



Iraqi citizens must have used the word Israel.   Israel was formed in 1948.   Just
from my personal experience, I know there were lots of long-established Jewish
Iraqi citizens in Iraq before the political repression of them in the 1950s.   >From about
1957, they fled for their lives to other countries, which was wise.   Jews have
been persecuted for so long, they quickly sense persecution and make the
enormous sacrifice of packing up and moving on, to save their families.   What
else can they do?   They are not warmongers by nature.



Why were Jewish people being persecuted
suddenly in Iraq in the 1950s?   I dont know.   



I do know however that in the mid-60s there
were ex-Nazi types who had become comfortably established in the Middle Eastern
countries.   I noted this during my own travels in the Middle East.   This factor could
have had something to do with the fact that cultured, educated Iraqi Jewish
families who had lived there peacefully for many generations suddenly had to
pack up and flee their own country.   



The whole attitude depicted in this story
is disgraceful, in my view, and you shouldnt be promulgating it.





L L Milnes











William Shannon
wrote: (extract)


Dr. Anwar Abdu Aziz, professor of political sciences in Baghdad University, charged that MEMRI and its offshoots have
sinister objectives. 

Israel's underground goals in the Middle East are not a secret; this center
is, in effect, a façade for intelligence and security bodies orchestrated by
the Mossad (Israel's intelligence service), he stressed. 

The academic urged the U.S.-handpicked interim Iraqi Governing Council to
immediately shut down the Israeli center in Baghdad because it will penetrate our security. 

For her part, Dr. Soad Bahudin al-Mousli from Al-Rafeden University, said Iraqis have never pronounced the word Israel and always referred to it as the Zionist
enemy. 

She wondered: Who would have imagined that Baghdad would someday host a center serving Israeli plots and
schemes? 

Before the ouster of Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, Iraq was the only country in the Arab world 
if not in the entire world  to sentence anyone who imported Israeli
products to capital punishment. 

This is the product of the U.S.
occupation of Iraq and reaffirms out conviction that Israel and the United
  States are
two sides of the same coin, Dr. Mousli underlined. 

She further exhorted Iraqis to stand up to this Israeli infiltration, which runs
counter to the interests of the Arab nations.  






www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] U.N. Group in 'showdown' with religion (Bacon)

2003-08-14 Thread Lyn Milnes
-Caveat Lector-

I am puzzled about how the Roman Catholic Church can speak out as though
opposing gays, when 10% of its own priests are leading active gay lives.

The 10% figure comes from married ex-priest and university lecturer in
psychiatry W. Richard Sipe, who is a sexual counsellor of catholic priests.


His books say 10% of priests are gay, 30% of priests are leading lives of
heterosexual relationships, and 6% are sexually oriented towards children.

Is the Pope's real objection to gay marriage that it might put extra
pressure on the church to let all priests marry, which would mean they have
to pay priests salaries?  This might send the church bankrupt.

In the USA alone, if all RC priests had to be paid a salary of $35,000 a
year, a minimum so they could marry and support a family, this would cost
the Roman Catholic church $1.57 billion a year.

LLM
(Sending this again, so apologies if duplicated - I got a strange garbled
version back)


 Subj: U.N. group in 'showdown with religion'
 Date: 8/7/03 11:51:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent from the Internet (Details)



 U.N. group in 'showdown with religion'
 Gathered homosexual leaders to sharpen 'rights' strategy worldwide

 http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33984

C 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

   Buoyed by growing political acceptance of homosexuals worldwide, a
 United Nations group promoting gay and lesbian rights met in New
 York

 to sharpen a multi-pronged strategy that includes a showdown with
 religion.

 The meeting was sponsored by the U.N. Gay, Lesbian or Bisexual
 Employees, known as UNGLOBE, a group officially recognized by the
 worldwide body in 1996.

 At a forum Monday, attended briefly by U.N. Secretary General Kofi
 Annan, panel members singled out Roman Catholics and evangelical
 Protestants as opponents, according to the New York-based Catholic
 Family and Human Rights Institute.

 Speakers included U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., who urged Congress
 to withhold support for a free trade agreement with Muslim-majority
 Egypt because of its treatment of homosexuals.

 Paula Ettelbrick, executive director of the San Francisco-based
 International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, or IGLHRC,
 announced a coming showdown with religion and vowed Pope John Paul
 II's call to arms against homosexual marriage would be successfully
 combated.

 Another panel member, Princeton University professor Anthony Appiah,
 wondered whether or not religion should be limited, as it poses a
 challenge to the homosexual agenda.

 To thunderous applause, Svend Robinson, a member of the Canadian
 parliament, told the Catholic Church to clean up your own house
 before criticizing the morality of homosexuals.


www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] Catholic Hitler With Nazi Photos!

2003-08-14 Thread Lyn Milnes
Title: Message
-Caveat Lector-


-Caveat Lector-











Dave,



I found these statements striking.?? 



Yes, and a lot of non-catholics died at the stake because
they refused to say that the mass wafer and wine were LITERALLY THE FLESH AND
THE BLOOD OF Christ.?? (You were not allowed to say it merely represented the
body and blood of Christ.)



If you feel like it, tell me how you characterise the
squabbling RC sides.?? ?i.e. Which group or order is on which side in the RC
church internal squabble??? This is a question that has been occupying my mind
for a while.



Lyn Milnes



I very much doubt that one-godder-theists with
their plethora of squabblesinternal andexternal, often over the
most banal of theological minutia, need any help toward schism and
dysfunctional 'unity'from so-called New Agers. Monotheists do a far
better job of screwing each other over than any outsiders. They have shed each
others blood over such profound societal issues as to whether god is one person
or three.



Roman Catholicism (aka Globalism), is a political
totalitarian system which masquerades as areligious faith. 



Ithas spilt more human blood than any other pseudo
religious organism.










www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
Om

Re: [CTRL] U.N. Group in 'showdown' with religion (Bacon)

2003-08-11 Thread Lyn Milnes
-Caveat Lector-

I am puzzled about how the Roman Catholic Church can speak out as though
opposing gays, when 10% of its own priests are leading active gay lives.

The 10% figure comes from married ex-priest and university lecturer in
psychiatry W. Richard Sipe, who is a sexual counsellor of catholic priests.


His books say 10% of priests are gay, 30% of priests are leading lives of
heterosexual relationships, and 6% are sexually oriented towards children.

Is the Pope's real objection to gay marriage that it might put extra
pressure on the church to let all priests marry, which would mean they have
to pay priests salaries?  This might send the church bankrupt.

In the USA alone, if all RC priests had to be paid a salary of $35,000 a
year, a minimum so they could marry and support a family, this would cost
the Roman Catholic church $1.57 billion a year.

LLM




 Subj: U.N. group in 'showdown with religion'
 Date: 8/7/03 11:51:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent from the Internet (Details)



 U.N. group in 'showdown with religion'
 Gathered homosexual leaders to sharpen 'rights' strategy worldwide

 http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33984

 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

   Buoyed by growing political acceptance of homosexuals worldwide, a
 United Nations group promoting gay and lesbian rights met in New York

 to sharpen a multi-pronged strategy that includes a showdown with
 religion.

 The meeting was sponsored by the U.N. Gay, Lesbian or Bisexual
 Employees, known as UNGLOBE, a group officially recognized by the
 worldwide body in 1996.

 At a forum Monday, attended briefly by U.N. Secretary General Kofi
 Annan, panel members singled out Roman Catholics and evangelical
 Protestants as opponents, according to the New York-based Catholic
 Family and Human Rights Institute.

 Speakers included U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., who urged Congress
 to withhold support for a free trade agreement with Muslim-majority
 Egypt because of its treatment of homosexuals.

 Paula Ettelbrick, executive director of the San Francisco-based
 International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, or IGLHRC,
 announced a coming showdown with religion and vowed Pope John Paul
 II's call to arms against homosexual marriage would be successfully
 combated.

 Another panel member, Princeton University professor Anthony Appiah,
 wondered whether or not religion should be limited, as it poses a
 challenge to the homosexual agenda.

 To thunderous applause, Svend Robinson, a member of the Canadian
 parliament, told the Catholic Church to clean up your own house
 before criticizing the morality of homosexuals.

 Robinson criticized Roman Catholic Bishop Frederick Henry of Calgary,
 calling his actions in defense of traditional marriage unbelievable.

 The deputy mocked born again Christians, asking, Did they have to
 come back again as themselves?

 As WorldNetDaily reported, Robinson is the sponsor of a bill that would

 add sexual orientation as a protected category in Canada's genocide and

 hate crimes legislation. Opponents believe it would criminalize public
 expression against homosexual behavior, including making quotations
 from the Bible.

 The U.N. group that hosted the event is pressing the United Nations to
 recognize same-sex couples and treat their partnerships as equal to
 traditional marriages.

 Carol Bellamy, executive director of the U.N. Children's Fund, or
 UNICEF, sent a message of support to the conference.

 Annan told panel members the world should become much more tolerant
 and compassionate.

 I think what is important is that we should stress those positive
 aspects in our society, the things that bring us together, and move
 away from discrimination and persecution, the secretary general said.

 At a news conference last week, the Atlantic Monthly reported, Annan
 was asked to comment on the debate over what constitutes a family.

 I believe that individuals should be allowed to make their own choices

 and that we should be careful not to draw conclusions or adopt
 prejudicial attitudes towards people for their choices and
 preferences, he said. That's not something I think this organization
 should get involved in.

 Mark Malloch Brown, administrator of the U.N. Development Program, sent

 a statement to the organizers, stating, Discrimination based on sexual

 orientation not only violates basic human rights but also hinders
 development by immobilizing human capital, stifling expression and
 limiting freedom of choice.



   U.N. Human Rights Commission meeting


 The panel discussed ways to ensure the success of a resolution at
 introduced at this year's U.N. Human Rights Commission to expand the
 world body's definition of discrimination to include sexual
 orientation.

 Robinson blamed the Vatican for the resolution's failure and promised a

 global lobby effort to ensure victory next year.

 This year's resolution was 

[CTRL] Liberia, West Africa US religious right

2003-08-05 Thread Lyn Milnes
-Caveat Lector-


-Caveat Lector-









From American Atheists newsletter:





* Thousands of miles away is
yet another theater of al Qaeda operations, and politics involving Enron
friends and the American religious right.? Start with Ralph Reed, Enron
political hit man and associate of televangelist Pat Robertson.? Robertson --
who recently spent $75 million in an unsuccessful bid to open a California
oil refinery of his own -- is in business in Liberia
thanks to close friend and associate Charles Taylor, the country's dictator.



In December, 1998, Robertson
incorporated Freedom Gold Limited out of the Caymans, the same offshore shelter
used by Enron and numerous other financial operators.? On May
 18, 1999 Robertson, Charles Taylor and members of the
Taylor puppet cabinet signed an
operating agreement.? Robertson would invest money in the Freedom Gold Limited
exploration, and the Taylor
government -- Charles R.? Taylor
-- would be given 10% equity investment and the right to purchase
at least 15% of subsequent shares.



Robertson has become an
outspoken defender of Taylor,
despite his shabby record on human rights.? For those who have watched Pat
Robertson and his global business dealings over the past quarter-century, this
is a reminder of his earlier financial and personal relationship with former
Zairian strongman Mobutu Sese-Seko. Robertson established the African
Development Corporation and obtained lucrative mining and lumber contracts, all
the while serving as Mobutu's advocate in the United
  States.? The dictatorial Mobutu, though, drained
his nation's treasury, absconding to Switzerland
with an estimated $2 billion in stolen assets.



Robertson has defended Taylor
as a Christian statesman despite the scrutiny of human rights
groups and now even links to the al Qaeda terrorist network.? This story begins
in September, 1998 when, following an attack by Taylor's
police on the U.S.?
Embassy, al Qaeda operative Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah arrived in the capital of Monrovia
and met with a top Taylor
lieutenant, Ibrahim Bah.? According to a story in the New
 Republic
magazine by Ryan Lizza, the two then flew in a government helicopter to meet
with a senior commander of the Revolutionary United Front.? RUF has
controlled the diamond mines of Sierra Leon
for the last four years, and was the source of conflict
diamonds used to obtain funds for the American embassy bombings in Kenya
and Tanzania.



Since then ...? bin
Laden has raised millions -- perhaps tens of millions -- of dollars buying
cut-rate RUF diamonds and selling them in Europe,
noted Lizza.



This is all very bad
news for Taylor's
apologists and business associates in the United
  States,  added Lizza, a motley crew
that includes Jesse Jackson, Pat Robertson, New Jersey Representative Donald
Payne, and former Massachusetts Democratic Party Chairman Lester Hyman...



It has been bad news for
Robertson as well, whose deal with Taylor
calls for mining operations in a 900-square-kilometer section of southeastern Liberia.?
Taylor's regime has even issued a
press release quoting Robertson as saying, I pray that this investment
may become a wonderful blessing to the people of Liberia.



One functionary in the
Taylor-Robertson deal is Jenkins Dunbar, Minister of Lands, Mines and Energy
for the Taylor
regime.? He has been reported as a collaborator with other cronies of the Liberian
strongman in facilitating the work of international criminal gangs. Dunbar's
name also surfaced in the fraud investigation into Greater Ministries
International, an investment scam operated by Rev.? James W.? List of Tampa,
 Florida.?
List has already been convicted in U.S.
federal court for his participation in the scheme, and it was Dunbar who vetoed
concerns by the Ministry of National Security, and ushered through the permits
allowing List and his group to operate in Liberia.
In addition, Dunbar
has an indictment against him in the Oklahoma
where he worked as an inspector for the state and monitored oil wells.
According to Perspective magazine, Dunbar
orchestrated fraud and received bribes and kickbacks for ignoring safety
hazards.



-- Robertson, Jackson
and others defend Taylor
against charges of corruption and megalomania; but the Freedom Gold operation
in Liberia
required direct intervention by Taylor who bypassed his own legislature in
order to obtain mining concessions for the prominent American televangelist.?
The Robertson-Taylor document was labeled Mineral Development Agreement Between
the Republic of Liberia and Freedom Gold Limited.? It gave Robertson
control of gold mining concessions that had belonged to an established
businessman named Ken Ross II, a supporter of an earlier regime.



The Liberian legislature,
though, refused to ratify the Agreement.? A second contract was drawn up in
October, 2000 which provided that the Taylor-Dunbar-Robertson deal would take
effect when approved by the president of Republic
 of Liberia.?
Gone was language 

Re: [CTRL] We Already Know ... [CTRL] Gassed Kurds

2003-08-02 Thread Lyn Milnes
-Caveat Lector-

FLW:

Thank you for your reply.

I am having difficulty here because my messages are being bounced back to me
by CTRL, so the rest of the list will not have a clue what your reply
referred to.   For some reason my original comment on Kurds/WMD was allowed
through, but now we are back to the blocked stage I was at on the list
prior to that.   I can only assume some selective mechanism is operating.

I saw your two points about
(1)  gas is not a WMD, only nukes, and
(2)  the USA helped Saddam earlier on.

My letter contained a point which I thought replied to the first of these.
5000 Kurds (even though that number is disputed) is a mass of people, and
most discussions of WMD go wider than nuclear weapons.

I believe you are correct about the US helping Saddam earlier on.   I have
looked at the weapons source statistics, and the contributions of France and
Russia towards Saddam's arsenal were also large.

Regards,
LM

-Original Message-
From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of flw
Sent: 03 August 2003 13:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] We Already Know ...  [CTRL] Gassed Kurds

Lyn:

The point of my message was not whether or not Saddam gassed the Kurds.
The Iranians gassed, the Iraqis gassed, the Kurds were victims.

You ignored the point that the US helped Saddam manufacture his poison.

The US was responsible for the deaths of 100,000/s of Shiites and Kurds when
it formented an uprising against Saddam in 1991 after the Gulf War - then
had
second thoughts about permitting the Shiites from taking power, afraid they
would
ally themselves with the Iranian Shiites. The US permitted Saddam to use his
heliocopters after we had established a 'no fly zone' to butcher the Shiites
and
Kurds. Now we cry crocodile tears

The WMD BS is agiprop invented by the neo-cons.
flw

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] We Already Know ... [CTRL] Gassed Kurds

2003-08-02 Thread Lyn Milnes
-Caveat Lector-

Your argument is not valid.   Halabja had been occupied (temporarily) by
Iranian forces 48 hours before the main chemical attack from Iraq.   But
there had been earlier chemical attacks as well, and the Iraqi
administration later used the chemical attack on Halabja as a threat to keep
its Kurdish citizens in line.

There is a book called No Friends But The Mountains - the Tragic History Of
The Kurds, written by two senior UK journalists called John Bullock and
Harvey Morris, and first published in 1992.

On page 9 of the Penguin 1993 edition, it states:

. The Kurds saw little prospect that the Western build-up in the Gulf would
bring them any direct advantage.   In the early months of the crisis there
was certainly no thought in the West of a possible Kurdish role in an Iraqi
post-war settlement, if indeed there was to be a war.   The Kurds were also
mindful of the fact that if they decided to strike at the regime but struck
too soon and before it was sufficiently weakened, then Baghdad might respond
as it had in the past, with bombardment by chemical weapons.   Saddam's
deputy, Izzat Ibrahim, had even gone to Suleimaniyeh to warn them:  'If you
have forgotten Halabja, I would like to remind you that we are ready to
repeat the operation.' 

On page 142 it states:

 ...  In the late afternoon of 16 March the first wave of Iraqi planes
appeared over the town to drop their bomb-loads of mustard has, nerve gas
and cyanide.   Within a few hours as many as 5,000 people were dead and as
many again lay burned and gasping for breath from the effects of the
chemical attack..

.  The Kurds call Halabja the Kurdish Auschwitz, not because the scale of
the massacre was comparable with that of the Nazi death camp, but because
the victims were chosen merely because they were Kurds.   .as a punishment
for their assumed collaboration with Iran and the Iranian-backed peshmerga
who had seized Halabja from Iraqi forces less than forty-eight hours
earlier..

And

It was not the first time the Baathist regime had used chemical weapons
against the Kurds - Mullah Mustafa Barzani complained to the United Nations
as early as 1963 that Baghdad was using chemicals.   Nor was it to be the
last.   In the twelve months leading up to the raid on Halabja there had
been chemical attacks against villages, civilians and peshmerga units in
isolated valleys on twenty-one separate days.   After a raid on the Balasan
valley in Arbil province on 16 April 1987, 286 injured Kurds made their way
to Arbil city for medical attention.   They were all captured and killed by
the Iraqi army.   But Halabja was the most ruthless and deadly operation
until then, and had been directed at targets - civilian citizens of Iraq -
with no possible military significance.

L L Milnes

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] We Already Know the Administration Was Lying

2003-08-01 Thread Lyn Milnes
-Caveat Lector-


-Caveat Lector-










If Saddam Husseins
administration did not have WMD, then what did he use against the Kurds in northern
Iraq, when he dropped chemical weapons to murder
thousands of his own people? 



L L Milnes









-Original
Message-
From: Conspiracy Theory Research
List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of William Shannon
Sent: 02 August 2003 15:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CTRL] We Already Know
the Administration Was Lying

http://www.lewrockwell.com/callahan/callahan113.html


We Already Know the Administration Was Lying
by Gene Callahan

I found Bob Murphy's recent piece on
LewRockwell.com to be an excellent analysis of the recent controversy as to
whether the Bush administration was guilty of inflating the threat Saddam
Hussein presented to the US.
However, I felt that the conclusion understated the actual case against Bush.
Murphy wrote: Until weapons of mass destruction are found in Iraq, and have been verified by
independent experts, the US
invasion remains immoral and illegal, on the very criteria President Bush
himself laid out for it.

This implies that should the US find weapons of mass destruction (henceforth, WMDs),
then Bush is off the hook for lying to us on this issue. But I believe that we
already can conclude the administration was lying, whether or not any WMDs or
documents proving there were WMDs eventually are unearthed. (Like Murphy, I
don't pretend to have any deep knowledge of Iraq's military programs over the last decade. It would
neither shock me if it really had developed some very deadly weapons, nor if it
had not. I am an Iraq WMD agnostic. However, I do think it is
difficult to explain why, if Hussein would not destroy his WMDs to avert war,
he would suddenly destroy them right when they would actually be of use to
him.)







www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om