[CTRL] Fwd: Russia China --nuclear rivals of U.S.-- worried by talk of Iran attack

2007-09-19 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 18, 2007 5:50:24 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Russia  China --nuclear rivals of U.S.-- worried by talk  
of Iran attack





http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKL1877362220070918? 
pageNumber=1


Russia and China worried by Iran attack talk

Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:14pm BST
By Chris Baldwin

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia and China expressed alarm on Tuesday over  
comments by France's foreign minister raising the spectre of war  
with Iran, and Washington said diplomacy was key to ending a  
standoff with Tehran over its nuclear programme.


Minister Bernard Kouchner, his comments clearly testing the  
resilience of a coalition of major powers seeking to curb Iran's  
ambitions, sought to play down his weekend remarks, saying they had  
been meant as a warning against war.


I do not want it to be said that I am a warmonger! he told Le  
Monde newspaper, days before the five U.N. Security Council  
permanent members, including Russia and China, and Germany were due  
to meet to discuss possible new sanctions against Tehran.


My message was a message of peace, of seriousness and of  
determination, the paper quoted Kouchner as saying on his plane as  
he headed to Moscow for talks with his Russian counterpart.


Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov made it clear at a joint  
news briefing with Kouchner that his remarks had disturbed a  
Kremlin, like China, less inclined to sanctions than the West.


We are worried by reports that there is serious consideration  
being given to military action in Iran, Lavrov said. That is a  
threat to a region where there are already grave problems in Iraq  
and Afghanistan.


Washington, which itself has kept open the possibility of armed  
force if diplomacy fails, made clear it had no interest in military  
embroilment at this stage. At the same time, it seemed at pains to  
dismiss suggestions of disunity among the powers.


We believe that there is a diplomatic solution, White House  
spokeswoman Dana Perino said. We are working with the French and  
the rest of the EU (European Union) community in order to pressure  
Iran to comply with their obligations under the U.N. Security  
Council regulations.


Western powers led by the United States accuse Iran of using a  
purported nuclear power programme as a screen for development of  
nuclear arms -- something they fear could add enormously to  
instability in the already volatile Middle East. They point to  
Iran's past secrecy over nuclear research as cause for concern.


IRAN UNMOVED

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, an outspoken critic of the  
West, said Kouchner's comments were meant only for the media. We  
do not consider these threats to be serious.


Iran says it seeks nuclear energy only for electricity and condemns  
U.N. sanctions promoted by the five permanent members -- China,  
Russia, the United States, France and Britain -- and Germany over  
its uranium enrichment programme.


Lavrov, signalling Russian policy at a powers' meeting scheduled  
for Friday to consider new steps, said Iran should be left to work  
with the International Atomic Energy Agency before the world  
considers further sanctions or military action.


The United States and the European Union are taking tougher anti- 
Iranian sanctions ... if we agree to work collectively... then what  
purpose is served by unilateral actions?


China also condemned Kouchner's weekend remarks.

We believe the best option is to peacefully resolve the Iranian  
nuclear issue through diplomatic negotiations, which is in the  
common interests of the international community, Chinese Foreign  
Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said at a briefing.


We do not approve of easily resorting to threatening use of force  
in international affairs, Jiang said.


Kouchner said France had asked French firms not to bid for work in  
Iran.


We must prepare for the worst, he said in the weekend interview  
with RTL radio and LCI television. The worst, sir, is war. He  
said, however, that war was not an imminent prospect.



© Reuters 2006. All rights reserved. Republication or  
redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or  
similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written  
consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are  
registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of  
companies around the world.


Reuters journalists are subject to the Reuters Editorial Handbook  
which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.





See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its 

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia Arrests Assassins Hired by Berezovsky, Moles in Security Services

2007-08-29 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: August 28, 2007 8:29:19 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Russia Arrests Assassins Hired by Berezovsky, Moles in  
Security Services


Russia suggests Berezovsky

behind journalist's killing

by Shaun Walker in Moscow

The Independent (UK), 28 August 2007

http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article2901005.ece
Russian prosecutors have announced a breakthrough in the hunt for  
the killers of Anna Politkovskaya, the crusading journalist and  
prominent critic of Vladimir Putin, who was murdered last year.


Conveniently for the Kremlin, the finger of suspicion points  
directly at President Vladimir Putin's main enemy, the exiled  
Russian tycoon Boris Berezovsky.


The announcement came three days before what would have been  
Politkovskaya's 49th birthday, and almost a year after she was shot  
dead in a hail of bullets in the lift of her Moscow apartment  
building early last October.


The Russian prosecutor-general, Yuri Chaika, said at a press  
conference in Moscow yesterday that 10 arrests had been made,  
including the direct organisers, accomplices and the assassin himself.


Figures within the Russian Interior Ministry and secret services  
have been arrested as accomplices to the crime, but it was hinted  
that the mastermind of the murder was the oligarch living outside  
Russia.


The person who ordered the crime, said Mr Chaika, was living  
outside Russia and wanted to destabilise the situation in the  
country ... and return to the previous ruling system, when money  
and oligarchs decided everything.


This would suggest either the London-based Boris Berezovsky, or the  
former head of Yukos oil and gas company, Leonid Nevzlin, who lives  
in Israel. The Kremlin and Russian authorities have long suggested  
that Mr Berezovsky is behind the murder of both Politkovskaya and  
Alexander Litvinenko, the former KGB agent poisoned in London last  
November.


Experts and former colleagues of the assassinated journalist  
expressed satisfaction that arrests had been made, but scepticism  
at Mr Chaika's conclusions.


It's good that there has been progress in the case, said Igor  
Yakovenko, secretary-general of the Russian Union of Journalists.  
If we believe everything that Chaika says then this is the end of  
the sad tradition of the murders of journalists in Russia going  
unsolved. But, he said, there were several doubts about the  
allegations. It's worrying that, even before the investigation has  
been officially completed, they are pointing the finger at people  
abroad, he said.


Dmitry Muratov, the editor of Novaya Gazeta, the opposition  
newspaper where Politkovskaya published her hard-hitting reports on  
Russian politics and the conflict in Chechnya, expressed similar  
doubts. We have known about this for a while. We've worked  
together with their investigation and we trust their  
professionalism, said Mr Muratov. But we are absolutely amazed  
that they have openly stated they know who ordered the crime before  
the investigation has even been completed.


Mr Muratov confirmed that a security services official had been  
arrested, and revealed that the FSB security-service operative in  
question was a Moscow-based lieutenant-colonel. At this stage, I  
don't want to reveal any more, he said. Let's wait first for the  
court case.


Mr Chaika stated that the killing was carried out by a Chechen  
criminal gang operating in Moscow that specialises in professional  
hits. He also linked the group to the killings of Andrei Kozlov,  
the corruption-fighting banker who was shot dead last year, and the  
Forbes magazine editor Paul Klebnikov, killed in 2004.


He refused to name the mastermind, but separately stated that  
Russia's long-standing efforts to have Boris Berezovsky brought  
before a Russian court could bear fruit soon, if the former  
oligarch is extradited from Britain to Brazil, where he is wanted  
on charges of financial irregularity, and from there to Russia.


If all of Mr Chaika's claims are to be believed, it would mean that  
members of Russia's security services are under the command of  
Boris Berezovsky.  The level of corruption in Russia can bring  
many unpleasant surprises, said Gennady Gudkov, a former FSB  
colonel and now a member of the security committee of the Duma, or  
parliament. Mr Gudkov said he was certain the London-based exile  
was behind the killing: My information leads me to believe that  
Berezovsky himself, or people controlled by him, are behind both  
this act and many acts of terrorism.


Others were sceptical. We have no guarantees the names of those  
who really ordered the killing and the names of those who will be  
accused of it will be the same, said a statement from Novaya  
Gazeta's editorial team. We have no complaints about the  
investigative team. We're working together ... But 

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia China Begin JOINT Military Exercises in Eurasia

2007-08-08 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: August 8, 2007 1:01:44 AM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Russia  China Begin JOINT Military Exercises in Eurasia

The Times
August 6, 2007
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2204006.ece
‘Rival to Nato’ begins first military exercise

Tony Halpin in Moscow
Russian and Chinese troops are joining forces this week in the  
first military exercises by an international organisation that is  
regarded in some quarters as a potential rival to Nato.


Thousands of soldiers and 500 combat vehicles will take part in  
“Peace Mission 2007”, organised by the Shanghai Cooperation  
Organisation (SCO) in the Chelyabinsk region of Russia. Russian  
officials have also proposed an alliance between the SCO and a body  
representing most of the former Soviet republics.


Scores of Russian and Chinese aircraft begin joint exercises  
tomorrow before a week of military manoeuvres from Thursday that  
will include Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. At least 6,500  
troops are involved in what is described as an antiterror exercise.


Colonel-General Vladimir Moltenskoi, the deputy commander of  
Russian ground forces, said: “The exercise will involve practically  
all SCO members for the first time in its history.”


Staff officers from Uzbekistan, the sixth SCO member, will also  
attend in what is being regarded as a major extension of the  
organisation’s capabilities. The SCO was founded as a nonmilitary  
alliance in 2001 to combat drugs and weapons smuggling as well as  
terrorism and separatism in the region. It has since developed a  
role in regional trade and is increasingly regarded by Moscow and  
Beijing as a counterweight to US global influence.


The secretary-general of the Collective Security Treaty  
Organisation (CSTO) called last week for joint military exercises  
with the SCO. Nikolai Bordyuzha said that the body representing  
Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and  
Uzbekistan should work with the SCO to guarantee security across  
the region. Mr Bordyuzha has already announced a CSTO plan to  
create a large military force capable of assisting a member state  
in the event of an attack. A rapid-reaction force is already based  
in Central Asia and there are plans for a common air defence system  
covering most of the former Soviet Union.


Leaders of SCO member states will meet in Bishkek, the Kyrgyz  
capital, next week for their annual summit. Turkmenistan will also  
attend for the first time, while Mongolia, Iran, India and Pakistan  
have observer status.


Igor Ivanov, the head of Russian security, played down concerns in  
May that the SCO was evolving into a military alliance to counter  
the expansion of Nato into Asia as part of the War on Terror.


But MPs on the Foreign Affairs Select Committee expressed fears  
last year that the West could be on a collision course in the  
struggle for energy resources with “an authoritarian bloc opposed  
to democracy” that was based on an alliance between China and Russia.


A newly assertive Russia, flush with oil and gas revenues, is  
moving rapidly to increase its military capability amid tensions  
with the West over missile defence and Nato expansion. Almost £100  
billion has been set aside for rearmament over the next eight years.




At the ready

$24.9bn Russian defence budget 2006

395,000 on active service in army

142,000 in active service in navy

160,000 on active service in air force $35.3bn Chinese defence budget

$35.3bn Chinese defence budget

1.6m Army

255,000 Navy

400,000 Air force

$535bn US defence budget

595,946 Army

376,750 Navy

347,400 Air force

Source: International Institute for Strategic Studies




Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.


www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory 

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia, Free Again

2007-07-15 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: July 15, 2007 5:52:46 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Russia, Free Again

Gorbachev: Russia's Suspension of Arms Treaty Justified

Voice of America, 15 July 2007
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-07-15-voa25.cfm

Mikhail Gorbachev (file photo)
Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev says Russia's decision to  
suspend participation in a major European arms treaty is an  
absolutely logical move.


Mr. Gorbachev signed the original Conventional Forces in Europe  
treaty - a key Cold War-era agreement with the United States and  
NATO - in 1990.


The treaty was revised in 1999, after the Warsaw Pact communist  
alliance was dissolved, but neither the United States nor NATO's  
members have ratified those changes. Mr. Gorbachev tells Russia's  
Interfax news agency it would be incomprehensible for Moscow to  
abide by the treaty under those circumstances.


U.S. plans to deploy a missile shield in central Europe are widely  
seen as the major factor behind Russia's treaty suspension. Mr.  
Gorbachev, however, says Russia wants to save the treaty, by  
reopening talks on the accord.


The United States, NATO and the European Union all have said they  
are disappointed by Mr. Putin's suspension of the treaty.


Mr. Putin hinted at such action earlier this year and linked the  
treaty issue to the U.S. missile plan. Official announcement of the  
Kremlin decree on Saturday in Moscow did not mention the missile  
proposal, but a Russian Foreign Ministry statement said the  
decision was based NATO's failure to ratify the 1999 revision.


The conventional-forces treaty put specific limits on the number of  
tanks, heavy artillery and fighter jets that could be deployed in  
Europe or western Russia -- from the Atlantic Coast to the Ural  
Mountains -- and the original version is credited for major  
reductions in military hardware in the region after 1992.


The United States and its NATO allies refused to ratify the revised  
treaty in 1999 after Russia refused to withdraw troops it has  
stationed in the former Soviet republics, including Georgia and  
Moldova.


---

No defence against missiles

The Guardian (UK), July 16, 2007


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2127232,00.html

The current fad of tearing up vital arms-control agreements was  
started by America when it abrogated the anti-ballistic missile  
treaty in order to build its missile shield.


Russia followed suit on Saturday by announcing that it would  
suspend its obligations under the conventional forces in Europe  
(CFE) treaty. If the trend continues, the intermediate-range  
nuclear forces treaty could be next. And then Europe, freshly  
liberated from the Cold-War threat of instant extinction, will be  
bristling with missiles.


The US will have its missile interceptor base in Poland and a long- 
range radar in the Czech Republic that can direct a missile on to a  
target anywhere in Russia. To counter that, Russia will deploy long- 
range Iskander missiles in its enclave in Kaliningrad, behind the  
line of the Baltic states and right on the Polish border. Heavy  
tanks will once again roam the forests of Germany and central  
Russia, just like the good old days.


Does this sound insane on a continent which has said goodbye to  
war? It may, but it could come to pass. For all the touchy-feely  
togetherness that Vladimir Putin and George Bush indulged in at  
their recent lobster summit in Maine, both leaders continue to  
send each other messages of a more traditional kind. Mr Bush is  
intent on pushing ahead with missile defence plans come what may,  
and is finalising an agreement with the Polish president Lech  
Kaczynski today.


Mr Putin has made it crystal clear that if there is no compromise  
on missile defence, Russia is prepared to carry out its threat to  
point its missiles at Europe again.





Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL.com.



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/;ctrl/A

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia - Oil

2000-08-29 Thread Kris Millegan





Stratfor.com's Global Intelligence Update - 29 August 2000
_

It's not news, it's intelligence.

*Coming Soon*
Oil, Power and Politics.
Crude oil prices are higher than anytime in the last 10 years,
tripling in just the last two years. And yet, the world's largest
consumer of oil - the United States - rolls along, largely
unaffected. The global economy is changing. Over the long term,
power relationships between the world's oil producers and oil
consumers will shift, as will economic relationships between
competing oil consumers.
_

Russia: Putin's Coming Concession to the Oligarchs

Summary

On Sept. 19, the Russian government will put up for auction
majority control of the ONAKO oil company, one of the country's
most profitable energy companies. Because foreigners are barred
from holding more than a fraction of any Russian oil company, the
government will likely be forced to hand over control to the
powerful businessmen once known as oligarchs, the men that Putin
has publicly campaigned against.

Analysis

After months of trying to rein in Russia's oligarchs, Russian
President Vladimir Putin will soon have to hand over to them a
piece of the country's most profitable industry: oil production.
The government plans to privatize the ONAKO oil company, the 11th
largest oil company in the country, selling off 85 percent of its
shares.

The only true contenders for buying up control of the company - to
be auctioned off Sept. 19 with bids starting at $425 million - are
members of the wealthy, but allegedly corrupt, oligarchy. The
president has staked much of his presidency on diminishing the
power of these men, holdovers from the Yeltsin era. The Putin
government will soon be forced to pick one group of oligarchs over
another, to control ONAKO. The ONAKO auction may also set a
precedent: It is the first of four energy companies to be
privatized.

Would you like to see full text?
http://www.stratfor.com/SERVICES/giu2000/082900.ASP
___

Russian law limits the amount of equity that foreign investors can
control in the country's oil companies, capping ownership at no
more than 15 percent, according to a June edition of the St.
Petersburg Times. The shares in ONAKO will be auctioned off to the
highest bidder.

More than 20 groups have submitted an offer, but only two are true
contenders: LUKoil, the largest oil producer in Russia, and an
alliance of three smaller companies, Yukos, Sibneft and
Surgutneftgaz. Two oligarchs direct LUKoil, Rem Vyakhirev and Vagit
Alekperov, although these two men are largely under Kremlin
control.

In contrast, the three oligarchs behind the alliance behind the
other companies - Yukos, Sibneft and Surgutneftgaz - are Mikhail
Khodorkovsky, Boris Berezovsky and Roman Abramovich. Putin has
publicly sought their power since taking office. They largely
bought their way into power under former President Boris Yeltsin,
amassing fortunes and increasing their political influence.
Abramovich, widely considered Berezovsky's protege, is a Duma
member, as Berezovsky himself was until recently.
_

For more on Russia, see:
http://www.stratfor.com/CIS/countries/Russia/default.htm
_

Though not Russia's largest companies, ONAKO is one of the most
profitable. The average Russian oil company makes less than 30
percent of its profits from exports; ONAKO exports 40 percent of
its product, enabling it to reap the benefits of the higher oil
prices outside Russia. Last year ONAKO earned as much money as some
other companies by pumping less oil, according to Russica
Information on Aug. 16.

Allowing Berezovsky or Khodorkovsky to control the company would be
a dangerous risk for the Kremlin, considering the pasts of the two.
Both oligarchs were linked to the 1998 IMF money laundering
scandal; both have been targets of tax police raids or
investigations in the past three months according to articles in
The Moscow Times in late August. Berezovsky was notably absent from
the late-July summit between Putin and the oligarchs, while
Khodorkovsky has links to businessmen recently expelled from
Bulgaria on corruption and money laundering allegations.

For ONAKO to remain profitable so that the government can take its
share of revenues and taxes, the government needs LUKoil to win the
bid for ONAKO. Putin has already won a battle with Gazprom's Rem
Vyakirev. Second, the government owns 15 percent of LUKoil's stock
and plays a controlling role behind the scenes of the company.

But the fact is that former oligarchs remain the only ones
financially stable enough to contend in the bidding. Unless Putin
can get laws passed that favor foreign investment in strategically
important industries, he 

Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Russia - Oil

2000-08-29 Thread Aleisha Saba

Sorry Kris - I just sent this one out too as I thought a good one, and
had not read all my email ..

So still a good one because China and Russia I think have as much oil as
arabic oil?Not sure, but they do off shore drill in China.

A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Russia: No hope left for sub crew

2000-08-20 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

From: "Aleisha Saba" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get that garbage out of our White House.

GIGO


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: Russia: No hope left for sub crew

2000-08-19 Thread Aleisha Saba

So Putin was on vacation..and while all those Russian sailors were
350 feet beneath the water, why the delay in the rescue attempts?

But then remember, we have in Putin all that is KGB for he still is
KGB.remember the little 14 year old boy who had his legs amputated
because Putins new policy was to really show them publicly what will
happen to anyone who opposes his regimeend result a broken hearted
mother sitting with her child in a wheelchair.Russians refuse him
medical treatment, until gangrene set in so they then accommodated the
mother and child, by cutting off his legs.

These are friends of USA..our Director of FBI met with Putin and was
oh so impressed - and little Madeline Albright went to Putin and asked
him if we could beef up our defenses, in the USA...bet she did a
little golly gee, Mr. Putin

Was there something about that submarine that was oh so secret - why
refusal to ask for USA aidwhat happened to that submarine - was it
like another USS Liberty deal, someone trying to start a war and then
blame it on someone else?

Explosion inside?   The experts said Titanic looked like had been hit
with explosion, not iceberg.

All those men at the bottom of the sea, dying while Nero fiddled - Putin
on vacation, too busy to care or give order to send out marines.been
nice of these men had gotten the same attention as the FBI gave in
covering Flight 800 - said to have been blown of sky by missile - they
spent $32 million dollars investigating that one - remember the daily
news conferences the FBI called and how sickening they all were.

Only thing I know, the Russians gave that sub as much attenion as the
USA gave the USS Liberty, where Israelies napalmed that ship and bombed
it and 34 died and 170 injured and they bombed and napalmed it IN
INTERNATIONAL WATERS for 45 minutes trying to sink same,,like where
there is a testimony there must be by necessity death of testators - for
Egypt would be blamed for that one if they had gotten away with it..

Well I do not think this submarine will be forgotten and if I were Putin
I would feel pretty shaky by nowthat guy obvivously is not too
bright and then their Navy SOLD the names of the sailors?A Dead
Pool?

Did you see the picture of some of those just near kids on that sub?
Will Putin cry with Henry Kissinger, old KGB Agent Code Name
Bore

How I hate these bastards..but then the Russian Mafia killed more
Christians than Hitler killed jews - but then who realizes that 55
million people died in WWII?

So Remember the USS Liberty always - sign of times?

Get that garbage out of our White House.


Russia: No hope left for sub crew  Official says critical time has
passed to rescue 118 men  Two women prepare to receive news of their
relatives on board the crippled nuclear submarine. Russian navy
officials said Saturday there is almost no hope of rescuing any
survivors.
 MSNBC STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS
MOSCOW, Aug. 19 —  The critical time has passed to rescue the
118-man crew of the stricken nuclear submarine Kursk and the men are
likely dead, a Russian official announced Saturday morning. He said the
crew likely died by drowning in the first moments of the accident nearly
a week ago or by unbearable air pressure.
   
 
 
 
 
.
Chronology of Russian nuclear submarine accidents
March 20, 1993
A Russian Delta-3 class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine
operating in the Barents Sea was struck by the U.S. nuclear-powered
attack submarine USS Grayling. Both vessels returned to base.September
27, 1991
A missile misfired aboard a Soviet Typhoon class nuclear-powered
submarine in the northern White Sea during a training exercise. The
submarine, armed with nuclear missiles and torpedoes, returned to base
safely.
April 7, 1989
A Soviet Mike class nuclear-powered attack submarine sank off northern
Norway with the loss of 42 lives after a fire on board. The Komsomolets
submarine was armed with two nuclear torpedoes.October 6, 1986
A Soviet Yankee class nuclear-powered submarine armed with 16 SS-N-6
missiles, each carrying two warheads, and an estimated two nuclear
torpedoes sank some 600 miles northeast of Bermuda.
August 10, 1985
An explosion devastated the Shkotovo-22 ship repair facility which
services Soviet navy nuclear-powered vessels. Ten people were killed and
many died later from radiation exposure.September 8, 1977
A Soviet Delta-1 class nuclear-powered submarine accidentally jettisoned
a nuclear warhead off Russia's Far-Eastern Kamchatka peninsula. The
warhead was later recovered.
April 12, 1970
A Soviet November class nuclear-powered attack submarine sank in the
Atlantic Ocean off Spain. The K-8 submarine was powered by two nuclear
reactors and carried two nuclear torpedoes.March 8-10, 1968
A Soviet Golf-2 class diesel-powered submarine armed with three nuclear
SS-N-5 missiles sank in the Pacific. In 1974 the CIA used a commissioned
vessel, the 63,000 ton Hughes Glomar Explorer, to recover the 

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia develops stealth bomber

2000-05-03 Thread Kris Millegan





http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_smith_news/2503_xnsof_russia_dev.shtml 

Russia develops stealth bomber 
Expert: New weapons systems
'state-of-the-art,'
some 'superior' to America's 


By Charles Smith
© 2000 WorldNetDaily.com 

WorldNetDaily has learned that Russia is pursuing an
aggressive program of weapons development that now
includes the production of a new stealth bomber. 

Described as smaller than the U.S. Air Force Northup
B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, the Russian T-60S stealth
bomber is being developed by Russian aircraft
manufacturer Sukhoi, maker of the famed SU-27
Flanker fighter. The T-60S program reportedly uses a
variable "swing" geometry wing and includes extensive
stealth design features. 

The move toward a stealth bomber is seen as an
indication that President Validmir Putin intends to
upgrade both the tactical and strategic weapons
employed by Russia. The new stealth aircraft will allow
the Russian air force to fight an advanced conventional
war beyond the borders of Federation and compete
directly with the U.S. Air Force. 

The Russian air force decayed rapidly after the fall of
the Soviet Union to approximately one half its original
size. But the widespread impression of an under-funded
and poorly manned air force in today's Russia has been
disputed by Russian generals who released video of
advanced warplanes making precision strikes during the
war against Chechen rebels. 

"The Russians continue to invest heavily in advanced
military technology," agreed Rep. Curt Weldon, a senior
member of the House National Security Committee. 

Weldon estimated that "over a billion dollars" of U.S.
funding has been diverted by the Russian military into
new weapons programs. According to Weldon, Russia
is now fielding "state-of-the-art" weapons and some
Russian technology is "superior" to U.S. systems. 

"The Russian military continues to lead the world with
the best weapons," noted Weldon. "The Russian
government continues to invest heavily in advanced
military technology. The Russian military investment also
includes money from the United States, profits from
sales to our military like the Sunburn and Ma-31
missiles, and from other funds such as Nunn Lungar and
military to military contacts." 

   The Russian stealth
   program may have
   been assisted by the
   recovery and sale of
   a shot-down U.S.
   Air Force F-117A
   stealth fighter during
   the 1999 war against
   Serbia. Serbs
   reportedly sold the
   remains of the
American stealth aircraft directly to the Russians. 

However, the Russian stealth program has been ongoing
for several years. In 1995, then commander of the
Russian air force, Col. Gen. Peter Deinekin, stated that
a new "multi-role strategic bomber" would replace the
aging Tupolev TU-22 Blinder medium-range bomber
and the Sukhoi SU-24 Fencer swing-wing fighter
bomber. 

Russian fighter
maker Sukhoi is
using the S-37
Berkut or "Golden
Eagle" test-bed
aircraft to prototype
technologies for the
next generation of
Russian aircraft, including the new stealth bomber. 

The Sukhoi S-37 features forward-swept wings that
provide improved aerodynamics at subsonic speeds and
at high angles of attack. The S-37 forward-swept wings
are also unstable in flight, requiring high-speed computer
controls. Stealth aircraft are notably difficult to control
because the radar evading aircraft are also unstable in
flight. 

Recent 

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia

2000-01-17 Thread Kris Millegan






STRATFOR.COM's Global Intelligence Update - January 17, 2000

By The Internet's Most Intelligent Source
of International News  Analysis
http://www.stratfor.com/
_

WHAT'S GOING ON IN YOUR WORLD?

U.S. aid intended to fight the Colombian drug trade and foster the
peace talks will instead encourage more fighting.
http://www.stratfor.com/world/specialreports/special8.htm

France's military exercises with the UAE are part of its new
security strategy in the Persian Gulf.
http://www.stratfor.com/MEAF/commentary/m0001142255.htm

Algerian extremists not willing to accept President Bouteflika's
amnesty-for-peace plan will be forced to seek safe haven elsewhere.
http://www.stratfor.com/MEAF/commentary/m0001142234.htm

__

STRATFOR.COM Global Intelligence Update
January 17, 1999


The Putin Doctrine: Nuclear Threats and Russia's Place in the World


Summary

Russia's acting president, Vladimir Putin, last week reversed his
country's vow never to use nuclear weapons first. The announcement
sent shock waves around the world. And it should have. Russian
nuclear warheads are not about to rain down on the United States
but Putin is doing more than rattling sabers. A new Russian
national security doctrine has emerged over the last few months and
Putin's announcement is intended to round out that doctrine,
affecting the war in Chechnya, and re-ordering relations both with
Russia's neighbors and the United States.


Analysis

Until a few months ago, Russia had no clear-cut national security
policy. Since the end of the Cold War, Russian security doctrine
had devolved into Russian economic policy. Russian economic policy
consisted of intensifying relations with the advanced industrial,
capitalist world in order to create the financial structures and
relationships needed to jump-start the economy. Russian national
security doctrine consisted primarily of doing nothing to disrupt
those economic relationships while, within the framework of the
first imperative, maintaining the territorial and institutional
integrity of the Russian Federation.

Thus, the most important aspect of the new Russian national
security doctrine is that it exists at all. Putin's announcement on
first strike has as its primary purpose the elevation of national
security issues to the same level as national economic issues. In
other words, Putin's announcement on nuclear weapons represents the
death of the preceding national strategy, which relegated national
security issues to a distant second place behind national economic
concerns. It was intended to stun a number of audiences into
realizing that the post-Cold War world is gone.

The choice of the nuclear issue served a number of purposes and
spoke to a number of audiences. The first audience was the United
States and its allies. As our readers know, it has been our view
that the West's decision to bomb Iraq in December of 1998 -
followed by the war in Kosovo, both in direct opposition to Russian
wishes - generated a revolution in Russian policy. Those two
actions convinced the Russians that the United States intended to
reduce Russia to the status of a tertiary power. Washington's
systematic indifference to Russian wishes convinced the Russian
national security community that without leverage against the
United States, Russia would have no traction whatsoever. Economic
relations with the West had effectively collapsed in the financial
crisis of August 1998, so the Russians felt they had little to
lose.

Putin's announcement is perfectly designed to drive home the price
and risks of U.S. economic and strategic policy. It systematically
accomplishes what Yeltsin tried spasmodically when he reminded
Washington that Russia had nuclear weapons and was prepared to use
them. First, the Putin doctrine reminds the United States that
Russia is the only nation in the world with sufficient nuclear
weapons of sufficient range to conduct an annihilating attack on
the United States. To put it bluntly, Russia could choose to kill a
large percentage of the American public if it is prepared to endure
the same.

Second, Moscow's new stance poses a practical problem for the
United States, which must now at least consider Russian responses.
No matter how unlikely a Russian first strike is, there is a huge
difference between a negligible threat and a non-existent one,
particularly at the orders of magnitude involved. During the Cold
War, the threat of a Soviet nuclear response was in the back of
every policy maker's mind when dealing with issues from Nicaragua
to Angola to India. That threat disappeared with Glasnost. Putin
intends to resurrect it.

Third, this is a meaningful threat because of the relative weakness
of Russia's conventional forces. Consider Western nuclear strategy,
particularly during the Cold War. The United States and NATO never
renounced a possible first strike; indeed, it was explicitly
understood that a massive 

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia/China

1999-12-06 Thread Kris Millegan






STRATFOR.COM's Global Intelligence Update - December 7, 1999


By The Internet's Most Intelligent Source
of International News  Analysis
http://www.stratfor.com/
_

WHAT'S GOING ON IN YOUR WORLD?

China: the Wild Card in Taiwan's Election
http://www.stratfor.com/asia/commentary/m9912062245.htm

Gadhafi's African Influence Attracts Europe
http://www.stratfor.com/MEAF/commentary/m9912062205.htm


FIND OUT AT http://www.stratfor.com/

__

STRATFOR.COM Global Intelligence Update
December 7, 1999


Yeltsin Recovers - Long Enough to Ask for China's Support


Summary

On Dec. 6, the government of Russian President Boris Yeltsin
announced that he had recovered enough from a bout of pneumonia to
hold a long-awaited informal summit with Chinese President Jiang
Zemin in Beijing. The president's sudden recovery and the summit
coincide with the intensification of Russian military operations in
Chechnya, particularly a new ultimatum to the people of Grozny.
Russia is making a final bid to gain international political
support in anticipation of a renewed offensive against Grozny.


Analysis

Russian President Boris Yeltsin was released from the hospital Dec.
6 following a week-long stay for a respiratory infection. Following
his release, the Kremlin announced that Yeltsin will attend an
informal summit with Chinese President Jiang Zemin in Beijing
December 8-10. The meeting between the two leaders has largely been
ignored by the West but widely anticipated both in Russia and
China. And throughout the autumn it has been repeatedly and
inexplicably postponed.

The sudden visit by Yeltsin to Beijing is not likely to be a mere
coincidence. Indeed, it appears to be an attempt by Russia to
guarantee political backing from China for what it is about to do:
make a concerted and unpopular push in the conflict in Chechnya.
The announcement of the summit came as the Russian military issued
an ultimatum to civilians and rebels alike in Grozny, the Chechen
capital, warning that if they fail to leave by Dec. 11 they will be
"annihilated with air and artillery bombardments."

Yeltsin's visit to China suggests urgency. It has been postponed
several times this year. He has canceled or postponed other
international trips, such as the one to Japan, which implies the
importance Moscow places on China's support. The Russian Duma
elections are just two weeks away, and stories of Russian
casualties have leaked out of Chechnya.

Russia is likely concerned that its apparent intention to flatten
Grozny will trigger a backlash from Islamic fundamentalists,
particularly terrorist organizations. Opposition to the war is
growing among Islamic nations, unconvinced by Moscow's diplomatic
campaign to emphasize that the rebels are terrorists and that
religion has nothing to do with the conflict. Fundamentalist
clerics in Egypt are calling for a boycott of Russia. The
Organization of the Islamic Conference has sent a delegation to
Moscow and called for a peaceful solution to the war in Chechnya.
If Russia and China share a worry, it is the prospect of increased
terrorism and separatism in Central Asia.

Moscow is also likely to try to enlist China's support during what
will surely be an even more trying economic period. Because of the
war in Chechnya, the West has threatened to withhold the next
disbursement of International Monetary Fund (IMF) loans. Without
the $640 million, Russia cannot pay off previous loans
( http://www.stratfor.com/cis/commentary/c9912020015.htm ). More
important, if Russia defaults, it stands to lose the future
confidence of foreign investors. The Russian government may be
warning Beijing that it will forego the money to wage the war in
Chechnya and is telling the Chinese government to brace itself for
economic turmoil.

Or Moscow may be trying to signal the Chinese leadership that
economic ties will continue - regardless of what the West and the
IMF do. On Dec. 1, Russian oil giant Yukos signed a deal with China
that will double the amount of exported Russian oil. ITAR-Tass
reported that Yeltsin and Jiang will discuss a proposed gas
pipeline, which would bring Russia $2 billion to $3 billion
annually.

Like Moscow, Beijing does not want to see the West continue to
intervene in internal separatist struggles.

Russia appears to be engaged in a broad effort to shore up
international political and economic ties in advance of a renewed
assault on Grozny. Until recently, Yeltsin has been too ill to talk
to visiting dignitaries. But Yeltsin rose from his sickbed to meet
with Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma - and offered to restructure
Ukraine's $1.8 billion debt for Russian gas. Yeltsin is also
scheduled to sign the treaty for Russia-Belarus unification before
heading to China. As well, Moscow has recently reinforced ties with
India.

This meeting between Yeltsin and Jiang is only a precursor to re-
defining the broader relationship between Russia 

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia to report to IMF on economy, plans on Friday

1999-10-26 Thread Carl Amedio

In a message dated 10/26/99 4:37:37 AM Central Daylight Time, AOL News writes:

 Subj:Russia to report to IMF on economy, plans on Friday
 Date:  10/26/99 4:37:37 AM Central Daylight Time
 From:  AOL News
 BCC:   Ahab42

 Russia to report to IMF on economy, plans on Friday

 MOSCOW, Oct 26 (Reuters) - Russia will inform the International Monetary
Fund this week on the current state of the economy and on how it intends to
comply with conditions to secure further credits, government officials said
on Tuesday.

 First Deputy Prime Minister Viktor Khristenko told reporters the government
would provide the necessary information on Friday in two letters

 For the full text of this story, A
HREF="aol://4344:30.L100BXLQ.383346.625397553"click here/A.

 (c) 1999 Reuters Ltd.  All rights reserved.  No republication,
redistribution or framing is permitted absent Reuter's prior consent.
Reuters is not liable for errors or delays in content or actions taken based
on this content.  Active hyperlinks inserted by AOL.

 Announcement: America Online has added Reuters newswires to News Profiles.
To add Reuters articles to your daily news delivery, go to KW: A
HREF="aol://5862:146"News Profiles/A and click on "Modify Your News
Profiles." Then click "Edit" and add Reuters from the list on the left.

 To edit your profile, go to keyword A HREF="aol://1722:NewsProfiles"NewsPro
files/A.
 For all of today's news, go to keyword A HREF="aol://1722:News"News/A. 




Russia to report to IMF on economy, plans on Friday

MOSCOW, Oct 26 (Reuters) - Russia will inform the International Monetary Fund this 
week on the current state of the economy and on how it intends to comply with 
conditions to secure further credits, government officials said on Tuesday.

First Deputy Prime Minister Viktor Khristenko told reporters the government would 
provide the necessary information on Friday in two letters

For the full text of this story, A 
HREF="aol://4344:30.L100BXLQ.383346.625397553"click here/A.

(c) 1999 Reuters Ltd.  All rights reserved.  No republication, redistribution or 
framing is permitted absent Reuter's prior consent.  Reuters is not liable for errors 
or delays in content or actions taken based on this content.  Active hyperlinks 
inserted by AOL.

Announcement: America Online has added Reuters newswires to News Profiles. To add 
Reuters articles to your daily news delivery, go to KW: A HREF="aol://5862:146"News 
Profiles/A and click on "Modify Your News Profiles." Then click "Edit" and add 
Reuters from the list on the left.

To edit your profile, go to keyword A HREF="aol://1722:NewsProfiles"NewsProfiles/A.
For all of today's news, go to keyword A HREF="aol://1722:News"News/A.




[CTRL] Fwd: Russia

1999-09-10 Thread Kris Millegan






___

What's going on in your world?  Find Out.
Visit Stratfor's Global Intelligence Center
http://www.stratfor.com/world/default.htm
___

OTHER FEATURES ON STRATFOR.COM

PKK Withdrawal Portends Split and Change of Tactics
http://www.stratfor.com/MEAF/commentary/m9909092104.htm

The IMF and the World Bank Bow Toward Malaysia
http://www.stratfor.com/asia/specialreports/special71.htm

Renewed Fighting in Dagestan Begs Chechen Response
http://www.stratfor.com/CIS/commentary/c9909100015.htm

__


STRATFOR.COM
Global Intelligence Update
September 10, 1999

Checkmate Nears for Yeltsin

Summary:

Russian President Boris Yeltsin has now been directly
implicated in one of several corruption scandals currently
engulfing the Kremlin. Despite rumors, Yeltsin is unlikely to
resign from office over the scandals, retaining presidential
immunity. This immunity will soon evaporate, however, with
presidential elections scheduled for next May, leaving him three
choices - flee the country, choose a sympathetic successor, or
declare a state of emergency, canceling the elections. The latter
would provide the ultimate justification - in Russia and abroad -
for his removal and the purge of his allies.


Analysis:

Amid a storm of scandals engulfing his administration, Russian
President Boris Yeltsin has long been suspected of being personally
involved in illegal activity. His presumably biased Russian
political foes have accused Yeltsin of wrongdoing, leaving rumors
to float freely in international circles. But now, according to the
September 8 edition of the Washington Post, Swiss investigators
have directly linked Yeltsin to one of the burgeoning number of
Russian corruption scandals - to the tune of $1 million. The Post
cited law enforcement authorities investigating the Mabetex scandal
as alleging the Swiss construction firm provided credit cards for
Yeltsin and his two daughters, backed up by $1 million deposited in
a Hungarian bank account. Yeltsin himself reportedly denied the
allegations during a September 8 telephone conversation with U.S.
President Bill Clinton.

For the time being, the alleged bribe is less important than the
fact that Yeltsin has been unambiguously linked to the scandal.
Already most of the group of close Yeltsin advisors, senior
administration members and supporters collectively known as the
"Family" are under investigation for alleged involvement in one or
more of the major scandals now facing the Kremlin
[ http://www.stratfor.com/SERVICES/GIU/090299.ASP ]. These include
allegedly laundering billions of dollars - some possibly from IMF
loans - through New York banks, using IMF funds for international
currency market speculations, skimming profits from the state
airline Aeroflot, and accepting bribes from Mabetex.

The Russian officials, their family members and friends under
investigation now number nearly 800. Moreover, investigators are
reportedly uncovering links between the scandals, effectively
painting the whole Yeltsin administration as one boundless
kleptocracy. With Yeltsin himself under investigation, the question
immediately rises, will he remain in office for the duration of his
term and if so, what then?

Yeltsin has a few options - none of them good.  He is unlikely to
step down before the end of his term. Under the Russian
constitution Yeltsin is immune from prosecution as long as he
remains in office. In addition, retaining the presidency keeps
levers at his disposal with which he can interfere in the
investigations. He has already apparently used those levers,
attempting to dismiss Prosecutor General Yuri Skuratov and
"reassigning" investigator Georgy Chuglazov just before he was to
travel to Switzerland to review evidence in the Mabetex case. The
Duma could attempt to impeach Yeltsin, but the Duma's previous
failed attempt took 10 months from initial discussion to final
vote. With Duma elections slated for December and presidential
elections scheduled for next May, there is little time for formal
proceedings.

Assuming Yeltsin has no desire or intention to submit himself for
prosecution, he has three options before next year's presidential
election. He can flee the country - a risk with no guarantees,
considering the Russian security services. The security apparatus
is apparently fueling these scandals and would no doubt be watching
for such a move.

Alternately, he could attempt to affect the election of a
sympathetic successor who might theoretically protect him once his
immunity ends. Yeltsin's ability to pick his successor, however,
has been eroded by Russia's dismal economic situation and the
snowballing scandals. Public support from Yeltsin is generally
considered to be a political kiss of death.

Moreover, he will be tempted to try to cast the blame on others in
order to shake off the scandals and regain the ability to influence
the vote in his favor. He will 

Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Russia Gets First of IMF Payments

1999-08-02 Thread Bill

 -Caveat Lector-

This makes me wonder if the russkies are still going to coin
the silver and
gold money like they said they were.  They thought to
provide their populace with currency of value in
prreparation for y2k, believing that theirs would be the
only currency worth ANYTHING in the world a year from now.
Is this a world bank
payoff to keep them from doing that because the world bank
knows it would shatter the currency of the rest of the
World?




Carl Amedio wrote:

 In a message dated 8/1/99 1:09:55 PM Central Daylight Time, AOL News writes:

  Subj:Russia Gets First of IMF Payments
  Date:  8/1/99 1:09:55 PM Central Daylight Time
  From:  AOL News
  BCC:   Ahab42

  Russia Gets First of IMF Payments

  .c The Associated Press

   MOSCOW (AP) - The first of seven installments of the International Monetary
 Fund's new loan to Russia is being transferred on Sunday to Russia's IMF
 account, the Interfax news agency reported.

  The fund agreed last week to provide the $4.5 billion, 17-month stand-by
 credit to Russia.

  The $640 million is to be used to pay off part of Russia's debt to the IMF.
 Russia was due to pay $808.4 million to the fund in July and $520.4 million
 in August, Interfax said.

  Altogether, Russia owes the IMF about $18 billion. It has struggled to stay
 current on its debts to the fund since the economic crash last August.

  AP-NY-08-01-99 1409EDT

   Copyright 1999 The Associated Press.  The information  contained in the AP
 news report may not be published,  broadcast, rewritten or otherwise
 distributed without  prior written authority of The Associated Press.

  Announcement: America Online has added Reuters newswires to News Profiles.
 To add Reuters articles to your daily news delivery, go to KW: A
 HREF="aol://5862:146"News Profiles/A and click on "Modify Your News
 Profiles." Then click "Edit" and add Reuters from the list on the left.

  To edit your profile, go to keyword A
 HREF="aol://1722:NewsProfiles"NewsProfiles/A.
  For all of today's news, go to keyword A HREF="aol://1722:News"News/A. 

   

 Subject: Russia Gets First of IMF Payments
 Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 14:09:55 EDT
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: undisclosed-recipients:;

 Russia Gets First of IMF Payments

 .c The Associated Press

  MOSCOW (AP) - The first of seven installments of the International Monetary Fund's 
new loan to Russia is being transferred on Sunday to Russia's IMF account, the 
Interfax news agency reported.

 The fund agreed last week to provide the $4.5 billion, 17-month stand-by credit to 
Russia.

 The $640 million is to be used to pay off part of Russia's debt to the IMF. Russia 
was due to pay $808.4 million to the fund in July and $520.4 million in August, 
Interfax said.

 Altogether, Russia owes the IMF about $18 billion. It has struggled to stay current 
on its debts to the fund since the economic crash last August.

 AP-NY-08-01-99 1409EDT

  Copyright 1999 The Associated Press.  The information  contained in the AP news 
report may not be published,  broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without  
prior written authority of The Associated Press.

 Announcement: America Online has added Reuters newswires to News Profiles. To add 
Reuters articles to your daily news delivery, go to KW: A HREF="aol://5862:146"News 
Profiles/A and click on "Modify Your News Profiles." Then click "Edit" and add 
Reuters from the list on the left.

 To edit your profile, go to keyword A 
HREF="aol://1722:NewsProfiles"NewsProfiles/A.
 For all of today's news, go to keyword A HREF="aol://1722:News"News/A.

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: Russia

1999-07-30 Thread William Shannon






___

What's going on in your world?  Find Out.
Visit Stratfor's Global Intelligence Center
http://www.stratfor.com/world/default.htm
___

OTHER FEATURES ON STRATFOR.COM

Washington Begins the Post-Kosovo Purge
http://www.stratfor.com/world/Commentaries/w9907300240.htm

Uzbekistan's Decision not to Attend CIS Summit Signals Further
Alienation of Pro-Western Faction inside CIS
http://www.stratfor.com/CIS/commentary/c9907300041.htm

Democratic Republic of Congo: Situation Report
http://www.stratfor.com/MEAF/specialreports/special3.htm

Short Term Political Gain May Win Nazarbayev Long Term Blame
http://www.stratfor.com/CIS/commentary/c9907292230.htm

China Backs Down on Embassy Issue, But at What Price?
http://www.stratfor.com/asia/specialreports/special39.htm
__


STRATFOR.COM
Global Intelligence Update
July 30, 1999

Touting Barter, Russia Continues its Economic Regression

Summary:

Moscow has begun floating barter schemes for international trade
and for the repayment of debts to Russia.  This comes on top of a
report that Russia's industrial output has risen, though serving
only domestic consumers who cannot afford imports.  The only
major export growth being experienced by Russia is in arms sales.
Finally, Moscow has made it clear that it is simply unable to
service its international debt.  Russia's economy is
introverting, reverting to a model reminiscent of the old Soviet
Union.  Closed off by inefficiency and lack of foreign capital,
it is focusing its domestic economy on meeting domestic needs,
limiting its interaction with the global economy for the most
part to barter in machinery and raw materials, and earning its
foreign currency with arms.  The seal on this introversion may
arrive in the form of default on international loans.

Analysis:

Russian First Deputy Premier Viktor Khristenko proposed at a
meeting of the Confederation of Indian Industry in New Delhi on
July 29 that India repay its debt to his country by establishing
joint ventures in India that would produce civilian aircraft.
The proposed ventures also include Russian upgrading of coal and
power plants, and leasing of aircraft to India.  Khristenko also
signed an agreement with Indian Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha
about partial repayment of the Indian debt by establishing a new
nuclear power plant in India.

Similarly, Russia is currently negotiating an agreement with
Ukraine on repayment of a portion of Kiev's gas debt to Moscow in
the form of 10 strategic bombers.  Ukraine has offered to supply
Tu-160 and Tu-95 bombers to Moscow.  On July 28 Russian Foreign
Minister Igor Ivanov proposed a barter agreement between Russia
and the Association of Southeast Asian States (ASEAN).  "In view
of the foreign exchange constraints in Russian and the ASEAN
countries, the use of a mutually linked trade mechanism could be
a promising area of trade relations for instance, food supplies
to the Far East regions in exchange for Russian machinery and
equipment," Ivanov said.

Russia's return to barter reflects both the noncompetitiveness of
Russian products and the strains imposed on Russian foreign
currency reserves by the country's massive foreign debt.
Reminiscent of the Soviet economy, during which the
nonconvertible ruble forced exchanges like Pepsi syrup for
Stolichnaya vodka, it is just one aspect of Russia's economic
regression.

Another feature of Russia's economic regression is its increase
of industrial production to serve impoverished domestic demand
while exports are on the decline.  On July 15, the Russian
Statistics Agency announced that Russia's industrial output was
up 3.1 percent in the first six months of 1999 as compared to the
same period the previous year.  Officials said the fall of the
ruble made Russian goods cheaper to manufacture and more
competitive in the domestic market, where imports have become too
expensive for most Russians. At the same time, Russia's GDP fell
2.9 percent year-on-year in the first six months of 1999.  The
only place Russian exports are surging are in the arms industry.

Russia may be focused on barter because it can neither compete
abroad nor afford imports, but this does nothing to help Russia's
debt crunch.  And giving its own debtors relief in the form of
barter arrangements further limits Russia's ability to service
its own debt burden.  As it awaits additional loans to apply to
its existing loans, Russia is heavily tapping its existing
currency reserves. Russia's ITAR-TASS news agency has reported
that, due to government debts, Russia's gold and currency
reserves plummeted by $300 million during the week of July 9, to
$11.8 billion.  Barter may free up more of Russia's reserves for
debt service, but without income form exports or payments from
Russia's debtors, this is simply not sustainable.

Moscow is aware of this, and has already begun arguing to
international lenders that 

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia/NATO/Azerbaijan

1999-04-14 Thread Kris Millegan





__

Stratfor's FREE Kosovo Crisis Center -
http://www.stratfor.com/kosovo/crisis/
The most comprehensive coverage of the
Kosovo Crisis anywhere on the Internet
__


STRATFOR's
Global Intelligence Update
April 15, 1999

NATO Presses Russia on Another Front

Summary:

NATO's campaign in Yugoslavia, waged against the fervent
objections of Moscow, has once again driven Russia and NATO into
opposing camps.  NATO has also been pursuing relationships in the
Caucasus and Central Asia, and surprisingly is continuing to
actively do so even as it is attempting to stabilize relations
with Russia over Kosovo.

Analysis:

Russia's Interfax news agency has cited Azerbaijani presidential
administration sources as saying that Azerbaijani President
Haidar Aliyev received personal messages on April 14 from U.S.
President Bill Clinton and U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright.  According to Interfax, the message from Clinton
"contains a proposal on settling the Karabakh conflict," while
Albright invited Aliyev to attend NATO's anniversary celebration
later in April.  Azerbaijan has been eagerly pursuing a
relationship with -- if not membership in -- NATO, a campaign
matched by the growing strategic alliance between Russia and
Armenia.  But while this strategic positioning is well underway,
it is surprising that Clinton and Albright would personally fuel
this standoff just now.  Relations between NATO and Russia have
been shattered by the Kosovo crisis, and efforts to mend those
relations and find a solution to the crisis can only be hurt by
increasing tension in the Caucasus.

We have thoroughly reported and analyzed the collapse of Russia's
relations with NATO over the conflict in Kosovo on our Kosovo in
Crisis web site (http://www.stratfor.com/kosovo/crisis/).  Russia
was not only infuriated when NATO ignored its objections prior to
launching air strikes on Yugoslavia, but has come to view NATO's
actions as a direct challenge to Russian national interests and
security.  The Russian journal Segodnya on April 10 described
NATO as destroying the last outpost of Russian influence in
Europe.  But NATO's campaign against Russia does not stop in
Yugoslavia, Segodnya argued, "Georgia and Azerbaijan do not want
a Russian military presence anymore and are the most "advanced"
countries in this respect, as far as the United States is
concerned."

Azerbaijani officials had already announced on April 7 Aliyev's
intention to attend NATO's 50th anniversary ceremonies.  The
officials told the newspaper Bilik Dunyasi that Aliyev was also
expected while in the United States to hold talks with U.S.
leaders on expanding bilateral cooperation.  Georgian President
Eduard Shevardnadze has also announced his intention to attend
NATO's anniversary ceremonies.

Azerbaijan and Georgia, along with Uzbekistan, opted out of the
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) Collective Security
Treaty earlier this month.  Additionally, both Azerbaijan and
Georgia refused to sign a CIS statement condemning NATO air
strikes in Yugoslavia.  In fact, Azerbaijani political parties,
both in the opposition and the ruling coalition, have come out
publicly in favor of NATO air strikes.  Azerbaijan has even
announced its intention to send 50 soldiers as part of a Turkish
unit to participate in NATO peacekeeping operations in Bosnia, or
perhaps in Kosovo once a settlement is reached.

Whether proactive or reactive, Azerbaijan has appealed for closer
relations with NATO to counterbalance Russian relations with
Armenia.  Azerbaijan and Armenia are currently in shaky truce
over the predominantly Armenian enclave of Nagorno Karabakh in
Azerbaijan.  While Russia has denied it is supplying arms
directly to Armenia -- since arming combatants in an intra-CIS
feud is forbidden -- it has deployed advanced S-300 surface to
air missiles and MiG-29 fighters to Russian units in Armenia.
Speaking in Armenia on April 13, Russian air force commander
Colonel General Anatoly Kornukov announced that Armenia's air
defense system and Russia's air force are "ready to embark on
joint combat duty."  For its part, Georgia has requested the
departure of Russian army units guaranteeing a truce between
Georgia and the breakaway region of Abkhazia.  Georgia accuses
Russia of siding with the Abkhaz separatists.

On March 19, Azerbaijan detained a Russian cargo plane carrying
MiG fighters Baku claimed were bound for Yugoslavia.  The Russian
newspaper Nezavisimaya Gazeta interpreted this as little more
than a show of loyalty to NATO.  On March 20, Aliyev questioned
Russian President Boris Yeltsin about Russian missile and jet
shipments to Armenia.  On March 23, a U.S. delegation led by Air
Force Major General Charles Wax reportedly visited Azerbaijan,
where they held talks with Azerbaijani Defense and Foreign
Ministry officials and toured the Nasosnaya Air Base, which
Azerbaijan has offered to the U.S., Turkey, and NATO.

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia Sends Warship to Balkans

1999-03-31 Thread Kris Millegan





Russia Warship To Monitor NATO

By VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV
.c The Associated Press

MOSCOW (AP) -- Adding a show of force to its protest against NATO raids on
Yugoslavia, Russia said Wednesday it is sending a warship to the Mediterranean
and putting others on standby.

The announcement came the same day Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov returned to
Moscow after failing to persuade Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic to
revive talks on ending the Kosovo dispute.

Defense Minister Igor Sergeyev said one warship of the Black Sea Fleet would
leave Friday and another six were also ready to go ``to ensure Russia's
security when the defense ministry considers it necessary.''

``The defense ministry is also considering more decisive actions that will be
recommended to the leadership if the situation changes,'' Sergeyev said,
refusing to elaborate.

President Boris Yeltsin and other top officials have said repeatedly that
Russia will not get involved militarily in the conflict around the Yugoslav
province of Kosovo.

But the appearance of a Russian naval squadron in the Mediterranean would irk
NATO commanders and add to already tense situation in the region, where U.S.
and allied warships are deployed for operations against Yugoslavia.

In Washington, State Department spokesman James P. Rubin said the move was not
a ``particularly helpful gesture.''

``We are obviously concerned by the signal such a large deployment might send
to Belgrade and other countries in the region,'' he said.

Sergeyev did not say what kind of ship Russia was sending first. In Turkey,
the foreign ministry said it had approved a Russian request for passage
through the Bosporus, beginning Saturday, of one cruiser, two destroyers, two
patrol ships and three support ships.

While any Russian deployment of warships would likely be symbolic, it's a step
up in the Russian response, which so far has remained largely limited to
vociferous verbal protests. Moscow has also recalled its representative at
NATO and suspended all contacts with the alliance.

Some Russian politicians have demanded that Russia break the international
arms embargo on Yugoslavia and supply Belgrade with air defense missiles and
other weapons.

Regional governor Alexander Lebed, a presidential hopeful and former general,
called Wednesday for sending air defense missiles to Yugoslavia in some of his
strongest statements yet on the NATO bombing.

``We must declare that we will render military and technical aid to Yugoslavia
with the aim of supporting the civilian population,'' said Lebed, adding that
Russia should declare Yugoslavia a ``zone of strategic interest.''

Later Wednesday, Lebed argued on NTV television that the military help to
Yugoslavia would help save Europe from what he described as U.S. domination.
``Their idea of peacemaking is hitting a mosquito on your forehead with an
ax,'' he said.

But the Russian military is in shambles and the nation badly needs foreign
loans to crawl out of one of the worst recessions ever experienced by an
industrial country. That effectively deprives Russia of an opportunity to give
military help to its Yugoslav ally and confines its response to symbolic
steps.

According to Russian news reports, the Black Sea Fleet is suffering an
especially acute fuel shortage and has had little training lately.

Returning to the Russian capital following his meeting with Milosevic in
Belgrade, Primakov said the Yugoslav leader gave a ``signal'' that he was
ready to revive peace talks.

``Russia will continue efforts to end this not clever and tragically wrong
decision to continue the military action against Yugoslavia,'' Primakov said.





[CTRL] Fwd: Russia/Iraq/Yugoslavia

1999-03-30 Thread Kris Millegan





__

Stratfor's FREE Kosovo Crisis Center -
http://www.stratfor.com/kosovo/crisis/
The most comprehensive coverage of the
Kosovo Crisis anywhere on the Internet
__


STRATFOR's
Global Intelligence Update
March 31, 1999

Russia Helping Iraq Upgrade Air Defenses

Summary:

Intelligence officials now admit that Serb and Iraqi defense
officials have met and collaborated in recent months on anti-
aircraft operations.  Russia is now supplying sophisticated radar
systems to Iraq.  The possibility of a second front is
increasing.

Analysis:

One of the critical issues in the Kosovo war is the intention and
capabilities of Iraq.  It must be remembered that many of the
same nations that are currently engaged in the Kosovo air
campaign are also, simultaneously, engaged in an air war in Iraq.
As NATO intensifies the air war over Kosovo, the possibility of
an intensification of the air war over Iraq poses an important
strategic challenge by diverting aircraft and logistical support.

Recent reports emerging in the press tend to confirm Stratfor's
long-standing view that Yugoslavia and Iraq collaborated in the
run-up to the current conflict.  According to the Associated
Press, for example, U.S. intelligence now has evidence that
Yugoslav technicians met with Iraqi specialists in Baghdad in
February to help prepare Yugoslavia for an air war.  Since both
sides have similar equipment and are facing similar aircraft, the
Yugoslav military quite rationally wanted to learn whatever
lessons the Iraqis had to teach them.

It is obviously in the interest of both countries to cooperate
strategically as well as technically.  Anything that forces the
United States to divide its scarce air campaign resources
benefits both.  Thus, a report from the IBC from Baghdad,
claiming that Iraq is distributing advanced radar guidance
systems for the SAM-6 surface-to-air missile system, is
particularly significant.  According to the report, Iraq is
intensely engaged in upgrading its anti-air missile grid.  Abed
Hameed Hmoud, special secretary to Saddam and a member of the
Presidential Council, is said to be personally supervising the
installations of the systems at the Presidential Palaces, air
bases and other critical installations.  The article further
states that both the Northern and Southern Corps of the
Republican Guards are receiving new computing equipment and
small, advanced Russian-made radar units as well as technicians.

If these reports are true, and we think that to be likely, the
Russians are now engaged in a dramatic re-supply of equipment to
the Iraqis.  There have been numerous reports from sources in
Russia about such a re-supply, and the IBC report is merely
confirming the arrival and deployment of this equipment.  The
upgrading of the Iraqi air defense grid has the potential of
posing serious problems for allied pilots on missions in Iraq,
particularly if new systems have been distributed inside the no-
fly zones where routine air patrols are carried out.  We note,
however, that we can find no evidence of any U.S. or allied air
strikes in Iraq at this time.  This indicates that both sides are
lying low for the moment.

The new systems increase the ability of the Iraqis to engage U.S.
and allied pilots on missions in this area.  The standard U.S.
response to such an engagement is first to target the radar and
missile sites.  By substantially increasing the number of such
sites, Iraq is able to dictate a quickened tempo of allied air
operations.  Even if they lose some of their equipment, if the
Russians have provided equipment in sufficient numbers to provide
redundancy, Iraq will be able to dictate the level of allied
operations.  At a time when U.S. logistical capabilities required
to support air operations will be heavily tilted toward Serbia,
increased air operations over Iraq might pose a serious burden.
If, on one hand, the U.S. declines to increase its air
operations, it opens a window of opportunity for Saddam.  If, on
the other hand, the U.S. does increase air operations in Iraq, it
could, over the long haul, degrade its logistical capabilities.

Two front wars are the traditional fear of any power.  There is
no question but that the U.S. can handle one intense and one low-
grade air war.  There is some question whether the U.S. has the
supplies and transport systems needed to sustain two simultaneous
high-intensity air campaigns.  There is no doubt but that Saddam
and Milosevic understand that they may have an opportunity to
pose serious problems for the United States.  Milosevic, of
course, has done his part.  Now the question is whether Saddam
will up the ante.

It is not certain that there is any clear comprehensive
warfighting agreement between Yugoslavia and Iraq, nor that if
there were, the Iraqis would honor it.  But there is a real
window of opportunity available to Iraq and some indication that
it is preparing to exploit it, with 

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia Friends

1999-03-24 Thread Kris Millegan





From http://defence-data.com/current/page4009.htm


Russia starts building India's three Krivak class destroyers

March 22nd, 1999

by Gordon Feller, Defence Systems Daily's correspondent in Moscow

After being delayed several months while furiously looking for financing,
on Wednesday St. Petersburg's Baltiisky Zavod shipyard finally laid the
keel on the first of a $1 billion trio of state-of-the-art warships ordered
by the Indian navy.

Vladimir Yukhnin, the chief naval architect at the Severnoye PKB, which
designed the frigates, calls them the "warships of the next century" and
said that no foreign navy has anything comparable.

The 4,000-ton frigates are equipped with advanced-guidance missiles to
neutralise surface, subsurface and aerial targets. Reports have said that
the ships are also equipped with "stealth" technology that enables them to
avoid detection by enemy radar, and Yukhnin said the ships also have a
bombing complex called RBU-6000 and facilities to harbour helicopters - all
of which makes them extremely competitive on the international market.

India ordered the three Krivak class warships from Russia's state arms
dealer, Rosvooruzheniye, in 1997 to "partially arrest its declining force
levels and to improve combat capabilities," according to Indian news
reports at the time.

On Wednesday shipyard director Oleg Shulyakovsky said Baltiisky Zavod will
deliver two of the frigates by 2002 and the third by 2003. The first
frigate has to be completed in April of 2002 - two years later than
originally planned - with the second coming six months later and the third
six months after that.

"The keel for the second warship will be laid by the end of the year,"
Shulyakovsky said.

The project and the shipyard's controversial director have received
considerable attention in the Russian media. Last month, when Shulyakovsky
appealed to the Kremlin for funds for the project, the media accused him of
embezzling India's down payment, which, according to Shulyakovsky himself,
was more than $100 million - but he denied the charges.

Construction, which was supposed to begin last year, was put on hold after
the shipyard - one of the largest in Russia - saw its credit line disappear
with the crisis. The original investor, Uneximbank - which owns 50.5
percent of the shipyard - sold its stake just before the August crash. But
even before the sell-off and the crisis the shipyard was having trouble
getting financing.

The framework agreement with India calls for Baltiisky Zavod to borrow
private money to complete the projects because the cost of the first
frigate is estimated at $270 million, and India agreed only to pay a small
portion of that before 2001.

Shulyakovsky tried several different tracks to attract a new lender
-including last month's request to First Deputy Prime Minister Yury
Maslyukov to print $300 million worth of roubles. Another option, which
Shulyakovsky proposed in January, was a state guarantee for the loans the
shipyard planned to attract from abroad. It is unclear where the money is
coming from, however. At Wednesday's keel-laying celebration Shulyakovsky
would only said that the "financial problem had been solved" and he
declined to elaborate.

There is nothing unusual in borrowing money for contracts that are paid off
steadily over several years, experts said Thursday. But this deal was
particularly difficult to finance because commercial conditions are worse
here than in other European shipyards. And Baltiisky Zavod has been
troubled by the recent economic situation, which has forced it to change
its prospective partners several times. Shulyakovsky did say, however, that
the shipyard is not using any state money and has attracted a $140 million
credit line with a "satisfactory" interest rate, but he declined to name
the bank or specify the conditions of the loan.

There are several possible sources of financing for Baltiisky Zavod. The
shipyard has significant support from Inter-regional Investment Bank, known
by its Russian acronym MIB, which is one of the shipyard's shareholders and
has tight connections with Rosvooruzheniye through affiliated companies.
Another possible source of financing, according to the respected daily
newspaper Kommersant, is Vneshtorgbank. And another bank, Vnesheconombank,
is already close to the deal by performing the role as agent to handle
payments from India to Rosvooruzheniye.

Whichever bank is involved, however, the project is finally up and running
with financing based on the future payments from India. "The credit line
the shipyard received recently is guaranteed by the prospective payments of
the Indian government," Shulyakovsky said cautiously.

Baltiisky Zavod desperately needed this contract to move ahead. Losing the
Indian navy as a client would probably have forced the shipyard to layoff
staff and made getting future contracts more difficult.

But now, thanks in part to finally finding a lender, business is looking up
for the shipyard. 

[CTRL] Fwd: Russia Outlaws Fringe Christians

1999-03-04 Thread Kris Millegan





Russia Court Bans Religous Group

By NICK WADHAMS
.c The Associated Press

MOSCOW (AP) -- A Russian court has used a controversial religion law to ban
the Pentecostalist Church from a town in eastern Siberia, a news report said
today.

Under Russian law, courts have the right to outlaw religious groups that are
found to be inciting hatred or intolerant behavior. The law has been used
against several groups recently.

A judge in the Siberian town of Aldan ruled Tuesday that the Pentecostalists
had violated the law because they refused medical aid for ailing members of
the group. The court also said the Pentecostalists had preached intolerance by
teaching their children at home, the ITAR-Tass news agency said.

The religion law, passed in 1997, recognizes the Russian Orthodox Church as
the nation's leading faith and pledges to respect Islam, Judaism and Buddhism.
But other denominations face a host of restrictions and have to prove they've
had a presence in Russia for at least 15 years before they're permitted full
legal status.

The court's ruling came at a time when the city and the Pentecostalists were
involved in another confrontation in Aldan, about 3,000 miles east of Moscow.

A group of 60 Pentecostalists took over the city's administration building
Sunday and demanded that the city pay them for work they performed when severe
flooding hit the region last spring, ITAR-Tass said. City leaders say they
repaid the church members with food, clothing and fuel.

Authorities removed the Pentecostalists from the building today, taking the
women and children to a hospital, while the men were placed in a detention
center, the Interfax news agency said.

Human rights groups have protested Russia's religion law as a violation of the
Russian constitution, which permits freedom of religion. However, authorities
have acted against several religious groups recently.

Last month, 400 Pentecostalists in the eastern coastal city of Magadan applied
for asylum in the United States after alleging they were harassed by local
officials.

In other high-profile cases, prosecutors in Moscow are seeking to ban the
Jehovah's Witnesses from the Russian capital in a trial that currently
underway.

And tax police last week raided the Moscow offices of the Church of
Scientology, confiscating documents and questioning leaders.