date:20040515

partman_38_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman_38.dsc
  partman_38.tar.gz
  partman_38_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-auto_19_i386.changes

partman-auto_19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-auto_19.dsc
  partman-auto_19.tar.gz
  partman-auto_19_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-basicfilesystems_25_i386.changes

partman-basicfilesystems_25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-basicfilesystems_25.dsc
  partman-basicfilesystems_25.tar.gz
  partman-basicfilesystems_25_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-basicmethods_16_i386.changes

partman-basicmethods_16_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-basicmethods_16.dsc
  partman-basicmethods_16.tar.gz
  partman-basicmethods_16_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-ext3_25_i386.changes

partman-ext3_25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-ext3_25.dsc
  partman-ext3_25.tar.gz
  partman-ext3_25_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-lvm_15_i386.changes

partman-lvm_15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-lvm_15.dsc
  partman-lvm_15.tar.gz
  partman-lvm_15_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-partitioning_20_i386.changes

partman-partitioning_20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-partitioning_20.dsc
  partman-partitioning_20.tar.gz
  partman-partitioning_20_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-reiserfs_12_i386.changes

partman-reiserfs_12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-reiserfs_12.dsc
  partman-reiserfs_12.tar.gz
  partman-reiserfs_12_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-target_21_i386.changes

partman-target_21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-target_21.dsc
  partman-target_21.tar.gz
  partman-target_21_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-xfs_12_i386.changes

partman-xfs_12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-xfs_12.dsc
  partman-xfs_12.tar.gz
  partman-xfs_12_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#248104: marked as done (A missing debconf template is reported on Edit partition screen for partitions with unsupported filesystem)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#248104: fixed in partman 38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2004 10:58:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 09 03:58:44 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BMm16-0005zw-00; Sun, 09 May 2004 03:58:44 -0700
Received: from [10.0.0.8] (228.80-202-25.nextgentel.com [80.202.25.228])
by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFC2415C
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun,  9 May 2004 12:58:25 +0200 (MEST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?H=E5vard_Korsvoll?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Partman report 10 partman/filesystem_long/hfs+ doesn't exist.
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 12:58:05 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: Partman
Severity: Normal
Tags: d-i

Doing a test-installation on my iBook G4. I used beta4 of the new d-i. Doin=
g=20
it primarily for checking norwegian translations. When entering Partition=
=20
disks menu and choosing an existing partition with hfs+ as partition typ=
e.=20
The first lines of text are:
You are editing partition #3 of IDE1 master. This partition is formatted w=
ith=20
the 10 partman/filesystem_long/hfs+ doesn't exist.

H=E5vard

---
Received: (at 248104-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:36 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvrM-0008QK-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:36 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl3-0008Ic-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#248104: fixed in partman 38
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9

Source: partman
Source-Version: 38

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman_38.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.dsc
partman_38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.tar.gz
partman_38_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 07:34:37 +0300
Source: partman
Binary: partman
Architecture: source i386
Version: 38
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 partman- Partition the storage devices (partman) (udeb)
Closes: 240937 243374 244821 245027 245524 246723 247027 248063 248104
Changes: 
 partman (38) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Anton Zinoviev
  - parted_server.c (command_undo): destroy the old disk before
reopening.  It

Bug#248063: marked as done (Listes devices as to be formated which have been formated already)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#248063: fixed in partman 38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2004 23:56:17 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 08 16:56:08 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BMbfs-0004Pe-00; Sat, 08 May 2004 16:56:08 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 35CD964D3A; Sat,  8 May 2004 23:56:08 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A9F7D10691; Sun,  9 May 2004 00:55:44 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 00:55:44 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Listes devices as to be formated which have been formated already
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: partman
Version: 36
Severity: minor

I get something like the following:

   The following partitions are going to be formatted:

  partition #3 of IDE1 slave as swap  
  partition #5 of IDE1 slave as ext2  
  partition #6 of IDE1 slave as lvm   
  partition #7 of IDE1 slave as raid  
  partition #1 of RAID1 device #1 as reiserfs 
  partition #1 of LVM VG vg, LV home as ext2  
  partition #1 of LVM VG vg, LV scratch as ext3   

However, partition #5 of IDE1 slave has already been formated as ext2
when I went in the LVM configuration menu and it wrote changes to
disk.  This is correctly not being formated again, and should also not
be displayed.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 248063-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:25 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvrB-0008OU-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:25 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl3-0008Ia-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#248063: fixed in partman 38
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8

Source: partman
Source-Version: 38

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman_38.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.dsc
partman_38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.tar.gz
partman_38_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 07:34:37 +0300
Source: partman
Binary: partman
Architecture:

Bug#247780: marked as done (Does not detect the existing file systems on logical volumes (LVM))

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:11 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#247780: fixed in partman-lvm 15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2004 23:25:14 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 06 16:25:14 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from daedalus.andrew.net.au [210.18.204.2] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BLsEs-0006Ln-00; Thu, 06 May 2004 16:25:14 -0700
Received: from daedalus.andrew.net.au ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by daedalus.andrew.net.au (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-1) with ESMTP id 
i46NPC0x017114
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 May 2004 09:25:12 +1000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by daedalus.andrew.net.au (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-1) id i46NPCL7017112
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 May 2004 09:25:12 +1000
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 09:25:12 +1000
From: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: partman LV filesystem detection problem
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: partman

Hi,

Rather than repartition, this time I chose to leave my partitioning as it
was

(/dev/hda2 = ext3
 /dev/hda3 = swap
 /dev/hda4 = LVM)

and reactivate the existing VG. This worked fine, and the partitioner showed
the partition arrangement as it should.

When I then went to each LV, and went to mount them, the partitioner said
that no filesystem was detected on the LV, and only gave me the choice of
formatting it, not leaving it as it was and mounting it.

I suspect something's amiss with the filesystem detection code.

Andrew

---
Received: (at 247780-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:41 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:41 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvrQ-0008RI-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:40 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl9-0008KO-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:11 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#247780: fixed in partman-lvm 15
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:11 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: partman-lvm
Source-Version: 15

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-lvm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-lvm_15.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_15.dsc
partman-lvm_15.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_15.tar.gz
partman-lvm_15_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_15_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman-lvm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 07:43:49 +0300
Source: partman-lvm
Binary: partman-lvm
Architecture: source all
Version: 15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 partman-lvm - Add to

Bug#245524: marked as done (Usability issue: finish should be at the bottom)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#245524: fixed in partman 38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2004 16:24:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 23 09:24:24 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BH3TU-0002Nq-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:24:24 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 30F6E64D50; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:24:22 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 28306FFA0; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:23:48 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:23:48 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Usability issue: finish should be at the bottom
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: partman
Version: 33

In d-i, it's common to have Finish items at the bottom of the sreen.  p=
artman
breaks this assumption when it shows some help and other options at the b=
ottom,
whereas the finish is at the top.  I think you could move the items from =
the
bottom up, and move the finish down.


  =B3Finish partitioning and write changes to disk   =
 =B3
  =B3Undo changes to partitions  =
 =B3
  =B3=
 =B3
  =B3IDE1 master - 40.0 GB ST340810A =
 =B3
  =B3  #2 primary   39.7 GB ext3=
 =B3
  =B3  #1 primary  254.9 MB   F ext3   /=
 =B3
  =B3 pri/log4.6 MB FREE SPACE  =
 =B3
  =B3=
 =B3
  =B3Help on partitioning=
 =B3
  =B3Guided partitioning =
 =B3
  =B3Configure the Logical Volume Manager=
 =B3



--=20
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 245524-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:33 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:33 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvrJ-0008Pz-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:33 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl3-0008IU-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#245524: fixed in partman 38
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: partman
Source-Version: 38

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman_38.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.dsc
partman_38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.tar.gz
partman_38_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL

Bug#245145: marked as done (Entries in the generated fstab are sorted by device name. They should be sorted by mount point name.)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#245145: fixed in partman-target 21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 16:28:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 09:28:20 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bastille.unicaen.fr [193.55.130.33] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGKaC-00070R-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:28:20 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bastille.unicaen.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3F743A1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:25:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bastille.unicaen.fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bastille [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 19256-07 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:25:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from evalingui.unicaen.fr (evalingui.unicaen.fr [193.55.121.63])
by bastille.unicaen.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B229E431D
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:25:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rantanplan.info.unicaen.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by evalingui.unicaen.fr (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with SMTP id i3LGPShx023953
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:25:29 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 25985 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 16:25:28 -
Received: from unknown (HELO culdesac.eriador.me) (10.130.11.62)
  by rantanplan.info.unicaen.fr with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 16:25:28 -
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sylvain Sauvage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian-installer: wrong order of entries in generated fstab
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:25:27 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unicaen.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: debian-installer
Severity: important

Entries in the generated fstab are sorted by device name.
 They should be sorted by mount point name.

 For example, if you have /usr on /dev/sdb1 and /usr/local on /dev/sda3 (which
 was my case), in the generated fstab, /usr/local will be listed before /usr.
 In such a case, /usr/local will be mounted before /usr, which is something we
 absolutely do not want to happen.

---
Received: (at 245145-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:10 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:10 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvqw-0008NX-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:10 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvlD-0008LH-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:15 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#245145: fixed in partman-target 21
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:15 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: partman-target
Source-Version: 21

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-target, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-target_21.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_21.dsc
partman-target_21.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_21.tar.gz
partman-target_21_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_21_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if

Bug#245027: marked as done (Not obious how to reformat an existing partition)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#245027: fixed in partman 38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 03:27:57 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 20 20:27:57 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from intolerance.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.14.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BG8Oz-0002v1-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:27:57 -0700
Received: from umich.edu (bgp995300bgs.nanarb01.mi.comcast.net [68.40.45.65])
by intolerance.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp) with ESMTP id i3L3RuAa008403
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:27:56 -0400
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:25:27 -0400
From: Eric Zupunski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: installation-reports
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 4/18/2004 from www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer, Beta 3
uname -a: Linux megami 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 4/20/2004, 8:00 pm (Eastern time)
Method: Debian-installer booting from 100 MB Beta 3 cd

Machine: Dell Inspiron 4000 (laptop)
Processor: Pentium III
Memory: 256 MB
Root Device: ide hard drive
Root Size/partition table:  /boot : 105 MB
/ : 6.4 GB
swap  : 500 MB
(sizes were determined by a previous Redhat 9 install)
Output of lspci:
pcilib: Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/devices
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 03)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev 03)
:00:03.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1420
:00:03.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1420
:00:07.0 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
:00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
:00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
:00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 03)
:00:08.0 Multimedia audio controller: ESS Technology ES1983S Maestro-3i PCI Audio 
Accelerator (rev 10)
:00:10.0 PCI bridge: Actiontec Electronics Inc: Unknown device 0100 (rev 11)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility M3 AGP 2x 
(rev 02)
:08:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08)
:08:08.0 Communication controller: Lucent Microelectronics WinModem 56k (rev 01)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

The program to partition the hard drive was very intimidating; for example, it wasn't 
obvious to reformat a partition in use, one hilites it, hits enter, and then proceeds.
An instruction on the instruction to choose the partition to have a file system put on 
it would have help me get through the install faster.

Other than that, however, the install worked very well.  I only had to hit next and it 
installed.


---
Received: (at 245027-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:27 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:27 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvrD-0008P5-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:27 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl3-0008IS-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL

Bug#244977: marked as done (auto-partition wipes out existing NewWorld boot partition if created in the same session)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#244977: fixed in partman-auto 19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2004 22:14:17 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 20 15:14:17 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sinclair.syndicomm.com [64.144.87.98] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BG3VR-0006LZ-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:14:17 -0700
Received: from syndicomm.com (sinclair.syndicomm.com [64.144.87.98])
by sinclair.syndicomm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id i3KMEBFQ023918;
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:14:11 -0700
Received: from 66.227.241.44
(SquirrelMail authenticated user justdave)
by www.syndicomm.com with HTTP;
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:14:11 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:14:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: auto-partition wipes out existing NewWorld boot partition if created in the 
same session
From: Dave Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Syndicomm-MailScanner: No viruses found (not authoritative)
X-Syndicomm-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.428,
required 5, BAYES_20 -1.43)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: partman-auto
Version: 15

steps to reproduce:

1) Choose auto-partition
2) write partition map
3) get yelled at because there's no NewWorld boot partition (see bug 243253)
4) go back to the partition map
5) delete the new ext3 and swap partitions
6) choose FREE SPACE
7) select Create a new partition
8) set size to 820K
9) set usage to Use as NewWorld boot partition
10) choose Done setting up
11) choose FREE SPACE
12) choose auto-partition

Actual results:

partition map now shows the former NewWorld boot partition as do not use
instead of boot

Expected results:

the NewWorld boot partition should still be intact




---
Received: (at 244977-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:20 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:20 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvr6-0008OG-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:20 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl4-0008J1-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:06 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#244977: fixed in partman-auto 19
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:06 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: partman-auto
Source-Version: 19

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-auto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-auto_19.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_19.dsc
partman-auto_19.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_19.tar.gz
partman-auto_19_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_19_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman-auto package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Bug#244821: marked as done (drive names may be confusing to those expecting linux device names)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#244821: fixed in partman 38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2004 05:20:23 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 14 22:20:23 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ns.imhosted.com (premiere.imhosted.com) [64.247.27.40] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BDzIV-0002rA-00; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:20:23 -0700
Received: from c-24-9-157-118.client.comcast.net ([24.9.157.118] ident=qucho)
by premiere.imhosted.com with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128)
(Exim 4.24)
id 1BDzFh-00080c-OR
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:17:29 -0400
From: Ricardo Corral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: installation-reports
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:16:38 -0600
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse 
report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - premiere.imhosted.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - qucho.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version:  (04/10/2004) 
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux noisybox 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 04/14/2004 04:00 AM MST (Mountain US) 
Method: CD burned image. Boot from CD (IDE2 Master), Default install option.  Ethernet 
NIC(DHCP autoconfigured) (connected to Cable internet modem) for extra packages 
installation.
Machine: Gateway Desktop
Processor: Inter(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1700 Mhz
Memory: 1.25 Gb
Root Device: hdb: Maxtor 2B020H1, ATA DISK drive
Root Size/partition table: /dev/hdb1 ext3 18.3 GB  
Output of lspci:
pcilib: Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/devices
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge (rev 
03)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 03)
:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB/ER Hub interface to PCI Bridge 
(rev 12)
:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 12)
:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801BA IDE U100 (rev 12)
:00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 12)
:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM SMBus (rev 12)
:00:1f.4 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 12)
:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM AC'97 Audio (rev 12)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 MX 440] (rev 
a3)
:02:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM/CA/CAM Ethernet Controller 
(rev 03)
:02:0a.0 Modem: Broadcom Corporation BCM4212 v.90 56k modem
:02:0b.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq ES1371 [AudioPCI-97] (rev 09)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[o ]
Configure network HW:   [ ]
Config network: [o ]
Detect CD:  [e ]
Load installer modules: [ o]
Detect hard drives: [o ]
Partition hard drives:  [o ]
Create file systems:[o ]
Mount partitions:   [o ]
Install base system:[o ]
Install boot loader:[o ]
Reboot: [o ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

The boot loader would not install an entry for WindowsXP located in my hda1. (no 
choice was given in the matter)

The partitioning utility referred to my HD's as 'IDE1 Master' and 'IDE1 Slave' this 
got me confused at first. (I was expecting the 
acostum linux way 'hda' and hdb')

While the installer detect my CDROM's drivers it gets confused if I have a CD inserted 
in the second drive. 
Due to such confusion the installer is unable to proceed. The installer loose track of 
what driver had the installer CD.
The same problem occurs ergardless of selecting

partman-xfs_12_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-xfs_12.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_12.dsc
partman-xfs_12.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_12.tar.gz
partman-xfs_12_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_12_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243253: marked as done (doesn't know to create Apple_Bootstrap partition)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#243253: fixed in partman-auto 19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2004 02:20:13 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 11 19:20:13 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from cmailm2.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.210] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCr3V-0002Eg-00; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:20:13 -0700
Received: from user-4493.l2.c1.dsl.pol.co.uk ([81.77.177.141] helo=matisse.sulem)
by cmailm2.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1BCr3P-0005gO-U6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:20:08 +0100
Subject: Package: installation-reports
From: Jared Sulem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:20:21 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 2004-04-11 
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/beta3/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux imac 2.4.25-powerpc #1 ven mar 19:29:26 CET 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-04-12, very early morning
Method: Installed from bootable CD.  Installed base from CD.

Machine: Original iMac (ie Bondi Blue)
Processor: 233MHz, 740/750, pmac-generation: NewWorld
Memory: 160MB
Root Device: IDE (QUANTUM FIREBALL SE4.3A, ATA DISK drive)
Root Size/partition table:
4.3 GB hard disk partitioned as follows:
Apple partition map:63 sectors
Root partition: ~3.8GB
Swap partition: ~200MB

Output of lspci:
[ Email me if this is necessary.  I can't currently acquire this. ]

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Partition harddrive - Automatic partitioning was chosen but did not create 800KB 
partition for yaboot to install bootloader in.



---
Received: (at 243253-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:38 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:38 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvrO-0008Qi-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:38 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl4-0008Ix-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:06 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#243253: fixed in partman-auto 19
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:06 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: partman-auto
Source-Version: 19

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-auto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-auto_19.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_19.dsc
partman-auto_19.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_19.tar.gz
partman-auto_19_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_19_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen

Bug#247027: marked as done (merged)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#240937: fixed in partman 38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2004 21:48:27 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 02 14:48:27 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BKOp1-0003P6-00; Sun, 02 May 2004 14:48:27 -0700
Received: from localhost (h00a0cc520a75.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.31.84.201])
  by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP
  id 2004050221475601400deg2te; Sun, 2 May 2004 21:47:56 +
Received: from [192.168.0.6] (helo=192.168.0.6)
by localhost with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16)
(Exim 4.31)
id 1BKOnK-0003iF-RD
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 02 May 2004 17:46:42 -0400
Subject: should report when no hard disks are found
From: Brad Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 17:47:53 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 05022004 - http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer
uname -a: can't install
Date: Sun May  2 17:35:02 EDT 2004
Method: installed from 
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/2.6/mini.iso

Machine: vmware virtual machine
Processor: virtual
Memory: 256
Root Device: scsi virtual disk
Root Size/partition table: unable to partition
Output of lspci: can't install

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [E]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:[ ]
Mount partitions:   [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

The system did not detect my disk - which is fine - however it did not 
complain... I was very confused the partitioning questions because they
did not display any disks.

Probably there should be an error message displayed if there are 
no hard drives detected.

brad


---
Received: (at 240937-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:29 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvrF-0008Pi-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:29 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl3-0008IM-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#240937: fixed in partman 38
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: partman
Source-Version: 38

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman_38.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.dsc
partman_38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.tar.gz
partman_38_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian

Bug#246723: marked as done (merged)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#240937: fixed in partman 38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2004 17:42:34 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 30 10:42:34 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BJc1y-0006AE-00; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:42:34 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 9CFEA64D4F; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:42:32 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D5CF1FE85; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:41:20 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:41:20 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: does not complain if there is no hard drive
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: partman
Version: 31
Severity: minor

partman does not complain if there is no hard drive, but happily
displays a manually partition disk menu and then shows no disk.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 240937-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:29 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvrF-0008Pi-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:29 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl3-0008IM-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#240937: fixed in partman 38
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: partman
Source-Version: 38

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman_38.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.dsc
partman_38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.tar.gz
partman_38_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 07:34:37 +0300
Source: partman
Binary: partman
Architecture: source i386
Version: 38
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 partman- Partition the storage devices (partman) (udeb)
Closes: 240937 243374 244821 245027 245524 246723 247027 248063 248104
Changes: 
 partman (38) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Anton Zinoviev
  - parted_server.c (command_undo): destroy the old disk before
reopening.  It is possible that this fixes #239300
  - init.d/unsupported: exit 10 when the user presses back (instead
of continuing the partitioner).  Thanks to Martin Michlmayr,
closes: #243374
  - templates (partman/choose_partition): specify precisely that
selecting a partition

Bug#240937: marked as done (Should notify when no partitionable media is available)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#240937: fixed in partman 38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2004 23:52:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 29 15:52:12 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mxout6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B86Y8-pp-00; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:52:12 -0800
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139])
by mxout6.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id 
i2TNqBe7012667;
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:52:11 -0800
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (io.csde.washington.edu [128.95.92.10])
by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id 
i2TNqBWS009853;
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:52:11 -0800
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Matt Weatherford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: installation-reports: beta3 i386 When no hard drive present,
 partitioning menus make no sense
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:52:09 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports
Version: Debian Installer Beta 3
Severity: minor

Dell Dimension X400 - installed with no IDE hard drive in the box,
booted from floppies boot.img and root.img - came up fine.  When 
reached the partitioning menu, I realized I had not put a HD in the
machine at all - the only media devices were cdrom and floppy.
The Partition menu was weird and circular in this case, rather than
pointing out there was not any device acceptable to recevie the
installation. 

Keep up the good work - this installer looks GREAT!  Once I put an
actual hard drive in the system, it came up perfectly - you guys
rock!

Matt Weatherford
seattle, wa

note: this bug NOT reported on the actual system that was installed.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 240937-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:29 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvrF-0008Pi-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:29 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl3-0008IM-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#240937: fixed in partman 38
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: partman
Source-Version: 38

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman_38.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.dsc
partman_38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.tar.gz
partman_38_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by

partman-lvm_15_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-lvm_15.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_15.dsc
partman-lvm_15.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_15.tar.gz
partman-lvm_15_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_15_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 247343 247780 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#241817: marked as done ([powerpc] Does not create newworld boot partition)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#241817: fixed in partman-auto 19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2004 07:04:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 02 23:04:53 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from (galileo.castrov.cuug.ab.ca) [24.64.161.27] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B9fD2-0001f7-00; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 23:04:52 -0800
Received: from wuth by galileo.castrov.cuug.ab.ca with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1B9fCy-0006Zl-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 00:04:48 -0700
From: Brett Wuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: install: does not create yaboot partition
X-Debbugs-CC: Brett Wuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Brett Wuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 00:04:48 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC 
autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: install
Severity: important

Using the sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso image as of 2004-04-01, I
attempted to install Debian on an iMac.  The install failed because it
did not create a partition for yaboot.

The details:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] md5sum ~/tmp/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso 
49dd5281613dc1cb938c7b267cb11e35  /home/wuth/tmp/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso

I'm not too familiar with iMac's so I don't know the exact model, but
the following might help (after work-around):

arcturus:/proc# cat cpuinfo
processor   : 0
cpu : 740/750
temperature : 47-49 C (uncalibrated)
clock   : 333MHz
revision: 2.2 (pvr 0008 0202)
bogomips: 665.19
machine : iMac,1
motherboard : iMac MacRISC Power Macintosh
detected as : 65 (iMac (first generation))
pmac flags  : 
L2 cache: 512K unified
memory  : 32MB
pmac-generation : NewWorld
arcturus:/proc# cat meminfo
total:used:free:  shared: buffers:  cached:
Mem:  29282304 28602368   6799360  1167360 20070400
Swap: 302567424 36569088 265998336
MemTotal:28596 kB
MemFree:   664 kB
MemShared:   0 kB
Buffers:  1140 kB
Cached:  13468 kB
SwapCached:   6132 kB
Active:  12344 kB
Inactive:10072 kB
HighTotal:   0 kB
HighFree:0 kB
LowTotal:28596 kB
LowFree:   664 kB
SwapTotal:  295476 kB
SwapFree:   259764 kB
arcturus:/proc# cat partitions 
major minor  #blocks  name rio rmerge rsect ruse wio wmerge wsect wuse running use 
aveq

   3 06297480 ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc 25418 47678 584746 982960 4938 
12673 144616 520420 0 314910 1505600
   3 1 31 ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
   3 2801 ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
   3 3 295494 ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3 5167 12878 144360 342640 3088 
9172 101704 324870 0 147760 669660
   3 46001152 ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part4 20249 34794 440370 640300 1850 
3501 42912 195550 0 298060 835920
arcturus:/proc# 


Reproducing bug:

at chang sound, hold down 'c' key
at boot: prompt, wait for install kernel to default
low memory mode: enter
country: canada
connects with dhcp
set hostname to arcturus
partition: use entire drive
choose: all files in one partition
partition table will display as:
  #1 32.2  kB  Apple
  #2  6.1  GB B F ext3 untitled
  #3 302.5 MB   F swap swap

No error should occur, but the partition table is wrong, the bug
causes the following to be displayed:

[!!] Install yaboot on a hard disk
Failed to install bootloader
The installation of the yaboot boot loader failed.
Please check the sytem log or the output on the third console (tty3).
Warning: Your system may be unbootable!
4th console shows:
yaboot-installer[...]: WARNING **: boot_devfs=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/targe0/lun0/part2, 
root_devfs=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2
yaboot-installer[...]: mkofboot: Finding OpenFirmware device path to `/dev/hda2'...
yaboot-installer[...]: mkofboot: /dev/hda2 appears to be mounted! aborting


A work-around to the bug is:

* Execute the

Bug#238689: marked as done (Installation on Notebook Gericom X5 Force successful/Problem with mount options chooser and german locale)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:13 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238689: fixed in partman-reiserfs 12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2004 12:57:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 18 04:57:21 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from natsmtp01.rzone.de [81.169.145.166] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B3x5N-00089H-00; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:57:21 -0800
Received: from eslapion.lazarevic.de (port-212-202-34-137.reverse.qsc.de 
[212.202.34.137])
by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ICvINA37
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:57:18 +0100 (MET)
Received: from renaud.lazarevic.de ([192.168.0.2])
by eslapion.lazarevic.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16)
(Exim 4.30)
id 1B3x5J-0002zA-AZ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:57:17 +0100
From: Alexander =?iso-8859-2?q?Lazarevi=E6?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation on Notebook Gericom X5 Force successful/Problem with mount 
options chooser and german locale
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:57:06 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
X-GnuPG-Fingerprint: ED36 582B 2E3A 3DB5 8062  C9B8 6221 76C1 24C4 67D8
X-GnuPG-Key-At: http://laza.homeip.net:8080/Lazarevic/DOWNLOAD/alex/laza.gpg
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol=application/pgp-signature;
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary=Boundary-02=_ryZWAZ2sxNHeC7t;
  charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 


--Boundary-02=_ryZWAZ2sxNHeC7t
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 18.01.2004 from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/t=
esting/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux francois 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 =
GNU/Linux
Date: 18.01.2004
Method: Installation from 100MB Debian-Basesystem CD
Machine: Notebook Gericom X5 Force 1630 DVD-CDRW
Processor: mobile Pentium4 1,6 GHz
Memory: 384 MB
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table:
Output of lspci:

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [ ]
Config network: [ ]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

I have chosen the german locale at the beginning of the installation. When I
want to set a particular mount option of a partition I get the following
options:

[ ] notail - Setzen Sie dies
[ ] wenn die Partition /boot enth=E4lt
[ ] noatime - Zugriffszeit einer Inode nicht bei jedem Zugriff aktual
[ ] nodev - Keine Unterst=FCtzung f=FCr Zeichen- oder Blockorientierte
=2E..

The second line is part of the comment of the first option. The problem
is, that if I select the third option for noatime the nodev option shows
up later on in the partition-settings overview. The options below the
second line are off by one.


--Boundary-02=_ryZWAZ2sxNHeC7t
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQBAWZyrYiF2wSTEZ9gRAk7VAJ9ZPCoiklZm7i3VMRJPhWvLPnQUoACdFBwy
cf2ztAfp3hBL+XokLCmeG6I=
=L/zi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--Boundary-02=_ryZWAZ2sxNHeC7t--

---
Received: (at 238689-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:46 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvrW-0008RV-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:46 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id

partman-basicmethods_16_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-basicmethods_16.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_16.dsc
partman-basicmethods_16.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_16.tar.gz
partman-basicmethods_16_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_16_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 237841 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243374: marked as done (The back button on the dialog for unsupported subarchitecture hangs the installer)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#243374: fixed in partman 38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2004 18:37:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 12 11:37:19 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BD6J5-0005NE-00; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:37:19 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 2807564D4F; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 18:37:16 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BA1C210864; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 19:36:29 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 19:36:29 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: partman hangs when it doesn't know part table for arch
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: partman
Version: 0.30
Severity: minor

I got the following notice about my sub-arch not being listed in
definitions.sh, and when I hit Go back, the whole system simply
hung.  Pressing Yes works just fine.


[!!] Partition disks

This partitioner doesn't have information about the default type of
   the partition tables on your architecture.  Please send an e-mail
   message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with information.

   Please note that if the type of the partition table is unsupported by
   libparted, then this partitioner will not work properly.

   Continue with partitioning?

Go Back   YesNo

Go back:

   Starting up the partitioner

  0%

   Please wait ...

... nothing, it just hangs.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 243374-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:28 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvrE-0008PV-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:28 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl3-0008IO-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#243374: fixed in partman 38
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: partman
Source-Version: 38

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman_38.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.dsc
partman_38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.tar.gz
partman_38_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 07:34:37 +0300
Source: partman
Binary: partman
Architecture: source i386
Version: 38
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL

Bug#246749: marked as done (/tmp partition is too small and breaks package installs)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#246749: fixed in partman-auto 19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2004 20:13:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 30 13:13:29 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail4.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BJeO1-00042i-00; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:13:29 -0700
Received: (qmail 8776 invoked by uid 64014); 30 Apr 2004 20:13:28 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mail4.speakeasy.net with 
AmikaGuardian-Server-2.1.2; 30 Apr 2004 20:13:28 -
X-AmikaGuardian-Id: mail4.speakeasy.net10833560062618733
X-AmikaGuardian-Category: AN:Junk Mail : 1.0
X-AmikaGuardian-Category: AN:Spam : 1.0
X-AmikaGuardian-Action: Trigger(Junk Mail)
Received: from 167.189.171.66.subscriber.vzavenue.net (HELO harpua) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  (envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by mail4.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 30 Apr 2004 20:13:26 -
Received: by harpua (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 52E0251B93; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:14:24 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ivan Nestlerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tetex-bin: upgrade to 2.0.2-14 fails (bogus 'No space left on device')
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:14:24 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-14
Severity: important

When I attempted to upgrade tetex-bin today, I got a slew of errors
about No space left on device despite having what should be plenty of
space:

$ df -h
FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hde1 133M   81M   46M  64% /
tmpfs 253M 0  253M   0% /dev/shm
/dev/hde5 4.6G  1.5G  2.9G  34% /usr
/dev/hde6 2.8G  127M  2.5G   5% /var
/dev/hde7  15M  1.1M   13M   8% /tmp
/dev/hde8 103G   16G   82G  16% /home

Also, I am using dash as /bin/sh if that makes a difference.

Here is the error:

Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-14) ...
Regenerating /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ... done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ... done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ... done
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
! Could not write 1 8-byte item(s).
! Could not write 2926 4-byte item(s).
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/lambda.oft installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt3966.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt3971.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/amstex.fmt installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt3976.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt3981.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.fmt installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt3986.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdftex.fmt installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt3991.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/tex.fmt installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt3996.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/cont-en.efmt installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt4001.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/elatex.efmt installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt4006.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/etex.efmt installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt4011.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mptopdf.efmt installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt4016.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdfelatex.efmt installed.
mkdir: cannot create directory `/tmp/mt4021.tmp': No space left on device
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdfetex.efmt

Bug#247343: marked as done (should show which partitions are going to be formated)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:11 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#247343: fixed in partman-lvm 15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2004 16:07:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 04 09:07:36 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BL2SG-00052V-00; Tue, 04 May 2004 09:07:36 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 526CE64D3A; Tue,  4 May 2004 16:07:34 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DDA99FFA0; Tue,  4 May 2004 17:07:25 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 17:07:25 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: should show which partitions are going to be formated
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: lvmcfg
Severity: minor

In the following screen asking whether it's okay to write changed to
the disk, it should show which devices are going to be formated
(similarly to what partman shows).

[!!] Partition disks 
  
Before the Logical Volume Manager can be configured, the current  
paritioning scheme has to be written to disk. These changes cannot be 
undone.   
  
After the Logical Volume Manager is configured, no additional changes 
to the partitions in the disks containing physical volumes are
allowed. Please decide if you are satisfied with the current  
partitioning scheme in these disks before continuing. 
  
Write the changes to the storage devices and configure LVM?   
  
Go Back   YesNo 


-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 247343-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:09 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvqv-0008NL-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:09 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvl9-0008KM-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:11 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#247343: fixed in partman-lvm 15
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:11 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: partman-lvm
Source-Version: 15

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-lvm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-lvm_15.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_15.dsc
partman-lvm_15.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_15.tar.gz
partman-lvm_15_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_15_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman-lvm package)

(This

partman-basicfilesystems_25_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_25.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_25.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_25.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_25.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_25_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_25_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#247439: marked as done (wrong order of mountpoints in fstab)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#247439: fixed in partman-target 21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 07:10:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 05 00:10:02 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from licsboj0.customer.nettuno.it (localhost) [130.186.216.8] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BLGXa-0002bM-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 00:10:02 -0700
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D7F454BDE3; Wed,  5 May 2004 09:09:54 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Guido Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wrong fstab generated at installation time
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 09:09:54 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: install
Severity: normal

Hi,

I've installed sarge yesterday from beta4 (and already submitted an
installation report). Now I've found another problem about the generated
fstab: it isn't ordered correctly.

In particular at installation time I choose to have a partition for /home
and two other for /home/students and /home/staff (I'm doing this
installation for a school). 

The resulting fstab had the second two before /home itself, thus
causing mount to complain that their mount moint was non-existent and
actually not mounting them.

This may depend on the fact that /home resides on the second raid disc
provided by the controller (/dev/cciss/c0d1) while the other two reside 
on the first one (/dev/cciss/c0d0) (or, at installation time 
/dev/cciss/disc1 and /dev/cciss/disc0)

Anyway the installer component that generates the fstab should take care
that the order respects the filesystem hierarchy, before anything else!

Thanks,

Guido

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

---
Received: (at 247439-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 09:53:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 02:53:09 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvqv-0008NK-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:53:09 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOvlD-0008LJ-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:15 -0400
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#247439: fixed in partman-target 21
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 05:47:15 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: partman-target
Source-Version: 21

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-target, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-target_21.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_21.dsc
partman-target_21.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_21.tar.gz
partman-target_21_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_21_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman-target package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the

partman-auto_19_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-auto_19.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_19.dsc
partman-auto_19.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_19.tar.gz
partman-auto_19_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_19_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 241817 243253 244957 244977 246749 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman_38_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman_38.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.dsc
partman_38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38.tar.gz
partman_38_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_38_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 240937 243374 244821 245027 245524 246723 247027 248063 248104 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman-partitioning_20_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-partitioning_20.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_20.dsc
partman-partitioning_20.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_20.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_20_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_20_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman-reiserfs_12_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-reiserfs_12.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_12.dsc
partman-reiserfs_12.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_12.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_12_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_12_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 238689 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

srm-reader bug

2004-05-15 Thread Benoit

I don't which udeb contains the file srm-reader (for alpha), hence the post 
here.

There is an 'if' without a 'then' at line 16 in this file.


Have a good day,
Benoit


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: srm-reader bug

* Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-15 12:03]:
 I don't which udeb contains the file srm-reader (for alpha), hence the post 
 here.
 
 There is an 'if' without a 'then' at line 16 in this file.

I think this has been fixed in our development branch but hasn't been
released yet:

  * Fix a rather glaring (but not glaring enough) shell syntax error.
Still doesn't work because we aren't priming the right debconf
questions for languagechooser, but closer.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: clone 249082 to partman

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 clone 249082 -1
Bug#249082: Installation report for Sun Ultra Enterprise 2
Bug 249082 cloned as bug 249142.

 reassign -1 partman-auto
Bug#249142: Installation report for Sun Ultra Enterprise 2
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman-auto'.

 retitle -1 The guided partitioning of whole drive with sun disk label does not work
Bug#249142: Installation report for Sun Ultra Enterprise 2
Changed Bug title.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#249082: Installation report for Sun Ultra Enterprise 2

2004-05-15 Thread Anton Zinoviev

clone 249082 -1
reassign -1 partman-auto
retitle -1 The guided partitioning of whole drive with sun disk label does not work

On 14.V.2004 at 15:50 (-0600) Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
 
 Failed to partition the selected disk This probably happened because
 there are too many (primary) partitions in the partition table.

Yes partman-auto can not partition entire drive with sun disk label.
This is because of a bug in libparted and can not be fixed in
partman-auto.  However partman-auto should not propose to do something
that it can not do.  The easiest fix is to remove partman-auto for
sparc but on the other hand the guided partitioning of a free space
works...

Anton Zinoviev


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#248963: Sarge Debian-installer installation error on SPARC IPX

2004-05-15 Thread Magnus Hyllander

Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Magnus Hyllander [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-14 20:46]:
 

Booting with linux ramdisk_size=8192 gets me past the previous 
problem. Now I get other errors just a little later during initial boot:

Freeing unused kernel memory: 132k freed
Setting up filesystem, please wait ...
echo[8]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
mount[9]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
uname[11]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
grep[12]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
init[10]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
[[13]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
Segmentation fault
BusyBox v1.00-pre10 (Debian 20040415-3) multi-call binary
   

And idea?
Magnus, can you check if
http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-05-14/cdrom-mini.iso
boots?
 

I tried cdrom-mini.iso, resulting in the same error (I didn't need to 
increase the ramdisk size in this case).


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#248963: Sarge Debian-installer installation error on SPARC IPX

2004-05-15 Thread Magnus Hyllander

Blars Blarson wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 

* Magnus Hyllander [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-14 20:46]:
   

Booting with linux ramdisk_size=8192 gets me past the previous 
problem. Now I get other errors just a little later during initial boot:

Freeing unused kernel memory: 132k freed
Setting up filesystem, please wait ...
echo[8]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
mount[9]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
uname[11]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
grep[12]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
init[10]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
[[13]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
Segmentation fault
BusyBox v1.00-pre10 (Debian 20040415-3) multi-call binary
 

And idea?
   

This is one of the possible symtoms of the bterm/sparc framebuffer bug.
Try adding the debian-installer/framebuffer=false option to the silo
command line.
 

I tried this option with both the beta 4 image and cdrom-mini.iso. It 
didn't help in either case, the same error still occurs.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

burnish

2004-05-15 Thread Ellis

Duvall,

Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004

http://www.9002hosting.com/cd/

evaporate,and you were.

Bug#249101: Problem in appendix/chroot-install.xml

On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 10:37:44AM +0900, KURASAWA Nozomu wrote:
 Package: debian-installer-manual
 
 In appendix/chroot-install.xml  line 333,
 
 filenameetc/hostname/filename.
 
 but, It may be 'filename/etc/hostname/filename.' 

Fixed in the trunk, thanks.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: initrd testing

2004-05-15 Thread Ben Collins

 Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)

Ok, there's a new second.b on sparc-boot.org/pub/testing/. Give that a
shot.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: call for help: quik- (oldworld ppc) installer (d-i skills needed, not powerpc)

2004-05-15 Thread Holger Levsen

Hi,

btw, isn't mkvmlinux
(http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/mkvmlinuz) suitable to create
boot floppies for oldworld ?! (I currently don't have a monitor for my
oldworld mac but I'll get one until the weekend.)
I'm in a similar situation and will try it soon; I only heard about
mkvmlinuz today.

Has anybody tried now ? ;)

d-i installer installs quik just fine, and quik (at least for my powermac
4400/200) creates a good quik.conf, except for the refered link to
/boot/vmlinux. /boot/vmlinux-2.4.25-powerpc-small exists, but the link to
/boot/vmlinux is missing. I think this is a bug in
kernel-image-powerpc-small.
No, we can fix this in rootskel, and we need to fix it anyway for yaboot
(see a couple of merged bugs against yaboot-installer). I've got the
change in my working copy, and it just needs testing.

Could you please point me to the exact location in rootskel's code? I just had
a brief look at the contents of rootskel_0.75.tar.gz but couldn't find it.

if someone would be willing to help start with a quik-installer I would
happily help that person and (co-)maintain it and collect open firmware
settings for specific mac models.
I'll try to check in what I've got over the weekend, unfinished and
untested though it is.

That's great! Until then I'll examine the build at
http://people.debian.org/~luther/debian-installer/daily-powerpc-built/2004.05.15/powerpc-small/floppy/
and post the results.

regards,
Holger

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: propigating udebs to testing for the next release

So, I've a question.  I want to commit a change to base-installer
which will allow root partitions to be on LVM.  However, this requires
initrd-tools 0.1.68 which was accepted today (and will break LVM
installations with an older initrd-tools).  If I make the
base-installer change now, this means this version cannot move to
testing.  I guess I could wait 10 days to commit that change, but that
would slow down development quite a few.  I suppose I can commit it in
5 days, because we said udebs need to be in unstable for 5 days before
we consider moving them to testing.  Is this the right thing to do?

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

boltzmann

2004-05-15 Thread Frieda Terrell

Franklin,+

75%off for all New Softwares.
WindowXP,Photoshop,Window2003...etcMore

http://www.terrar.info/OE017/?affiliate_id=233635campaign_id=601

cheekbone,the secretary turned.

Re: propigating udebs to testing for the next release

* Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-15 12:53]:
 I didn't upload partman-md because my testing environment doesn't
 allow me to test this package.  In particular there are some changes
 in the scripts partman-lvm/init.d/lvm and partman-lvm/undo.d/lvm in
 order to detect the existing file systems on logical volumes.  I
 haven't attempted to make similar changes in partman-md.

I'll sync the changes later; at the moment, partman-md isn't affected
anyway because we don't handle existing MD devices.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

d-i daily build 20040514 fails on Sparc Ultra 10

2004-05-15 Thread Jens Schmalzing

Hi,

I've just tested the latest daily build on a Sparc Ultra 10, and while
the kernel starts fine now (contrary to beta4), the installation
system hangs during hardware discovery, going into an endless loop of
`modprobe usbkdb; modprobe keybdev; modprobe usbserial; Segmentation
fault'.

Regards, Jens.

-- 
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!

Processed: Re: Bug#249049: INSTALL REPORT

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 249049 grub-installer
Bug#249049: INSTALL REPORT
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'.

 retitle 249049 use grub-install /dev/xx and allow installs on hdc
Bug#249049: INSTALL REPORT
Changed Bug title.

 --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#249049: INSTALL REPORT

2004-05-15 Thread Christian Pernegger

 The grub-installer is quite confused about hdc being the first BIOS
 disk, but that is to be expected I guess.
I don't think having hc as the first disk is that uncommon, so we
should try to make this work.  What problems did you encounter
exactly?
Onboard PATA controller:
Primary master == hda: Maxtor 4D080H4, ATA DISK drive
Primary slave == hdb: JLMS XJ-HD166S, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
Secondary master == hdc: Maxtor 6Y120L0, ATA DISK drive
The disk on SM is set to boot in BIOS.
If I answer the install in MBR question with a yes, it executes 
grub-install (hd0) -- the boot sector lands on the wrong disk. If I chose 
no, and chose (hd1) I get a grub prompt, but the root disk is set to 
(hd1,1), where there isn't even a partition. Easily fixed by editing 
menu.list, but ...

grub-install can use device nodes as arguments, so the default call could 
be:
grub-install /dev/??? (node of disk on which /boot resides)
and the 'root' entry in menu list set to
(hd0,?). ? being the partition numer of the partition that has /boot

That way the boot sector should land on the right disk, and grubs 'root' 
entry, since (hd0) at boot-time seems to be the disk that was booted from in 
all cases. Or not?

Cheers
C

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: propigating udebs to testing for the next release

2004-05-15 Thread Joey Hess

Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 So, I've a question.  I want to commit a change to base-installer
 which will allow root partitions to be on LVM.  However, this requires
 initrd-tools 0.1.68 which was accepted today (and will break LVM
 installations with an older initrd-tools).  If I make the
 base-installer change now, this means this version cannot move to
 testing.  I guess I could wait 10 days to commit that change, but that
 would slow down development quite a few.  I suppose I can commit it in
 5 days, because we said udebs need to be in unstable for 5 days before
 we consider moving them to testing.  Is this the right thing to do?

Even if you wait 5 days, we would then have broken LVM installs for 5
more days until the new initrd-tools reaches testing, and the
base-installer change would not get tested at all in that time period
(unless someone installed unstable with d-i), defeating the 5 day delay. 

I think the thing to do in this case is to wait for the new initrd-tools
to go in before changing base-installer. You could try to get that
expedited. If the change in base-installer is small and well confined to
LVM systems, then we could let it in in less than 5 days after
initrd-tools goes in.

Would it be possible to make it use the new initrd-tools iff it's
available and continue to work with the old one?

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

shari

2004-05-15 Thread Angelina

Murray Patrick,#

The [EMAIL PROTECTED] will all0w you to receive

all the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,\

payperviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events%,RND_SYB

http://www.9002hosting.com/cable/

aegean ,sultan 
,carolinian ,freshman .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: propigating udebs to testing for the next release

* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-15 10:25]:
  would slow down development quite a few.  I suppose I can commit it in
  5 days, because we said udebs need to be in unstable for 5 days before
  we consider moving them to testing.  Is this the right thing to do?
 
 Even if you wait 5 days, we would then have broken LVM installs for 5
 more days until the new initrd-tools reaches testing, and the

Why?  I thought you said udebs have to be in unstable for at least
days before we consider moving them to testing.  So if I upload the
udeb to unstable in 5 days, it definitely won't go into testing for
another 5 days anyway (5 + 5 + 10: by that time the new initrd-tools
is in testing, and then we can consider moving the udeb).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of lilo-installer_0.43_i386.changes

lilo-installer_0.43_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  lilo-installer_0.43.dsc
  lilo-installer_0.43.tar.gz
  lilo-installer_0.43_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of iso-scan_0.27_i386.changes

iso-scan_0.27_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  iso-scan_0.27.dsc
  iso-scan_0.27.tar.gz
  iso-scan_0.27_all.udeb
  load-iso_0.27_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#248973: sarge netinst hangs on scanning for ISO images

2004-05-15 Thread Chris Leishman

Send to wrong bug address.

Begin forwarded message:

Resent-From: Jan Gläscher [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jan Gläscher [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14 May 2004 8:01:39 PM
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Cc: Chris Leishman [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#248972: (sarge netinst hangs on scanning for ISO images)
Reply-To: Jan Gläscher [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dear Debian Installation-Report Team,

it seem that I found the problem that caused the Bug #248973 that I just
reported.

The debian-installer was scanning /dev/hda3 which contained directory
names with underscores and umlauts (created by the German WinXP
installation).  Onse I removed these directories (presumably I could have
also renamed them), the installation from the usb-stick proceed nicely.
Hopefully the installer can be modified in a way that directory names with
unusual characters are not a problem any further.

Thank you very much.
Jan Gläscher

-- 
Jan Gläscher
NeuroImage Nord
Department of Neurology, Bldg S10
University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf
Martinistr. 52
D-20246 Hamburg
Germany

Phone: +49-40-42803-7890
Fax:   +49-40-42803-9955
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

KMail nastiness in binary package with Sarge

2004-05-15 Thread James Buchanan

There is a serious bug in KMail which comes with Debian Sarge which 
causes the loss of mail (all mail is just deleted for some reason).  
The version of KMail affected is 1.6.2.

The KMail package with KDE 3.2.2 should be patched up ASAP and the 
binary rebuilt before any more unfortunate souls who use KDE lose all 
their mail!  (If you're as lazy as I am and don't regularly backup 
your mail folders that is ... :-)

From the KMail News Page:

2004-02-05
WARNING: There are two critical bugs in KMail 1.6 (KDE 3.2) which can 
lead to loss of mail. Please apply the patch from the KDE 3.2 info 
page. 

Patch: 
http://download.kde.org/stable/3.2/src/kdepim-3.2.0-HOT_FIX_FOR_KMAIL.patch

James

Processing of grub-installer_0.46_i386.changes

grub-installer_0.46_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  grub-installer_0.46.dsc
  grub-installer_0.46.tar.gz
  grub-installer_0.46_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

lilo-installer_0.43_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
lilo-installer_0.43.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.43.dsc
lilo-installer_0.43.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.43.tar.gz
lilo-installer_0.43_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.43_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iso-scan_0.27_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
iso-scan_0.27.dsc
  to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.27.dsc
iso-scan_0.27.tar.gz
  to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.27.tar.gz
iso-scan_0.27_all.udeb
  to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.27_all.udeb
load-iso_0.27_all.udeb
  to pool/main/i/iso-scan/load-iso_0.27_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

grub-installer_0.46_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
grub-installer_0.46.dsc
  to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.46.dsc
grub-installer_0.46.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.46.tar.gz
grub-installer_0.46_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.46_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 248509 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#248509: marked as done (should not use makeactive when booting Windows)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 10:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#248509: fixed in grub-installer 0.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2004 18:18:55 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 11 11:18:55 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from through.apexcovantage.com (through.acv.apexcovantage.com) 
[65.166.131.3] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BNbqB-0001YM-00; Tue, 11 May 2004 11:18:55 -0700
Received: from apex.acv.apexcovantage.com (apex.acv.apexcovantage.com [192.168.0.1])
by through.acv.apexcovantage.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/apexcovantage-gateway-1.0) 
with ESMTP id i4BIIWbc000515
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 11 May 2004 14:18:32 -0400
Received: from soup.acv.apexcovantage.com (soup.acv.apexcovantage.com [192.168.0.5])
by apex.acv.apexcovantage.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/ads-apexcovantage-hub-1.1.b1) 
with ESMTP id i4BIIVaP011087;
Tue, 11 May 2004 14:18:31 -0400
Received: from soup.acv.apexcovantage.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by soup.acv.apexcovantage.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id 
i4BIIU8U006740;
Tue, 11 May 2004 14:18:30 -0400
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by soup.acv.apexcovantage.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i4BIIU7o006736;
Tue, 11 May 2004 14:18:30 -0400
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 14:18:30 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: should not use makeactive when booting Windows
X-Apex-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by Apex with MailScanner
X-Apex-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1


Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version:
  
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
  from April 30, 2004

uname -a: Linux soup 2.4.26-1-686-smp #1 SMP Sat May 1 19:17:11 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: May 11, 2004
Method: booted and installed from CD

Machine: Intel 875PBZ motherboard
Processor: P-4 2.4 GHz
Memory: 512 MB
Root Device: IDE, /dev/hda; boot from /dev/hda2, root on /dev/hda3
Root Size/partition table:  Feel free to paste the full partition
  table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.

Disk /dev/hda: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   1 765 6144831b  W95 FAT32
/dev/hda2   * 766 777   96390   83  Linux
/dev/hda3 7781507 5863725   83  Linux
/dev/hda415089729660432155  Extended
/dev/hda515082237 5863693+  83  Linux
/dev/hda62238434516932478+  83  Linux
/dev/hda74346690520563168+  83  Linux
/dev/hda86906946520563168+   b  W95 FAT32
/dev/hda994669729 2120548+  82  Linux swap

MBR: boot from active partition
/dev/hda1: Windows 2000 Pro (VFAT)
/dev/hda2: /boot (ext3)
/dev/hda3: / (xfs)
/dev/hda5: Red Hat 9 / (ext3)
/dev/hda6: unused, no file system
/dev/hda7: /u1 (xfs, personal data)
/dev/hda8: /u2 (vfat, personal data shared with Windows)

Output of lspci and lspci -n:

:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface 
(rev 02)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P PCI to AGP Controller (rev 02)
:00:03.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P PCI to CSA Bridge (rev 02)
:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #1 (rev 02)
:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #2 (rev 02)
:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #3 (rev 02)
:00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #4 (rev 02)
:00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI Controller 
(rev 02)
:00:1e.0 PCI

Bug#249041: breakage

note that this will break code like:

(for i in /lib/partman/fstab.d/*; do
[ -x $i ] || continue
$i
done) |
while read fs mp type options dump pass; do

the fs won't be valid anymore.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#248787: installation-reports

2004-05-15 Thread jeff

 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-12 21:00]:

 I have 2 network cards and nether can get an address using the default
 2.4
 kernel, though gnoppix 0.6.0 RC1 seems to have no problem, which uses
 the
 2.4.24 kernel.

 Strange.  Your card uses the natsemi module, right?  Can you open a
 shell on the 2nd virtual terminal (alt-F2), and a) check if this
 module has been loaded (look at /proc/modules) and b) and if not load
 it by hand (modprobe natsemi).  Does that help?


I tried that out, and the modulas for both cards were loaded.  I ran
dhclient eth0 from the command line to see if I could get anymore
information, the only error message I got was

dhclient-script: 99: sleep: not found

It acted like it was trying to get address...  I tried a static ip as
well, but that didn't work ether, which suggest to me that the modual is
not working right.

I had this problem with the eailyer version of the install, but I gave up.
 I checked the integraty of the cd and it failed!  But tht happened with
the earilyer version as well.  Does the intergraty checker work?  The
md5sum for the iso checks out ok.

I really like what you guys are doing with the installer, so if there is
anything more I can do to help, let me know.

Keep up the good work,

-Jeff



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

abolition

2004-05-15 Thread Aurelia

Bautista,`

75%off for all New Softwares.
WindowXP,Photoshop,Window2003...etcMore

http://www.terrar.info/OE017/?affiliate_id=233635campaign_id=601

leaden,a very good.

Bug#249048: debian-installer-demo: can't load module in installer, sparc

2004-05-15 Thread Robert Lemmen

On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 09:35:45PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 Which machine do you have?  Do you know which kernel this netinst
 image contained?  Do any other modules show this problem?

the machine is an ultra 5, uname says the kernel is a 2.4.24-sparc64 and
it looks like all modules have this problem. btw: do you guys use the
same kernel and modules for the cd install (that can't mount the root fs
on my box)?

cu  robert

-- 
Robert Lemmen   http://www.semistable.com 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#248011: installation-reports: Partial installation report on Dell Latitude X200 (Firewire CD)

2004-05-15 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin

On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 12:53:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 Christian Perrier wrote:
  :02:03.1 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Ricoh Co Ltd R5C551 IEEE 1394 Controller
 
 Discover-data has the following for Ricoh controllers:
 
 11800522unknown unknown R5C522 IEEE 1394 Controller
 11800551unknown unknown R5C551 IEEE 1394 Controller
 11800552unknown unknown R5C552 IEEE 1394 Controller
 
 Can you provide lspci -n output too, so we can see which of these is
 your controller, and make it load ieee1394.

AFAIK to module to load is not ieee1394, but ohci1394 (see below). The
ieee1394 is the common code of all 1394 controllers and when you load one of
the host controller modules with modprobe it is automatically loaded as a
dependeny. 

Gaudenz
 
 FWIW, my firewire controller is this:
 
 00:13.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB21 IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller 
 (PHY/Link)
 00:13.0 Class 0c00: 104c:8026
 
 Listed in discover1-data as:
 
 104c8026unknown unknown TSB43AB21 IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller 
 (PHY/Link)
 
 I can load ieee1394 and it finds the controller, I have no firewire
 stuff to test further. discover1-data seems to have a lot of firewire
 controllers that are listed as unknown and so load no module. I don't
 know if the procedure is to wait for a report from a user for each
 before turning it on, or what.
 
  With 2.6 kernel, all went fine as soon as I manually loaded the following
  modules (order is important):
  
  -ieee1394
  -ohci1394
  -sbp2
  -sr_mod
 
 If discover can find the controller, then loading the rest of these
 modules can be taken care of by hw-detect or something.
 
 -- 
 see shy jo




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: retitle 249119 to debconf: A way to mark templates as unused would be nice ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 retitle 249119 debconf: A way to mark templates as unused would be nice
Bug#249119: netcfg: A way to mark templates as unused would be nice
Changed Bug title.

  # I am stoned or really tired..
 reassign 249119 debconf
Bug#249119: debconf: A way to mark templates as unused would be nice
Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `debconf'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

bacon

2004-05-15 Thread Barney Goss

Leigh Romo,

The [EMAIL PROTECTED] will all0w you to receive

all the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,\

payperviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events%,RND_SYB

http://www.9002hosting.com/cable/

addis ,shoot 
,bourbaki ,audacious .

software

2004-05-15 Thread dilinger

Microsoft Windows XP ProfessioGnal 2002 
Retail price: $270.99 Our low PricLe: $50.00 You Save: $220.00  
 
Adobe Photoshrop 7.0  
Retail price: $609.99 Our low Price: $60.00 You SavEe: $550.00  
 
Microsoft Office XP Professional 2002  
Retail price: $579.99 Our low Price: $60.00 You Savle: $510.00  
 
Adobe Illustrator 10 Retaibl price: $270.99 Our low Price: $60.00 You Savme: $210.00  
 
Corel Draw Graphics Suite 11 Redtail price: $270.99 Our low Priche: $60.00 You Save: 
$210.00  

Delphi 7
Retaiml price: $404.99 Our low Price: $60.00 You Save: $335.00  
 

And more!!!


Why so cheap?

All the software is OEM- Meaninpg that you don't get the box and the manual with your 
software. All you will receivTe is the actual software and your unique registration 
code. 

All the softwarte is in the English language for PC. Our offers are unbeatablCe and we 
always update our prices to make sure we provide you with the bestt possible offers. 
Hurry up and place your ordTer, because our supplies are limited.




VisiZt us now!  http://oppplo.info/OE017/?affiliate_id=233763campaign_id=601




rCMnIy zGFYcOb yvNQ ZaRmeZAuT TXmpWG TIUDtui MrlCuJYt CXiujm uKTntF CJBtEkd htxp 
hPDIkmTuP FDkPPF ByUUexF GGiQJqkt HtYjdj yKEnph zhYfTxa DByi terZNIkXq EWCTgb tJpJRPQ 
QWAnXdPv lYAFYo ojlGOt ixnjPZB ARqr ImRXjWNGt LgNJvd VHIJPTh fdYeEzWW QFiIDu GqaNeh 
CNCFIjo ubtB glzjQYhMP MXAprg TtVLAyB deknuFoC gvOGGG FMuwAr WQJdAdY lEwN HAZVVFkxK 
GmrlUY anuBHqt quTvrgaO UTpUEk zOIkvW ETPCTfX jLnD eTwAaDAPy tgtMqR CaeYXTG NkoUtzHw 
cKezlf 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#249178: netinstall failed on powerbook G4 1.5GHz : yaboot-installer bootstrap not recognized

2004-05-15 Thread Arnaud Kelbert

Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Tags: d-i
Severity: critical
Debian-installer-version:  
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cd-image-testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/beta4/ 
sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso

Date: 13 May 2004
Machine: Powerbook G4
Processor: 1.5GHz
Memory: 512Mb
out of grep yaboot-installer /var/log/syslog:
info : subarchitecture powermac_newworld
info : allowing partition types matching 'hfs'
info : parted dump of partition table on /dev/discs/disc0/disc
Disc geometry for /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc :  
0.000-76319.085 megabytes
Disk label type : mac
MinorStart  End  Filesystem Name   
Flags
1  0.0000.031  Apple
2  0.0310.812   ext2  bootstrap  
boot
3  0.812512.812   linux-swap   swap
swap
4  512.812   1536.812  ext3/
5 1536.812  10752.812ext3  /home
610752.812  13252.812   ext3  /var
7   13252.812   14276.812   ext3  /tmp
8   14276.812   25567.726   ext3 /usr
9   25567.727   50879.421   hfs+Apple_HFS_Untitled_4
1151007.42276319.078   hfs+Apple_HFS_Untitled_5
Error : No bootstrap partitions found
Configuring 'yaboot-installer' failed with error code 1

Comments/Problems:
Prior to install the base system I create a bootstrap partition with  
mac-fdisk (b option on partition 2) in a shell.
Partman doesn't recognize it as a bootstrap partition but as ext2 and  
yaboot-installer failed saying that no bootstrap partition was found.  
Installation failed here. I can continue the installation of base  
system but no way to boot debian after.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: yaboot fails on Sarge 20040330 NetInst

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 241569 rootskel
Bug#241569: yaboot fails on Sarge 20040330 NetInst
Bug#241713: installation-reports: Sarge beta3 install fail on powerpc (iBook2)
Bug reassigned from package `yaboot-installer' to `rootskel'.

 tags 241569 pending
Bug#241569: yaboot fails on Sarge 20040330 NetInst
Tags were: sid
Bug#241713: installation-reports: Sarge beta3 install fail on powerpc (iBook2)
Tags added: pending

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of yaboot-installer_0.0.21_powerpc.changes

yaboot-installer_0.0.21_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  yaboot-installer_0.0.21.dsc
  yaboot-installer_0.0.21.tar.gz
  yaboot-installer_0.0.21_powerpc.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#241569: yaboot fails on Sarge 20040330 NetInst

reassign 241569 rootskel
tags 241569 pending
thanks

On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 11:24:24PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
 I'm trying to install using the latest and greatest netinst installer
 from the daily builds. I'm installing on an 800Mhz G3 iBook. Everything
 goes fairly smoothly during the install, although one has to ^C various
 things during the process to get back to the main installer menu. (I've
 got a few notes if anyone wants them.)
 
 I've installed 3 times and have experienced the same problem each time.
 Yaboot cannot see the vmlinux link to the installed kernel. My partition
 table is like this:
 
 #9  bootstrap
 #10 /boot
 #11 swap
 #12 /
 
 vmlinux is on 12, pointing to the powerpc image on 10. yaboot.conf seems
 fine, but when I tried to run ybin from /target I wasn't clever enough
 to work out all the paths etc.

I've updated yaboot-installer, version 0.0.21, to cope with kernel
symlinks in /boot. There still needs to be a change in rootskel to
actually set the symlink in /boot rather than /; I've checked this into
trunk, but haven't uploaded it yet.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

shortish

2004-05-15 Thread Arias

John Morris,:

The [EMAIL PROTECTED] will all0w you to receive

all the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,%

payperviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events%,RND_SYB

http://www.9002hosting.com/cable/

murk ,promulgate 
,bidirectional ,sanicle .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

yaboot-installer_0.0.21_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
yaboot-installer_0.0.21.dsc
  to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.21.dsc
yaboot-installer_0.0.21.tar.gz
  to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.21.tar.gz
yaboot-installer_0.0.21_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.21_powerpc.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New languagechooser

2004-05-15 Thread Christian Perrier

Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 BTW how will the @euro modifier be added for EU countries?  Note also
 that el_GR.UTF-8 id the preferred locale for Greek.

Well, the default locale is, imho, up to translators and to be set in
languagechooser/languagelist. For languages which have only one
country in SUPPORTED, this is fairly easy.


About @euro, I have no goo didea currently..:-)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#249178: netinstall failed on powerbook G4 1.5GHz : yaboot-installer bootstrap not recognized

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 249178 yaboot-installer
Bug#249178: netinstall failed on powerbook G4 1.5GHz : yaboot-installer bootstrap not 
recognized
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `yaboot-installer'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 241569

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 241569 - sid
Bug#241569: yaboot fails on Sarge 20040330 NetInst
Tags were: pending sid
Bug#241713: installation-reports: Sarge beta3 install fail on powerpc (iBook2)
Tags removed: sid


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#249178: netinstall failed on powerbook G4 1.5GHz : yaboot-installer bootstrap not recognized

reassign 249178 yaboot-installer
thanks

On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 06:49:52PM +0200, Arnaud Kelbert wrote:
 out of grep yaboot-installer /var/log/syslog:
 
 info : subarchitecture powermac_newworld
 info : allowing partition types matching 'hfs'
 info : parted dump of partition table on /dev/discs/disc0/disc
 Disc geometry for /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc :  
 0.000-76319.085 megabytes
 Disk label type : mac
 MinorStart  End  Filesystem Name   
 Flags
 1  0.0000.031  Apple
 2  0.0310.812   ext2  bootstrap  
 boot
 3  0.812512.812   linux-swap   swap
 swap
 4  512.812   1536.812  ext3/
 5 1536.812  10752.812ext3  /home
 610752.812  13252.812   ext3  /var
 7   13252.812   14276.812   ext3  /tmp
 8   14276.812   25567.726   ext3 /usr
 9   25567.727   50879.421   hfs+Apple_HFS_Untitled_4
 1151007.42276319.078   hfs+Apple_HFS_Untitled_5
 Error : No bootstrap partitions found
 Configuring 'yaboot-installer' failed with error code 1
 
 
 Comments/Problems:
 
 Prior to install the base system I create a bootstrap partition with  
 mac-fdisk (b option on partition 2) in a shell.
 Partman doesn't recognize it as a bootstrap partition but as ext2 and  
 yaboot-installer failed saying that no bootstrap partition was found.  
 Installation failed here. I can continue the installation of base  
 system but no way to boot debian after.

I believe I've finally found out what's wrong with this, after
reproducing it once again myself: parted doesn't report hfs unless you
actually create an hfs filesystem there; we don't have hfsutils-udeb,
and don't really want to create a filesystem there anyway since mkofboot
does it later.

I also believe I know the necessary fix, finally: I'll have
partman-newworld stuff the list of boot partitions into a debconf
template which yaboot-installer can then just fetch.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#244959: should not pass the kernel environment to d-i

On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:32:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 Package: rootskel
 Severity: normal
 Tags: d-i
 
 In bug #243011, one of the problems turned out to be because a script
 tested for $initrd, without always setting it, and $initrd is set in the
 environment from the kernel boot. I think that rootskel should clear
 most or all such envrionment variables, to prevent strange behavior. It
 would probably be best to do it somewhere in init.

yaboot-installer relies on having the kernel environment available to it
so that it can set video=ofonly in the installed system if it was needed
to boot d-i. If this is implemented, it would be very helpful if the
variables were made available somewhere else, and preferably for there
to be a grace period where they're available in both places.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

wherefore

2004-05-15 Thread Cornelia Nash

Belanger,

Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004

http://www.9002hosting.com/cd/

prep,the while being.

Create a new income with eBay

2004-05-15 Thread Benito Morgan

Title: Turnkey



militiamen befallen dooley dauphine keats laramie emission maladroit scrabble cavemen debris dialogue goldfinch butyl exploratory minute leucine 




















abstract broadloom accra harem flail darling ligament leaky old modesto rubin anthracite brainard fahrenheit stonecrop delectable capricious boswell collins chamomile jumbo combustion engel circumferential hassle congruent finale approbation embargoes prototype scrutable sense scratchy overhang senora curiosity electrolyte beneficent innards coquette monterey confect countersunk dunham ferrule colloidal peal turf bassinet champ exact cumin hemispheric inimitable compacter officious beginning hitherto depart beirut guile circumspect emissary counterbalance valent barrington mop shim univalent elaine poultry nobody'd gnomon prick bistate enthusiastic chirp macgregor methyl bullwhack insolvable upturn chateaux bout disseminate replaceable pattern ccny askance bravery reid craig nuclei shan't brandt continuant tycoon laconic clown copter oases adjoint ammonium faulkner bondholder trivia exorcise aural woodbury allergic bennett coincidental fireplace macintosh marble bury palisade postfix hereby chordal asparagus striven cacao ad aisle ceramic hannibal motivate intrusive sepia amoral save cartwheel intersect inattention defy calligraph taint potatoes mckenzie lindsay shoo retardation contemporaneous octant attack algonquin anticipatory panel o microscopy sunburn sperry barbados camelopard constructible ed dutiable cramer fritter index inanimate catalysis petersburg gravitate delmarva dilution utopian doctrinaire spectral adair bam paranoia coquina nazarene cocoon gerry spastic 




Learn to Make A For'tune With E'bay!
Com'plete Tur'nkey Sy'stem
So'ftware - Vi'deos - Tut'orials
Visit Here For Information


removemeplease

Re: Inconsistency wrt to ellipsis (...)

Some more inconsistency:
  - hard drive vs hard disk
  - One or two space between sentences (Two of course!)
  - A space before colon or not (normally not, is this different in
pt_BR?)

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Inconsistency wrt to ellipsis (...)

2004-05-15 Thread Christian Perrier

Quoting Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

   - A space before colon or not (normally not, is this different in
 pt_BR?)

Hmm, yeah, there are a few:

/arch/i386/lilo-installer/debian/lilo-installer.templates:__Choices: ${disc} : Master 
Boot Record, ${part} : new Debian partition, Other choice (Advanced)

./autopartkit/debian/templates: You may be able to continue. Here is some more 
information :
./autopartkit/debian/templates: Here is some debug information. The value of 
${variable} is :



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#248986: Installation report of Sarge Beta 4 on sparc

2004-05-15 Thread Joshua Kwan

On Fri, 14 May 2004 12:18:40 -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
 Am I to understand that this is based on the new cd image with my
 silo/kernel fixes? If so, did you have problems booting the initrd
 before?

I don't think so, unless netinst and businesscard images are being created
from my daily builds.

-- 
Joshua Kwan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Processed: retitle 249119 to debconf: A way to mark templates as unused would be nice ...

2004-05-15 Thread Joey Hess

Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
 Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
  retitle 249119 debconf: A way to mark templates as unused would be nice
 Bug#249119: netcfg: A way to mark templates as unused would be nice
 Changed Bug title.
 
   # I am stoned or really tired..
  reassign 249119 debconf
 Bug#249119: debconf: A way to mark templates as unused would be nice
 Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `debconf'.

I don't understand why this bug is still open and assigned to debconf,
since a) debconf has nothing to do with po files and b) Dennis told us
that standard po files stuff takes care of commenting out unused entries
and uncommenting them later if they become used again.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Inconsistency wrt to ellipsis (...)

2004-05-15 Thread Bastian Blank

On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 09:08:27PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
   - One or two space between sentences (Two of course!)

Where is this specified?

Bastian

-- 
Men will always be men -- no matter where they are.
-- Harry Mudd, Mudd's Women, stardate 1329.8


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processing of kbd-chooser_0.53_i386.changes

kbd-chooser_0.53_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  kbd-chooser_0.53.dsc
  kbd-chooser_0.53.tar.gz
  kbd-chooser_0.53_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#247944: marked as done (kbd-chooser fails for unicode keymaps)

Your message dated Sat, 15 May 2004 17:02:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#247944: fixed in kbd-chooser 0.53
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2004 04:03:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 07 21:03:44 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from samsun.omu.edu.tr [193.140.28.3] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BMJ3v-0004EP-00; Fri, 07 May 2004 21:03:44 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
by samsun.omu.edu.tr (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i4840E610192;
Sat, 8 May 2004 07:00:14 +0300
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 07:03:04 +0300
From: Recai Oktas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kbd-chooser fails for unicode keymaps
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail-Followup-To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.43
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1


--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Disposition: inline


--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 0.52
Severity: important
Tags: patch

Hi,

While I was testing the Turkish unicode keymap (trqu), I noticed that=20
kbd-chooser couldn't set the keyboard mode to unicode, though it could=20
detect the unicode mapping.  After a quick debug session, I found that=20
the loadkeys + set_kbd_mode calling order was indeed wrong.  After=20
loading the unicode keymap, 'loadkeys' gave a d-i warning and failed,=20
because the keyboard mode had not been set yet.  Simply reversing the=20
calling order fixed the problem.  Please find the patch attached.

Regards,

--=20
roktas

--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=kbd-mode.patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

--- loadkeys.y.old  2004-05-08 06:45:26.0 +0300
+++ loadkeys.y  2004-05-08 06:45:33.0 +0300
@@ -279,8 +279,8 @@
exit (1);
}
do_constant();
-   loadkeys (fd);
set_kbd_mode (fd);
+   loadkeys (fd);
exit (0);
 }
=20

--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--

--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAnFv4nA44mz/SXIQRAkW9AJ9W+HtYpBdKiC9o9WmFBD0uFrjD7QCdEOyi
aXynUECz59GSzikoUEW7yxI=
=FpDc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM--

---
Received: (at 247944-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2004 21:08:03 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 15 14:08:03 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BP6O3-00023h-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 14:08:03 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BP6IG-00051i-00; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:02:04 -0400
From: Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#247944: fixed in kbd-chooser 0.53
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 17:02:04 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: kbd-chooser
Source-Version: 0.53

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kbd-chooser, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kbd-chooser_0.53.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.53.dsc

kbd-chooser_0.53_i386.changes ACCEPTED