Re: New d-i devcamp?

2004-07-23 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Thorsten Sauter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 Yeah. Of course I'm interessted into d-i debcamp.


Provided that it is planned enough in advance and not during my
umcoming holidays (--Aug. 15th and following two week-ends busy), I
may be able to come. But, well, it's always complicate for me to cope
with family schedule..:-)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Logs of Arabic install available

2004-07-23 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

  LANGUAGE in languagechooser contains the 4th field of languagelist
  (see languagemap script). This field *always* has the two-letter code
  of the language.
 
 Except for zh_CN, zh_TW, and pt_BR, surely?

No, even for those, the 4th field is the iso-639 language code.

Anyway, in the case we're currently dealing with, no matter whether
this is zh_CN or zh_TW, no goal is loading things specific to
languages display.

However, of course, the *locales* for these languages are different,
definitely.

This language code, per se, is not kept anywhere after
languagechooser. The important thing becomes the locale.

So, definitely, the test we're talking about, has redundant
entries. Be, I currently prefer being conservative.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#260887: Untranslated country names and hang in apt-config and korean locale.

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 retitle 260887 Should use iso_3166.tab file from the iso-codes package
Bug#260887: Untranslated country names in apt-config and korean
Changed Bug title.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Debian Installer string freeze and translation status report

2004-07-23 Thread Christian Perrier
Some news from the Debian Installer string freeze as of 07/23 03:00UTC

69 hours left until freeze end

Again string changes happened yesterday, but this time they were
ack'ed changes : one template added in network-console (I asked Batian
to make it translatable immediately because this was a string
*addition*) and on rewritten by Joey Hess in partman-lvm because the
English was completely wrong and misleading.

Depite this, we now have:

9 complete languages
 tr, pt_BR, pt, nn, lt, ja, fr, da, ca
22 nearly complete (over 95%)
 zh_CN, uk, sq, sk, ro, pl, ko, he, fi, eu, el, de, cs, bg, id 
 ru, nl, nb, hu, es, hr, bs
7 partial (over 80%)
 it, cy, ar, zh_TW, sl, sv, gl
1 very partial (over 50%)
 fa
2 stucked (We have translators but no progress)
 vi, sr
3 abandoned (no translator registered)
 ga, se, lv

I want to highlight the great effort of the Croatian translator who
bringed hr from 0% to 95% in less than 2 weeks. This plus a lot of
translations in 2nd stage.

Today (which happens to me my last work days before 3 weeks away), I
will:

- commit back Arabic translations from Arabeyes CVS, which should 
  bring ar to 99%
- report the bug about missing characters in unifont.bdf which make
  the Farsi translation unusable
- test the very recent changes in languagechooser which should make
  RTL languages (ar, he, fa) right-to-left in 2nd stage

About 2nd and 3rd stages:

-base-config and tasksel are very well translated now
-don't forget the iso 3166 list. It is absolutely not
 moving, so easy to fix
-shadow is also quite good. I made a NMU again which was accepted 2
 days ago. No more NMU until late August except on RC bug fix
-aptitude is very moving target currently. I suggest we leave it
 stabilize for a few weeks
-others such as popularity-contest, dictionaries-common, dpkg, apt and
 so on are not moving that much



PLEASE TEST d-i in your language, especially non Latin languages. I
made less test with recent images, so the status for Japanese, Russian
and others is currently a bit unknown.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#260936: marked as done (Installer menu system is corrupt...)

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:52:56 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260936: Installer menu system is corrupt...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2004 21:44:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 22 14:44:46 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.hff-wi.com (mail.scc-wi.com) [209.253.169.18] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BnlMs-00053v-00; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:44:46 -0700
Received: by mail.scc-wi.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
id PN3W1FMN; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:44:13 -0500
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Michael Kahle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installer menu system is corrupt...
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:44:12 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 2004-07-22  Image from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-
netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux debian 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jun 24 12:42:08 EDT 2004 i686
unknown
Date: 2004-07-22, 4:34pm CST
Method: I used the current sarge-i386-netinst.iso from the above location.
I used the standard install method using the Linux 2.6 Kernel.  This was a
machine that was behind a firewall on my company LAN with non-proxied access
to the internet.

Machine: IBM IntelliStation Z Pro 6221-1PU
Processor: Dual Intel Xeon 2.4 Ghz
Memory: 1.5 GB
Root Device: Root device was a Hardware RAID Array (Level 5), Adaptec 2120S
w/ 3x Seagate 73.4GB U320SCSI 68PIN 10K SEA-ST373307LW

Root Size/partition table: ...
File System: ext3
Mount point: /
Bootable flag: on
Size 146.7 GB

Output of lspci:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. E7505 Memory Controller Hub (rev 03)
:00:00.1 Class ff00: Intel Corp. E7000 Series RAS Controller (rev 03)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. E7000 Series Processor to AGP
Controller (rev 03) :00:02.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. E7000 Series Hub
Interface B PCI-to-PCI Bridge (rev 03)
:00:02.1 Class ff00: Intel Corp. E7000 Series Hub Interface B PCI-to-PCI
Bridge RAS Controller (rev 03) :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp.
82801DB (ICH4) USB UHCI #1 (rev 02)
:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB UHCI #2 (rev 02)
:00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB2 EHCI Controller
(rev 02) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB/ER Hub
interface to PCI Bridge (rev 82) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp.
82801DB (ICH4) LPC Bridge (rev 02)
:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) Ultra ATA 100 Storage
Controller (rev 02)
:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBM (ICH4) SMBus Controller (rev 02)
:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) AC'97
Audio Controller (rev 02) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox
Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev 85) :02:1c.0 PIC: Intel Corp. 82870P2
P64H2 I/OxAPIC (rev 04) :02:1d.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2
Hub PCI Bridge (rev 04) :02:1e.0 PIC: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 I/OxAPIC
(rev 04) :02:1f.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 Hub PCI Bridge
(rev 04) :03:01.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme
BCM5703X Gigabit Ethernet (rev 02) :03:02.0 RAID bus controller: Adaptec
AAC-RAID (rev 01) :04:02.0 PCI bridge: Hint Corp HB6 Universal PCI-PCI
bridge (non-transparent mode) (rev 15) :05:08.0 USB Controller: NEC
Corporation USB (rev 41)
:05:08.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
:05:08.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 02) :05:0c.0
FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB23 IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller
(PHY/Link)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[E]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please 

Bug#260934: Installation report for Compaq Proliant DL360

2004-07-23 Thread Christian Perrier

 The only relevant issue was the boot loader.  Grub failed to install
 for an unknown reason (checked the logs in the tty as well as 'dmesg'
 result to no avail). I settled for LILO which installed just fine in
 the first attempt.

This has been a problem during a few days recently. I guess you
probably went on one of these images.

If possible, can you try again with amore recent image ? Otherwise, I
suggest the bug is closed as it is highly likely to be already
obsolete.





Bug#260852: installation-reports

2004-07-23 Thread Christian Perrier
 Then I reinstall from beginning, use directly lilo, and it works!!!


Can you do the same test with the following image:

http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso

And if it fails again:

http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso

Did you make the install in French?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#260887: Untranslated country names and hang in apt-config and korean locale.

2004-07-23 Thread Christian Perrier
retitle 260887 Should use iso_3166.tab file from the iso-codes package
thanks

Quoting Changwoo Ryu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 Package: base-config
 Version: 2.36
 Severity: important
 
 
 How to reproduce:
 1. install base-config
 2. run /usr/sbin/apt-setup with LANG=ko_KR.UTF-8, in a UTF-8 capable
 terminal.
 3. select http or ftp
 4. at the top of the country list, you will see 3 untranslated country
 names,
 Britain (UK), Korea (South), Russia.  Especially the top Britain
 (UK) line
 looks very badly formatted...  
 5. choosing Britain (UK) hangs apt-setup.
 
 
 
 The problem was, that different names were used between iso3166.tab and 
 iso-codes package.

apt-setup seems to make reference to /usr/share/zoneinfo/iso_3166.tab

This file is obsolete and not as carefully maintained as the same file
from iso-codes.

I'm not sure the severity you choose is really adapted, however.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#260934: Installation report for Compaq Proliant DL360

2004-07-23 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 06:50:20AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
 
 If possible, can you try again with amore recent image ? Otherwise, I
 suggest the bug is closed as it is highly likely to be already
 obsolete.

Unfortunately I can't, the system is no longer available to me. In any 
case, I made some other points in the bug (proposed updates availability?) 
which might be worth reviewing (or not).

Regards

Javier


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Debian Installer string freeze and translation status report

2004-07-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Christian Perrier]
 3 abandoned (no translator registered)
  ga, se, lv

The original translator for 'se' is
Børre Gaup [EMAIL PROTECTED].

I believe the translator for 'lv' is
Aigars Mahinovs [EMAIL PROTECTED].


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#260997: GRUB/LILO

2004-07-23 Thread Julien Muchembled
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst-20040718
uname -a: Linux jmuchemb 2.6.6-1-386 #1 Wed May 12 13:19:06 EST 2004
i586 GNU/Linux
Date: Jul 21 17:27
Method:
 Installation from a CD.
 Boot: linux26
 Network: Ethernet 100 Mbps, NAT'ed
 Source: ftp://ftp.proxad.net/ only
Machine: PC/AT
Processor: Intel Pentium 187.5 (FSB 75)
Memory: 256 Mo SDRAM
Root Device: IDE 20 GB (WDC WD200BB-32CXA0)
Root Size/partition table:
   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   *   1   3879219551136+  83  Linux (XFS)
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430TX - 82439TX MTXC (rev 01)
:00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 01)
:00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
:00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
:00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 01)
:00:09.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. 86c764/765
[Trio32/64/64V+] (rev 54)
:00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
:00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
:00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:7100 (rev 01)
:00:07.0 Class 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 01)
:00:07.1 Class 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01)
:00:07.2 Class 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01)
:00:07.3 Class 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 01)
:00:09.0 Class 0300: 5333:8811 (rev 54)
:00:0a.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10)
:00:0b.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
At last, I can use XFS on that PC :)
But there is a problem with GRUB.
In fact, the hard drive is a little too big for the motherboard, and
even when I could format it (there were also problems with partman
before), GRUB completely messed all.
Now, GRUB installation simply aborts and I can install LILO... which
works. Maybe the user should be asked which bootloader to install.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bug#260512: swap is turned OFF after disk formatting!

2004-07-23 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 05:18:03PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 
 Partman has always run swapon and then swapoff, and then swapon again.
 It no longer does this final swapon.

My only change in this release of partman was to repair the function
enable_swap in definitions.sh.  The final swapon must have been broken
somehow long ago.

#260746 (swap is not in /etc/fstab) is also not new.  I don't understand
how this was possible but this bug seams to be there since version 22 of
partman-basicfilesystems (11 Apr 2004 !).  If there was at least one bug
report about this problem, I would fix it.

 This has caused a delay in the d-i release schedule, and I'm rather
 annoyed by it.

Sory about this.  I only want to say that most likely both problems are
not caused by my recent changes in partman.

Anton Zinoviev


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



car audio

2004-07-23 Thread Ling





- Original Message - 
From: Ling 
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 6:23 PM
Subject: car audio



Dear Sirs,Nice to 
contact with you! we have your name over the internet.I am 
venturing to write you this email for introducing our company as one of the 
professional exporters of car audio 
in China. I am Ling Zhou, sales representative from 
Zhuhai Astro-win Import and Export Trade Co., Ltd. We are mainly dealing with 
car audio products, such as car DVD/VCD/MP3, Car speaker ,Car amplifier etc.. We 
have been in this line for many years with rich experiences; meanwhile, we have 
many well cooperated factories with complete manufacturing system. These make us 
confident that we are in the position to offer customer both good quality and 
competitve prices.It's mypleasure to tell you that we 
have some new products at present --car LCD Monitor, I think it will have more 
interest .Kindly check !It will be grateful if you can take us 
into consideration as one of your another potential partner here in China, for 
more information on us, you can take little time to explore our website: 
http://www.astro-win.com 
Any interest please do not hesitate to contact me,andany of 
yourinquiry will get our promptest attention. Thank 
you!Awaiting your kind response!Best 
regardsLing Zhou(Miss.)

ZHUHAI ASTRO-WINIMPORT  
EXPORTTRADE CO., LTD.

7D Shengzhen Development Building ,
Xiangzhou District , Zhuhai , 519000 , China 

Tel: 86-756-2172651ext 804
Fax: 86-756-2172670
http://www.astro-win.com 
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#260887: Untranslated country names and hang in apt-config and korean locale.

2004-07-23 Thread Kenshi Muto
At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:47:38 +0200,
Christian Perrier wrote:
 Quoting Changwoo Ryu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
  The problem was, that different names were used between iso3166.tab and 
  iso-codes package.
 
 apt-setup seems to make reference to /usr/share/zoneinfo/iso_3166.tab
 
 This file is obsolete and not as carefully maintained as the same file
 from iso-codes.

Well, but country names in iso-codes have a headache problem... some of
them (such as Korea, Russian) have , in their name.

This confuses debconf and needs some dirty trick for apt-setup.

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#260997: marked as done (GRUB/LILO)

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:43:32 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line GRUB/LILO
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2004 06:41:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 22 23:41:46 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bleuets-3-81-56-123-123.fbx.proxad.net (jmuchemb) [81.56.123.123] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BntkX-0007Rn-00; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:41:46 -0700
Received: from julien ([192.168.0.2])
by jmuchemb with asmtp (Exim 4.32 #1 (Debian))
id 1BntkW-00015H-Oe
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:41:44 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:41:38 +0200
From: Julien Muchembled [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7+ (Windows/20040618)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GRUB/LILO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst-20040718
uname -a: Linux jmuchemb 2.6.6-1-386 #1 Wed May 12 13:19:06 EST 2004
i586 GNU/Linux
Date: Jul 21 17:27
Method:
  Installation from a CD.
  Boot: linux26
  Network: Ethernet 100 Mbps, NAT'ed
  Source: ftp://ftp.proxad.net/ only

Machine: PC/AT
Processor: Intel Pentium 187.5 (FSB 75)
Memory: 256 Mo SDRAM
Root Device: IDE 20 GB (WDC WD200BB-32CXA0)
Root Size/partition table:
Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   *   1   3879219551136+  83  Linux (XFS)
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430TX - 82439TX MTXC (rev 01)
:00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 01)
:00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
:00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
:00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 01)
:00:09.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. 86c764/765
[Trio32/64/64V+] (rev 54)
:00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
:00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
:00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:7100 (rev 01)
:00:07.0 Class 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 01)
:00:07.1 Class 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01)
:00:07.2 Class 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01)
:00:07.3 Class 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 01)
:00:09.0 Class 0300: 5333:8811 (rev 54)
:00:0a.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10)
:00:0b.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]

Comments/Problems:
At last, I can use XFS on that PC :)
But there is a problem with GRUB.
In fact, the hard drive is a little too big for the motherboard, and
even when I could format it (there were also problems with partman
before), GRUB completely messed all.
Now, GRUB installation simply aborts and I can install LILO... which
works. Maybe the user should be asked which bootloader to install.


---
Received: (at 260997-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2004 07:43:38 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 23 00:43:38 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BnuiP-0006KW-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:43:38 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05D35C009
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:43:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from baikonur.stro.at ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (baikonur [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 

20040722 i386 sid_d-i netinst 2.4 nearly OK (fr_FR)

2004-07-23 Thread Christian Perrier
Environment: VmWare
Platform   : i386
Kernel : 2.4
Locale : fr_FR
Image  : netinst sid_d-i 20040722
Priority   : high

Result : Nearly OK. 
 Still an issue with the keyboard on 2nd stage
 if choosing fr-latin9 (#260496)
 Installing unstable solves this
 We probably need console-data from unstable (-43)
 instead of the one from testing (-42)


  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261008: installation-reports: Partman with other OS goes loop around swap control

2004-07-23 Thread Kenshi Muto
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Version: 20040722 sid_d-i

I tried today's image, and found a problem around swap control.

Environment:
 i386 VMware

This host has Windows partition and 1.8GB free space.
Debian installer plans automatically:

IDE1 master (hda) - 3.2 GB VMware virtual IDE Hard Drive
  #1 primary2.1 GB ntfs
  #2 primary1.0 GB ext3   /
  #5 logical   86.6 MB swap   swap

When I chose Finish partiioning and write changes to disk and Yes,
it backs partitioner screen again.
I don't know what's happen (other virtual terminal doesn't show
anything error), but I noticed it was succeeded when I removed swap
partition or changed it to other filesystem type. It looks something
wrong around swap partition handling.

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#260109: SOLUTION = kde and gnome and any app 5 minutes start up each

2004-07-23 Thread Herbert Kaminski
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 01:47:47 +, Andre Felipe Machado wrote:

edit the /etc/network/interfaces
include the 2 following lines:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
[...]
It should be included before the sarge release. 

Thats exactly what is in the file created during my test 
install yesterday (2004-07-22), so this seems to be solved.

Herbert





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#260997: GRUB/LILO

2004-07-23 Thread Christian Perrier

 But there is a problem with GRUB.

There was a problem with GRUB on recent days images.

Can you try again with the following:

http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso

 In fact, the hard drive is a little too big for the motherboard, and
 even when I could format it (there were also problems with partman
 before), GRUB completely messed all.
 Now, GRUB installation simply aborts and I can install LILO... which
 works. Maybe the user should be asked which bootloader to install.

At high priority (default installs), users are not prompted, in order
to avoid potential confusion to newbies.

When GRUB fails, you're dropped into the main menu as priority is
lowered and there, you can installer another boot loader.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



S-ata Controler modul installation fails

2004-07-23 Thread mayjus
Hi.

I can't integrate the modul for my S-ata Controler.
-- promise fasttrak 376 (pdc200376)
-- modul: ft3xx.o
-- used the daily net-install CD http://www.promise.com/support/download/download2_eng.asp?productId=104category=driveros=4

please give me some little feedback 
,yours sincerly 
Markus Chur

		Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 100MB kostenlosem Speicher

Re: Bug#260512: swap is turned OFF after disk formatting!

2004-07-23 Thread Herbert Kaminski
Hi Anton,

...this bug seams to be there since version 22 of
partman-basicfilesystems (11 Apr 2004 !).  If there was at least one bug
report about this problem, I would fix it.

On my desktop machine (512 MB of RAM), I am running sarge with KDE 
for weeks now without even noticing the lack of swap! OK, KDE is 
sluggish, but I attributed that to the new version 3.2. So no wonder 
you got no bug reports from 'normal' systems :-)

Herbert




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Partition type selection with sarge installer

2004-07-23 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello

Am Freitag, 23. Juli 2004 07:15 schrieb Anton Zinoviev:
 On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:26:51PM +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
  I told the installer to make the changes, and it did create a new
  ext3 file system on the partition,

 Partman created the ext3 file system, but didn't write the partition
 table. I already fixed this bug on my computer but I haven't tested
 the fix enough so I have not commited.

 For now the work around is to make any change in the partition table.
 For example you can remove a partition and recreate it afterwards. 
 Or you can simply toggle the bootable flag of the bootable partition
 off and then back on.  In this way partman will think that the
 partition table is changed and will write it to the disk.

I will use that workaround the next time I install Sarge. Thanks so far.

best regards
Andreas Janssen

-- 
Andreas Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674 ICQ #17079270
Registered Linux User #267976
http://www.andreas-janssen.de/debian-tipps.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#242128: Alpha netboot install report

2004-07-23 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Matthew,

Thanks again for testing.

On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 11:20:41PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:

 The netboot images on the daily build don't work - we don't ship a
 bootloader that can netboot separate images (and, as far as I can tell,
 we don't actually ship a bootloader that can netboot at all...). It's
 impossible to cross-compile netbooting alpha kernels on a 32-bit system
 due to breakage in the objstrip utility, and even on an alpha they 
 currently don't seem to build (undefined references to printk in some of 
 the lib files - I think the build system assumes that it can use the 
 kernel lib.a without all of the kernel, which fails in this case). 
 Hacking around that I generated a kernel and libc, and could then 
 netboot this with (remembered, so possibly slightly wrong) 

This has now been fixed in the daily builds for quite some time.

 which then launched the installer. Everything then went fine up to
 mirror selection - the.earth.li was offered as a mirror despite not
 carrying anything other than i386+source, and so failed.

Do you know if this mirror is still showing up in the list?

 Once that was rectified, the install continued until partitioning.
 Here I was given a confusing message telling me I could
 automatically or manually partition a disk, but was only given the
 opportunity to manually edit it.

Modulo a few bugs in the autopartitioning recipes, this should be fixed.

The other problems you mention all appear to be related to the kernel,
which should be fixed in short order.

Regards,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Ce message a ete envoye par l'antivirus des Salins

2004-07-23 Thread AntivirusSalins
*** eSafe detected hostile content in this email. ***


Time: 23 Jul 2004 10:40:24
Scan result: Mail rejected
Protocol: SMTP in
File Name\Mail Subject: mail_1090296075: Hello
Source: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destination: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Details: game.doc   
.pif   Infected with Win32.Netsky.q (Non-Removable), Whole File Blocked 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#260512: swap is turned OFF after disk formatting!

2004-07-23 Thread Test User
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:03:39AM +0200, Herbert Kaminski wrote:
 
 ...this bug seams to be there since version 22 of
 partman-basicfilesystems (11 Apr 2004 !).  If there was at least one bug
 report about this problem, I would fix it.
 
 On my desktop machine (512 MB of RAM), I am running sarge with KDE 
 for weeks now without even noticing the lack of swap! OK, KDE is 
 sluggish, but I attributed that to the new version 3.2. So no wonder 
 you got no bug reports from 'normal' systems :-)

I tracked this bug.  It was caused by my fix of #250453 and #251487 in
update.d/filesystems from partman-target.  So no, it was not that old.

Anton Zinoviev


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#260109: SOLUTION problem 1 = kde and gnome and any app 5 minutes start up each

2004-07-23 Thread Andre Felipe Machado
Hello,
Thanks for your message.
Unfortunately, the actual problem is more subtle.
If you examine the bug report from start at 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=260109
You could see that, following instructions to install using pppoe, I DID NOT 
configure the network , because it assumes that you are connecting through a 
dhcp server.
So, installed without network until the phase 1 end.
At the phase 2 start, opened a second console to call pppoeconf, and after 
returned to the main installer screen to proceed.

I guess that this file is only configured at network install phase.
BUT it remains incomplete for other methods, without any advice.
I suggest that this bare minimal file should be configured default even 
without explicitly entering the network configure phase (dhcp centric).
This problem is very frustrating for a new user.
It turns a freshly installed debian almost of no practical use for a desktop 
newbie.
No error messages are clearly showed. No hints.
This problem is likely to happen for who freshly install without dhcp server 
(pppoe or ppp), skipping the network configuration phase.

Also, this will solve only one of the problems reported.
There are still issues with wrong installed kernel, wrongly detected PCI video 
slot, wrong mouse, wrong video card, wrong monitor, incomplete detection of 
the cdrw-dvd drive, brazilian portuguese abnt2 keyboard,  some menu tweakings 
(mouse port, keyboard codes), and explanations for the newbie  (why desktop 
needs a MTA, and what is libpango?).

Best regards.
Andre Felipe


On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 01:47:47 +, Andre Felipe Machado wrote:

edit the /etc/network/interfaces
include the 2 following lines:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
[...]
It should be included before the sarge release. 

Thats exactly what is in the file created during my test 
 install yesterday (2004-07-22), so this seems to be solved.

 Herbert



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261008: installation-reports: Partman with other OS goes loop around swap control

2004-07-23 Thread Kenshi Muto
At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:04:26 +0900 (JST),
Kenshi Muto wrote:
 Package: installation-reports
 Severity: important
 Version: 20040722 sid_d-i
 
 I tried today's image, and found a problem around swap control.

 When I chose Finish partiioning and write changes to disk and Yes,
 it backs partitioner screen again.
 I don't know what's happen (other virtual terminal doesn't show
 anything error), but I noticed it was succeeded when I removed swap
 partition or changed it to other filesystem type. It looks something
 wrong around swap partition handling.

This is from commit.d/parted, in partman.

Unfortunately following r18111 change caused a problem.

---
--- commit.d/parted (revision 18110)
+++ commit.d/parted (revision 18111)
@@ -2,9 +2,11 @@

 . /lib/partman/definitions.sh

+disable_swap
 for dev in $DEVICES/*; do
 [ -d $dev ] || continue
 cd $dev
 open_dialog COMMIT
 close_dialog
 done
+enable_swap
---

When I comment out disable_swap and enable_swap, it works.
But as I know this change is needed for small memory installation... Hmm.

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#260887: Untranslated country names and hang in apt-config and korean locale.

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 260887 normal
Bug#260887: Should use iso_3166.tab file from the iso-codes package
Severity set to `normal'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#260887: Untranslated country names and hang in apt-config and korean locale.

2004-07-23 Thread Changwoo Ryu
severity 260887 normal
thanks

I have set this as important because I thought apt-setup hanged by this
bug.
Now I know it didn't...

2004-07-23, 16:30 +0900, Kenshi Muto:
 At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:47:38 +0200,
 Christian Perrier wrote:
  Quoting Changwoo Ryu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
   The problem was, that different names were used between iso3166.tab and 
   iso-codes package.
  
  apt-setup seems to make reference to /usr/share/zoneinfo/iso_3166.tab
  
  This file is obsolete and not as carefully maintained as the same file
  from iso-codes.
 
 Well, but country names in iso-codes have a headache problem... some of
 them (such as Korea, Russian) have , in their name.
 
 This confuses debconf and needs some dirty trick for apt-setup.

Indeed..  :(


Hmm I think changing Korea, Republic of to South Korea or 
Korea (South) would be fine (Same for North Korea).  Anyway most
ordinary people can't know these official Korean names, ROK/DPRK.  ;)   
South Korea to South Korean, or North Korea to North Korean people 
may sound offensive...  But I can translate these to non-offensive
ones 
for Korean language users.

If we change these two Korean country names, we have no comma-contained 
country names at least in the current list.

-- 
Changwoo Ryu [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=EB=94=94=EC=A7=80?= =?UTF-8?Q?=ED=83=88?=	=?UTF-8?Q?_=EC=84=9C=EB=AA=85?= =?UTF-8?Q?=EB=90=9C?=	=?UTF-8?Q?_=EB=A9=94=EC=84=B8?= =?UTF-8?Q?=EC=A7=80?=	=?UTF-8?Q?_=EB=B6=80=EB=B6=84=EC=9E=85=EB=8B=88?= =?UTF-8?Q?=EB=8B=A4?=


Bug#260887: Untranslated country names and hang in apt-config and korean locale.

2004-07-23 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Changwoo Ryu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 Hmm I think changing Korea, Republic of to South Korea or 
 Korea (South) would be fine (Same for North Korea).  Anyway most
 ordinary people can't know these official Korean names, ROK/DPRK.  ;)   
 South Korea to South Korean, or North Korea to North Korean people 
 may sound offensive...  But I can translate these to non-offensive
 ones 
 for Korean language users.

I would object to this as iso-codes contains official names for
countries and in that case, using non official names is very likely to
trigger political problems while official names are accepted.

We have to find a way to handle these commas, imho. Usually the method
is escaping them in the templates file.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261070: lowmem message displayed before usb keyboard enabled

2004-07-23 Thread Joey Hess
Package: usb-discover, lowmem
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

On a (hypothetical?) system with little memory and a usb keyboard,
usb-discover does not load the modules needed to drive the keyboard
until after lowmem's message about entering low memory mode. So the user
wouldn't be able to continue past the message.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#260970: marked as done (stuck at low memory prompt)

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:17:46 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260970: stuck at low memory prompt
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2004 02:42:23 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 22 19:42:23 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pengo.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.193] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bnq0t-0004XE-00; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:42:23 -0700
Received: from plugwashlap (81-86-184-211.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.184.211])
by pengo.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E9F24C00158
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 03:42:20 +0100 (BST)
From: peter green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: stuck at low memory prompt
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 03:42:13 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300
Importance: Normal
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: downloaded on 20040723 (image dated 22-Jul-2004)
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/
uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt
Date: 200407
Method: floppy boot planing to network install

Machine: vmware workstation 3.2.0
Processor: amd mobile athlon xp
Memory: 32M
Root Device: vmware virtual ide
Root Size/partition table: 4gb not partioned yet
Output of lspci:

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[E]
Configure network HW:   [ ]
Config network: [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:[ ]
Mount partitions:   [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:
got low memory mdoe prompt
pressed enter
got low memory prompt again
pressed enter
got low memory prompt again
pressed enter

and so on until eventually i gave up and gave the virtual machine more ram
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 27/06/2004


---
Received: (at 260970-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2004 14:17:52 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 23 07:17:52 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bo0rw-hE-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 07:17:52 -0700
Received: from joeyh by gluck.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bo0rq-0004fY-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:17:46 -0600
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:17:46 -0600
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: peter green [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#260970: stuck at low memory prompt
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
OUR_MTA_MSGID autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

peter green wrote:
 Comments/Problems:
 got low memory mdoe prompt
 pressed enter
 got low memory prompt again
 pressed enter
 got low memory prompt again
 pressed enter

This will be fixed in today's floppy build.

-- 
see shy jo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261073: on serial console installs, file descriptor error

2004-07-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 0.55

Since recently, I get this error about not being able to find a file
descriptor for the console and serial console installs.  I thought
kbd-chooser had been completely disabled for serial consle installs,
but it seem not...

umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument^M
Starting system log daemon: syslogd, klogd.^M
(process:134): ERROR **: Couldnt get a file descriptor referring to the console^M

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Processed: cloning 260658, retitle -1 to pci ids for sata_sil, reassign -1 to discover1-data

2004-07-23 Thread Joey Hess
Harald Dunkel wrote:
 reassigning this bug report to discover-data won't help. I
 have mounted the initrd and verified that sata_sil is a
 lready in discover-data.

For your pci id? Reported by discover when it's run?

 There is a problem with d-i that prevents sata_sil from
 being loaded at installation time.

Seems unlikely, what do you have to indicate that?

-- 
see shy jo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261008: installation-reports: Partman with other OS goes loop around swap control

2004-07-23 Thread Joey Hess
Kenshi Muto wrote:
 At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:04:26 +0900 (JST),
 Kenshi Muto wrote:
  Package: installation-reports
  Severity: important
  Version: 20040722 sid_d-i
  
  I tried today's image, and found a problem around swap control.
 
  When I chose Finish partiioning and write changes to disk and Yes,
  it backs partitioner screen again.
  I don't know what's happen (other virtual terminal doesn't show
  anything error), but I noticed it was succeeded when I removed swap
  partition or changed it to other filesystem type. It looks something
  wrong around swap partition handling.
 
 This is from commit.d/parted, in partman.
 
 Unfortunately following r18111 change caused a problem.
 
 ---
 --- commit.d/parted (revision 18110)
 +++ commit.d/parted (revision 18111)
 @@ -2,9 +2,11 @@
 
  . /lib/partman/definitions.sh
 
 +disable_swap
  for dev in $DEVICES/*; do
  [ -d $dev ] || continue
  cd $dev
  open_dialog COMMIT
  close_dialog
  done
 +enable_swap
 ---
 
 When I comment out disable_swap and enable_swap, it works.
 But as I know this change is needed for small memory installation... Hmm.

Can you get any kind of debugging info? Of course I can't reproduce
this, even with a similar setup (except no windows).

-- 
see shy jo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261079: Netinst Daily Build 32/4/2004

2004-07-23 Thread Dave Whiteley
Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/   
23/07/2004 
uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt
Date: 23/07/2004   14:00
Method: Boot off CD 

Machine: Evesham Deskdop 
Processor:?
Memory:?
Root Device:  Did not get that far
Root Size/partition table: 

hda1   NTFS

Attempt to re-partition the rest.

.
Output of lspci:?

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[0]
Configure network HW:   [0]
Config network: [0]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:[ ]
Mount partitions:   [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

We were taken to the partitioner.  We set up the required partitions.
During this I made some bad primary/logical decisions, which meant
that part of the disk was unusable.  I deleted some of my partitions
and started again.  I wrote the changes to the disk.  The install did
not then proceed to formatting.

I then tried again with a Beta 4 CD.  This found the disk already
repartitioned.  The new CD had done the work, but the overall script
did not get this information.

Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
  and ideas you had during the initial install.

The new partitioner looks better that the one on Beta 4.

Thanks for all your work.

Dave

-- 



Dave Whiteley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone +44 (0)113 343 2059
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering
The University of Leeds. Leeds, LS2 9JT,  UK


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fixed in NMU of lowmem 0.14

2004-07-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
tag 260949 + fixed

quit

This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:04:27 +0100
Source: lowmem
Binary: lowmemcheck lowmem
Architecture: all i386 mipsel source 
Version: 0.14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 lowmem - free memory for lowmem install (udeb)
 lowmemcheck - detect low-memory systems and enter lowmem mode (udeb)
Closes: 260949
Changes: 
 lowmem (0.14) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Martin Michlmayr
 - Before running the kill command, check whether there is actually
   any suitable tail process to kill; otherwise the postinst will
   fail when there is no such process which is always the case in
   serial console installs and might be the case when the postinst
   is run twice.  Closes: #260949
 - Also, be super cautious and use kill $pid || true because there
   is the possibilty for a race occuring; thanks, Joey Hess.
 - Increase needed ram on mipsel from 25 to 33: installations on
   Cobalt machines without lowmem do not work with 32 MB but work
   with 36 MB, so enable lowmem when less than 36 MB are found.
   (Machines with 35 MB RAM are shown to have 32, 32 MB are shown
   as 29, so pick 33 for needed ram.)
Files: 
 3318b2c282b582712dcc0b8a8f0db4a0 940 debian-installer optional lowmem_0.14_all.udeb
 392d6afac7163ed1e6c31641c0b61947 5602 debian-installer extra lowmem_0.14.tar.gz
 d052d8ec6691e1bf46082c63dec0db6e 4178 debian-installer standard 
lowmemcheck_0.14_mipsel.udeb
 d71493361da853d170171a6c6ac76e8f 555 debian-installer extra lowmem_0.14.dsc
 ecd9fb7378e030659ab7efd0f56a2824 3842 debian-installer standard 
lowmemcheck_0.14_i386.udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBASo1Kb5dImj9VJ8RApLNAJ9LxEYL23CnIKHYq461nLH7/EuhagCfTCIW
W+AdySVRZstlKHo33AmMLC0=
=hUfW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261008: installation-reports: Partman with other OS goes loop around swap control

2004-07-23 Thread Kenshi Muto
At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:28:10 -0600,
Joey Hess wrote:
 Kenshi Muto wrote:
  At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:04:26 +0900 (JST),
  Kenshi Muto wrote:
   Package: installation-reports
   Severity: important
   Version: 20040722 sid_d-i
  When I comment out disable_swap and enable_swap, it works.
  But as I know this change is needed for small memory installation... Hmm.
 
 Can you get any kind of debugging info? Of course I can't reproduce
 this, even with a similar setup (except no windows).

This can be reproduced by:
Choice Erase entire disk, Automatically partition the free space, then
do Separate partition for home directories or Multi-user system.

My test result:
1. All files in one partition (recommended for new users) works.
2. When I removed swap partition, it works.

I can send /var/log/partman, but it looks too long...

I think current partman works only:
1. 1 partition, 1 swap
2. multiple partitions, no swap

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



S/390 and whatever the don't-really-reboot flag is

2004-07-23 Thread Adam Thornton
As I understand it, the run /sbin/reboot or not flag in d-i is kind of
in flux. 

It was put there for embedded devices, because reboot repeats the last
boot you did, which will, in those devices, boot from the wrong thing.

This is also the case in the S/390 install: you will have booted (IPLed,
in the S/390 world) the installer from either a (virtual) card deck or a
tape.  If you run /sbin/reboot, you use the same thing again.  That will
run the installer again (or fail, if the card reader wasn't set to hang
on to its decks or the tape wasn't rewound) rather than booting the
installed system, which isn't what we want.

Instead we want to simply halt the system and instruct the user to IPL
from the disk (DASD in S/390-speak) device that the boot record was
written to.

What's the right way to tell d-i this for S/390?

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of lowmem_0.14_multi.changes

2004-07-23 Thread Archive Administrator
lowmem_0.14_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  lowmem_0.14_all.udeb
  lowmem_0.14.tar.gz
  lowmemcheck_0.14_mipsel.udeb
  lowmem_0.14.dsc
  lowmemcheck_0.14_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed in NMU of lowmem 0.14

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 260949 + fixed
Bug#260949: postinst fails on serial console installs
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: reassign 261079 to partman

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 reassign 261079 partman
Bug#261079: Netinst Daily Build 32/4/2004
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



lowmem override disparity

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

lowmemcheck_0.14_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
lowmemcheck_0.14_mipsel.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says 
optional.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



lowmem_0.14_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
lowmem_0.14.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_0.14.dsc
lowmem_0.14.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_0.14.tar.gz
lowmem_0.14_all.udeb
  to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_0.14_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_0.14_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmemcheck_0.14_i386.udeb
lowmemcheck_0.14_mipsel.udeb
  to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmemcheck_0.14_mipsel.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 260949 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261008: installation-reports: Partman with other OS goes loop around swap control

2004-07-23 Thread Joey Hess
Kenshi Muto wrote:
 This can be reproduced by:
 Choice Erase entire disk, Automatically partition the free space, then
 do Separate partition for home directories or Multi-user system.

That's my typical way to use partman, and I did not reproduce it
yesterday.

 My test result:
 1. All files in one partition (recommended for new users) works.
 2. When I removed swap partition, it works.
 
 I can send /var/log/partman, but it looks too long...

Please send it.

-- 
see shy jo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261079: Netinst Daily Build 32/4/2004

2004-07-23 Thread Joey Hess
Dave Whiteley wrote:
 We were taken to the partitioner.  We set up the required partitions.
 During this I made some bad primary/logical decisions, which meant
 that part of the disk was unusable.  I deleted some of my partitions
 and started again.  I wrote the changes to the disk.  The install did
 not then proceed to formatting.

Please, we need more details,. What was the last thing that you saw?

-- 
see shy jo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: S/390 and whatever the don't-really-reboot flag is

2004-07-23 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 10:25:35AM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote:
 What's the right way to tell d-i this for S/390?

Read commit logs and use the packages in sid.

Bastian

-- 
Many Myths are based on truth
-- Spock, The Way to Eden,  stardate 5832.3


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument

2004-07-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
When booting, I get:

Freeing unused kernel memory: 6200k freed
Setting up filesystem, please wait ...
umount: /initrd: Invalid argument

The last warning is harmless but might confuse newbies.  Basically,
rootskel runs:

# Cleanup after the first init, which left the initrd mounted
# on /initrd.
umount /initrd/dev
umount /initrd

However, when this is run, only these are mounted:

/dev/root on /initrd type ext2 (ro)
tmpfs on / type tmpfs (rw)
none on /dev type devfs (rw)
none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw)
none on /proc type proc (rw)

busybox says Invalid argument when something is not mounted rather
than is not mounted.

As I see it, this unmount can safely be removed.  Does anyone know why
it's there?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: reassign 261008 to partman

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 reassign 261008 partman
Bug#261008: installation-reports: Partman with other OS goes loop around swap control
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261087: network-console: Should tell user not to continue with install on real console

2004-07-23 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: network-console
Version: 0.03
Severity: wishlist

This is just a minor usability issue: after network-console generates
its host keys and tells you that it's ready for you to SSH into the
install system, the user is then told Press Any Key to Continue, and
you're taken, on the console, back to the main menu.  (at least on
S/390, which is where I'm testing)

I think that network-console should say, as the last thing it does
You're going to be told to press any key to continue, but really, don't
use the console anymore.  All interaction up until system halt
should be via the SSH session.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (700, 'testing')
Architecture: s390
Kernel: Linux 2.4.17
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Réponse automatique d'absence du bureau : Mail Delivery (failure fnabet@businessdecision.fr)

2004-07-23 Thread NABET Franck
Title: Réponse automatique d'absence du bureau : Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])






Absent jusqu'au 6 aout inclus, merci de contacter Emilie WARDELL([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ou Imen BOURGUIBA ([EMAIL PROTECTED])




Bug#260949: marked as done (postinst fails on serial console installs)

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:37:09 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in NMU of lowmem 0.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2004 22:51:16 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 22 15:51:16 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BnmPE-0002EL-00; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:51:16 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 5FA4264D3B; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:51:16 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3CB301004E; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:50:49 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:50:49 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: postinst fails on serial console installs
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: lowmem
Version: 0.13
Severity: important

lowmem's postinst fails on serial console installs when it tries to
kill the tail processes - they don't exist on serial installs so
kill is run without any parameter.


/var/log # more syslog 
Log file truncated to save memory.
Jan  1 00:03:24 main-menu[182]: (process:3578): BusyBox v1.00-pre10 (Debian 
20040623-1) multi-call binary 
Jan  1 00:03:24 main-menu[182]: (process:3578):  
Jan  1 00:03:24 main-menu[182]: (process:3578): Usage: kill [-signal] process-id 
[process-id ...] 
Jan  1 00:03:24 main-menu[182]: (process:3578):  
Jan  1 00:03:24 main-menu[182]: (process:3578): BusyBox v1.00-pre10 (Debian 
20040623-1) multi-call binary 
Jan  1 00:03:24 main-menu[182]: (process:3578):  
Jan  1 00:03:24 main-menu[182]: (process:3578): Usage: kill [-signal] process-id 
[process-id ...] 
Jan  1 00:03:24 main-menu[182]: (process:3578):  
Jan  1 00:03:24 main-menu[182]: WARNING **: Configuring 'lowmem' failed with error 
code 1 
Jan  1 00:03:24 main-menu[182]: WARNING **: Menu item 'lowmem' failed. 
Jan  1 00:03:33 main-menu[182]: INFO: Modifying debconf priority limit from 'high' to 
'medium' 
Jan  1 00:03:33 debconf: Setting debconf/priority to medium
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 260949-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2004 15:37:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 23 08:37:24 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bo26u-0003hN-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:37:24 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 4FCFA64D3C; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:37:24 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 060771004E; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:37:10 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:37:09 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of lowmem 0.14
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

closing.

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 11:17]:
 tag 260949 + fixed
 
 quit
 
 This message was generated automatically in response to a
 non-maintainer upload.  The .changes file follows.
 
 Format: 1.7
 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:04:27 +0100
 Source: lowmem
 Binary: lowmemcheck lowmem
 Architecture: all i386 mipsel source 
 Version: 0.14
 Distribution: unstable
 Urgency: low
 Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Changed-By: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Description: 
  lowmem - free memory for lowmem install (udeb)
  lowmemcheck - detect low-memory systems and enter lowmem mode (udeb)
 Closes: 260949
 

Re: Processed: cloning 260658, retitle -1 to pci ids for sata_sil, reassign -1 to discover1-data

2004-07-23 Thread Harald Dunkel
Joey Hess wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
reassigning this bug report to discover-data won't help. I
have mounted the initrd and verified that sata_sil is a
lready in discover-data.

For your pci id? Reported by discover when it's run?
Yes.
To be sure I have rebooted my PC some minutes ago, booted the
monolithic image in expert mode, switched to con2, and ran
'discover -d': The SI3512 was listed. I got a similar output
as for running discover within my usual desktop environment:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} discover -d
Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading USB hardware database...
Reading PCMCIA hardware database...
Probing PCI cards...
Found NVIDIA Corporation nForce3 Host Bridge (bridge)
Found NVIDIA Corporation nForce3 LPC Bridge (bridge)
Found NVIDIA Corporation nForce3 SMBus (Unknown)
Found NVIDIA Corporation nForce3 USB 1.1 (usb)
Found NVIDIA Corporation nForce3 USB 1.1 (usb)
Found NVIDIA Corporation nForce3 USB 2.0 (usb)
Found NVIDIA Corporation nForce3 Ethernet (ethernet)
Found NVIDIA Corporation nForce3 Audio (sound)
Found NVIDIA Corporation nForce3 IDE (ide)
Found NVIDIA Corporation nForce3 PCI Bridge (bridge)
Found NVIDIA Corporation nForce3 AGP Bridge (bridge)
Found Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge (bridge)
Found Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge (bridge)
Found Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge (bridge)
Found Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge (bridge)
Found VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (bridge)
Found CMD Technology Inc Silicon Image Serial ATARaid Controller [ CMD/Sil 
3512 ] (ide)
Found NVIDIA Corporation NV28GL [Quadro4 980 XGL] (video)
Probing USB devices...
Found Unknown Unknown
Found Unknown Unknown
Found Unknown Unknown
Found Unknown Unknown
Found Unknown Unknown
Probing SCSI devices...
Found ATA SAMSUNG SP1614C (4)
Found USB2.0 CardReader CF RW (4)
Found USB2.0 CardReader Combo (4)
Probing parallel ports...
Found [/dev/lp0]
Probing serial ports...
Found [/dev/ttyS0]

There is a problem with d-i that prevents sata_sil from
being loaded at installation time.

Seems unlikely, what do you have to indicate that?
Thats easy: If I don't run 'modprobe sata-sil' on console 2,
then the partition tool doesn't list my harddisk. The PCI
ID is in pci.lst, discover lists the SI3512 (as shown above),
so I would say that discover is innocent.
Did you note my installation report saying that d-i listed
a lot of IDE controllers? None of them (except ide-generic)
matched the hardware.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Processing of partman_44_i386.changes

2004-07-23 Thread Archive Administrator
partman_44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman_44.dsc
  partman_44.tar.gz
  partman_44_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument

2004-07-23 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 When booting, I get:
 
 Freeing unused kernel memory: 6200k freed
 Setting up filesystem, please wait ...
 umount: /initrd: Invalid argument
 
 The last warning is harmless but might confuse newbies.

The current SVN rootskel supresses the warning.

[snip]
 As I see it, this unmount can safely be removed.  Does anyone know why
 it's there?

Bug #218602, I think.


Thiemo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



partman_44_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
partman_44.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_44.dsc
partman_44.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_44.tar.gz
partman_44_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_44_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 261008 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument

2004-07-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 18:16]:
  The last warning is harmless but might confuse newbies.
 The current SVN rootskel supresses the warning.

Does it?  I don't see how.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261100: go back problem is just papered over, still exists

2004-07-23 Thread Joey Hess
Package: partman
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

- Add confirmation dialog for the Back button of the main
  partitioning menu.  Thanks to Yann Dirson, closes: #241476.

This dialog is very annoying, manages to be quite confusing IMHO in its
wording, and is really just papering over a still existing problem, which is
that backing up from the main menu should return to autopartitioning,
like bug #241476 originally said.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#261101: installation report: system freeze libdiscover

2004-07-23 Thread Christofer Stoll
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst-beta4.iso
uname -a: Linux 2.4.25-1-i386
Date: 2004-Jul-22 16:42 CEST Central European Summer Time
Method: Booted with CD-Rom without any further boot options

Machine: IBM eServer X300 Model-No. 8672-83X with recent BIOS version
Processor: Pentium III 1000
Memory: 512MB SDRAM PC133
Root Device:2x IBM-PSG DDYS-T18350N 18GB U2W-SCSI (ID 0 and 1)
on an Adaptec 29160LP, Bios 2.57.0
Root Size/partition table:
/dev/sda1   /   (17.6 GB)
/dev/sda2   swap(500MB)
/dev/sdb1   /home   (18.1GB)
/dev/hdcCDROM with sarge-CD

Output of lspci:

:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C693A/694x [Apollo PRO133x] (rev 
c4)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C598/694x [Apollo MVP3/Pro133x AGP]
:00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 40)
:00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C 
PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
:00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller 
(rev 16)
:00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller 
(rev 16)
:00:07.4 Bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 40)
:00:0a.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7892A U160/m (rev 02)
:00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 0c)
:00:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 0c)
:00:0f.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. Savage 4 (rev 06)

Base System Installation Checklist:


Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[E]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

The system freezes (no NUM-LOCK, no CTRL-ALT-DEL, have to power-off!) totally at this 
stage:

Install base system:
 95% ##
installing extra packages


If I switch to the debug console (ALT-F3) before the machine freezes the last output 
is:

Setting up libdiscovery1 (1.5.9)
Settung up discover1 (1.5.9)
Detecting hardware:


I've tried the daily snapshot (20040722) but it freezes at exactly the same position 
with discover1 (1.6.1).
I have a very old sarge-i386-netinst (20040103) with libdiscover1 (1.5-1.4.3). This 
one does NOT freeze. But after the first reboot sarge gets the new packages from the 
internet (no new packages just upgrade the packages from netinst-20040103) and it 
freezes again with this output:

discovery-data (2.2004.05.03-4)
libdiscovery2 (2.0.4-5)
Discovering hardware: agpgart parport_pc usb-uhci aic7xxx e100
loading: agpgart:
Linux agpgart interface v0.99
agpgart: maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 439M
agpgart: Detected Via Apollo Pro chipset


I don't know if it's really the agpgart which is responsible for the freeze, maybe 
it's the next command and the system couldn't print the message.

Hopefully these are the information you need. If you need more informations please 
contact me.

Christofer Stoll



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261008: marked as done (installation-reports: Partman with other OS goes loop around swap control)

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:18:00 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#261008: fixed in partman 44
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2004 08:04:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 23 01:04:29 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] 
(postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bnv2b-Lr-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 01:04:29 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8D1222F7A
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:04:27 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 04254-02 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:04:27 +0900 (JST)
Received: from hellhound (orochi.topstudio.co.jp [202.224.239.193])
by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB7A222F61
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:04:27 +0900 (JST)
Received: by hellhound (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7FCBA214158; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:04:26 +0900 (JST)
From: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: installation-reports: Partman with other OS goes loop around swap control
X-Debbugs-CC: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4 
(patch 15) (Security Through Obscurity) (i386-debian-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - Maruoka)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:04:26 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using From header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Version: 20040722 sid_d-i

I tried today's image, and found a problem around swap control.

Environment:
 i386 VMware

This host has Windows partition and 1.8GB free space.
Debian installer plans automatically:

IDE1 master (hda) - 3.2 GB VMware virtual IDE Hard Drive
  #1 primary2.1 GB ntfs
  #2 primary1.0 GB ext3   /
  #5 logical   86.6 MB swap   swap

When I chose Finish partiioning and write changes to disk and Yes,
it backs partitioner screen again.
I don't know what's happen (other virtual terminal doesn't show
anything error), but I noticed it was succeeded when I removed swap
partition or changed it to other filesystem type. It looks something
wrong around swap partition handling.

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 261008-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2004 16:19:47 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 23 09:19:47 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bo2lv-0001MP-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:19:47 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bo2kC-00059W-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:18:00 -0400
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#261008: fixed in partman 44
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:18:00 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: partman
Source-Version: 44

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman_44.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_44.dsc
partman_44.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_44.tar.gz
partman_44_i386.udeb
  to 

Processing of partman_45_i386.changes

2004-07-23 Thread Archive Administrator
partman_45_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman_45.dsc
  partman_45.tar.gz
  partman_45_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



/etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?

2004-07-23 Thread Adam Thornton
The /etc/fstab written for S/390 assumes old-style, static /dev entries:
/dev/dasda1, /dev/dasdb1, and so on.

Unfortunately, the installed system does not have those device nodes,
but instead has devfs: /dev/dasd/address/part1, etc.

The first device (/dev/dasda) works in /etc/fstab and in the IPL parms,
presumably because there's no filesystem there yet for it not to find
its device node in.  All subsequent ones fail, as you can see from the
log at the bottom.

So I think we need static device nodes created in /dev for S/390.

/dev/dasda - b 94 0
/dev/dasda[1-3] - b 94 [1-3]
/dev/dasdb - b 94 4
/dev/dasdb[1-3] - b 94 [5-7]

and so on.  /dev/dasd[a-z] is almost certainly enough for the installer;
after that you go to /dev/dasdaa, but I think 26 disks is enough to get
almost any site started.

I *think* this should go into subarch-dev in userdevfs, but I definitely
would like some confirmation of that before committing any changes.

Adam

***INSTALL LOG*

On IPL from DASD after installation:

Checking all file systems...  
fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)  
fsck.ext3: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/dasdb1   
/dev/dasdb1:   
The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2  
filesystem.  If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2  
filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock 
is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate
superblock:  
e2fsck -b 8193 device  
  
  
fsck failed.  Please repair manually.  
  
[drop into root shell]

ls /dev/dasd*  
0150  0151  0152  
(none):~# 

(none):~# mount /dev/dasd/0151/part1 /tmp
mount /dev/dasd/0151/part1 /tmp  
kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds 
EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.19, 19 August 2002 on dasd(94,5), internal journal 
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. 
(none):~# swapon /dev/dasd/0152/part1
swapon /dev/dasd/0152/part1  
Adding Swap: 99156k swap-space (priority -1) 
(none):~# 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



partman_45_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
partman_45.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_45.dsc
partman_45.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_45.tar.gz
partman_45_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_45_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?

2004-07-23 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 12:03:00PM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote:

 I *think* this should go into subarch-dev in userdevfs, but I definitely
 would like some confirmation of that before committing any changes.

userdevfs was written for systems that couldn't use devfs, 2.2 kernels
for instance. I far as I can tell, m68k is the only arch using it.

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument

2004-07-23 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 * Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 18:16]:
   The last warning is harmless but might confuse newbies.
  The current SVN rootskel supresses the warning.
 
 Does it?  I don't see how.

The line reads now:

umount initrd 2/dev/null || true
 

Thiemo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?

2004-07-23 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Adam Thornton wrote:
 The /etc/fstab written for S/390 assumes old-style, static /dev entries:
 /dev/dasda1, /dev/dasdb1, and so on.
 
 Unfortunately, the installed system does not have those device nodes,
 but instead has devfs: /dev/dasd/address/part1, etc.

AFAICS the installed system shouldn't mount devfs. It also should have
static /dev entries, managed by makedev.


Thiemo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?

2004-07-23 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 12:23, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
 AFAICS the installed system shouldn't mount devfs. It also should have
 static /dev entries, managed by makedev.

In that case where in the debian-installer build do I need to put the
script to generate the static /dev entries that the parmfile and fstab
require?

The fact that it *does* mount devfs is probably a bug in the kernel
build parameters for S/390, but not a major one if we also have the
static /dev entries.

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of net-retriever_0.38_i386.changes

2004-07-23 Thread Archive Administrator
net-retriever_0.38_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  net-retriever_0.38.dsc
  net-retriever_0.38.tar.gz
  net-retriever_0.38_all.udeb
  download-installer_0.38_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



net-retriever_0.38_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
download-installer_0.38_all.udeb
  to pool/main/n/net-retriever/download-installer_0.38_all.udeb
net-retriever_0.38.dsc
  to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_0.38.dsc
net-retriever_0.38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_0.38.tar.gz
net-retriever_0.38_all.udeb
  to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_0.38_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 260348 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#260348: marked as done (Try downloads three times before prompting)

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:17:13 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260348: fixed in net-retriever 0.38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2004 04:44:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 19 21:44:21 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from zoon.lafn.org [206.117.18.9] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BmmUG-00038D-00; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:44:21 -0700
Received: from localhost (host-66-81-182-140.rev.o1.com [66.81.182.140])
by zoon.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i6K4iJJq015023
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1BmhF7-00018h-SM
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:08:22 -0700
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:08:21 -0700
From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cannot specify that failed downloads should be automatically retried
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: anna
Version: 0.065

After each failed download, anna asks whether I want to retry,
change the mirror, or cancel.  Since the network connection here
is poor, I see this question a lot.  It would be nice to have an
option to always retry failed downloads.

-- 
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/

---
Received: (at 260348-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2004 18:20:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 23 11:20:09 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bo4eP-0004Kd-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:20:09 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bo4bZ-lV-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:17:13 -0400
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#260348: fixed in net-retriever 0.38
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:17:13 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: net-retriever
Source-Version: 0.38

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
net-retriever, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

download-installer_0.38_all.udeb
  to pool/main/n/net-retriever/download-installer_0.38_all.udeb
net-retriever_0.38.dsc
  to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_0.38.dsc
net-retriever_0.38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_0.38.tar.gz
net-retriever_0.38_all.udeb
  to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_0.38_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated net-retriever package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:12:41 -0400
Source: net-retriever
Binary: download-installer net-retriever
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.38
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#261116: start shell uses di-utils-shell which has misleading message

2004-07-23 Thread Joey Hess
Package: network-console
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

network-console's start shell option causes the message from
di-utils-shell to be displayed. This message ends with Use the exit
command to return to the installation menu.. But here exit ends the ssh
session. Either that should be fixed, or a different template could be
used, as it is, the text is incorrect.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?

2004-07-23 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Adam Thornton wrote:
 On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 12:23, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
  AFAICS the installed system shouldn't mount devfs. It also should have
  static /dev entries, managed by makedev.
 
 In that case where in the debian-installer build do I need to put the
 script to generate the static /dev entries that the parmfile and fstab
 require?

The installer doesn't need to do anything special besides installing
makedev, which is Priority: required. The entries in /target/dev should
be created by the makedev postinst script.

 The fact that it *does* mount devfs is probably a bug in the kernel
 build parameters for S/390, but not a major one if we also have the
 static /dev entries.

Are you sure this doesn't simply hide the static entries by mounting
devfs over it?


Thiemo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?

2004-07-23 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 13:23, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
 Are you sure this doesn't simply hide the static entries by mounting
 devfs over it?

Well, no, I'm not.  In fact, it probably does, and that's why the very
first /dev/dasda works.

So it looks like the right answer is to rebuild the kernel so as not to
use devfs by default, then, right?

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: reassign 261101 to discover1

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 reassign 261101 discover1
Bug#261101: installation report: system freeze libdiscover
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover1'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 261101

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 tags 261101 d-i
Bug#261101: installation report: system freeze libdiscover
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Processed: cloning 260658, retitle -1 to pci ids for sata_sil, reassign -1 to discover1-data

2004-07-23 Thread Harald Dunkel
I would suggest this patch:
--- hw-detect~  1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ hw-detect   2004-07-23 20:46:40.657067301 +0200
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
  sparc/*) sbus=,sbus ;;
esac
discover --format=%m:%V %M\n --disable-all \
- --enable=pci,ide,scsi${sbus},pcmcia scsi cdrom ethernet 
bridge |
+ --enable=pci,ide,scsi${sbus},pcmcia ide scsi cdrom ethernet 
bridge |
sed 's/ $//'
;;
esac
I do not know whether d-i is supposed to list all these
IDE modules that do not match the hardware, though.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bug#260348: marked as done (Try downloads three times before prompting)

2004-07-23 Thread Steve Glines
I'm not sure if this is the same bug or not but when I do a PXE install
from a mirror I have no problem. When I create a mirror from the CD rom
images I get stuck at disk partitioning - It's missing. This means there
is a disconnect between the CD's and the Sarge mirrors.

SG

Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

 Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:17:13 -0400
 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 and subject line Bug#260348: fixed in net-retriever 0.38
 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
 
 This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
 If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
 Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
 
 (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
 talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
 somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)
 
 Debian bug tracking system administrator
 (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
 
 --
 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2004 04:44:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 19 21:44:21 2004
 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Received: from zoon.lafn.org [206.117.18.9] 
   by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
   id 1BmmUG-00038D-00; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:44:21 -0700
 Received: from localhost (host-66-81-182-140.rev.o1.com [66.81.182.140])
   by zoon.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i6K4iJJq015023
   for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
   (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.32)
   id 1BmhF7-00018h-SM
   for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:08:22 -0700
 Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:08:21 -0700
 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Cannot specify that failed downloads should be automatically retried
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
 Sender: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j
 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
   (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
   autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
 X-Spam-Level: 
 
 Package: anna
 Version: 0.065
 
 After each failed download, anna asks whether I want to retry,
 change the mirror, or cancel.  Since the network connection here
 is poor, I see this question a lot.  It would be nice to have an
 option to always retry failed downloads.
 

-- 
Steve Glines
voice: 978-952-6340 www.is-cs.com
  fax: 978-952-8524 145 Foster Street
 cell: 617-549-7274 Littleton MA 01460

I'm a complex person. I have a real and an imaginary part.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: UTF-8 default

2004-07-23 Thread Blars Blarson
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,

Is there any reason why UTF-8 seems to be the default in Debian nowadays? I
installed sid with d-i (current businesscard as of 2004-07-21) and noticed
that LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (a locale that was not even generated); this
confused aterm and probably other applications.

This is probably bug 246398 in xterm.

This bug is not related to d-i, you'll get it on upgraded systems that
lack utf8 locales as well.
-- 
Blars Blarson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261122: [i386] [20040722] [floppy,network] various problems

2004-07-23 Thread Gintautas Miliauskas
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040723
Severity: normal

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 2004-07-22,
downloaded from http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/
uname -a: Linux metalas 2.4.26-1-586tsc #1
Sat May 1 16:46:38 EST 2004 i586 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-07-23
Method: floppy, then network (http://debian.vinita.lt, no proxy).

Machine: An old Pentium
Processor: Pentium 200
Memory: 32MB
Root Device: IDE (/dev/hda1)
Root Size/partition table:
~1800MB /
~200MB  swap

Output of lspci:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430TX - 82439TX MTXC (rev 01)
:00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 01)
:00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
:00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
:00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 01)
:00:09.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (rev 30)
:00:0a.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 264VT
[Mach64 VT] (rev 40)


Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[E]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:[E]
Mount partitions:   [E]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

expert installation.

Boy, that was *painful* :(

On boot the 'low RAM' dialog went on an infinite loop.  joeyh on IRC
said that the issue was fixed after the images I was using were build.
Went through with a workaround (used nano to change 'set -e' to 'set +e' in
/sbin/debian-installer-startup).

Then I had problems with the network: the first time I tried, my router
firewall didn't let the box through.  I fixed that (BTW, ping would be a
very nice thing to have...). Then I tried to install Debian stable.  Didn't
work (showed an error, I think it was something like can't download,
but I'm not sure).  I reluctantly went on with Sarge (testing).

When the kernel module screen came up, I didn't bother unselecting the
unneeded ones.  Later, when I ran out of memory, I found out that rmmod
wasn't there!

Partitioning didn't work, I think because of memory shortage.  I would
get to the partitioning screen, choose 'Guided partitioning' (I'd have
chosen 'manual partitioning', but there was no such thing), and then I
would get bounced back to the main menu immediately.  I did the
partitioning manually with fdisk in the other console.

BTW, I'd like to have at least two extra consoles, but that's not
really important.

Then I ran into a problem when trying to install the base system.  I
think that before I managed to set up swap, the 'parted_server' daemon
got killed; the installer was trying to run the partition setup, which
would fail, then it would try to go on with the installation and failed
with 'no partition mounted on /target'.  I mounted the partition, but
the error didn't go away -- apparently the partitioning stage would
unmount /target every time it ran and then try to run parted (or
something else), which would fail, and then continue to the next stage.
I worked around by repeatedly executing the mount command on the other
console after pressing Enter to proceed with base installation (I
guess I managed to fit one of the mount commands in the time interval
after the partition was unmounted but before the next stage checked for
the mount).

Had I known that I would have to get through all this, I surely would
have used the Woody installer...  I had thought that d-i was pretty much
complete, and had expected to encounter maybe several minor glitches --
definitely not two near-showstoppers.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT.UTF-8

-- 
Gintautas


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: UTF-8 default

2004-07-23 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Steinar H. Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 Hi,
 
 Is there any reason why UTF-8 seems to be the default in Debian nowadays? I
 installed sid with d-i (current businesscard as of 2004-07-21) and noticed
 that LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (a locale that was not even generated); this
 confused aterm and probably other applications.
 
 A friend of mine installed sarge with d-i today (ie. current businesscard as
 of 2004-07-22) and now his x-chat is suddenly spewing out UTF-8 on IRC. Are
 we copying Red Hat's classic bugs here? :-)


I just ran a complete base system install with English as language and
Norway as country, like you mentioned me. 20040722 netinst sif_d-i
(sarge_d-i is very likely to have similar result)

At the end of the install, neither root nor the created user have any
locale set up.

When doing dpkg-reconfigure locales, I find that the only generated
locale is en_US.ISO-8859-1 (the UTF-8 flavour is not checked) with
None as default locale.

So, I don't really know why your friend install ended with the
en_US.UTF-8 but it does not seems to be because of d-i.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#261073: on serial console installs, file descriptor error

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 261073 + patch
Bug#261073: on serial console installs, file descriptor error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261073: on serial console installs, file descriptor error

2004-07-23 Thread Recai Oktas
tag 261073 + patch
thanks

* Martin Michlmayr [2004-07-23 15:24:20+0100]
 Since recently, I get this error about not being able to find a file
 descriptor for the console and serial console installs.  I thought
 kbd-chooser had been completely disabled for serial consle installs,
 but it seem not...
 
 umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument^M
 Starting system log daemon: syslogd, klogd.^M
 (process:134): ERROR **: Couldnt get a file descriptor referring to the console^M

Could you try the patch attached?

Regards,

-- 
roktas
--- S55kbd-chooser.orig 2004-07-04 20:05:14.0 +0300
+++ S55kbd-chooser  2004-07-24 00:30:45.0 +0300
@@ -4,6 +4,11 @@
 
 set -e
 
+# Silently exit on a serial console.
+if [ $TERM_TYPE = serial ]; then
+   exit 0
+fi
+
 # Set console mode to unicode
 if [ -x $kbdmode ] ; then
$kbdmode -u || true


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#261140: d-i failure: i386/Compaq Deskpro 2000 5120

2004-07-23 Thread R Seiji
Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 7/23/04 from
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot
uname -a: 2.4.6-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i586 unknown
Date: 7/23/04 @ 5p
Method: PXE boot using Intel Pro 100/M NIC

Machine: Compaq Deskpro 2000 5120
Processor: 120MHz Pentium
Memory: 32MB
Root Device: Dual IDE 17.2GB Drives (one master on each controller)
Root Size/partition table: None created.  Plan 2GB RAID1 /, 32GB RAID0
/home.
Output of lspci: Unknown.

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:[ ]
Mount partitions:   [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

PXE boot Compaq Deskpro 2000 5120 system using Intel Pro 100/M NIC.
Installer runs fine until reach step to partition drives.  Currently have
two 17.2GB IDE drives installed on the embedded controllers (had also tried
with a single 1GB IDE) with the BIOS configured with the CHS values of the
drives.  Upon reaching Starting up the partitioner, installation stalls at
38%/Scanning disks...

Last recorded line in dmesg is:

__alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x1d2/0)
VM: killing process parted_server
--
R. Seiji
www.arslist.info




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261073: on serial console installs, file descriptor error

2004-07-23 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 12:42:48AM +0300, Recai Oktas wrote:
 Could you try the patch attached?

Better disable kbd-chooser on anything than virtual console.

Something like 
| [ $TERM_TYPE != virtual ]  exit 0

Bastian

-- 
Time is fluid ... like a river with currents, eddies, backwash.
-- Spock, The City on the Edge of Forever, stardate 3134.0


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#260512: swap is turned OFF after disk formatting!

2004-07-23 Thread Joey Hess
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
 My only change in this release of partman was to repair the function
 enable_swap in definitions.sh.  The final swapon must have been broken
 somehow long ago.
 
 #260746 (swap is not in /etc/fstab) is also not new.  I don't understand
 how this was possible but this bug seams to be there since version 22 of
 partman-basicfilesystems (11 Apr 2004 !).  If there was at least one bug
 report about this problem, I would fix it.

I worked out exactly what caused this all yesterday. You changed swap to
a method, but fstab.d/basic had this code:

[ -f $id/method ] || continue
[ -f $id/acting_filesystem ] || continue
method=$(cat $id/method)
if [ $method = swap ]; then
echo $path none swap sw 0 0
fi

Swap partitions no longer have an acting_filesystem file (maybe this is
a bug), and this made it not output the fstab entries. Also 
finish.d/mount_partitions no longer saw the swap entries, so it
neglected to call mount.d on the swap partitions to swapon them. I fixed
the bug yesterday and swap is again working well (although my other
changes to make it swapon as early as possible, and only swapoff when
really necessary introduced a new bug that I only fixed today).

 Sory about this.  I only want to say that most likely both problems are
 not caused by my recent changes in partman.

I'm quite sure that they were caused by making swap a method.

Also, Christian Perrier has reported a problem where partman hangs on
startup (at init.d/35something), it seems that parted_server has a pid
file but is not running. I've not gotten any more info to debug this but
it seems this is also a new problem since Christian does lots of tests
in vmware all the time.

I'm still not sure if we'll be able to include the new partman in the
next release, since we still seem to be finding new bugs in it.

-- 
see shy jo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: UTF-8 default

2004-07-23 Thread Joey Hess
Blars Blarson wrote:
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Hi,
 
 Is there any reason why UTF-8 seems to be the default in Debian nowadays? I
 installed sid with d-i (current businesscard as of 2004-07-21) and noticed
 that LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (a locale that was not even generated); this
 confused aterm and probably other applications.
 
 This is probably bug 246398 in xterm.

He's not running xterm, so it seems unlikely that a bug in xterm wold be
the culprit.

FWIW, I once saw gnome stick me with a en_US.utf-8 locale, but I've not
had much luck with reproducing it.

-- 
see shy jo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261144: Wrong symbol conversions in ASCII mode

2004-07-23 Thread Recai Oktas
Package: kbd-chooser
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n patch

This is the same issue of #260758.  Please find the patch attached.

-- 
roktas
diff -ru kbd-chooser.orig/ksyms.c kbd-chooser/ksyms.c
--- kbd-chooser.orig/ksyms.c2004-07-08 00:24:08.0 +0300
+++ kbd-chooser/ksyms.c 2004-07-24 02:10:03.0 +0300
@@ -1100,7 +1100,7 @@
{ 0x00da,  },
{ 0x00db,  },
{ 0x00dc,  },
-   { 0x0130, Idotabove },
+   { 0x0130, Iabovedot },
{ 0x015e, Scedilla },
{ 0x00df,  },
{ 0x00e0,  },
@@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@
{ 0x00fa,  },
{ 0x00fb,  },
{ 0x00fc,  },
-   { 0x0131, dotlessi },
+   { 0x0131, idotless },
{ 0x015f, scedilla },
{ 0x00ff,  }
 };
@@ -1607,7 +1607,10 @@
{ cyrillic_small_letter_yeri, cyrillic_small_letter_yeru },
{ cyrillic_small_letter_reversed_e, cyrillic_small_letter_e },
{ cyrillic_small_letter_ii, cyrillic_small_letter_i },
-   { cyrillic_small_letter_short_ii, cyrillic_small_letter_short_i }
+   { cyrillic_small_letter_short_ii, cyrillic_small_letter_short_i },
+/* Turkish */
+   { Idotabove,  Iabovedot },
+   { dotlessi,   idotless }
 };
 
 const int syms_size = sizeof(syms) / sizeof(syms_entry);
@@ -1618,6 +1621,7 @@
 sym *charnames;
 int start;
 } charsets[] = {
+{ , NULL, 256 },
 { iso-8859-1,latin1_syms, 160 },
 { iso-8859-2,latin2_syms, 160 },
 #ifdef CHARSET_ISO_8859_3
@@ -1666,8 +1670,11 @@
return 0;
}
 
-   for (i = 0; i  sizeof(charsets)/sizeof(charsets[0]); i++) {
+   for (i = 1; i  sizeof(charsets)/sizeof(charsets[0]); i++) {
if (!strcasecmp(charsets[i].charset, charset)) {
+   charsets[0].charset = charsets[i].charset;
+   charsets[0].charnames = charsets[i].charnames;
+   charsets[0].start = charsets[i].start;
p = charsets[i].charnames;
for (i = charsets[i].start; i  256; i++,p++) {
if(p-name[0])


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#261140: d-i failure: i386/Compaq Deskpro 2000 5120

2004-07-23 Thread Joey Hess
R Seiji wrote:
 Machine: Compaq Deskpro 2000 5120
 Processor: 120MHz Pentium
 Memory: 32MB

Did you get a message about entering low memory mode the first thing
when the installer ran?

-- 
see shy jo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument

2004-07-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 19:03]:
 The line reads now:
 umount initrd 2/dev/null || true

Where's this from?

The code I look at is in packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S01mount

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261073: on serial console installs, file descriptor error

2004-07-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Recai Oktas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-24 00:42]:
 Could you try the patch attached?
 +# Silently exit on a serial console.
 +if [ $TERM_TYPE = serial ]; then

Doesn't work, $TERM_TYPE is not set.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument

2004-07-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-24 02:56]:
  The code I look at is in 
  packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S01mount
 packages/rootskel/src/sbin/init

Well, I still see the error with an image from today.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument

2004-07-23 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 * Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 19:03]:
  The line reads now:
  umount initrd 2/dev/null || true
 
 Where's this from?
 
 The code I look at is in 
 packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S01mount

packages/rootskel/src/sbin/init


Thiemo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261073: on serial console installs, file descriptor error

2004-07-23 Thread Recai Oktas
* Martin Michlmayr [2004-07-24 01:45:35+0100]
 * Recai Oktas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-24 00:42]:
  Could you try the patch attached?
  +# Silently exit on a serial console.
  +if [ $TERM_TYPE = serial ]; then
 
 Doesn't work, $TERM_TYPE is not set.

This is because TERM_TYPE is set in lib/debian-installer.d/S30term-linux
which comes after calling the etc/rcS.d/S55kbd-chooser.  Here is the
excerpt from debian-installer-startup:

for script in /lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S[0-9][0-9]* \
/etc/rcS.d/S[0-9][0-9]*; do
if [ -x $script ]; then
$script
elif [ -e $script ]; then
. $script
fi
done

Either we should install S30kbd-chooser to /lib/debian-installer.d/
(i.e. S31kbd-chooser) or we could completely move it to rootskel
package.  I think the former sounds more reasonable as for the package
maintainer convenience.

Regards,

-- 
roktas


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument

2004-07-23 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 * Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-24 02:56]:
   The code I look at is in 
   packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S01mount
  packages/rootskel/src/sbin/init
 
 Well, I still see the error with an image from today.

Apparently we talk about two different instances of those umount
messages. I've never seen the one you mean (but I haven't looked that
hard for it). This one should be there since we stopped to mount devfs
via kernel parameters. I think the umount call can be removed.


Thiemo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of base-config_2.38_i386.changes

2004-07-23 Thread Archive Administrator
base-config_2.38_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  base-config_2.38.dsc
  base-config_2.38.tar.gz
  base-config_2.38_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument

2004-07-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 03:38:00AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
  * Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-24 02:56]:
The code I look at is in 
packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S01mount
   packages/rootskel/src/sbin/init
  
  Well, I still see the error with an image from today.
 
 Apparently we talk about two different instances of those umount
 messages. I've never seen the one you mean (but I haven't looked that
 hard for it). This one should be there since we stopped to mount devfs
 via kernel parameters. I think the umount call can be removed.

Have all architectures stopped doing that? We should check debian-cd.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#260802: marked as done (base-config - cleas remove s390 telnet cleanup)

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2004 22:02:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260802: fixed in base-config 2.38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2004 09:44:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 22 02:44:21 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bna7g-0004dc-00; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 02:44:21 -0700
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 55DFB3C025; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:44:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:44:19 +0200
From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: base-config - cleas remove s390 telnet cleanup
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=KuLpqunXa7jZSBt+
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--KuLpqunXa7jZSBt+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: base-config
Version: 2.35
Severity: wishlist

please remove s390 telnet cleanup, it is unused.

Bastian

--=20
There is an order of things in this universe.
-- Apollo, Who Mourns for Adonais? stardate 3468.1

--KuLpqunXa7jZSBt+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkD/jHMACgkQnw66O/MvCNFQHQCfV8yK3T97r6XINblwHV0yjKoR
Xm0An3cI9IT2bNi1Wz4TxoBmgR0AEyzX
=o2tp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--KuLpqunXa7jZSBt+--

---
Received: (at 260802-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2004 02:08:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 23 19:08:44 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BoBxs-gw-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:08:44 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BoBrQ-0003wR-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 22:02:04 -0400
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#260802: fixed in base-config 2.38
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 22:02:04 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: base-config
Source-Version: 2.38

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
base-config, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

base-config_2.38.dsc
  to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.38.dsc
base-config_2.38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.38.tar.gz
base-config_2.38_all.deb
  to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.38_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated base-config package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 21:04:25 -0400
Source: base-config
Binary: base-config
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.38
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 base-config - Debian base system configurator
Closes: 260802

base-config_2.38_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
base-config_2.38.dsc
  to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.38.dsc
base-config_2.38.tar.gz
  to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.38.tar.gz
base-config_2.38_all.deb
  to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.38_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 260802 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#261140: d-i failure: i386/Compaq Deskpro 2000 5120

2004-07-23 Thread R Seiji
Yes, I did.
--
R. Seiji
www.arslist.info

 -Original Message-
 From: Joey Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joey Hess
 Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 6:43 PM
 To: R Seiji; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Bug#261140: d-i failure: i386/Compaq Deskpro 2000 5120
 
 R Seiji wrote:
  Machine: Compaq Deskpro 2000 5120
  Processor: 120MHz Pentium
  Memory: 32MB
 
 Did you get a message about entering low memory mode the first thing
 when the installer ran?
 
 --
 see shy jo



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of main-menu_0.072_powerpc.changes

2004-07-23 Thread Archive Administrator
main-menu_0.072_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  main-menu_0.072.dsc
  main-menu_0.072.tar.gz
  main-menu_0.072_powerpc.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   >