Bug#976632: obsession: Project dead from upstream
Le 06/12/2020 à 07:43, jim_p a écrit : Package: obsession Version: 20140608-2+b1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: pitsior...@gmail.com As it seems, the project is dead. The link to bitbucket leads to a 404. Plus its developer* has probably moved to github and obsession is not among the things he currently maintains. So, I think it is time to remove it from the repo. 6 years with no new versions are more than enough to justify that. Hi Jim, Yeah, I was discussing this problem on the mentors mailing list last month: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2020/11/msg00139.html I believe this software should no longer be packaged for debian. I was wondering if making a transitional package was the right thing to do. -- fabien
Bug#975594: RFS: capbattleship/1.0~alpha4-1 -- Sink your enemy before he gets you!
Le 24/11/2020 à 00:26, Paul Wise a écrit : On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:26 PM Fabien Givors wrote: capbattleship - Sink your enemy before he gets you! I would encourage you to use a more descriptive summary and also avoid non-inclusive language. I think the summary you used in the ITP was better for both of these suggestions. Oh, right, thanks. I should be more careful about that. I updated the short description, new version of the package should be there by now: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/capbattleship/capbattleship_1.0~alpha4-2.dsc -- captnfab
Bug#975594: RFS: capbattleship/1.0~alpha4-1 -- Sink your enemy before he gets you!
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear all, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "capbattleship": * Package name: capbattleship Version : 1.0~alpha4-1 Upstream Author : Fabien Givors * URL : https://capbattleship.tuxfamily.org/ * License : CC0-1.0, CC-BY-4.0, MIT * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/captnfab-guest/capbattleship Section : games I wish to maintain this package inside the Debian Games Team. It builds those binary packages: capbattleship - Sink your enemy before he gets you! To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/capbattleship/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/capbattleship/capbattleship_1.0~alpha4-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: capbattleship (1.0~alpha4-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Update to new upstream version 1.0~alpha4 * .desktop and icon now installed by upstream (via setup.py) Regards, -- captnfab
Bug#975570: ITP: capbattleship -- Sink your enemy! - A (pretty) pirate battleship board game.
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Fabien Givors X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, f+deb...@chezlefab.net * Package name: capbattleship Version : 1.0~alpha2 Upstream Author : Fabien Givors and Damien Monteillard * URL : https://capbattleship.tuxfamily.org/ * License : MIT (code) + CC-BY-4.0 (music) + CC0-1.0 (artworks) Programming Lang: Python3 + Pygame Description : Sink your enemy! - A (pretty) pirate battleship board game. Capbattleship is a pirate themed modern implementation of the classic turn-based battleship board-game, featuring amazing graphics and cool music. I beleive this package should be included in Debian because: - it's more graphical and accessible to children - there is an imersive pirate theme - it has very little dependencies I would like to maintain this package inside the Debian Games Team. I am looking for a sponsor.
Bug#974701: Crash: KeyError at launch
Package: whichwayisup Version: 0.7.9-7 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, This game doesn't run on my machine. Trying to run it from terminal gave me the following error: pygame 1.9.6 Hello from the pygame community. https://www.pygame.org/contribute.html Traceback (most recent call last): File "run_game.py", line 13, in main.main() File "/usr/share/games/whichwayisup/lib/main.py", line 105, in main end_trigger = game.run(screen, level_name, world.index, score, joystick) File "/usr/share/games/whichwayisup/lib/game.py", line 263, in run inputs = parse_inputs(joystick) File "/usr/share/games/whichwayisup/lib/game.py", line 173, in parse_inputs if keys_released["J_A1U"]: KeyError: 'J_A1U' * What led up to the situation? I installed whichwayisup and tried to run whichwayisup from the shell. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_USER, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.utf8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages whichwayisup depends on: ii fonts-dejavu-core 2.37-2 ii python33.8.6-1 ii python3-pygame 1.9.6+dfsg-4 whichwayisup recommends no packages. whichwayisup suggests no packages. -- no debconf information Many thanks to you, Have a good day! -- Fabien Givors
Bug#906804: reprepro: Homepage URL is invalid
Package: reprepro Version: 5.1.1-1 Severity: minor Dear maintainer, According to the control file, the homepage url is http://mirrorer.alioth.debian.org/ However, this page doesn't exist anymore, and I don't know where/if it has moved. BTW, this broken link can be found here: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/SetupWithReprepro (and in many other places all arround the internet) Cheers, -- fabien
Bug#719888: developers-reference: Says next stable release will be called wheezy
Hi, I updated the patch (for commit ce9016122bb6c67aa8407ec2e0b27ee40137819c) so it doesn't change the phrasing but fixes the bug. This way is more consistent with what propose bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646235 which I think makes sense. Thanks, -- fabien diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 9ac5681..fc1dde8 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-xsl (= 1.71.0), dblatex (= 0.2), xsltproc, libxml texlive-lang-cyrillic, texlive-lang-french, texlive-lang-german, texlive-xetex, xmlto, zip Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8), dpkg-dev (= 1.16.1~) -Vcs-Git: git://anonscn.debian.org/collab-maint/developers-reference.git +Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/developers-reference.git Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/developers-reference.git Package: developers-reference diff --git a/resources.dbk b/resources.dbk index d8bd056..2751b46 100644 --- a/resources.dbk +++ b/resources.dbk @@ -764,8 +764,8 @@ Debian 1.3, literalbo/literal; Debian 2.0, literalhamm/literal; Debian 2.1, literalslink/literal; Debian 2.2, literalpotato/literal; Debian 3.0, literalwoody/literal; Debian 3.1, literalsarge/literal; Debian 4.0, literaletch/literal; Debian 5.0, literallenny/literal; -Debian 6.0, literalsqueeze/literal -and the next release will be called literalwheezy/literal. +Debian 6.0, literalsqueeze/literal; Debian 7.0, literalwheezy/literal; +and the next release will be called literaljessie/literal. There is also a ``pseudo-distribution'', called literalsid/literal, which is the current literalunstable/literal distribution; since packages are moved from literalunstable/literal to
Bug#607644: #607644 - couldn't upload .JPG, only .jpg
Package: iceweasel Version: 30.0-2 Dear Maintainer, Uploading of .JPG pictures works just fine. Since the bug report 3.5 years ago, no more information on the bug was provided. The extend depict… syntax appears to be a flash uploader (hence site-specific) problem [1]. The initial website does not exist anymore (it moved on a .net domain name and probably changed it's api since then). I believe this bug can safely be closed. [1] http://www.newxing.com/SA8544B51440/misc_swfupload.php Regards, -- fabien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#558828: iceweasel: impossible to close print preview when a new tab is opened
Package: iceweasel Version: 30.0-2 Dear Maintainer, I can't reproduce this bug in the current Jessie version. The Close button now remains visible when a new tab is opened while doing a print preview. I believe this bug has been fixed and can now safely be closed. Regards, -- fabien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#535917: iceweasel: File filter for save as dialog doesn't always work
Package: iceweasel Version: 30.0-2 Dear Maintainer, I tried to reproduce the bug using the above mentioned procedure. I experienced the correct behavior, that is, .html files were listed. I think either there was a bug in FireFox and it has been fixed upstream, of the bug was site-specific, like a missing HTTP header : Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=myfile.ext and is no longer relevant on delicious.com. Since in both cases I see no reason to incriminate iceweasel anymore, I suggest to close this bug. Regards, -- fabien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#514359: iceweasel: Downloading twice a file changes its second extension
Package: iceweasel Version: 30.0-2 Dear Maintainer, Good news again, it appears this bug has been fixed in a previous version. When trying, with current Jessie's version, to download a .tar.gz file, like: http://chezlefab.net/share/bugrep/victory.tar.gz On first try, a victory.tar.gz is created. On second try, a victory(1).tar.gz is created. I hence recommend to close this bug. Regards, -- fabien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#488691: Too many parallel open cookie dialogs
found 488691 30.0-2 thanks Package: iceweasel Version: 30.0-2 Dear Maintainer, This bug is still present in recent Iceweasel versions. However, it's not very intuitive to reproduce. Here is what I did to reproduce the unwanted behavior (don't do that unless you're very patient since closing all the boxes is quite painfull): - create a fresh Firefox Profile - go to the Menu/Preferences dialog - go to the Privacy pannel - in the History group, select Sue custom settings for history - change the Keep until select-box to ask me every time - go to http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/1286808/Storm-Nugache-lead-dangerous-new-botnet-barrage - you'll have a first dialog box. Chose Deny. - go on until about 7 dialog boxes show up. - if you want to get rid of all of these boxes, you'll have to close them in a correct order, and you should check always do that for this domain/website since otherwise they'll keep reappearing (maybe thanks to some Ajax magic?) Happy dialog boxes closing party, -- fabien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#741980: closed by Jo Shields direct...@apebox.org (Bug#741980: fixed in libgdiplus 2.11+git20131008.9732566-5)
Dear Maintainer, The new version indeed fixed the problem. Many thanks! Cheers, -- fabien signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#741100: valac-0.22: GLib handling uses deprecated functions
Package: valac-0.22
Version: 0.22.1-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
While building the enclosed xdg-autostart.vala file, I noticed some
warnings issued by the C compiler and pointing out the use of deprecated
function:
xdg-autostart.vala.c: In function 'main':
xdg-autostart.vala.c:704:2: warning:
'g_type_init' is deprecated (declared at
/usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gtype.h:669) [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
g_type_init ();
^
Or incompatible pointer casts:
xdg-autostart.vala.c: In function ‘autostart_xdg_autostart’:
xdg-autostart.vala.c:632:18: warning: assignment from incompatible
pointer type [enabled by default]
_tmp4_ = _tmp3_ = g_get_system_config_dirs ();
^
xdg-autostart.vala.c:668:3: warning: passing argument 2 of
‘g_hash_table_foreach’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
g_hash_table_foreach (_tmp13_, _autostart_launch_file_gh_func, NULL);
^
I assume these warnings are caused by the the compilation of GLib vala
code into outdated GLib C code.
Best wishes,
Fabien
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages valac-0.22 depends on:
ii libc62.17-97
ii libglib2.0-0 2.38.2-5
ii libglib2.0-dev 2.38.2-5
ii libvala-0.22-0 0.22.1-2
ii valac-0.22-vapi 0.22.1-2
valac-0.22 recommends no packages.
valac-0.22 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
// valac xdg-autostart.vala --disable-assert -Xcc -march=generic -Os
/*
* xdg-autostart
* Copyright (c) 2011-2013 Fabrice THIROUX fabrice.thir...@free.fr.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published
* by the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or any
* later version. See http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lgpl.html the full text
* of the license.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston,
* MA 02110-1301, USA.
*/
class Autostart
{
static string desktop;
static void
launch_file (string key, string filename) {
string[] show_list;
string? exec;
bool found;
KeyFile kf = new KeyFile();
try {
if (kf.load_from_file (filename, KeyFileFlags.NONE)) {
try {
message (Processing %s file., filename);
/* Hidden desktop file don't have to be launched */
if (kf.get_boolean (Desktop Entry, Hidden))
{
message (Hidden attribute set, aborting.);
return;
}
}
catch (KeyFileError e) {}
try {
/* Check if the desktop file is launched in current desktop environment */
if (kf.has_key (Desktop Entry, OnlyShowIn)) {
show_list = kf.get_string_list (Desktop Entry, OnlyShowIn);
found = false;
foreach (string de in show_list) {
if (de == desktop) {
found = true;
break;
}
}
/* Current desktop is not found in the OnlyShowIn list */
if (found == false)
{
message (Not found in OnlyShowIn list, aborting.);
return;
}
}
/* Check if the desktop file is not launched in current desktop environment */
else if (kf.has_key (Desktop Entry, NotShowIn)) {
show_list = kf.get_string_list (Desktop Entry, NotShowIn);
foreach (string de in show_list) {
if (de == desktop) {
message (Found in NotShowIn list, aborting.);
return;
}
}
}
/* Lookup for TryExec file and check if it's found in path */
if (kf.has_key (Desktop Entry, TryExec)) {
exec = kf.get_string (Desktop Entry, TryExec);
if (exec != null) {
if (Environment.find_program_in_path (exec) == null) {
message (Can't find %s from TryExec key, aborting., exec);
return; // Exec is not found in path = exit
}
}
}
/* Find the command line to launch and launch it */
exec = kf.get_string (Desktop Entry, Exec);
try {
Process.spawn_command_line_async (exec);
message (Launching: %s (%s), exec, key);
}
catch (SpawnError e) {
warning (Error: %s\n, e.message);
}
}
catch (KeyFileError e) {
warning (KeyFileError: %s\n, e.message);
}
}
}
catch (FileError e) {
warning (Error: %s\n, e.message);
}
}
static void get_files_in_dir (HashTablestring, string table,
Bug#738920: RFS: obsession/20130822-1 [ITP] -- Session management helpers for lightweight desktop environments
Hi Eriberto, hi mentors, d/changelog: the initial realease is your first work in the package. So, d/changelog must have only 'Initial release (Closes: #731278)'. done. d/copyright: I suggest you put all licenses grouped at the end of the file. This will provide a better organization. done. d/docs: remove AUTHORS. The authors must be put in d/copyright only. done. My only definitive modifications were the creation of manpages. Since I forwarded them to upstream, I now add them with a patch. So, I removed the README.source d/rules: remove the unecessary comments, as '# -*- makefile -*-', '# Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.' and '# This has to be exported to make some magic below work.'. I kept the emacs-line and removed the other comments. I also suggest you add '--parallel' to 'dh $@'. done. - two 'I' about hardening-no-fortify-functions. I admit I haven't tried to solve this one, but I'm sure tho CPPFLAGS are given to the C++ compiler. So I assumed it was a false-positive. This is the problem. :-) Generally, has a solution. Please, try here: https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening I made sure that the CPPFLAGS are given to the C and the C++ compilers, but the warning remains. Maybe a clue: the binaries produced are not PIE (but they have 'fortify source functions'). Thanks to recent emails on d-mentors (thx ekasper for asking and bmarc for answering), I learned that I could host a personal git repository thanks to my alioth account. So that's what I did, so I also started using git-buildpackage, and I added the Vcs-Git field in the control file. The up-to-date version of the package is here: https://mentors.debian.net/package/obsession If anyone has more comments, please tell me. Cheers, Fabien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#738920: RFS: obsession/20130822-1 [ITP] -- Session management helpers for lightweight desktop environments
Hi Eriberto, On 16/02/2014 13:24, Eriberto wrote: I checked your package. Note that I want help you improve your package but I can upload it. And that's much appreciated. My considerations: d/changelog: the initial realease is your first work in the package. So, d/changelog must have only 'Initial release (Closes: #731278)'. Ok, I suppose the changes I was mentioning in the changelog are to be put in the README.source. d/copyright: I suggest you put all licenses grouped at the end of the file. This will provide a better organization. Thank you, I wasn't even hoping such a thing could be DEP-5 compliant, but it is mentioned in section Stand-alone License Paragraph (Optional, Repeatable) I'm so unused to good standards… d/docs: remove AUTHORS. The authors must be put in d/copyright only. Ok. d/patches: replicate d/changelog parts in patches headers is unusual. Please, fix this. Ok (that's dpkg-source --commit works, I assumed it was good practice since the patches are related to the content of the changelog). But it indeed doesn't make much sense since there are other fields to add details into the patch. d/patches/copyright: is unusual fix the copyright notices in upstream code. I suggest to remove it. Ok. Anyway, the patch has been forwarded upstream, who told me he'll try to apply it ASAP. d/README.source: must be used to list modifications that you made, definitely, in the upstream source code. So that doesn't include patches or does it? d/rules: remove the unecessary comments, as '# -*- makefile -*-', '# Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.' and '# This has to be exported to make some magic below work.'. I also suggest you add '--parallel' to 'dh $@'. Ok. Building, I can see some lintian warnings. Please, see http://eriberto.pro.br/blog/?p=1289 I've seen the remaining I and P issues (I'm always running lintian on both the source and the binary with options --pedantic --show-overrides --display-info --display-experimental --color auto -i): - one P about upstream changelog missing. I could try to dump git log« of his repository, but would that make the package better? - one P about sources not being gpg-checkable. I'm afraid I can't do much here. Except maybe asking upstream to sign his tarballs… Wouldn't that be a bit pedantic for a project hosted by bitbucket? - two I about hardening-no-fortify-functions. I admit I haven't tried to solve this one, but I'm sure tho CPPFLAGS are given to the C++ compiler. So I assumed it was a false-positive. I hope this help. It does. :) I'll upload a new version as soon as I'll have taken those remarks into account. Regards, -- captnfab -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#731278: ITP: obsession 2013-08-22
Hi, Since melodie (the owner of the ITP) is a bit busy, she asked me if I could take care of the packaging. Here it is, lintian-clean and ready to be reviewed: - Mentors page: https://mentors.debian.net/package/obsession - DSC: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/obsession/obsession_20130822-1.dsc As far as I understood, we might already have a sponsor for this package (mati75.) Thanks in advance for your help. -- Fabien (captnfab) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#731278: ITP: obsession 2013-08-22
On 13/02/2014 21:59, Fabien Givors (Debian) wrote: Hi, Since melodie (the owner of the ITP) is a bit busy, she asked me if I could take care of the packaging. Here it is, lintian-clean and ready to be reviewed: - Mentors page: https://mentors.debian.net/package/obsession - DSC: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/obsession/obsession_20130822-1.dsc As far as I understood, we might already have a sponsor for this package (mati75.) Ah, it looks like I got it wrong. Sorry mati75, I thought you were a DD. So I *am* looking for a sponsor (and willing to adopt the package) :) Thanks in advance for your help. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#738920: RFS: obsession/20130822-1 ITP:#731278
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package obsession * Package name: obsession Version : 20130822-1 Upstream Author : Fabrice Thiroux * URL : https://bitbucket.org/fabriceT/obsession/overview * License : GPL3 (code), LGPL3 (graphics), GPL2+ (package) Section : x11 It builds this binary package: obsession - Session management helpers for light desktop environments To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/obsession Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/obsession/obsession_20130822-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #731278) * Adding menu file * Patches fixing Makefile Regards, Fabien Givors (captnfab) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#728238: installation-reports: popcon's caption displayed in mandb configuration (expert install)
Package: installation-reports Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, I downloaded Wheezy 7.2 CD1-Xfce4 and installed it. During the man-db configuration, when the installer asks if man-db should be installed setuid, the title is wrong. Instead of describing the operation, it repeats popcon configuration window's title. See the attached screenshot. Thank you, -- captnfab -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: Wheezy 7.2 CD1-Xfce Date: 2013-10-29 Machine: VirtualBox -- == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=7 (wheezy) - installer build 20130613+deb7u1 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.2 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash attachment: test-wheezy-man-db.png signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#727680: “Yes, do as I say!“ sounds odd
I'm sure you have, as an apt dev, a better understanding than me of these problems so, now that I've reported my thoughts, I'll stop arguing and trust your decision :) No no no no no. Put that idea back into the trash bin there it belongs. Use a baseball bat if you have to, to keep it from popping up again! ;) Ok ok ok ok ok, will do :) Then using the I'll do everything I can without checking anything --force-yes option looks to me like we don't support removing essential packages anymore. Ah, now I see where are you coming from. My take is: Removing an essential package is in the same category as 'rm -rf /'. Very few people will ever need it for what it does, but many people (in comparison) will execute it by accident. rm invented the --preserve-root flag, APT has this silly question (and a flag) and starts to bug you to install this package again e.g. on dist-upgrade. I feel like this is in line with what the debian policy says: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s3.8 Thank you for recalling the Policy and explaining how the unfortunate essential flag on sysvinit led me to this situation. Now I understand your position better. Indeed Essential is more critical than I thought, and the --force-yes option makes more sense in this context, the operation being crossing the border. Thanks for taking your time to explain that, much appreciated. Best regards, -- captnfab -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#727680: “Yes, do as I say!“ sounds odd
David Kalnischkies wrote: Stepping back for a second and freeing myself from the consequences: How about dropping this question altogether? We have a flag which is (supposed to be) able to skip this question: --force-yes which is described as being potentially harmful in the manpage. Rational: Users who run into this question by 'accident' aren't saying yes to it; Users who know they will because they are changing e.g. the init system are just annoyed by the question. So how about: […] 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 5 to remove and 0 not upgraded. After this operation, 5509 kB disk space will be freed. WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed: apt The outlined actions are potentially very harmful, so executing them is refused by default, but can be forced with the --force-yes flag. This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing! # (I am open for a better suggestion regarding the actual message) It would be an interface change, but those aren't a problem, people depending on the old one could just keep using the old version. SCNR. What I really mean is: In this particular case, I really hope nobody is doing something as insane as depending on this. [0] What do you two think? I'm rather against that. --force-all does't only force removal of essential packages, but also AFAIK installation from untrusted sources, etc. More generally, I think that options like --force-all shouls /never/ be recommanded as good practices. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) That's why I'm more in favor of Yes, I do understand this can be harmful. Best regards, -- fabien givors -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#727680: “Yes, do as I say!“ sounds odd
On 27/10/2013 18:54, David Kalnischkies wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Fabien Givors (Debian) f+deb...@chezlefab.net wrote: I'm rather against that. --force-all does't only force removal of essential packages, but also AFAIK installation from untrusted sources, etc. More generally, I think that options like --force-all shouls /never/ be recommanded as good practices. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) I agree, but I don't see how removing essentials could be interpreted as good practice Well, replacing the (essential) init with a non-supported one looks to me like an operation that should be well supported by the package manager. The fact that everything may break after is not the responsibility on APT/DPKG anymore (and that's' to my understanding, the non-supported part.) Then using the I'll do everything I can without checking anything --force-yes option looks to me like we don't support removing essential packages anymore. But that's where I may be wrong. Maybe we don't support the removal of essential packages. Or maybe the --force-yes option can't add more danger than the validation of the failsafe. I'm sure you have, as an apt dev, a better understanding than me of these problems so, now that I've reported my thoughts, I'll stop arguing and trust your decision :) Thank you for your work, Regards, -- captnfab 0x5E2B115E.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#690985: installation-report: expert graphical install: wrong caption during grub install
Dear maintainer,
This bug used to happen during expert {graphical,non-graphical} French
install at the time of the report. It does not anymore.
However, the same bug now happen (with Debian 7.2), during expert
{graphical,non-graphical} {French,*US*} install, on the 'setuid man'
window, where the title is now the popcon's one.
I wonder if it's a new bug or if it's the same one that shifted (or if
this bug was already there and I missed it).
I'd like to underline that it happens both in the en_us and in the fr_fr
cases (not tried any other).
On my first report I had not performed any test on the US version,
unfortunately.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
--
captnfab
0x5E2B115E.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Bug#727680: apt: [l10n-fr] Confirmation sentence for replacing essential packages contains unidentifiable character
Package: apt Version: 0.9.12.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch l10n Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? I tried to remove an essential package (namely sysvinit) for testing purposes (of upstart) with the following command: apt-get install upstart which asked me to type the following sentence to confirm the operation: Pour continuer, tapez la phrase « Oui, faites ce que je vous dis ! » (where the space before ! is an unbreakable space) * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I entered Oui, faites ce que je vous dis ! (where the space is a normal space) * What was the outcome of this action? Confirmation sentence was refused. * What outcome did you expect instead? Confirmation sentence is accepted. I suggest one of the following solution: - remove the unbreakable space diff fr.po fr-new.po 660c660 msgstr Oui, faites ce que je vous dis ! --- msgstr Oui, faites ce que je vous dis! - replace it with a normal space diff fr.po fr-new2.po 660c660 msgstr Oui, faites ce que je vous dis ! --- msgstr Oui, faites ce que je vous dis ! The unbreakable space is typographically the right char, but few normal people are used to type it (or even know it's existence.) Using a normal space could disturb people used to do the right thing and type the unbreakable space. Removing the space is a workaround generally accepted when there is no available unbreakable space. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages apt depends on: ii debian-archive-keyring 2012.4 ii gnupg 1.4.15-1.1 ii libapt-pkg4.12 0.9.12.1 ii libc6 2.17-93 ii libgcc1 1:4.8.2-1 ii libstdc++6 4.8.2-1 apt recommends no packages. Versions of packages apt suggests: pn apt-doc none ii aptitude0.6.8.2-1.2 ii dpkg-dev1.17.1 ii python-apt 0.9.1 ii xz-utils5.1.1alpha+20120614-2 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#602463: Update on the packaging
Hi, A reminder to myself and anyone who wishes to help with the packaging of lib clanlib2: I updated clanlib2 package for the last stable (2.x) release. The clanlib team is now working on a 3.x rewrite of the lib which is still in a beta stage this means that there shouldn't be any abi breakage anymore for the 2.x version :) and that the 2.3.7 version has been long tested. There are still some problems to fix - one of them being dealing with non-mmx2 arch, on whom the lib won't build (I still don't know how to deal with that - there is the question of the C++ symbols: it's such a mess, is it really a good idea to imbed the .symbols file? And finally, the soname problem,we currently use a lintian override, but I think we should rename the libs to remove caps and rewrite the version numbers in a standard way - there are other details that I should take care of next week… Feel free to discuss this with me (captnfab on #debian-games @ OFTC) Bye, -- fabien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#719888: developers-reference: Says next stable release will be called wheezy
Le 17/08/2013 08:40, Charles Plessy a écrit : would you like to convert your suggestion into a patch ? You can download the source of the Developers reference with apt-get source developers-reference or debcheckout developers-reference. Hi Charles, Ok, you'll find the patch (for svn revision r10224) enclosed to this message. I changed my previous suggestion to: At the time of writing, this documentation is aimed to be part of literaljessie/literal which will be Debian 8.0 once released. which I think is a bit more elegant. I'm not familiar with providing patch for documentation and didn't know if I had to do the make pot myself, so I didn't. Have a nice week-end, Thanks, you too, -- fabien givors Index: resources.dbk === --- resources.dbk (révision 10224) +++ resources.dbk (copie de travail) @@ -764,8 +764,10 @@ Debian 2.1, literalslink/literal; Debian 2.2, literalpotato/literal; Debian 3.0, literalwoody/literal; Debian 3.1, literalsarge/literal; Debian 4.0, literaletch/literal; Debian 5.0, literallenny/literal; -Debian 6.0, literalsqueeze/literal -and the next release will be called literalwheezy/literal. +Debian 6.0, literalsqueeze/literal and Debian 7.0, +literalwheezy/literal. At the time of writing, this documentation is aimed +to be part of literaljessie/literal which will be Debian 8.0 once +released. There is also a ``pseudo-distribution'', called literalsid/literal, which is the current literalunstable/literal distribution; since packages are moved from literalunstable/literal to
Bug#678134: nautilus: Cannot open directory with JP2 files
Dear Maintainer, According to [1], this bug is fixed in later releases. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690764 However, I was able to reproduce the segmentation fault with nautilus 3.8 from experimental. Looking closer at the trace from the segfault, I noticed the function causing the failure was part of libjasper.so.1 from package libjasper1. It appears there is already a bug report [2] concerning this problem. [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617818 Hence I suggest to close this bug marking it as duplicate of #617818. Thanks, -- fabien givors -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678134: nautilus: Cannot open directory with JP2 files
Package: nautilus Version: 3.4.2-1+build1 Followup-For: Bug #678134 Dear Maintainer, I installed a brand new wheezy yesterday. And run on this bug while browsing in my documents. Il appears that this bug has not been fixed in version 3.4.2-1+build1. Instead of displaying a list of the folder elements, including a thumbnail of the .jp2 file and the picture properties, nautilus segfaults. Here is the faulty .jp2 [1]. I got the same behavior with Mathieu's .jp2 [2] Thanks, [1] http://chezlefab.net/poubelle/bugrep/271212_nautilus_segfault_on_thumb.jp2 [2] ftp://ftp.microimages.com/pub/tnt/data/jp2/NEBMOSAI.jp2 -- fabien -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages nautilus depends on: ii desktop-file-utils 0.20-0.1 ii gsettings-desktop-schemas 3.4.2-3 ii gvfs 1.12.3-1+b1 ii libatk1.0-02.4.0-2 ii libc6 2.13-37 ii libcairo-gobject2 1.12.2-2 ii libcairo2 1.12.2-2 ii libexempi3 2.2.0-1 ii libexif12 0.6.20-3 ii libgail-3-03.4.2-4 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.1-1 ii libglib2.0-0 2.33.12+really2.32.4-3 ii libglib2.0-data2.33.12+really2.32.4-3 ii libgnome-desktop-3-2 3.4.2-1 ii libgtk-3-0 3.4.2-4 ii libnautilus-extension1a3.4.2-1+build1 ii libnotify4 0.7.5-1 ii libpango1.0-0 1.30.0-1 ii libselinux12.1.9-5 ii libtracker-sparql-0.14-0 0.14.1-3 ii libx11-6 2:1.5.0-1 ii libxml22.8.0+dfsg1-7 ii nautilus-data 3.4.2-1+build1 ii shared-mime-info 1.0-1+b1 Versions of packages nautilus recommends: ii brasero 3.4.1-4 ii eject2.1.5+deb1+cvs20081104-12 ii gnome-sushi 0.4.1-3 ii gvfs-backends1.12.3-1+b1 ii librsvg2-common 2.36.1-1 Versions of packages nautilus suggests: ii eog 3.4.2-1+build1 ii evince [pdf-viewer] 3.4.0-3.1 ii totem3.0.1-8 ii tracker 0.14.1-3 ii xdg-user-dirs0.14-1 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690985: installation-report: expert graphical install: wrong caption during grub install
Package: installation-reports Version: 2.47 Severity: minor Tags: d-i Dear Maintainers, During the process of a graphical expert install, if I follow the steps one by one up to the boot loader install. I chose grub installation and then in the next window (asking me if I want to install grub on the firstvsector of my disk), the title is wrong (see capture [1], in French). It shoud say something like Grub2 installation but instead it shows man-db configuration. If, once the installation of grub2 achieved, I choose to redo this step specifically, then the caption is correct. It's a very minor bug, but still... Also, it's not impossible that it was already there for squeeze (and maybe even before that) Thanks for your good work, [1] http://chezlefab.net/poubelle/8ebf362d6e681e53166e/grub-installer_only_debian_0.png -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: debian-wheezy-DI-b3-amd64-CD-1.iso Date: 2012-10-19 20:00 UTC+0200 Machine: VirtualBox 4.1.18-dfsg-1.1/amd64 Partitions: sda1 / ext4 3.8 GB, sda2 swap 258 MB Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[E] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: See the above comment. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20120930+b1 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux wheezy 3.2.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 02:45:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 440FX - 82441FX PMC [Natoma] [8086:1237] (rev 02) lspci -knn: 00:01.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] [8086:7000] lspci -knn: 00:01.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE [8086:7111] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ata_piix lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH VirtualBox Graphics Adapter [80ee:beef] lspci -knn: 00:03.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller [8086:100e] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:001e] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: e1000 lspci -knn: 00:04.0 System peripheral [0880]: InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH VirtualBox Guest Service [80ee:cafe] lspci -knn: 00:05.0 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Intel Corporation 82801AA AC'97 Audio Controller [8086:2415] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: snd_intel8x0 lspci -knn: 00:06.0 USB controller [0c03]: Apple Inc. KeyLargo/Intrepid USB [106b:003f] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:07.0 Bridge [0680]: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI [8086:7113] (rev 08) lspci -knn: 00:0d.0 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation 82801HM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [8086:2829] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ahci usb-list: usb-list: Bus 01 Device 01: OHCI Host Controller [1d6b:0001] usb-list:Level 00 Parent 00 Port 00 Class 09(hub ) Subclass 00 Protocol 00 usb-list:Manufacturer: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 ohci_hcd usb-list:Interface 00: Class 09(hub ) Subclass 00 Protocol 00 Driver hub usb-list: usb-list: Bus 01 Device 02: USB Tablet [80ee:0021] usb-list:Level 01 Parent 01 Port 00 Class 00(ifc ) Subclass 00 Protocol 00 usb-list:Manufacturer: VirtualBox usb-list:Interface 00: Class 03(HID ) Subclass 00 Protocol 00 Driver usbhid lsmod: Module Size Used by lsmod: fuse 61981 0 lsmod: hfsplus71571 0 lsmod: hfs45877 0 lsmod: minix 27580 0 lsmod: msdos 17077 0 lsmod: ufs58774 0 lsmod: qnx4 13184 0 lsmod: ntfs 163839 0 lsmod: reiserfs 192077 0 lsmod: battery13109 0 lsmod: power_supply 13475 1 battery lsmod: efivars17780 0 lsmod: dm_mod 63545 0 lsmod: md_mod 87742 0 lsmod: xfs 594991 0 lsmod: jfs
Bug#690541: get-flash-videos: Fails to download youtube videos.
Package: get-flash-videos Version: 1.25~git2012.06.27-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, Downloading youtube videos with get-flash-videos seems to be broken. Here is what happens (whichever video I try to download): $ get_flash_videos http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d_tfF3EQVA; Using method 'youtube' for http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d_tfF3EQVA Downloading http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d_tfF3EQVA Downloading http://o-o---preferred---sn-5hn7sner---v12---lscache4.c.youtube.com/videoplayback?upn=6p0d7DhZ68wsparams=algorithm%2Cburst%2Ccp%2Cfactor%2Cid%2Cip%2Cipbits%2Citag%2Csource%2Cupn%2Cexpirefexp=927104%2C922401%2C920704%2C912806%2C927201%2C913546%2C913556%2C925109%2C919003%2C920201%2C912706%2C900816%2C92expire=1350319049algorithm=throttle-factorburst=40ip=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXXitag=35sver=3key=yt1mt=1350297856mv=msource=youtubems=auipbits=8factor=1.25cp=U0hURVNMV19JU0NONF9LRkFBOk5TNk91UkZmZHA3id=fddfed7c5dc44150... Couldn't download http://o-o---preferred---sn-5hn7sner---v12---lscache4.c.youtube.com/videoplayback?upn=6p0d7DhZ68wsparams=algorithm%2Cburst%2Ccp%2Cfactor%2Cid%2Cip%2Cipbits%2Citag%2Csource%2Cupn%2Cexpirefexp=927104%2C922401%2C920704%2C912806%2C927201%2C913546%2C913556%2C925109%2C919003%2C920201%2C912706%2C900816%2C92expire=1350319049algorithm=throttle-factorburst=40ip=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXXitag=35sver=3key=yt1mt=1350297856mv=msource=youtubems=auipbits=8factor=1.25cp=U0hURVNMV19JU0NONF9LRkFBOk5TNk91UkZmZHA3id=fddfed7c5dc44150: 403 Forbidden Couldn't download any videos. (where XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX is my IP) Also, since there is no way we can assume youtube won't change its API for two years, I'm not sure this package should go to stable. Maybe it should go into some versatile branch or in the backports one? -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages get-flash-videos depends on: ii libcrypt-blowfish-perl 2.12-1+b2 ii libdata-amf-perl0.09-3 ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.69-2 ii libhtml-tree-perl 5.02-1 ii libtie-ixhash-perl 1.21-2 ii liburi-perl 1.60-1 ii libwww-mechanize-perl 1.71-1 ii libwww-perl 6.04-1 ii perl5.14.2-14 ii rtmpdump2.4+20111222.git4e06e21-1 Versions of packages get-flash-videos recommends: ii get-iplayer 2.82-2 ii libcrypt-rijndael-perl 1.11-1 ii liblwp-protocol-socks-perl 1.6-1 ii libxml-simple-perl 2.20-1 Versions of packages get-flash-videos suggests: ii mplayer 3:1.1-dmo7 ii mplayer2 [mplayer] 1:2.0~git20120817-dmo1 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633769: python-gtk2: crashes as soon as a call to set_events is done
Hi,
Apparently, this is not a bug.
- It's not specific to this package since it can be reproduced with the
following C code:
---
#include gtk/gtk.h
#include gdk/gdk.h
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
gtk_init(argc, argv);
GdkWindow* rootwin = gdk_get_default_root_window();
gdk_window_set_events(rootwin, GDK_BUTTON_PRESS_MASK);
gtk_main();
return 0;
}
---
gcc -o test script.c -g $(pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0 --cflags)
./test
The program 'test' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied)'.
(Details: serial 111 error_code 10 request_code 2 minor_code 0)
(Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)
- This happens when the event we try to grab is already listened by a
program (here, the window manager).
The following raises no problem:
Xephyr :3
DISPLAY=:3 ./test
But the bug is reproduced with
Xephyr :3
DISPLAY=:3 awesome
DISPLAY=:3 ./test
Where test is either the compiled C program or the following python code:
---
#!/usr/bin/env python
import gtk
rootwin = gtk.gdk.get_default_root_window()
rootwin.set_events(gtk.gdk.BUTTON_PRESS_MASK)
gtk.main()
---
Maybe this bug should be marked as done since it appears to be normal
behaviour for gtk2 [1].
[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.lib.gtk%2B.devel.apps/5895
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#676627: More information
Apparently, the bug is known upstream [1] A workaround is to create a config file with the commande : touch ~/.ncmpcpp/config [1] http://musicpd.org/mantis/view.php?id=3490 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#602463: Still interested in packaging clanlib2?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andreas, Yes, I opened bug #602463 some time ago... I did most of the packaging. Unfortunately, I couldn't get rid of some lintian warnings. So, the package is not perfect. I can give you the product of my work if you want. It worked quite well. After seeking for a sponsor and trying to contact the maintainers of clanlib-1.0 package, I realized that the good way to do was to contact the Debian Games Team. Unfortunately, at the same time, my spare time amount began to decrease dramatically :) And I was not able to pursue my task. Currently, last clanlib version is 2.3.5 [1], and the API does not seem to have changed a lot [2]. So, the question is, should we package the last stable 2.2 version, or the last released version? I hope we will be able to work together, - -- captnfab [1] http://clanlib.org/wiki/Main_Page [2] http://clanlib.org/wiki/BreakingChanges -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPUqBjAAoJEML91QheKxFehf8QALXTRU3Z3zzCUcIhgfXzBqyU GFI3frOqm+xUiBgtMv3IQ/axiQmi5EUZcKW0pb5mv1xahPrirKZWiSNh+xfw1Ly4 +giWbCxg70DTtB+kQme68q6LJAjOnXicTNeO/jFJA8IAkWJa1YIBtZra6FsTVeiY sqmNj9Tr+jq9qXhQgoK93tEE3f/GEQ72iRL5fb+ggUvP8gAEUdxJBrUXRR8+Btaf lWmsAP3tI5ZtDj3BYISuuzk+Vc6BmK2h8/cY9imLAFWQi29ZUpmwlfs3l2uDRYFS PFemwYQFi3IfT2bAniLyarsA03l2RoGvL01x1kG/tL2AajlykNwlvZCG77r7zbEo 9BW4vkuHOLpYZbi+uZHsqKrl3OUlGAmDBpdSIxzN5yeIERH23naeCrAR5ZPMd3qc JZe3lOj6ptB/rJc6jOHbDvx41Jb4Oy98j6atMHuWY5mHQQRbdu7Sdl8+8GE1QF56 eH/R2/HPy47OnlA8q3zFdz792alB3UYtETjtbbarrXJZuof4mkMwx5KKo6imm6KF dhKlJzpOZo27g4vkx0OOweLDGx11G60ztiH7Gfoy0td5KI2X0vRHuNcnV9h9G3ai VKi/b98UpS7+C/MuVBoRaFLCHykrydxvhqIxFg1/7GGXrH8/IP4O/qWITAOE+UJf MjqxATJdZnoZ78NBvQ8n =wCyP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
