Bug#404829: RM: zope-cps -- RoM; unmaintained upstream, not compatible with the current zope2.9 package
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, please remove zope-cps from debian: it is unmaintained upstream, as Nuxeo is switching from Zope to Java, and it is not compatible with the current zope2.9 package in testing/unstable. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#404833: RM: zope-cpsskins -- RoM; support package for zope-cps, which is being removed
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, please remove zope-cpsskins from debian: it is a support package for zope-cps which is being removed from debian. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#404355: python-psycopg: Python 2.5 support missing
Hi Christian, * 2006-12-23 23:12, Christian Joergensen wrote: Package: python-psycopg Version: 1.1.21-13 Severity: wishlist Hello It seems as if there is no support for python 2.5 in this package: Uhm, you are right: python-psycopg misses the 2.5 support, but I do not understand if this should be fixed in etch or just in etch+1. Running pyversions does not provide python2.5 with any of the command line switches. Cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED], so somebody with a better knowledge of the python policy could help me to understand if I need to fix something in my package in order to provide a python2.5-compatible package. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#404601: websvn: Missing alternate dependency on libapache2-mod-php5
Package: websvn Version: 1.61-20 Severity: important Tags: patch Hello, please modify the dependency on php[45] to prefer php5 instead of php4 and to add libapache2-mod-php5 which is actually missing. Original: Depends: apache2 | httpd, php4 (= 4.3.0) | libapache2-mod-php4 | php4-cgi | php5, subversion, debconf (= 0.2.26) | debconf-2.0, po-debconf, ucf (= 0.8) Recommended: Depends: apache2 | httpd, libapache2-mod-php5 | php5 | php5-cgi | libapache2-mod-php4 | php4 (= 4.1.0) | php4-cgi (= 4.1.0), debconf (= 0.2.26) | debconf-2.0, po-debconf, ucf (= 0.8) Please, apply this patch and target it to etch: it is actually impossible for me to install websvn on my server running etch which uses libapache2-mod-php5. Thanks for maintaining websvn! -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to it_IT.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404355: python-psycopg: Python 2.5 support missing
* 2006-12-26 21:53, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: * 2006-12-23 23:12, Christian Joergensen wrote: It seems as if there is no support for python 2.5 in this package: $ pyversions --supported python2.4 Thanks Piotr, I'll keep the bug report open for lenny then. Thanks again, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403696: gtkdialog: Fails to load
severity 403696 normal retitle 403696 gtkdialog: Fails to load if MAIN_DIALOG is not defined thanks * 2006-12-19 03:26, David Broome wrote: Package: gtkdialog Version: 2:0.7.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I try to run it I get: ** ERROR **: GtkDialog: Could not find the dialog description in the environment variable 'MAIN_DIALOG'. aborting... Aborted This is not a bug, but the intended behaviour of the program. In order to use gtkdialog, you must define an environment variable MAIN_DIALOG with a glade XML definition for the first dialog window. Also, be sure to have a look at the examples in /usr/share/doc/gtkdialog. I'm downgrading the severity of this bug, and I leave it open in case you have suggestion on how to document in an effective way the behaviour of gtkdialog. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402075: dovecotpw only prints help message on powerpc
* 2006-12-08 00:14, Koen Vermeer wrote: Package: dovecot-common Version: 1.0.rc15-1 Severity: Important Hi Koen, When running dovecotpw on powerpc (a Buffalo Linkstation HG), no matter what command line parameters I pass, I always get the help message. For example: # dovecotpw -l usage: dovecotpw [-l] [-p plaintext] [-s scheme] [-u user] [-V] -lList known password schemes -p plaintext New password -s scheme Password scheme -u user Username (if scheme uses it) -VInternally verify the hash When doing the same on i386, it does work correctly, so it seems architecture-dependent. I'm not able to test dovecotpw on powerpc because I am away from my usual workstation so I can't connect to debian.org machines. I'll test it next week, in the meanwhile could you please check if previous versions worked correctly? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#401796: CVE-2006-4249: Plone vulnerability
* 2006-12-06 23:08, Encolpe Degoute wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit : Package: zope-cmfplone Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole I don't know very much about Plone and I didn't investigate too deeply as Sarge is not affected, but I suppose this needs to be fixed for Etch: http://plone.org/about/security/advisories/cve-2006-4249/ | PlonePAS-using Plone releases (Plone 2.5 and Plone 2.5.1) | has a potential vulnerability that allows a user to | masquerade as a group. Please update your sites. Applying the hotfix is probably preferable to upgrading to 2.5.2. +1 There's no Plone 2.5.2 release before january, apply the patch is the solution for etch. I'm working on this issue, and I'll upload the fix to unstable ASAP. Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#394970: Please, add credits for patch while closing #394970
Hi Frans and Holger, do you mind to retroactively modify the changelog for the upload 2.6 of finish-install to credit Sven Luther about the patch he submitted? I do not want to be pedantic, and I know that you modified and fixed his patch, but I think it would be correct considering that in the same changelog entry you already cite the names of the translators who submitted the updates. Thanks, and have a nice day. finish-install (2.6) unstable; urgency=low . * 90console: [powerpc64] Added support for hvc* and hvsi* serial consoles. Note: untested on powerpc. Closes: #394970. * 90console: add a blank line before pringing new lines to securetty. . [ Updated translations ] * Esperanto (eo.po) by Serge Leblanc * Georgian (ka.po) by Aiet Kolkhi * Kurdish (ku.po) by rizoye-xerzi * Panjabi (pa.po) by A S Alam -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#394970: Please, add credits for patch while closing #394970
Hi Frans, * 2006-11-30 18:33, Frans Pop wrote: On Thursday 30 November 2006 18:02, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: do you mind to retroactively modify the changelog for the upload 2.6 of finish-install to credit Sven Luther about the patch he submitted? I do not want to be pedantic, and I know that you modified and fixed his patch, but I think it would be correct considering that in the same changelog entry you already cite the names of the translators who submitted the updates. No sorry. The patch that was applied was not Sven's patch, but a patch I basically created myself from scratch. Sven's patch was broken (/etc/inittab would not have had the correct line) and had unnecessary code duplication (as he indicated himself). Fine, thanks for your explanation: I now understand your reasons, and I accept it. credit people just for submitting a bug report. That's normal. Sven has always been correctly credited for any patches he's submitted or work he's contributed. Thanks for confirming this, too. Have a nice day, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#399957: zope-cmfforum: Breaks my folder and probably other things
clone 399957 -1 severity -1 normal reassign -1 ftp.debian.org retitle -1 RM: zope-cmfforum -- RoM; unmaintained, does not work current version of Plone in unstable thanks * 2006-11-28 17:34, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 02:33:43AM +, Antony Gelberg wrote: Package: zope-cmfforum Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [...] Either way, please don't release this in Etch. It seems to be really old-hat and things have moved on. I would suggest to ask ftpmasters to remove the package from Debian. There is no version working with Plone 2.5 and CMFForum is not even listed in the products section of plone.org (through the package list the Plone collective project as upstream). Done. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#400729: RM: zope-docfindereverywhere -- RoM; unmaintained upstream, superseeded by zope-docfindertab
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zope-docfindereverywhere: it has been superseeded by zope-docfindertab, and it blocks the removal of zope2.8 from testing. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#399567: closed by Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#399567: apache conf should _not_ be in sites-available)
reopen 399567 thanks * 2006-11-22 04:41, Loye Young wrote: The problem with the way you have it set up now is that upon installation of phpLDAPadmin, it becomes the default page for the host instead of whatever the sysadmin wanted to be the default page. Conf.d is parsed before sites-enabled (which includes the directives for the default page), so the default is no longer the default. In my case, it brought down my employer's website in favor of the LDAP web configuration site. That didn't go over so well with the boss. Can I ask how is it possible that this snippet: IfModule mod_alias.c Alias /phpldapadmin /usr/share/phpldapadmin/htdocs /IfModule can replace your website with a phpLDAPadmin installation? It seems to be impossible, as it should only mount the software under /phpldapadmin. When apache2.conf is loaded, it first includes ../conf.d to pick up miscellaneous server configurations and then includes ../sites-enable to pick up configurations relating to particular sites. (Sites in this context doesn't just refer to vhosts or separate domains. It refers to any self-contained URL and related directory structure like the phpLDAPadmin page.) I'll have a look at the relevant documentation, but after a long e-mail as yours I would think that you have good reasons to insist on this issue. :) Alias and Directory directives are precisely what should go into the ../sites-available directory. They are the principal directives (in addition to VirtualHost) that control virtual hosting and directory structure rewriting rules. The apache conf for phpldapadmin contains exactly the same sort of information as in /etc/apache2/sites-available/default. (I note, by the way, that the phpLDAPadmin apache.conf file also includes vhost information, which would clearly part of sites-available.) This has just a endeavour: phpldapadmin won't be accessible and enabled by default, and the system administrator will have to manually run a2ensite in order to enable the alias directive in his configuration. Thanks again for your excellent work on this package. Thanks for your kind email, Fabio -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#395306: Dovecot with inotify support
Hello, quick follow-up for your bugreport: linux-kernel-headers is build-essential, so there is no need to build-depends on it, but inotify support is only in glbc 2.4, and this version is in experimental actually. For this reason, inotify support in dovecot will be available only for etch+1. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#398338: Apply patch to provide a size argument to twisted.web2.stream readline method
Package: twisted Severity: important Tags: patch Please, apply the patch provided in the upstream bug tracking system: http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/1451 It provides a size argument to twisted.web2.stream readline method, which is required by the current zope3 version. Without this patch, zope3 fails to parse forms. It should be definitely fixed before the etch release, as without this patch zope3 in testing/unstable is not working. Thanks, -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-xen-686 Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to it_IT.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#398338: Apply patch to provide a size argument to twisted.web2.stream readline method
* 2006-11-13 19:44, Matthias Klose wrote: please could you fix this in a NMU? Fine, I'm uploading it in a few hours. Thanks for your quick agreement, and have a nice day. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#397555: zope-formulator: Should depend zope2.9 | zope2.8
* 2006-11-08 13:51, Andreas Tille wrote: In case I would decide to switch to zope-formulator 1.11.2, what is the right way to do in svn (simply overriding the files from 1.9.0 seems quite stupid. I also do not really understand the sense of duplicating upstream source in our svn. (Sorry if I missunderstood something but I'm new to pkg-zope svn repository.) We use svn-buildpackage, so in order to package the new upstream release you should use svn-upgrade. The svn-buildpackage guide contains a quick tutorial on svn-inject, svn-upgrade and svn-buildpackage. Thanks for taking care of zope-formulator, and if you don't have enough time feel free to ask for help on IRC (#debian-zope on OFTC) or by email. I'm willing to help... :) Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#397555: zope-formulator: Should depend zope2.9 | zope2.8
* 2006-11-09 10:21, Andreas Tille wrote: Thanks for taking care of zope-formulator, and if you don't have enough time feel free to ask for help on IRC (#debian-zope on OFTC) or by email. I'm willing to help... :) I think the original matter is that simple to solve that I would need much more time to learn svn-buildpackage as someone else needs to fix the issue. So I would prefer if someone would just fix the control file. If I would have done it, I would have decided for the new upstream version, but I'd like to leave the matter for the uploader. Fine, I'm going to upload the new upstream release in a few hours. :) Have a nice day, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#396221: zope-cmfplone: Plone content not accessible after update
* 2006-11-09 15:26, Alexander Nofftz wrote: I've deleted everything in /var/lib/zope2.9/instance/name/Products, downloaded the original tarball vom plone.org and extracted it into this path. This is definitely a bug in the debian packaging. I've just noticed that very old and very new content doesn't make any problems, only content created within Plone 2.5.0, so maybe not this but the last upgrade went wrong. I can send you a data export of my portal, if it's helpful. Yes, please... That would allow me to debug the problem. Feel free to forward it to my private email if you don't feel comfortable to the public BTS. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#397288: dbconfig-common: random generated password is not UTF-8 encoded
Package: dbconfig-common Severity: important Hi, the random password auto-generated by dbconfig-common for the postgresql user which will be used by the application can contain invalid utf-8 sequences. When creating a postgresql database on an utf-8 enabled system, the invalid utf-8 sequence will cause psql to stop and the installation to break. I'm able to reproduce this behaviour using zabbix packages from experimental. Is it possible to use only ascii characters for auto-generated passwords? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#397288: Acknowledgement (dbconfig-common: random generated password is not UTF-8 encoded)
severity 397288 grave severity 397288 tag + patch thanks Raising severity as suggested by Andreas Barth. The fix is straightforward: dbc_dbpass=`env LANG=C sed -n -e 's/[^[:alnum:]]//g;p;q' /dev/urandom | cut -b1-12` It should export LC_ALL=C as well: dbc_dbpass=`env LANG=C LC_ALL=C sed -n -e 's/[^[:alnum:]]//g;p;q' /dev/urandom | cut -b1-12` Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#388072: Test needed: non-root usage of dzhandle for zope {2.9, 3}
Hi folks, I know that we are in hurry for the release, but I'd like to upload a new zope-common for etch with non-root usage support for dzhandle and the current zope2.9 and zope3 packages in testing. For non-root usage, I mean the ability to create, manage and run zope and zeo instances as normal user without any special permission and within the own user's home directory. I must admit that this feature has been long-waited, and the implementation (which is non-intrusive and required minimal effort) stayed on my laptop for a few months before landing on the newly created svn repository. You can find the new zope-common package here: http://dmgroup.hu/~kobold/debian/ For a usage example, please refer to the README.Debian file shipped in /usr/share/doc/zope-common/README.Debian.gz. Any feedback is welcome, especially on the documentation side. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#396720: RM: zope-localizer -- RoM; obsolete; superseeded by zope-cps-localizer
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zope-localizer: it has been superseeded by zope-cps-localizer (new upstream) and there are no reverse dependencies other than zope-translationservice which is going to be removed, too. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#396722: RM: zopeedit -- RoM; obsolete; superseeded by zope-externaleditor
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zopeedit: it has been superseeded by zope-externaleditor which now builds a zopeedit binary package, thus it makes no sense to have this source package in the archive. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 - End forwarded message - -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#396723: RM: zope-translationservice -- RoM; obsolete; superseeded by zope-cps-translationservice
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zope-translationservice: it has been superseeded by zope-cps-translationservice (new upstream) and there are no reverse dependencies. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#293482: zopeedit: cannot use it with epihany or firefox
* 2006-11-02 13:51, Igor Stroh wrote: Just for the record: I've uploaded a new release of zope-externaleditor which adds this note to the README file. -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#396780: RM: zope-cmf1.5 -- RoM; obsolete; superseeded by zope-cmf1.6;
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zope-cmf1.5: it has been superseeded by zope-cfm1.6, and it blocks the removal of zope2.8 from testing. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 - End forwarded message - -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 - End forwarded message - -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#395306: dovecot-common: Please, compile with inotify support
On gio, 26 ott 2006, Vincent Bernat wrote: Package: dovecot-common Version: 1.0.rc10-2 Severity: wishlist Hi ! Compiling dovecot with inotify support could boost performances. I think you need to source depend on linux-kernel-header since inotify should be on by default if correct header is installed. Build-depending on linux-kernel-headers would render dovecot not buildable on non-linux ports (like, for example, GNU/kFreeBSD). I'm not aware of a good way to avoid this; if you know a good way to solve this issue, let me know and I'll be glad to apply it. Have a nice day, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388415: (no subject)
On mer, 20 set 2006, Alex Pimperton wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1.0.rc7-1 After upgrading to 1.0.rc7-1 on Debian Etch, Dovecot kicks out the errors below and gets very confused: Hi, could you please test the just-uploaded dovecot 1.0.rc10-1? It will hit unstable with the next mirror pulse, in the meanwhile you can download it from http://incoming.debian.org. I switched to the new release of dovecot deliver (LDA) distributed by upstream in the dovecot tarball, so it is possible that the problem is fixed by this new release. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#393244: schoolbell: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named servicecontainer
On mer, 18 ott 2006, Brian Sutherland wrote: Hi Andreas, The error you describe is probably from trying to build schoolbell with Zope3.3 which was lately uploaded in an un-coordinated fashion. Are you talking about uploads in Debian? Zope3.3 has been uploaded a few days after the official release, so the lately doesn't apply to the context. SchoolBell needs to be updated to work with Zope 3.3, but it looks as if upstream is not willing to make that happen. No outside volunteers have appeared to take over that role. Well, doesn't schooltool depend on schoolbell? How can upstream release a zope 3.3-compatible product for one without the other one? Are you talking about just `schoolbell.app'? I think it is just a matter of conditional import, isn't it? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#391758: Upgrade path for plone 2.1 - 2.5
severity 391758 important thanks Hi, first of all, let's downgrade the severity of the bug report: plone 2.1 is not part of a stable release: sarge includes plone 2.0.4 which is not managed by dzhandle, so it is not affected by this issue. Anyway, this affaire could be problematic for etch+1 so it surely needs attention. I'll deeply test the upgrade path from 2.1 to 2.5 in the next days, as well as a bunch of other changes for zope-common I'd like to do before the general freeze. One thing which I would need is a good testing of upgrades.. are you available for a few test upgrades in the next days if I hand you the new packages before the uploads? Obviously, this testing request is open for everybody so contact me by email if you have some spare time and you're willing to help. Thanks for raising this problem up, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#388289: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#388289: closed by Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#388289: fixed in zope-cmfplone 2.5.1-1)
Il giorno lun, 09/10/2006 alle 10.20 +0100, Matthew Vernon ha scritto: Hi, * New upstream release. (Closes: #388289) It's not clear to me that this does address this issue - will the new packages install onto a stable system? Is that the recommended solution for people running stable? Sorry, the changelog it wasn't enough clear.. this is my fault. Anyway, the 2.5.1 release fixes the problem in unstable but the problem is still present in 2.0.4-3sarge1, thanks to the versioned support of the BTS. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388289 This means that the bug in stable is not yet fixed. I'm preparing an updated package which will hopefully included in the next point release of sarge. I'll let you know where to download the packages as soon as I'll have completed the backport of the patch. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#374692: python-sqlobject: This bug really should be fixed
Il giorno mer, 27/09/2006 alle 13.55 +0200, Damien Laniel ha scritto:
Package: python-sqlobject
Version: 0.7.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #374692
Python policy does require it : see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=374692
And this part of the policy _is_ for modules
I've added the provides field within the debian/control file:
Provides: ${python:Provides}
But during the build I get:
...
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable
${python:Provides}
...
What is the supposed way to enable these provides?
Thanks,
--
Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it
Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it
_
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564
signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#374692: python-sqlobject: This bug really should be fixed
Il giorno mer, 27/09/2006 alle 16.54 +0200, Heretik ha scritto: * Asking pysqlite maintainer for an answer * ps : In my last message, the link to the policy I wanted to give was http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-provides Please, read carefully that link: Provides in packages of the form python-foo must be specified, if the package contains an extension for more than one python version. Provides should also be added on request of maintainers who depend on a non-default python version. Read especially if the package contains an extension for more than one python version. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#374692: python-sqlobject: This bug really should be fixed
Il giorno mer, 27/09/2006 alle 18.06 +0200, Heretik ha scritto: I didn't really understand your objections but here is a simple fix : echo 2.3- debian/pyversions You still miss the point: what will happen when python2.3 will be removed from unstable (really soon)? Will the resulting package binNMU-able? Don't you think there is a reason why that provides field is not populated by dh_pycentral? -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#388289: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#388289: zope-cmfplone: Please deploy anti-link-spam patch as a matter of urgency
Il giorno mar, 19/09/2006 alle 16.53 +0100, Matthew Vernon ha scritto: Package: zope-cmfplone Version: 2.0.4-3sarge1 Severity: important Tags: security [possibly this should be higher priority] A new version of plone has been released, which fixes link-spamming attacks in older versions. This is causing quite a serious problem on the site I administer. A backport of the fix to plone 2.0.x has been released, and should be made available to debian users as a matter of urgency. http://plone.org/news/plone-2.5.1-and-2.1.4-released has the details. I'm working on it, I'll submit the package to the security team as soon as possible and I'm going to upload 2.5.1 in unstable today. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#382640: zabbix: Postgresql interface missing
Il giorno ven, 22/09/2006 alle 14.43 +0200, Marcin 'golish' Goliszewski ha scritto: On Saturday 12 of August 2006 18:26, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: One solution might be to upload a package with postgresql support to experimental (as soon as its fixed) and wait for feedback. Now that PostgreSQL is fixed in Zabbix 1.1.2, would you consider creating a zabbix-server-postgresql package and uploading it to experimental? We are working on it. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388410: Zabbix PHP front-end doesn't allow to login
Package: zabbix-frontend-php Version: 1:1.1.2-1 Severity: critical We have problems with the login page which prevent the whole front-end to works. I'm filing this bug report in order to prevent this version of the package to migrate to testing. -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#324293: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#324293: INTL:vi Vietnamese translation for zope
Il giorno sab, 16/09/2006 alle 18.17 +0930, Clytie Siddall ha scritto: On 15/09/2006, at 10:19 PM, Thomas Huriaux wrote: zope has been removed from the archived (see #335488) and debconf templates have been moved to the zope-common package. The Vietnamese translation is now strongly outdated. Clytie, could you please update the attached file and send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am really pleased that there is finally a zope-common debconf file. I spent ages on that list of dratted almost-the-same zope files. ;) Does zope-common mean I can delete all my other zope- debconf translations? (Just checking!) Yes, zope-common is source for common templates for all zope packages. Thanks for your translation, I'll include it with the next upload. -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#388072: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#388072: zope-common - dzhandle make-instance produces non-root owned files which are executed as root
Il giorno lun, 18/09/2006 alle 15.07 +0200, Bastian Blank ha scritto: Package: zope-common Version: 0.5.24 Severity: grave Tags: security dzhandle make-instance creates files with owner zope which is executed as root by the init script. This gives this user the same rights as root. Bastian I still do not understand... after start-up, zope uses the zope user. I've created a hacked product, with a __init__.py like this: import os; os.system(touch /tmp/abc.txt) After start-up, the /tmp/abc.txt is owned by zope:zope which is correct. So, what are you talking about? Are /var/lib/zope2.9/instance/devel/bin/runzope and /var/lib/zope2.9/instance/devel/bin/zopectl the faulty scripts? If you want to write on it, then you must be within the zope group, and if the system administrator adds you to a system group it must know what he is doing. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#386066: dovecot config files not installed for ppc arch
Il giorno lun, 04/09/2006 alle 17.20 -0700, Jamie Adams ha scritto: Package: dovecot-pop3d Version: 1.0.rc6-1 The dovecot packages for the PowerPC architecture do not install config files, and the init scripts do not recognise when the service fails to start because of this. The file list on packages.debian.org includes the configuration files for this version on powerpc: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelistword=dovecot-commonversion=testingarch=powerpc Anyway, we already have 1.0.rc7-1 in unstable, and it will migrate to testing in four-five days. Could you please check if it solves the problem? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#385687: RM: zope2.8 -- RoM; superseeded by zope2.9, last big package depending on python2.3
Package: ftp.debian.org Hello, please remove zope2.8 package from testing/unstable: it has been superseeded by zope2.9 and it is the last big obstacle before the python2.3 removal from testing/unstable. Almost all the reverse dependencies already have an alternate dependency on zope2.9. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#385144: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#385144: zope-zms: New upstream version available for some time
Il giorno mer, 30/08/2006 alle 08.51 +0200, Uwe Steinmann ha scritto: BTW, I would be more than happy if somebody would take over zope-zms because I do not use it any more. I thought so, but I cannot honestly offer to take it over, because my knowledge of zope is rather weak. Let me try to get a recent version of zms packaged. If I do not run into major problems I'll rethink it. Hi Uwe, I can offer all the help you need with zope packaging both via email and via IRC. I really care about zope packages in Debian, but I do not use zms so I can't adopt it. If you use it and you have enough time to package new upstream releases and to care of bug reports, I would be glad if you could help us to improve the packaging. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#385101: dovecot segfaults after upgrade
Il giorno mar, 29/08/2006 alle 13.50 +0800, Andrew Buckeridge ha scritto: package: dovecot version: 1.0.rc6-1 Severity: grave Justification: Can not start dovecot. Hi, could you please try dovecot-1.0.rc7 from http://people.debian.org/~kobold/dovecot to see if the problem has been solved with the new release candidate? If it doesn't solve your problem, could you please run strace with dovecot and send us the output? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#385101: dovecot segfaults after upgrade
Il giorno mar, 29/08/2006 alle 16.12 +0800, Andrew Buckeridge ha scritto: Yes, it has been solved. Running these binaries now: - dovecot-common_1.0.rc7-1_i386.deb dovecot-imapd_1.0.rc7-1_i386.deb Fine, I'm uploading the packages. Thanks for your tests, and have a nice day. -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#377840: #377840: dovecot: imap segfaults on small mbox files (2 bytes)
Il giorno lun, 28/08/2006 alle 12.58 +0200, Roland Stigge ha scritto: found 377840 1.0.rc6-1 thanks This upstream version doesn't fix the problem, yet. I still needed to apply the patch (accepted by upstream, though) at http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2006-August/006233.html Thanks for pointing this out. dovecot-1.0.rc7, which I'm preparing and I hope to upload in a few days, will include the fix for this problem. Have a nice day, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#379626: CPSSkins for Plone
Hi Jean-Marc, sorry for the disturb. One of our users pointed out [1] that CPSSkins doesn't work anymore with plone and filed a bug report against CPSSkins. Do you have any plan to patch your product to make it compatible again with Plone? Thanks, and have a nice day. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=379626 -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#379626: CPSSkins for Plone
Il giorno ven, 25/08/2006 alle 11.08 +0200, Jean-Marc Orliaguet ha scritto: Hi! I am aware of the problem. This is mostly due to the fact that Plone (2.1) introduced new main templates for the presentation of some screens. Some changes have already been made in the svn code to adapt to that. I am going to make a new release soon, when I get the chance to test again plone 2.5 :-) Hi Jean-Marc, thanks for your kind reply. Just let me know when the release will happen, so I can package it and upload to the Debian archive. Thanks again for your work, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#384437: Installation report from Dell PowerEdge 2950
systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [E] Comments/Problems: The server has a DRAC (Dell Remote Access Card) which allows the remote administration of the system and which provides virtual floppy and cd-rom drives. One of them (I suppose the cd-rom one) is supported as removable scsi device. The two SCSI disks are configured in RAID-1 with a SCSI RAID controller which requires the metaraid_sas module. In the first part of the installation, this module wasn't loaded so the removable SCSI device was /dev/sda and the SCSI disks weren't accessible. After the Detect hard drives phase, the megaraid_sas module was loaded and the RAID-1 disk were detected as /dev/sdb. After the first reboot, the machine failed to start: 1. The initrd didn't load the megeraid_sas module, so the disk wasn't detected. 2. After booting in rescue mode, adding megaraid_sas to the list of modules to load (/etc/initramfs-tools/modules) and run update-initramfs, the problem was that megaraid_sas was loaded before the removable SCSI module so the RAID disk was detected as /dev/sda instead of /dev/sdb. 3. After booting again in rescue mode and changing /etc/fstab to match /dev/sda, the system went up. I wonder why the installer doesn't add megaraid_sas to the list of additional modules for initramfs if it uses that module to detect the disks? And, in any case, this will change the order of the disk devices depending on the order with the modules are loaded. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#378529: Fixed upstream
Il giorno ven, 18/08/2006 alle 10.18 +1000, Matt Doran ha scritto: I just looked at the dovecot website, and it appears that these issues have been resolved in the latest release candidate, RC6. Released the sixth 1.0 release candidate. This should finally take care of the SSL hangs that have caused so much trouble lately. So we should be near v1.0 again, I think. http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2006-August/14.html 1.0.rc6 just hit unstable, could you please try if it really solves your problem? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#383098: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#383098: Installing zope-common attempts to remove kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
Il giorno lun, 14/08/2006 alle 17.36 -0700, Mark Phillips ha scritto: Package: zope-common Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Running 'apt-get -t testing install zope-common' reported that my kernel-image had to be removed. This does not happen when I try to install other packages (like zope2.8). This is the only kernel-image I have running on my machine, so I don't think I should respond 'yes' to the operation! From your command (apt-get -t testing) I would say you are running sarge. Am I correct? In this case, the best solution to run a zople/plone site with the lastest packages is to use backports.org. Could you please confirm that you are installing packages from testing/unstable in a stable box? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#383089: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#383089: plone-site 2.5-1 fails to install a plone site
severity 383089 important thanks Il giorno lun, 14/08/2006 alle 17.29 -0600, Soren Stoutner ha scritto: Package: plone-site Version: 2.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi Soren, thanks for your report. First of all, I adjusted the severity of the report because the package is installable in a clean testing/unstable environment, and we are not going to support upgrade from plone-site (based on zope2.8) and the actual version of plone-site because the former wasn't included in sarge. Now, let's go ahead. I am running Debian testing on i386. I just upgraded to plone-site 2.5-1 and Zope 2.9. I was running the previous release on Plone on Zope 2.8. After the upgrade Plone would not work on Zope 2.8 or Zope 2.9. There is no Plone Site option in the Select type to add... dropdown box in the Zope Management Interface. The only options related to Plone are Plone Language Tool and PlonePAS Tool. I backed up my data files, purged all Zope and Plone packages, and reinstalled but had the same results. I also tried installing plone-site on an AMD64/testing with the same results. I suspect you are still looking at the zope2.8 instance which (obviously) will be broken by the upgrade. Everything starts with a Zope2.8 plone-site instance, then you upgrade plone-site which does: 1. upgrade all the zope-* packages to be compatible with Plone 2.5 2. install zope2.9 (because Plone 2.5 requires it) 3. create a new plone-site instance for zope2.9 4. leave untouched the old zope2.8-based plone-site instance. Yeah, I could remove the old zope2.8-based plone-instance but this would mean data-loss; an automatic migration between zope2.8 and zope2.9 is not supported, so there are no other solutions. Please let me know if there is anything else I should try. Thanks for all your hard work maintaining the plone packages. Could you please confirm me that you are looking at the zope2.9 instance? And, please, could you attach to your bug report the list of zope packages installed (something like `dpkg -l | grep zope` is enough). Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#382773: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#382773: zope-common - dzhandle removes products without notice
On dom, 13 ago 2006, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: zope-common Version: 0.5.24 Severity: important dzhandle removes products from the instances on upgrade. Hi Bastian, could you please explain with more details when this happens? Are you using a manually created zope instance or the one provided by plone-site or cps-site? Could you please post here the command line you used to make the instance, the list of products which are installed (both manually and using dzhandle) and the list of products you are upgrading? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#378712: [Pkg-zope-developers] zope-ttwtype
Il giorno lun, 07/08/2006 alle 07.31 +0200, Andreas Tille ha scritto: Hi, I wonder whether anybody is interested to take over zope-ttwtype that has one serious bug (#378712). While there is a quite simple patch attached I hesitate to apply this without testing. The problem is that I stopped using this Product for years and upstream did not updated it since 3 years. So I wonder whether the better solution would be to drop this product. I'm quite sure that the product is not working anymore with the updated products we have in unstable (eg. zope-formulator, zope-cmf1.6), and upstream seems stopped. In my opinion, we should drop it. Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#379561: MySQL setup for Wordpress
Hi, I think the best solution would be to recommend mysql-server instead of suggesting it. In this way, aptitude will install it by default, unless the system administrator explicitly tells aptitude to not install recommended packages. About the mysql automatic setup, dbconfig-common is a good choice. I have no time to put togheter a patch now, but if you think it is worth using it I'll help as I can. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#379118: Depends for wordpress
Hi, please modify the depends line as follow: Depends: apache2 | httpd, php5 | php4 | libapache2-mod-php4, php4-mysql | php5-mysql This will install apache2 by default. The bug is caused by apt, which if needs to install a package in order to satisfy a dependency always choosee the first option when a or-block is in the dependency. In your case, the first block install apache, then php5 depends on libapache2-mod-php5 | libapache-mod-php5, which trigger in apache2. Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#379118: Depends for wordpress
Il giorno mar, 25/07/2006 alle 10.22 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella ha scritto: Hi, please modify the depends line as follow: Depends: apache2 | httpd, php5 | php4 | libapache2-mod-php4, php4-mysql | php5-mysql Hi again, sorry but I forgot to invert php4-mysql and php5-mysql for the same reason. By default, we install php5 so we need php5-mysql | php4-mysql. -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#379118: Depends for wordpress
Il giorno mar, 25/07/2006 alle 18.06 +0900, Kai Hendry ha scritto: Hmmm, that's silly. Because if someone does: apt-get install wordpress apache2 Shouldn't it check that apache2 is selected and fulfils the httpd dependency condition, and hence apache isn't required to be installed? It should, but apt does not. Try the following commands: apt-get install wordpress apache2 libapache2-mod-php5 php5-mysql (this doesn't work as expected) apt-get install apache2 libapache2-mod-php5 php5-mysql wordpress (this works as expectd) With your suggestion, now apache2 becomes default. Sooner or later someone is going to file a bug moaning that apache2 was installed even though he has another httpd server. Or am I wrong? :) You are wrong: if he already has another http server with php4 or php5, everything is ok. This only affects the case when the dependency is not satisfied by already installed packages (which includes the ones you specified in the command-line of apt-get **before** wordpress). Take care, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#379626: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#379626: zope-cpsskins: Adding the CPSSkins product to Plone fails with maximum recursion depth exceeded
Il giorno lun, 24/07/2006 alle 17.47 +0200, Peter Paluch ha scritto: Package: zope-cpsskins Version: 2.10.0-1 Severity: important Hello, Hi Peter, thanks for your report. The zope-cpsskins package seems to be unusable within Plone 2.1.3-2. After trying to add the CPSSkins product into the Plone site, the process fails, reporting maximum recursion depth exceeded. I am attaching log files that cover every step from creating a Zope instance up to and including the failed addition of the CPSSkins product. This is a clear upstream problem, and there is nothing which I can do to solve it (excluding to dig into the code and found the bug, which I have no time to do). I'll forward it upstream. Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#379169: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#379169: zope-common - dzhandle location don't match manpage section
Il giorno ven, 21/07/2006 alle 23.41 +0200, Bastian Blank ha scritto: Package: zope-common Version: 0.5.24 Severity: normal dzhandle is in /usr/sbin, but the manpage section is 1. Please move it to /usr/bin, as it is pretty usable as normal user. Hi Bastian, thanks for your report. I'll move dzhandle from /usr/sbin to /usr/bin as soon as I complete the tasks listed in #359256, which will allow full non-root usage. Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#378459: Formencode: exception not catched if the DNS server is unreachable
Il giorno mer, 19/07/2006 alle 12.36 -0500, Ian Bicking ha scritto: Fabio Tranchitella wrote: What is your opinion about the issue? Can the patch be applied to the next release of formencode? Looks good to me; patch applied in r1828. Great! Thanks for your quick answer, have a nice day. -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#378364: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#378364: zope-common: upgrades restart all instances, not just those in /etc/default/zope*
reopen 378364 thanks Hi Ross, Il giorno dom, 16/07/2006 alle 14.59 -0700, Ross Boylan ha scritto: I think this is not a bug, and you can disable this behaviour as explained above. I'm closing the report, but feel free to re-open it if you do not agree and/or have a better idea/implementation. The behavior continues to seem undesirable for me, and I see a number of problem areas: 1) upgrades respecting runlevel 2) upgrades respecting instance selection in /etc/default/ 3) documentation. I may have misunderstood or missed something, however. Restart behaviour on upgrades can't be unified with system start-up behaviour: I have several zope instances which I can't restart untill the week-end or holidays, and in this way I can upgrade the machine at any day, and then plan the restart. Even if an instance is started at boot-time, this doesn't mean it is useful for me if apt tries to restart it on upgrade. Also, think about the product upgrades: Plone 2.0.2 - 2.0.3 requires migration, and this is something which I would prefer to do in a second moment for **a particular** instance. So, about the bug: what about restarting instances only if it is already running? In my opinion this is the best solution. Anyway, I'll add some documentation about the restart-policy (even if my english is terrible). Especially for this last point, any help is welcome. Have a nice day, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#378459: Processed: Re: Bug#378459: formencode: exception not catched
Il giorno dom, 16/07/2006 alle 23.07 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine ha scritto: It would make sense if the upstream author did it like that in the URL class (line 1294 in validators.py). In this class, the error exception is catched and then an Invalid exception is raise with the proper error message. I think it is better to have an exception Invalid because every other exceptions in the validators file are catched and then a Invalid exception is raised. In addition, it is necessary for third application (like turbogears) to use the instance variables provided by this exception. I fully agree and will apply the patch with the next upload. Thanks for your report, patch and explanation. :) -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#378459: Processed: Re: Bug#378459: formencode: exception not catched
Hi Arnaud, thanks for your report! I'm not sure that an exception Invalid is better then a socket.error: all in all, there is a problem with the socket and the actual behaviour is quite clear in this sense. Anyway, you missed to attach the patch! :) What about talking with upstream about this issue? There is nothing debian specific and I would prefer to not apply this patch if upstream doesn't agree. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#375811: closed by Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on backports.org)
Il giorno mar, 11/07/2006 alle 13.21 +0200, Robert Millan [ackstorm] ha scritto: Hi Michael, Hi Robert, My report was a request to relax build-dependencies in order to facilitate backports: -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0), libsnmp9-dev, libmysqlclient15-dev, libpq-dev, libldap2-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libsnmp9-dev | libsnmp-dev, libmysqlclient15-dev | libmysqlclient14-dev, libpq-dev | postgresql-dev, libldap2-dev rather than to create them for backports.org. We're already rolling our own backport of this package, with some local customisation, but it'd be nice if we could derive from the official package when updating it. I think that modifying the build-dependencies for the package which is uploaded for etch to include the sarge dependencies is not the right thing to do. I know that it is improbable, but the auto-builders could link the binaries to different versions of the libraries (eg. libmysqlclient15-dev vs. libmysqlclient14-dev) and it is not a clean solution. All in all, backports.org is there for this purpose and the package builds fine with sarge + backports. Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#374134: Follow-up for zope3 bug (#374134)
Hi Andrey, any news about this report? Can I close it or it is still valid? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#377285: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#377277: Mitre ID
Il giorno sab, 08/07/2006 alle 09.17 +0100, Neil McGovern ha scritto: Hi there, This has been given a Mitre ID CVE-2006-3458. Please mention this in changelogs. Cheers, Neil Hi Neil, thanks for your reports, but I have some hardware problems and I won't be able to work on these issues untill the week-end. Best regards, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#375751: sqlobject: should use the parse method when using pkg_resources.Requirement
Il giorno dom, 02/07/2006 alle 19.33 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva ha scritto: Fabio! Hi Gustavo, Sorry for your notebook =(... I'd be very sad if it was mine to break heh... Luckly, it is in its warranty period, but ASUS doesn't provide a replacement while it is in repair, so I'll have to wait a few weeks (or months, I don't know). :-/ I accept it, thanks for the offer! I will do the upload then... also, TurboGears 0.9.6a really wants sqlobject 0.7.1; are you ok if I upload a svn snapshot to experimental? Please, do so. And, have you considered joining the python-modules team? http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/ Yes, but no time yet to request it. Could you please add me (my alioth account is kobold)? We can start with sqlobject, and then I'll migrate my python packages to it when I'll have my notebook back. Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#376222: dovecot-common: dovecot dies immediately
On sab, 01 lug 2006, Neil Roeth wrote: Content-Description: message body text strace output is attached. Hi Neil, could you please run again strace with the -f switch, in order to trace the child process too? Thanks, Fabio -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#375751: sqlobject: should use the parse method when using pkg_resources.Requirement
Il giorno mar, 27/06/2006 alle 19.26 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva ha scritto: Package: sqlobject Severity: normal Hi Gustavo, I have some troubles with my notebook, I'm away from home and no debian machine around: it is likely that I won't be able to do an upload in the next days. Considering that sqlobject is an important dependency of TurboGears, would you like to co-maintain the package with me? If you agree, please apply the patch and upload the package adding yourself as uploader. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#375832: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#375832: zope-kupu: unable to install in plone
severity 375832 important reassign 375832 zope-cmf1.5 retitle 375832 zope-cmf1.5: CMF binary packages must be in sync clone 375832 -1 reassign -1 zope-cmf1.6 retitle -1 zope-cmf1.6: CMF binary packages must be in sync thanks Il giorno gio, 29/06/2006 alle 00.34 +0200, Maximilian Mehnert ha I am not sure what to do here - close this bug, reopen a bug for zope-cmf1.4? I'm leaving this to you. :-) I'll fix this for zope-cmf1.5 and zope-cmf1.6 I can't do anything about zope-cmf1.4: it will be removed from testing/unstable soon and there is no way to change the package in sarge. Have a nice day, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#375832: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#375832: zope-kupu: unable to install in plone
Il giorno mer, 28/06/2006 alle 13.35 +0200, Maximilian Mehnert ha scritto: Package: zope-kupu Version: 1.3.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Trying to install kupu in plone_2.1.3-1 I get the following error: Hi Maximilian, I'm not able to reproduce this bug, especially considering that installing a plone site automatically installs kupu, and even removing and installing it again doesn't hit what you report. Could you please try to build a new zope instance, with a new plone site and reproduce the problem? And, if you are able to reproduce it, could you please send me the exported plone site? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#374692: sqlobject: should have a Provides field
Il giorno mar, 20/06/2006 alle 13.54 -0700, Steve Langasek ha scritto: Following the Python policy, sqlobject should have the following field in debian/control: Provides: python2.4-sqlobject python2.3-sqlobject - sqlobject is a source package, it shouldn't have any Provides:. - If the python policy says that it's mandatory to have such Provides, that's a bug in the python policy. There is no consensus that such a Provides: is mandatory. It's definitely not RC. I complitely agree: the main purpose of the new python policy (as far as I understand) is that adding/removing python versions will just require binNMUs in order to fix the packages. Adding a static provides would prevent this, and the python policy says that they are required for extensions and not for modules. -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#374134: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#374134: zope3: Can't install on debian unstable
Il giorno sab, 17/06/2006 alle 15.54 +0300, Andrey Lebedev ha scritto: Package: zope3 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: normal Can't install zope3 on debian unstable system: Hi, could you please tell me the version of python2.4-zopeinterface you have in your system? Could you please upgrade it to the last release? Thanks! -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#373710: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#373710: zope2.9: zopectl test broken due to: ZOPE_HOME is not exported from zopectl, runzope skeletons
Hi Balazs, Il giorno gio, 15/06/2006 alle 10.23 +0200, Balazs Ree ha scritto: Package: zope2.9 Version: 2.9.3-2 Severity: normal I fully agree with your bug report, but... ... and this, combined with the fact that Debian changed the distribution path /lib/python to /lib/python2.4/site-packages, makes it impossible to run tests from zopectl with instances created with these skeletons. ... Debian didn't changed the distribution path. Taken from debian/rules: ./configure \ --prefix=/usr/lib/$(ZOPE) \ --with-python=$(PYTHONBIN) \ --force $(PYTHONBIN) install.py build AFAIK, there is no Debian modification and the upstream build system, when called as above, will install under $PREFIX/lib/python2.4/site-packages. Do you have any suggestion/patch to workaround this behaviour, instead of exporting ZOPE_HOME inside the skeletons? Have a nice day, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#372647: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#372647: zope-cmfplone invlved in 3 circular depdendencies
Il giorno lun, 12/06/2006 alle 16.19 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio ha scritto: Complex circular dependencies are known to cause problems during upgrade between stable releases, so we should try to get rid of them. What could we do about this? Put ATContentTypes, PloneErrorReporting and PloneLanguageTool in the same package that CMFPlone? In my opinion, the best thing to do is to downgrade the dependencies on ATContentTypes, PloneErrorReporting and PloneLanguageTool as Recommends instead of Depends. Greetings, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#370435: invalid argument supplied for foreach()
Il giorno lun, 05/06/2006 alle 11.06 +0200, Giuseppe Sacco ha scritto: Package: phpldapadmin Version: 0.9.8.3-1 Hi Fabio, Hi Giuseppe, thanks for your report. I had a new installation of a local LDAP server, created an ou=rubrica, changed authorization on my /etc/ldap/slapd.conf and reconnected with phpldapadmin using the admin user. Could you please send me the configuration file of phpldapadmin (obviously clearing out all your secret data as, for example, passwords) and the authorization section from your /etc/ldap/slapd.conf? A dump of your ldap directory would help, too: reading your report it seems that it is quite simple, so it could be a good test case for upstream, too. This is not a general problem, so I'm quite sure that there is a particular configuration which triggers it. Please report this bug by clicking below! Moreover, there were no link below :-) Oh, this is a funny behaviour of phpldapadmin! It seems that the upstream developers do not want to receive bug reports at all. :) Ciao! -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#370435: invalid argument supplied for foreach()
Il giorno lun, 05/06/2006 alle 14.11 +0200, Giuseppe Sacco ha scritto: It seems that I created an oraganization unit called ou=rubrica. phpldapadmin created this entry ou=ou\=rubrica,dc=myserver,dc=local When logging in and creating the tree on the left frame, the program stopped at this very entry. Hi Giuseppe, so the bug is within phpldapadmin, but it is triggered by a non standard data. I'll forward the report to upstream, and it will be fixed with the next release. Thanks! -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369581: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#369581: closed by Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#369581: fixed in zope2.8 2.8.7-1)
Il giorno mar, 30/05/2006 alle 14.32 -0700, Ross Boylan ha scritto: On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 14:18 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: * debian/zopeZVER.logrotate.in: fixed a small bug in the shell script ran after the rotation. (Closes: #369581) Wow! Thanks for the fast fix. Should this clean up the errors from non-2.8 zopes as well? zope2.9 and zope3 will be fixed with the next uploads, for zope (=2.6) and zope2.7 there won't be any fix: they are not part of testing/unstable anymore. Thanks for your help, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369581: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#369581: zope2.8: error running shared postrotate script
Il giorno mar, 30/05/2006 alle 11.45 -0700, Ross Boylan ha scritto: Package: zope2.8 Version: 2.8.6-1 Severity: normal Hi, and thanks for your report. My logs show this error: /etc/cron.daily/logrotate: error: error running shared postrotate script for /var/log/zope2.8/*/Z2.log /var/log/zope2.8/*/event.log run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/logrotate exited with return code 1 Do you have at least one zope instance? I mean, does /var/log/zope2.8/*/Z2.log really exist or no? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#366852: phpldapadmin: PHP segfault on tree.php
Il giorno ven, 12/05/2006 alle 00.25 +0800, Steven McCoy ha scritto: Package: phpldapadmin Version: 0.9.8.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm sorry, but I can't reproduce the bug on my sid machines. Is the bug still present or have you found a fix for it? Could you please list check if the bug disappears using a plain new LDAP directory? And, could you please test phpldapadmin with another webserver (eg. apache)? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#366852: phpldapadmin: PHP segfault on tree.php
Il giorno ven, 12/05/2006 alle 00.25 +0800, Steven McCoy ha scritto: Package: phpldapadmin Version: 0.9.8.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The left HTML pane, tree.php returns 500 - Internal Server Error in Lighty, and running on the command line I see the following: I doubt that phpldapadmin could be the reason for the segmentation fault. I think that the problem here is php-ldap, but before saying more I'll try to reproduce the bug. Thanks for the report, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#366531: [false positive] lintian fails to retrieve debhelper versioned dependency from control file
Package: lintian Severity: normal With the following debian/control snippet I get this lintian error, which goes away if I remove the dependency on zope-debhelper. E: zope-cachefu source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 5 debian/control: Source: zope-cachefu ... Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0) Build-Depends-Indep: zope-debhelper (= 0.3.2.7), lsb-release -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to it_IT.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#188748: Zabbix debian packages
Hi, I'm interested in preparing debian packages for Zabbix and I've just seen your (quite old) ITP. Are you still interested? Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa parte del messaggio è firmata
Bug#362221: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#362221: zope3: version python2.4-mechanise was not up-to-date
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 21:51 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: Package: zope3 Version: 3.2.1-1 Severity: normal out-of-date version of python2.4-mechanize was (already) installed which probably says that the dependency version is wrong. Hi, could you please elaborate more your problem? zope3 requires mechanize = 0.0.10a, and you have 0.0.11a-2 installed, so I do not see the bug. Thanks for your report, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#362283: RM: zope2.7 -- superseded by zope2.8 and zope2.9
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope2.7 package, superseded by zope2.8 and zope2.9. The following packages will be uninstallable without zope2.7, but the maintainers are already working to fix this. zope-ttwtype zope-zms zope-extfile zope-textindexng2 zope-zwiki zope-docfindertab squishdot Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#362280: RM: zope-tinytableplus -- incompatible with recent Zope releases
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-tinytableplus package: it is incompatible with zope2.8, and zope2.7 will be soon removed from testing/unstable. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#362284: RM: zope-cmf1.4 -- superseded by zope-cmf1.5 and zope-cmf1.6
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-cmf1.4 package, superseded by zope-cmf1.5 and zope-cmf1.6. The following packages will be uninstallable without zope-cmf1.4, but the maintainers are already working to fix this. zope-ttwtype zope-portaltransport zope-cmfsin zope-cmfphoto zope-cmfforum Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#362287: RM: zope-i18nfolder -- very low user base, better alternative exists
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-i18nfolder. popcon shows that very few people use it, and there is a better alternative (zope-linguaplone). Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#362286: RM: zope-i18nlayer -- very low user base, better alternative exists
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-i18nlayer. popcon shows that very few people use it, and there is a better alternative (zope-linguaplone). Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#362285: RM: zope-cmfactionicons -- superseded by zope-cmfactionicons1.5 and zope-cmfactionicons1.6
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-cmfactionicons1.4 package, superseded by zope-cmfactionicons1.5 and zope-cmfactionicons1.6. No packages depend on it. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#362290: RM: zope-portaltransport-- very low user base, no packages depend on it
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-portaltransport. popcon shows that very few people use it, and zope-cmfplone does not depend on it anymore. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#362303: RM: zope-zattachmentattribute -- no packages depend on it, superseded by zope-attachmentfield
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-zattachmentattribute. popcon shows that very few people use it, and zope-plonearticle does not depend on it anymore. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#362304: RM: zope-zaaplugins -- no packages depend on it, superseded by zope-attachmentfield
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-zaaplugins. popcon shows that very few people use it, and zope-plonearticle does not depend on it anymore. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#361948: RM: zope-testcase -- this product is included within Zope = 2.8
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-testcase package: it is included with zope2.8, and zope2.7 will be soon removed from testing/unstable. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#361946: RM: zope-speedpack -- incompatible with recent Zope releases
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-speedpack package: it is incompatible with zope2.8, and zope2.7 will be soon removed from testing/unstable. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#361947: RM: zope-filesystemsite -- incompatible with recent Zope releases
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-filesystemsite package: it is incompatible with zope2.8, and zope2.7 will be soon removed from testing/unstable. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#361950: RM: zopeinterface -- binary packages are now built from zope3 source package
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zopeinterface source package: its binary packages are now built from zope3 source package. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#361949: RM: zope-verbosesecurity -- this product is included within Zope = 2.8
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please, remove zope-verbosesecurity package: it is included with zope2.8, and zope2.7 will be soon removed from testing/unstable. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#361662: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#361662: ITP: zope-cachefu -- suite of products for speeding up Plone
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 15:08 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: zope-cachefu Version : 1.0-beta Upstream Author : Geoff Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://plone.org/products/cachefu * License : ZPL Description : suite of products for speeding up Plone Hi Jérémy, I'm really interested in the package (which will be a dependency of the new Plone). If you need any help (or sponsorship), please ask me. Have a nice day, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
