Bug#518688: Clarification request for debian/copyright content

2009-03-21 Thread Michael Hanke
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 01:33:33PM +, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Tue, 10, Mar, 2009 at 07:33:13AM +0100, Michael Hanke spoke thus..
> > Dear ftp-masters,
> > 
> > the recently accepted 'caret' package received a bug report asking for
> > clarification of the debian/copyright wrt to a listed non-free license.
> > 
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518688
> > 
> > The original request to include a verbatim copy of the file is attached
> > below.
> > 
> > Would it be acceptable to remove to OpenContent license from
> > debian/copyright, as it is not relevant for the pieces of AFNI code
> > included in caret (which are licensed under the GPL-2+)? Or do you
> > recommend/require the full specs of the AFNI package to be present?
> 
> If the code isn't shipped in the orig tarball (which it shouldn't be
> otherwise the package doeesn't belong in main), then you don't need to
> mention the licenses of the non-free parts (we're not distributing
> them).

Thanks for clarifying!

The code is not shipped (of course) and hence I am going to
clarify/simplify the copyright statement.

Thanks,

Michael

-- 
GPG key:  1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke
http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke
ICQ: 48230050



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#518688: Clarification request for debian/copyright content

2009-03-21 Thread Mark Hymers
On Tue, 10, Mar, 2009 at 07:33:13AM +0100, Michael Hanke spoke thus..
> Dear ftp-masters,
> 
> the recently accepted 'caret' package received a bug report asking for
> clarification of the debian/copyright wrt to a listed non-free license.
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518688
> 
> The original request to include a verbatim copy of the file is attached
> below.
> 
> Would it be acceptable to remove to OpenContent license from
> debian/copyright, as it is not relevant for the pieces of AFNI code
> included in caret (which are licensed under the GPL-2+)? Or do you
> recommend/require the full specs of the AFNI package to be present?

If the code isn't shipped in the orig tarball (which it shouldn't be
otherwise the package doeesn't belong in main), then you don't need to
mention the licenses of the non-free parts (we're not distributing
them).

Hope that clarifies,

Mark

-- 
Mark Hymers 

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the Lawyers"
 Henry VI Part II, Shakespeare



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#518688: Clarification request for debian/copyright content

2009-03-09 Thread Michael Hanke
Dear ftp-masters,

the recently accepted 'caret' package received a bug report asking for
clarification of the debian/copyright wrt to a listed non-free license.

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518688

The original request to include a verbatim copy of the file is attached
below.

Would it be acceptable to remove to OpenContent license from
debian/copyright, as it is not relevant for the pieces of AFNI code
included in caret (which are licensed under the GPL-2+)? Or do you
recommend/require the full specs of the AFNI package to be present?


Thanks in advance for clarifying,

Michael



On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 11:07:34PM +, Mark Hymers wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> From your debian/copyright file:
> 
>   This source code has been derived from parts of the AFNI package
>   (http://afni.nimh.nih.gov). The copyright statement refers to a
>   'README.copyright' file, which contains the licensing terms of AFNI. This
>   file is not available in the Caret source distribution, but only included in
>   the binary distribution as 'copyright.afni'. This file has been included in
>   the Debian packaging as 'debian/copyright.afni'.
> 
> Please include the AFNI license verbatim in debian/copyright and just get
> rid of debian/copyright.afni.  This is required for all licenses not in
> base-files in /usr/share/common-licenses
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> ===
> 
> If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
> override file requires editing, reply to this email.

-- 
GPG key:  1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke
http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke
ICQ: 48230050



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org