Bug#404751: CVE-2005-4816: Buffer overflow in mod_radius in ProFTPD
tags 404751 + sarge thanks On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:24AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: Package: proftpd Version: 1.2.10-15sarge3 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole According to http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16535 the proftpd in sarge is still vulnerable to CVE-2005-4816: Buffer overflow in mod_radius in ProFTPD before 1.3.0rc2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long password. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404751: marked as done (CVE-2005-4816: Buffer overflow in mod_radius in ProFTPD)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:32:26 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404751: CVE-2005-4816: Buffer overflow in mod_radius in ProFTPD has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: proftpd Version: 1.2.10-15sarge3 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole According to http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16535 the proftpd in sarge is still vulnerable to CVE-2005-4816: Buffer overflow in mod_radius in ProFTPD before 1.3.0rc2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long password. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package: proftpd Version: 1.3.10-1 Solved in = 1.3.0 On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:24AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: Package: proftpd Version: 1.2.10-15sarge3 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole According to http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16535 the proftpd in sarge is still vulnerable to CVE-2005-4816: Buffer overflow in mod_radius in ProFTPD before 1.3.0rc2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long password. -- Francesco P. Lovergine ---End Message---
Bug#354355: Bug#404140: Accepted sympa 5.2.3-0.8 (source i386)
Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Stefan Hornburg wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Version: 5.2.3-0.8 Distribution: experimental Jean-Charles, except #404140, do you see any other bug to be fixed before uploading this sympa package to unstable ? Any other tester ? Stefan, please upload new version with a fix for #404140 to unstable ASAP ! We need to get this version in etch soon. Yes, sympa will be uploaded today to unstable. Bye Racke -- LinuXia Systems = http://www.linuxia.de/ Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration ICDEVGROUP = http://www.icdevgroup.org/ Interchange Development Team -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404143: Fans unreliable under load, permanent memory leak
hello, On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm more than willing to help test a kernel package, but I'll be on [VAC] from 2006-12-23 to 2007-01-03 inclusive. So, please do not release Etch just now :) I have ordered an nx6325, which should arrive directly after Christmas. I would also be happy to test a fixed kernel. Due to this being an overheating problem, I would prefer if you could provide kernel images, so that I don't have to compile it. Marc -- BOFH #34: (l)user error could you please send in the output of: dmidecode acpidump thanks -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404756: gnome-control-center: Error activating XKB configuration when logging on
tag 404756 experimental thanks Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 00:41 +, Sam Morris a écrit : Package: gnome-control-center Version: 1:2.16.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: breaks user config -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Having compiled installed the packages of GNOME 2.16, when logging in I am presented with my old friend ;) Error activating XKB configuration. It can happen under various circumstances: - a bug in libxklavier library - a bug in X server (xkbcomp, xmodmap utilities) - X server with incompatible libxkbfile implementation This is a known issue: the gswitchit code doesn't work at all in experimental. I'm afraid you'll have to downgrade to gnome-session and control-center 2.14 in the meantime. Of course this package won't go to unstable until this bug is fixed. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-our own. Resistance is futile. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Processed: Re: Bug#404756: gnome-control-center: Error activating XKB configuration when logging on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 404756 experimental Bug#404756: gnome-control-center: Error activating XKB configuration when logging on There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404724: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: can't compile kernel modules, incompatible with gcc 4.1)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:21:39 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404724: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: can't compile kernel modules, incompatible with gcc 4.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 Version: 2.6.16-12 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The current versions of kernel and gcc in unstable conflict, though not detected at package load time. This means that it is not possible to compile loadable kernel modules, which most end-users need to do at some point (not to mention module developers). I just did a dist-upgrade from stable to unstable in the last 24 hours. After that there were serius screen update problems so I tried to install the nvidia driver (direct from nvidia, the older version I had been using before). It reported that the version of gcc used to compile the kernel (4.0) is not the same as the version of gcc on the system (4.1) and that the kernel module loader would reject any modules built with gcc 4.1 (and indeed the module was rejected). Nvidia driver version: NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-8762-pkg1.run -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 depends on: ii module-init-tools 3.3-pre3-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii yaird [linux-initramfs-tool] 0.0.12-18 Yet Another mkInitRD Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 recommends: pn libc6-i686none (no description available) -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.16-1-686: false linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.16-1-686: false linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/abort-install-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.16-1-686: ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- * Mark Whitis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-27 21:49]: Thanks for the quick response. Unfortunately, apt-get dist-upgrade doesn't know that 2.6.18-3 replaces 2.6.16-1. Since I managed to get things working by reverting to gcc 4.0 and upgrading to the newest nvidia driver (see Bug #282183), I might stay at 2.6.16 for the time being. 2.6.16 is no longer supported. If you install linux-image-2.6-686 you'll always get the latest version. Anyway, closing this bug report. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Processed: Re: Bug#404234: CVE-2006-6669: WebCalendar XSS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 404234 important Bug#404234: CVE-2006-6669: WebCalendar XSS Severity set to `important' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 370132 5.2.3-6 Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults upon first query [ia64 s390] Bug marked as found in version 5.2.3-6. retitle 370132 snmpd segfaults upon first query [s390] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults upon first query [ia64 s390] Changed Bug title. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 404342 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 # valid for a ROM flashing tool to FTBFS on s390 :) severity 404342 important Bug#404342: flashrom - FTBFS: warning: implicit declaration of function 'iopl' Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#404662: dwww: File conflict with iceweasel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 404662 dwww Bug#404662: iceweasel: creates /usr/share/firefox symlink Bug reassigned from package `iceweasel' to `dwww'. severity 404662 serious Bug#404662: iceweasel: creates /usr/share/firefox symlink Severity set to `serious' from `important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
found 370132 5.2.3-6 retitle 370132 snmpd segfaults upon first query [s390] thanks I just tested 5.2.3-4 which doesn't expose this bug, cool! Thanks for the report. However, i leave this bug open until the s390 buildd is fixed and a corrected s390 binary has been uploaded. Thanks to version-tracking, closing with the right version works now. :) Unfortunately, only the ia64 bug is fixed. s390 is still miscompiled by buildd in 5.2.3-6. We need a binary NMU with the s390 buildd fixed to have a /etc/mtab file so configure finds its location. Else, snmpd will crash on s390 as soon as a disk space check is configured in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf. Thanks, Jochen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404234: CVE-2006-6669: WebCalendar XSS
severity 404234 important thanks On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:51:46PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: Package: webcalendar Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole A vulnerability has been found in webcalender: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in export_handler.php in WebCalendar 1.0.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the format parameter. See http://secunia.com/advisories/23341 for details. Please mention the CVE id in the changelog. I think it would be nice if it was fixed in etch, but I guess one could also argue that this is not RC. Yes, last I knew, XSS vulns were not treated as 'grave' by the security team. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404143: Fans unreliable under load, permanent memory leak
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 06:52:06PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 03:40:58AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: I have reviewed the information available on the thermal problems with HP laptops, and it appears that there is a fairly conservative set of patches which takes care of the problems (thanks to Bas for pointing most of the out). I might have missed some upstream bugs, so please let me know if there is anything else available on the issue. Below is the summary, describing the relevant patches: i nack the mentioned patches! Well, that's one in favor and one vote against then. I'm going to have to side with maks on this. The last thing we need at this point of the release is a complex backported patch, targetted or not, that's going to require a lot of third-party testing before we can even establish whether it's caused regressions for other systems. I think that leaves the best option as ACPI blacklisting, in the kernel, for those models known to have problems. I think this is strictly better than trying to have the kernel give a warning when it detects such a model; it's more likely to reach the target audience than a note in the release notes; and it's far less of a support burden overall than trying to add in a special 2.6.19 kernel in and pretend that support for it could be at all comparable to that of the main kernel for the release. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403356: Bug can be closed
Resolved. The reason turned out to be filesystem corruption in my chroot. How did it happed, that's another question. Sorry for the late followup, in the meantime I had hardware problems. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404143: Fans unreliable under load, permanent memory leak
hello, On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 09:46:04PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: At Jurij's request, I've tried out his patch. It seems to work perfectly here (HP nc6120) , and fixes the no fans after suspend problem of #400488. forgot to ask you to for the ouput of dmidecode and acpidump. for the acpi blacklisting. thanks -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Repoen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 370132 Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults upon first query [s390] 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383164: I can't reproduce the bug
At 1167261963 time_t, Anibal Avelar wrote: Hi. I have a question. I hope not be obvious. I tried to reproduce the bug about upx error, but I couldn't. What was the conditions under it should be proved? I have i386/unstable with kernel 2.6.16 and 2.6.17 and I can't see it. Still fails to build for me under pbuilder with 2.6.18-3 Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#403994: marked as done (file conflict with webmagick)
quote who=Debian Bug Tracking System date=Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:03:25AM -0800 Your message dated Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#403994: fixed in aub 2.2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. Thanks Andreas for clearing this up! As you know, it's the Holiday sand I've been traveling and largely unresponsive over the last week or so. I saw the bug but had not had an opportunity to address it yet. Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mako.cc/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403345: patch for 2.0.2+20060303-4.1
The patch in 2.1.4-6 does not apply cleanly to 2.0.2+20060303-4.1 . I extracted the attached patch from 2.0.4. 21_20061210_eRuby_Injection.dpatch Description: application/shellscript
Processed: found 404009 in 1.9.0.2-4, reassign 404010 to slang-slirp, forcibly merging 404009 404010
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 found 404009 1.9.0.2-4 Bug#404009: file conflict between slang-slirp and slang Bug marked as found in version 1.9.0.2-4. reassign 404010 slang-slirp Bug#404010: file conflicts between slirp and slang-slirp Bug reassigned from package `slirp' to `slang-slirp'. forcemerge 404009 404010 Bug#404009: file conflict between slang-slirp and slang Bug#404010: file conflicts between slirp and slang-slirp Forcibly Merged 404009 404010. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 404476 to postinst does not deal correctly with sockets/pipes in subdirectories of /dev ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 # forward maintainer request retitle 404476 postinst does not deal correctly with sockets/pipes in subdirectories of /dev Bug#404476: Not able to install udev Changed Bug title. severity 404476 normal Bug#404476: postinst does not deal correctly with sockets/pipes in subdirectories of /dev Severity set to `normal' from `critical' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#354355: marked as done (New debian sympa package)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:47:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#354355: fixed in sympa 5.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: sympa
Version: 5.1.2-cvs.20060224-0.1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Please have a look to
deb http://ldap.u-picardie.fr/~delepine/APT/sympa ./
deb-src http://ldap.u-picardie.fr/~delepine/APT/sympa ./
It install and upgrade fine if mysql is used. Postgres is in the
same state as in the old package.
5.1.2-cvs.20060224-0.1 is based on sympa's stable cvs branch (only
bugs fixes over 5.1.2), it's a good candidate for a long waited upload
to unstable.
I'd like to co-maintain this package with you.
Here's the changelog.
sympa (5.1.2-cvs.20060224-0.1) experimental; urgency=low
* NMU
* new upstream release
Closes: #301264, #349883
* Closes old fixed bugs
Closes: #65299, #149285, #188399, #192120, #237621, #347735, #253301,
#275003, #321026,
* remove msgdir and set localedir in old sympa.conf
* more perl modules recommandation
* more configure variables settings (doc, locale, sample, scripts, ...)
* assure wwsympa.fcgi knowns it should run as sympa.sympa (configure option)
* remove /usr/lib/sympa/nls from list of dir
* remove obsolete patches
* really dirty hack to set supported_lang according to /etc/locale.gen
* Change the test used to know if we can connect mysql without password
* mysql_read_default_file uses group client, force it to use group mysql
Closes: #336157
* don't exit 1 when install-${DBTYPE}-db ends successfully
* use $user instead of sympa in install-mysql-db
* sympa url is now /sympa by default, not /wws
* remove more obsolete files and directory
* reorganize wwsympa configuration
* add debconf menu for the soap server
* populate and chown /etc/sympa/data_structure.version if it doesn't exist
* All modifications of orginal sympa sources are now in dpatch format
Buid-Depend dpatch
* MAIL::Internet is needed at build time
* New upstream release from sympa cvs.
* remove obsolete patches
* try to conform to /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian advices
* build depend on automake1.9 and autoconf as we've modified configure.in
and Makefile.am
* cleaning po/* in make clean
* Add libregexp-common-perl dependancy
* Adapt postrm to the new wwsympa and sympa-soap apache conf
* convert debian/control to UTF-8 (lintian)
* chown sympa.sympa = sympa:sympa (lintian)
* doesn't translate anymore default select field (lintian)
* upgrade to Standards-Version 3.6.2 (lintian)
* do not expose internal text to PO files anymore and run debconf-updatepo.
Closes: #338161, #343634.
* new French, German and Swedish debconf templates translation .
Closes: #313832, #335419, #339710,
-- Jean Charles Delepine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:40:13 +0100
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (100, 'testing'), (10, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages sympa depends on:
ii adduser3.63 Add and remove users and groups
ii debconf1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy
ii libarchive-zip-perl1.14-1Module for manipulation of ZIP arc
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcgi-fast-perl 5.8.4-8sarge3 CGI::Fast Perl module
ii libcrypt-ciphersaber-perl 0.61-4Perl module implementing CipherSab
ii libdbd-mysql-perl 2.9006-1 A Perl5 database interface to the
ii libdbi-perl1.46-6Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu
ii libfcgi-perl 0.67-1FastCGI Perl module
ii libintl-perl 1.11-1Uniforum message translations syst
ii libio-stringy-perl 2.110-1 Perl5 modules for IO from scalars
ii libmailtools-perl 1.62-1Manipulate email in perl programs
ii libmd5-perl2.03-1backwards-compatible wrapper for D
ii libmime-perl 5.417-1 Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m
ii libmsgcat-perl 1.03-3Locale::Msgcat perl module
ii libnet-ldap-perl 0.3202-3 A Client interface to LDAP servers
ii libregexp-common-perl 2.120-1 Provide commonly requested regular
ii
Bug#404140: marked as done (wwsympa and soap must be restarted before database upgrade)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:47:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404140: fixed in sympa 5.2.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: sympa Version: 5.2.3-0.7 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: causes non-serious data loss wwsympa and soap can cause database corruption if running while database upgrade : http://listes.cru.fr/sympa/arc/sympa-users/2006-12/msg00058.html With newer sympa versions, including 5.2.3, if wwsympa and soap detecte that the database is outdated, they will stay in maintenance mode waiting that sympa.pl upgrade the it. One solution for debian is then to restart or reload apache before upgrading the database. wwsympa will then be restarted too and will stay in maintenance mode. In the patch the execution of prepare-db is moved to the end of postinst, just after apache restart. At this stade the conf files are upgraded and wwsympa and soap can be restarted. Apache restart is strongly recommended, maybe it should be forced ? A reload is enought. Index: debian/postinst === --- debian/postinst (revision 2089) +++ debian/postinst (working copy) @@ -315,10 +315,9 @@ chown sympa:sympa /etc/sympa/sympa.conf chmod 0640 /etc/sympa/sympa.conf - - /usr/share/sympa/db/prepare_db fi + # remove depreciated WWW configuration fragment db_get wwsympa/webserver_type @@ -454,6 +453,10 @@ fi fi +if [ $use_db = true ]; then + /usr/share/sympa/db/prepare_db +fi + ## End up with debconf db_stop Index: debian/templates === --- debian/templates(revision 2084) +++ debian/templates(working copy) @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ Type: boolean Default: true _Description: Do you want the Web server to be restarted after installation? + In case of sympa upgrade, if you don't want the webserver to be restarted + you must make sure wwsympa and sympasoap are not running or you can + experience database corruption. Template: wwsympa/remove_spool Type: boolean -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable'), (10, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-xen-amd64 Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages sympa depends on: ii adduser 3.100 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.5.8 Debian configuration management sy ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.16-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcgi-fast-perl 5.8.8-6.1 CGI::Fast Perl module ii libcrypt-ciphersaber-perl0.61-4 Perl module implementing CipherSab ii libdbd-mysql-perl3.0008-1A Perl5 database interface to the ii libdbi-perl 1.53-1 Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu ii libfcgi-perl 0.67-2 FastCGI Perl module ii libintl-perl 1.16-1 Uniforum message translations syst ii libio-stringy-perl 2.110-1 Perl5 modules for IO from scalars ii libmailtools-perl1.74-1 Manipulate email in perl programs ii libmd5-perl 2.03-1 backwards-compatible wrapper for D ii libmime-perl 5.420-0.1 Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libmsgcat-perl 1.03-3 Locale::Msgcat perl module ii libnet-ldap-perl 1:0.33-2A Client interface to LDAP servers ii libtemplate-perl 2.14-1 template processing system written ii libxml-libxml-perl 1.59-2 Perl module for using the GNOME li ii mhonarc 2.6.16-1Mail to HTML converter ii perl [libmime-base64-perl] 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-suid5.8.8-6.1 Runs setuid Perl scripts ii postfix [mail-transport-agen 2.3.4-3 A high-performance mail transport ii sysklogd [system-log-daemon] 1.4.1-18System Logging Daemon Versions of packages sympa recommends: ii doc-base 0.7.21 utilities to manage online documen ii logrotate 3.7.1-3Log rotation utility -- debconf information: * wwsympa/webserver_type: Apache * sympa/listmaster: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 404517 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 # not ported, not RC severity 404517 important Bug#404517: purelibc_0.2-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing definitions? Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404801: Kill -9 on gdb processs results in a kernel krash.
Package: gdb Version: 6.3-6 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system We are currently running our program with gdb inside a screen. Every night we restart it by running kill -9 on both the screen and gdb pids. This results in a kernel crash. A screenshot from the console output can be found here: http://www.streamingemotions.se/console.jpg -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages gdb depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline44.3-11 GNU readline and history libraries -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 404416 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 severity 404416 important Bug#404416: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: pc working very slow with new kernel Severity set to `important' from `grave' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404484: marked as done (gcompris: FTBFS on ia64 - needs build-dep on libasound2-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:55:26 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404484: gcompris: FTBFS on ia64 - needs build-dep on libasound2-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gcompris Version: 8.2.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hello The package fails to build on ia64 according to the build log[1]. The missing file is in libasound2-dev so maybe a new build-dependency will fix it. bye, -christian- [1]: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gcomprisver=8.2.2-1arch=ia64stamp=1166917613file=log -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 05:31:50PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061226 08:08]: * Christian Hammers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061225 06:51]: The package fails to build on ia64 according to the build log[1]. The missing file is in libasound2-dev so maybe a new build-dependency will fix it. Actually, I doubt the culprit is this package, but some other package - but yes, adding the build dep will probably fix it. This comes from the file libSDL_mixer.la from the package libsdl-mixer1.2-dev: libSDL_mixer.la.hppa:dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libvorbisfile.la -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libvorbis.la /usr/lib/libogg.la /usr/lib/libsmpeg.la -lstdc++ -lSDL -lm /usr/lib/libSDL.la' libSDL_mixer.la.i386:dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libvorbisfile.la /usr/lib/libvorbis.la /usr/lib/libogg.la -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libsmpeg.la -lstdc++ -lSDL -lm /usr/lib/libSDL.la' libSDL_mixer.la.ia64:dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libvorbisfile.la /usr/lib/libvorbis.la /usr/lib/libogg.la -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libsmpeg.la -lstdc++ -lSDL /usr/lib/libSDL.la /usr/lib/libasound.la /usr/lib/libartsc.la -L/usr/share/qt3/lib /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.la /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.la /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.la -lrt /usr/lib/libesd.la /usr/lib/libaudiofile.la -laudio -lXt /usr/lib/libdirectfb.la /usr/lib/libfusion.la /usr/lib/libdirect.la -lz -ldl /usr/lib/libaa.la -lncurses -lslang -lm -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lpthread' A binary rebuild fixed this issue. As such, I believe this bug should be closed. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ ---End Message---
Bug#404500: marked as done (missing dependency against perl-modules (fixed in sid))
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:56:57 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404500: missing dependency against perl-modules (fixed in sid) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: sitesummary-client Version: 0.0.19 Severity: serious Hi This RC bug documents that the current version in etch has an RC bug due to a missing dependency against perl-modules which is currently needed for sitesummary-client . Merry merry Christmas. Cheers Steffen ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.0.20 On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 07:12:33PM +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote: This RC bug documents that the current version in etch has an RC bug due to a missing dependency against perl-modules which is currently needed for sitesummary-client . Then we should also be documenting what version it's fixed in. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ ---End Message---
Bug#404634: marked as done (copyright file missing)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 03:01:37 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404634: copyright file missing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- package: vlc version: 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-1 severity: serious Hi, the binary package lacks a copyright file, this violates policy severerly, thus serious. regards, Holger pgptdidaIAEod.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 06:55:06PM +0100, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote: On Wed, Dec 27, 2006, Holger Levsen wrote: package: vlc version: 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-1 severity: serious the binary package lacks a copyright file, this violates policy severerly, thus serious. vlc Depends: vlc-nox and vlc-nox contains /usr/share/doc/vlc/ see http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelistword=vlc-noxversion=unstablearch=i386page=1number=all Moreover /usr/share/doc/vlc-nox - vlc/ Is this a problem? Based on your description, no. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ ---End Message---
Processed: severity of 404377 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 severity 404377 normal Bug#404377: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Severity set to `normal' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Not a security problem per se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 404775 -security Bug#404775: iceweasel: upgrade fails from 2.0+dfsg-1 to 2.0.0.1+dfsg-1 There were no tags set. Tags removed: security thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404801: marked as done (Kill -9 on gdb processs results in a kernel krash.)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 03:30:48 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404801: Kill -9 on gdb processs results in a kernel krash. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gdb Version: 6.3-6 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system We are currently running our program with gdb inside a screen. Every night we restart it by running kill -9 on both the screen and gdb pids. This results in a kernel crash. A screenshot from the console output can be found here: http://www.streamingemotions.se/console.jpg -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages gdb depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline44.3-11 GNU readline and history libraries -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 11:53:06AM +0100, Håkan Larsson wrote: Package: gdb Version: 6.3-6 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system We are currently running our program with gdb inside a screen. Every night we restart it by running kill -9 on both the screen and gdb pids. This results in a kernel crash. Then your kernel is buggy, not gdb. Based on the information in your report it's plausible that you're using an official Debian kernel for sarge, in which case feel free to reopen this bug and reassign it to the kernel; but it's unlikely that it will be fixed in sarge, with etch just around the corner. Regards, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ ---End Message---
Bug#403056: tagging 403056
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:32:37PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Marco Nenciarini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061217 03:25]: tags 403056 + pending When can we expect an upload of the next version of wengophone? Or should I just upload the fix as NMU for now? I'm testing it just now. Bye -- - |Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia | - Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95 5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: remove powerpc and sparc from pingus build architectures
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 241931 grave Bug#241931: pingus: Weird colors on powerpc arch (clanlib issue?) Severity set to `grave' from `important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392785: marked as done (zope-book: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Invalid syntaxt. Assignment to None.)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:12:01 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line zope-book: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Invalid syntax. Assignment to None. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: zope-book Version: 1:0.20050408-1 Severity: serious When building 'zope-book' in a clean unstable chroot, I get the following error: make html make[1]: Entering directory `/zope-book-0.20050408' /usr/bin/python html.py Acquisition.stx Traceback (most recent call last): File html.py, line 4, in ? from StructuredText import HTMLWithImages, DocumentWithImages, Basic File /zope-book-0.20050408/StructuredText/__init__.py, line 86, in ? import HTMLClass, DocumentClass File /zope-book-0.20050408/StructuredText/HTMLClass.py, line 87, in ? import re, sys, ST File /zope-book-0.20050408/StructuredText/ST.py, line 1, in ? import re, STDOM File /zope-book-0.20050408/StructuredText/STDOM.py, line 417 def _get_PreviousSibling(self, SyntaxError: Invalid syntax. Assignment to None. make[1]: *** [Acquisition.html] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/zope-book-0.20050408' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Regards Andreas Jochens ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Closing, as the package has been removed from unstable (long overdue, too). A slightly newer, although not completely updated, version of the book is available at: http://www.plope.com/Books/2_7Edition (Also see: http://www.zope.org/Documentation/Books/ZopeBook/) Note: the 2.7 book is also pretty much outdated, as Zope has evolved very fast. Please see the various Zope community sites for more information. ---End Message---
Bug#395181: initrd-tools?
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Noah Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 19:41]: Our options would seem to be to revise the release notes to no longer suggest upgrading aptitude before dist-upgrade, or including an initrd-tools package that doesn't conflict with current libc6. I believe we should include an initrd-tools package, even if it is just a dummy package, to provide for a smooth upgrade path. I doubt that a dummy package is better, I think it is even worse because it will lull people into security where there is none. Basically, initrd-tools has been removed because it maintainers asked for removal from testing plus unstable. If I understand it correct, someone could take over a package where the maintainers asked for removal (well, basically it is orphaned with the please remove foo now) - and if the then-current maintainer ask to let the initrd-tools back to testing, I don't see why we should refuse this. (Of course, my understanding could be wrong.) If initrd-tools needs to be kept around for etch for an upgrade path, I'm willing to do the minimum of work necessary to support this. The reason it was removed from testing in the first place is that it had an RC bug filed against it that no one thought was worth the effort of investigating. I'll prepare an upload to fix 395181. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#241931: Weird colors on powerpc arch (clanlib issue?)
Hi, For checking a bit more whether the bug is in pingus or clanlib/etc, could you check other games that use it? (clanbomber and trophy) Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392785: zope-book: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Invalid syntax. Assignment to None.
Closing, as the package has been removed from unstable (long overdue, too). A slightly newer, although not completely updated, version of the book is available at: http://www.plope.com/Books/2_7Edition (Also see: http://www.zope.org/Documentation/Books/ZopeBook/) Note: the 2.7 book is also pretty much outdated, as Zope has evolved very fast. Please see the various Zope community sites for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404020: libuser: NMU diff file
Hello, Please find libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.diff as an attachment. Aníbal Monsalve Salazar -- http://v7w.com/anibal interdiff -z -p1 ../libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1.diff.gz ../libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.diff.gz diff -u libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/rules libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/rules --- libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/rules +++ libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/rules @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ # This special exception was added by Craig Small in version 0.37 of dh-make. # Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode. -#export DH_VERBOSE=1 +export DH_VERBOSE=1 #include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ cp $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python$*/site-packages/libusermodule.so \ $(CURDIR)/debian/python-libuser/usr/lib/python$*/site-packages/libuser.so + mkdir -p $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man8 + for n in lchage lgroupadd lgroupdel lgroupmod lid lnewusers \ + lpasswd luseradd luserdel lusermod; \ + do \ + sed s/^\.TH $$n 1 /.TH $$n 8 / $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/$$n.1 \ + $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man8/$$n.8; \ + rm -f $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/$$n.1; \ + done + install: $(patsubst %,install-%,$(shell pyversions -s)) dh_testdir install -Dm644 debian/shlibs.libuser1 debian/libuser1/DEBIAN/shlibs diff -u libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/control libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/control --- libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/control +++ libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/control @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED] Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), python-all-dev, pkg-config, libglib2.0-dev, linuxdoc-tools, groff, libpam0g-dev, libpopt-dev, - dpatch, python-support (= 0.4) + dpatch, autotools-dev, python-support (= 0.4) Standards-Version: 3.7.2 Package: libuser diff -u libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/changelog libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/changelog --- libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/changelog +++ libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +libuser (1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Moved all manpages of commands in /usr/sbin/ from section 1 to +section 8 (Closes: #404020). + * Added autotools-dev as build-dependency. + + -- Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:18:14 +1100 + libuser (1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#404823: Usb devices doesn't work
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.18-3-amd64 Severity: grave Justification: renders system unusable I've just installed Debian Etch for amd64. The boot process sleep 2 times for about 5 minutes. My usb device doesn't work, they aren't powered. My motherboard is an Asus A8V Deluxe. I've used a lot of distros and Debian worked. The installer works. I can't give you any other information because I've only usb mouse and keyboard, and ssh is not installed. Say what you need for solve this. I'll get ps2 keyboard in the less time possible. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404822: /usr/bin/gnome-mouse-properties: Mouse Preferences have no effect
Package: gnome-control-center Version: 1:2.16.2-2 Severity: serious File: /usr/bin/gnome-mouse-properties -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 None of the mouse-related options seem to have any effect: * Left-handed mouse * Pointer Theme * Locate Pointer * Acceleration * Sensitivity - -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (530, 'testing'), (520, 'unstable'), (510, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gnome-control-center depends on: ii capplets-data 1:2.16.2-2 configuration applets for GNOME 2 ii desktop-file-utils0.11-1 Utilities for .desktop files ii gnome-desktop-data2.16.2-1 Common files for GNOME 2 desktop a ii gnome-icon-theme 2.16.1-1 GNOME Desktop icon theme ii gnome-menus 2.16.1-2 an implementation of the freedeskt ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.12.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.16.0-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.16.0-1 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.2.4-4The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libdbus-1-3 1.0.2-1simple interprocess messaging syst ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.71-3 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libebook1.2-9 1.8.1-3Client library for evolution addre ii libesd-alsa0 [libesd0]0.2.36-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libfontconfig12.4.1-2generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.2.1-5FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgconf2-4 2.16.0-3 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.0-3 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.12.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-desktop-22.16.2-1 Utility library for loading .deskt ii libgnome-keyring0 0.6.0-3GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome-menu22.16.1-2 an implementation of the freedeskt ii libgnome-window-settings1 1:2.16.2-2 Utility library for getting window ii libgnome2-0 2.16.0-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.14.0-2 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.16.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.16.1-1 GNOME virtual file-system (runtime ii libgstreamer-plugins-base 0.10.11-1 GStreamer libraries from the base ii libgstreamer0.10-00.10.11-1 Core GStreamer libraries and eleme ii libgtk2.0-0 2.10.6-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libhal1 0.5.8.1-4 Hardware Abstraction Layer - share ii libice6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libmetacity0 1:2.16.3-1 library of lightweight GTK2 based ii libnautilus-extension12.16.3-1 libraries for nautilus components ii liborbit2 1:2.14.3-0.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.14.8-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.15~beta5-1 PNG library - runtime ii libpopt0 1.10-3 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm61:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library ii libstartup-notification0 0.8-2 library for program launch feedbac ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-4 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor1 1.1.7-4X cursor management library ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxfixes31:4.0.1-5 X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio ii libxft2 2.1.10-3 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi61:1.0.1-4 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4.1X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxklavier11 3.0-2 X Keyboard Extension high-level AP ii libxml2 2.6.27.dfsg-1 GNOME XML library ii libxrandr22:1.1.0.2-5X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.1-3 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxss1 1:1.1.0-1 X11 Screen Saver extension library ii libxxf86misc1 1:1.0.1-2 X11 XFree86 miscellaneous extensio ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime Versions of packages gnome-control-center recommends: ii bzip2
Bug#404021: marked as done (file conflicts between libuser and id-utils)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404020: fixed in libuser 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libuser Version: 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both id-utils and libuser ship `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libuser_1%3a0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz', which is also in package id-utils Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libuser_1%3a0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/id-utils_libuser for the full log. bye, - michael ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libuser Source-Version: 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libuser, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libuser1-dev_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb to pool/main/libu/libuser/libuser1-dev_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb libuser1_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb to pool/main/libu/libuser/libuser1_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.diff.gz to pool/main/libu/libuser/libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.diff.gz libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.dsc to pool/main/libu/libuser/libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.dsc libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb to pool/main/libu/libuser/libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb python-libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb to pool/main/libu/libuser/python-libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libuser package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:18:14 +1100 Source: libuser Binary: python-libuser libuser1 libuser libuser1-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libuser- user and group account administration library libuser1 - user and group account administration library (shared libraries) libuser1-dev - user and group account administration library (development files) python-libuser - user and group account administration library (development files) Closes: 404020 Changes: libuser (1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Moved all manpages of commands in /usr/sbin/ from section 1 to section 8 (Closes: #404020). * Added autotools-dev as build-dependency. Files: 54b164b54ff2ba8a80af55ea0863e3b7 777 admin optional libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.dsc 5a7e1e990729242c136c1cc4307077b1 3547 admin optional libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.diff.gz 6a49787f8b0ba6a27ca8c2bfcc6e4062 308572 admin optional libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb 33539708dc9487e542a0bcfa3e412aae 60604 admin optional libuser1-dev_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb 8a1e3646599b4108d468d6ca9d581b74 48722 libs optional libuser1_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb 9f2d2b8a76f62ef36a2bc4686a5d4df9 32898 admin optional python-libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFk7gzipBneRiAKDwRAgeOAJ0SWa20EuMF/gvPJEakJQ12vSY0eQCcD+y9 wS+SvKX+VQWt0X5rcH6vZM8= =LONo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#404020: marked as done (file conflict with id-utils: Must rename lid.1.gz - lid.8.gz)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404020: fixed in libuser 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: id-utils Version: 3.2d-11 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both id-utils and libuser ship `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libuser_1%3a0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz', which is also in package id-utils Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libuser_1%3a0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/id-utils_libuser for the full log. bye, - michael ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libuser Source-Version: 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libuser, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libuser1-dev_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb to pool/main/libu/libuser/libuser1-dev_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb libuser1_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb to pool/main/libu/libuser/libuser1_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.diff.gz to pool/main/libu/libuser/libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.diff.gz libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.dsc to pool/main/libu/libuser/libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.dsc libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb to pool/main/libu/libuser/libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb python-libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb to pool/main/libu/libuser/python-libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libuser package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:18:14 +1100 Source: libuser Binary: python-libuser libuser1 libuser libuser1-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libuser- user and group account administration library libuser1 - user and group account administration library (shared libraries) libuser1-dev - user and group account administration library (development files) python-libuser - user and group account administration library (development files) Closes: 404020 Changes: libuser (1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Moved all manpages of commands in /usr/sbin/ from section 1 to section 8 (Closes: #404020). * Added autotools-dev as build-dependency. Files: 54b164b54ff2ba8a80af55ea0863e3b7 777 admin optional libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.dsc 5a7e1e990729242c136c1cc4307077b1 3547 admin optional libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.diff.gz 6a49787f8b0ba6a27ca8c2bfcc6e4062 308572 admin optional libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb 33539708dc9487e542a0bcfa3e412aae 60604 admin optional libuser1-dev_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb 8a1e3646599b4108d468d6ca9d581b74 48722 libs optional libuser1_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb 9f2d2b8a76f62ef36a2bc4686a5d4df9 32898 admin optional python-libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFk7gzipBneRiAKDwRAgeOAJ0SWa20EuMF/gvPJEakJQ12vSY0eQCcD+y9 wS+SvKX+VQWt0X5rcH6vZM8= =LONo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#404826: prboom.wad contains material from doom and wolfenstein 3d
Package: prboom Version: 2:2.4.6-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 It has been brought bto my attention that prboom's prboom.wad contains sprites taken from the commercial ID software game Wolfenstein 3D (the dog sprites, DOGS*) and resources derived from copyright material taken from the commercial ID software game Doom or Doom 2 (many of the M_* graphic resources which describe menu entries are based on the typeface used in the commercial graphics). I intend to fix this problem within the next few days by substituting in resources taken from Freedoom. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages prboom depends on: ii freedoom [doom-wad] 0.5-1free game files for the 3D game DO ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]6.5.1-0.4A free implementation of the OpenG ii libglu1-mesa [libglu1] 6.5.1-0.4The OpenGL utility library (GLU) ii libsdl-mixer1.2 1.2.6-1.1+b2 mixer library for Simple DirectMed ii libsdl-net1.2 1.2.5-7+b1 network library for Simple DirectM ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.11-7 Simple DirectMedia Layer prboom recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403117: Incomplete copyright/license information: Additional restrictions to GPL
You might want to read this regarding the license issue: http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2006/12/20/lets-hear-the-communitys-voice-the-faad-2-5-licensing-issue I also tried to contact ahead a few times in the past with absolutely no answer. As you might've noticed I'm maintaining this package since more than a year now for Ubuntu and we've taken the last CVS snapshot because of this issue and various other bugfixes for portability, broken API, etc you might be interested in. Otherwise I could give you some patches in early January as I'm currently busy... Bye signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#403136: Further investigation : The stdout pipe gets killed for some reason ...
Can you provide more info about this alleged bug? If not then it should be downgraded or closed. If you need more help with debugging you can find me on IRC. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#404828: clanbomber: unusable on sparc and powerpc (clanlib issue?)
Package: clanbomber Version: 1.05cdbs-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, On powerpc and sparc architectures where I have tried it, clanbomber takes 99% of CPU and does not display anything but a blackscreen (the X window is frozen and not refreshed). It is impossible to shutdown and needs to be killed. It might be related to clanlib issues on big-endian architectures. See also #241931. With respect to the severity of the bug, I read (in reportbug) the following description: 1 renders package unusablerenders the package unusable, or mostly so, on all or nearly all possible systems on which it could be installed (i.e., not a hardware-specific bug); or renders package uninstallable or unremovable without special effort and chose it as it is not specific to one single hardware but at least two architectures. If I am wrong in understanding the severity description, feel free to downgrade the severity (and fix the reportbug English description... or maybe fix my English understanding). :) An easy solution would be to disable building of clanbomber on powerpc and sparc architectures (I wonder if it has ever worked). Thanks, Frédéric -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages clanbomber depends on: ii clanbomber-data 1.05cdbs-5 Bomberman like game ii libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libclan2c2a-mikmod 0.6.5-1-3.3 MikMod module for ClanLib game SDK ii libclan2c2a-sound0.6.5-1-3.3 Sound module for ClanLib game SDK ii libclanlib2c2a 0.6.5-1-3.3 ClanLib game SDK core runtime ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-19 GCC support library ii libmikmod2 3.1.11-a-6 A portable sound library ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-19The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 clanbomber recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
Bug#403985: apt-get update crashes in pkgAcqDiffIndex::ParseDiffIndex
Hi, sorry that nobody contacted you for such a long time. * jacob kuenzel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061220 18:50]: I just did a fresh install from the stable netinst iso and then dist-upgraded to unstable. Now when I try to aptitude update or apt-get update, I get a crash: does this error still happen for you? I couldn't reproduce it. If so, could you try moving away /var/cache/apt/*bin and if it works after that? Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404834: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64: Kernel unaligned access kills at least sshfs (and may make USB unreliable)
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64 Version: 2.6.18-8 Severity: critical Tags: patch Justification: breaks unrelated software Hi, at first: if the severity may seem inflated feel free to adjust it. Well start with the easy things: my hardware is an old Sun Ultra 5. I added an USB 2.0 controller because I do not have a type 6 mouse, only a keyboard (output of lspci concerning the controller): 02:03.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41) 02:03.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41) 02:03.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 02) The mouse works but at boot I get this: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[1000c9e4] ehci_hub_control+0x54c/0x68c [ehci_hcd] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[1000c9e4] ehci_hub_control+0x54c/0x68c [ehci_hcd] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[1000c9e4] ehci_hub_control+0x54c/0x68c [ehci_hcd] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[1000c9e4] ehci_hub_control+0x54c/0x68c [ehci_hcd] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[1000c9e4] ehci_hub_control+0x54c/0x68c [ehci_hcd] According to http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/22/326 A 2.6.18-rc kernel compiled with gcc-4.1.1 will throw a few unaligned accesses when I initialise USB by inserting a USB memory stick. Removing the memory stick then results in PCI errors and other breakage. Well, I do not have any USB mass media which is dispensible and as this may (or may not) kill data I opted not to try. A patch is included in http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/23/184: diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c index fb4d058..7766d7b 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c @@ -344,7 +344,8 @@ static int rh_call_control (struct usb_h struct usb_ctrlrequest *cmd; u16 typeReq, wValue, wIndex, wLength; u8 *ubuf = urb-transfer_buffer; - u8 tbuf [sizeof (struct usb_hub_descriptor)]; + u8 tbuf [sizeof (struct usb_hub_descriptor)] + __attribute__((aligned(4))); const u8*bufp = tbuf; int len = 0; int patch_wakeup = 0; I compiled a kernel with this patch (wrecked a harddisk while doing this, but this is almost 100% certainly not related) and the messages disappears. But as I tried to use sshfs to access another computer on my net this happened: $ unset LANG $ echo $LANG $ sshfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/smc phobos/ Kernel unaligned access at TPC[5d3770] scm_detach_fds_compat+0x74/0x16c Kernel unaligned access at TPC[5d37dc] scm_detach_fds_compat+0xe0/0x16c Kernel unaligned access at TPC[5d37f8] scm_detach_fds_compat+0xfc/0x16c Kernel unaligned access at TPC[5d3810] scm_detach_fds_compat+0x114/0x16c Bus-Zugriffsfehler $ ls phobos ls: phobos: Transport endpoint is not connected $ ls total 12 drwxr-xr-x 6 smc smc 4096 Dec 28 13:22 GNUstep/ drwx-- 5 smc smc 4096 Dec 28 14:13 Maildir/ ?- ? ? ? ?? phobos The mountpoint is unusable (but luckily unmountable via fusermount -u). I guess the same problem as above applies BUT I DO NOT HAVE ANY KERNEL EXPERTISE WHATSOEVER! If there is anything I can do to help please let me know! Greetings, Sebastian Fontius -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (550, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (40, 'experimental') Architecture: sparc (sparc64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-sparc64 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64 depends on: ii coreutils 5.97-5 The GNU core utilities ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy ii initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.85e tools for generating an initramfs ii module-init-tools 3.3-pre3-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64 recommends no packages. -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.18-3-sparc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.18-3-sparc64: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/preinst/initrd-2.6.18-3-sparc64: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.18-3-sparc64: true shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true * linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.18-3-sparc64: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.18-3-sparc64: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.18-3-sparc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.18-3-sparc64: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.18-3-sparc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.18-3-sparc64: true linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.18-3-sparc64: true
Bug#241931: Weird colors on powerpc arch (clanlib issue?)
Hi, Thanks for the hints. On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:53PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: For checking a bit more whether the bug is in pingus or clanlib/etc, could you check other games that use it? (clanbomber and trophy) I have checked clanbomber on powerpc and sparc etch. It freezes in both cases (I have filed an other bug report on clanbomber: #404828). Trophy is not in Debian etch nor unstable anymore: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341102 I have tried clanbomber and trophy on a (remote) sparc sarge (I do not have at hand a powerpc sarge). They both refuse to start in remote X sessions (not very surprising...), see below. (just for the record) $ clanbomber [1] 1897 X Error of failed request: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied) Major opcode of failed request: 146 (MIT-SHM) Minor opcode of failed request: 3 (X_ShmPutImage) Serial number of failed request: 26 Current serial number in output stream: 29 [1]+ Exit 1 clanbomber $ trophy [1] 1900 ClanLib Info(1): X11 Implementation: Fallback to normal XImages. This will be horribly slow! from Sources/Display/Display/X11/display_xwindow.cpp:342 An error occured: Imagefile characters: 77 Resourcefile characters: 94 Thanks for your interest. Best regards, Frédéric
Bug#403136: Further investigation : The stdout pipe gets killed for some reason ...
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:38:47PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: Can you provide more info about this alleged bug? What more information do you want ? I think you said this was in the camp of upstream now ? And you asked me to contact them. Which admitelly i have not yet done, but which i also believe is somehow the job of the package maintainer. If not then it should be downgraded or closed. I strongly object to this. As said, i installed Yellow Dog Linux, and it had no such problem, so i think we can exclude any kind of hardware problem, and this is a serious regression. If you need more help with debugging you can find me on IRC. Yeah, just right now i don't have time for this, i need to find it though, i need the box to go into production again ASAP. But any hint about how to find out why udevd kills the pipe would be welcome, i was told to write a C program which writes to stdout, and reports the exact error message. Also, another idea would be to debug the problem on the udevd side, but the quick glance i had was not enough to allow me to do this in a meaningful way. Like always, time is missing to further investigate this. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 02:08]:
* Jochen Friedrich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 10:58]:
found 370132 5.2.3-6
retitle 370132 snmpd segfaults upon first query [s390]
thanks
I just tested 5.2.3-4 which doesn't expose this bug, cool!
Thanks for the report. However, i leave this bug open until the s390
buildd is fixed
and a corrected s390 binary has been uploaded.
Thanks to version-tracking, closing with the right version works now. :)
Unfortunately, only the ia64 bug is fixed. s390 is still miscompiled by
buildd in 5.2.3-6.
We need a binary NMU with the s390 buildd fixed to have a /etc/mtab file so
configure finds
its location. Else, snmpd will crash on s390 as soon as a disk space check
is configured in
/etc/snmp/snmpd.conf.
Can't you hardcode the location into the code?
The attached patch makes sure we don't mind about that anymore (though
that is a bad patch, configure should have an option like
--mtab=/etc/mtab or so).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
diff -ur ../net-snmp-5.2.3~/configure ../net-snmp-5.2.3/configure
--- ../net-snmp-5.2.3~/configure2006-07-13 23:33:19.0 +
+++ ../net-snmp-5.2.3/configure 2006-12-28 14:18:34.0 +
@@ -13906,23 +13906,7 @@
# Check for mount table location
#
-echo $as_me:$LINENO: checking for mount table location 5
-echo $ECHO_N checking for mount table location... $ECHO_C 6
-if test ${ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB+set} = set; then
- echo $ECHO_N (cached) $ECHO_C 6
-else
- ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=unknown
-for i in /etc/mnttab /etc/mtab /etc/filesystems
- do
- if test -f $i; then
-ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=$i
-break;
- fi
-done
-
-fi
-echo $as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB 5
-echo ${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB 6
+ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=/etc/mtab
cat confdefs.h _ACEOF
#define ETC_MNTTAB $ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB
diff -ur ../net-snmp-5.2.3~/configure.in ../net-snmp-5.2.3/configure.in
--- ../net-snmp-5.2.3~/configure.in 2006-07-13 23:29:49.0 +
+++ ../net-snmp-5.2.3/configure.in 2006-12-28 14:17:45.0 +
@@ -2100,16 +2100,7 @@
# Check for mount table location
#
-AC_CACHE_CHECK(for mount table location,ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB,
-[ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=unknown
-for i in /etc/mnttab /etc/mtab /etc/filesystems
- do
- if test -f $i; then
-ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=$i
-break;
- fi
-done
-])
+ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=/etc/mtab
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(ETC_MNTTAB,$ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB)
diff -ur ../net-snmp-5.2.3~/debian/changelog ../net-snmp-5.2.3/debian/changelog
--- ../net-snmp-5.2.3~/debian/changelog 2006-12-28 14:13:22.0 +
+++ ../net-snmp-5.2.3/debian/changelog 2006-12-28 14:19:05.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+net-snmp (5.2.3-6.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * We are on Debian, always use /etc/mtab.
+
+ -- Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:18:48 +
+
net-snmp (5.2.3-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Update non-duplicate patch to upstream version.
Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andreas, Please allow me another remark - I think you should by way force configure to use sane values. Otherwise, you get errors like in http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=net-snmpver=5.2.3-6arch=powerpcstamp=1166829254file=log without any related change. That's an autoconf bug, see #403243. Thanks, Jochen -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFk9mg0fhX0Y/ocz0RAmswAJ9hr5OAiAY22sHIS7E7iHitD2jHIACfSvUh gKet5TuirL5yW8lH8CcHdMc= =VSt4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 06:20]: * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 02:08]: * Jochen Friedrich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 10:58]: found 370132 5.2.3-6 retitle 370132 snmpd segfaults upon first query [s390] thanks I just tested 5.2.3-4 which doesn't expose this bug, cool! Thanks for the report. However, i leave this bug open until the s390 buildd is fixed and a corrected s390 binary has been uploaded. Thanks to version-tracking, closing with the right version works now. :) Unfortunately, only the ia64 bug is fixed. s390 is still miscompiled by buildd in 5.2.3-6. We need a binary NMU with the s390 buildd fixed to have a /etc/mtab file so configure finds its location. Else, snmpd will crash on s390 as soon as a disk space check is configured in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf. Can't you hardcode the location into the code? The attached patch makes sure we don't mind about that anymore (though that is a bad patch, configure should have an option like --mtab=/etc/mtab or so). Please allow me another remark - I think you should by way force configure to use sane values. Otherwise, you get errors like in http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=net-snmpver=5.2.3-6arch=powerpcstamp=1166829254file=log without any related change. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#241931: Weird colors on powerpc arch (clanlib issue?)
Hi, Frederic Lehobey, le Thu 28 Dec 2006 14:57:02 +0100, a écrit : On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:53PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: For checking a bit more whether the bug is in pingus or clanlib/etc, could you check other games that use it? (clanbomber and trophy) I have checked clanbomber on powerpc and sparc etch. It freezes in both cases (I have filed an other bug report on clanbomber: #404828). Ok, so I guess your suggestion to disable the build on ppc and sparc archs should be fine (and turn this bug into a Big-Endian wishlist) Samuel
Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andreas, The attached patch makes sure we don't mind about that anymore (though that is a bad patch, configure should have an option like --mtab=/etc/mtab or so). The attached patch adds a configure option --with-mnttab=path. Maybe it's a good idea to push this upstream (e.g. for embedded platforms which might operate without /etc/mtab, but with /proc/mounts instead). Thomas, what is your opinion on this one? Thanks, Jochen -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFk99Y0fhX0Y/ocz0RAoR+AJ0VSaCnQWKR0cF1TTllveUsEHNhpACePTJH SKUb7eVjowABiQp3gI+qV0Q= =fAx3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- net-snmp-5.2.3.orig/configure.in 2006-07-14 01:29:49.0 +0200 +++ net-snmp-5.2.3/configure.in 2006-12-28 16:07:34.0 +0100 @@ -2102,13 +2102,18 @@ AC_CACHE_CHECK(for mount table location,ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB, [ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=unknown -for i in /etc/mnttab /etc/mtab /etc/filesystems - do - if test -f $i; then -ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=$i -break; - fi -done +AC_ARG_WITH(mnttab, +[ --with-mnttab=\/etc/mnttab\ Mount table location.], + [ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=$with_mnttab]) +if test $ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB = unknown; then + for i in /etc/mnttab /etc/mtab /etc/filesystems +do +if test -f $i; then + ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=$i + break; +fi + done +fi ]) AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(ETC_MNTTAB,$ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB)
Bug#395181: initrd-tools?
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 04:00:53AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Noah Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 19:41]: Our options would seem to be to revise the release notes to no longer suggest upgrading aptitude before dist-upgrade, or including an initrd-tools package that doesn't conflict with current libc6. I believe we should include an initrd-tools package, even if it is just a dummy package, to provide for a smooth upgrade path. I doubt that a dummy package is better, I think it is even worse because it will lull people into security where there is none. Basically, initrd-tools has been removed because it maintainers asked for removal from testing plus unstable. If I understand it correct, someone could take over a package where the maintainers asked for removal (well, basically it is orphaned with the please remove foo now) - and if the then-current maintainer ask to let the initrd-tools back to testing, I don't see why we should refuse this. (Of course, my understanding could be wrong.) If initrd-tools needs to be kept around for etch for an upgrade path, I'm willing to do the minimum of work necessary to support this. The reason it was removed from testing in the first place is that it had an RC bug filed against it that no one thought was worth the effort of investigating. agreed. I'll prepare an upload to fix 395181. no need we'll handle that. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404828: clanbomber: unusable on sparc and powerpc (clanlib issue?)
reassign 404828 libclanlib2 severity 404828 important tag 404828 upstream confirmed merge 404828 335886 thanks Hi Frederic, Frederic Daniel Luc Lehobey [2006-12-28 14:38 +0100]: On powerpc and sparc architectures where I have tried it, clanbomber takes 99% of CPU and does not display anything but a blackscreen (the X window is frozen and not refreshed). It is impossible to shutdown and needs to be killed. It might be related to clanlib issues on big-endian architectures. See also #241931. Right, clanlib has never worked on big endian machines. Merging with the already existing bugs. I agree that clanlib should not be built on big endian architectures if it's that hard to fix it on those. If that is done, I'll ask for removing the clanlib packages on those architectures, too. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: bug 403566
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity #403566 grave Bug#403566: psad doesn't start because /usr/lib/psad doesn't exist Severity set to `grave' from `normal' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#404828: clanbomber: unusable on sparc and powerpc (clanlib issue?)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 404828 libclanlib2 Bug#404828: clanbomber: unusable on sparc and powerpc (clanlib issue?) Bug reassigned from package `clanbomber' to `libclanlib2'. severity 404828 important Bug#404828: clanbomber: unusable on sparc and powerpc (clanlib issue?) Severity set to `important' from `grave' tag 404828 upstream confirmed Bug#404828: clanbomber: unusable on sparc and powerpc (clanlib issue?) There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream, confirmed merge 404828 335886 Bug#335886: libclanlib2: still fails on bigendian machines Bug#404828: clanbomber: unusable on sparc and powerpc (clanlib issue?) Bug#374857: clanbomber: Not working on PowerPc Merged 335886 374857 404828. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391601: marked as done (ping6: unusable if built from source)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:19:45 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#391601: fixed in iputils 3:20020927-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: iputils-ping Version: 3:20020927-3 Severity: serious Justification: Building from source results in unusable binary Hello, With the binary currently in unstable: % ping6 ::1 PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.058 ms --- ::1 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.058/0.058/0.058/0.000 ms With the binary obtained from unmodified Debian source: % ping6 ::1 can't receive hop limit: Protocol not available I've not checked yet, but my best guess is a mixup between the RFC2292- and RFC3542-style socket options. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages iputils-ping depends on: ii libc62.3.6.ds1-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries iputils-ping recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: iputils Source-Version: 3:20020927-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of iputils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: iputils-arping_20020927-4_i386.deb to pool/main/i/iputils/iputils-arping_20020927-4_i386.deb iputils-ping_20020927-4_i386.deb to pool/main/i/iputils/iputils-ping_20020927-4_i386.deb iputils-tracepath_20020927-4_i386.deb to pool/main/i/iputils/iputils-tracepath_20020927-4_i386.deb iputils_20020927-4.diff.gz to pool/main/i/iputils/iputils_20020927-4.diff.gz iputils_20020927-4.dsc to pool/main/i/iputils/iputils_20020927-4.dsc netkit-ping_20020927-4_i386.deb to pool/main/i/iputils/netkit-ping_20020927-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Noah Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated iputils package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:05:27 -0500 Source: iputils Binary: iputils-ping iputils-tracepath netkit-ping iputils-arping Architecture: source i386 Version: 3:20020927-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Noah Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Noah Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: iputils-arping - Tool to send ICMP echo requests to an ARP address iputils-ping - Tools to test the reachability of network hosts iputils-tracepath - Tools to trace the network path to a remote host netkit-ping - The ping utility from netkit (transitional package) Closes: 233125 384012 391601 397935 402121 Changes: iputils (3:20020927-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * Acknowledge NMU * Apply patch from Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] to fix arping behavior when -w and -c command line flags are given and the target host does not reply. (Closes: Bug#233125) * Provide a netkit-ping package so there's a smooth upgrade path for people who had the old netkit ping implementation installed. (Closes: Bug#384012) * Apply patch from Rémi Denis-Courmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] to fix incompatibilities with 2.4 and older 2.6 kernels in ping6 and tracepath6. (Closes: Bug#402121, Bug#397935) . iputils (3:20020927-3.1) unstable; urgency=low . * NMU * Use IPV6_RECVHOPLIMIT instead of IPV6_HOPLIMIT in ping6 to build with current kernel headers. Closes: #391601 * Explicitly build-depend on the current version of linux-kernel-headers since older ones don't have IPV6_RECVHOPLIMIT. Files: fc57b0b89dcf4c1bdf5049e0b04fec3c 682 net extra iputils_20020927-4.dsc c8d128e5c2861814c2a4d85b7f0396f8 11250 net extra iputils_20020927-4.diff.gz 1b440c6d28c4bd453b4a7e45a0944f8d 41758 net important iputils-ping_20020927-4_i386.deb 84d2345a81b779438ef11c15fc98ca2c 26510 net
Bug#404631: marked as done (missing files under /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:40:20 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404631: missing files under /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/ has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libtiff-tools Version: 3.8.2-6 Severity: serious copyright file is not shipped along, which violates the policy. Might be some cdbs flaw which led to such package? dpkg -L libtiff-tools | grep doc /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools ls -l /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/ total 0 -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) Versions of packages libtiff-tools depends on: ii libc62.3.6.ds1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libjpeg626b-13 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libtiff4 3.8.2-6 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime libtiff-tools recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well. Situation persists after reinstallation. Purging first and reinstallation of libtiff-tools helps. Thus I confirm the bug which probably exists due to improper handling of link creation during upgrades, thus probably will be present in etch shipped to people upgrading from sarge. . . . I have reopened the bug and will look into the problem more deeply, attempting to determine whether the problem is in libtiff or something else such as dpkg or apt . . . I'm closing this bug once again as the problem is not with tiff's packaging but with dpkg or something related to it. I have confirmed that upgrading from 3.7.2-7 (the sarge version) to 3.8.2-6 leaves an empty /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools behind and that dpkg -P libtiff-tools followed apt-get install libtiff-tools creates the link as expected. It appears that dpkg is not successfully replacing a directory with a symbolic link, but I need to confirm this. I noticed that my sid system, which I installed in 2003 or 2004 with an early sarge debian-installer candidate version and have been upgrading since contains several empty directories in /usr/share/doc: /usr/share/doc/attr /usr/share/doc/bogofilter /usr/share/doc/cdrecord /usr/share/doc/libxml2-dev /usr/share/doc/libxml2-utils /usr/share/doc/python-dev /usr/share/doc/python-examples /usr/share/doc/libapr1.0 Before I had /usr/share/doc/idle there as well. When I uninstalled and reinstalled it, I got /usr/share/doc/idle as a link to python. So this problem is obviously affecting multiple packages. Creating links in /usr/share/doc seems completely valid though: % find /usr/share/doc -maxdepth 1 -type l -print | wc -l 133 I will report a bug against dpkg (or whatever I determine to be appropriate) after coming up with a reliable recipe to reproduce the problem. I'll debbugs-cc you unless you tell me not to. -- Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---End Message---
Bug#290833: marked as done (dbmail-pgsql: Inconsistent escaping of user supplied data in dbauthpgsql.c)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:48:18 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: dbmail-pgsql Version: 1.2.11 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In pgsql/dbauthpgsql.c escaping is not consistent. Sometimes username and other user supplied values are escaped and sometimes like in: auth_check_user(...) auth_check_user_ext(...) auth_adduser(...) auth_delete_user(...) they are not. This most likely opens ways sql injection. I don't have proof of concept yet, so if this doesn't look exploitable to you at first glance, please close it and I'll resubmit it when I finish PoC. Best regards, Primoz - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB6xk+HOuqnSwJthERAjDgAKCUymqECSMx0/c2p9P+zO7Bdn2zWQCeMLZF IWWvdB8kL1HOs/Hc0JNCUW0= =GoHo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This package has been removed because: RC buggy, unreleased, next version NEW anyway -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#309558: marked as done (php4-vpopmail_4.3.4-5.4.4+2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: can't find '/vadddomain')
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line vpopmail removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: php4-vpopmail Version: 4.3.4-5.4.4+2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of php4-vpopmail_4.3.4-5.4.4+2 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 33 Build started at 20050517-2308 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libvpopmail-dev (= 5.4.4-1), php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) [...] checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes checking if compiler supports -R... no checking if compiler supports -Wl,-rpath,... yes checking for PHP prefix... /usr checking for PHP includes... -I/usr/include/php4 -I/usr/include/php4/main -I/usr/include/php4/Zend -I/usr/include/php4/TSRM checking for PHP extension directory... /usr/lib/php4/20020429 checking for re2c... exit 0; checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... mawk checking for vpopmail support... yes, shared checking for vpopmail install directory... configure: error: Could not find '/vadddomain' or binary not executeable under current user. Please make sure you have vpopmail properly installed. Use ./configure --with-vpopmail=vpopmail-home-dir if necessary make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppapkg=php4-vpopmailver=4.3.4-5.4.4+2 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- vpopmail has been removed because it is buggy and appears unmaintained. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#382463: marked as done (lightlab: FTBFS: build-dep on xlibmesa-glu-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:48:46 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: lightlab Version: 0.3-3.1 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: Automatic build of lightlab_0.3-3.1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 Build started at 20060811-0840 ** Checking available source versions... Fetching source files... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Need to get 131kB of source archives. Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main lightlab 0.3-3.1 (dsc) [847B] Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main lightlab 0.3-3.1 (tar) [105kB] Get:3 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main lightlab 0.3-3.1 (diff) [25.8kB] Fetched 131kB in 7s (16.7kB/s) Download complete and in download only mode ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libgnome-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libx11-dev, libxt-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, xlibmesa-glu-dev | libglu-dev, bc, libgdk-pixbuf-dev, libglut-dev ** Filtered missing central deps that are dependencies of or provide build-deps: libart-dev (= 1.2.13-5), libaudiofile-dev (= 0.2.3-4), libdb3-dev (= 3.2.9-17), libesd0-dev (= 0.2.23-1), xlibs-dev ( 4.1.0) Warning: The following central src deps are (probably) missing: gdk-imlib-dev, xlibmesa-dev Checking for already installed source dependencies... debhelper: missing libgnome-dev: missing libgtk1.2-dev: missing libglib1.2-dev: missing libx11-dev: missing libxt-dev: missing xlibmesa-gl-dev: missing libgl-dev: missing xlibmesa-glu-dev: missing libglu-dev: missing bc: missing libgdk-pixbuf-dev: missing libglut-dev: missing Checking for source dependency conflicts... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Package xlibmesa-glu-dev has no installation candidate Package xlibmesa-glu-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source apt-get failed. Package installation failed Trying to reinstall removed packages: Trying to uninstall newly installed packages: Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping lightlab ** Finished at 20060811-0840 Build needed 00:01:29, 7760k disk space -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This package has been removed because it's buggy, unused. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#393103: marked as done (peacock segfaults on every action)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:47:36 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: peacock Version: 1.9.1-3 Severity: important In short: peacock crashes on both open or new. After starting, I get a window. Hitting either New or Open + selectign a html file, gives me the following messages and peacock segfaults: *cerebro /tmp# peacock-2 (peacock-2:10295): gtkhtml-WARNING **: Cannot create spell dictionary instance (iid:OAFIID:GNOME_Spell_Dictionary:0.3) (peacock-2:10295): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid cast from `ColorCombo' to `GtkBox' (peacock-2:10295): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid cast from `ColorCombo' to `GtkBox' -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 Versions of packages peacock depends on: ii bonobo-activation 1:2.4.0-4 The GNOME Bonobo support binaries ii gtkhtml3.03.0.9-2.1 HTML rendering/editing library - b ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-5 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.6.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo-activation4 1:2.4.0-4 The GNOME Bonobo library (dummy pa ii libbonobo2-0 2.6.2-4Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.6.1-1The Bonobo UI library hi libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgconf2-4 2.6.2-1GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.0-1 Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.4-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.6.1-8The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.6.1.1-2 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-02.4.2-6The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeui-0 2.4.0.1-12 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.6.1.1-3 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnomevfs2-common 2.6.1.1-3 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.3-3The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtksourceview1.0-0 0.7.0-2Shared libraries for the GTK+ synt ii liblinc1 2:1.0.3-4 library to simplify creating netwo ii liborbit2 1:2.10.2-1.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.4.0-4Layout and rendering of internatio ii libxml2 2.6.10-3 GNOME XML library ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.1.1-5compression library - runtime -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This package has been removed because it is unmaintained, buggy. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#394568: marked as done (mediawiki1.5: CVE-2006-2611 / obsolete)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:05:21 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: mediawiki1.5 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole mediawiki1.5 is vulnerable to CVE-2006-2611, which is already fixed in mediawiki1.7. mediawiki1.5 is also scheduled for removal (390491). Hence, it should be removed from testing. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Removed -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#243007: marked as done (libvpopmail-perl_0.08-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line vpopmail removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libvpopmail-perl Version: 0.08-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of libvpopmail-perl_0.08-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5 Build started at 20040410-1031 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libvpopmail-dev (= 5.4.0-1), perl (= 5.6.0-16) [...] vpopmail.c: At top level: vpopmail.xs:31: warning: `not_here' defined but not used Running Mkbootstrap for vpopmail () chmod 644 vpopmail.bs rm -f blib/arch/auto/vpopmail/vpopmail.so LD_RUN_PATH= cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib vpopmail.o -o blib/arch/auto/vpopmail/vpopmail.so -L/usr/lib/vpopmail -lvpopmail /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.3/../../../libvpopmail.a(vpopmail.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol OptimizeAddDomain /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.3/../../../libvpopmail.a(vpopmail.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol verrori /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.3/../../../libvpopmail.a(vpopmail.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol OptimizeAddDomain /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.3/../../../libvpopmail.a(vpopmail.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol verrori /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.3/../../../libvpopmail.a(vpopmail.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol verrori collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [blib/arch/auto/vpopmail/vpopmail.so] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libvpopmail-perl-0.08' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64pkg=libvpopmail-perlver=0.08-1 shared libraries must be built using only -fPIC code. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- vpopmail has been removed because it is buggy and appears unmaintained. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#347771: marked as done (webmin-ldap-user-simple: Depends on removed webmin)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:50:27 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: webmin-ldap-user-simple Severity: serious Hi Your package depends on the now removed webmin package suite. (See #343897 for more). Possible solutions: - File a bug against ftp.debian.org to remove your package too. - Build a maintenance team for webmin that works (see #343897 for more) and get webmin into Debian again. -- bye Joerg That's just f***ing great, now the bar for being a cool guy in free software just got raised. It used to be you just had to write a million lines of useful code. Now you've got to get a subpoena from SCO to be cool. pgpemnpfY2L7D.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- webmin-ldap-user-simple has been removed because it depends on webmin which is no longer in Debian. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#378941: marked as done (localeconf.postinst does not preserve local changes in /etc/environment)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:53:46 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: localeconf Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 Hi, localeconf.postinst does not preserve local changes in /etc/environment, it uses debconf markers. This usage is considered a violation of policy for a long time. As /etc/environment is a PAM configuration file, modifying this file is also a violation of 10.7.4. Of course this one is not your fault, it was a bug in the locales package. It has been fixed now, and update-locale(8) should be used to modify locale variables. Anyway this package is almost useless nowadays, so instead of fixing it to make it policy compliant, I suggest that you request its removal from unstable. Most other Progeny packages also modify configuration files without preserving local changes, have not been updated for a long time and do no more integrate well with current Debian tools, please remove them also from unstable. Thanks Denis ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This package has been removed because it is orphaned, buggy. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#268349: marked as done (base-passwd: Conflicting allocation in the 64000-64999 range between vpopmail and asterisk)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line vpopmail removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: base-passwd Version: 3.5.7 Severity: normal The README in /usr/share/doc/base-passwd say that UID 64020 is allocated to user asterisk and the GID 64020 by group asterisk. In fact, the asterisk package postinst script use dynamic uid : adduser --system --group ... Aditionnaly, UID 64020 and GID 64020 are statically used for the user vpopmail and the group vchkpw in the vpopmail-bin package preinst script. Who is wrong ? Should the README be corrected or vpopmail allocate another UID ? -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (1000, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages base-passwd depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- vpopmail has been removed because it is buggy and appears unmaintained. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#336374: marked as done (libvpopmail-freecdb - fails to uninstall)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line vpopmail removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libvpopmail-freecdb Version: 5.4.4-1 Severity: grave libvpopmail-freecdb fails to uninstall | Removing libvpopmail-freecdb ... | /var/lib/dpkg/info/libvpopmail-freecdb.postrm: line 3: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory | dpkg: error processing libvpopmail-freecdb (--remove): | subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 | Errors were encountered while processing: | libvpopmail-freecdb | E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Bastian -- Spock: The odds of surviving another attack are 13562190123 to 1, Captain. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- vpopmail has been removed because it is buggy and appears unmaintained. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#344426: marked as done (Remove unnecessary, buggy fmtutil code)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:55:07 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: passivetex Severity: serious Version: 1.25-2 The package has two serious bugs, and some normal ones: 1. The package has in its postinst the line: /usr/bin/fmtutil --cnffile /usr/share/tetex-bin/fmtutil.cnf --all /dev/null 21 Beside the fact that it should use fmtutil-sys as soon as teTeX-3.0 is in testing, and that it should not prepend a path to the binary, it has a major flaw: It statically uses a template configuration file in /usr/share/tetex-bin instead of the actual configuration file (/var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf, a file generated from files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d). This does not make any sense at all, and it creates formats according to the tetex-bin package default instead of local customization. Furthermore, since passivetex is not listed anywhere in /usr/share/tetex-bin/fmtutil.cnf, the line only recreates formats that are already available anyway (created by tetex-bin's postinst script). 2. The postinst snippet below has the effect that if the local admin deletes the configuration file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/96passivetex.cnf, it is resurrected from the template file, which is a violation of Policy 10.7.3: if [ -f $conffile ] ; then : elif [ -f $conffile.disable ]; then mv $conffile.disable $conffile else cp $TMPLDIR/`basename $conffile` $conffile fi Furthermore, there is no Policy or tradition that a configuration file with suffix disable is treated specially. Therefore it might well be that local admin renamed the configuration file manually to $conffile.disable, and this would also be destroyed by this snippet. As a sidenote, it seems as if this configuration file has not been updated for years - the main_memory setting for passivetex is obviously supposed to increase the available memory size for initex, but in fact it is only half the size as the setting for all other programs. 3. In the prerm script, the configuration file discussed above is moved to $conffile.disable. This is not necessary, since texmf variable settings for programs that won't be run don't do any harm. Furthermore, after this is done, the program update-fmtutil is called, but for the change to have an effect update-texmf would be needed. This is only of normal severity, but when it's fixed the postrm script has to be adapted. I don't know how passivetex is actually used, but the Makefile in the examples directory calls xsltproc from the package of the same name, without Depending on it, or listing it in Suggests/Recommends. Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This package has been removed because: buggy, few users. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#356985: marked as done (aptconf: Completely broken (fails to modify sources.list))
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:58:02 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: aptconf Version: 0.8-0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This report should normally be sent as 2 important bug reports, but these add up to make aptconf unusable, and I don't see any fixes other than removal coming, so I'm opening a single grave bug. aptconf's debconf interface seems completely broken. All tests I have done did not modify sources.list. The interface, despite looking rather awkward, is not broken. Here are some tests that failed to modify sources.list on 3 machines (2 Etch, 1 Sarge). Test 1 # dpkg-reconfigure aptconf 0. Insert CD repository and mount or not 1. Add CD 2. Done Results: aptconf doesn't complain, but sources.list is not modified. On at least one machine, aptconf outputs string:25: DeprecationWarning: xreadlines is deprecated; use 'for line in file'. Test 2 # dpkg-reconfigure aptconf 1. Add Custom 2. Description: TEST 3. Type: Binary 4. Base URL: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ 5. Suite: etch 6. Components : main 7. Done I am not sure that these values are in the form expected, but I have tried several things and they all failed. Results are identical to those of test 1. aptconf's GNOME interface (configlet) was broken on 1 machine (Etch) on which I tested it. I didn't test on the other Etch machine as GNOME is not installed. It is possible that the behaviour described is not reproducible everywhere. Note that on stable, the recommandation python-configlet is not available. On this machine, trying to launch the configlet Software Sources from GNOME's Debian menu failed. From the CLI, # aptconf-configlet-capplet; outputs: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/aptconf-configlet-capplet, line 111, in ? dialog = gnome.ui.GnomeMessageBox( AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'GnomeMessageBox' Google failed to give any result related to this, so my tests stopped there. Unless my problem with the configlet is not reproducable everywhere, these issues make aptconf unusable. Since the last upload was an NMU and was done over a year ago, QA should IMO request removal of this package from unstable for being broken and orphan. The package seems also unusable in stable, but I don't think it's worth removing it from there. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_CA, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages aptconf depends on: ii debconf 1.4.70 Debian configuration management sy ii libxml-grove-perl 0.46alpha-11 Perl module for accessing parsed * Versions of packages aptconf recommends: ii configlet-frontends 2.4alternate debconf configuration in ii python-configlet 2.4alternative debconf configuration ii python-xml0.8.4-1XML tools for Python [dummy packag -- debconf information: aptconf/mirror_country-debian-stable-security: aptconf/repotype-http_dolly.ift.ulaval.ca_debian_-main: binary aptconf/action_menu: Done aptconf/confirm_delete: false aptconf/description-debian-stable-security: Debian - security updates aptconf/suite-http_dolly.ift.ulaval.ca_debian_-main: debian/ aptconf/description-debian-stable-proposed: Debian - proposed updates aptconf/idlist: aptconf/components-debian-stable-security: main contrib non-free aptconf/disabled-debian-stable: true aptconf/disabled-debian-stable-security: true aptconf/components_menu: aptconf/repotype: binary aptconf/repotype-debian-stable: binary aptconf/disabled-: false aptconf/components-debian-stable-proposed: aptconf/suite: main aptconf/disabled: false aptconf/suite-debian-stable-proposed: dists/proposed-updates aptconf/components-http_dolly.ift.ulaval.ca_debian_-main: main aptconf/description-http_dolly.ift.ulaval.ca_debian_-main: TEST aptconf/mirror_country-debian-stable: aptconf/mainmenu: Done aptconf/enable_source: false aptconf/repotype-debian-stable-proposed: binary aptconf/baseurl: http://dolly.ift.ulaval.ca/debian/ aptconf/baseurl-debian-stable-proposed: http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian aptconf/components: main aptconf/components-debian-stable: main contrib non-free
Bug#326757: marked as done (vpopmail: Miscompilation on amd64: Please update the libtool scripts)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line vpopmail removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: vpopmail Version: 5.4.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'vpopmail' on amd64/unstable, the resulting libvpopmail1 package does not contain the shared library files libvpopmail.so.1*. This is apparently caused by outdated libtool scripts. With the attached patch 'vpopmail' can be compiled on amd64/unstable. The attached patch also adds the missing Build-Depends on 'adduser' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/vpopmail-5.4.4/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/vpopmail-5.4.4/debian/rules 2005-09-05 13:51:07.0 + +++ ./debian/rules 2005-09-05 13:47:28.0 + @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ configure: configure-stamp configure-stamp: dh_testdir + libtoolize -f /bin/sh ./autogen.sh \ --enable-vpopmail=/var/lib/vpopmail \ --enable-vpopmailbindir=/usr/sbin \ diff -urN ../tmp-orig/vpopmail-5.4.4/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/vpopmail-5.4.4/debian/control 2005-09-05 13:51:07.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-05 13:47:58.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: contrib/mail Priority: optional Maintainer: Pawel Wiecek [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), autoconf, automake, freecdb, libmysqlclient10-dev | libmysqlclient-dev, libtool, zlib1g-dev, libglib-dev, ed +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), autoconf, automake, adduser, freecdb, libmysqlclient10-dev | libmysqlclient-dev, libtool, zlib1g-dev, libglib-dev, ed Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: vpopmail-bin ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- vpopmail has been removed because it is buggy and appears unmaintained. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#256236: marked as done (dbmail doesn't stop itself on remove)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:48:18 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- package: dbmail-pgsql version: 1.2.8b severity: serious There is no prerm in this package; therefor, it's not possible for it to shuyt itself down when being removed. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This package has been removed because: RC buggy, unreleased, next version NEW anyway -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#382757: marked as done (fst - FTBFS: Build depeneds agains unavailable package)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:45:54 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: fst Version: 1.8-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of fst_1.8-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), dpatch, vstsdk, libjack-dev, liblash-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libasound2-dev, libwine-dev [...] E: Couldn't find package vstsdk apt-get failed. Package installation failed Trying to reinstall removed packages: Trying to uninstall newly installed packages: Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping fst ** Finished at 20060812-1311 Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disk space Bastian -- Earth -- mother of the most beautiful women in the universe. -- Apollo, Who Mourns for Adonais? stardate 3468.1 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This package has been removed: RoQA, GPL/contrib, non-redistributable -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#267333: marked as done (vpopmail-bin: missing dependency on adduser)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line vpopmail removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- package: vpopmail-bin severity: serious version: n/a The postinst of vpopmail-bin calls adduser. adduser is not among the dependencies of vpopmail-bin but should be since it is not essential. Regards, uLI ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- vpopmail has been removed because it is buggy and appears unmaintained. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#277170: marked as done (Need upload with support for newer mozilla)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:06:17 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: mozilla-locale-zh-cn Version: 1.6-0.1 According to the testing status on URL:http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mozilla-locale-zh-cn.html, this mozilla translation need to be updated to support the latest version of mozilla. Testing Status 201 days old (needed 2 days) mozilla-locale-zh-cn/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: mozilla-browser ( 2:1.6.1) Valid candidate ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- orphaned, mozilla scheduled for removal. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#359927: marked as done (fails to install: addgroup command not found)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line vpopmail removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: vpopmail-bin Version: 5.4.4-1 Severity: serious In a buildd chroot, attempting to install vpopmail-bin results in: Unpacking vpopmail-bin (from .../vpopmail-bin_5.4.4-1_hppa.deb) ... Checking vpopmail user...not exist. Checking vchkpw group...not exist. Creating vchkpw group.../var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 71: addgroup: command not found dpkg: error processing /home2/buildd/build/chroot-unstable/var/cache/apt/archives/vpopmail-bin_5.4.4-1_hppa.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 127 lamont ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- vpopmail has been removed because it is buggy and appears unmaintained. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#366509: marked as done (webmin-ldap-user-simple: I have just installed the packege, and gone into it for the first time and get error messages)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:50:27 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: webmin-ldap-user-simple Version: 1.3-20 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I get the error messages on my first access to this module in webmin.:- Error - Bad Header [Tue May 9 11:27:31 2006] index.cgi: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/webmin/web-lib.pl line 1785. [Tue May 9 11:27:31 2006] index.cgi: Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/webmin/web-lib.pl line 1880. [Tue May 9 11:27:31 2006] index.cgi: readline() on closed filehandle USERMODS at /usr/share/webmin/web-lib.pl line 3476. [Tue May 9 11:27:31 2006] index.cgi: Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/webmin/web-lib.pl line 1925. [Tue May 9 11:27:31 2006] index.cgi: LDAP Error: LDAP_OPERATIONS_ERROR Server encountered an internal error [Tue May 9 11:27:31 2006] index.cgi: at /usr/share/webmin/ldap-users/ldap-users.pl line 49. System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages webmin-ldap-user-simple depends on: ii debconf1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii libcgi-application-perl3.31-0.1 Framework for building reusable we pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libhtml-fromtext-perl 2.05-1Mark up text as HTML ii libhtml-template-perl 2.6-2 HTML::Template : A module for usin ii libio-socket-ssl-perl 0.96-1Class implementing an object orien ii libnet-ldap-perl 0.3202-3 A Client interface to LDAP servers ii libtext-unaccent-perl 1.08-1provides functions to remove accen pn libtime-hires-perl Not found. ii libunicode-string-perl 2.07-1Perl modules for Unicode strings ii liburi-perl1.35-1Manipulates and accesses URI strin ii perl [libstorable-perl]5.8.4-8sarge4 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii webmin 1.180-3 web-based administration toolkit -- debconf information: webmin-ldap-skolelinux/passwd_number: 1 webmin-ldap-skolelinux/passwd_capital: 1 webmin-ldap-skolelinux/passwd_lowercase: 1 webmin-ldap-skolelinux/homeprefix: /skole/tjener/home0 webmin-ldap-skolelinux/rootdn: cn=admin,ou=People,dc=skole,dc=skolelinux,dc=no webmin-ldap-skolelinux/secret: 4efa0f613910e4e1199dffcbde71c27a webmin-ldap-skolelinux/auto-update_nextid: true webmin-ldap-skolelinux/basedn: dc=skole,dc=skolelinux,dc=no webmin-ldap-skolelinux/no-auto-config: webmin-ldap-skolelinux/mailprefix: /var/lib/maildirs webmin-ldap-skolelinux/passwd_length: 6 webmin-ldap-skolelinux/sambasync: 1 webmin-ldap-skolelinux/server: ldap ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- webmin-ldap-user-simple has been removed because it depends on webmin which is no longer in Debian. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#401079: marked as done (timezoneconf: Filed for removal, keep it out of Etch)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:59:26 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: timezoneconf Severity: grave It's been filed for removal from sid: reassign 379035 ftp.debian.org retitle 379035 RM: timezoneconf -- RoQA; orphaned, unsupportably buggy thanks Some of the more unsupportable bugs are 275289 and 289637. Like localeconf and etherconf, this is one of the leftovers from Progeny's configuration system, which they stopped maintaining years ago (early 2004). So it should most likely be hinted out of testing. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Removed - orphaned, unsupportably buggy. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#352342: marked as done (vpopmail: FTBFS: freecdbmake.h: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line vpopmail removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: php4-vpopmail Version: 5.4.4-1 Severity: serious When building 'vpopmail' in 'unstable', I get the following error: gcc -g -shared -fPIC -o freecdb.so ../vcdb.c -I.. -I/usr/include/freecdb -lfreec db -lfreecdbmake ../vcdb.c:38:25: error: freecdbmake.h: No such file or directory ../vcdb.c: In function 'make_vpasswd_cdb': ../vcdb.c:73: error: storage size of 'cdbm' isn't known ../vcdb.c:128: error: 'CDBMAKE_HASHSTART' undeclared (first use in this function ) ../vcdb.c:128: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../vcdb.c:128: error: for each function it appears in.) make[1]: *** [freecdb.so] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/vpopmail-5.4.4/plugins' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 This occurs because the latest unstable version of freecdb no longer provides freecdbmake.h. Regards Andreas Jochens ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- vpopmail has been removed because it is buggy and appears unmaintained. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#390461: marked as done (dbmail-pgsql: Depends on obsolete libpq3/b-deps on obsolete postgresql-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:48:18 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: dbmail-pgsql Version: 1.2.11-1 Severity: serious dbmail-pgsql still depends on libpq3 and build-depends on postgresql-dev. As announced ages ago [1], packages should build-dep on libpq-dev and use libpq4. I am going to remove libpq3 from the postgresql-7.4 source package now, since dbmail-pgsql is the only package that still depends on it and is not even in testing any more. I make this bug serious to prevent it from going into testing with the broken dependencies. Thank you, Martin [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/06/msg00500.html -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This package has been removed because: RC buggy, unreleased, next version NEW anyway -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#337436: marked as done (passivetex: destroys local configuration)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:55:07 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: passivetex Severity: serious Version: 1.25-2 The package has two serious bugs, and some normal ones: 1. The package has in its postinst the line: /usr/bin/fmtutil --cnffile /usr/share/tetex-bin/fmtutil.cnf --all /dev/null 21 Beside the fact that it should use fmtutil-sys as soon as teTeX-3.0 is in testing, and that it should not prepend a path to the binary, it has a major flaw: It statically uses a template configuration file in /usr/share/tetex-bin instead of the actual configuration file (/var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf, a file generated from files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d). This does not make any sense at all, and it creates formats according to the tetex-bin package default instead of local customization. Furthermore, since passivetex is not listed anywhere in /usr/share/tetex-bin/fmtutil.cnf, the line only recreates formats that are already available anyway (created by tetex-bin's postinst script). 2. The postinst snippet below has the effect that if the local admin deletes the configuration file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/96passivetex.cnf, it is resurrected from the template file, which is a violation of Policy 10.7.3: if [ -f $conffile ] ; then : elif [ -f $conffile.disable ]; then mv $conffile.disable $conffile else cp $TMPLDIR/`basename $conffile` $conffile fi Furthermore, there is no Policy or tradition that a configuration file with suffix disable is treated specially. Therefore it might well be that local admin renamed the configuration file manually to $conffile.disable, and this would also be destroyed by this snippet. As a sidenote, it seems as if this configuration file has not been updated for years - the main_memory setting for passivetex is obviously supposed to increase the available memory size for initex, but in fact it is only half the size as the setting for all other programs. 3. In the prerm script, the configuration file discussed above is moved to $conffile.disable. This is not necessary, since texmf variable settings for programs that won't be run don't do any harm. Furthermore, after this is done, the program update-fmtutil is called, but for the change to have an effect update-texmf would be needed. This is only of normal severity, but when it's fixed the postrm script has to be adapted. I don't know how passivetex is actually used, but the Makefile in the examples directory calls xsltproc from the package of the same name, without Depending on it, or listing it in Suggests/Recommends. Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This package has been removed because: buggy, few users. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#382644: marked as done (vpopmail-bin uninstallable)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line vpopmail removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: vpopmail-bin Severity: serious Version: 5.4.4-1 vpopmail-bin Depends: libmysqlclient10, which is no longer in the archive, making the package uninstallable. lamont ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- vpopmail has been removed because it is buggy and appears unmaintained. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#310585: marked as done ('kernel-patch-ttl' does not apply to any current sarge kernel)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:57:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: kernel-patch-ttl Version: 2.4.24-1 Severity: grave Dear Pawel Wiecek As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-ttl does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to document this in the package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be hinted for removing in sarge. See also this ML thread about the issue: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html -- Francesco P. Lovergine ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Removed - out of date kernel patch. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Processed: Re: dwww: File conflict with iceweasel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 404662 patch Bug#404662: iceweasel: creates /usr/share/firefox symlink There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#389292: marked as done (gnome-presence-applet_0.3.1-1+b1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:08:36 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gnome-presence-applet Version: 0.3.1-1+b1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of gnome-presence-applet_0.3.1-1+b1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 85 Build started at 20060924-1200 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 4.0.0), libxml-perl, libgalago-gtk-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libgnomeui-dev, libpanel-applet2-dev, libglade2-dev [...] prefs-dialog.c: In function 'destroy_cb': prefs-dialog.c:282: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token prefs-dialog.c:282: error: 'l' undeclared (first use in this function) prefs-dialog.c:282: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once prefs-dialog.c:282: error: for each function it appears in.) prefs-dialog.c:282: error: 'l2' undeclared (first use in this function) prefs-dialog.c:282: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect prefs-dialog.c:282: error: 'l2_next' undeclared (first use in this function) [...] prefs-dialog.c:303: warning: implicit declaration of function 'galago_object_unref' prefs-dialog.c: In function 'set_values': prefs-dialog.c:425: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token prefs-dialog.c:425: error: 'l' undeclared (first use in this function) prefs-dialog.c:476: warning: implicit declaration of function 'galago_core_get_person' prefs-dialog.c:476: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast prefs-dialog.c:486: warning: implicit declaration of function 'galago_object_ref' prefs-dialog.c:515: warning: implicit declaration of function 'galago_core_get_people' make[3]: *** [prefs-dialog.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnome-presence-applet-0.3.1/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnome-presence-applet-0.3.1' make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnome-presence-applet-0.3.1' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppapkg=gnome-presence-appletver=0.3.1-1+b1 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Removed - obsolete; abandoned upstream. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#404662: dwww: File conflict with iceweasel
tags 404662 patch
thanks
Here's a patch for this bug, together with three other hunks that should
go into an NMU (restart apache properly, remove webserver configuration
snippet properly, and spanish debconf translation update).
I'm not going to NMU this myself, unless requested by the maintainer
until Friday (tomorrow) afternoon, because the RC bug is quite young and
I will be on vacation from Saturday on. Here's the changelog, the
package has been tested without apache installed, with apache installed
and running, and with installed but not running apache.
--- dwww-1.10.0.old/debian/changelog2006-06-04 16:55:26.0 +0200
+++ dwww-1.10.0/debian/changelog2006-12-28 17:59:02.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+dwww (1.10.0-0.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * NMU to fix RC, important and l10n bugs
+ * Change firefox to iceweasel in dwww.links. This broke installing
+iceweasel when dwww was present, hence the urgency. (closes: #404775,
+#404662)
+ * In postinst, restart apache2 if it is running (closes: #374665)
+ * Use readlink -f instead of realpath, which isn't available in the
+packages dwww depends on (closes: #404666)
+ * Spanish debconf translation update, by Steve Lord Flaubert
+[EMAIL PROTECTED] and others (closes: #397061, #404748,
+#396474, #385051)
+
+ -- Frank KÃŒster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:58:59 +0100
Regards, Frank
diff -Nur dwww-1.10.0.old/debian/changelog dwww-1.10.0/debian/changelog
--- dwww-1.10.0.old/debian/changelog2006-06-04 16:55:26.0 +0200
+++ dwww-1.10.0/debian/changelog2006-12-28 17:59:02.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+dwww (1.10.0-0.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * NMU to fix RC, important and l10n bugs
+ * Change firefox to iceweasel in dwww.links. This broke installing
+iceweasel when dwww was present, hence the urgency. (closes: #404775,
+#404662)
+ * In postinst, restart apache2 if it is running (closes: #374665)
+ * Use readlink -f instead of realpath, which isn't available in the
+packages dwww depends on (closes: #404666)
+ * Spanish debconf translation update, by Steve Lord Flaubert
+[EMAIL PROTECTED] and others (closes: #397061, #404748,
+#396474, #385051)
+
+ -- Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:58:59 +0100
+
dwww (1.10.0) unstable; urgency=low
* Upload to unstable.
diff -Nur dwww-1.10.0.old/debian/dwww.links dwww-1.10.0/debian/dwww.links
--- dwww-1.10.0.old/debian/dwww.links 2006-05-30 20:56:45.0 +0200
+++ dwww-1.10.0/debian/dwww.links 2006-12-28 16:26:44.0 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
usr/share/man/man8/dwww.8 usr/share/man/man5/dwww.conf.5
-usr/share/dwww/mozilla-dwww.src usr/share/firefox/searchplugins/dwww.src
-usr/share/dwww/mozilla-dwww.gif usr/share/firefox/searchplugins/dwww.gif
+usr/share/dwww/mozilla-dwww.src usr/share/iceweasel/searchplugins/dwww.src
+usr/share/dwww/mozilla-dwww.gif usr/share/iceweasel/searchplugins/dwww.gif
usr/share/dwww/mozilla-dwww.src usr/lib/mozilla/searchplugins/dwww.src
usr/share/dwww/mozilla-dwww.gif usr/lib/mozilla/searchplugins/dwww.gif
diff -Nur dwww-1.10.0.old/debian/dwww.postinst dwww-1.10.0/debian/dwww.postinst
--- dwww-1.10.0.old/debian/dwww.postinst2006-05-07 20:30:09.0
+0200
+++ dwww-1.10.0/debian/dwww.postinst2006-12-28 17:39:48.0 +0100
@@ -57,6 +57,11 @@
my $confd=/etc/$apache/conf.d;
symlink (../../dwww/apache.conf, $confd/dwww) if
(-d $confd ! -e $confd/dwww);
}
+ # restart apache2 if it is installed and configured
+ if (system(apache2ctl configtest 2/dev/null) == 0) {
+ system(invoke-rc.d apache2 force-reload);
+ }
+
}
if ( -x /etc/cron.daily/dwww )
diff -Nur dwww-1.10.0.old/debian/dwww.prerm dwww-1.10.0/debian/dwww.prerm
--- dwww-1.10.0.old/debian/dwww.prerm 2006-06-04 16:55:26.0 +0200
+++ dwww-1.10.0/debian/dwww.prerm 2006-12-28 17:57:37.0 +0100
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
for apache in apache apache-perl apache-ssl apache2; do
cfile=/etc/$apache/conf.d/dwww
dwwwf=/etc/dwww/apache.conf
- if [ -L $cfile ] [ x`realpath $cfile` = x$dwwwf ]; then
+ if [ -L $cfile ] [ x`readlink -f $cfile` = x$dwwwf ];
then
rm -f $cfile
elif [ -e $cfile ]; then
echo $cfile exists, but isn't symlinked to $dwwwf. Not
removing
diff -Nur dwww-1.10.0.old/debian/po/es.po dwww-1.10.0/debian/po/es.po
--- dwww-1.10.0.old/debian/po/es.po 2006-05-30 21:35:51.0 +0200
+++ dwww-1.10.0/debian/po/es.po 2006-12-28 16:17:39.0 +0100
@@ -1,164 +1,186 @@
+# dwww po-debconf translation to spanish
+# Copyright (C) 2006 Software in the Public Interest, SPI Inc.
+# This file is distributed under the same license as the dwww package.
+#
+# Changes:
+# - Initial
Bug#310583: marked as done ('kernel-patch-time' does not apply to any current sarge kernel)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:57:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: kernel-patch-time Version: 2.4.24-1 Severity: grave Dear Pawel Wiecek As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-time does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to document this in the package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be hinted for removing in sarge. See also this ML thread about the issue: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html -- Francesco P. Lovergine ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Removed - out of date kernel patch. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#277169: marked as done (Need upload with support for newer mozilla)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:07:07 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: mozilla-locale-zh-tw Version: 1.6-0.1 According to the testing status on URL:http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mozilla-locale-zh-tw.html, this mozilla translation need to be updated to support the latest version of mozilla. Testing Status 201 days old (needed 2 days) mozilla-locale-zh-tw/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: mozilla-browser ( 2:1.6.1) Valid candidate ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- orphaned, mozilla scheduled for removal. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#309373: marked as done (libvpopmail-perl: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line vpopmail removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libvpopmail-perl Version: 0.08-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on several arches because you're not using -fPIC to make a shared lib. From the buildd log: LD_RUN_PATH= cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib vpopmail.o -o blib/arch/auto/vpopm ail/vpopmail.so -L/usr/lib/vpopmail -lvpopmail /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3.6/../../../libvpopmail.a(vpopmail. o): relocation R_PARISC_DPREL21L can not be used when making a shared object; r ecompile with -fPIC /usr/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3.6/../../../libvpopmail.a: could not read symbol s: Bad value Kurt ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- vpopmail has been removed because it is buggy and appears unmaintained. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#310581: marked as done ('kernel-patch-quota' does not apply to any current sarge kernel)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:57:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: kernel-patch-quota Version: 2.4.24-1 Severity: grave Dear Pawel Wiecek As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-quota does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to document this in the package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be hinted for removing in sarge. See also this ML thread about the issue: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html -- Francesco P. Lovergine ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Removed - out of date kernel patch. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#348360: marked as done (firefox: There are no Firefox translations anymore!)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:07:43 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg-4 Severity: normal Lots and lots of people contribut their work in order to have Firefox localized to several languages (and contry - language combinations). These localizations where previously packages, please, package them again. Not everyone can read English. The mozilla-firefox-locale-* packages are for 1.0.7 and, expectedly, don't work anymore. You should upload package with those names and make them depend on new firefox-locale-* ones. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Superseded by mozilla-firefox-locale-all. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#392951: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:56:18 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: toolchain-source Version: 3.4-5 Severity: serious The package (at least the source) contains GFDL docs with invariant sections and/or cover texts. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- toolchain-source has been removed because new versions of the toolchain can be used directly to build a cross-compiler. If your problem still appears, please let me know. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#356652: marked as done (gxmms: should bre removed now that playground is in debian)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:21:19 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gxmms Severity: important Please ask to have gxmms removed from debian, since it has been renamed to playground, which is now in unstable. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Removed - superseded by playground. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#390336: marked as done (Uninstallable due to dependency boson conflicting with boson-base)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:22:32 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: boson-base Severity: serious Version: 0.11-4 Hi boson-base is not installable as it depends on boson which in turn conflicts with boson-base. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Removed. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#392405: marked as done (ships architecture-dependent files in /usr/share)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:30:42 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: linpac Version: 0.16stable-0.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.1.1 /usr/share/linpac/bin should be moved to somewhere in /usr/lib/linpac. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.11 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Removed - RC-buggy; upstream and maintainer appears MIA. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ---End Message---
