Bug#819977: jessie-pu: package roger-router/1.8.9-2jessie1
On 04.04.2016 16:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> I'd like to request to upload a bug-fix for the roger-router package >> to Jessie. This would fix bugs #798471 and #774116. >> >> Roger Router is a tool to interact with Fritzbox hardware from AVM. >> One of the things it can do is to send a fax. This was broken until >> version 1.8.9-3 because compilation happened as --with-cups-yes >> assuming this would include cups-support when in fact this disabled >> a known-good code base for cups-support and replaced it with a >> known-broken, experimental one. The patches are cherry-picked from >> 1.8.9-3 and 1.8.9-4. > > Please provide a source debdiff of the proposed package as built and > tested on Jessie, rather than indvidual patches; that's what we'll be > acking (or otherwise). Sure. I thought the individual patches would be easier to inspect and approve/reject as necessary. Attached is a single debdiff. diff --git a/debian/README.Debian b/debian/README.Debian index 13996bd..7a06d73 100644 --- a/debian/README.Debian +++ b/debian/README.Debian @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ += Configuration = + configuration help is available from http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/FritzBox/Roger_Router @@ -6,10 +8,17 @@ http://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic/roger-router-roger/ http://en.tabos.org/installation-prequel If you want to use the incoming call notification you will have to enable -it on your fritzbox with: #96*5* - -If you want to use the capifax plugin you will have to enable capi-over-tcp -on your fritzbox with: #96*3* +it on your fritzbox with: #96*5* If you want to use the capifax plugin +you will have to enable capi-over-tcp on your fritzbox with: #96*3* Both +of these settings will be reset to their default value of "off" whenever +you update the router firmware. Please reenable them as necessary. Please note, quick reconnect & display external ip in tooltip for Fritz!Box needs active UPnP support! + += Fax support = + +Roger installs a Cups printer. To be able to fax, you either need to use +roger_cli where you specify all necessary information including the number +to send to on the command line or you should have Roger GUI running and it +will prompt you for the receiving Fax number. diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index f02d242..fa2aca8 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,22 @@ +roger-router (1.8.9-2jessie1) stable; urgency=medium + + backport fixes to fax support from 1.8.9-3 and 1.8.9-4 + + * do not build the experimental (!) cups backend. +Closes: #774116, closes: #798471. + +Upstream uses a very funny (NOT!) semantics to their make-switches. +Who would expect that "--with-cups=yes" actually DISABLES a working +cups support? + + * README.Debian: +- add some information on how to send a fax +- add information what needs to be done after firmware updates + certain functions, such as fax support, will be reset to being + disabled every time a new firmware is installed + + -- Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewie.biz> Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:14:08 +0200 + roger-router (1.8.9-2) unstable; urgency=low * copyright: add copyright information for win32/printer/ghostpdf.ppd diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index a1df6d4..b660a8f 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -6,9 +6,7 @@ Uploaders: Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brum...@tabos.org> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), dh-autoreconf, libappindicator3-dev, libcapi20-dev (>= 1:3.24), - libcups2-dev, libebook1.2-dev, - libgconf2-dev, libgstreamer1.0-dev, libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev, libgtk-3-dev, libnotify-dev, diff --git a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols index 1d29ec1..7e302d9 100644 --- a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols +++ b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ libroutermanager.so.0 libroutermanager0 #MINVER# fax_send@Base 1.8.4 fax_set_log_level@Base 1.8.4 fax_spandsp_workaround@Base 1.8.4 - fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 +#MISSING: 1.8.9-2# fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 fax_transfer@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_close@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_connect@Base 1.8.4 diff --git a/debian/roger-router-cli.install b/debian/roger-router-cli.install index d8d4c6b..1379a1c 100644 --- a/debian/roger-router-cli.install +++ b/debian/roger-router-cli.install @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ usr/bin/roger_cli usr/lib/*/routermanager/ -usr/lib/cups/backend/roger-cups usr/share/man/*/roger_cli* -usr/share/roger/roger-cups +usr/share/roger/roger-cups usr/lib/cups/backend/ usr/share/roger/roger-fax.ppd usr/share/roger/install-fax.sh diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 95b94a1..c7c5f2f 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- \ --with-spandsp=6 \ --with-libn
Bug#819977: jessie-pu: package roger-router/1.8.9-2jessie1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello, first of all, reportbug lists only squeeze and wheezy when making a pu-related bug report. I'd like to request to upload a bug-fix for the roger-router package to Jessie. This would fix bugs #798471 and #774116. Roger Router is a tool to interact with Fritzbox hardware from AVM. One of the things it can do is to send a fax. This was broken until version 1.8.9-3 because compilation happened as --with-cups-yes assuming this would include cups-support when in fact this disabled a known-good code base for cups-support and replaced it with a known-broken, experimental one. The patches are cherry-picked from 1.8.9-3 and 1.8.9-4. I'd like to ship alongside some improvements in the README.Debian file to guide the user in case they run into problems. These changes should have little risk of regression and improve the user experience for stable customers considerably. Looking forward to your comments. Regards Rolf Leggewie >From 67bc92d83524ebce8c3c0253d19e509c2556e2ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewie.biz> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 22:59:00 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] do not build the experimental (!) cups backend. Closes: #798471, Closes: #774116 OMG. the compilation switch "--with-cups" doesn't mean what you'd expect. It means "build the experimental, known-broken, WIP (!) version of cups-support", and disable the standard, working cups backend. Who in their right mind would expect that kind of semantic? Of course, upstream didn't document this anywhere. Grr! --- debian/control | 2 -- debian/libroutermanager0.symbols | 2 +- debian/roger-router-cli.install | 3 +-- debian/rules | 3 +-- 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index a1df6d4..b660a8f 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -6,9 +6,7 @@ Uploaders: Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brum...@tabos.org> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), dh-autoreconf, libappindicator3-dev, libcapi20-dev (>= 1:3.24), - libcups2-dev, libebook1.2-dev, - libgconf2-dev, libgstreamer1.0-dev, libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev, libgtk-3-dev, libnotify-dev, diff --git a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols index 1d29ec1..7e302d9 100644 --- a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols +++ b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ libroutermanager.so.0 libroutermanager0 #MINVER# fax_send@Base 1.8.4 fax_set_log_level@Base 1.8.4 fax_spandsp_workaround@Base 1.8.4 - fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 +#MISSING: 1.8.9-2# fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 fax_transfer@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_close@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_connect@Base 1.8.4 diff --git a/debian/roger-router-cli.install b/debian/roger-router-cli.install index d8d4c6b..1379a1c 100644 --- a/debian/roger-router-cli.install +++ b/debian/roger-router-cli.install @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ usr/bin/roger_cli usr/lib/*/routermanager/ -usr/lib/cups/backend/roger-cups usr/share/man/*/roger_cli* -usr/share/roger/roger-cups +usr/share/roger/roger-cups usr/lib/cups/backend/ usr/share/roger/roger-fax.ppd usr/share/roger/install-fax.sh diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 95b94a1..c7c5f2f 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- \ --with-spandsp=6 \ --with-libnotify=yes \ - --with-cups=yes \ --with-secret=yes \ --with-ebook=yes \ --with-gstreamer1=yes \ @@ -32,7 +31,7 @@ override_dh_install: override_dh_fixperms: dh_fixperms - chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/share/roger/roger-cups chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/share/roger/install-fax.sh + chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/lib/cups/backend/roger-cups chown lp.fax debian/roger-router-cli/var/spool/roger chmod 2770 debian/roger-router-cli/var/spool/roger -- 1.9.1 >From ad80ff407b739f4975325fce7524dbe4ed740c86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rolf Leggewie <f...@rolf.leggewie.biz> Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:39:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] README.Debian: add some information on how to send a fax --- debian/README.Debian | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/README.Debian b/debian/README.Debian index 13996bd..8bb1f9f 100644 --- a/debian/README.Debian +++ b/debian/README.Debian @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ += Configuration = + configuration help is available from http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/FritzBox/Roger_Router @@ -8,8 +10,15 @@ http://en.tabos.org/installation-prequel If you want to use the incoming call notification you will have to enable it on your fritzbox with: #96*5* +Please note, quick reconnect & display external ip in tooltip for Fritz!Box +needs active UPnP support! + += Fax support = + If you want to use the capifax plugin you will have to enable capi-
Bug#780285: unblock: roger-router/1.8.9-2jessie1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package roger-router Dear Release Team, as maintainer of the roger-router package I would like to upload a fix for #774116. I've already uploaded a fix to experimental and I would like to upload it to unstable as 1.8.9-2jessie1 and have it migrate eventually. I'd like to request a freeze exception before actually doing that. Faxing via the FritzBox device is one of the important functions of Roger Router. It is currently known-broken in testing. The background is that upstream has a makefile switch --with-cups which when set to yes builds an experimental, known-broken cups-support. Building as --with-cups=no actually builds the working CUPS support. Go figure! That tripped me and I would like to correct this mistake before jessie gets released. Regards Rolf Leggewie unblock roger-router/1.8.9-2jessie1 From a59161f6e088cf254438946433f7ef373fded9ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 22:59:00 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] do not build the experimental (!) cups backend. Closes: #774116 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit OMG. the compilation switch --with-cups doesn't mean what you'd expect. It means build the experimental, known-broken, WIP (!) version of cups-support, and disable the standard, working cups backend. Who in their right mind would expect that kind of semantic? Of course, upstream didn't document this anywhere. Grr! I was unable to verify this personally, but Dieter Schäfer and Markus Grunwald kindly confirmed that the test packages I put out for the purpose work fine for him. Thanks! --- debian/control | 2 -- debian/libroutermanager0.symbols | 2 +- debian/roger-router-cli.install | 3 +-- debian/rules | 3 +-- 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index a1df6d4..b660a8f 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -6,9 +6,7 @@ Uploaders: Jan-Michael Brummer jan.brum...@tabos.org Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), dh-autoreconf, libappindicator3-dev, libcapi20-dev (= 1:3.24), - libcups2-dev, libebook1.2-dev, - libgconf2-dev, libgstreamer1.0-dev, libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev, libgtk-3-dev, libnotify-dev, diff --git a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols index 1d29ec1..7e302d9 100644 --- a/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols +++ b/debian/libroutermanager0.symbols @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ libroutermanager.so.0 libroutermanager0 #MINVER# fax_send@Base 1.8.4 fax_set_log_level@Base 1.8.4 fax_spandsp_workaround@Base 1.8.4 - fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 +#MISSING: 1.8.9-2# fax_spooler_new_dir_cb@Base 1.8.4 fax_transfer@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_close@Base 1.8.4 faxophone_connect@Base 1.8.4 diff --git a/debian/roger-router-cli.install b/debian/roger-router-cli.install index d8d4c6b..1379a1c 100644 --- a/debian/roger-router-cli.install +++ b/debian/roger-router-cli.install @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ usr/bin/roger_cli usr/lib/*/routermanager/ -usr/lib/cups/backend/roger-cups usr/share/man/*/roger_cli* -usr/share/roger/roger-cups +usr/share/roger/roger-cups usr/lib/cups/backend/ usr/share/roger/roger-fax.ppd usr/share/roger/install-fax.sh diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 95b94a1..c7c5f2f 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- \ --with-spandsp=6 \ --with-libnotify=yes \ - --with-cups=yes \ --with-secret=yes \ --with-ebook=yes \ --with-gstreamer1=yes \ @@ -32,7 +31,7 @@ override_dh_install: override_dh_fixperms: dh_fixperms - chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/share/roger/roger-cups chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/share/roger/install-fax.sh + chmod 755 debian/roger-router-cli/usr/lib/cups/backend/roger-cups chown lp.fax debian/roger-router-cli/var/spool/roger chmod 2770 debian/roger-router-cli/var/spool/roger -- 1.9.1 From d89739a8fceda7f2b0897476f8b4daf42ab53428 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:39:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] README.Debian: add some information on how to send a fax --- debian/README.Debian | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/README.Debian b/debian/README.Debian index 13996bd..8bb1f9f 100644 --- a/debian/README.Debian +++ b/debian/README.Debian @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ += Configuration = + configuration help is available from http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/FritzBox/Roger_Router @@ -8,8 +10,15 @@ http://en.tabos.org/installation-prequel If you want to use the incoming call notification you will have to enable it on your fritzbox with: #96*5* +Please note, quick reconnect display external ip in tooltip for Fritz!Box +needs active UPnP support! + += Fax support
Bug#780285: unblock: roger-router/1.8.9-2jessie1
On 12.03.2015 02:02, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi Rolf, If the change truly drops a symbol in a public shared library, then I am afraid it is far far too late to accept this change. It implies doing an ABI transition, which we stopped accepting back in October 2014. Niels, thank you for the quick reply. I'm afraid the change is indeed pretty intrusive, it completely swaps out the used code base. Can I get in a change to README.Debian to inform the users of the non-working CUPS printer? Here is my suggestion. CUPS support for Roger Router in Jessie is currently known to be non-working. The maintainer will try to release a backport after the jessie release. Until then, you can either recompile version 1.8.9-3 or higher for yourself to get the fix or get the known-good, precompiled and signed binaries straight from the maintainer at http://oss.leggewie.org/bdo774116/; Would that be acceptable? Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5500fc3b.9050...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#778591: unblock: pastebinit/1.4-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pastebinit to allow the fix for RC-bug 778336 to propagate to testing. Thank you unblock pastebinit/1.4-3 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 7de6407..b3370f0 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +pastebinit (1.4-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Andrew Starr-Bochicchio ] + * detect_distro_with_python3.patch: Use platform instead of +lsb_release to detect the distro as lsb_release is not +available under Python 3 (Closes: #760341). pastebinit +will now default again to using paste.debian.net on Debian +(Closes: #778336). + + -- Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:35:07 +0800 + pastebinit (1.4-3) unstable; urgency=low * bump debhelper to version 9 diff --git a/debian/patches/detect_distro_with_python3.patch b/debian/patches/detect_distro_with_python3.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..e0737c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/detect_distro_with_python3.patch @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +Index: pastebinit/pastebinit +=== +--- pastebinit.orig/pastebinit 2015-02-16 12:37:04.434846203 -0500 pastebinit/pastebinit 2015-02-16 12:39:22.709104460 -0500 +@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ + + # Now try to override it with a distributor pastebin + try: +-import lsb_release +-release = lsb_release.get_distro_information()['ID'].lower() ++import platform ++release = platform.linux_distribution()[0].lower() + if release == 'debian': + defaultPB = http://paste.debian.net; + elif release == 'fedora': diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series index 986704d..b17e68f 100644 --- a/debian/patches/series +++ b/debian/patches/series @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ upstream-r205_r201.patch increase_timeout.patch +detect_distro_with_python3.patch
Bug#768526: unblock: scim/1.4.15-3
On 08.11.2014 17:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:21:14PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: I would like to apply the following patches to scim in unstable and have them migrate to testing/jessie. Please let me know if you will allow a freeze exception for all or at least some of them. The scim package in unstable is currently the same as in testing. Patch 3 is the one I amm most keen on pushing into jessie. I have yet to upload after getting clearance or rejection for a freeze exception for these patches Definitely not the first two. What's the problem that patch 3 fixes? Thank you for the clear answer. Patch 3 is addressing what is discussed in #71621, that update-alternative --remove should not be called on upgrade or deconfigure. There's potential data loss of user-configured data if it is done nonetheless. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/545dfa11.6010...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#768526: unblock: scim/1.4.15-3
On 08.11.2014 20:17, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Control: tag -1 - moreinfo + confirmed On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:10:09PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: Patch 3 is addressing what is discussed in #71621, that update-alternative --remove should not be called on upgrade or deconfigure. There's potential data loss of user-configured data if it is done nonetheless. Please upload a fix for that only, and ping this bug when it's installed. Done. 1.4.15-3 has been uploaded to unstable with patch 3 only. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/545e401f.7050...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#768526: unblock: scim/1.4.15-3
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package scim
Hello,
I would like to apply the following patches to scim in unstable and have
them migrate to testing/jessie. Please let me know if you will allow a
freeze exception for all or at least some of them. The scim package in
unstable is currently the same as in testing. Patch 3 is the one I amm
most keen on pushing into jessie. I have yet to upload after getting
clearance or rejection for a freeze exception for these patches
Regards
Rolf Leggewie
unblock scim/1.4.15-3
From 7076075e6cdccd43c345269e44a14f2163718f6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tz-Huan Huang tzh...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:20:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] control: multi-archify the scim-im-agent package
---
debian/control | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 6f627fb..a74ab3b 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ Description: Clutter input method module with SCIM as backend
Package: scim-im-agent
Architecture: any
+Multi-Arch: foreign
Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: scim-modules-socket (= ${binary:Version}), ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Provides: scim-bridge-agent
--
1.9.1
From 28c022257e4e2e3669d6068732b42f8b8969a7f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 21:57:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] postinst: stop special-casing a long-gone package version
---
debian/scim.postinst | 26 --
1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/scim.postinst b/debian/scim.postinst
index 09ee9ce..1b7db15 100644
--- a/debian/scim.postinst
+++ b/debian/scim.postinst
@@ -28,30 +28,6 @@ ua_inst () {
/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/$2 $3 ;
}
-# If u-a is in manual mode as a result of the bug in
-# 1.4.7-3ubuntu1, reset it back to auto.
-# Also forcefully remove the scim-bridge entry from xinput_all-ALL in u-a.
-if dpkg --compare-versions $2 ge 1.4.7-3ubuntu1 \
-dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt-nl 1.4.7-3ubuntu5
-then
- for conf in ja_JP ko_KR zh_CN zh_HK zh_SG zh_TW all_ALL
- do
- if LC_ALL=C update-alternatives --display xinput-${conf} \
- | grep -q 'status is manual' \
- LC_ALL=C update-alternatives --display xinput-${conf} \
- | grep -q 'currently points to .*scim-bridge'
- then
- update-alternatives --auto xinput-${conf}
- fi
- done
- if LC_ALL=C update-alternatives --display xinput-all_ALL \
- | grep -q 'currently points to .*scim-bridge'
- then
- update-alternatives --remove xinput-all_ALL \
- /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/scim-bridge
- fi
-fi
-
case $1 in
configure)
# Set up default
@@ -87,5 +63,3 @@ esac
#DEBHELPER#
exit 0
-
-
--
1.9.1
From f4dd743aa8f12769676bb63dfa58b7531638c64f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 22:10:46 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] prerm: stop calling ua --remove on upgrade and deconfigure. See #71621
---
debian/scim.prerm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/scim.prerm b/debian/scim.prerm
index 75d63e9..06bea3f 100644
--- a/debian/scim.prerm
+++ b/debian/scim.prerm
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ ua_remove () {
}
case $1 in
-remove|upgrade|deconfigure)
+remove)
ua_remove all_ALL scim
ua_remove ja_JP scim
ua_remove ko_KR scim
--
1.9.1
requesting freeze exception for scim
Hello,
I would like to apply the following patches to scim in unstable and have
them migrate to testing/jessie. Please let me know if you will allow a
freeze exception for all or at least some of them. The scim package in
unstable is currently the same as in testing. Patch 3 is the one I amm
most keen on pushing into jessie.
Regards
Rolf Leggewie
From 7076075e6cdccd43c345269e44a14f2163718f6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tz-Huan Huang tzh...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:20:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] control: multi-archify the scim-im-agent package
---
debian/control | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 6f627fb..a74ab3b 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ Description: Clutter input method module with SCIM as backend
Package: scim-im-agent
Architecture: any
+Multi-Arch: foreign
Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: scim-modules-socket (= ${binary:Version}), ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Provides: scim-bridge-agent
--
1.9.1
From 28c022257e4e2e3669d6068732b42f8b8969a7f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 21:57:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] postinst: stop special-casing a long-gone package version
---
debian/scim.postinst | 26 --
1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/scim.postinst b/debian/scim.postinst
index 09ee9ce..1b7db15 100644
--- a/debian/scim.postinst
+++ b/debian/scim.postinst
@@ -28,30 +28,6 @@ ua_inst () {
/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/$2 $3 ;
}
-# If u-a is in manual mode as a result of the bug in
-# 1.4.7-3ubuntu1, reset it back to auto.
-# Also forcefully remove the scim-bridge entry from xinput_all-ALL in u-a.
-if dpkg --compare-versions $2 ge 1.4.7-3ubuntu1 \
-dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt-nl 1.4.7-3ubuntu5
-then
- for conf in ja_JP ko_KR zh_CN zh_HK zh_SG zh_TW all_ALL
- do
- if LC_ALL=C update-alternatives --display xinput-${conf} \
- | grep -q 'status is manual' \
- LC_ALL=C update-alternatives --display xinput-${conf} \
- | grep -q 'currently points to .*scim-bridge'
- then
- update-alternatives --auto xinput-${conf}
- fi
- done
- if LC_ALL=C update-alternatives --display xinput-all_ALL \
- | grep -q 'currently points to .*scim-bridge'
- then
- update-alternatives --remove xinput-all_ALL \
- /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/scim-bridge
- fi
-fi
-
case $1 in
configure)
# Set up default
@@ -87,5 +63,3 @@ esac
#DEBHELPER#
exit 0
-
-
--
1.9.1
From f4dd743aa8f12769676bb63dfa58b7531638c64f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 22:10:46 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] prerm: stop calling ua --remove on upgrade and deconfigure. See #71621
---
debian/scim.prerm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/scim.prerm b/debian/scim.prerm
index 75d63e9..06bea3f 100644
--- a/debian/scim.prerm
+++ b/debian/scim.prerm
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ ua_remove () {
}
case $1 in
-remove|upgrade|deconfigure)
+remove)
ua_remove all_ALL scim
ua_remove ja_JP scim
ua_remove ko_KR scim
--
1.9.1
Bug#745736: RM: isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3.3 from testing
On 25.04.2014 01:39, Julien Cristau wrote:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 23:51:34 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hello,
this is a request for removal of the isdnutils package from
testing by the maintainer. The reason is that its presence
presents the new libcapi20-3 package from migrating.
# Broken Depends:
drdsl/non-free: drdsl [i386]
ibod: ibod [amd64 armel armhf i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390x sparc]
isdnactivecards/contrib: isdnactivecards [amd64 armel i386 mips mipsel
powerpc sparc]
# Broken Build-Depends:
manpages-de: isdnlog
What should happen to those packages?
Julien,
thank you for the swift reaction.
Hm, I'm really at a loss about this one myself. I've been the
maintainer for isdnutils for a number of years and my main focus has
always been to get rid of the many, many hacks in isdnutils that were
somehow working, but unhealthy and unmaintainable, especially all the
hand-crafted scripting. There's been an NMU that I do not approve of
and I consider hackish. It works around a kernel problem and thus is
out of place in isdnutils. I do not want to bless that NMU with an
upload of mine. At the same time, reversing that NMU would create a
backlash and wouldn't be the right thing, either, I think. Essentially,
I am unable to upload to unstable. I've seen experimental as the only
venue left for me. I was unaware it would not be sufficient.
I carved out libcapi20-3 from the isdnutils package for greater
modularity and I'd like it to migrate to testing. In 2005, a versioned
dependency on libcapi20-3 was introduced in the pppdcapiplugin and
capiutils Depends: libcapi20-3 (= ${binary:Version}). I've contacted
doko who apparently uploaded that change to see if that is really
necessary, I believe it's not and can be relaxed to an unversioned
dependency.
The same reason that prevents the migration is now obviously preventing
the removal of the testing package. Two things need to be done, I guess
in isdnutils in testing if the binary package cannot be temporarily
removed without too much collateral damage.
1) stop building the libcapi20-3 binary
2) relax the versioned run-time dependency above to an unversioned one
For the package to successfully migrate from unstable to testing a few
RC-bugs would need to be addressed as well, though (#745624, #725000,
#710359). I'm willing to do that work, but like I stated, I feel
precluded from doing it in unstable. I'm hoping for a suggestion on how
to move this forward in the best interest of everyone involved. How do
we get out of this situation?
Regards
Rolf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/535a21b2.8010...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#745736: RM: isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3.3 from testing
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, this is a request for removal of the isdnutils package from testing by the maintainer. The reason is that its presence presents the new libcapi20-3 package from migrating. Best regards Rolf Leggewie -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTWTKiAAoJEJSEK8huURwxhuAP/RB3XNJc2DOcp6/EtE6nZSAC nD8sQG9iRxGZ8W+ZDWmrmEbP8CB7IN3lb7DpADkDlShbu0Bb25ERQ9Pk9Mym1gEJ GpKdbm7hOmItg06prLtul1UcSJOkeP5TK+2/u4GNw1hdeD3mR7bc+oj0RkVGqvXr OOmfwmKOoBNouy0WwX6Kbxa06s4WqG5JD5/Sw/0pqYYn5BDb9GynwW/BDAU6BgRB GxW1VAaganH776daxL/jnZB0TRWzhH2F1bEz73ZmLQXQt4qLVOOyC+cElepFieWq 9hRzXTHVH4t6he/xAB/o+9zkPArXoEzmL1/aweFGIr6K8DcYOCBe3z3VrjxaOx27 tvgF41wQG6R9v8+u875vvdkWJukPDqxMTvvjK5bd4tGF2lLf7LxY+xrBDw9Ikvvy hJtfL3KlNPQMvZgBQfgW5/W2H4H1CHkG1ZtcK3KI9Ll6oRKNJXA3aaQVB1+BaChR WB2EBgbsEYOsHKcjAoEmJoZagNyVjKG7btSLW0casTK77wiXY5ryJVo/kVywBk+9 cFkCb1gyCfj2UVuGRa4Dx0tmqU+13zbMKc7bjAdGVb3/q/R2DR91SdvKakP9dXha daAbs9AZEN9QwlDrYfNkcml/KZlG9EfOck4vAjdlaufQQJJ4GYYaUaEU19feOEGE 0m7MfRRVBwz5ikT+rH/U =Vj2/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140424155134.9187.61530.report...@www.google-analytics.com
Bug#688502: unblock: isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package isdnutils version 1:3.25+dfsg1-3 This is a translation-only update so I hope it should be fine unblock isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120923080536.23367.16076.report...@www.google-analytics.com
Bug#685036: unblock: scim-anthy/1.2.7-5
On 26.08.2012 16:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote: the size of that diff is the main issue with unblocking it currently, as it's very difficult to review. Adam, please do not hesitate to contact me or Tz-Huan if we can somehow make the review any easier or more efficient for the release team. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/503c761d.8090...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#683367: unblock: ffgtk/0.8.1-2
Niels, thank you for having a look at this request. On 15.08.2012 16:14, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2012-07-31 08:53, Rolf Leggewie wrote: Please unblock package ffgtk 0.8.1-2 which fixes an FTBFS induced by changes in libcapi20-dev upstream. This package appear to be brand new? If so, it is too late for Wheezy. You are right, the package entered unstable only a few days before the freeze, after waiting for sponsorship for almost half a year. The package entered NEW about a week or ten days before the freeze and miraculously made it into unstable in time for the freeze. The RC bug was not the doing of ffgtk but things broke through an upload of the isdnutils package. The ffgtk package was uploaded RC-bugs free and only broke through no fault of its own by the introduction of a new libcapi20-dev version on June 30. That being grounds for an exclusion from Wheezy wouldn't seem just. I kindly ask you to reconsider. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/502c36f3.3040...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#685036: unblock: scim-anthy/1.2.7-5
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package scim-anthy version 1.2.7-5 It has been reported to us that the configuration setup for scim-anthy crashes for some users (bug 682601 and 680988). This is due to the recent transition in the package from gtk2 to gtk3. We've also included build-flag hardening in this upload. Please consider scim-anthy/1.2.7-5 for Wheezy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120816002428.14237.51348.report...@www.google-analytics.com
Bug#680335: unblock: scim/1.4.14-2 - debdiff to unstable
Dear release team, it looks like my request for discussion to unfreeze scim from more than a month ago never reached you. I'll write a separate mail about that to listmaster. Scim in Debian needs a couple of changes for Wheezy and I would like to request a freeze exception. Attached is the debdiff between version 1.4.14-1, the latest upload before the freeze and 1.4.14-2. Since I had no feedback from you, I was conservative and excluded everything but the immediate patch to fix an FTBFS that occured since one of our build-time dependencies was multi-archified about the same time as 1.4.14-1 was uploaded. It's very important this patch be allowed to pass. Regards Rolf diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 0d166cc..6a3ea6e 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +scim (1.4.14-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * release 1.4.14-1x1 to unstable + + -- Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:04:35 +0800 + +scim (1.4.14-1x1) experimental; urgency=low + + * scim-clutter-immodule: install files from multi-arch paths. +Closes: #679724 + + -- Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:35:06 +0800 + scim (1.4.14-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Rolf Leggewie ] diff --git a/debian/scim-clutter-immodule.install.in b/debian/scim-clutter-immodule.install.in index 83938fe..1427c76 100644 --- a/debian/scim-clutter-immodule.install.in +++ b/debian/scim-clutter-immodule.install.in @@ -1 +1 @@ -usr/lib/clutter-imcontext/immodules/im-scim.so +usr/lib/@DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH@/clutter-imcontext/immodules/im-scim.so
mail is getting dropped
Dear listmaster and release team, I would like to bring to your attention that apparently some mail to debian-release@ is being dropped somewhere. Some of the unblock requests for my packages arrived fine in the BTS but it looks like they never made it to the mailing list of the release team. I usually use reportbug for these requests. Bug 680512 for isdnutils made it to both the BTS and the ML and was acted upon swiftly. #680335 and #683367 arrived fine in the BTS but apparently did not make it to the list and are still pending. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5022980d.5030...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#684320: unblock: isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Dear release team,
with the help of Peter Marschall I managed to iron
out a few more quirks in the isdnutils build system.
The package now builds with the latest autotools
instead of hardcoding. isdnutils was one of the
last few packages to depend on automake1.7 and this
requirement being dropped might allow for wheezy to
ship without automake1.7. I've taken the liberty
to disable the watch file since upstream currently
does not release tarballs. Please kindly consider
to allow isdnutils 1:3.25+dfsg-2 into wheezy.
Thank you.
Regards
Rolf
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 0dfe4cb..519fab6 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+isdnutils (1:3.25+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Rolf Leggewie ]
+ * deactivate watch file until upstream starts releasing tarballs again
+
+ [ Peter Marschall ]
+ * simplify autotools stuff and drop dependency on obsolete automake
+version 1.7. Closes: #549137
+
+ -- Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Mon, 30 Jul 2012 03:53:00 +0800
+
isdnutils (1:3.25+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/init.d.functions: reintroduce cd-command lost in 985a74cd63.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 921c56f..95c1269 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Standards-Version: 3.9.3
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), bzip2, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev,
xutils-dev | imake, tcl-dev, linuxdoc-tools (=0.9.20), groff, libtool,
libxaw7-dev, libreadline-dev, libpcap0.8-dev, autotools-dev,
- automake1.7, automake1.9, autoconf2.13, autoconf, libssl-dev, psutils,
+ automake, autoconf, libssl-dev, psutils,
lsb-release, po-debconf, ppp-dev
Homepage: http://www.isdn4linux.de
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/isdnutils.git
diff --git a/debian/patches/capiinfo-autotools.patch b/debian/patches/capiinfo-autotools.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..fceb7c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/capiinfo-autotools.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+Author: Peter Marschall pe...@adpm.de
+Description: make sure autoreconf works
+Applied-Upstream: commit:e23cdd55623a7c4f91a
+Forwarded: Yes
+Last-Update: 2012-07-30
+
+diff --git a/capiinfo/acconfig.h b/capiinfo/acconfig.h
+deleted file mode 100644
+--- a/capiinfo/acconfig.h
/dev/null
+@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
+-
+-#undef VERSION
+-#undef PACKAGE
+-#undef CONFIG_SBINDIR
+-#undef CONFIG_MANDIR
+diff --git a/capiinfo/configure.in b/capiinfo/configure.in
+--- a/capiinfo/configure.in
b/capiinfo/configure.in
+@@ -27,14 +27,14 @@ dnl Optional sbin directory
+ AC_ARG_WITH(sbin,
+ [ --with-sbin=DIR Set dir where binary is istalled. [/sbin]],
+ CONFIG_SBINDIR=${withval}
+- AC_DEFINE(CONFIG_SBINDIR,${withval}),
++ AC_DEFINE(CONFIG_SBINDIR,${withval}, [capiinfo sbin directory]),
+ )
+
+ dnl Optional man directory
+ AC_ARG_WITH(man,
+ [ --with-man=DIR Set manpage dir. [/usr/man]],
+ CONFIG_MANDIR=${withval}
+- AC_DEFINE(CONFIG_MANDIR,${withval}),
++ AC_DEFINE(CONFIG_MANDIR,${withval}, [capiinfo manual directory]),
+ )
+
+ AC_SUBST(INSTALL)
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index 37f82d0..d488fb0 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ capiinit-conffile.patch
capiinit-fwpath.patch
libtool.patch
ipppd-replace-gpl-code.patch
+capiinfo-autotools.patch
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index e752ae1..ba7fe34 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -12,55 +12,13 @@ override_dh_auto_build:
done
@set -e; \
- for d in capi20; do \
+ for d in capi20 capifax capiinfo capiinit rcapid vbox eicon ipppd; do \
echo Regenerating autotools files in $$d ...; \
cd $$d; \
- echo libtool; libtoolize -c -f ; \
- echo aclocal-1.9; aclocal-1.9; \
- echo automake-1.9; automake-1.9 --add-missing; \
+ echo autoreconf; autoreconf -if; \
cd ..; \
done
- @set -e; \
- for d in capifax capiinfo capiinit rcapid; do \
- echo Regenerating autotools files in $$d ...; \
- cd $$d; \
- echo aclocal; aclocal; \
- echo autoconf; autoconf; \
- case $$d in rcapid);; *) echo autoheader; autoheader; esac; \
- echo automake; automake --add-missing; \
- touch configure.in; \
- touch aclocal.m4; \
- touch configure; \
- cd ..; \
- done
-
- @set -e; \
- for d in vbox; do \
- echo Regenerating autotools files in $$d ...; \
- cd $$d; \
- echo aclocal-1.7; aclocal-1.7; \
- echo autoconf; autoconf; \
- echo automake-1.7; automake-1.7 -c --add-missing; \
- touch configure.in; \
- touch aclocal.m4; \
- touch configure; \
- cd ..; \
- done
-
- @set -e; \
- for d in eicon; do \
- echo Regenerating autotools files in $$d ...; \
- cd $$d; \
- echo autoconf2.13; autoconf2.13; \
- cd ..; \
- done
-
-# autoheader doesn't work in vbox ... is it needed?
-# echo autoheader; autoheader
Bug#683367: unblock: ffgtk/0.8.1-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package ffgtk 0.8.1-2 which fixes an FTBFS induced by
changes in libcapi20-dev upstream. I've also taken the liberty to
update the watch file to make it work again despite upstream blocking
straight access to directories now. Debdiff is attached for your
kind review.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 047070f..0825a42 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ffgtk (0.8.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * add patch to compile ffgtk against libcapi v3.25. Closes: #680813
+ * unbreak the watch file, upstream disallows direct directory access now
+
+ -- Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:57:12 +0800
+
ffgtk (0.8.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* initial release. Closes: #602723, LP: #522644.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index d3dde38..9e31ba5 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Priority: extra
Maintainer: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Uploaders: Jan-Michael Brummer jan.brum...@tabos.org
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~), libxml2-dev, libcurl4-gnutls-dev,
- libspandsp-dev, intltool, libtool, libsndfile-dev, libcapi20-dev (= 3.22),
+ libspandsp-dev, intltool, libtool, libsndfile-dev, libcapi20-dev (= 1:3.24),
libdbus-glib-1-dev, libebook1.2-dev, libgnome-keyring-dev, libasound2-dev,
libspeex-dev, libspeexdsp-dev, libpulse-dev, libnotify-dev, dh-autoreconf,
libgtk-3-dev | libgtk2.0-dev
diff --git a/debian/patches/build-with-i4l-v3.25.patch b/debian/patches/build-with-i4l-v3.25.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..5f8525b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/build-with-i4l-v3.25.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Description: build successfully against version 3.25 of isdnutils
+Author: Jan-Michael Brummer
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/680813
+Forwarded: not-needed, latest ffgtk upstream does not need this anymore
+Last-Update: 2012-07-20
+
+--- ffgtk-0.8.1.orig/ffgtk/faxophone/faxophone.c
ffgtk-0.8.1/ffgtk/faxophone/faxophone.c
+@@ -1538,7 +1538,10 @@ struct sSession *faxophoneInit( struct s
+
+ if ( psSession == NULL ) {
+ if ( pnHost != NULL ) {
+- setHostName( pnHost );
++ capi20ext_set_driver( fritzbox );
++ capi20ext_set_host( ( char * ) pnHost );
++ capi20ext_set_port( 5031 );
++ capi20ext_set_tracelevel( 0 );
+ }
+
+ nApplId = capiInit( nController );
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index 26c8ab4..cba2577 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
po-files.patch
+build-with-i4l-v3.25.patch
diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch
index 9a83286..de64fbc 100644
--- a/debian/watch
+++ b/debian/watch
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
version=3
-http://www.tabos.org/ffgtk/download/ffgtk-(.*)\.tar\.bz2
+http://www.tabos.org/ffgtk/download.php .*/ffgtk-(.*)\.tar\.bz2
Bug#680512: unblock: isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-1
Hello, I've had a fair bit of trouble to get the VERY brittle net connection here to successfully complete the upload of the sizeable isdnutils package. I believe it's complete now but it took me a while. I did not provide a debdiff here, I am not sure it makes much sense. You've already seen the patch and ACK'd it. On top of that is the changelog patch which should be unspectacular. The sizeable rest would have been a bunch of dropped files. Instead, I now made the upload to unstable. Feel free to grab it from there and inspect it. Thank you. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ffb10b8.5000...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#680512: unblock: isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Dear Release Team,
I'm requesting a freeze exception for 3.25+dfsg1-1 of isdnutils
Quoting the RC-bug 680503 I just filed:
'In the past few months I had been working with upstream to drop
dfsg-nonfree bits from their tarball and make my life easier.
git diff $dfsgbranch $upstreambranch|lsdiff recently led me
to believe that the difference between upstream and what we were
shipping as the dfsg-tarball had essentially dwindled down to
insignificant bits such as dotfiles, etc, leaving upstream
dfsg-free. This assumption turns out to be mistaken and we need
to ship 3.25 as dfsg, too, just like previous versions.'
I'm sorry about the inconvenience my neglect has caused. I've
already prepared a dfsg-tarball for upload where I drop the same
files as we did in Debian up to upstream 3.22.
A regression in the maintainer scripts was reported today in bug
#679651 that I'd like to fix alongside. Please see the attached
simple patch. I'm reintroducing a cd-command to make sure the
following commands are executed in the correct context. When I
dropped it I had considered it as part of the dropped code.
Please let me know if you have any objections to shipping
the patch alongside the dfsg-fix.
Regards
Rolf
From 1bdd1ae0c2a8c210d0b1bbc5834109eb816f48a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:53:31 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] debian/init.d.functions: reintroduce cd-command lost in
985a74cd63. Closes: #679651
The cd-command wasn't actually meant to be removed
---
debian/init.d.functions |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/init.d.functions b/debian/init.d.functions
index 0078d9c..1979cab 100644
--- a/debian/init.d.functions
+++ b/debian/init.d.functions
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ start_devices() {
check_isdncards # side-effect: sets $isdncards
what=' interfaces'
olddir=`pwd`
+cd /etc/isdn
listdevices
if [ -z $DEVS -a ! -f /etc/isdn/noconfig ]; then
log_success_msg There is apparently no configuration created yet.
--
1.7.0.4
Bug#680512: unblock: isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-1
Mehdi, thank you for the quick reply. On 06.07.2012 21:32, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 06/07/12 15:26, Rolf Leggewie wrote: I'm requesting a freeze exception for 3.25+dfsg1-1 of isdnutils Did you upload it? Not yet. I wanted to hear first if it's going to be slimmed-down dfsg-tarball and no other changes or slimmed-down dfsg-tarball plus patch for 679651 that I attached in my original report. Regarding your question in bug 680503, are things clear now? Some files will need to be dropped from the current upstream tarball to create a dfsg-tarball again. I had mistakenly assumed this was no longer the case. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ff6f240.4090...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#675740: unblock: ffgtk/None
Hi, On 04.06.2012 05:34, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Rolf Leggewie debian-b...@rolf.leggewie.biz (03/06/2012): Please grant a freeze exception or better yet, sponsor it ;-) http://bugs.debian.org/602723 (ITP) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/ffgtk/ffgtk_0.8.1-1.dsc http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=f...@rolf.leggewie.biz unblock ffgtk/None This makes little sense. There's nothing blocked yet I guess it would be helpful if you guys made up your mind on whether you do or don't want to be contacted *NOW* !?! +--[http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/05/msg4.html] | | If there is something you really believe should be in Wheezy and you | expect that it will not be ready before we freeze, please contact us | *now*. | +-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd8a8a4.4080...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#675740: unblock: ffgtk/None
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package ffgtk I've been trying for a while to find a sponsor for ffgtk. The mentor who said they would do it informed me yesterday that it likely won't happen in time for the freeze. D'uh. Please grant a freeze exception or better yet, sponsor it ;-) http://bugs.debian.org/602723 (ITP) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/ffgtk/ffgtk_0.8.1-1.dsc http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=f...@rolf.leggewie.biz unblock ffgtk/None -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120603025814.23611.59394.report...@www.google-analytics.com
Re: Bug#655179: pastebinit does not read .conf files from ~/.pastebin.d/ directory
On 17.01.2012 02:49, Adam D. Barratt wrote: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917005 Okay. Even if this turns out to be another bug it would need to be resolved in unstable first Of course. I've accepted the package you uploaded. Many thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f14c51f.2060...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Re: Bug#655179: pastebinit does not read .conf files from ~/.pastebin.d/ directory
On 15.01.2012 23:28, Maximilian Gerhard wrote: Adding configs to ~/.pastebin.d overrides everything, because of the pastebind configuration list reset. But that's the way it is upstream. I've opened a ticket upstream to see if this is really intentional. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917005 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f1385c6.9010...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Re: Bug#655179: pastebinit does not read .conf files from ~/.pastebin.d/ directory
On 15.01.2012 00:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote: I'd like to see a debdiff for a final ack, but from the description provided this sounds like something I'd be okay with fixing in a point release. Adam, thank you for your reply. Not quite a debdiff but I suppose http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~pastebinit-developers/pastebinit/trunk/revision/81 might be enough for you to inspect? Basically, that commit in debian/patches plus a changelog entry is what I intend to upload. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f125f25.1020...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Re: Bug#655179: pastebinit does not read .conf files from ~/.pastebin.d/ directory
On 15.01.2012 00:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote: sounds like something I'd be okay with fixing in a point release. I've now taken the liberty to actually make the upload to stable. Since a member of the release team needs to either ACK or reject this anyhow I thought we might as well do it on the real upload and save a step at this stage. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f126e43.4010...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Re: Bug#655179: pastebinit does not read .conf files from ~/.pastebin.d/ directory
Severity: normal thank you Max, thank you for your report. You request a backport of upstream commit r81 to version 1.1-2 of pastebinit in Squeeze. I'm willing to do that as I believe your request has merit, but I'd like to hear from the Stable Release Team first what they think. They will be the final arbiter of any upload to a stable release. r81 entered Debian Experimental in 1.2-2 on February 2nd last year. Subsequently 1.2-3 was uploaded to Unstable on July 4th. There has been no negative feedback regarding this change in either Debian or Ubuntu and it's highly unlikely to cause any regression due to the minimal and obviously beneficial change it introduces. I'm bumping this ticket to severity important since the faulty code greatly diminishes the ability of ordinary users to customize their interaction with a pastebin as you pointed out. I'm including your original report as a full-quote below for the convenience of the Stable Release Team. Regards Rolf On 09.01.2012 02:06, Maximilian Gerhard wrote: Version: 1.1-2 Tags: squeeze patch Users can not override pastebinit global config or add own service configs via ~/.pastebin.d conf files. This directory is not read by pastebinit, because of an indention error in pastebinit code. Only chance for users to override or add configs is to receive root priviliges and change /etc/pastebin.d. For example to edit the expire time for paste.debian.net (7 days as default is a really long time, even the website offers only 72h as maximum). Changing global configs has the disadvantage of checksum mismatch while new updates occour. And of course not every user has the possibility to become root. Even if, this is not the prefered way because pastebinit offers the possibility to use a local config directory for users. You can test the bug if you move a config from /etc/pastebin.d to ~/.pastebin.d and make a paste to this service. You will get an error that this service is unknown. The problem is an indention error in pastebinit function def preloadPastebins(). There are 2 nested for-loops. First to iterate all config directories and the second to read all conf files inside of an config directory. The return of the first loop has a too deep indention so it is executed after the first run of the second for-loop. That means that pastebinit does only read the conf files from the first config directory. This bug was filled already for Ubuntu, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pastebinit/+bug/701039 There is a fix mentioned in comment #2 in revision 81, see http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~pastebinit-developers/pastebinit/trunk/revision/81 The patch just change the indention of the return so it will be executed just after iteration of all config directories. Best regards, Max -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-030200-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages pastebinit depends on: ii python 2.6.6-3+squeeze6 interactive high-level object-orie ii python-configobj4.7.2+ds-1 simple but powerful config file re pastebinit recommends no packages. pastebinit suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0a60b7.3080...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Re: Bug#655179: pastebinit does not read .conf files from ~/.pastebin.d/ directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Severity: important thank you Max, thank you for your report. You request a backport of upstream commit r81 to version 1.1-2 of pastebinit in Squeeze. I'm willing to do that as I believe your request has merit, but I'd like to hear from the Stable Release Team first what they think. They will be the final arbiter of any upload to a stable release. r81 entered Debian Experimental in 1.2-2 on February 2nd last year. Subsequently 1.2-3 was uploaded to Unstable on July 4th. There has been no negative feedback regarding this change in either Debian or Ubuntu and it's highly unlikely to cause any regression due to the minimal and obviously beneficial change it introduces. I'm bumping this ticket to severity important since the faulty code greatly diminishes the ability of ordinary users to customize their interaction with a pastebin as you pointed out. I'm including your original report as a full-quote below for the convenience of the Stable Release Team. Regards Rolf On 09.01.2012 02:06, Maximilian Gerhard wrote: Version: 1.1-2 Tags: squeeze patch Users can not override pastebinit global config or add own service configs via ~/.pastebin.d conf files. This directory is not read by pastebinit, because of an indention error in pastebinit code. Only chance for users to override or add configs is to receive root priviliges and change /etc/pastebin.d. For example to edit the expire time for paste.debian.net (7 days as default is a really long time, even the website offers only 72h as maximum). Changing global configs has the disadvantage of checksum mismatch while new updates occour. And of course not every user has the possibility to become root. Even if, this is not the prefered way because pastebinit offers the possibility to use a local config directory for users. You can test the bug if you move a config from /etc/pastebin.d to ~/.pastebin.d and make a paste to this service. You will get an error that this service is unknown. The problem is an indention error in pastebinit function def preloadPastebins(). There are 2 nested for-loops. First to iterate all config directories and the second to read all conf files inside of an config directory. The return of the first loop has a too deep indention so it is executed after the first run of the second for-loop. That means that pastebinit does only read the conf files from the first config directory. This bug was filled already for Ubuntu, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pastebinit/+bug/701039 There is a fix mentioned in comment #2 in revision 81, see http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~pastebinit-developers/pastebinit/trunk/revision/81 The patch just change the indention of the return so it will be executed just after iteration of all config directories. Best regards, Max -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-030200-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages pastebinit depends on: ii python 2.6.6-3+squeeze6 interactive high-level object-orie ii python-configobj 4.7.2+ds-1 simple but powerful config file re pastebinit recommends no packages. pastebinit suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPCmI/AAoJEJSEK8huURwxvysQAJgib1NKprBA0w6299b1Y6sl IIGh+Ee5yQx10i1sRCjNuduYOfHZ6TrUZzAKSn3ZjdSCR8uFmUL0AIXDxJGtSI1H 2Zd9wZ0RZs00CTmALUr3aVJuh+XuZyMwRKQq1E/q+hbwN07hdQi8/7tnzkGILXD7 jVEZD5wTCNffnCQ7c88v9EThs1EA70YDQSH9ZcQJohu+KS6QHKpKIMNOkp4RhUS5 6Kwx42yRtOzJQdBmLSSq2LzboFp4LZBYvixPrrTE37c1EG905q34+Vp5Eo6vNGUc Al3+65Afx4ME5Cigb0yh2YPagLmIPtiOCp1S66XNxzpXpaiNvhyjCNP5UkaBr7Ui QCThrnENDpEjIvuS3sAi3VwBKOxCQWnNV7Zv2gbmzp+QSYmyevlsM6ztvu1dE5yM i/KOhf/mpoiVSFVhsK9H489iYWea+5U8jiAZFU+Y2dTF/xJKnwGkL6VOhF9dFOl5 wJPixr9I2p7URgxxe8Aa+oquQokk3tBL1j9A2D9VhIhEozGLQn3lXnrhM7wmJQje 6EN0i3NWebLPOD5YSWHrvn1w12hWvzCjGgu09CGfNBvv8enA9LVxNsh1HOCELt0Q pBJ/jBEXrEWtGBsc2ORNBuKQ9LPeVNijIGrKQeOXmuBMoh49MAFOCKxllivOww0Z gWy5b0b+w5FTlXFfPN0j =li/w -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0a6240.9080...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0
On 07.10.2011 02:46, Julien Cristau wrote: openssl098 is still kept in testing by: [...] - isdnutils (#618228, has reverse dependencies) Julien, thank you for the heads up. I maintain (to the best of my limited abilities) the isdnutils package in Debian. I believe isdnutils is a false positive in your list. All packages in testing depend on 1.0.0 of the openssl packages. The arches where isdnutils-derived packages still depend on 0.9.8 either have outdated isdnutils and/or openssl packages. There's nothing inherently in isdnutils that should block the transition so there is nothing I can do, I believe. FWIW, there's also no blocker bug against isdnutils among the list in the BTS. FYI, RC bug 618228 which you list above has also finally been fixed this morning. I had been waiting for a sponsor for about 2 months or so on that one. Otavio was kind enough to help me out and upload my fix quickly after I asked him for support. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8eaeb7.5040...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0
Adam, thank you for your comment. FWIW, http://packages.debian.org/sid/ipppd lists libssl0.9.8 for alpha, armhf, hppa, m68k, sh4 and libssl1.0.0 for the rest. I checked the other binary packages as well. I can only repeat that there is nothing inherently in isdnutils to force dependency on libssl0.9.8. Grep through the source and packaging information if you don't believe me. To me it seems as if the packages that still depend on the old libssl are simply outdated and were built at a time when 0.9.8 was the default. Maybe you want to rebuild the packages? I don't think there's anything I can do. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8ec399.6000...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0
I'm not in a mood for this kind of discussion. I can only reiterate that there is nothing I can do. Packages built after openssl 1.0.0 had become the standard are fine and I have no control over older binary packages that are already released. I can only repeat that there is nothing inherently in isdnutils to force dependency on libssl0.9.8. Grep through the source and packaging information if you don't believe me. See above. Maybe you should look at the right packages and ACK that Adam meant *testing*. There's nothing in isdnutils packaging or source in testing that would force a dependency on a specific version, either. Look at the testing-to-unstable debdiff or the testing source if you think I'm wrong. The only significant difference is the time the packages were built. If packages are stuck at older binaries built pre-openssl1.0.0 for certain arches that is nothing I have control over, either. You guys keep barking up the wrong tree. Send a patch against isdnutils if you disagree and can prove your point. If there is indeed something I can do to help fix the situation I'm more than willing to do that. But I think there simply isn't. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8ef867.5000...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Re: Accepted isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 (source all amd64)
Mehdi, thank you for your mail. If you were aware of the mentors.debian.net package and the discussion then why ask the question in the way you asked it? I have received no further replies to my last message and certainly nothing that would made me reconsider my position. If anything I should be the one asking those questions. On 12.12.2010 18:57, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Well, I did check the package on mentors and it doesn't match what we asked. And I explained my position as package maintainer that I do not intend to bring the dependency on makedev or udev back. I don't feel to repeat my arguments here, but I feel the need to repeat that I stand by them. The more I think about it the more arguemnts I find against bringing back that incorrect dependency. It would be just plain silly, it seems. Take 2-7 which has no RC-relevant bug or use 2-8 from mentors if you prefer that. At this point, I'm strictly against anything else. My strong preference is for the current 2-8 up at mentors to make it for squeeze. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d04cd03.2080...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Re: Accepted isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 (source all amd64)
Hi, On 12.12.2010 07:14, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Any news here? Can't you put the dependency back so that we get this finally properly fixed? Do you prefer an NMU? My package has been up at mentors.debian.net for sponsorship for almost a week now. I sincerely hope that anybody actually considering to interfere with my maintenance of the package with an NMU would at least bother to check mentors.debian.net or the PTS page which has a big fat warning about my package waiting to be sponsored. Thank you for your consideration. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d043a8e.6030...@rolf.leggewie.biz
Re: Request freeze exception for pastebinit 0.10-2
Luk Claes wrote: unblocked Thanks a lot for your work. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Request freeze exception for pastebinit 0.10-2
Hi, I have prepared a minimal patch to fix bug 499410 in pastebinit and uploaded the 0.10-2 release to mentors.debian.net so that it can be included in the upcoming stable release of debian. Pastebinit upstream has released version 0.11 yesterday. But before I push that into unstable, I'd like to see 0.10-2 migrate into testing so that bug 499410 is not in the stable release. Regards Rolf http://bugs.debian.org/499410 http://oss.leggewie.org/wip/pastebinit.debdiff http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pastebinit/pastebinit_0.10-2.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
request freeze exception for new package gourmet
Hi there, I have been trying to get gourmet into debian for some time now. It seems that unfortunately, I missed the lenny window. Or more precisely, my package was lingering in the upload queue before anybody had a chance to look at it while the window closed. I was wondering if it is possible to have this new package granted a freeze exception so that it can get into lenny. No other packages depend on it, obviously, so I think the potential for disruption is small or probably even zero. The package has no open bugs filed against it and my record as a packager is also clean. http://bugs.debian.org/gourmet http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=foss%40rolf.leggewie.biz http://packages.debian.org/sid/gourmet Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
