Re: John sous Squeeze : vérification de la solidité des mots de passe
Le jeudi 03 janvier 2013 à 0:34, Alain Vaugham a écrit : Bonjour la liste, Bonjour, [...] Cela me laisse perplexe que Squeeze fournirait un paquet qui ne fonctionnerait pas brut d'install. Chez moi (Squeeze), ça fonctionne correctement (sudo john /etc/shadow). Dans quelles autres directions devrais-je plutôt chercher? Tu as peut-être des choses qui le dérangent dans /root/.john (je ne connais pas bien le fonctionnement de l'outil). Seb -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130103080318.ga7...@sebian.nob900.homeip.net
Re: butineur et utf8
Le jeudi 03 janvier 2013 à 8:43, bruno.deb...@cyberoso.com a écrit : Iceweasel 14.01 ici et il m'a fallu forcer l'encodage UTF8 car western était sélectionné par défaut. Pareil pour moi. J'ai un Iceweasel (18, je crois) de http://mozilla.debian.net/ et un Iceweasel 3.5.16-20 de Squeeze. Il a fallu que je le redémarre pour que l'encodage soit pris en compte. Seb -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130103080545.gb7...@sebian.nob900.homeip.net
problème de routage avec 2 interfaces réseau
J'ai mon Raspberry avec une Raspbian dedans (je reste en charte). J'ai une clé wifi et une RJ45 branchés. Les deux séparément fonctionnent sans problème. D'office je suis sur la RJ45. Si je le débranche je perds la liaison. Si je boote avec le Wifi seul c'est lui qui a la route par défaut. En fait j'ai un route par défaut qui utilise le RJ45. Une seule route par défaut (ce qui semble normal). Les deux liaisons sont configurées en IP fixe via /etc/network/interface. Comment je fais pour garder la liaison en cas de changement de mode ? Merci d'avance -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5cb40$0$2355$426a7...@news.free.fr
Re: [Un peu HS] Raspberry PI clavier/souris
Bonjour, Après réception de mon Raspberry PI, je reprends ce fil de discussion car, si le Logitech K400 fonctionne bien, à chaque reboot, je dois débrancher le récepteur USB puis le rebrancher pour qu'il soit reconnu... Tu as aussi ce problème ? Merci. David. Le Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:27:45 +0100, David Cure deb...@cure.nom.fr a écrit : Bonjour, Le Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:10:32PM +0100, David BERCOT ecrivait : Avez-vous une expérience personnelle avec cet objet ? Dans le cadre de l'usage que je souhaite en faire ? Des conseils ? pour ma part, j'ai choisi le Logitec K400 qui a un touchpad intégré au clavier et j'en suis satisfait. David. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130103201601.330ac603@debian-david
Zimowisko Linuxowe TLUG-u Puck-2013.
Dnia 3 Stycznia 2013, 3:06 pm, Cz, Tomasz Lenartowicz napisał. Witajcie, w tym roku planujemy zorganizowac Zimowisko linuksowe 2013 w terminie 8-10 marzec 2013 (pt-nd), w CKU Pucku. Termin jest juz zaklepany. W zwiazku z tym: Zapraszamy do zglaszania prezentacji i wykladow za posrednictwem strony: https://zimowisko2013.konfeo.com Dla wykladowcow oferujemy jak zawsze atrakcyjne znizki. Bez waszego aktywnego udzialu Zimowisko sie nie odbedzie. Termin zglaszania propozycji mija 31 stycznia 2013. Organizatorzy. zimowisko.linux.gda.pl Witam. Obecnie do 31 stycznia trwa przyjmowanie zgloszen prezentacji i o nim wiecej w powyzszym cytacie. Witryna pod http://zimowisko.linux.gda.pl i tu w lutym beda otwarte zapisy i podane ceny uczestnictwa. Miejsce tak jak rok temu. Powiatowe Centrum Kształcenia Ustawicznego ul. Kolejowa 7, 84-100 Puck Open Source jest dziś największym i najważniejszym nurtem w sektorze IT - albo dasz się ponieść na fali, albo utoniesz próbując płynąć pod prąd... -- Konczac Pozdrawiam. Krzysztof. Registered Linux User: 253243 Powered by Aurox 11.0, Ubuntu Studio 8.04 i Fedora 9.0 Krzysztof Zubik. | kzu...@netglob.com.pl| kzu...@wp.pl http://www.kzubik.cba.pl GaduGadu. 1208376 | Jabber. kzu...@jabber.wp.pl | Skype. kzubik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-polish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/c948102eda45c5718aaabd22a26dea16.squir...@webmail.netglob.com.pl
Re: Feliz y Prospero 2013
Gracias a todos por el 2012. SALUD, PAZ y ÉXITOS en este 2013 Atte Javier Sánchez González. On Miércoles 02 Enero 2013 21:53:04 TuxNut - El laboratorio Informático Online escribió: MUY FELIZ 2013 !! El 2 de enero de 2013 20:33, Paradix ;) rayn...@infomed.sld.cu escribió: Ala de Dragón aladedra...@gmail.com escribió: Igualmente: :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D Feliz año nuevo a tod@s. :D :D :D :D:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D Saludos El 02/01/13, alexissauc...@gmail.com alexissauc...@gmail.com escribió: Comparto el saludo desde argentina! Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Personal (http://www.personal.com.ar/) -Original Message- From: francisco cid francisco...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 13:37:27 To: Lista de correos Debian en Españoldebian-user-spanish@**lists.debian.orgdebian-user-spanish@lis ts.debian.org Subject: Re: Feliz y Prospero 2013 El 02/01/2013 13:31, José Manuel (EB8CXW) eb8cx...@infonegocio.com escribió: Hola a tod@s, Les deseo que este año recién empezado les traiga todo y nada. Todo lo que lees haga feliz y nada de lo que les haga triste. Feliz 2013 Cuídense. -- Un saludo, José Manuel Gran Canaria/España Si vas a escribir.. piensa en esto: no digas nada que no sea mas precioso que el silencio!!! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-REQUEST@**lists.debian.orgdebian-user-spanish-RE qu...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**50E45F7C.3060001@infonegocio.**comhttp://l ists.debian.org/50e45f7c.3060...@infonegocio.com igualmente que sea un lindo año para todos. saludos desde chile -- El cielo es para los dragones lo que el agua es para las ninfas Desde Cuba les deseamos muchas felicidades en este 2013. Muchos exitos y cosas buenas -- Paradix ;) Haciendo abogacía por el software libre adonde voy --**--** This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- Este mensaje le ha llegado mediante el servicio de correo electronico que ofrece Infomed para respaldar el cumplimiento de las misiones del Sistema Nacional de Salud. La persona que envia este correo asume el compromiso de usar el servicio a tales fines y cumplir con las regulaciones establecidas Infomed: http://www.sld.cu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-REQUEST@**lists.debian.orgdebian-user-spanish-REQUE s...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**20130102183301.** 97947ka774hnp...@webmail.sld.**cuhttp://lists.debian.org/20130102183301. 97947ka774hnp...@webmail.sld.cu -- Este mensaje le ha llegado mediante el servicio de correo electronico que ofrece Infomed para respaldar el cumplimiento de las misiones del Sistema Nacional de Salud. La persona que envia este correo asume el compromiso de usar el servicio a tales fines y cumplir con las regulaciones establecidas Infomed: http://www.sld.cu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201301030817.26709.vcljav...@infomed.sld.cu
Re: Debian squeze en IBM 3550 M4
De: Camaleón noela...@gmail.com Para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org Enviado: lunes, 31 de diciembre de 2012 15:01 Asunto: Re: Debian squeze en IBM 3550 M4 El Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:24:25 -0800, Nicolas Paleari escribió: (...) No sé... piensa si no te convendría esperar a que salga wheezy que ya trae de serie un kernel actualizado, aunque tampoco estoy segura de que tenga soporte directo, convendría probar primero con una LiveCD. Si, veo que yahoo no funciona bien con la lista, registrare un mail de gmail. Antes mira a ver si puedes configurarlo porque desde luego es un destroza- mensajes :-( En cuanto a mi problema quiero aclarar que la controladora ee la Serveraid M5110 de IBM y viene con el controlador LSI SAS 2208, el mismo que la controladora 9270-8i que nombras. Ah, perfecto. El firmware aun no lo pude actualizar, por lo que dice en el booteo es viejo, la version es la 5.30 de nov de 2011, baje el firmware de la 9270-8i pero me dice que es invalido. Como se trata de una controladora integrada, es posible que tengas que usar el firmware de IBM que es el ensamblador. Respeto a instalar una imagen personalizada lo probe e instale la que nombran en este articulo (http://infogerance-linux.net/2012 /installation-de-debian-squeeze-sur-un-ibm-x3550m4-avec-carte-raid- m5110-base-sur-lsi-sas2208-roc-firmware-mars-2012/) la instale y me tomo la controladora sin problema. Qué bien :-) Ahora bien, por una cuestion de requerimientos de un soft privativo que se instalara en el server me exigen instala squeezy con el kernel 2.6.32-5, Pues diles que tendrán que elegir entre una configuración de discos en modo RAID o el kernel que quieren porque ambos son incompatibles. Y la verdad es que es una pena no poder usar esa controladora en modo RAID porque parece bastante buena ;-( la proxima semana voy a consultar si puedo dejar instalado el debian q me reconocio la controladora raid, en caso que me pidan si o si squeezy kernel 2.6.32-5, tengo alguna solucion?? No, no la tienes salvo que a) te pongas en contacto con LSI y les pidas un driver para tu versión del kernel o b) configures los discos duros de manera independiente (sin RAID) y pongas un RAID por software (md) pero repito que sería una pena desaprovechar esa tarjeta. Saludos, -- Camaleón -- Hola lista, queria comentarles que ya pude solucionar mi problema, logro contactarme con el fabricante (LSI) de la controladora (M5110 SAS2208) y me mando los drivers para Squeeze 6.0 oficial, segui los paso que me detallaron y me detecto el RAID si problema, cualquiera que necesite los drivers me avisa y se los mando. Muchas gracias a todos! Saludos
Re: SAMBA Error: Could not change to user. Removing deferred open, mid=36293
El Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:19:22 -0300, Robert J. Briones C. escribió: Estimados. Tengo un servidor samba instalado y de un momento a otro me bloqueo el acceo a un PC. estan todos con windows 7 y todos se conectan sin problema, y el pc bloqueado tambien lo hacía, hastq eu dejo de hacerlo. Ni siquiera veo el servidor SAMBA en la red. el log de ese es el siguiente : (...) [2013/01/02 09:48:21.607088, 1] smbd/service.c:1070(make_connection_snum) marketing (:::20.0.0.100) connect to service desarrollos initially as user robert (uid=1003, gid=1004) (pid 31569) [2013/01/02 09:48:48.760674, 1] smbd/service.c:678(make_connection_snum) create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED (...) [2013/01/02 10:05:19.991764, 0] lib/util.c:1465(smb_panic) PANIC (pid 31569): register_initial_vuid: Tried to register uid in security=share [2013/01/02 10:05:20.000275, 0] lib/util.c:1569(log_stack_trace) BACKTRACE: 17 stack frames: (...) Bueno, el primer mensaje podría no ser grave pero el segundo es un traza de fallo en toda regla y bastante descriptiva en cuanto a la gravedad, por cierto (smb_panic). El servicio smbd ha encontrado una situación que no puede gestionar y se habrá colgado, conviene informar del fallo. Parece que me bloqueo el equipo o algo así.. si alguien me ayuda o me dice donde buscar ya que no he encontrado nada se los agradecería. ¿Dices que se ha bloqueado _el equipo completo_? Eso sería más grave aún. Mira a ver si puedes acceder vía ssh para reiniciar el demonio. Saludos, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kc44o2$plj$1...@ger.gmane.org
Re: Squid, Debian y un usuario domestico enloquecido ;)
El Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:52:49 +0100, Ala de Dragón escribió: ¡Hola a tod@s y feliz año nuevo! :D Igualmente :-) Estoy buscando info en la lista y google acerca de como configurar squid. He encontrado mucha info acerca de entornos complejos, pero creo que mi escenario es sencillo y les solicito consejo. les descrio el entorno. Una maquina con debian: Linux version 2.6.32-5-powerpc64 (Debian 2.6.32-46) (da...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) Dos interficies de Red ^^^ ¿Inter-qué? ¿T'has inventao un palabro nuevo? :-P eth0 eth1 Una conexión a internet por mediación de un viejo teléfono móvil. Una combinacion entre 3g y bluetooth. (...) Tengo configurado un servidor proxy, squid 2 escuchando en todas las interficies de red. ¿En llas tres? :-? Squid Cache: Version 2.7.STABLE9 (...) lsof -i | grep LISTEN squid 4238 proxy9u IPv4 444516 0t0 TCP localhost:http-alt (LISTEN) Funcionar, funciona puesto que me estoy conectando ahora mismo desde el proxy. No esta activada la cache ni esta en modo transparente. Si cambio la configuración del proxy en el navegador salgo a la red sin problemas. La configuración de squid la obtuve de: https://calomel.org/squid.html Por lo que podido leer en la lista se puede utilizar iptables o ebtables para redireccionar las solicitudes al proxy (modo transparente) y denegar la salida a la red a todo lo que no pase por el proxy. La idea es minimizar el uso del ancho de banda, tengo unos 100 MB mensuales. ¿Y no sería más sencillo en lugar de un proxy desactivar en el navegador flash y las imágenes y habilitar un espacio en caché gordota? No sé, un proxy para un único usuario me parece un tanto excesivo :-? Como ejemplo desactivo las imágenes en el navegador etc... Me gustaría cachear la web para de ese modo poder leer las paginas de manuales que tengo almacenadas en el historial sin necesidad de gastar un bit del isp. No creo que necesites un proxy para eso... Por ejemplo este manual sobre como montar squid http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-spanish/2012/12/msg00292.html http://www.tutoriales-ubuntu.com/archives/configurar-un-proxy- transparente-con-squid Pero en todos esos ejemplos describen una red local a la que darle servicio no es mi caso. (...) Bueno, no veo por qué no ha de servirte, pero en tu caso quizá te apañes mejor con algo más ajustado a tu entorno como Polipo. Pero si te interesa tirar por soluciones gigánticas lo dices y nos podemos con los problemas que enumeras más abajo :-) Saludos, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kc45nb$plj$2...@ger.gmane.org
Re: Debian squeze en IBM 3550 M4
El Thu, 03 Jan 2013 05:37:24 -0800, Nicolas Paleari escribió: (...) la proxima semana voy a consultar si puedo dejar instalado el debian q me reconocio la controladora raid, en caso que me pidan si o si squeezy kernel 2.6.32-5, tengo alguna solucion?? No, no la tienes salvo que a) te pongas en contacto con LSI y les pidas un driver para tu versión del kernel o b) configures los discos duros de manera independiente (sin RAID) y pongas un RAID por software (md) pero repito que sería una pena desaprovechar esa tarjeta. Hola lista, queria comentarles que ya pude solucionar mi problema, logro contactarme con el fabricante (LSI) de la controladora (M5110 SAS2208) y me mando los drivers para Squeeze 6.0 oficial, segui los paso que me detallaron y me detecto el RAID si problema, cualquiera que necesite los drivers me avisa y se los mando. Caray... pues qué quieres que te diga, +10 puntos para LSI, eso sí que es un soporte técnico como debe ser. Pues tomo buena nota para la próxima controladora RAID que tenga que comprar, no todos los días te encuentras con una respuesta como la que te han dado a ti y eso, en una empresa, vale tanto o más como un buen producto. Muchas gracias a todos! Pues me alegro un montón de que lo hayas solucionado, aunque sería interesante que publicaran esos drivers en su página web para que otros usuarios en tu situación pudieran hacer lo mismo sin tener que hacer malabares :-) Saludos, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kc4679$plj$3...@ger.gmane.org
Re: OT: instalar spip como localhost en debian
Saludos lista, Camaleón: On 29/12/12 16:25, Camaleón wrote: El Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:42:42 -0600, Anamhoo escribió: Estoy tratando de aprender a usar spip (http://www.spip.net) en mi computadora personal pero como soy una neófita en todo esto me atoro en cosas que tal vez son muy simples, así que el primer problema que tuve fue con lograr una instalación manual de spip con un localhost. Lo primero que hice fue recurrir a synaptic e instalar pero no funcionó. (...) ¿Y qué error te daba? Porque los paquetes disponibles en los repositorios oficiales no deberían dar muchos problemas salvo que tengan algún bug o que sean realmente complejos de configurar para lo cual suele haber instrucciones más Más bien cuando hice la instalación se abrió una carpeta SPIP pero no contenía los archivos que me indicaban desde la instalación del sitio SPIP y otra documentación de la red que había consultado. Pensé que tal vez estarían en otro sitio y busqué dentro de las carpetas pero no encontré nada. Entonces fue que seguí buscando y encontré la página que comenté. o menos detalladas en la documentación... ¿Consultaste el archivo /usr/ share/doc/spip/README.Debian? No (//) no fui directo a esa carpeta, lo que hice fue ver todos los archivos spip en el buscador y traté de encontrar si había algún documento help pero no encontré nada, tal vez no supe buscar. Aunque ahora que veo el paquete desde http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/all/spip/download veo que no probé instalar desde ahí, me fui directo al synaptic... En un tiempito libre pruebo y escribo de vuelta Saludos Saludos, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5a37f.1040...@gamil.com
Re: OT: instalar spip como localhost en debian
El Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:27:59 -0600, Anamhoo escribió: Saludos lista, Camaleón: On 29/12/12 16:25, Camaleón wrote: (...) Lo primero que hice fue recurrir a synaptic e instalar pero no funcionó. (...) ¿Y qué error te daba? Porque los paquetes disponibles en los repositorios oficiales no deberían dar muchos problemas salvo que tengan algún bug o que sean realmente complejos de configurar para lo cual suele haber instrucciones más Más bien cuando hice la instalación se abrió una carpeta SPIP pero no contenía los archivos que me indicaban desde la instalación del sitio SPIP y otra documentación de la red que había consultado. Pensé que tal vez estarían en otro sitio y busqué dentro de las carpetas pero no encontré nada. Entonces fue que seguí buscando y encontré la página que comenté. Bueno, ya sabes que Debian (al igual que el resto de distribuciones Linux) suele personalizar los directorios de los paquetes para adecuarlo a su sistema, es algo normal, por eso conviene leer la documentación del paquete que incluye tu versión concreta de Debian para ver dónde, cómo y qué ha instalado exactamente y para saber cómo configurarlo e iniciarlo ya que los paquetes de Debian también suelen incluir un asistente que no está disponible en el programa original. o menos detalladas en la documentación... ¿Consultaste el archivo /usr/ share/doc/spip/README.Debian? No (//) no fui directo a esa carpeta, lo que hice fue ver todos los archivos spip en el buscador y traté de encontrar si había algún documento help pero no encontré nada, tal vez no supe buscar. Generalmente, los paquetes de Debian incluyen siempre la documentación y la instalan en /usr/share/doc/[paquete]. Aunque ahora que veo el paquete desde http://packages.debian.org /squeeze/all/spip/download veo que no probé instalar desde ahí, me fui directo al synaptic... En un tiempito libre pruebo y escribo de vuelta Es lo mismo :-) Synaptic descarga los paquetes desde los repositorios en línea pero con la ventaja de que puede resolver las dependencias automáticamente mientras que si descargas manualmente un paquete .deb con dpkg que depende de algún otro paquete te dirá que no puede instalarlo. Saludos, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kc48cn$plj$4...@ger.gmane.org
Iceweasel no genera en PDF un recibo de un banco
Hola Hasta noviembre si lo hacía, pero hoy he querido imprimir un duplicado de un recibo en mi entidad de crédito, y al intentar general el pdf del recibo, se abre una ventana en blanco, con el asunto about:blank. Tengo Debian testing con iceweaset 17.0.1. el iceweaset esta instalado desde experimental. Espero que me puedan ayudar, gracias de antemano. Feliz año 2013 -- Un saludo, José Manuel Gran Canaria/España Si vas a escribir.. piensa en esto: no digas nada que no sea mas precioso que el silencio!!! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5d477.8020...@infonegocio.com
Re: Iceweasel no genera en PDF un recibo de un banco
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:56:55PM +, José Manuel (EB8CXW) wrote: Hola Hasta noviembre si lo hacía, pero hoy he querido imprimir un duplicado de un recibo en mi entidad de crédito, y al intentar general el pdf del recibo, se abre una ventana en blanco, con el asunto about:blank. Tengo Debian testing con iceweaset 17.0.1. el iceweaset esta instalado desde experimental. Puedes probar con otro navegador... o con otro banco. Tambien sería de utilidad que 1) dijeras de qué entidad bancaria se trata por si hay otros usuarios que les funciona y te pueden dar pistas. 2) dijeras de qué entidad bancaria se trata para no hacerse cliente de ella. 3) hablaras con tu entidad bancaria para que tomen consciencia de que existe mundo más allá del navegador de la 'e' azul. Un poco utópico, pero por probar que no quede. -- Adrià García-Alzórriz adri...@gmail.com GPG Key: 9DE37ED4 Thus spake the master programmer: Without the wind, the grass does not move. Without software, hardware is useless. -- Geoffrey James, The Tao of Programming signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian squeze en IBM 3550 M4
El día 3 de enero de 2013 11:56, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Thu, 03 Jan 2013 05:37:24 -0800, Nicolas Paleari escribió: (...) la proxima semana voy a consultar si puedo dejar instalado el debian q me reconocio la controladora raid, en caso que me pidan si o si squeezy kernel 2.6.32-5, tengo alguna solucion?? No, no la tienes salvo que a) te pongas en contacto con LSI y les pidas un driver para tu versión del kernel o b) configures los discos duros de manera independiente (sin RAID) y pongas un RAID por software (md) pero repito que sería una pena desaprovechar esa tarjeta. Hola lista, queria comentarles que ya pude solucionar mi problema, logro contactarme con el fabricante (LSI) de la controladora (M5110 SAS2208) y me mando los drivers para Squeeze 6.0 oficial, segui los paso que me detallaron y me detecto el RAID si problema, cualquiera que necesite los drivers me avisa y se los mando. Caray... pues qué quieres que te diga, +10 puntos para LSI, eso sí que es un soporte técnico como debe ser. Pues tomo buena nota para la próxima controladora RAID que tenga que comprar, no todos los días te encuentras con una respuesta como la que te han dado a ti y eso, en una empresa, vale tanto o más como un buen producto. Muchas gracias a todos! Pues me alegro un montón de que lo hayas solucionado, aunque sería interesante que publicaran esos drivers en su página web para que otros usuarios en tu situación pudieran hacer lo mismo sin tener que hacer malabares :-) Saludos, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kc4679$plj$3...@ger.gmane.org +1 Publicar los driver y la forma en como lo solucionaste siguiendo los pasos que te indico el proveedor de la controladora seria más aun efectivo para quienes tenemos o tienen problemas con dicha controladora. Saludos -- Roberto Quiñones Owner - Service Manager and System ACShell.NET – Internet Services robe...@acshell.net - www.acshell.net San Martin #311 Santiago – CL (Chile) +560981361713 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAO7F6e-jPyQF-8W2B4iA2nJoFMWgUJp0hZxU-V6+Wm1WP=c...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Iceweasel no genera en PDF un recibo de un banco
El 03/01/13 19:03, Adrià escribió: On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:56:55PM +, José Manuel (EB8CXW) wrote: Hola Hasta noviembre si lo hacía, pero hoy he querido imprimir un duplicado de un recibo en mi entidad de crédito, y al intentar general el pdf del recibo, se abre una ventana en blanco, con el asunto about:blank. Tengo Debian testing con iceweaset 17.0.1. el iceweaset esta instalado desde experimental. Puedes probar con otro navegador... o con otro banco. Tambien sería de utilidad que 1) dijeras de qué entidad bancaria se trata por si hay otros usuarios que les funciona y te pueden dar pistas. 2) dijeras de qué entidad bancaria se trata para no hacerse cliente de ella. 3) hablaras con tu entidad bancaria para que tomen consciencia de que existe mundo más allá del navegador de la 'e' azul. Un poco utópico, pero por probar que no quede. Hola Adrián, gracias por contestar. La entidad es Caja de Canarias. y como dije hasta noviembre lo hacía sin problemas. Lo he comprobado con el navegador que viene por defecto de Gnome y funciona bien. Por lo que es un problema de Iceweasel, y no se porque ahora no se puede y antes si. -- Un saludo, José Manuel Gran Canaria/España Si vas a escribir.. piensa en esto: no digas nada que no sea mas precioso que el silencio!!! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5d8bb.9000...@infonegocio.com
Re: SAMBA Error: Could not change to user. Removing deferred open, mid=36293
El día 3 de enero de 2013 11:31, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:19:22 -0300, Robert J. Briones C. escribió: Estimados. Tengo un servidor samba instalado y de un momento a otro me bloqueo el acceo a un PC. estan todos con windows 7 y todos se conectan sin problema, y el pc bloqueado tambien lo hacía, hastq eu dejo de hacerlo. Ni siquiera veo el servidor SAMBA en la red. el log de ese es el siguiente : (...) [2013/01/02 09:48:21.607088, 1] smbd/service.c:1070(make_connection_snum) marketing (:::20.0.0.100) connect to service desarrollos initially as user robert (uid=1003, gid=1004) (pid 31569) [2013/01/02 09:48:48.760674, 1] smbd/service.c:678(make_connection_snum) create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED (...) [2013/01/02 10:05:19.991764, 0] lib/util.c:1465(smb_panic) PANIC (pid 31569): register_initial_vuid: Tried to register uid in security=share [2013/01/02 10:05:20.000275, 0] lib/util.c:1569(log_stack_trace) BACKTRACE: 17 stack frames: (...) Bueno, el primer mensaje podría no ser grave pero el segundo es un traza de fallo en toda regla y bastante descriptiva en cuanto a la gravedad, por cierto (smb_panic). El servicio smbd ha encontrado una situación que no puede gestionar y se habrá colgado, conviene informar del fallo. bug ?, por que me pasa solo con un cliente, he probado con 7 equipos distintos y todos se conectan menos 1. el equipo que no se conecta se conectaba sin problemas. es un windows 7 ultimate, al igual que otros 4, un windows 7 started, un windows 8 , y un XP, todos sin problemas. Parece que me bloqueo el equipo o algo así.. si alguien me ayuda o me dice donde buscar ya que no he encontrado nada se los agradecería. ¿Dices que se ha bloqueado _el equipo completo_? Eso sería más grave aún. Mira a ver si puedes acceder vía ssh para reiniciar el demonio. no, me exprese mal, me refiero a que me ha bloqueado el acceso a un cliente. el servidor funciona bien, con ese cliente tengo acceso a todo lo demas. (SSH, HTTP, FTP, SVN, ETC) NOTA: probe reinstalar el servidor de samba, pero sigo sin poder conectarme. Saludos, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kc44o2$plj$1...@ger.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGUcOaEdJh+oDexBeKvRrOj4Mm0QKSu=gsirfnnzcu1yzjl...@mail.gmail.com
Re: problema ao montar hd externo
http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-faq/#unprivileged Atenciosamente, *Gabriel Ricardo* Consultor em Tecnologia *Cel.:* (41) 8881-7828 *Skype:* gabriel.nerdworkti *Facebook:* facebook.com/nerdworkti *Site*: www.nerdworkti.com.br Em 2 de janeiro de 2013 20:31, Deckardbot deckard...@gmail.com escreveu: Olá Gabriel, Desculpe pela demora em responder. Sabe como é virada de ano né heuhhue Mas enfim... monitorei o dmesg e obtive o seguinte registro ao plugar o HD na USB: [ 6165.714394] scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access Samsung S2 Portable PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 CCS [ 6165.715688] sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0 [ 6165.717062] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] 976773168 512-byte logical blocks: (500 GB/465 GiB) [ 6165.717804] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off [ 6165.717810] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 28 00 00 00 [ 6165.717816] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 6165.719304] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 6165.719312] sdb: sdb1 [ 6165.747684] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 6165.747694] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk Estranho porque nunca tive problema em montá-lo e começou ocorrer após formatar o squeeze (kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64). Percebi tambem que não permissão para usar o comando mount. $ mkdir hdd $ mount -t ntfs /dev/sdb1 ~/hdd/ mount: operação exclusiva de root Porem, pelo Gnome eu marquei todas as opções de permissão para o meu usuário. Tanto que aparece com o tipo administrador. Obs: com o root estou conseguindo montar o hd externo. Em 28 de dezembro de 2012 06:48, Gabriel Ricardo gricard...@gmail.comescreveu: A partição NTFS pode estar pedindo para passar chkdsk ( dirty flag ativa). Abra outro terminal, e acompanhe via dmesg: watch dmesg | tail Tente montar, se ele reclamar de dirty existem 2 opções, usar o ntfsfix no linux mesmo (que nem sempre resolve) ou usar um Windows para verificar partição. Atenciosamente, *Gabriel Ricardo* Consultor em Tecnologia *Cel.:* (41) 8881-7828 *Skype:* gabriel.nerdworkti *Facebook:* facebook.com/nerdworkti *Site*: www.nerdworkti.com.br 2012/12/28 Deckardbot deckard...@gmail.com Olá Tenho um hd externo formatado com NTFS. Nunca tive problemas para montá-lo, porem depois de formatar meu Squeeze ocorre o erro: Error mounting: mount exited with exit code 1: helper failed with: Error opening '/dev/sdb1': Permission denied Failed to mount '/dev/sdb1': Permission denied Please check '/dev/sdb1' and the ntfs-3g binary permissions, and the mounting user ID. More explanation is provided at http://ntfs-3g.org/support.html#unprivileged Mas estou no grupo FUSE. $ groups user adm dialout fax cdrom floppy tape audio dip video plugdev netdev bluetooth lpadmin fuse scanner Alguem pode ajudar? abs -- deckardbot -- deckardbot
Re: problema ao montar hd externo
mount: operação exclusiva de root Seu usuariio nao tem permissao para usar o comando mount. Adicione seu usuario ao grupo mount: # adduser USUARUI mount Abraços. Em 2 de janeiro de 2013 18:31, Deckardbot deckard...@gmail.com escreveu: mount: operação exclusiva de root
Re: problema ao montar hd externo
Em 03/01/13, Rodolforof20...@gmail.com escreveu: mount: operação exclusiva de root Seu usuariio nao tem permissao para usar o comando mount. Adicione seu usuario ao grupo mount: Não existe esse grupo pelo menos na versão Wheezy do debian que estou usando, o grupo não seria esse? plugdev Members of this group can access removable devices in limited ways without explicit configuration in /etc/fstab. This is useful for local users who expect to be able to insert and use CDs, USB drives, and so on. Since pmount (the original implementor of group plugdev) always mounts with the nodev and nosuid options and applies other checks, this group is not intended to be root-equivalent in the ways that the ability to mount filesystems might ordinarily allow. Implementors of semantics involving this group should be careful not to allow root-equivalence. fonte: /usr/share/doc/base-passwd/users-and-groups.txt.gz O pacote ntfs-3g esta instalado para hablitar a escrita nesse tipo de sistema de arquivo? Agora não me lembro, mas eu acho que tem que configurar o policykit tb, lembro que quebrei a cabeça com essas coisas que o gnome fazia por debaixo do pano depois que me livrei dele... RTMF[1] [1] Nada pessoal, só para descontrair relembrando os velhos tempos. =-D [ ] 's -- | .''`. A fé não dá respostas. Só impede perguntas. | : :' : | `. `'` | `- Je vois tout -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACnf0pi18876_hMDJWzbN=p2p-y3n5af9+fmrqfcbzjb8sp...@mail.gmail.com
Re: problema ao montar hd externo
Eu nao uso o Wheezy, mas a mensagem de erro é sobre a permissao de usar o comando mount, e na epoca que eu mexia nesses arquivos, tinha um grupo chamado mount, ou algo parecido, na verdade nem lembro hehehehe. Abracos. 2013/1/3 P. J. pjotam...@gmail.com Em 03/01/13, Rodolforof20...@gmail.com escreveu: mount: operação exclusiva de root Seu usuariio nao tem permissao para usar o comando mount. Adicione seu usuario ao grupo mount: Não existe esse grupo pelo menos na versão Wheezy do debian que estou usando, o grupo não seria esse? plugdev Members of this group can access removable devices in limited ways without explicit configuration in /etc/fstab. This is useful for local users who expect to be able to insert and use CDs, USB drives, and so on. Since pmount (the original implementor of group plugdev) always mounts with the nodev and nosuid options and applies other checks, this group is not intended to be root-equivalent in the ways that the ability to mount filesystems might ordinarily allow. Implementors of semantics involving this group should be careful not to allow root-equivalence. fonte: /usr/share/doc/base-passwd/users-and-groups.txt.gz O pacote ntfs-3g esta instalado para hablitar a escrita nesse tipo de sistema de arquivo? Agora não me lembro, mas eu acho que tem que configurar o policykit tb, lembro que quebrei a cabeça com essas coisas que o gnome fazia por debaixo do pano depois que me livrei dele... RTMF[1] [1] Nada pessoal, só para descontrair relembrando os velhos tempos. =-D [ ] 's -- | .''`. A fé não dá respostas. Só impede perguntas. | : :' : | `. `'` | `- Je vois tout -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cacnf0pi18876_hmdjwzbnp2p-y3n5af9+fmrqfcbzjb8sp...@mail.gmail.com
Re: problema ao montar hd externo
Ia me esquecendo, essa operacao de mount ser somente para o root é algo muito aceitavel no aspecto de seguranca, eu particularmente nunca tive problemas com esse tipo de coisa, porque eu nunca deleguei nada de especial a usuario nenhum, nem o meu. Sempre deixei tudo nas maos do root. Quando quero montar qualquer coisa, eu uso # su -c mount tra la la la e depois desmonto. Eu uso blackbox, nao sei o que é automount, vo tudo na tela preta mermo. Em 3 de janeiro de 2013 09:05, Rodolfo rof20...@gmail.com escreveu: Eu nao uso o Wheezy, mas a mensagem de erro é sobre a permissao de usar o comando mount, e na epoca que eu mexia nesses arquivos, tinha um grupo chamado mount, ou algo parecido, na verdade nem lembro hehehehe. Abracos. 2013/1/3 P. J. pjotam...@gmail.com Em 03/01/13, Rodolforof20...@gmail.com escreveu: mount: operação exclusiva de root Seu usuariio nao tem permissao para usar o comando mount. Adicione seu usuario ao grupo mount: Não existe esse grupo pelo menos na versão Wheezy do debian que estou usando, o grupo não seria esse? plugdev Members of this group can access removable devices in limited ways without explicit configuration in /etc/fstab. This is useful for local users who expect to be able to insert and use CDs, USB drives, and so on. Since pmount (the original implementor of group plugdev) always mounts with the nodev and nosuid options and applies other checks, this group is not intended to be root-equivalent in the ways that the ability to mount filesystems might ordinarily allow. Implementors of semantics involving this group should be careful not to allow root-equivalence. fonte: /usr/share/doc/base-passwd/users-and-groups.txt.gz O pacote ntfs-3g esta instalado para hablitar a escrita nesse tipo de sistema de arquivo? Agora não me lembro, mas eu acho que tem que configurar o policykit tb, lembro que quebrei a cabeça com essas coisas que o gnome fazia por debaixo do pano depois que me livrei dele... RTMF[1] [1] Nada pessoal, só para descontrair relembrando os velhos tempos. =-D [ ] 's -- | .''`. A fé não dá respostas. Só impede perguntas. | : :' : | `. `'` | `- Je vois tout -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cacnf0pi18876_hmdjwzbnp2p-y3n5af9+fmrqfcbzjb8sp...@mail.gmail.com
Bloquear Facebook https
Ola Galera, Preciso bloquear o facebook pelo protocolo https (443) aqui na empresa, possuo proxy transparente mas acredito que a melhor solucao seria atraves do Firewall. Nao posso bloquear o protocolo https pois usamos sites de banco e outros que usam o mesmo protocolo. Lembrando que preciso de uma lista branca para diretores e outros que possam acessar o face. Alguem ai ja passou pro isso? ou pode me dar uma luz por onde começar. desde ja agradeco -- Att. Mauro Collin. Analista de Suporte Técnico. TI-Infraestrutura.
RE: Bloquear Facebook https
Bloquear pelo endereço ip do facebook não dá certo?ou a range do facebook !? Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:07:31 -0200 Subject: Bloquear Facebook https From: maurocol...@gmail.com To: debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Ola Galera, Preciso bloquear o facebook pelo protocolo https (443) aqui na empresa, possuo proxy transparente mas acredito que a melhor solucao seria atraves do Firewall.Nao posso bloquear o protocolo https pois usamos sites de banco e outros que usam o mesmo protocolo. Lembrando que preciso de uma lista branca para diretores e outros que possam acessar o face. Alguem ai ja passou pro isso? ou pode me dar uma luz por onde começar. desde ja agradeco-- Att. Mauro Collin. Analista de Suporte Técnico.TI-Infraestrutura.
Re: Bloquear Facebook https
E aí, O SquidGuard resolve o seu problema. Aqui tem um tutorial explicando o uso: http://www.hardware.com.br/livros/servidores-linux/usando-squidguard-para-bloquear-paginas-improprias.html Att, Fabiano Em 03-01-2013 13:07, Mauro Collin escreveu: Ola Galera, Preciso bloquear o facebook pelo protocolo https (443) aqui na empresa, possuo proxy transparente mas acredito que a melhor solucao seria atraves do Firewall. Nao posso bloquear o protocolo https pois usamos sites de banco e outros que usam o mesmo protocolo. Lembrando que preciso de uma lista branca para diretores e outros que possam acessar o face. Alguem ai ja passou pro isso? ou pode me dar uma luz por onde começar. desde ja agradeco -- Att. Mauro Collin. Analista de Suporte Técnico. TI-Infraestrutura. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5a92e.2070...@wolaksistemas.com.br
Re: Bloquear Facebook https
Olá, utilize o squid com o url_regex, daí tu coloca a palavra facebook, é bem eficiente. Dá para fazer pelo iptables também, bloqueando strings que contenham facebook, mas usando ele não é a maneira mais correta para isso. -- att, Adiel de Lima Ribeiro facebook.com/sembr.dyndns.info On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 13:07 -0200, Mauro Collin wrote: Ola Galera, Preciso bloquear o facebook pelo protocolo https (443) aqui na empresa, possuo proxy transparente mas acredito que a melhor solucao seria atraves do Firewall. Nao posso bloquear o protocolo https pois usamos sites de banco e outros que usam o mesmo protocolo. Lembrando que preciso de uma lista branca para diretores e outros que possam acessar o face. Alguem ai ja passou pro isso? ou pode me dar uma luz por onde começar. desde ja agradeco -- Att. Mauro Collin. Analista de Suporte Técnico. TI-Infraestrutura. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1357229198.1817.2.camel@fucker
Res: Re: Bloquear Facebook https
Se voce usa proxy transparente, a única solução eh bloquear no firewall. Com isso, manter 2 listas de bloqueio, uma no squid e a outra no firewall. Sim, eh exatamente o que parece q você NÃO quer fazer: administrar 2 listas em 2 locais diferentes. Quando a estrutura se torna mais complexa, ou você parte para gpo em ambiente windows, ou você parte pro wpad em ambiente geral. Gpo e wpad são o que poderíamos falar como proxy transparente feito decentemente. Tem no google maiores exemplos (você so queria uma luz). Tem alguns impactos e restrições, mas no geral escala bem e o resultado eh excelente do ponto de vista da segurança e controle. Proxy transparente via firewall eh ótimo pra soluções caseiras, ou pequenas ou amadoras, e exige um maior trabalho. E só. Depois q você implementar wpad ou gpo (ou ambos), dai você pode incrementar o seu squid como bem quiser com squidguard, dansguardian, urlfilterdb, tralalá. Abracos, Henry. Enviado pelo meu aparelho BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: Fabiano Machado Dias fabi...@wolaksistemas.com.br Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:52:14 To: debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Bloquear Facebook https E aí, O SquidGuard resolve o seu problema. Aqui tem um tutorial explicando o uso: http://www.hardware.com.br/livros/servidores-linux/usando-squidguard-para-bloquear-paginas-improprias.html Att, Fabiano Em 03-01-2013 13:07, Mauro Collin escreveu: Ola Galera, Preciso bloquear o facebook pelo protocolo https (443) aqui na empresa, possuo proxy transparente mas acredito que a melhor solucao seria atraves do Firewall. Nao posso bloquear o protocolo https pois usamos sites de banco e outros que usam o mesmo protocolo. Lembrando que preciso de uma lista branca para diretores e outros que possam acessar o face. Alguem ai ja passou pro isso? ou pode me dar uma luz por onde começar. desde ja agradeco -- Att. Mauro Collin. Analista de Suporte Técnico. TI-Infraestrutura. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5a92e.2070...@wolaksistemas.com.br
Re: Bloquear Facebook https
Em 03-01-2013 15:26, Mauro Collin escreveu: Valeu Galera, Saí pra almoçar e quando voltei, varias soluções.!!! mas vamos ao que interessa: Adiel: já implementei sua solução mas os usuarios colocam https na barra de endereço do navegador para entrar no facebook, o squid nao esta tratando o trafego https, sabe como devo tratar o trafego https ou algum manual?. O bloqueio de palavra acredito nao ser eficiente pois varios sites fazem referencia ao facebook no seu conteudo e os mesmos seriam bloqueados sem necessidade. Sei que poderia bloquear no firewall a porta https, mas teria problemas com os sites de banco e demais. alem disso tudo, preciso de uma lista branca dos IPs que poderão acessar o face Mais alguma ideia? Obrigado. Olá! Eu bloqueio pelo IP dos sites que não podem ser acessados, mas restrinjo o DNS (porta 53), obrigando a rede a usar apenas o meu DNS-cache. Assim sei quando o IP de um terminado domínio irá ser renovado e então atualizo esse IP no iptatles. []'s Junior Polegato -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5c3c8.8070...@juniorpolegato.com.br
Re: Bloquear Facebook https
Mesmo com essa lista, te garanto que em pouco tempo teus usuários vão conseguir acessar de novo. Os IPs do fb (assim como de outros grandes portais) não é estática. Invariavelmente os FB começa a responder por outros IPs (isso não é publicamente divulgado) e lá vai vc correr atras de forum, mailing lists e coisas assim pra descobrir qual é o IP novo do FB.
Re: Bloquear Facebook https
Oi, Concordo com o pessoal que é contrário a bloquear por ip, a range dele muda muito... Em 3 de janeiro de 2013 15:37, Leonardo Carneiro chesterma...@gmail.com escreveu: Mesmo com essa lista, te garanto que em pouco tempo teus usuários vão conseguir acessar de novo. Os IPs do fb (assim como de outros grandes portais) não é estática. Invariavelmente os FB começa a responder por outros IPs (isso não é publicamente divulgado) e lá vai vc correr atras de forum, mailing lists e coisas assim pra descobrir qual é o IP novo do FB. -- | .''`. A fé não dá respostas. Só impede perguntas. | : :' : | `. `'` | `- Je vois tout -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACnf0phTEpdrcXuVB3=mM_fRm0FSOvÌ5TPUjRDBQK0=xk...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bloquear Facebook https
Soluções possíveis e eficazes com transparência para o usuário: - SSL_BUMP: vai possibilitar filtrar o trafego https mesmo com o squid transparente. provavelmente vai te render uma dor de cabeça com erro de certificados em alguns sites - http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SslBump - WPAD: vai automatizar a configuração do proxy no cliente, fazendo com que o tráfego HTTPS seja direcionado para o proxy desde o cliente, sem necessidade de redirect no firewall - http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Technology/WPAD - GP: não manjo mto, mas acho que nesta situação tem função análoga a do WPAD, só que a configuração automática vai ser por regras de group policy vindas do AD. Somente para ambientes windows. - http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/5156.how-to-force-proxy-settings-via-group-policy.aspx Usando squid e tendo transparência (transparente do ponto de vista do usuário, não da rede), acho que essas são as soluções que são eficazes. Em todas essas, o trafego vai passar pelo squid que vai realizar o bloqueio por url. Desconheço outra maneira de fazer esse bloqueio usando squid de maneira transparente para o usuário. 2013/1/3 P. J. pjotam...@gmail.com Oi, Concordo com o pessoal que é contrário a bloquear por ip, a range dele muda muito... Em 3 de janeiro de 2013 15:37, Leonardo Carneiro chesterma...@gmail.com escreveu: Mesmo com essa lista, te garanto que em pouco tempo teus usuários vão conseguir acessar de novo. Os IPs do fb (assim como de outros grandes portais) não é estática. Invariavelmente os FB começa a responder por outros IPs (isso não é publicamente divulgado) e lá vai vc correr atras de forum, mailing lists e coisas assim pra descobrir qual é o IP novo do FB. -- | .''`. A fé não dá respostas. Só impede perguntas. | : :' : | `. `'` | `- Je vois tout -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACnf0phTEpdrcXuVB3mM_fRm0FSOvÌ5tpujrdbqk0xk...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bloquear Facebook https
Agora me surgiu uma dúvida, eu falei sobre você utilizar o url_regex, ele não funciona, ok. Mas e se você utilizar o dstdom no squid, mesmo assim colocando o https o tráfego passa ? Eu resolvi isso com o iptables em uma rede que administrei, ao invez de colocar apenas facebook na string, coloque facebook.com, e daí veja que se está bloqueando tráfego legítimo que contenha essa string, que acredito que possa ser pouco. Daí você terá que ter um range de ips liberados e outro de bloqueados. -- att, Adiel de Lima Ribeiro facebook.com/sembr.dyndns.info On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 15:26 -0200, Mauro Collin wrote: Valeu Galera, Saí pra almoçar e quando voltei, varias soluções.!!! mas vamos ao que interessa: Adiel: já implementei sua solução mas os usuarios colocam https na barra de endereço do navegador para entrar no facebook, o squid nao esta tratando o trafego https, sabe como devo tratar o trafego https ou algum manual?. O bloqueio de palavra acredito nao ser eficiente pois varios sites fazem referencia ao facebook no seu conteudo e os mesmos seriam bloqueados sem necessidade. Sei que poderia bloquear no firewall a porta https, mas teria problemas com os sites de banco e demais. alem disso tudo, preciso de uma lista branca dos IPs que poderão acessar o face Mais alguma ideia? Obrigado. Em 3 de janeiro de 2013 14:39, China china.lis...@gmail.com escreveu: +1 pro wpad. Soluções baseadas em strings degradam a performance da rede e consomem mais máquina, além de ser uma solução burra por bloquear sites legitmos só por terem trechos das strings em seus nomes. Em 3 de janeiro de 2013 14:15, Leonardo Carneiro chesterma...@gmail.com escreveu: Mauro, a não ser que eu esteja redondamente enganado, a única maneira de vc fazer isso com proxy transparente é usando uma função do squid (tem nas versões mais recentes) chamada SSL_BUMP, na qual vc usa um certificado para fazer todo o tráfego, inclusive o HTTPS passar pelo proxy transparente. Uma solução mais eficiente, que oferece um certo nível de transparência é usar o WPAD. Com ele, o proxy não vai ser transparente, mas vai ser configurado automaticamente para o usuário, o que na maioria das vezes é bom o suficiente. Soluções baseadas em strings ou ranges no iptables geralmente são mto custosas e/ou ineficientes. Os ips do facebook não são sempre os mesmos e processar as strings no iptables é custoso (cpu) e nem sempre funciona como o esperado. 2013/1/3 Adiel de Lima Ribeiro adiel.netad...@gmail.com Olá, utilize o squid com o url_regex, daí tu coloca a palavra facebook, é bem eficiente. Dá para fazer pelo iptables também, bloqueando strings que contenham facebook, mas usando ele não é a maneira mais correta para isso. -- att, Adiel de Lima Ribeiro facebook.com/sembr.dyndns.info On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 13:07 -0200, Mauro Collin wrote: Ola Galera, Preciso bloquear o facebook pelo protocolo https (443) aqui na empresa, possuo proxy transparente mas acredito que a melhor solucao seria atraves do Firewall. Nao posso bloquear o protocolo https pois usamos sites de banco e outros que usam o mesmo protocolo. Lembrando que preciso de uma lista branca para diretores e outros que possam acessar o face. Alguem ai ja passou pro isso? ou pode me dar uma luz por onde começar. desde ja agradeco -- Att. Mauro Collin. Analista de Suporte Técnico. TI-Infraestrutura. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1357229198.1817.2.camel@fucker -- @chinabhz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cake1zwqi_7v6ylra6dc3tuiukn5q11n0ubfhulyqudga1m...@mail.gmail.com -- Att. Mauro
Re: Bloquear Facebook https
Leonardo, Obrigado pelas dicas, são de grande valia. Vou dar uma estudada na tecnologia pois ainda nao estou muito a vontade no squid. Devido a urgencia da solicitação, vou implementar a principio no firewall e depois migrar a solução para o squid.(recomendação da empresa). Agradeço a todos que dedicaram seu tempo postando soluções, essa lista é o melhor suporte do mundo. ;/) Se quiserem continuar postando fiquem a vontade estou aberto a sugestões. Abs. Em 3 de janeiro de 2013 16:54, Leonardo Carneiro chesterma...@gmail.comescreveu: Soluções possíveis e eficazes com transparência para o usuário: - SSL_BUMP: vai possibilitar filtrar o trafego https mesmo com o squid transparente. provavelmente vai te render uma dor de cabeça com erro de certificados em alguns sites - http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SslBump - WPAD: vai automatizar a configuração do proxy no cliente, fazendo com que o tráfego HTTPS seja direcionado para o proxy desde o cliente, sem necessidade de redirect no firewall - http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Technology/WPAD - GP: não manjo mto, mas acho que nesta situação tem função análoga a do WPAD, só que a configuração automática vai ser por regras de group policy vindas do AD. Somente para ambientes windows. - http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/5156.how-to-force-proxy-settings-via-group-policy.aspx Usando squid e tendo transparência (transparente do ponto de vista do usuário, não da rede), acho que essas são as soluções que são eficazes. Em todas essas, o trafego vai passar pelo squid que vai realizar o bloqueio por url. Desconheço outra maneira de fazer esse bloqueio usando squid de maneira transparente para o usuário. 2013/1/3 P. J. pjotam...@gmail.com Oi, Concordo com o pessoal que é contrário a bloquear por ip, a range dele muda muito... Em 3 de janeiro de 2013 15:37, Leonardo Carneiro chesterma...@gmail.com escreveu: Mesmo com essa lista, te garanto que em pouco tempo teus usuários vão conseguir acessar de novo. Os IPs do fb (assim como de outros grandes portais) não é estática. Invariavelmente os FB começa a responder por outros IPs (isso não é publicamente divulgado) e lá vai vc correr atras de forum, mailing lists e coisas assim pra descobrir qual é o IP novo do FB. -- | .''`. A fé não dá respostas. Só impede perguntas. | : :' : | `. `'` | `- Je vois tout -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACnf0phTEpdrcXuVB3mM_fRm0FSOvÌ5tpujrdbqk0xk...@mail.gmail.com -- Att. Mauro Collin. Analista de Suporte Técnico. TI-Infraestrutura. Cel: 21 8728-5445 (Oi). Cel: 21 8055-3606 (Tim). Cel: 21 9600-5348 (Vivo).
[Dica] Disponibilizando Filtro para o Synaptic
Não sei se aqui na lista alguém já usou o Ubuntu, já viu que o Synaptic do Ubuntu tem uma caixa de texto onde você pode filtrar e fazer uma pesquisa melhor? Tá, tá!!! O Synaptic quando instalado no Debian também tem, basta dar Ctrl+F ou clicar no botão da barra de ferramentas, na janelinha que se abre você digita o que quer e manda ver Mas não me referi a fazer uma busca, eu digo em filtrar e buscar apenas digitando na caixa. O engraçado é que, no Synaptic instalado no Debian tem até o espaço dessa caixa de texto, mostrando que alguma coisa falta na barra de ferramenta dele. Já fiz de tudo para tentar mostrar essa caixa de texto, vi até na internet algumas pessoas falarem que se trata de versões do Synaptic. Nada disso, é muito simples, basta fazer o seguinte: Se não tiver o sudo ativado, entre como administrador. Feche o Synaptic; sudo apt-get install apt-xapian-index sudo update-apt-xapian-index -vf Abra o Synaptic, vai ver que a caixa vai estar lá junto ao botão Localizar. É isso aí, deixarei registrado aqui para quem quiser (até eu mesmo ao formatar o pc) um dia usar. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5de43.8040...@gmail.com
Re: Bloquear Facebook https
Em 03-01-2013 15:45, Linux - Junior Polegato escreveu: Em 03-01-2013 15:26, Mauro Collin escreveu: Valeu Galera, Saí pra almoçar e quando voltei, varias soluções.!!! mas vamos ao que interessa: Adiel: já implementei sua solução mas os usuarios colocam https na barra de endereço do navegador para entrar no facebook, o squid nao esta tratando o trafego https, sabe como devo tratar o trafego https ou algum manual?. O bloqueio de palavra acredito nao ser eficiente pois varios sites fazem referencia ao facebook no seu conteudo e os mesmos seriam bloqueados sem necessidade. Sei que poderia bloquear no firewall a porta https, mas teria problemas com os sites de banco e demais. alem disso tudo, preciso de uma lista branca dos IPs que poderão acessar o face Mais alguma ideia? Obrigado. Eu bloqueio pelo IP dos sites que não podem ser acessados, mas restrinjo o DNS (porta 53), obrigando a rede a usar apenas o meu DNS-cache. Assim sei quando o IP de um terminado domínio irá ser renovado e então atualizo esse IP no iptatles. Minha dica: #!/bin/bash IPS_REDE_LIBERADOS='192.168.1.100 192.168.1.105 192.168.1.106' iptables -N FACE_BLOQUEADO iptables -N FACE_LIBERADO for IP in $IPS_REDE_LIBERADOS; do iptables -A FORWARD -s $IP -j FACE_LIBERADO done iptables -A FORWARD -j FACE_BLOQUEADO while true; do IPS_FACE=`dig facebook.com facebook.com.br www.facebook.com www.facebook.com.br m.facebook.com m.facebook.com.br +short|grep '^[0-9.]\+$'` iptables -F FACE_LIBERADO iptables -F FACE_BLOQUEADO for IP in $IPS_FACE; do iptables -A FACE_LIBERADO -d $IP -j ACCEPT iptables -A FACE_BLOQUEADO -d $IP -j REJECT done sleep 30 done []'s Junior Polegato -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5df0c.6020...@juniorpolegato.com.br
Re: Bloquear Facebook https
Ok. Robson Dantas. Muitas soluções já foram sugeridas, a do Junior Polegato parece bem interessante. Uns sugerem pelo firewall outros pelo squid, pelo firewall talvez eu teria um retrabalho de verificar de tempos em tempos os IPs do FB. Pelo Squid parece ser mais correto, mais ainda nao estou 100% seguro em aplicar (por falta de conhecimento mesmo). Junior Polegato Sua solução vai bloquear https ? poderia dar uma pequena explicação? ainda estou meio verde no iptables. Abs Em 3 de janeiro de 2013 17:42, Linux - Junior Polegato li...@juniorpolegato.com.br escreveu: Em 03-01-2013 15:45, Linux - Junior Polegato escreveu: Em 03-01-2013 15:26, Mauro Collin escreveu: Valeu Galera, Saí pra almoçar e quando voltei, varias soluções.!!! mas vamos ao que interessa: Adiel: já implementei sua solução mas os usuarios colocam https na barra de endereço do navegador para entrar no facebook, o squid nao esta tratando o trafego https, sabe como devo tratar o trafego https ou algum manual?. O bloqueio de palavra acredito nao ser eficiente pois varios sites fazem referencia ao facebook no seu conteudo e os mesmos seriam bloqueados sem necessidade. Sei que poderia bloquear no firewall a porta https, mas teria problemas com os sites de banco e demais. alem disso tudo, preciso de uma lista branca dos IPs que poderão acessar o face Mais alguma ideia? Obrigado. Eu bloqueio pelo IP dos sites que não podem ser acessados, mas restrinjo o DNS (porta 53), obrigando a rede a usar apenas o meu DNS-cache. Assim sei quando o IP de um terminado domínio irá ser renovado e então atualizo esse IP no iptatles. Minha dica: #!/bin/bash IPS_REDE_LIBERADOS='192.168.1.100 192.168.1.105 192.168.1.106' iptables -N FACE_BLOQUEADO iptables -N FACE_LIBERADO for IP in $IPS_REDE_LIBERADOS; do iptables -A FORWARD -s $IP -j FACE_LIBERADO done iptables -A FORWARD -j FACE_BLOQUEADO while true; do IPS_FACE=`dig facebook.com facebook.com.br www.facebook.com www.facebook.com.br m.facebook.com m.facebook.com.br +short|grep '^[0-9.]\+$'` iptables -F FACE_LIBERADO iptables -F FACE_BLOQUEADO for IP in $IPS_FACE; do iptables -A FACE_LIBERADO -d $IP -j ACCEPT iptables -A FACE_BLOQUEADO -d $IP -j REJECT done sleep 30 done []'s Junior Polegato -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-**requ...@lists.debian.orgdebian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**50E5DF0C.6020601@** juniorpolegato.com.brhttp://lists.debian.org/50e5df0c.6020...@juniorpolegato.com.br -- Att. Mauro Collin. Analista de Suporte Técnico. TI-Infraestrutura. Cel: 21 8728-5445 (Oi). Cel: 21 8055-3606 (Tim). Cel: 21 9600-5348 (Vivo).
Re: Bloquear Facebook https
Em 03-01-2013 17:56, Mauro Collin escreveu: Junior Polegato Sua solução vai bloquear https ? poderia dar uma pequena explicação? ainda estou meio verde no iptables. Olá! No caso vai bloquear todo o tráfego para os IPs do Facebook que atualmente seu DNS está resolvendo. Veja que precisa colocar as regras abaixo para não deixar a rede usar outro DNS: iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport 53 -j REJECT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 53 -j REJECT O dig domínios +short|grep ... vai me dar a lista de IPs que atualmente o seu DNS está provendo para a rede quando pedirem por um dos domínios do facebook. Com essa lista em mãos, eu limpo e alimento a chains FACE_LIBERADO e FACE_BLOQUEADO, isso a cada 30 segundos. Outra alternativa seria em vez de limpar, verificar se está na lista, se não estiver, adiciona, assim terá um pelo repertório de IPs do Facebook sendo bloqueados por completo. Para liberar ou bloquear o acesso, criei basta colocar os IPs liberados na lista e o restante será bloqueado. []'s Junior Polegato
Re: problema ao montar hd externo
Oi, Em 03/01/13, Luiz L. Marinsluizlmar...@globomail.com escreveu: PJ, Instale o /disk-manager/ (ou mountmanager). Veja pelo aptitude search qual está disponpível. Vlw pela dica, já usei essa coisas e não gostei, tipo... a uma dica tb eh botar um comando no gerenciador de arquivos, ainda nao tive tempo de configurar do jeito correto q seria pedindo a senha de root... como por exemplo fazem o nautilus+gnome... enfim acho que o pessoal quer é isso... q qnd os dispositivos forem listados nos filemanagers tenham permissões ou peçam senhas ao clicar no icone para montá-los -- | .''`. A fé não dá respostas. Só impede perguntas. | : :' : | `. `'` | `- Je vois tout -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACnf0pgbPbSzTX3XWei=ryrownopjpmpvh+9dyx2s2bbos2...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Problem Mounting USB Stick in Debian Wheezy
Hi, Dňa Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:23:14 +1100 Igor Cicimov icici...@gmail.com napísal: Also +1, if you need USB support you need to download VBox version from VBox site. Also don't forget to add the user who's running the VBox on the *host* pc to the vboxusers group*. Although i don't read whole thread, you are not right with USB support in the VBox and downloading the official VBox. The two different VBox versions are not shipped a long time ago (perhaps after Sun - Oracle change). Of course, download the VBox from Oracle site will work, but it is nod needed. Only Extension pack download is needed. I am using the Debian's VirtualBox package (4.1.18) with Oracle VM Extension Pack installed in it and the USB in virtual machines works. With one small problem, but this can be caused by my old settings (something with filters) - my settings are used from VBox 2.x version. There is no needing to download (and install) new version of the Extension pack for ever new VBox version. Although i have the equivalent versions now, i am not updating the Extension pack regularly. regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk signature.asc Description: PGP signature
RE: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity
From: Bonno Bloksma [mailto:b.blok...@tio.nl] To: Patrick Bartek; debian-user@lists.debian.org Hi Patrick, In preparation of a clean install of Wheezy, I did a test install in VirtualBox 3.1.8 running under Fedora 12 64-bit. To save time, I used the installer's default partitioning scheme. Normally I custom partition. Anyway, I noticed an oddity: There are gaps between the partitions. Sizable ones. Plus, sda1 starts at 2048, not 1. I don't know if this is due to the installer partitioner or a quirk in VirtualBox. I noticed this on a VB install of Debian 6, too, on the same system. Anybody got any ideas on the why? Wasn't able to find anything applicable on net searches. The only reason I can think about is the new requirement for partitioning on 4k boundaries due to new harddrive specs. Harddrives used to be broken up in 512b blocks, they are now chopped up in 4k blocks. I read a good article the other day explaining the performance hits if the OS does not properly allign the partition boundaries to the new 'Advanced Format' 4k boundaries. Unfortunately that was in a paper magazine so I cannot refer to it here. But have a look at http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/advanced-format-4k-sector-size- hard-drive,2759.html and look in Wikipedia for more info. Bonno Bloksma If you are using LVM, you need to leave 1MB before and after the partition for metadata. Some of the tools do this automatically for you. If you don't like it, you can manually adjust the start and end yourself. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/009f01cde9af$6a645000$3f2cf000$@allums.com
Re: [OT] I wish to have a mentor
Good time of the day, lina, again. You wrote: Indeed, golden time ... You do agree w/ You! :o) BTW, your message is encouraging. Oh! Last night since I posted I couldn't help following up. Hours later I started to realize something, not some epiphany, but something like I should take more initiative in doing it even many times it's used to be the detour that I pick. Frankly speaking, I feel annoyed about myself among abundant road information still hard to pick the right way. I have noticed the very same thing - when I did search for the info I desired. - I wanted to package a sound software that I use, that is in DMO but not in Debian. So I sought for info on how to package at the first - the thing I never did, and I thought I had to join to multimedia team in order that my packages might be uploaded and therefore used by others. By the way of my searching I have found that there is no single documents that helps me w/ packaging, at least I have found 2 eventually - one speaking about packaging, another - about the way how the software is inserted into Debian project - i.e. git. Also, I have found that I have no need to become a member of a team - there are sponsors/mentors - still mix up these terms - that can upload those packages for me. In short, let not this poorly organized documentation - for a new maintainer - will not discourage You. It is possible that the things will not go w/ the speed You desired them, yet it is possible and worth of doing. Also things can be hard at the first, then it will be much easier as You/me get habit w/ them. Finally, we can organize the documentation for future maintainer generations - once we have doen our own home work. Have a good time! Sthu. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e57da2.6c67980a.33e0.1...@mx.google.com
Pidgin makes noise
Hello, my Pidgin is making noise (not Pidgin directly but it's an error in Pidgin) Everythyme when I try to get back and reached the start oft the text the system is making a terrible noise. The system Speaker (not the normal speaker) it makes beep. Very loud. The same happens when I get in the other direction or remove the typed text. How can I configure pidgin not to do this anymore. I didn't found it. Regards Thore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5ac3b.4000...@datensumpf.de
Re: [OT] I wish to have a mentor
lina wrote: Hi, I wish to have a mentor. Know something basic about perl, python, bash and C. wish to learn more. Every time go through the wnpp-alert, don't know which one to pick and just put them aside. really wish to be involved in some projects, I have some considerable free time. Thanks ahead for suggestions, Best regards, May I repeat some advice I recently received on this this list - consider contributing to Debian documentation [http://www.debian.org/doc/ddp or http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals]. What we have to offer is an outsider's viewpoint. I.E. things which appear obvious to experts aren't necessarily so. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5b16c.5020...@cloud85.net
Re (2): Running vlc from another machine.
From: Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:48:11 -0700 I recommend looking at the vlc network streaming interface. Will do. Thanks. My intention was to add sound interpretation capability to my task server, http://142.103.107.138/NetworksPage.html#incron;, with this case. *.WAV ) DISPLAY=:0 vlc file:///home/peter/$1 ;; Or this. *.WAV ) cvlc file:///home/peter/$1 ;; (Still haven't found any explanation of cvlc.) The iceweasel cases work with no problem; but any WAV plays endlessly and appears to keep a process for each interpretation. According to the incron documentation, IN_CLOSE_WRITE is the trigger for a file being written. vlc shouldn't need to write the file; it should only be read. So how are vlc processes after the first started? Any ideas are welcome. Regards,... Peter E. -- 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12 Tel +13606390202 Bcc: peasthope at shaw.ca http://carnot.yi.org/ http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/index.html#Itinerary -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171057891.35820.30746@cantor.invalid
logcheck and bug #657641
I am seeing lots of emails like this from logcheck '/usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (10554) - No such process' which is bug #657641, and there is a patch provided. How do I apply that patch please to my 'logcheck' in wheezy please? Thanks Sharon. -- A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk/taste/index.html efever = http://www.efever.blogspot.com/ efever = http://sharon04.livejournal.com/ Debian Wheezy, LXDE 2 LibreOffice 3.5.4.2 Registered Linux user 334501
Percentage noted by network manager.
Network Nanager gives a que such as Wireless network connection 'ubcsecure' active: ubcsecure (66%). No mention of the percentage in http://wiki.debian.org/NetworkManager#Documentation , http://projects.gnome.org/NetworkManager/users/ or https://live.gnome.org/NetworkManager . I'll guess it is a fraction of bytes or packets transmitted without retransmission. From what I've read of TCP this success rate will be available for data sent but not for data received. Any enlightment? Any one noticed the percentage in a document? Thanks, ... Peter E. -- 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12 Tel +13606390202 Bcc: peasthope at shaw.ca http://carnot.yi.org/ http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/index.html#Itinerary -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171057891.39555.30747@cantor.invalid
Re: logcheck and bug #657641
On Thu 03 Jan 2013 at 17:27:56 +, Sharon Kimble wrote: I am seeing lots of emails like this from logcheck '/usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (10554) - No such process' which is bug #657641, and there is a patch provided. How do I apply that patch please to my 'logcheck' in wheezy please? Open /sbin/logcheck in an editor. Find if [ -n $LOCK ]; then debug cleanup: Killing lockfile-touch - $LOCK kill $LOCK unset LOCK fi Replace the third line with kill -0 $LOCK kill $LOCK unset LOCK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130103181305.GE32121@desktop
Re: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity
- Original Message - From: Go Linux goli...@yahoo.com To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 5:42 PM Subject: Re: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity --- On Wed, 1/2/13, Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com wrote: As I said in my original query, this partitioning was done automatically by the Wheezy installer. I would have never partitioned that way myself. Besides this is just a test install to root out any problems for when I do the real one on a real hard drive. FWIW, the wheezy installer created the same partitioning scheme on a hard drive install the first time I gave wheezy a run. I found that rather odd and a good reason to manually partition the drive prior to installing wheezy in the future. I usually do that but was being a bit lazy this one time. ;) Thanks. Now, I know it's not just my install or a quirk in VirtualBox. It's the installer. Since my original post, I've been reading up on GPT. Based on that, plus what others have posted here, it seems the cause of the gaps is a combination of aligning partitions based 4096 byte sectors, regardless of whether they are that size, and LVM needing unpartitioned space between partitions for metadata whether you're using LVM or not. Mostly, the latter, I think. Like you, for the real install, I'll just manually partition. Gap, LVM and GPT problems solved. B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1357236909.39129.yahoomail...@web142304.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Re: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity
- Original Message - From: Bonno Bloksma b.blok...@tio.nl To: Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com; debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 11:04 PM Subject: RE: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity Hi Patrick, In preparation of a clean install of Wheezy, I did a test install in VirtualBox 3.1.8 running under Fedora 12 64-bit. To save time, I used the installer's default partitioning scheme. Normally I custom partition. Anyway, I noticed an oddity: There are gaps between the partitions. Sizable ones. Plus, sda1 starts at 2048, not 1. I don't know if this is due to the installer partitioner or a quirk in VirtualBox. I noticed this on a VB install of Debian 6, too, on the same system. Anybody got any ideas on the why? Wasn't able to find anything applicable on net searches. The only reason I can think about is the new requirement for partitioning on 4k boundaries due to new harddrive specs. Harddrives used to be broken up in 512b blocks, they are now chopped up in 4k blocks. I read a good article the other day explaining the performance hits if the OS does not properly allign the partition boundaries to the new 'Advanced Format' 4k boundaries. Unfortunately that was in a paper magazine so I cannot refer to it here. But have a look at http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/advanced-format-4k-sector-size-hard-drive,2759.html and look in Wikipedia for more info. I've come across this in my research on my gap problem, too. The 4K sector alignment doesn't apply to me as the hard drive I'm installing Wheezy on has 512 byte sectors as far as I've been able to determine. It was manufactured in 2006 before the switch. I think the main cause of the gaps is the Wheezy installer partitioner assuming' LVM will be used at some time, and is setting up the drive for that future use. Thanks for the link. B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1357237891.71288.yahoomail...@web142305.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Re: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity
- Original Message - From: Mark Allums m...@allums.com To: 'Bonno Bloksma' b.blok...@tio.nl; 'Patrick Bartek' bartek...@yahoo.com; debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 4:39 AM Subject: RE: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity From: Bonno Bloksma [mailto:b.blok...@tio.nl] To: Patrick Bartek; debian-user@lists.debian.org Hi Patrick, In preparation of a clean install of Wheezy, I did a test install in VirtualBox 3.1.8 running under Fedora 12 64-bit. To save time, I used the installer's default partitioning scheme. Normally I custom partition. Anyway, I noticed an oddity: There are gaps between the partitions. Sizable ones. Plus, sda1 starts at 2048, not 1. I don't know if this is due to the installer partitioner or a quirk in VirtualBox. I noticed this on a VB install of Debian 6, too, on the same system. Anybody got any ideas on the why? Wasn't able to find anything applicable on net searches. The only reason I can think about is the new requirement for partitioning on 4k boundaries due to new harddrive specs. Harddrives used to be broken up in 512b blocks, they are now chopped up in 4k blocks. I read a good article the other day explaining the performance hits if the OS does not properly allign the partition boundaries to the new 'Advanced Format' 4k boundaries. Unfortunately that was in a paper magazine so I cannot refer to it here. But have a look at http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/advanced-format-4k-sector-size- hard-drive,2759.html and look in Wikipedia for more info. Bonno Bloksma If you are using LVM, you need to leave 1MB before and after the partition for metadata. Some of the tools do this automatically for you. If you don't like it, you can manually adjust the start and end yourself. I'm not, but I think the Wheezy partitioner thinks I may in the future, so, is setting things up for that possible future need. B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1357238073.79697.yahoomail...@web142305.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Re: Percentage noted by network manager.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/01/2013 17:42, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: Network Nanager gives a que such as Wireless network connection 'ubcsecure' active: ubcsecure (66%). No mention of the percentage in http://wiki.debian.org/NetworkManager#Documentation , http://projects.gnome.org/NetworkManager/users/ or https://live.gnome.org/NetworkManager . I'll guess it is a fraction of bytes or packets transmitted without retransmission. From what I've read of TCP this success rate will be available for data sent but not for data received. This being a Wireless connection, it's more likely to be signal strength. Typically, that will be measured in dB (which is basically a ratio) but it's probably being normalised such that no attenuation = 100% and no signal = 0%. Don't expect to see either value as a result. Any enlightment? Any one noticed the percentage in a document? Thanks, ... Peter E. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ5db6AAoJEKB7YbRsd8TGbVsP/0FGF8eu7UEql9vOLM/e7+/V XVq6LGWpESazjVx7j5K/lwmtZhU40qkFcgrRcHttAaN4bfU7clGahaagmQ6QYEoz KCMvyt894XrIKvdNeWL8I68segdRsqK1L91j0MaR445/o6HnZDDZJwVDECWKXGOt v//4zsZrxj7gtCvUfPpuNNrPrR/OXwFuv8s02KjpnHx2nb9tgfbe0dw3wg/t7M4/ 6Mt9jMns1blXUfReVQ+nMPtjATdIT0Xlgo5HuERVFjXyKArGxeR3ImwzeC2GaBv4 RFV0g0V3E8qO0ER3snt488c5q+xcs9JnUN2R7cOcKPq09CgKVVoIx1nxM58PmrOr /+QDtDBATASCEarbLyzPmYqLXwCX0hlDiK32/xNxsPyuLaI081KrTcEvA1wsWzQg 9APiymWKTkwj1JI9ouyG83+RYdZDJYniqnNWjF90ld2a310d/jsPDZVFiESHKqmY r8gPVywy1/JOjakWTJaxpNLDD0JXLlcUaJT2Uwo5alXvGMQSPr7+jKGMWk6OeaRL KcKYb8WJbwHw740FJu0iQ1MUWzOzk9gXGA68lhMrJWMtf1LZlVYjoA5b251GXBwq gpqOfxOVZcxc1FN2BJ8AHIE/4wv6A6ANdrqY0kSEzL8qKK7yot9wOz1hu+HBqgEe X6dEoXBB9IpG6MPWcTJ1 =ZnDd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e5d6fa.4070...@darac.org.uk
Re: [OT] I wish to have a mentor
lina: I wish to have a mentor. http://mentors.debian.net/ http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/ J. -- If I won the lottery I would keep all the money and wallpaper my house with it. [Agree] [Disagree] http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity
--- On Thu, 1/3/13, Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Thursday, January 3, 2013, 12:15 PM - Original Message - From: Go Linux goli...@yahoo.com To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 5:42 PM Subject: Re: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity --- On Wed, 1/2/13, Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com wrote: As I said in my original query, this partitioning was done automatically by the Wheezy installer. I would have never partitioned that way myself. Besides this is just a test install to root out any problems for when I do the real one on a real hard drive. FWIW, the wheezy installer created the same partitioning scheme on a hard drive install the first time I gave wheezy a run. I found that rather odd and a good reason to manually partition the drive prior to installing wheezy in the future. I usually do that but was being a bit lazy this one time. ;) Thanks. Now, I know it's not just my install or a quirk in VirtualBox. It's the installer. Since my original post, I've been reading up on GPT. Based on that, plus what others have posted here, it seems the cause of the gaps is a combination of aligning partitions based 4096 byte sectors, regardless of whether they are that size, and LVM needing unpartitioned space between partitions for metadata whether you're using LVM or not. Mostly, the latter, I think. Like you, for the real install, I'll just manually partition. Gap, LVM and GPT problems solved. B Just for the record . . . that install was to an old WD 80gb drive that was around long before the new sector changes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1357250263.87100.yahoomailclas...@web163402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
Re: unexpected script output
Except that I must be root to do that, it does not hurt me, so I did not investigate further. Give sudo a try. I will do. But I will also find how to only give me su rights for stuff like networkpower, not for everything, becoming su for system administration reminds me to take care when my username is root (or did I checked the uid? I do not remember) : the username in the prompt is in red, while green usually. I do not know why debian disable colors by default, they can be quite useful, and make terminals easier to use. Of course, I still do not really understand the root access needed on your physical computer but using light workarounds is ok for me... for now. I didn't understand these words. But I feel there is an important question waiting to get out of them. Well, some features are needed root access to be used. For some of them, I perfectly understand why, and I do not even want to do workarounds: it would be stupid. (Not that I'm not, but not enough for some things :) ) Some examples are power management tools, like poweroff/pm-hibernate co. I understand why it is useful on a server with ssh connection, but having no alternative for desktop use as single-user computers sounds strange for me. I still does not know if it is a limitation forced by kernel, or if it is an artificial limitation from those tools, which will only accept to be ran if(0==uid). For now, using workarounds which does not involve tools remaining in background like dbus is fine for me, but it is highly probable that one day, I will find the will to look at source code where is the limitation, and patch it myself, for my own usage (and maybe share the patch if someone is interested, of course, but anyway I need to make it before :D ) In my opinion, those rights problems for basic actions on your own are one of the most annoying problems when people wants light environment they can tweak themselves with small and readable configuration files (small and readable excludes bloatwares using xml. sudo is an good enough workaround for me and for now.). But it is not an important question, since most people are perfectly happy with policykit and sudo stuff. Ouch! Well. Perhaps it is time to start shopping for a more sturdy machine? Some hardware seems to last forever. Others develop problems and must be fixed or replaced. I know the exact problem: my hard disk is floating a little, causing those HD disconnections when the computer moves a little. That's not constructor fault, only my own :) Using some basic tricks like putting some non-conductor stuff in holes would fix the problem quite fast, or simply use my electronics knowledge to use this computer in some robotics (with components fixed directly, not by using actual plastic stuff) are my favorite options :) I'm just waiting money for the second... You need a new device. Well, I also have some reliable desktop computers, so I do not really mind if this one dies. While it does not make me looses hours of work, but this is not a realistic problem, since I often send my work on a git elsewere every time I did some good progress in autorealm source code. I have seen it do this when sitting on the table untouched and unmoving. I need to shop and replace it. But it does this infrequently, once a month or so, and so hasn't been an urgent enough problem to do yet. Maybe you have some unwanted electronic connection because some dust of dunnowhat is somewhere? Try to simply open your hardware and clean it, before buying new, it could save you some money... Just taking some precautions like studying images on the Internet to know where are small f** fragile plastic plots to avoid destroying them when removing plastic things will be enough. I did not did that study :) I do keep important data on my laptop so I do need to protect it with data encryption. But most importantly then I don't need to worry about *if* I have something there. If my laptop is stolen and it were not encrypted then I would need to be very concerned about what happened to be stored there. It is difficult to be completely disiplined about everything you do on the computer 100% of the time. Even simple things like browser history is problematic. I think it is easier to implement the security of encryption at the system level and then I know it adds that layer even if I make a mistake at another. I prefer steganography instead of cryptography. If one day I want to use cryptography to secure some data, there will probably be some steganographic techniques used before, since it's harder to find data than to decrypt them. Decrypting is just a matter of time and computer power, unlike finding them. Now, just imagine the combination... For now, just knowing that at least 95% percent of people could not use my computer makes me thinking that data is hidden enough. If someone wants to read my data, he will need to at least know
Re: [OT] I wish to have a mentor
Le 03.01.2013 22:05, Jochen Spieker a écrit : Erm... I know this is perfectly out of thread but... I LOVE your signature :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/00bd6fe7f325d2cf6efa0686dcb90...@neutralite.org
Re: Pidgin makes noise
Thore wrote: my Pidgin is making noise (not Pidgin directly but it's an error in Pidgin) Everythyme when I try to get back and reached the start oft the text the system is making a terrible noise. The system Speaker (not the normal speaker) it makes beep. Very loud. The same happens when I get in the other direction or remove the typed text. How can I configure pidgin not to do this anymore. I didn't found it. Two places and two different possibilities. 1. In [Tools], [Preferences], [Sounds] is the Pidgin sound configuration option dialog. It could be that you have a combination of sound enabled that you don't want enabled. I only have these checked. I have all others unchecked. [x] Message received [x] Message sent [x] You talk in chat [x] Others talk in chat [x] Attention received 2. The beep you describe sounds like the system console beep or console bell. Many people find that annoying but it has always been the default console bell. But searching for information around it and around the Linux pcspkr kernel module will yield better information about it. To turn off the console bell / console beeper in X use: $ xset b off This is enabled by the Linux kernel module pcspkr. You can unload the module from the running kernel with: # modprobe -r pcspkr To prevent the kernel module pcspkr from ever being loaded you can blacklist it by creating a file with just these contents: File /etc/modprobe.d/pcspkr-blacklist.conf: blacklist pcspkr With that in place the module won't be loaded by default at boot time. Without that module installed then no program will be able to access the console bell beeper (by normal means) and the beeper will always be silent. Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Fwd: php install
Please tell why php5 does not work under apache2 (with engine on) using this index file: HTML HEAD TITLETest Page/TITLE /HEAD BODY ?php echo Hello; -- /BODY /HTML all I get is the --- display. Can you help? Thanks. -- Forwarded message -- From: Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no Date: Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:37 PM Subject: Re: php install To: Samuel Morgan smorga...@gmail.com Cc: ad...@db.debian.org ]] Samuel Morgan Please tell why php5 does not work under apache2 (with engine on) using this index file: You've reached the people responsible for Debian's account infrastructure. You probably want to email debian-user@lists.debian.org instead. Cheers, -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
Re: php install
Samuel Morgan wrote: Please tell why php5 does not work under apache2 (with engine on) using this index file: ... ?php echo Hello; Missing the closing container marker. Put a ? in there and it should work. Try this file: ?php phpinfo(); ? Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: php install
--- On Thu, 1/3/13, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: From: Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com Subject: Re: php install To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Thursday, January 3, 2013, 8:22 PM Samuel Morgan wrote: Please tell why php5 does not work under apache2 (with engine on) using this index file: ... ?php echo Hello; Missing the closing container marker. Put a ? in there and it should work. Try this file: ?php phpinfo(); ? Bob Is that in a .php file or embedded in .html? IIRC serving php in html requires toggling an option in the config file and my sites at least require an .htaccess handler to get it to work. I can post that when I get back on another computer if you like. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/135729.95599.yahoomailclas...@web163402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
Re: php install
On 1/3/2013 9:31 PM, Go Linux wrote: --- On Thu, 1/3/13, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: From: Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com Subject: Re: php install To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Thursday, January 3, 2013, 8:22 PM Samuel Morgan wrote: Please tell why php5 does not work under apache2 (with engine on) using this index file: ... ?php echo Hello; Missing the closing container marker. Put a ? in there and it should work. Try this file: ?php phpinfo(); ? Bob Is that in a .php file or embedded in .html? IIRC serving php in html requires toggling an option in the config file and my sites at least require an .htaccess handler to get it to work. I can post that when I get back on another computer if you like. Incorrect. It does require an option in the httpd.conf file, but the Debian install takes care of that. Nothing else is required to imbed the file. His problem is the incorrect terminator, as Bob indicated. And Samuel, check out the PHP manual for error message directives, specifically error_reporting and display_errors. They should be enabled on your development system (but not a production system). Jerry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e64ac1.8020...@attglobal.net
Re: php install
On 1/3/2013 9:31 PM, Go Linux wrote: --- On Thu, 1/3/13, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: From: Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com Subject: Re: php install To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Thursday, January 3, 2013, 8:22 PM Samuel Morgan wrote: Please tell why php5 does not work under apache2 (with engine on) using this index file: ... ?php echo Hello; Missing the closing container marker. Put a ? in there and it should work. Try this file: ?php phpinfo(); ? Bob Is that in a .php file or embedded in .html? IIRC serving php in html requires toggling an option in the config file and my sites at least require an .htaccess handler to get it to work. I can post that when I get back on another computer if you like. I should also add - if the php interpreter were not working, he would have seen the source code in his browser. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e65d8e.4090...@attglobal.net
Re: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity
- Original Message - From: Go Linux goli...@yahoo.com To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org; Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com Cc: Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 1:57 PM Subject: Re: Wheezy Installer Auto-Partition Oddity [snip] FWIW, the wheezy installer created the same partitioning scheme on a hard drive install the first time I gave wheezy a run. I found that rather odd and a good reason to manually partition the drive prior to installing wheezy in the future. I usually do that but was being a bit lazy this one time. ;) Thanks. Now, I know it's not just my install or a quirk in VirtualBox. It's the installer. Since my original post, I've been reading up on GPT. Based on that, plus what others have posted here, it seems the cause of the gaps is a combination of aligning partitions based 4096 byte sectors, regardless of whether they are that size, and LVM needing unpartitioned space between partitions for metadata whether you're using LVM or not. Mostly, the latter, I think. Like you, for the real install, I'll just manually partition. Gap, LVM and GPT problems solved. B Just for the record . . . that install was to an old WD 80gb drive that was around long before the new sector changes. Mine, too. WD 160GB purchased late 2006. 512 byte sectors. B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1357282703.5360.yahoomail...@web142305.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
(emulatie van) i386 op x86_64
Beste Mensen Beste Wensen Geloof het of geloof het niet, er is nog software die aannames doet over de breedte (in bits) van data structuren. Nu ben ik dus op zoek naar een snelle emulatie van i386 op x86_64. Mijn vraag is dan ook: Welke soort emualatie kan snel een i386 na doen? De wens van snel betreft CPU power en disktoegang op de host. Snel met grafisch (pixels op scherm) is hierbj niet belangrijk, het gaat om compiler-achtige toepassing (bestand lezen, wat conversies en wegschrijven in ander bestand) Mijn short list is nu: * kvm ( die zou een '-m i386' optie hebben ) * qemu --nographic * bochs En mijn plan B is niet voor emulatie gaan, maar i386 op x86_64 hardware installeren. Graag jullie advies, tips, opmerkingen en zo. Groeten Geert Stappers P.S. Paul van der Vlis heeft gelijk: Het is _aan ons_ deze mailinglist levendig te houden. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-dutch-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130103123731.gr21...@gpm.stappers.nl
Re: (emulatie van) i386 op x86_64
Als het om een command-line applicatie gaat met weinig dependencies: Is ia32-libs [1] installeren en het programma 'native' uitvoeren misschien gewoon voldoende? Gr. David [1] http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/ia32-libs 2013/1/3 Geert Stappers stapp...@stappers.nl Beste Mensen Beste Wensen Geloof het of geloof het niet, er is nog software die aannames doet over de breedte (in bits) van data structuren. Nu ben ik dus op zoek naar een snelle emulatie van i386 op x86_64. Mijn vraag is dan ook: Welke soort emualatie kan snel een i386 na doen? De wens van snel betreft CPU power en disktoegang op de host. Snel met grafisch (pixels op scherm) is hierbj niet belangrijk, het gaat om compiler-achtige toepassing (bestand lezen, wat conversies en wegschrijven in ander bestand) Mijn short list is nu: * kvm ( die zou een '-m i386' optie hebben ) * qemu --nographic * bochs En mijn plan B is niet voor emulatie gaan, maar i386 op x86_64 hardware installeren. Graag jullie advies, tips, opmerkingen en zo. Groeten Geert Stappers P.S. Paul van der Vlis heeft gelijk: Het is _aan ons_ deze mailinglist levendig te houden. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-dutch-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130103123731.gr21...@gpm.stappers.nl
Re: (emulatie van) i386 op x86_64
Of een i386 chroot: sudo debootstrap --arch=i386 stable chroot-i386 sudo chroot chroot-i386 /bin/sh Kristof On 2013-01-03 13:50:22 (+0100), David Hartveld da...@hartveld.net wrote: Als het om een command-line applicatie gaat met weinig dependencies: Is ia32-libs [1] installeren en het programma 'native' uitvoeren misschien gewoon voldoende? Gr. David [1] http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/ia32-libs 2013/1/3 Geert Stappers stapp...@stappers.nl Beste Mensen Beste Wensen Geloof het of geloof het niet, er is nog software die aannames doet over de breedte (in bits) van data structuren. Nu ben ik dus op zoek naar een snelle emulatie van i386 op x86_64. Mijn vraag is dan ook: Welke soort emualatie kan snel een i386 na doen? De wens van snel betreft CPU power en disktoegang op de host. Snel met grafisch (pixels op scherm) is hierbj niet belangrijk, het gaat om compiler-achtige toepassing (bestand lezen, wat conversies en wegschrijven in ander bestand) Mijn short list is nu: * kvm ( die zou een '-m i386' optie hebben ) * qemu --nographic * bochs En mijn plan B is niet voor emulatie gaan, maar i386 op x86_64 hardware installeren. Graag jullie advies, tips, opmerkingen en zo. Groeten Geert Stappers P.S. Paul van der Vlis heeft gelijk: Het is _aan ons_ deze mailinglist levendig te houden. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-dutch-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130103123731.gr21...@gpm.stappers.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-dutch-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130103130407.go96...@thebe.jupiter.sigsegv.be
Re: (emulatie van) i386 op x86_64
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 02:04:07PM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote: On 2013-01-03 13:50:22 (+0100), David Hartveld wrote: 2013/1/3 Geert Stappers Geloof het of geloof het niet, er is nog software die aannames doet over de breedte (in bits) van data structuren. Nu ben ik dus op zoek naar een snelle emulatie van i386 op x86_64. Mijn vraag is dan ook: Welke soort emualatie kan snel een i386 na doen? De wens van snel betreft CPU power en disktoegang op de host. Snel met grafisch (pixels op scherm) is hierbj niet belangrijk, het gaat om compiler-achtige toepassing (bestand lezen, wat conversies en wegschrijven in ander bestand) } [ shortlist: kvm, qemu, bochs ] Als het om een command-line applicatie gaat met weinig dependencies: Is ia32-libs [1] installeren en het programma 'native' uitvoeren misschien gewoon voldoende? Gr. David [1] http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/ia32-libs Die kende ik nog niet, dank. Of een i386 chroot: sudo debootstrap --arch=i386 stable chroot-i386 sudo chroot chroot-i386 /bin/sh In een chroot environment is het mij nog niet gelukt om daar `aptitude install nog-een-package` te doen. Op een of andere manier krijg ik daar networking niet aan de gang. En mijn plan B is niet voor emulatie gaan, maar i386 op x86_64 hardware installeren. Graag jullie advies, tips, opmerkingen en zo. Groeten Geert Stappers P.S. Paul van der Vlis heeft gelijk: Het is _aan ons_ deze mailinglist levendig te houden. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-dutch-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130103132359.gs21...@gpm.stappers.nl
Re: (emulatie van) i386 op x86_64
2013/1/3 Geert Stappers stapp...@stappers.nl Op een of andere manier krijg ik daar networking niet aan de gang. Kun je iets specifieker zijn dan dit? :-) Stuur even wat console output mee s.v.p. Wat vaak mis gaat: Je hebt in ieder geval een /etc/resolv.conf nodig (die is misschien leeg, kun je kopiëren vanaf je oorspronkelijke root fs).
chroot networking WAS: (emulatie van) i386 op x86_64
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 02:28:00PM +0100, David Hartveld wrote: 2013/1/3 Geert Stappers } In een chroot environment is het mij nog niet gelukt } om daar `aptitude install nog-een-package` te doen. Op een of andere manier krijg ik daar networking niet aan de gang. Kun je iets specifieker zijn dan dit? :-) Stuur even wat console output mee s.v.p. Wat vaak mis gaat: Je hebt in ieder geval een /etc/resolv.conf nodig (die is misschien leeg, kun je kopiëren vanaf je oorspronkelijke root fs). Het bestand etc/resolv.conf bleek te ontbreken in de chroot tree. Een kopie van /etc/resolv.conf kopieren in die tree maakt `aptitude install nog-een-package` mogelijk \o/ David: Dank je wel! Groeten Geert Beginner Stappers -- And is there a policy on top-posting vs. bottom-posting? Yes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-dutch-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130103140637.gt21...@gpm.stappers.nl
Kernel 3.8
Heeft iemand onder squeeze kernel 3.8 al draaien ? Ik heb hem net draaiend gekregen toen ik ubuntu .deb pakketjes tegen kwam. Ik zie geen problemen, maar misschien is ubuntu pakketjes niet aan te raden voor squeeze. Als iemand dan ook debian pakketjes heeft, zou mooi zijn. Stephan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-dutch-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130103141820.ga29...@stephanverrips.nl
Re: (emulatie van) i386 op x86_64
Op 03-01-13 14:23, Geert Stappers schreef: On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 02:04:07PM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote: On 2013-01-03 13:50:22 (+0100), David Hartveld wrote: 2013/1/3 Geert Stappers Geloof het of geloof het niet, er is nog software die aannames doet over de breedte (in bits) van data structuren. Nu ben ik dus op zoek naar een snelle emulatie van i386 op x86_64. Mijn vraag is dan ook: Welke soort emualatie kan snel een i386 na doen? De wens van snel betreft CPU power en disktoegang op de host. Snel met grafisch (pixels op scherm) is hierbj niet belangrijk, het gaat om compiler-achtige toepassing (bestand lezen, wat conversies en wegschrijven in ander bestand) } [ shortlist: kvm, qemu, bochs ] Als het om een command-line applicatie gaat met weinig dependencies: Is ia32-libs [1] installeren en het programma 'native' uitvoeren misschien gewoon voldoende? Gr. David [1] http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/ia32-libs Die kende ik nog niet, dank. Ik vond de beschrijving op de wiki pagina over Skype erg bruikbaar, maar dat is wel voor Wheezy: - # dpkg --add-architecture i386 # apt-get update # wget -O skype-install.deb http://www.skype.com/go/getskype-linux-deb # dpkg -i skype-install.deb # apt-get -f install - Of een i386 chroot: sudo debootstrap --arch=i386 stable chroot-i386 sudo chroot chroot-i386 /bin/sh In een chroot environment is het mij nog niet gelukt om daar `aptitude install nog-een-package` te doen. Op een of andere manier krijg ik daar networking niet aan de gang. Hij gebruikt de networking van het hoofdsysteem. /etc/network/interfaces moet leeg zijn. /etc/resolv.conf moet uiteraard een nameserver bevatten. P.S. Paul van der Vlis heeft gelijk: Het is _aan ons_ deze mailinglist levendig te houden. Ja, er zijn niet alleen antwoorden, maar ook vragen nodig ;-) Groet, Paul. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen http://www.vandervlis.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-dutch-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e61bcd.1050...@vandervlis.nl
Re: Kernel 3.8
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:18:20PM +0100, Stephan Verrips wrote: || Heeft iemand onder squeeze kernel 3.8 al draaien ? Ik heb hem net draaiend || gekregen toen ik ubuntu .deb pakketjes tegen kwam. Ik zie geen problemen, || maar misschien is ubuntu pakketjes niet aan te raden voor squeeze. Als || iemand dan ook debian pakketjes heeft, zou mooi zijn. Uhm... linux-3.8 is nog niet uit, die is zit net op release candidate 1, herstel, 2, dus dat duurt nog even. Bedoel je misschien linux-3.7? Ik heb geen ubuntu debjes geïnstalleerd, maar de zelfgebakken kernel werkt prima. Ciao. Vincent. -- Vincent Zweije vinc...@zweije.nl | If you're flamed in a group you http://www.xs4all.nl/~zweije/ | don't read, does anybody get burnt? [Xhost should be taken out and shot] |-- Paul Tomblin on a.s.r. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
