Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:28:03 + (UTC) Curtwrote: > On 2016-04-05, Brian wrote: > > > >> Result of my GNOME install: I typed 'startx' from my > >> command line, and I got a beautiful blue screen, a delight to the > >> eye after days of perusing tiny > > I get that too (blue, it must be the default desktop watchamacallit, > with a light-grayish swirl in the middle). > > > > >> characters on a black display. And in the middle of the > >> blue screen there was a handsome mouse arrow, which moved around > >> elegantly when controlled by my right hand. > > > > Have you moved it elegantly to the extreme upper-left hand corner of > the display? > > > Progress indeed. > > > >> And that was _all_!! No icons, nothing to click on . . . > >> I typed on the keyboard, no reaction . . . There must be some > >> simple way to get a proper GNOME started, but since I've never > >> used it before, I wonder if someone can give me a hint. > > > > The gnome I have has 'Activities' in the top left of the screen. > > > > Right. Activities. Wonder what they mean by that. It's as good a name as any, I suppose. The GNOME Overview is the central location where everything from the applications menu to open windows to a window list to workspaces are located, so it would make sense to give it some generic name. "Activities" means pretty much everything one would want to do with a computer. pgp94iWuJ46Zc.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
New developments! When I turned my machine on this morning, I was given a lovely blue screen with "Alan McConnell" in a box in the center and a space for the password just below. I typed in my password and was presented with a bunch of icons on the left hand side of the screen. Very pretty. But when I clicked on any of them, trying to find a terminal emulator so I can run from the command line, I get a frowny face, telling me that an error occurred(???) and the system is suspending. All I can do is click OK and then I get put into the original login screen, as above. I am not given a clue what the problem is. I do know that I don't have an .Xauthority file in /home/alan, and this may be part of the difficulty. Does anyone know how to create an .Xauthority with xauth? I find the man page of xauth pretty impenetrable. [ What is the difference between hitting the reset button, causing a reboot, and turning the machine off? It seems that there is one; otherwise why didn't I get this result yesterday? ] I am still not able to connect to "the Internet" aka the outside world, and I don't know why this is. I am living in a retirement community and when I first moved in, in December, a staff member came in with a router, connected my machine to it, and it "worked". That was with wheezy . I haven't a clue why it doesn't work with jessie . Of course this is a problem that I can expect only suggestions from the friendly and innovative members of this E-list. - Original Message - From: "Brian" <a...@cityscape.co.uk> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 5:51:25 AM Subject: Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question On Mon 04 Apr 2016 at 16:51:23 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > solved now, I hope! Now my progress report: after futzing around > and > trying to install this and that, I decided to bite the bullet/go with > the > flow, and install GNOME, the whole thing. Which I did, and it took > just > short of an hour. For some reason, Libreoffice was not installed. I > hope > I can get it later, since I know no other method of reading the > occasional > .doc and .docx files that come my way. Strange. Libreoffice packages are dependencies of gnome (as is gdm3). You could try I did get it later(apt-get install libreoffice). > [ By the way: I could and did get emacsen-common, but still have no > working > emacs. How does one get such? ] emacs24 is on DVD-2, so either you obtain this disk or (as was suggested earlier in this thread) set up sources.list for an external mirror and get it over the network. Once I get the network working, I can try this. I think I will have to edit /etc/apt/sources.list, a ticklish procedure. I am going to ask my GSFC friend if he can burn me the Official Debian jessie disks 2 and 3, which should keep be busy for a while. The saga continues! Alan, swimming through molasses
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On 2016-04-05, Brianwrote: > >> Result of my GNOME install: I typed 'startx' from my command >> line, and I >> got a beautiful blue screen, a delight to the eye after days of >> perusing tiny I get that too (blue, it must be the default desktop watchamacallit, with a light-grayish swirl in the middle). >> characters on a black display. And in the middle of the blue screen >> there was >> a handsome mouse arrow, which moved around elegantly when controlled >> by my right >> hand. > Have you moved it elegantly to the extreme upper-left hand corner of the display? > Progress indeed. > >> And that was _all_!! No icons, nothing to click on . . . I typed on >> the keyboard, >> no reaction . . . There must be some simple way to get a proper >> GNOME started, >> but since I've never used it before, I wonder if someone can give me >> a hint. > > The gnome I have has 'Activities' in the top left of the screen. > Right. Activities. Wonder what they mean by that. -- Hypertext--or should I say the ideology of hypertext?--is ultrademocratic and so entirely in harmony with the demagogic appeals to cultural democracy that accompany (and distract one’s attention from) the ever-tightening grip of plutocratic capitalism. - Susan Sontag
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Mon 04 Apr 2016 at 16:51:23 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > solved now, I hope! Now my progress report: after futzing around > and > trying to install this and that, I decided to bite the bullet/go with > the > flow, and install GNOME, the whole thing. Which I did, and it took > just > short of an hour. For some reason, Libreoffice was not installed. I > hope > I can get it later, since I know no other method of reading the > occasional > .doc and .docx files that come my way. Strange. Libreoffice packages are dependencies of gnome (as is gdm3). You could try apt-get install -f or apt-get install libreoffice > [ By the way: I could and did get emacsen-common, but still have no > working > emacs. How does one get such? ] emacs24 is on DVD-2, so either you obtain this disk or (as was suggested earlier in this thread) set up sources.list for an external mirror and get it over the network. > Result of my GNOME install: I typed 'startx' from my command > line, and I > got a beautiful blue screen, a delight to the eye after days of > perusing tiny > characters on a black display. And in the middle of the blue screen > there was > a handsome mouse arrow, which moved around elegantly when controlled > by my right > hand. Progress indeed. > And that was _all_!! No icons, nothing to click on . . . I typed on > the keyboard, > no reaction . . . There must be some simple way to get a proper > GNOME started, > but since I've never used it before, I wonder if someone can give me > a hint. The gnome I have has 'Activities' in the top left of the screen.
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Monday 04 April 2016 21:51:23 Alan McConnell wrote: > I don't know why LinuxCollections > offers such a silly coupling for sale. Because it is useful? If you were someone who installs frequently (many people do) then you need both to cover a variety of computers. Some don't have optical drives. Some won't boot from USB keys. To be fair to LinuxCollections, I thought that they make this abundantly clear. :-/ But you wouldn't have believed it until you had discovered it for yourself. As I understood it, both are DVD1. But I thought you had decided to use Ubuntu, which you are again going to have on both USB stick and DVD? Lisi
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
- Original Message - From: "Brian" <a...@cityscape.co.uk> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:18:49 PM Subject: Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question On Sat 02 Apr 2016 at 16:42:35 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > Well, it doesn't contain emacs or tex or mutt, or ImageMagick. Why > are you > telling me what it 'should' have? I have touched on this in another post but here is a fuller answer: I owe Brian an apology. When asked to put in my DVD, I put it into my _second_ DVD/CD drive, which is what I used to install. Now I have detached my USB-connected CD/DVD reader-writer, and I have made a lot of progress. But I am still having problems; see below. assume it is DVD-1. This image contains mutt and ImageMagick. That is why you are being told it "'should' have". Why you think it doesn't is a mystery. solved now, I hope! Now my progress report: after futzing around and trying to install this and that, I decided to bite the bullet/go with the flow, and install GNOME, the whole thing. Which I did, and it took just short of an hour. For some reason, Libreoffice was not installed. I hope I can get it later, since I know no other method of reading the occasional .doc and .docx files that come my way. [ By the way: I could and did get emacsen-common, but still have no working emacs. How does one get such? ] Result of my GNOME install: I typed 'startx' from my command line, and I got a beautiful blue screen, a delight to the eye after days of perusing tiny characters on a black display. And in the middle of the blue screen there was a handsome mouse arrow, which moved around elegantly when controlled by my right hand. And that was _all_!! No icons, nothing to click on . . . I typed on the keyboard, no reaction . . . There must be some simple way to get a proper GNOME started, but since I've never used it before, I wonder if someone can give me a hint. > I hope for further responses from people who have _answers_, although I'll > try to > respond to questions of significance. To repeat: I want to know how to > install > SW that I need from off the thumb drive(aka USB stick) That's another discovery I've made. The data on the DVD and the data on the thumb drive are exactly the same! I don't know why LinuxCollections offers such a silly coupling for sale. As I wrote previously, I thought there was some 'new technology' going on. Not so at all. You have had responses from people who have answers. None of them appear to meet your "significance" criterion. Repeating your question again is unlikely to produce better answers. Responding to a mail or two might get you further on. An unfair charge, Brian. I've done a _lot_ of work, learning about and coping with a Debian version totally unlike the one's I've used before. I have paid attention to, and benefitted from, and acknowledged the help of several people. Other people. As someone elsewhere has remarked: an experienced user, familiar with Debian, should be able to install a new version in a half hour. This experience -- and I'm not done yet -- has taken me _days_. I still don't know why. Best wishes to all, and I hope Brian is satisfied Alan
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Sat 02 Apr 2016 at 16:42:35 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > Well, it doesn't contain emacs or tex or mutt, or ImageMagick. Why > are you > telling me what it 'should' have? I have touched on this in another post but here is a fuller answer: A netinst image is about 300M. The vendor has sold you a DVD. There is a lot of wasted space if it only holds that image. You haven't responded to the question asking for image identification of the disk. We will assume it is DVD-1. This image contains mutt and ImageMagick. That is why you are being told it "'should' have". Why you think it doesn't is a mystery. > I hope for further responses from people who have _answers_, although I'll > try to > respond to questions of significance. To repeat: I want to know how to > install > SW that I need from off the thumb drive(aka USB stick) You have had responses from people who have answers. None of them appear to meet your "significance" criterion. Repeating your question again is unlikely to produce better answers. Responding to a mail or two might get you further on.
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:56:23 + Mark Fletcherwrote: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016, 17:11 Floris wrote: > > > Op Sat, 02 Apr 2016 19:46:09 +0200 schreef Alan McConnell > > : > > > > > Well, I finally got my Jessie installed! I had to pick a > > > different kernel than then one > > > suggested, but things finally went through. I was even able to > > > use the partitions I had > > > prepared and carefully sized. > > > > > > My question: how do I install "new" SW? E.g. emacs, and mutt, > > > and ImageMagick? These > > > are not found on the one CD I have. I have in addition a thumb > > > drive, which came with > > > my purchase from LinuxCollections. I have mounted it and find > > > that it is chock full > > > of .deb files. I suppose there is some way of 'manually' copying > > > a particular .deb > > > to my disk and then installing it. But I am afraid of getting > > > stuck in "dependency > > > hell". Does someone here also have the same CD + thumb drive > > > situation. > > > > > > TIA, > > > > > > Alan > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just don't understand why anyone would pay money for Jessie in the > first place. It's supposed to be free software... Your are free to distribute free software for money, if you so desire. The point of free software is that you are *free* to distribute it as you wish (either gratis or not). pgpSHe7JsO4cI.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:22:10AM +, Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 at 04:20, David Wrightwrote: > > > On Sun 03 Apr 2016 at 08:56:23 (+), Mark Fletcher wrote: [...] > download it from Debian.org already. Separate vendors aren't adding any > value. Why should they get paid for doing nothing useful? They do add value: convenience. Sometimes for people without the bandwidth, sometimes because they forward part of their proceeds to SPI or something (if I wanted to do that I'd be forced to wrestle with some international bank bureaucracy I better don't describe here). I've chosen to pay for "something which is free", often for the second reason, thus helping make it possible for you to download things for free. You're welcome. - -- t -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlcCC6cACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZlzQCfWMmNpG+3MIwYlK8sR4NI88c8 6EcAnjmPRw6UK+cW/IkxZaZKY0d1hGN8 =8yVs -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 02:22:10 + Mark Fletcherwrote: Hello Mark, >download it from Debian.org already. Separate vendors aren't adding any Because *everyone's* got always on, unlimited access to the internet haven't they? -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent" We are the League, we are the anti band We're The League - Anti-Nowhere League pgptraLNDb89D.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Mon 04 Apr 2016 at 02:22:10 (+), Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 at 04:20, David Wrightwrote: > > On Sun 03 Apr 2016 at 08:56:23 (+), Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > I just don't understand why anyone would pay money for Jessie in the first > > > place. > > > > Convenience, bandwidth, trust,... > > > > > It's supposed to be free software... > > > > It *is* free software. That doesn't mean that vendors have to download > > it, burn it, verify it, market it, distribute it, support it and pay > > for all the overheads for nothing. There's no business model in that. > Precisely. That was my question. Why would anyone do any of that? Eh? "Anyone" in your first question referred to purchasers who pay money for something that is free. OK, you obviously want the quick answer. Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis_versus_libre and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_terms_for_free_software and realise there's no contradiction in paying for free software. "Anyone" in your second question refers to the vendors who do any or all of that, and charge you for it. > Just > download it from Debian.org already. Separate vendors aren't adding any > value. Why should they get paid for doing nothing useful? That's your opinion. Fortunately for the purchasers, the vendors do something that the purchasers consider useful, and they get paid for doing so. Bandwidth doesn't come free, so you pay for your download instead of buying the media. You either pay your ISP directly, or indirectly through council/property taxes (in a library), the bill (in a restaurant), or your employer's overheads (at work). Cheers, David.
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
Mark Fletcher writes: > Precisely. That was my question. Why would anyone do any of that? Just > download it from Debian.org already. Separate vendors aren't adding > any value. Why should they get paid for doing nothing useful? They get paid because the people who pay them choose to do so. Presumably they disagree with you and find that the vendors do add value, but really that's their business. If you see no values in purchased DVDs don't buy any. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 at 04:20, David Wrightwrote: > On Sun 03 Apr 2016 at 08:56:23 (+), Mark Fletcher wrote: > > I just don't understand why anyone would pay money for Jessie in the > first > > place. > > Convenience, bandwidth, trust,... > > > It's supposed to be free software... > > It *is* free software. That doesn't mean that vendors have to download > it, burn it, verify it, market it, distribute it, support it and pay > for all the overheads for nothing. There's no business model in that. > > Cheers, > David. > > Precisely. That was my question. Why would anyone do any of that? Just download it from Debian.org already. Separate vendors aren't adding any value. Why should they get paid for doing nothing useful?
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Sun 03 Apr 2016 at 08:56:23 (+), Mark Fletcher wrote: > I just don't understand why anyone would pay money for Jessie in the first > place. Convenience, bandwidth, trust,... > It's supposed to be free software... It *is* free software. That doesn't mean that vendors have to download it, burn it, verify it, market it, distribute it, support it and pay for all the overheads for nothing. There's no business model in that. Cheers, David.
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Sun 03 Apr 2016 at 11:03:10 +0200, Floris wrote: > Op Sun, 03 Apr 2016 10:56:23 +0200 schreef Mark Fletcher >: > > > > I just don't understand why anyone would pay money for Jessie in the > > first place. It's supposed to be free software... > > > >Respect to anyone who chooses to donate to the project, or to the upstream > >of packages they particularly derive value from, >but surely the thing to > >do would be to use it, then decide to do that??? What's the use case that > >makes sense to pay for it >before you've tried it? > >BTW best answer in my opinion is get networking working, then set up > >sources.list to point at the repos as others have >suggested. If > >networking isn't available, sources.list set up to use the thumb drive as > >others have suggested is the way to >go. Either way, once at up, there are > >commands line apt-get install to install software and keep it up > >to date. > >Mark > > > > I don't know if the OP has a good Internet connection or need some non-free > firmware packages to make it work. But you are right. Get your network > up-and-running so you can make sure you have the most stable and secure > packages available. No, your advice first time round was right. Or at least it was useful and appropriate for Alan McConnell's situation. The fact that he has a DVD and a USB stick indicates he has some need or desire to use them. Purchasing them still gets him free software. The USB stick can most probably be used as an archive. What is on the DVD is unknown, apart from it having the installer. If it is Debian's DVD-1 it will contain mutt and imagemagick, so they should be capable of installation with a correct sources.list (which d-i should have set up).
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
Op Sun, 03 Apr 2016 10:56:23 +0200 schreef Mark Fletcher: On Sun, Apr 3, 2016, 17:11 Floris wrote: Op Sat, 02 Apr 2016 19:46:09 +0200 schreef Alan McConnell : Well, I finally got my Jessie installed! I had to pick a different kernel than then one suggested, but things finally went through. I was even able to use the partitions I had prepared and carefully sized. My question: how do I install "new" SW? E.g. emacs, and mutt, and ImageMagick? These are not found on the one CD I have. I have in addition a thumb drive, which came with my purchase from LinuxCollections. I have mounted it and find that it is chock full of .deb files. I suppose there is some way of 'manually' copying a particular .deb to my disk and then installing it. But I am afraid of getting stuck in "dependency hell". Does someone here also have the same CD + thumb drive situation. TIA, Alan I just don't understand why anyone would pay money for Jessie in the first place. It's supposed to be free software... Respect to anyone who chooses to donate to the project, or to the upstream of packages they particularly derive value from, >but surely the thing to do would be to use it, then decide to do that??? What's the use case that makes sense to pay for it >before you've tried it? BTW best answer in my opinion is get networking working, then set up sources.list to point at the repos as others have >suggested. If networking isn't available, sources.list set up to use the thumb drive as others have suggested is the way to >go. Either way, once at up, there are commands line apt-get install to install software and keep it up to date. Mark I don't know if the OP has a good Internet connection or need some non-free firmware packages to make it work. But you are right. Get your network up-and-running so you can make sure you have the most stable and secure packages available. Floris
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016, 17:11 Floriswrote: > Op Sat, 02 Apr 2016 19:46:09 +0200 schreef Alan McConnell : > > > Well, I finally got my Jessie installed! I had to pick a different > > kernel than then one > > suggested, but things finally went through. I was even able to use the > > partitions I had > > prepared and carefully sized. > > > > My question: how do I install "new" SW? E.g. emacs, and mutt, and > > ImageMagick? These > > are not found on the one CD I have. I have in addition a thumb drive, > > which came with > > my purchase from LinuxCollections. I have mounted it and find that it > > is chock full > > of .deb files. I suppose there is some way of 'manually' copying a > > particular .deb > > to my disk and then installing it. But I am afraid of getting stuck in > > "dependency > > hell". Does someone here also have the same CD + thumb drive situation. > > > > TIA, > > > > Alan > > > > > > I just don't understand why anyone would pay money for Jessie in the first > place. It's supposed to be free software... > Respect to anyone who chooses to donate to the project, or to the upstream of packages they particularly derive value from, but surely the thing to do would be to use it, then decide to do that??? What's the use case that makes sense to pay for it before you've tried it? BTW best answer in my opinion is get networking working, then set up sources.list to point at the repos as others have suggested. If networking isn't available, sources.list set up to use the thumb drive as others have suggested is the way to go. Either way, once at up, there are commands line apt-get install to install software and keep it up to date. Mark
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
Op Sat, 02 Apr 2016 19:46:09 +0200 schreef Alan McConnell: Well, I finally got my Jessie installed! I had to pick a different kernel than then one suggested, but things finally went through. I was even able to use the partitions I had prepared and carefully sized. My question: how do I install "new" SW? E.g. emacs, and mutt, and ImageMagick? These are not found on the one CD I have. I have in addition a thumb drive, which came with my purchase from LinuxCollections. I have mounted it and find that it is chock full of .deb files. I suppose there is some way of 'manually' copying a particular .deb to my disk and then installing it. But I am afraid of getting stuck in "dependency hell". Does someone here also have the same CD + thumb drive situation. TIA, Alan I think it is possible to use the thumb drive as a local repo. Does the drive have a directory with the following sub-directories? dists, pool, indices and doc Insert and mount the drive and take a note of the location. For example /media/USER_NAME/usb_drive Add a line in /etc/apt/sources.list deb file:/media/USER_NAME/usb_drive/dir_which_have_the_sub_dirs jessie main contrib non-free Tell apt you have new packages as root with: apt-get update Install the software you want with: apt-get install emacs success, Floris
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Sat 02 Apr 2016 at 16:42:35 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > You have a DVD (not a CD). It would (or should) contain more than a > netinst image. > Well, it doesn't contain emacs or tex or mutt, or ImageMagick. Why > are you > telling me what it 'should' have? Please mount the DVD on /mnt and post here the output of cat /mnt/.disk/info
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On 04/02/2016 10:50 PM, Alan McConnell wrote: > > > - Original Message - > From: "Brian" <a...@cityscape.co.uk> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Sent: Saturday, April 2, 2016 3:17:09 PM > Subject: Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question > > On Sat 02 Apr 2016 at 13:46:09 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > >> Well, I finally got my Jessie installed! I had to pick a different kernel >> than then one >> suggested, but things finally went through. I was even able to use the >> partitions I had >> prepared and carefully sized. > > Good, but this is information underload. Which kernel was suggested? > Which one did you pick? Remember, it could help others than yourself. >It wasn't the one with the .pae. IIRC there were a couple. Of > course I >didn't copy down the names of all the choices! > >> My question: how do I install "new" SW? E.g. emacs, and mutt, and >> ImageMagick? These >> are not found on the one CD I have. I have in addition a thumb drive, which >> came with >> my purchase from LinuxCollections. I have mounted it and find that it is >> chock full > > You have a DVD (not a CD). It would (or should) contain more than a > netinst image. > Well, it doesn't contain emacs or tex or mutt, or ImageMagick. Why > are you > telling me what it 'should' have? > >> of .deb files. I suppose there is some way of 'manually' copying a >> particular .deb >> to my disk and then installing it. But I am afraid of getting stuck in >> "dependency >> hell". Does someone here also have the same CD + thumb drive situation. > > The vendor has it. Have you thought of asking what it is they have sold > you? > I suppose I should have bought the 8 or 10 or 15 DVDs. As I have > already > said: I bought the DVD+thumb drive from LinuxCollections, since it > was > a) cheaper, and b) less bulky, and c) represented, I hoped a new > technology. Thumb drives can contain a lot more on them than a DVD > can. > > I hope for further responses from people who have _answers_, although I'll > try to > respond to questions of significance. To repeat: I want to know how to > install > SW that I need from off the thumb drive(aka USB stick) > > Alan > getting network running, configuring /etc/apt/sources.list and doing apt-get update, then aptitude to install software would be the easiest thing. the ones in mine are: ``` deb http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib deb-src http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib ``` You may have to vary. (may have to be stable for stable distribution and maybe servers in your region for faster access) There are ways to set up apt to use removable drives, but I forgot how2 do that. It's likely how to use that thumb drive you got. Try the apt/aptitude manual page(s). oh, also apt.conf and apt-cdrom...
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
- Original Message - From: "Brian" <a...@cityscape.co.uk> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Saturday, April 2, 2016 3:17:09 PM Subject: Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question On Sat 02 Apr 2016 at 13:46:09 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > Well, I finally got my Jessie installed! I had to pick a different kernel > than then one > suggested, but things finally went through. I was even able to use the > partitions I had > prepared and carefully sized. Good, but this is information underload. Which kernel was suggested? Which one did you pick? Remember, it could help others than yourself. It wasn't the one with the .pae. IIRC there were a couple. Of course I didn't copy down the names of all the choices! > My question: how do I install "new" SW? E.g. emacs, and mutt, and > ImageMagick? These > are not found on the one CD I have. I have in addition a thumb drive, which > came with > my purchase from LinuxCollections. I have mounted it and find that it is > chock full You have a DVD (not a CD). It would (or should) contain more than a netinst image. Well, it doesn't contain emacs or tex or mutt, or ImageMagick. Why are you telling me what it 'should' have? > of .deb files. I suppose there is some way of 'manually' copying a > particular .deb > to my disk and then installing it. But I am afraid of getting stuck in > "dependency > hell". Does someone here also have the same CD + thumb drive situation. The vendor has it. Have you thought of asking what it is they have sold you? I suppose I should have bought the 8 or 10 or 15 DVDs. As I have already said: I bought the DVD+thumb drive from LinuxCollections, since it was a) cheaper, and b) less bulky, and c) represented, I hoped a new technology. Thumb drives can contain a lot more on them than a DVD can. I hope for further responses from people who have _answers_, although I'll try to respond to questions of significance. To repeat: I want to know how to install SW that I need from off the thumb drive(aka USB stick) Alan
Re: Modified Rapture, and a new question
On Sat 02 Apr 2016 at 13:46:09 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > Well, I finally got my Jessie installed! I had to pick a different kernel > than then one > suggested, but things finally went through. I was even able to use the > partitions I had > prepared and carefully sized. Good, but this is information underload. Which kernel was suggested? Which one did you pick? Remember, it could help others than yourself. > My question: how do I install "new" SW? E.g. emacs, and mutt, and > ImageMagick? These > are not found on the one CD I have. I have in addition a thumb drive, which > came with > my purchase from LinuxCollections. I have mounted it and find that it is > chock full You have a DVD (not a CD). It would (or should) contain more than a netinst image. > of .deb files. I suppose there is some way of 'manually' copying a > particular .deb > to my disk and then installing it. But I am afraid of getting stuck in > "dependency > hell". Does someone here also have the same CD + thumb drive situation. The vendor has it. Have you thought of asking what it is they have sold you?
Modified Rapture, and a new question
Well, I finally got my Jessie installed! I had to pick a different kernel than then one suggested, but things finally went through. I was even able to use the partitions I had prepared and carefully sized. My question: how do I install "new" SW? E.g. emacs, and mutt, and ImageMagick? These are not found on the one CD I have. I have in addition a thumb drive, which came with my purchase from LinuxCollections. I have mounted it and find that it is chock full of .deb files. I suppose there is some way of 'manually' copying a particular .deb to my disk and then installing it. But I am afraid of getting stuck in "dependency hell". Does someone here also have the same CD + thumb drive situation. TIA, Alan