Re: finger causing kernel seg fault

2024-03-15 Thread Ralph Aichinger
On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 09:12 +, Michael Grant wrote:
> I use tmux on my server.  tmux creates multiple pttys.  When I run
> finger, I see an error like this:
> 
> $ finger
> finger: /dev//pts/6: No such file or directory
> 
> and in the log, I see:
> 
> /var/log/syslog:Mar 15 05:06:18 strange kernel: [2740248.159942]
> finger[1987858]: segfault at 1c ip 55b1c20baad5 sp


I had similar problems in my Raspberry Pi running native Debian arm64,
I have filed this bug about it:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018879

/ralph



finger causing kernel seg fault

2024-03-15 Thread Michael Grant
I use tmux on my server.  tmux creates multiple pttys.  When I run 
finger, I see an error like this:


$ finger
finger: /dev//pts/6: No such file or directory

and in the log, I see:

/var/log/syslog:Mar 15 05:06:18 strange kernel: [2740248.159942] 
finger[1987858]: segfault at 1c ip 55b1c20baad5 sp 7ffc8878b8b0 
error 4 in finger[55b1c20b9000+3000] likely on CPU 1 (core 1, socket 0)
/var/log/syslog:Mar 15 05:06:18 strange kernel: [2740248.161979] Code: 
7b 20 00 0f 85 cc fe ff ff 31 c0 48 8d 3d 80 18 00 00 e8 7e 0f 00 00 83 
7b 08 01 0f 85 d0 fe ff ff 48 8d 7b 18 e8 8b e8 ff ff <8b> 70 1c 85 f6 
0f 85 d0 00 00 00 8b 70 08 8b 50 04 85 f6 0f 85 f2


I do not see pts/6 being used:

$ w
 04:56:14 up 31 days, 17:01,  6 users,  load average: 0.68, 0.20, 0.06
USER TTY  FROM   LOGIN@   IDLE   JCPU   PCPU WHAT
mgrant   pts/01.2.3.4Tue127:53m  0.32s  0.32s -tcsh
mgrant   pts/11.2.3.403:573.00s  0.03s  0.03s tmux 
attach

mgrant   pts/2tmux(1243630).%0   02Mar24  3.00s  0.18s  0.01s w
mgrant   pts/3tmux(1243630).%1   02Mar24 12days 29.02s 29.02s emacs
mgrant   pts/4tmux(1243630).%2   04Mar24 32:52m  0.05s  0.05s -bash

w reports one more user than there seems to be in the utmp.  I didn't 
close a tmux window but i have disconnected and reconnected several 
times.  If I start enough tmux windows and one happens to end up on the 
missing pts, the error goes away.  I'm not sure if this is a bug in 
finger, tmux, or something that manages the utmp getting out of sync.  
Any ideas what to do about this?


Michael Grant

Re: seg fault on many applets

2016-10-11 Thread Bhasker C V
Hurray !
Thanks to all
Just today morning got the updates on stretch ! things are back to
normal now. What a relief !
Thanks all again


On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Frank McCormick  wrote:
> On 08/10/16 12:49 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>> Sorry to get back to you all on this again. Its now nearly 4 days. Has
>> anybody had success in getting the packages of mate updated ?
>> My sources.list is
>> deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main
>> deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch main
>> deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch-backports main
>>
>> Hopefully I have got things right. I am wondering if others had
>> success and I am missing something.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Frank McCormick 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:


 Hi all,

 About mate again.
 As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of
 Sept the packages must get fixed.
 I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary
 file/folder manager.
 and many other applets too are crashing.
 Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ?


 On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick

  wrote:
>
>
> On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you Frank
>> I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
>> will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
>> some other disastrous consequence.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:




 Hi,
  I am on
 $ lsb_release -a
 No LSB modules are available.
 Distributor ID:Debian
 Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
 Release:testing
 Codename:stretch

 Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


 [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
 f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
 libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
 [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb
 sp
 ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


 Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
 causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file
 manager.

>>>
>>>
>>>   The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment.
>>> It
>>> was
>>> caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of
>>> everything
>>> are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it
>>> may
>>> take
>>> a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
>>> downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
>>> than it's worth.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be
> updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)
>
>

>>>
>>> I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the
>>> packages
>>> have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a
>>> day or two.
>>>
>
>
>The updated packages are in Sid which I am now running. I don't know how
> long it will be until they get into Stretch.
>
>
>
>



Re: seg fault on many applets

2016-10-08 Thread Frank McCormick

On 08/10/16 12:49 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:

Hi all
Sorry to get back to you all on this again. Its now nearly 4 days. Has
anybody had success in getting the packages of mate updated ?
My sources.list is
deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch main
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch-backports main

Hopefully I have got things right. I am wondering if others had
success and I am missing something.


On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Frank McCormick  wrote:

On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:


Hi all,

About mate again.
As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of
Sept the packages must get fixed.
I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary
file/folder manager.
and many other applets too are crashing.
Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ?


On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick

 wrote:


On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:



Thank you Frank
I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
some other disastrous consequence.


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:



On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:




Hi,
 I am on
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
Release:testing
Codename:stretch

Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


[ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
[ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.




  The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment.
It
was
caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of
everything
are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may
take
a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
than it's worth.






   I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be
updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)






I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the packages
have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a
day or two.




   The updated packages are in Sid which I am now running. I don't know 
how long it will be until they get into Stretch.







Re: seg fault on many applets

2016-10-08 Thread Bhasker C V
Hi all
Sorry to get back to you all on this again. Its now nearly 4 days. Has
anybody had success in getting the packages of mate updated ?
My sources.list is
deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch main
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch-backports main

Hopefully I have got things right. I am wondering if others had
success and I am missing something.


On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Frank McCormick  wrote:
> On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> About mate again.
>> As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of
>> Sept the packages must get fixed.
>> I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary
>> file/folder manager.
>> and many other applets too are crashing.
>> Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick
>>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:


 Thank you Frank
 I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
 will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
 some other disastrous consequence.


 On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
  wrote:
>
>
> On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>  I am on
>> $ lsb_release -a
>> No LSB modules are available.
>> Distributor ID:Debian
>> Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
>> Release:testing
>> Codename:stretch
>>
>> Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)
>>
>>
>> [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
>> f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
>> libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
>> [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
>> ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]
>>
>>
>> Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
>> causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.
>>
>
>
>   The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment.
> It
> was
> caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of
> everything
> are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may
> take
> a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
> downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
> than it's worth.
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be
>>> updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the packages
> have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a
> day or two.
>
>
>
>



Re: seg fault on many applets

2016-10-04 Thread Frank McCormick

On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:

Hi all,

About mate again.
As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of
Sept the packages must get fixed.
I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary
file/folder manager.
and many other applets too are crashing.
Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ?


On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:

On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:


Thank you Frank
I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
some other disastrous consequence.


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:


On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:



Hi,
 I am on
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
Release:testing
Codename:stretch

Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


[ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
[ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.




  The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It
was
caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of
everything
are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may
take
a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
than it's worth.






   I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be
updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)






I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the 
packages have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a

day or two.






Re: seg fault on many applets

2016-10-04 Thread Bhasker C V
Hi all,

About mate again.
As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of
Sept the packages must get fixed.
I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary
file/folder manager.
and many other applets too are crashing.
Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ?


On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:
> On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Frank
>> I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
>> will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
>> some other disastrous consequence.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:


 Hi,
  I am on
 $ lsb_release -a
 No LSB modules are available.
 Distributor ID:Debian
 Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
 Release:testing
 Codename:stretch

 Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


 [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
 f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
 libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
 [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
 ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


 Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
 causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.

>>>
>>>
>>>   The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It
>>> was
>>> caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of
>>> everything
>>> are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may
>>> take
>>> a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
>>> downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
>>> than it's worth.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be
> updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)
>
>



Re: seg fault on many applets

2016-09-23 Thread Frank McCormick

On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:

Thank you Frank
I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
some other disastrous consequence.


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:

On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:


Hi,
 I am on
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
Release:testing
Codename:stretch

Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


[ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
[ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.




  The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It was
caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of everything
are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may take
a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
than it's worth.









   I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be 
updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)





Re: seg fault on many applets

2016-09-23 Thread Bhasker C V
Thank you Frank
I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
some other disastrous consequence.


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:
> On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>  I am on
>> $ lsb_release -a
>> No LSB modules are available.
>> Distributor ID:Debian
>> Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
>> Release:testing
>> Codename:stretch
>>
>> Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)
>>
>>
>> [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
>> f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
>> libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
>> [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
>> ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]
>>
>>
>> Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
>> causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.
>>
>
>
>   The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It was
> caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of everything
> are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may take
> a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
> downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
> than it's worth.
>
>
>
>



Re: seg fault on many applets

2016-09-20 Thread Frank McCormick

On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:

Hi,
 I am on
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
Release:testing
Codename:stretch

Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


[ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
[ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.




  The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. 
It was caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of 
everything are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon 
but it may take a little while before they make it into Debian. A 
temporary fix is to downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble

than it's worth.






seg fault on many applets

2016-09-20 Thread Bhasker C V
Hi,
 I am on
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
Release:testing
Codename:stretch

Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


[ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
[ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.



Amarok throwing a seg fault in testing

2011-02-20 Thread AG

Hi all

I've run into a problem with Amarok not starting.  When opened on the CL 
it just reports segmentation fault.  I have amarok-debug installed and 
ran gdb amarok and this is the response:


GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-debian
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
snip
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/amarok...Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/amarok...done.


I can't find any documentation what file gdb writes to and this output 
doesn't tell me anything.


There are two potential causes:

1. This morning's testing update
2. Installing the nouveau driver for my nVidia card.

Searching on the Net, there is some material from 2008/09 that suggests 
that Amarok doesn't/ didn't play nicely with non-nVidia drivers.  I 
cannot confirm that however.


If the problem is the video driver that's too bad. I like the resolution 
nouveau gives me, but is there anyway of tweaking it so that Amarok 
plays nicely too?


TIA

AG



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d6105c6.6020...@gmail.com



help with seg fault in aptitude and booting xen

2009-04-17 Thread whollygoat
This is a recently installed firewalling router/gateway
running Lenny.  For two or three days it has been 
running for long periods with no interruptions in 
connectivity or with booting.

p3 500Mhz slot 1 
seanix columbia sx mobo
   i440bx chipset

Today it suddenly died in the middle of my web browsing.
Didn't think to write down the message on the console
(figured it would be in the logs) but it was an end trace
message like the one below.

When I rebooted with a xen'ified host kernel, the boot 
dropped to an initramfs prompt after waiting a couple of 
minutes for the root file system.

I booted the non-xen kernel thinking that having only just 
removed two xen meta packages.  When I tried to run ncurses
aptitude, the screen was drawn but then stopped with an 
Ouch! segmentation fault.  

I was able to reinstall the two metapackages with command line
aptitude.  Started to surf the web some more and the machine 
died again with the (by hand, so the spacing, capitalization, 
etc might be wrong)

[3700.929083] EIP: [c017119ad] cache_alloc_refill+0xe5/0x44d 
ss: ESP 0068:def89dcc
[3700.929083] ---[ end trace 794d24/daccc4879f ]---


So I tried rebooting with the xen kernel.  As above, the boot
process dropped to initramfs command prompt after waiting one or 
two minutes for the root file system.

Anybody understand what the above means?

Thanks,

willy
-- 
  
  whollyg...@letterboxes.org

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and
  love email again


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Frank
After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault 
running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.


Where to start looking ??

Cheers

Frank


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:10:08PM -0400, Frank wrote:
 After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault  
 running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.

 Where to start looking ??

have you logged out and back in yet? restarted X yet? maybe even
restarted the machine yet? 

that's where I'd start. 

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Frank

Frank wrote:
After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault 
running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.


Where to start looking ??




  I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root.

Cheers


Frank


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Kent West

Frank wrote:

Frank wrote:
After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault 
running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.


Where to start looking ??




  I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root.





FYI: I'm seeing similar problems with Iceweasel. I can run it as root, 
or I can run it from within Icewm, but I can not run it as normal user 
from within KDE.


--
Kent


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
please reply to the list instead of to me directly.

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:22:24PM -0400, Frank wrote:
 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
 On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:10:08PM -0400, Frank wrote:
 After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault   
 running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.

 Where to start looking ??

 have you logged out and back in yet? restarted X yet? maybe even
 restarted the machine yet? 


   Yup. Machine has been restarted - but as I just noted, Sylpheed runs
 as root, just not as a user. 

hmmm... permissions issue that causes a segfault? that's ugly. you
might look at the last few lines of an strace to see what it's trying
to access that cuases the segfault. 

that's all I got.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Damon L. Chesser
On Sunday 20 July 2008 04:19:09 pm Frank wrote:
 Frank wrote:
  After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault
  running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.
 
  Where to start looking ??

I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root.

 Cheers


 Frank

Frank,

I can't tell if you still have the issue or not, but if you do, open a term 
and type sylpheed or claws-mail if you are running claws.  What does that 
exit message say?

if it only shows segmentation fault, then issue strace sylpheed then look 
through the last part of strace to see what is killing slypheed.

HTH

-- 
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Frank

Damon L. Chesser wrote:

On Sunday 20 July 2008 04:19:09 pm Frank wrote:

Frank wrote:

After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault
running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.

Where to start looking ??

   I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root.

Cheers


Frank


Frank,

I can't tell if you still have the issue or not, but if you do, open a term 
and type sylpheed or claws-mail if you are running claws.  What does that 
exit message say?


if it only shows segmentation fault, then issue strace sylpheed then look 
through the last part of strace to see what is killing slypheed.


HTH



strace output:


open(/usr/share/icons/DMZ-White/cursors/xterm, O_RDONLY) = 8
fstat64(8, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=15776, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 
0) = 0xb6d39000
read(8, 
Xcur\20\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\3\0\0\0\2\0\375\377\30\0\0\0004\0\0\0\2\0\375\377 
..., 4096) = 4096

_llseek(8, 0, [0], SEEK_SET)= 0
read(8, 
Xcur\20\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\3\0\0\0\2\0\375\377\30\0\0\0004\0\0\0\2\0\375\377 
..., 4096) = 4096

close(8)= 0
munmap(0xb6d39000, 4096)= 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++


Cheers

Frank


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Frank

Anders Lagerås wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:20:20 +0200
Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault 
running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.


Where to start looking ??

Use reportbug to report the bug.

Then downgrade libgkt2.0 to 2.12.10-2 that will solve the problem for
now.




  Bug report on it's way

  What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this.


Cheers


Frank


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Anders Lagerås
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400
Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Anders Lagerås wrote:
Bug report on it's way
 
What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this.
Using aptitude is the easiest way.
If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show
up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed.
Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad
to select it and then g to install.
= to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be
useful.

-- 
Mvh Anders Lagerås


pgpjPHwuyoUOo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Frank McCormick

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Anders Lagerås wrote:
| On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400
| Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Anders Lagerås wrote:
|Bug report on it's way
|
|What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this.
| Using aptitude is the easiest way.
| If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show
| up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed.
| Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad
| to select it and then g to install.
| = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be
| useful.
|

~  Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one.

Cheers

Frank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiDuP8ACgkQnQV1aTcQlJuIHACfUzpQYK0pE/XZ2PFiQh6B1Ppf
968AnRIGwtxstwf6rb8YwsThV22NV1co
=ImGL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Frank McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:15:27 -0400
Frank McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Anders Lagerås wrote:
 | On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400
 | Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 |
 | Anders Lagerås wrote:
 |Bug report on it's way
 |
 |What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this.
 | Using aptitude is the easiest way.
 | If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show
 | up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed.
 | Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad
 | to select it and then g to install.
 | = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be
 | useful.
 |
 
 ~  Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one.

 Got around it by dl'ing from lenny repository and installing using
dpkg. Seems to work - writing this using Sylpheed.

cheers

Frank
- -- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiDvJAACgkQnQV1aTcQlJvjfwCfZbZ4dqf1epJfcndzamXhTy+B
t8kAoJbwdKyzdcsMVchxfjGxeAAEDjtq
=yft1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:15:27PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
 Anders Lagerås wrote:
 | On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400
 | Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 |
 | Anders Lagerås wrote:
 |Bug report on it's way
 |
 |What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this.
 | Using aptitude is the easiest way.
 | If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show
 | up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed.
 | Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad
 | to select it and then g to install.
 | = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be
 | useful.
 |
 
 ~  Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one.

enable the lenny repos.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Seg fault

2008-07-20 Thread Anders Lagerås
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:15:27 -0400
Frank McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Anders Lagerås wrote:
 | On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400
 | Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 |
 | Anders Lagerås wrote:
 |Bug report on it's way
 |
 |What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do
 | this.
 | Using aptitude is the easiest way.
 | If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description
 | show up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk
 | listed. Select the row of the version you want and use + on the
 | numeric keypad to select it and then g to install.
 | = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can
 | also be useful.
 |
 
 ~  Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one.
ok
that is probably since you have only repositories for one version
in /etc/apt/sources.list
or maybe by your /etc/apt/preferences settings

To be able to downgrade to get around problems like this do I have
both stable testing and unstable repositories in sources.list

You can also download from here:
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
and use dpkg -i to install.

But if you don't have a sources.list with the corresponding
repositories can you get problem with dependencies.

-- 

Mvh Anders Lagerås


pgpJVjoKb1hYP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: seg fault Firefox

2008-06-25 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Mumia W.. wrote:
 On 06/24/2008 03:40 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
 On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
 when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!)

 Not particularly.  The choice there was:

 1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks.
 2) Not distribute Firefox at all.

 Which would you rather have?

 
 Wasn't there another option?
 
 3) Keep the Firefox trademarks and put the browser into non-free.

And then Firefox is not part of Debian and cannot be shipped on official Debian 
CDs or any
other media...

- --
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIYf+1chorMMFUmYwRArfgAKCKqfMFl/vSSYFYeEN8zRow+mI03gCglpM8
pfuw+x6TUaAoR44j8mJ2n1g=
=M04m
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: seg fault Firefox

2008-06-25 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:27:20PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
 On Tuesday 24 June 2008 05:08:23 pm Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:

  What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the problem
  is in one of your extensions.
 
 Works fine in -safe-mode.  I will now uninstall my extensions and add them 
 one 
 by one.  Thanks!

As this seems to happen pretty often lately (probably due to the upgrade 
to IW3) I have documented the procedure here.

http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#package-iceweasel-crash

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: seg fault Firefox

2008-06-25 Thread Damon L. Chesser
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 06:44:24 am Andrei Popescu wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:27:20PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
  On Tuesday 24 June 2008 05:08:23 pm Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
   What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the
   problem is in one of your extensions.
 
  Works fine in -safe-mode.  I will now uninstall my extensions and add
  them one by one.  Thanks!

 As this seems to happen pretty often lately (probably due to the upgrade
 to IW3) I have documented the procedure here.

 http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#package-iceweasel-crash

 Regards,
 Andrei

Andrei,

removing the .mozilla dir did the trick.  Thanks!

-- 
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


seg fault Firefox

2008-06-24 Thread Damon L. Chesser
when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) I get a seg 
fault.

== messages ==
Jun 24 13:08:03 dam-main kernel: [59583.098628] firefox-bin[3836]: segfault at 
7fc9a0d0d21b ip 7fc9a2136160 sp 7fffaad49d70 error 4 in 
libc-2.7.so[7fc9a20c2000+14a000]

and iceweasle opens as I would expect and everything works.  I only know about 
the segfault because I am monitoring messages.

Any ideas?

-- 
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: seg fault Firefox

2008-06-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
 when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!)

Not particularly.  The choice there was:

1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks.
2) Not distribute Firefox at all.

Which would you rather have?

-- 
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: seg fault Firefox

2008-06-24 Thread Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
On 24/06/2008, Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 when ever I run [firesomething] I get a segfault.

Strange, I've gotten segfaults too, but it doesn't seem to affect anything.

- Jordi G. H.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: seg fault Firefox

2008-06-24 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Damon L. Chesser wrote:

 when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) I get a seg
 fault.
 
 == messages ==
 Jun 24 13:08:03 dam-main kernel: [59583.098628] firefox-bin[3836]:
 segfault at 7fc9a0d0d21b ip 7fc9a2136160 sp 7fffaad49d70 error 4 in
 libc-2.7.so[7fc9a20c2000+14a000]
 
 and iceweasle opens as I would expect and everything works.  I only know
 about the segfault because I am monitoring messages.
 
 Any ideas?
 

What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the problem
is in one of your extensions.

raju
-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: seg fault Firefox

2008-06-24 Thread Damon L. Chesser
On Tuesday 24 June 2008 05:08:23 pm Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
 Damon L. Chesser wrote:
  when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) I get a seg
  fault.
 
  == messages ==
  Jun 24 13:08:03 dam-main kernel: [59583.098628] firefox-bin[3836]:
  segfault at 7fc9a0d0d21b ip 7fc9a2136160 sp 7fffaad49d70 error 4 in
  libc-2.7.so[7fc9a20c2000+14a000]
 
  and iceweasle opens as I would expect and everything works.  I only know
  about the segfault because I am monitoring messages.
 
  Any ideas?

 What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the problem
 is in one of your extensions.

 raju
 --
 Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
 http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
 http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/

Works fine in -safe-mode.  I will now uninstall my extensions and add them one 
by one.  Thanks!

-- 
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: seg fault Firefox

2008-06-24 Thread Mumia W..

On 06/24/2008 03:40 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:

On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:

when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!)


Not particularly.  The choice there was:

1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks.
2) Not distribute Firefox at all.

Which would you rather have?



Wasn't there another option?

3) Keep the Firefox trademarks and put the browser into non-free.

After all, wasn't the closed-source Netscape 4.77 once distributed with 
Debian Potato?





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: seg fault Firefox

2008-06-24 Thread Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
On 24/06/2008, Mumia W.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 06/24/2008 03:40 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
 
   On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
  
when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!)
   
  
   Not particularly.  The choice there was:
  
   1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks.
   2) Not distribute Firefox at all.
  
   Which would you rather have?
  
  
 
   Wasn't there another option?
 
   3) Keep the Firefox trademarks and put the browser into non-free.


Ugh. I prefer the Iceweasel route. I like having it on the install CDs.

 By the way, one thing I don't understand is why Ubuntu still uses the
 Firefox logo and branding, especially regarding Mike Connor's comment
 that

 I have actually been asked recently by another distro
 maintainer whether everyone is on a fair playing field.  Right now, it
 seems to others as if Debian has a special deal, which isn't fair, and
 it needs to change.

 regarding why Debian was still using the Firefox name. Now it seems to
 me that Ubuntu has that special deal. Whenever I ask about, it seems
 that nobody knows, and makes me think that Shuttleworth must have
 signed off some secret deal with Mozilla in order to be allowed to
 keep using the logo and name, even though their Firefox is even more
 heavily modified than Debian's!

 Please correct me if I'm wrong about these observations.

 - Jordi G. H.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mplayer seg fault

2007-11-25 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Paul Cartwright wrote:

 $ mplayer
 Segmentation fault
 
 
 ok, this just started, and I have no idea why. nothing in any logs files I
 could find, and I did a
 aptitude mplayer reinstall
 
 what next?
 running Debian lenny
 

Segmentation fault is almost always a bug in that package or one of its
dependencies or incompatibility among them. If you are interested in fixing
the problem, compile mplayer with debugging symbols enabled and run it via
gdb and look at the backtrace.

hth
raju
-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



mplayer seg fault

2007-11-24 Thread Paul Cartwright
$ mplayer
Segmentation fault


ok, this just started, and I have no idea why. nothing in any logs files I 
could find, and I did a 
aptitude mplayer reinstall

what next?
running Debian lenny

-- 
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Registered Ubuntu User #12459


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mplayer seg fault

2007-11-24 Thread wanderlust
Hello.
Well the same error appeared with my mplayer, after each kernel update.
After reboot, it is corrected in some cases, but not in all. So I'm
re-compiling mplayer from sources (by the way, in this case I'm getting
mencoder also).

Sincerely,
Wanderlust

У сб, 2007-11-24 у 20:06 -0500, Paul Cartwright пише:
 $ mplayer
 Segmentation fault
 
 
 ok, this just started, and I have no idea why. nothing in any logs files I 
 could find, and I did a 
 aptitude mplayer reinstall
 
 what next?
 running Debian lenny
 
 -- 
 Paul Cartwright
 Registered Linux user # 367800
 Registered Ubuntu User #12459
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: (SOLVED)seg fault in apt-get after disk filled up

2006-08-06 Thread David Goodenough
On Saturday 05 August 2006 19:13, David Goodenough wrote:
 On Saturday 05 August 2006 18:51, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
  On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:03:28PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
   I have a small machine that I keep completely up to date.  It ran out
   of disk space in the middle of an update and now every time it tries to
 
  you mean completely out of disk space? or just your /var partition?
  maybe apt-get clean or auto-clean might be in order?

 There is only one partition, and it ran out of space completely (its
 only 4GB).  apt-get autoclean segfaults just like the rest of apt-get.

 I have now cleared some space.

 David

  A
 
   build its dependancy tree it gets to about 50% and then seg faults.
  
   It is running package apt 0.6.45.
  
   I have copied the old available and status files in /var/lib/dpkg over
   the current version, and that has not fixed the problem.
  
   Short of a reinstall, any idea how to proceed?
  
   David
  
  
   --
   To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well I found the solution, clear /var/cache/apt/archives and run 
apt-get update.  So it would appear that something in there (and
those are all supposed to be text files, not binaries) can cause a 
seg fault in apt-get while building it dependency tree - not good.

Unfortunately as the machine is so small I could not keep the files
so I do not have them to submit in a bug report.

David 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



seg fault in apt-get after disk filled up

2006-08-05 Thread David Goodenough
I have a small machine that I keep completely up to date.  It ran out of
disk space in the middle of an update and now every time it tries to 
build its dependancy tree it gets to about 50% and then seg faults.

It is running package apt 0.6.45.

I have copied the old available and status files in /var/lib/dpkg over
the current version, and that has not fixed the problem.

Short of a reinstall, any idea how to proceed?

David


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: seg fault in apt-get after disk filled up

2006-08-05 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:03:28PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
 I have a small machine that I keep completely up to date.  It ran out of
 disk space in the middle of an update and now every time it tries to 

you mean completely out of disk space? or just your /var partition?
maybe apt-get clean or auto-clean might be in order?

A


 build its dependancy tree it gets to about 50% and then seg faults.
 
 It is running package apt 0.6.45.
 
 I have copied the old available and status files in /var/lib/dpkg over
 the current version, and that has not fixed the problem.
 
 Short of a reinstall, any idea how to proceed?
 
 David
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: seg fault in apt-get after disk filled up

2006-08-05 Thread David Goodenough
On Saturday 05 August 2006 18:51, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
 On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:03:28PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
  I have a small machine that I keep completely up to date.  It ran out of
  disk space in the middle of an update and now every time it tries to

 you mean completely out of disk space? or just your /var partition?
 maybe apt-get clean or auto-clean might be in order?
There is only one partition, and it ran out of space completely (its
only 4GB).  apt-get autoclean segfaults just like the rest of apt-get.

I have now cleared some space.

David

 A

  build its dependancy tree it gets to about 50% and then seg faults.
 
  It is running package apt 0.6.45.
 
  I have copied the old available and status files in /var/lib/dpkg over
  the current version, and that has not fixed the problem.
 
  Short of a reinstall, any idea how to proceed?
 
  David
 
 
  --
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



seg Fault bei ps fax

2005-04-03 Thread Lukas Pataki
Hallo List,
ich habe ein seltsames Phänomen.
Seit einiger Zeit schmiert mein Rechner immer wieder ab.
Debian /sarge Kernel 2.4.27-2-k7
In den Logs ist nichts zu finden.
Das letzte mal war er nur per ping erreichbar
aber sonst hat keine Service reagiert.(smtp,http,ftp,pop)
Ich bekomme seit neuestem bei `ps fax` ein:

  PID   TTY   STAT  TIME COMMAND
Segmentation fault
---
ps aux kann ich ohne Probleme ausführen
Im exim4/mainlog stand mal was von to many open files, da ist
der Rechner aber nicht abgestürzt.
laut lsof sind um di 4-6 tausend files immer offen. -scheint mir normal.
Ein netstat -at bringt den Rechner auf einen Load von über 200.
Firewall ist keine am laufen.
Wo kann ich den mit der Fehlersuche beginnen ?
danke.luke
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): 
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/

Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)


Re: seg Fault bei ps fax

2005-04-03 Thread Gerhard Brauer
Gruesse!
* Lukas Pataki [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [03.04.05 18:04]:

 Hallo List,
 
 
 ich habe ein seltsames Phänomen.
 Seit einiger Zeit schmiert mein Rechner immer wieder ab.
 Debian /sarge Kernel 2.4.27-2-k7
 In den Logs ist nichts zu finden.
 Das letzte mal war er nur per ping erreichbar
 aber sonst hat keine Service reagiert.(smtp,http,ftp,pop)
 Ich bekomme seit neuestem bei `ps fax` ein:
 
   PID   TTY   STAT  TIME COMMAND
 Segmentation fault
 ---
 ps aux kann ich ohne Probleme ausführen
 

Vielleicht kann du mit
strace ps fax
sehen, an welcher Stelle und warum er einen segfault hat.

 Im exim4/mainlog stand mal was von to many open files, da ist
 der Rechner aber nicht abgestürzt.
 laut lsof sind um di 4-6 tausend files immer offen. -scheint mir normal.

Wenn
echo /proc/sys/fs/file-max
nicht bedenklich in der Nähe deines Wertes ist sollte das nicht die
Ursache sein.

 Ein netstat -at bringt den Rechner auf einen Load von über 200.
 Firewall ist keine am laufen.

Auch bei netstat -nat, also ohne Namens-Auflösung der IP-Adressen?
Ansonsten käme die Load vom DNS. Allerdings ist 200 erheblich hoch für
solch einen einfachen Vorgang.

 Wo kann ich den mit der Fehlersuche beginnen ?

Filesystem-Check(s)
Wenn dieser Rechner (ohne Firewall) mit dem Internet verbunden ist,
kannst du einen Einbruch ausschließen? chkrootkit installieren und
ausführen?

Ansonsten, wenn der Rechner einfach so stehenbleibt kann es IMHO jede
beteiligte Hardware sein: RAM (memtest laufen lassen),
IDE-BUS/KABEL/Festplatten, Netzteil,...

Evtl. alle nicht benötigte Hardware ausbauen und selektiv testen.

 danke.luke

Gruß
Gerhard

-- 
HAL is running Windows...



(fwd) Re: seg Fault bei ps fax [lukas@netskip.net]

2005-04-03 Thread Gerhard Brauer
Bitte keine Mails an mich privat.
Bitte an die Liste antworten.


- Forwarded message from Lukas Pataki [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: Lukas Pataki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:25:58 +0200
Subject: Re: seg Fault bei ps fax
To: Gerhard Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: at kis.te

Hi,



Vielleicht kann du mit
strace ps fax
sehen, an welcher Stelle und warum er einen segfault hat.
das hatte ich schon durch.
z.b. bekomme ich ein segfault (ab) wenn ich bind starte.
aber laut strace bleibt es immer bei mysql hängen.

..  na ok wenn ich mysql stoppe ist es ok.



Im exim4/mainlog stand mal was von to many open files, da ist
der Rechner aber nicht abgestürzt.
laut lsof sind um di 4-6 tausend files immer offen. -scheint mir normal.

Wenn
echo /proc/sys/fs/file-max

cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
25388
--sollte passen




Auch bei netstat -nat, also ohne Namens-Auflösung der IP-Adressen?
Ansonsten käme die Load vom DNS. Allerdings ist 200 erheblich hoch für
solch einen einfachen Vorgang.
`netstat -na`

sh: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable

...
nirvana...

auch bei gestoppten bind...
Load über 300


Filesystem-Check(s)
Wenn dieser Rechner (ohne Firewall) mit dem Internet verbunden ist,
kannst du einen Einbruch ausschließen? chkrootkit installieren und
ausführen?

Ansonsten, wenn der Rechner einfach so stehenbleibt kann es IMHO jede
beteiligte Hardware sein: RAM (memtest laufen lassen),
IDE-BUS/KABEL/Festplatten, Netzteil,...
Ram wurde getauscht.
laut smart ist alles rellativ


Gruß
   Gerhard

danke.luke




- End forwarded message -

Die sh: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable Meldung deutet auf
einen vollen Prozeß-Table hin. Wieviele Prozesse laufen auf dem Rechner?

Beim strace: Gibt es auch diese Probleme, wenn du mysql stoppst?

Gruß
Gerhard

-- 
Der schwarze Ritter ist unbesiegbar...



Re: Postfix lmtp seg fault

2004-10-20 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:01:15 -0500, Adi Linden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I cannot get postfix to deliver mail via lmtp to cyrus-imap. Here are the
 relevant configuration chunks I added:
 
 cyrus.conf:
 lmtpcyr   cmd=lmtpd listen=/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp prefork=1
 

I think something is wrong with your config. Have added yourself the
line above? I don't recall if the default Debian config is good
enough, but i've found this in the cyrus.conf:

lmtpunixcmd=lmtpd listen=/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp
prefork=0 maxchild=20

 master.cf
 lmtpcyr   unix  -   -   n   -   -   lmtp
 
 main.cf:
 mailbox_transport = lmtpcyr:unix:/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp
 

The same for the line above. I think you only need to add a line:

mailbox_transport = cyrus

but i've looked at Cyrus looong time ago, so i don't recall right now
what  needs to be modified. I remember that i've had trouble with the
config cause postfix runs chrooted, so the access to the sasl.db needs
some attention, and something about the quota of the mailboxes...

 Both cyrus-imap and postfix have access to /var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp. No
 problem there.
 
 In the end I turned on debugging for lmtp in master.cf and added a debug
 command with gdb in main.cf. This is (a small part) of what I get:
 
 -- snip --
 Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2
 0x40214718 in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6
 (gdb) Continuing.
 
 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
 0x4005c121 in match_hostaddr () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1
 (gdb) #0  0x4005c121 in match_hostaddr () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1
 #1  0x4005b78e in match_list_match () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1
 #2  0x4002c886 in debug_peer_check () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-global.so.1
 #3  0x0804c7bf in ?? ()
 #4  0x0805a515 in ?? ()
 -- snip --
 
 I have no clue as to what is happening. I guess compiling from source is
 one option if I figure out how to convince apt-get to play nice without
 MTA package...
 

I'm in a hurry right now, if you want i can check with more calm later today...


Andrea


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Postfix lmtp seg fault

2004-10-19 Thread Adi Linden
I cannot get postfix to deliver mail via lmtp to cyrus-imap. Here are the
relevant configuration chunks I added:

cyrus.conf:
lmtpcyr   cmd=lmtpd listen=/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp prefork=1

master.cf
lmtpcyr   unix  -   -   n   -   -   lmtp

main.cf:
mailbox_transport = lmtpcyr:unix:/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp

Both cyrus-imap and postfix have access to /var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp. No
problem there.

In the end I turned on debugging for lmtp in master.cf and added a debug
command with gdb in main.cf. This is (a small part) of what I get:

-- snip --
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2
0x40214718 in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) Continuing.

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x4005c121 in match_hostaddr () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1
(gdb) #0  0x4005c121 in match_hostaddr () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1
#1  0x4005b78e in match_list_match () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1
#2  0x4002c886 in debug_peer_check () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-global.so.1
#3  0x0804c7bf in ?? ()
#4  0x0805a515 in ?? ()
-- snip --

I have no clue as to what is happening. I guess compiling from source is
one option if I figure out how to convince apt-get to play nice without
MTA package...

Adi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apache woes after upgrade - seg fault

2004-01-16 Thread David Purton
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:45:58PM +1030, David Purton wrote:
 Hi, I'm having all sorts of trouble since upgrading Apache to the
 latest in testing, yesterday.
 
 Using the default settings, it works.
 
 As soon as I try and add some VirtualHost directives and start apache,
 very occasionally it works, but mostly it just fails silently.
 

On further investigation, if I run apache -X, it seg faults almost
immediately :(


-- 
David Purton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to
strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him.
 2 Chronicles 16:9a


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Apache woes after upgrade - seg fault

2004-01-16 Thread David Purton
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 07:26:57PM +1030, David Purton wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:45:58PM +1030, David Purton wrote:
  Hi, I'm having all sorts of trouble since upgrading Apache to the
  latest in testing, yesterday.
  
  Using the default settings, it works.
  
  As soon as I try and add some VirtualHost directives and start apache,
  very occasionally it works, but mostly it just fails silently.
  
 
 On further investigation, if I run apache -X, it seg faults almost
 immediately :(
 

OK more info - If I take out the php4 module it works.

I want php, so leaving it out is not a good solution

dc

-- 
David Purton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to
strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him.
 2 Chronicles 16:9a


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: fsck seg. fault Please Help!

2003-11-04 Thread Werner Scharinger
Am Montag, 3. November 2003 09:00 schrieb Matt:
 Bruce Sass wrote:
 On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, matt wrote:
 hi, the other day my woody machine just kinda stopped working...upon a
 reboot i learned via beep-codes that the ram had failed.  i broke out the
 shop-vac and cleaned it out and it started to boot...here's where the
 troubble began...
 
 Unable to andle kernel paging request at virtual address blabla hex
 
 I've seen this message (or something very similar) when I had a bad
 stick of RAM... did you replace your RAM or just vacuum the dust off?

 this did cross my mind...there is one stick that i've had problems with
 on and off since i bought it in 1999.  i cleaned it and put it back in.
 i thought it may have been a problem with fsck b/c i thought seg faults
 happened when a program tried to access memory owned by another user.
 i'll run fsck with only one stick in there at a time and hopefuly it
 will work.

Just try to proof your RAM with free memtest86, download under:
http://www.memtest86.com

Bye, Werner

-- 
Werner Scharinger
Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter der
soft  hard Computerservice GmbH * Am Erlenbach 8 * 94032 Passau
Tel. +49 851 33025 * Fax. +49 851 31725 * www.shcs.de

Fördermitglied der Wirtschaftsjunioren Passau
Mitglied der Strategiekommission der Wirtschaftsjunioren Deutschland
c/o IHK für Niederbayern in Passau * Nibelungenstr. 15 * 94032 Passau


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: fsck seg. fault Please Help!

2003-11-03 Thread Matt
Bruce Sass wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, matt wrote:

 

hi, the other day my woody machine just kinda stopped working...upon a
reboot i learned via beep-codes that the ram had failed.  i broke out the
shop-vac and cleaned it out and it started to boot...here's where the
troubble began...
   

...
 

Unable to andle kernel paging request at virtual address blabla hex
   

I've seen this message (or something very similar) when I had a bad
stick of RAM... did you replace your RAM or just vacuum the dust off?
 

this did cross my mind...there is one stick that i've had problems with 
on and off since i bought it in 1999.  i cleaned it and put it back in.  
i thought it may have been a problem with fsck b/c i thought seg faults 
happened when a program tried to access memory owned by another user.  
i'll run fsck with only one stick in there at a time and hopefuly it 
will work. 

...
 

but seriously, what other utils can i use instead of fsck to repair the
drive?
   

There is a low level tool (can't remember the name and a quick search
through packages.debian.org didn't find it, may also only be in
unstable or testing) but you'd need to know the structure of the fs at
the bits level to use it.
If fsck is able to recover a block (or sequence of blocks) but doesn't
know where they belong it will place them in lost+found (each
partition has one) -- you then need to manually look at the data,
figure out what it is, and cp it to where it should be... not fun, and
really only worth it for stuff you can't just download again or
configure up.
 

what kind of memory requirements does fsck have?  i hope it will be able 
to check a 10gig drive with all these errors with only 32mb of ram+130mb 
swap.

-matt

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: fsck seg. fault Please Help!

2003-10-30 Thread Bruce Sass
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, matt wrote:

 hi, the other day my woody machine just kinda stopped working...upon a
 reboot i learned via beep-codes that the ram had failed.  i broke out the
 shop-vac and cleaned it out and it started to boot...here's where the
 troubble began...
...
 Unable to andle kernel paging request at virtual address blabla hex

I've seen this message (or something very similar) when I had a bad
stick of RAM... did you replace your RAM or just vacuum the dust off?

...
 but seriously, what other utils can i use instead of fsck to repair the
 drive?

There is a low level tool (can't remember the name and a quick search
through packages.debian.org didn't find it, may also only be in
unstable or testing) but you'd need to know the structure of the fs at
the bits level to use it.


If fsck is able to recover a block (or sequence of blocks) but doesn't
know where they belong it will place them in lost+found (each
partition has one) -- you then need to manually look at the data,
figure out what it is, and cp it to where it should be... not fun, and
really only worth it for stuff you can't just download again or
configure up.


- Bruce


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



fsck seg. fault Please Help!

2003-10-29 Thread matt
hi, the other day my woody machine just kinda stopped working...upon a
reboot i learned via beep-codes that the ram had failed.  i broke out the
shop-vac and cleaned it out and it started to boot...here's where the
troubble began...

none of the rc scripts ran, and many other problems (couldn't login due
to pam libs not loaded, etc.)

i booted to a potato, and later tried woody rescue disks.  running fsck
-p /dev/sda2 tells me to run manually.did that and there were
thousands of problems that were repaired, but then fsck caused a
segmentation fault!

here's some of the output...
cleared a few illegal blocks
Unable to andle kernel paging request at virtual address blabla hex
current-tss.cr3 = 08d18000, %cr3 = 08d18000
if you want all the stack dumps etc, let me know
Code: 8b 12 39 78 04 75 f3 39 68 08 75 ee 66 39 70 0c 75 e8 89 c2
Segmentation fault

HELP ME! i need to recover my home directory!  i've learned my lesson and
promise to make use of my tape drive from now on to backup!

but seriously, what other utils can i use instead of fsck to repair the
drive?

when i mount the partition, i can ls / fine, but ls /home/matt lists one
directory, then reports .:input/output error

thanks,
-matt
-- 
  matt
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Real Producer seg fault in unstable

2003-10-08 Thread Antony Gelberg
Hi all,

I have an odd issuer since upgrading to unstable.  I DJ on a radio
station that has a Real Networks server (worse luck!), hence I use Real
/ Helix Producer to broadcast my show.

However, it is now segfaulting:

antgel $ producer -ac /dev/dsp0 -o /tmp/tmp.rm
Helix(TM) Producer Basic 9.0.1 from RealNetworks(R). Build number:
9.0.1.250
Initializing  Errors: 0 Warnings: 0Segmentation fault

It used to work like a dream and is especially odd as I haven't upgraded
my kernel or modules.

The emu10k1 module is loaded and happy.

Whilst I'm not expecting anyone here to have tried this software, I'd
like to know if anyone has any ideas for debugging something like this.

If anyone is really feeling helpful, the binary can be downloaded from:
http://forms.real.com/rnforms/products/tools/producerbasic/  :)

A


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



threads seg fault

2003-03-16 Thread Mathias
Bonjour,

Je viens de télécharger les sources de firestarter et de dia (les
dernières versions sous gtk2.

La compilation se passe sans problème, mais lors de l'exécution j'ai
droit à un segmentation fault (aussi bien pour dia que pour
firestarter).

Avec gdb j'ai droit à (pour les deux progs) : 

[New Thread 1024 (LWP 22884)]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 22884)]
0x409b4a41 in __errno_location () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

J'ai googlé sur le sujet et j'ai effectivement trouvé quelques threads
(c'est le cas de le dire ;), sur le sujet mais rien de tres probant.
Il semblerait qu'il y ai un rapport avec la glibc-2.2.5.

J'ai installé les GNU pthreads, est ce que le problème peut venir de là?
J'avoue que je suis un peu perdu, donc si quelqu'un s'est déjà retrouvé
avec ce problème...

Merci d'avance, 

Mathias.

PS : j'utilise une woody 

-- 
This e-mail is written 100 percent Microsoft free.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

2002-12-25 Thread CARRY émile
Le mer 25/12/2002 à 02:28, Didier Conchaudron a écrit :
 Salut à tous,
Salut,
 Depuis que j'ai installé une woody/testing dpkg me fait des seg fault en
 permanence.
 Cela intervient pendant des mises à jour avec apt-get:
 Voici le message que cela me donne:
 
 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault
 
 Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)?
 Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées?

La dernière fois que j'ai eu ça, c'était une barette de 128 Mo qui était
rapée. un petit coup de memtest86 (paquet hwtools avec le readme à lire
pour faire une disquette de boot spéciale) pour être sur.

 Merci d'avance.

Bon courage

 Didier
Émile
-- 
Avant de choisir le prénom d'un garçon, pensez toujours à la femme qui aura a
le murmurer plus tard.
Barbey D'Aurevilly



Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

2002-12-25 Thread Jean-Michel OLTRA
Le mercredi 25 décembre 2002, Didier Conchaudron a écrit...
bonjour,


 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault

 Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)?
 Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées?

Utiliser strace et gdb pour voir où ça plante ?
-- 
jean-michel



Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

2002-12-25 Thread Philippe Monroux
Le mer 25 déc 2002, à 02 h 28 min 46 s  (UTC +0100),
Didier Conchaudron a écrit :

 Depuis que j'ai installé une  woody/testing dpkg me fait des seg fault
 en permanence.  Cela intervient pendant des mises à jour avec apt-get:
 Voici  le message  que  cela me  donne:  E: Sub-process  /usr/bin/dpkg
 received a segmentation fault Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle
 est fraiche!)?  Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées?

Tiens ?  Hier j'ai  fait l'installation indiquée sur MAINTENANCE FACILE
ETSÉCURISÉED'UNSYSTÈMEDEBIAN   GNU/LINUXAVECAPT
(http://free2.org/d/) et  quand j'ai  fait apt-get install  shorewall ça
m'a donné le même message (segmentation fault)...Alors j'ai abandonné.

Si cela peut aider...

ph
-- 
Depuis que j'utilise les logiciels libres
suis scotché à mon écran =:P



Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

2002-12-25 Thread Lucas Moulin
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 02:28:46 +0100
Didier Conchaudron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault
 Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)?
 Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées?

Deux solutions : un problème avec une barrette de RAM, ou le processeur
qui fait des siennes. Pour le premier, tu peux tester avec memtest86, et
pour le second, il faut changer de processeur...

-- 
Lucas Moulin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wish I had a shilling for every senseless killing, I'd buy a
government -- NOFX


pgpFxT96UOfqm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

2002-12-25 Thread Didier Conchaudron
Je suis en train de réaliser le test de la mémoire avec memtest86 qui, ma
foi, n'a l'air pas mal du tout ;-)
J'ai eu une nouvelle erreur ce matin: ça ressemble à un dump des registres
du processeur, ce qui me fait craindre un problème hard avec mon cpu...
Et là je me dis qu'il chauffe peut etre un peu trop: 64 degrés au démarrage
pour un Duron 800 ça me parait beaucoup...Est-ce que mes seg fault
pourraient venir de là?

Didier

- Original Message -
From: CARRY émile [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg


 Le mer 25/12/2002 à 02:28, Didier Conchaudron a écrit :
  Salut à tous,
 Salut,
  Depuis que j'ai installé une woody/testing dpkg me fait des seg fault en
  permanence.
  Cela intervient pendant des mises à jour avec apt-get:
  Voici le message que cela me donne:
 
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault
 
  Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)?
  Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées?

 La dernière fois que j'ai eu ça, c'était une barette de 128 Mo qui était
 rapée. un petit coup de memtest86 (paquet hwtools avec le readme à lire
 pour faire une disquette de boot spéciale) pour être sur.

  Merci d'avance.

 Bon courage

  Didier
 Émile
 --
 Avant de choisir le prénom d'un garçon, pensez toujours à la femme qui
aura a
 le murmurer plus tard.
 Barbey D'Aurevilly


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]







Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

2002-12-25 Thread Jeremie Koenig
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 12:44:42PM +0100, Didier Conchaudron wrote:
 Je suis en train de réaliser le test de la mémoire avec memtest86 qui, ma
 foi, n'a l'air pas mal du tout ;-)
 J'ai eu une nouvelle erreur ce matin: ça ressemble à un dump des registres
 du processeur, ce qui me fait craindre un problème hard avec mon cpu...

Tu veux dire un Ooops du noyeau ?
C'est exactement le genre de truc, avec les segfaults intempestives, qui
arrive :
- Si ta RAM est moisie
- Si ton proce chauffe trop (attention overclock)

Tu peux essayer de ralentir la RAM dans le BIOS, ou de ralentir ton
proce, et voire ce que ca donne (le probleme etant que tu ne saura pas
tout de suite si ca va mieux... Il faut voire a la longue si tu as
encore des histoire dans ce genre ou si ca disparait completement.)

 Et là je me dis qu'il chauffe peut etre un peu trop: 64 degrés au démarrage
 pour un Duron 800 ça me parait beaucoup...Est-ce que mes seg fault
 pourraient venir de là?

on dirait que oui...

-- 
Jeremie Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED]



seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

2002-12-24 Thread Didier Conchaudron
Salut à tous,

Depuis que j'ai installé une woody/testing dpkg me fait des seg fault en
permanence.
Cela intervient pendant des mises à jour avec apt-get:
Voici le message que cela me donne:

E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault

Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)?
Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées?

Merci d'avance.

Didier




tetex-bin upgrade fails due to seg fault

2002-03-11 Thread Frederik Vanrenterghem
Hi all,

I tried a dist-upgrade earlier, and the upgrade of tetex-bin fails:

Setting up tetex-bin (1.0.7+20011202-5) ...
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R... 
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R... 
/usr/bin/mktexlsr: line 122:  6874 Segmentation fault  \ls -LRa
2/dev/null
mktexlsr: Updating /var/spool/texmf/ls-R... 
mktexlsr: Done.
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
 Errors were encountered while processing:
  tetex-bin
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Also, if I run initex, following error appears:
! I can't read tex.pool; bad path?

Is this a known problem?

Thanks,

-- 
   Frederik Vanrenterghem   |You will attract cultured and artistic
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] |people to your home.
   GPG Fingerprint: |
   966B 0E4B 25C1 CC04 E2CB |
   8D4C 117F 6469 8925 BDE0 |



Re: update-mozilla-chrome seg fault

2002-03-06 Thread Martin Wuertele
Hi Greg!

On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, Greg Madden wrote:

 I have a woody box with KDE from Sid . When trying to install Mozilla 
 from Woody I get the following message:
 
 updating mozilla chrome registry
 /usr/bin/update-mozilla-chrome: line 49: 14658 segmentation fault 
 regxpcom /dev/null 2/dev/null
 
had the same problem when upgrading from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8.

what worked for me was the following:

1. get the mozilla-* debs you want to install
2. dpkg --unpack mozilla-debs
3. edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-*.postinst and comment the
   update-mozilla-chrome line
4. dpkg dpkg --configure -a
5. manually run /usr/bin/update-mozilla-chrome

the funny thing is that when i run manually the update-mozilla-chrome
script it did not segfault

yours martin
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- NO HTML MAILS PLEASE
 PGP/GPG encrypted and signed messages preferred


pgpDrvGAZh6mK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: update-mozilla-chrome seg fault

2002-03-06 Thread Greg Madden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 06 March 2002 12:43 am, Martin Wuertele wrote:
 Hi Greg!

 On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, Greg Madden wrote:
  I have a woody box with KDE from Sid . When trying to install
  Mozilla from Woody I get the following message:
 
  updating mozilla chrome registry
  /usr/bin/update-mozilla-chrome: line 49: 14658 segmentation fault
  regxpcom /dev/null 2/dev/null

 had the same problem when upgrading from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8.

 what worked for me was the following:

 1. get the mozilla-* debs you want to install
 2. dpkg --unpack mozilla-debs
 3. edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-*.postinst and comment the
update-mozilla-chrome line
 4. dpkg dpkg --configure -a
 5. manually run /usr/bin/update-mozilla-chrome

 the funny thing is that when i run manually the update-mozilla-chrome
 script it did not segfault

 yours martin

Thanks, I had tried that, except for manually running 
update-mozilla-chrome.  I thought my problems may have ben caused by 
mixing some apps from Sid, anyway Mozilla installed without 
intervention last night but Galeon seg faults.  I just want to run  
Galeon :)
- -- 
Greg C. Madden
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjyGafkACgkQaefA3q8KcpD57gCfZk6IfnLUxH7gK8c7t7Csf8w9
cuYAoJku2lDvX8fjyYs38r00UPByjLhF
=RivZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



update-mozilla-chrome seg fault

2002-03-05 Thread Greg Madden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I have a woody box with KDE from Sid . When trying to install Mozilla 
from Woody I get the following message:

updating mozilla chrome registry
/usr/bin/update-mozilla-chrome: line 49: 14658 segmentation fault 
regxpcom /dev/null 2/dev/null

any help appreciated

TIA
- -- 
Greg C. Madden
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjyFOy4ACgkQaefA3q8KcpAwxwCfZRicSOSciQV9IOVKG2DKjjbQ
h6YAoIuxsv4LgZYU2ucIDKX7DbHg+zyj
=cZRb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



apt-get seg fault

2001-05-16 Thread Stephen E. Hargrove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

here's the results of a recent install request.  any pointers most
welcome.

# apt-get install mozilla
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  libnspr4
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libnspr4 mozilla
0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 12  not upgraded.
1 packages not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 9068kB of archives. After unpacking 26.4MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org woody/main libnspr4 M18-3 [127kB]
Get:2 http://http.us.debian.org woody/main mozilla M18-3 [8941kB]
Fetched 9068kB in 56s (162kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package libnspr4.
(Reading database ... 73543 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libnspr4 (from .../libnspr4_M18-3_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package mozilla.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault.

- -- 
 ) ,_)
(-(__ -|- __
 ) | (/_\/(/_
(
 ___
| mailto : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
| linux  : http://exitwound.org |
| mozart : http://mozart.sourceforge.net|
| buck   : http://www.BuckOwensFan.com  |
 ___
| Sin boldly.
-- Martin Luther|
 ___

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7Ao5zr9c0KwefYXMRAr66AJ4k4l62etiBYme416gbf+5f9m90IACcCxB2
AyzAhLOgLJIFEkeQdhx5zc8=
=SRWc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: apt-get seg fault

2001-05-16 Thread Colin Watson
Stephen E. Hargrove [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's the results of a recent install request.  any pointers most
welcome.
[...]
Selecting previously deselected package libnspr4.
(Reading database ... 73543 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libnspr4 (from .../libnspr4_M18-3_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package mozilla.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault.

What version of dpkg are you running?

-- 
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Win4Lin seg fault

2001-04-29 Thread Stephen E. Hargrove
i've downloaded win4lin v2.2 and performed the following:

# alien --to-deb win4lin.rpm
# dpkg -i win4lin.deb
# /opt/win4lin/postinst_rpm.sh
# su
# winsetup

the set up window appears, i click on systemwide setup (or anything) and
win4lin seg faults.  i've set this up on other debian (woody)
installations, and i seem to remember seeing something about this
situation before, but i can't recall when/where/what the solution was.

any direction/information would be appreciated.  thanks!

-- 
 ) ,_)
(-(__ -|- __
 ) | (/_\/(/_
(
 ___
| mailto : [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| linux  : http://exitwound.org |
| mozart : http://mozart.sourceforge.net|
| buck   : http://www.BuckOwensFan.com  |
 ___
| the sixth sense:  |
| i am dead, but i must still go to work|
 ___



2.1 - 2.2 apt-get dist-upgrade issue... SEG FAULT

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Fox
I have a slink box running on kernel 2.2.17, and I have updated my
/etc/apt/sources.list to point to potato 2.2 tree.

I have ran apt-get update.

Now if I run apt-get dist-upgrade, or anything else apt-get related other
then update... it seg faults.

Anyone care to explain what is happening?



Seg fault in xawtv with webcam3 USB

2000-05-11 Thread Ivan J. Varzinczak

Hi, folks!

I think I've solved the problem with /dev/video device for the 
webcam3 USB camera. Now I have another problem: everytime I run xawtv
it gives a segmentation fault. I have another camera, a webcam 2
parallel, and it works very fine. I've checked the modules for the USB 
one and they seem correct, so I think it could be a problem related
with some X configuration. Below it follows the result:

cartman:~# xawtv
This is xawtv-3.06, running on Linux/i586 (2.3.99-pre6)
visual: id=0x22 class=3 (PseudoColor), depth=8
visual: id=0x23 class=5 (DirectColor), depth=8
visual: id=0x24 class=1 (GrayScale), depth=8
visual: id=0x25 class=2 (StaticColor), depth=8
visual: id=0x26 class=4 (TrueColor), depth=8
visual: id=0x27 class=0 (StaticGray), depth=8
switching visual (0x27)
x11: 1280x1024, 8 bit/pixel, 1280 byte/scanline, DGA, VidMode
/dev/video: no overlay support
waitpid: No child processes
v4l-conf had some trouble, trying to continue anyway
/dev/video: no overlay support
waitpid: No child processes
v4l-conf had some trouble, trying to continue anyway
v4l: 0x0, 0 bit/pixel, 0 byte/scanline
WARNING: v4l and dga disagree about the screen size
WARNING: Is v4l-conf installed correctly?
WARNING: v4l and dga disagree about the color depth
WARNING: Is v4l-conf installed correctly?
8 0
WARNING: v4l and dga disagree about the framebuffer base
WARNING: Is v4l-conf installed correctly?
ov_fbuf.base=(nil), base=0xff00
WARNING: overlay mode disabled
wmhooks: gnome
Warning: Cannot convert string -*-ledfixed-medium-r-semicondensed--39-* to 
type FontStruct
shmget: Invalid argument
Segmentation fault

The questions are: 

-With the webcam2 I don't get the /dev/video: no overlay support
message. What does this message mean? 

-Does this have something to do with the monitor resolution or X
configuration?

Any help will be very appreciated.

Thanks in advance!
-- 
Ivan J. Varzinczak - http://www.inf.ufpr.br/~ivan
Scholarship holder - Boursier - (PET/CAPES)
Informatics Department - Département d'Informatique
Federal University of Paraná - Université Fédérale du Paraná
Curitiba - Paraná - Brazil/Brésil

11-V-2000

-- 
Ivan J. Varzinczak - http://www.inf.ufpr.br/~ivan
Scholarship holder - Boursier - (PET/CAPES)
Informatics Department - Département d'Informatique
Federal University of Paraná - Université Fédérale du Paraná
Curitiba - Paraná - Brazil/Brésil

11-V-2000



Re: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault

2000-03-13 Thread John Stevenson
Have you tried moving your orignial ~/.mozilla folder.  It may have config 
settings
that the new version of mozilla doesnt like...

Johnny


Bryan K. Walton wrote:

 Hi everyone,
 This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on
 frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14!  BUT
 WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start.  When I run it, this is what I
 get from the shell startup:

 $ mozilla
 Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin
 Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin
 Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End
 ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
 ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
 Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End
 Segmentation fault

 --Any ideas?

 Thanks,
 Bryan Walton

 --
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
begin:vcard 
n:Stevenson;John
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:Valtech Ltd
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Technical Consultant / Trainer
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:John Stevenson
end:vcard


Re: Solved - New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault

2000-03-10 Thread Martin Fluch
Hi,

since I read the mailinglist this morning with the high-speed option 'd'
and the mailing list archive isn't updated yet, I don't know if it has
allready been reported. Anyway, the preoblem described below got solved on
my woody box by a simple 

  rm -r ~/.mozilla

Martin


On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Martin Fluch wrote:

 I have the exact same problem on my woody box, too.
 
 Martin
  
 On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
 
  Hi everyone,
  This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on
  frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14!  BUT
  WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start.  When I run it, this is what I
  get from the shell startup:
  
  $ mozilla
  Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin
  Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin
  Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End
  ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
  ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
  Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End
  Segmentation fault

-- 
Win2k: It's not so much that it's only 65,000 bugs,
it's just that they stopped at 65,535 to prevent an overflow.

For public PGP-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]


New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault

2000-03-09 Thread Bryan K. Walton
Hi everyone,
This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on
frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14!  BUT
WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start.  When I run it, this is what I
get from the shell startup:

$ mozilla
Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin
Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin
Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End
ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End
Segmentation fault

--Any ideas?

Thanks,
Bryan Walton


Re: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault

2000-03-09 Thread Martin Fluch
I have the exact same problem on my woody box, too.

Martin
 
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Bryan K. Walton wrote:

 Hi everyone,
   This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on
 frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14!  BUT
 WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start.  When I run it, this is what I
 get from the shell startup:
 
 $ mozilla
 Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin
 Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin
 Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End
 ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
 ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
 Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End
 Segmentation fault

-- 
Win2k: It's not so much that it's only 65,000 bugs,
it's just that they stopped at 65,535 to prevent an overflow.

For public PGP-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault

2000-03-09 Thread Davide



On 9 Mar 2000, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
 Date: 9 Mar 2000 14:20:12 -
 To: Debian-User Mailing List debian-user@lists.debian.org
 From: Bryan K. Walton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault
 
 Hi everyone,
   This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on
 frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14!  BUT
 WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start.  When I run it, this is what I
 get from the shell startup:
 
 $ mozilla
 Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin
 Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin
 Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End
 ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
 ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
 Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End
 Segmentation fault
 
 --Any ideas?
 
 Thanks,
 Bryan Walton

I had the same problem, you have to create a symbolic link called icons
to /usr/lib/mozilla/icons in your $HOME/.mozilla, like this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.mozilla$ ls -l icons
lrwxrwxrwx1 evo  evo22 mar  5 23:14 icons -
/usr/lib/mozilla/icons

Ciao, Davide


Re: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault

2000-03-09 Thread Jonathan Vaughan
Hi everyone,
This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on
   frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to
   M14!  BUT
   WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start.  When I run it, this
   is what I
   get from the shell startup:

Try doing an rm -r of your ~/.mozilla directory.  I had the same
problem and it worked for me.

Jon


Re: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault

2000-03-09 Thread Bryan K. Walton
Thanks to all who offered up suggestions for fixing the seg fault with
Mozilla M14.  The first email I got suggested creating the sym link, and
that fixed the problem.

Thanks!
Bryan

***
Bryan K. Walton
Network Operations Center Analyst
Berbee
5520 Research Park Drive  Madison, Wisconsin 53711
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
608.288.3000

Berbee...putting the E in business

On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Davide wrote:

 
 
 
 On 9 Mar 2000, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
  Date: 9 Mar 2000 14:20:12 -
  To: Debian-User Mailing List debian-user@lists.debian.org
  From: Bryan K. Walton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault
  
  Hi everyone,
  This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on
  frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14!  BUT
  WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start.  When I run it, this is what I
  get from the shell startup:
  
  $ mozilla
  Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin
  Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin
  Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End
  ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
  ProfileManager : GetProfileDir
  Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End
  Segmentation fault
  
  --Any ideas?
  
  Thanks,
  Bryan Walton
 
 I had the same problem, you have to create a symbolic link called icons
 to /usr/lib/mozilla/icons in your $HOME/.mozilla, like this:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.mozilla$ ls -l icons
 lrwxrwxrwx1 evo  evo22 mar  5 23:14 icons -
 /usr/lib/mozilla/icons
 
 Ciao, Davide
 


Re: seg fault

2000-02-19 Thread Andrew Chung
 With my current installation of Corel Linux, I am getting more
 segmentation faults, and they are with programs that did not have this
 problem with my previous install (Adobe Acrobat, for one).
 
 I don't see segmentation in the indices of the Running Linux or
 Learning Debian/GNU Linux books.

This usually means that the program expects library versions that are not
binary compatible with what you have. Check the system requirements for the
programs.

If you have access to the source code, a simple recompilation should do the 
trick. Otherwise install an older version of whatever library is needed.

Andrew
-- 
Don't let your sanity stand in your way

Andrew Chung -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://anderoo.dhs.org/~anderoo/


base-passwd seg fault

1999-12-01 Thread paul
Hello again
I`ve nearly managed to upgrade cleanly from Slink/2.0.36 to Potato/2.2.13 with 
only problems of my own making except for one last thing, dselect won`t 
complete the installation of base-passwd. This is what it tells me:

Okay, I am going to make the necessary updates now
Reading passwd from /usr/share/base-passwd/passwd.master
Reading group from /usr/share/base-passwd/group.master
Reading passwd from /etc/passwd
Reading shadow from /etc/shadow
Reading group from /etc/group
Adding group video (44)
1 changes have been made, rewriting files
Writing passwd-file to /etc/passwd.upwd-write
Replacing /etc/passwd with /etc/passwd.upwd-write
Writing shadow-file to /etc/shadow.upwd-write
Replacing /etc/shadow with /etc/shadow.upwd-write
Writing group-file to /etc/group.upwd-write
/var/lib/dpkg/info/base-passwd.postinst: line 57:  1554 Segmentation fault  
update-passwd --verbose
dpkg: error processing base-passwd (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139
Errors were encountered while processing:
 base-passwd

installation script returned error exit status 100.


Can anyone shed any light on this? Running the update-passwd command just 
returns a segmentation fault.

Thanks again

Paul

  

-- 
Paul Walton * Powered by * 
Cambridge* Debian GNU Linux *   
U.K.   * http://www.debian.org *
  * PGP Public Key: http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu/ *


pgpYQnI2ibteg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: base-passwd seg fault

1999-12-01 Thread The Doctor What
Bug Tracking is your friend... :)

See:
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=51577
Summary: Fixed in 3.1.5 which (I assume) is pending being moved into
the main archive.

Ciao!

-- 
I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.
-- Mark Twain

The Doctor What: fill in the blank http://docwhat.gerf.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED](finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP key)
KF6VNC


[off-topic] setrlimit()/C++ new() seg fault

1999-11-08 Thread othman
Hi,

I've been experimenting with limiting the amount of memory available to
a process by setting its data segment resource limit from within the
process by using setrlimit().  I've been testing if this technique
would work by attempting to allocate more memory on the heap than the
limit set in setrlimit() call.  Unfortunately, I get a seg fault in the
standard C++ library (gcc 2.95.2 on a potato box).

I'm not very familiar with the behavior of setrlimit() so please let me
know if I'm doing something silly.

Here is the test program:

// -
#include sys/time.h
#include sys/resource.h
#include unistd.h
#include cstdio
#include cerrno

#include new

#include iostream

int
main (int, char *[])
{
  struct rlimit r;

  r.rlim_cur = 1000;
  r.rlim_max = 1;

  if (::setrlimit (RLIMIT_DATA, r) != 0)
::perror (setrlimit);

  int *b = 0;

  try
{
  b = new int[5L];
  
  delete [] b;
}
  catch (std::bad_alloc)
{
  std::cout  caught bad_alloc exception  endl;

  return 0;  // Success
}

  std::cerr  Allocated more than what should be available.  endl;

  return 1;  // Failure
}
// -

Here is back trace from the core dump:

#0  0x4003e7f1 in exception::what () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3
#1  0x4003e937 in exception::what () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3
#2  0x4003e9b5 in exception::what () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3
#3  0x4003f14c in __frame_state_for () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3
#4  0x4003da98 in __throw () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3
#5  0x4003f4fd in __builtin_new () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3
#6  0x4003f66f in __builtin_vec_new () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3
#7  0x80489af in main ()
#8  0x400937a2 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
-Ossama
-- 
Ossama Othman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Center for Distributed Object Computing, Washington University, St. Louis
58 60 1A E8 7A 66 F4 44  74 9F 3C D4 EF BF 35 88  1024/8A04D15D 1998/08/26


Wordperfect 8 seg fault

1999-11-01 Thread Stephen . Murphy
Any ideas why Wordperfect 8 seg faults immediately
on start-up?


Wordperfect 8 seg fault

1999-11-01 Thread Stephen . Murphy
Thanks for your reply - I've been thinking
along those lines - I actually installed libc5 quite
early on. 
Am I right in thinking if ldd xwp shows all the 
libaries can be found then that is not the problem?

I understood that as long as the library path is listed in
/etc/ld.so.conf then the library  should be locatable
at run time and presumably by the ldd command. However
ldd could not find the libraries, nor could they be
found at run time unless I put the path in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
environment variable.

I am quite new to this as you may have gathered.


Re: Wordperfect 8 seg fault

1999-11-01 Thread aphro
ldd may show all the libraries but there may be conflicts.. hard to
explain cuz i hardly understand myself, but i will say that my
wordperfect8 was broken for several months(as was realvideo player and
other libc5 apps) because of misconfiguration of libc5, eventually i
started playing with it, and got it working..now the only libc5 app i cant
get running is xview.

sorry i cant help u more! 

nate

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
   Vice President Network Operations   http://www.firetrail.com/
  Firetrail Internet Services Limited  http://www.aphroland.org/
   Everett, WA 425-348-7336http://www.linuxpowered.net/
Powered By:http://comedy.aphroland.org/
Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMPhttp://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--

On Mon, 1 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks for your reply - I've been thinking
 along those lines - I actually installed libc5 quite
 early on. 
 Am I right in thinking if ldd xwp shows all the 
 libaries can be found then that is not the problem?
 
 I understood that as long as the library path is listed in
 /etc/ld.so.conf then the library  should be locatable
 at run time and presumably by the ldd command. However
 ldd could not find the libraries, nor could they be
 found at run time unless I put the path in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
 environment variable.
 
 I am quite new to this as you may have gathered.
 
 


Re: Wordperfect 8 seg fault

1999-11-01 Thread David Blackman
you need xpm***-altdev, I generally just install everything with xpm in
the name on a debian box that's going to have wp8.

--dave

On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, aphro wrote:

 i had that problem and it was due to libc5 libs being either not installed
 or misconfigured (my /etc/ld.so.conf was all screwed up) .. check to make
 sure the libc5 and xlib6 packages are installed.
 
 nate
 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
Vice President Network Operations   http://www.firetrail.com/
   Firetrail Internet Services Limited  http://www.aphroland.org/
Everett, WA 425-348-7336http://www.linuxpowered.net/
 Powered By:http://comedy.aphroland.org/
 Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMPhttp://yahoo.aphroland.org/
 -[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
 
 On Mon, 1 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Any ideas why Wordperfect 8 seg faults immediately
  on start-up?
  
  
  -- 
  Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
  
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
 
 


Enlightenment Seg Fault

1999-06-16 Thread Kelly Corbin
Problem:  Enlightenment seg faults with the sound turned on.  It plays
the intro sound, and then crashes if I hit a button.  Gnome sounds work
as well as CD sound if I use Enlightement-without-sound.  Any ideas?  I
have a Crystal CS4236 on-board sound chip compiled into the kernel. 
Thanks.

Kelly C


Re: Enlightenment Seg Fault

1999-06-13 Thread Oz Dror
I have the same problem, but only when enlightenment sound is turned on.
the problem started when I upgraded to the latest potato packages.

Kelly Corbin wrote:

 I recently set up a potato machine and had enlightement working.  Then I
 installed sound in my kernel and turned it on in enlightenment.  Now,
 every time I fire it up, it seg faults and exits.  Sound is working
 correctly; I can use it with gnome and quake.  I also un-installed and
 re-installed enlightenment to no avail.  Any ideas?  Thanks.

 Kelly Corbin

 --
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null


Enlightenment Seg Fault

1999-06-08 Thread Kelly Corbin
I recently set up a potato machine and had enlightement working.  Then I
installed sound in my kernel and turned it on in enlightenment.  Now,
every time I fire it up, it seg faults and exits.  Sound is working
correctly; I can use it with gnome and quake.  I also un-installed and
re-installed enlightenment to no avail.  Any ideas?  Thanks.

Kelly Corbin


Re: matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 libc.so.5 ?)

1999-04-16 Thread Robert King
 On Wed, 14 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
   Mathworks tech support has been unable to help get matlab 5.3
 running on my Debian system.  I was wondering if anybody else has got
 it working and perhaps would know how to fix my problem.
 
 Hi, I haven't undated my 5.2 to 5.3, but I got 5.2 working after some
 mucking about.  My problem was that I had created some symlinks in /usr/lib,
 which was causing the problem.  
 
 I eventually found the problem by stepping though the script which calls
 matlab, because it actually changes some of the library linking stuff.  Walk
 through the lines of that file until you come to the place where you 
 start /usr/local/matlab/bin/lnx86/matlab and do the ldd there.  Then check
 the links of all the libraries mentioned there.  Check that every library
 used has been installed by a proper debian package if you suspect you made
 the same mistake I did.
 
Robert.

Robert King, Australian Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Australia
3875 6677   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.ens.gu.edu.au/robertk/

This library is open one hour each fortnight.  No book shall leave these 
 premises. We have sworn it with an oath!
 -- Library of King Ashurbanipal, Babylon, ca. 3000 BC. 
  


Re: matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 libc.so.5 ?)

1999-04-16 Thread Brian Servis
Aaron

See if you can get the libdl, libXt, libX11, libXpm, libSM, libICE and
ld-linux libs that MATHWORKS compiled the MATLAB binary against and stick 
them in one of the Matlab 5.3 directories, probably
/usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86, listed below in your ldd output. 
The libs that it is currently pulling in are compiled against libc6 and
that is why it is pulling in libc6 as well.  Ask them to stick all the
required libs on there ftp site somewhere(as I am sure others will have
the problem as well), they currently have all the libs for 5.2 at 
ftp://ftp.mathworks.com/pub/tech-support/outgoing/linux/matlab5.

This is what I have for my copy of 5.2:

 !ldd /usr/local/matlab5/bin/lnx86/matlab
libXpm.so.4 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libXpm.so.4 (0x4000b000)
libXt.so.6 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libXt.so.6 (0x40019000)
libXext.so.6 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libXext.so.6 (0x4005b000)
libX11.so.6 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libX11.so.6 (0x40064000)
libtermcap.so.2 = /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x400e1000)
libdl.so.1 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libdl.so.1 (0x400e5000)
libg++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libg++.so.27 (0x400e8000)
libstdc++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libstdc++.so.27 (0x40120
000)
libm.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libm.so.5 (0x40152000)
libc.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libc.so.5 (0x4015b000)
libSM.so.6 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libSM.so.6 (0x40217000)
libICE.so.6 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libICE.so.6 (0x4022)

Notice that all libs(except termcap) are in my matlab tree.

-- 
Brian 
-
Never criticize anybody until you have walked a mile in their shoes,  
 because by that time you will be a mile away and have their shoes. 
   - unknown  

Mechanical Engineering[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purdue University   http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis
-

*- On 14 Apr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use 
both libc.so.6  libc.so.5 ?)
 Hi all,
 
   Mathworks tech support has been unable to help get matlab 5.3
 running on my Debian system.  I was wondering if anybody else has got
 it working and perhaps would know how to fix my problem.
 
 When I start matlab is says,
 
   Segmentation fault
 
 BTW, the license manager appears to be up and running.
 
 Here is an env variable that was used to find all the needed libs.
 
 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/X11R6/lib/:/usr/local/matlab5.3/extern/lib/lnx86:/usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/:/usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86
 
 I suspect matlab is confused since it is finding libc.so.6, as well as
 libc.so.5 . Mathworks says they don't support libc6.  If this is the
 problem how would I, just for matlab ;-), hide the fact that libc6 is on
 my system?  How does it find /lib/libc.so.6 when it doesn't want it?
 
 Commercial products linked against old libs are frustrating...
 
 thank you for any help,
 aaron
 
 
 Dear Aaron:
 
 I am writing in response to your email on April 12, 1999 regarding MATLAB
 installation.
 
 Thank you for sending me your information, there are a couple of things
 that I noticed whcih may be causing the problem.
 
 First, it seems as though /lib is missing from the Library path.  You can
 add this to the path with the following command:
 
 setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /lib/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
 
 This is what I see for shared library linking.
 
 ldd /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/matlab
 libut.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/extern/lib/lnx86/libut.so 
 (0x4000b000)
 libmwhardcopy.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhardcopy.so 
 (0x4002b000)
 libmwhg.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhg.so (0x4004f000)
 libmwsimulink.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwsimulink.so 
 (0x40149000)
 libmwgui.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwgui.so (0x404ae000)
 libmwnumerics.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwnumerics.so 
 (0x40545000)
 libmwmpath.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwmpath.so 
 (0x405b3000)
 libmwuix.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwuix.so (0x405c2000)
 libmwcompiler.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwcompiler.so 
 (0x40854000)
 libmatlbmx.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmatlbmx.so 
 (0x408fa000)
 libdl.so.1 = /lib/libdl.so.1 (0x40959000)
 libg++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libg++.so.27 
 (0x4095c000)
 libstdc++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libstdc++.so.27 
 (0x4099)
 libm.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libm.so.5 (0x409bf000)
 -  libc.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libc.so.5 (0x409c8000)
 libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6

Re: matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 libc.so.5 ?)

1999-04-15 Thread Hamori Andras


On Wed, 14 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,
 
   Mathworks tech support has been unable to help get matlab 5.3
 running on my Debian system.  I was wondering if anybody else has got
 it working and perhaps would know how to fix my problem.
 
 When I start matlab is says,
 
   Segmentation fault
 

...

 This is what I see for shared library linking.
 
 ldd /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/matlab
 libut.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/extern/lib/lnx86/libut.so 
 (0x4000b000)
 libmwhardcopy.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhardcopy.so 
 (0x4002b000)
 libmwhg.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhg.so (0x4004f000)
 libmwsimulink.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwsimulink.so 
 (0x40149000)
 libmwgui.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwgui.so (0x404ae000)
 libmwnumerics.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwnumerics.so 
 (0x40545000)
 libmwmpath.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwmpath.so 
 (0x405b3000)
 libmwuix.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwuix.so (0x405c2000)
 libmwcompiler.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwcompiler.so 
 (0x40854000)
 libmatlbmx.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmatlbmx.so 
 (0x408fa000)
 libdl.so.1 = /lib/libdl.so.1 (0x40959000)
 libg++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libg++.so.27 
 (0x4095c000)
 libstdc++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libstdc++.so.27 
 (0x4099)
 libm.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libm.so.5 (0x409bf000)
 -  libc.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libc.so.5 (0x409c8000)
 libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40a84000)
 libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40ac7000)
 libXpm.so.4 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x40b5f000)
 libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x40b6d000)
 libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x40b75000)
 -  libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40b89000)
 ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40c2e000)

it seems you haven't got the libc5-compatible X11-related libraries
installed... have a look at the packages in the 'oldlibs' section, I think
'xlib6' and 'xpm' are the ones you need. BTW, is there a FAQ entry on this
topic somewhere? Just about every Debian user can face this problem when
trying to run libc5-based applications...

Andras


matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 libc.so.5 ?)

1999-04-14 Thread amj
Hi all,

Mathworks tech support has been unable to help get matlab 5.3
running on my Debian system.  I was wondering if anybody else has got
it working and perhaps would know how to fix my problem.

When I start matlab is says,

Segmentation fault

BTW, the license manager appears to be up and running.

Here is an env variable that was used to find all the needed libs.

LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/X11R6/lib/:/usr/local/matlab5.3/extern/lib/lnx86:/usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/:/usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86

I suspect matlab is confused since it is finding libc.so.6, as well as
libc.so.5 . Mathworks says they don't support libc6.  If this is the
problem how would I, just for matlab ;-), hide the fact that libc6 is on
my system?  How does it find /lib/libc.so.6 when it doesn't want it?

Commercial products linked against old libs are frustrating...

thank you for any help,
aaron


 Dear Aaron:
 
 I am writing in response to your email on April 12, 1999 regarding MATLAB
 installation.
 
 Thank you for sending me your information, there are a couple of things
 that I noticed whcih may be causing the problem.
 
 First, it seems as though /lib is missing from the Library path.  You can
 add this to the path with the following command:
 
 setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /lib/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH

This is what I see for shared library linking.

ldd /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/matlab
libut.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/extern/lib/lnx86/libut.so (0x4000b000)
libmwhardcopy.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhardcopy.so 
(0x4002b000)
libmwhg.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhg.so (0x4004f000)
libmwsimulink.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwsimulink.so 
(0x40149000)
libmwgui.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwgui.so (0x404ae000)
libmwnumerics.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwnumerics.so 
(0x40545000)
libmwmpath.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwmpath.so 
(0x405b3000)
libmwuix.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwuix.so (0x405c2000)
libmwcompiler.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwcompiler.so 
(0x40854000)
libmatlbmx.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmatlbmx.so 
(0x408fa000)
libdl.so.1 = /lib/libdl.so.1 (0x40959000)
libg++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libg++.so.27 
(0x4095c000)
libstdc++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libstdc++.so.27 
(0x4099)
libm.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libm.so.5 (0x409bf000)
-  libc.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libc.so.5 (0x409c8000)
libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40a84000)
libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40ac7000)
libXpm.so.4 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x40b5f000)
libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x40b6d000)
libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x40b75000)
-  libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40b89000)
ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40c2e000)

 I also noticed that the version of libc.so that you are using is version 6.
  Unfortunately, this version is not supported.  We are using revision 5.

matlab appears to find both libc.so.5 and libc.so.6 .  If it should
not use libc.so.6 how do convice matlab not to see it?


RE: Telnet and dselect seg fault

1998-10-10 Thread David
Hi Patrick!

Thanks for email for my problem :)

But for now, I have an other problem, and an other question!
My problem is located when I try to execute grasp (an small c editting
tool) I have some strange error like this can't found some lib.  After
these error messages I've done this to check for the dep:

$ldd grasp
libXt.so.6 = not found
libX11.so.6 = not found
libXext.so.6 = not found
libm.so.5 = /lib/libm.so.5 (0x4000b000)
libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x40014000)

and after I've listed all the database of ldconfig with ldconfig -p
i.e.: the file with -- are the one that ldd is saying that they aren't
here...

#ldconfig -p

178 libs found in cache `/etc/ld.so.cache' (version 1.7.0)
--libX11.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
--libX11.so.6 (libc4) = /usr/X11R6/lib/i486-linuxaout/libX11.so.6
libX11.so.3 (libc4) = /usr/X11R5/lib/libX11.so.3
libX11.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so
libXtst.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXtst.so.6
libXtst.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXtst.so
--libXt.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
libXt.so.6 (libc4) = /usr/X11R6/lib/i486-linuxaout/libXt.so.6
libXt.so.3 (libc4) = /usr/X11R5/lib/libXt.so.3
libXt.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so
libXpm.so.4 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4
libXp.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6
libXp.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so
libXmu.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6
libXmu.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so
libXm.so.1 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.1
libXm.so.0 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.0
libXi.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6
libXi.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so
--libXext.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6
libXext.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so
libXaw3d.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw3d.so.6
libXaw3d.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw3d.so
libXaw.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw3d/libXaw.so.6
libXaw.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw.so.6
... (many more)

--  

So, i realy don't know why the executable don't run because all the
dependencies are there.



On Fri, 9 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Le 03-Oct-98, David Boisvert a pris ses électrons pour écrire::
  Hello!
 ...
  So, that's the problem, dselect and telnet crash and and don't know
  why.  
  
  So, if someone have this problem with or without a solution, mail me.
 
 I had once a similar problem after some hard disk corruption, that some apps
 were just dumping core (Seg Fault)
 
 How i resolved the problem:
 1)ulimit -c unlimited
 2)run the apps, seg fault = core file present in directory
 3)gdb nameofapp core
 4)found where the apps has seg fault'd 
 i've seen then that all my apps where failing when using the same library
 (libnss_dns)
 so i just copied back that library from install disks, a little ldconfig and
 then everything was running again !!!
 
 Try doing so to find if there is a common point of failure for all your 
 apps.
 
 Patrick
 


RE: Telnet and dselect seg fault

1998-10-09 Thread pat
Le 03-Oct-98, David Boisvert a pris ses électrons pour écrire::
 Hello!
...
 So, that's the problem, dselect and telnet crash and and don't know
 why.  
 
 So, if someone have this problem with or without a solution, mail me.

I had once a similar problem after some hard disk corruption, that some apps
were just dumping core (Seg Fault)

How i resolved the problem:
1)ulimit -c unlimited
2)run the apps, seg fault = core file present in directory
3)gdb nameofapp core
4)found where the apps has seg fault'd 
i've seen then that all my apps where failing when using the same library
(libnss_dns)
so i just copied back that library from install disks, a little ldconfig and
then everything was running again !!!

Try doing so to find if there is a common point of failure for all your apps.

Patrick


Telnet and dselect seg fault

1998-10-03 Thread David Boisvert
Hello!

I have a little problem with telnet and dselect.  I'm not new with
Linux.  I've my own network of 4 x86 with slackware running on it and
one P100 with debian running on it.  This is  the 2nd time I've
installed debian gnu linux on my P100 box.  The first time, everything
was ok in the 2 first week, but the week after the 2nd week telnet and
dselect start to core dump. I think that's not the fault of linux but
the fault of the hardware, but I'm not sure of that. I've maid some
check to verify if the shared library were ok  : 


$ ldd /usr/bin/telnet == 
/usr/bin/telnet:
libncurses.so.3.4 = /lib/libncurses.so.3.4 (0x4000e000)
libstdc++.so.2.8 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.8 (0x40053000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x40098000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400b3000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) 

And everythings look ok. 

$ ldd /usr/bin/dselect
libdpkg.so.0 = /usr/lib/libdpkg.so.0 (0x4000c000)
libncurses.so.3.4 = /lib/libncurses.so.3.4 (0x40023000)
libstdc++.so.2.8 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.8 (0x40068000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x400af000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400c8000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)

So, that's the problem, dselect and telnet crash and and don't know
why.  

So, if someone have this problem with or without a solution, mail me.


dselect seg fault after dpkg upgrades

1998-02-05 Thread Britton

I have been working lately on upgrading to hamm.  In an effort to fix a
problem with dpkg-ftp, I upgraded to the following packages:

dpkg_1.3.0.20.deb
dpkg-ftp_1.4.9.deb

But now when I try to run dselect I get a segmentation fault.  This is
perhaps not too surprising, considering that I havn't (to my knowledge) 
upgraded dselect since before making the jump to libc6, whereas the new
dpkg (which mayby is called by exec* or something?) probably uses libc6. 
The next obvious thing to try was upgrading via dpkg to the latest version
of dselect, but I couldn't find it.  Does it go by an odd name or live
somewhere other than the obvious /debian/hamm/hamm/binary-i386/base?
Mayby you need diety with hamm?  Any ideas greatly appreciated.

Britton


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


RE: dselect seg fault after dpkg upgrades

1998-02-05 Thread Fulgham, Brent/SCO
I have been working lately on upgrading to hamm.  In an effort
to fix a
problem with dpkg-ftp, I upgraded to the following packages:

dpkg_1.3.0.20.deb
dpkg-ftp_1.4.9.deb

I think you need to upgrade to dpkg-dev to get a working dselect.

-Brent



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Base14 seg fault (msgId for labeling)

1997-03-07 Thread Donny DaLee, ProSoft
Hello,

I recently started trying to install Debian and have been running into
problems with the base14 1-4 disks.  The disks are read correctly, but when
the files are extracting, I get:

Segmentation fault
Segmentation fault
Segmentation fault

I've downloaded the base14 files again and created new floppies on two
machines with no luck.

I am VERY new to UNIX/Linux and don't much about this type of error, however
I think it has something to do with a corrupt file on the distribution.  I
obtained the Base14 files from ftp.debian.org (current) and downloaded
twice.  The floppies were created on Win95 systems using rawwrite2.exe.

I did get the system up, but man doesn't exist on the system and the only
book I have is Teach yourself UNIX (very beginner).  I says nothing about
installing the system, connecting to the Internet or a LAN; only how to
navigate the directories, manipulate files and use some of the tools I am
vaguely familiar with from experience in setting up Web sites on remote Web
servers (Telnet).

I would assume that the Segmentation fault error indicates that the Base
system has not been completely installed?  Out of frustration, I did
something like gunzip -r /* to uncompress the rest of the files installed
late last night.  This may not have been a good idea, but the system still
functions and I have gotten quite used to running the install.  ; )  Figured
I had nothing to lose!

I have a plethora of additional problems, but here are some good ones to
start with:

Connecting to the local network
(Win95 LAN is running Ethernet TCP/IP and IPX
but I don't know the appropriate IPs for
the 2 Network systems, net mask,) anything else for that matter
Accessing the floppy drive
Accessing the modem in an attempt to reach the debian FTP site
(or the Internet for that matter)
On and on and on...

Any help in any area will be much appreciated.

Thanks.

Donny


  1   2   >