Re: finger causing kernel seg fault
On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 09:12 +, Michael Grant wrote: > I use tmux on my server. tmux creates multiple pttys. When I run > finger, I see an error like this: > > $ finger > finger: /dev//pts/6: No such file or directory > > and in the log, I see: > > /var/log/syslog:Mar 15 05:06:18 strange kernel: [2740248.159942] > finger[1987858]: segfault at 1c ip 55b1c20baad5 sp I had similar problems in my Raspberry Pi running native Debian arm64, I have filed this bug about it: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018879 /ralph
finger causing kernel seg fault
I use tmux on my server. tmux creates multiple pttys. When I run finger, I see an error like this: $ finger finger: /dev//pts/6: No such file or directory and in the log, I see: /var/log/syslog:Mar 15 05:06:18 strange kernel: [2740248.159942] finger[1987858]: segfault at 1c ip 55b1c20baad5 sp 7ffc8878b8b0 error 4 in finger[55b1c20b9000+3000] likely on CPU 1 (core 1, socket 0) /var/log/syslog:Mar 15 05:06:18 strange kernel: [2740248.161979] Code: 7b 20 00 0f 85 cc fe ff ff 31 c0 48 8d 3d 80 18 00 00 e8 7e 0f 00 00 83 7b 08 01 0f 85 d0 fe ff ff 48 8d 7b 18 e8 8b e8 ff ff <8b> 70 1c 85 f6 0f 85 d0 00 00 00 8b 70 08 8b 50 04 85 f6 0f 85 f2 I do not see pts/6 being used: $ w 04:56:14 up 31 days, 17:01, 6 users, load average: 0.68, 0.20, 0.06 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT mgrant pts/01.2.3.4Tue127:53m 0.32s 0.32s -tcsh mgrant pts/11.2.3.403:573.00s 0.03s 0.03s tmux attach mgrant pts/2tmux(1243630).%0 02Mar24 3.00s 0.18s 0.01s w mgrant pts/3tmux(1243630).%1 02Mar24 12days 29.02s 29.02s emacs mgrant pts/4tmux(1243630).%2 04Mar24 32:52m 0.05s 0.05s -bash w reports one more user than there seems to be in the utmp. I didn't close a tmux window but i have disconnected and reconnected several times. If I start enough tmux windows and one happens to end up on the missing pts, the error goes away. I'm not sure if this is a bug in finger, tmux, or something that manages the utmp getting out of sync. Any ideas what to do about this? Michael Grant
Re: seg fault on many applets
Hurray ! Thanks to all Just today morning got the updates on stretch ! things are back to normal now. What a relief ! Thanks all again On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Frank McCormickwrote: > On 08/10/16 12:49 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >> >> Hi all >> Sorry to get back to you all on this again. Its now nearly 4 days. Has >> anybody had success in getting the packages of mate updated ? >> My sources.list is >> deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main >> deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch main >> deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch-backports main >> >> Hopefully I have got things right. I am wondering if others had >> success and I am missing something. >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Frank McCormick >> wrote: >>> >>> On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: Hi all, About mate again. As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of Sept the packages must get fixed. I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary file/folder manager. and many other applets too are crashing. Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ? On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick wrote: > > > On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: >> >> >> >> Thank you Frank >> I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it >> will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring >> some other disastrous consequence. >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: Hi, I am on $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID:Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) Release:testing Codename:stretch Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update) [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000] [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000] Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is causing this SIGSEGV ? I am unable to even use the caja file manager. >>> >>> >>> The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. >>> It >>> was >>> caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of >>> everything >>> are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it >>> may >>> take >>> a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to >>> downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble >>> than it's worth. >>> >>> > > >I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be > updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :) > > >>> >>> I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the >>> packages >>> have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a >>> day or two. >>> > > >The updated packages are in Sid which I am now running. I don't know how > long it will be until they get into Stretch. > > > >
Re: seg fault on many applets
On 08/10/16 12:49 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: Hi all Sorry to get back to you all on this again. Its now nearly 4 days. Has anybody had success in getting the packages of mate updated ? My sources.list is deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch main deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch-backports main Hopefully I have got things right. I am wondering if others had success and I am missing something. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Frank McCormickwrote: On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: Hi all, About mate again. As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of Sept the packages must get fixed. I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary file/folder manager. and many other applets too are crashing. Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ? On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick wrote: On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: Thank you Frank I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring some other disastrous consequence. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick wrote: On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: Hi, I am on $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID:Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) Release:testing Codename:stretch Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update) [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000] [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000] Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is causing this SIGSEGV ? I am unable to even use the caja file manager. The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It was caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of everything are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may take a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble than it's worth. I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :) I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the packages have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a day or two. The updated packages are in Sid which I am now running. I don't know how long it will be until they get into Stretch.
Re: seg fault on many applets
Hi all Sorry to get back to you all on this again. Its now nearly 4 days. Has anybody had success in getting the packages of mate updated ? My sources.list is deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch main deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch-backports main Hopefully I have got things right. I am wondering if others had success and I am missing something. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Frank McCormickwrote: > On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> About mate again. >> As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of >> Sept the packages must get fixed. >> I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary >> file/folder manager. >> and many other applets too are crashing. >> Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ? >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick >> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: Thank you Frank I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring some other disastrous consequence. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick wrote: > > > On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> I am on >> $ lsb_release -a >> No LSB modules are available. >> Distributor ID:Debian >> Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) >> Release:testing >> Codename:stretch >> >> Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update) >> >> >> [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip >> f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in >> libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000] >> [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp >> ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000] >> >> >> Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is >> causing this SIGSEGV ? I am unable to even use the caja file manager. >> > > > The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. > It > was > caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of > everything > are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may > take > a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to > downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble > than it's worth. > > >>> >>> >>>I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be >>> updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :) >>> >>> >> > > I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the packages > have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a > day or two. > > > >
Re: seg fault on many applets
On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: Hi all, About mate again. As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of Sept the packages must get fixed. I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary file/folder manager. and many other applets too are crashing. Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ? On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormickwrote: On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: Thank you Frank I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring some other disastrous consequence. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick wrote: On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: Hi, I am on $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID:Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) Release:testing Codename:stretch Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update) [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000] [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000] Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is causing this SIGSEGV ? I am unable to even use the caja file manager. The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It was caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of everything are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may take a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble than it's worth. I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :) I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the packages have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a day or two.
Re: seg fault on many applets
Hi all, About mate again. As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of Sept the packages must get fixed. I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary file/folder manager. and many other applets too are crashing. Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ? On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormickwrote: > On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: >> >> Thank you Frank >> I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it >> will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring >> some other disastrous consequence. >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick >> wrote: >>> >>> On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: Hi, I am on $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID:Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) Release:testing Codename:stretch Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update) [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000] [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000] Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is causing this SIGSEGV ? I am unable to even use the caja file manager. >>> >>> >>> The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It >>> was >>> caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of >>> everything >>> are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may >>> take >>> a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to >>> downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble >>> than it's worth. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be > updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :) > >
Re: seg fault on many applets
On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: Thank you Frank I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring some other disastrous consequence. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormickwrote: On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: Hi, I am on $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID:Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) Release:testing Codename:stretch Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update) [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000] [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000] Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is causing this SIGSEGV ? I am unable to even use the caja file manager. The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It was caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of everything are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may take a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble than it's worth. I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)
Re: seg fault on many applets
Thank you Frank I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring some other disastrous consequence. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormickwrote: > On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I am on >> $ lsb_release -a >> No LSB modules are available. >> Distributor ID:Debian >> Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) >> Release:testing >> Codename:stretch >> >> Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update) >> >> >> [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip >> f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in >> libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000] >> [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp >> ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000] >> >> >> Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is >> causing this SIGSEGV ? I am unable to even use the caja file manager. >> > > > The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It was > caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of everything > are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may take > a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to > downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble > than it's worth. > > > >
Re: seg fault on many applets
On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: Hi, I am on $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID:Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) Release:testing Codename:stretch Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update) [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000] [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000] Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is causing this SIGSEGV ? I am unable to even use the caja file manager. The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It was caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of everything are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may take a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble than it's worth.
seg fault on many applets
Hi, I am on $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID:Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) Release:testing Codename:stretch Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update) [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000] [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000] Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is causing this SIGSEGV ? I am unable to even use the caja file manager.
Amarok throwing a seg fault in testing
Hi all I've run into a problem with Amarok not starting. When opened on the CL it just reports segmentation fault. I have amarok-debug installed and ran gdb amarok and this is the response: GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-debian Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. snip Reading symbols from /usr/bin/amarok...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/amarok...done. I can't find any documentation what file gdb writes to and this output doesn't tell me anything. There are two potential causes: 1. This morning's testing update 2. Installing the nouveau driver for my nVidia card. Searching on the Net, there is some material from 2008/09 that suggests that Amarok doesn't/ didn't play nicely with non-nVidia drivers. I cannot confirm that however. If the problem is the video driver that's too bad. I like the resolution nouveau gives me, but is there anyway of tweaking it so that Amarok plays nicely too? TIA AG -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d6105c6.6020...@gmail.com
help with seg fault in aptitude and booting xen
This is a recently installed firewalling router/gateway running Lenny. For two or three days it has been running for long periods with no interruptions in connectivity or with booting. p3 500Mhz slot 1 seanix columbia sx mobo i440bx chipset Today it suddenly died in the middle of my web browsing. Didn't think to write down the message on the console (figured it would be in the logs) but it was an end trace message like the one below. When I rebooted with a xen'ified host kernel, the boot dropped to an initramfs prompt after waiting a couple of minutes for the root file system. I booted the non-xen kernel thinking that having only just removed two xen meta packages. When I tried to run ncurses aptitude, the screen was drawn but then stopped with an Ouch! segmentation fault. I was able to reinstall the two metapackages with command line aptitude. Started to surf the web some more and the machine died again with the (by hand, so the spacing, capitalization, etc might be wrong) [3700.929083] EIP: [c017119ad] cache_alloc_refill+0xe5/0x44d ss: ESP 0068:def89dcc [3700.929083] ---[ end trace 794d24/daccc4879f ]--- So I tried rebooting with the xen kernel. As above, the boot process dropped to initramfs command prompt after waiting one or two minutes for the root file system. Anybody understand what the above means? Thanks, willy -- whollyg...@letterboxes.org -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Seg fault
After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed. Where to start looking ?? Cheers Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Seg fault
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:10:08PM -0400, Frank wrote: After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed. Where to start looking ?? have you logged out and back in yet? restarted X yet? maybe even restarted the machine yet? that's where I'd start. A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Seg fault
Frank wrote: After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed. Where to start looking ?? I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root. Cheers Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Seg fault
Frank wrote: Frank wrote: After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed. Where to start looking ?? I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root. FYI: I'm seeing similar problems with Iceweasel. I can run it as root, or I can run it from within Icewm, but I can not run it as normal user from within KDE. -- Kent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Seg fault
please reply to the list instead of to me directly. On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:22:24PM -0400, Frank wrote: Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:10:08PM -0400, Frank wrote: After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed. Where to start looking ?? have you logged out and back in yet? restarted X yet? maybe even restarted the machine yet? Yup. Machine has been restarted - but as I just noted, Sylpheed runs as root, just not as a user. hmmm... permissions issue that causes a segfault? that's ugly. you might look at the last few lines of an strace to see what it's trying to access that cuases the segfault. that's all I got. A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Seg fault
On Sunday 20 July 2008 04:19:09 pm Frank wrote: Frank wrote: After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed. Where to start looking ?? I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root. Cheers Frank Frank, I can't tell if you still have the issue or not, but if you do, open a term and type sylpheed or claws-mail if you are running claws. What does that exit message say? if it only shows segmentation fault, then issue strace sylpheed then look through the last part of strace to see what is killing slypheed. HTH -- Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Seg fault
Damon L. Chesser wrote: On Sunday 20 July 2008 04:19:09 pm Frank wrote: Frank wrote: After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed. Where to start looking ?? I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root. Cheers Frank Frank, I can't tell if you still have the issue or not, but if you do, open a term and type sylpheed or claws-mail if you are running claws. What does that exit message say? if it only shows segmentation fault, then issue strace sylpheed then look through the last part of strace to see what is killing slypheed. HTH strace output: open(/usr/share/icons/DMZ-White/cursors/xterm, O_RDONLY) = 8 fstat64(8, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=15776, ...}) = 0 mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xb6d39000 read(8, Xcur\20\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\3\0\0\0\2\0\375\377\30\0\0\0004\0\0\0\2\0\375\377 ..., 4096) = 4096 _llseek(8, 0, [0], SEEK_SET)= 0 read(8, Xcur\20\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\3\0\0\0\2\0\375\377\30\0\0\0004\0\0\0\2\0\375\377 ..., 4096) = 4096 close(8)= 0 munmap(0xb6d39000, 4096)= 0 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++ Cheers Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Seg fault
Anders Lagerås wrote: On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:20:20 +0200 Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed. Where to start looking ?? Use reportbug to report the bug. Then downgrade libgkt2.0 to 2.12.10-2 that will solve the problem for now. Bug report on it's way What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this. Cheers Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Seg fault
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400 Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anders Lagerås wrote: Bug report on it's way What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this. Using aptitude is the easiest way. If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed. Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad to select it and then g to install. = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be useful. -- Mvh Anders Lagerås pgpjPHwuyoUOo.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Seg fault
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anders Lagerås wrote: | On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400 | Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Anders Lagerås wrote: |Bug report on it's way | |What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this. | Using aptitude is the easiest way. | If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show | up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed. | Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad | to select it and then g to install. | = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be | useful. | ~ Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one. Cheers Frank -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiDuP8ACgkQnQV1aTcQlJuIHACfUzpQYK0pE/XZ2PFiQh6B1Ppf 968AnRIGwtxstwf6rb8YwsThV22NV1co =ImGL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Seg fault
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:15:27 -0400 Frank McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anders Lagerås wrote: | On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400 | Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Anders Lagerås wrote: |Bug report on it's way | |What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this. | Using aptitude is the easiest way. | If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show | up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed. | Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad | to select it and then g to install. | = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be | useful. | ~ Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one. Got around it by dl'ing from lenny repository and installing using dpkg. Seems to work - writing this using Sylpheed. cheers Frank - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiDvJAACgkQnQV1aTcQlJvjfwCfZbZ4dqf1epJfcndzamXhTy+B t8kAoJbwdKyzdcsMVchxfjGxeAAEDjtq =yft1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Seg fault
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:15:27PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: Anders Lagerås wrote: | On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400 | Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Anders Lagerås wrote: |Bug report on it's way | |What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this. | Using aptitude is the easiest way. | If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show | up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed. | Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad | to select it and then g to install. | = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be | useful. | ~ Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one. enable the lenny repos. A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Seg fault
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:15:27 -0400 Frank McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anders Lagerås wrote: | On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400 | Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Anders Lagerås wrote: |Bug report on it's way | |What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do | this. | Using aptitude is the easiest way. | If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description | show up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk | listed. Select the row of the version you want and use + on the | numeric keypad to select it and then g to install. | = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can | also be useful. | ~ Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one. ok that is probably since you have only repositories for one version in /etc/apt/sources.list or maybe by your /etc/apt/preferences settings To be able to downgrade to get around problems like this do I have both stable testing and unstable repositories in sources.list You can also download from here: http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages and use dpkg -i to install. But if you don't have a sources.list with the corresponding repositories can you get problem with dependencies. -- Mvh Anders Lagerås pgpJVjoKb1hYP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: seg fault Firefox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mumia W.. wrote: On 06/24/2008 03:40 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) Not particularly. The choice there was: 1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks. 2) Not distribute Firefox at all. Which would you rather have? Wasn't there another option? 3) Keep the Firefox trademarks and put the browser into non-free. And then Firefox is not part of Debian and cannot be shipped on official Debian CDs or any other media... - -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIYf+1chorMMFUmYwRArfgAKCKqfMFl/vSSYFYeEN8zRow+mI03gCglpM8 pfuw+x6TUaAoR44j8mJ2n1g= =M04m -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: seg fault Firefox
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:27:20PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: On Tuesday 24 June 2008 05:08:23 pm Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the problem is in one of your extensions. Works fine in -safe-mode. I will now uninstall my extensions and add them one by one. Thanks! As this seems to happen pretty often lately (probably due to the upgrade to IW3) I have documented the procedure here. http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#package-iceweasel-crash Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: seg fault Firefox
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 06:44:24 am Andrei Popescu wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:27:20PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: On Tuesday 24 June 2008 05:08:23 pm Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the problem is in one of your extensions. Works fine in -safe-mode. I will now uninstall my extensions and add them one by one. Thanks! As this seems to happen pretty often lately (probably due to the upgrade to IW3) I have documented the procedure here. http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#package-iceweasel-crash Regards, Andrei Andrei, removing the .mozilla dir did the trick. Thanks! -- Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
seg fault Firefox
when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) I get a seg fault. == messages == Jun 24 13:08:03 dam-main kernel: [59583.098628] firefox-bin[3836]: segfault at 7fc9a0d0d21b ip 7fc9a2136160 sp 7fffaad49d70 error 4 in libc-2.7.so[7fc9a20c2000+14a000] and iceweasle opens as I would expect and everything works. I only know about the segfault because I am monitoring messages. Any ideas? -- Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: seg fault Firefox
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) Not particularly. The choice there was: 1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks. 2) Not distribute Firefox at all. Which would you rather have? -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: seg fault Firefox
On 24/06/2008, Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: when ever I run [firesomething] I get a segfault. Strange, I've gotten segfaults too, but it doesn't seem to affect anything. - Jordi G. H. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: seg fault Firefox
Damon L. Chesser wrote: when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) I get a seg fault. == messages == Jun 24 13:08:03 dam-main kernel: [59583.098628] firefox-bin[3836]: segfault at 7fc9a0d0d21b ip 7fc9a2136160 sp 7fffaad49d70 error 4 in libc-2.7.so[7fc9a20c2000+14a000] and iceweasle opens as I would expect and everything works. I only know about the segfault because I am monitoring messages. Any ideas? What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the problem is in one of your extensions. raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: seg fault Firefox
On Tuesday 24 June 2008 05:08:23 pm Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: Damon L. Chesser wrote: when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) I get a seg fault. == messages == Jun 24 13:08:03 dam-main kernel: [59583.098628] firefox-bin[3836]: segfault at 7fc9a0d0d21b ip 7fc9a2136160 sp 7fffaad49d70 error 4 in libc-2.7.so[7fc9a20c2000+14a000] and iceweasle opens as I would expect and everything works. I only know about the segfault because I am monitoring messages. Any ideas? What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the problem is in one of your extensions. raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ Works fine in -safe-mode. I will now uninstall my extensions and add them one by one. Thanks! -- Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: seg fault Firefox
On 06/24/2008 03:40 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) Not particularly. The choice there was: 1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks. 2) Not distribute Firefox at all. Which would you rather have? Wasn't there another option? 3) Keep the Firefox trademarks and put the browser into non-free. After all, wasn't the closed-source Netscape 4.77 once distributed with Debian Potato? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: seg fault Firefox
On 24/06/2008, Mumia W.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 06/24/2008 03:40 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) Not particularly. The choice there was: 1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks. 2) Not distribute Firefox at all. Which would you rather have? Wasn't there another option? 3) Keep the Firefox trademarks and put the browser into non-free. Ugh. I prefer the Iceweasel route. I like having it on the install CDs. By the way, one thing I don't understand is why Ubuntu still uses the Firefox logo and branding, especially regarding Mike Connor's comment that I have actually been asked recently by another distro maintainer whether everyone is on a fair playing field. Right now, it seems to others as if Debian has a special deal, which isn't fair, and it needs to change. regarding why Debian was still using the Firefox name. Now it seems to me that Ubuntu has that special deal. Whenever I ask about, it seems that nobody knows, and makes me think that Shuttleworth must have signed off some secret deal with Mozilla in order to be allowed to keep using the logo and name, even though their Firefox is even more heavily modified than Debian's! Please correct me if I'm wrong about these observations. - Jordi G. H. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mplayer seg fault
Paul Cartwright wrote: $ mplayer Segmentation fault ok, this just started, and I have no idea why. nothing in any logs files I could find, and I did a aptitude mplayer reinstall what next? running Debian lenny Segmentation fault is almost always a bug in that package or one of its dependencies or incompatibility among them. If you are interested in fixing the problem, compile mplayer with debugging symbols enabled and run it via gdb and look at the backtrace. hth raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mplayer seg fault
$ mplayer Segmentation fault ok, this just started, and I have no idea why. nothing in any logs files I could find, and I did a aptitude mplayer reinstall what next? running Debian lenny -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux user # 367800 Registered Ubuntu User #12459 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mplayer seg fault
Hello. Well the same error appeared with my mplayer, after each kernel update. After reboot, it is corrected in some cases, but not in all. So I'm re-compiling mplayer from sources (by the way, in this case I'm getting mencoder also). Sincerely, Wanderlust У сб, 2007-11-24 у 20:06 -0500, Paul Cartwright пише: $ mplayer Segmentation fault ok, this just started, and I have no idea why. nothing in any logs files I could find, and I did a aptitude mplayer reinstall what next? running Debian lenny -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux user # 367800 Registered Ubuntu User #12459 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (SOLVED)seg fault in apt-get after disk filled up
On Saturday 05 August 2006 19:13, David Goodenough wrote: On Saturday 05 August 2006 18:51, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:03:28PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote: I have a small machine that I keep completely up to date. It ran out of disk space in the middle of an update and now every time it tries to you mean completely out of disk space? or just your /var partition? maybe apt-get clean or auto-clean might be in order? There is only one partition, and it ran out of space completely (its only 4GB). apt-get autoclean segfaults just like the rest of apt-get. I have now cleared some space. David A build its dependancy tree it gets to about 50% and then seg faults. It is running package apt 0.6.45. I have copied the old available and status files in /var/lib/dpkg over the current version, and that has not fixed the problem. Short of a reinstall, any idea how to proceed? David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well I found the solution, clear /var/cache/apt/archives and run apt-get update. So it would appear that something in there (and those are all supposed to be text files, not binaries) can cause a seg fault in apt-get while building it dependency tree - not good. Unfortunately as the machine is so small I could not keep the files so I do not have them to submit in a bug report. David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seg fault in apt-get after disk filled up
I have a small machine that I keep completely up to date. It ran out of disk space in the middle of an update and now every time it tries to build its dependancy tree it gets to about 50% and then seg faults. It is running package apt 0.6.45. I have copied the old available and status files in /var/lib/dpkg over the current version, and that has not fixed the problem. Short of a reinstall, any idea how to proceed? David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: seg fault in apt-get after disk filled up
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:03:28PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote: I have a small machine that I keep completely up to date. It ran out of disk space in the middle of an update and now every time it tries to you mean completely out of disk space? or just your /var partition? maybe apt-get clean or auto-clean might be in order? A build its dependancy tree it gets to about 50% and then seg faults. It is running package apt 0.6.45. I have copied the old available and status files in /var/lib/dpkg over the current version, and that has not fixed the problem. Short of a reinstall, any idea how to proceed? David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: seg fault in apt-get after disk filled up
On Saturday 05 August 2006 18:51, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:03:28PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote: I have a small machine that I keep completely up to date. It ran out of disk space in the middle of an update and now every time it tries to you mean completely out of disk space? or just your /var partition? maybe apt-get clean or auto-clean might be in order? There is only one partition, and it ran out of space completely (its only 4GB). apt-get autoclean segfaults just like the rest of apt-get. I have now cleared some space. David A build its dependancy tree it gets to about 50% and then seg faults. It is running package apt 0.6.45. I have copied the old available and status files in /var/lib/dpkg over the current version, and that has not fixed the problem. Short of a reinstall, any idea how to proceed? David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seg Fault bei ps fax
Hallo List, ich habe ein seltsames Phänomen. Seit einiger Zeit schmiert mein Rechner immer wieder ab. Debian /sarge Kernel 2.4.27-2-k7 In den Logs ist nichts zu finden. Das letzte mal war er nur per ping erreichbar aber sonst hat keine Service reagiert.(smtp,http,ftp,pop) Ich bekomme seit neuestem bei `ps fax` ein: PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND Segmentation fault --- ps aux kann ich ohne Probleme ausführen Im exim4/mainlog stand mal was von to many open files, da ist der Rechner aber nicht abgestürzt. laut lsof sind um di 4-6 tausend files immer offen. -scheint mir normal. Ein netstat -at bringt den Rechner auf einen Load von über 200. Firewall ist keine am laufen. Wo kann ich den mit der Fehlersuche beginnen ? danke.luke -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: seg Fault bei ps fax
Gruesse! * Lukas Pataki [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [03.04.05 18:04]: Hallo List, ich habe ein seltsames Phänomen. Seit einiger Zeit schmiert mein Rechner immer wieder ab. Debian /sarge Kernel 2.4.27-2-k7 In den Logs ist nichts zu finden. Das letzte mal war er nur per ping erreichbar aber sonst hat keine Service reagiert.(smtp,http,ftp,pop) Ich bekomme seit neuestem bei `ps fax` ein: PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND Segmentation fault --- ps aux kann ich ohne Probleme ausführen Vielleicht kann du mit strace ps fax sehen, an welcher Stelle und warum er einen segfault hat. Im exim4/mainlog stand mal was von to many open files, da ist der Rechner aber nicht abgestürzt. laut lsof sind um di 4-6 tausend files immer offen. -scheint mir normal. Wenn echo /proc/sys/fs/file-max nicht bedenklich in der Nähe deines Wertes ist sollte das nicht die Ursache sein. Ein netstat -at bringt den Rechner auf einen Load von über 200. Firewall ist keine am laufen. Auch bei netstat -nat, also ohne Namens-Auflösung der IP-Adressen? Ansonsten käme die Load vom DNS. Allerdings ist 200 erheblich hoch für solch einen einfachen Vorgang. Wo kann ich den mit der Fehlersuche beginnen ? Filesystem-Check(s) Wenn dieser Rechner (ohne Firewall) mit dem Internet verbunden ist, kannst du einen Einbruch ausschließen? chkrootkit installieren und ausführen? Ansonsten, wenn der Rechner einfach so stehenbleibt kann es IMHO jede beteiligte Hardware sein: RAM (memtest laufen lassen), IDE-BUS/KABEL/Festplatten, Netzteil,... Evtl. alle nicht benötigte Hardware ausbauen und selektiv testen. danke.luke Gruß Gerhard -- HAL is running Windows...
(fwd) Re: seg Fault bei ps fax [lukas@netskip.net]
Bitte keine Mails an mich privat. Bitte an die Liste antworten. - Forwarded message from Lukas Pataki [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Lukas Pataki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:25:58 +0200 Subject: Re: seg Fault bei ps fax To: Gerhard Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: at kis.te Hi, Vielleicht kann du mit strace ps fax sehen, an welcher Stelle und warum er einen segfault hat. das hatte ich schon durch. z.b. bekomme ich ein segfault (ab) wenn ich bind starte. aber laut strace bleibt es immer bei mysql hängen. .. na ok wenn ich mysql stoppe ist es ok. Im exim4/mainlog stand mal was von to many open files, da ist der Rechner aber nicht abgestürzt. laut lsof sind um di 4-6 tausend files immer offen. -scheint mir normal. Wenn echo /proc/sys/fs/file-max cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max 25388 --sollte passen Auch bei netstat -nat, also ohne Namens-Auflösung der IP-Adressen? Ansonsten käme die Load vom DNS. Allerdings ist 200 erheblich hoch für solch einen einfachen Vorgang. `netstat -na` sh: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable ... nirvana... auch bei gestoppten bind... Load über 300 Filesystem-Check(s) Wenn dieser Rechner (ohne Firewall) mit dem Internet verbunden ist, kannst du einen Einbruch ausschließen? chkrootkit installieren und ausführen? Ansonsten, wenn der Rechner einfach so stehenbleibt kann es IMHO jede beteiligte Hardware sein: RAM (memtest laufen lassen), IDE-BUS/KABEL/Festplatten, Netzteil,... Ram wurde getauscht. laut smart ist alles rellativ Gruß Gerhard danke.luke - End forwarded message - Die sh: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable Meldung deutet auf einen vollen Prozeß-Table hin. Wieviele Prozesse laufen auf dem Rechner? Beim strace: Gibt es auch diese Probleme, wenn du mysql stoppst? Gruß Gerhard -- Der schwarze Ritter ist unbesiegbar...
Re: Postfix lmtp seg fault
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:01:15 -0500, Adi Linden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cannot get postfix to deliver mail via lmtp to cyrus-imap. Here are the relevant configuration chunks I added: cyrus.conf: lmtpcyr cmd=lmtpd listen=/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp prefork=1 I think something is wrong with your config. Have added yourself the line above? I don't recall if the default Debian config is good enough, but i've found this in the cyrus.conf: lmtpunixcmd=lmtpd listen=/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp prefork=0 maxchild=20 master.cf lmtpcyr unix - - n - - lmtp main.cf: mailbox_transport = lmtpcyr:unix:/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp The same for the line above. I think you only need to add a line: mailbox_transport = cyrus but i've looked at Cyrus looong time ago, so i don't recall right now what needs to be modified. I remember that i've had trouble with the config cause postfix runs chrooted, so the access to the sasl.db needs some attention, and something about the quota of the mailboxes... Both cyrus-imap and postfix have access to /var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp. No problem there. In the end I turned on debugging for lmtp in master.cf and added a debug command with gdb in main.cf. This is (a small part) of what I get: -- snip -- Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2 0x40214718 in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) Continuing. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x4005c121 in match_hostaddr () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1 (gdb) #0 0x4005c121 in match_hostaddr () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1 #1 0x4005b78e in match_list_match () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1 #2 0x4002c886 in debug_peer_check () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-global.so.1 #3 0x0804c7bf in ?? () #4 0x0805a515 in ?? () -- snip -- I have no clue as to what is happening. I guess compiling from source is one option if I figure out how to convince apt-get to play nice without MTA package... I'm in a hurry right now, if you want i can check with more calm later today... Andrea -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix lmtp seg fault
I cannot get postfix to deliver mail via lmtp to cyrus-imap. Here are the relevant configuration chunks I added: cyrus.conf: lmtpcyr cmd=lmtpd listen=/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp prefork=1 master.cf lmtpcyr unix - - n - - lmtp main.cf: mailbox_transport = lmtpcyr:unix:/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp Both cyrus-imap and postfix have access to /var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp. No problem there. In the end I turned on debugging for lmtp in master.cf and added a debug command with gdb in main.cf. This is (a small part) of what I get: -- snip -- Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2 0x40214718 in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) Continuing. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x4005c121 in match_hostaddr () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1 (gdb) #0 0x4005c121 in match_hostaddr () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1 #1 0x4005b78e in match_list_match () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-util.so.1 #2 0x4002c886 in debug_peer_check () from /usr/lib/libpostfix-global.so.1 #3 0x0804c7bf in ?? () #4 0x0805a515 in ?? () -- snip -- I have no clue as to what is happening. I guess compiling from source is one option if I figure out how to convince apt-get to play nice without MTA package... Adi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache woes after upgrade - seg fault
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:45:58PM +1030, David Purton wrote: Hi, I'm having all sorts of trouble since upgrading Apache to the latest in testing, yesterday. Using the default settings, it works. As soon as I try and add some VirtualHost directives and start apache, very occasionally it works, but mostly it just fails silently. On further investigation, if I run apache -X, it seg faults almost immediately :( -- David Purton [EMAIL PROTECTED] For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him. 2 Chronicles 16:9a signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Apache woes after upgrade - seg fault
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 07:26:57PM +1030, David Purton wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:45:58PM +1030, David Purton wrote: Hi, I'm having all sorts of trouble since upgrading Apache to the latest in testing, yesterday. Using the default settings, it works. As soon as I try and add some VirtualHost directives and start apache, very occasionally it works, but mostly it just fails silently. On further investigation, if I run apache -X, it seg faults almost immediately :( OK more info - If I take out the php4 module it works. I want php, so leaving it out is not a good solution dc -- David Purton [EMAIL PROTECTED] For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him. 2 Chronicles 16:9a signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: fsck seg. fault Please Help!
Am Montag, 3. November 2003 09:00 schrieb Matt: Bruce Sass wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, matt wrote: hi, the other day my woody machine just kinda stopped working...upon a reboot i learned via beep-codes that the ram had failed. i broke out the shop-vac and cleaned it out and it started to boot...here's where the troubble began... Unable to andle kernel paging request at virtual address blabla hex I've seen this message (or something very similar) when I had a bad stick of RAM... did you replace your RAM or just vacuum the dust off? this did cross my mind...there is one stick that i've had problems with on and off since i bought it in 1999. i cleaned it and put it back in. i thought it may have been a problem with fsck b/c i thought seg faults happened when a program tried to access memory owned by another user. i'll run fsck with only one stick in there at a time and hopefuly it will work. Just try to proof your RAM with free memtest86, download under: http://www.memtest86.com Bye, Werner -- Werner Scharinger Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter der soft hard Computerservice GmbH * Am Erlenbach 8 * 94032 Passau Tel. +49 851 33025 * Fax. +49 851 31725 * www.shcs.de Fördermitglied der Wirtschaftsjunioren Passau Mitglied der Strategiekommission der Wirtschaftsjunioren Deutschland c/o IHK für Niederbayern in Passau * Nibelungenstr. 15 * 94032 Passau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fsck seg. fault Please Help!
Bruce Sass wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, matt wrote: hi, the other day my woody machine just kinda stopped working...upon a reboot i learned via beep-codes that the ram had failed. i broke out the shop-vac and cleaned it out and it started to boot...here's where the troubble began... ... Unable to andle kernel paging request at virtual address blabla hex I've seen this message (or something very similar) when I had a bad stick of RAM... did you replace your RAM or just vacuum the dust off? this did cross my mind...there is one stick that i've had problems with on and off since i bought it in 1999. i cleaned it and put it back in. i thought it may have been a problem with fsck b/c i thought seg faults happened when a program tried to access memory owned by another user. i'll run fsck with only one stick in there at a time and hopefuly it will work. ... but seriously, what other utils can i use instead of fsck to repair the drive? There is a low level tool (can't remember the name and a quick search through packages.debian.org didn't find it, may also only be in unstable or testing) but you'd need to know the structure of the fs at the bits level to use it. If fsck is able to recover a block (or sequence of blocks) but doesn't know where they belong it will place them in lost+found (each partition has one) -- you then need to manually look at the data, figure out what it is, and cp it to where it should be... not fun, and really only worth it for stuff you can't just download again or configure up. what kind of memory requirements does fsck have? i hope it will be able to check a 10gig drive with all these errors with only 32mb of ram+130mb swap. -matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fsck seg. fault Please Help!
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, matt wrote: hi, the other day my woody machine just kinda stopped working...upon a reboot i learned via beep-codes that the ram had failed. i broke out the shop-vac and cleaned it out and it started to boot...here's where the troubble began... ... Unable to andle kernel paging request at virtual address blabla hex I've seen this message (or something very similar) when I had a bad stick of RAM... did you replace your RAM or just vacuum the dust off? ... but seriously, what other utils can i use instead of fsck to repair the drive? There is a low level tool (can't remember the name and a quick search through packages.debian.org didn't find it, may also only be in unstable or testing) but you'd need to know the structure of the fs at the bits level to use it. If fsck is able to recover a block (or sequence of blocks) but doesn't know where they belong it will place them in lost+found (each partition has one) -- you then need to manually look at the data, figure out what it is, and cp it to where it should be... not fun, and really only worth it for stuff you can't just download again or configure up. - Bruce -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fsck seg. fault Please Help!
hi, the other day my woody machine just kinda stopped working...upon a reboot i learned via beep-codes that the ram had failed. i broke out the shop-vac and cleaned it out and it started to boot...here's where the troubble began... none of the rc scripts ran, and many other problems (couldn't login due to pam libs not loaded, etc.) i booted to a potato, and later tried woody rescue disks. running fsck -p /dev/sda2 tells me to run manually.did that and there were thousands of problems that were repaired, but then fsck caused a segmentation fault! here's some of the output... cleared a few illegal blocks Unable to andle kernel paging request at virtual address blabla hex current-tss.cr3 = 08d18000, %cr3 = 08d18000 if you want all the stack dumps etc, let me know Code: 8b 12 39 78 04 75 f3 39 68 08 75 ee 66 39 70 0c 75 e8 89 c2 Segmentation fault HELP ME! i need to recover my home directory! i've learned my lesson and promise to make use of my tape drive from now on to backup! but seriously, what other utils can i use instead of fsck to repair the drive? when i mount the partition, i can ls / fine, but ls /home/matt lists one directory, then reports .:input/output error thanks, -matt -- matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Real Producer seg fault in unstable
Hi all, I have an odd issuer since upgrading to unstable. I DJ on a radio station that has a Real Networks server (worse luck!), hence I use Real / Helix Producer to broadcast my show. However, it is now segfaulting: antgel $ producer -ac /dev/dsp0 -o /tmp/tmp.rm Helix(TM) Producer Basic 9.0.1 from RealNetworks(R). Build number: 9.0.1.250 Initializing Errors: 0 Warnings: 0Segmentation fault It used to work like a dream and is especially odd as I haven't upgraded my kernel or modules. The emu10k1 module is loaded and happy. Whilst I'm not expecting anyone here to have tried this software, I'd like to know if anyone has any ideas for debugging something like this. If anyone is really feeling helpful, the binary can be downloaded from: http://forms.real.com/rnforms/products/tools/producerbasic/ :) A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
threads seg fault
Bonjour, Je viens de télécharger les sources de firestarter et de dia (les dernières versions sous gtk2. La compilation se passe sans problème, mais lors de l'exécution j'ai droit à un segmentation fault (aussi bien pour dia que pour firestarter). Avec gdb j'ai droit à (pour les deux progs) : [New Thread 1024 (LWP 22884)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 22884)] 0x409b4a41 in __errno_location () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 J'ai googlé sur le sujet et j'ai effectivement trouvé quelques threads (c'est le cas de le dire ;), sur le sujet mais rien de tres probant. Il semblerait qu'il y ai un rapport avec la glibc-2.2.5. J'ai installé les GNU pthreads, est ce que le problème peut venir de là? J'avoue que je suis un peu perdu, donc si quelqu'un s'est déjà retrouvé avec ce problème... Merci d'avance, Mathias. PS : j'utilise une woody -- This e-mail is written 100 percent Microsoft free. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg
Le mer 25/12/2002 à 02:28, Didier Conchaudron a écrit : Salut à tous, Salut, Depuis que j'ai installé une woody/testing dpkg me fait des seg fault en permanence. Cela intervient pendant des mises à jour avec apt-get: Voici le message que cela me donne: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)? Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées? La dernière fois que j'ai eu ça, c'était une barette de 128 Mo qui était rapée. un petit coup de memtest86 (paquet hwtools avec le readme à lire pour faire une disquette de boot spéciale) pour être sur. Merci d'avance. Bon courage Didier Émile -- Avant de choisir le prénom d'un garçon, pensez toujours à la femme qui aura a le murmurer plus tard. Barbey D'Aurevilly
Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg
Le mercredi 25 décembre 2002, Didier Conchaudron a écrit... bonjour, E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)? Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées? Utiliser strace et gdb pour voir où ça plante ? -- jean-michel
Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg
Le mer 25 déc 2002, à 02 h 28 min 46 s (UTC +0100), Didier Conchaudron a écrit : Depuis que j'ai installé une woody/testing dpkg me fait des seg fault en permanence. Cela intervient pendant des mises à jour avec apt-get: Voici le message que cela me donne: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)? Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées? Tiens ? Hier j'ai fait l'installation indiquée sur MAINTENANCE FACILE ETSÉCURISÉED'UNSYSTÈMEDEBIAN GNU/LINUXAVECAPT (http://free2.org/d/) et quand j'ai fait apt-get install shorewall ça m'a donné le même message (segmentation fault)...Alors j'ai abandonné. Si cela peut aider... ph -- Depuis que j'utilise les logiciels libres suis scotché à mon écran =:P
Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 02:28:46 +0100 Didier Conchaudron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)? Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées? Deux solutions : un problème avec une barrette de RAM, ou le processeur qui fait des siennes. Pour le premier, tu peux tester avec memtest86, et pour le second, il faut changer de processeur... -- Lucas Moulin [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wish I had a shilling for every senseless killing, I'd buy a government -- NOFX pgpFxT96UOfqm.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg
Je suis en train de réaliser le test de la mémoire avec memtest86 qui, ma foi, n'a l'air pas mal du tout ;-) J'ai eu une nouvelle erreur ce matin: ça ressemble à un dump des registres du processeur, ce qui me fait craindre un problème hard avec mon cpu... Et là je me dis qu'il chauffe peut etre un peu trop: 64 degrés au démarrage pour un Duron 800 ça me parait beaucoup...Est-ce que mes seg fault pourraient venir de là? Didier - Original Message - From: CARRY émile [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 9:48 AM Subject: Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg Le mer 25/12/2002 à 02:28, Didier Conchaudron a écrit : Salut à tous, Salut, Depuis que j'ai installé une woody/testing dpkg me fait des seg fault en permanence. Cela intervient pendant des mises à jour avec apt-get: Voici le message que cela me donne: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)? Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées? La dernière fois que j'ai eu ça, c'était une barette de 128 Mo qui était rapée. un petit coup de memtest86 (paquet hwtools avec le readme à lire pour faire une disquette de boot spéciale) pour être sur. Merci d'avance. Bon courage Didier Émile -- Avant de choisir le prénom d'un garçon, pensez toujours à la femme qui aura a le murmurer plus tard. Barbey D'Aurevilly -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 12:44:42PM +0100, Didier Conchaudron wrote: Je suis en train de réaliser le test de la mémoire avec memtest86 qui, ma foi, n'a l'air pas mal du tout ;-) J'ai eu une nouvelle erreur ce matin: ça ressemble à un dump des registres du processeur, ce qui me fait craindre un problème hard avec mon cpu... Tu veux dire un Ooops du noyeau ? C'est exactement le genre de truc, avec les segfaults intempestives, qui arrive : - Si ta RAM est moisie - Si ton proce chauffe trop (attention overclock) Tu peux essayer de ralentir la RAM dans le BIOS, ou de ralentir ton proce, et voire ce que ca donne (le probleme etant que tu ne saura pas tout de suite si ca va mieux... Il faut voire a la longue si tu as encore des histoire dans ce genre ou si ca disparait completement.) Et là je me dis qu'il chauffe peut etre un peu trop: 64 degrés au démarrage pour un Duron 800 ça me parait beaucoup...Est-ce que mes seg fault pourraient venir de là? on dirait que oui... -- Jeremie Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seg fault intempestive avec dpkg
Salut à tous, Depuis que j'ai installé une woody/testing dpkg me fait des seg fault en permanence. Cela intervient pendant des mises à jour avec apt-get: Voici le message que cela me donne: E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)? Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées? Merci d'avance. Didier
tetex-bin upgrade fails due to seg fault
Hi all, I tried a dist-upgrade earlier, and the upgrade of tetex-bin fails: Setting up tetex-bin (1.0.7+20011202-5) ... mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R... mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R... /usr/bin/mktexlsr: line 122: 6874 Segmentation fault \ls -LRa 2/dev/null mktexlsr: Updating /var/spool/texmf/ls-R... mktexlsr: Done. Running initex. This may take some time. ... dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: tetex-bin E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Also, if I run initex, following error appears: ! I can't read tex.pool; bad path? Is this a known problem? Thanks, -- Frederik Vanrenterghem |You will attract cultured and artistic [EMAIL PROTECTED] |people to your home. GPG Fingerprint: | 966B 0E4B 25C1 CC04 E2CB | 8D4C 117F 6469 8925 BDE0 |
Re: update-mozilla-chrome seg fault
Hi Greg! On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, Greg Madden wrote: I have a woody box with KDE from Sid . When trying to install Mozilla from Woody I get the following message: updating mozilla chrome registry /usr/bin/update-mozilla-chrome: line 49: 14658 segmentation fault regxpcom /dev/null 2/dev/null had the same problem when upgrading from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8. what worked for me was the following: 1. get the mozilla-* debs you want to install 2. dpkg --unpack mozilla-debs 3. edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-*.postinst and comment the update-mozilla-chrome line 4. dpkg dpkg --configure -a 5. manually run /usr/bin/update-mozilla-chrome the funny thing is that when i run manually the update-mozilla-chrome script it did not segfault yours martin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- NO HTML MAILS PLEASE PGP/GPG encrypted and signed messages preferred pgpDrvGAZh6mK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: update-mozilla-chrome seg fault
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 06 March 2002 12:43 am, Martin Wuertele wrote: Hi Greg! On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, Greg Madden wrote: I have a woody box with KDE from Sid . When trying to install Mozilla from Woody I get the following message: updating mozilla chrome registry /usr/bin/update-mozilla-chrome: line 49: 14658 segmentation fault regxpcom /dev/null 2/dev/null had the same problem when upgrading from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8. what worked for me was the following: 1. get the mozilla-* debs you want to install 2. dpkg --unpack mozilla-debs 3. edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-*.postinst and comment the update-mozilla-chrome line 4. dpkg dpkg --configure -a 5. manually run /usr/bin/update-mozilla-chrome the funny thing is that when i run manually the update-mozilla-chrome script it did not segfault yours martin Thanks, I had tried that, except for manually running update-mozilla-chrome. I thought my problems may have ben caused by mixing some apps from Sid, anyway Mozilla installed without intervention last night but Galeon seg faults. I just want to run Galeon :) - -- Greg C. Madden Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjyGafkACgkQaefA3q8KcpD57gCfZk6IfnLUxH7gK8c7t7Csf8w9 cuYAoJku2lDvX8fjyYs38r00UPByjLhF =RivZ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
update-mozilla-chrome seg fault
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have a woody box with KDE from Sid . When trying to install Mozilla from Woody I get the following message: updating mozilla chrome registry /usr/bin/update-mozilla-chrome: line 49: 14658 segmentation fault regxpcom /dev/null 2/dev/null any help appreciated TIA - -- Greg C. Madden Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjyFOy4ACgkQaefA3q8KcpAwxwCfZRicSOSciQV9IOVKG2DKjjbQ h6YAoIuxsv4LgZYU2ucIDKX7DbHg+zyj =cZRb -END PGP SIGNATURE-
apt-get seg fault
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 here's the results of a recent install request. any pointers most welcome. # apt-get install mozilla Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libnspr4 The following NEW packages will be installed: libnspr4 mozilla 0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 12 not upgraded. 1 packages not fully installed or removed. Need to get 9068kB of archives. After unpacking 26.4MB will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org woody/main libnspr4 M18-3 [127kB] Get:2 http://http.us.debian.org woody/main mozilla M18-3 [8941kB] Fetched 9068kB in 56s (162kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package libnspr4. (Reading database ... 73543 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libnspr4 (from .../libnspr4_M18-3_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package mozilla. E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault. - -- ) ,_) (-(__ -|- __ ) | (/_\/(/_ ( ___ | mailto : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | linux : http://exitwound.org | | mozart : http://mozart.sourceforge.net| | buck : http://www.BuckOwensFan.com | ___ | Sin boldly. -- Martin Luther| ___ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7Ao5zr9c0KwefYXMRAr66AJ4k4l62etiBYme416gbf+5f9m90IACcCxB2 AyzAhLOgLJIFEkeQdhx5zc8= =SRWc -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: apt-get seg fault
Stephen E. Hargrove [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: here's the results of a recent install request. any pointers most welcome. [...] Selecting previously deselected package libnspr4. (Reading database ... 73543 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libnspr4 (from .../libnspr4_M18-3_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package mozilla. E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault. What version of dpkg are you running? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Win4Lin seg fault
i've downloaded win4lin v2.2 and performed the following: # alien --to-deb win4lin.rpm # dpkg -i win4lin.deb # /opt/win4lin/postinst_rpm.sh # su # winsetup the set up window appears, i click on systemwide setup (or anything) and win4lin seg faults. i've set this up on other debian (woody) installations, and i seem to remember seeing something about this situation before, but i can't recall when/where/what the solution was. any direction/information would be appreciated. thanks! -- ) ,_) (-(__ -|- __ ) | (/_\/(/_ ( ___ | mailto : [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | linux : http://exitwound.org | | mozart : http://mozart.sourceforge.net| | buck : http://www.BuckOwensFan.com | ___ | the sixth sense: | | i am dead, but i must still go to work| ___
2.1 - 2.2 apt-get dist-upgrade issue... SEG FAULT
I have a slink box running on kernel 2.2.17, and I have updated my /etc/apt/sources.list to point to potato 2.2 tree. I have ran apt-get update. Now if I run apt-get dist-upgrade, or anything else apt-get related other then update... it seg faults. Anyone care to explain what is happening?
Seg fault in xawtv with webcam3 USB
Hi, folks! I think I've solved the problem with /dev/video device for the webcam3 USB camera. Now I have another problem: everytime I run xawtv it gives a segmentation fault. I have another camera, a webcam 2 parallel, and it works very fine. I've checked the modules for the USB one and they seem correct, so I think it could be a problem related with some X configuration. Below it follows the result: cartman:~# xawtv This is xawtv-3.06, running on Linux/i586 (2.3.99-pre6) visual: id=0x22 class=3 (PseudoColor), depth=8 visual: id=0x23 class=5 (DirectColor), depth=8 visual: id=0x24 class=1 (GrayScale), depth=8 visual: id=0x25 class=2 (StaticColor), depth=8 visual: id=0x26 class=4 (TrueColor), depth=8 visual: id=0x27 class=0 (StaticGray), depth=8 switching visual (0x27) x11: 1280x1024, 8 bit/pixel, 1280 byte/scanline, DGA, VidMode /dev/video: no overlay support waitpid: No child processes v4l-conf had some trouble, trying to continue anyway /dev/video: no overlay support waitpid: No child processes v4l-conf had some trouble, trying to continue anyway v4l: 0x0, 0 bit/pixel, 0 byte/scanline WARNING: v4l and dga disagree about the screen size WARNING: Is v4l-conf installed correctly? WARNING: v4l and dga disagree about the color depth WARNING: Is v4l-conf installed correctly? 8 0 WARNING: v4l and dga disagree about the framebuffer base WARNING: Is v4l-conf installed correctly? ov_fbuf.base=(nil), base=0xff00 WARNING: overlay mode disabled wmhooks: gnome Warning: Cannot convert string -*-ledfixed-medium-r-semicondensed--39-* to type FontStruct shmget: Invalid argument Segmentation fault The questions are: -With the webcam2 I don't get the /dev/video: no overlay support message. What does this message mean? -Does this have something to do with the monitor resolution or X configuration? Any help will be very appreciated. Thanks in advance! -- Ivan J. Varzinczak - http://www.inf.ufpr.br/~ivan Scholarship holder - Boursier - (PET/CAPES) Informatics Department - Département d'Informatique Federal University of Paraná - Université Fédérale du Paraná Curitiba - Paraná - Brazil/Brésil 11-V-2000 -- Ivan J. Varzinczak - http://www.inf.ufpr.br/~ivan Scholarship holder - Boursier - (PET/CAPES) Informatics Department - Département d'Informatique Federal University of Paraná - Université Fédérale du Paraná Curitiba - Paraná - Brazil/Brésil 11-V-2000
Re: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault
Have you tried moving your orignial ~/.mozilla folder. It may have config settings that the new version of mozilla doesnt like... Johnny Bryan K. Walton wrote: Hi everyone, This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14! BUT WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start. When I run it, this is what I get from the shell startup: $ mozilla Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End ProfileManager : GetProfileDir ProfileManager : GetProfileDir Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End Segmentation fault --Any ideas? Thanks, Bryan Walton -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null begin:vcard n:Stevenson;John x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:Valtech Ltd adr:;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Technical Consultant / Trainer x-mozilla-cpt:;0 fn:John Stevenson end:vcard
Re: Solved - New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault
Hi, since I read the mailinglist this morning with the high-speed option 'd' and the mailing list archive isn't updated yet, I don't know if it has allready been reported. Anyway, the preoblem described below got solved on my woody box by a simple rm -r ~/.mozilla Martin On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Martin Fluch wrote: I have the exact same problem on my woody box, too. Martin On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Bryan K. Walton wrote: Hi everyone, This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14! BUT WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start. When I run it, this is what I get from the shell startup: $ mozilla Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End ProfileManager : GetProfileDir ProfileManager : GetProfileDir Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End Segmentation fault -- Win2k: It's not so much that it's only 65,000 bugs, it's just that they stopped at 65,535 to prevent an overflow. For public PGP-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault
Hi everyone, This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14! BUT WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start. When I run it, this is what I get from the shell startup: $ mozilla Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End ProfileManager : GetProfileDir ProfileManager : GetProfileDir Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End Segmentation fault --Any ideas? Thanks, Bryan Walton
Re: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault
I have the exact same problem on my woody box, too. Martin On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Bryan K. Walton wrote: Hi everyone, This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14! BUT WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start. When I run it, this is what I get from the shell startup: $ mozilla Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End ProfileManager : GetProfileDir ProfileManager : GetProfileDir Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End Segmentation fault -- Win2k: It's not so much that it's only 65,000 bugs, it's just that they stopped at 65,535 to prevent an overflow. For public PGP-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault
On 9 Mar 2000, Bryan K. Walton wrote: Date: 9 Mar 2000 14:20:12 - To: Debian-User Mailing List debian-user@lists.debian.org From: Bryan K. Walton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault Hi everyone, This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14! BUT WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start. When I run it, this is what I get from the shell startup: $ mozilla Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End ProfileManager : GetProfileDir ProfileManager : GetProfileDir Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End Segmentation fault --Any ideas? Thanks, Bryan Walton I had the same problem, you have to create a symbolic link called icons to /usr/lib/mozilla/icons in your $HOME/.mozilla, like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.mozilla$ ls -l icons lrwxrwxrwx1 evo evo22 mar 5 23:14 icons - /usr/lib/mozilla/icons Ciao, Davide
Re: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault
Hi everyone, This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14! BUT WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start. When I run it, this is what I get from the shell startup: Try doing an rm -r of your ~/.mozilla directory. I had the same problem and it worked for me. Jon
Re: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault
Thanks to all who offered up suggestions for fixing the seg fault with Mozilla M14. The first email I got suggested creating the sym link, and that fixed the problem. Thanks! Bryan *** Bryan K. Walton Network Operations Center Analyst Berbee 5520 Research Park Drive Madison, Wisconsin 53711 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 608.288.3000 Berbee...putting the E in business On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Davide wrote: On 9 Mar 2000, Bryan K. Walton wrote: Date: 9 Mar 2000 14:20:12 - To: Debian-User Mailing List debian-user@lists.debian.org From: Bryan K. Walton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New Mozilla (M14-1) causes seg fault Hi everyone, This morning I performed my daily distribution upgrade on frozen, and to my delight, my Mozilla was upgraded from M13 to M14! BUT WAIT! . . . I can't get Mozilla to start. When I run it, this is what I get from the shell startup: $ mozilla Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End ProfileManager : GetProfileDir ProfileManager : GetProfileDir Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : End Segmentation fault --Any ideas? Thanks, Bryan Walton I had the same problem, you have to create a symbolic link called icons to /usr/lib/mozilla/icons in your $HOME/.mozilla, like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.mozilla$ ls -l icons lrwxrwxrwx1 evo evo22 mar 5 23:14 icons - /usr/lib/mozilla/icons Ciao, Davide
Re: seg fault
With my current installation of Corel Linux, I am getting more segmentation faults, and they are with programs that did not have this problem with my previous install (Adobe Acrobat, for one). I don't see segmentation in the indices of the Running Linux or Learning Debian/GNU Linux books. This usually means that the program expects library versions that are not binary compatible with what you have. Check the system requirements for the programs. If you have access to the source code, a simple recompilation should do the trick. Otherwise install an older version of whatever library is needed. Andrew -- Don't let your sanity stand in your way Andrew Chung -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://anderoo.dhs.org/~anderoo/
base-passwd seg fault
Hello again I`ve nearly managed to upgrade cleanly from Slink/2.0.36 to Potato/2.2.13 with only problems of my own making except for one last thing, dselect won`t complete the installation of base-passwd. This is what it tells me: Okay, I am going to make the necessary updates now Reading passwd from /usr/share/base-passwd/passwd.master Reading group from /usr/share/base-passwd/group.master Reading passwd from /etc/passwd Reading shadow from /etc/shadow Reading group from /etc/group Adding group video (44) 1 changes have been made, rewriting files Writing passwd-file to /etc/passwd.upwd-write Replacing /etc/passwd with /etc/passwd.upwd-write Writing shadow-file to /etc/shadow.upwd-write Replacing /etc/shadow with /etc/shadow.upwd-write Writing group-file to /etc/group.upwd-write /var/lib/dpkg/info/base-passwd.postinst: line 57: 1554 Segmentation fault update-passwd --verbose dpkg: error processing base-passwd (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139 Errors were encountered while processing: base-passwd installation script returned error exit status 100. Can anyone shed any light on this? Running the update-passwd command just returns a segmentation fault. Thanks again Paul -- Paul Walton * Powered by * Cambridge* Debian GNU Linux * U.K. * http://www.debian.org * * PGP Public Key: http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu/ * pgpYQnI2ibteg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: base-passwd seg fault
Bug Tracking is your friend... :) See: http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=51577 Summary: Fixed in 3.1.5 which (I assume) is pending being moved into the main archive. Ciao! -- I have never let my schooling interfere with my education. -- Mark Twain The Doctor What: fill in the blank http://docwhat.gerf.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED](finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP key) KF6VNC
[off-topic] setrlimit()/C++ new() seg fault
Hi, I've been experimenting with limiting the amount of memory available to a process by setting its data segment resource limit from within the process by using setrlimit(). I've been testing if this technique would work by attempting to allocate more memory on the heap than the limit set in setrlimit() call. Unfortunately, I get a seg fault in the standard C++ library (gcc 2.95.2 on a potato box). I'm not very familiar with the behavior of setrlimit() so please let me know if I'm doing something silly. Here is the test program: // - #include sys/time.h #include sys/resource.h #include unistd.h #include cstdio #include cerrno #include new #include iostream int main (int, char *[]) { struct rlimit r; r.rlim_cur = 1000; r.rlim_max = 1; if (::setrlimit (RLIMIT_DATA, r) != 0) ::perror (setrlimit); int *b = 0; try { b = new int[5L]; delete [] b; } catch (std::bad_alloc) { std::cout caught bad_alloc exception endl; return 0; // Success } std::cerr Allocated more than what should be available. endl; return 1; // Failure } // - Here is back trace from the core dump: #0 0x4003e7f1 in exception::what () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 #1 0x4003e937 in exception::what () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 #2 0x4003e9b5 in exception::what () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 #3 0x4003f14c in __frame_state_for () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 #4 0x4003da98 in __throw () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 #5 0x4003f4fd in __builtin_new () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 #6 0x4003f66f in __builtin_vec_new () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 #7 0x80489af in main () #8 0x400937a2 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 Any ideas? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. -Ossama -- Ossama Othman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Center for Distributed Object Computing, Washington University, St. Louis 58 60 1A E8 7A 66 F4 44 74 9F 3C D4 EF BF 35 88 1024/8A04D15D 1998/08/26
Wordperfect 8 seg fault
Any ideas why Wordperfect 8 seg faults immediately on start-up?
Wordperfect 8 seg fault
Thanks for your reply - I've been thinking along those lines - I actually installed libc5 quite early on. Am I right in thinking if ldd xwp shows all the libaries can be found then that is not the problem? I understood that as long as the library path is listed in /etc/ld.so.conf then the library should be locatable at run time and presumably by the ldd command. However ldd could not find the libraries, nor could they be found at run time unless I put the path in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable. I am quite new to this as you may have gathered.
Re: Wordperfect 8 seg fault
ldd may show all the libraries but there may be conflicts.. hard to explain cuz i hardly understand myself, but i will say that my wordperfect8 was broken for several months(as was realvideo player and other libc5 apps) because of misconfiguration of libc5, eventually i started playing with it, and got it working..now the only libc5 app i cant get running is xview. sorry i cant help u more! nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By:http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMPhttp://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- On Mon, 1 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your reply - I've been thinking along those lines - I actually installed libc5 quite early on. Am I right in thinking if ldd xwp shows all the libaries can be found then that is not the problem? I understood that as long as the library path is listed in /etc/ld.so.conf then the library should be locatable at run time and presumably by the ldd command. However ldd could not find the libraries, nor could they be found at run time unless I put the path in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable. I am quite new to this as you may have gathered.
Re: Wordperfect 8 seg fault
you need xpm***-altdev, I generally just install everything with xpm in the name on a debian box that's going to have wp8. --dave On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, aphro wrote: i had that problem and it was due to libc5 libs being either not installed or misconfigured (my /etc/ld.so.conf was all screwed up) .. check to make sure the libc5 and xlib6 packages are installed. nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By:http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMPhttp://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- On Mon, 1 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any ideas why Wordperfect 8 seg faults immediately on start-up? -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null
Enlightenment Seg Fault
Problem: Enlightenment seg faults with the sound turned on. It plays the intro sound, and then crashes if I hit a button. Gnome sounds work as well as CD sound if I use Enlightement-without-sound. Any ideas? I have a Crystal CS4236 on-board sound chip compiled into the kernel. Thanks. Kelly C
Re: Enlightenment Seg Fault
I have the same problem, but only when enlightenment sound is turned on. the problem started when I upgraded to the latest potato packages. Kelly Corbin wrote: I recently set up a potato machine and had enlightement working. Then I installed sound in my kernel and turned it on in enlightenment. Now, every time I fire it up, it seg faults and exits. Sound is working correctly; I can use it with gnome and quake. I also un-installed and re-installed enlightenment to no avail. Any ideas? Thanks. Kelly Corbin -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null
Enlightenment Seg Fault
I recently set up a potato machine and had enlightement working. Then I installed sound in my kernel and turned it on in enlightenment. Now, every time I fire it up, it seg faults and exits. Sound is working correctly; I can use it with gnome and quake. I also un-installed and re-installed enlightenment to no avail. Any ideas? Thanks. Kelly Corbin
Re: matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 libc.so.5 ?)
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Mathworks tech support has been unable to help get matlab 5.3 running on my Debian system. I was wondering if anybody else has got it working and perhaps would know how to fix my problem. Hi, I haven't undated my 5.2 to 5.3, but I got 5.2 working after some mucking about. My problem was that I had created some symlinks in /usr/lib, which was causing the problem. I eventually found the problem by stepping though the script which calls matlab, because it actually changes some of the library linking stuff. Walk through the lines of that file until you come to the place where you start /usr/local/matlab/bin/lnx86/matlab and do the ldd there. Then check the links of all the libraries mentioned there. Check that every library used has been installed by a proper debian package if you suspect you made the same mistake I did. Robert. Robert King, Australian Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Australia 3875 6677 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ens.gu.edu.au/robertk/ This library is open one hour each fortnight. No book shall leave these premises. We have sworn it with an oath! -- Library of King Ashurbanipal, Babylon, ca. 3000 BC.
Re: matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 libc.so.5 ?)
Aaron See if you can get the libdl, libXt, libX11, libXpm, libSM, libICE and ld-linux libs that MATHWORKS compiled the MATLAB binary against and stick them in one of the Matlab 5.3 directories, probably /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86, listed below in your ldd output. The libs that it is currently pulling in are compiled against libc6 and that is why it is pulling in libc6 as well. Ask them to stick all the required libs on there ftp site somewhere(as I am sure others will have the problem as well), they currently have all the libs for 5.2 at ftp://ftp.mathworks.com/pub/tech-support/outgoing/linux/matlab5. This is what I have for my copy of 5.2: !ldd /usr/local/matlab5/bin/lnx86/matlab libXpm.so.4 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libXpm.so.4 (0x4000b000) libXt.so.6 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libXt.so.6 (0x40019000) libXext.so.6 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libXext.so.6 (0x4005b000) libX11.so.6 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libX11.so.6 (0x40064000) libtermcap.so.2 = /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x400e1000) libdl.so.1 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libdl.so.1 (0x400e5000) libg++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libg++.so.27 (0x400e8000) libstdc++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libstdc++.so.27 (0x40120 000) libm.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libm.so.5 (0x40152000) libc.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libc.so.5 (0x4015b000) libSM.so.6 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libSM.so.6 (0x40217000) libICE.so.6 = /usr/local/matlab5/sys/lnx86/libICE.so.6 (0x4022) Notice that all libs(except termcap) are in my matlab tree. -- Brian - Never criticize anybody until you have walked a mile in their shoes, because by that time you will be a mile away and have their shoes. - unknown Mechanical Engineering[EMAIL PROTECTED] Purdue University http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis - *- On 14 Apr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 libc.so.5 ?) Hi all, Mathworks tech support has been unable to help get matlab 5.3 running on my Debian system. I was wondering if anybody else has got it working and perhaps would know how to fix my problem. When I start matlab is says, Segmentation fault BTW, the license manager appears to be up and running. Here is an env variable that was used to find all the needed libs. LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/X11R6/lib/:/usr/local/matlab5.3/extern/lib/lnx86:/usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/:/usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86 I suspect matlab is confused since it is finding libc.so.6, as well as libc.so.5 . Mathworks says they don't support libc6. If this is the problem how would I, just for matlab ;-), hide the fact that libc6 is on my system? How does it find /lib/libc.so.6 when it doesn't want it? Commercial products linked against old libs are frustrating... thank you for any help, aaron Dear Aaron: I am writing in response to your email on April 12, 1999 regarding MATLAB installation. Thank you for sending me your information, there are a couple of things that I noticed whcih may be causing the problem. First, it seems as though /lib is missing from the Library path. You can add this to the path with the following command: setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /lib/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH This is what I see for shared library linking. ldd /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/matlab libut.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/extern/lib/lnx86/libut.so (0x4000b000) libmwhardcopy.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhardcopy.so (0x4002b000) libmwhg.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhg.so (0x4004f000) libmwsimulink.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwsimulink.so (0x40149000) libmwgui.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwgui.so (0x404ae000) libmwnumerics.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwnumerics.so (0x40545000) libmwmpath.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwmpath.so (0x405b3000) libmwuix.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwuix.so (0x405c2000) libmwcompiler.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwcompiler.so (0x40854000) libmatlbmx.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmatlbmx.so (0x408fa000) libdl.so.1 = /lib/libdl.so.1 (0x40959000) libg++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libg++.so.27 (0x4095c000) libstdc++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libstdc++.so.27 (0x4099) libm.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libm.so.5 (0x409bf000) - libc.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libc.so.5 (0x409c8000) libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
Re: matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 libc.so.5 ?)
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Mathworks tech support has been unable to help get matlab 5.3 running on my Debian system. I was wondering if anybody else has got it working and perhaps would know how to fix my problem. When I start matlab is says, Segmentation fault ... This is what I see for shared library linking. ldd /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/matlab libut.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/extern/lib/lnx86/libut.so (0x4000b000) libmwhardcopy.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhardcopy.so (0x4002b000) libmwhg.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhg.so (0x4004f000) libmwsimulink.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwsimulink.so (0x40149000) libmwgui.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwgui.so (0x404ae000) libmwnumerics.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwnumerics.so (0x40545000) libmwmpath.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwmpath.so (0x405b3000) libmwuix.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwuix.so (0x405c2000) libmwcompiler.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwcompiler.so (0x40854000) libmatlbmx.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmatlbmx.so (0x408fa000) libdl.so.1 = /lib/libdl.so.1 (0x40959000) libg++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libg++.so.27 (0x4095c000) libstdc++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libstdc++.so.27 (0x4099) libm.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libm.so.5 (0x409bf000) - libc.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libc.so.5 (0x409c8000) libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40a84000) libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40ac7000) libXpm.so.4 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x40b5f000) libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x40b6d000) libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x40b75000) - libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40b89000) ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40c2e000) it seems you haven't got the libc5-compatible X11-related libraries installed... have a look at the packages in the 'oldlibs' section, I think 'xlib6' and 'xpm' are the ones you need. BTW, is there a FAQ entry on this topic somewhere? Just about every Debian user can face this problem when trying to run libc5-based applications... Andras
matlab 5.3 seg fault (can it use both libc.so.6 libc.so.5 ?)
Hi all, Mathworks tech support has been unable to help get matlab 5.3 running on my Debian system. I was wondering if anybody else has got it working and perhaps would know how to fix my problem. When I start matlab is says, Segmentation fault BTW, the license manager appears to be up and running. Here is an env variable that was used to find all the needed libs. LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/X11R6/lib/:/usr/local/matlab5.3/extern/lib/lnx86:/usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/:/usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86 I suspect matlab is confused since it is finding libc.so.6, as well as libc.so.5 . Mathworks says they don't support libc6. If this is the problem how would I, just for matlab ;-), hide the fact that libc6 is on my system? How does it find /lib/libc.so.6 when it doesn't want it? Commercial products linked against old libs are frustrating... thank you for any help, aaron Dear Aaron: I am writing in response to your email on April 12, 1999 regarding MATLAB installation. Thank you for sending me your information, there are a couple of things that I noticed whcih may be causing the problem. First, it seems as though /lib is missing from the Library path. You can add this to the path with the following command: setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /lib/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH This is what I see for shared library linking. ldd /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/matlab libut.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/extern/lib/lnx86/libut.so (0x4000b000) libmwhardcopy.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhardcopy.so (0x4002b000) libmwhg.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwhg.so (0x4004f000) libmwsimulink.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwsimulink.so (0x40149000) libmwgui.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwgui.so (0x404ae000) libmwnumerics.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwnumerics.so (0x40545000) libmwmpath.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwmpath.so (0x405b3000) libmwuix.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwuix.so (0x405c2000) libmwcompiler.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmwcompiler.so (0x40854000) libmatlbmx.so = /usr/local/matlab5.3/bin/lnx86/libmatlbmx.so (0x408fa000) libdl.so.1 = /lib/libdl.so.1 (0x40959000) libg++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libg++.so.27 (0x4095c000) libstdc++.so.27 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libstdc++.so.27 (0x4099) libm.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libm.so.5 (0x409bf000) - libc.so.5 = /usr/local/matlab5.3/sys/os/lnx86/libc.so.5 (0x409c8000) libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40a84000) libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40ac7000) libXpm.so.4 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x40b5f000) libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x40b6d000) libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x40b75000) - libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40b89000) ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40c2e000) I also noticed that the version of libc.so that you are using is version 6. Unfortunately, this version is not supported. We are using revision 5. matlab appears to find both libc.so.5 and libc.so.6 . If it should not use libc.so.6 how do convice matlab not to see it?
RE: Telnet and dselect seg fault
Hi Patrick! Thanks for email for my problem :) But for now, I have an other problem, and an other question! My problem is located when I try to execute grasp (an small c editting tool) I have some strange error like this can't found some lib. After these error messages I've done this to check for the dep: $ldd grasp libXt.so.6 = not found libX11.so.6 = not found libXext.so.6 = not found libm.so.5 = /lib/libm.so.5 (0x4000b000) libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x40014000) and after I've listed all the database of ldconfig with ldconfig -p i.e.: the file with -- are the one that ldd is saying that they aren't here... #ldconfig -p 178 libs found in cache `/etc/ld.so.cache' (version 1.7.0) --libX11.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 --libX11.so.6 (libc4) = /usr/X11R6/lib/i486-linuxaout/libX11.so.6 libX11.so.3 (libc4) = /usr/X11R5/lib/libX11.so.3 libX11.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so libXtst.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXtst.so.6 libXtst.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXtst.so --libXt.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 libXt.so.6 (libc4) = /usr/X11R6/lib/i486-linuxaout/libXt.so.6 libXt.so.3 (libc4) = /usr/X11R5/lib/libXt.so.3 libXt.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so libXpm.so.4 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 libXp.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 libXp.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so libXmu.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 libXmu.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so libXm.so.1 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.1 libXm.so.0 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.0 libXi.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 libXi.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so --libXext.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 libXext.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so libXaw3d.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw3d.so.6 libXaw3d.so (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw3d.so libXaw.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw3d/libXaw.so.6 libXaw.so.6 (libc6) = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw.so.6 ... (many more) -- So, i realy don't know why the executable don't run because all the dependencies are there. On Fri, 9 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le 03-Oct-98, David Boisvert a pris ses électrons pour écrire:: Hello! ... So, that's the problem, dselect and telnet crash and and don't know why. So, if someone have this problem with or without a solution, mail me. I had once a similar problem after some hard disk corruption, that some apps were just dumping core (Seg Fault) How i resolved the problem: 1)ulimit -c unlimited 2)run the apps, seg fault = core file present in directory 3)gdb nameofapp core 4)found where the apps has seg fault'd i've seen then that all my apps where failing when using the same library (libnss_dns) so i just copied back that library from install disks, a little ldconfig and then everything was running again !!! Try doing so to find if there is a common point of failure for all your apps. Patrick
RE: Telnet and dselect seg fault
Le 03-Oct-98, David Boisvert a pris ses électrons pour écrire:: Hello! ... So, that's the problem, dselect and telnet crash and and don't know why. So, if someone have this problem with or without a solution, mail me. I had once a similar problem after some hard disk corruption, that some apps were just dumping core (Seg Fault) How i resolved the problem: 1)ulimit -c unlimited 2)run the apps, seg fault = core file present in directory 3)gdb nameofapp core 4)found where the apps has seg fault'd i've seen then that all my apps where failing when using the same library (libnss_dns) so i just copied back that library from install disks, a little ldconfig and then everything was running again !!! Try doing so to find if there is a common point of failure for all your apps. Patrick
Telnet and dselect seg fault
Hello! I have a little problem with telnet and dselect. I'm not new with Linux. I've my own network of 4 x86 with slackware running on it and one P100 with debian running on it. This is the 2nd time I've installed debian gnu linux on my P100 box. The first time, everything was ok in the 2 first week, but the week after the 2nd week telnet and dselect start to core dump. I think that's not the fault of linux but the fault of the hardware, but I'm not sure of that. I've maid some check to verify if the shared library were ok : $ ldd /usr/bin/telnet == /usr/bin/telnet: libncurses.so.3.4 = /lib/libncurses.so.3.4 (0x4000e000) libstdc++.so.2.8 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.8 (0x40053000) libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x40098000) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400b3000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) And everythings look ok. $ ldd /usr/bin/dselect libdpkg.so.0 = /usr/lib/libdpkg.so.0 (0x4000c000) libncurses.so.3.4 = /lib/libncurses.so.3.4 (0x40023000) libstdc++.so.2.8 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.8 (0x40068000) libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x400af000) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400c8000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) So, that's the problem, dselect and telnet crash and and don't know why. So, if someone have this problem with or without a solution, mail me.
dselect seg fault after dpkg upgrades
I have been working lately on upgrading to hamm. In an effort to fix a problem with dpkg-ftp, I upgraded to the following packages: dpkg_1.3.0.20.deb dpkg-ftp_1.4.9.deb But now when I try to run dselect I get a segmentation fault. This is perhaps not too surprising, considering that I havn't (to my knowledge) upgraded dselect since before making the jump to libc6, whereas the new dpkg (which mayby is called by exec* or something?) probably uses libc6. The next obvious thing to try was upgrading via dpkg to the latest version of dselect, but I couldn't find it. Does it go by an odd name or live somewhere other than the obvious /debian/hamm/hamm/binary-i386/base? Mayby you need diety with hamm? Any ideas greatly appreciated. Britton -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
RE: dselect seg fault after dpkg upgrades
I have been working lately on upgrading to hamm. In an effort to fix a problem with dpkg-ftp, I upgraded to the following packages: dpkg_1.3.0.20.deb dpkg-ftp_1.4.9.deb I think you need to upgrade to dpkg-dev to get a working dselect. -Brent -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Base14 seg fault (msgId for labeling)
Hello, I recently started trying to install Debian and have been running into problems with the base14 1-4 disks. The disks are read correctly, but when the files are extracting, I get: Segmentation fault Segmentation fault Segmentation fault I've downloaded the base14 files again and created new floppies on two machines with no luck. I am VERY new to UNIX/Linux and don't much about this type of error, however I think it has something to do with a corrupt file on the distribution. I obtained the Base14 files from ftp.debian.org (current) and downloaded twice. The floppies were created on Win95 systems using rawwrite2.exe. I did get the system up, but man doesn't exist on the system and the only book I have is Teach yourself UNIX (very beginner). I says nothing about installing the system, connecting to the Internet or a LAN; only how to navigate the directories, manipulate files and use some of the tools I am vaguely familiar with from experience in setting up Web sites on remote Web servers (Telnet). I would assume that the Segmentation fault error indicates that the Base system has not been completely installed? Out of frustration, I did something like gunzip -r /* to uncompress the rest of the files installed late last night. This may not have been a good idea, but the system still functions and I have gotten quite used to running the install. ; ) Figured I had nothing to lose! I have a plethora of additional problems, but here are some good ones to start with: Connecting to the local network (Win95 LAN is running Ethernet TCP/IP and IPX but I don't know the appropriate IPs for the 2 Network systems, net mask,) anything else for that matter Accessing the floppy drive Accessing the modem in an attempt to reach the debian FTP site (or the Internet for that matter) On and on and on... Any help in any area will be much appreciated. Thanks. Donny