Re: Staroffice 3.1 core-dumps.

1998-01-22 Thread Raja R Harinath
Scott Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Neilen Marais wrote:
   I installed Staroffice 3.1 using the debian installer .deb's  All
   seemed to have gone fine, but when I run setup to do the per-user
  setup
   bit, it coredumps... Also if I run swriter3, or any of the other
   binaries, it also tries to run the setup bit, which core-dumps of
   course, and then complains about the user setup not being done.
   
   Running a Hamm system that is about a week old since the last
  update.
  
  Quick hack to make it work
  
  rename /usr/X11R6/lib to /usr/X11R6/libx
  run the staroffice setup
  rename /usr/X11R6/libx to /usr/X11R6/lib
  
  Would there be anything wrong with just making a symbolic link?  And
  leaveing it there (in case there are any other hair-brained apps
  looking for a funny lib
 
 The problem is that the setup program is finding the xlib6g libs there,
 which causes it a problem since it needs the regular xlib6 libs.  Renaming
 the directory moves the xlib6g stuff completely out of ld.so's path.  This
 will, of course, break running new X stuff until the directory is put
 back, but it allows the setup program to find the correct libraries in
 /usr/lib/libc5-compat

This looks like the same growing pains problems that we had 3-4 months
ago with X11 in hamm.  Wasn't there a perl script that you could run on
binaries to scratch out the /usr/X11R6/lib directory from the `rpath'?

If that works, maybe the debian installer package could do something
similar.

- Hari
-- 
Raja R Harinath -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When all else fails, read the instructions.  -- Cahn's Axiom
Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing.   -- Roy L Ash


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Staroffice 3.1 core-dumps.

1998-01-22 Thread Scott Ellis
On 21 Jan 1998, Raja R Harinath wrote:

 Scott Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  The problem is that the setup program is finding the xlib6g libs there,
  which causes it a problem since it needs the regular xlib6 libs.  Renaming
  the directory moves the xlib6g stuff completely out of ld.so's path.  This
  will, of course, break running new X stuff until the directory is put
  back, but it allows the setup program to find the correct libraries in
  /usr/lib/libc5-compat
 
 This looks like the same growing pains problems that we had 3-4 months
 ago with X11 in hamm.  Wasn't there a perl script that you could run on
 binaries to scratch out the /usr/X11R6/lib directory from the `rpath'?
 
 If that works, maybe the debian installer package could do something
 similar.

I attempted to run the patch on setup and it didn't work.  I wasn't
feeling ambitious enough to figure out why though, since my hack worked
well enough.

-- 
Scott K. Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gate.net/~storm/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Staroffice 3.1 core-dumps.

1998-01-16 Thread Neilen Marais


  Running a Hamm system that is about a week old since the last
 update.
 
 Quick hack to make it work
 
 rename /usr/X11R6/lib to /usr/X11R6/libx
 run the staroffice setup
 rename /usr/X11R6/libx to /usr/X11R6/lib
 
 Would there be anything wrong with just making a symbolic link?  And
 leaveing it there (in case there are any other hair-brained apps
 looking for a funny lib

The problem is that the setup program is finding the xlib6g libs
there,
which causes it a problem since it needs the regular xlib6 libs. 
Renaming
the directory moves the xlib6g stuff completely out of ld.so's path. 
This
will, of course, break running new X stuff until the directory is put
back, but it allows the setup program to find the correct libraries in
/usr/lib/libc5-compat

I see... So is there no permanent solution to the problem allowing
libc5 dependant stuff like the setup program to find the right libs? 
And out of curiosity. why don't the actual apps (swriter for example)
not have this problem?


Cheers
Neilen

--
E-Mail: Neilen Marais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 16-Jan-98
Time: 21:45:16

This message was sent by XFMail
--


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Staroffice 3.1 core-dumps.

1998-01-15 Thread Martin Schulze
On Wed, Jan 14, 1998 at 09:27:28PM +0200, Neilen Marais wrote:
 Hi
 
 I installed Staroffice 3.1 using the debian installer .deb's  All
 seemed to have gone fine, but when I run setup to do the per-user setup
 bit, it coredumps... Also if I run swriter3, or any of the other
 binaries, it also tries to run the setup bit, which core-dumps of
 course, and then complains about the user setup not being done.

This is what Scott Ellis wrote about it:

   The setup script is being confused by your xlib6g (the rest of the
   staroffice stuff works).  A hack to get it to work is to rename
   /usr/XllR6/lib to /usr/X11R6/libx, run the setup util, then rename the
   directory back.

Regards

Joey

-- 
  / Martin Schulze  *  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  *  26129 Oldenburg /
 /  No question is too silly to ask, /
/but, of course, some are too silly to answer  -- perl book /


pgpM35cLIePNf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Staroffice 3.1 core-dumps.

1998-01-15 Thread Neilen Marais
 Hi
 
 I installed Staroffice 3.1 using the debian installer .deb's  All
 seemed to have gone fine, but when I run setup to do the per-user
setup
 bit, it coredumps... Also if I run swriter3, or any of the other
 binaries, it also tries to run the setup bit, which core-dumps of
 course, and then complains about the user setup not being done.
 
 Running a Hamm system that is about a week old since the last
update.

Quick hack to make it work

rename /usr/X11R6/lib to /usr/X11R6/libx
run the staroffice setup
rename /usr/X11R6/libx to /usr/X11R6/lib

Would there be anything wrong with just making a symbolic link?  And
leaveing it there (in case there are any other hair-brained apps
looking for a funny lib

To answer myself, no, a link don't work, only re-naming.

Anyway, thanks for the quick, correct answer :)


-- 
Scott K. Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gate.net/~storm/


Cheers
Neilen
--
E-Mail: Neilen Marais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 15-Jan-98
Time: 02:07:55

This message was sent by XFMail
--


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Staroffice 3.1 core-dumps.

1998-01-15 Thread Scott Ellis
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Neilen Marais wrote:

  Hi
  
  I installed Staroffice 3.1 using the debian installer .deb's  All
  seemed to have gone fine, but when I run setup to do the per-user
 setup
  bit, it coredumps... Also if I run swriter3, or any of the other
  binaries, it also tries to run the setup bit, which core-dumps of
  course, and then complains about the user setup not being done.
  
  Running a Hamm system that is about a week old since the last
 update.
 
 Quick hack to make it work
 
 rename /usr/X11R6/lib to /usr/X11R6/libx
 run the staroffice setup
 rename /usr/X11R6/libx to /usr/X11R6/lib
 
 Would there be anything wrong with just making a symbolic link?  And
 leaveing it there (in case there are any other hair-brained apps
 looking for a funny lib

The problem is that the setup program is finding the xlib6g libs there,
which causes it a problem since it needs the regular xlib6 libs.  Renaming
the directory moves the xlib6g stuff completely out of ld.so's path.  This
will, of course, break running new X stuff until the directory is put
back, but it allows the setup program to find the correct libraries in
/usr/lib/libc5-compat


-- 
Scott K. Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gate.net/~storm/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Staroffice 3.1 core-dumps.

1998-01-14 Thread Neilen Marais
Hi

I installed Staroffice 3.1 using the debian installer .deb's  All
seemed to have gone fine, but when I run setup to do the per-user setup
bit, it coredumps... Also if I run swriter3, or any of the other
binaries, it also tries to run the setup bit, which core-dumps of
course, and then complains about the user setup not being done.

Running a Hamm system that is about a week old since the last update.

P.S.  I am still having problems with my perl, if anyone remembers my
previous messages on the topic... I'd really appreciate some input...

Cheers
Neilen
--
E-Mail: Neilen Marais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 14-Jan-98
Time: 21:27:28

This message was sent by XFMail
--


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Staroffice 3.1 core-dumps.

1998-01-14 Thread Scott Ellis
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Neilen Marais wrote:

 Hi
 
 I installed Staroffice 3.1 using the debian installer .deb's  All
 seemed to have gone fine, but when I run setup to do the per-user setup
 bit, it coredumps... Also if I run swriter3, or any of the other
 binaries, it also tries to run the setup bit, which core-dumps of
 course, and then complains about the user setup not being done.
 
 Running a Hamm system that is about a week old since the last update.

Quick hack to make it work

rename /usr/X11R6/lib to /usr/X11R6/libx
run the staroffice setup
rename /usr/X11R6/libx to /usr/X11R6/lib

-- 
Scott K. Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gate.net/~storm/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .