Re: GPG error: http://approx wheezy/updates Release
debian-user: It's working today: 2015-02-01 08:43:44 root@cd2533 ~ # apt-get update Hit http://approx wheezy Release.gpg Get:1 http://approx wheezy/updates Release.gpg [836 B] Hit http://approx wheezy Release Get:2 http://approx wheezy/updates Release [102 kB] Hit http://approx wheezy/main Translation-en Get:3 http://approx wheezy/updates/main Translation-en [137 kB] Hit http://approx wheezy/main Sources Hit http://approx wheezy/main amd64 Packages Get:4 http://approx wheezy/updates/main Sources [202 kB] Get:5 http://approx wheezy/updates/main amd64 Packages [299 kB] Fetched 740 kB in 9s (74.4 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54ce5988.2040...@holgerdanske.com
Re: GPG error: http://approx wheezy/updates Release
David Christensen wrote: I seem to be having trouble getting security updates. Is this a problem with my client system, my Approx server, the Release file on the Debian servers, or something else? ... W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://approx wheezy/updates Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 8B48AD6246925553 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (7.0/wheezy) ftpmas...@debian.org I saw random problems from my machines last night. I think one of the mirrors became out of sync. security http://security.debian.org/debian-security $ host security.debian.org security.debian.org has address 149.20.20.6 security.debian.org has address 128.101.240.212 security.debian.org has address 128.61.240.73 security.debian.org has address 128.31.0.36 security.debian.org has IPv6 address 2607:ea00:101:3c0b:207:e9ff:fe00:e595 security.debian.org has IPv6 address 2610:148:1f10:3::73 security.debian.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:8:36::6 I think at least one of those mirrors was out of sync last night. Which one? No idea. The signature error protects against chicanery but apt doesn't know it could rotate to another mirror. I didn't see the problem this morning while running a couple of the failing systems manually. Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature
GPG error: http://approx wheezy/updates Release
debian-user: I seem to be having trouble getting security updates. Is this a problem with my client system, my Approx server, the Release file on the Debian servers, or something else? David 2015-01-31 22:44:57 root@cd2533 ~ # apt-get update Hit http://approx wheezy Release.gpg Get:1 http://approx wheezy/updates Release.gpg [836 B] Hit http://approx wheezy Release Get:2 http://approx wheezy/updates Release [102 kB] Err http://approx wheezy/updates Release Hit http://approx wheezy/main Translation-en Hit http://approx wheezy/main Sources Hit http://approx wheezy/main amd64 Packages Fetched 103 kB in 3s (26.3 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://approx wheezy/updates Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 8B48AD6246925553 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (7.0/wheezy) ftpmas...@debian.org W: Failed to fetch http://approx:/security/dists/wheezy/updates/Release W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. 2015-01-31 22:48:34 root@cd2533 ~ # cat /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://approx:/debian/ wheezy main deb-src http://approx:/debian/ wheezy main deb http://approx:/security/ wheezy/updates main deb-src http://approx:/security/ wheezy/updates main 2015-01-31 22:50:15 root@cd2533 ~ # cat /etc/approx/approx.conf | egrep '^[a-z]' debian http://ftp.debian.org/debian securityhttp://security.debian.org/debian-security -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54cdcf00.70...@holgerdanske.com
Re: Signature invalides sur http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates ; pourquoi ?
Le Tue, 6 May 2014 17:23:36 +0200 kaliderus kalide...@gmail.com a écrit: Bonjour, Aujourd'hui, update du système : - résultat, 2 fois ceci : W: Une erreur s'est produite lors du contrôle de la signature. Le dépôt n'est pas mis à jour et les fichiers d'index précédents seront utilisés. Erreur de GPG : http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release : Les signatures suivantes ne sont pas valables : BADSIG 8B48AD6246925553 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (7.0/wheezy) ftpmas...@debian.org De mémoire je n'ai pas vu passer d'annonces sur une mise à jour des clés, j'ai loupé quelque chose ou bien ? C'est du à la faille SSL récente ? Dois-je faire une mise à jour manuelle des clés ou m'inquiéter ? Merci bien par avance. k. Je ne sais pas si c'est lié mais j'ai ça depuis 2 jours sur une de mes 2 machines : W: Impossible de récupérer ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/experimental/main/source/SourcesIndex Somme de contrôle de hachage incohérente W: Impossible de récupérer ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-amd64/PackagesIndex Somme de contrôle de hachage incohérente W: Impossible de récupérer ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-i386/PackagesIndex Somme de contrôle de hachage incohérente W: Impossible de récupérer ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/source/SourcesIndex Somme de contrôle de hachage incohérente Gaëtan -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140507160043.eb7576c6e49b9f3596941...@neuf.fr
Re: Signature invalides sur http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates ; pourquoi ?
Le mercredi 7 mai 2014, 16:00:43 Gaëtan PERRIER a écrit : […] Je ne sais pas si c'est lié mais j'ai ça depuis 2 jours sur une de mes 2 machines : W: Impossible de récupérer ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/experimental/main/source/ SourcesIndex Somme de contrôle de hachage incohérente W: Impossible de récupérer ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/experimental/main/binary- amd64/PackagesIndex Somme de contrôle de hachage incohérente W: Impossible de récupérer ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/experimental/main/binary- i386/PackagesIndex Somme de contrôle de hachage incohérente W: Impossible de récupérer ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/source/SourcesIn dex Somme de contrôle de hachage incohérente Une lecture instructive : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624122 En résumé : — parfois, c’est le miroir (p.ex. mise à jour en cours / non atomique) ; — parfois, c’est un proxy trop zélé mis en place par le FAI (qui sert des vieux fichiers) ; — parfois, c’est une erreur de transmission ; — parfois, c’est un bogue de APT (le dernier cité dans le rapport : erreur avec la décompression des .xz). Étant donné que ça dépend de pas mal de paramètres non reproductibles (phase de la lune…), ça n’est pas facilement débogable. Plusieurs contournements sont proposés dans le rapport de bogue, pas forcément logiques ni efficaces… -- Sylvain Sauvage -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1556961.zNr8zz0lH1@earendil
Re: Signature invalides sur http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates ; pourquoi ?
Hello again, Le 7 mai 2014 16:35, Sylvain L. Sauvage sylvain.l.sauv...@free.fr a écrit : Une lecture instructive : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624122 Ok vu. La phase de la lune aura eu raison du bousin, c'est parti comme c'est arrivé, va comprendre... Le sujet est clos merci et bon week end. k. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caprkk3bvuzt4oiecs06fuoruae3ip1hg4brn4r9pmjhq94z...@mail.gmail.com
Signature invalides sur http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates ; pourquoi ?
Bonjour, Aujourd'hui, update du système : - résultat, 2 fois ceci : W: Une erreur s'est produite lors du contrôle de la signature. Le dépôt n'est pas mis à jour et les fichiers d'index précédents seront utilisés. Erreur de GPG : http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release : Les signatures suivantes ne sont pas valables : BADSIG 8B48AD6246925553 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (7.0/wheezy) ftpmas...@debian.org De mémoire je n'ai pas vu passer d'annonces sur une mise à jour des clés, j'ai loupé quelque chose ou bien ? C'est du à la faille SSL récente ? Dois-je faire une mise à jour manuelle des clés ou m'inquiéter ? Merci bien par avance. k. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAPrKK3CfmxODe8=NpsXZLzST3=u4dWpFoApiU=vku7pkapv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Signature invalides sur http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates ; pourquoi ?
Bonjour, Le 06/05/2014 17:23, kaliderus a écrit : Bonjour, Aujourd'hui, update du système : - résultat, 2 fois ceci : W: Une erreur s'est produite lors du contrôle de la signature. Le dépôt n'est pas mis à jour et les fichiers d'index précédents seront utilisés. Erreur de GPG : http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release : Les signatures suivantes ne sont pas valables : BADSIG 8B48AD6246925553 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (7.0/wheezy) ftpmas...@debian.org De mémoire je n'ai pas vu passer d'annonces sur une mise à jour des clés, j'ai loupé quelque chose ou bien ? C'est du à la faille SSL récente ? Dois-je faire une mise à jour manuelle des clés ou m'inquiéter ? J'ai eu le cas deux fois aujourd'hui sur des squeeze pour ma part : Ce que j'ai fait : apt-get install debian-archive-keyring puis de nouveau un apt-get update Je ne l'ai plus entendu couiner ;). @+ Christophe. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53692302.5050...@stuxnet.org
Re: Signature invalides sur http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates ; pourquoi ?
Re, Sans conviction, j'ai testé en réinstallant debian-archive-keyring, ça change rien :-( Le 6 mai 2014 19:59, Christophe t...@stuxnet.org a écrit : Bonjour, Le 06/05/2014 17:23, kaliderus a écrit : Bonjour, Aujourd'hui, update du système : - résultat, 2 fois ceci : W: Une erreur s'est produite lors du contrôle de la signature. Le dépôt n'est pas mis à jour et les fichiers d'index précédents seront utilisés. Erreur de GPG : http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release : Les signatures suivantes ne sont pas valables : BADSIG 8B48AD6246925553 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (7.0/wheezy) ftpmas...@debian.org De mémoire je n'ai pas vu passer d'annonces sur une mise à jour des clés, j'ai loupé quelque chose ou bien ? C'est du à la faille SSL récente ? Dois-je faire une mise à jour manuelle des clés ou m'inquiéter ? J'ai eu le cas deux fois aujourd'hui sur des squeeze pour ma part : Ce que j'ai fait : apt-get install debian-archive-keyring puis de nouveau un apt-get update Je ne l'ai plus entendu couiner ;). @+ Christophe. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53692302.5050...@stuxnet.org -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En cas de soucis, contactez EN ANGLAIS listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAPrKK3BOQ38FWhZB2b9gOmu9g_6q=N4u0wd7a9f6_=enlqa...@mail.gmail.com
Re: wheezy updates
On 03/20/2013 06:22 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: Verde Denim wrote: I have a long list of updates today for Wheezy. I was wondering - since I am using Oracle Java on this particular machine, would it interfere with this config to install the updates to OpenJDK and IcedTea? (I'm wondering if the current config using Oracle Java would get overwritten)... You are asking a question that probably only you know. It depends upon where you installed Oracle Java. For example, anything that you install in /usr/local is always yours and safe from any system upgrade. In my opinion I would never smash over system files with locally installed files because of just this reason. (But people do it all of the time anyway.) Where did you install your local installation of Oracle Java? Did you install it in /usr/local? Did you install it in /home? If so then you are safe. /usr/local is always safe. Bob Thanks, Bob. Oracle Java is currently installed in /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle (runtime). I'm actually looking for the jdk but don't see it, so perhaps this isn't installed as of yet. I'm still setting up Eclipse and some other development pieces, so I'll likely install the jdk at some point in the next day or so. I'll keep the final install location in mind. Would these updates affect the runtime since they are installed in /usr/lib? (In looking at /usr/bin/java, it is linked to /etc/alternatives/java, which is linked to the oracle-7 directory noted here). Thanks -- Regards Jack Boston Tea Party, Coercive Acts, Powder Alarm, Revolution Lessons not learned are bound to be repeated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/514b404e.2040...@gmail.com
Re: wheezy updates
Verde Denim wrote: Thanks, Bob. Oracle Java is currently installed in /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle (runtime). How did you install it? Was it installed as a 'deb' file? Or was it simply copied into place? The reason to know if it were installed as a 'deb' file or not is because the files are in /usr/lib/jvm which is owned by the system. If it is installed as a deb then the system will know this and the files handled properly. But if the files were copied into place outside of the package management system then it also won't know to preserve them them. If it does not know about them then it might overwrite one without knowing it. If it is installed as a deb then the package management system will prevent this. I must ask this question because whenever people appear asking about nonfree programs almost invariably it turns out that they simply copied the files into place. Why? Because they are nonfree. If it were free(dom) software then it is almost always available packaged for Debian and can simply be installed. But nonfree(dom) software can't be and therefore it is always the nonfree(dom) software that people take shortcuts with and get into problems. Sigh. I should have just asked. Why are you using Oracle Java? Wouldn't it be better to use OpenJDK? Then all of these problems disappear. I'm actually looking for the jdk but don't see it, so perhaps this isn't installed as of yet. I'm still setting up Eclipse and some other development pieces, so I'll likely install the jdk at some point in the next day or so. I'll keep the final install location in mind. Okay. Would these updates affect the runtime since they are installed in /usr/lib? (In looking at /usr/bin/java, it is linked to /etc/alternatives/java, which is linked to the oracle-7 directory noted here). If the alternatives point to Oracle Java then I think it likely that it was packaged properly and installed that way. What does the alternatives say? Here is an example from my machine. $ update-alternatives --display java java - auto mode link currently points to /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java - priority 1051 slave java.1.gz: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/man/man1/java.1.gz Current 'best' version is '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java'. Some time ago I posted this in a discussion about the Debian alternatives and it includes a walkthrough of how alternatives are used and configured. I think it is still relevant as a description of how the Debian alternatives work for you on a system. http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/08/msg02808.html Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: wheezy updates
On 03/21/2013 04:39 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: Verde Denim wrote: Thanks, Bob. Oracle Java is currently installed in /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle (runtime). How did you install it? Was it installed as a 'deb' file? Or was it simply copied into place? The reason to know if it were installed as a 'deb' file or not is because the files are in /usr/lib/jvm which is owned by the system. If it is installed as a deb then the system will know this and the files handled properly. But if the files were copied into place outside of the package management system then it also won't know to preserve them them. If it does not know about them then it might overwrite one without knowing it. If it is installed as a deb then the package management system will prevent this. I must ask this question because whenever people appear asking about nonfree programs almost invariably it turns out that they simply copied the files into place. Why? Because they are nonfree. If it were free(dom) software then it is almost always available packaged for Debian and can simply be installed. But nonfree(dom) software can't be and therefore it is always the nonfree(dom) software that people take shortcuts with and get into problems. Sigh. I should have just asked. Why are you using Oracle Java? Wouldn't it be better to use OpenJDK? Then all of these problems disappear. I'm actually looking for the jdk but don't see it, so perhaps this isn't installed as of yet. I'm still setting up Eclipse and some other development pieces, so I'll likely install the jdk at some point in the next day or so. I'll keep the final install location in mind. Okay. Would these updates affect the runtime since they are installed in /usr/lib? (In looking at /usr/bin/java, it is linked to /etc/alternatives/java, which is linked to the oracle-7 directory noted here). If the alternatives point to Oracle Java then I think it likely that it was packaged properly and installed that way. What does the alternatives say? Here is an example from my machine. $ update-alternatives --display java java - auto mode link currently points to /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java - priority 1051 slave java.1.gz: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/man/man1/java.1.gz Current 'best' version is '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java'. Some time ago I posted this in a discussion about the Debian alternatives and it includes a walkthrough of how alternatives are used and configured. I think it is still relevant as a description of how the Debian alternatives work for you on a system. http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/08/msg02808.html Bob Bob Thanks for the reply. I'm looking through the post you linked here now... Here is the output from update-alt - $ update-alternatives --display java java - auto mode link currently points to /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre/bin/java /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java - priority 1061 slave java.1.gz: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-amd64/jre/man/man1/java.1.gz /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre/bin/java - priority 1064 slave java.1.gz: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/man/man1/java.1.gz Current 'best' version is '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre/bin/java'. So it would appear that the jvm is set properly from a packaged install of oracle java. I haven't done the jdk yet - I'll look to this probably tonight or tomorrow. I'm taking my time setting this box up, since it's the first debian box I've been working with (it started out as Squeeze and I did a fresh re-build after I got the new ram and ssd). (didn't know you could set an alternative to 'manual' and choose _which_ alternatives you wanted to use... very useful info to have! -- Regards Jack Boston Tea Party, Coercive Acts, Powder Alarm, Revolution Lessons not learned are bound to be repeated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/514b83d8.3020...@gmail.com
wheezy updates
I have a long list of updates today for Wheezy. I was wondering - since I am using Oracle Java on this particular machine, would it interfere with this config to install the updates to OpenJDK and IcedTea? (I'm wondering if the current config using Oracle Java would get overwritten)... Thanks, as always, for the input. -- Regards Jack Boston Tea Party, Coercive Acts, Powder Alarm, Revolution Lessons not learned are bound to be repeated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5149dd8f.9030...@gmail.com
Re: wheezy updates
Verde Denim wrote: I have a long list of updates today for Wheezy. I was wondering - since I am using Oracle Java on this particular machine, would it interfere with this config to install the updates to OpenJDK and IcedTea? (I'm wondering if the current config using Oracle Java would get overwritten)... You are asking a question that probably only you know. It depends upon where you installed Oracle Java. For example, anything that you install in /usr/local is always yours and safe from any system upgrade. In my opinion I would never smash over system files with locally installed files because of just this reason. (But people do it all of the time anyway.) Where did you install your local installation of Oracle Java? Did you install it in /usr/local? Did you install it in /home? If so then you are safe. /usr/local is always safe. Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: wheezy updates status question
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:15:03 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze-updates main Is put into the /etc/apt/sources.list file by the installation system on espeakup distribution at least so it makes sense that it would be discontinued for wheezy testing. I wonder why the package adds that source for testing but if that's so you can open a bug report to inform the packagers :-? OTOH, squeeze-updates is fine for the stable flavor. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jidasn$69j$1...@dough.gmane.org
Re: wheezy updates status question
I tried using reportbug to report the bug that on the kernel that prevents serial ATA drives from being recognized several times and every time I did that, I get back a reject message complaining that there's no package tag in the body of my message. I allowed reportbug to make its own headings and didn't interfere with any of those yet this continues to happen. So in preparation for the next time I try this, what is the format for that package tag? I'll write it in myself.On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Camale?n wrote: On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:15:03 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze-updates main Is put into the /etc/apt/sources.list file by the installation system on espeakup distribution at least so it makes sense that it would be discontinued for wheezy testing. I wonder why the package adds that source for testing but if that's so you can open a bug report to inform the packagers :-? OTOH, squeeze-updates is fine for the stable flavor. Greetings, Jude jdashiel-at-shellworld-dot-net http://www.shellworld.net/~jdashiel/nj.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.bsf.2.01.1202261153120.11...@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg
Re: wheezy updates status question
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:57:49 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: (a bottom-posting style it reads better :-P) On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Camale?n wrote: On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:15:03 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze-updates main Is put into the /etc/apt/sources.list file by the installation system on espeakup distribution at least so it makes sense that it would be discontinued for wheezy testing. I wonder why the package adds that source for testing but if that's so you can open a bug report to inform the packagers :-? OTOH, squeeze-updates is fine for the stable flavor. I tried using reportbug to report the bug that on the kernel that prevents serial ATA drives from being recognized several times and every time I did that, I get back a reject message complaining that there's no package tag in the body of my message. Have you configured reportbug to be run in expert mode or something like that? I would reconfigure it from scratch and be sure to select a novice style for the wizard, this way it will ask you all the required data to properly fill the bug report and also add the required tags. But hey, this is a different issue that has been treated in another thread, let's not mix up things ;-) I allowed reportbug to make its own headings and didn't interfere with any of those yet this continues to happen. So in preparation for the next time I try this, what is the format for that package tag? I'll write it in myself. This is explained in detail at Debian's wiki: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.en.html It's hard to get the first time but once you get used to, it can be also very quick. I use this method quite often... Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jidqfa$69j$3...@dough.gmane.org
Re: wheezy updates status question
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze-updates main Is put into the /etc/apt/sources.list file by the installation system on espeakup distribution at least so it makes sense that it would be discontinued for wheezy testing.On Mon, 20 Feb 2012, Bob Proulx wrote: Jude DaShiell wrote: Has that part of the repository been discontinued or renamed? Do you mean this: deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main It's fine. Or are you asking for the new squeeze-updates that replaced volatile? As far as I know that is only for Stable and not for Testing. deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze-updates main Wheezy/Testing is already volatile and so doesn't need that repository. Here is the original announcement. http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile-announce/2011/msg0.html Bob Jude jdashiel-at-shellworld-dot-net http://www.shellworld.net/~jdashiel/nj.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.bsf.2.01.1202200912140.78...@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg
Re: wheezy updates status question
I don't think discontinued is the correct term here, but rather wheezy-updates has not been instated yet. I assume it will be as soon as wheezy is stable. Kind regards, Andrei P.S. sorry for the top-post, relevant quote of previous message below On Lu, 20 feb 12, 09:15:03, Jude DaShiell wrote: deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze-updates main Is put into the /etc/apt/sources.list file by the installation system on espeakup distribution at least so it makes sense that it would be discontinued for wheezy testing. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
wheezy updates status question
Has that part of the repository been discontinued or renamed? Jude jdashiel-at-shellworld-dot-net http://www.shellworld.net/~jdashiel/nj.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.bsf.2.01.1202200016100.56...@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg
Re: wheezy updates status question
Jude DaShiell wrote: Has that part of the repository been discontinued or renamed? Do you mean this: deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main It's fine. Or are you asking for the new squeeze-updates that replaced volatile? As far as I know that is only for Stable and not for Testing. deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze-updates main Wheezy/Testing is already volatile and so doesn't need that repository. Here is the original announcement. http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile-announce/2011/msg0.html Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: last wheezy updates is disconfiguring my system!
OK, I think I found a culprit. The task manager shows that Xfwm4 is not running! What happened, and what can I do to get it running anew? Kjetil I will try to make a new user now to see! Kjetil -- If you want a picture of the future - imagine a boot stamping on the human face - forever. George Orwell (1984) If you run $ /usr/bin/xfwm4 in shell dou you get some errors? Filelist of package xfwm4 in wheezy of architecture amd64: http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/amd64/xfwm4/filelist Do you have all? Do you have all dependencies? http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/xfwm4 If yes try to reinstall xfwm4 -- Bye, Goran Dobosevic Hrvatski: www.dobosevic.com English: www.dobosevic.com/en/ Registered Linux User #503414 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f19a601.8070...@dobosevic.com
last wheezy updates is disconfiguring my system!
Hola! Starting with the updates this monday, my wheezy/xfce4 system is disconfigured! For instance, the three boxes on each window, close/maximize/minimize have disappeared! Also, while I can resize windows, I cannot any longer move them!. So my ability to easily switch between windows disappeared. Why? What to do? Kjetil -- If you want a picture of the future - imagine a boot stamping on the human face - forever. George Orwell (1984) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAH=m5mieoll3xtm-k2ry8hxegzgwxh32sfoafbm1vkclsbn...@mail.gmail.com
Re: last wheezy updates is disconfiguring my system!
On 01/19/2012 04:33 PM, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: Hola! Starting with the updates this monday, my wheezy/xfce4 system is disconfigured! For instance, the three boxes on each window, close/maximize/minimize have disappeared! Also, while I can resize windows, I cannot any longer move them!. So my ability to easily switch between windows disappeared. Why? What to do? Kjetil Sorry to hear that. My up to date Wheezy XFCE+KDE is normal. Yesterday in KDE Dolphin had SIGGKILL all the time. Today I'm in XFCE and everything is normal except Xarchiver. Did you try reboot after upgrade? I think that today or yesterday was also some updates. -- Bye, Goran Dobosevic Hrvatski: www.dobosevic.com English: www.dobosevic.com/en/ Registered Linux User #503414 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f184e97.6030...@dobosevic.com
Re: last wheezy updates is disconfiguring my system!
see below. On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:10, godo go...@dobosevic.com wrote: On 01/19/2012 04:33 PM, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: Hola! Starting with the updates this monday, my wheezy/xfce4 system is disconfigured! For instance, the three boxes on each window, close/maximize/minimize have disappeared! Also, while I can resize windows, I cannot any longer move them!. So my ability to easily switch between windows disappeared. Why? What to do? Kjetil Sorry to hear that. My up to date Wheezy XFCE+KDE is normal. Yesterday in KDE Dolphin had SIGGKILL all the time. Today I'm in XFCE and everything is normal except Xarchiver. Did you try reboot after upgrade? I think that today or yesterday was also some updates. I did reboot, which do not help (also after today' s updates). There are other problems, too. 1) The XFCE menubar misbehaves, for instance, the panel applet allowing changes between four virtual desktops stopped to work. 2) When starting an terminal window (menu /Accessories/Terminal), the started teminal window cannot be used --- it is impossible to write anything in it! Furthermore, it cannot be closed, and when I do rebot, there is a black hole on the screen where it was! Kjetil -- Bye, Goran Dobosevic Hrvatski: www.dobosevic.com English: www.dobosevic.com/en/ Registered Linux User #503414 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f184e97.6030...@dobosevic.com -- If you want a picture of the future - imagine a boot stamping on the human face - forever. George Orwell (1984) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAH=m5MhU93F6ouZvzr44xVzDaerkcLVWiGbVGW==9ly4nu_...@mail.gmail.com
Re: last wheezy updates is disconfiguring my system!
I did reboot, which do not help (also after today' s updates). There are other problems, too. 1) The XFCE menubar misbehaves, for instance, the panel applet allowing changes between four virtual desktops stopped to work. 2) When starting an terminal window (menu /Accessories/Terminal), the started teminal window cannot be used --- it is impossible to write anything in it! Furthermore, it cannot be closed, and when I do rebot, there is a black hole on the screen where it was! Kjetil That sound really nasty. I don't have all this problems. Forgot to say I have 3.1.0-1-486. Is it same if you log in in new created acc.? -- Bye, Goran Dobosevic Hrvatski: www.dobosevic.com English: www.dobosevic.com/en/ Registered Linux User #503414 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f186955.4010...@dobosevic.com
Re: last wheezy updates is disconfiguring my system!
see below. On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 13:04, godo go...@dobosevic.com wrote: I did reboot, which do not help (also after today' s updates). There are other problems, too. 1) The XFCE menubar misbehaves, for instance, the panel applet allowing changes between four virtual desktops stopped to work. 2) When starting an terminal window (menu /Accessories/Terminal), the started teminal window cannot be used --- it is impossible to write anything in it! Furthermore, it cannot be closed, and when I do rebot, there is a black hole on the screen where it was! Kjetil That sound really nasty. I don't have all this problems. Forgot to say I have 3.1.0-1-486. Is it same if you log in in new created acc.? My kernel is 3.1.0-1-amd64 I will try to make a new user now to see! Kjetil -- Bye, Goran Dobosevic Hrvatski: www.dobosevic.com English: www.dobosevic.com/en/ Registered Linux User #503414 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f186955.4010...@dobosevic.com -- If you want a picture of the future - imagine a boot stamping on the human face - forever. George Orwell (1984) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAH=m5MjKjiJcg4h5mJyj0_sss5Ny+bXüp6_wfr1fjxuwe...@mail.gmail.com
Re: last wheezy updates is disconfiguring my system!
see below. On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 14:15, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen kjetil1...@gmail.com wrote: see below. On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 13:04, godo go...@dobosevic.com wrote: I did reboot, which do not help (also after today' s updates). There are other problems, too. 1) The XFCE menubar misbehaves, for instance, the panel applet allowing changes between four virtual desktops stopped to work. 2) When starting an terminal window (menu /Accessories/Terminal), the started teminal window cannot be used --- it is impossible to write anything in it! Furthermore, it cannot be closed, and when I do rebot, there is a black hole on the screen where it was! Kjetil That sound really nasty. I don't have all this problems. Forgot to say I have 3.1.0-1-486. Is it same if you log in in new created acc.? My kernel is 3.1.0-1-amd64 OK, I think I found a culprit. The task manager shows that Xfwm4 is not running! What happened, and what can I do to get it running anew? Kjetil I will try to make a new user now to see! Kjetil -- Bye, Goran Dobosevic Hrvatski: www.dobosevic.com English: www.dobosevic.com/en/ Registered Linux User #503414 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f186955.4010...@dobosevic.com -- If you want a picture of the future - imagine a boot stamping on the human face - forever. George Orwell (1984) -- If you want a picture of the future - imagine a boot stamping on the human face - forever. George Orwell (1984) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAH=m5mhukxlwvtvmy5dqw+y6-y011ppmtwbfdttkn_gg5zy...@mail.gmail.com
