Re: Need help recovering hard drive

2012-12-11 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 14:42:48 -0600
Dennis Wicks w...@mgssub.com wrote:

 Greetings;
 
 One of my hard drives quit working, and as luck would have 
 it, just before the scheduled backup! So I need to recover 
 some info that has been updated/added since the last backup.
 
 First, is there any thing I can do to get the system to 
 mount that drive even with errors? As it is right now I get 
 error messages at boot time and the drive isn't recognized. 
 Apparently doesn't make any difference whether the drive is 
 on controller 0 or 1 or is master or slave.
 
 Second, is there any program that I can use to get data of 
 off that drive?
 
 TIA for any help!
 Dennis
 
 
Hi, Dennis

Have you looked at testdisk?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121211100127.4c8cb...@speeduke.wildblue.com



Re: Laptop fan control

2012-12-22 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:33:31 +1100
Daniel Dalton d.dal...@iinet.net.au wrote:

 Hello, 
 
 I'm using a Dell vostro 3350 machine. 
 
 At times I feel the intensity of the fan is unnecessarily high. 
 
 This occurs when for example using firefox or watching flash. 
 
 It seems most times when I restart the gui the fan returns to normal
 speed. 
 
 This is a concern because it obviously will effect battery life. 
 
 So I'm wondering if this is unusual behaviour, and if so how to maybe
 correct it?
 
 I've looked at thinkafan but no idea what I'm doing to be honest. 
 
 Thanks in advance for any help. 
 
 Cheers,
 Dan
 
 
  

Hey,Daniel 

Try i8kutils,  Dell laptops do their own thing!!

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121222113304.3e847...@speeduke.wildblue.com



Re: Moving from a proprietary OS - unnecessarily inful experience -- was [Re: I wish to advocate linux]

2013-03-01 Thread Jack Schneider
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:37:32 -0500
Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:

 Brian wrote:
  On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 08:34:57 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
 
  Fair enough, but... I have to say it
 
  Back in my day, we not only had to walk to school, uphill, in both
  directions, in the snow, but we also had to build our computers by
  hand, from TTL logic gates. :-)
  You had TTL logic gates? Boy, you were lucky! We were given relay
  switches from cast-off telephone equipment. And we had to buy our
  own electrodes and lemons to power the machine.
 
 
 Ahh yes, programmable relay logic.  Still around, by the way. :-)
 
 Ok, anybody here played with really old IBM card sorters - the kind
 that you programmed with patch cords? (Not me, I might add.)
 
Like an IBM 1400?

'Musing along

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130301154612.7bd1a...@speeduke.wildblue.com



Printing problem jpeg file size gets multiplied???

2011-07-11 Thread Jack Schneider
Hi, All
I have two jpeg files on my desktop. Both show correct file sizes in
Properties.  Running Debian Squeeze Up2date.  Printer is Lexmark C540
Xl, printer properties shows connected to printer. via my local network.

Using Gthumb to print, it sends to queue and hangs... never prints...
Lexmark printer eventually goes to powersave mode  top of list is
processing
Looking at queue  for one image shows a file size of  25megs  for a 2.2
meg jpeg file.   Both file sizes seem to be up by a factor of 10 

Where can I look for a start??? 

TIA, Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110711162548.71aa765f@Speeduke



Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-13 Thread Jack Schneider

I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from a
live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end result was the
names of the arrays were changed on the working 2 drives. IE: /dev/md0
to /dev/126 and /dev/md1 became md127. Strangely the md2 array which I
setup on the added drives remains as /dev/md2. My root partition is/was
on /dev/md0. The result is that Grub2 fails to boot the / array. I have
tried three REINSTALLING GRUB procedures from Sysresccd online docs
and many others GNU.org, Ubuntu etc. The errors occur when I try to
mount the partition with the /boot directory. 'Complains about file
system type 'linux_raid_member' This machine has worked for 3 years
flawlessly.. Can anyone help with this? Or point me to a place or link
to get this fixed. Google doesn't help... I can't find a
article/posting where it ended successfully.  
I have considered a full reinstall after Squeeze goes stable, since this
O/S is a crufty upgrade from sarge over time. But useless now..

TIA, Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110113082311.6ad80...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-14 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:43:53 -0500
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
  
  I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
  until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
  used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
  a live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end result was
  the names of the arrays were changed on the working 2 drives.
  IE: /dev/md0 to /dev/126 and /dev/md1 became md127. Strangely the
  md2 array which I setup on the added drives remains as /dev/md2. My
  root partition is/was on /dev/md0. The result is that Grub2 fails
  to boot the / array. I have tried three REINSTALLING GRUB
  procedures from Sysresccd online docs and many others GNU.org,
  Ubuntu etc. The errors occur when I try to mount the partition with
  the /boot directory. 'Complains about file system type
  'linux_raid_member' This machine has worked for 3 years
  flawlessly.. Can anyone help with this? Or point me to a place or
  link to get this fixed. Google doesn't help... I can't find a
  article/posting where it ended successfully. I have considered a
  full reinstall after Squeeze goes stable, since this O/S is a
  crufty upgrade from sarge over time. But useless now..
  
 You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's instead
 of /dev/mdX.  That removes the possibility that the kernel will change
 the mdX designations.
 
 Use blkid to find out the UUID's of your partitions.
 
 -Rob
 
 
Thanks for the reply, Rob.   What grub file do I change?
grub.cfg?  grub *.map? I seem to have UUIDs for both disks and
LVM partitions, change both? 

TIA, Jack
   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110114060617.5dfa8...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-14 Thread Jack Schneider
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:06:17 -0600
Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:

 On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:43:53 -0500
 Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:
 
  On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
   
   I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
   until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
   used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility
   from a live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end
   result was the names of the arrays were changed on the working 2
   drives. IE: /dev/md0 to /dev/126 and /dev/md1 became md127.
   Strangely the md2 array which I setup on the added drives remains
   as /dev/md2. My root partition is/was on /dev/md0. The result is
   that Grub2 fails to boot the / array. I have tried three
   REINSTALLING GRUB procedures from Sysresccd online docs and many
   others GNU.org, Ubuntu etc. The errors occur when I try to mount
   the partition with the /boot directory. 'Complains about file
   system type 'linux_raid_member' This machine has worked for 3
   years flawlessly.. Can anyone help with this? Or point me to a
   place or link to get this fixed. Google doesn't help... I can't
   find a article/posting where it ended successfully. I have
   considered a full reinstall after Squeeze goes stable, since this
   O/S is a crufty upgrade from sarge over time. But useless now..
   
  You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
  instead of /dev/mdX.  That removes the possibility that the kernel
  will change the mdX designations.
  
  Use blkid to find out the UUID's of your partitions.
  
  -Rob
  
  
 Thanks for the reply, Rob.   What grub file do I change?
 grub.cfg?  grub *.map? I seem to have UUIDs for both disks and
 LVM partitions, change both? 
 
 TIA, Jack

Whoops!! UUIDs for Not just disks, LVM volumes  RAID arrays..
Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110114063014.3d4c5...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-15 Thread Jack Schneider
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:16:37 -0500
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
  
[BIG SNIP]

  You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
  instead of /dev/mdX.  That removes the possibility that the kernel
  will change the mdX designations.
 
  Use blkid to find out the UUID's of your partitions.
 
  Thanks for the reply, Rob. What grub file do I change?
  grub.cfg?  grub *.map? I seem to have UUIDs for both disks and
  LVM partitions, change both?
 
 So you have LVM over RAID, not just RAID.
Hi, Tom.
Well, not really, not all of the disks are LVM2. The first two
disks raid1 /dev/sda  /dev/sdc are partitioned with 1 small
/(root) partition, /dev/md0 - 10 gigs. The balance of the disk
is /dev/md1 under LVM2 with seven logical volumes. /home,/var,/swap
etc  The next two disks sdb and sdd are raid1 as /dev/md2 which I
need to use as an extension of the LVM. 

More info, when I boot the machine, I see the GRUB loading. WELCOME to
GRUB! info.  Then it enters the rescue mode with a grub rescue
prompt.  So the kernel is found/finding the / partition. Right?
 


 
 For grub2, you're only supposed to edit /etc/default/grub.
 
 

I started interpreting that as simply needing a update-grub type of
fix.. I was/am  wrong...   So I resorted  to systemrescuecd-2.0.0..
to fix up Grub..


Thanks, Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110115072451.00d25...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-15 Thread Jack Schneider
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:25:45 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
  until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
  used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
  a live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end result was
  the names of the arrays were changed on the working 2 drives.
  IE: /dev/md0 to /dev/126 and /dev/md1 became md127.
 
 Something else must have happened too.  Because normally just adding
 arrays will not rename the existing arrays.  I am not familiar with
 the Disk Utility that you mention.
 
 Next time instead you might just use mdadm directly.  It really is
 quite easy to create new arrays using it.  Here is an example that
 will create a new device /dev/md9 mirrored from two other devices
 /dev/sdy5 and /dev/sdz5.
 
   mdadm --create /dev/md9 --level=mirror
 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdy5 /dev/sdz5

This is how I created /dev/md2.

 
  Strangely the md2 array which I setup on the added drives remains as
  /dev/md2. My root partition is/was on /dev/md0. The result is that
  Grub2 fails to boot the / array.
 
 You may have to boot a rescue cd.  I recommend booting the Debian
 install disk in rescue mode.  Then you can inspect and fix the
 problem.  But as of yet you haven't said enough to let us know what
 the problem might be yet.
 
  I have tried three REINSTALLING GRUB procedures from Sysresccd
  online docs and many others GNU.org, Ubuntu etc.
 
 This isn't encouraging.  I can tell that you are grasping at straws.
 You have my sympathy.  But unfortunately that doesn't help diagnose
 the problem.  Remain calm.  And repeat exactly the problem that you
 are seeing and the steps you have taken to correct it.
 
I have not made any changes to any files on the root partition. I have
only used the procedures from SystemRescueCD and then backed out. All
seem to fail with the same linux_raid_member error.
  The errors occur when I try to mount the partition with the /boot
  directory. 'Complains about file system type 'linux_raid_member'
 


 I haven't seen that error before.  Maybe someone else will recognize
 it.
 
 I don't understand why you would get an error mounting /boot that
 would prevent the system from coming online.  Because by the time the
 system has booted enough to mount /boot it has already practically
 booted completely.  The system doesn't actually need /boot mounted to
 boot.  Grub reads the files from /boot and sets things in motion and
 then /etc/fstab instructs the system to mount /boot.
I get that when using the live rescue disk.
 
 Usually when the root device cannot be assembled the error I see is
 that the system is Waiting for root filesystem and can eventually
 get to a recovery shell prompt.
 
  This machine has worked for 3 years flawlessly.. Can anyone help
  with this? Or point me to a place or link to get this fixed. Google
  doesn't help... I can't find a article/posting where it ended
  successfully.  I have considered a full reinstall after Squeeze goes
  stable, since this O/S is a crufty upgrade from sarge over time. But
  useless now..
 
 The partitions for raid volumes should be 'autodetect' 0xFD.  This
 will enable mdadm to assemble then into raid at boot time.
 
 You can inspect the raid partitions with --detail and --examine.
 
   mdadm --examine /dev/sda1
   mdadm --detail /dev/md0
 
 That will list information about the devices.  Replace with your own
 series of devices.
 
 I would boot a rescue image and then inspect the current configuration
 using the above commands.  Hopefully that will show something wrong
 that can be fixed after you know what it is.
 
 A couple of other hints: If you are not booting a rescue system but
 using something like a live boot then you may need to load the kernel
 modules manually.  You may need to load the dm_mod and md_mod modules.
 
   modprobe md_mod
 
 You might get useful information from looking at the /proc/mdstat
 status.
 
   cat /proc/mdstat
 
 There is a configuration file /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf that holds the
 UUIDs of the configured devices.  If those have become corrupted then
 mdadm won't be able to assemble the /dev/md* devices.  Check that file
 and compare against what you see with the --detail output.
 
 The initrd contains a copy of the mdadm.conf file with the components
 needed to assemble the root filesystem.  If the UUIDs change over what
 is recorded in the initrd then the initrd will need to be rebuilt.  To
 do that make sure that the /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf file is correct and
 then reconfigure the kernel with dpkg-reconfigure.
 
   dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.32-5-i686
 
 Good luck!
 
 Bob
Thanks, Bob
I will do as you suggest shortly.. BTW,  A little more info in my reply
to Tom..

TIA, Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive

Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-15 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:06:11 -0200
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:

 On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
instead of /dev/mdX.  That removes the possibility that the
kernel will change the mdX designations.
   
Use blkid to find out the UUID's of your partitions.
 
 Whatever you do, NEVER use the UUIDs of partitions, use the UUID of
 the md devices.  The worst failure scenario involving MD and idiotic
 tools is for a tool to cause a component device to be mounted instead
 of the MD array.
 
 This is one of the reasons why the new MD formats that offset the data
 inside the component devices exists.
 
Thanks, Henrique!!!  That gives me a new place to start this AM...

Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110115082823.28019...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-15 Thread Jack Schneider
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:25:45 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
  until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
  used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
  a live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end result was
  the names of the arrays were changed on the working 2 drives.
  IE: /dev/md0 to /dev/126 and /dev/md1 became md127.
 
 Something else must have happened too.  Because normally just adding
 arrays will not rename the existing arrays.  I am not familiar with
 the Disk Utility that you mention.
 
Hi, Bob 
Thanks for your encouraging advice...

As I mentioned in a prior post,Grub was leaving me at a Grub rescueprompt.  

I followed this procedure:
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/GRUB-only-offers-a-rescue-shell.html#GRUB-only-offers-a-rescue-shell
Booting now leaves me at a busy box: However the Grub menu is correct.
With the correct kernels. So it appears that grub is now finding the
root/boot partitions and files. 
 Next time instead you might just use mdadm directly.  It really is
 quite easy to create new arrays using it.  Here is an example that
 will create a new device /dev/md9 mirrored from two other devices
 /dev/sdy5 and /dev/sdz5.
 
   mdadm --create /dev/md9 --level=mirror
 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdy5 /dev/sdz5
 
  Strangely the md2 array which I setup on the added drives remains as
  /dev/md2. My root partition is/was on /dev/md0. The result is that
  Grub2 fails to boot the / array.
 
 You may have to boot a rescue cd.  I recommend booting the Debian
 install disk in rescue mode.  Then you can inspect and fix the
 problem.  But as of yet you haven't said enough to let us know what
 the problem might be yet.
 
  I have tried three REINSTALLING GRUB procedures from Sysresccd
  online docs and many others GNU.org, Ubuntu etc.
 
 This isn't encouraging.  I can tell that you are grasping at straws.
 You have my sympathy.  But unfortunately that doesn't help diagnose
 the problem.  Remain calm.  And repeat exactly the problem that you
 are seeing and the steps you have taken to correct it.
 
  The errors occur when I try to mount the partition with the /boot
  directory. 'Complains about file system type 'linux_raid_member'
 
 I haven't seen that error before.  Maybe someone else will recognize
 it.
 
 I don't understand why you would get an error mounting /boot that
 would prevent the system from coming online.  Because by the time the
 system has booted enough to mount /boot it has already practically
 booted completely.  The system doesn't actually need /boot mounted to
 boot.  Grub reads the files from /boot and sets things in motion and
 then /etc/fstab instructs the system to mount /boot.
 
 Usually when the root device cannot be assembled the error I see is
 that the system is Waiting for root filesystem and can eventually
 get to a recovery shell prompt.
 
  This machine has worked for 3 years flawlessly.. Can anyone help
  with this? Or point me to a place or link to get this fixed. Google
  doesn't help... I can't find a article/posting where it ended
  successfully.  I have considered a full reinstall after Squeeze goes
  stable, since this O/S is a crufty upgrade from sarge over time. But
  useless now..
 
 The partitions for raid volumes should be 'autodetect' 0xFD.  This
 will enable mdadm to assemble then into raid at boot time.
 
 You can inspect the raid partitions with --detail and --examine.
 
   mdadm --examine /dev/sda1
   mdadm --detail /dev/md0
 

mdadm --examine /dev/sda1  /dev/sda2  gives I think a clean result 
I have posted the output at : http://pastebin.com/pHpKjgK3
mdadm --detail /dev/md0 -- gives  mdadm: md device /dev/md0 does not
appear to be active. 

There is no /proc/mdstat  data output.  

 That will list information about the devices.  Replace with your own
 series of devices.
 
 I would boot a rescue image and then inspect the current configuration
 using the above commands.  Hopefully that will show something wrong
 that can be fixed after you know what it is.
 
 A couple of other hints: If you are not booting a rescue system but
 using something like a live boot then you may need to load the kernel
 modules manually.  You may need to load the dm_mod and md_mod modules.
 
   modprobe md_mod
 
 You might get useful information from looking at the /proc/mdstat
 status.


 
   cat /proc/mdstat
 
 There is a configuration file /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf that holds the
 UUIDs of the configured devices.  If those have become corrupted then
 mdadm won't be able to assemble the /dev/md* devices.  Check that file
 and compare against what you see with the --detail output.
 
 The initrd contains a copy of the mdadm.conf file with the components
 needed to assemble the root filesystem.  If the UUIDs change over what
 is recorded in the initrd then the initrd will need to be rebuilt.  To
 do that make

Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-16 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:57:46 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  Bob Proulx wrote:
   Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility
from a live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end
result was the names of the arrays were changed on the working
2 drives. IE: /dev/md0 to /dev/126 and /dev/md1 became md127.
   
   Something else must have happened too.  Because normally just
   adding arrays will not rename the existing arrays.  I am not
   familiar with the Disk Utility that you mention.
 
  Hi, Bob 
  Thanks for your encouraging advice...
 
 I believe you should be able to completely recover from the current
 problems.  But it may be tedious and not completely trivial.  You will
 just have to work through it.
 
 Now that there is more information available, and knowing that you are
 using software raid and lvm, let me guess.  You added another physical
 extent (a new /dev/md2 partition) to the root volume group?  If so
 that is a common problem.  I have hit it myself on a number of
 occasions.  You need to update the mdadm.conf file and rebuild the
 initrd.  I will say more details about it as I go here in this
 message.
 
  As I mentioned in a prior post,Grub was leaving me at a Grub
  rescueprompt.  
  
  I followed this procedure:
  http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/GRUB-only-offers-a-rescue-shell.html#GRUB-only-offers-a-rescue-shell
 
 That seems reasonable.  It talks about how to drive the grub boot
 prompt to manually set up the boot.
 
 But you were talking about using a disk utility from a live cd to
 configure a new array with two new drives and that is where I was
 thinking that you had been modifying the arrays.  It sounded like it
 anyway.
 
 Gosh it would be a lot easier if we could just pop in for a quick peek
 at the system in person.  But we will just have to make do with the
 correspondence course.  :-)
 
  Booting now leaves me at a busy box: However the Grub menu is
  correct. With the correct kernels. So it appears that grub is now
  finding the root/boot partitions and files. 
 
 That sounds good.  Hopefully not too bad off then.
 
   Next time instead you might just use mdadm directly.  It really is
   quite easy to create new arrays using it.  Here is an example that
   will create a new device /dev/md9 mirrored from two other devices
   /dev/sdy5 and /dev/sdz5.
   
 mdadm --create /dev/md9 --level=mirror
   --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdy5 /dev/sdz5
   
Strangely the md2 array which I setup on the added drives
remains as /dev/md2. My root partition is/was on /dev/md0. The
result is that Grub2 fails to boot the / array.
 
  This is how I created /dev/md2.
 
 Then that explains why it didn't change.  Probably the HOMEHOST
 parameter is involved on the ones that changed.  Using mdadm from the
 command line doesn't set that parameter.
 
 There was just a long discussion about this topic just recently.
 You might want to jump into it in the middle here and read our
 learnings with HOMEHOST.
 
   http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/12/msg01105.html
 
  mdadm --examine /dev/sda1  /dev/sda2  gives I think a clean result 
  I have posted the output at : http://pastebin.com/pHpKjgK3
 
 That looks good to me.  And healthy and normal.  Looks good to me for
 that part.
 
 But that is only the first partition.  That is just /dev/md0.  Do you
 have any information on the other partitions?
 
 You can look at /proc/partitions to get a list of all of the
 partitions that the kernel knows about.
 
   cat /proc/partitions
 
 Then you can poke at the other ones too.  But it looks like the
 filesystems are there okay.
 
  mdadm --detail /dev/md0 -- gives  mdadm: md device /dev/md0 does
  not appear to be active. 
  
  There is no /proc/mdstat  data output.  
 
 So it looks like the raid data is there on the disks but that the
 multidevice (md) module is not starting up in the kernel.  Because it
 isn't starting then there aren't any /dev/md* devices and no status
 output in /proc/mdstat.
 
   I would boot a rescue image and then inspect the current
   configuration using the above commands.  Hopefully that will show
   something wrong that can be fixed after you know what it is.
 
 I still think this is the best course of action for you.  Boot a
 rescue disk into the system and then go from there.  Do you have a
 Debian install disk #1 or Debian netinst or other installation disk?
 Any of those will have a rescue system that should boot your system
 okay.  The Debian rescue disk will automatically search for raid
 partitions and automatically start the md modules.
 
  So it appears that I must rebuild my arrays.
 
 I think your arrays might be fine.  More information is needed.
 
 You said your boot partition was /dev/md0.  I assume that your

Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-16 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:57:46 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  Bob Proulx wrote:
   Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility
from a live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end
result was the names of the arrays were changed on the working
2 drives. IE: /dev/md0 to /dev/126 and /dev/md1 became md127.
   
   Something else must have happened too.  Because normally just
   adding arrays will not rename the existing arrays.  I am not
   familiar with the Disk Utility that you mention.
 
  Hi, Bob 
  Thanks for your encouraging advice...
 
 I believe you should be able to completely recover from the current
 problems.  But it may be tedious and not completely trivial.  You will
 just have to work through it.
 
 Now that there is more information available, and knowing that you are
 using software raid and lvm, let me guess.  You added another physical
 extent (a new /dev/md2 partition) to the root volume group?  If so
 that is a common problem.  I have hit it myself on a number of
 occasions.  You need to update the mdadm.conf file and rebuild the
 initrd.  I will say more details about it as I go here in this
 message.
 
  As I mentioned in a prior post,Grub was leaving me at a Grub
  rescueprompt.  
  
  I followed this procedure:
  http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/GRUB-only-offers-a-rescue-shell.html#GRUB-only-offers-a-rescue-shell
 
 That seems reasonable.  It talks about how to drive the grub boot
 prompt to manually set up the boot.
 
 But you were talking about using a disk utility from a live cd to
 configure a new array with two new drives and that is where I was
 thinking that you had been modifying the arrays.  It sounded like it
 anyway.
 
 Gosh it would be a lot easier if we could just pop in for a quick peek
 at the system in person.  But we will just have to make do with the
 correspondence course.  :-)
 
  Booting now leaves me at a busy box: However the Grub menu is
  correct. With the correct kernels. So it appears that grub is now
  finding the root/boot partitions and files. 
 
 That sounds good.  Hopefully not too bad off then.
 
   Next time instead you might just use mdadm directly.  It really is
   quite easy to create new arrays using it.  Here is an example that
   will create a new device /dev/md9 mirrored from two other devices
   /dev/sdy5 and /dev/sdz5.
   
 mdadm --create /dev/md9 --level=mirror
   --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdy5 /dev/sdz5
   
Strangely the md2 array which I setup on the added drives
remains as /dev/md2. My root partition is/was on /dev/md0. The
result is that Grub2 fails to boot the / array.
 
  This is how I created /dev/md2.
 
 Then that explains why it didn't change.  Probably the HOMEHOST
 parameter is involved on the ones that changed.  Using mdadm from the
 command line doesn't set that parameter.
 
 There was just a long discussion about this topic just recently.
 You might want to jump into it in the middle here and read our
 learnings with HOMEHOST.
 
   http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/12/msg01105.html
 
  mdadm --examine /dev/sda1  /dev/sda2  gives I think a clean result 
  I have posted the output at : http://pastebin.com/pHpKjgK3
 
 That looks good to me.  And healthy and normal.  Looks good to me for
 that part.
 
 But that is only the first partition.  That is just /dev/md0.  Do you
 have any information on the other partitions?
 
 You can look at /proc/partitions to get a list of all of the
 partitions that the kernel knows about.
 
   cat /proc/partitions
 
 Then you can poke at the other ones too.  But it looks like the
 filesystems are there okay.
 
  mdadm --detail /dev/md0 -- gives  mdadm: md device /dev/md0 does
  not appear to be active. 
  
  There is no /proc/mdstat  data output.  
 
 So it looks like the raid data is there on the disks but that the
 multidevice (md) module is not starting up in the kernel.  Because it
 isn't starting then there aren't any /dev/md* devices and no status
 output in /proc/mdstat.
 
   I would boot a rescue image and then inspect the current
   configuration using the above commands.  Hopefully that will show
   something wrong that can be fixed after you know what it is.
 
 I still think this is the best course of action for you.  Boot a
 rescue disk into the system and then go from there.  Do you have a
 Debian install disk #1 or Debian netinst or other installation disk?
 Any of those will have a rescue system that should boot your system
 okay.  The Debian rescue disk will automatically search for raid
 partitions and automatically start the md modules.
 
  So it appears that I must rebuild my arrays.
 
 I think your arrays might be fine.  More information is needed.
 
 You said your boot partition was /dev/md0.  I assume that your

Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system. Corrections!!!!!

2011-01-16 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:57:46 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  Bob Proulx wrote:
   Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility
from a live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end
result was the names of the arrays were changed on the working
2 drives. IE: /dev/md0 to /dev/126 and /dev/md1 became md127.
   
   Something else must have happened too.  Because normally just
   adding arrays will not rename the existing arrays.  I am not
   familiar with the Disk Utility that you mention.
 
  Hi, Bob 
  Thanks for your encouraging advice...
 
 I believe you should be able to completely recover from the current
 problems.  But it may be tedious and not completely trivial.  You will
 just have to work through it.
 
 Now that there is more information available, and knowing that you are
 using software raid and lvm, let me guess.  You added another physical
 extent (a new /dev/md2 partition) to the root volume group?  If so
 that is a common problem.  I have hit it myself on a number of
 occasions.  You need to update the mdadm.conf file and rebuild the
 initrd.  I will say more details about it as I go here in this
 message.
 
  As I mentioned in a prior post,Grub was leaving me at a Grub
  rescueprompt.  
  
  I followed this procedure:
  http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/GRUB-only-offers-a-rescue-shell.html#GRUB-only-offers-a-rescue-shell
 
 That seems reasonable.  It talks about how to drive the grub boot
 prompt to manually set up the boot.
 
 But you were talking about using a disk utility from a live cd to
 configure a new array with two new drives and that is where I was
 thinking that you had been modifying the arrays.  It sounded like it
 anyway.
 
 Gosh it would be a lot easier if we could just pop in for a quick peek
 at the system in person.  But we will just have to make do with the
 correspondence course.  :-)
 
  Booting now leaves me at a busy box: However the Grub menu is
  correct. With the correct kernels. So it appears that grub is now
  finding the root/boot partitions and files. 
 
 That sounds good.  Hopefully not too bad off then.
 
   Next time instead you might just use mdadm directly.  It really is
   quite easy to create new arrays using it.  Here is an example that
   will create a new device /dev/md9 mirrored from two other devices
   /dev/sdy5 and /dev/sdz5.
   
 mdadm --create /dev/md9 --level=mirror
   --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdy5 /dev/sdz5
   
Strangely the md2 array which I setup on the added drives
remains as /dev/md2. My root partition is/was on /dev/md0. The
result is that Grub2 fails to boot the / array.
 
  This is how I created /dev/md2.
 
 Then that explains why it didn't change.  Probably the HOMEHOST
 parameter is involved on the ones that changed.  Using mdadm from the
 command line doesn't set that parameter.
 
 There was just a long discussion about this topic just recently.
 You might want to jump into it in the middle here and read our
 learnings with HOMEHOST.
 
   http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/12/msg01105.html
 
  mdadm --examine /dev/sda1  /dev/sda2  gives I think a clean result 
  I have posted the output at : http://pastebin.com/pHpKjgK3
 
 That looks good to me.  And healthy and normal.  Looks good to me for
 that part.
 
 But that is only the first partition.  That is just /dev/md0.  Do you
 have any information on the other partitions?
 
 You can look at /proc/partitions to get a list of all of the
 partitions that the kernel knows about.
 
   cat /proc/partitions
 
 Then you can poke at the other ones too.  But it looks like the
 filesystems are there okay.
 
  mdadm --detail /dev/md0 -- gives  mdadm: md device /dev/md0 does
  not appear to be active. 
  
  There is no /proc/mdstat  data output.  
 
 So it looks like the raid data is there on the disks but that the
 multidevice (md) module is not starting up in the kernel.  Because it
 isn't starting then there aren't any /dev/md* devices and no status
 output in /proc/mdstat.
 
   I would boot a rescue image and then inspect the current
   configuration using the above commands.  Hopefully that will show
   something wrong that can be fixed after you know what it is.
 
 I still think this is the best course of action for you.  Boot a
 rescue disk into the system and then go from there.  Do you have a
 Debian install disk #1 or Debian netinst or other installation disk?
 Any of those will have a rescue system that should boot your system
 okay.  The Debian rescue disk will automatically search for raid
 partitions and automatically start the md modules.
 
  So it appears that I must rebuild my arrays.
 
 I think your arrays might be fine.  More information is needed.
 
 You said your boot partition was /dev/md0.  I assume that your

Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system. Corrections!!!!!

2011-01-17 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:42:49 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Jack,
 
 With your pastebin information and the mdstat information (that last
 information in your mail and pastebins was critical good stuff) and
 I found this old posting from you too:  :-)
 
   http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/10/msg00808.html
 
 With all of that I deduce the following:
 
   /dev/md125 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1 (10G) root partition with no lvm
   /dev/md126 /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5 (288G) LVM for /home, /var, swap, ...
   /dev/md127 /dev/sdb /dev/sdd (465G) as yet unformatted
 
 Jack, If that is wrong please correct me.  But I think that is right.
 

That is Exactly correct.


 The mdstat data showed that the arrays are sync'd.  The UUIDs are as
 follows.
 
   ARRAY /dev/md/125_0 metadata=0.90
 UUID=e45b34d8:50614884:1f1d6a6a:d9c6914c ARRAY /dev/md/126_0
 metadata=0.90 UUID=c06c0ea6:5780b170:ea2fd86a:09558bd1
 ARRAY /dev/md/Speeduke:2 metadata=1.2 name=Speeduke:2
 UUID=91ae6046:969bad93:92136016:116577fd
 
 The desired state:
 
   /dev/md0 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1 (10G) root partition with no lvm
   /dev/md1 /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5 (288G) LVM for /home, /var, swap, ...
 
 Will get to /dev/md2 later...
 
  My thinking is that I should rerun mdadm and reassemble the arrays
  to the original definitions...  /md0  from sda1  sdc1
   /md1  from sda5  sdc5  note: sda2
  sdc2 are  legacy msdos extended partitions.
  I would not build a md device with msdos extended partitions under
  LVM2 at this time..   Agree?
 
 Agreed.  You want to rename the arrays.  Don't touch the msdos
 partitions.
 
  Is the above doable?  If I can figure the right mdadm commands...8-)
 
 Yes.  It is doable.  You can rename the array.  First stop the array.
 Then assemble it again with the new desired name.  Here is what you
 want to do.  Tom, Henrique, others, Please double check me on these.
 
   mdadm --stop /dev/md125
   mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
 
   mdadm --stop /dev/126
   mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 --update=super-minor /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5
 
 That should by itself be enough to get the arrays going.
 
 But, and this is an important but, did you previously add the new disk
 array to the LVM volume group on the above array?  If so then you are
 not done yet.  The LVM volume group won't be able to assemble without
 the new disk.  If you did then you need to fix up LVM next.


NO!  I did NOT add /dev/sdb and /dev/sdd to the LVM..  So that is not a
problem.. I was about to do that when the machine failed..
 
 I think you should try to get back to where you were before when your
 system was working.  Therefore I would remove the new disks from the
 LVM volume group.  But I don't know if you did or did not add it yet.
 So I must stop here and wait for further information from you.
 

 I don't know if your rescue disk has lvm automatically configured or
 not.  You may need to load the device mapper module dm_mod.  I don't
 know.  If you do then here is a hint:
 
   modprobe dm_mod
 
 To scan for volume groups:
 
   vgscan
 
Found volume group Speeduke using metadata type lvm2


 To activate a volume group:
 
   vgchange -ay

5 logical volume(s) in volume group Speeduke now active

 
 To display the physical volumes associated with a volume group:
 
   pvdisplay


PV Name /dev/md126
VG Name Speeduke

Other data ommited

PV UUID kUoBgV-R9n6-exZ1-fdIk-aqlb-7Ue1-R3B1PD 




 If the new disks haven't been added to the volume group (I am hoping
 not) then you should be home free.  But if they are then I think you
 will need to remove them first.
 
 I don't know if the LVM actions above are going to be needed.  I am
 just trying to proactively give some possible hints.
 
 Bob



 Bob, You cannot know how much I appreciate the time and effort you
 and others have given to this, hopefully a few more steps and all will
 be well..
 I have not done the things you have suggested above. I'll wait for your
 response and then go!!!

 One other thing I am bothered by, md0, md1 were built using mdadm
 v0.90, md2 was built with the current mdadm v 3.1.4. which changed
 the md names.  Does this matter

Jack



Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110117071903.09664...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system. 2nd Corrections!!!!!

2011-01-17 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:19:03 -0600
Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:

 On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:42:49 -0700
 Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
 
  Jack,
  
  With your pastebin information and the mdstat information (that last
  information in your mail and pastebins was critical good stuff) and
  I found this old posting from you too:  :-)
  
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/10/msg00808.html
  
  With all of that I deduce the following:
  
/dev/md125 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1 (10G) root partition with no lvm
/dev/md126 /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5 (288G) LVM for /home, /var,
  swap, ... /dev/md127 /dev/sdb /dev/sdd (465G) as yet unformatted
  
  Jack, If that is wrong please correct me.  But I think that is
  right.
  
 
 That is Exactly correct.
 
 
  The mdstat data showed that the arrays are sync'd.  The UUIDs are as
  follows.
  
ARRAY /dev/md/125_0 metadata=0.90
  UUID=e45b34d8:50614884:1f1d6a6a:d9c6914c ARRAY /dev/md/126_0
  metadata=0.90 UUID=c06c0ea6:5780b170:ea2fd86a:09558bd1
  ARRAY /dev/md/Speeduke:2 metadata=1.2 name=Speeduke:2
  UUID=91ae6046:969bad93:92136016:116577fd
  
  The desired state:
  
/dev/md0 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1 (10G) root partition with no lvm
/dev/md1 /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5 (288G) LVM for /home, /var, swap, ...
  
  Will get to /dev/md2 later...
  
   My thinking is that I should rerun mdadm and reassemble the arrays
   to the original definitions...  /md0  from sda1  sdc1
  /md1  from sda5  sdc5  note: sda2
   sdc2 are  legacy msdos extended partitions.
   I would not build a md device with msdos extended partitions under
   LVM2 at this time..   Agree?
  
  Agreed.  You want to rename the arrays.  Don't touch the msdos
  partitions.
  
   Is the above doable?  If I can figure the right mdadm
   commands...8-)
  
  Yes.  It is doable.  You can rename the array.  First stop the
  array. Then assemble it again with the new desired name.  Here is
  what you want to do.  Tom, Henrique, others, Please double check me
  on these.
  
mdadm --stop /dev/md125
mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
  
mdadm --stop /dev/126
mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 --update=super-minor /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5
  
  That should by itself be enough to get the arrays going.
  
  But, and this is an important but, did you previously add the new
  disk array to the LVM volume group on the above array?  If so then
  you are not done yet.  The LVM volume group won't be able to
  assemble without the new disk.  If you did then you need to fix up
  LVM next.
 
 
 NO!  I did NOT add /dev/sdb and /dev/sdd to the LVM..  So that is not
 a problem.. I was about to do that when the machine failed..
  
  I think you should try to get back to where you were before when
  your system was working.  Therefore I would remove the new disks
  from the LVM volume group.  But I don't know if you did or did not
  add it yet. So I must stop here and wait for further information
  from you.
  
 
  I don't know if your rescue disk has lvm automatically configured or
  not.  You may need to load the device mapper module dm_mod.  I don't
  know.  If you do then here is a hint:
  
modprobe dm_mod
  
  To scan for volume groups:
  
vgscan
  
 Found volume group Speeduke using metadata type lvm2
 
 
  To activate a volume group:
  
vgchange -ay
 
 5 logical volume(s) in volume group Speeduke now active
 
  
  To display the physical volumes associated with a volume group:
  
pvdisplay
 
 
 PV Name /dev/md126
 VG Name Speeduke
 
 Other data ommited
 
 PV UUID kUoBgV-R9n6-exZ1-fdIk-aqlb-7Ue1-R3B1PD 
 
 
 
 
  If the new disks haven't been added to the volume group (I am hoping
  not) then you should be home free.  But if they are then I think you
  will need to remove them first.
  
  I don't know if the LVM actions above are going to be needed.  I am
  just trying to proactively give some possible hints.
  
  Bob
 
 
 
  Bob, You cannot know how much I appreciate the time and effort you
  and others have given to this, hopefully a few more steps and all
 will be well..
  I have not done the things you have suggested above. I'll wait for
 your response and then go!!!
 
  One other thing I am bothered by, md0, md1 were built using md
 metadata v0.90, md2 was built with the current mdadm metadata v 1.3
 which changed the md names.  Does this matter
 

 Jack
 
 
 

 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110117132946.06f98...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system. Corrections!!!!!

2011-01-17 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:29 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  Bob Proulx wrote: will be well..
 
 I have my fingers crossed for you that it will all be okay.
 
   I have not done the things you have suggested above. I'll wait for
  your response and then go!!!
 
 Please go ahead and do the above commands to rename the arrays and to
 reboot to the previous system.  I believe that should work.  Hope so.
 These things can be finicky though.
 
   One other thing I am bothered by, md0, md1 were built using mdadm
   v0.90, md2 was built with the current mdadm v 3.1.4. which changed
   the md names.  Does this matter
 
 Yes.  I am a little worried about that problem too.  But we were at a
 good stopping point and I didn't want to get ahead of things.  But
 let's assume that the above renaming of the raid arrays works and you
 can boot to your system again.  Then what should be done about the new
 disks?  Let me talk about the new disks.  But hold off working this
 part of the problem until you have the first part done.  Just do one
 thing at a time.
 
   /dev/md127 /dev/sdb /dev/sdd (465G) as yet unformatted
   ARRAY /dev/md/Speeduke:2 metadata=1.2 name=Speeduke:2
 UUID=91ae6046:969bad93:92136016:116577fd
 
 This was created using newer metadata.  I think that is going to be a
 problem for Lenny/Sqeeze.  It says 1.2 but Lenny/Squeeze is 0.90.  (A
 major difference is where the metadata is located.  1.0 is in a
 similar location to 0.90 but 1.1 and 1.2 use locations near the start
 of the device.)  Plus you assigned the entire drive (/dev/sdb) instead
 of using a partition for it (/dev/sdb1).  I personally don't prefer
 that and always set up using a partition instead of the whole disk.
 
 I am not sure the best course of action for the new disks.  I suggest
 stopping the new array, partitioning the drives to a partion instead
 of the raw disk, then recreating it using the newly created
 partitions.  Do that under your (hopefully now booting) Squeeze system
 and then you are assured of compatibility.  It is perhaps possible
 that because of the new metadata that the metadata=1.2 array won't be
 recognized under Squeeze.  I don't know.  I haven't been in that
 situation yet.  I think that would be good though because it would
 mean that they would just look like raw disks again without needing to
 stop the array, if it never got started.  Then you could partition and
 so forth.  The future is hard to see here.
 
 So that is my advice.  If the new array is running then I would stop
 it.  (mdadm --stop /dev/md127) Then partition it, partition /dev/sdb
 into /dev/sdb1 and /dev/sdd into /dev/sdd1.  Then create the array
 using the new sdb1 and sdd1 partitions.  Then decide how to make use
 of it.
 
 Note that if you add new disk to the lvm root volume group then you
 also need to rebuild the initrd or your system won't be able to
 assemble the array at boot time and will fail to boot.  (Saying that
 mostly for people who find this in the archive later.)
 
 Bob
 

Thanks, Bob 

What is the command to rebuild initrd? From what directory?
Just mostly for people who find this in the archive later.   8-)

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110117151918.6acbb...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net




Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system. Corrections!!!!!

2011-01-17 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:29 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  Bob Proulx wrote:
   But, and this is an important but, did you previously add the new
   disk array to the LVM volume group on the above array?  If so
   then you are not done yet.  The LVM volume group won't be able to
   assemble without the new disk.  If you did then you need to fix
   up LVM next.
  
  NO!  I did NOT add /dev/sdb and /dev/sdd to the LVM..  So that is
  not a problem.. I was about to do that when the machine failed..
 
 Oh good.  Then you are good to go.  Run these commands to stop the
 arrays and to reassemble them with the new names.
 
   mdadm --stop /dev/md125
   mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
 
   mdadm --stop /dev/126
   mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 --update=super-minor /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5
 
 Then try rebooting to the system.  I think at that point that all
 should be okay and that it should boot up into the previous system.
 
   Bob, You cannot know how much I appreciate the time and effort you
   and others have given to this, hopefully a few more steps and all
  will be well..
 
 I have my fingers crossed for you that it will all be okay.
 
   I have not done the things you have suggested above. I'll wait for
  your response and then go!!!
 
 Please go ahead and do the above commands to rename the arrays and to
 reboot to the previous system.  I believe that should work.  Hope so.
 These things can be finicky though.
 
   One other thing I am bothered by, md0, md1 were built using mdadm
   v0.90, md2 was built with the current mdadm v 3.1.4. which changed
   the md names.  Does this matter
 
 Yes.  I am a little worried about that problem too.  But we were at a
 good stopping point and I didn't want to get ahead of things.  But
 let's assume that the above renaming of the raid arrays works and you
 can boot to your system again.  Then what should be done about the new
 disks?  Let me talk about the new disks.  But hold off working this
 part of the problem until you have the first part done.  Just do one
 thing at a time.
 
   /dev/md127 /dev/sdb /dev/sdd (465G) as yet unformatted
   ARRAY /dev/md/Speeduke:2 metadata=1.2 name=Speeduke:2
 UUID=91ae6046:969bad93:92136016:116577fd
 
 This was created using newer metadata.  I think that is going to be a
 problem for Lenny/Sqeeze.  It says 1.2 but Lenny/Squeeze is 0.90.  (A
 major difference is where the metadata is located.  1.0 is in a
 similar location to 0.90 but 1.1 and 1.2 use locations near the start
 of the device.)  Plus you assigned the entire drive (/dev/sdb) instead
 of using a partition for it (/dev/sdb1).  I personally don't prefer
 that and always set up using a partition instead of the whole disk.
 
 I am not sure the best course of action for the new disks.  I suggest
 stopping the new array, partitioning the drives to a partion instead
 of the raw disk, then recreating it using the newly created
 partitions.  Do that under your (hopefully now booting) Squeeze system
 and then you are assured of compatibility.  It is perhaps possible
 that because of the new metadata that the metadata=1.2 array won't be
 recognized under Squeeze.  I don't know.  I haven't been in that
 situation yet.  I think that would be good though because it would
 mean that they would just look like raw disks again without needing to
 stop the array, if it never got started.  Then you could partition and
 so forth.  The future is hard to see here.
 
 So that is my advice.  If the new array is running then I would stop
 it.  (mdadm --stop /dev/md127) Then partition it, partition /dev/sdb
 into /dev/sdb1 and /dev/sdd into /dev/sdd1.  Then create the array
 using the new sdb1 and sdd1 partitions.  Then decide how to make use
 of it.
 
 Note that if you add new disk to the lvm root volume group then you
 also need to rebuild the initrd or your system won't be able to
 assemble the array at boot time and will fail to boot.  (Saying that
 mostly for people who find this in the archive later.)
 
 Bob
 

Bob, a small glitch.  mdadm:/dev/sda1 exists but is not an md array.
mdadm --stop was successful, before the above. 

It appears that a --create-like command is needed.  Looks like
md125 is md0 overwritten somewhere...  

One of the problems of my no problem found mentality..

Jack  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110117155012.7c001...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system. Corrections!!!!!

2011-01-17 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:50:12 -0600
Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:

 On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:29 -0700
 Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
 
  Jack Schneider wrote:
   Bob Proulx wrote:
But, and this is an important but, did you previously add the
new disk array to the LVM volume group on the above array?  If
so then you are not done yet.  The LVM volume group won't be
able to assemble without the new disk.  If you did then you
need to fix up LVM next.
   
   NO!  I did NOT add /dev/sdb and /dev/sdd to the LVM..  So that is
   not a problem.. I was about to do that when the machine failed..
  
  Oh good.  Then you are good to go.  Run these commands to stop the
  arrays and to reassemble them with the new names.
  
mdadm --stop /dev/md125
mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
  
mdadm --stop /dev/126
mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 --update=super-minor /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5
  
  Then try rebooting to the system.  I think at that point that all
  should be okay and that it should boot up into the previous system.
  
Bob, You cannot know how much I appreciate the time and effort
   you and others have given to this, hopefully a few more steps and
   all will be well..
  
  I have my fingers crossed for you that it will all be okay.
  
I have not done the things you have suggested above. I'll wait
   for your response and then go!!!
  
  Please go ahead and do the above commands to rename the arrays and
  to reboot to the previous system.  I believe that should work.
  Hope so. These things can be finicky though.
  
One other thing I am bothered by, md0, md1 were built using mdadm
v0.90, md2 was built with the current mdadm v 3.1.4. which
   changed the md names.  Does this matter
  
  Yes.  I am a little worried about that problem too.  But we were at
  a good stopping point and I didn't want to get ahead of things.  But
  let's assume that the above renaming of the raid arrays works and
  you can boot to your system again.  Then what should be done about
  the new disks?  Let me talk about the new disks.  But hold off
  working this part of the problem until you have the first part
  done.  Just do one thing at a time.
  
/dev/md127 /dev/sdb /dev/sdd (465G) as yet unformatted
ARRAY /dev/md/Speeduke:2 metadata=1.2 name=Speeduke:2
  UUID=91ae6046:969bad93:92136016:116577fd
  
  This was created using newer metadata.  I think that is going to be
  a problem for Lenny/Sqeeze.  It says 1.2 but Lenny/Squeeze is
  0.90.  (A major difference is where the metadata is located.  1.0
  is in a similar location to 0.90 but 1.1 and 1.2 use locations near
  the start of the device.)  Plus you assigned the entire drive
  (/dev/sdb) instead of using a partition for it (/dev/sdb1).  I
  personally don't prefer that and always set up using a partition
  instead of the whole disk.
  
  I am not sure the best course of action for the new disks.  I
  suggest stopping the new array, partitioning the drives to a
  partion instead of the raw disk, then recreating it using the newly
  created partitions.  Do that under your (hopefully now booting)
  Squeeze system and then you are assured of compatibility.  It is
  perhaps possible that because of the new metadata that the
  metadata=1.2 array won't be recognized under Squeeze.  I don't
  know.  I haven't been in that situation yet.  I think that would be
  good though because it would mean that they would just look like
  raw disks again without needing to stop the array, if it never got
  started.  Then you could partition and so forth.  The future is
  hard to see here.
  
  So that is my advice.  If the new array is running then I would stop
  it.  (mdadm --stop /dev/md127) Then partition it, partition /dev/sdb
  into /dev/sdb1 and /dev/sdd into /dev/sdd1.  Then create the array
  using the new sdb1 and sdd1 partitions.  Then decide how to make use
  of it.
  
  Note that if you add new disk to the lvm root volume group then you
  also need to rebuild the initrd or your system won't be able to
  assemble the array at boot time and will fail to boot.  (Saying that
  mostly for people who find this in the archive later.)
  
  Bob
  
 
 Bob, a small glitch.  mdadm:/dev/sda1 exists but is not an md array.
 mdadm --stop was successful, before the above. 
 
 It appears that a --create-like command is needed.  Looks like
 md125 is md0 overwritten somewhere...  
 
 One of the problems of my no problem found mentality..
 
 Jack  
 
 
Additionally, maybe I'm in the wrong config.  Running from a
sysrescuecd.  I do have a current Debian-AMD64-rescue-live cd.   Which
I made this AM.  I need to find out what's there...  
further:
Can I execute the mdadm commands from a su out of a busybox prompt? 

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org

Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system. Corrections!!!!!

2011-01-18 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:43:16 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  Bob Proulx wrote:
 mdadm --stop /dev/md125
 mdadm --assemble /dev/md0
   --update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
  
 mdadm --stop /dev/126
 mdadm --assemble /dev/md1
   --update=super-minor /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5
 
  Bob, a small glitch.  mdadm:/dev/sda1 exists but is not an md array.
  mdadm --stop was successful, before the above.
 
 If mdadm --stop was successful then it must have been an array before
 that point.  So that doesn't make sense.  Double check everything.
 
   mdadm --examine /dev/sda1
   mdadm --examine /dev/sdc1
   mdadm --detail /dev/md0
 
  It appears that a --create-like command is needed.  Looks like
  md125 is md0 overwritten somewhere...
 
 If you create an array it will destroy the data that is on the
 array.  Unless you want to discard your data you don't want to do
 that.  You want to assemble an array from the components.  That is
 an important distinction.
 
 You really want to be able to assemble the array.  Do so with one disk
 only if that is the only way (would need the mdadm forcing options to
 start an array without all of the components) and then add the other
 disk back in.  But if the array was up a moment before then it should
 still be okay.  So I am suspicious about the problem.  Poke around a
 little more with --examine and --detail first.  Something does seem
 right.
 
  Additionally, maybe I'm in the wrong config.  Running from a
  sysrescuecd.  I do have a current Debian-AMD64-rescue-live cd.
  Which I made this AM.
 
 That would definitely improve things.  Because then you will have
 compatible versions of all of the tools.
 
 Is your system amd64?
 
Yes,  a Supermicro X7DAL-E M/B with dual XEON quad core 3.2 ghz
processors and 4 Seagate Barracuda drives. 8 gigs of Ram.



  I need to find out what's there...  
  further:
  Can I execute the mdadm commands from a su out of a busybox
  prompt? 
 
 If you are in a busybox prompt at boot time then you are already root
 and don't need an explicit 'su'.  You should be able to execute root
 commands.  The question is whether the mdadm command is available at
 that point.  The reason for busybox is that it is a self-contained set
 of small unix commands.  'mdadm' isn't one of those and so probably
 isn't available.  Normally you can edit files and the like.  Normally
 I would mount and chroot to the system.  But you don't yet have a
 system.  So that is problematic at that point.
 
 Bob

This AM when I booted, (I powerdown init 0 each PM to save power 
hassle from S/O) the machine did not come up with grub-rescue prompt.
It booted to the correct grub menu then to Busy Box. I am thinking it
goes to BB because it can't find /var and or /usr on the md1/sda5 LVM
partition. I checked /proc/mdstat and lo  behold there was md1:active
with correct partitions and md0: active also correct partitions...  I
must have been seeing md125 et al from only the sysrescuecd 2.0.0.  So
here I sit with a root prompt from Busy Box I checked mdadm
--examine for all known partitions and mdadm --detail /mdo  /md1 and
all seems normal and correct.  No Errors. 

I seem to need a way of rerunning grub-install or update-grub to
fix this setup.  What say you??  I am thinking of trying to start the
/etc/grub.d demon.

Jack






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110118081441.6a807...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-18 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:43:16 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  Bob Proulx wrote:
 mdadm --stop /dev/md125
 mdadm --assemble /dev/md0
   --update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
  
 mdadm --stop /dev/126
 mdadm --assemble /dev/md1
   --update=super-minor /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5
 
  Bob, a small glitch.  mdadm:/dev/sda1 exists but is not an md array.
  mdadm --stop was successful, before the above.
 
 If mdadm --stop was successful then it must have been an array before
 that point.  So that doesn't make sense.  Double check everything.
 
   mdadm --examine /dev/sda1
   mdadm --examine /dev/sdc1
   mdadm --detail /dev/md0
 
  It appears that a --create-like command is needed.  Looks like
  md125 is md0 overwritten somewhere...
 
 If you create an array it will destroy the data that is on the
 array.  Unless you want to discard your data you don't want to do
 that.  You want to assemble an array from the components.  That is
 an important distinction.
 
 You really want to be able to assemble the array.  Do so with one disk
 only if that is the only way (would need the mdadm forcing options to
 start an array without all of the components) and then add the other
 disk back in.  But if the array was up a moment before then it should
 still be okay.  So I am suspicious about the problem.  Poke around a
 little more with --examine and --detail first.  Something does seem
 right.
 
  Additionally, maybe I'm in the wrong config.  Running from a
  sysrescuecd.  I do have a current Debian-AMD64-rescue-live cd.
  Which I made this AM.
 
 That would definitely improve things.  Because then you will have
 compatible versions of all of the tools.
 
 Is your system amd64?
 
  I need to find out what's there...  
  further:
  Can I execute the mdadm commands from a su out of a busybox
  prompt? 
 
 If you are in a busybox prompt at boot time then you are already root
 and don't need an explicit 'su'.  You should be able to execute root
 commands.  The question is whether the mdadm command is available at
 that point.  The reason for busybox is that it is a self-contained set
 of small unix commands.  'mdadm' isn't one of those and so probably
 isn't available.  Normally you can edit files and the like.  Normally
 I would mount and chroot to the system.  But you don't yet have a
 system.  So that is problematic at that point.
 
 Bob


Bob, MORE!

Both /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab show entries for /dev/md126..

What the ... ?

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110118084217.0e9ed...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-18 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:19:11 -0200
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:

 On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
  Both /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab show entries for /dev/md126..
  
  What the ... ?
 
 After you modified thei files in the real filesystem, did you update
 the initramfs?
 
Hi, Henrique

I have not modified any files a yet. I never got to the mdadm
--assemble because of the   mdadm:/dev/sda1 exists but is not an md
array.  ERROR!

The curious question that exists is why were md125,md126, created
when I tried to build the /dev/md2 array. The only difference is the
versions of mdadm used 3 years ago and ~10 days ago

TIA

Jack 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110118132038.4cad8...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-21 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:31:29 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  It booted to the correct grub menu then to Busy Box. I am thinking
  it goes to BB because it can't find /var and or /usr on the
  md1/sda5 LVM partition.
 
 Very likely.
 
  I checked /proc/mdstat and lo  behold there was md1:active
  with correct partitions and md0: active also correct partitions...
 
 That is good news to hear.  Becuase it should mean that all of your
 data is okay on those disks.  That is always a comfort to know.
 
  So here I sit with a root prompt from Busy Box I checked mdadm
  --examine for all known partitions and mdadm --detail /mdo  /md1
  and all seems normal and correct.  No Errors.
 
 Yeah!  :-)
 
  Both /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab show entries for /dev/md126..
  What the ... ?
 
 That does seem strange.  Could the tool you used previously have
 edited that file?
 
 You said you were using /dev/md1 as an lvm volume for /var, /home,
 swap and other.  As I read this it means you would only have /dev/md0
 for /boot in your /etc/fstab.  Right?  Something like this from my
 system:
 
   /dev/md0/boot  ext2defaults0   2
 
 You /var, /home and swap would use the lvm, right?  So from my system
 I have the following:
 
   /dev/mapper/v1-var  /var   ext3defaults0   2
   /dev/mapper/v1-home /home  ext3defaults0   2
 
 Those don't mention /dev/md1 (which showed up for you as /dev/md126)
 at all.  They would only show up in the volume group display.
 
 If you are seeing /dev/md126 in /etc/fstab then it is conflicting
 information.  You will have to sort out the information conflict.  Do
 you really have LVM in there?
 
 Certainly if the /dev/md0 /boot boot line is incorrect then you
 should correct it.  Edit the file and fix it.  If your filesystem is
 mounted read-only at that point you will need to remount it
 read-write.
 
   mount -n -o remount,rw /
 
 Bob



Hi, Bob  Back at it...8-(

 I think I found a significant glitch.. I appears that mdadm is
 confused.  I think it happened when I created the /dev/md2 array from
 the new disks.  It looks like the metadata 1.2 vs 0.90 configs is the
 culprit...  
Here's the output of:
mdadm --detail --scan:
ARRAY /dev/md0 metadata=0.90 UUID=e45b34d8:50614884:1f1d6a6a:d9c6914c
ARRAY /dev/md1 metadata=0.90 UUID=c06c0ea6:5780b170:ea2fd86a:09558bd1

Here's the output of /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf:
 
# mdadm.conf
#
# Please refer to mdadm.conf(5) for information about this file.
#

# by default, scan all partitions (/proc/partitions) for MD superblocks.
# alternatively, specify devices to scan, using wildcards if desired.
DEVICE partitions

# auto-create devices with Debian standard permissions
CREATE owner=root group=disk mode=0660 auto=yes

# automatically tag new arrays as belonging to the local system
HOMEHOST system

# instruct the monitoring daemon where to send mail alerts
MAILADDR root

# definitions of existing MD arrays
ARRAY /dev/md/0 metadata=1.2 UUID=f6de5584:d9dbce39:090f16ff:f795e54c 
name=hetzner:0
ARRAY /dev/md/1 metadata=1.2 UUID=0e065fee:15dea43e:f4ed7183:70d519bd 
name=hetzner:1
ARRAY /dev/md/2 metadata=1.2 UUID=ce4dd5a8:d8c2fdf4:4612713e:06047473 
name=hetzner:2

# This file was auto-generated on Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:32:59 +
# by mkconf 3.1.4-1+8efb9d1

Given that the metadata from 0.90  1.2 cannot be on each  md0 and md1
at the same time. Although they are on different places on the disks
IIRC.  Something needs to change...  I am thinking of an mdadm.conf
edit. But there maybe an alternative tool or approach... 
This was obtained using my Debian-live amd64 rescue disk.

TIA
Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110121195115.3e62f...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Grub2 reinstall on raid1 system.

2011-01-22 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:54:32 -0500
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Jack Schneider
 p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
 
   I think I found a significant glitch.. I appears that mdadm is
   confused.  I think it happened when I created the /dev/md2 array
  from the new disks.  It looks like the metadata 1.2 vs 0.90 configs
  is the culprit...
 
  Here's the output of:
 
  mdadm --detail --scan:
  ARRAY /dev/md0 metadata=0.90
  UUID=e45b34d8:50614884:1f1d6a6a:d9c6914c ARRAY /dev/md1
  metadata=0.90 UUID=c06c0ea6:5780b170:ea2fd86a:09558bd1
 
  Here's the output of /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf:
 
  DEVICE partitions
  CREATE owner=root group=disk mode=0660 auto=yes
  HOMEHOST system
  MAILADDR root
  ARRAY /dev/md/0 metadata=1.2
  UUID=f6de5584:d9dbce39:090f16ff:f795e54c name=hetzner:0
  ARRAY /dev/md/1 metadata=1.2
  UUID=0e065fee:15dea43e:f4ed7183:70d519bd name=hetzner:1
  ARRAY /dev/md/2 metadata=1.2
  UUID=ce4dd5a8:d8c2fdf4:4612713e:06047473 name=hetzner:2
 
  Given that the metadata from 0.90  1.2 cannot be on each  md0 and
  md1 at the same time. Although they are on different places on the
  disks IIRC.  Something needs to change...  I am thinking of an
  mdadm.conf edit. But there maybe an alternative tool or
  approach...  This was obtained using my Debian-live amd64
  rescue disk.
 
 Check your partitions' metadata with mdadm --examine --scan
 --config=partitions. Those'll be the settings that you'll need in
 mdadm.conf.
 
 
Thanks, Tom

A couple of small ?s.  I can get the output of the command on the live
file system and it appears  to make sense.   I am running on a
debian-live amd64 O/S. The data has 4 arrays and I only have 3, there
are two entries for the new empty disks /dev/md/2 and /dev/md127.
They don't appear in /proc/mdstat, so they are not running.  Do I need
to kill them permanently some how?  I need, I think, to get the info
to the mdadm.conf on the real /dev/sda1  /dev/sdc1 partitions.  Mount
them on the live system and edit mdadm.conf???  When I reboot, I'll
need the right info... chroot??
  
TIA Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110122072452.0a4b5...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Difficulty installing Debian 6.0.0 on an old computer

2011-02-11 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:29:44 +
Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:

 On Wed 09 Feb 2011 at 18:13:54 -0600, Jason Hsu wrote:
 
  Thanks, Brian, I'll try installing Lenny and then upgrading.  If I
  still have trouble with Squeeze, then I'll have to stick with Lenny
  until I buy a somewhat newer computer that doesn't have problems
  with the Debian Squeeze CD.
 
 As it happens I used PLOP and a usb stick to install Squeeze on one
 machine. The netinst.iso was put on to the stick using
 
cat netinst.iso  /dev/sdX
 
 If the Squeeze installer and your machine don't get on it may not help
 you - but you never know.
 
 
If you can try burning the ISO on a CD-R media some OLD optical drives
can't handle the newer media, also burn at lowest speeds..

FWIW
Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110211164006.36347...@torrid.volunteerwireless.net



Window Borders Disappear

2007-11-20 Thread Jack Schneider
Hi, folks

I have lost my Desktop window borders. I am using Debian lenny updated. 
Problem occurred after an abortedattempt to install Compiz.. I get the 
following error from theSystempreferenceswindows menu..
 Cannot start the preferences application for your window manager.Window 
manager unknown has not registered a configuration tool..

Any help would be great...
J
ack




Re: Cannot boot from root lvm volume: lvm2 broken?

2008-03-27 Thread Jack Schneider
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:32:50 +0100
Benjamin Kircher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi there,
 
 
 need some advice over here. Installed Etch from netinstall iso and upgraded
 to sid, which works flawlessly. All partitions except /boot are in a LVM
 group (even my root fs is a LVM volume). Then I removed (more precise:
 purged) 2.6.18-5-486 kernel in favor of 2.6.24-1-686. After running a
 update-initramfs -u and a shutdown -r now my box fails to boot up. It
 complains:
 
 (nah nah nah, a lot of this not and a lot of that not, neh neh ney)
 ...
 /scripts/local-top/lvm2: line 68 tr not found
 /scripts/local-top/lvm2: line 68 sed not found
 (I guess, this part of the script tries to activate my volume group)
 ...
 /proc/mounts: fopen %s failed: No such file or directory
 Failed to create lvm type filter
 Waiting for root file system ...
 
 ... which my box never gets. Hereafter it throws me to a very limited shell.
 Indeed, /proc and /dev are empty ;(
 
 Google isn't my friend: A search found no similar messages like this. There
 are no bugs listed for the lvm2 package which describes this behavior nor
 are there any recent changes in the /scripts/local-top/lvm2 script.
 
 Any clues from you guys on how to proceed and hunting down this issue?
 
 
 Thanks in advance,
 Benjamin

Hi, Did you update grub (if that's what your using)?  grub install? or edit at 
boot?
Jack 
-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Aptitude Abnormality

2008-04-21 Thread Jack Schneider

Hi, All
Minor problem... I thinks 8-)
Just noted an error/warning during an install, as follows:
  database /var/lib/apt/listchanges.db failed to load
Install completed OK.


My Sys_Info: Debian Lenny
Linux Speeduke 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Mar 27 16:52:38 UTC 2008
x86_64 GNU/Linux

What does it mean?  Besides the obvious..-- 
Is it serious? 
How do I fix? 
What's needed?

Thanks,  Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Aptitude Abnormality

2008-04-22 Thread Jack Schneider

Thanks, for the reply.

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:34:05 +0200 (CEST)
s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Jack Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  
   Minor problem... I thinks 8-)
   Just noted an error/warning during an install, as follows:
 database /var/lib/apt/listchanges.db failed to load
   Install completed OK.
  
   My Sys_Info: Debian Lenny
   Linux Speeduke 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Mar 27 16:52:38 UTC 2008
   x86_64 GNU/Linux
  
   What does it mean?  Besides the obvious..-- 
 
 It looks like a non-fatal warning from apt-listchanges.
 
   Is it serious? 
 
 What's apt-listchanges do when you install something, or does this
 happen on every install?
 

Yes,this seems to happen on every install
   How do I fix? 
   What's needed?
 
 Can't help there, sorry.  Does /var/lib/apt/listchanges.db exist?
 
 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ du -h  /var/lib/apt/listchanges.db
12K /var/lib/apt/listchanges.db

So the file seems to be there...

What next coach?
-- 
Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Window Borders Disappear

2007-11-20 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 10:26 -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 02:42:09PM +, Jack Schneider wrote:
  Hi, folks
  
  I have lost my Desktop window borders. I am using Debian lenny
  updated. Problem occurred after an abortedattempt to install Compiz..
  I get the following error from theSystempreferenceswindows menu..  
  Cannot start the preferences application for your window
  manager.Window manager unknown has not registered a configuration
  tool..
  
  Any help would be great...  J ack
  
  
 
 Why don't you try aptitude reinstall metacity? That may work.
 
 - -- 
 If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative
 programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they
 restrict the use of these programs. 
  - Richard Stallman
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQFHQvyeg6qL2BGnx4QRAtJ6AKCpsifzfjb0qwef2H+NznSRjDl0OACeJkTY
 tOqFhYDUm23ZvY4iFkdMHAM=
 =+Nhg
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 

Thanks, for the reply...  I did the  # aptitude reinstall metacity thing
and regretably no change...

It really makes it painfull to have all windows in upper left corner
with no size or position control... What could be plan b???

Thanks, again

Jack 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Window Borders Disappear

2007-11-21 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 20:59 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:06:59PM -0600, Jack Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 was heard to say:
  On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 10:26 -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
   On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 02:42:09PM +, Jack Schneider wrote:
I have lost my Desktop window borders. I am using Debian lenny
updated. Problem occurred after an abortedattempt to install Compiz..
I get the following error from theSystempreferenceswindows menu..  
Cannot start the preferences application for your window
manager.Window manager unknown has not registered a configuration
tool..

Any help would be great...  J ack


   
   Why don't you try aptitude reinstall metacity? That may work.
  
  Thanks, for the reply...  I did the  # aptitude reinstall metacity thing
  and regretably no change...
  
  It really makes it painfull to have all windows in upper left corner
  with no size or position control... What could be plan b???
 
   If you can get access to the windows themselves: does running metacity
 from a terminal help?  If that complains that another window manager is
 running, try metacity --replace.  I think you have to save the Gnome
 session after that if it works, but I don't remember what the Gnome
 voodoo for saving a session is.
 
   Daniel
 
 

Thanks, Daniel, That helps..  I now have window's with borders on
current screen , after running:  sudo metacity --replace.  I get an
error though!!  

[Window manager warning: Failed to load theme Clearlooks: Failed to
find a valid file for theme Clearlooks]  
and I am not sure this condition will be there at next login

Re: Andrei's question.. 
 How did you try to install compiz? Please detail your steps, maybe we 
can find a way to revert what has been done.

Since it's been a couple of day's, this is best that I can recall.  

I run a NVIDIA Geforce 8600GT video card.  So There were some howto's on
the (I think) Debian-Compiz wiki. calling for some changes to xorg.conf
under etch.  I run lenny but the same video driver as I did under
etch, NVIDIA 100.14.19 so  I added the suggested changes...via $ sudo
vim /etc/X11/xorg.conf.
I recall a addtion entry to the device' section and a new extensions
entry... 
then I used  # aptitude install compiz  to load Compiz.  It installed
with out error... I then logged out and in. and that's where the problem
happened... I PANICed !   I was able to use a xterm OK so I replaced the
xorg.conf from xorg.conf.bak and # aptitude remove compizOK.  That
didnt help.

Then I asked for help  This is the best I can remember...Memory is
slipping as I get older...really old...8-(

Thanks, to both of you...
Jack




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Window Borders Disappear

2007-11-21 Thread Jack Schneider
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 09:42 -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:06:59PM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
  On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 10:26 -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
   -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
   Hash: SHA1
   
   On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 02:42:09PM +, Jack Schneider wrote:
Hi, folks

I have lost my Desktop window borders. I am using Debian lenny
updated. Problem occurred after an abortedattempt to install Compiz..
I get the following error from theSystempreferenceswindows menu..  
Cannot start the preferences application for your window
manager.Window manager unknown has not registered a configuration
tool..

Any help would be great...  J ack


   
   Why don't you try aptitude reinstall metacity? That may work.
   
 
 aptitude purge metacity  aptitude install metacity (If this gives you
 dependency errors reinstall everything else as well).
 
 -
Have'nt done this yet,but
A little more info... what might everything else entail
I'm guessing you mean whatever dependency errors occur... 
Thanks, Jack


  -- 
 If programmers deserve to be rewaeverything elserded for creating innovative
 programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they
 restrict the use of these programs. 
  - Richard Stallman
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQFHREPYg6qL2BGnx4QRAo2OAJ9gwixc9HYCiMilJzpZCc6nafQHggCgh+hR
 +v9JR9ivQJuhWsrphNWSgRw=
 =L+S7
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Window Borders Disappear

2007-11-21 Thread Jack Schneider
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 09:42 -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:06:59PM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
  On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 10:26 -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
   -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
   Hash: SHA1
   
   On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 02:42:09PM +, Jack Schneider wrote:
Hi, folks

I have lost my Desktop window borders. I am using Debian lenny
updated. Problem occurred after an abortedattempt to install Compiz..
I get the following error from theSystempreferenceswindows menu..  
Cannot start the preferences application for your window
manager.Window manager unknown has not registered a configuration
tool..

Any help would be great...  J ack


   
   Why don't you try aptitude reinstall metacity? That may work.
   
 
 aptitude purge metacity  aptitude install metacity (If this gives you
 dependency errors reinstall everything else as well).
 
 - -- 
 If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative
 programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they
 restrict the use of these programs. 
  - Richard Stallman
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQFHREPYg6qL2BGnx4QRAo2OAJ9gwixc9HYCiMilJzpZCc6nafQHggCgh+hR
 +v9JR9ivQJuhWsrphNWSgRw=
 =L+S7
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
Hi, Michael 

Tried it, purge  reinstall, log out  in --  No Change... Only way to
get borders back is $ metacity --replacethat works...

FYI

Jack
ps plan C ???




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



NO mail from Debian lists..

2007-12-18 Thread Jack Schneider
Hi, 

Anyone seeing mail???

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Corrupted Gnome terminal ( reposted from debian-amd64)

2008-01-14 Thread Jack Schneider
Hi, all

I screwed up my Gnome Terminal setup some how... on my workstation
desktop.

My system:
Debian Lenny
Kernel: 2.6.22-3-amd64
Video:  Nvidia 8600 GT
Video Drv. NVIDIA 169.07

My Problems:
Gnome terminal has unreadable fonts..TOO small. The terminal will not
close, when clicking on X, and cntrl++ will not work. 

Xterm seems to work. OK  /var/log/Xorg.0.log has one failure:
(EE) Failed to load module type1 (module does not exist, 0)

I created a new user, and the Gnome terminal on that Desktop works
normally..OK  So it seems I have a hidden file screwed up on my
desktop...

Anyone have a idea what folder i should replace???  or what/where I
should look or go from here???  I have been struggling for several days
and come up blank from Archive and Google.

Thanks, in advance..
Jack 




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Installation upgrade errors--- HELP

2003-11-20 Thread Jack Schneider
Hi, All
Does anyone have a recommendation as to: what do I do with this error???
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jack# apt-get install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 478 not upgraded.
3 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Setting up cron (3.0pl1-81) ...
Adding group crontab (106)...
groupadd: unable to lock group file
addgroup: `/usr/sbin/groupadd -g 106 crontab' returned error code 10. 
Aborting.
Cleaning up.
dpkg: error processing cron (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of logrotate:
 logrotate depends on cron (= 3.0pl1-53) | anacron; however:
  Package cron is not configured yet.
  Package anacron is not installed.
dpkg: error processing logrotate (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of adminmenu:
 adminmenu depends on logrotate; however:
  Package logrotate is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing adminmenu (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 cron
 logrotate
 adminmenu
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jack#





Thanks, if you can help!   Thanks anyway.

Jack

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: xorg update clobbers Nvidia GL

2008-08-16 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:57:51 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 08/16/08 12:57, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
  Hello:
  
  It seems every time xorg is updated it clobbers my Nvidia driver
  and, all of a sudden, those cool GLX screen savers, not to mention
  Google Earth (a mission-critical application!) don't work.  If I use
  nvidia-installer to UNinstall the drivers, it tells me
  '/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so is not a symbolic link',
  whereas, right after installing the nvidia drivers, it IS.  So, what
  I'm wondering is whether there's any way to protect a symbolic link
  from being overwritten.  Ordinarily, if I want to protect a file,
  I'll make it read- or read-and-execute-only, but a symbolic link is
  always 'lrwxrwxrwx' and 'chmod 555 link' just changes the
  permissions on the underlying file.  Perhaps that will protect the
  link from being replaced with a file, but I'm not confident!  A
  hack solution would be simply to rename the underlying file to the
  link name and make THAT unwritable, but I think that might confuse
  the nvidia installer.
  
  Any suggestions will be welcome.
 
 After any xorg update, I go into /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions 
 and manually symlink the nvidia libglx.so.XXX.YY.ZZ to libglx.so.
 
Hey, Ron
Does yours look like this???

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  19 2008-07-13 16:25 libglx.so -
libglx.so.173.14.09

Sorry about the highjack!!!

Jack

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



BUSY BOX after boot attempt..

2008-09-09 Thread Jack Schneider


-- Hi, all 

I created my own problem. I think!
I have a dual boot Dell M60 laptop. Running Lenny, linux kernel
2.6.26-1-686.  I have/had  a small primary (hda3) as /boot.
A larger logical (hda2) with / (hda5) and /home (hda6) + Swap (hda7).
hda1 is XP.  
I used GRML 1.1 iso and gparted to resize/move /boot to 5X intial
size. because with kernel changes, I had low disk space errors. All
seemed to go well. No errors.  When I rebooted back to lenny on hdd I
get the BusyBox prompt. I get the GRUB window OK.  I see what looks like
errors as follows,
Mount: No such file or directory.  (Three times)
Target filesystem doesn't have /sbin/init
No init found, Try parsing init= bootarg

I don't know where to go next... 

Thanks in advance...

Jack

 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BUSY BOX after boot attempt..

2008-09-10 Thread Jack Schneider
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:30:15 +0300
Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue,09.Sep.08, 16:00:11, Jack Schneider wrote:
  
  
  -- Hi, all 
  
  I created my own problem. I think!
  I have a dual boot Dell M60 laptop. Running Lenny, linux kernel
  2.6.26-1-686.  I have/had  a small primary (hda3) as /boot.
  A larger logical (hda2) with / (hda5) and /home (hda6) + Swap
  (hda7). hda1 is XP.  
  I used GRML 1.1 iso and gparted to resize/move /boot to 5X intial
  size. because with kernel changes, I had low disk space errors. All
  seemed to go well. No errors.  When I rebooted back to lenny on hdd
  I get the BusyBox prompt. I get the GRUB window OK.  I see what
  looks like errors as follows,
  Mount: No such file or directory.  (Three times)
  Target filesystem doesn't have /sbin/init
  No init found, Try parsing init= bootarg
  
  I don't know where to go next... 
  
 I've had cases where changes in partitioning has changed the
 partition numbers. Boot your GRML and check what the correct numbers
 are. In case of any doubt use labels.
 
 Regards,
 Andrei


-- 
Thanks, Andrei for the response.  Checked out #s and yes they have
changed.  
So I need some further guidance... In case of any doubt use labels.
Any pointers to an appropriate howto   Question 2 What's the
impact on FSTAB settings?

Thanks, again.
Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BUSY BOX after boot attempt..

2008-09-10 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:52:30 +0300
Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wed,10.Sep.08, 14:24:07, Jack Schneider wrote:
 
  Thanks, Andrei for the response.  Checked out #s and yes they have
  changed.  
  So I need some further guidance... In case of any doubt use
  labels. Any pointers to an appropriate howto   Question
  2 What's the impact on FSTAB settings?
  
Thanks, again. 

 Here's a (very quick) howto:
 
 * use e2label to create labels for all your partition:
 
This is done by mounting the drive somewhere under grml?
Since I can't boot the OS with the current partition #s.
Seems tricky..8-(  since I know less of GRML than lenny...I however
can get to a bash term # window. 8-)  

 e2label /dev/hdaX root_part
 
 (where 'root_part' is the label for the root partition and /dev/hdaX
 is the device name of the root partition. Use whatever naming scheme
 you want).
 
 * edit /boot/grub/menu.lst and change the line
 
/boot is on a separate partition, which I will have labeled. Will I
have a problem mounting /boot under grml??  say with
~# mount /dev/hda3 /mnt ?? cd mnt then edit /boot/grub/menu.lst

 # kopt=root=/dev/hda5 ro (other boot options)
 
 to
 
 # kopt=root=LABEL=root_part ro (other boot options)
 
 * also edit the stanza that you will boot and replace
 'root=/dev/hda5' with 'root=LABEL=root_part'
 
 * edit /etc/fstab and change all references to the device (/dev/hda5, 
   ...) with LABEL={label}
 
 * reboot

If it doesn't, then what?
 
 * run /usr/sbin/update-grub to regenerate /boot/grub/menu.lst to use
 the label everywhere.
 
 Regards,
 Andrei


-- 

The power of Debian-Users is earth-shaking.
Have a great day!

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Best methods?

2008-09-18 Thread Jack Schneider

Hi, all 

Just noticed that the results of doing [dpkg --get-selections 
Packages]  gives me a list which includes-- 194 packages marked for
deinstall'.  What's the best tool to clean this up, and how to do it?? 

TIA, Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Best methods?

2008-09-18 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:44:56 +0200
Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 2008-09-18 22:34 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
 
  On Thu,18.Sep.08, 15:18:37, Jack Schneider wrote:
  
  Hi, all 
  
  Just noticed that the results of doing [dpkg --get-selections 
  Packages]  gives me a list which includes-- 194 packages marked for
  deinstall'.  What's the best tool to clean this up, and how to do
  it?? 
 
  Don't ever ask what the best method is, there are just too many
  of them. Here's the first I can think of:
   
  grep -v deinstall file  new_file
 
 This gives a list without these packages, but I assume that Jack's
 goal is to get rid of (= purge) the packages themselves.
 
 Sven
 
 
Hi, all 

Thanks for all the guides.  Andrei, deliberately done.  I read this
list.. Sven has the key..  My / partition is growing beyond 80% 0f 10
Gig, so I thought there may be some junk in there, /home /var /tmp are
on separate partitions.. OK  This machine is a noob's (me) upgrade
from i386 etch to lenny -AMD64 -update over the past year.  I'll
re-read responses and choose... 

Thanks.. 

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: anyone installed nvidia drivers on etch recently?

2008-10-03 Thread Jack Schneider
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:21:18 +0100
Adam Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm suffering from repeated crashes in my Eclipse IDE, which is java.
 Restarting it is slow and losing work is never much fun anyway, but I
 thought I'd find a solution until now.
 
 I have 4 approaches to the problem:
   - upgrade java (done that, now on the latest release of JDK 1.5,
 1.5.0_16)
   - upgrade Eclipse (worst approach, might require me to do a dev
 environment re-install)
   - upgrade Etch to latest packages (done that)
   - upgrade the nvidia driver (trying and failing).
 
 I'm using nv, so I thought I'd try the proprietary nvidia driver.
 
 Following any of the methods on
 http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers just leads me down the
 same path to the point where I find nvidia.ko failed to build in
 the logs.
 
 I'm using the stock kernel 2.6.26-bpo.1-686 from apt, and trying to
 get the nvidia-glx-legacy nvidia-kernel-common
 nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6-686 packages from non-free to install, but
 using the instruction:
 
 m-a auto-install nvidia
 
 leads to the error nvidia.ko failed build, as I mentioned above.
 
 The other methods outlined on the wiki fail similarly.
 
 The executable download directly from nvidia.com has the same problem.
 
 Is this whole thing with the proprietary driver a bad idea or just
 something that won't work until I get lenny?
 
 Thanks
 Adam
 
 
 
 

Take a look at this link:

-- http://tinyplanet.ca/~lsorense/debian/debian-nvidia-dri-howto.html

Thanks to Len Sorenson for keeping me straight...8-)

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: anyone installed nvidia drivers on etch recently?

2008-10-04 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:24:16 +0100
Adam Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Jack Schneider on 04/10/08 03:46, wrote:
  On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:21:18 +0100
  Adam Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I'm using nv, so I thought I'd try the proprietary nvidia driver.
 
  Following any of the methods on
  http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers just leads me down the
  same path to the point where I find nvidia.ko failed to build in
  the logs.
 
  I'm using the stock kernel 2.6.26-bpo.1-686 from apt, and trying to
  get the nvidia-glx-legacy nvidia-kernel-common
  nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6-686 packages from non-free to install, but
  using the instruction:
 
  m-a auto-install nvidia
 
  leads to the error nvidia.ko failed build, as I mentioned above.
 
  
  Take a look at this link:
  
  --
  http://tinyplanet.ca/~lsorense/debian/debian-nvidia-dri-howto.html
 
 I followed those instructions to the letter with no success. It was
 good in that it was definitive about whether I should be using legacy
 or not, however the only other main difference from the wiki article
 was the m-a command:
 
 m-a a-i -i -t -f nvidia-kernel-source
 
 which made no difference to the end result of the nvidia.ko build.
 
 I think it's something to do with v 2.6.26-bpo.1-686
 
 Is that the kernel version you're running too?
 
 Regards
 Adam
 
 
Hi. Adam
:~$ uname -r
2.6.26-1-amd64
May be the difference... Send Len a query...He's super helpful...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Have a great day...
Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: House wireless/wired router: choices? Plus wireless neophyte questions.

2008-10-04 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008 08:58:41 +0300
Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri,03.Oct.08, 01:46:48, Chris Metzler wrote:
 
 [...]
 
 One detail not mentioned here was that you should use WPA2 encryption
 to protect your wireless network. WEP is easy to crack with standard
 Linux tools. As far as I recall the XP version of the other OS needs
 at least SP2 (or was that SP3?) to use WPA2.
 
 As for choice of wireless routers, I have used a D-Link DI-524 for a 
 while with no problems (using the standard firmware). That box is now
 at my mom's house and I'm planning on getting the Asus WL-500g
 Premium, which has a lot of nice features, but is more expensive.
 Maybe it would be interesting for you to look for a model with
 integrated DSL modem?
 
 Regards,
 Andrei


-- 

Andrei,

Doesn't WPA2 require access to a Radius server..?

My Cisco seems to...

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: (nautilus:3241): Unique-DBus-WARNING **: Error while sending message: Did not receive a reply.

2009-08-01 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 13:21:33 -0400
Rick Thomas rbthoma...@pobox.com wrote:

 On Aug 1, 2009, at 5:28 AM, Leonardo Gaudino wrote:
 
  I experience the same problem (only difference is nautilus:3645,  
  whatever it means...). A pop-up message appears while loading the  
  session showing that phrase. The strangest is that everything does  
  work fine. This happens only at the first login: if i terminate
  the session and login again no errors pop up.
 
  Debian testing, kernel 2.6.30-bpo.1-686, gnome 2.26.1
 
  Leonardo
 
 
 
 Check your ~/.xsession-errors file.  I have two machines that are  
 having this problem.  On one, I get the same popup you do, but I get  
 it every time I log in.  The other one, I don't get the popup, but
 it shows up in the .xsession-errors file instead.
 
 Both of my machines are PowerPC Macs.  How about you?
 
 And yes, everything seems to be working fine.
 
 Very curious!
 
 
 Rick
 
 
Me Too!!! only different:  8-(

This is on my desktop at startup:


There was an error starting the GNOME Settings Daemon
Some things, such as themes, sounds, or background settings may not work 
correctly.

The last error message was:

Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did 
not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply 
timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.

GNOME will still try to restart the Settings Daemon next time you log
in.

Looks somthing like a dbus like error..

Keep me informed...
Nothing else seems broken..


Jack
-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Virtualbox Lenny Guest - Screen resize and Seamless mode

2009-08-03 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:33:32 -0500
Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:

 Chris wrote:
  On Monday 03 August 2009, go...@dobosevic.com wrote:
  Chris wrote:
  I am trying to get Screen resize and Seamless mode working on
  Lenny guest systems to no avail.
 
  I have tried insalling the guest-utils packages, as well as the
  guest-additions the manual way with m-a.  They install fine, but
  sreen-resize and seamless mode don't work.
 
  Does anyone have this working at all?  I've tried various
  xorg.conf files with the video driver and no screen resolutions.
 
  I am running virtualbox-ose 2.1.4 from lenny-backports on the
  host.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Chris
  I also have same problem.
  I have Debian Sid LXDE, Debian Sid XFCE and Debian Sid KDE as a
  guest. They were first Lenny and screen size was to big so I was
  edit xorg.conf and it was fine. After upgrade to Sid all of them
  have to small screen with black frame around (800x600 on 15
  laptop, native resolution is 1024x768). Editing xorg.conf doesn't
  help any more. Bye,
  Goran Dobosevic
  Hrvatski: www.dobosevic.com
English: www.dobosevic.com/en/
  
  Lets see if anyone has it working!  I have some SIDUX guests
  (09-01, 09-02) that work...
 
 I have the same problem.  An update to xorg occuring at approximately 
 the same time as an upgrade of VirtualBox has caused VBox to turn off 
 dynamic resizing, and nothing I can think of will bring it back. 
 Editing xorg.conf is futile. Reinstalling the additions does nothing. 
 The screen resolutions allowed are 800x600 or 640x480.  It is very 
 frustrating.
 
 Mark Allums
 
 
 
Hi, folks
I'm running VirtualBox 3.0.2 not the Debian -OSE edition, but downloaded
from the Sun Site..  Sun has precipitated a good number of changes,
Guest Additions work much better... I have resized windows in M$, SuSE, 
without incident.
uname -r 2.6.26-2-amd64
FWIW  
Jack
-- 




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Virtualbox Lenny Guest - Screen resize and Seamless mode

2009-08-03 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:11:49 -0500
Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:33:32 -0500
  Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
  
  Chris wrote:
  On Monday 03 August 2009, go...@dobosevic.com wrote:
  Chris wrote:
  I am trying to get Screen resize and Seamless mode working on
  Lenny guest systems to no avail.
 
  I have tried insalling the guest-utils packages, as well as the
  guest-additions the manual way with m-a.  They install fine, but
  sreen-resize and seamless mode don't work.
 
  Does anyone have this working at all?  I've tried various
  xorg.conf files with the video driver and no screen resolutions.
 
  I am running virtualbox-ose 2.1.4 from lenny-backports on the
  host.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Chris
  I also have same problem.
  I have Debian Sid LXDE, Debian Sid XFCE and Debian Sid KDE as a
  guest. They were first Lenny and screen size was to big so I was
  edit xorg.conf and it was fine. After upgrade to Sid all of them
  have to small screen with black frame around (800x600 on 15
  laptop, native resolution is 1024x768). Editing xorg.conf doesn't
  help any more. Bye,
  Goran Dobosevic
  Hrvatski: www.dobosevic.com
English: www.dobosevic.com/en/
  Lets see if anyone has it working!  I have some SIDUX guests
  (09-01, 09-02) that work...
  I have the same problem.  An update to xorg occuring at
  approximately the same time as an upgrade of VirtualBox has caused
  VBox to turn off dynamic resizing, and nothing I can think of will
  bring it back. Editing xorg.conf is futile. Reinstalling the
  additions does nothing. The screen resolutions allowed are 800x600
  or 640x480.  It is very frustrating.
 
  Mark Allums
 
 
 
  Hi, folks
  I'm running VirtualBox 3.0.2 not the Debian -OSE edition, but
  downloaded from the Sun Site..  Sun has precipitated a good number
  of changes, Guest Additions work much better... I have resized
  windows in M$, SuSE, without incident.
  uname -r 2.6.26-2-amd64
  FWIW  
  Jack
 
 
 I am Vista 64 SP2, VBox 3.0.2 (non-free), Debian amd64 guest, Squeeze 
 with a few Sid bits.  This includes Sid X.org, GNOME, and GCC 4.3.3, 
 with Debian kernel 2.6.30-1 (which is Sid version of 2.6.30.5).
 
 # uname -a
 Linux patricia 2.6.30-1-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Aug 3 12:28:22 UTC 2009
 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 
 Mark Allums
 
 
Mark,  sorry I didn't mention it, I run Debian Squeeze as host...
Jack

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Musings on debian-user list

2009-08-03 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:54:56 -0400
Chris Jones cjns1...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:20:58PM EDT, John Hasler wrote:
  Chris Jones writes:
   I guess so..  though I'm not sure about the usefulness thereof,
   save for demo'ing the flexibility of, what's the word.. Window
   Managers..?
  
  Organization.  I can have an FVWM desktop with a couple of dozen
  panes for each of umpteen projects.  I can then, for rxample,
  switch quickly from the environment where I am working on Chrony,
  with a couple of Emacs instances, a debugger, an xterm running
  tail -f on a log, etc, to the desktop where I am studing music
  theory and have Noteedit, Solfege, etc running.
 
 Yes John, but why would one need all shapes of xterms with
 extraordinary dimensions to achieve this..? I mean, most terminal
 screen-oriented apps assume some form of 4:3 geometry to begin with.. 
 
 If you need the editor, a shell, a debugger, and a log tail displaying
 concurrently on the one physical screen to achieve what you are
 working one faster and more effectively, fine.. but as I hinted
 above, I suspect that in most circumstances, having all that stuff
 visible on the same display is often a case of showing off one's
 environment.. screenshot feed, no more.. 
 
 Sounds like you're talking IDE.. but correct me if I'm wrong, doesn't
 text-mode emacs provide all of this, and more - even on a barebones
 linux console..??
 
 But never mind, what I really was saying is that I'm as much of an
 idiot as the next guy for wasting huge amounts of time to set up,
 modify, etc. my computing interface.. and all the same I often feel
 that better folks than myself do not care too much about such aspects.
 
 I mean.. I'm a mediocre hobbyist programmer, trying to make some sense
 of some C code that clearly shows its age, via vim and gdb.. Now, do I
 really need, am I really going to keep an eye on, half a dozen five
 line xterms that tail all my system's logs while I chug along..?
 
 In my case the tradeoff at this point is to have whatever I'm working
 on full screen - with some form of split/windowed display when
 useful.. and a minimal one-line last (status in gnu/screen
 parlance..) line of the screen display a bunch of automatically
 refreshed counters that provide me with a summary of what's going on
 in my system..  as much as I can grasp in one eyeful.
 
 And naturally use different X desktops in order to instantly switch
 to a different environment as necessary.
 
 Thanks,
 
 CJ
 
 
Chris,
I've found Compiz-fusion useful to keep multiple things going..
ctrl-alt-- giving a new desktop quickly... YMMV.
Jack

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: usb floppy, image files

2009-08-20 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:08:26 -0400
Hugh Lawson hlaw...@triad.rr.com wrote:

 
 Hello Debian Users,
 
 I'm looking for a program like 'dd' that can copy image files to
 a USB floppy drive.
 
 I've done some googling without success.
 
 Hugh Lawson
 
 

Did you you look @ clonezilla-live ??


http://www.clonezilla.org/

FWIW, Jack
-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Which programming Language

2009-02-10 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:45:49 -0600
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:

 On 02/10/2009 12:32 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
  Ron Johnson wrote:
  
   Readability and maintainability of assembly
  language.
 
  Yep.  The (CISC) VAX instruction set was designed partly with
  assembly programmers in mind (and also to map closely to FORTRAN
  and COBOL instructions), and the (macro, natch) assembler is
  designed with HLL features.
 
  
  The Motorola 68000 series was allegedly designed partly with C in
  mind.
 
 Patterned after the PDP-11 (), and DEC always liked orthogonal CISC 
 chips.
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_68000#History
  The MACSS team drew heavily on the influence of minicomputer
  processor design, such as the PDP-11 and VAX systems, which were
  similarly microcoded.
 
Hey, Ron

Due to Obama's intent to automate medical records, do you think that it
may be helpful to get out the old MUMPS(M) docs?  Never got it's place
in the sun.  But still in use at the GOV!

Thinks I may have them on DECtape!  8-)

Jack



-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Which programming Language

2009-02-10 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:42:15 -0600
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:

 On 02/10/2009 04:55 PM, Jack Schneider wrote:
 [snip]
  
  Due to Obama's intent to automate medical records, do you think
  that it
 
 I don't think his ultimate purpose is hackable medical records, but 
 that's another story...
 
  may be helpful to get out the old MUMPS(M) docs?  Never got it's
  place in the sun.  But still in use at the GOV!
  
  Thinks I may have them on DECtape!  8-)
 
 Found this via Google:
 http://www.vistasoftware.org/presentations/VSA-What_Is_VistA_080406.pdf
 
 
Hooray! Now I know of two incompatible systems named VISTA!!!

Have a great evening!

Jack

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: [OT] Friday the 13th

2009-02-11 Thread Jack Schneider
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:29:37 +
David Jardine da...@jardine.de wrote:

 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:17:47AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
  [...] 
  No, I think the much better idea would be to ditch timezones and
  put the whole world on UTC.  Get rid of DST and 12-hour clocks,
  too, while you're at it.  There is absolutely no real benefit to
  having the clock say 7am when you wake up and 11pm when you go
  to sleep instead of (assuming UTC-6) waking up at 1:00 (which,
  remember, represents the same actual time as is currently called
  7am in that timezone), working 3-12, and going to bed at 19:00.
 
 And whatever happened to decimalisation?
 
 
Hi,folks

We are probably the only entities in the universe who spend so much
energy keeping track of the number of times our planet spins.
How bazaar!

Jack
-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: [OT] Friday the 13th

2009-02-11 Thread Jack Schneider
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:06:36 -0600
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:

 On 02/11/2009 07:47 AM, Jack Schneider wrote:
 [snip]
  
  We are probably the only entities in the universe who spend so much
  energy keeping track of the number of times our planet spins.
  How bazaar!
 
 How can you make such a comment when you have *no clue* as to what 
 any other entity does?
 
RE:  probably

Jack

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: [OT] Friday the 13th

2009-02-11 Thread Jack Schneider
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:05:10 -0800
Marc Shapiro mshapiro...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
   We are probably the only entities in the universe who spend so much
  energy keeping track of the number of times our planet spins.
  How bazaar!
 
 Or, how bizarre.  Bazaar goes with 'The Cathedral and the.
 
 Sorry to nitpick, but I could resist.
 
Thanks!  Never was good at spellin
Jack

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: [OT] Friday the 13th

2009-02-11 Thread Jack Schneider
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:12:21 -0600
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:

 On 02/11/2009 08:32 AM, Jack Schneider wrote:
  On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:06:36 -0600
  Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
  
  On 02/11/2009 07:47 AM, Jack Schneider wrote:
  [snip]
  We are probably the only entities in the universe who spend so
  much energy keeping track of the number of times our planet spins.
  How bazaar!
  How can you make such a comment when you have *no clue* as to what 
  any other entity does?
 
  RE:  probably
 
  From WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) [wn]:
 
 probably
  adv 1: with considerable certainty; without much doubt; He is
 probably out of the country; in all likelihood we are
 headed for war [syn: {probably}, {likely}, {in all
 likelihood}, {in all probability}, {belike}]
  2: easy to believe on the basis of available evidence; he
 talked plausibly before the committee; he will probably win
 the election [syn: {credibly}, {believably}, {plausibly},
 {probably}] [ant: {implausibly}, {improbably}, {incredibly},
 {unbelievably}]
 
 
 Based on these definitions, your statement is a fallacy:
 (Logic) An argument, or apparent argument, which professes
  to be decisive of the matter at issue, while in reality it
  is not; a sophism.
 
 
1/6,759,846,988

Jack

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: [OT] Friday the 13th

2009-02-16 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:28:45 -0800
Marc Shapiro mshapiro...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Celejar wrote:
  On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:13:15 -0800
  Marc Shapiro mshapiro...@yahoo.com wrote:
  
  On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:16:49PM +, Avi Greenbury wrote:
  Marc Shapiro wrote:
  Jack Schneider wrote:
   We are probably the only entities in the universe who spend so
  much
  energy keeping track of the number of times our planet spins.
  How bazaar!
  Or, how bizarre.  Bazaar goes with 'The Cathedral and the.
 
  Sorry to nitpick, but I could resist.
 
  What's the name of that law that states that any post pointing
  out someone's mistake will always include a typo of its own?
  Avi,
 
  Are you referring to my mismatched single and double quotes?  Or
  is there something else that I am not seeing?
  
  You wrote could resist rather than couldn't resist.
  
 Ah!  I missed it when I wrote the post, and again, when you
 commented. We are always our own worst proofreaders.
 
BIZARRE!

Jack

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: how does GRUB read from /boot on software-RAID partition?

2009-02-24 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:21:23 -0500
Barclay, Daniel dan...@fgm.com wrote:

 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
  Barclay, Daniel wrote:
 ...
  Since GRUB hasn't loaded the kernel file yet, GRUB can't be using
  the kernel and its md driver, and therefore can't be reading the
  partition _as_a_RAID_ _volume_ (/dev/mdX), right?
 
 
  So is GRUB just reading the partition directly to get to the file
  system?
 
  
  GRUB does not know anything about RAID, so I assume this is true.
 
 That's what I have been thinking, but I just found the message at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-r...@vger.kernel.org/msg09712.html
 that says::
 
 ... once grub2 has determined that the intended boot partition is
 a raid partition, the raid code takes over ... and it scans for
 all the other members of the raid array and utilizes whichever drives
 it needs to in order to complete the boot process.  ... [I]t doesn't
 need any member of a raid1 array to be perfect[;] it will attempt
 a round robin read on all the sectors and only fail if all drives
 return an error for a given read.
 
 Is that _just_ for GRUB2 and or does the current GRUB (0.97) in Lenny
 also do that?
 
 
 
  ... is GRUB taking advantage of the fact that the RAID metadata is
  written at the end of a partition ...
 ...
  If so, how reliable is that?
 
  Should one put /boot on a plain, non-RAID partition on one disk and
  somehow (manually or automatically) maintain a backup /boot
  partition on 
   the second disk, or is it fine to put /boot on a mirrored
   partition (so maintaining redundancy is automatic) and let GRUB
   read the partition directly?
 
  
  Again, while I haven't tried, I've seen several reports that this
  works. ... So why make things more complicated and not automatic?
 
 I don't get why you're asking that.  I _am_ trying to avoid the
 complicated and non-automatic solution (trying to check whether the
 simpler solution is reliable).
 
 
 
 Daniel
Hi, Daniel et al

The following is an outline of my setup on a couple of the system disks.

Roughly I have two md devices for the host system, md0  md1:

j...@host:~$ df -m
Filesystem   1M-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/md0  9389  7157  1755  81% /
tmpfs 4005 1  4005   1% /lib/init/rw
udev10 110   2% /dev
tmpfs 4005 0  4005   0% /dev/shm
/dev/dm-040318 11628 26642  31% /home
/dev/dm-419686 15356  3331  83% /home/jack/XP_VDI
/dev/dm-630238  7453 21250  26% /home/jack/suse
/dev/dm-2 302470  2802   3% /tmp
/dev/dm-1 8064  3426  4229  45% /var
/dev/hda9090 0 100% /media/cdrom0

The only concern I have is that / is marginally small. It's
expandable tho. 
 /boot is just on /mdo. I have run without incident for over a year.
Provides sufficient isolation from my bumbling around...  8-)

FWIW. 

Jack
.


-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: how does GRUB read from /boot on software-RAID partition?

2009-02-24 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:14:54 -0500
Barclay, Daniel dan...@fgm.com wrote:

 Jack Schneider wrote:
  On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:21:23 -0500
  Barclay, Daniel dan...@fgm.com wrote:
  
  Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
  Barclay, Daniel wrote:
 ...
  ... is GRUB taking advantage of the fact that the RAID metadata
  is written at the end of a partition ...
  ...
  If so, how reliable is that?
 
  Should one put /boot on a plain, non-RAID partition on one disk
  and ...maintain a backup /boot partition on 
  the second disk, or is it fine to put /boot on a mirrored
  partition (so maintaining redundancy is automatic) and let GRUB
  read the partition directly?
  ... why make things more complicated and not automatic?
  ...  I _am_ trying to avoid the
  complicated and non-automatic solution (trying to check whether the
  simpler solution is reliable).
 ...
 
  Hi, Daniel et al
  
  The following is an outline of my setup on a couple of the system
  disks.
  
  Roughly I have two md devices for the host system, md0  md1:
  
  j...@host:~$ df -m
  Filesystem   1M-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
  /dev/md0  9389  7157  1755  81% /
  tmpfs 4005 1  4005   1% /lib/init/rw
  udev10 110   2% /dev
  tmpfs 4005 0  4005   0% /dev/shm
  /dev/dm-040318 11628 26642  31% /home
  /dev/dm-419686 15356  3331
  83% /home/jack/XP_VDI /dev/dm-630238  7453
  21250  26% /home/jack/suse /dev/dm-2 3024
  70  2802   3% /tmp /dev/dm-1 8064
  3426  4229  45% /var /dev/hda90
  90 0 100% /media/cdrom0
  
  The only concern I have is that / is marginally small. It's
  expandable tho. 
   /boot is just on /mdo. I have run without incident for over a year.
 
 But if you haven't had any disk-failure incidents, do you know whether
 your setup will reliably work if either disk fails?  (Did you mean
 that you simulated disk failure?)
 
 
 
 Daniel
Hi, Daniel

Sorry, no failures to date.  My thinking was since I was running testing
I didn't want updates/bugs/my ineptitude to trash my data and other
OS. This config allows me to change easily... of course I'm a Debian
nooby.  I can boot from either disk. I pulled a sata cable from one.

Jack
-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

2008-10-17 Thread Jack Schneider
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:05:17 +0200
Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi there,
 
   If I click on the following URLs:
 
 * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4628view=rev
 * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4627view=rev
 
   I can get a 404 error on the second one, however if I copy/paste
 them directly in the URL bar, both appears to be working fine. I can
 reproduce on firefox 3.0  2.0 on debian testing/stable.
 
   Could someone please try and report ?
 
 thank you,
They both work for me... Lenny AMD64  FF 3.0.3

Have a great day!

Jack

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Nvidia, apt-get Synaptic

2008-10-28 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:52:43 -0500
MLewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 I'm new to the list and Debian, but not new to Linux. I have been 
 running RH for 10+ years and recently was very impressed with Debian
 and decided to make the switch. Congrats to the team that puts Debian 
 together, it looks like a well thought out distribution. Also, thanks 
 much for an update method that doesn't require a six-pack to get
 through.
 
 I'm running Lenny Beta2.
 
 Two questions:
 
 Nvidia - I have an Nvidia Geforce 6600LE video card in my machine. I 
 understand that it is better to run 'nvidia' or 'nv' drivers than to
 get the binaries from Nvidia (However no glx mode). I have looked for
 the nv  nvidia drivers on my machine and apparently do not have them:
 
 rattler:/etc/postfix$ dpkg -S nv.ko
 linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: 
 /lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686/kernel/drivers/ata/sata_nv.ko
 rattler:/etc/postfix$ dpkg -S nvidia.ko
 dpkg: *nvidia.ko* not found.
 
 I've tried dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg but that didn't help either. 
 What package do I need to install to get the nv  nvidia drivers?
 
 
 Synaptic vs apt-get: Is there a difference in these two packages
 other than one is a GUI and one is CLI? If so, is one method
 preferred over the other?
 
 Thanks,
 Mike
 

Hi, Mike

Try this link :

http://tinyplanet.ca/~lsorense/debian/debian-nvidia-dri-howto.html

Len watches this list so you might ask him if you have further questions

Jack 
-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Broken flashplayer installation.

2008-11-18 Thread Jack Schneider

Hi, all.
Debian lenny
Linux Speeduke 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Oct 9 14:16:53 UTC 2008 x86_64 
GNU/Linux



-- I get the following errors from Synaptic when trying to reinstall
flashplayer-mozilla.  RE:

E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libidn11_1.10-0.0_amd64.deb: trying to 
overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libidn.so.11.5.39', which is also in 
package libidn11-emul
E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libssh2_0.18-0.0_amd64.deb: trying to 
overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libssh2.so.1.0.0', which is also in package 
libssh2-1-emul
E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libcurl3_7.18.2-0.0_amd64.deb: trying to 
overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libcurl.so.4.1.0', which is also in package 
libcurl3-emul
E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libnspr4_4.7.1-0.1_amd64.deb: trying to 
overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libplds4.so.0d', which is also in package 
libnspr4-0d-emul
E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libnss3_3.12.0-0.1_amd64.deb: trying to 
overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libssl3.so.1d', which is also in package 
libnss3-1d-emul

I don't know what the /emul/* stuff is or where it came from...

How do I get started fixing this...??

TIA  Jack



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [OT] Broken flashplayer installation.

2008-11-18 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:18:55 -0600
Stackpole, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  From: Jack Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:01 PM
  Subject: Broken flashplayer installation.
  
  
  Hi, all.
  Debian lenny
  Linux Speeduke 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Oct 9 14:16:53 UTC 2008
 x86_64
  GNU/Linux
  
  
  
  -- I get the following errors from Synaptic when trying to reinstall
  flashplayer-mozilla.  RE:
  
  E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libidn11_1.10-0.0_amd64.deb:
 trying
  to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libidn.so.11.5.39', which is
 also
  in package libidn11-emul
  E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libssh2_0.18-0.0_amd64.deb:
 trying to
  overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libssh2.so.1.0.0', which is also
 in
  package libssh2-1-emul
  E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libcurl3_7.18.2-0.0_amd64.deb:
 trying
  to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libcurl.so.4.1.0', which is
 also in
  package libcurl3-emul
  E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libnspr4_4.7.1-0.1_amd64.deb:
 trying
  to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libplds4.so.0d', which is
  also
 in
  package libnspr4-0d-emul
  E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libnss3_3.12.0-0.1_amd64.deb:
 trying
  to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libssl3.so.1d', which is also
 in
  package libnss3-1d-emul
  
  I don't know what the /emul/* stuff is or where it came from...
  
  How do I get started fixing this...??
  
  TIA  Jack
  
 
 This is probably not the answer you were expecting, so I labeled it
 Off Topic.
 
 Have you looked into the new 64bit version from Adobe?
 http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
 
 I had many problems with getting 32bit flash working right. I ended up
 getting something usable, but nothing satisfactory. Adobe still claims
 that the 64bit version is Alpha and it was only released yesterday
 but I have not had any issues with it yet. I have already seen a
 noticeable decrease in system resources while getting much better
 performance. The 32bit wrapper would take minutes to load a youtube
 video and would crash if I skipped around too much. None of those
 issues so far with the 64bit version. All of the sites I visit work
 without problem (YMMV of course).
 
 I have 2 64bit Debian Lenny systems with flash. So far 0 problems with
 the 64bit flash player 10.
 
 It is something you might want to consider.
 
 Have fun!
 ~S~
 
 
Thanks, Chris

I am off to see the (that) wizard...

That may help... alot.

Jack

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [OT] Broken flashplayer installation.

2008-11-18 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:18:55 -0600
Stackpole, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  From: Jack Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:01 PM
  Subject: Broken flashplayer installation.
  
  
  Hi, all.
  Debian lenny
  Linux Speeduke 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Oct 9 14:16:53 UTC 2008
 x86_64
  GNU/Linux
  
  
  
  -- I get the following errors from Synaptic when trying to reinstall
  flashplayer-mozilla.  RE:
  
  E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libidn11_1.10-0.0_amd64.deb:
 trying
  to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libidn.so.11.5.39', which is
 also
  in package libidn11-emul
  E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libssh2_0.18-0.0_amd64.deb:
 trying to
  overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libssh2.so.1.0.0', which is also
 in
  package libssh2-1-emul
  E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libcurl3_7.18.2-0.0_amd64.deb:
 trying
  to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libcurl.so.4.1.0', which is
 also in
  package libcurl3-emul
  E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libnspr4_4.7.1-0.1_amd64.deb:
 trying
  to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libplds4.so.0d', which is
  also
 in
  package libnspr4-0d-emul
  E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libnss3_3.12.0-0.1_amd64.deb:
 trying
  to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libssl3.so.1d', which is also
 in
  package libnss3-1d-emul
  
  I don't know what the /emul/* stuff is or where it came from...
  
  How do I get started fixing this...??
  
  TIA  Jack
  
 
 This is probably not the answer you were expecting, so I labeled it
 Off Topic.
 
 Have you looked into the new 64bit version from Adobe?
 http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
 
 I had many problems with getting 32bit flash working right. I ended up
 getting something usable, but nothing satisfactory. Adobe still claims
 that the 64bit version is Alpha and it was only released yesterday
 but I have not had any issues with it yet. I have already seen a
 noticeable decrease in system resources while getting much better
 performance. The 32bit wrapper would take minutes to load a youtube
 video and would crash if I skipped around too much. None of those
 issues so far with the 64bit version. All of the sites I visit work
 without problem (YMMV of course).
 
 I have 2 64bit Debian Lenny systems with flash. So far 0 problems with
 the 64bit flash player 10.
 
 It is something you might want to consider.
 
 Have fun!
 ~S~ 
 
 


Hi, Chris 

Got the libflashplayer.so.So where exactly do I put it???
 FWIW, just spent a few minutes removing the 32bit stuff...
Thanks again!  

Jack


-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [OT] Broken flashplayer installation.

2008-11-18 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:13:18 -0600
Stackpole, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  From: Jack Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [OT] Broken flashplayer installation.
  
  On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:18:55 -0600
  Stackpole, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
From: Jack Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:01 PM
Subject: Broken flashplayer installation.
   
   
Hi, all.
Debian lenny
Linux Speeduke 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Oct 9 14:16:53 UTC 2008
   x86_64
GNU/Linux
   
   
   
-- I get the following errors from Synaptic when trying to
 reinstall
flashplayer-mozilla.  RE:
   
E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libidn11_1.10-0.0_amd64.deb:
   trying
to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libidn.so.11.5.39', which
 is
   also
in package libidn11-emul
E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libssh2_0.18-0.0_amd64.deb:
   trying to
overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libssh2.so.1.0.0', which is
 also
   in
package libssh2-1-emul
E:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libcurl3_7.18.2-0.0_amd64.deb:
   trying
to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libcurl.so.4.1.0', which
is
   also in
package libcurl3-emul
E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libnspr4_4.7.1-0.1_amd64.deb:
   trying
to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libplds4.so.0d', which is
also
   in
package libnspr4-0d-emul
E: /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-libnss3_3.12.0-0.1_amd64.deb:
   trying
to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libssl3.so.1d', which is
 also
   in
package libnss3-1d-emul
   
I don't know what the /emul/* stuff is or where it came
 from...
   
How do I get started fixing this...??
   
TIA  Jack
   
  
   This is probably not the answer you were expecting, so I labeled
   it Off Topic.
  
   Have you looked into the new 64bit version from Adobe?
   http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
  
   I had many problems with getting 32bit flash working right. I
   ended
 up
   getting something usable, but nothing satisfactory. Adobe still
 claims
   that the 64bit version is Alpha and it was only released
   yesterday but I have not had any issues with it yet. I have
   already seen a noticeable decrease in system resources while
   getting much better performance. The 32bit wrapper would take
   minutes to load a youtube video and would crash if I skipped
   around too much. None of those issues so far with the 64bit
   version. All of the sites I visit work without problem (YMMV of
   course).
  
   I have 2 64bit Debian Lenny systems with flash. So far 0 problems
 with
   the 64bit flash player 10.
  
   It is something you might want to consider.
  
   Have fun!
   ~S~
  
  
  
  
  Hi, Chris
  
  Got the libflashplayer.so.So where exactly do I put it???
   FWIW, just spent a few minutes removing the 32bit stuff...
  Thanks again!
  
  Jack
 
 
 I just put it in ~/.mozilla/plugins/, restarted iceweasel, and as soon
 as iceweasel came back up it said it found a new add-on. I verified it
 by checking Tools-Add-ons and it worked for me from there on out.
 
 Have fun!
 ~S~
 
 
Thanks, Chris
That did it!!  You're the man!
Ain't DEBIAN folks wunderfull!!  8-)

Jack




-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 64-bit Flash Player

2008-11-28 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:02:01 +0200
Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sat,22.Nov.08, 07:59:29, John Hasler wrote:
  Debian-multimedia now has a native 64 bit flashplayer in
  Experimental.  I haven't tried it yet so I don't know how well it
  works.
 
 It needed some hacking to get installed
 
 # LANG=C dpkg --configure -a
 Setting up flashplayer-mozilla (2:10.0.d20.7-0.1) ...
 update-alternatives: unable to
 make /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so.dpkg-tmp a symlink
 to /etc/alternatives/flash-mozilla.so: No such file or directory
 dpkg: error processing flashplayer-mozilla (--configure): subprocess
 post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were
 encountered while processing: flashplayer-mozilla # ln
 -s /usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/libflashplayer.so 
 /etc/alternatives/flash-mozilla.so
 think:/etc# LANG=C dpkg --configure -a Setting up flashplayer-mozilla
 (2:10.0.d20.7-0.1) ...
 
 So it installed, but iceweasel didn't see it so I symlinked 
 /usr/lib/libflashplayer.so into ~/.mozilla/plugins
 
 I only tested with one youtube video, but no problems.
 
 Regards,
 Andrei


-- 
Hi, folks  the following worked for me :

Linux Speeduke 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 SMP Sat Nov 8 18:25:23 UTC 2008 x86_64
GNU/Linux


 Hi, Chris
  
  Got the libflashplayer.so. from adobe.   So where exactly do I put
  it??? FWIW, just spent a few minutes removing the 32bit stuff...
  Thanks again!
  
  Jack  
 
 
 I just put it in ~/.mozilla/plugins/, restarted iceweasel, and as soon
 as iceweasel came back up it said it found a new add-on. I verified it
 by checking Tools-Add-ons and it worked for me from there on out.
 
 Have fun!
 ~S~
 
   
Thanks, Chris
That did it!!  You're the man!
Ain't DEBIAN folks wunderfull!!  8-)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT: laptop recomendations

2008-12-11 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:08:14 +0100
Sjoerd Hardeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Micha Feigin wrote:
  Hello,
  
  Sorry for being a bit off topic but it's time for a new laptop that
  will run linux solely and I'm looking for recomendation on what has
  a good build quallity (will travel), descent battery life, although
  more important is good computing power and a good screen at
  15.4 (needs to be workable with the screen) at a price range of
  around 1500$ rough ballpark. Good service is a must since it's a
  working laptop.
  
  I know that hp and compaq are a big no no (build quality is shaky
  at best).  I also have the worst experience possible with Sony
  support on just about every continent (haven't managed to run into
  worse).  Lenovo 3000 series also has a bad track run at our uni in
  terms of build quallity, no experience with the ideapad pad heard
  that they are not much brighter.
  
  Currently the best candidates are the lenovo thinkpad series
  (either stick with the older and probed t61 or go with the t500 or
  similar), mac (not sure about the one button issue although the
  design is nice).
  
  Runner up is Dell, although the hardware seems a bit cheap when
  looking at the drivers (especially the touchpad which tends to be
  alps which isn't up to par with the synaptic).
  
  Toshiba local dealers didn't prove themselves with a friends laptop.
  
  Can't find anyone with experience with lg and fujitsu.
  
  Will be happy for feedback/experience/hardware trouble/Service
  experience in case of mulfunciton etc.
  
  Thanks
  
  
 I love my Dell XPS. I have a 13.3', but there are versions with
 larger screens. They can be bought with Ubuntu preinstalled, so you
 know for sure that Linux works on these systems. Also some Inspirions
 can be bought with Ubuntu, which saves you a Windows licence.
 
 Sjoerd
 
 


-- 

Hi, I concur with the DELL idea.  I have an Precision M60 3-years
old and it's a tank. still using initial battery. I would recommend
that you explore the refurbished supply for a more reasonable price. 
Mine has been dropped, rained on, slipped off the car hood and sat-on
with never a hiccup.  But of course, YMMV.
My .02

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT: laptop recomendations

2008-12-11 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:51:47 +
Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote:

 On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:54:41AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
 
  -- 
  
  Hi, I concur with the DELL idea.  I have an Precision M60
  3-years
 
 Is that an answer or a signature?
 
 '-- ' on a line of its own is a signature separator. If you really
 like '--' as a separator line, just don't put the extra space after
 it.
 
 As in:
 


-- 
Just Carelessness..  8-)
Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Hypervisor on an existing system?

2008-12-23 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:12:36 -0600
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. bs...@volumehost.net wrote:

 On Monday 22 December 2008, Ross Boylan
 rossboy...@stanfordalumni.org wrote about 'Re: Hypervisor on an
 existing system?':
 All I really wanted was to run MS Windows to watch TV online and
 maybe play games; I'm thinking maybe qemu is the way to go for that.
 
 Some games are not going to be playable under an emulator (kvm, qemu, 
 virtualbox, vmware-workstation) or under a hypervisor (xen,
 vmware-esx). Anything that uses Direct3D, e.g., needs direct hardware
 access to the video card, which isn't available under either of those
 environments right now.
I run Vbox-peul edition version 2.1.0.  This supports USB devices in
guest O/S. also has 3D enabled on my NVIDIA graphics card.. One H--- of
a lot faster than native install of MS. 

FWIW
Jack
-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Nit-query

2008-12-23 Thread Jack Schneider

Hi,all
I have just used CLI 'users' command.  I get two(2) entries for myself.
Re:
j...@speeduke:~$ users
jack jack

Is this normal???
---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Nit-query

2008-12-23 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:43:50 -0800
Raquel raq...@thericehouse.net wrote:

 On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:17:41 -0600
 Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
 
  
  Hi,all
  I have just used CLI 'users' command.  I get two(2) entries for
  myself. Re:
  j...@speeduke:~$ users
  jack jack
  
  Is this normal???
  ---
 
 Let's see, I have 9 raquel because I have 6 windows open and 3
 terminals, using ssh, to other machines.
 
OK, Thanks folks.  I get it!!
Jack


-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Nit-query

2008-12-23 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:24:54 +
Tzafr irCohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote:

 On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:17:41AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
  
  Hi,all
  I have just used CLI 'users' command.  I get two(2) entries for
  myself. Re:
  j...@speeduke:~$ users
  jack jack
 
 See also:
 
   w
   who
   finger
 
 It also depends on your terminal. Some terminals don't register each
 new terminal as a login entry in utmp .
 

Hi, Tzafr

Is that a/the reason for  SYSTEM  ADMINISTRATION  USERSGROUPS
ROOT(password) gives so many user entries???
TIA
Jack
-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Hypervisor on an existing system?

2008-12-26 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:45:08 -0600
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:

 On 12/22/08 14:58, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
  On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:14:06PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
  I don't know enough about the subject to be able to intelligently  
  Google, so I thought I'd ask first.
 
  My system is a fully-kitted out Sid system, and I'd like to
  experiment with virtual machines.
  
  qemu / virtualbox?
  
  openvz / vserver? (for userspace utilities only).
 
 Probably virtualbox-ose, but I'm open to ideas.
 
Ron, run the Virtual Box_ peul edition.  You get a robust USB support
and 3D Graphics.  Just my $.02 
That is free too single users.  'it's come a long way since SUN
acquired them.

Have a great day!

Jack
-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Debian Live hangs on cd boot.

2010-01-12 Thread Jack Schneider
Hi, All  I have a debian live cd which starts to boot.  I get the
ISOLINUX 3.71 Debian-2008-9-06 Copyright notice. Then it just hangs-
cd active.  Disk is debian-live-502-amd64-gnome-desktop.iso  MD5 sums
check out...Cd is on-top in bios boot priority.  Others, sysrescucd,
Ubuntu, Debian testing net-installer all boot fine. I have tried other
RW disks.  'may try CD-R disk if no one has a helping guess...

TIA  Jack  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Debian Live hangs on cd boot.

2010-01-12 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:00:27 -0500 (EST)
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:

 On 2010-01-12 at 12:23:49 -0500, Jack Schneider wrote:
  Hi, All  I have a debian live cd which starts to boot.  I get the
  ISOLINUX 3.71 Debian-2008-9-06 Copyright notice. Then it just hangs-
  cd active.  Disk is debian-live-502-amd64-gnome-desktop.iso  MD5
  sums check out...Cd is on-top in bios boot priority.  Others,
  sysrescucd, Ubuntu, Debian testing net-installer all boot fine. I
  have tried other RW disks.  'may try CD-R disk if no one has a
  helping guess...
 
 You haven't said what your hardware is, and this is just a wild guess.
 But I have an old laptop which frequently hangs on cold boot from CD
 (i.e. boot from power-on).  Warm boot from an already running
 operating system (Ctrl+Alt+Delete) works fine.  Obviously, it's
 possible there's something wrong with the image or with that
 particular burn of the image. But try warm booting the Debian Live CD
 after booting something else first.  In fact, try warm booting from
 the hang of the cold boot. That is one possibility.  In the case of
 my laptop, the cold boot from CD problem appears to be a BIOS bug.
 
 

Stephen:
Thanks for the reply.  My hardware is a Supermicro X7DAL-E M/B a couple
of years old.  I burned the image using Brasero from an Ubuntu laptop.
I tried your suggestion - Warm Boot - deliberately  I probably had done
it before, without thinking, chasing this..

THX, Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Segmentation fault query.

2010-01-31 Thread Jack Schneider
Hi, all

I need some direction.  I am running Debian squeeze-amd64 and have
encountered a problem. On shutting down with kernel 2.6.32-trunk-amd64
after the system halt, I get a segmentation fault and hangs.
the system stays powered up. Booting with kernel 2.6.30-1 this does not
occur and the system shuts down normally.  I have a trace output but
it's beyond my understanding and not complete as it may be  scrolled off
screen.  

How and to whom should this be reported? What other info should I
obtain?  My syslog and messages seem to not be reporting it. as it has
halted.

TIA Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Graphics Diag Query

2010-02-22 Thread Jack Schneider
Hi, All
Does any one know of a diagnostic tool to pin down a smeared LCD screen?
I have an old laptop i386, running lenny, up2date, 2.6.26-2-486 kernel,
which I want to take the load as a parallel-port printer host.  
It runs a Neomagic NM2093 video chip. I have checked the LCD display
with lcdtest and all's well.  It seems to display B/W terms at full
screen, OK.
I have googled 'till I get running in circles.  

I am thinking about removing color from the display, pointers on
if/how to do that would be appreciated.

TIA jack   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100222120641.30ac9...@speeduke.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Graphics Diag Query

2010-02-22 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:51:09 -0500 (EST)
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:

 On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:06:41 -0500 (EST), Jack Schneider wrote:
 
  Hi, All
  Does any one know of a diagnostic tool to pin down a smeared LCD
  screen? I have an old laptop i386, running lenny, up2date,
  2.6.26-2-486 kernel, which I want to take the load as a
  parallel-port printer host. It runs a Neomagic NM2093 video chip. I
  have checked the LCD display with lcdtest and all's well.  It seems
  to display B/W terms at full screen, OK.
  I have googled 'till I get running in circles.  
  
  I am thinking about removing color from the display, pointers on
  if/how to do that would be appreciated.
 
 I am a native speaker of English, but I haven't a clue what you're
 asking.  What exactly do you mean by pin down?  What do you mean
 by smeared?  (I assume you *don't* mean that your child smeared his
 peanut butter and jelly sandwich all over it, but I don't know what
 you *do* mean.)  And if you're only
 using it as a print server anyway, who cares?  Would you be so kind
 as to explain in less techno-slang terms exactly what the problem is
 and exactly what you are trying to accomplish.  I have an old laptop
 too, with an LCD screen and a neomagic 2160 chipset.  So I'm familiar
 with the hardware.  But I still have no clue what you are talking
 about.
 
 
Stephen, thanks for the reply...8-)
I want to find out if the color distortions (smears on left side of
images) I see on the LCD are due to a faulty LCD or faulty graphics
chip.  I want to know if there is a diagnostic to help figure that out.
I want to place a message/s in the screen (legible) what jobs are
pending/finished as appropriate.

Thanks, Jack
ps sometimes it appears that peanut butter was smeared... red-blue-
green-pink-violet  peanut butter  etc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100222134307.3ff6a...@speeduke.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Graphics Diag Query

2010-02-22 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:10:18 -0500 (EST)
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:

 On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:43:07 -0500 (EST), Jack Schneider wrote:
  Stephen, thanks for the reply...8-)
  I want to find out if the color distortions (smears on left side of
  images) I see on the LCD are due to a faulty LCD or faulty graphics
  chip.  I want to know if there is a diagnostic to help figure that
  out. I want to place a message/s in the screen (legible) what jobs
  are pending/finished as appropriate.
 
 OK, so you're seeing strange distortion of the colors and you
 want to figure out if it is a hardware problem or a software problem.
 I see.  Well, the only suggestion I have is rather low-tech; and
 I'm sure you've thought of it already; but I would suggest installing
 some other graphical operating system, such as Windows 95, DOS/Win
 3.1, etc. and see how things look then.  If you still see the smear,
 it's almost certainly a hardware problem.  But again, I'm sure you've
 thought of that.  Maybe someone else has a better idea, but that's
 all I know to suggest.
 
 
Thanks again, But no way to connect...8-(
The boot up screen is perfectly OK in black and white. Just need to
turn off colors, I think...
Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100222162907.05b6e...@speeduke.volunteerwireless.net



Re: ACPI problem on linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 powering off

2010-03-03 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:37:28 +
campbell mcleay campbell.mcl...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I am running 64-bit Debian Squeeze with kernel
 linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-vserver-amd64, and when
 I initiate a shutdown to halt/poweroff the system, either within a
 Gnome session or on the console,
 it reboots instead of powering off. I can see what looks like a kernel
 oops error message at the
 very end of the shutdown process, and then it reboots (it is too quick
 for me to see the exact error).
 My suspicion was that ACPI was the issue, so I disabled it at boot
 with 'acpi=off', and indeed it no longer
 reboots when I issue shutdown to halt it, but I lose hyperthreading
 and it won't power off at all. I have
 used Ubuntu 9.04 and 10.04 (which uses 2.6.32 kernel) to test the
 hardware as well, and these shut
 the machine down with no issue. I would use another linux-image
 package, but there seems to be only
 one for Squeeze (aside from a vserver image).
 
 Any suggestions on a way round this? I don't want to boot with
 'acpi=off', as it won't shutdown and
 hyperthreading won't work.
 
 Hardware is dual Xeon x5550 with 6GB ram and SSD hard disk.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Campbell
 
 
Hi, 

See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15005 

FWIW

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100303084016.02308...@speeduke.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Wifi Can't Connect

2010-03-22 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:23:23 -0400
Mark herrpoe...@hailmail.net wrote:

 I had wifi, now I don't.
 
 I just upgraded my kernel (using aptitude) from 2.6.26-686 to
 2.6.32-3-686 and followed that with aptitude full-upgrade, which
 removed a number of packages (that I wasn't using anyway) because I
 had previously always used apt-get (and I understand the consequences
 of this). I also installed kde-minimal (version 4).
 
 I know that the wifi was working for at least one session on the new
 kernel. But after a reboot, it stopped being able to connect. Alas, I
 do not know what I did in between. I was messing with aptitude
 without really knowing the consequences of my actions.
 
 SYMPTOMS
 
 Both when booting up and when trying things like ifup wlan0 and
 dhclient wlan0, I get the following response:
  DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 3
  DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 6
  DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 11
  DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8
  DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 12
  DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 19
  DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 9
  DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 9
  DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 14
  DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 10
  No DHCPOFFERS received.
  No working leases in persistent database - sleeping.
 
 When I open KWiFiManager, most of the time it sees my SSID and
 alternates between appearing connected -- i.e. green bars, good
 signal strength -- but with no Local IP, and an Unavailable Access
 Point; -- it stays like that for maybe 10-15 seconds, and then shows
 no connection.
 
 CONFIGURATION
 
 Basics: Dell Inspiron E1505, 2GB RAM. Running Lenny. Using
 repositories: lenny, testing, lenny-backports, lenny/updates
 (security), and debian-volatile.
 
 I have a Verizon (Westell) wireless modem/router. My MacBook Pro is
 connected to it wirelessly with no problem. I use WPA authentication.
 My /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf file reads (actual values not given here):
  network={
  ssid=MY_SSID
  psk=MY_PSK
  }
 
 My /etc/network/interfaces files reads:
  # This file describes the network interfaces available on your
  system # and how to activate them. For more information, see
  interfaces(5).
 
  # The loopback network interface
  auto lo
  iface lo inet loopback
 
  # The primary network interface -- This section commented-out on
  12/31/09, and got wifi working in the first place.
  #allow-hotplug eth0
  #iface eth0 inet static
  #   address 192.168.1.24
  #   netmask 255.255.255.0
  #   network 192.168.1.0
  #   broadcast 192.168.1.255
  #   gateway 192.168.1.1
  #   # dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package,
  if installed #  dns-nameservers 192.168.1.1
 
  # New DHCP Setup [WORKED UNTIL YESTERDAY]
  iface eth0 inet dhcp
  allow-hotplug eth0
 
 
 
  iface wlan0 inet dhcp
  wpa-driver wext
  wpa-key-mgmt WPA-PSK
  wpa-proto WPA
  wpa-ssid MY_SSID
 
  auto wlan0
 
 Trying something I found on the web, I edited
 my /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf file by uncommenting the timeout line:
  #timeout 60;
  # NEXT LINE ADDED AS PER
  http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=21520 timeout 100;
 
 I've installed KNetworkManager, but I don't understand how it works,
 and adding my wifi network in the WiFi tab seems to do nothing at all.
 
 I would appreciate any help anyone can offer!
 
 - Mark
 
 
Hi, Mark 
Have you got wpa-supplicant /installed/loaded ?
You need that for wpa access, I believe...

FWIW
Jack 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/2010030305.428c3...@speeduke.volunteerwireless.net



Re: Wifi Can't Connect

2010-03-23 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:30:42 -0400
Mark herrpoe...@hailmail.net wrote:

 On 3/22/10 11:03 PM, Jack Schneider wrote:
  Hi, Mark
  Have you got wpa-supplicant /installed/loaded ?
  You need that for wpa access, I believe...
 
  FWIW
  Jack
 
 
 Good question, Jack. I had not remembered that there was actually a 
 wpasupplicant package. I did have it installed. I just upgraded it, 
 rebooted. No change: still no wifi.
 
 I think in my first post about this I gave a slightly mixed up
 account of what happens when I start KWiFiManager. It alternates
 every few seconds between Ultimate Signal Strength (full bars) and
 Out of Range (no bars). When it has full bars, The Status of
 Active Connection box says Connected to network: [MY_SSID]. When
 it has no bars, it says Searching for network: any. It persistently
 shows Local IP: unavailable.  If I click on the Scan for
 Networks... button, it sees my SSID (and my neighbor's).
  But the odd thing is that, in the Status of Active Connection 
 box, the Access point address shows a mac address that is the same
 as my broadband router's address, except for the last digit: the last
 digit of my router's mac address is 5, but KWiFiManager says it's
 connecting to an Access point address that ends in B.
 
 When I run KNetworkManager, And click on the Scan button next to
 the SSID textbox, it sees no SSIDs at all -- neither in the map nor
 the details view.
 
 This is killing me. The computer's networking is handshaking my
 router but not getting an IP. Can anyone help me figure this out?
 Below is the rest of my original post, for reference.
 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 I had wifi, now I don't.
 
 I just upgraded my kernel (using aptitude) from 2.6.26-686 to
 2.6.32-3-686 and followed that with aptitude full-upgrade, which
 removed a number of packages (that I wasn't using anyway) because I
 had previously always used apt-get (and I understand the consequences
 of this). I also installed kde-minimal (version 4).
 
 I know that the wifi was working for at least one session on the new
 kernel. But after a reboot, it stopped being able to connect. Alas, I
 do not know what I did in between. I was messing with aptitude
 without really knowing the consequences of my actions.
 
 SYMPTOMS
 
 Both when booting up and when trying things like ifup wlan0 and
 dhclient wlan0, I get the following response:
 
DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 3
DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 6
DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 11
DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8
DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 12
DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 19
DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 9
DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 9
DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 14
DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 10
No DHCPOFFERS received.
No working leases in persistent database - sleeping.
 
 When I open KWiFiManager, most of the time it sees my SSID and
 alternates between appearing connected -- i.e. green bars, good
 signal strength -- but with no Local IP, and an Unavailable Access
 Point; -- it stays like that for maybe 10-15 seconds, and then shows
 no connection.
 
 CONFIGURATION
 
 Basics: Dell Inspiron E1505, 2GB RAM. Running Lenny. Using
 repositories: lenny, testing, lenny-backports, lenny/updates
 (security), and debian-volatile.
 
 I have a Verizon (Westell) wireless modem/router. My MacBook Pro is
 connected to it wirelessly with no problem. I use WPA authentication.
 My /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf file reads (actual values not given here):
 
network={
 ssid=MY_SSID
 psk=MY_PSK
}
 
 My /etc/network/interfaces files reads:
 
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your
   system # and how to activate them. For more information, see
   interfaces(5).
  
# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
  
# The primary network interface -- This section commented-out on
12/31/09, and got wifi working in the first place.
#allow-hotplug eth0
#iface eth0 inet static
#address 192.168.1.24
#netmask 255.255.255.0
#network 192.168.1.0
#broadcast 192.168.1.255
#gateway 192.168.1.1
## dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf
   package, if installed #   dns-nameservers 192.168.1.1
  
# New DHCP Setup [WORKED UNTIL YESTERDAY]
 iface eth0 inet dhcp
 allow-hotplug eth0
  
  
  
iface wlan0 inet dhcp
wpa-driver wext
wpa-key-mgmt WPA-PSK
wpa-proto WPA
wpa-ssid MY_SSID
  
auto wlan0
 
 Trying something I found on the web, I edited
 my /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf file by uncommenting the timeout line:
 
#timeout 60

Gnome/X terminal resize

2008-04-28 Thread Jack Schneider

Hi, All

Got a minor problem,  
Desktop and laptop running Debian lenny 2.6.24-1
up to date with updates.
Problem:  On 'desktop' cannot resize Gnome or X-term windows by dragging
borders-- Laptop works fine.
Comparing terminal  config info to laptop install shows no setup
differences. No Errors reported in X-org logs..

Where should I looked further???[don't need use laptop... 8-) ]

Thanks in advance..
Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Gnome/X terminal resize

2008-04-28 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:58:11 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On 04/28/08 14:55, Jack Schneider wrote:
  Hi, All
  
  Got a minor problem,  
  Desktop and laptop running Debian lenny 2.6.24-1
  up to date with updates.
  Problem:  On 'desktop' cannot resize Gnome or X-term windows by
  dragging borders-- Laptop works fine.
  Comparing terminal  config info to laptop install shows no setup
  differences. No Errors reported in X-org logs..
  
  Where should I looked further???[don't need use laptop...
  8-) ]
 
 It sounds like your window manager (metacity) isn't running.
 
 - --
 Ron Johnson, Jr.
 Jefferson LA  USA
 
 We want... a Shrubbery!!
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQFIFjpjS9HxQb37XmcRArPeAKDvXBCDTOKyY0MOlF1aRGEDO+cpSQCg5ADT
 Ymc5HMxenUfxSE3Do6DkJuA=
 =rM0h
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 


--Thanks, Ron

That was it.

Now to takeoff from here...

Jack 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Blank CDRW wierdness

2009-04-17 Thread Jack Schneider
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:59:17 -0500
John W Foster jfoster81...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 14:16 +0300, Aioanei Rares wrote:
  John W Foster wrote:
   I have Debian Lenny on a box that I use to burn Data CD's on I
   have recently noticed that when I burn one and for some reason
   need to read it on the Debian box, it says I have inserted anothe
   'blank' CD. It will no longet read it. I have been using
   GnomeBaker to do this. I can read them just fine on a Windows XP
   box. If I want to add data to them from time to time I can not do
   it. Any ideas? 
  What flavor of Debian are you using? What brand/type of hardware?
  What kernel?
 I'm using the recently updated stable. I decided that this must be
 because the CDRW device is a very old Mitsumi piece. I don't use it
 often so I do not know exactly when this started. I currently believe
 this is the result of the kernel moving past obsolete devices. CDRW is
 at least 14 years old.
 Thanks!
Hi, John
I have had a similar dilemma. 'could not read verified CD on old drive-
ATAPI type.
Had to only write to CD-R media at min write speed. Then all cd-r
disks read correctly..

FWIW, Jack  

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Raid disk delimma

2009-09-19 Thread Jack Schneider
Hi, All

Somewhere (about 9/15) in my enthusiasm for Debian, Testing up2date
  kernel 2.6.30-1-amd64,--updating I said (y) where I should have said
(q). My system will not boot correctly. It halts with: fsck died with
exit status 8 

I have  4 disks, 2 in raid1, ie. 2 in use - 2 unused

Disks are setup as /dev/md0 --/root (small-ish) partition and /dev/md1
much  bigger containing /tmp /opt /var and several VirtualBox DVI
partitions all under lvm2.

I get to the Give root password for maintenance etc. place and when I
do it will not allow me to find any logs.  I can run dmesg which looks
normal.  Anything that that tries to use /var -locks. etc. fails, so
it's unable to find /dev/md1 and contents..it seems to me... df -h
finds /md0 but not /md1

I have tried to google/linux and man on mdadm etc.  but  ... nothing
close... I don't know where to go from here...  HELP! or directions,
Please!

TIA  Jack 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Raid disk delimma

2009-09-20 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:37:51 +0200
martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:

 also sprach Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com [2009.09.20.0044
 +0200]:
  I get to the Give root password for maintenance etc. place and
  when I do it will not allow me to find any logs.  I can run dmesg
  which looks normal.  Anything that that tries to use /var -locks.
  etc. fails, so it's unable to find /dev/md1 and contents..it seems
  to me... df -h finds /md0 but not /md1
 
 Have a look at the output of
 
   mdadm -Es
 
 and compare that to the ARRAY lines /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf. Anything
 different?
 
 What do you see when you run
 
   mdadm -Asayes
   vgchange -a
 
 ?
 
Hi,Martin
Thanks for your reply...

A little more info /home is also on a /dev/md1 partition.  
Re:mdadm -Es
 
 and compare that to the ARRAY lines /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf. Anything
 different?

There is 'no' difference in the array info UUID's match for both md0 
md1.  

I have yet to try the other commands.  need to see what they mean...8-)

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Grub update problems

2009-09-21 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:54:44 +0300
Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun,20.Sep.09, 22:34:23, Frank McCormick wrote:
  
 [snip grub2 troubles]
 
 As far as I understand you fixed your problem by going back to
 grub1.
 
  I also don't see any reference in it to the Ubuntu which I have on 
  hda3. Debian testing is on hda2.
 
 For the archives, to boot other OSes on your machine just install 
 os-prober and run update-grub. In unstable os-prober is recommended
 by grub-common.
 
 Regards,
 Andrei
Andrei, thanks, I think. 8-)
I am Paranoid this AM.  I have two broken machines from this problem...
I'm on the last...

Here's the output from update-grub:
sudo update-grub
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found Debian background: moreblue-orbit-grub.png
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.30-1-686
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.30-1-686
Found Microsoft Windows XP Professional on /dev/hda1
done


Does that guarantee a safe reboot??? 
Thanks, Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Raid disk delimma

2009-09-21 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:03:45 +0200
martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:

 Let's keep this on the list...

OK with me.. I normally just hit reply in Claws 3.5.  You may get 2
if I use reply-all..


 
 also sprach Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com [2009.09.21.1857
 +0200]:
  Results from :  mdadm -Asayes
  
  Just returns a prompt: #
  
  vgchange -a (gives argument needed message)
  
  vgchange -a y :gives  7 logical volume(s) in volume
  group Speeduke now active
  
  'first seems to complete without error and the second (with my
  change) seems to indicate that all volume groups are found...hmmm!
 
 I'll take a shot into the dark: does it work if you add rootdelay=30
 to the linux kernel boot line? E.g.
 
   kernel /boot/vmlinuz ro root=/dev/md0 rootdelay=30
 
 This will incur a 30 second delay during boot. If that makes it
 work, you can experiment with lowering this value, but you will need
 to have some sort of sleep in there like that, because apparently
 your controllers need more time to make the disks available, and
 they do not properly convey to the kernel when they're ready.
 
 Cheers,
 
You mean in the grub boot edit function?  At  boot-up ?  Where I
put it, /boot/grub/menu.lst  It didn't help...  Same fault. 

Sorry about that..  It was not a problem until the 2.6.30 update I did
about 9/14- 9/15 time frame... the problem came up after the next
boot.  I had to shut down for a storm... I don't trust UPS's for
protection..8-(

TIA,  Jack
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Odd behavusr

2009-10-12 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:21:12 +0200
steef debian.li...@home.nl wrote:

 Wayne Topa wrote:
  Hi List
 
I have noticed some odd behavior with aptitude when doing 
  safe-upgrades for the past month or so.  On 5 or 6 occasions a
  number of files are downloaded more then once.  Below is an example
  on my current upgrade
 
   Get:95 http://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main xulrunner-1.9.1 
  1.9.1.3-3 [8389kB]
   Get:96 http://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main xulrunner-1.9.1 
  1.9.1.3-3 [8389kB]
 
So far this is the only time it has happened in this run.
 
Has anyone else seen this?  IT does not happen every time I
  upgrade but when it does, it sure runs my up my download close to
  my limit. Especially when its happen with the linux-source and
  openoffice files.
 
  THIA
 
  Wayne
 
 
 nope,
 
 steef
 
 
Ay-yup! I see it all the time... Thought it might be my ISP... but now
that you brought it up... my aptitude update is most frequently the
issue..

Jack 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Raid help needed !

2009-10-13 Thread Jack Schneider
Hi, All
For over two years, I have used /md0 as / and /md1 under lvm2 with 7
partitions on this amd64 system.  I have migrated from etch to
squeeze without undue problems.  BUT, now I cannot boot either kernel
2.6.30-1 or 2.6.30-2 with grub2, it fails by not finding or identifying 
my swap partition.  It is one of the seven partitions on /md1.  I can
boot 2.6.26-2 without error. I have looked at list archives and googled
but nothing helped.  Since I have had minimal problems to this point, I
am not fluent in mirroring commands. My reading of mdadm  lvm manpages
doesn't seem to address swap issues.  Can someone point me in the
right direction???

TIA,  Jack   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Raid help needed !

2009-10-14 Thread Jack Schneider
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:03:11 -0400
Justin eqi...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Jack Schneider
 p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
  Hi, All
  For over two years, I have used /md0 as / and /md1 under lvm2 with 7
  partitions on this amd64 system.  I have migrated from etch to
  squeeze without undue problems.  BUT, now I cannot boot either
  kernel 2.6.30-1 or 2.6.30-2 with grub2, it fails by not finding or
  identifying my swap partition.  It is one of the seven partitions
  on /md1.  I can boot 2.6.26-2 without error. I have looked at list
  archives and googled but nothing helped.  Since I have had minimal
  problems to this point, I am not fluent in mirroring commands. My
  reading of mdadm  lvm manpages doesn't seem to address swap
  issues.  Can someone point me in the right direction???
 
  TIA,  Jack
 
 
  --
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
  listmas...@lists.debian.org
 
 
 
 What are you raiding and what time? How are we doing loot?
 
 
Hi, Justin

What:  Cumulative smarts of Debian Users
When:  Almost any time, when you're ready
Loot:  Stored in 75 year old grey matter

If you want to help  http://pastebin.com/m7cc9da3d

TIA Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Raid help needed !

2009-10-14 Thread Jack Schneider
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:19:56 +1100
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au wrote:

 On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:16:47PM -0500, Jack Schneider wrote:
  Hi, All
  For over two years, I have used /md0 as / and /md1 under lvm2 with 7
  partitions on this amd64 system.  I have migrated from etch to
  squeeze without undue problems.  BUT, now I cannot boot either
  kernel 2.6.30-1 or 2.6.30-2 with grub2, it fails by not finding or
  identifying my swap partition.  It is one of the seven partitions
  on /md1.  I can boot 2.6.26-2 without error. I have looked at list
  archives and googled but nothing helped.  Since I have had minimal
  problems to this point, I am not fluent in mirroring commands. My
  reading of mdadm  lvm manpages doesn't seem to address swap
  issues.  Can someone point me in the right direction???
  
 what is the error you are getting ?
 what happens when you type mount -a or swapon -a
 
 
 
 
  TIA,  Jack   
  
  
 
Hi, Alex

Error: The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct
ext2 file system..fsck died with exit status 8

#   mount -a  gives :  wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on
dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap,missing codepage or helper program, or other
error  (plus some others that says it's not reading/recognizing /md1 )

#  swapon -a  gives:
swapon: /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_tmp: read swap header failed: Invalid
argument

#swapon /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap  (executes with out error)

Note:  see http://pastebin.com/m7cc9da3d  for a view of what I've
got in this system..

Thanks for your reply...

Jack 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Raid help needed !

2009-10-15 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:31:36 +0200
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Jack Schneider
 p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
  On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:19:56 +1100
  Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au wrote:
  On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:16:47PM -0500, Jack Schneider wrote:
  For over two years, I have used /md0 as / and /md1 under lvm2
  with 7 partitions on this amd64 system.  I have migrated from
  etch to squeeze without undue problems.  BUT, now I cannot
  boot either kernel 2.6.30-1 or 2.6.30-2 with grub2, it fails by
  not finding or identifying my swap partition.  It is one of the
  seven partitions on /md1.  I can boot 2.6.26-2 without error. I
  have looked at list archives and googled but nothing helped.
   Since I have had minimal problems to this point, I am not fluent
  in mirroring commands. My reading of mdadm  lvm manpages doesn't
  seem to address swap issues.  Can someone point me in the right
  direction???
 
  what is the error you are getting ?
  what happens when you type mount -a or swapon -a
 
  Error: The superblock could not be read or does not describe a
  correct ext2 file system..fsck died with exit status 8
 
  #   mount -a  gives :  wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on
  dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap,missing codepage or helper program, or
  other error  (plus some others that says it's not
  reading/recognizing /md1 )
 
  #  swapon -a  gives:
  swapon: /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_tmp: read swap header failed: Invalid
  argument
 
  #swapon /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap  (executes with out error)
 
  Note:  see http://pastebin.com/m7cc9da3d  for a view of what I've
  got in this system..
 
 I am confused... Before suggesting anything...
 
 (1) All the output in pastebin is when booted into 2.6.26-2, I assume
 that the above mount and swapon are also when booted into 2.6.26-2.
 

Hi, Tom  Thanks for the reply.

(1) No, Those are the responses I get when trying to boot into
2.6.30-X  and get to the type root password for maintenance. 

 (2) When you say that you cannot boot into 2.6.30-1 or 2.6.30-2
 because of your swap partition, are you not booting at all into these
 kernels or are you booting but swap is not mounting?
 
(2)  When I try to boot into a 2.6.30-X kernel I get the repair promt.
as in (1) what it complains about is fsck.ext3: Bad magic number etc... 
 (3) When you say that you have migrated from etch to squeeze without
 undue problems, what do you actually mean?
 

(3) I built this machine to run Debian as host for VirtualBox.  
Started with etch then etch  1/2, lenny(testing), now squeeze(testing)
using aptitude dist-upgrades.
I had some expected Nvidia driver and gnome desktop glitches and some
NetworkManager instability.  I never got Compiz working right...
I have much cruft in /root (/md0) it's over 8 gigs of disk space
and /var-/home-/tmp are on (/md1)...

 (4i) Please post your grub.cfg.
Here's the link.   
http://pastebin.com/m243acd1
 
 (4ii) Please post fstab and, while booted into the kernel with the
 mount and swapon output above, the following sequence:
 swapoff -a
 mount -a
 swapon -s
 swapoff -a
 swapon -s
 
 
I'll send (4ii) when I figure out how to get it 8-(

TIA,  Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re:Raid help needed !

2009-10-15 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:03:26 -0500
Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:

 On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:31:36 +0200
 Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
   
  On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Jack Schneider
  p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:  
   On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:19:56 +1100
   Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au wrote:  
   On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:16:47PM -0500, Jack Schneider wrote:  
   For over two years, I have used /md0 as / and /md1 under lvm2
   with 7 partitions on this amd64 system.  I have migrated from
   etch to squeeze without undue problems.  BUT, now I cannot
   boot either kernel 2.6.30-1 or 2.6.30-2 with grub2, it fails by
   not finding or identifying my swap partition.  It is one of the
   seven partitions on /md1.  I can boot 2.6.26-2 without error. I
   have looked at list archives and googled but nothing helped.
    Since I have had minimal problems to this point, I am not
   fluent in mirroring commands. My reading of mdadm  lvm
   manpages doesn't seem to address swap issues.  Can someone
   point me in the right direction???  

   what is the error you are getting ?
   what happens when you type mount -a or swapon -a  

   Error: The superblock could not be read or does not describe a
   correct ext2 file system..fsck died with exit status 8  

   #   mount -a  gives :  wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock
   on dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap,missing codepage or helper program,
   or other error  (plus some others that says it's not
   reading/recognizing /md1 )  

   #  swapon -a  gives:
   swapon: /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_tmp: read swap header failed:
   Invalid argument  

   #swapon /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap  (executes with out error)  

   Note:  see http://pastebin.com/m7cc9da3d  for a view of what I've
   got in this system..  
  
  I am confused... Before suggesting anything...
  
  (1) All the output in pastebin is when booted into 2.6.26-2, I
  assume that the above mount and swapon are also when booted into
  2.6.26-2.

 
 Hi, Tom  Thanks for the reply.
 
 (1) No, Those are the responses I get when trying to boot into
 2.6.30-X  and get to the type root password for maintenance. 
   
  (2) When you say that you cannot boot into 2.6.30-1 or 2.6.30-2
  because of your swap partition, are you not booting at all into
  these kernels or are you booting but swap is not mounting?

 (2)  When I try to boot into a 2.6.30-X kernel I get the repair promt.
 as in (1) what it complains about is fsck.ext3: Bad magic number
 etc...   
  (3) When you say that you have migrated from etch to squeeze
  without undue problems, what do you actually mean?

 
 (3) I built this machine to run Debian as host for VirtualBox.  
 Started with etch then etch  1/2, lenny(testing), now
 squeeze(testing) using aptitude dist-upgrades.
 I had some expected Nvidia driver and gnome desktop glitches and some
 NetworkManager instability.  I never got Compiz working right...
 I have much cruft in /root (/md0) it's over 8 gigs of disk space
 and /var-/home-/tmp are on (/md1)...
   
  (4i) Please post your grub.cfg.  
 Here's the link.   
 http://pastebin.com/m243acd1  
  
  (4ii) Please post fstab and, while booted into the kernel with the
  mount and swapon output above, the following sequence:
  swapoff -a
  mount -a
  swapon -s
  swapoff -a
  swapon -s
  

 I'll send (4ii) when I figure out how to get it 8-(
 
 TIA,  Jack
 
   
  

Hi, Tom

I've attached the FSTAB to the bottom of my prior pastebin post:

http://pastebin.com/m50e45f6a



swapoff -a  gives Speeduke prompt
mount -agives [  982.179.186] VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on
dev dm-0, 
mount: wrong fs type,bad option,bad superblock
on /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap, missing codepage etc... 
mount: mount point /home/jack/XP_VDI does not exist
(+  more similar)

swapon -s   gives Filename Type Size Used Priority (no other data) 
swapoff -a  gives Speeduke prompt
swapon -s   gives (same as previous swapon -s)

'Hope that helps!!

Jack 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: initramfs-tools does not add dm-mod.ko to initrd for kernels 2.6.30-2-686 and kernels 2.6.30-2-686-bigmem

2009-10-15 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:56:20 -0400
Mitchell Laks ml...@post.harvard.edu wrote:

 On 00:05 Thu 15 Oct , Mitchell Laks wrote:
  How can I work around this and what to do? My old kernel 2.6.26
  works fine How to force initrd to load the dm-mod and other
  device-mapper kernel modules?
 
 I have added
 dm_mod
 dm_log
 dm_snapshot
 dm_mirror
 to 
 /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
 file and then 
 did 
 dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmen
 and it regenerated the initrd.img file
 but then when I selected this kernel in grub2
 it still could  not find the 
 /dev/mapper/debian-root device.
 
 I was dumped by grub2 into Busybox
 (initramfs)
 and when I ran
 (initramfs) cat /proc/modules 
 
 sure enough these modules were now in the kernel.
 However when I did ls /dev/mapper all I see is
 /dev/mapper/control
 and I cannot find the
 /dev/mapper/debian-root
 directory
  
 which exists when I boot into the vmlinuz-2.6.26-2-686  kernel.
 
 So why is grub2 failing to boot in the 2.6.30-2-686 kernel?
 
 Mitchell
 
 
  
 
 
Hi, Mitchell
FWIW I have exactly the same problem...  Whew !!!  I didn't cause this
messI hope!!!

Thanks more that you know... BTW I haven't fix mine yet... But getting
some help.

Jack


Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Raid help needed !

2009-10-15 Thread Jack Schneider
Hi, Tim 
   what is the error you are getting ?
   what happens when you type mount -a or swapon -a
 
   Error: The superblock could not be read or does not describe a
   correct ext2 file system..fsck died with exit status 8
 
   #   mount -a  gives :  wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock
   on dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap,missing codepage or helper program,
   or other error  (plus some others that says it's not
   reading/recognizing /md1 )
 
   #  swapon -a  gives:
   swapon: /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_tmp: read swap header failed:
   Invalid argument
 
   #swapon /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap  (executes with out error)
 
   Note:  see http://pastebin.com/m7cc9da3d  for a view of what I've
   got in this system..
 
 
 I am going to be at work for a while so I will not have a chance to
 look at this closely for a few more hours.
 
 Sorry about that.  8-)

 
  (1) All the output in pastebin is when booted into 2.6.26-2, I
  assume that the above mount and swapon are also when booted into
  2.6.26-2.
 
  (1) No, Those are the responses I get when trying to boot into
  2.6.30-X  and get to the type root password for maintenance.
 
 The first two lines of your pastebin are:
 
 j...@speeduke:~$ uname -a
 Linux Speeduke 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Jun 21 04:47:08 UTC 2009
 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 
 so I am surprised.
The paste bin was generated using the only kernel that works right now!

2.6.30-X and the like, will not run at all usefully...
Sorry, that the best this old man can do.  8-) 

 
 
  (2) When you say that you cannot boot into 2.6.30-1 or 2.6.30-2
  because of your swap partition, are you not booting at all into
  these kernels or are you booting but swap is not mounting?
 
  (2)  When I try to boot into a 2.6.30-X kernel I get the repair
  prompt. as in (1) what it complains about is fsck.ext3: Bad magic
  number etc...
 
 OK. Thanks.
 
 
  (3) When you say that you have migrated from etch to squeeze
  without undue problems, what do you actually mean?
 
  (3) I built this machine to run Debian as host for VirtualBox.
  Started with etch then etch  1/2, lenny(testing), now
  squeeze(testing) using aptitude dist-upgrades.
  I had some expected Nvidia driver and gnome desktop glitches and
  some NetworkManager instability.  I never got Compiz working
  right... I have much cruft in /root (/md0) it's over 8 gigs of disk
  space and /var-/home-/tmp are on (/md1)...
 
 OK, more or less.
 

 Did I answer your question?? 


  (4i) Please post your grub.cfg.
 
  http://pastebin.com/m243acd1
 
 Your grub.cfg looks OK at first glance. I would have thought that you
 would have needed an insmod lvm but  I am still teaching myself
 about grub2 so my assumption must be wrong.
 
 
Can't address this Grub2 just worked as advertised, for me..

  (4ii) Please post fstab and, while booted into the kernel with the
  mount and swapon output above, the following sequence:
  swapoff -a
  mount -a
  swapon -s
  swapoff -a
  swapon -s
 
  I'll send (4ii) when I figure out how to get it 8-(
 
 Sorry. I emailed you late and should probably have been in bed rather
 than going through emails at 3am - and missed a line (a swapon -a)
 as a penultimate step. Please email the output of:
 
 swapoff -a
 swapon -a
 swapon -s
 
 Thanks and sorry...
 
 
  swapoff -a  gives Speeduke prompt
  mount -agives [  982.179.186] VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem
  on dev dm-0,
  mount: wrong fs type,bad option,bad superblock
  on /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap, missing codepage etc...
  mount: mount point /home/jack/XP_VDI does not exist
  (+  more similar)
  swapon -s   gives Filename Type Size Used Priority (no other data)
  swapoff -a  gives Speeduke prompt
  swapon -s   gives (same as previous swapon -s)
 
 It is difficult to reconcile mount point /home/jack/XP_VDI does not
 exist with the output of df -h pastebin. Are any of your /dev/dm-x
 mounted?
 
 Please add the output of mount after the swapon -s above. Thanks.
 
 
 There is another email from earlier today about initramfs and success
 with 2.6.26 and problems with 2.6.30. The other OP's symptoms are
 different but I do not believe coincidences.
 
 
Yes, 'Saw that.  Whew!!!  I guess!!

I will have to sync this mail to the laptop and reboot this machine... 

I'll add the above later... Thanks,more than you know!

Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Raid help needed !

2009-10-15 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:23:59 -0500
Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:

 On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:03:26 -0500
 Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
 
  On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:31:36 +0200
  Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:

   On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Jack Schneider
   p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:  
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:19:56 +1100
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au wrote:  
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:16:47PM -0500, Jack Schneider
wrote:  
For over two years, I have used /md0 as / and /md1 under lvm2
with 7 partitions on this amd64 system.  I have migrated from
etch to squeeze without undue problems.  BUT, now I cannot
boot either kernel 2.6.30-1 or 2.6.30-2 with grub2, it fails
by not finding or identifying my swap partition.  It is one
of the seven partitions on /md1.  I can boot 2.6.26-2 without
error. I have looked at list archives and googled but nothing
helped. Since I have had minimal problems to this point, I am
not fluent in mirroring commands. My reading of mdadm  lvm
manpages doesn't seem to address swap issues.  Can someone
point me in the right direction???  
 
what is the error you are getting ?
what happens when you type mount -a or swapon -a  
 
Error: The superblock could not be read or does not describe a
correct ext2 file system..fsck died with exit status 8  
 
#   mount -a  gives :  wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock
on dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap,missing codepage or helper program,
or other error  (plus some others that says it's not
reading/recognizing /md1 )  
 
#  swapon -a  gives:
swapon: /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_tmp: read swap header failed:
Invalid argument  
 
#swapon /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap  (executes with out error)  
 
Note:  see http://pastebin.com/m7cc9da3d  for a view of what
I've got in this system..  
   
   I am confused... Before suggesting anything...
   
   (1) All the output in pastebin is when booted into 2.6.26-2, I
   assume that the above mount and swapon are also when booted into
   2.6.26-2.
 
  
  Hi, Tom  Thanks for the reply.
  
  (1) No, Those are the responses I get when trying to boot into
  2.6.30-X  and get to the type root password for maintenance. 

   (2) When you say that you cannot boot into 2.6.30-1 or 2.6.30-2
   because of your swap partition, are you not booting at all into
   these kernels or are you booting but swap is not mounting?
 
  (2)  When I try to boot into a 2.6.30-X kernel I get the repair
  promt. as in (1) what it complains about is fsck.ext3: Bad magic
  number etc...   
   (3) When you say that you have migrated from etch to squeeze
   without undue problems, what do you actually mean?
 
  
  (3) I built this machine to run Debian as host for VirtualBox.  
  Started with etch then etch  1/2, lenny(testing), now
  squeeze(testing) using aptitude dist-upgrades.
  I had some expected Nvidia driver and gnome desktop glitches and
  some NetworkManager instability.  I never got Compiz working
  right... I have much cruft in /root (/md0) it's over 8 gigs of disk
  space and /var-/home-/tmp are on (/md1)...

   (4i) Please post your grub.cfg.  
  Here's the link.   
  http://pastebin.com/m243acd1  
   
   (4ii) Please post fstab and, while booted into the kernel with the
   mount and swapon output above, the following sequence:
   swapoff -a
   mount -a
   swapon -s
   swapoff -a
   swapon -s
   
 
  I'll send (4ii) when I figure out how to get it 8-(
  
  TIA,  Jack
  

   
 
 Hi, Tom
 
 I've attached the FSTAB to the bottom of my prior pastebin post:
 
 http://pastebin.com/m50e45f6a
 
 
 
 swapoff -a  gives Speeduke prompt
 mount -agives [  982.179.186] VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on
 dev dm-0, 
 mount: wrong fs type,bad option,bad superblock
 on /dev/mapper/Speeduke-_swap, missing codepage etc... 
 mount: mount point /home/jack/XP_VDI does not exist
 (+  more similar)
 
 swapon -s   gives Filename Type Size Used Priority (no other data) 
 swapoff -a  gives Speeduke prompt
 swapon -s   gives (same as previous swapon -s)
 
 'Hope that helps!!
 
 Jack 
 
 
Hi, Tom 

Response after the swapon -s to the mount cmd is

/dev/md0 and a bunch of the transient fs stuff.. tmpfs, proc, etc.

No /dev/md1!!  Which appears to be the same as Mitchell Laks problem.

Thanks, Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: initramfs-tools does not add dm-mod.ko to initrd for kernels 2.6.30-2-686 and kernels 2.6.30-2-686-bigmem

2009-10-15 Thread Jack Schneider
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:42:00 -0400
Mitchell Laks ml...@post.harvard.edu wrote:

 On 15:47 Thu 15 Oct , Jack Schneider wrote:
  Hi, Mitchell
  FWIW I have exactly the same problem...  Whew !!!  I didn't cause
  this messI hope!!!
  
  Thanks more that you know... BTW I haven't fix mine yet... But
  getting some help.
  
  Jack
 
 I have identified the problem.
 
 dist-upgrade was the problem:
 
 1. lvm2 requires dmsetup
 2. devicekit-disks conflicts with dmsetup
 3. gnome-control-center and other gnome crap need devicekit-disks
 4. so lvm2 and dmsetup get kicked out to rc status
 5. then you can't boot with your kernel if / is on lvm2
 
Hi, Mitchell
Just some nits.  I really am happy you found the glitch.
I just wanted to let you know that my raid1 system is a bit different.
My /boot  /root partitions are on /md0 (not under LVM2).  I have 7
partitions under /md1, but /home /var /tmp are 3 of those partitions.
'Don't know if that affects your analysis, which is undoubtedly
correct, but may require some extension..  If you are going to file a
bug report, you may suggest that more complexity may/can exist.  I was
going to reinstall as a cruft clean-up exercise.  Not Now!!  Until
this gets fixed...
Thanks, for your effort.. Keep me informed please...

Jack 

 :)
 
 so 
 apt-get install dmsetup lvm2 
 will kick out lots of gnome stuff
 but i use stumpwm anyway :)
 
 I will start a new thread to publicize this information.
 
 Mitchell 
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: installing mdadm breaks udev (and *lots* of other stuff!) in squeeze

2009-10-24 Thread Jack Schneider
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:55:04 +1100
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au wrote:

 On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:48:32AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
  Whooo boy!
  
  When I decided to raid my home directories, I never expected this!
  
  Anybody have any suggestions for getting udev and mdadm to coexist?
  
  Rick
 
 a recent release of udev conflicted against the at the time current
 version of mdadm, I found it through out quit a lot of my packges as
 well
 
 some suggested to use the one from sid
 
 [snip]


Hi,All

see bug #550434 et al

FIW Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



  1   2   >