[Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR

2006-11-01 Thread Jeff Pereira
Hi -Does anyone know of the procedure for reporting FP results that are failing the ZEROHOUR test ?jeff

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR

2006-11-01 Thread Ken Weise



I was about to ask that myself. Also, the procedure for 
reporting spam that is not caught...


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff PereiraSent: 
Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:25 AMTo: 
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting 
for ZEROHOUR
Hi -Does anyone know of the procedure for reporting FP 
results that are failing the ZEROHOUR test ?jeff---This 
E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send 
an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". 
The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading - which version?

2006-11-01 Thread David Barker
When upgrading from Declude 2.x or prior you need to run the New install
rather than the upgrade. 2.x and prior is the single application version
whereas the new version is the decludeproc service.

David B
www.declude.com 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
AlamoHost Admin
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:19 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading - which version?

Thanks, David.  I get an error when running the legacy upgrade that says
Error moving decludeproc.exe Err: 2.  Any ideas?

Bill

- Original Message -
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading - which version?


 Bill,

 I would suggest 4.x the 3.x is for individual products whereas 4.x is all 
 3
 products PRO version.

 David

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 AlamoHost Admin
 Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 4:59 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading - which version?

 I'm currently on 2.0.6.16 with Imail 8.22.  My SA gives me the choice to
 upgrade to 3.13 or 4.3.14.  I'm not really clear on why there are now two
 versions.  Which one should I be considering?  Any open problems big 
 enough
 to suggest holding off?

 Thanks,

 Bill





 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
 just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
 Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
 http://www.mail-archive.com.



 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


 





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How long is each test taking?

2006-11-01 Thread Chris Anton
Thanks for the feedback!  I will definatly make some updates to our config and 
also run on debug level.  I probably should update to the new Sniffer and run 
both declude and message sniffer in persistent mode.  -Chris



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How long is each test taking?

2006-11-01 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Chris,

You might also check your Declude logs to make sure no DNS-based tests are
timing out.  That extra wait can be a killer for message processing time.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Chris Anton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How long is each test taking?


Thanks for the feedback!  I will definatly make some updates to our config
and also run on debug level.  I probably should update to the new Sniffer
and run both declude and message sniffer in persistent mode.  -Chris



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Blackholes test

2006-11-01 Thread Kevin Stanford
I have declude setup to block by country using the blackholes dnsbl. It
appears that blackholes is having intermittent problems staying up thus
allowing spam to get through. Does anyone have a work around to block by IP
address by country? Seems like I read somewhere about setting up a private
dns server to do the same but not sure how to do it.

Thanks,

Kevin




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

2006-11-01 Thread David Barker
Herb,

I need to clarify something here. This source of this problem is that these
messages do not conform to the RFC's and are extremely broken and should not
be accepted by the mail server in the first place. That is the source of the
problem, Declude is showing the symptom. Have you approached
SmarterMail/Imail and asked them to fix this issue, either not accept the
message or apply message standardization ? What was their response ?

With that said, we are working on correcting this problem because clearly
the Mail server is not doing it. 

Secondly, there are alternatives to marking the Subject line and having the
mail server take action based on the headers. You could use actions like.

# MAILBOX  will move the E-mail to a user's folder (no, not a Windows
directory)
# ROUTETO will re-route the E-mail to an alternate address
# HOLD will hold the message in the spool\spam directory.

David B  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herb
Guenther
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:59 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

Hi All;

Another week has went by and I have not heard any time schedule for fixing
the issue with not modifying the message header correctly.  This continues
to allow hundreds of spam messages to land in our customers mailboxes every
day. 

Again, what is required to get this fixed?  We are happy to send samples,
message source examples, or whatever is required.  Otherwise we are going to
move to a gateway filter model and just abandon declude.

How did declude get in a situation where phone calls, emails, and service
tickets can just be ignored because no one wants to take the bull by the
horn?  I know that our business does not operate that way.  
I assume that my disappointment is showing thru, frankly at a loss.

Herb

--
Herb Guenther
Lanex, LLC
www.lanex.com
(262)789-0966x102 Office
(262)780-0424 Direct


This e-mail is confidential and is for the use of the intended
recipient(s)only. If you are not an intended recipient please advise us of
our error by return e-mail then delete this e-mail and any attached files.
You may not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

2006-11-01 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi David:

Pardon me - but lets not forget that we choose to pay Declude license and
maintenance fees, precisely because of its claim of being superior in
detecting viruses, vulnerabilities and RFC violations that other components
are known to letting through.

When your business model is based on the premise that you will be closing
the holes that other components leave, then Declude cannot retreat behind an
argument that you are only as defect as the other guys.

Clearly, if Imail/Smartermail did act appropriately and offered all the
features it should, then you wouldn't have a customer base in the first
place.

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:02 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

Herb,

I need to clarify something here. This source of this problem is that these
messages do not conform to the RFC's and are extremely broken and should not
be accepted by the mail server in the first place. That is the source of the
problem, Declude is showing the symptom. Have you approached
SmarterMail/Imail and asked them to fix this issue, either not accept the
message or apply message standardization ? What was their response ?

With that said, we are working on correcting this problem because clearly
the Mail server is not doing it. 

Secondly, there are alternatives to marking the Subject line and having the
mail server take action based on the headers. You could use actions like.

# MAILBOX  will move the E-mail to a user's folder (no, not a Windows
directory)
# ROUTETO will re-route the E-mail to an alternate address # HOLD will hold
the message in the spool\spam directory.

David B  




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

2006-11-01 Thread David Barker
Agreed Andy.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:31 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

Hi David:

Pardon me - but lets not forget that we choose to pay Declude license and
maintenance fees, precisely because of its claim of being superior in
detecting viruses, vulnerabilities and RFC violations that other components
are known to letting through.

When your business model is based on the premise that you will be closing
the holes that other components leave, then Declude cannot retreat behind an
argument that you are only as defect as the other guys.

Clearly, if Imail/Smartermail did act appropriately and offered all the
features it should, then you wouldn't have a customer base in the first
place.

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:02 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

Herb,

I need to clarify something here. This source of this problem is that these
messages do not conform to the RFC's and are extremely broken and should not
be accepted by the mail server in the first place. That is the source of the
problem, Declude is showing the symptom. Have you approached
SmarterMail/Imail and asked them to fix this issue, either not accept the
message or apply message standardization ? What was their response ?

With that said, we are working on correcting this problem because clearly
the Mail server is not doing it. 

Secondly, there are alternatives to marking the Subject line and having the
mail server take action based on the headers. You could use actions like.

# MAILBOX  will move the E-mail to a user's folder (no, not a Windows
directory)
# ROUTETO will re-route the E-mail to an alternate address # HOLD will hold
the message in the spool\spam directory.

David B  




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

2006-11-01 Thread Herb Guenther

Hi David;

First, I'd like to thank you for your response, it is the first that I 
have had and I really appreciate it.


I realize that the issue is the either accidentally or purposely 
malformed messages.  I would assume that there is a whole spectrum of 
message rfc compliance out there, and everyone has to draw the line 
somewhere.  In an ideal world we could apply some very exact rules and 
just say too bad, so sad and reject the messages.  However customers 
would view this as I did not get my email and in effect a false positive.


So, outright rejection would not be the solution I think.  However, to 
answer your question, we have not approached smartermail on the issue as 
that is not our spam tool vendor.  I think that any message that an 
email client can display should be viewed as compliant enough from a 
real world perspective, even tho I agree that philosophically that is 
not the way it should be.


Do you have an idea as to what the time frame for an update to this will 
be? 


Take care,

Herb

David Barker wrote:

Herb,

I need to clarify something here. This source of this problem is that these
messages do not conform to the RFC's and are extremely broken and should not
be accepted by the mail server in the first place. That is the source of the
problem, Declude is showing the symptom. Have you approached
SmarterMail/Imail and asked them to fix this issue, either not accept the
message or apply message standardization ? What was their response ?

With that said, we are working on correcting this problem because clearly
the Mail server is not doing it. 


Secondly, there are alternatives to marking the Subject line and having the
mail server take action based on the headers. You could use actions like.

# MAILBOX  will move the E-mail to a user's folder (no, not a Windows
directory)
# ROUTETO will re-route the E-mail to an alternate address
# HOLD will hold the message in the spool\spam directory.

David B  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herb
Guenther
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:59 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

Hi All;

Another week has went by and I have not heard any time schedule for fixing
the issue with not modifying the message header correctly.  This continues
to allow hundreds of spam messages to land in our customers mailboxes every
day. 


Again, what is required to get this fixed?  We are happy to send samples,
message source examples, or whatever is required.  Otherwise we are going to
move to a gateway filter model and just abandon declude.

How did declude get in a situation where phone calls, emails, and service
tickets can just be ignored because no one wants to take the bull by the
horn?  I know that our business does not operate that way.  
I assume that my disappointment is showing thru, frankly at a loss.


Herb

--
Herb Guenther
Lanex, LLC
www.lanex.com
(262)789-0966x102 Office
(262)780-0424 Direct


This e-mail is confidential and is for the use of the intended
recipient(s)only. If you are not an intended recipient please advise us of
our error by return e-mail then delete this e-mail and any attached files.
You may not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

  


--
Herb Guenther
Lanex, LLC
www.lanex.com
(262)789-0966x102 Office
(262)780-0424 Direct


This e-mail is confidential and is for the use of the intended 
recipient(s)only. If you are not an intended recipient please advise us of our 
error by return e-mail then delete this e-mail and any attached files. You may 
not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

2006-11-01 Thread Darin Cox
I agree.  That and the fact that RFCs are non-enforceable standards.  There
are many cases of RFCs not being followed.  We can't just decide which
non-RFC situations to handle and which not.  We also cannot force all
non-standard mailers to adapt to our requirements.  We must accept mail and
process it appropriately, since we cannot control the sending parameters.
This is especially true when all it entails on our part is handling an
additional case while parsing the message.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line


Hi David:

Pardon me - but lets not forget that we choose to pay Declude license and
maintenance fees, precisely because of its claim of being superior in
detecting viruses, vulnerabilities and RFC violations that other components
are known to letting through.

When your business model is based on the premise that you will be closing
the holes that other components leave, then Declude cannot retreat behind an
argument that you are only as defect as the other guys.

Clearly, if Imail/Smartermail did act appropriately and offered all the
features it should, then you wouldn't have a customer base in the first
place.

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:02 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

Herb,

I need to clarify something here. This source of this problem is that these
messages do not conform to the RFC's and are extremely broken and should not
be accepted by the mail server in the first place. That is the source of the
problem, Declude is showing the symptom. Have you approached
SmarterMail/Imail and asked them to fix this issue, either not accept the
message or apply message standardization ? What was their response ?

With that said, we are working on correcting this problem because clearly
the Mail server is not doing it.

Secondly, there are alternatives to marking the Subject line and having the
mail server take action based on the headers. You could use actions like.

# MAILBOX  will move the E-mail to a user's folder (no, not a Windows
directory)
# ROUTETO will re-route the E-mail to an alternate address # HOLD will hold
the message in the spool\spam directory.

David B




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR

2006-11-01 Thread Jeff



Thanks Kevin...

Next question -- How can I have Declude add 
the X-Declude-RefID: to the header ??

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kevin Bilbee 
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:16 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP 
  reporting for ZEROHOUR
  
  
  Here 
  is the document Declude sent to me for reporting false positives and false 
  negatives.
  
  
  Kevin 
  Bilbee
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken WeiseSent: 
  Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:46 AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: 
  RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for 
  ZEROHOUR
  
  I was 
  about to ask that myself. Also, the procedure for reporting spam that is not 
  caught...
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff 
  PereiraSent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:25 AMTo: 
  declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] FP 
  reporting for ZEROHOUR
  Hi -Does anyone know of the procedure for reporting 
  FP results that are failing the ZEROHOUR test ?jeff---This 
  E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just 
  send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe 
  Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat 
  http://www.mail-archive.com.
  ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail 
  mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
  andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat 
  http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came 
  from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail 
  to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The 
  archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR

2006-11-01 Thread David Barker



Ensure you running the latest version of Declude 4.x and 
that you have ZEROHOUR 14 in the global.cfg

David B


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JeffSent: Wednesday, 
November 01, 2006 12:47 PMTo: 
declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FP 
reporting for ZEROHOUR

Thanks Kevin...

Next question -- How can I have Declude add 
the X-Declude-RefID: to the header ??

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kevin Bilbee 
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:16 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP 
  reporting for ZEROHOUR
  
  
  Here 
  is the document Declude sent to me for reporting false positives and false 
  negatives.
  
  
  Kevin 
  Bilbee
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken WeiseSent: 
  Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:46 AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: 
  RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for 
  ZEROHOUR
  
  I was 
  about to ask that myself. Also, the procedure for reporting spam that is not 
  caught...
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff 
  PereiraSent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:25 AMTo: 
  declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] FP 
  reporting for ZEROHOUR
  Hi -Does anyone know of the procedure for reporting 
  FP results that are failing the ZEROHOUR test ?jeff---This 
  E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just 
  send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe 
  Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat 
  http://www.mail-archive.com.
  ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail 
  mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
  andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat 
  http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came 
  from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail 
  to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The 
  archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. 
Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat 
http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR

2006-11-01 Thread Gary Steiner
So you are implying that those of us who are not running Commtouch, if we 
remove the ZEROHOUR statement from the global.cfg the X-Declude-RefID line in 
the headers will go away?

(How to get rid of that line is a question that has been asked here before.)



 Original Message 
 From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:52 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 Ensure you running the latest version of Declude 4.x and that you have
 ZEROHOUR   14 in the global.cfg
  
 David B
 
   _  
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:47 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 
 Thanks Kevin...
  
 Next question --  How can I have Declude add the X-Declude-RefID: to the
 header ??
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Kevin Bilbee mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:16 PM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 
 Here is the document Declude sent to me for reporting false positives and
 false negatives.
 
  
 
  
 
 Kevin Bilbee
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
 Weise
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:46 AM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
  
 
 I was about to ask that myself. Also, the procedure for reporting spam that
 is not caught...
 
  
 
   _  
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
 Pereira
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:25 AM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 Hi -
 
 Does anyone know of the procedure for reporting FP results that are failing
 the ZEROHOUR test ?
 
 jeff
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com. 






---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR

2006-11-01 Thread David Barker
For now you cannot get rid of the X-Declude-RefID line

David B
www.declude.com 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:54 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR

So you are implying that those of us who are not running Commtouch, if we
remove the ZEROHOUR statement from the global.cfg the X-Declude-RefID line
in the headers will go away?

(How to get rid of that line is a question that has been asked here before.)



 Original Message 
 From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:52 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 Ensure you running the latest version of Declude 4.x and that you have
 ZEROHOUR   14 in the global.cfg
  
 David B
 
   _
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Jeff
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:47 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 
 Thanks Kevin...
  
 Next question --  How can I have Declude add the X-Declude-RefID: to 
 the header ??
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Bilbee mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:16 PM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 
 Here is the document Declude sent to me for reporting false positives 
 and false negatives.
 
  
 
  
 
 Kevin Bilbee
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Ken Weise
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:46 AM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
  
 
 I was about to ask that myself. Also, the procedure for reporting spam 
 that is not caught...
 
  
 
   _
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Jeff Pereira
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:25 AM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 Hi -
 
 Does anyone know of the procedure for reporting FP results that are 
 failing the ZEROHOUR test ?
 
 jeff
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at 
 http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at 
 http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at 
 http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at 
 http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
 http://www.mail-archive.com.






---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR

2006-11-01 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Declude has indicated to me that the line will be removable for users not 
running ZEROHOUR in a future version of Declude. It is currently hard coded to 
be displayed in all email headers Declude processes SAME for ZEROHOUR[0] in 
tests failed.



Kevin Bilbee

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Gary Steiner
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:54 AM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 So you are implying that those of us who are not running Commtouch, if
 we remove the ZEROHOUR statement from the global.cfg the X-Declude-
 RefID line in the headers will go away?
 
 (How to get rid of that line is a question that has been asked here
 before.)
 
 
 
  Original Message 
  From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:52 PM
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
  Ensure you running the latest version of Declude 4.x and that you
 have
  ZEROHOUR   14 in the global.cfg
 
  David B
 
_
 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Jeff
  Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:47 PM
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 
  Thanks Kevin...
 
  Next question --  How can I have Declude add the X-Declude-RefID: to
 the
  header ??
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Kevin Bilbee mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
  Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:16 PM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 
  Here is the document Declude sent to me for reporting false positives
 and
  false negatives.
 
 
 
 
 
  Kevin Bilbee
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Ken
  Weise
  Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:46 AM
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
 
 
  I was about to ask that myself. Also, the procedure for reporting
 spam that
  is not caught...
 
 
 
_
 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Jeff
  Pereira
  Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:25 AM
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] FP reporting for ZEROHOUR
 
  Hi -
 
  Does anyone know of the procedure for reporting FP results that are
 failing
  the ZEROHOUR test ?
 
  jeff
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.






---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading Declude Configs - Which Tests are valid?

2006-11-01 Thread Brian T.
I spent this afternoon cleaning up my global.cfg file and I still have some 
tests listed that no longer show up in the latest config file from Declude.


I was wondering which of the following, if any are still active tests?

DSBL , SENDERDB-BLACK, SENDERDB-SUSPICIOUS, MAILPOLICE-BULK, 
MAILPOLICE-PORN, FIVETEN-SPAM, FIVETEN-BULK, FIVETEN-MULTISTAGE, 
FIVETEN-SPAMSUPPORT, FIVETEN-MISC, FIVETEN-SINGLESTAGE, FIVETEN-FREE, 
AHBL-RELAYS, AHBL-PROXIES, AHBL-SOURCES, AHBL-PROVISIONAL, AHBL-FORMMAIL, 
AHBL-DUL, NJABL-DYNABLOCK, NJABL-RELAYS, NJABL-DUL, NJABL-SOURCES, 
NJABL-MULTI, NJABL-FORMMAIL, and NJABL-PROXIES
Are any of these tests duplicates, as in basically using the same data or 
basically the same test?


Thanks for the help,

Brian T.









---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading Declude Configs - Which Tests are valid?

2006-11-01 Thread Gary Steiner
I'm using most of the ones you mention, and the ones I'm using all work.  He's 
what I have in my global.config that matches your list:

AHBLip4rdnsbl.ahbl.org  *   7   0
DSBLip4rlist.dsbl.org   *   8   0
MAILPOLICE-BULK rhsbl   bulk.rhs.mailpolice.com 127.0.0.2   7   0
MAILPOLICE-PORN rhsbl   porn.rhs.mailpolice.com 127.0.0.2   7   0
FIVETEN-SPAMip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com  127.0.0.2   5   0
FIVETEN-BULKip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com  127.0.0.4   5   0
FIVETEN-MULTISTAGE  ip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com  127.0.0.5   
5   0
FIVETEN-SINGLESTAGE ip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com  127.0.0.6   
5   0
FIVETEN-SPAM-SUPPORTip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com  127.0.0.7   
5   0
FIVETEN-WEBFORM ip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com  127.0.0.8   5   0
FIVETEN-MISCip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com  127.0.0.9   5   0
FIVETEN-CR  ip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com  127.0.0.13  
5   0
NJABL-OPENRELAY ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org 127.0.0.2   3   0
NJABL-DUL   ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org 127.0.0.3   3   0
NJABL-SPAMSRC   ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org 127.0.0.4   3   0
NJABL-MULTI ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org 127.0.0.5   3   0
NJABL-BADHOST   ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org 127.0.0.6   3   0
NJABL-CGI   ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org 127.0.0.8   3   0
NJABL-PROXY ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org 127.0.0.9   3   0
NJABL-DYNA  ip4rdynablock.njabl.org 127.0.0.3   5   0

If you really want a breakdown on what each one does, you will have to go to 
their individual web sites.  For example, I'm just using the one AHBL test 
which includes all of that blacklist rolled into one.  You can break AHBL into 
several tests based on what they have on their web site.
http://www.ahbl.org/docs/dnsbl.php

The same can be said for the others:
http://dsbl.org/usage
http://rhs.mailpolice.com/usage.php
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/blackhole.php
http://dnsbl.njabl.org/use.html

Using DLanalyzer, here is a breakdown of what percentage of spam on my server 
was hit by the tests mentioned for the past week:

AHBL3.64%
DSBL9.83%
MAILPOLICE-BULK 0.18%
MAILPOLICE-PORN 0.29%
FIVETEN-SPAM46.89%
FIVETEN-BULK0.30%
FIVETEN-MULTISTAGE  0.00%
FIVETEN-SINGLESTAGE 0.00%
FIVETEN-SPAM-SUPPORT0.11%
FIVETEN-WEBFORM 0.00%
FIVETEN-MISC0.16%
FIVETEN-CR  0.00%
NJABL-OPENRELAY 0.06%
NJABL-DUL   1.41%
NJABL-SPAMSRC   0.09%
NJABL-MULTI 0.00%
NJABL-BADHOST   0.00%
NJABL-CGI   0.00%
NJABL-PROXY 3.69%
NJABL-DYNA  31.30%

You may get different results.  Just because a test gets a low percentage of 
hits doesn't necessarily mean it is a bad test.  I suggest you download a copy 
of the free lite version of DLanalyzer and run it on your logs.  This will give 
you an idea as to which tests are getting hits on your setup and which are not.
http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/

Good luck,

Gary


 Original Message 
 From: Brian T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 7:21 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading Declude Configs - Which Tests are valid?
 
 I spent this afternoon cleaning up my global.cfg file and I still have some 
 tests listed that no longer show up in the latest config file from Declude.
 
 I was wondering which of the following, if any are still active tests?
 
 DSBL , SENDERDB-BLACK, SENDERDB-SUSPICIOUS, MAILPOLICE-BULK, 
 MAILPOLICE-PORN, FIVETEN-SPAM, FIVETEN-BULK, FIVETEN-MULTISTAGE, 
 FIVETEN-SPAMSUPPORT, FIVETEN-MISC, FIVETEN-SINGLESTAGE, FIVETEN-FREE, 
 AHBL-RELAYS, AHBL-PROXIES, AHBL-SOURCES, AHBL-PROVISIONAL, AHBL-FORMMAIL, 
 AHBL-DUL, NJABL-DYNABLOCK, NJABL-RELAYS, NJABL-DUL, NJABL-SOURCES, 
 NJABL-MULTI, NJABL-FORMMAIL, and NJABL-PROXIES
 Are any of these tests duplicates, as in basically using the same data or 
 basically the same test?
 
 Thanks for the help,
 
 Brian T.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com. 










---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading Declude Configs - Which Tests are valid?

2006-11-01 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I know the SENDERDB ones changed to MXRATE and you have to register (free) 
to use the new lists.

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers.

- Original Message - 
From: Brian T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:54 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Upgrading Declude Configs - Which Tests are 
valid?


I spent this afternoon cleaning up my global.cfg file and I still have some
tests listed that no longer show up in the latest config file from Declude.

I was wondering which of the following, if any are still active tests?

DSBL , SENDERDB-BLACK, SENDERDB-SUSPICIOUS, MAILPOLICE-BULK,
MAILPOLICE-PORN, FIVETEN-SPAM, FIVETEN-BULK, FIVETEN-MULTISTAGE,
FIVETEN-SPAMSUPPORT, FIVETEN-MISC, FIVETEN-SINGLESTAGE, FIVETEN-FREE,
AHBL-RELAYS, AHBL-PROXIES, AHBL-SOURCES, AHBL-PROVISIONAL, AHBL-FORMMAIL,
AHBL-DUL, NJABL-DYNABLOCK, NJABL-RELAYS, NJABL-DUL, NJABL-SOURCES,
NJABL-MULTI, NJABL-FORMMAIL, and NJABL-PROXIES
Are any of these tests duplicates, as in basically using the same data or
basically the same test?

Thanks for the help,

Brian T.









---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.