RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing codes

2004-12-23 Thread Keith Johnson
Andy,
   Upon your phone call with Barry, should we as Declude Users (4 lic. in 
my case), contact Barry directly before upgrading or should we await for a post 
on this forum for new procedures?  I too have a cold spare, however, Declude is 
not loaded there until necessary and upon written procedures that we have in 
place to shutdown the current server (whether down by failure or otherwise), 
rename it and re-ip it and the like.  Thanks for the info.
 
Keith

-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Andy Schmidt 
Sent: Thu 12/23/2004 9:05 AM 
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing  codes



Hi,

At the end, there are two components to this:

A) the technique used to validate licenses (e.g., an activation code,
hardware detection, etc.)

B) the procedures on how a questionable situation is handled.

I really don't have a problem with ANY technique as long as I can be
comfortable with the procedures.  If the procedures could even 
remotely
result in an accidental automatic disabling, I'd no longer be able to
justify use of the product.  Per example, if the procedures involve a 
long
grace period, or, if the procedures simply allow a License Validation
Staff to REVIEW a questionable license with a customer at a mutually
convenient time, or similar safeguards - then I'm absolutely okay with 
it.

When Barry called yesterday, I listened and agreed wholeheartedly, that
Declude owes it to is PAYING customers to identify and go after
non-compliant customers.  After all - it's money stolen from the paying
customer (by either having to raise prices or by not being able to 
invest
into future development as much).

But, I repeated my expectations that NOT details of the techniques 
need to
be disclosed - but there should be sufficient disclosure of the
procedures.  And that should be disclosed BEFORE the software is 
offered
for download - not AFTER people are starting to get suspicious.

With the information that I was given, I'm perfectly satisfied that I 
can
continue to use Declude - and I fully support their efforts (in 
general) of
license enforcement.

However, I still hope that Barry recognizes the need that ALL customers 
need
to know enough about the procedures to regain (!) MY level of comfort 
and
confidence in the company and the product.

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 02:01 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing  codes


Here is some information for all who have concerns about the new 
licensing
and tie in to IPs and/or MACs:

I have spoken to Barry today, and while I will not reveal the little 
bit of
information I was given, I will state on my honor that I have no problem
with the new license code process what ever you want to call it.

Additionally, Declude has designed and taken steps to make sure there 
will
be no problems in the event you need to change IPs or hardware 
overnight, on
a weekend, on an extended weekend or even if disaster were to strike 
and the
Declude offices were not available for a week.

Hopefully, you can now rest assured that Declude will not stop working 
if
you have to fix your server.

FYI, there is also a process in place for a cold spare server to be 
prepared
and ready ahead of time. You will need to contact Declude to 
specifically
set that up.

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, 
just
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing codes

2004-12-23 Thread Info Wind
An idea from me to the new licence policy from Declude:
Is it perhaps possible to expand the Decludce Pro licence to include one 
test system (which only will be used for testing before upgrading and to 
test new features, not for business use)) ?
I think this would also help a lot of declude users, who has problems with 
the new Licence code.

Bye,
Uwe
- Original Message - 
From: Keith Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 3:40 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing  codes


Andy,
  Upon your phone call with Barry, should we as Declude Users (4 lic. 
in my case), contact Barry directly before upgrading or should we await 
for a post on this forum for new procedures?  I too have a cold spare, 
however, Declude is not loaded there until necessary and upon written 
procedures that we have in place to shutdown the current server (whether 
down by failure or otherwise), rename it and re-ip it and the like. 
Thanks for the info.

Keith
-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Thu 12/23/2004 9:05 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Cc:
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing  codes


Hi,
At the end, there are two components to this:
A) the technique used to validate licenses (e.g., an activation code,
hardware detection, etc.)
B) the procedures on how a questionable situation is handled.
I really don't have a problem with ANY technique as long as I can be
comfortable with the procedures.  If the procedures could even remotely
result in an accidental automatic disabling, I'd no longer be able to
justify use of the product.  Per example, if the procedures involve a long
grace period, or, if the procedures simply allow a License Validation
Staff to REVIEW a questionable license with a customer at a mutually
convenient time, or similar safeguards - then I'm absolutely okay with it.
When Barry called yesterday, I listened and agreed wholeheartedly, that
Declude owes it to is PAYING customers to identify and go after
non-compliant customers.  After all - it's money stolen from the paying
customer (by either having to raise prices or by not being able to invest
into future development as much).
But, I repeated my expectations that NOT details of the techniques need 
to
be disclosed - but there should be sufficient disclosure of the
procedures.  And that should be disclosed BEFORE the software is offered
for download - not AFTER people are starting to get suspicious.

With the information that I was given, I'm perfectly satisfied that I can
continue to use Declude - and I fully support their efforts (in general) 
of
license enforcement.

However, I still hope that Barry recognizes the need that ALL customers 
need
to know enough about the procedures to regain (!) MY level of comfort and
confidence in the company and the product.

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 02:01 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing  codes
Here is some information for all who have concerns about the new licensing
and tie in to IPs and/or MACs:
I have spoken to Barry today, and while I will not reveal the little bit 
of
information I was given, I will state on my honor that I have no problem
with the new license code process what ever you want to call it.

Additionally, Declude has designed and taken steps to make sure there will
be no problems in the event you need to change IPs or hardware overnight, 
on
a weekend, on an extended weekend or even if disaster were to strike and 
the
Declude offices were not available for a week.

Hopefully, you can now rest assured that Declude will not stop working if
you have to fix your server.
FYI, there is also a process in place for a cold spare server to be 
prepared
and ready ahead of time. You will need to contact Declude to specifically
set that up.

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, 
just
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing codes

2004-12-23 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi Keith:
 
Well - *I* am satisfied that I could switch NICs or servers and any time of
day or night or weekends - without license-related impact on any authorized
use of Declude. I am under a verbal non-disclosure - so I can't elaborate,
besides any statement should come from an official source to have any value.
 
It did seem to me, as if Barry was working on drafting a response to post on
this list as well.
 
For the benefit of CPHZ and their relationship with their customers, I
sincerely hope that they understand that they can't just refer to
generalized privacy policies on the web site and terms of the license
agreement (which permits what they are doing) - but that they need to be
pro-active and have a policy to always announce and sufficiently explain new
procedures BEFORE they are accidentally uncovered by customers - so that
everyone can be as satisfied as I am now.
 
It's never smart to gamble with the trust of your customers - even if you
have the legal right to whatever actions you take.
 
I appreciate that personal phone call - it should demonstrate that Barry
does care.  But, it did not effect my personal opinion that firefighting
phone calls are time poorly spent and that CPHZ needs to do a better job of
customer communications and relations.


Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206 

-Original Message-
From: Keith Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith Johnson
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 09:41 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing  codes


Andy,
   Upon your phone call with Barry, should we as Declude Users (4 lic.
in my case), contact Barry directly before upgrading or should we await for
a post on this forum for new procedures?  I too have a cold spare, however,
Declude is not loaded there until necessary and upon written procedures that
we have in place to shutdown the current server (whether down by failure or
otherwise), rename it and re-ip it and the like.  Thanks for the info.
 
Keith

 

attachment: winmail.dat

RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing codes

2004-12-23 Thread Markus Gufler

This as my comment on many posts about licensing:

I believe Scott and Berry KNOW there are out many unlicensed copies of
Declude. I believe also that only a product with an appropriate revenue can
be maintained and brought forward regulary. (Probably this was a big problem
in the last 12 months)

So I really love it to see that there are strong rules that will bring users
of unlicensed copies in trouble and  the paying customers will benefit.

For sure: The non-announcement of such actions can create some colateral
damage. At least any of Barry's posts contained a final statement that all
users of unlicensed copies should make them legal.

I've a friend who's a truly genius regarding application developement. Any
of his applications (mostly windows services) contains an activation
component who contacts the online licensing server the first time and each
time if more then two basic properties of the hardware has changed (For
example CPU, MAC, IP, or ...)

As Declude.exe is called for each single message it wouldn't work in the
same way but maybe something like a weekly or monthly
Keep-Alive-License-Package?
The local application will continue to work only if after a new request
(containing hostname, IP, MAC, CPU-ID, ...) there is a returning
time-limited license package from Decludes license server. So each customer
know that he will have time enough to reactivate his license if he has
changed hardware. On the other side CPHZ has a great control over
definitively (or maybe) unlicensed copies. This would include also control
over illegal usage of new releases without an service agreement. Also test
systems will work for some days.

Maybe the new declude licensing functionality is already able to do all
this. So the only criticism is that there was no announcement. Also not to
customerers who's running definitively legal copies.

In order to keep admin's informed about unexpected licensing errors there
should be a new parameter like LICENSEALERT = [EMAIL PROTECTED] in each config
file. So If there is something going wrong with the licensing even if I'm a
legal customer I can read this immediatly in my inbox and have no problems
while sleeping at night because I haven't checked todays logfiles. 

We're talking about software that has to work around the clock. If this
software is not doing his job and let pass malicious content I want back
money - much more then I've payd for because I've damage on my side.

Markus




---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing codes

2004-12-23 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi,

At the end, there are two components to this:

A) the technique used to validate licenses (e.g., an activation code,
hardware detection, etc.)

B) the procedures on how a questionable situation is handled.

I really don't have a problem with ANY technique as long as I can be
comfortable with the procedures.  If the procedures could even remotely
result in an accidental automatic disabling, I'd no longer be able to
justify use of the product.  Per example, if the procedures involve a long
grace period, or, if the procedures simply allow a License Validation
Staff to REVIEW a questionable license with a customer at a mutually
convenient time, or similar safeguards - then I'm absolutely okay with it.

When Barry called yesterday, I listened and agreed wholeheartedly, that
Declude owes it to is PAYING customers to identify and go after
non-compliant customers.  After all - it's money stolen from the paying
customer (by either having to raise prices or by not being able to invest
into future development as much).

But, I repeated my expectations that NOT details of the techniques need to
be disclosed - but there should be sufficient disclosure of the
procedures.  And that should be disclosed BEFORE the software is offered
for download - not AFTER people are starting to get suspicious.

With the information that I was given, I'm perfectly satisfied that I can
continue to use Declude - and I fully support their efforts (in general) of
license enforcement.

However, I still hope that Barry recognizes the need that ALL customers need
to know enough about the procedures to regain (!) MY level of comfort and
confidence in the company and the product.

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 02:01 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Declude Licensing  codes


Here is some information for all who have concerns about the new licensing
and tie in to IPs and/or MACs:

I have spoken to Barry today, and while I will not reveal the little bit of
information I was given, I will state on my honor that I have no problem
with the new license code process what ever you want to call it.

Additionally, Declude has designed and taken steps to make sure there will
be no problems in the event you need to change IPs or hardware overnight, on
a weekend, on an extended weekend or even if disaster were to strike and the
Declude offices were not available for a week.

Hopefully, you can now rest assured that Declude will not stop working if
you have to fix your server.

FYI, there is also a process in place for a cold spare server to be prepared
and ready ahead of time. You will need to contact Declude to specifically
set that up.

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.