[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1966780] [NEW] transmission-qt crashes when UI element is destroyed before RPC call gets to update it

2022-03-28 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported:

Currently Transmission (Qt client) crashes really often when you just
use it against a distant server. This is because the RPC callback tries
to update an UI element that is often destroyed.

Please backport this patch to Ubuntu releases as soon as possible as
this crash is very frequent for some users.

https://github.com/transmission/transmission/pull/1604

** Affects: transmission
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: transmission (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

** Changed in: transmission (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Bug watch added: github.com/transmission/transmission/issues #1510
   https://github.com/transmission/transmission/issues/1510

** Also affects: transmission via
   https://github.com/transmission/transmission/issues/1510
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to transmission in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966780

Title:
  transmission-qt crashes when UI element is destroyed before RPC call
  gets to update it

Status in Transmission:
  Unknown
Status in transmission package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Currently Transmission (Qt client) crashes really often when you just
  use it against a distant server. This is because the RPC callback
  tries to update an UI element that is often destroyed.

  Please backport this patch to Ubuntu releases as soon as possible as
  this crash is very frequent for some users.

  https://github.com/transmission/transmission/pull/1604

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/transmission/+bug/1966780/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1965535] Re: Stop recommending snap

2022-03-18 Thread Avamander
It's also worth pointing out how snap does not offer feature parity. VA-
API and native-component extensions are broken to this day with Chromium
snap, for four years now. The latter meaning that entire countries can
not use chromium snap if they wish to use their national authentication
and signature system on the web. Broken for millions of potential users
and nobody cares.

Seeing how shipping fully-working software seems not doable with snaps,
recommending it as a default is an user-hostile decision at this point
in time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965535

Title:
  Stop recommending snap

Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  Currently, ubuntu recommends installing snap by default, and some apps
  are slowly transitioning from DEB-based installation to Snap-based
  installation.

  APT is great, and facilitates having a clean, maintainable system.

  The snap project is not very well designed or engineered (just
  changing the location of where snap data is located is taking the
  project more than 5 years because it was hardcoded:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1575053). Snaps are large and
  VERY slow. The design of snap, as well as the way that decisions are
  made, are very questionable, and are receiving increasing amounts of
  criticism.

  I'd like to request that Ubuntu stops recommending snap, stops
  transitioning towards snaps, and we come back to defaulting to
  DEB/APT-based installation for all apps.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1965535/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1960307] Re: No gstreamer dependency causes high-fidelity codecs to be missing for Bluetooth devices

2022-02-22 Thread Avamander
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #991597
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991597

** Also affects: pulseaudio via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991597
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960307

Title:
  No gstreamer dependency causes high-fidelity codecs to be missing for
  Bluetooth devices

Status in PulseAudio:
  Unknown
Status in gst-plugins-bad1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After the announcements of PulseAudio 15 and Gstreamer 1.20, which
  both advertised LDAC and AptX (HD) support, I expected that jammy
  (22.04) would support those codecs.

  Though in reality it seems that something is missing, gstreamer
  reports that those codecs are supported but "pactl [...] list-codec"
  only lists sbc (and variants).

  Checking here https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/pulseaudio-module-
  bluetooth it seems that PulseAudio is not built with gstreamer
  support, is that the current blocker?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/1960307/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1960307] Re: No gstreamer dependency causes high-fidelity codecs to be missing for Bluetooth devices

2022-02-20 Thread Avamander
** Also affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960307

Title:
  No gstreamer dependency causes high-fidelity codecs to be missing for
  Bluetooth devices

Status in gst-plugins-bad1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After the announcements of PulseAudio 15 and Gstreamer 1.20, which
  both advertised LDAC and AptX (HD) support, I expected that jammy
  (22.04) would support those codecs.

  Though in reality it seems that something is missing, gstreamer
  reports that those codecs are supported but "pactl [...] list-codec"
  only lists sbc (and variants).

  Checking here https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/pulseaudio-module-
  bluetooth it seems that PulseAudio is not built with gstreamer
  support, is that the current blocker?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins-bad1.0/+bug/1960307/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1960307] [NEW] No gstreamer dependency causes high-fidelity codecs to be missing for Bluetooth devices

2022-02-08 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported:

After the announcements of PulseAudio 15 and Gstreamer 1.20, which both
advertised LDAC and AptX (HD) support, I expected that jammy (22.04)
would support those codecs.

Though in reality it seems that something is missing, gstreamer reports
that those codecs are supported but "pactl [...] list-codec" only lists
sbc (and variants).

Checking here https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/pulseaudio-module-
bluetooth it seems that PulseAudio is not built with gstreamer support,
is that the current blocker?

** Affects: gst-plugins-bad1.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: gst-plugins-bad1.0 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960307

Title:
  No gstreamer dependency causes high-fidelity codecs to be missing for
  Bluetooth devices

Status in gst-plugins-bad1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After the announcements of PulseAudio 15 and Gstreamer 1.20, which
  both advertised LDAC and AptX (HD) support, I expected that jammy
  (22.04) would support those codecs.

  Though in reality it seems that something is missing, gstreamer
  reports that those codecs are supported but "pactl [...] list-codec"
  only lists sbc (and variants).

  Checking here https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/pulseaudio-module-
  bluetooth it seems that PulseAudio is not built with gstreamer
  support, is that the current blocker?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins-bad1.0/+bug/1960307/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1914918] Re: The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs to die to SIGTRAP

2021-03-01 Thread Avamander
> I've seen no problems for last 5 days, while before, I had to restart
browser every couple hours.

Similar experience here with refresh-app-awareness + no robust-mount-
namespace-updates. One problem I did see was related to audio output
breaking. Restart fixed it. Might just be a Chromium anomaly I wouldn't
attribute to snap.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914918

Title:
  The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs
  to die to SIGTRAP

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The last few background updates of chromium have made some old tabs
  suddenly crash with SIGTRAP and it also makes it impossible to open
  new tabs, those die instantly with a SIGTRAP as well.

  This is incredibly destructive to whatever might be the dying tabs'
  unsaved state and there's no warning about it. Yet again a snap-
  related change rolled out to users with absolutely amateur-tier
  testing.

  Ubuntu: 20.04.2
  Snap: 2.48+20.04
  Chromium: 88.0.4324.150

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1914918/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1914918] Re: The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs to die to SIGTRAP

2021-02-09 Thread Avamander
Ran it, will report back how it affects behaviour, thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914918

Title:
  The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs
  to die to SIGTRAP

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The last few background updates of chromium have made some old tabs
  suddenly crash with SIGTRAP and it also makes it impossible to open
  new tabs, those die instantly with a SIGTRAP as well.

  This is incredibly destructive to whatever might be the dying tabs'
  unsaved state and there's no warning about it. Yet again a snap-
  related change rolled out to users with absolutely amateur-tier
  testing.

  Ubuntu: 20.04.2
  Snap: 2.48+20.04
  Chromium: 88.0.4324.150

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1914918/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1914918] Re: The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs to die to SIGTRAP

2021-02-09 Thread Avamander
There are no good workarounds either, it observably causes anomalies in
apps. Some PWAs lose their state after a restart and it's infuriating.

Canonical should dogfood their own known breaking changes.

** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914918

Title:
  The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs
  to die to SIGTRAP

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The last few background updates of chromium have made some old tabs
  suddenly crash with SIGTRAP and it also makes it impossible to open
  new tabs, those die instantly with a SIGTRAP as well.

  This is incredibly destructive to whatever might be the dying tabs'
  unsaved state and there's no warning about it. Yet again a snap-
  related change rolled out to users with absolutely amateur-tier
  testing.

  Ubuntu: 20.04.2
  Snap: 2.48+20.04
  Chromium: 88.0.4324.150

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1914918/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1914918] [NEW] The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs to die to SIGTRAP

2021-02-07 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported:

The last few background updates of chromium have made some old tabs
suddenly crash with SIGTRAP and it also makes it impossible to open new
tabs, those die instantly with a SIGTRAP as well.

This is incredibly destructive to whatever might be the dying tabs'
unsaved state and there's no warning about it. Yet again a snap-related
change rolled out to users with absolutely amateur-tier testing.

Ubuntu: 20.04.2
Snap: 2.48+20.04
Chromium: 88.0.4324.150

** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914918

Title:
  The snap being updated in the background causes both old and new tabs
  to die to SIGTRAP

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The last few background updates of chromium have made some old tabs
  suddenly crash with SIGTRAP and it also makes it impossible to open
  new tabs, those die instantly with a SIGTRAP as well.

  This is incredibly destructive to whatever might be the dying tabs'
  unsaved state and there's no warning about it. Yet again a snap-
  related change rolled out to users with absolutely amateur-tier
  testing.

  Ubuntu: 20.04.2
  Snap: 2.48+20.04
  Chromium: 88.0.4324.150

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1914918/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] Apparmor audit messages for calls to sched_setaffinity

2021-01-26 Thread Avamander
Ubuntu 20.04.1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679

Title:
  [snap] Apparmor audit messages for calls to sched_setaffinity

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210734): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210735): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210736): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210737): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210738): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210739): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5

  Things like these just get repeated endlessly and very often, making
  any potential debugging very annoying.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1900679/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-25 Thread Avamander
I see sched_setaffinity also used in base/cpu_affinity_posix.cc, so I
doubt it's only beneficial on ARM.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679

Title:
  [snap] chromium spams dmesg

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210734): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210735): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210736): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210737): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210738): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210739): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5

  Things like these just get repeated endlessly and very often, making
  any potential debugging very annoying.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1900679/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-25 Thread Avamander
> @avamander, do you have a reproducer for this?

I'm just using it on a Ryzen 9 3900x and Radeon R7 360. I have GPU
acceleration enabled to the extent it is possible.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679

Title:
  [snap] chromium spams dmesg

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210734): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210735): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210736): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210737): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210738): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210739): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5

  Things like these just get repeated endlessly and very often, making
  any potential debugging very annoying.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1900679/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2021-01-24 Thread Avamander
@~malakai1197

You're out of luck really, switch distributions that don't use half-
baked snaps. Maintainers think that this usability regression is an
"opinion" and that tells really more than enough.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in Chromium Browser:
  Invalid
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-23 Thread Avamander
[pid 1278569] sched_setaffinity(1278640, 128, [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23] 

[pid 1278569] <... sched_setaffinity resumed>) = -1 EPERM (Operation not 
permitted)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679

Title:
  [snap] chromium spams dmesg

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210734): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210735): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210736): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210737): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210738): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210739): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5

  Things like these just get repeated endlessly and very often, making
  any potential debugging very annoying.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1900679/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-23 Thread Avamander
[pid 1278591] sched_setaffinity(1278591, 128, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 
30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 
50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 
70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 
90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 
108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 
124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 
140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 
156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 
172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 
188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 
204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 
220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 
236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 
252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 
268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 
284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 
300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 
316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 
332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 
348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 
364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 
380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 
396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 
412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 
428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 
444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 
460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 
476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 489, 490, 491, 
492, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 
508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 
524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 
540, 541, 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, 
556, 557, 558, 559, 560, 561, 562, 563, 564, 565, 566, 567, 568, 569, 570, 571, 
572, 573, 574, 575, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583, 584, 585, 586, 587, 
588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599, 600, 601, 602, 603, 
604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 
620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 628, 629, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 
636, 637, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 
652, 653, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658, 659, 660, 661, 662, 663, 664, 665, 666, 667, 
668, 669, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 675, 676, 677, 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 683, 
684, 685, 686, 687, 688, 689, 690, 691, 692, 693, 694, 695, 696, 697, 698, 699, 
700, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715, 
716, 717, 718, 719, 720, 721, 722, 723, 724, 725, 726, 727, 728, 729, 730, 731, 
732, 733, 734, 735, 736, 737, 738, 739, 740, 741, 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 
748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, 758, 759, 760, 761, 762, 763, 
764, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769, 770, 771, 772, 773, 774, 775, 776, 777, 778, 779, 
780, 781, 782, 783, 784, 785, 786, 787, 788, 789, 790, 791, 792, 793, 794, 795, 
796, 797, 798, 799, 800, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811, 
812, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817, 818, 819, 820, 821, 822, 823, 824, 825, 826, 827, 
828, 829, 830, 831, 832, 833, 834, 835, 836, 837, 838, 839, 840, 841, 842, 843, 
844, 845, 846, 847, 848, 849, 850, 851, 852, 853, 854, 855, 856, 857, 858, 859, 
860, 861, 862, 863, 864, 865, 866, 867, 868, 869, 870, 871, 872, 873, 874, 875, 
876, 877, 878, 879, 880, 881, 882, 883, 884, 885, 886, 887, 888, 889, 890, 891, 
892, 893, 894, 895, 896, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905, 906, 907, 
908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 
924, 925, 926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 
940, 941, 942, 943, 944, 945, 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953, 954, 955, 
956, 957, 958, 959, 960, 961, 962, 963, 964, 965, 966, 967, 968, 969, 970, 971, 
972, 973, 974, 975, 976, 977, 978, 979, 980, 981, 982, 983, 984, 985, 986, 987, 
988, 989, 990, 991, 992, 993, 994, 995, 996, 997, 998, 999, 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-16 Thread Avamander
> Can someone who is experiencing this bug run an strace to determine
what argument chromium is trying to use with sched_setaffinity ?

I'm not sure how its possible to strace a snap container ran under a
specific user. Could you provide the command?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679

Title:
  [snap] chromium spams dmesg

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210734): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210735): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210736): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210737): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210738): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210739): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5

  Things like these just get repeated endlessly and very often, making
  any potential debugging very annoying.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1900679/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-16 Thread Avamander
It doesn't break it visibly. I would prefer if it were allowed to set
its affinity, but if that can't be done, silencing is a must. This is
incredibly spammy.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679

Title:
  [snap] chromium spams dmesg

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210734): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210735): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210736): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210737): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210738): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210739): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5

  Things like these just get repeated endlessly and very often, making
  any potential debugging very annoying.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1900679/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900679] Re: [snap] chromium spams dmesg

2021-01-12 Thread Avamander
The rulesets still don't explicitly forbid this syscall and it still
gets massively logged into dmesg, making it totally unusable.

```
audit: type=1326 audit(1610482813.754:1835962): auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 
ses=4 pid=2201984 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1444/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f1190d36c7f code=0x5
```

Current Chromium snap AppArmor profile needs fixing, this level of
logging is not okay.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679

Title:
  [snap] chromium spams dmesg

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210734): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210735): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210736): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210737): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210738): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210739): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5

  Things like these just get repeated endlessly and very often, making
  any potential debugging very annoying.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1900679/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900679] Re: snap chromium spams dmesg

2020-10-22 Thread Avamander
Your rulesets are bad, it's not apparmor's fault.

** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679

Title:
  snap chromium spams dmesg

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in snap package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210734): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210735): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210736): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210737): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210738): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210739): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5

  Things like these just get repeated endlessly and very often, making
  any potential debugging very annoying.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1900679/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900679] [NEW] snap chromium spams dmesg

2020-10-20 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported:

[T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210734): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
[T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210735): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
[T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210736): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
[T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210737): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
[T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210738): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
[T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210739): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5

Things like these just get repeated endlessly and very often, making any
potential debugging very annoying.

** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: snap (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: chromium (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: chromium (Ubuntu)

** Also affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900679

Title:
  snap chromium spams dmesg

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in snap package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210734): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:09 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185912.099:210735): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210736): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:12 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185915.095:210737): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210738): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5
  [T okt   20 12:25:14 2020] audit: type=1326 audit(1603185917.419:210739): 
auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=3 pid=53766 comm="chrome" 
exe="/snap/chromium/1350/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome" sig=0 arch=c03e 
syscall=203 compat=0 ip=0x7f46a3f19b9f code=0x5

  Things like these just get repeated endlessly and very often, making
  any potential debugging very annoying.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1900679/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892093] Re: mem_encrypt=on makes radeon driver crash during startup

2020-08-18 Thread Avamander
Dmesg output of encountering non-working graphics

** Attachment added: "dmesg2"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/1892093/+attachment/5402600/+files/dmesg2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892093

Title:
  mem_encrypt=on makes radeon driver crash during startup

Status in xserver-xorg-video-ati package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  lspci output:

  08:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
  [AMD/ATI] Bonaire XTX [Radeon R7 260X/360] [1002:6658]

  dmesg error output:

  [drm:cik_ring_test [radeon]] *ERROR* radeon: ring 0 test failed 
(scratch(0x3010C)=0xCAFEDEAD)
  radeon :08:00.0: disabling GPU acceleration

  kernel parameters with issue:

  quiet splash amd_iommu=on mem_encrypt=on

  Issue appears on kernels 5.4.0-26-generic 5.4.0-40-generic
  5.4.0-42-generic 5.6.0-1021-oem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/1892093/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892093] [NEW] mem_encrypt=on makes radeon driver crash during startup

2020-08-18 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported:

lspci output:

08:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[AMD/ATI] Bonaire XTX [Radeon R7 260X/360] [1002:6658]

dmesg error output:

[drm:cik_ring_test [radeon]] *ERROR* radeon: ring 0 test failed 
(scratch(0x3010C)=0xCAFEDEAD)
radeon :08:00.0: disabling GPU acceleration

kernel parameters with issue:

quiet splash amd_iommu=on mem_encrypt=on

Issue appears on kernels 5.4.0-26-generic 5.4.0-40-generic
5.4.0-42-generic 5.6.0-1021-oem

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Package changed: ubuntu => xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892093

Title:
  mem_encrypt=on makes radeon driver crash during startup

Status in xserver-xorg-video-ati package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  lspci output:

  08:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
  [AMD/ATI] Bonaire XTX [Radeon R7 260X/360] [1002:6658]

  dmesg error output:

  [drm:cik_ring_test [radeon]] *ERROR* radeon: ring 0 test failed 
(scratch(0x3010C)=0xCAFEDEAD)
  radeon :08:00.0: disabling GPU acceleration

  kernel parameters with issue:

  quiet splash amd_iommu=on mem_encrypt=on

  Issue appears on kernels 5.4.0-26-generic 5.4.0-40-generic
  5.4.0-42-generic 5.6.0-1021-oem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/1892093/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-31 Thread Avamander
> Bug reports should stick to fact, using wording like 'Snap-mangled'

I'm sorry, that's factually what happened. Should I have worded it Snap-
disfigured, Snap-distorted, Snap-impaired or Snap-wrecked instead?

> isn't appropriate and not a basis for any discussion.

I have **never** had any software on Linux in the past ten years that
has caused this many issues because of the stuff it does, how that
behaviour is forced on me and which's developers are **this** dismissive
and inappropriate. Issues, some major, have been open for years.

You should have enough empathy to understand that users don't take that
behaviour very kindly for any significant period of time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in Chromium Browser:
  Invalid
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-30 Thread Avamander
Just to be sure you didn't miss a few facts here as you really like to
rub it under people's noses:

* Snap mangles Chromium's configuration directory

* Snap-mangled Chromium configuration directory is not backupable

* Snap-mangled Chromium configuration directory is not compliant with
the de facto interpretation of XDG-BD specification

* Snap-mangled Chromium configuration directory is not compliant with
the spirit of the XDG-BD specification

* Snap-mangled Chromium configuration directory is unnecessarily not
portable between distributions because it assumes the existence of snap


I see a common denominator here - snap's mangling that should really not be 
done.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in Chromium Browser:
  New
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-30 Thread Avamander
> Anything else has little objective value.

That's just your opinion.

> That's not an assumption, it's a fact: https://snapcraft.io/docs
/installing-snapd.

It's an assumption, there are a lot of distributions that stay away from
snap.

> Most (average) users don't care about packaging formats at all (nor do
they care where software stores their cache/config, for that matter).

That's just your opinion and really not up to you to decide.

> That's just your opinion/perception.

That's really just your opinion.

> I'm marking again this bug as a duplicate of bug #1575053.

It's not! The location of the snap directory is totally separate from
where chromium's configuration is stored.


** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1575053
   Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in Chromium Browser:
  New
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-30 Thread Avamander
> I don't think the specification¹ mandates how folders should be
structured under $XDG_DATA_HOME and $XDG_CONFIG_HOME.

`$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/$SOFTWARE_NAME` is the de facto way, snap ignores it.
Technically, yes, you're absolutely free to use hashes instead of your
software's name when you store things in the configuration folder,
really doesn't mean it's a good idea.

> Hopefully snapd behaves (mostly) the same on all supported
distributions, so distro-hopping shouldn't be a concern either.

You're making three assumptions. That snap will behave the same across
distributions, that snap is supported on different distributions at all,
and that someone even wants to install the snap package. All of them are
frankly really bad assumptions and just cause people pain.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in Chromium Browser:
  New
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-29 Thread Avamander
> How so?

The actual software of which the configuration belongs to is chromium
(or "notes"), not snap, snap is "just there" in the middle.

Say I want to wipe snap's configuration, I should be able to wipe
`$XDG_DATA_HOME/snap` without losing my n+1 snap application's data.
Very simply put, `$XDG_DATA_HOME/snap` is for snap,
`$XDG_DATA_HOME/chromium` is for chromium. It would be equally silly to
have i386 software use ``$XDG_DATA_HOME/i386/software`.

Thirdly, it creates a discrepancy in configuration folder location
between distributions, which is pointlessly annoying and hinders distro-
hopping.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in Chromium Browser:
  New
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-29 Thread Avamander
> Therefore snap packages should base the value of SNAP_USER_DATA on the
value of XDG_DATA_HOME (or its specified default). For the "notes" snap,
this would be "$HOME/.local/share/snap/notes/1".

That's still incorrect.

> As to comment #6, can you elaborate on how you copied the existing
profile?

Literally just did that, copied the folder over. It didn't work.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in Chromium Browser:
  New
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-17 Thread Avamander
Oh and I didn't confirm my own bug, that was done by the janitor because
someone else felt that this affects them, I just restored the previous
status.

** Also affects: chromium-browser
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in Chromium Browser:
  New
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-17 Thread Avamander
Upstream bug report that would resolve a half of this issue:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1106754

Just to summarize what's left broken by this specific Ubuntu package:

  * Config and cache are not in the folders defined by the base
directory specification

  * Current `common`/configuration folder is incomplete - can't be
backed up and restored

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in Chromium Browser:
  New
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-17 Thread Avamander
I also have to repeat that currently, copying over the folder contents
you mentioned did NOT result in a working instance of Chromium. All of
my extensions broke, databases failed to open, the common folder is just
incomplete and needs attention. Please do try it yourself.

That absolutely 100% NOT a duplicate of the general snap lunacy.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in Chromium Browser:
  New
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-17 Thread Avamander
> You're right, it does contain cache data. That would be an upstream
bug, can you please file it at
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/entry ?

I will

>  I just found bug #1575053 which looks very similar to your issue, so
I'm going to mark it as duplicate, and I encourage you to read all the
comments to understand the rationale.

They're not duplicates because that one is about moving ~/snap, this one
is making the package actually XDG base directory specification
compliant. If Snap does not offer basic mount features, then this is
also a bug in snapd.

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1575053
   Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-16 Thread Avamander
> The chromium snap is strictly confined, and that means that it cannot
read/write to hidden directories inside the user's home folder (such as
$HOME/.config or $HOME/.cache).

Change the folder it's confined to.

> That one is stored in $HOME/chromium/common/.cache/

No, not really. The profile folder contains gigabytes of cache files.

> The default profile directory is stored in
$HOME/chromium/common/chromium/.

No, not really. Copying it over resulted in a utterly broken profile,
some vital files are not in the common folder.

> Given all this, I'm not really sure what the bug really is about? Can
you share concrete use cases?

I'm not sure what's unclear, XDG base directory specification is NOT
followed, my environment variables are ignored and the wrong folder is
used for everything. That has multiple negative effects, as I listed.

** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1616650] Re: snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

2020-07-16 Thread Avamander
This issue is related to it and probably both could be fixed at the same
time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616650

Title:
  snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

Status in snapd:
  In Progress
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  In testing a desktop snap that saves state in $HOME on close, I
  noticed that if I snap refresh the snap while the command is running
  that it will try to save its state to the previous snap version's data
  directory. For the snap I was testing (a browser), this resulted in a
  very poor user experience (the browser on restart complained about an
  improper shutdown).

  What is happening is that:
  1. on launch the snap's HOME is set to SNAP_USER_DATA, which is something 
like /home/user/snap/foo/x1. The security policy correctly allows writes to 
SNAP_USER_DATA
  2. on snap refresh to 'x2', the security policy for the snap is updated for 
the running process such that /home/user/snap/foo/x1 is readonly and 
/home/user/snap/foo/x2 is read/write
  3. the command in '1's environment is not changed and HOME (as well as 
SNAP_USER_DATA and SNAP_DATA) are all still using 'x1' in the path
  4. the command tries to shutdown gracefully and save state to the 'x1' HOME 
and security policy blocks it

  Snappy's design for rollbacks relies on the previous SNAP_DATA and
  SNAP_USER_DATA directories not being writable and IMHO we should not
  change the policy to make other snap version's data dirs writable.

  The design of the snappy state engine ensures (among other things)
  that there is only ever one security policy in place for the snap. In
  snappy 15.04 this problem was (intentionally) avoided because we used
  snap security policy that was versioned such that the new policy would
  not apply until the next app invocation.

  Gustavo and Zygmunt, you both advocated strongly for only one version
  of the policy on disk and loaded in the kernel and I recall bringing
  up this type of bug as a counter-argument, and if IIRC for daemons we
  said that snapd could simply restart them (makes perfect sense). Have
  you thought of the mechanism for restarting non-daemons?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1616650/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1616650] Re: snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

2020-07-16 Thread Avamander
I opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-
browser/+bug/1887804 to address the fact that chromium-browser-snap is
not following XDG base directory specification and that breaks backing
up the snap's configuration and wiping it's cache properly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616650

Title:
  snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

Status in snapd:
  In Progress
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  In testing a desktop snap that saves state in $HOME on close, I
  noticed that if I snap refresh the snap while the command is running
  that it will try to save its state to the previous snap version's data
  directory. For the snap I was testing (a browser), this resulted in a
  very poor user experience (the browser on restart complained about an
  improper shutdown).

  What is happening is that:
  1. on launch the snap's HOME is set to SNAP_USER_DATA, which is something 
like /home/user/snap/foo/x1. The security policy correctly allows writes to 
SNAP_USER_DATA
  2. on snap refresh to 'x2', the security policy for the snap is updated for 
the running process such that /home/user/snap/foo/x1 is readonly and 
/home/user/snap/foo/x2 is read/write
  3. the command in '1's environment is not changed and HOME (as well as 
SNAP_USER_DATA and SNAP_DATA) are all still using 'x1' in the path
  4. the command tries to shutdown gracefully and save state to the 'x1' HOME 
and security policy blocks it

  Snappy's design for rollbacks relies on the previous SNAP_DATA and
  SNAP_USER_DATA directories not being writable and IMHO we should not
  change the policy to make other snap version's data dirs writable.

  The design of the snappy state engine ensures (among other things)
  that there is only ever one security policy in place for the snap. In
  snappy 15.04 this problem was (intentionally) avoided because we used
  snap security policy that was versioned such that the new policy would
  not apply until the next app invocation.

  Gustavo and Zygmunt, you both advocated strongly for only one version
  of the policy on disk and loaded in the kernel and I recall bringing
  up this type of bug as a counter-argument, and if IIRC for daemons we
  said that snapd could simply restart them (makes perfect sense). Have
  you thought of the mechanism for restarting non-daemons?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1616650/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1887804] [NEW] chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-16 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported:

Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory specification
which means that the cache and configuration folder aren't properly
used.

This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate or
back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
(and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
compliant, shame!).

There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
follow the XDG base directory specification.

** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- chromium-browser does not follow xdg base directory specification
+ chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

** Description changed:

  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory specification
  which means that the cache and configuration folder aren't properly
  used.
  
  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate or
  back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.
  
  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
- gigabytes of cache in ~/snap (also not XDG base directory specification
+ gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
+ (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).
  
  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.
  
  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804

Title:
  chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Currently Chromium does not follow the XDG base directory
  specification which means that the cache and configuration folder
  aren't properly used.

  This causes the issue that it's nearly impossible to properly migrate
  or back up Chromium configuration (between computers) and it makes for
  example mounting cache as tmpfs or wiping it very very difficult.

  I felt those both immensely when trying to migrate my home folder,
  gigabytes of cache in ~/snap/chromium/[id]/.config/chromium/[folder]
  (and ~/snap itself is also not XDG base directory specification
  compliant, shame!).

  There's also the issue that the previous configuration that is located
  properly, isn't migrated by the migrational package.

  In order to fix this bug, it would require making the snap package
  follow the XDG base directory specification.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1887804/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 307152] Re: Get rid of .hplip folder and follow fd.o specifications

2020-07-10 Thread Avamander
Unfortunately this is still a minor problem. It would be nice to not
have hplip clutter people's home directories.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to hplip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307152

Title:
   Get rid of .hplip folder and follow fd.o specifications

Status in HPLIP:
  Triaged
Status in hplip package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  There should not be an .hplip folder in $HOME.

  According to Freedesktop specification it should be put in
  $XDG_CONFIG_HOME (if removing this folder will impact the user) or in
  $XDG_CACHE_HOME (if it's there only for performance reason).

  Personnally, I don't see any difference if I plug my printer after
  removing this folder so I suggest that it should be put in
  $XDG_CACHE_HOME..

  If this folder exist to permit some manual tweaks, then it should be
  put in $XDG_CONFIG_HOME but should not be created automatically.

  
  More infos : http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/latest/ar01s03.html

  The reason why I'm reporting this bug :
  http://ploum.frimouvy.org/?184-cleaning-user-preferences-keeping-user-data

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/307152/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1616650] Re: snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

2020-06-13 Thread Avamander
This is still an issue. The notification is a nice rub of salt in the
wound, but doesn't fix the issue. Absolutely inane, I hope whoever
decided to turn chromium-browser gets a kernel panic when they're
updating their system.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616650

Title:
  snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

Status in snapd:
  In Progress
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  In testing a desktop snap that saves state in $HOME on close, I
  noticed that if I snap refresh the snap while the command is running
  that it will try to save its state to the previous snap version's data
  directory. For the snap I was testing (a browser), this resulted in a
  very poor user experience (the browser on restart complained about an
  improper shutdown).

  What is happening is that:
  1. on launch the snap's HOME is set to SNAP_USER_DATA, which is something 
like /home/user/snap/foo/x1. The security policy correctly allows writes to 
SNAP_USER_DATA
  2. on snap refresh to 'x2', the security policy for the snap is updated for 
the running process such that /home/user/snap/foo/x1 is readonly and 
/home/user/snap/foo/x2 is read/write
  3. the command in '1's environment is not changed and HOME (as well as 
SNAP_USER_DATA and SNAP_DATA) are all still using 'x1' in the path
  4. the command tries to shutdown gracefully and save state to the 'x1' HOME 
and security policy blocks it

  Snappy's design for rollbacks relies on the previous SNAP_DATA and
  SNAP_USER_DATA directories not being writable and IMHO we should not
  change the policy to make other snap version's data dirs writable.

  The design of the snappy state engine ensures (among other things)
  that there is only ever one security policy in place for the snap. In
  snappy 15.04 this problem was (intentionally) avoided because we used
  snap security policy that was versioned such that the new policy would
  not apply until the next app invocation.

  Gustavo and Zygmunt, you both advocated strongly for only one version
  of the policy on disk and loaded in the kernel and I recall bringing
  up this type of bug as a counter-argument, and if IIRC for daemons we
  said that snapd could simply restart them (makes perfect sense). Have
  you thought of the mechanism for restarting non-daemons?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1616650/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1616650] Re: snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

2020-04-09 Thread Avamander
@osomon

No, as already said, refresh-app-awareness doesn't work as a solution. I
still get unannounced data loss.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616650

Title:
  snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

Status in snapd:
  In Progress
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  In testing a desktop snap that saves state in $HOME on close, I
  noticed that if I snap refresh the snap while the command is running
  that it will try to save its state to the previous snap version's data
  directory. For the snap I was testing (a browser), this resulted in a
  very poor user experience (the browser on restart complained about an
  improper shutdown).

  What is happening is that:
  1. on launch the snap's HOME is set to SNAP_USER_DATA, which is something 
like /home/user/snap/foo/x1. The security policy correctly allows writes to 
SNAP_USER_DATA
  2. on snap refresh to 'x2', the security policy for the snap is updated for 
the running process such that /home/user/snap/foo/x1 is readonly and 
/home/user/snap/foo/x2 is read/write
  3. the command in '1's environment is not changed and HOME (as well as 
SNAP_USER_DATA and SNAP_DATA) are all still using 'x1' in the path
  4. the command tries to shutdown gracefully and save state to the 'x1' HOME 
and security policy blocks it

  Snappy's design for rollbacks relies on the previous SNAP_DATA and
  SNAP_USER_DATA directories not being writable and IMHO we should not
  change the policy to make other snap version's data dirs writable.

  The design of the snappy state engine ensures (among other things)
  that there is only ever one security policy in place for the snap. In
  snappy 15.04 this problem was (intentionally) avoided because we used
  snap security policy that was versioned such that the new policy would
  not apply until the next app invocation.

  Gustavo and Zygmunt, you both advocated strongly for only one version
  of the policy on disk and loaded in the kernel and I recall bringing
  up this type of bug as a counter-argument, and if IIRC for daemons we
  said that snapd could simply restart them (makes perfect sense). Have
  you thought of the mechanism for restarting non-daemons?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1616650/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1616650] Re: snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

2020-04-04 Thread Avamander
Enabled the "refresh-app-awareness", still, without warning Chromium
suddenly stops recording history, keeping state and sessions. Incredibly
annoying and causes unavoidable data loss.

It's is frankly inane to roll out new snaps when it has been known for
FOUR. YEARS. that there's a major bug that causes data loss.

** Also affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616650

Title:
  snap refresh while command is running may cause issues

Status in snapd:
  In Progress
Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In testing a desktop snap that saves state in $HOME on close, I
  noticed that if I snap refresh the snap while the command is running
  that it will try to save its state to the previous snap version's data
  directory. For the snap I was testing (a browser), this resulted in a
  very poor user experience (the browser on restart complained about an
  improper shutdown).

  What is happening is that:
  1. on launch the snap's HOME is set to SNAP_USER_DATA, which is something 
like /home/user/snap/foo/x1. The security policy correctly allows writes to 
SNAP_USER_DATA
  2. on snap refresh to 'x2', the security policy for the snap is updated for 
the running process such that /home/user/snap/foo/x1 is readonly and 
/home/user/snap/foo/x2 is read/write
  3. the command in '1's environment is not changed and HOME (as well as 
SNAP_USER_DATA and SNAP_DATA) are all still using 'x1' in the path
  4. the command tries to shutdown gracefully and save state to the 'x1' HOME 
and security policy blocks it

  Snappy's design for rollbacks relies on the previous SNAP_DATA and
  SNAP_USER_DATA directories not being writable and IMHO we should not
  change the policy to make other snap version's data dirs writable.

  The design of the snappy state engine ensures (among other things)
  that there is only ever one security policy in place for the snap. In
  snappy 15.04 this problem was (intentionally) avoided because we used
  snap security policy that was versioned such that the new policy would
  not apply until the next app invocation.

  Gustavo and Zygmunt, you both advocated strongly for only one version
  of the policy on disk and loaded in the kernel and I recall bringing
  up this type of bug as a counter-argument, and if IIRC for daemons we
  said that snapd could simply restart them (makes perfect sense). Have
  you thought of the mechanism for restarting non-daemons?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1616650/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1741074] Re: [snap] chrome-gnome-shell extension fails to detect native host connector

2020-04-04 Thread Avamander
** Also affects: kdeconnect (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: goopg (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741074

Title:
  [snap] chrome-gnome-shell extension fails to detect native host
  connector

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in goopg package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in kdeconnect package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  (initially reported at https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/chrome-gnome-
  shell-does-not-work-with-chromium-snap/3377)

  See attached screenshot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1741074/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1870829] [NEW] AptX and AptX HD unavailable as Bluetooth audio quality options

2020-04-04 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported:

Current situation:

When one connects a Bluetooth audio device, at best one can choose
between "Headset Head Unit (HSP/HFP)" and "High Fidelity Playback (A2DP
Sink)". That is sad when the audio device supports AptX or AptX HD.


Expected situation:

One can select AptX or AptX HD as the Bluetooth audio output profile.

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870829

Title:
  AptX and AptX HD unavailable as Bluetooth audio quality options

Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Current situation:

  When one connects a Bluetooth audio device, at best one can choose
  between "Headset Head Unit (HSP/HFP)" and "High Fidelity Playback
  (A2DP Sink)". That is sad when the audio device supports AptX or AptX
  HD.

  
  Expected situation:

  One can select AptX or AptX HD as the Bluetooth audio output profile.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1870829/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1860137] Re: Chromium-browser Snap is amnesiac

2020-01-30 Thread Avamander
I enabled the flag, still encountered this issue.

This time when I restarted Chromium my tabs were lost and restoring
previous session just did nothing. Thankfully the extension "Tab
Suspender" allowed me to recover my tabs but a few services logged me
off.

I guess the flag improves situation, thanks for that, but isn't
flawless.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860137

Title:
  Chromium-browser Snap is amnesiac

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I'm using Ubuntu 19.10, latest Chromium(-browser) installed.

  The issue is that after the switch to snap-based Chromium it started
  forgetting my logged in sessions very very often. This is not isolated
  to one online service, I have to log back in to everything I use,
  including Chromium itself. It also forgets any "Remember this device"
  checkmarks.

  History, downloads or extensions however do not suffer from any data
  loss.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1860137/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1741074] Re: [snap] chrome-gnome-shell extension fails to detect native host connector

2020-01-22 Thread Avamander
KDE Connect is also affected by this. I'm wondering though, unable to
find the answer online, why was the transition to snap-based chromium
made?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741074

Title:
  [snap] chrome-gnome-shell extension fails to detect native host
  connector

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  (initially reported at https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/chrome-gnome-
  shell-does-not-work-with-chromium-snap/3377)

  See attached screenshot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1741074/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1860137] Re: Chromium-browser Snap is amnesiac

2020-01-20 Thread Avamander
I enabled the flag, will report back.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860137

Title:
  Chromium-browser Snap is amnesiac

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I'm using Ubuntu 19.10, latest Chromium(-browser) installed.

  The issue is that after the switch to snap-based Chromium it started
  forgetting my logged in sessions very very often. This is not isolated
  to one online service, I have to log back in to everything I use,
  including Chromium itself. It also forgets any "Remember this device"
  checkmarks.

  History, downloads or extensions however do not suffer from any data
  loss.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1860137/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1860137] [NEW] Chromium-browser Snap is amnesiac

2020-01-17 Thread Avamander
Public bug reported:

I'm using Ubuntu 19.10, latest Chromium(-browser) installed.

The issue is that after the switch to snap-based Chromium it started
forgetting my logged in sessions very very often. This is not isolated
to one online service, I have to log back in to everything I use,
including Chromium itself. It also forgets any "Remember this device"
checkmarks.

History, downloads or extensions however do not suffer from any data
loss.

** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860137

Title:
  Chromium-browser Snap is amnesiac

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I'm using Ubuntu 19.10, latest Chromium(-browser) installed.

  The issue is that after the switch to snap-based Chromium it started
  forgetting my logged in sessions very very often. This is not isolated
  to one online service, I have to log back in to everything I use,
  including Chromium itself. It also forgets any "Remember this device"
  checkmarks.

  History, downloads or extensions however do not suffer from any data
  loss.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1860137/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1833793] Re: Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when nothing is playing audio

2019-07-03 Thread Avamander
@hui.wang Your suggestion worked and you saved my sanity. Thank you so
much.

Could Ubuntu developers please sort out the power saving, so that the
sound card actually shuts down instead of continuous clicking
(reinitialization?), just for the sake of others on this chipset.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833793

Title:
  Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when nothing is playing audio

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  My Ubuntu version: Ubuntu 19.04
  My sound card: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller 
(rev 02)

  What I expect to happen:
  Sound is absolutely quiet when no audio is playing

  What happens now:
  Audio output starts clicking every second incredibly annoyingly and loud.

  What previously happened on Ubuntu 18.10:
  I heard the click twice during boot and then it worked properly (without 
clicking during the time it should have been silent)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1833793/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1833793] Re: Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when nothing is playing audio

2019-06-30 Thread Avamander
Is this some kind of new power optimization to constantly reinitialize
my sound card?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833793

Title:
  Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when nothing is playing audio

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  My Ubuntu version: Ubuntu 19.04
  My sound card: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller 
(rev 02)

  What I expect to happen:
  Sound is absolutely quiet when no audio is playing

  What happens now:
  Audio output starts clicking every second incredibly annoyingly and loud.

  What previously happened on Ubuntu 18.10:
  I heard the click twice during boot and then it worked properly (without 
clicking during the time it should have been silent)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1833793/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1833793] Re: Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when nothing is playing audio

2019-06-30 Thread Avamander
It literally doesn't go away, only reliable way is playing something
24/7 just to get Ubuntu to shut the f*** up.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833793

Title:
  Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when nothing is playing audio

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  My Ubuntu version: Ubuntu 19.04
  My sound card: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller 
(rev 02)

  What I expect to happen:
  Sound is absolutely quiet when no audio is playing

  What happens now:
  Audio output starts clicking every second incredibly annoyingly and loud.

  What previously happened on Ubuntu 18.10:
  I heard the click twice during boot and then it worked properly (without 
clicking during the time it should have been silent)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1833793/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1833793] Re: Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when nothing is playing audio

2019-06-23 Thread Avamander
This is seriously infuriating, why do I have to keep something playing
at 1% volume just for stuff to stay quiet.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833793

Title:
  Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when nothing is playing audio

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  My Ubuntu version: Ubuntu 19.04
  My sound card: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller 
(rev 02)

  What I expect to happen:
  Sound is absolutely quiet when no audio is playing

  What happens now:
  Audio output starts clicking every second incredibly annoyingly and loud.

  What previously happened on Ubuntu 18.10:
  I heard the click twice during boot and then it worked properly (without 
clicking during the time it should have been silent)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1833793/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1833793] Re: Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when it should be silent

2019-06-21 Thread Avamander
** Package changed: ubuntu => alsa-driver (Ubuntu)

** Summary changed:

- Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when it should be silent
+ Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when nothing is playing audio

** Description changed:

  My Ubuntu version: Ubuntu 19.04
  My sound card: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller 
(rev 02)
  
  What I expect to happen:
  Sound is absolutely quiet when no audio is playing
  
  What happens now:
- Audio output starts clicking every second incredibly annoyingly and loud. 
+ Audio output starts clicking every second incredibly annoyingly and loud.
  
  What previously happened on Ubuntu 18.10:
- I heard the click twice during boot and then it worked properly (without 
clicking all the time)
+ I heard the click twice during boot and then it worked properly (without 
clicking during the time it should have been silent the time)

** Description changed:

  My Ubuntu version: Ubuntu 19.04
  My sound card: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller 
(rev 02)
  
  What I expect to happen:
  Sound is absolutely quiet when no audio is playing
  
  What happens now:
  Audio output starts clicking every second incredibly annoyingly and loud.
  
  What previously happened on Ubuntu 18.10:
- I heard the click twice during boot and then it worked properly (without 
clicking during the time it should have been silent the time)
+ I heard the click twice during boot and then it worked properly (without 
clicking during the time it should have been silent)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833793

Title:
  Updating to 19.04 audio keeps clicking when nothing is playing audio

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  My Ubuntu version: Ubuntu 19.04
  My sound card: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller 
(rev 02)

  What I expect to happen:
  Sound is absolutely quiet when no audio is playing

  What happens now:
  Audio output starts clicking every second incredibly annoyingly and loud.

  What previously happened on Ubuntu 18.10:
  I heard the click twice during boot and then it worked properly (without 
clicking during the time it should have been silent)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1833793/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp