[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
** Changed in: gnome-control-center Status: Unknown => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center: Fix Released Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues #1504 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues/1504 ** Also affects: gnome-control-center via https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues/1504 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center: Unknown Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
Thanks for the details, I'm closing for the current serie since it's fixed there, we can open 22.04 specific target if we decide to cherrypick a fix there but the lack of reports so far suggest it's not hitting enough users to justify a stable update ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
Failure to understand why that option is hidden, or in some cases, that the profile is actually available but the gnome-control-center hides it anyway. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
Why would they go to the command line rather than switching to performance from the top panel indicator or the settings? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
The selector defaults to balance, but an inexperienced gamer or a desparate power user may force the performance profile via the command line, despite the fact gnome-control-center thinks it is not available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
Could you give a more specific example? Do you mean that gamer are likely to want another profile than 'performance' which isn't available/known by the GNOME settings? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
> The fact that we didn't see reports about it until now is also an
indication that it's not a common problem
Hard to encounter by a casual office user, but power users, overclockers
and high performance gamers are very likely to encounter this bug
("performance" profile is conditionally hidden by the gnome-control-
center but the test hiding it does not always work correctly, sometimes
it is hidden even when it is actually available by the hardware, such as
I encountered in my Zen 3 processor).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503
Title:
[jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian:
New
Bug description:
In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or
through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those
cases.
The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported
power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl.
Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453
I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the
backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a
backport.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
> Could you provide some details on how you set a profile which isn't available? I invoked powerprofilectl and "fixed" the performance profile using that. And then gnome-control-center would throw a fatal assertion failure (UI cannot open, basically total non-function of the app), and stop working. If the profile setting is rolled back using the same powerprofilectl, it can be opened again. The patch from upstream converts this error into a logged non-fatal warning. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
Thank you for your bug report. Could you provide some details on how you set a profile which isn't available? I'm a bit unclear also that it's a fix important enough to justify a backport upload by itself, that's not an issue that users hit in normal conditions. The fact that we didn't see reports about it until now is also an indication that it's not a common problem ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
related freeze exception from upstream: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Releng/freeze-breaks/-/issues/101 ** Tags added: jammy ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Releng/freeze-breaks/-/issues #101 https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Releng/freeze-breaks/-/issues/101 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037503] Re: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
** Description changed: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 + + I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the + backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a + backport. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
