[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-21 Thread John Sirois 
This vote has passed.  Vote summary:

+1 votes: 3 binding
+0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 0

Artifacts are now available in the official Apache Aurora bintray repos:
https://bintray.com/apache/aurora/

Thanks folks!

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:10 PM, John Sirois  wrote:

> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm packaging
> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
>
> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> *
>
> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
> ---
> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
> *https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> *
>
> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora
> -packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
>
> The packages are available at:
> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> *
>
> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>
> Please download, verify, and test.
>
> The vote will close on Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:00:00 -0700
>
> [ ] +1 Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> ---
>
> Please consider verifying these rpms using the install guide:
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md
>
> Or by using the test guide for rpms:
>
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
> 
>
>
>
> I'd like to kick off voting with my own +1
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-21 Thread John Sirois 
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Erb, Stephan <stephan@blue-yonder.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Verified using the install instructions here
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md#released
> but with together with John's pkg_root.
>
> I have noticed two things:
> * our thermos_root variable does not seem to play well with the default
> work_dir of the slave. They use different defaults. However, this is not
> really a problem with the packaging rather than with the default
> configuration. Our install guide even covers the case.
> * Our install guide (in the Aurora) is heavily outdated and a little bit
> confusing. Maybe we can merge this with the Vagrant test file to only have
> a single authority telling a user how to do the setup.
>

Thanks Stephan, I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1646
and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1647 to fix these.


>
> Packages in general are fine, so we can leave those two issues for another
> day.
> 
> From: John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 14:25
> To: Bill Farner
> Cc: dev@aurora.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms
>
> Folks - the rpm release for 0.12.0 still needs one more binding +1 to pass.
>
> From what I can tell, there is no need to create a new RC (there are no
> identified bugs) and the only mention of time limits in the voting
> guidelines [1] is to bound the voting window on the low side to give enough
> time for folks to vote.  As such, unless someone is aware of conflicting
> policy, I'll extend this vote until we get a binding +1 or any -1.
>
> Please test if you can find the time!
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:19 AM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I'll be offline tomorrow through Saturday (3/16-3/19) and the vote closes
> > Sunday 3/20 10am Mountain time so sending out a last reminder to test
> these
> > rpms and vote if you have time between now and then.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Verified using instructions starting here:
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md#released
> >>
> >> and
> >> pkg_root="https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/;
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:10 PM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm
> >>> packaging
> >>> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
> >>>
> >>> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> >>> <https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>*
> >>>
> >>> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
> >>> ---
> >>> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
> >>> *
> >>>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> >>> <
> >>>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> >>> >*
> >>>
> >>> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora
> >>> -packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
> >>>
> >>> The packages are available at:
> >>> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> >>> <https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>*
> >>>
> >>> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Please download, verify, and test.
> >>>
> >>> The vote will close on Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:00:00 -0700
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0
> >>> [ ] +0
> >>> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Please consider verifying these rpms using the install guide:
> >>> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md
> >>>
> >>> Or by using the test guide for rpms:
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
> >>> <
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to kick off voting with my own +1
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-21 Thread Erb, Stephan 
+1 

Verified using the install instructions here 
https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md#released
 but with together with John's pkg_root.

I have noticed two things:
* our thermos_root variable does not seem to play well with the default 
work_dir of the slave. They use different defaults. However, this is not really 
a problem with the packaging rather than with the default configuration. Our 
install guide even covers the case.
* Our install guide (in the Aurora) is heavily outdated and a little bit 
confusing. Maybe we can merge this with the Vagrant test file to only have a 
single authority telling a user how to do the setup.

Packages in general are fine, so we can leave those two issues for another day.

From: John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 14:25
To: Bill Farner
Cc: dev@aurora.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

Folks - the rpm release for 0.12.0 still needs one more binding +1 to pass.

>From what I can tell, there is no need to create a new RC (there are no
identified bugs) and the only mention of time limits in the voting
guidelines [1] is to bound the voting window on the low side to give enough
time for folks to vote.  As such, unless someone is aware of conflicting
policy, I'll extend this vote until we get a binding +1 or any -1.

Please test if you can find the time!

[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:19 AM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> wrote:

> I'll be offline tomorrow through Saturday (3/16-3/19) and the vote closes
> Sunday 3/20 10am Mountain time so sending out a last reminder to test these
> rpms and vote if you have time between now and then.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Verified using instructions starting here:
>> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md#released
>>
>> and
>> pkg_root="https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/;
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:10 PM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm
>>> packaging
>>> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
>>>
>>> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
>>> <https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>*
>>>
>>> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
>>> ---
>>> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
>>> *
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
>>> <
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
>>> >*
>>>
>>> The branch used to create the packaging is:
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora
>>> -packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
>>>
>>> The packages are available at:
>>> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
>>> <https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>*
>>>
>>> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>
>>> The vote will close on Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:00:00 -0700
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Please consider verifying these rpms using the install guide:
>>> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md
>>>
>>> Or by using the test guide for rpms:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
>>> <
>>> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to kick off voting with my own +1
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-21 Thread John Sirois 
Folks - the rpm release for 0.12.0 still needs one more binding +1 to pass.

>From what I can tell, there is no need to create a new RC (there are no
identified bugs) and the only mention of time limits in the voting
guidelines [1] is to bound the voting window on the low side to give enough
time for folks to vote.  As such, unless someone is aware of conflicting
policy, I'll extend this vote until we get a binding +1 or any -1.

Please test if you can find the time!

[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:19 AM, John Sirois  wrote:

> I'll be offline tomorrow through Saturday (3/16-3/19) and the vote closes
> Sunday 3/20 10am Mountain time so sending out a last reminder to test these
> rpms and vote if you have time between now and then.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Bill Farner  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Verified using instructions starting here:
>> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md#released
>>
>> and
>> pkg_root="https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/;
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:10 PM, John Sirois  wrote:
>>
>>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm
>>> packaging
>>> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
>>>
>>> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
>>> *
>>>
>>> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
>>> ---
>>> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
>>> *
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
>>> <
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
>>> >*
>>>
>>> The branch used to create the packaging is:
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora
>>> -packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
>>>
>>> The packages are available at:
>>> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
>>> *
>>>
>>> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>
>>> The vote will close on Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:00:00 -0700
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Please consider verifying these rpms using the install guide:
>>> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md
>>>
>>> Or by using the test guide for rpms:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
>>> <
>>> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to kick off voting with my own +1
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-15 Thread John Sirois 
I'll be offline tomorrow through Saturday (3/16-3/19) and the vote closes
Sunday 3/20 10am Mountain time so sending out a last reminder to test these
rpms and vote if you have time between now and then.

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Bill Farner  wrote:

> +1
>
> Verified using instructions starting here:
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md#released
>
> and
> pkg_root="https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/;
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:10 PM, John Sirois  wrote:
>
>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm
>> packaging
>> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
>>
>> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
>> *
>>
>> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
>> ---
>> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
>> *
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
>> <
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
>> >*
>>
>> The branch used to create the packaging is:
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora
>> -packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
>>
>> The packages are available at:
>> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
>> *
>>
>> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>>
>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>
>> The vote will close on Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:00:00 -0700
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>> ---
>>
>> Please consider verifying these rpms using the install guide:
>> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md
>>
>> Or by using the test guide for rpms:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
>> <
>> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd like to kick off voting with my own +1
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-14 Thread Bill Farner 
+1

Verified using instructions starting here:
https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md#released

and
pkg_root="https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/;


On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:10 PM, John Sirois  wrote:

> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm
> packaging
> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
>
> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> *
>
> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
> ---
> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
> *
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> <
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> >*
>
> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora
> -packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
>
> The packages are available at:
> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> *
>
> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>
> Please download, verify, and test.
>
> The vote will close on Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:00:00 -0700
>
> [ ] +1 Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> ---
>
> Please consider verifying these rpms using the install guide:
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md
>
> Or by using the test guide for rpms:
>
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
> <
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
> >
>
>
>
> I'd like to kick off voting with my own +1
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-14 Thread John Sirois 
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, John Sirois  wrote:

> My sanity may be partially restored, although several things are wonky.
> More below on my morning experiments, all after vagrant destroy for sanity
> sake in the test/rpm/centos-7 dir of the aurora-packaging repo:
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Bill Farner  wrote:
>
>> -1
>>
>> I'm had trouble getting these to work.  I used the vagrant environment
>> here:
>> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/tree/master/test/rpm/centos-7
>>
>> *Executor:*
>> $ sudo rpm -ivh aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm
>> error: Failed dependencies:
>> docker is needed by aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64
>>
>> Apparently the official docker package is called docker-engine
>> https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/linux/centos/
>>
>> Dependency naming aside, i think we should omit docker from our
>> dependencies, as it really should be a mesos dep if anything.  *I can
>> send a patch for that if others agree.*
>>
>
> Actually, I drilled in on this again this am and although there are
> problems building the RPMs smoothly (MESOS_REV=0.25.0 must be exported as
> things stand), the install does go fine with the caveat s/rpm -i/yum
> install/.  This is enough to invalidate the release though and I'll get out
> more fixes to the test docs.
>
> My install procedure was exactly:
> version=0.12.0
> pkg_root="https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/;
> for rpm in \
> aurora-scheduler-${version}-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm \
> aurora-executor-${version}-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm \
> aurora-tools-${version}-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm; do
>   wget $pkg_root/$rpm
>   sudo yum install -y $rpm
> done
>
>
>
>> *Scheduler:*
>> I had trouble getting the scheduler to start, it exits due to an uncaught
>> exception in the main thread, and unfortunately a stack trace doesn't turn
>> up in journalctl.  We need to figure out why the errors don't show up,
>> possibly in conjunction with addressing the items below.
>>
>
> I do not repro.  Things start up and logs do go to journalctl using the
> test/rpm/centos-7/README.md instructions.  That said, my updated
> instructions, though they show up on master [1] do not show up on the
> github mirror [2] - which is odd.
>

I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11461 for the github
mirror sync issue.


>
> [1]
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=blob;f=test/rpm/centos-7/README.md;h=6a6e419eae0b91608450d932139e515ff47c8445;hb=HEAD
> [2]
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
>
>
>> Doing some investigation, i noticed something strange - JAVA_OPTS (set
>> in /etc/sysconfig/aurora) doesn't make it to the process launched by
>> systemd.  It seems to be discarded when /usr/bin/aurora-scheduler-startup
>> calls /usr/lib/aurora/bin/aurora-scheduler.  Other variables (e.g.
>> AURORA_SCHEDULER_OPTS) propagate fine.  I've probably been staring at
>> this too long and am missing something obvious, but i'm not making sense of
>> it.
>>
>> Sidestepping the above issue, i discovered 2 reasons the scheduler won't
>> start up:
>> - Default backup dir /var/lib/aurora/scheduler/backups does not exist,
>> insufficient permission to create
>>
>> - Fails to load the mesos native lib
>> aurora-scheduler-startup[8500]: Failed to load native Mesos library from
>> /usr/lib;/usr/lib64
>> I was able to fix this by removing ;/usr/lib64 from
>> -Djava.library.path='/usr/lib;/usr/lib64', alternatively by removing the
>> library.path setting and exporting LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib.
>>
>> Happy to pitch in on fixing these issues, curious what folks think of the
>> items above, especially the JAVA_OPTS issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:31 PM, John Sirois  wrote:
>>
>>> Pinging this VOTE and noting that the close is Monday at 11am Mountain
>>> time.
>>>
>>> Please test!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, John Sirois  wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:00 AM, John Sirois 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm
>>> packaging
>>> >> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
>>> >>
>>> >> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
>>> >> *
>>> >>
>>> >> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
>>> >> ---
>>> >> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
>>> >> *
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
>>> >> <
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
>>> >*
>>> >>
>>> >> The branch used to create the packaging is:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
>>> >>
>>> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-14 Thread John Sirois 
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, John Sirois  wrote:

> My sanity may be partially restored, although several things are wonky.
> More below on my morning experiments, all after vagrant destroy for sanity
> sake in the test/rpm/centos-7 dir of the aurora-packaging repo:
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Bill Farner  wrote:
>
>> -1
>>
>> I'm had trouble getting these to work.  I used the vagrant environment
>> here:
>> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/tree/master/test/rpm/centos-7
>>
>> *Executor:*
>> $ sudo rpm -ivh aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm
>> error: Failed dependencies:
>> docker is needed by aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64
>>
>> Apparently the official docker package is called docker-engine
>> https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/linux/centos/
>>
>> Dependency naming aside, i think we should omit docker from our
>> dependencies, as it really should be a mesos dep if anything.  *I can
>> send a patch for that if others agree.*
>>
>
> Actually, I drilled in on this again this am and although there are
> problems building the RPMs smoothly (MESOS_REV=0.25.0 must be exported as
> things stand), the install does go fine with the caveat s/rpm -i/yum
> install/.  This is enough to invalidate the release though and I'll get out
> more fixes to the test docs.
>
> My install procedure was exactly:
> version=0.12.0
> pkg_root="https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/;
> for rpm in \
> aurora-scheduler-${version}-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm \
> aurora-executor-${version}-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm \
> aurora-tools-${version}-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm; do
>   wget $pkg_root/$rpm
>   sudo yum install -y $rpm
> done
>
>
>
>> *Scheduler:*
>> I had trouble getting the scheduler to start, it exits due to an uncaught
>> exception in the main thread, and unfortunately a stack trace doesn't turn
>> up in journalctl.  We need to figure out why the errors don't show up,
>> possibly in conjunction with addressing the items below.
>>
>
> I do not repro.  Things start up and logs do go to journalctl using the
> test/rpm/centos-7/README.md instructions.  That said, my updated
> instructions, though they show up on master [1] do not show up on the
> github mirror [2] - which is odd.
>

More concretely, logs show up under the `aurora-scheduler-startup` syslog
id:
[vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo journalctl -t aurora-scheduler-startup | tail
Mar 14 16:33:26 localhost.localdomain aurora-scheduler-startup[13373]:
I0314 16:33:26.683169 13538 leveldb.cpp:343] Persisting action (124 bytes)
to leveldb took 5.614887ms
Mar 14 16:33:26 localhost.localdomain aurora-scheduler-startup[13373]:
I0314 16:33:26.683202 13538 replica.cpp:679] Persisted action at 3
Mar 14 16:33:26 localhost.localdomain aurora-scheduler-startup[13373]:
I0314 16:33:26.683207 13538 replica.cpp:664] Replica learned APPEND action
at position 3
Mar 14 16:33:26 localhost.localdomain aurora-scheduler-startup[13373]:
I0314 16:33:26.844 [RowGarbageCollector RUNNING, RowGarbageCollector:91]
Deleted 0 unreferenced rows.
Mar 14 16:33:26 localhost.localdomain aurora-scheduler-startup[13373]:
W0314 16:33:26.845 [AsyncProcessor-0, ServerSetImpl:137] Joining a
ServerSet without a shard ID is deprecated and will soon break.
Mar 14 16:33:26 localhost.localdomain aurora-scheduler-startup[13373]:
I0314 16:33:26.882 [AsyncProcessor-0, Group$ActiveMembership:407] Set group
member ID to member_01
Mar 14 16:33:26 localhost.localdomain aurora-scheduler-startup[13373]:
I0314 16:33:26.897 [RedirectMonitor STARTING-EventThread,
ServerSetImpl$ServerSetWatcher:383] server set /aurora/scheduler change:
from 0 members to 1
Mar 14 16:33:26 localhost.localdomain aurora-scheduler-startup[13373]:
joined:
Mar 14 16:33:26 localhost.localdomain aurora-scheduler-startup[13373]:
ServiceInstance(serviceEndpoint:Endpoint(host:127.0.0.1, port:8081),
additionalEndpoints:{http=Endpoint(host:127.0.0.1, port:8081)},
status:ALIVE)
Mar 14 16:33:26 localhost.localdomain aurora-scheduler-startup[13373]:
I0314 16:33:26.897 [RedirectMonitor STARTING-EventThread,
LeaderRedirect$SchedulerMonitor:208] Found leader scheduler at
[ServiceInstance(serviceEndpoint:Endpoint(host:127.0.0.1, port:8081),
additionalEndpoints:{http=Endpoint(host:127.0.0.1, port:8081)},
status:ALIVE)]


> [1]
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=blob;f=test/rpm/centos-7/README.md;h=6a6e419eae0b91608450d932139e515ff47c8445;hb=HEAD
> [2]
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md
>
>
>> Doing some investigation, i noticed something strange - JAVA_OPTS (set
>> in /etc/sysconfig/aurora) doesn't make it to the process launched by
>> systemd.  It seems to be discarded when /usr/bin/aurora-scheduler-startup
>> calls /usr/lib/aurora/bin/aurora-scheduler.  Other variables (e.g.
>> AURORA_SCHEDULER_OPTS) propagate fine.  I've probably been staring

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-14 Thread John Sirois 
My sanity may be partially restored, although several things are wonky.
More below on my morning experiments, all after vagrant destroy for sanity
sake in the test/rpm/centos-7 dir of the aurora-packaging repo:

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Bill Farner  wrote:

> -1
>
> I'm had trouble getting these to work.  I used the vagrant environment
> here:
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/tree/master/test/rpm/centos-7
>
> *Executor:*
> $ sudo rpm -ivh aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> docker is needed by aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64
>
> Apparently the official docker package is called docker-engine
> https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/linux/centos/
>
> Dependency naming aside, i think we should omit docker from our
> dependencies, as it really should be a mesos dep if anything.  *I can
> send a patch for that if others agree.*
>

Actually, I drilled in on this again this am and although there are
problems building the RPMs smoothly (MESOS_REV=0.25.0 must be exported as
things stand), the install does go fine with the caveat s/rpm -i/yum
install/.  This is enough to invalidate the release though and I'll get out
more fixes to the test docs.

My install procedure was exactly:
version=0.12.0
pkg_root="https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/;
for rpm in \
aurora-scheduler-${version}-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm \
aurora-executor-${version}-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm \
aurora-tools-${version}-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm; do
  wget $pkg_root/$rpm
  sudo yum install -y $rpm
done



> *Scheduler:*
> I had trouble getting the scheduler to start, it exits due to an uncaught
> exception in the main thread, and unfortunately a stack trace doesn't turn
> up in journalctl.  We need to figure out why the errors don't show up,
> possibly in conjunction with addressing the items below.
>

I do not repro.  Things start up and logs do go to journalctl using the
test/rpm/centos-7/README.md instructions.  That said, my updated
instructions, though they show up on master [1] do not show up on the
github mirror [2] - which is odd.

[1]
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=blob;f=test/rpm/centos-7/README.md;h=6a6e419eae0b91608450d932139e515ff47c8445;hb=HEAD
[2]
https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/test/rpm/centos-7/README.md


> Doing some investigation, i noticed something strange - JAVA_OPTS (set in
> /etc/sysconfig/aurora) doesn't make it to the process launched by
> systemd.  It seems to be discarded when /usr/bin/aurora-scheduler-startup
> calls /usr/lib/aurora/bin/aurora-scheduler.  Other variables (e.g.
> AURORA_SCHEDULER_OPTS) propagate fine.  I've probably been staring at
> this too long and am missing something obvious, but i'm not making sense of
> it.
>
> Sidestepping the above issue, i discovered 2 reasons the scheduler won't
> start up:
> - Default backup dir /var/lib/aurora/scheduler/backups does not exist,
> insufficient permission to create
>
> - Fails to load the mesos native lib
> aurora-scheduler-startup[8500]: Failed to load native Mesos library from
> /usr/lib;/usr/lib64
> I was able to fix this by removing ;/usr/lib64 from
> -Djava.library.path='/usr/lib;/usr/lib64', alternatively by removing the
> library.path setting and exporting LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib.
>
> Happy to pitch in on fixing these issues, curious what folks think of the
> items above, especially the JAVA_OPTS issue.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:31 PM, John Sirois  wrote:
>
>> Pinging this VOTE and noting that the close is Monday at 11am Mountain
>> time.
>>
>> Please test!
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, John Sirois  wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:00 AM, John Sirois 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm
>> packaging
>> >> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
>> >>
>> >> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
>> >> *
>> >>
>> >> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
>> >> ---
>> >> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
>> >> *
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
>> >> <
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
>> >*
>> >>
>> >> The branch used to create the packaging is:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
>> >>
>> >> The packages are available at:
>> >> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
>> >> *
>> >>
>> >> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>> >>
>> >> Please download, verify, and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-12 Thread John Sirois 
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Erb, Stephan <stephan@blue-yonder.com>
wrote:

> I'll try to spin up a centos box myself and see how that goes.
>

Re-running through testing I hit more basic roadblocks.  Its not clear to
me what / how I built here!
Apologies for wasting your time - I'll get in a few patches and then kick
off a new vote.


>
> > Dependency naming aside, i think we should omit docker from our
> > dependencies, as it really should be a mesos dep if anything.  *I can
> send
> > a patch for that if others agree.*
>
> We also have to be more diligent in tracking the Mesos version we depend
> on. It already got out of date here [1] and here [2].
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md#mesos-on-centos-7
> [2]
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/specs/rpm/aurora.spec#L41
>
>
> 
> From: Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 21:34
> To: dev@aurora.apache.org; jsir...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms
>
> -1
>
> I'm had trouble getting these to work.  I used the vagrant environment
> here:
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/tree/master/test/rpm/centos-7


Agreed - this vote has failed.


>
>
> *Executor:*
> $ sudo rpm -ivh aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> docker is needed by aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64
>
> Apparently the official docker package is called docker-engine
> https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/linux/centos/
>
> Dependency naming aside, i think we should omit docker from our
> dependencies, as it really should be a mesos dep if anything.  *I can send
> a patch for that if others agree.*
>
> *Scheduler:*
> I had trouble getting the scheduler to start, it exits due to an uncaught
> exception in the main thread, and unfortunately a stack trace doesn't turn
> up in journalctl.  We need to figure out why the errors don't show up,
> possibly in conjunction with addressing the items below.
>
> Doing some investigation, i noticed something strange - JAVA_OPTS (set in
> /etc/sysconfig/aurora) doesn't make it to the process launched by systemd.
> It seems to be discarded when /usr/bin/aurora-scheduler-startup calls
> /usr/lib/aurora/bin/aurora-scheduler.  Other variables (e.g.
> AURORA_SCHEDULER_OPTS) propagate fine.  I've probably been staring at this
> too long and am missing something obvious, but i'm not making sense of it.
>
> Sidestepping the above issue, i discovered 2 reasons the scheduler won't
> start up:
> - Default backup dir /var/lib/aurora/scheduler/backups does not exist,
> insufficient permission to create
>
> - Fails to load the mesos native lib
> aurora-scheduler-startup[8500]: Failed to load native Mesos library from
> /usr/lib;/usr/lib64
> I was able to fix this by removing ;/usr/lib64 from
> -Djava.library.path='/usr/lib;/usr/lib64', alternatively by removing the
> library.path setting and exporting LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib.
>
> Happy to pitch in on fixing these issues, curious what folks think of the
> items above, especially the JAVA_OPTS issue.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:31 PM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Pinging this VOTE and noting that the close is Monday at 11am Mountain
> > time.
> >
> > Please test!
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:00 AM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm
> > packaging
> > >> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
> > >>
> > >> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> > >> <https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>*
> > >>
> > >> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
> > >> ---
> > >> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
> > >> *
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> > >> <
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> > >*
> > >>
> > >> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
> > >>
> > >> The packages are available at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-12 Thread Erb, Stephan 
I'll try to spin up a centos box myself and see how that goes.

> Dependency naming aside, i think we should omit docker from our
> dependencies, as it really should be a mesos dep if anything.  *I can send
> a patch for that if others agree.*

We also have to be more diligent in tracking the Mesos version we depend on. It 
already got out of date here [1] and here [2].

[1] 
https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md#mesos-on-centos-7
[2] 
https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/specs/rpm/aurora.spec#L41



From: Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 21:34
To: dev@aurora.apache.org; jsir...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

-1

I'm had trouble getting these to work.  I used the vagrant environment
here:
https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/tree/master/test/rpm/centos-7

*Executor:*
$ sudo rpm -ivh aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
docker is needed by aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64

Apparently the official docker package is called docker-engine
https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/linux/centos/

Dependency naming aside, i think we should omit docker from our
dependencies, as it really should be a mesos dep if anything.  *I can send
a patch for that if others agree.*

*Scheduler:*
I had trouble getting the scheduler to start, it exits due to an uncaught
exception in the main thread, and unfortunately a stack trace doesn't turn
up in journalctl.  We need to figure out why the errors don't show up,
possibly in conjunction with addressing the items below.

Doing some investigation, i noticed something strange - JAVA_OPTS (set in
/etc/sysconfig/aurora) doesn't make it to the process launched by systemd.
It seems to be discarded when /usr/bin/aurora-scheduler-startup calls
/usr/lib/aurora/bin/aurora-scheduler.  Other variables (e.g.
AURORA_SCHEDULER_OPTS) propagate fine.  I've probably been staring at this
too long and am missing something obvious, but i'm not making sense of it.

Sidestepping the above issue, i discovered 2 reasons the scheduler won't
start up:
- Default backup dir /var/lib/aurora/scheduler/backups does not exist,
insufficient permission to create

- Fails to load the mesos native lib
aurora-scheduler-startup[8500]: Failed to load native Mesos library from
/usr/lib;/usr/lib64
I was able to fix this by removing ;/usr/lib64 from
-Djava.library.path='/usr/lib;/usr/lib64', alternatively by removing the
library.path setting and exporting LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib.

Happy to pitch in on fixing these issues, curious what folks think of the
items above, especially the JAVA_OPTS issue.



On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:31 PM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> wrote:

> Pinging this VOTE and noting that the close is Monday at 11am Mountain
> time.
>
> Please test!
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:00 AM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm
> packaging
> >> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
> >>
> >> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> >> <https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>*
> >>
> >> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
> >> ---
> >> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
> >> *
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> >> <
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> >*
> >>
> >> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> >>
> >>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
> >>
> >> The packages are available at:
> >> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> >> <https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>*
> >>
> >> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> >>
> >> Please download, verify, and test.
> >>
> >> The vote will close on Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:00:00 -0700
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0
> >>
> >
> > Correction - "Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0"
> >
> > [ ] +0
> >> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> >> ---
> >>
> >>
> > And again, copypasta - "Please consider verifying these rpms using the
> > install guide:"
> >
> > Please consider verifying these debs using the install guide:
> >>   https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md
> >>
> >>
> >> I'd like to kick off voting with my own +1
> >>
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-12 Thread Bill Farner 
-1

I'm had trouble getting these to work.  I used the vagrant environment
here:
https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/tree/master/test/rpm/centos-7

*Executor:*
$ sudo rpm -ivh aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
docker is needed by aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64

Apparently the official docker package is called docker-engine
https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/linux/centos/

Dependency naming aside, i think we should omit docker from our
dependencies, as it really should be a mesos dep if anything.  *I can send
a patch for that if others agree.*

*Scheduler:*
I had trouble getting the scheduler to start, it exits due to an uncaught
exception in the main thread, and unfortunately a stack trace doesn't turn
up in journalctl.  We need to figure out why the errors don't show up,
possibly in conjunction with addressing the items below.

Doing some investigation, i noticed something strange - JAVA_OPTS (set in
/etc/sysconfig/aurora) doesn't make it to the process launched by systemd.
It seems to be discarded when /usr/bin/aurora-scheduler-startup calls
/usr/lib/aurora/bin/aurora-scheduler.  Other variables (e.g.
AURORA_SCHEDULER_OPTS) propagate fine.  I've probably been staring at this
too long and am missing something obvious, but i'm not making sense of it.

Sidestepping the above issue, i discovered 2 reasons the scheduler won't
start up:
- Default backup dir /var/lib/aurora/scheduler/backups does not exist,
insufficient permission to create

- Fails to load the mesos native lib
aurora-scheduler-startup[8500]: Failed to load native Mesos library from
/usr/lib;/usr/lib64
I was able to fix this by removing ;/usr/lib64 from
-Djava.library.path='/usr/lib;/usr/lib64', alternatively by removing the
library.path setting and exporting LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib.

Happy to pitch in on fixing these issues, curious what folks think of the
items above, especially the JAVA_OPTS issue.



On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:31 PM, John Sirois  wrote:

> Pinging this VOTE and noting that the close is Monday at 11am Mountain
> time.
>
> Please test!
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, John Sirois  wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:00 AM, John Sirois  wrote:
> >
> >> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm
> packaging
> >> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
> >>
> >> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> >> *
> >>
> >> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
> >> ---
> >> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
> >> *
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> >> <
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> >*
> >>
> >> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> >>
> >>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
> >>
> >> The packages are available at:
> >> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> >> *
> >>
> >> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> >>
> >> Please download, verify, and test.
> >>
> >> The vote will close on Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:00:00 -0700
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0
> >>
> >
> > Correction - "Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0"
> >
> > [ ] +0
> >> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> >> ---
> >>
> >>
> > And again, copypasta - "Please consider verifying these rpms using the
> > install guide:"
> >
> > Please consider verifying these debs using the install guide:
> >>   https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md
> >>
> >>
> >> I'd like to kick off voting with my own +1
> >>
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-11 Thread John Sirois 
Pinging this VOTE and noting that the close is Monday at 11am Mountain time.

Please test!

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, John Sirois  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:00 AM, John Sirois  wrote:
>
>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm 
>> packaging
>> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
>>
>> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
>> *
>>
>> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
>> ---
>> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
>> *https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
>> *
>>
>> The branch used to create the packaging is:
>>
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
>>
>> The packages are available at:
>> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
>> *
>>
>> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>>
>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>
>> The vote will close on Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:00:00 -0700
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0
>>
>
> Correction - "Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0"
>
> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>> ---
>>
>>
> And again, copypasta - "Please consider verifying these rpms using the
> install guide:"
>
> Please consider verifying these debs using the install guide:
>>   https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md
>>
>>
>> I'd like to kick off voting with my own +1
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms

2016-03-09 Thread John Sirois 
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:00 AM, John Sirois  wrote:

> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm packaging
> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0.
>
> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> *
>
> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
> ---
> The CHANGELOG is viewable at:
> *https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x
> *
>
> The branch used to create the packaging is:
>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x
>
> The packages are available at:
> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/
> *
>
> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>
> Please download, verify, and test.
>
> The vote will close on Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:00:00 -0700
>
> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0
>

Correction - "Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0"

[ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> ---
>
>
And again, copypasta - "Please consider verifying these rpms using the
install guide:"

Please consider verifying these debs using the install guide:
>   https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md
>
>
> I'd like to kick off voting with my own +1
>