Re: [VOTE] Convert to gitbox

[Niels Basjes]

I have the same problem; I cannot see the ticket so I have no clue what the
current status is.

Niels

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Suraj Acharya  wrote:

> Ryan had filed an Infra ticket to turn it on.
> I am not sure what the status of that ticket is.
> I don't have view privileges on that ticket.
>
> Suraj
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Niels Basjes  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see this transition was started but at this point it does not seem to
> > work yet.
> > What is the current status?
> >
> > Niels
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Suraj Acharya  wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Sean Busbey 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On 2017-08-29 11:29, "Sean Busbey" wrote:
> > > > > Way back in May we had consensus[1] on using gitbox so that we
> could
> > > > start making use of pull requests.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the subsequent JIRAs to implement, it became clear that the
> entry
> > > bar
> > > > to start is convert our repo to use gitbox. this means the writeable
> > > > repository will be on github and some committer set up will be
> > > needed[2]. I
> > > > don't think this got adequately conveyed originally, so I wanted to
> > call
> > > it
> > > > out here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Additionally, the infra process for converting to gitbox requires a
> > > link
> > > > to a community consensus thread. While I think we already had that
> back
> > > in
> > > > [1], May was a long time ago and some folks might not be watching for
> > > > [DISCUSS] threads.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1: we should convert to gitbox and enable pull request merging
> > > > > -1: we should not convert to gitbox because...
> > > > >
> > > > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be subject to
> > Majority
> > > > Approval (3 or more +1s and more +1s than -1s).
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]: https://s.apache.org/ieB0
> > > > > [2]: Committers will need to flag a github account as theirs via
> the
> > > > account linking utility:
> > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
> > > > >
> > > > > The git-wip repository will also cease, so folks who currently use
> it
> > > > will need to update their remote url for existing git clones. We can
> > call
> > > > this out in our contribution docs.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
> >
> > Niels Basjes
> >
>



-- 
Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,

Niels Basjes

Re: [VOTE] Convert to gitbox

[Suraj Acharya]

Ryan had filed an Infra ticket to turn it on.
I am not sure what the status of that ticket is.
I don't have view privileges on that ticket.

Suraj

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Niels Basjes  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I see this transition was started but at this point it does not seem to
> work yet.
> What is the current status?
>
> Niels
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Suraj Acharya  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Sean Busbey  wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 2017-08-29 11:29, "Sean Busbey" wrote:
> > > > Way back in May we had consensus[1] on using gitbox so that we could
> > > start making use of pull requests.
> > > >
> > > > In the subsequent JIRAs to implement, it became clear that the entry
> > bar
> > > to start is convert our repo to use gitbox. this means the writeable
> > > repository will be on github and some committer set up will be
> > needed[2]. I
> > > don't think this got adequately conveyed originally, so I wanted to
> call
> > it
> > > out here.
> > > >
> > > > Additionally, the infra process for converting to gitbox requires a
> > link
> > > to a community consensus thread. While I think we already had that back
> > in
> > > [1], May was a long time ago and some folks might not be watching for
> > > [DISCUSS] threads.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote:
> > > >
> > > > +1: we should convert to gitbox and enable pull request merging
> > > > -1: we should not convert to gitbox because...
> > > >
> > > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be subject to
> Majority
> > > Approval (3 or more +1s and more +1s than -1s).
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://s.apache.org/ieB0
> > > > [2]: Committers will need to flag a github account as theirs via the
> > > account linking utility:
> > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
> > > >
> > > > The git-wip repository will also cease, so folks who currently use it
> > > will need to update their remote url for existing git clones. We can
> call
> > > this out in our contribution docs.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
>
> Niels Basjes
>

Re: [VOTE] Convert to gitbox

[Niels Basjes]

Hi,

I see this transition was started but at this point it does not seem to
work yet.
What is the current status?

Niels

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Suraj Acharya  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Sean Busbey  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 2017-08-29 11:29, "Sean Busbey" wrote:
> > > Way back in May we had consensus[1] on using gitbox so that we could
> > start making use of pull requests.
> > >
> > > In the subsequent JIRAs to implement, it became clear that the entry
> bar
> > to start is convert our repo to use gitbox. this means the writeable
> > repository will be on github and some committer set up will be
> needed[2]. I
> > don't think this got adequately conveyed originally, so I wanted to call
> it
> > out here.
> > >
> > > Additionally, the infra process for converting to gitbox requires a
> link
> > to a community consensus thread. While I think we already had that back
> in
> > [1], May was a long time ago and some folks might not be watching for
> > [DISCUSS] threads.
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > >
> > > +1: we should convert to gitbox and enable pull request merging
> > > -1: we should not convert to gitbox because...
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be subject to Majority
> > Approval (3 or more +1s and more +1s than -1s).
> > >
> > > [1]: https://s.apache.org/ieB0
> > > [2]: Committers will need to flag a github account as theirs via the
> > account linking utility:
> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
> > >
> > > The git-wip repository will also cease, so folks who currently use it
> > will need to update their remote url for existing git clones. We can call
> > this out in our contribution docs.
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,

Niels Basjes

Re: [VOTE] Convert to gitbox

[Suraj Acharya]

+1

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Sean Busbey  wrote:

> +1
>
> On 2017-08-29 11:29, "Sean Busbey" wrote:
> > Way back in May we had consensus[1] on using gitbox so that we could
> start making use of pull requests.
> >
> > In the subsequent JIRAs to implement, it became clear that the entry bar
> to start is convert our repo to use gitbox. this means the writeable
> repository will be on github and some committer set up will be needed[2]. I
> don't think this got adequately conveyed originally, so I wanted to call it
> out here.
> >
> > Additionally, the infra process for converting to gitbox requires a link
> to a community consensus thread. While I think we already had that back in
> [1], May was a long time ago and some folks might not be watching for
> [DISCUSS] threads.
> >
> > Please vote:
> >
> > +1: we should convert to gitbox and enable pull request merging
> > -1: we should not convert to gitbox because...
> >
> > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be subject to Majority
> Approval (3 or more +1s and more +1s than -1s).
> >
> > [1]: https://s.apache.org/ieB0
> > [2]: Committers will need to flag a github account as theirs via the
> account linking utility:
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
> >
> > The git-wip repository will also cease, so folks who currently use it
> will need to update their remote url for existing git clones. We can call
> this out in our contribution docs.
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Convert to gitbox

[Niels Basjes]

+1

On Aug 29, 2017 18:50, "Gabor Szadovszky"  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Ryan Blue 
> wrote:
>
> > +!
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Sean Busbey  wrote:
> >
> > > Way back in May we had consensus[1] on using gitbox so that we could
> > start
> > > making use of pull requests.
> > >
> > > In the subsequent JIRAs to implement, it became clear that the entry
> bar
> > > to start is convert our repo to use gitbox. this means the writeable
> > > repository will be on github and some committer set up will be
> > needed[2]. I
> > > don't think this got adequately conveyed originally, so I wanted to
> call
> > it
> > > out here.
> > >
> > > Additionally, the infra process for converting to gitbox requires a
> link
> > > to a community consensus thread. While I think we already had that back
> > in
> > > [1], May was a long time ago and some folks might not be watching for
> > > [DISCUSS] threads.
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > >
> > > +1: we should convert to gitbox and enable pull request merging
> > > -1: we should not convert to gitbox because...
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be subject to Majority
> > > Approval (3 or more +1s and more +1s than -1s).
> > >
> > > [1]: https://s.apache.org/ieB0
> > > [2]: Committers will need to flag a github account as theirs via the
> > > account linking utility:
> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
> > >
> > > The git-wip repository will also cease, so folks who currently use it
> > will
> > > need to update their remote url for existing git clones. We can call
> this
> > > out in our contribution docs.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ryan Blue
> > Software Engineer
> > Netflix
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Convert to gitbox

[Gabor Szadovszky]

+1

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Ryan Blue 
wrote:

> +!
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Sean Busbey  wrote:
>
> > Way back in May we had consensus[1] on using gitbox so that we could
> start
> > making use of pull requests.
> >
> > In the subsequent JIRAs to implement, it became clear that the entry bar
> > to start is convert our repo to use gitbox. this means the writeable
> > repository will be on github and some committer set up will be
> needed[2]. I
> > don't think this got adequately conveyed originally, so I wanted to call
> it
> > out here.
> >
> > Additionally, the infra process for converting to gitbox requires a link
> > to a community consensus thread. While I think we already had that back
> in
> > [1], May was a long time ago and some folks might not be watching for
> > [DISCUSS] threads.
> >
> > Please vote:
> >
> > +1: we should convert to gitbox and enable pull request merging
> > -1: we should not convert to gitbox because...
> >
> > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be subject to Majority
> > Approval (3 or more +1s and more +1s than -1s).
> >
> > [1]: https://s.apache.org/ieB0
> > [2]: Committers will need to flag a github account as theirs via the
> > account linking utility:
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
> >
> > The git-wip repository will also cease, so folks who currently use it
> will
> > need to update their remote url for existing git clones. We can call this
> > out in our contribution docs.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ryan Blue
> Software Engineer
> Netflix
>

Re: [VOTE] Convert to gitbox

[Ryan Blue]

+!

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Sean Busbey  wrote:

> Way back in May we had consensus[1] on using gitbox so that we could start
> making use of pull requests.
>
> In the subsequent JIRAs to implement, it became clear that the entry bar
> to start is convert our repo to use gitbox. this means the writeable
> repository will be on github and some committer set up will be needed[2]. I
> don't think this got adequately conveyed originally, so I wanted to call it
> out here.
>
> Additionally, the infra process for converting to gitbox requires a link
> to a community consensus thread. While I think we already had that back in
> [1], May was a long time ago and some folks might not be watching for
> [DISCUSS] threads.
>
> Please vote:
>
> +1: we should convert to gitbox and enable pull request merging
> -1: we should not convert to gitbox because...
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be subject to Majority
> Approval (3 or more +1s and more +1s than -1s).
>
> [1]: https://s.apache.org/ieB0
> [2]: Committers will need to flag a github account as theirs via the
> account linking utility:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
>
> The git-wip repository will also cease, so folks who currently use it will
> need to update their remote url for existing git clones. We can call this
> out in our contribution docs.
>



-- 
Ryan Blue
Software Engineer
Netflix