Re: RC for 4.3.1?
I'm not sure this is right. When I run locally, I get this in the logs of
CookieTest
Host address: 127.0.0.1
Host name: localhost
while in the vm I get this:
Host address: 10.0.0.4
Host name: 10.0.0.4
Host name is what I get here in Bookie.java:
if (conf.getUseHostNameAsBookieID()) {
hostAddress = inetAddr.getAddress().getCanonicalHostName();
LOG.info(Host name: + hostAddress);
}
It shouldn't be returning the IP address, no?
-Flavio
On 19 Mar 2015, at 17:08, Sijie Guo guosi...@gmail.com wrote:
The hostname in that host will be resolved to be IP, which the IP and
hostname would be same. But the tests expect that the IP and hostname are
different.
We should change the tool to allow passing in any bookie id, which would make
the tests more deterministic.
- Sijie
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira
fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid mailto:fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
Sijie,
The problem seems to be that the public address (the one the hostname maps
to) and the virtual network are different. The tests that are failing seem to
expect that they are the same. Does it make sense?
-Flavio
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:12 AM, Rakesh R rake...@huawei.com
mailto:rake...@huawei.com wrote:
Can we include BOOKKEEPER-834 fix also in 4.3.1, this is addressing one test
case failure.
-Rakesh
-Original Message-
From: Sijie Guo [mailto:guosi...@gmail.com mailto:guosi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 March 2015 10:23
To: dev@bookkeeper.apache.org mailto:dev@bookkeeper.apache.org
Subject: Re: RC for 4.3.1?
I think RC0 is failed because of the failed tests. We need to address those
tests for producing the new RC.
- Sijie
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Flavio Junqueira
fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
Do we have a code freeze on branch 4.3 right now because of release 4.3.1?
I'm actually not sure what's going on with the RC0 of 4.3.1.
-Flavio
Re: RC for 4.3.1?
Sijie, The problem seems to be that the public address (the one the hostname maps to) and the virtual network are different. The tests that are failing seem to expect that they are the same. Does it make sense? -Flavio On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:12 AM, Rakesh R rake...@huawei.com wrote: Can we include BOOKKEEPER-834 fix also in 4.3.1, this is addressing one test case failure. -Rakesh -Original Message- From: Sijie Guo [mailto:guosi...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 March 2015 10:23 To: dev@bookkeeper.apache.org Subject: Re: RC for 4.3.1? I think RC0 is failed because of the failed tests. We need to address those tests for producing the new RC. - Sijie On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Flavio Junqueira fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Do we have a code freeze on branch 4.3 right now because of release 4.3.1? I'm actually not sure what's going on with the RC0 of 4.3.1. -Flavio
Re: RC for 4.3.1?
The hostname in that host will be resolved to be IP, which the IP and hostname would be same. But the tests expect that the IP and hostname are different. We should change the tool to allow passing in any bookie id, which would make the tests more deterministic. - Sijie On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Sijie, The problem seems to be that the public address (the one the hostname maps to) and the virtual network are different. The tests that are failing seem to expect that they are the same. Does it make sense? -Flavio On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:12 AM, Rakesh R rake...@huawei.com wrote: Can we include BOOKKEEPER-834 fix also in 4.3.1, this is addressing one test case failure. -Rakesh -Original Message- From: Sijie Guo [mailto:guosi...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 March 2015 10:23 To: dev@bookkeeper.apache.org Subject: Re: RC for 4.3.1? I think RC0 is failed because of the failed tests. We need to address those tests for producing the new RC. - Sijie On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Flavio Junqueira fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Do we have a code freeze on branch 4.3 right now because of release 4.3.1? I'm actually not sure what's going on with the RC0 of 4.3.1. -Flavio
