Re: v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.1

2015-05-05 Thread Christian Kaltepoth
+1 for 1.4.0

2015-05-04 22:05 GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides benevi...@redhat.com:

 I though more about it and considering that we had some APIs change I'm
 doing a

 +1 to 1.4.0



 On 5/4/15 12:37, Rafael Benevides wrote:

 I'm ok with either 1.3.1 or 1.4.0.


 On 5/4/15 12:14, Jason Porter wrote:

 +1

 On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Gerhard Petracek 
 gerhard.petra...@gmail.com

 wrote:
 finally this mail arrived twice...
 in the other thread we already have 3x +1 for v1.4.0 - i'll add your
 opinions their once i send the conclusion.

 regards,
 gerhard



 2015-05-02 23:27 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org:

  Agreed looks like a 1.3.1 to me.

 On Sat, May 2, 2015, 17:09 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Yep didnt see sthg justifying an upgrade for me. What would justify it

 for

 a user - ie not for us.
   Le 2 mai 2015 23:03, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
 

 a

 écrit :

  @romain:
 see e.g.



 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312820version=12327249

 regards,
 gerhard



 2015-05-02 22:48 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com

 :

 Hi Gerhard, can you highlight some new features? Not sure proxy

 module

 is

 enough by itself so would be +0 ATM for me.
 hi @ all,

 if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0

 before the next release.

 reasons:
   - the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
   - we added several new features

 regards,
 gerhard








-- 
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
GitHub: https://github.com/chkal


Re: v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.1

2015-05-04 Thread Jason Porter
Fine by me
+1

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:

 +1

 LieGrue,
 strub


  Am 01.05.2015 um 18:51 schrieb Gerhard Petracek 
 gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
 
  hi @ all,
 
  if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
  before the next release.
 
  reasons:
  - the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
  - we added several new features
 
  regards,
  gerhard




-- 
Jason Porter
http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp


Re: v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.1

2015-05-04 Thread Jason Porter
+1

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 finally this mail arrived twice...
 in the other thread we already have 3x +1 for v1.4.0 - i'll add your
 opinions their once i send the conclusion.

 regards,
 gerhard



 2015-05-02 23:27 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org:

  Agreed looks like a 1.3.1 to me.
 
  On Sat, May 2, 2015, 17:09 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   Yep didnt see sthg justifying an upgrade for me. What would justify it
  for
   a user - ie not for us.
Le 2 mai 2015 23:03, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
 a
   écrit :
  
@romain:
see e.g.
   
   
  
 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312820version=12327249
   
regards,
gerhard
   
   
   
2015-05-02 22:48 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 :
   
 Hi Gerhard, can you highlight some new features? Not sure proxy
  module
   is
 enough by itself so would be +0 ATM for me.
 hi @ all,

 if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
 before the next release.

 reasons:
  - the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
  - we added several new features

 regards,
 gerhard

   
  
 




-- 
Jason Porter
http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp


Re: v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.1

2015-05-04 Thread Rafael Benevides

I'm ok with either 1.3.1 or 1.4.0.


On 5/4/15 12:14, Jason Porter wrote:

+1

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com

wrote:
finally this mail arrived twice...
in the other thread we already have 3x +1 for v1.4.0 - i'll add your
opinions their once i send the conclusion.

regards,
gerhard



2015-05-02 23:27 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org:


Agreed looks like a 1.3.1 to me.

On Sat, May 2, 2015, 17:09 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:


Yep didnt see sthg justifying an upgrade for me. What would justify it

for

a user - ie not for us.
  Le 2 mai 2015 23:03, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com

a

écrit :


@romain:
see e.g.



https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312820version=12327249

regards,
gerhard



2015-05-02 22:48 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com

:

Hi Gerhard, can you highlight some new features? Not sure proxy

module

is

enough by itself so would be +0 ATM for me.
hi @ all,

if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0

before the next release.

reasons:
  - the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
  - we added several new features

regards,
gerhard








Re: v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.1

2015-05-04 Thread Rafael Benevides
I though more about it and considering that we had some APIs change I'm 
doing a


+1 to 1.4.0


On 5/4/15 12:37, Rafael Benevides wrote:

I'm ok with either 1.3.1 or 1.4.0.


On 5/4/15 12:14, Jason Porter wrote:

+1

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Gerhard Petracek 
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com

wrote:
finally this mail arrived twice...
in the other thread we already have 3x +1 for v1.4.0 - i'll add your
opinions their once i send the conclusion.

regards,
gerhard



2015-05-02 23:27 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org:


Agreed looks like a 1.3.1 to me.

On Sat, May 2, 2015, 17:09 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:

Yep didnt see sthg justifying an upgrade for me. What would 
justify it

for

a user - ie not for us.
  Le 2 mai 2015 23:03, Gerhard Petracek 
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com

a

écrit :


@romain:
see e.g.


https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312820version=12327249 


regards,
gerhard



2015-05-02 22:48 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com

:

Hi Gerhard, can you highlight some new features? Not sure proxy

module

is

enough by itself so would be +0 ATM for me.
hi @ all,

if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0

before the next release.

reasons:
  - the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
  - we added several new features

regards,
gerhard










Re: v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.1

2015-05-02 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1

2015-05-02 20:16 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org:

 it looks like the mail never arrived - once again:

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
 Date: 2015-05-01 18:51 GMT+02:00

 hi @ all,

 if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
 before the next release.

 reasons:
  - the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
  - we added several new features

 regards,
 gerhard



Re: v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.1

2015-05-02 Thread Daniel Cunha
+1

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
 hi @ all,

 if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
before the next release.

 reasons:
  - the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
  - we added several new features

 regards,
 gerhard



-- 
Best regard,
Daniel Cunha (soro)


Re: v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.1

2015-05-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Yep didnt see sthg justifying an upgrade for me. What would justify it for
a user - ie not for us.
 Le 2 mai 2015 23:03, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com a
écrit :

 @romain:
 see e.g.

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312820version=12327249

 regards,
 gerhard



 2015-05-02 22:48 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:

  Hi Gerhard, can you highlight some new features? Not sure proxy module is
  enough by itself so would be +0 ATM for me.
  hi @ all,
 
  if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
  before the next release.
 
  reasons:
   - the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
   - we added several new features
 
  regards,
  gerhard
 



Re: v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.1

2015-05-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Gerhard, can you highlight some new features? Not sure proxy module is
enough by itself so would be +0 ATM for me.
hi @ all,

if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
before the next release.

reasons:
 - the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
 - we added several new features

regards,
gerhard


Re: v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.1

2015-05-02 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@romain:
see e.g.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312820version=12327249

regards,
gerhard



2015-05-02 22:48 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:

 Hi Gerhard, can you highlight some new features? Not sure proxy module is
 enough by itself so would be +0 ATM for me.
 hi @ all,

 if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
 before the next release.

 reasons:
  - the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
  - we added several new features

 regards,
 gerhard