Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> Btw your example failed for me with error [2], so I moved formatter
> to declarations - Didn't you have such error ?

No error here. Not checked but I think that only happens if you use a 
s:Application rather than an mx:Application.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> Please raise jira issue.

Will do.

> I'm going to move forward with release, cause it’s existing issue and it's 
> probably with us for a long time. Does any user
> raise that problem ?

No user has raised an issue for pound sign not showing that I could find.

BTW I’ve used en_GB in the last couple of years and didn’t run into the issue 
but I can’t recall what version of the SDK that was.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Justin,

I just build your example with 4.16 and have same issue [1] - My console
build. Btw your example failed for me with error [2], so I moved formatter
to declarations - Didn't you have such error ?

[1] https://paste.apache.org/DzmO
[2] https://paste.apache.org/YXdl

Thanks, Piotr



2017-11-21 7:41 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean :

> Hi,
>
> > I have so far more +1 than -1 so I can release it, but wondering how to
> fix
> > it for the next release.
>
> For a release you need at least 3 +1 binding votes and more +1’s than -1’s.
>
> Currently by my count there’s two +2 and one -1. Piotr you could vote +1
> and make this a release.  However given this problem just been found I’d
> suggest waiting 24 hours to see if any other PMC members vote or change
> their minds.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin




-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> I have so far more +1 than -1 so I can release it, but wondering how to fix
> it for the next release.

For a release you need at least 3 +1 binding votes and more +1’s than -1’s.

Currently by my count there’s two +2 and one -1. Piotr you could vote +1 and 
make this a release.  However given this problem just been found I’d suggest 
waiting 24 hours to see if any other PMC members vote or change their minds.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> Please raise jira issue. I'm going to move forward with release, cause it's
> existing issue and it's probably with us for a long time.


AFAIKS this is not an existing issue but a new issue. Looking at the comparison 
of 4.16.0 to what's in version control they match. 4.16.1 doesn’t match what in 
version control.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> My suggestion is to vote +1 and ship this release since this is not a new
> issue.

And I'd suggest fixing this before making a release. But if the release gets 
three +1 votes and more +1’s than -1’s then that’s a release.

> I think there are code page issues in the source files.  Volunteers can
> work it out later for the next release.  Let's get our users a release
> that more of them can use.  IMO, releases do not have to be perfect.

More of them can use? Not so sure about that. From Google Analysis (for the 
past year) 60% or so of our users use a locale other than en_US.

How many would be effected by this encoding issue? I’m not sure as I’m don’t 
know all locales that have an issue but en_GB is 5% of users.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Alex Harui]

I am not an expert on code pages and what the consumers of these files are
expecting.  I believe that if we ensure that all source files are in
UTF-8, we will be better off, but Windows is a strange place, and how Ant
and Maven and Java interact with various code pages on Windows is a
potential mess.  Justin just posted all of the variants he has found in
our files so far.  I think we still need to understand what programs might
read those files and what character encoding they are expecting.

Whatever the answer is, it apparently hasn't been a showstopper for Flex.
I think it has been this way for a while and we have lots of bigger fish
to fry, but folks who are interested in this problem are welcome to take a
shot at it.  I won't be one of them.

-Alex

On 11/20/17, 10:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>Alex,
>
>What do you mean by this "I think there are code page issues in the source
>files." ?
>
>I have so far more +1 than -1 so I can release it, but wondering how to
>fix
>it for the next release.
>
>Thanks, Piotr
>
>
>2017-11-21 7:17 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> My suggestion is to vote +1 and ship this release since this is not a
>>new
>> issue.
>>
>> I think there are code page issues in the source files.  Volunteers can
>> work it out later for the next release.  Let's get our users a release
>> that more of them can use.  IMO, releases do not have to be perfect.
>>
>> My 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 11/20/17, 10:13 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>wrote:
>>
>> >We are using everywhere: JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS -Dfile.encoding=UTF8, your
>> >suggestion is to use JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS ISO-8859 in the bundles builds
>>? Am
>> >I understand correctly.
>> >
>> >Piotr
>> >
>> >2017-11-21 7:11 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Just the opposite. I have compiled your example with 4.16 and 4.15
>>and
>> >>we
>> >> have exactly same issue.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks, Piotr
>> >>
>> >> 2017-11-21 7:03 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean :
>> >>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> > It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?
>> >>>
>> >>> Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile
>> >>> against it (yet).
>> >>>
>> >>> 4.16.1 vs VC gives:
>> >>>
>> >>> diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol
>> >>> < currencySymbol=
>> >>> > currencySymbol=?
>> >>>
>> >>> 4.16.0 vs VC gives no differences.
>> >>>
>> >>> Also the file types match 4.16.0 and what’s in version control (but
>> >>>it's
>> >>> not UTF-8):
>> >>>
>> >>> 4.16.1 RC:
>> >>> $file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bun
>> >>> dles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>> >>> UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
>> >>>
>> >>> VC:
>> >>> $file /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/b
>> >>> undles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>> >>> ISO-8859 text
>> >>>
>> >>> 4.16.0:
>> >>> file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.16/frameworks/proj
>> >>> ects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>> >>> ISO-8859 text
>> >>>
>> >>> Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly
>>converted
>> >>>to
>> >>> UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is
>>character
>> >>> 163.) Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Justin
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> Piotr Zarzycki
>> >>
>> >> Patreon:
>> >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>> 
reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
>> ff
>> >>79%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=
>> >>%2BwIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0
>> >>
>> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>> 
reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
>> ff
>> >>79%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=
>> >>%2BwIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0>*
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>> >
>> >Patreon:
>> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
>> ff79
>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=%2B
>> >wIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
>> ff79
>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=%2B
>> >wIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon: 
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C04e6976b53ba42e9c24a08d530a7dea4
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468419910119168&sdata=RAo
>xf8xUdX%2FYO

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Justin,

Please raise jira issue. I'm going to move forward with release, cause it's
existing issue and it's probably with us for a long time. Does any user
raise that problem ?

Thanks, Piotr

2017-11-21 7:20 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean :

> Hi,
>
> > Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted to
> UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character
> 163.) Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?
>
> Answer yes and it’s a bit of a mess.
>
> In version control we have resource files with:
> ASCII text
> ASCII text, with CRLF line terminators
> ASCII text, with CRLF, LF line terminators
> ASCII text, with no line terminators
> ASCII text, with very long lines
> ISO-8859 text
> SVG XML document
> UTF-8 Unicode (with BOM) text
> UTF-8 Unicode (with BOM) text, with CRLF line terminators
> UTF-8 Unicode text
> UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
> UTF-8 Unicode text, with very long lines
> UTF-8 Unicode text, with very long lines, with CRLF line terminators
> directory
>
>
> In the 4.16.1 RC we have:
> ASCII text, with CRLF line terminators
> ASCII text, with no line terminators
> ASCII text, with very long lines, with CRLF line terminators
> SVG XML document
> UTF-8 Unicode (with BOM) text, with CRLF line terminators
> UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
> UTF-8 Unicode text, with very long lines, with CRLF line terminators
> directory
>
> So some conversion has gone on and that is going to explain the
> differences. Note that some of the files also have the BOM (byte order
> mark).
>
> One of the ISO-8859 files just happened to contain the en_GB currency
> symbol.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin




-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted to 
> UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character 163.) 
> Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?

Answer yes and it’s a bit of a mess.

In version control we have resource files with:
ASCII text
ASCII text, with CRLF line terminators
ASCII text, with CRLF, LF line terminators
ASCII text, with no line terminators
ASCII text, with very long lines
ISO-8859 text
SVG XML document
UTF-8 Unicode (with BOM) text
UTF-8 Unicode (with BOM) text, with CRLF line terminators
UTF-8 Unicode text
UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
UTF-8 Unicode text, with very long lines
UTF-8 Unicode text, with very long lines, with CRLF line terminators
directory


In the 4.16.1 RC we have:
ASCII text, with CRLF line terminators
ASCII text, with no line terminators
ASCII text, with very long lines, with CRLF line terminators
SVG XML document
UTF-8 Unicode (with BOM) text, with CRLF line terminators
UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
UTF-8 Unicode text, with very long lines, with CRLF line terminators
directory

So some conversion has gone on and that is going to explain the differences. 
Note that some of the files also have the BOM (byte order mark).

One of the ISO-8859 files just happened to contain the en_GB currency symbol.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Alex,

What do you mean by this "I think there are code page issues in the source
files." ?

I have so far more +1 than -1 so I can release it, but wondering how to fix
it for the next release.

Thanks, Piotr


2017-11-21 7:17 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :

> My suggestion is to vote +1 and ship this release since this is not a new
> issue.
>
> I think there are code page issues in the source files.  Volunteers can
> work it out later for the next release.  Let's get our users a release
> that more of them can use.  IMO, releases do not have to be perfect.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 11/20/17, 10:13 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> >We are using everywhere: JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS -Dfile.encoding=UTF8, your
> >suggestion is to use JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS ISO-8859 in the bundles builds ? Am
> >I understand correctly.
> >
> >Piotr
> >
> >2017-11-21 7:11 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Just the opposite. I have compiled your example with 4.16 and 4.15 and
> >>we
> >> have exactly same issue.
> >>
> >> Thanks, Piotr
> >>
> >> 2017-11-21 7:03 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean :
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> > It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?
> >>>
> >>> Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile
> >>> against it (yet).
> >>>
> >>> 4.16.1 vs VC gives:
> >>>
> >>> diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol
> >>> < currencySymbol=
> >>> > currencySymbol=?
> >>>
> >>> 4.16.0 vs VC gives no differences.
> >>>
> >>> Also the file types match 4.16.0 and what’s in version control (but
> >>>it's
> >>> not UTF-8):
> >>>
> >>> 4.16.1 RC:
> >>> $file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bun
> >>> dles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> >>> UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
> >>>
> >>> VC:
> >>> $file /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/b
> >>> undles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> >>> ISO-8859 text
> >>>
> >>> 4.16.0:
> >>> file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.16/frameworks/proj
> >>> ects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> >>> ISO-8859 text
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted
> >>>to
> >>> UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character
> >>> 163.) Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Justin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >> Patreon:
> >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
> ff
> >>79%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=
> >>%2BwIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
> ff
> >>79%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=
> >>%2BwIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0>*
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >Patreon:
> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
> ff79
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=%2B
> >wIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
> ff79
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=%2B
> >wIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Alex Harui]

My suggestion is to vote +1 and ship this release since this is not a new
issue.

I think there are code page issues in the source files.  Volunteers can
work it out later for the next release.  Let's get our users a release
that more of them can use.  IMO, releases do not have to be perfect.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 11/20/17, 10:13 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>We are using everywhere: JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS -Dfile.encoding=UTF8, your
>suggestion is to use JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS ISO-8859 in the bundles builds ? Am
>I understand correctly.
>
>Piotr
>
>2017-11-21 7:11 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just the opposite. I have compiled your example with 4.16 and 4.15 and
>>we
>> have exactly same issue.
>>
>> Thanks, Piotr
>>
>> 2017-11-21 7:03 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> > It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?
>>>
>>> Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile
>>> against it (yet).
>>>
>>> 4.16.1 vs VC gives:
>>>
>>> diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol
>>> < currencySymbol=
>>> > currencySymbol=?
>>>
>>> 4.16.0 vs VC gives no differences.
>>>
>>> Also the file types match 4.16.0 and what’s in version control (but
>>>it's
>>> not UTF-8):
>>>
>>> 4.16.1 RC:
>>> $file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bun
>>> dles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>>> UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
>>>
>>> VC:
>>> $file /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/b
>>> undles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>>> ISO-8859 text
>>>
>>> 4.16.0:
>>> file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.16/frameworks/proj
>>> ects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>>> ISO-8859 text
>>>
>>> Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted
>>>to
>>> UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character
>>> 163.) Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: 
>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6ff
>>79%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468416174018287&sdata=
>>%2BwIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6ff
>>79%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468416174018287&sdata=
>>%2BwIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon: 
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6ff79
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468416174018287&sdata=%2B
>wIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6ff79
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468416174018287&sdata=%2B
>wIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0>*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Piotr Zarzycki]

We are using everywhere: JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS -Dfile.encoding=UTF8, your
suggestion is to use JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS ISO-8859 in the bundles builds ? Am
I understand correctly.

Piotr

2017-11-21 7:11 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :

> Hi,
>
> Just the opposite. I have compiled your example with 4.16 and 4.15 and we
> have exactly same issue.
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
> 2017-11-21 7:03 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?
>>
>> Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile
>> against it (yet).
>>
>> 4.16.1 vs VC gives:
>>
>> diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol
>> < currencySymbol=
>> > currencySymbol=?
>>
>> 4.16.0 vs VC gives no differences.
>>
>> Also the file types match 4.16.0 and what’s in version control (but it's
>> not UTF-8):
>>
>> 4.16.1 RC:
>> $file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bun
>> dles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>> UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
>>
>> VC:
>> $file /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/b
>> undles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>> ISO-8859 text
>>
>> 4.16.0:
>> file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.16/frameworks/proj
>> ects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>> ISO-8859 text
>>
>> Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted to
>> UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character
>> 163.) Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi,

Just the opposite. I have compiled your example with 4.16 and 4.15 and we
have exactly same issue.

Thanks, Piotr

2017-11-21 7:03 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean :

> Hi,
>
> > It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?
>
> Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile
> against it (yet).
>
> 4.16.1 vs VC gives:
>
> diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol
> < currencySymbol=
> > currencySymbol=?
>
> 4.16.0 vs VC gives no differences.
>
> Also the file types match 4.16.0 and what’s in version control (but it's
> not UTF-8):
>
> 4.16.1 RC:
> $file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/
> bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
>
> VC:
> $file /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/
> bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> ISO-8859 text
>
> 4.16.0:
> file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.16/frameworks/
> projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> ISO-8859 text
>
> Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted to
> UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character
> 163.) Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?

Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile against it 
(yet).

4.16.1 vs VC gives:

diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol
< currencySymbol=
> currencySymbol=?

4.16.0 vs VC gives no differences.

Also the file types match 4.16.0 and what’s in version control (but it's not 
UTF-8):

4.16.1 RC:
$file 
apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators

VC:
$file 
/Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
ISO-8859 text

4.16.0:
file 
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.16/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
ISO-8859 text

Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted to UTF-8 
when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character 163.) Perhaps 
we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Alex Harui]

It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?

-Alex

On 11/20/17, 8:58 PM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:

>Hi,
>
>> diff -w -r 
>>apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/Sh
>>aredResources.properties
>>/Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/
>>SharedResources.properties
>> 39c39
>> < currencySymbol=�
>> ---
>>> currencySymbol=
>
>Just confirmed this is an issue and here's some example code to test it.
>To test compile with the en_GB locale.
>
>
>http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml";
>layout="absolute"  applicationComplete="format()">
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>
>The currency symbol will show as a question mark in a black diamond in
>the text input field. If you need a screen shot just ask.
>
>Thanks,
>Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> diff -w -r 
> apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>  
> /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> 39c39
> < currencySymbol=�
> ---
>> currencySymbol=

Just confirmed this is an issue and here's some example code to test it. To 
test compile with the en_GB locale.


http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"; layout="absolute"  
applicationComplete="format()">







The currency symbol will show as a question mark in a black diamond in the text 
input field. If you need a screen shot just ask.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

-1 binding because of locale issues.

I checked:
- hashes and signatures correct
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- no unexpected binary files
- all source file has ASF header where needed
- can compile from source

Tried a few simple tests and while most worked but we are still having locale 
issues.

For instance when in en_GB the pound sign incorrectly shows as a question mark 
in a  black dimond.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Justin Mclean]

Hi, 

Looks like we may still have some unicode issues. Some that are likely to cause 
issues:

Comparing  the source release to a clean checked out repo:

file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/licenseParts/saxon9-NOTICES/UNICODE.txt
apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/licenseParts/saxon9-NOTICES/UNICODE.txt: ISO-8859 
text, with CRLF line terminators

That that probably not a an issue but is is likely to cause locale issues:
diff -w -r 
apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/apache/bundles/fr_FR/apache.properties
 
/Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/apache/bundles/fr_FR/apache.properties
21c21
< invalidCharPostcodeError=Le code postal contient des caract�res invalides.
---
> invalidCharPostcodeError=Le code postal contient des caractres invalides.

diff -w -r 
apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
 
/Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
39c39
< currencySymbol=�
---
> currencySymbol=

diff -w -r 
apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/modules/debugger/src/java/flex/tools/debugger/cli/fdbhelp_fi.txt
 
/Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/modules/debugger/src/java/flex/tools/debugger/cli/fdbhelp_fi.txt

< M��ritt�m�t�n komento. Sy�tt�m�ll� 'help' n�et luettelon kaikista 
---
> Mrittmtn komento. Syttmll 'help' net 
> luettelon kaikista 

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2

[Peter Ent]

+1

The problem on my part which caused the failure of the installation. Once
corrected the install completed and I was able to verify it.

Regards,
Peter

On 11/20/17, 1:40 PM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:

>-1
>
>ApproveSDK.xml
>I used both Java 1.8 and Java 1.7. The script fails on the osmf.xml
>download again.
>macOS 10.12.6
>
>Peter Ent
>
>On 11/15/17, 4:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
>>Hi Folks,
>>
>>This is a Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 release candidate 2 Please see the
>>RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
>>
>>Changes:
>>- Sources has been prepared using JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS=-Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>>- Sources from the git repository has been checkout without line change
>>with option core.autocrlf=input which helps to resolve issue with launch
>>*.sh scripts on Mac
>>
>>The release candidate can be found here:
>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.ap
>>a
>>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Fsdk%2F4.16.1%2Frc2%2F&data=02%7C01%
>>7
>>C%7Ce24b18e0f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7
>>C
>>0%7C0%7C636463341455363318&sdata=WGgqV5J62c7YlxD6Tm%2FkOdgSG5N5F530cSXVat
>>J
>>USW0%3D&reserved=0
>>>a
>>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Fsdk%2F4.16.1%2Frc2%2F&data=02%7C01%
>>7
>>C%7Ce24b18e0f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7
>>C
>>0%7C0%7C636463341455363318&sdata=WGgqV5J62c7YlxD6Tm%2FkOdgSG5N5F530cSXVat
>>J
>>USW0%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>>The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>>are
>>available here:
>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.ap
>>a
>>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Fsdk%2F4.16.1%2Frc2%2Fbinaries%2F&da
>>t
>>a=02%7C01%7C%7Ce24b18e0f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
>>1
>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463341455363318&sdata=ZJtyyozOB5yYTVQiVbRsXBqRPO6OT
>>A
>>z%2FruDBYJ4mN9o%3D&reserved=0
>>>a
>>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Fsdk%2F4.16.1%2Frc2%2Fbinaries%2F&da
>>t
>>a=02%7C01%7C%7Ce24b18e0f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
>>1
>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463341455363318&sdata=ZJtyyozOB5yYTVQiVbRsXBqRPO6OT
>>A
>>z%2FruDBYJ4mN9o%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>>The most convenient way to use the binary package is to install it via
>>Ant
>>or the Installer. To use an Installer you should use Apache Flex SDK
>>Installer 3.3 RC2:
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
>>c
>>he.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Finstaller%2F3.3%2Frc2%2Fbinaries%2F&
>>d
>>ata=02%7C01%7C%7Ce24b18e0f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed
>>2
>>c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463341455363318&sdata=D0GWoQFlmeku0qPwrfYrI1WlU6D
>>d
>>w6nw1ReVgJitnFc%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>Before voting please review the section, 'What are the ASF requirements
>>on
>>approving a release?', at:
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>>e
>>.org%2Fdev%2Frelease.html%23approving-a-release&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce24b18e
>>0
>>f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636
>>4
>>63341455363318&sdata=KU8ZMDcxPm06ptkGv601ov1ddoBpnJV2r4Ojs3HiKdY%3D&reser
>>v
>>ed=0
>>
>>At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>>- MD5 and signed packages are correct
>>- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>>- That you can compile from source package
>>- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice
>>- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser
>>application
>>
>>When testing please check the md5 and asc files and make sure that the
>>source can be compiled.
>>
>>Please vote to approve this release:
>>+1 Approve the release
>>-1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>>
>>This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>>
>>The vote passes if there is:
>>- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>>- More positive votes than negative votes
>>
>>If you find an issue with the release that's a 'show stopper' please
>>don't
>>hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing as we
>>want
>>to try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of
>>release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote during
>>the voting process.
>>
>>People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
>>vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how
>>the
>>PMC votes.
>>
>>When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>>version you tested the SDK with.
>>
>>Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
>>this VOTE thread.
>>
>>For your convenience, there issues an Ant script in the RC folder that
>>automates the checks a voter should perform on the RC.  It will:
>>- download the default source package for your OS (use
>>-Dpackage.suffix
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Peter Ent]

That was the problem. I guess I forgot to install that; lots of parts to
get Apache Royale going, that's for sure.

‹peter

On 11/20/17, 1:54 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

>Peter and others, if you are going to test this release, you will probably
>need the JCE upgrade.  Piotr already mentioned it in the RC1 discussion.
>
>Java 8:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oracle
>.com%2Ftechnetwork%2Fjava%2Fjavase%2Fdownloads%2Fjce8-download-21331&data=
>02%7C01%7C%7Cb634ed95d2194df0f14908d530481daf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468008649778290&sdata=psFORwac70PRCy616onb1dwvMxsiJ1cx
>QAPSUmk0ucI%3D&reserved=0
>66.html
>Java 7:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oracle
>.com%2Ftechnetwork%2Fjava%2Fjavase%2Fdownloads%2Fjce-7-download-4321&data=
>02%7C01%7C%7Cb634ed95d2194df0f14908d530481daf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468008649778290&sdata=L%2F6K3EOBVbicEkpZYrqu803RUrjbSB
>l174bCcQX0OdA%3D&reserved=0
>24.html
>
>There was some internet posts that Java 1.8.0_101 had the JCE upgrade
>built in, but that seems to no longer be the case.  I had to apply the
>upgrade to get OSMF to download properly.
>
>-Alex
>
>
>On 11/20/17, 10:45 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
>>Hi Peter,
>>
>>Too bad! I will take a look into that. It seems that this release is
>>going
>>to take much longer.
>>I'm wondering why Alex didn't have such problems...
>>
>>Happy Thanksgiving!
>>Piotr
>>
>>
>>2017-11-20 19:41 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent :
>>
>>> The osmf download still fails for me. I tried Java 1.8 and Java 1.7
>>>since
>>> someone in an email thread said that seemed to be the issue.
>>>
>>> I am going on vacation for the US Thanksgiving holiday and will be back
>>> next week.
>>> Regards,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On 11/15/17, 4:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hi Folks,
>>> >
>>> >Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
>>> >
>>> >Thanks,
>>> >--
>>> >
>>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>>> >
>>> >Patreon:
>>> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
>>> 9968
>>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>>> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0
>>> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
>>> 9968
>>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>>> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0>*
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>
>>Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>>Patreon: 
>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>r
>>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046e13
>>e
>>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468003336775690&sdata=mL
>>X
>>UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0
>>>r
>>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046e13
>>e
>>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468003336775690&sdata=mL
>>X
>>UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0>*
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Piotr Zarzycki]

I did exactly what Alex saying and it resolve my problems. I just thought
right now that it may be something else in Peter's case.

Let's wait to his info having your email.

Thanks, Piotr

2017-11-20 19:54 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :

> Peter and others, if you are going to test this release, you will probably
> need the JCE upgrade.  Piotr already mentioned it in the RC1 discussion.
>
> Java 8:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/
> downloads/jce8-download-21331
> 66.html
> Java 7:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/
> downloads/jce-7-download-4321
> 24.html
>
> There was some internet posts that Java 1.8.0_101 had the JCE upgrade
> built in, but that seems to no longer be the case.  I had to apply the
> upgrade to get OSMF to download properly.
>
> -Alex
>
>
> On 11/20/17, 10:45 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> >Hi Peter,
> >
> >Too bad! I will take a look into that. It seems that this release is going
> >to take much longer.
> >I'm wondering why Alex didn't have such problems...
> >
> >Happy Thanksgiving!
> >Piotr
> >
> >
> >2017-11-20 19:41 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent :
> >
> >> The osmf download still fails for me. I tried Java 1.8 and Java 1.7
> >>since
> >> someone in an email thread said that seemed to be the issue.
> >>
> >> I am going on vacation for the US Thanksgiving holiday and will be back
> >> next week.
> >> Regards,
> >> Peter
> >>
> >> On 11/15/17, 4:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Folks,
> >> >
> >> >Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >--
> >> >
> >> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >
> >> >Patreon:
> >> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
> >> 9968
> >> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
> >> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0
> >> > >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
> >> 9968
> >> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
> >> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0>*
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >Patreon:
> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046
> e13e
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468003336775690&sdata=mLX
> >UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046
> e13e
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468003336775690&sdata=mLX
> >UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Alex Harui]

Peter and others, if you are going to test this release, you will probably
need the JCE upgrade.  Piotr already mentioned it in the RC1 discussion.

Java 8:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jce8-download-21331
66.html
Java 7:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jce-7-download-4321
24.html

There was some internet posts that Java 1.8.0_101 had the JCE upgrade
built in, but that seems to no longer be the case.  I had to apply the
upgrade to get OSMF to download properly.

-Alex


On 11/20/17, 10:45 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>Hi Peter,
>
>Too bad! I will take a look into that. It seems that this release is going
>to take much longer.
>I'm wondering why Alex didn't have such problems...
>
>Happy Thanksgiving!
>Piotr
>
>
>2017-11-20 19:41 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent :
>
>> The osmf download still fails for me. I tried Java 1.8 and Java 1.7
>>since
>> someone in an email thread said that seemed to be the issue.
>>
>> I am going on vacation for the US Thanksgiving holiday and will be back
>> next week.
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>>
>> On 11/15/17, 4:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Folks,
>> >
>> >Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >--
>> >
>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>> >
>> >Patreon:
>> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
>> 9968
>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
>> 9968
>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon: 
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046e13e
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468003336775690&sdata=mLX
>UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046e13e
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468003336775690&sdata=mLX
>UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0>*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi Peter,

Too bad! I will take a look into that. It seems that this release is going
to take much longer.
I'm wondering why Alex didn't have such problems...

Happy Thanksgiving!
Piotr


2017-11-20 19:41 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent :

> The osmf download still fails for me. I tried Java 1.8 and Java 1.7 since
> someone in an email thread said that seemed to be the issue.
>
> I am going on vacation for the US Thanksgiving holiday and will be back
> next week.
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> On 11/15/17, 4:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> >Hi Folks,
> >
> >Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >--
> >
> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >Patreon:
> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
> 9968
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
> 9968
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

[Peter Ent]

The osmf download still fails for me. I tried Java 1.8 and Java 1.7 since
someone in an email thread said that seemed to be the issue.

I am going on vacation for the US Thanksgiving holiday and will be back
next week.
Regards,
Peter

On 11/15/17, 4:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>Hi Folks,
>
>Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
>
>Thanks,
>-- 
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon: 
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c099968
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c099968
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0>*

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2

[Peter Ent]

-1

ApproveSDK.xml
I used both Java 1.8 and Java 1.7. The script fails on the osmf.xml
download again.
macOS 10.12.6

Peter Ent

On 11/15/17, 4:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>Hi Folks,
>
>This is a Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 release candidate 2 Please see the
>RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
>
>Changes:
>- Sources has been prepared using JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS=-Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>- Sources from the git repository has been checkout without line change
>with option core.autocrlf=input which helps to resolve issue with launch
>*.sh scripts on Mac
>
>The release candidate can be found here:
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Fsdk%2F4.16.1%2Frc2%2F&data=02%7C01%7
>C%7Ce24b18e0f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C
>0%7C0%7C636463341455363318&sdata=WGgqV5J62c7YlxD6Tm%2FkOdgSG5N5F530cSXVatJ
>USW0%3D&reserved=0
>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Fsdk%2F4.16.1%2Frc2%2F&data=02%7C01%7
>C%7Ce24b18e0f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C
>0%7C0%7C636463341455363318&sdata=WGgqV5J62c7YlxD6Tm%2FkOdgSG5N5F530cSXVatJ
>USW0%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>are
>available here:
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Fsdk%2F4.16.1%2Frc2%2Fbinaries%2F&dat
>a=02%7C01%7C%7Ce24b18e0f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463341455363318&sdata=ZJtyyozOB5yYTVQiVbRsXBqRPO6OTA
>z%2FruDBYJ4mN9o%3D&reserved=0
>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Fsdk%2F4.16.1%2Frc2%2Fbinaries%2F&dat
>a=02%7C01%7C%7Ce24b18e0f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463341455363318&sdata=ZJtyyozOB5yYTVQiVbRsXBqRPO6OTA
>z%2FruDBYJ4mN9o%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>The most convenient way to use the binary package is to install it via Ant
>or the Installer. To use an Installer you should use Apache Flex SDK
>Installer 3.3 RC2:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apac
>he.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Finstaller%2F3.3%2Frc2%2Fbinaries%2F&d
>ata=02%7C01%7C%7Ce24b18e0f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
>c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463341455363318&sdata=D0GWoQFlmeku0qPwrfYrI1WlU6Dd
>w6nw1ReVgJitnFc%3D&reserved=0
>
>Before voting please review the section, 'What are the ASF requirements on
>approving a release?', at:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache
>.org%2Fdev%2Frelease.html%23approving-a-release&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce24b18e0
>f6cd4520811a08d52c09726c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364
>63341455363318&sdata=KU8ZMDcxPm06ptkGv601ov1ddoBpnJV2r4Ojs3HiKdY%3D&reserv
>ed=0
>
>At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>- MD5 and signed packages are correct
>- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>- That you can compile from source package
>- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice
>- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser
>application
>
>When testing please check the md5 and asc files and make sure that the
>source can be compiled.
>
>Please vote to approve this release:
>+1 Approve the release
>-1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
>This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
>The vote passes if there is:
>- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>- More positive votes than negative votes
>
>If you find an issue with the release that's a 'show stopper' please don't
>hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing as we want
>to try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of
>release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote during
>the voting process.
>
>People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
>vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the
>PMC votes.
>
>When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>version you tested the SDK with.
>
>Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
>this VOTE thread.
>
>For your convenience, there issues an Ant script in the RC folder that
>automates the checks a voter should perform on the RC.  It will:
>- download the default source package for your OS (use
>-Dpackage.suffix
>to override)
>- run md5 and gpg checks (this assumes you have gpg installed in your
>path)\n\
>- uncompress the source package
>- install and run rat
>- display the rat report and ask you to verify
>- display the rat report without the AL files and ask you to verify
>the
>non-AL files
>- display the README and ask you to verify
>- display the RELEASE_NOTES a