Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
I will start GEP M1 release soon. 2010/6/21 Bill Stoddard wgstodd...@gmail.com On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent reviewing this. The release artifacts will be promoted and made available for download ASAP. Rick Hi, Rick. Couple of comments... There's a problem with the names of the install packages. Check out the link to the tomcat7 image on this page: http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v30-m1-release.html That link tries to download this file: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.M1-bin.tar.gz Actual name is: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0-M1-bin.tar.gz Maybe a good idea to work up an announcement letter when GEP and sample apps are ready. Bill On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been included. See the JIRA issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Rick -- Best Regards, Delos
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
On Jun 20, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote: On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent reviewing this. The release artifacts will be promoted and made available for download ASAP. Rick Hi, Rick. Couple of comments... There's a problem with the names of the install packages. Check out the link to the tomcat7 image on this page: http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v30-m1-release.html That link tries to download this file: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.M1-bin.tar.gz Actual name is: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0-M1-bin.tar.gz Fixed, I think... --kevan
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
I will start Samples 3.0-M1 release soon. Forrest On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote: On Jun 20, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote: On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent reviewing this. The release artifacts will be promoted and made available for download ASAP. Rick Hi, Rick. Couple of comments... There's a problem with the names of the install packages. Check out the link to the tomcat7 image on this page: http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v30-m1-release.html That link tries to download this file: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.M1-bin.tar.gz Actual name is: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0-M1-bin.tar.gz Fixed, I think... --kevan
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent reviewing this. The release artifacts will be promoted and made available for download ASAP. Rick Hi, Rick. Couple of comments... There's a problem with the names of the install packages. Check out the link to the tomcat7 image on this page: http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v30-m1-release.html That link tries to download this file: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.M1-bin.tar.gz Actual name is: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0-M1-bin.tar.gz Maybe a good idea to work up an announcement letter when GEP and sample apps are ready. Bill On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been included. See the JIRA issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Rick
[RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent reviewing this. The release artifacts will be promoted and made available for download ASAP. Rick On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been included. See the JIRA issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Rick
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
Believe you meant Kevan Miller and Donald Woods... :-) -Donald On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent reviewing this. The release artifacts will be promoted and made available for download ASAP. Rick On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been included. See the JIRA issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Rick
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
On 6/18/2010 8:24 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Believe you meant Kevan Miller and Donald Woods... :-) Yeah...it's been a rough morning! Rick -Donald On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the release were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Kevan Woods Donald Wood Joe Bohn Thank you for the time spent reviewing this. The release artifacts will be promoted and made available for download ASAP. Rick On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been included. See the JIRA issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Rick
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
On 6/15/10 11:33 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: Here's my +1 as well ... but I did notice a few strange things that I don't think have been pointed out yet: Perhaps the most annoying thing is that we aren't including the tranql connector rars in server images as with previous releases. I guess this isn't a big concern because they should be available via other means - just a bit annoying. Yep, I fixed that in trunk. I also noticed a dependency management entry in the root pom for a geronimo bundle of axiom (at a SNAPSHOT version). This doesn't actually exist but it seems that it isn't causing any build issues either. I was able to build fine and I ran one of the EBA samples in the tomcat assembly. Joe On 6/9/10 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been included. See the JIRA issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Rick
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
Here's my +1. Build, source, signatures, checksums, license/notice files all look good. Some minor issues running the server: ExceptionInInitializerError during shutdown of Jetty server warnings during start of Tomcat Java EE server Here's my +1 --kevan On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been included. See the JIRA issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Rick
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
Here's my +1 as well ... but I did notice a few strange things that I don't think have been pointed out yet: Perhaps the most annoying thing is that we aren't including the tranql connector rars in server images as with previous releases. I guess this isn't a big concern because they should be available via other means - just a bit annoying. I also noticed a dependency management entry in the root pom for a geronimo bundle of axiom (at a SNAPSHOT version). This doesn't actually exist but it seems that it isn't causing any build issues either. I was able to build fine and I ran one of the EBA samples in the tomcat assembly. Joe On 6/9/10 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been included. See the JIRA issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Rick
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
+1 as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.
Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
-Donald
On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
+0.5
M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
following in var/config/config.xml:
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}/attribute
to
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}/attribute
Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
server startup by the activemq plugin.
M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
error from time to time.
Jarek
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has
been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been
included.
See the JIRA issues here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
Staged to
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
plausible builds from them.
The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
Rick
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
Donald,
I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried with
Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK 1.6.0_20. Which
version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the tag?
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
+1 as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.
Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
-Donald
On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
+0.5
M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
following in var/config/config.xml:
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}/attribute
to
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}/attribute
Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
server startup by the activemq plugin.
M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
error from time to time.
Jarek
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem
has
been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have
been
included.
See the JIRA issues here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
Staged to
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
plausible builds from them.
The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
Rick
--
Vamsi
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
Those versions on Mac
What problem did you encounter? Did you run the bootstrap build first?
mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap
mvn install
-Donald
On 6/11/10 12:33 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Donald,
I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried
with Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK
1.6.0_20. Which version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the
tag?
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
mailto:dwo...@apache.org wrote:
+1 as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.
Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
-Donald
On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
+0.5
M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
following in var/config/config.xml:
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}/attribute
to
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}/attribute
Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
server startup by the activemq plugin.
M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
error from time to time.
Jarek
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com
mailto:rick...@gmail.com wrote:
A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE
problem has
been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek
noticed have been
included.
See the JIRA issues here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
Staged to
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
plausible builds from them.
The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
Rick
--
Vamsi
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
Ah... missed the bootstrap build step :D . The build seems to run fine now.
Will post again if it fails. Thanks Donald.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
Those versions on Mac
What problem did you encounter? Did you run the bootstrap build first?
mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap
mvn install
-Donald
On 6/11/10 12:33 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Donald,
I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried
with Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK
1.6.0_20. Which version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the
tag?
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
mailto:dwo...@apache.org wrote:
+1 as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone
release.
Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
-Donald
On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
+0.5
M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind
to
the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you
won't
be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing
the
following in var/config/config.xml:
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort
+
PortOffset}/attribute
to
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}/attribute
Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated
at
server startup by the activemq plugin.
M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
error from time to time.
Jarek
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com
mailto:rick...@gmail.com wrote:
A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE
problem has
been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek
noticed have been
included.
See the JIRA issues here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
Staged to
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure
something
plausible builds from them.
The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
Rick
--
Vamsi
--
Vamsi
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
+0.5
M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
following in var/config/config.xml:
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}/attribute
to
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}/attribute
Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
server startup by the activemq plugin.
M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
error from time to time.
Jarek
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has
been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been
included.
See the JIRA issues here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
Staged to
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
plausible builds from them.
The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
Rick
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
On Jun 10, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
+0.5
M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
following in var/config/config.xml:
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}/attribute
to
attribute name=ServerUrltcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}/attribute
Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
server startup by the activemq plugin.
M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
error from time to time.
Thanks Jarek. I haven't reviewed the release yet (though given past reviews, I
think I'll be able to support this one). IMO, those issues are acceptable for
an M1. Hope to get to a full review, but I've got family in town. So, may be a
little slow...
--kevan
[VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt
A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review. The LICENSE problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been included. See the JIRA issues here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220 Staged to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them. The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours. [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Rick
