Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
I'm not sure what you're saying. There are plenty of specs we've released that are final MRx's IIRC we've dealt with the "don't claim it's final" by having a SNAPSHOT maven version and a disclaimer somewhere and, well, not releasing it. The micro version of an osgi version has to be numeric, here's the grammar: version ::= major( '.' minor ( '.' micro ( '.' qualifier )? )? )? major ::= number minor ::=number micro ::=number qualifier ::= ( alphanum | ’_’ | '-' )+ so MR2 won't work as the micro version. For now I'd recommend 1.2.1. I'll try to find out what the discussion on osgi versions for javaee packages ended up with as a recommendation. thanks david jencks On Apr 19, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > thats a legal thingy with the JCP rules. > > We must not release this as 'final' version if the spec is only a MR. Thus > the next best we can do is to add the MR2 to the version. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > >> ____________ >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau >> To: Mark Struberg ; dev@geronimo.apache.org >> Sent: Friday, 19 April 2013, 22:10 >> Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 >> >> >> >> No app/lib will ise mr2 IMO so i'd remove it >> Le 19 avr. 2013 20:09, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : >> >> folks, what is the correct bundle version for a MR2 release? >>> >>> >>> javax.annotation*;version=1.2.MR2 >>> >>> is this ok from an OSGi perspective? Or should we ditch the 'MR2' anyway >>> and just keep it in the version for now? >>> >>> >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message - >>>> From: Kevan Miller >>>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:40 >>>> Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: >>>> >>>>> hi folks! >>>>> >>>>> In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from >>>> commons-annotation-1.2.MR2. >>>>> Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation. >>>>> >>>>> Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add >>>>> the >>>> missing annotations? >>>> >>>> Hi Mark, >>>> Are you proposing that we svn copy geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec to a new >>>> geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec and start adding new features defined by the >>>> new >>>> spec? >>>> >>>> If so, then yes. Sounds good to me. Thanks! >>>> >>>> --kevan >>>> >>> >> >>
Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
thats a legal thingy with the JCP rules. We must not release this as 'final' version if the spec is only a MR. Thus the next best we can do is to add the MR2 to the version. LieGrue, strub > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau >To: Mark Struberg ; dev@geronimo.apache.org >Sent: Friday, 19 April 2013, 22:10 >Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 > > > >No app/lib will ise mr2 IMO so i'd remove it >Le 19 avr. 2013 20:09, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > >folks, what is the correct bundle version for a MR2 release? >> >> >> javax.annotation*;version=1.2.MR2 >> >>is this ok from an OSGi perspective? Or should we ditch the 'MR2' anyway and >>just keep it in the version for now? >> >> >> >>LieGrue, >>strub >> >> >> >>- Original Message ----- >>> From: Kevan Miller >>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:40 >>> Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 >>> >>> >>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: >>> >>>> hi folks! >>>> >>>> In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from >>> commons-annotation-1.2.MR2. >>>> Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation. >>>> >>>> Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add the >>> missing annotations? >>> >>> Hi Mark, >>> Are you proposing that we svn copy geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec to a new >>> geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec and start adding new features defined by the >>> new >>> spec? >>> >>> If so, then yes. Sounds good to me. Thanks! >>> >>> --kevan >>> >> > >
Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
No app/lib will ise mr2 IMO so i'd remove it Le 19 avr. 2013 20:09, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > folks, what is the correct bundle version for a MR2 release? > > > javax.annotation*;version=1.2.MR2 > > is this ok from an OSGi perspective? Or should we ditch the 'MR2' anyway > and just keep it in the version for now? > > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Kevan Miller > > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg > > Cc: > > Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:40 > > Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 > > > > > > On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > >> hi folks! > >> > >> In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from > > commons-annotation-1.2.MR2. > >> Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation. > >> > >> Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add > the > > missing annotations? > > > > Hi Mark, > > Are you proposing that we svn copy geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec to a new > > geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec and start adding new features defined by > the new > > spec? > > > > If so, then yes. Sounds good to me. Thanks! > > > > --kevan > > >
Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
folks, what is the correct bundle version for a MR2 release? javax.annotation*;version=1.2.MR2 is this ok from an OSGi perspective? Or should we ditch the 'MR2' anyway and just keep it in the version for now? LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Kevan Miller > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:40 > Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 > > > On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> hi folks! >> >> In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from > commons-annotation-1.2.MR2. >> Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation. >> >> Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add the > missing annotations? > > Hi Mark, > Are you proposing that we svn copy geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec to a new > geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec and start adding new features defined by the new > spec? > > If so, then yes. Sounds good to me. Thanks! > > --kevan >
Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
yes, that's the plan. Not sure about any TCK. Do some of you have more info on that? Will it be in the EE7 umbrella TCK or a standalone one? There are parts which are tested in the CDI-TCK for sure. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Kevan Miller > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:40 > Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 > > > On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> hi folks! >> >> In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from > commons-annotation-1.2.MR2. >> Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation. >> >> Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add the > missing annotations? > > Hi Mark, > Are you proposing that we svn copy geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec to a new > geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec and start adding new features defined by the new > spec? > > If so, then yes. Sounds good to me. Thanks! > > --kevan >
Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > hi folks! > > In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from commons-annotation-1.2.MR2. > Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation. > > Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add the > missing annotations? Hi Mark, Are you proposing that we svn copy geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec to a new geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec and start adding new features defined by the new spec? If so, then yes. Sounds good to me. Thanks! --kevan
Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
well, change the appropriate versions too :-) but yes. thanks! david jencks On Apr 16, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > hi folks! > > In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from commons-annotation-1.2.MR2. > Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation. > > Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add the > missing annotations? > > LieGrue, > strub >
Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
btw, here is a bit more doc http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/maintenance/jsr250/jsr250changelog_2.html LieGrue, strub > > From: Mark Struberg >To: geronimo-dev >Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:32 >Subject: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 > > > >hi folks! > >In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from commons-annotation-1.2.MR2. >Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation. > >Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add the >missing annotations? > >LieGrue, >strub > > > > >
commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
hi folks! In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from commons-annotation-1.2.MR2. Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation. Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add the missing annotations? LieGrue, strub
