[RESULT][VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Steve Rowe]

This vote has passed.  Thanks to all who voted!

I’ll start publishing stuff now.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On May 27, 2016, at 3:02 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinman...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> SUCCESS! [1:10:04.644047]
> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a couple 
> problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t call the 
> vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
> 
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> 
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> 
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> 
> Here’s my +1.
> 
> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
> 
> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Shalin Shekhar Mangar]

+1

SUCCESS! [1:10:04.644047]

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> Here’s my +1.
>
> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Adrien Grand]

+1 SUCCESS! [0:55:13.784752]

Le jeu. 26 mai 2016 à 08:49, Tomás Fernández Löbbe 
a écrit :

> +1
> SUCCESS! [1:13:52.067157]
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Steve.
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Steve Rowe  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > On May 25, 2016, at 11:27 AM, David Smiley 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch.
>>> I thought it'd be good enough but apparently not.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe  wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless <
>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> David did you use master's smoke tester?
>>> >>
>>> >> You must use the version on 6.0.x.
>>> >
>>> > I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the
>>> appropriate version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.
>>>
>>> I committed a fix: the smoke tester will now fail when run against an
>>> incompatible release, i.e. one with a different major.minor version.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Tomás Fernández Löbbe]

+1
SUCCESS! [1:13:52.067157]

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> Thanks Steve.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Steve Rowe  wrote:
>
>>
>> > On May 25, 2016, at 11:27 AM, David Smiley 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch.
>> I thought it'd be good enough but apparently not.
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe  wrote:
>> >
>> >> On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless <
>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> David did you use master's smoke tester?
>> >>
>> >> You must use the version on 6.0.x.
>> >
>> > I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the
>> appropriate version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.
>>
>> I committed a fix: the smoke tester will now fail when run against an
>> incompatible release, i.e. one with a different major.minor version.
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Michael McCandless]

Thanks Steve.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Steve Rowe  wrote:

>
> > On May 25, 2016, at 11:27 AM, David Smiley 
> wrote:
> >
> > The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch.  I
> thought it'd be good enough but apparently not.
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe  wrote:
> >
> >> On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> David did you use master's smoke tester?
> >>
> >> You must use the version on 6.0.x.
> >
> > I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the
> appropriate version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.
>
> I committed a fix: the smoke tester will now fail when run against an
> incompatible release, i.e. one with a different major.minor version.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Steve Rowe]

> On May 25, 2016, at 11:27 AM, David Smiley  wrote:
> 
> The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch.  I 
> thought it'd be good enough but apparently not.
> 
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe  wrote:
> 
>> On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> David did you use master's smoke tester?
>> 
>> You must use the version on 6.0.x.
> 
> I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the 
> appropriate version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.

I committed a fix: the smoke tester will now fail when run against an 
incompatible release, i.e. one with a different major.minor version.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Tommaso Teofili]

Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 15:12 Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:

> Hi Tommaso,
>
> You and Anshum are getting that warning because you don’t trust me - or
> rather: neither you nor anybody you trust has signed my code signing key.
>
> Yesterday Anshum and I signed each other’s code signing keys and uploaded
> them, and I’m willing to do that with others.
>

thanks Steve for the clarification, I do trust you of course :) will fix
that on my side too.

Regards,
Tommaso


>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On May 25, 2016, at 4:26 AM, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > got the same warning on the GPG key signature but could not reproduce
> David's issue, not sure what it could be though. I'd say if no one else can
> reproduce it let's go ahead with the release.
> >
> > +1 on my side.
> > SUCCESS! [1:19:14.997834]
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tommaso
> >
> > Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 06:48 David Smiley <
> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed
> right after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What
> might the problem be?
> >
> >   unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
> > verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in 
> > main()
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
> > smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir,
> c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args))
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
> > unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, baseURL)
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in
> unpackAndVerify
> > verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in
> verifyUnpacked
> > checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir,
> baseURL)
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
> > checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision,
> version)
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in
> checkJARMetaData
> > (desc, verify))
> > RuntimeError: JAR file
> "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
> is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> >
> > Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a
> new project and haven't found issues yet.
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think
> you should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
> >
> > I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key
> is not certified with a trusted signature!
> >
> > Here's my +1!
> >
> > SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
> >
> > Mike McCandless
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> >
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> >
> > Here’s my +1.
> >
> > Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
> > --
> > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Yonik Seeley]

+1

-Yonik

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a couple 
> problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t call the 
> vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> Here’s my +1.
>
> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[David Smiley]

+1

SUCCESS! [0:49:14.757238]

The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch.  I
thought it'd be good enough but apparently not.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe  wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> I think this is a result of the JDK naming stuff that Uwe has been working
> on (e.g. 1.8->8) to enable JDK9 usage - but AFAIK that’s not on branch_6_0:
>
> > On May 25, 2016, at 12:48 AM, David Smiley 
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > RuntimeError: JAR file
> "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
> is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
> So I think Mike’s right:
>
> > On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> >
> > David did you use master's smoke tester?
> >
> > You must use the version on 6.0.x.
>
> I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the
> appropriate version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Steve Rowe]

Hi David, 

I think this is a result of the JDK naming stuff that Uwe has been working on 
(e.g. 1.8->8) to enable JDK9 usage - but AFAIK that’s not on branch_6_0:

> On May 25, 2016, at 12:48 AM, David Smiley  wrote:
> [...]
> RuntimeError: JAR file 
> "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
>  is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF

So I think Mike’s right:
 
> On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless  
> wrote:
> 
> David did you use master's smoke tester?
> 
> You must use the version on 6.0.x.

I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the appropriate 
version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Steve Rowe]

Hi Tommaso,

You and Anshum are getting that warning because you don’t trust me - or rather: 
neither you nor anybody you trust has signed my code signing key.

Yesterday Anshum and I signed each other’s code signing keys and uploaded them, 
and I’m willing to do that with others.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On May 25, 2016, at 4:26 AM, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> got the same warning on the GPG key signature but could not reproduce David's 
> issue, not sure what it could be though. I'd say if no one else can reproduce 
> it let's go ahead with the release.
> 
> +1 on my side.
> SUCCESS! [1:19:14.997834]
> 
> Regards,
> Tommaso
> 
> Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 06:48 David Smiley 
> <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right 
> after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What might 
> the problem be?
> 
>   unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
> verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in 
> main()
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
> smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir, c.is_signed, ' 
> '.join(c.test_args))
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
> unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision, version, 
> testArgs, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in unpackAndVerify
> verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision, version, 
> testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in verifyUnpacked
> checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
> checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision, 
> version)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in checkJARMetaData
> (desc, verify))
> RuntimeError: JAR file 
> "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
>  is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> 
> Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a new 
> project and haven't found issues yet.
> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you 
> should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
> 
> I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is 
> not certified with a trusted signature!
> 
> Here's my +1! 
> 
> SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless 
> <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> +1
> 
> SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
> 
> Mike McCandless
> 
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a couple 
> problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t call the 
> vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
> 
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> 
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> 
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> 
> Here’s my +1.
> 
> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
> 
> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Anshum Gupta
> -- 
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Michael McCandless]

David did you use master's smoke tester?

You must use the version on 6.0.x.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:48 AM, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right
> after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What might
> the problem be?
>
>   unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
> verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in 
> main()
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
> smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir,
> c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args))
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
> unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in
> unpackAndVerify
> verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in verifyUnpacked
> checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir,
> baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
> checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision,
> version)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in
> checkJARMetaData
> (desc, verify))
> RuntimeError: JAR file
> "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
> is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
> Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a new
> project and haven't found issues yet.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you
>> should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
>>
>> I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key
>> is not certified with a trusted signature!
>>
>> Here's my +1!
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <
>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
>>>> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
>>>> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>> Here’s my +1.
>>>>
>>>> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steve
>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Ahmet Arslan]

+1
SUCCESS! [1:00:26.085469]


On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:27 AM, Tommaso Teofili 
<tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote:



got the same warning on the GPG key signature but could not reproduce David's 
issue, not sure what it could be though. I'd say if no one else can reproduce 
it let's go ahead with the release.

+1 on my side.

SUCCESS! [1:19:14.997834]
Regards,
Tommaso

Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 06:48 David Smiley 
<david.w.smi...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right 
after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What might the 
problem be?
>
>
>  unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
>verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
>Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in 
>main()
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
>smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir, c.is_signed, ' 
> '.join(c.test_args))
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
>unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision, version, 
> testArgs, baseURL)
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in unpackAndVerify
>verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision, version, 
> testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in verifyUnpacked
>checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir, baseURL)
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
>checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision, 
> version)
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in checkJARMetaData
>(desc, verify))
>RuntimeError: JAR file 
>"/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
> is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
>
>Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a new 
>project and haven't found issues yet.
>
>On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>
>Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you 
>should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
>>
>>
>>
>>I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is 
>>not certified with a trusted signature!
>>
>>
>>Here's my +1! 
>>
>>
>>SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless 
>><luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>+1
>>>
>>>
>>>SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Mike McCandless
>>>
>>>http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>>
>>>On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a 
>>>couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t 
>>>call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>>>>
>>>>The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>>You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>>python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>>Here’s my +1.
>>>>
>>>>Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>>>
>>>>SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Steve
>>>>www.lucidworks.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>
>>Anshum Gupta
>-- 
>
>Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
>http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Tommaso Teofili]

got the same warning on the GPG key signature but could not reproduce
David's issue, not sure what it could be though. I'd say if no one else can
reproduce it let's go ahead with the release.

+1 on my side.

SUCCESS! [1:19:14.997834]
Regards,
Tommaso

Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 06:48 David Smiley <
david.w.smi...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right
> after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What might
> the problem be?
>
>   unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
> verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in 
> main()
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
> smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir,
> c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args))
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
> unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in
> unpackAndVerify
> verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in verifyUnpacked
> checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir,
> baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
> checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision,
> version)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in
> checkJARMetaData
> (desc, verify))
> RuntimeError: JAR file
> "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
> is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
> Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a new
> project and haven't found issues yet.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you
>> should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
>>
>> I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key
>> is not certified with a trusted signature!
>>
>> Here's my +1!
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <
>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
>>>> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
>>>> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>> Here’s my +1.
>>>>
>>>> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steve
>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[David Smiley]

I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right
after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What might
the problem be?

  unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in 
main()
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir, c.is_signed,
' '.join(c.test_args))
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision, version,
testArgs, baseURL)
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in unpackAndVerify
verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision,
version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in verifyUnpacked
checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir,
baseURL)
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision,
version)
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in
checkJARMetaData
(desc, verify))
RuntimeError: JAR file
"/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF

Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a new
project and haven't found issues yet.

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:

> Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you
> should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
>
> I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is
> not certified with a trusted signature!
>
> Here's my +1!
>
> SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
>>> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
>>> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>
>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>
>>> Here’s my +1.
>>>
>>> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>
-- 
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Anshum Gupta]

Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you
should get someone to sign you GPG key :)

I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is
not certified with a trusted signature!

Here's my +1!

SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]



On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
>> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
>> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>
>> Here’s my +1.
>>
>> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Michael McCandless]

+1

SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> Here’s my +1.
>
> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

[Steve Rowe]

Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a couple 
problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t call the 
vote, and cut RC2 instead.)

The artifacts can be downloaded from:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf

You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:

python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf

Here’s my +1.

Docs, changes and javadocs look good.

SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Steve Rowe]

The failures were SSL-related.  Reverting the SOLR-8970 commit allowed tests to 
pass.

Turns out I missed some commits under SOLR-5776 and SOLR-9068, because I was 
working off of CHANGES.txt, and those issues aren’t mentioned in there.

I have now pushed all the necessary commits, and three local runs passed.  I’ve 
included mention of all the related issues in the branch_6_0 CHANGES entry.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On May 21, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Uwe, I’m looking into it.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
>> On May 21, 2016, at 4:21 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> It looks like the 6.0 branch now fails with like 40 errors on solr-core at 
>> the moment (on all Jenkins servers).
>> Looks like there is something wrong with the backports.
>> 
>> Uwe
>> 
>> -
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 2:04 AM
>>> To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1
>>> 
>>> Progress:
>>> 
>>> I have finished backporting existing 5.5.1 and 6.1 LUCENE and SOLR bugfixes.
>>> 
>>> I plan on delaying 6.0.1 RC creation until Monday May 23, in the morning US
>>> Eastern - that’ll give time for the backported changes to soak on Jenkins.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>> 
>>>> On May 13, 2016, at 8:16 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Progress:
>>>> 
>>>> I added the 6.0.1 version where it should be, and I checked in backcompat
>>> indexes for 6.0.0, so the smoke checker should now succeed.
>>>> 
>>>> I’ve re-enabled the 6.0 branch jobs on ASF Jenkins and on my Jenkins.
>>>> 
>>>> Uwe, would you please re-enable the Policeman Jenkins 6.0 release branch
>>> jobs?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Steve
>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>> 
>>>>> On May 13, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Steve
>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Steve Rowe]

Thanks Uwe, I’m looking into it.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On May 21, 2016, at 4:21 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It looks like the 6.0 branch now fails with like 40 errors on solr-core at 
> the moment (on all Jenkins servers).
> Looks like there is something wrong with the backports.
> 
> Uwe
> 
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 2:04 AM
>> To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1
>> 
>> Progress:
>> 
>> I have finished backporting existing 5.5.1 and 6.1 LUCENE and SOLR bugfixes.
>> 
>> I plan on delaying 6.0.1 RC creation until Monday May 23, in the morning US
>> Eastern - that’ll give time for the backported changes to soak on Jenkins.
>> 
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>> 
>>> On May 13, 2016, at 8:16 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Progress:
>>> 
>>> I added the 6.0.1 version where it should be, and I checked in backcompat
>> indexes for 6.0.0, so the smoke checker should now succeed.
>>> 
>>> I’ve re-enabled the 6.0 branch jobs on ASF Jenkins and on my Jenkins.
>>> 
>>> Uwe, would you please re-enable the Policeman Jenkins 6.0 release branch
>> jobs?
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>> 
>>>> On May 13, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
>>>> 
>>>> I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Steve
>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

RE: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Uwe Schindler]

Hi,

It looks like the 6.0 branch now fails with like 40 errors on solr-core at the 
moment (on all Jenkins servers).
Looks like there is something wrong with the backports.

Uwe

-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de

> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 2:04 AM
> To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1
> 
> Progress:
> 
> I have finished backporting existing 5.5.1 and 6.1 LUCENE and SOLR bugfixes.
> 
> I plan on delaying 6.0.1 RC creation until Monday May 23, in the morning US
> Eastern - that’ll give time for the backported changes to soak on Jenkins.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
> > On May 13, 2016, at 8:16 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Progress:
> >
> > I added the 6.0.1 version where it should be, and I checked in backcompat
> indexes for 6.0.0, so the smoke checker should now succeed.
> >
> > I’ve re-enabled the 6.0 branch jobs on ASF Jenkins and on my Jenkins.
> >
> > Uwe, would you please re-enable the Policeman Jenkins 6.0 release branch
> jobs?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> >> On May 13, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
> >>
> >> I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Steve
> >> www.lucidworks.com
> >
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Steve Rowe]

Progress:

I have finished backporting existing 5.5.1 and 6.1 LUCENE and SOLR bugfixes.

I plan on delaying 6.0.1 RC creation until Monday May 23, in the morning US 
Eastern - that’ll give time for the backported changes to soak on Jenkins.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
 
> On May 13, 2016, at 8:16 PM, Steve Rowe  wrote:
> 
> Progress:
> 
> I added the 6.0.1 version where it should be, and I checked in backcompat 
> indexes for 6.0.0, so the smoke checker should now succeed.
> 
> I’ve re-enabled the 6.0 branch jobs on ASF Jenkins and on my Jenkins.
> 
> Uwe, would you please re-enable the Policeman Jenkins 6.0 release branch jobs?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
>> On May 13, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Steve Rowe  wrote:
>> 
>> I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
>> 
>> I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
>> 
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Steve Rowe]

Thanks Robert, I won’t backport them.

--
Steve
.lucidworks.com

> On May 20, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Robert Muir  wrote:
> 
> I think those would be risky to backport, there was a lot of
> refactoring and cleanup across many issues. Some of the fixes relied
> on fixing the encoding and things like that.
> 
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Steve Rowe  wrote:
>> Thanks Mike, sounds good.
>> 
>> BTW, (CC’ing Robert too), I tried to backport the following 6.1 bugfixes, 
>> but cherry-picking the branch_6x commits into branch_6_0 wasn’t clean ("both 
>> modified” for several files for each issue) - do you think they’re 
>> worthy/capable of being backported?:
>> 
>> * LUCENE-7127: Fix corner case bugs in GeoPointDistanceQuery. (Robert Muir)
>> 
>> * LUCENE-7166: Fix corner case bugs in LatLonPoint/GeoPointField bounding box
>>  queries. (Robert Muir)
>> 
>> * LUCENE-7168: Switch to stable encode for geo3d, remove quantization
>>  test leniency, remove dead code (Mike McCandless)
>> 
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>> 
>>> On May 20, 2016, at 2:36 PM, Michael McCandless  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Steve,
>>> 
>>> I think we should also fix 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7293 for 6.0.1 ... I'll commit 
>>> shortly.
>>> 
>>> Mike McCandless
>>> 
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>> 
>>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Steve Rowe  wrote:
>>> Yes, I will fix up trunk and branch_6x CHANGES.txt for backported issues.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>> 
 On May 14, 2016, at 12:33 AM, David Smiley  
 wrote:
 
 Oh right, of course :-)  So I cherry picked those over to the 6.0 branch.  
 The Lucene one is strictly speaking a "new feature" but it's to make the 
 GCD configurable necessary to enable the Solr-side to use it without a 
 GCD.  At some point after the release I presume you'll sync up the 
 CHANGES.txt on master & 6x?  That'd be easier than trying to make that 
 change for each cherry picked commit.  It's too bad this 
 conundrum/annoyance exists.
 
 ~ David
 
 On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:11 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
 David,
 
 Since it’s a bugfix release, the branch is already cut: branch_6_0.
 
 Please go ahead and start backporting whenever you’re ready.
 
 --
 Steve
 www.lucidworks.com
 
> On May 13, 2016, at 12:24 PM, David Smiley  
> wrote:
> 
> When you cut the branch, I'll port the "gregorian change date" 
> bugs/issues (2 Solr, 1 Lucene).
> 
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
> I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
> 
> I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
 
 --
 Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
 LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
 http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Robert Muir]

I think those would be risky to backport, there was a lot of
refactoring and cleanup across many issues. Some of the fixes relied
on fixing the encoding and things like that.

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Steve Rowe  wrote:
> Thanks Mike, sounds good.
>
> BTW, (CC’ing Robert too), I tried to backport the following 6.1 bugfixes, but 
> cherry-picking the branch_6x commits into branch_6_0 wasn’t clean ("both 
> modified” for several files for each issue) - do you think they’re 
> worthy/capable of being backported?:
>
> * LUCENE-7127: Fix corner case bugs in GeoPointDistanceQuery. (Robert Muir)
>
> * LUCENE-7166: Fix corner case bugs in LatLonPoint/GeoPointField bounding box
>   queries. (Robert Muir)
>
> * LUCENE-7168: Switch to stable encode for geo3d, remove quantization
>   test leniency, remove dead code (Mike McCandless)
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>> On May 20, 2016, at 2:36 PM, Michael McCandless  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> I think we should also fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7293 
>> for 6.0.1 ... I'll commit shortly.
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Steve Rowe  wrote:
>> Yes, I will fix up trunk and branch_6x CHANGES.txt for backported issues.
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>>
>> > On May 14, 2016, at 12:33 AM, David Smiley  
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Oh right, of course :-)  So I cherry picked those over to the 6.0 branch.  
>> > The Lucene one is strictly speaking a "new feature" but it's to make the 
>> > GCD configurable necessary to enable the Solr-side to use it without a 
>> > GCD.  At some point after the release I presume you'll sync up the 
>> > CHANGES.txt on master & 6x?  That'd be easier than trying to make that 
>> > change for each cherry picked commit.  It's too bad this 
>> > conundrum/annoyance exists.
>> >
>> > ~ David
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:11 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
>> > David,
>> >
>> > Since it’s a bugfix release, the branch is already cut: branch_6_0.
>> >
>> > Please go ahead and start backporting whenever you’re ready.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Steve
>> > www.lucidworks.com
>> >
>> > > On May 13, 2016, at 12:24 PM, David Smiley  
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > When you cut the branch, I'll port the "gregorian change date" 
>> > > bugs/issues (2 Solr, 1 Lucene).
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
>> > > I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
>> > >
>> > > I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Steve
>> > > www.lucidworks.com
>> > > -
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> > > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
>> > > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>> >
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
>> > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Steve Rowe]

Thanks Mike, sounds good.

BTW, (CC’ing Robert too), I tried to backport the following 6.1 bugfixes, but 
cherry-picking the branch_6x commits into branch_6_0 wasn’t clean ("both 
modified” for several files for each issue) - do you think they’re 
worthy/capable of being backported?:

* LUCENE-7127: Fix corner case bugs in GeoPointDistanceQuery. (Robert Muir)

* LUCENE-7166: Fix corner case bugs in LatLonPoint/GeoPointField bounding box
  queries. (Robert Muir)

* LUCENE-7168: Switch to stable encode for geo3d, remove quantization
  test leniency, remove dead code (Mike McCandless)

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On May 20, 2016, at 2:36 PM, Michael McCandless  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> I think we should also fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7293 
> for 6.0.1 ... I'll commit shortly.
> 
> Mike McCandless
> 
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> 
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Steve Rowe  wrote:
> Yes, I will fix up trunk and branch_6x CHANGES.txt for backported issues.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
> > On May 14, 2016, at 12:33 AM, David Smiley  wrote:
> >
> > Oh right, of course :-)  So I cherry picked those over to the 6.0 branch.  
> > The Lucene one is strictly speaking a "new feature" but it's to make the 
> > GCD configurable necessary to enable the Solr-side to use it without a GCD. 
> >  At some point after the release I presume you'll sync up the CHANGES.txt 
> > on master & 6x?  That'd be easier than trying to make that change for each 
> > cherry picked commit.  It's too bad this conundrum/annoyance exists.
> >
> > ~ David
> >
> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:11 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > Since it’s a bugfix release, the branch is already cut: branch_6_0.
> >
> > Please go ahead and start backporting whenever you’re ready.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> > > On May 13, 2016, at 12:24 PM, David Smiley  
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > When you cut the branch, I'll port the "gregorian change date" 
> > > bugs/issues (2 Solr, 1 Lucene).
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
> > > I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
> > >
> > > I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Steve
> > > www.lucidworks.com
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> > > --
> > > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> > > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
> > > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> > --
> > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
> > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Michael McCandless]

Hi Steve,

I think we should also fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7293
for 6.0.1 ... I'll commit shortly.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Steve Rowe  wrote:

> Yes, I will fix up trunk and branch_6x CHANGES.txt for backported issues.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On May 14, 2016, at 12:33 AM, David Smiley 
> wrote:
> >
> > Oh right, of course :-)  So I cherry picked those over to the 6.0
> branch.  The Lucene one is strictly speaking a "new feature" but it's to
> make the GCD configurable necessary to enable the Solr-side to use it
> without a GCD.  At some point after the release I presume you'll sync up
> the CHANGES.txt on master & 6x?  That'd be easier than trying to make that
> change for each cherry picked commit.  It's too bad this
> conundrum/annoyance exists.
> >
> > ~ David
> >
> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:11 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > Since it’s a bugfix release, the branch is already cut: branch_6_0.
> >
> > Please go ahead and start backporting whenever you’re ready.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> > > On May 13, 2016, at 12:24 PM, David Smiley 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > When you cut the branch, I'll port the "gregorian change date"
> bugs/issues (2 Solr, 1 Lucene).
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
> > > I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
> > >
> > > I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Steve
> > > www.lucidworks.com
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> > > --
> > > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> > > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> > --
> > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Steve Rowe]

Yes, I will fix up trunk and branch_6x CHANGES.txt for backported issues.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On May 14, 2016, at 12:33 AM, David Smiley  wrote:
> 
> Oh right, of course :-)  So I cherry picked those over to the 6.0 branch.  
> The Lucene one is strictly speaking a "new feature" but it's to make the GCD 
> configurable necessary to enable the Solr-side to use it without a GCD.  At 
> some point after the release I presume you'll sync up the CHANGES.txt on 
> master & 6x?  That'd be easier than trying to make that change for each 
> cherry picked commit.  It's too bad this conundrum/annoyance exists.
> 
> ~ David
> 
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:11 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
> David,
> 
> Since it’s a bugfix release, the branch is already cut: branch_6_0.
> 
> Please go ahead and start backporting whenever you’re ready.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
> > On May 13, 2016, at 12:24 PM, David Smiley  wrote:
> >
> > When you cut the branch, I'll port the "gregorian change date" bugs/issues 
> > (2 Solr, 1 Lucene).
> >
> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
> > I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
> >
> > I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> > --
> > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
> > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 
> -- 
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[David Smiley]

Oh right, of course :-)  So I cherry picked those over to the 6.0 branch.
The Lucene one is strictly speaking a "new feature" but it's to make the
GCD configurable necessary to enable the Solr-side to use it without a
GCD.  At some point after the release I presume you'll sync up the
CHANGES.txt on master & 6x?  That'd be easier than trying to make that
change for each cherry picked commit.  It's too bad this
conundrum/annoyance exists.

~ David

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:11 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:

> David,
>
> Since it’s a bugfix release, the branch is already cut: branch_6_0.
>
> Please go ahead and start backporting whenever you’re ready.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On May 13, 2016, at 12:24 PM, David Smiley 
> wrote:
> >
> > When you cut the branch, I'll port the "gregorian change date"
> bugs/issues (2 Solr, 1 Lucene).
> >
> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
> > I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
> >
> > I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> > --
> > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Steve Rowe]

Progress:

I added the 6.0.1 version where it should be, and I checked in backcompat 
indexes for 6.0.0, so the smoke checker should now succeed.

I’ve re-enabled the 6.0 branch jobs on ASF Jenkins and on my Jenkins.

Uwe, would you please re-enable the Policeman Jenkins 6.0 release branch jobs?

Thanks.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On May 13, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Steve Rowe  wrote:
> 
> I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
> 
> I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Steve Rowe]

David,

Since it’s a bugfix release, the branch is already cut: branch_6_0.

Please go ahead and start backporting whenever you’re ready.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On May 13, 2016, at 12:24 PM, David Smiley  wrote:
> 
> When you cut the branch, I'll port the "gregorian change date" bugs/issues (2 
> Solr, 1 Lucene).
> 
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:
> I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
> 
> I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 
> -- 
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Upayavira]

There are a collection of minor UI patches languishing in JIRA that it
would be good to get out there too. I will endeavour to get them into
Git before Friday.

Upayavira

On Fri, 13 May 2016, at 06:07 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Good idea, Adrien, but: I want to include SOLR-8992 in a 6.0.x release -
> it restores functionality unintentionally removed in 6.0.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
> > On May 13, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Adrien Grand  wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Steve,
> > 
> > I think it is about time to do a 6.1 release as well since we have some 
> > nice pending improvements. So if that would cover your needs too, maybe we 
> > could skip 6.0.1 and do a 6.1 directly to save some work?
> > 
> > This is not an objection to doing a 6.0.1 release, I just wanted to throw 
> > out the idea of releasing 6.1 instead.
> > 
> > Le ven. 13 mai 2016 à 18:06, Steve Rowe  a écrit :
> > I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
> > 
> > I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
> > 
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Steve Rowe]

Good idea, Adrien, but: I want to include SOLR-8992 in a 6.0.x release - it 
restores functionality unintentionally removed in 6.0.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On May 13, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Adrien Grand  wrote:
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> I think it is about time to do a 6.1 release as well since we have some nice 
> pending improvements. So if that would cover your needs too, maybe we could 
> skip 6.0.1 and do a 6.1 directly to save some work?
> 
> This is not an objection to doing a 6.0.1 release, I just wanted to throw out 
> the idea of releasing 6.1 instead.
> 
> Le ven. 13 mai 2016 à 18:06, Steve Rowe  a écrit :
> I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
> 
> I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Adrien Grand]

Hi Steve,

I think it is about time to do a 6.1 release as well since we have some
nice pending improvements. So if that would cover your needs too, maybe we
could skip 6.0.1 and do a 6.1 directly to save some work?

This is not an objection to doing a 6.0.1 release, I just wanted to throw
out the idea of releasing 6.1 instead.

Le ven. 13 mai 2016 à 18:06, Steve Rowe  a écrit :

> I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
>
> I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[David Smiley]

When you cut the branch, I'll port the "gregorian change date" bugs/issues
(2 Solr, 1 Lucene).

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:

> I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.
>
> I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

Lucene/Solr 6.0.1

[Steve Rowe]

I’d like to make a 6.0.1 release, and I volunteer to be RM.

I propose to cut the first RC in one week: next Friday.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org