Re: Lucene 3.6.1 release starting this week

2012-07-16 Thread Chris Male
Ah I want to do https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-416, I'll wrap
it up now.

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:

 Hi,

 I wanted to kick-off the release process for Lucene 3.6.1 this week and
 would also be the RM. If you have any backports to be merged to 3.6 branch
 please do it today. If there are any urgent bugs that need to be fixed in
 3.6.1 speak up, this will likely be the last 3.x release unless there are
 heavy bugs or security issues.

 I have one backport that might also be good in 3.6.1, it is already tested
 heavily on 4.0 and 5.0 branches, so I see no problems. It improves
 performance on MMapDirectory when you have lots of concurrency on opening
 TermEnums/DocsEnums because it removes the sync bottleneck in
 MMapIndexInput.clone(). Anything against a backport? See
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4163

 Uwe

 -
 Uwe Schindler
 H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
 http://www.thetaphi.de
 eMail: u...@thetaphi.de



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org




-- 
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl


RE: Lucene 3.6.1 release starting this week

2012-07-16 Thread Uwe Schindler
You mean 4167?

 

-

Uwe Schindler

H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen

 http://www.thetaphi.de/ http://www.thetaphi.de

eMail: u...@thetaphi.de

 

From: Chris Male [mailto:gento...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 1:45 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene 3.6.1 release starting this week

 

Ah I want to do https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-416, I'll wrap
it up now.

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:

Hi,

I wanted to kick-off the release process for Lucene 3.6.1 this week and
would also be the RM. If you have any backports to be merged to 3.6 branch
please do it today. If there are any urgent bugs that need to be fixed in
3.6.1 speak up, this will likely be the last 3.x release unless there are
heavy bugs or security issues.

I have one backport that might also be good in 3.6.1, it is already tested
heavily on 4.0 and 5.0 branches, so I see no problems. It improves
performance on MMapDirectory when you have lots of concurrency on opening
TermEnums/DocsEnums because it removes the sync bottleneck in
MMapIndexInput.clone(). Anything against a backport? See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4163

Uwe

-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org





 

-- 
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl



Re: Lucene 3.6.1 release starting this week

2012-07-16 Thread Chris Male
err sorry, I meant 4165.  I've committed the fix to 3x now.

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:

 You mean 4167?

 ** **

 -

 Uwe Schindler

 H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen

 http://www.thetaphi.de

 eMail: u...@thetaphi.de

 ** **

 *From:* Chris Male [mailto:gento...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Monday, July 16, 2012 1:45 PM
 *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
 *Subject:* Re: Lucene 3.6.1 release starting this week

 ** **

 Ah I want to do https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-416, I'll
 wrap it up now.

 On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:**
 **

 Hi,

 I wanted to kick-off the release process for Lucene 3.6.1 this week and
 would also be the RM. If you have any backports to be merged to 3.6 branch
 please do it today. If there are any urgent bugs that need to be fixed in
 3.6.1 speak up, this will likely be the last 3.x release unless there are
 heavy bugs or security issues.

 I have one backport that might also be good in 3.6.1, it is already tested
 heavily on 4.0 and 5.0 branches, so I see no problems. It improves
 performance on MMapDirectory when you have lots of concurrency on opening
 TermEnums/DocsEnums because it removes the sync bottleneck in
 MMapIndexInput.clone(). Anything against a backport? See
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4163

 Uwe

 -
 Uwe Schindler
 H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
 http://www.thetaphi.de
 eMail: u...@thetaphi.de



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



 

 ** **

 --
 Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl




-- 
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl