Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Henry,

Thank you very much for the clarification, It's my bad to misunderstand the
meanings of regression and feature.

We have not yet tried to compile the project with Java9 before, the issue
found by Patrick make me realize that the JDK9 has been GA released.

So we are fine with this release candidate, right? Thanks!

Hi Patrick,

I'm really sorry for the confusion.

Best.
Gary









On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I would argue this is not a blocker since the pom.xml define the target
> JVM:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/blob/master/pom.xml#L104
>
> Gary, when you said regression, did you mean it was working with Java9
> before and now it was not?
> If it has not been working with Java9 from beginning this should not be
> release blocker.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Johnu <johnugeorge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick,
> > Thanks for the reply. Currently,Mnemonic doesn't support
> > Java 9 due to incompatible interface changes. We verified the release
> with
> > Java8. (Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-401)  If
> it
> > is a blocker, I will cancel the rc vote. Else, we will fix it in the next
> > release.  Please let us know.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Johnu
> >
> > On Nov 6, 2017 11:38 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Patrick,
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for the guidance and we will try to figure out how
> to
> > > fix this issue you found.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Gary.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ic. If it's a regression I would personally terminate the rc vote,
> fix
> > > it,
> > > > and then cut a new rc. But that's my personal preference, I don't
> > believe
> > > > there's any specific rule wrt this type of thing. Would suck for
> folks
> > > > using it certainly.
> > > >
> > > > Patrick
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Patrick,
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it is a regression, not a feature. Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Gary.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is this a feature or a regression?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Johnu <johnugeorge...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Patrick and other mentors,
> > > > > > >   Can you please vote for the release?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Johnu
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate
> this
> > > > issue
> > > > > > > > further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we
> fix
> > it
> > > > for
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could
> be a
> > > > > blocker
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > this release candidate? Thanks!.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Hunt <
> ph...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> $java -version
> > > > > > > >> java version "9.0.1"
> > > > > > > >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
> > > > > > > >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed
> mode)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > > g

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Amit and Atri,

The invitations have been sent to your mailbox, please accept to join our
channel #storage-class-memory. thanks.

Best,
Gary.


On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Atri Sharma <atri.j...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would like to participate as well
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi Avinash, Welcome to join us. please register in the-asf.slack.com and
> > join our channel #storage-class-memory as well, Thanks!
> >
> > Best
> > Gary.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Avinash Dongre <adon...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to participate in this as well.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Avinash
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please
> register on
> >> > https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel
> >> #storage-class-memory,
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
> >> > > mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to
> post
> >> > > major findings and summary on Apache mail list...
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> >> > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our
> workgroup.
> >> > the
> >> > >> > progress is
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
> >> > >> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this
> >> > Slack
> >> > >> > channel -  not yet but soon later
> >> > >> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
> >> > >> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory
> >> > resource
> >> > >> -
> >> > >> > trying but not guaranteed
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> >> > >> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can
> have a
> >> > >> > > discussion...
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah <
> hit...@apache.org>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> > > > Hello Gary,
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this
> workgroup
> >> (I
> >> > am
> >> > >> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling
> for
> >> > >> this)
> >> > >> > > where
> >> > >> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > thanks
> >> > >> > > > -- Hitesh
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> >> > ga...@apache.org
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and
> APIs
> >> > for
> >> > >> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> >> > >> please go
> >> > >> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup.
> Thanks!
> &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Avinash, Welcome to join us. please register in the-asf.slack.com and
join our channel #storage-class-memory as well, Thanks!

Best
Gary.

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Avinash Dongre <adon...@apache.org> wrote:

> I'd like to participate in this as well.
>
> Thanks
> Avinash
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please register on
> > https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel
> #storage-class-memory,
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
> > > mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post
> > > major findings and summary on Apache mail list...
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup.
> > the
> > >> > progress is
> > >> >
> > >> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
> > >> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this
> > Slack
> > >> > channel -  not yet but soon later
> > >> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
> > >> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory
> > resource
> > >> -
> > >> > trying but not guaranteed
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > >> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
> > >> > > discussion...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > Hello Gary,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup
> (I
> > am
> > >> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for
> > >> this)
> > >> > > where
> > >> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > thanks
> > >> > > > -- Hitesh
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs
> > for
> > >> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> > >> please go
> > >> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <
> > ddu...@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
> > >> common
> > >> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Debo
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > >> > > >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Patrick,

Thank you very much for the guidance and we will try to figure out how to
fix this issue you found.

Best,
Gary.




On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:

> ic. If it's a regression I would personally terminate the rc vote, fix it,
> and then cut a new rc. But that's my personal preference, I don't believe
> there's any specific rule wrt this type of thing. Would suck for folks
> using it certainly.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > I think it is a regression, not a feature. Thanks.
> >
> > Best,
> > Gary.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Is this a feature or a regression?
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Johnu <johnugeorge...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Patrick and other mentors,
> > > >   Can you please vote for the release?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Johnu
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate this
> issue
> > > > > further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we fix it
> for
> > > new
> > > > > JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could be a
> > blocker
> > > > for
> > > > > this release candidate? Thanks!.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> $java -version
> > > > >> java version "9.0.1"
> > > > >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
> > > > >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to compile?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > $java -version
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Best,
> > > > >> > Gary.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > > >> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:compile
> > > > >> > > (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation
> failure:
> > > > >> > > Compilation failure:
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> > > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > > >> > > [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> > > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George <
> jo...@apache.org
> > >
> >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate this issue
further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we fix it for new
JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could be a blocker for
this release candidate? Thanks!.

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:

> $java -version
> java version "9.0.1"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to compile?
> >
> > $java -version
> >
> > Best,
> > Gary.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
> > >
> > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:compile
> > > (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation failure:
> > > Compilation failure:
> > > [ERROR]
> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> > > [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> > > [ERROR]
> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> > > [ERROR]
> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> > > [ERROR]
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > > > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > > > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> > > >
> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> > at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
> items
> > > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> > The
> > > > please vote:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to compile?

$java -version

Best,
Gary.


On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:

> Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:compile
> (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation failure:
> Compilation failure:
> [ERROR]
> /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> error: cannot find symbol
> [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> [ERROR]
> /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> error: cannot find symbol
> [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> [ERROR]
> /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> error: cannot find symbol
> [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> [ERROR]
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> >
> > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> >
> > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> > please vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Henry

Our project has not yet graduated since Mnemonic was not on the agenda of
Oct. board meeting for some reasons,
but fortunately, our project would be evaluated in next board meeting.
Thanks!

Best,
Gary.


On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Henry Saputra 
wrote:

> I think Apache Mnemonic has gotten board approval to be top level project
> (TLP), right?
>
> This should be the first release as TLP instead.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> >
> > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> >
> > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> > please vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

+1, Thanks!

Best
Gary


On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please register on
https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel #storage-class-memory,
Thanks!



On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
> mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post
> major findings and summary on Apache mail list...
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. the
>> > progress is
>> >
>> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
>> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this Slack
>> > channel -  not yet but soon later
>> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
>> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory resource
>> -
>> > trying but not guaranteed
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
>> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
>> > > discussion...
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > Hello Gary,
>> > > >
>> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I am
>> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for
>> this)
>> > > where
>> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
>> > > >
>> > > > thanks
>> > > > -- Hitesh
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
>> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
>> please go
>> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
>> common
>> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Debo
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
>> > > >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
>> > > >> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
>> > > >> > >   - Delivering solid solution
>> > > >> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
>> > > >> > >   - Integrating one another
>> > > >> > >   - Coordinating the progress
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
>> > ga...@apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > >> Add ORC
>> > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
>> > > >> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
>> > > >> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
>> > > >> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
>> > > >> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
>> > > >> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
>> > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > >> With above p

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post
major findings and summary on Apache mail list...

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. the
> > progress is
> >
> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this Slack
> > channel -  not yet but soon later
> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory resource -
> > trying but not guaranteed
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
> > > discussion...
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > Hello Gary,
> > > >
> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I am
> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for this)
> > > where
> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > -- Hitesh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, please
> go
> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards common
> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Debo
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > > >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > > >> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > > >> > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > > >> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > > >> > >   - Integrating one another
> > > >> > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Add ORC
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > > >> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > > >> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > > >> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > > >> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > > >> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
> oriented
> > > >> > *Distributed
> > > >> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed
> Data
> > > >> Store,
> > > >> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> > Model*
> > > for
> > > >> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
> querying,
> > > >> > >> processing, and analyt

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Add *ActiveMQ and Geode*

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
   - *Hive/LLAP *represented by *Gopal Vijayaraghavan*
   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
   - *RocketMQ  *represented by *Von Gosling*
   - *ActiveMQ *represented by *Clebert Suconic*
   - *Geode *represented by *Swapnil Bawaskar*
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
Columnar Storage, **Live Long And Process, Distributed Messaging and
Streaming, High Performance Data Management, **Durable Object Model,
Durable Computing Model* for new generation high-performance applications,
e.g. data querying, processing, and analytics.

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <
swapnil.bawas...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would be happy to represent Apache Geode.
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) <dedu...@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> > BTW should we name this group “Apache Durable Computing Initiative”?
> >
> > debo
> >
> > On 10/24/17, 11:18 AM, "Debo Dutta (dedutta)" <dedu...@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the moment we have the workgroup mailer setup, will send out a
> > DISCUSS thread.
> >
> > debo
> >
> > On 10/24/17, 10:14 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs
> for
> > storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> > please go
> > ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <
> ddu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
> > common
> > > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > >
> > > Debo
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > > >
> > > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > > >   - Integrating one another
> > > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Add ORC
> > > >>
> > > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > > >>
> > > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
> > oriented
> > > *Distributed
> >     > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed
> > Data Store,
> > > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> > Model* for
> > > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
> > querying,
> > > >> processing, and analytics.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <
> > owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I can represent ORC within the group.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> .. Owen
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hi all,
> &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Add *Hive/LLAP and RocketMQ*

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
   - *Hive/LLAP *represented by *Gopal Vijayaraghavan*
   - *RocketMQ  *represented by *Von Gosling*
   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
Columnar Storage, **Live Long And Process, Distributed Messaging and
Streaming, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for new
generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying, processing,
and analytics.

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Von Gosling <vongosl...@apache.org> wrote:

> I'm happy to represent Apache RocketMQ on this  storage collaboration
> effort. This is a very key in low latency messaging.
>
> Best Regards,
> Von Gosling
>
>
>
> > 在 2017年10月20日，02:55，Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> 写道：
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile
> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
> change
> > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> happened
> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> possible, I
> > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> collaboration
> > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> > technology-oriented projects.
> >
> > Best.
> > Gary.
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Add ORC

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for new
generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying, processing,
and analytics.


On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I can represent ORC within the group.
>
> .. Owen
>
> > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile
> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
> change
> > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> happened
> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> possible, I
> > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> collaboration
> > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> > technology-oriented projects.
> >
> > Best.
> > Gary.
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

It is wonderful, as of now, we have the following projects and their
communities.

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we can cover Storage-class memory oriented Database,
KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Durable Object Model, Durable
Computing Model for new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
querying, processing, and analytics.


On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.j...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +1..Am there to represent Apache HBase.
> >
> > -Anoop-
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I'm happy to represent Apache Arrow on this. This is very much in line
> >> with our focus on zero-copy / memory-mapped data access of structured
> >> data sets and cache-efficient memory layout.
> >>
> >> - Wes
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> This is a great idea. Storage class memory will have a big impact on
> many of the Apache projects.
> >>>
> >>> Debo
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> >>>> advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
> >>>> because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity
> non-volatile
> >>>> memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
> change
> >>>> the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> happened
> >>>> when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> possible, I
> >>>> advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> collaboration
> >>>> and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> >>>> technology-oriented projects.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best.
> >>>> Gary.
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> l'apprenant
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Our graduation approval has been postponed

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi all,

For some reason, our resolution was not added to the agenda of this board
meeting, fortunately, one of our mentor Andrew Purtell, he will help us to
make sure our resolution become one of agenda of next board meeting held on 15
November 2017, Thanks.

Best.
Gary

Fwd: Crail project looking for mentors

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

I forward this email thread for discussion if any. Thanks!


-- Forwarded message --
From: Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
Date: Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: Crail project looking for mentors
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org


I'm a PPMC at Mnemonic project,  we got interested in this project because
our project is working on Ceph memory service for our Durable object model
(DOM) and Durable computing model (DCM). Crail could be a promising and
more efficient solution for us to take fully advantage of the RDMA
capabilities for durable object exchange across nodes in a cluster. I'm
looking forward to integrating Crail soon...



On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:18 PM, patrick stuedi <pstu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Efficient asynchronous I/O is one key aspect in Crail, because we're
> directly leveraging the asynchronous hardware interfaces of NVMe,
> RDMA, etc and export them at the distributed systems level. If you
> have experience with libaio and similar interfaces then that's
> definitely related.. Crail is a distributed storage system designed
> for high-performance storage and networking hardware, tailored to
> support data processing in new data center deployments. If you're
> interested in becoming a mentor please let us know...
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Clebert Suconic
> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have written a libaio wrapper in java.  For artemis and high
> performance
> > sync IOs.
> >
> >
> > Would that work be related sim any form ?
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:37 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:58 PM, patrick stuedi <pstu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > The Crail project (www.crail.io) is looking for additional mentors
> >> > helping with the Apache incubator process. A draft of the Crail
> >> > incubator proposal is available here:
> >> >
> >> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CrailProposal
> >> >
> >> > If you're interested and you're eligible to be a mentor please let us
> >> know!
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> We are still looking for one more mentor before starting the formal vote
> >> for Crail.
> >>
> >> Any volunteers ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Luciano Resende
> >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

[ANNOUNCE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi, everyone,

Our project has passed the recommendation vote in general@incubator list.
and the resolution has been submitted to Apache board for final approval.
that will happen in next board meeting on 18 October 2017

I appreciate all you've done for our community and this project!

Cheers!
Gary


-- Forwarded message --
From: Gang Wang 
Date: Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:50 PM
Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org


Hi, PPMC and everyone,

This vote to graduate Apache Mnemonic to a top-level project has passed with
7 binding +1s and no -1s:

Binding Votes:
==
Uma Maheswara Rao G
Luke Han
James R. Taylor
Julian Hyde
Henry Saputra
Patrick D. Hunt
P. Taylor Goetz

Non-Binding Votes:
==
Johnu George
Debojyoti Dutta
Yanhui Zhao
Pierre Smits
Gang Wang
Devaraj K
Liang Chen
Rakesh Radhakrishnan
Ganhua Zhang
Wen Tong
Tsuyoshi Ozawa
Paley Shen

Thank you, everyone, for voting! We will submit the resolution to the board.

With appreciation,
Gary on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community

[ANNOUNCE] Get Started Page Added

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

We have prepared the Get Started page for our project, please visit the
following link to check it out

http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/getstarted.html

In this page, we will add more code snippets to guide the user to learn how
to make use of Mnemonic.

To contribute your guide code snippets, you can submit yours with tooltips
markup e.g.

In Java,

m_act = new NonVolatileMemAllocator(
*/*tooltip,a memory service instance*/*
Utils.getNonVolatileMemoryAllocatorService("pmalloc")*/*tooltip*/*,
*/*tooltip,the capacity*/*1024 * 1024 * 1024L*/*tooltip*/*,
*/*tooltip,an uri associated with memory service*/"*
./pobj_hashmaps.dat"*/*tooltip*/,*
*/*tooltip,open a new memory space*/*true*/*tooltip*/*);


The effect on this markup can be found in Get Started page, thanks!

Cheers

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating released

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Thank you for releasing the mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating.


On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Johnu George  wrote:

> The Apache Mnemonic community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
> Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating.
>
> Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library, it's
> proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model and
> durable computing model that bring several advantages to significantly
> improve the performance of massive real-time data processing/analytic.
> developers are able to use this library to design their cache-less and
> SerDe-less high performance applications.
>
> The release is available for download at:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/
> mnemonic/0.9.0-incubating
>
> The full changelog is available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/
> mnemonic/0.9.0-incubating/CHANGES.txt
>
> We would like to thank all contributors who made this release possible!
>

Re: Learn from Equifax breach

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Sure and please also point out which need to be fixed if possible, Thanks!

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Gary for the insightful thread. Maybe run our code base against a
> threat ID tool?
>
> Debo
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 13, 2017, at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > One of our contributors told me that this breach is related to a
> > serialized object that Mnemonic has tried to avoid as below
> >
> > "However, “for either vulnerability, the process is basically the same.
> The
> > attacker sends a specific HTTP request containing some special syntax.
> In
> > one case, an OGNL expression.  In the other, a serialized object,” he
> said
> > in comments emailed to SC Media. “The Equifax Struts application would
> > receive this request, and get tricked into executing operating system
> > commands.”
> >
> > The attacker can then “use these to take over the entire box – do
> anything
> > the application can do,” Williams said. “So, they probably stole the
> > database credentials out of the application, ran some queries, and then
> > exfiltrated the data to some server they control on the internet.”"
> >
> > https://www.scmagazine.com/apache-struts-vulnerability-
> likely-behind-equifax-breach-congress-launches-probes/article/687955/
> >
> > IMHO, from the technical view point, Mnemonic has nothing about how to
> > interact with UI layer. Theoretically, Mnemonic's linked durable objects
> > could be transferred between different layers to avoid SerDe, user code
> > makes use of those durable object for their own business logics.
> >
> > Regarding the Durable Query Model (DQM), it has not yet been fully
> > implemented, we need to consider any possible injection and provide the
> > proper measure to prevent potential breaches.
> >
> > Thanks!
>

Learn from Equifax breach

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

One of our contributors told me that this breach is related to a
serialized object that Mnemonic has tried to avoid as below

"However, “for either vulnerability, the process is basically the same. The
attacker sends a specific HTTP request containing some special syntax.  In
one case, an OGNL expression.  In the other, a serialized object,” he said
in comments emailed to SC Media. “The Equifax Struts application would
receive this request, and get tricked into executing operating system
commands.”

The attacker can then “use these to take over the entire box – do anything
the application can do,” Williams said. “So, they probably stole the
database credentials out of the application, ran some queries, and then
exfiltrated the data to some server they control on the internet.”"

https://www.scmagazine.com/apache-struts-vulnerability-likely-behind-equifax-breach-congress-launches-probes/article/687955/

IMHO, from the technical view point, Mnemonic has nothing about how to
interact with UI layer. Theoretically, Mnemonic's linked durable objects
could be transferred between different layers to avoid SerDe, user code
makes use of those durable object for their own business logics.

Regarding the Durable Query Model (DQM), it has not yet been fully
implemented, we need to consider any possible injection and provide the
proper measure to prevent potential breaches.

Thanks!

[DISCUSS] Avoiding Merge Commits in Git

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

As of now, we are using the Github PRs to merge changes, we try to keep the
Git history clean and avoid merge commit to pollute our code history while
upstreaming new commits to Apache repo. the blog states why and how to
avoid merge commits very clearly.

http://www.kerrybuckley.org/2008/06/18/avoiding-merge-commits-in-git/

The problem is if we received multiple pending PRs, we have to notify
all owners of remaining PRs to rebase their commits every time when a PR
commit got upstreamed.

Any idea about how to avoid merge commits while not bother PR owners to
rebase their changes once their PR get submitted?

Thanks!

Vote Process for Graduate Mnemonic to TLP expired on dev@list here

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Wei and Wen,

Please vote on general@incubator instead of dev@list here, because the
voting process for graduation on dev@list has been concluded.

if you have not yet subscribed the general@incubator list, please send
email to the following email address to subscribe it first.
general-subscr...@incubator.apache.org
and then waiting for the Mnemonic graduation vote thread send to your
mailbox.

Please note that the email subject in question is "[VOTE] Graduate Apache
Mnemonic project from Incubator" on general@incubator list. Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary.


On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Wen Tong <pures...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Wei HE <hevei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 (:))
> >
> > Wei HE
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:04 PM James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1. Nice work, everyone!
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Gangumalla, Uma <
> >> > uma.ganguma...@intel.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > +1
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Uma
> >> > >
> >> > > On 9/7/17, 3:00 PM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >Please vote on this community resolution to seek graduation to TLP
> for
> >> > > >Mnemonic.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >This vote will be open for ~72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> >> > least
> >> > > >three +1 Apache Mnemonic PPMC votes are cast.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >[ ] +1 Proceed with graduation process
> >> > > >[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> >> > > >[ ] -1 Do not proceed yet becauseŠ
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the technical documentation

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Great!, Thank you very much for the support, could you please also help to
list some work items in order so we can create JIRA ticket accordingly to
make it done.

>From Niall's feedback, I think there are at least 3 following items need to
be resolved.

1) add detailed description to sample code snippets shown in web page

2) simplify the sample codes shown in front page

3) use descriptive names for sample codes

please add more to this list, thanks!

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Yanhui ZHAO <yanhui.z...@outlook.com>
wrote:

> Hi Gary
>
> I think it is a great point. I can work with you and other devs who are
> interested to draft the documentation.
>
> A well written document will help devs like me to have a clear picture on
> roadmap, design, and technical details of our project. It also helps to
> attract other devs like Niall from the community to contribute to our
> project.
>
> Thanks
>
> Yanhui
> ____
> From: Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 10:10 AM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Improve the technical documentation
>
> As Niall mentioned suggestion and issues on MNEMONIC-360
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-360>, I think we need put
> more efforts on technical documentation after the release of
> 0.9.0-incubating. so I create this DISCUSS thread for discussion about
> where and how to improve it. please join us and help us to prioritize the
> next work items. Thanks!
>

[DISCUSS] Improve the technical documentation

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

As Niall mentioned suggestion and issues on MNEMONIC-360
, I think we need put
more efforts on technical documentation after the release of
0.9.0-incubating. so I create this DISCUSS thread for discussion about
where and how to improve it. please join us and help us to prioritize the
next work items. Thanks!

[VOTE] Graduate Mnemonic to TLP

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Please vote on this community resolution to seek graduation to TLP for
Mnemonic.

This vote will be open for ~72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
three +1 Apache Mnemonic PPMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Proceed with graduation process
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
[ ] -1 Do not proceed yet because…

Fwd: Apache Arrow at JupyterCon

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

I forward this discussion thread here for your information, please join if
you are also interested in this topic.


-- Forwarded message --
From: Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org>
Date: Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: Apache Arrow at JupyterCon
To: d...@arrow.apache.org


This is a interesting problem but also pretty complex. Arrow's Java memory
management model is complex on purpose (see
https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/java/memory/
src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/memory/README.md
for more info). It is designed to reserve and share memory in multiple
hierarchical domains (with reservations and limits) while providing
transfer semantics across those domains with minimal contention and
locking. An opaque (and potentially easy starting point would be to
optionally allow AllocationManager to use something other than the
PooledByteBufAllocatorL and UnsafeDirectLittleEndian for memory allocation.
This wouldn't expose movement between different memory tiers but that could
be managed underneath the Arrow system. At the end of the day, the whole
hierarchy is basically a collection of memory addresses, accounting and
reference counting.

A phase two could be a proposal which allows movement between memory
domains and could be generified across systems like Mnemonic as well
GPU/Device memory domains.


On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Gary, that is helpful context. In light if this, it might be
> worth writing some kind of a proposal for how to enable the Java
> vector classes to be backed by some other kind of byte buffers. It
> might be that an alternative version of portions of the Arrow Java
> library (i.e. decoupled from Netty) might need to be created.
>
> If it cannot be reconciled with the Netty AbstractByteBuf class then
> this would be useful to know so that Arrow developers can plan
> accordingly for the future.
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The ArrowBuf is inherited from AbstractByteBuf, the AbstractByteBuf is
> > defined in the Netty library, it does more like a memory pool not a pure
> > buffer so that's why ArrowBuf is not backed by ByteBuffer as now.
> >
> > I have ever tried to make ArrowBuf build on top of DurableBuffer of
> > Mnemonic, but looks it is not very easy to decouple the refcount from
> other
> > parts because the lifecycle of DurableBuffer could also be managed by
> > JVM automatically instead of using refcount.
> >
> > I still want to figure out how gracefully to migrate the backend of
> > ArrowBuf from Netty to Mnemonic. In addition, DurableBuffer could bring
> > other benefits for Arrow e.g. persistent on any kind of memory service
> that
> > could make use of SSD, NVMe, Memory and NAS and more. in this way, Arrow
> is
> > able to break through the capacity limitation of system memory, avoid
the
> > SerDe for storage and link other durable objects with ease and etc.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> It should be possible to have an ArrowBuf backed by a
> >> MappedByteBuffer. Anyone reading is welcome to dig in and write a
> >> patch for this.
> >>
> >> Semantically this is what we have done in C++ -- a memory map inherits
> >> from arrow::Buffer, so we can slice and dice a memory map as we would
> >> any other Buffer object
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/
> arrow/io/file.cc#L501
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Gonzalo Ortiz Jaureguizar
> >> <golthir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > This is a very interesting feature. It's very surprising that there
> is no
> >> > ByteBuffer implementation backed on a MappedByteBuffer. As far as I
> >> > understand, it should be trivial to implement (maybe not to pool) as
> >> > usually ByteBuf is backed on a ByteBuffer and MappedByteBuffer
extends
> >> > that. But I didn't find implementations when I goggled for it.
> >> >
> >> > 2017-09-03 16:12 GMT+02:00 Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> >> I think ideally we would have a Java interface that would support
all
> >> of:
> >> >>
> >> >> - Memory mapped files
> >> >> - Anonymous shared memory segments (e.g. POSIX shm)
> >> >> - NVM / Mnemonic
> >> >>
> >> >> We already have the ability to do zero-copy reads from buffer-like
> >> >> objects in C++ and IO interfaces that support zero copy (like memory
> >> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Let me summarize the discussion on graduation, Please refer to this email
thread for details.

1) We have completed the website of Mnemonic that is required before
graduation
http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/

2) We have filled the Apache project maturity assessment for Mnemonic and
fixed all gaps that would be helpful for graduation
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10LKTjPMceV4s4MrSRIA9L8pg7jLFp-ec-TmW96mZbXM/edit?usp=sharing

3) Many contributed have voted +1s for this graduation

Please add yours if any before we are starting graduation votes, Thanks!

Cheers
Gary



On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi John, Mentors and PPMCs
>
> Looks no new issues crop up for a few days, and many contributors are
> positive and voted +1s for graduation, no negative from our community, so I
> think this discussion could be settled down today and proceed to collect
> votes from our community and IPMCs for graduation, please guide us if any
> missing, misunderstanding and suggestion, Thanks!
>
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi John, Mentors and PPMCs
>>
>> Looks we have resolved all the issues that you have pointed out for
>> graduation, meanwhile, there are more contributors +1 for our project's
>> graduation so, could we start the community graduation vote and IPMC
>> graduation vote according to the following chart extracted from
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community ? Thanks!
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> Very truly yours
>> Gary
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Wen Tong <pures...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 support for graduation.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Wei HE <hevei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > +1 support for graduation.
>>> >
>>> > Wei HE
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Yes, I also totally agree this and we will try our best for the
>>> readiness
>>> >> for the graduation.
>>> >>
>>> >> For the suggestion that John advised, we have prepared the following
>>> >> comments for your review, Thanks!
>>> >>
>>> >> *CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me
>>> to
>>> >> your source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're
>>> on
>>> >> gitbox, the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.*
>>> >>
>>> >> The github link has been removed from CD20 and using
>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ as the link of
>>> website. we
>>> >> also create ticket MNEMONIC-355 (resolved) to remove Github link from
>>> >> navigator menu on website.
>>> >>
>>> >> *CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item,
>>> from
>>> >> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest"
>>> which
>>> >> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.*
>>> >>
>>> >> Yes, we will fix it through Apache Jira MNEMONIC-353(reviewed) and
>>> >> MNEMONIC-356(WIP)
>>> >>
>>> >> *CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from
>>> committers
>>> >> or from contributors.  If I take
>>> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60
>>> >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60> as an
>>> example, the
>>> >> commit message says nothing about provenance of the source code.*
>>> >>
>>> >> We have requested to revoke all stalled PRs, and all commit messages
>>> must
>>> >> contain Apache JIRA number and title.
>>> >>
>>> >> *LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
>>> >> *most*)*
>>> >>
>>> >> Yes we will correct it with "The files in the project source
>>> repository
>>> >> have appropriate headers", The files under target/ that generated by
>>> mvn
>>> >> building process would be excluded and all other project files have
>>> been
>>> >> properly licensed and guarded by RAT plugin.
>>> >>
>>> >> *RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apach

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John, Mentors and PPMCs

Looks no new issues crop up for a few days, and many contributors are
positive and voted +1s for graduation, no negative from our community, so I
think this discussion could be settled down today and proceed to collect
votes from our community and IPMCs for graduation, please guide us if any
missing, misunderstanding and suggestion, Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary


On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi John, Mentors and PPMCs
>
> Looks we have resolved all the issues that you have pointed out for
> graduation, meanwhile, there are more contributors +1 for our project's
> graduation so, could we start the community graduation vote and IPMC
> graduation vote according to the following chart extracted from
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community ? Thanks!
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Wen Tong <pures...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 support for graduation.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Wei HE <hevei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > +1 support for graduation.
>> >
>> > Wei HE
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Yes, I also totally agree this and we will try our best for the
>> readiness
>> >> for the graduation.
>> >>
>> >> For the suggestion that John advised, we have prepared the following
>> >> comments for your review, Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> *CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me to
>> >> your source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're on
>> >> gitbox, the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.*
>> >>
>> >> The github link has been removed from CD20 and using
>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ as the link of website.
>> we
>> >> also create ticket MNEMONIC-355 (resolved) to remove Github link from
>> >> navigator menu on website.
>> >>
>> >> *CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item,
>> from
>> >> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest"
>> which
>> >> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.*
>> >>
>> >> Yes, we will fix it through Apache Jira MNEMONIC-353(reviewed) and
>> >> MNEMONIC-356(WIP)
>> >>
>> >> *CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from
>> committers
>> >> or from contributors.  If I take
>> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60
>> >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60> as an example,
>> the
>> >> commit message says nothing about provenance of the source code.*
>> >>
>> >> We have requested to revoke all stalled PRs, and all commit messages
>> must
>> >> contain Apache JIRA number and title.
>> >>
>> >> *LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
>> >> *most*)*
>> >>
>> >> Yes we will correct it with "The files in the project source repository
>> >> have appropriate headers", The files under target/ that generated by
>> mvn
>> >> building process would be excluded and all other project files have
>> been
>> >> properly licensed and guarded by RAT plugin.
>> >>
>> >> *RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/
>> >> <http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/> but that doesn't include
>> any
>> >> download links.  http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/
>> >> <http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/> does include
>> download
>> >> links to the proper release mirrors.*
>> >>
>> >> That has been corrected by replacing it with the link
>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/
>> >>
>> >> *RE20 - You mention non-PMC members in the vote (PPMC).*
>> >>
>> >> Yes, we started with the community vote for releasing and the result
>> >> explicitly shows binding and non-binding votes.
>> >>
>> >> *RE30 - Again, not using mirror.*
>> >>
>> >> Looks no mirror link in this field.
>> >>
>> >> *RE40 - Correct answer would be "NO. We do not distribute binary
>> >> releases."*

Re: Mnemonic board report is due.

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

We have submitted the board report as below for your review and approval,
Thanks!

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2017

Very truly yours,
Gary.


On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Gary Wong  wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
>
> Thank you for reminding us, we will get it done today.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Patrick Hunt  wrote:
>
>> Hi folks, the board report is due tomorrow. Please get it submitted asap.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

+1 build pass, all test cases pass, no major bugs pending.

Very truly yours
Gary


On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Johnu  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.9.0-incubating, release candidate rc2. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 9.0-incubating-rc2/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic
> .git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.9.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 9861eb1e80edf46f600c3c5dd7f7e08255b278ba:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=
> 9861eb1e80edf46f600c3c5dd7f7e08255b278ba
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 9.0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

le.  I can give you some feedback on the APMM
> >> assessment, but I'll point out that I'm not a fan of this form and
> >> completing this form is not a requirement for graduation.
> >>
> >> So please, when reviewing the below list, understand that completing
> this
> >> is not a requirement for graduation.  Even then, podlings who think they
> >> pass it may be missing things.
> >>
> >> CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me to
> >> your
> >> source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're on
> gitbox,
> >> the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.
> >>
> >> CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item,
> from
> >> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest"
> which
> >> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.
> >>
> >> CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from
> committers
> >> or from contributors.  If I take
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60 as an example, the
> >> commit message says nothing about provenance of the source code.
> >>
> >> LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
> >> *most*)
> >>
> >> RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/ but that
> >> doesn't include any download links.
> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/ does include download
> >> links
> >> to the proper release mirrors.
> >>
> >> RE20 - You mention non-PMC members in the vote (PPMC).
> >>
> >> RE30 - Again, not using mirror.
> >>
> >> RE40 - Correct answer would be "NO. We do not distribute binary
> releases."
> >>
> >> RE50 - Your release process neglects deleting old artifacts.
> >>
> >> QU10 - Code quality is more than bug reports.  You may want to use
> >> linters,
> >> sonar, etc.
> >>
> >> QU20 - This is only achievable if you've had a security vulnerability
> >> reported.  If you haven't had one reported, there's no way to confirm
> >> this.
> >>
> >> QU50 - I see that MNEMONIC-203/217 have been open for around 6 months.
> >>
> >> CO10 - Github shows two pull requests open without any commentary or
> >> questions from the project's committers.  Why is that?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:00 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi John, Our Mentors and PPMCs
> >> >
> >> > We have prepared Apache Maturity checklist for your evaluation, please
> >> > guide us to graduate our project, thanks.
> >> >
> >> > All comments and suggestions are welcome!
> >> >
> >> > Cheers!
> >> > Gary
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi John
> >> >>
> >> >> Fixed it, Thank you for reminding me
> >> >>
> >> >> Very truly yours
> >> >> Gary
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:39 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndam...@apache.org
> >> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Please take a look at
> >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Hi John
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> This issue has been fixed please refresh your browser and then
> review
> >> >>>> it, Thanks!
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Very truly yours
> >> >>>> Gary
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Hi John
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it out,
> >> we
> >> >>>>> wil

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John

Thank you very much for the careful review and guidance, it is very helpful
and informative, we will follow up and fix all of the issues that you
pointed out for us, Thanks again!

Very truly yours
Gary


On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 7:50 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> So first, I'll say its always great to see a podling aim to graduate.  Its
> not up to me to measure whether the podling has been successful or not, but
> instead the IPMC as a whole.  I can give you some feedback on the APMM
> assessment, but I'll point out that I'm not a fan of this form and
> completing this form is not a requirement for graduation.
>
> So please, when reviewing the below list, understand that completing this
> is not a requirement for graduation.  Even then, podlings who think they
> pass it may be missing things.
>
> CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me to
> your source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're on
> gitbox, the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.
>
> CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item, from
> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest" which
> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.
>
> CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from committers
> or from contributors.  If I take https://github.com/
> apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60 as an example, the commit message says
> nothing about provenance of the source code.
>
> LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
> *most*)
>
> RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/ but that
> doesn't include any download links.  http://mnemonic.incubator.
> apache.org/downloads/ does include download links to the proper release
> mirrors.
>
> RE20 - You mention non-PMC members in the vote (PPMC).
>
> RE30 - Again, not using mirror.
>
> RE40 - Correct answer would be "NO. We do not distribute binary releases."
>
> RE50 - Your release process neglects deleting old artifacts.
>
> QU10 - Code quality is more than bug reports.  You may want to use
> linters, sonar, etc.
>
> QU20 - This is only achievable if you've had a security vulnerability
> reported.  If you haven't had one reported, there's no way to confirm this.
>
> QU50 - I see that MNEMONIC-203/217 have been open for around 6 months.
>
> CO10 - Github shows two pull requests open without any commentary or
> questions from the project's committers.  Why is that?
>
> Regards,
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:00 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi John, Our Mentors and PPMCs
>>
>> We have prepared Apache Maturity checklist for your evaluation, please
>> guide us to graduate our project, thanks.
>>
>> All comments and suggestions are welcome!
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John
>>>
>>> Fixed it, Thank you for reminding me
>>>
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:39 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please take a look at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/
>>>> mnemonic/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi John
>>>>>
>>>>> This issue has been fixed please refresh your browser and then review
>>>>> it, Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi John
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it out, we
>>>>>> will correct this according to your guidance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - You're linking directly to your u

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John, Our Mentors and PPMCs

We have prepared Apache Maturity checklist for your evaluation, please
guide us to graduate our project, thanks.

All comments and suggestions are welcome!

Cheers!
Gary


On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi John
>
> Fixed it, Thank you for reminding me
>
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:39 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Please take a look at https://dist.apache.org/rep
>> os/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John
>>>
>>> This issue has been fixed please refresh your browser and then review
>>> it, Thanks!
>>>
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi John
>>>>
>>>> I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it out, we
>>>> will correct this according to your guidance.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Very truly yours
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
>>>>>
>>>>> - You're linking directly to your un-mirrored artifacts, but you
>>>>> should be linking to your mirrored artifacts.
>>>>> - You have not cleaned up your old releases, your old releases should
>>>>> be archived.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now here's the catch - we require mirroring but I can't find anything
>>>>> saying what the mirroring URL is.  The format is going to be
>>>>> http://apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mnemonic and you'll want
>>>>> to grab your specific version from there.
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Download menu item has been added to the navigator in home page,
>>>>>> Please refresh your browser to review it, Thank you very much for the
>>>>>> suggestion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can download all versions of the package from Apache
>>>>>>> distribution site that is linked from the following web page
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated for
>>>>>>> downloading the latest one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament <
>>>>>>> johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Uma
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review,
>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for the guidance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>&

Re: MNEMONIC-349 do we need to show previous release manage in the website?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Wen Tong

How about showing all release manager in order and mark the current release
manager with an asterisk suffix? Thanks!

Very truly yours.
Gary



On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Wen Tong  wrote:

> HI Developers:
>   To make corrections, Johnu is our new release manager, but still
> want your options whether we should mention the ex-release manager's
> name on the updated page?
>   Thanks!
> Wen
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Wen Tong  wrote:
> > HI Developers:
> >   Ohnu has become our new release manager, we will update the website
> > to reflect this change, do you want to mention the previous release
> > manager's name on the website? please let me know
> >   Thanks!
> > Wen
>

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop/Spark Integration pages published

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi, there are two pages about Apache Hadoop and Spark that has been
published on our project website as follows for your reference. Thanks!

http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/sparkusecases.html
http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/hadoopusecases.html

Very truly yours,
Gary.

[DISCUSS] Continuous Integration

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi, our project has right now supported the Travis and CircleCI, but both
of them cannot run all of the test cases on their platforms because our
test cases consume too much storage space and time that is limited by the
free plan, I also tried the codefresh they also limit 30 mins for testing.
please let me know if you can recommend more powerful and open-source
friendly service for Mnemonic CI.

Thanks!
Gary.

Re: Afs-site link not working on the mnemonic website

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Yes, it is a bug, please fire up a JIRA ticket for follow-up.  Thanks!

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Yanhui ZHAO  wrote:

> Dear Gary and devs
>
>
> I found the afs-site source link on mnemonic website not working. The link
> directs to: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/tree/asf-site,
> and the request returned a 404 error. Please review.
>
>
> Issue path: https://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ -> Source Code
> -> asf-site
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Yanhui
>
>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John

Fixed it, Thank you for reminding me

Very truly yours
Gary


On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:39 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Please take a look at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/
> mnemonic/
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi John
>>
>> This issue has been fixed please refresh your browser and then review it,
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Very truly yours
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John
>>>
>>> I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it out, we
>>> will correct this according to your guidance.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
>>>>
>>>> - You're linking directly to your un-mirrored artifacts, but you should
>>>> be linking to your mirrored artifacts.
>>>> - You have not cleaned up your old releases, your old releases should
>>>> be archived.
>>>>
>>>> Now here's the catch - we require mirroring but I can't find anything
>>>> saying what the mirroring URL is.  The format is going to be
>>>> http://apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mnemonic and you'll want to
>>>> grab your specific version from there.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>
>>>>> The Download menu item has been added to the navigator in home page,
>>>>> Please refresh your browser to review it, Thank you very much for the
>>>>> suggestion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can download all versions of the package from Apache
>>>>>> distribution site that is linked from the following web page
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated for
>>>>>> downloading the latest one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Uma
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review, Thank
>>>>>>>> you very much for the guidance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <
>>>>>>>> uma.ganguma...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
>>>>>>>>> What is the mentors call on this?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist to
>>>>>>>>> check where
>>>>>>>>> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that will help
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> assess better?
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John

I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it out, we will
correct this according to your guidance.

Thanks!
Very truly yours
Gary


On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
>
> - You're linking directly to your un-mirrored artifacts, but you should be
> linking to your mirrored artifacts.
> - You have not cleaned up your old releases, your old releases should be
> archived.
>
> Now here's the catch - we require mirroring but I can't find anything
> saying what the mirroring URL is.  The format is going to be
> http://apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mnemonic and you'll want to
> grab your specific version from there.
>
> John
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> The Download menu item has been added to the navigator in home page,
>> Please refresh your browser to review it, Thank you very much for the
>> suggestion.
>>
>> Very truly yours
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> You can download all versions of the package from Apache
>>> distribution site that is linked from the following web page
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>
>>> Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>>>
>>> We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated for
>>> downloading the latest one.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Uma
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review, Thank
>>>>> you very much for the guidance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <
>>>>> uma.ganguma...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
>>>>>> What is the mentors call on this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist to check
>>>>>> where
>>>>>> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that will help to
>>>>>> assess better?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Uma
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/16/17, 12:46 PM, "Johnu George" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >It seems that we are ready to be a top level project .  We have a
>>>>>> stable
>>>>>> >release and we work well as a apache community under the guidance of
>>>>>> our
>>>>>> >mentors.   Any thoughts?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> Dear John and Patrick,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Thank you for the guidance, we have completed the construction of
>>>>>> >>Mnemonic
>>>>>> >> Website recently according to your feedback, this Apache server
>>>>>> hosted
>>>>>> >> website will be kept up to date and maintained by dedicated
>>>>>> community
>>>>>> >> members.  we also have redirected the visitors from Github to our
>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>> >> server hosted website by providing a forward link in project
>>>>>> README.md
>>>>>> >> file. Please review it as follows.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
>>>>>> >>
>>>&

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John,

The Download menu item has been added to the navigator in home page, Please
refresh your browser to review it, Thank you very much for the suggestion.

Very truly yours
Gary


On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> You can download all versions of the package from Apache distribution site
> that is linked from the following web page
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>
> Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
>
> We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated for
> downloading the latest one.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Uma
>>>
>>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review, Thank you
>>> very much for the guidance.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <
>>> uma.ganguma...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
>>>> What is the mentors call on this?
>>>>
>>>> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist to check
>>>> where
>>>> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that will help to
>>>> assess better?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Uma
>>>>
>>>> On 8/16/17, 12:46 PM, "Johnu George" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >It seems that we are ready to be a top level project .  We have a
>>>> stable
>>>> >release and we work well as a apache community under the guidance of
>>>> our
>>>> >mentors.   Any thoughts?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Dear John and Patrick,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thank you for the guidance, we have completed the construction of
>>>> >>Mnemonic
>>>> >> Website recently according to your feedback, this Apache server
>>>> hosted
>>>> >> website will be kept up to date and maintained by dedicated community
>>>> >> members.  we also have redirected the visitors from Github to our
>>>> Apache
>>>> >> server hosted website by providing a forward link in project
>>>> README.md
>>>> >> file. Please review it as follows.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Note: the browser cache may cause unexpected view of this website,
>>>> >>please
>>>> >> clear browser cache or visit it in incognito mode.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Very truly yours.
>>>> >> Gary
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:04 PM, John D. Ament <
>>>> johndam...@apache.org>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > Hi patrick,
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > I recently raised an issue with the website to the team.  I
>>>> personally
>>>> >> > would like to see that fixed before a graduation.  Specifically
>>>> saying
>>>> >> that
>>>> >> > you need to learn it from github.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > John
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > > Given the recent work to bring on additional RMs (and increase
>>>> >> community
>>>> >> > > involvement in general) and clearly document release procedures I
>>>> >>feel
>>>> >> > that
>>>> >> > > my previous concerns have been largely addressed. If there is
>>>> >>interest
>>>> >> in
>>&g

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John,

You can download all versions of the package from Apache distribution site
that is linked from the following web page
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases

Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases

We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated for
downloading the latest one.

Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary


On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
wrote:

> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
>
> John
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Uma
>>
>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC review, Thank you
>> very much for the guidance.
>>
>> Very truly yours
>> Gary
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <
>> uma.ganguma...@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
>>> What is the mentors call on this?
>>>
>>> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist to check where
>>> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that will help to
>>> assess better?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Uma
>>>
>>> On 8/16/17, 12:46 PM, "Johnu George" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> >It seems that we are ready to be a top level project .  We have a stable
>>> >release and we work well as a apache community under the guidance of our
>>> >mentors.   Any thoughts?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Dear John and Patrick,
>>> >>
>>> >> Thank you for the guidance, we have completed the construction of
>>> >>Mnemonic
>>> >> Website recently according to your feedback, this Apache server hosted
>>> >> website will be kept up to date and maintained by dedicated community
>>> >> members.  we also have redirected the visitors from Github to our
>>> Apache
>>> >> server hosted website by providing a forward link in project README.md
>>> >> file. Please review it as follows.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
>>> >>
>>> >> Note: the browser cache may cause unexpected view of this website,
>>> >>please
>>> >> clear browser cache or visit it in incognito mode.
>>> >>
>>> >> Very truly yours.
>>> >> Gary
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:04 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org
>>> >
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hi patrick,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I recently raised an issue with the website to the team.  I
>>> personally
>>> >> > would like to see that fixed before a graduation.  Specifically
>>> saying
>>> >> that
>>> >> > you need to learn it from github.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > John
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > Given the recent work to bring on additional RMs (and increase
>>> >> community
>>> >> > > involvement in general) and clearly document release procedures I
>>> >>feel
>>> >> > that
>>> >> > > my previous concerns have been largely addressed. If there is
>>> >>interest
>>> >> in
>>> >> > > the community I would now be in favor, but up to you - do you feel
>>> >> you're
>>> >> > > ready to graduate at this point?
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Regards,
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Patrick
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <
>>> ddu...@apache.org>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >> On the diversity issue, we are trying to solve that with new
>>> >> committers
>>> >> > >> from different organizations. We have had cont

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

gt; that's a
> >> > >> great sign.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> There probably is room for more on list discussion, and yes the
> >> > committer
> >> > >> diversity isn't 100% there (I would be curious to see company
> >> > >> affiliations).
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I'll also point out that I sometimes ask these questions to
> podlings
> >> to
> >> > >> get
> >> > >> them to start thinking about graduation, not actually moving
> forward
> >> yet
> >> > >> due to $reasons.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:58 PM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Hi John, did you read my feedback on the most recent podling
> >> report?
> >> > Do
> >> > >> > you disagree? I don't believe this has changed significantly in
> the
> >> > past
> >> > >> > month/two. For example all releases have been done by a single
> >> person.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2017
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > As I've mentioned previously my only concerns at this point are
> >> around
> >> > >> > diversity.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Patrick
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org
> >> >
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >> Hi John and PPMCs
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> As John advised, our community and project mnemonic might be
> >> ready to
> >> > >> get
> >> > >> >> graduated, I'd like to start the following votes according to
> the
> >> > >> >> processes
> >> > >> >> of http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html with your
> >> > >> mentoring
> >> > >> >> and guidance if no objection today
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>- Community graduation vote
> >> > >> >>- IPMC recommendation vote
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Mnemonic Project Incubation Status
> >> > >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
> >> > >> >> Very truly yours
> >> > >> >> +Gary
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> >> ga...@apache.org>
> >> > >> >> wrote:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> > Hi John
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Thank you for starting this discussion.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Yes, our community is growing and continue to attract more
> >> people
> >> > to
> >> > >> >> join
> >> > >> >> > our community. Some industry users are aware of mnemonic and
> >> > already
> >> > >> get
> >> > >> >> > interested as i known.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Mnemonic is able to deliver unique values to their business
> so I
> >> > >> think
> >> > >> >> > that it is very important for us to get mnemonic graduated in
> >> time
> >> > if
> >> > >> >> > qualified.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > My 2 cents, looks nothing left for us to graduate Mnemonic,
> I'm
> >> > also
> >> > >> >> > looking forward to propose our project as Apache TLP.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Thanks!
> >> > >> >> > Very truly yours
> >> > >> >> > Gary
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > On Tuesday, May 2, 2017, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org
> >
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> >> > > Hi Mnemonic PPMC,
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > After looking at your recent release, your current growth
> and
> >> > well
> >> > >> >> > functioning PPMC, was wondering what was left for you guys to
> >> > >> graduate?
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> > > John
> >> > >> >> > >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Best regards,
> >> > >
> >> > >- Andy
> >> > >
> >> > > If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. -
> >> Raymond
> >> > > Teller (via Peter Watts)
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Fwd: [DISCUSS][UPDATE] Durable Query Model Proposal

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Devs.

The following ticket has been resolved, it defined the interface for
durable memory service based query engine, the user could use this low
level engine to query their durable objects in very efficient way, i.e.
using native code to filter out business durable objects from large
capacity of durable memory service. it also is flexible for the underlying
implementation of query engine since it does not assume how the query
engine works. so for example, memory service provider could simply make use
of SQLite as query engine or use customized one to avoid copying from
durable objects.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-326

Best Regards.
Gary.



-- Forwarded message --
Hi Devs.

Mnemonic has been evolved to be able to support more sophistical features,
so I propose to design and implement another new model for Mnemonic that is
Durable Query Model (DQM).

DQM would build on top of durable collection and memory services. DQM is
also able to take fully advantages of Durable Object Model (DOM) and
Durable Computing Model (DCM) for high performance querying and updating on
Massive Linked Business Object Sets (MLBOS).

DQM should allows to distribute and sharing all or part of MLBOS across
nodes even data centers without heavily depending on frameworks to burden
developers.

The following diagram shows the concept architecture of this new model


​
​
The applications could use 3 querying forms with hints to query their
MLBOS. the model should provide enough flexibility to accommodate best
Query Engines working on durable collections and durable memory services.

The Collection Query Engine is inspired by CQEngine
https://github.com/npgall/cqengine
Thanks Niall Gallagher for join us and help me to learn his project

There are lot we can create for DQM around durable models with various
platforms/technologies e.g. cloud, container, hpc.

The DQM would be next big feature for Mnemonic, Please review arch. any
idea, suggestion and feedback are warmly welcome, Thanks!

Very truly yours.
Gary

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Johnu <johnugeorge...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gary,
> I think, there is some error in the attachment. I am not able
> to view it.
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs.
> >
> > Mnemonic has been evolved to be able to support more sophistical
> features,
> > so I propose to design and implement another new model for Mnemonic that
> is
> > Durable Query Model (DQM).
> >
> > DQM would build on top of durable collection and memory services. DQM is
> > also able to take fully advantages of Durable Object Model (DOM) and
> > Durable Computing Model (DCM) for high performance querying and updating
> on
> > Massive Linked Business Object Sets (MLBOS).
> >
> > DQM should allows to distribute and sharing all or part of MLBOS across
> > nodes even data centers without heavily depending on frameworks to burden
> > developers.
> >
> > The following diagram shows the concept architecture of this new model
> >
> >
> > ​
> > The applications could use 3 querying forms with hints to query their
> > MLBOS. the model should provide enough flexibility to accommodate best
> > Query Engines working on durable collections and durable memory services.
> >
> > The Collection Query Engine is inspired by CQEngine
> > https://github.com/npgall/cqengine
> > Thanks Niall Gallagher for join us and help me to learn his project
> >
> > There are lot we can create for DQM around durable models with various
> > platforms/technologies e.g. cloud, container, hpc.
> >
> > The DQM would be next big feature for Mnemonic, Please review arch. any
> > idea, suggestion and feedback are warmly welcome, Thanks!
> >
> > Very truly yours.
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >
>

[ANNOUNCE] Use case diagrams of DCM and MS published

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Devs.

The diagrams about the use cases of durable computing model and memory
service that have been added to our official project website for your
review and reference, Thanks!

http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/dcmusecases.html

http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/msusecases.html

Very truly yours
Gary.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Use case diagrams of durable object model published

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Peili,

Please create a JIRA ticket for this issue so we can follow up, Thanks!

Very truly yours.
Gary


On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Paley Shen <paleyit...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Gary for the diagrams.
>
> Could you help to remove the dead link (
> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/usage.html) after
> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/build.html.
>
> Thanks,
> Peili
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs.
> >
> > The diagrams about the use cases of durable model have been added to our
> > official project website for your review and reference, Thanks!
> >
> > http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/domusecases.html
> >
> >
> > Very truly yours
> > Gary
> >
>

[ANNOUNCE] Use case diagrams of durable object model published

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Devs.

The diagrams about the use cases of durable model have been added to our
official project website for your review and reference, Thanks!

http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/docs/domusecases.html


Very truly yours
Gary

Re: [DISCUSS] Durable Query Model Proposal

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Johnu, Thanks for pointing it out, looks the Apache mail system removes
embedded picture from mail body, Let me attach it here for your reference,
Thank!


​


On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Johnu <johnugeorge...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gary,
> I think, there is some error in the attachment. I am not able
> to view it.
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs.
> >
> > Mnemonic has been evolved to be able to support more sophistical
> features,
> > so I propose to design and implement another new model for Mnemonic that
> is
> > Durable Query Model (DQM).
> >
> > DQM would build on top of durable collection and memory services. DQM is
> > also able to take fully advantages of Durable Object Model (DOM) and
> > Durable Computing Model (DCM) for high performance querying and updating
> on
> > Massive Linked Business Object Sets (MLBOS).
> >
> > DQM should allows to distribute and sharing all or part of MLBOS across
> > nodes even data centers without heavily depending on frameworks to burden
> > developers.
> >
> > The following diagram shows the concept architecture of this new model
> >
> >
> > ​
> > The applications could use 3 querying forms with hints to query their
> > MLBOS. the model should provide enough flexibility to accommodate best
> > Query Engines working on durable collections and durable memory services.
> >
> > The Collection Query Engine is inspired by CQEngine
> > https://github.com/npgall/cqengine
> > Thanks Niall Gallagher for join us and help me to learn his project
> >
> > There are lot we can create for DQM around durable models with various
> > platforms/technologies e.g. cloud, container, hpc.
> >
> > The DQM would be next big feature for Mnemonic, Please review arch. any
> > idea, suggestion and feedback are warmly welcome, Thanks!
> >
> > Very truly yours.
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: Status of website?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John,

Thank you very much for the review and mentoring, Yes, as Johnu mentioned,
we are going to update the website and to complete it as soon as possible,
you also remind us to use the new ASF branding that will be our priority
task, Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Johnu George (johnugeo) <
johnu...@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>  Thanks for reaching out. We have recently opened two Jiras to
> track the same issues. We are updating the website content now.
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu
>
> On 6/23/17, 8:11 AM, "John D. Ament"  wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Congratulations on your recent release.
>
> I wanted to reach out to you because your website has a couple of
> issues.
>
> 1. You're using the old incubator logo/feather.  When do you plan to
> update
> your ASF branding?
>
> 2. You include some text "This site is under construction... Please
> learn
> it from Github instead." when do you plan to update the website?
>
> John
>
>
>

Update the dates of work items in project status page

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Mentors and PPMCs

As Patrick advised, we have added the missing dates for work items in
project status page,
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html

Please review those updates that marked as blue font under "incubation work
items" category.

The blue font mark would be removed next week after correction if any.
Thanks!

Very truly yours
Gary

[DISCUSSION] Durable Streaming Model

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi folks,

After the study of current streaming frameworks e.g. Spark, Storm,
Gearpump, I think it might be feasible to take the advantage of Mnemonic
durable models to construct a lightwight streaming modules as a durable
near real-time massive object graph based analytics library.

Very truly yours.
Gary

[NEXTFEATURES] Apache Mnemonic (incubating)

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Folks

I believe that the Mnemonic are not only used to make objects just durable
with in-place computing to improve the performance but also to propose a
larger ecosystem for a set of brand new concept and model about how to
manage customer's business data in full life-cycle on top of existing
big-data ecosystem.

My $0.02, the next concept/model would be based on DOM  and towards the
binding with distribution, high reliability, messaging, cloud service and
etc.

Very welcome you can join to propose your ideas, Thanks!

Very truly yours.
+Gary.

Re: [MILESTONE] Apache Mnemonic (incubating) development

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Yes I agree with you, a quick start guide with some example code snippets
would be very helpful for user/developer to get into it, the website of
mnemonic also need re-organized to accommodate it.

For the benchmark, I'm looking forward to carrying out with you
collaboratively for publishing some more unbiased performance results.

Regarding more features, we could create a new thread to discuss about it,
there might be more potential values to our audience. Thanks!

Very truly yours.
+Gary



On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Johnu George (johnugeo) <johnu...@cisco.com
> wrote:

> Great! We should have a quick start guide with usage examples of sessions
> and durable structures.  For Spark and Hadoop, we can publish few benchmark
> results on real workloads.
>
> Looking forward to more feature suggestions
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu
>
> On 5/10/17, 4:39 PM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
>   With the support and contribution from you and our community,
> Mnemonic
> has evolved to integrate with Apache Hadoop© and Apache Spark©. it
> makes
> those two popular computing engines possible to get benefits from
> Durable
> Object Model and Durable Computing Model.
>
>   We continue to enrich features of Mnemonic and add new concept/model
> to
> Mnemonic. we also encourage you to propose ideas, suggestion for
> Mnemonic
> development and introduce more contributors to our community, Thanks!
>
> Very truly yours.
> +Gary.
>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John and PPMCs

As John advised, our community and project mnemonic might be ready to get
graduated, I'd like to start the following votes according to the processes
of http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html with your mentoring
and guidance if no objection today

   - Community graduation vote
   - IPMC recommendation vote

Mnemonic Project Incubation Status
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
Very truly yours
+Gary


On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi John
>
> Thank you for starting this discussion.
>
> Yes, our community is growing and continue to attract more people to join
> our community. Some industry users are aware of mnemonic and already get
> interested as i known.
>
> Mnemonic is able to deliver unique values to their business so I think
> that it is very important for us to get mnemonic graduated in time if
> qualified.
>
> My 2 cents, looks nothing left for us to graduate Mnemonic, I'm also
> looking forward to propose our project as Apache TLP.
>
> Thanks!
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 2, 2017, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi Mnemonic PPMC,
> >
> > After looking at your recent release, your current growth and well
> functioning PPMC, was wondering what was left for you guys to graduate?
> >
> > John
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi John

Thank you for starting this discussion.

Yes, our community is growing and continue to attract more people to join
our community. Some industry users are aware of mnemonic and already get
interested as i known.

Mnemonic is able to deliver unique values to their business so I think that
it is very important for us to get mnemonic graduated in time if qualified.

My 2 cents, looks nothing left for us to graduate Mnemonic, I'm also
looking forward to propose our project as Apache TLP.

Thanks!
Very truly yours
Gary


On Tuesday, May 2, 2017, John D. Ament  wrote:
> Hi Mnemonic PPMC,
>
> After looking at your recent release, your current growth and well
functioning PPMC, was wondering what was left for you guys to graduate?
>
> John
>

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi all,

After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
Apache
Mnemonic 0.7.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s, 2 non-binding +1s and
no 0 or -1.

* *Binding votes +1s: **
Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh)
Patrick Hunt (phunt)


** non-binding votes +1s: **Yanping Wang (yanpingw)
Gary (garyw)

*Project Members Role Info*http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/

**Thanks all**
Cheers
Gary

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi all,

After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
Apache
Mnemonic 0.6.0-incubating passed with 2 binding +1s, 2 non-binding +1s and
no 0 or -1.

* *Binding votes +1s: **
Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh)


** non-binding votes +1s: * *Yanping Wang (yanpingw)
Gary (garyw)

*Project Members Role Info*http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/
**Thanks all**
Cheers
Gary


On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.6.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 6.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.6.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 6.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>
>

[VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating [rc1]

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi all,

This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
0.6.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.

The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.6.0-incubating-rc1/src/

The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.6.0-incubating

The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS

KEYS file available:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS

For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.6.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt

The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
please vote:

[ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating

[ ] +0 no opinion

[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Very truly yours,
Gary

[Release] Preparing next release v0.6.0

[Gang(Gary) Wang]

Hi Folks,

We are preparing Mnemonic v0.6.0 RC1, Please let me know if any blocker to
this release, Thanks.

Very truly yours.
+Gary.