review denied: [Bug 122922] Writer crashes when deleting a row from a table after copying a text from a cell in the same row : [Attachment 81239] reverse the iteration to keep the iterators valid afte
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org has denied h...@apache.org h...@apache.org's request for review: Bug 122922: Writer crashes when deleting a row from a table after copying a text from a cell in the same row https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122922 Attachment 81239: reverse the iteration to keep the iterators valid after an erase https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=81239action=edit --- Additional Comments from Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org see bug 122902 for the root cause and an improved solution - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Introduction
Hello, everyone! My name is Jack Chin. I'm from China. I am very interested in openoffice and an old user of it. I am especially interested in 3d graphic part because I am going to do some serious job on these aspects. So how could I select a module and where to start, I am a little confused.
Re: Example of spreadsheet formula testing
On 16.08.2013 21:37, Regina Henschel wrote: Rob Weir schrieb: Moving this topic to its own thread. It should be possible to code a very thorough set of test cases in a spreadsheet, without using macros or anything fancy. Just careful reading of the ODF 1.2 specification and simple spreadsheet logic. Following the spec is not enough. For example, if the accuracy decreases from 14 digits to 7 digits, that is not covered by the spec. skip test case example description If we used an approach like this on the other spreadsheet functions, we could have a semi-automated test suite that would practically guarantee that Calc is free of calculations errors. Once we're written the test cases, a modest upfront investment modest? One function a day and you need more than a year. , it will benefit us with every release we do. Heck, it would benefit LibreOffice, Gnumeric, Calligra as well, maybe even Microsoft and Google, though they might already have such test cases defined internally. I see a problem in how such a test suite is made available. And how the results for a special release are collected. The problem with the current test cases is, that I do not know where they are, how they are to use and how to generate new ones. It is a closed book, only for insiders. An example of a test case where a formula (addition) is checked is in [1]. This file is clean and easy enough that it could be used as a template for more formula checks. [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/test/testuno/source/fvt/uno/sc/formula/AddtionOperatorInFormula.java The general topic on getting started with test automation is covered in [2]. [2] http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/test_automation_guide Anyone interesting in helping with this kind of test case development? There exist some files already in Bugzilla. I used to make test documents, when working on functions. I think, that they can be extended to work in a way, that a simple look on it will tell errors. But I have no ready collection on my PC and most will be already deleted from my PC in the meantime. One problem is, that comparisons with constants have to be written in a way, that they are independent from local. Eike has once corrected one of my test spreadsheets that way. Any ideas on how to fully automate this? ODF 1.2 is very strict, so we're not starting from a perfect score. But we should find an easy way to report on regressions. If you will automate this, you will need to develop a frame. But automation is not the total solution. Testing can be a way to bring user into the community. And tests have to cover different languages and scripts. I remember errors reported to LibreOffice, where a time calculation was wrong only in special locals. To extend a testing frame to consider this would be very expensive. There is no need to develop a new framework. Please check Zhe Liu's wonderful work on test automation that I referenced above [2] that is already available in our test/ directory. It is very powerful, clean and relatively easy to use. Herbert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: target.mk and default make target.
Thanks andre and herbert for the fast reply. genPO: .ROOT gives a circular dependency, which is understandable when I read startup genPO: .INIT works but does not make the application. genPO: $(TARGET) also does not work. Somehow replacing $(TARGET) might the the easiest solution. Why do I have a feeling of slowly getting to know the build system internally. Not sure I like that feeling, because the more I see the more I get an urge to change it :-) rgds jan I. On 19 August 2013 10:26, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote: Hi Jan, On 19.08.2013 09:39, janI wrote: I am trying to find the default target for the build process. In any directory e.g. l10ntools, we can run build which calls dmake without parameters. Nearly all makefile.mk includes target.mk, where all target rules seems to be defined. The de facto standard is to have all: defined, but thats not defined (neither is default:). what is the default target, and in which file is it defined ? AFAIK There is no default target. The project specific target is set with a TARGET= line. For the l10ntools case there are many of these lines in several makefile.mk of its subdirectories. I have changed the build system so you can say build --genPO to extract sources, but I need to have the default target made for a small set (solenv, soltools and l10ntools). These modules use TARGET= lines too. Does it help if you change these targets e.g. to TARGET=all to emulate a default target of all:? Herbert --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
Hello! Several days, on your site (http://www.openoffice.org/download/), the link for downloading OpenOffive ver. 4.0 disappeared? Where can I download OpenOffice ver. 4.0 on your website? Thank you and best regards. Dorian Baciu
Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
Hi so i wanted to upgrade my OpenOffice from 3.31 to 4.0. I landed on the following url: http://www.openoffice.org/download/ . There are 3 main things on that page: share via facebook/twitter/googlePlus, browse addons, browse templates. But I don't want any of theese, I just want to download the installer. there is no easy-to-find link to do so. I suppose it shows up after i share it on FB/etc, bot I dont't have any account on any of them. Even if I had an account, why would you force me to share such an information? the download page without the actual download link makes no sense, I hope you fix this... regards, mike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO on Debian/Ubuntu via APT Repositories
On 16.08.2013 18:25, Marcelo Santana wrote: *PS: BTW does anybody know how the AOO's Debian packages are built? From my answer from last Wednesday to Mike Dupont: AOO creates its Debian packages using EPM [1] when the configure option --with-package-format=deb is given to the AOO build. They are assembled when AOO builds its main/postprocess module using some perl scripts in main/solenv/bin/ [1] http://www.msweet.org/projects.php?Z2 Herbert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Password protected Word Documents
Dear all, We are/were using MS Office2003. We are currently changing some workstations to OpenOffice. Our integration to OpenOffice is going very well but we are experiencing some problems. Word Documents that are password protected can only be read, not changed. It is possible to save it to an .ODT and then we can work with it but since Word can't read .ODT files, it's a bit of a problem for us since not all of of our colleagues are working with OpenOffice. I have read on the internet that there are many people with the same problem and for some time also. WIll there be an update for it??? Met vriendelijke groet / Yours sincerely, Cornee Grefkens Systeembeheerder Plieger B.V. Koxkampseweg 6 5301 KK Zaltbommel T +31 (0)418 682608 M +31 (0)6 38829681 http://www.plieger.nl
Re: Example of spreadsheet formula testing
On 19 August 2013 10:43, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote: On 16.08.2013 21:37, Regina Henschel wrote: Rob Weir schrieb: Moving this topic to its own thread. It should be possible to code a very thorough set of test cases in a spreadsheet, without using macros or anything fancy. Just careful reading of the ODF 1.2 specification and simple spreadsheet logic. Following the spec is not enough. For example, if the accuracy decreases from 14 digits to 7 digits, that is not covered by the spec. skip test case example description If we used an approach like this on the other spreadsheet functions, we could have a semi-automated test suite that would practically guarantee that Calc is free of calculations errors. Once we're written the test cases, a modest upfront investment modest? One function a day and you need more than a year. , it will benefit us with every release we do. Heck, it would benefit LibreOffice, Gnumeric, Calligra as well, maybe even Microsoft and Google, though they might already have such test cases defined internally. I see a problem in how such a test suite is made available. And how the results for a special release are collected. The problem with the current test cases is, that I do not know where they are, how they are to use and how to generate new ones. It is a closed book, only for insiders. An example of a test case where a formula (addition) is checked is in [1]. This file is clean and easy enough that it could be used as a template for more formula checks. [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/openoffice/trunk/test/** testuno/source/fvt/uno/sc/**formula/**AddtionOperatorInFormula.javahttp://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/test/testuno/source/fvt/uno/sc/formula/AddtionOperatorInFormula.java The general topic on getting started with test automation is covered in [2]. [2] http://wiki.openoffice.org/**wiki/QA/test_automation_guidehttp://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/test_automation_guide Anyone interesting in helping with this kind of test case development? There exist some files already in Bugzilla. I used to make test documents, when working on functions. I think, that they can be extended to work in a way, that a simple look on it will tell errors. But I have no ready collection on my PC and most will be already deleted from my PC in the meantime. One problem is, that comparisons with constants have to be written in a way, that they are independent from local. Eike has once corrected one of my test spreadsheets that way. Any ideas on how to fully automate this? ODF 1.2 is very strict, so we're not starting from a perfect score. But we should find an easy way to report on regressions. If you will automate this, you will need to develop a frame. But automation is not the total solution. Testing can be a way to bring user into the community. And tests have to cover different languages and scripts. I remember errors reported to LibreOffice, where a time calculation was wrong only in special locals. To extend a testing frame to consider this would be very expensive. There is no need to develop a new framework. Please check Zhe Liu's wonderful work on test automation that I referenced above [2] that is already available in our test/ directory. It is very powerful, clean and relatively easy to use. not only does it look very powerful, the documentation is easy to read and seems very complete. Am I correct in assuming, this is not used today for our current testing ? If a couple of the testers started to use that and update/expand with their tests, it would cost nearly the same time as the test does today, but with the huge benefit, that we can repeat the test as often as we like. big +1 from me, to get us running down this path. rgds jan I. Herbert --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
bug with FDF
Hello, this small mail to report a bug. I work under Ubuntu. Is it just Apache OpenOffice or it just Evince? I don't know. I don't know if it's only on Ubuntu . I created a form that I exported to FDF. no problem. When I open it with Evince to fill, the list fields are blank but it works (in invisible). When moving the cursor to change the value, it changes, but it is not obvious without seeing anything;) Sylvain DENIS AOO Belgium - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:53:32 +0200 Michał Mulawa mic...@o2.pl wrote: Hi so i wanted to upgrade my OpenOffice from 3.31 to 4.0. I landed on the following url: http://www.openoffice.org/download/ . There are 3 main things on that page: share via facebook/twitter/googlePlus, browse addons, browse templates. But I don't want any of theese, I just want to download the installer. there is no easy-to-find link to do so. I suppose it shows up after i share it on FB/etc, bot I dont't have any account on any of them. Even if I had an account, why would you force me to share such an information? the download page without the actual download link makes no sense, I hope you fix this... regards, mike Try it again - the site was undergoing extensive maintenance and upgrade. If it doesn't work you need to clear your browser cache. -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:53:32 +0200 Michał Mulawa mic...@o2.pl wrote: Hi so i wanted to upgrade my OpenOffice from 3.31 to 4.0. I landed on the following url: http://www.openoffice.org/download/ . There are 3 main things on that page: share via facebook/twitter/googlePlus, browse addons, browse templates. But I don't want any of theese, I just want to download the installer. there is no easy-to-find link to do so. I suppose it shows up after i share it on FB/etc, bot I dont't have any account on any of them. Even if I had an account, why would you force me to share such an information? the download page without the actual download link makes no sense, I hope you fix this... regards, mike Try it again - the site was undergoing extensive maintenance and upgrade. If it doesn't work you need to clear your browser cache. -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:36:06 +0300 Dorian Baciu baciu_dor...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello! Several days, on your site (http://www.openoffice.org/download/), the link for downloading OpenOffive ver. 4.0 disappeared? Where can I download OpenOffice ver. 4.0 on your website? Thank you and best regards. Dorian Baciu Try it again - the site was undergoing extensive maintenance and upgrade. If it doesn't work you need to clear your browser cache. -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
Michał Mulawa wrote: so i wanted to upgrade my OpenOffice from 3.31 to 4.0. I landed on the following url: http://www.openoffice.org/download/ . There are 3 main things on that page: share via facebook/twitter/googlePlus, browse addons, browse templates. But I don't want any of theese, I just want to download the installer. there is no easy-to-find link to do so. There must be some JavaScript problem with your browser/language configuration: normally you should see a green download button. Please download from http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html but please write again to the dev list copying and pasting the table you see at http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html : this will help us fix the problem. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Example of spreadsheet formula testing
Hi Jan, janI schrieb: On 19 August 2013 12:24, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote: [..] But for both kind of testing there exists a problem with expected values. For example, calculation of PMT needs expm1 and log1p, or calculation of LINEST needs lot of matrix calculation. It is not impossible to calculate this with Java, but who will do it? And when you use constant expected values, from where do you get them and how to ensure, that they are valid? Just one simple question, how do you do manually today ? use the same constants. I use my MuPad 3.1 and sometimes calculate values on http://www.wolframalpha.com/ Or I compare the values to those from Gnumeric and Excel. Having the same value does not mean that they are correct, but the other way round, having different values means that I have to investigate it. We should not try to invent a total new road, just do what we do today more efficiently. Suggestions? Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Strange phrase on download page: with other users
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:16:34 +0100 sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: There are two sentences on the download page which read very oddly to me: 1) Extend your Apache OpenOffice functionality with a large and growing library of extensions and dictionaries with other users. 2) Extend your Apache OpenOffice creativity with a large and growing library of templates with other users. I don't understand the phrase with other users. Well, obviously I understand the words, but they don't make sense to me in that context. Can anyone enlighten me what the phrase is intended to mean here? If the phrase were dropped entirely, the sentences would make sense to me. In both cases, if the with is replaced by from the phrases make sense. -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:10:09 +0200 Michał Mulawa mic...@o2.pl wrote: W dniu 2013-08-19 11:23, Rory O'Farrell pisze: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:53:32 +0200 Michał Mulawa mic...@o2.pl wrote: Hi so i wanted to upgrade my OpenOffice from 3.31 to 4.0. I landed on the following url: http://www.openoffice.org/download/ . There are 3 main things on that page: share via facebook/twitter/googlePlus, browse addons, browse templates. But I don't want any of theese, I just want to download the installer. there is no easy-to-find link to do so. I suppose it shows up after i share it on FB/etc, bot I dont't have any account on any of them. Even if I had an account, why would you force me to share such an information? the download page without the actual download link makes no sense, I hope you fix this... regards, mike Try it again - the site was undergoing extensive maintenance and upgrade. If it doesn't work you need to clear your browser cache. I followed your advice, and cleared the cache. Still the same - check out the attached screenshot. I am using FF 23.0.1. Later posts to this thread have suggested it may be a Java problem on your computer, which you may or may not wish to settle/install. This URL ought take you direct to a more complex download page, where yu can select the exact operating system version and language you require. http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: target.mk and default make target.
On 19.08.2013 10:44, janI wrote: Thanks andre and herbert for the fast reply. genPO: .ROOT gives a circular dependency, which is understandable when I read startup genPO: .INIT works but does not make the application. genPO: $(TARGET) also does not work. Have you tried genPO: $(ALLTAR)? -Andre Somehow replacing $(TARGET) might the the easiest solution. Why do I have a feeling of slowly getting to know the build system internally. Not sure I like that feeling, because the more I see the more I get an urge to change it :-) rgds jan I. On 19 August 2013 10:26, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote: Hi Jan, On 19.08.2013 09:39, janI wrote: I am trying to find the default target for the build process. In any directory e.g. l10ntools, we can run build which calls dmake without parameters. Nearly all makefile.mk includes target.mk, where all target rules seems to be defined. The de facto standard is to have all: defined, but thats not defined (neither is default:). what is the default target, and in which file is it defined ? AFAIK There is no default target. The project specific target is set with a TARGET= line. For the l10ntools case there are many of these lines in several makefile.mk of its subdirectories. I have changed the build system so you can say build --genPO to extract sources, but I need to have the default target made for a small set (solenv, soltools and l10ntools). These modules use TARGET= lines too. Does it help if you change these targets e.g. to TARGET=all to emulate a default target of all:? Herbert --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
W dniu 2013-08-19 12:46, Rory O'Farrell pisze: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:10:09 +0200 Michał Mulawa mic...@o2.pl wrote: W dniu 2013-08-19 11:23, Rory O'Farrell pisze: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:53:32 +0200 Michał Mulawa mic...@o2.pl wrote: Hi so i wanted to upgrade my OpenOffice from 3.31 to 4.0. I landed on the following url: http://www.openoffice.org/download/ . There are 3 main things on that page: share via facebook/twitter/googlePlus, browse addons, browse templates. But I don't want any of theese, I just want to download the installer. there is no easy-to-find link to do so. I suppose it shows up after i share it on FB/etc, bot I dont't have any account on any of them. Even if I had an account, why would you force me to share such an information? the download page without the actual download link makes no sense, I hope you fix this... regards, mike Try it again - the site was undergoing extensive maintenance and upgrade. If it doesn't work you need to clear your browser cache. I followed your advice, and cleared the cache. Still the same - check out the attached screenshot. I am using FF 23.0.1. Later posts to this thread have suggested it may be a Java problem on your computer, which you may or may not wish to settle/install. This URL ought take you direct to a more complex download page, where yu can select the exact operating system version and language you require. http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html I see some kind of error in JS console: TypeError: release_aoo400_matrix[LANG_ISO] is undefined http://www.openoffice.org/download/download.js Line 345 thanks for the direct link - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: target.mk and default make target.
On 19 August 2013 12:55, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote: On 19.08.2013 10:44, janI wrote: Thanks andre and herbert for the fast reply. genPO: .ROOT gives a circular dependency, which is understandable when I read startup genPO: .INIT works but does not make the application. genPO: $(TARGET) also does not work. Have you tried genPO: $(ALLTAR)? I still have much to learn. genPO: ALLTAR seems to working, thats a fixed target nor a variable so no $() thx a lot. rgds jan I. -Andre Somehow replacing $(TARGET) might the the easiest solution. Why do I have a feeling of slowly getting to know the build system internally. Not sure I like that feeling, because the more I see the more I get an urge to change it :-) rgds jan I. On 19 August 2013 10:26, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote: Hi Jan, On 19.08.2013 09:39, janI wrote: I am trying to find the default target for the build process. In any directory e.g. l10ntools, we can run build which calls dmake without parameters. Nearly all makefile.mk includes target.mk, where all target rules seems to be defined. The de facto standard is to have all: defined, but thats not defined (neither is default:). what is the default target, and in which file is it defined ? AFAIK There is no default target. The project specific target is set with a TARGET= line. For the l10ntools case there are many of these lines in several makefile.mk of its subdirectories. I have changed the build system so you can say build --genPO to extract sources, but I need to have the default target made for a small set (solenv, soltools and l10ntools). These modules use TARGET= lines too. Does it help if you change these targets e.g. to TARGET=all to emulate a default target of all:? Herbert --** --**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**a**pache.orghttp://apache.org dev-unsubscribe@**openoffice.apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Password protected Word Documents
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:07 AM, c.grefk...@plieger.nl wrote: Dear all, We are/were using MS Office2003. We are currently changing some workstations to OpenOffice. Our integration to OpenOffice is going very well but we are experiencing some problems. Word Documents that are password protected can only be read, not changed. It is possible to save it to an .ODT and then we can work with it but since Word can't read .ODT files, it's a bit of a problem for us since not all of of our colleagues are working with OpenOffice. I have read on the internet that there are many people with the same problem and for some time also. WIll there be an update for it??? What version of OpenOffice are you running? And on what operating system? What happens when you try to save as a .DOC file? You say it doesn't work. Do you get an error message? Does the problem also occur with Word files that are not password protected? -Rob Met vriendelijke groet / Yours sincerely, Cornee Grefkens Systeembeheerder -- Plieger B.V. Koxkampseweg 6 5301 KK Zaltbommel T +31 (0)418 682608 M +31 (0)6 38829681 http://www.plieger.nl
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
I ran the download page through Browsershots.org, which renders it on many different browsers and versions: http://browsershots.org/http://www.openoffice.org/download/ It looks like we're getting a Javascript error in I.E. 5.5, 6 and 7. Regards, -Rob On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Michał Mulawa mic...@o2.pl wrote: W dniu 2013-08-19 12:46, Rory O'Farrell pisze: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:10:09 +0200 Michał Mulawa mic...@o2.pl wrote: W dniu 2013-08-19 11:23, Rory O'Farrell pisze: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:53:32 +0200 Michał Mulawa mic...@o2.pl wrote: Hi so i wanted to upgrade my OpenOffice from 3.31 to 4.0. I landed on the following url: http://www.openoffice.org/download/ . There are 3 main things on that page: share via facebook/twitter/googlePlus, browse addons, browse templates. But I don't want any of theese, I just want to download the installer. there is no easy-to-find link to do so. I suppose it shows up after i share it on FB/etc, bot I dont't have any account on any of them. Even if I had an account, why would you force me to share such an information? the download page without the actual download link makes no sense, I hope you fix this... regards, mike Try it again - the site was undergoing extensive maintenance and upgrade. If it doesn't work you need to clear your browser cache. I followed your advice, and cleared the cache. Still the same - check out the attached screenshot. I am using FF 23.0.1. Later posts to this thread have suggested it may be a Java problem on your computer, which you may or may not wish to settle/install. This URL ought take you direct to a more complex download page, where yu can select the exact operating system version and language you require. http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html I see some kind of error in JS console: TypeError: release_aoo400_matrix[LANG_ISO] is undefined http://www.openoffice.org/download/download.js Line 345 thanks for the direct link - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Websites headers (forum, wiki, main site, ...)
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Ricardo Berlasso rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote: (top posting) User SLV-es from ES forums proposed a new logo http://forum.openoffice.org/es/forum/download/file.php?id=3924mode=view Why aren't we just using the proper AOO logo, the same one we use on the website, the blog, the wiki, etc.? If we can do that then the user will understand that this is an official website. Consistency is good for this. And then you can have a text title that says Community Support Forum or something like that. -Rob On his own words, it needs some work but IMO it shows an interesting tweak, maintaining both, colours and fonts from original logo but with a variant that suggest help (the main forum purpose). I suggested the author to attach his proposal to the issue. Regards Ricardo 2013/8/12 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Ricardo Berlasso rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/8/11 Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Dave Fisher w...@apache.org wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Aug 11, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Dave Fisher w...@apache.org wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Aug 11, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: There is also other sites like extensions, www and openoffice.apache.org , blog, templates. We have a new logo, which means the sites need to be updated. Since AOO hasn't really mature to the old OOo days where there was a dedicated webdev project to handle all sites, is clear there needs to be some initiative from somewhere to perform this mantainance. So the status is: blog, www, extensions and o...@apache.org have the new logo templates, forum, wiki, forum index still on the old logo or don't have the previous logo at all. I develop an incremental adaptation of the logo to perform a similar font to the new logo which uses Sans Pro. But kept the 3 gulls artwork. Andrea recomended to replace the 3 gulls with the orb. Why would you change the font? And what did you change it too? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122998#c0 The bugzilla does not answer my question. You used two fonts what are they and what is the license? IIRC open sans is Apache licensed. Why change? I think you missread, they were change into Sans Pro. Please look at the source SVG for 1 to 1 comparison from legacy to new one based on the current AOO Logo. Adobe's Source Sans Pro font is OLF licensed while, as Dave said, open sans is Apache Licensed. IMO, if you changed from open sans to source sans pro then Dave's question is perfectly valid. So we're all on the same page: the AOO 4.0 Logo uses Source Sans Pro. This must not be changed without discussion and PMC approval. If the idea is to update the old forum/wiki headers to use Source Sans Pro and new logo elements, then this sounds like the right direction. -Rob Regard Ricardo An issue has been put in place on bugzilla #122998 with all the samples and sources. On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote: The question was raised in another thread but better have a dedicated one. What is the status with the headers exactly? A user will certainly visit 3 areas first: the main site, then the wiki and the forum. Today they have 3 different headers. As pointed out by Andrea, we need a consistent branding to give users a kind of security feeling. I've made a dedicated topic in the forum showing the 3 current headers and a proposal I've made very quickly: http://forum.openoffice.org/** en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50t=**63523 http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50t=63523 No need to register to see it so have a look. The point is: we should have the same branding (icon + text) at least for every areas, at the same location. Hagar --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org
Use GDB but no debugging symbols found
Hello everyone, Recent days I have tried to run AOO with GDB dor debugging. But after I ran it(enter gdb ./soffice.bin), I got a message said no debugging symbols found. And then I typed list, I got No symbol table is loaded. Here is log: $ gdb ./soffice.bin GNU gdb (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.4-2012.04-0ubuntu2.1) 7.4-2012.04 Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux-gnu. For bug reporting instructions, please see: http://bugs.launchpad.net/gdb-linaro/... Reading symbols from /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice.bin...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (gdb) list No symbol table is loaded. Use the file command. I have configured with --enable-symbols. Here is my configure: $ ./configure \ --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 \ --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \ --enable-symbols \ --disable-odk \ --disable-binfilter It didn't show any error. And here is my build command: $ build debug=true dbg_build_only=true and I also tried build debug=true dbglevel=2 or $ build debug=true dbg_build_only=true dbglevel=2 No error showed but after I installed it and ran with gdb, I got the same result : no debugging symbols founds. In fact, I am not very skillful in Linux system and AOO building system. Maybe I lost something important needed to be done. Thanks for your patience and help. Regards, Yohey.
Re: Use GDB but no debugging symbols found
when you build something with gcc with -g option, gdb will find debugging symbols. So maybe soffice.bin has been optimized to some extent. 2013/8/19 ��仁瀚 yohey03...@gmail.com Hello everyone, Recent days I have tried to run AOO with GDB dor debugging. But after I ran it(enter gdb ./soffice.bin), I got a message said no debugging symbols found. And then I typed list, I got No symbol table is loaded. Here is log: $ gdb ./soffice.bin GNU gdb (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.4-2012.04-0ubuntu2.1) 7.4-2012.04 Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux-gnu. For bug reporting instructions, please see: http://bugs.launchpad.net/gdb-linaro/... Reading symbols from /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice.bin...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (gdb) list No symbol table is loaded. Use the file command. I have configured with --enable-symbols. Here is my configure: $ ./configure \ --with-dmake-url= http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 \ --with-epm-url= http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \ --enable-symbols \ --disable-odk \ --disable-binfilter It didn't show any error. And here is my build command: $ build debug=true dbg_build_only=true and I also tried build debug=true dbglevel=2 or $ build debug=true dbg_build_only=true dbglevel=2 No error showed but after I installed it and ran with gdb, I got the same result : no debugging symbols founds. In fact, I am not very skillful in Linux system and AOO building system. Maybe I lost something important needed to be done. Thanks for your patience and help. Regards, Yohey.
Should download pages *require* Javascript?
The download page at present requires Javascript. Without Javascript, there is no obvious way to download AOO 4.0 at all. Note that the page http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html also requires Javascript! It's nice to be able to use Javascript to guess which download the user wants, but I don't think that this convenience should be at the expense of preventing users from finding the download link if they don't have Javascript (or they have a broken version of Javascript). How about having drop-down lists for the OS and Language? Javascript could be used to preset the values, but at least the user would remain in control, e.g. if the Javascript failed to recognise their system or they wanted to download a different language from the one supported by their browser. Whatever method is chosen, I think it should be possible to download AOO without the use of Javascript. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Example of spreadsheet formula testing
On 19 August 2013 11:41, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote: Hi Jan, janI schrieb: On 19 August 2013 12:24, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote: [..] But for both kind of testing there exists a problem with expected values. For example, calculation of PMT needs expm1 and log1p, or calculation of LINEST needs lot of matrix calculation. It is not impossible to calculate this with Java, but who will do it? And when you use constant expected values, from where do you get them and how to ensure, that they are valid? Just one simple question, how do you do manually today ? use the same constants. I use my MuPad 3.1 and sometimes calculate values on http://www.wolframalpha.com/ Or I compare the values to those from Gnumeric and Excel. Having the same value does not mean that they are correct, but the other way round, having different values means that I have to investigate it. We should not try to invent a total new road, just do what we do today more efficiently. Suggestions? If there are a *lot* of similar calculations that need to be tested, then it might be worth investing some time looking at at ways to expresss these simply as a script, and then write a parser to drive the existing test code from the script, rather than having to update the Java test code. The advantage would be that just about anyone can create test cases, and they are easy to check by hand. However the parser may be a lot of work; I don't know. Maybe there is already a suitable script language which already has suitable examples? Also there are various script interpreters that already undestand some calculations, for example Commons JEXL. It should be possible to use them to check the test cases, and possibly even use as a basis for parsing the test cases. Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: cannot paste a web image into a presentation?
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 07.03.2012 09:16, lou ql wrote: On 6 March 2012 18:35, Oliver-Rainer Wittmannorwittm...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi, On 06.03.2012 03:41, lou ql wrote: URL: https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+**Snapshotshttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots I tried copy the logo at the topleft of this page then paste into document/spreadsheet/**presentation, and find that the picture cannot be pasted into presentation. But I can do this in MS office 2010 Currently, I have problems reproducing your problem. Can you please be a little bit more specific? How do you copy the image? Are you using a browser? Which one? I have done the following using latest snapshot build for Windows, rev. 1296433: - open the website in Firefox - open context menu for the image - choose Copy Image - open an empty presentation document - hit keys Ctrl-V -- bitmap is pasted into the presentation. (Unfortunately, its background is black. I am experiencing the same in MS Paint. Thus, I assume that the copy process of Firefox does not recognized a possible existing Alpha channel for the transparency.) My 2nd try was: - open the website in Firefox - make a selection of the image using the mouse - hit keys Ctrl-C - open an empty presentation document - hit keys Ctrl-V -- nothing happens (the same happens in OOo 3.3). Reason for this is that the presentation document can not interpret the HTML in the clipboard. My 3rd try was: - open the website in Firefox - open context menu for the image - choose Copy Image Location - open an empty presentation document - menu Insert - Picture - From file - paste image URL into File name field - check checkbox Link - hit button Open -- image is inserted as linked image. It takes some time to download the image from the internet - I also had to allow the soffice.bin process to access the internet. I'm doing with the second way, it works in document and spreadsheet, also works in MS office PPT. Ok. Thus, this way is currently not supported by Impress - our presentation component. Thus, from my point of view this issue would be a request for enhancement. Note: Before pasting you can observe via menu edit - paste special what the corresponding application can interpret from the different available formats provided by the clipboard. I think we have a regression here. Steps: 1. Load Impress, Load Browser to http://www.openoffice.org 2. Right click on the AOO logo in upper left corner (a PNG file) and Copy/Image (in Firefox) or Copy (in Internet Explorer) 3. In Impress, Edit Paste the image.(If you do Edit/Paste Special the format is called bitmap) Observed Behavior: 1. In AOO 3.4.1 the image pastes in correct in I.E. and Firefox on Windows 2. In AOO 4.0.0 the image pastes in as a solid black box in Firefox, but pastes in correctly in I.E. The same version of Firefox (23.0.1) was used in both tests. IMHO this is a serious issue, since it makes it very hard to reuse graphics from the web. The workaround is not very good -- save image from web to a file and then import it into Impress. Regards, -Rob Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Usability: dictionary updates and profile migration
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 03/08/2013 Andrea Pescetti wrote: I've just uploaded an updated version of the English dictionary. It is kept unpublished because of the usability issues below, but you can download it from http://extensions.openoffice.org/download/17415 ... Instead, if one is using 3.4.1 and decides to update the dictionary BEFORE updating OpenOffice, there are some usability issues. Everything will work, no matter what the user chooses, but is the following scenario acceptable to avoid too many support requests? Not seeing comments, I'll publish the updated dictionary in a couple of days. In the end this is not breaking anything, it just produces a Fatal Error (that is actually not fatal, and solved by simply restarting OpenOffice) during profile migration. Of course, 2.B looks like a profile migration bug to me: I've already chosen to keep my (newer) dictionary and OpenOffice insists on installing the old one. Reported as https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122976 I don't know if it is related, but we're starting to get a few reports from confused users on Facebook. It sounds like they are getting dictionary upgrade notifications but are then lost when trying to download/install the update. It is coming down as a ZIP file rather than an OXT. -Rob Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: cannot paste a web image into a presentation?
Hi Rob, it is https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122920 Kind regards Regina Rob Weir schrieb: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 07.03.2012 09:16, lou ql wrote: On 6 March 2012 18:35, Oliver-Rainer Wittmannorwittm...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi, On 06.03.2012 03:41, lou ql wrote: URL: https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+**Snapshotshttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots I tried copy the logo at the topleft of this page then paste into document/spreadsheet/**presentation, and find that the picture cannot be pasted into presentation. But I can do this in MS office 2010 Currently, I have problems reproducing your problem. Can you please be a little bit more specific? How do you copy the image? Are you using a browser? Which one? I have done the following using latest snapshot build for Windows, rev. 1296433: - open the website in Firefox - open context menu for the image - choose Copy Image - open an empty presentation document - hit keys Ctrl-V -- bitmap is pasted into the presentation. (Unfortunately, its background is black. I am experiencing the same in MS Paint. Thus, I assume that the copy process of Firefox does not recognized a possible existing Alpha channel for the transparency.) My 2nd try was: - open the website in Firefox - make a selection of the image using the mouse - hit keys Ctrl-C - open an empty presentation document - hit keys Ctrl-V -- nothing happens (the same happens in OOo 3.3). Reason for this is that the presentation document can not interpret the HTML in the clipboard. My 3rd try was: - open the website in Firefox - open context menu for the image - choose Copy Image Location - open an empty presentation document - menu Insert - Picture - From file - paste image URL into File name field - check checkbox Link - hit button Open -- image is inserted as linked image. It takes some time to download the image from the internet - I also had to allow the soffice.bin process to access the internet. I'm doing with the second way, it works in document and spreadsheet, also works in MS office PPT. Ok. Thus, this way is currently not supported by Impress - our presentation component. Thus, from my point of view this issue would be a request for enhancement. Note: Before pasting you can observe via menu edit - paste special what the corresponding application can interpret from the different available formats provided by the clipboard. I think we have a regression here. Steps: 1. Load Impress, Load Browser to http://www.openoffice.org 2. Right click on the AOO logo in upper left corner (a PNG file) and Copy/Image (in Firefox) or Copy (in Internet Explorer) 3. In Impress, Edit Paste the image.(If you do Edit/Paste Special the format is called bitmap) Observed Behavior: 1. In AOO 3.4.1 the image pastes in correct in I.E. and Firefox on Windows 2. In AOO 4.0.0 the image pastes in as a solid black box in Firefox, but pastes in correctly in I.E. The same version of Firefox (23.0.1) was used in both tests. IMHO this is a serious issue, since it makes it very hard to reuse graphics from the web. The workaround is not very good -- save image from web to a file and then import it into Impress. Regards, -Rob Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Websites headers (forum, wiki, main site, ...)
On 8/19/13 1:43 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Ricardo Berlasso rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote: (top posting) User SLV-es from ES forums proposed a new logo http://forum.openoffice.org/es/forum/download/file.php?id=3924mode=view Why aren't we just using the proper AOO logo, the same one we use on the website, the blog, the wiki, etc.? If we can do that then the user will understand that this is an official website. Consistency is good for this. And then you can have a text title that says Community Support Forum or something like that. exactly I do not understand either this discussion, why not using the new existing one. Maybe tweaked to fit in the forum header Juergen -Rob On his own words, it needs some work but IMO it shows an interesting tweak, maintaining both, colours and fonts from original logo but with a variant that suggest help (the main forum purpose). I suggested the author to attach his proposal to the issue. Regards Ricardo 2013/8/12 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Ricardo Berlasso rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/8/11 Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Dave Fisher w...@apache.org wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Aug 11, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Dave Fisher w...@apache.org wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Aug 11, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: There is also other sites like extensions, www and openoffice.apache.org , blog, templates. We have a new logo, which means the sites need to be updated. Since AOO hasn't really mature to the old OOo days where there was a dedicated webdev project to handle all sites, is clear there needs to be some initiative from somewhere to perform this mantainance. So the status is: blog, www, extensions and o...@apache.org have the new logo templates, forum, wiki, forum index still on the old logo or don't have the previous logo at all. I develop an incremental adaptation of the logo to perform a similar font to the new logo which uses Sans Pro. But kept the 3 gulls artwork. Andrea recomended to replace the 3 gulls with the orb. Why would you change the font? And what did you change it too? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122998#c0 The bugzilla does not answer my question. You used two fonts what are they and what is the license? IIRC open sans is Apache licensed. Why change? I think you missread, they were change into Sans Pro. Please look at the source SVG for 1 to 1 comparison from legacy to new one based on the current AOO Logo. Adobe's Source Sans Pro font is OLF licensed while, as Dave said, open sans is Apache Licensed. IMO, if you changed from open sans to source sans pro then Dave's question is perfectly valid. So we're all on the same page: the AOO 4.0 Logo uses Source Sans Pro. This must not be changed without discussion and PMC approval. If the idea is to update the old forum/wiki headers to use Source Sans Pro and new logo elements, then this sounds like the right direction. -Rob Regard Ricardo An issue has been put in place on bugzilla #122998 with all the samples and sources. On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote: The question was raised in another thread but better have a dedicated one. What is the status with the headers exactly? A user will certainly visit 3 areas first: the main site, then the wiki and the forum. Today they have 3 different headers. As pointed out by Andrea, we need a consistent branding to give users a kind of security feeling. I've made a dedicated topic in the forum showing the 3 current headers and a proposal I've made very quickly: http://forum.openoffice.org/** en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50t=**63523 http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50t=63523 No need to register to see it so have a look. The point is: we should have the same branding (icon + text) at least for every areas, at the same location. Hagar --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --
Re: Strange phrase on download page: with other users
On 19 August 2013 11:42, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:16:34 +0100 sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: There are two sentences on the download page which read very oddly to me: 1) Extend your Apache OpenOffice functionality with a large and growing library of extensions and dictionaries with other users. 2) Extend your Apache OpenOffice creativity with a large and growing library of templates with other users. I don't understand the phrase with other users. Well, obviously I understand the words, but they don't make sense to me in that context. Can anyone enlighten me what the phrase is intended to mean here? If the phrase were dropped entirely, the sentences would make sense to me. In both cases, if the with is replaced by from the phrases make sense. Thanks, now fixed! -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.0.1_release_blocker requested: [Bug 123021] OO Writer crashes on document open
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org has asked for 4.0.1_release_blocker: Bug 123021: OO Writer crashes on document open https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123021 --- Additional Comments from Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org Defect has been introduced by the changes for bug 120928 - enhance WW8 (Microsoft Word binary file format) import by importing graphic bullets. Fix is in progress. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.0.1_release_blocker granted: [Bug 123021] OO Writer crashes on document open
j...@apache.org has granted Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org's request for 4.0.1_release_blocker: Bug 123021: OO Writer crashes on document open https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123021 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org approve showstopper request - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.0.1_release_blocker granted: [Bug 122868] writer crash on pdf export from page preview
j...@apache.org has granted Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org's request for 4.0.1_release_blocker: Bug 122868: writer crash on pdf export from page preview https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122868 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org approve showstopper request - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [IDEA] Back to School with AOO blog post
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:12 PM, fred juan diaz diaz_frede...@yahoo.fr wrote: En date de : Ven 9.8.13, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de a On 06.08.2013 at 5:10 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:On 6 August 2013 15:56, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 August 2013 15:40, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: It is that time of year now: back to school. I wonder if this could make a good blog post. So...did this ever happen? Don
Re: Usability: dictionary updates and profile migration
Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Not seeing comments, I'll publish the updated dictionary in a couple of days. In the end this is not breaking anything, it just produces a Fatal Error (that is actually not fatal, and solved by simply restarting OpenOffice) during profile migration. ... I don't know if it is related, but we're starting to get a few reports from confused users on Facebook. It sounds like they are getting dictionary upgrade notifications but are then lost when trying to download/install the update. It is coming down as a ZIP file rather than an OXT. This is a known problem with Internet Explorer (unrelated to this specific extension): at times, IE tries to be smart and fixes the filename extension into ZIP rather than OXT as you correctly observed. I don't have more precise information, but this has happened for years and the common advice given on lists is use another browser (obviously, capable users can rename the file as OXT). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Usability: dictionary updates and profile migration
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Not seeing comments, I'll publish the updated dictionary in a couple of days. In the end this is not breaking anything, it just produces a Fatal Error (that is actually not fatal, and solved by simply restarting OpenOffice) during profile migration. ... I don't know if it is related, but we're starting to get a few reports from confused users on Facebook. It sounds like they are getting dictionary upgrade notifications but are then lost when trying to download/install the update. It is coming down as a ZIP file rather than an OXT. This is a known problem with Internet Explorer (unrelated to this specific extension): at times, IE tries to be smart and fixes the filename extension into ZIP rather than OXT as you correctly observed. I don't have more precise information, but this has happened for years and the common advice given on lists is use another browser (obviously, capable users can rename the file as OXT). If I.E. is suggesting a ZIP content type then this means they've resorted to content sniffing and found the ZIP magic number in the file header. Usually a browser only resorts to this if every other attempt to determine the content type has failed, e.g., HTTP response headers, file name, etc. This is something that should be fixable. -Rob Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Usability: dictionary updates and profile migration
On 19 August 2013 16:39, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Not seeing comments, I'll publish the updated dictionary in a couple of days. In the end this is not breaking anything, it just produces a Fatal Error (that is actually not fatal, and solved by simply restarting OpenOffice) during profile migration. ... I don't know if it is related, but we're starting to get a few reports from confused users on Facebook. It sounds like they are getting dictionary upgrade notifications but are then lost when trying to download/install the update. It is coming down as a ZIP file rather than an OXT. This is a known problem with Internet Explorer (unrelated to this specific extension): at times, IE tries to be smart and fixes the filename extension into ZIP rather than OXT as you correctly observed. I don't have more precise information, but this has happened for years and the common advice given on lists is use another browser (obviously, capable users can rename the file as OXT). If I.E. is suggesting a ZIP content type then this means they've resorted to content sniffing and found the ZIP magic number in the file header. Usually a browser only resorts to this if every other attempt to determine the content type has failed, e.g., HTTP response headers, file name, etc. This is something that should be fixable. The request uses a lot of redirects; the last two respond as follows (some headers dropped): HTTP/1.1 302 Found Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=dict-en.oxt Location: http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/aoo-extensions/17102/1/dict-en.oxt Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: 0 Server: lighttpd/1.4.26 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Apache/2.2.14 Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 6529865 Content-Type: application/octet-stream I did an experiment with IE 8 - it downloads as .zip from the SourceForge, but downloads OK from a copy on people.apache.org. The relevant response headers from people.a.o are: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Apache/2.2.24 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.24 OpenSSL/1.0.1e DAV/2 Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 6529865 Content-Type: application/vnd.openofficeorg.extension So it might be sufficient to ensure that the correct content-type is returned. I think this will need to be done by SourceForge on all their systems. -Rob Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Pootle User Guide progress
Hi, my draft on http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Talk:Pootle_User_Guide progresses. It is not completed, but I have integrated all still relevant parts from http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Pootle_User_Guide. I now want to move the content from the talk page to the real page, replacing its current content. Any objections? The content is already very large for a single page. So I want to follow Andreas suggestion to divide it in several pages. That can be done by transferring some content to independent other pages or by creating subpages. What do you like more? I do not own the text. Feel free to change or add content. Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [IDEA] Back to School with AOO blog post
Hi all, 2013/8/19 Donald Whytock dwhyt...@apache.org On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:12 PM, fred juan diaz diaz_frede...@yahoo.fr wrote: En date de : Ven 9.8.13, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de a On 06.08.2013 at 5:10 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:On 6 August 2013 15:56, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 August 2013 15:40, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: It is that time of year now: back to school. I wonder if this could make a good blog post. So...did this ever happen? If it happens, a reminder of the following post could also be interesting. http://markmail.org/message/4pzhwx47glilgxqd Can not be achieved immediately, of course, but I think that these ideas should not be forgotten, and stored in a more visible location. A+ -- gw
Re: Best practice for description.xml
On 8/15/13 9:07 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello, I have read: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Localized_XML_Elements but I'm not sure which is the better practice in a description.xml: (a) publisher name lang=de xlink:href=http://de.openoffice.info;Klaus Meyer/name /publisher (in this case de is only an example) (b) publisher name xlink:href=http://de.openoffice.info;Klaus Meyer/name /publisher If (a) or (b) better for an entry that will apply in all languages? b) in this case it makes of course no sense to use the lang tag. Publisher shouldn't be translated Juergen greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO on Debian/Ubuntu via APT Repositories
On 16/08/2013 Marcelo Santana wrote: On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:07:32 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: But we can surely list Marcelo's repository at http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ ... I just download all Debian packages, unpackage and provide them using the reprepro approach as described at Debian wiki page[1]. Since I need to sign the packages with my GPG key, the final MD5 checksums are different from the original packages provided by Apache Foundation through sourceforge. Thank you Marcelo for the explanation; it's fine and, unless somebody objects or needs further details, I'll list your unofficial DEB repository at http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ next weekend. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [IDEA] Back to School with AOO blog post
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:12 PM, fred juan diaz diaz_frede...@yahoo.fr wrote: En date de : Ven 9.8.13, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de a On 06.08.2013 at 5:10 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:On 6 August 2013 15:56, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 August 2013 15:40, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: It is that time of year now: back to school. I wonder if this could make a good blog post. So...did this ever happen? No. I started collecting ideas, but then had a family emergency to deal with, so I never pulled it all together. -Rob Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Should download pages *require* Javascript?
On 19/08/2013 sebb wrote: Note that the page http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html also requires Javascript! This is not so good. The noscript option should direct the user to http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/openoffice/ (users who disable JavaScript are likely to be able to browse the FTP-like structure they will see there). Whatever method is chosen, I think it should be possible to download AOO without the use of Javascript. It should also be possible to download OpenOffice in the cases where JavaScript parsing breaks, i.e., we should have alternative download links that are always visible (working JavaScript, broken Javascript, no JavaScript). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Strange phrase on download page: with other users
Am 08/19/2013 12:42 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:16:34 +0100 sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: There are two sentences on the download page which read very oddly to me: 1) Extend your Apache OpenOffice functionality with a large and growing library of extensions and dictionaries with other users. 2) Extend your Apache OpenOffice creativity with a large and growing library of templates with other users. I don't understand the phrase with other users. Well, obviously I understand the words, but they don't make sense to me in that context. Can anyone enlighten me what the phrase is intended to mean here? I idea behind this wording is to express the bi-directional way: a) You can download extensions/templates from other users and use them in your OpenOffice. b) But you can also create own extensions/templates and upload them to share with other users. Of course I don't know if this is good English language. However, it seems you have already changed the wording. ;-) I hope it's still fitting, otherwise you can change it. Marcus If the phrase were dropped entirely, the sentences would make sense to me. In both cases, if the with is replaced by from the phrases make sense. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
Thanks a lot for your data. The problem was that Polish is no supported language for the AOO 4.0 release. However, it was tried to assemble a download link with LANG_ISO = pl. This wasn't working and therefore the error. This should be fixed now. You should see the green download box. When clicking you will be redirected to the native language webpage where you can download AOO 3.4.1. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Marcus Am 08/19/2013 12:49 PM, schrieb Michał Mulawa: W dniu 2013-08-19 12:46, Rory O'Farrell pisze: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:10:09 +0200 Michał Mulawa mic...@o2.pl wrote: W dniu 2013-08-19 11:23, Rory O'Farrell pisze: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:53:32 +0200 Michał Mulawa mic...@o2.pl wrote: Hi so i wanted to upgrade my OpenOffice from 3.31 to 4.0. I landed on the following url: http://www.openoffice.org/download/ . There are 3 main things on that page: share via facebook/twitter/googlePlus, browse addons, browse templates. But I don't want any of theese, I just want to download the installer. there is no easy-to-find link to do so. I suppose it shows up after i share it on FB/etc, bot I dont't have any account on any of them. Even if I had an account, why would you force me to share such an information? the download page without the actual download link makes no sense, I hope you fix this... regards, mike Try it again - the site was undergoing extensive maintenance and upgrade. If it doesn't work you need to clear your browser cache. I followed your advice, and cleared the cache. Still the same - check out the attached screenshot. I am using FF 23.0.1. Later posts to this thread have suggested it may be a Java problem on your computer, which you may or may not wish to settle/install. This URL ought take you direct to a more complex download page, where yu can select the exact operating system version and language you require. http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html I see some kind of error in JS console: TypeError: release_aoo400_matrix[LANG_ISO] is undefined http://www.openoffice.org/download/download.js Line 345 thanks for the direct link - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Ciao Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
Thanks a lot for your data. The problem was that Polish is no supported language for the AOO 4.0 release. However, it was tried to assemble a download link with LANG_ISO = pl. This wasn't working and therefore the error. This should be fixed now. You should see the green download box. When clicking you will be redirected to the native language webpage where you can download AOO 3.4.1. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Marcus Am 08/19/2013 11:59 AM, schrieb Piotr B. [pb2004]: Andrea Pescettipesce...@apache.org wrote: Michał Mulawa wrote: so i wanted to upgrade my OpenOffice from 3.31 to 4.0. I landed on the following url: http://www.openoffice.org/download/ . There are 3 main things on that page: share via facebook/twitter/googlePlus, browse addons, browse templates. But I don't want any of theese, I just want to download the installer. there is no easy-to-find link to do so. There must be some JavaScript problem with your browser/language configuration: normally you should see a green download button. Please download from http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html but please write again to the dev list copying and pasting the table you see at http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html : this will help us fix the problem. Same problem[1]. Table from analyze.html: Browser variables Values navigator.appCodeName Mozilla navigator.appName Microsoft Internet Explorer navigator.appVersion 5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0) navigator.platform Win32 navigator.oscpu undefined navigator.cpuClass x86 navigator.product undefined navigator.productSub undefined navigator.vendor undefined navigator.vendorSub undefined navigator.language undefined navigator.browserLanguage pl-PL navigator.userLanguage pl-PL navigator.systemLanguage pl-PL navigator.userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0) JavaScript functions/variables Values Language name Polski Language ISO code pl Language array data pl,Polish,Polski,n,http://pl.openoffice.org/product.download.html Release matrix platform position 10 Release matrix platform array data UI platform name Windows (EXE) URL platform name Win_x86_install File name File extension .exe File size 0 Download file link Checksum file link (here for MD5) hasMirrorLink() false 1. http://sdrv.ms/16Zrv0x - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Should download pages *require* Javascript?
Am 08/19/2013 08:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 19/08/2013 sebb wrote: Note that the page http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html also requires Javascript! This is not so good. The noscript option should direct the user to http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/openoffice/ (users who disable JavaScript are likely to be able to browse the FTP-like structure they will see there). That's a good alternative as this is already available and completely working. So the green NOJS box could link to this webpage. Marcus Whatever method is chosen, I think it should be possible to download AOO without the use of Javascript. It should also be possible to download OpenOffice in the cases where JavaScript parsing breaks, i.e., we should have alternative download links that are always visible (working JavaScript, broken Javascript, no JavaScript). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO on Debian/Ubuntu via APT Repositories
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:04:16 +0200, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote: On 16.08.2013 18:25, Marcelo Santana wrote: *PS: BTW does anybody know how the AOO's Debian packages are built? From my answer from last Wednesday to Mike Dupont: AOO creates its Debian packages using EPM [1] when the configure option --with-package-format=deb is given to the AOO build. They are assembled when AOO builds its main/postprocess module using some perl scripts in main/solenv/bin/ [1] http://www.msweet.org/projects.php?Z2 Herbert Thank you so much Herbert. Regards, -- Marcelo Santana (aka msantana) marcgsant...@yahoo.com.br GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: AOO on Debian/Ubuntu via APT Repositories
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:02:01 +0200, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: [...] Thank you Marcelo for the explanation; it's fine and, unless somebody objects or needs further details, I'll list your unofficial DEB repository at http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ next weekend. Regards, Andrea Thank you so much Andrea. Regards, -- Marcelo Santana (aka msantana) marcgsant...@yahoo.com.br GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
